Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The Mid-Oceanic <strong>Ridge</strong><br />
A Dynamic Global System<br />
Ocean Studies Board<br />
Commission on Physical Sciences,<br />
Mathematics, and Resources<br />
National Research Council<br />
National Academy Press<br />
Washington, D.C. 1988
NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the<br />
Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn<br />
from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences. the National Academy<br />
of Engineering and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee<br />
responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with<br />
regard for appropriate balance.<br />
This report has been reviewed by a group other than the authors according<br />
to procedures approved by a <strong>Report</strong> Review Committee consisting of members of<br />
the National Academy of Sciences. the ,National Academy of Engineering. and the<br />
Institute of Medicine.<br />
The National Academy of Sciences is a private. nonprofit self-perpetuating<br />
society of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and engineering<br />
research. dedicated to the furtherance of science and technology and to their<br />
use for the general welfare. Upon the authority of the charter granted to it<br />
by the Congress in 1863. the Academy has a mandate that requires it to advise<br />
the federal government on scientific and technical matters. Dr. Frank Press is<br />
president of the National Academy of Sciences.<br />
The National Academy of Engineering was established in 19611. under the<br />
charter of the National Academy of Sciences. as a parallel organization of<br />
outstanding engineers. It is autonomous in its administration and in the<br />
selection of its members. sharing with the National Academy of Sciences the<br />
responsibility for advising the federal government: The National Academy of<br />
Engineering also sponsors engineering programs aimed at meeting national needs,<br />
encourages education and research, and recognizes the superior achievements of<br />
engineers. Dr. Robert M. White is president of the National Academy of<br />
Engineering.<br />
The Institute of Medicine was established in 1970 by the National Academy<br />
of Sciences to secure the services of eminent members of appropriate<br />
professions in the examination of policy matters pertainin~ to the health of<br />
the public. The Institute acts under the responsibility given to the National<br />
Academy of Sciences by its congressional charter to be an adviser to the<br />
federal government and, upon its own initiative, to identify issues of medical<br />
care. research. and education. Dr. Samuel O. Thier is president of the<br />
Institute of Medicine.<br />
The National Research Council was organized by the National Academy of<br />
Sciences in 1916 to associate the broad community of science and technology<br />
with the Academy's purposes of furthering knowledge and advising the federal<br />
government. Functioning in accordance with general policies determined by the<br />
Academy. the Council has become the principal operating agency of both the<br />
National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering in<br />
providing services to the government. the public. and the scientific and<br />
engineering communities. The Council is administered jointly by both Academies<br />
and the Institute of Medicine. Dr. Frank Press and Dr. Robert M. White are<br />
chairman and vice chairman. respectively. of the National Research Council.<br />
Support for this project was provided by the National Science Foundation.<br />
Office of Naval Research. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. and<br />
the U. S. Geological Survey.<br />
Copies are available from<br />
Ocean Studies Board<br />
2101 Constitution Avenue. N. W.<br />
Washington. D.C. 201118<br />
Printed in the United States of America
OCEAN STUDIES BOARD<br />
WALTER H. MUNK, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, Chairman<br />
D. JAMES BAKER, JR .. Joint Oceanographic Institutions, Inc.<br />
PETER BREWER, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution<br />
JOHN M. EDMOND, Massachusetts Institute of Technology<br />
EDWARD A. FRIEMAN, Scripps Institution of Oceanography<br />
MICHAEL GLANTZ. National Center for Atmospheric Research<br />
MICHAEL C. GREGG, University of Washington<br />
JOHN IMBRIE, Brown University<br />
REUBEN LASKER, National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration<br />
JAMES J. McCARTHY, Harvard University<br />
DENNIS A. POWERS, Johns Hopkins University<br />
C. BARRY RALEIGH, Columbia University<br />
DAVID A. ROSS, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution<br />
JOHN G. SCLATER, University of Texas at Austin<br />
JOHN H. STEELE, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution<br />
MARY TYLER, Versar, Inc.<br />
CARL I. WUNSCH, Massachusetts Institute of Technology<br />
MARY HOPE KATSOUROS, Senior Staff Officer<br />
JUDITH MARSHALL, Staff Assistant<br />
iii
COMMISSION ON PHYSICAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICS, AND RESOURCES<br />
NORMAN HACKERMAN, Robert A. Welch Foundation<br />
GEORGE F. CARRIER, Harvard University<br />
DEAN E. EASTMAN, IBM T. J. Watson Research Center<br />
MARYE ANNE FOX, University of Texas<br />
GERHART FRIEDLANDER, Brookhaven National Laboratory<br />
LAWRENCE W. FUNKHOUSER, Chevron Corporation<br />
PHILIP A. GRIFFITHS, Duke University<br />
J. ROSS MACDONALD, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill<br />
CHARLES J. MANKIN, University of Oklahoma<br />
PERRY L. McCARTY, Stanford University<br />
JACK E. OLIVER, Cornell University<br />
JEREMIAH P. OSTRI KER, Princeton University<br />
WILLIAM D. PHILLIPS, Mallinckrodt, Inc.<br />
DEN IS J. PRAGER, MacArthur Foundation<br />
DAVID M. RAUP, University of Chicago<br />
RICHARD J. REED, University of Washington<br />
ROBERT E. SIEVERS, University of Colorado<br />
LARRY L. SMARR, University of Illinois<br />
EDWARD C. STONE, JR., California Institute of Technology<br />
KARL K. TUREKIAN, Yale University<br />
GEORGE W. WETHERILL, Carnegie Institution of Washington<br />
IRVING WLADAWSKY-BERGER, IBM Corporation<br />
RAPHAEL G. KASPER, Executive Director<br />
LAWRENCE E. McCRAY, Associate Executive Director<br />
iv
PREFACE<br />
Recent discoveries of the widespread nature of volcanicallydriven<br />
submarine hot springs and their attendant chemosynthetically-based<br />
animal communities underscore the fact that the<br />
seafloor/ridge crest environment represents one of the current<br />
frontiers in the exploration and understanding of our planet.<br />
The global spreading center network may be viewed as a single<br />
system of focused energy flow from the earth's interior to the<br />
lithosphere, hydrosphere, and biosphere. Viewed in this manner<br />
it becomes evident that the processes involved in generation of<br />
oceanic lithosphere are strongly interconnected and that an<br />
interdisciplinary approach will be necessary to achieve major<br />
strides in our understanding of the role lithosphere genesis<br />
plays in planetary evolution.<br />
Major technical advancements in seafloor imaging capability<br />
and recent developments in understanding relevant ridge cre.st<br />
processes have suggested to a number of scientists that it was<br />
timely to hold structured discussions of the problems and<br />
benefits of making comprehensive, in-depth observations and<br />
measurements of this global system. Further, the active nature<br />
of the planetary ridge system combined with the vastly improved<br />
capacity for spatial resolution of features on and beneath the<br />
seafloor has led researchers to begin examining the potential<br />
for making a wide variety of integrated time-series measurements<br />
on processes related to lithosphere genesis.<br />
In response to these exciting developments, the Ocean<br />
Studies Board of the National Research Council agreed to host a<br />
workshop on liThe Mid-Ocean <strong>Ridge</strong>: A Dynamic Global System."<br />
The report that follows presents the results of that workshop,<br />
which was held from April 6 through 10, 1987, at Salishan Lodge,<br />
Gleneden Beach, Oregon. More than 80 individuals representing<br />
six countries and a wide range of expertise participated in the<br />
workshop. Six working groups, organized around the principal<br />
themes identified by the steering committee, were suggested<br />
during the preparation phase with the recognition that exchange<br />
between related groups would be necessary and useful. The<br />
participants in each group and its focus were as follows.<br />
o Group 1: "Mantle Dynamics: Magma Generation and<br />
Delivery." Donald Forsyth and Jack Whitehead, Co-Chairmen;<br />
Roger Buck, Charles Cox, Roger Denlinger, Henry Dick,<br />
Michael Gurnis, Adolphe Nicolas, John Orcutt,<br />
Jason Phipps Morgan, and Sean Solomon.<br />
v
o Group 2: "Geometry and Dynamics of Magma Chambers."<br />
Robert Detrick and Charles Langmuir, Co-Chairmen; Wilfrid Bryan,<br />
Charles Cox. Karl Gronvold, John Malpas, Stewart McCallum,<br />
Janet Morton. Adolphe Nicolas, Michael Purdy, Kristin Rohr, and<br />
John Sinton.<br />
o Group 3: "<strong>Ridge</strong> Crest Segmentation, Tectonic Cycles<br />
and Lithosphere Evolution." Rodey Batiza and Paul J. Fox,<br />
Co-Chairmen; Jean Francheteau, William Haxby, Jeffrey Karson.<br />
Clive Lister, Peter Lonsdale. Kenneth MacDonald, Bruce Malfait,<br />
John Mutter, Ned Ostenso, Marc Parmentier, Jason Phipps Morgan,<br />
Hans Schouten, Roger Searle, Jean-Christophe Sempere,<br />
Fred Spiess, and Robert Tyee.<br />
o Group ll: "Subseafloor Hydrothermal Processes."<br />
Johnson Cann and John Edmond, Co-Chairmen; Alan Chave,<br />
John Delaney, Dave Janecky, Marc Langseth, Robert Lowell,<br />
Russ McDuff. Peter Rona, William Seyfried, Wayne Shanks,<br />
Norman Sleep, Geoffrey Thompson, and Richard von Herzen.<br />
o Group 5: "Biology of Hydrothermal Systems."<br />
Jim Childress and George Somero. Co-Chairmen; John Baross,<br />
Daniel Desbruyeres, Fredrick Grassle, Eric Hartwig,<br />
Robert Hessler, Holger Jannasch, Richard Lutz, Michael Reeve,<br />
Gary Taghon, and Philip Taylor.<br />
o Group 6: "Water Column Dynamics and Sedimentation<br />
Processes." John Lupton and Jack Dymond, Co-Chairmen;<br />
Edward Baker, Edward Bernard, Robert Collier, Stephen Hammond,<br />
Gary Klinkhammer, Michael Mottl, David Ross, and<br />
Richard Thompson.<br />
Despite the fact that fields of scientific inquiry among the<br />
participants varied from mantle dynamics to cell biology, a<br />
remarkable level of consensus regarding overall focus and<br />
general approaches to the dynamic processes involved in ocean<br />
lithosphere genesis emerged in the working group reports. The<br />
unifying goal of the RIDGE initiative (<strong>Ridge</strong> Interdisciplinary<br />
Global Experiments) is to understand the physical, chemical, and<br />
biological causes and consequences of mass and energy transfer<br />
within the global ridge system through time and space. Each<br />
group identified at least three scales of inquiry necessary to<br />
achieve this overall goal as well as its own specific<br />
objectives.<br />
o Global Scale: a significant proportion of the global<br />
rift system must be characterized sufficiently well to establish<br />
what is representative and what the range of natural variation<br />
is at the planetary level.<br />
vi
o Regional Scale: selected subsets of the rift system<br />
must be thoroughly documented at scales of hundreds of kilometers<br />
both along and across strike to provide comprehensive<br />
and comparable data sets required to evaluate the reasons for<br />
their similarities and the differences.<br />
o Local Scale: a small number of sites should be chosen<br />
for focused long-term efforts directed at documentation of the<br />
temporal variation in a broad range of ridge crest-related<br />
processes.<br />
<strong>Workshop</strong> participants made no attempt to design more<br />
specific experimental approaches to the objectives, but it was<br />
generally recognized that an interdisciplinary program of ridge<br />
crest experiments was feasible, worthwhile, and timely. Discussion<br />
of the overall goal, specific working group objectives, and<br />
recommendations for next steps in planning such a program are<br />
discussed in the report.<br />
Financial support for the workshop was provided by the<br />
National Science Foundation, the Office of Naval Research. the<br />
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and the U.S.<br />
Geological Survey. Stephen Hammond of NOAA, Janet Morton of<br />
the USGS, and David Ross of WHOI and OSS served as scientific<br />
liaison members to the Steering Committee and contributed<br />
substantially to the preparation of the workshop and editorial<br />
revision of the report. We deeply appreciate the special<br />
efforts of Alan Chave and David Janecky before, during, and<br />
after the workshop in helping to organize the program and<br />
present the final product.<br />
John R. Delaney<br />
Steering Committee Chairman<br />
vii
CONTENTS<br />
1 INTRODUCTION<br />
1<br />
2 STATEMENT OF GOALS AND OBJECTIVES<br />
5<br />
3 NEXT STEPS TOWARD A RIDGE INITIATIVE<br />
11<br />
4 REPORTS OF THE WORKING GROUPS<br />
13<br />
Introduction, 13<br />
Group 1 - Mantle Dynamics:<br />
Group 2<br />
Group 3 -<br />
Group 4<br />
Group 5 <br />
Group 6<br />
Magma Generation and<br />
Delivery, 14<br />
Geometry and Dynamics of Magma Chambers, 21<br />
<strong>Ridge</strong> Crest Segmentation, Tectonic Cycles,<br />
and Lithosphere Evolution, 30<br />
Subseafloor Hydrothermal Processes, 38<br />
Biology of Hydrothermal Systems, 45<br />
Water Column Dynamics and Sediment<br />
Processes, 53<br />
APPENDIXES<br />
59<br />
I List of Participants, 59<br />
II Background Papers<br />
ix
1<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
The global mid-ocean ridge is perhaps the most striking<br />
single feature on the solid surface of our planet. Sections of<br />
the ridge extend along the floors of all the world's oceans to a<br />
length in excess of 50,000 km. The mid-ocean ridge dominates<br />
the Earth's volcanic flux and creates an average of 20 km 3 of<br />
new oceanic crust every year. The processes of generation and<br />
cooling of oceanic lithosphere contribute two thirds of the heat<br />
lost annually from the Earth's interior. One third of the heat<br />
flux in oceanic lithosphere is carried by the circulation of<br />
seawater through fractures in hot oceanic crust. This<br />
hydrothermal circulation facilitates a major chemical exchange<br />
between seawater and oceanic crustal rocks that acts as an<br />
important regulator of the chemistry of the oceans and of the<br />
volatile content of the Earth's interior. The most stunning<br />
manifestations of this circulation are the high-temperature<br />
hydrothermal vents along the ridge axis. Major vent fields<br />
provide the energy and nutrients for the support of diverse<br />
communities of organisms sustained by a unique food chain based<br />
on chemosynthetic bacteria. Not only are these organisms<br />
profoundly influenced by such hydrothermal circulation, but the<br />
vent communities in turn have a marked impact on the physical<br />
and chemical environments they inhabit. These types of<br />
interactions point to an essential interconnection on a wide<br />
variety of temporal and spatial scales among the biological and<br />
physical processes operative along the ocean ridge system.<br />
The last major report of the National Research Council on<br />
the scientific objectives for study of the mid-ocean ridge was<br />
Understanding the Mid-Atlantic <strong>Ridge</strong>, published under the<br />
auspices of the Ocean Affairs Board in 1972. That report had a<br />
major impact on subsequent programs in mid-ocean ridge science.<br />
Most notable was Project FAMOUS I French-American Mid-Ocean<br />
Undersea StudyL which initiated the use of manned submersibles<br />
to conduct geological studies of the mid-ocean ridge median<br />
valley.<br />
The 15 years since the publication of that report. however,<br />
have seen many new discoveries of ridge phenomena and the<br />
development of a number of sophisticated technological tools for<br />
1
detailed investigation of the seafloor and the subsurface<br />
crust. High temperature hydrothermal vents. for instance. were<br />
discussed only as theoretical possibilities before their<br />
discovery in the Pacific in the late 1970s. Such vent fields<br />
and their associated biological communities were not observed on<br />
slow spreading ridge crests until 1985. High resolution swath<br />
mapping and side-scan sonar imaging have only recently begun to<br />
yield a rich return of information on the detailed morphology<br />
and structure of ridge systems. including such discoveries as<br />
the existence of overlapping spreading centers and major<br />
along-strike variations in volcanic and tectonic processes.<br />
Multi-channel seismic imaging techniques have advanced to the<br />
stage where widespread mapping of the prominent reflector<br />
thought to mark the roof of the axial magma chamber has been<br />
initiated. The Global Positioning Satellite system promises to<br />
reduce ship navigational errors to a few tens of meters on a<br />
routine basis. permitting easy intercomparison of data sets and<br />
assured placement of instrumentation for experiments.<br />
Much of the promise of this new technology remains to be<br />
realized. Detailed sampling and mapping of the mid-ocean ridge.<br />
for instance. has been confined to date only to a small fraction<br />
of its total length. The range in diversity of volcanic and<br />
tectonic processes manifested along the ridge axis. as a consequence.<br />
has not yet been fully defined. More fundamentally.<br />
the complex and interlinked processes of magmatism. hydrothermal<br />
circulation. development of vent communities. and lithospheric<br />
evolution are only dimly understood. The dynamics of these<br />
processes have not yet been elucidated because of the lack of<br />
in situ observations of sufficient duration and diversity to<br />
determine the important interactions and time scales.<br />
For these reasons. the Ocean Studies Board convened a workshop<br />
on the mid-ocean ridge. The workshop participants were<br />
asked to summarize our current understanding of the processes of<br />
generation and evolution of oceanic lithosphere. to identify the<br />
primary objectives for ridge crest science in the next decade.<br />
and to outline a research program capable of meeting these<br />
objectives. The workshop proceedings presented here are the<br />
response to that charge.<br />
In organizing the workshop. the Steering Committee attempted<br />
to assure that a wide spectrum of views from the entire oceanographic<br />
community would be represented. More than 80 individuals<br />
representing physical. chemical. and biological oceanography<br />
and marine geology and geophysics were invited to participate.<br />
The list of participants is included in Appendix I.<br />
Before the workshop. a number of participants were asked to<br />
prepare papers on the state of our understanding of the<br />
principal dynamical processes occurring at the mid-ocean ridge.<br />
with an emphasis on the major scientific questions currently<br />
outstanding. Additional papers were solicited on promising<br />
techniques for addressing these questions. The background<br />
2
papers were compiled, printed, and bound prior to the workshop,<br />
where they served as a basis for discussion. Because of the<br />
importance of these papers to the deliberations, they are made<br />
available in Appendix II.<br />
The first. day of the workshop was devoted to open discussion,<br />
in a plenary session, of six principal scientific themes<br />
of the mid-ocean ridge system:<br />
1. mantle dynamics: magma generation and delivery;<br />
2. geometry and dynamics of magma chambers;<br />
3. ridge crest segmentation, tectonic cycles, and<br />
lithospheric evolution;<br />
4. subseafloor hydrothermal processes;<br />
5. biology of hydrothermal systems; and<br />
6. water column dynamics and sediment processes near<br />
hydrothermal vents.<br />
The discussions were initiated by 10- to 15-minute<br />
commentaries, which drew on, but did not repeat, the content<br />
of the position papers. Discussion, often heated, of the major<br />
issues followed each presentation. By the end of the day all<br />
participants had been exposed to the major scientific issues<br />
held to be of greatest importance to each of the disciplinary<br />
groups.<br />
On the second and third days, smaller working groups met to<br />
discuss each of the principal scientific themes. Each working<br />
group was asked to determine the single most important<br />
scientific objective within its respective theme and to define<br />
the processes that must be studied and the approach that must be<br />
taken to achieve that objective. While many of the working<br />
groups began their discussions along narrow problematic or<br />
disciplinary lines, it became clear to all participants that the<br />
operative processes are strongly interconnected and that a<br />
multidisciplinary attack will be necessary to achieve major<br />
advances in understanding.<br />
On the final day, the workshop participants agreed on a set<br />
of primary scientific objectives for the future study of the<br />
global mid-ocean ridge system. They further agreed that these<br />
objectives could be met in the next decade by a coordinated<br />
program of exploration and experiment, and that planning for<br />
such an effort. to be name RIDGE (<strong>Ridge</strong> Interdisciplinary Global<br />
Experiments), should proceed. It was evident that resources<br />
from a variety of federal agencies will be required to support<br />
the RIDGE program. It was further recommended that this program<br />
be international in scope, a view endorsed by representatives<br />
from the United Kingdom, France, Japan, Canada, and Iceland<br />
present among the workshop participants.<br />
These proceedings reflect views expressed by workshop participants,<br />
and the overall goal and specific objectives as<br />
3
stated in Chapter 2 represent a consensus reached by the workshop<br />
as a group and not necessarily those of the members of the<br />
Ocean Studies Board. The suggested next steps in the development<br />
of RIDGE are outlined in Chapter 3. Chapter 4 includes the<br />
full reports of the six working groups.
2<br />
STATEMENT OF GOALS AND OBJECTIVES<br />
Activity along the global mid-ocean ridge involves complex<br />
interactions among a number of processes. Decompressional<br />
melting of the Earth's mantle delivers molten rock to ridge-axis<br />
magma chambers. Volcanic eruption and hydrothermal circulation<br />
cool and solidify the magma, forming new oceanic lithosphere.<br />
Temporal and spatial variations in these processes along the<br />
ridge axis contribute to distinctly segmented patterns of<br />
fracturing in the newly accreted lithosphere. Circulating<br />
seawater guided by the fractures extracts heat from the magma<br />
chamber, exchanges chemically with the oceanic crust and upper<br />
mantle, and supports seafloor hotspring activity of widely<br />
varying intensity. Chemosynthetically-based biological<br />
communities thrive on the hydrothermally induced nutrient<br />
fluxes. Geothermally driven water column plumes disperse heat.<br />
chemical species, and biota from the vents into the overlying<br />
oceans and adjacent sediments.<br />
The interactions among these major processes allow the<br />
global spreading center network to be viewed as a single complex<br />
and dynamic system of focused energy flow from the Earth's interior<br />
to the lithosphere, hydrosphere, and biosphere. <strong>Workshop</strong><br />
participants agreed that the unifying goal of the RIDGE initiative<br />
is to understand the physical, chemical and biological<br />
causes and consequences of energy transfer within the global<br />
ridqe system through time and space.<br />
<strong>Workshop</strong> participants further agreed on six primary scientific<br />
objectives necessary to accomplish the broad goal of the<br />
RIDGE initiative:<br />
1. to understand the flow of the mantle, the generation of<br />
melt, and the transport of magmas beneath mid-ocean ridges;<br />
2. to understand the processes that transform magma into<br />
ocean crust;<br />
3. to understand the processes that control the segmentation<br />
and episodicity of lithosphere accretion;<br />
4. to understand the physical, chemical. and biological<br />
processes involved in the interactions between circulating<br />
seawater and the lithosphere;<br />
5
5. to determine the interactions of organisms with<br />
physical and chemical environments at mid-ocean ridges; and<br />
6. to determine the distribution and intensity of<br />
mid-ocean hydrothermal venting and the interaction of venting<br />
with the ocean environment.<br />
A brief development of the rationale and definition of<br />
each of these objectives follows. Further detail is provided<br />
in the respective working group reports, presented in full in<br />
Chapter 4.<br />
OBJECTIVE 1: To understand the flow of the mantle, the<br />
generation of melt. and the transport of magmas beneath<br />
mid-ocean ridges.<br />
Material in the Earth's mantle wells up beneath mid-ocean<br />
ridges in response to the spreading of the lithospheric plates.<br />
This upward flow is accompanied by pressure-release melting of<br />
mantle material. The detailed pattern of mantle flow and the<br />
depth extent and degree of melting, however, are poorly known.<br />
The physical and chemical processes that control melt segregation<br />
and the transport of magma to chambers at the base of, or<br />
within, the crust are also poorly understood. These processes<br />
control the structure of young oceanic lithosphere and the composition<br />
of the melt emplaced in crustal magma bodies. Spatial<br />
and temporal variations in these processes are strongly linked<br />
to mantle heterogeneity, to variations in crustal morphology<br />
and composition, and to segmentation of the ridge crest.<br />
Seismological and electromagnetic techniques are capable of<br />
determining the deep structure and anisotropy of the mantle<br />
beneath mid-ocean ridges with a spatial resolution sufficient<br />
to define the signature of large-scale flow and the distribution<br />
of melt within the mantle. Development of new technology<br />
will be necessary before the promise of these techniques can<br />
be realized.<br />
OBJECTIVE 2: To understand the processes that transform magma<br />
into ocean crust.<br />
The transformation of magma into oceanic crust at spreading<br />
centers has fundamental implications for the mechanisms of heat<br />
and material transport from deep within the Earth to the lithosphere,<br />
hydrosphere, and biosphere. Most models of ocean crust<br />
formation require the presence of a shallow molten zone, or<br />
magma chamber, in the crust beneath the spreading axis. Such<br />
magma chambers control the structure and composition of oceanic<br />
crust and provide the heat to drive hydrothermal systems.<br />
The important processes that transform mantle melt into<br />
oceanic crust and the role of crustal chambers are poorly<br />
understood. Owing to recent advances in technology and<br />
6
experience from land volcanic and magmatic systems, however,<br />
we can now address several critical problems. We can begin<br />
to determine the global distribution and physical properties<br />
of magma chambers at oceanic ridges and their temporal and<br />
spatial variability. Studies can be carried out of interrelationships<br />
among magmatism, tectonism, and hydrothermal<br />
activity. Internal dynamics of magma chambers are important<br />
factors that must be understood along with their effects on<br />
structure and composition of the crust and the transfer of heat<br />
from the magma chamber. Of vital concern are the physical and<br />
chemical processes occurring at the interface between the magma<br />
chamber and the overlying region of seawater circulation.<br />
OBJECTIVE 3: To understand the processes that control the<br />
segmentation and episodicity of lithospheric accretion.<br />
Use of new technology such as satellites, swath-mapping, and<br />
side looking sonar has revealed that the global rift system is<br />
segmented and that the pattern of segmentation varies temporally<br />
and spatially. The ocean crust and lithosphere are generated in<br />
a patchwork fashion by individual ridge segments that interact<br />
dynamically at their borders with other segments. The thickness<br />
and thermomechanical properties of the young ocean lithosphere<br />
are determined by interactions among volcanic and tectonic<br />
processes along individual segments, and this episodic or cyclic<br />
interplay can vary both temporally and spatially. Segmentation<br />
and episodic accretion are reflections of the interaction between<br />
upwelling mantle flow and the young lithosphere this flow<br />
engenders. The interplay is moderated and affected by melting,<br />
melt migration, and volcanism. Consequently, processes of melt<br />
formation, segregation, and ascent to magma chambers also displaya<br />
segmented pattern and temporal variability. Likewise,<br />
segmentation-scale diversity may arise in the style and<br />
distribution of hydrothermal venting, mid-water plumes and<br />
vent-related fauna. It is essential to understand the physical<br />
processes controlling segmentation, its temporal and spatial<br />
variation, and the processes causing episodic accretion along<br />
individual segments and their boundary zones. The individual<br />
processes of melt migration and eruption, faulting, fissuring,<br />
and stretching must also be better understood so that their<br />
possible interactions can be interpreted.<br />
OBJECTIVE 4: To understand the physical, chemical, and<br />
biological processes involved in the interactions between<br />
circulating seawater and the lithosphere.<br />
Hydrothermal systems at mid-ocean ridge crests transfer<br />
much of the heat from the Earth's interior to its surface.<br />
Hydrothermally-induced chemical exchanges between the oceans<br />
and underlying crust are pivotal in influencing. the chemical<br />
mass balances that affect the composition of the oceans and<br />
7
control the genesis of many types of seafloor ore deposits that<br />
are analogous to those found on land. <strong>Ridge</strong> crest venting of<br />
seawater provides the ultimate energy source to support unique<br />
chemosynthetic biological communities on mid-ocean spreading<br />
centers. Interactions with circulating seawater strongly affect<br />
the geometry and external dynamics of axial magma chambers,<br />
resulting in some of the topographic and morphological variability<br />
seen on ridge segments. The injection of vent water into<br />
the ocean by hydrothermal activity has implications for ciculation<br />
patterns. A detailed understanding of the individual<br />
physical and chemical processes that constitute a hydrothermal<br />
system will provide insight into many problems in biological,<br />
chemical, geological. and physical oceanography. While current<br />
research on seafloor hydrothermal circulation has begun to<br />
address a few of these problems, new approaches and a more<br />
focused effort will be required to achieve an interdisciplinary<br />
view.<br />
Four broad areas about which future hydrothermal system<br />
research might center can be outlined. First. the physical<br />
mechanisms of heat transfer from magma chambers or hot rock<br />
into hydrothermal systems must be identified. Second, the<br />
geometry of hydrothermal plumbing and the permeability structure<br />
of the crust must be delineated. Third, information must<br />
be gathered about the temporal variability of hydrothermal<br />
systems. Finally, the spatial variability and tectonic associations<br />
of hydrothermal systems must be more clearly defined.<br />
All of these objectives involve a mixture of basic exploratory<br />
research with more focused, detailed investigations using new<br />
technologies and imaginative approaches.<br />
OBJECTIVE 5: To determine the interactions of organisms with<br />
physical and chemical environments at mid-ocean ridges.<br />
The discovery and subsequent studies of unique biological<br />
communities associated with hydrothermal vents along the midocean<br />
ridge system have altered drastically many traditional<br />
views of biological processes and adaptations on this planet.<br />
In these hydrothermal environments, the energy source is chemical<br />
rather than solar, with chemosynthetic bacteria rather<br />
than photosynthetic plants at the base of the food chain.<br />
Many of the dominant animals at the vents have incorporated<br />
these bacteria within their tissues, resulting in unusual<br />
symbiotic adaptations that are now proving to be far more<br />
widespread throughout the entire Earth's biosphere than<br />
originally imagined. Some bacteria in these environments<br />
survive temperatures well above the range once thought<br />
tolerable for living organisms, and continuing studies of<br />
such microbial adaptations will be of fundamental importance<br />
to our understanding of the basic structure of living matter.<br />
Further definition of the extent to which chemosynthetic bacteria<br />
affect the chemistry of vent fluids is essential to a<br />
8
solid understanding of both the biology and geochemistry of<br />
these systems.<br />
The great spatial and temporal variability in environmental<br />
parameters at hydrothermal vents stands in marked contrast to<br />
that usually encountered in the deep sea, and such conditions<br />
alter physiological. behavioral, reproductive, and dispersal<br />
requirements placed on the organisms. One of the most remarkable<br />
manifestations of this variability is a vent community<br />
strikingly different from the surrounding deep-sea fauna, often<br />
at high taxonomic levels. Detailed studies of mechanisms of<br />
dispersal. the role of geographic isolation in the evolution of<br />
vent communities, the spatial and successional special patterns<br />
at particular vents sites, and the time scale of vent activity<br />
along various ridge segments are critical to our understanding<br />
of the biological and geological consequences of such variability.<br />
Equally important are further studies of the responses<br />
and adaptations of these organisms to, and their impacts on,<br />
these hydrothermal systems on time scales ranging from seconds<br />
to eras and spatial scales ranging from millimeters to global.<br />
OBJECTIVE 6: To determine the distribution and intensity of<br />
mid-ocean hydrothermal venting and the interaction of venting<br />
with the ocean environment.<br />
Hydrothermal plumes which issue from seafloor vents link<br />
the oceanic lithosphere, hydrosphere, and biosphere through<br />
a complex series of physical, chemical, and biological interactions.<br />
Plumes disperse heat and chemical species from<br />
newly-formed ocean crust, thereby modifying the composition<br />
of seawater and the underlying sediments on a global scale.<br />
Plumes influence the distribution of deep sea biota remote<br />
from the vents by providing energy, nutrients, and dispersal<br />
mechanisms. Hydrothermal plumes can be direct indicators of<br />
abyssal currents; however, the flux of buoyant water from<br />
hydrothermal vents also promotes vertical mixing and may even<br />
contribute to deep ocean circulation. Although many early<br />
studies used the plume as an exploration tool for locating new<br />
hydrothermal vents, recent work has shown that the plume can<br />
address fundamental questions regarding the magnitude and scale<br />
of hydrothermal venting.<br />
The character of the plume is determined both by crustal<br />
processes and by the oceanic environment. Changes in the plume<br />
can reflect events with diverse spatial and temporal scales,<br />
such as magma chamber evolution, changes in the subsurface<br />
hydrothermal plumbing, and shifting bottom currents. To understand<br />
these complex interactions, we must study hydrothermal<br />
plumes over a wide range of scales in time and space: from the<br />
scale of the individual vent plume fluctuating over a period of<br />
seconds, up to the 1000-km scale of the large ocean-basin plumes<br />
estimated to contain the integrated output from 100 years of<br />
9
hydrothermal venting. An important new research direction is to<br />
move from the realm of general observations to the quantification<br />
of rates and processes in hydrothermal plumes. a goal that<br />
can best be achieved via the cooperative. multidisciplinary<br />
approach suggested in these proceedings.<br />
In summary. workshop participants recognized that significant<br />
strides in understanding any particular aspect of the midocean<br />
ridge system will require focused efforts at integration<br />
with related processes. <strong>Ridge</strong> subsystems commonly studied by<br />
individual researchers are not separable from the system cjs a<br />
whole. All working groups identified scales of inquiry that<br />
range over several orders of magnitude in time and space.<br />
Current technologies are relatively well developed for<br />
establishing that spatial variations within the system. but<br />
observations of temporal change will be challenging to obtain.<br />
Global-scale reconnaisance surveys can set the context for more<br />
focused regional studies in which coordinated experiments<br />
involving a range of long-term measurements can be implemented.<br />
A common requirement of many of the recommended studies is a<br />
need for accurate age information on time scales between a<br />
decade and a million years. Innovative approaches to dating of<br />
hydrothermal fluids. rocks. and biological materials will be<br />
necessary to meet this requirement.<br />
10
NEXT STEPS TOWARD A RIDGE INITIATIVE<br />
3<br />
The workshop participants were unanimous in their agreement<br />
that a major interdisciplinary investigation of the mid-ocean<br />
ridge system would be both feasible and of outstanding scientific<br />
merit. It was further recommended that the initial planning<br />
steps for such an initiative should be taken during the coming<br />
year.<br />
The next steps necessary for the development of a RIDGE initiative<br />
as identified by the workshop steering committee are as<br />
follows:<br />
1. Distribute the workshop report and solicit comments.<br />
This report is being widely circulated within the U.S. scientific<br />
community to provide potentially interested participants with<br />
the background and recommendations of the workshop. It is to be<br />
stressed that this report is not a scientific plan. It consists<br />
of the opinions and ideas of workshop participants. Recipients<br />
of this report are asked to provide their own answers to the<br />
questions addressed by the workshop participants and to comment<br />
on the results. These responses will be incorporated in the<br />
development of the program plan.<br />
2. Form a RIDGE Steering Committee. The Committee should<br />
provide oversight for early planning and advise appropriate<br />
U. S. funding agencies on program implementation.<br />
3. Establish RIDGE working groups. It is planned that<br />
these working groups will assist in the formulation of the<br />
program and will consider aspects critical to further planning.<br />
It is suggested that the working groups focus on the following<br />
topics:<br />
a. Mapping and sampling,<br />
b. Advanced measurement, and<br />
c. Theory and laboratory experimentation.<br />
4. Initiate an annual summer RIDGE forum for the purpose<br />
of encouraging scientific exchange. evaluating program progress<br />
and reviewing scientific objectives. This forum would be open<br />
to interested participants.<br />
11
5. Explore possibilities for establishment of an international<br />
component for RIDGE.<br />
6. Host planning workshops on technical topics as necessary<br />
to develop a detailed scientific plan.<br />
7. Draft a scientific plan for RIDGE. Because of the many<br />
technical and scientific uncertainties bearing on program design,<br />
the initial plan will be preliminary and will be modified<br />
as required over a period of several years. The plan will take<br />
into account all comments, criticisms, and suggestions provided<br />
in response to the workshop report.<br />
12
4<br />
REPORTS OF THE WORKING GROUPS<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
The following six reports, written during the workshop,<br />
present the deliberations of the working groups. Each working<br />
group focused on one of the six scientific themes of the<br />
mid-ocean ridge system. The working group members were asked to<br />
consider the following questions:<br />
1. What is the single most important scientific objective<br />
within this theme?<br />
2. What are the critical problems (primary and secondary)<br />
that must be solved in order to achieve this objective?<br />
3. What are the specific physical processes that<br />
studied in order to understand the critical problems?<br />
be listed in priority order?<br />
need to be<br />
Can they<br />
4. What data ought to be collected, and what is it<br />
realistic to expect in the future?<br />
5. What laboratory, theoretical, and numerical developments<br />
are needed now and what capabilities should be developed?<br />
6. What measurement capabilities are needed?<br />
capabilities exist, or can they be developed during<br />
decade?<br />
Do these<br />
the coming<br />
7. What is the strategy for proceeding? What studies must<br />
be simultaneous? What needs to be done now for planning?<br />
8. What cross-disciplinary coordination needs to be<br />
planned?<br />
13
GROUP 1:<br />
MANTLE DYNAMICS: MAGMA GENERATION AND DELIVERY<br />
Members:<br />
Donald Forsyth. Co-Chairman<br />
John Whitehead. Co-Chairman<br />
Roger Buck. Charles Cox. Roger Denlinger. Henry Dick.<br />
Michael Gurnis. Adolphe Nicolas. John Orcutt.<br />
Jason Phipps Morgan. and Sean Solomon<br />
Scientific Rationale<br />
Pressure-release melting of upwelling mantle beneath a<br />
spreading center is the primary process by which magma is<br />
generated. The depth and degree of partial melting beneath the<br />
ridge is controlled by the rate of upwelling and the composition<br />
and temperature of the mantle. The spatial and temporal<br />
distribution of melting thus reflects the dynamics of mantle<br />
flow. Although some constraints on the pressure and temperature<br />
conditions of melt formation are provided by petrological<br />
studies. the physical processes which control magma generation<br />
and delivery. and their chemical consequences. are poorly<br />
understood.<br />
The primary scientific objective in the study of mantle<br />
dynamics at spreading centers is to understand the flow of the<br />
mantle. the generation of melt. and the transport of magmas<br />
beneath ridge systems. Separation of melt from residual mantle<br />
will control the redistribution and chemical stratification of<br />
mantle materials. the structure of young oceanic plates. the<br />
rate and geometry of melt delivery to the base of the crust. and<br />
the composition of parental melts emplaced in crustal magma<br />
bodies. Understanding these mechanisms is important for a broad<br />
range of topics. including the nature of mantle heterogeneity.<br />
the spatial and temporal variations in crustal morphology.<br />
structure. and composition. and segmentation of the ridge crest.<br />
Investigation of this problem can be separated into two<br />
questions: (1) what is the pattern of mantle flow and melt<br />
generation beneath a spreading center? and (2) how does melt<br />
segregate from the mantle and migrate to the base of the crust?<br />
The answers to these questions will require coordinated.<br />
interdisciplinary observational. laboratory. and theoretical<br />
efforts. In addition. understanding of the behavior of the<br />
upper mantle revealed by ophiolite studies is of great<br />
importance.<br />
14
Critical Investigations<br />
The specific physical and chemical characteristics and<br />
processes which must be studied in order to answer these two<br />
questions include:<br />
1. Orientation of Upper Mantle Crystal F"bric. Olivine<br />
crystals are strongly anisotropic in their elastic properties<br />
and preferentially aligned by shear flow deformation. Thus,<br />
spatial distribution of seismic velocity anisotropy can<br />
constrain flow directions.<br />
2. Three-dimensional Distribution of Melt within the<br />
Mantle. The geometry of melt distribution will help constrain<br />
the conditions of melt formation and pathways of melt migration.<br />
3. Distribution of Temperatures within the Mantle.<br />
Lateral variations in temperature reflect spatial variations in<br />
hydrothermal circulation, flow of mantle materials, and melt<br />
formation and transport.<br />
4. Compositional Variability within the Mantle. Variations<br />
in composition of upwelling mantle dictate the volume and<br />
chemistry of melt. Variations in composition of the residual<br />
mantle are introduced by the melt extraction process.<br />
5. Physics and Chemistry of Melting within an Open System.<br />
Nearly all laboratory and thermodynamics studies to date are<br />
based on the assumption of a closed system, which is not valid<br />
in the mantle because of differential movement of melt and<br />
mantle materials.<br />
6. Physical Properties of Crystal-melt Aggregates. Interpretation<br />
of seismological, electromagnetic, and rheological<br />
phenomena requires more complete knowledge of the physical<br />
characteristics of rock-melt mixtures.<br />
7. Physical Mechanisms for Melt Migration and Segregation<br />
in a Deforming Crystalline Matrix. Whether melt moves from the<br />
generation site to the surface by way of porous flow, diapirism.<br />
or dike propagation will be critical to the delivery rate of<br />
melt and the degree of mixing and chemical modification which<br />
occurs during ascent.<br />
8. Variations in Crustal Structure, Morphology. and<br />
Composition. These variations. in the form of thickened crust.<br />
seamounts. or changes in composition, provide our only record<br />
of long-term changes in the spatial and temporal distribution<br />
of the melting and melt transport processes.<br />
15
9. Early Evolution of Oceanic lithosphere. Growth and<br />
deformation of the oceanic lithosphere affects the development<br />
of ridge axis morphology, the migration of melt, and the pattern<br />
of mantle flow.<br />
Approaches<br />
Successful investigation of these phenomena requires a<br />
combination of field, laboratory, and theoretical studies.<br />
Field Studies<br />
1. Seismological Studies. Seismic waves are fundamental<br />
means of sampling the Earth's interior. Different modes of wave<br />
propagation sample the Earth in distinct and complementary ways.<br />
Active (man-made) seismic sources have the advantages of control<br />
over the location and timing of the source, but are limited in<br />
size, and therefore depth of penetration. With year-long<br />
observation times, teleseismic (natural) sources probably<br />
provide the best tool for directly sampling the deeper structure<br />
where melting occurs.<br />
Passive seismic tomography can be used to determine the<br />
three-dimensional seismic velocity structure of the upper mantle<br />
and holds the potential for measuring directly the flow-aligned<br />
fabric of the mantle, distribution of zones of partial melting,<br />
and variation in the lithosphere structure associated with its<br />
early evolution. Tomographic experiments require long-term<br />
deployment of a large number (-100) of Ocean Bottom Seismometers<br />
(OBS's) in a grid to record arrival times and waveforms of body<br />
waves from distant earthquakes. With sufficient data from a<br />
variety of distances and azimuths, the travel time or waveform<br />
data can be inverted to recover the seismic velocity structure<br />
with a horizontal resolution comparable to the instrument<br />
spacing and a vertical resolution that will depend on the<br />
distance range of the sources.<br />
Surface wave methods detect the dispersion of teleseismic<br />
surface waves in the period range that is sensitive to structure<br />
of the upper 200 km of mantle. Velocity variations as a<br />
function of period indicate variations in average shear<br />
velocity, which is sensitive to temperature, composition, and<br />
the presence of melt. Measurement of both Love and Rayleigh<br />
waves, which have different polarizations, and. azimuthal<br />
variations in velocity yield information on anisotropy and<br />
crystal alignment with flow fields. This method requires<br />
deployment of eight to ten long-period seismometers over a<br />
region of several hundred kilometers square for periods of about<br />
a year, in order to ensure monitoring of an adequate number of<br />
teleseismic events. Another related technique is to measure the<br />
response to loading of the seafloor by long wavelength water<br />
gravity waves.<br />
16
Seismic refraction methods provide information on crustal<br />
structure, which can be used to investigate variations rn<br />
crustal thickness and composition and their relationship to<br />
seafloor morphology. In addition, anisotropy in the shallow<br />
upper mantle can be mapped with this method and compared with<br />
observations in ophiolite ultramafic sections.<br />
Multichannel seismic reflection techniques can map crustal<br />
thickness and provide greater resolution of crustal structure<br />
than other methods. Deeper, sub-horizontal, strongly reflective<br />
layers associated with interfaces between unmelted and melted<br />
mantle regions, if presenL may also be detected with this<br />
technique.<br />
Earthguake studies involve deployment of a network of OSS's<br />
on a ridge segment located near a seismically active region<br />
(e.g., a large fracture zone or subduction zone). Regional<br />
earthquakes yield a number of seismic phases sensitive to upper<br />
mantle structure that are not strongly excited in experiments<br />
with artificial sources and not detectable at teleseismic<br />
distances. In addition, the maximum depth of local seismic<br />
activity (microearthquakes) provides a key constraint on<br />
lithospheric thermal structure.<br />
2. Electromagnetic Techniques. The electrical conductivity<br />
of ultramafic rocks increases rapidly with temperature and<br />
dramatically increases when connected melt is present. Electromagnetic<br />
techniques can map the conductivity and anisotropy of<br />
conductivity within the mantle and will be a valuable tool in<br />
assessing the temperature, melt content and directional properties<br />
of the partial melt fabric within the mantle. Magnetotelluric<br />
sounding, which uses naturally-occurring magnetic<br />
fluctuations generated in and above the earth's atmosphere, may<br />
be effective in detecting extensive bodies of partial melt to<br />
depths greater than 100 km, but it is limited to detecting<br />
regions with conductivities comparable to that of the overlying<br />
ocean. Active source techniques can be used to detect variations<br />
in much more resistive materials to depths of 10-30 km.<br />
3. Rock Sampling. Systematic sampling of basalts and<br />
peridotites emplaced at selected spreading center segments and<br />
fracture zones can help to constrain the spatial and temporal<br />
variability of the melting process and efficiency of melt<br />
extraction in the upper mantle. Compositional variations in<br />
seafloor basalts reflect the integrated history of magmatic<br />
processes beneath a ridge axis and thus allow inferences to be<br />
made about melt generation and transport at depth. Correlation<br />
of these variations with crustal structure variations indicate<br />
spatial changes in these processes. Laboratory analysis of<br />
petrofabric characteristics of peridotites, as well as chemical<br />
variations in the peridotites, will indicate the degree of<br />
melting, the amount of trapped melt and its distribution, and<br />
the crystal fabric left after melting and melt extraction. The<br />
inter-relationships among major, trace, and isotopic element<br />
variations in basalts and spatially associated peridotites will<br />
also help to constrain these processes.<br />
17
4. Regional Surveys. Variations in crustal thickness,<br />
which may indicate variations in magma supply from the mantle,<br />
are most efficiently mapped over large regions by combined<br />
gravity and bathymetric surveys. In addition, gravity<br />
measurements may provide some constraints on the thermal<br />
structure of the mantle. Surveys may indicate the presence of<br />
small-scale secondary convection which could influence the<br />
melting process. Of particular importance is a determination of<br />
the distribution of off-axis volcanism that may reflect spatial<br />
variations in melt production in the vicinity of the ridge.<br />
Laboratory Experiments<br />
1. High Temperature/Pressure Experiments on Mantle<br />
Materials. Experimental determination of the physical and<br />
chemical behavior of mantle materials and melt-rock aggregates<br />
over the range of relevant temperature (800-1400 0 C), pressure<br />
(1-30 kbar), and strain rate conditions is critical to meaningful<br />
interpretation of data obtained by field studies, as well as<br />
to the parameterization of models which simulate components of<br />
the upper mantle flow/melt regime beneath spreading centers.<br />
Needed studies include characterization of: equilibrium and<br />
non-equilibrium chemical interactions between melt and rock;<br />
physical properties such as seismic velocities, electrical<br />
conductivity, and rheology (particularly at low deviatoric<br />
stress); and, the distribution of melt in, and permeability<br />
of. partially molten peridotite.<br />
2. Laboratory and Numerical Fluid Dynamic Experiments.<br />
Laboratory and numerical fluid mechanics experiments on idealized<br />
and analogue mantle systems result in testable predictions<br />
about the behavior of the system they describe, directly<br />
stimulate the design of field experiments, and show how the<br />
integrated system might work. Laboratory experiments can give<br />
direct information about fluid instabilities, episodicity of<br />
transport phenomena, and complicated flows that are beyond the<br />
range of present calculations. Numerical experiments, which can<br />
involve more realistic geometries than laboratory analogues and<br />
yield extensive quantitative predictions, can be developed in<br />
three dimensions with supercomputers. Future experiments can<br />
investigate: episodicity in melt and transport phenomena,<br />
diapirism; flow with large variations in temperature, pressure<br />
and temperature-dependent viscosity; two-phase flow including<br />
compaction; coupling between two-phase flow and sub-solidus<br />
thermal convection; and, interaction of mantle flow with the<br />
lithosphere.<br />
3. Numerical Modeling of Wave Propagation. Tomographic and<br />
electromagnetic experiments require development of numerical<br />
simulations of seismic and electromagnetic wave propagation in<br />
three-dimensional, inhomogeneous, anisotropic media.<br />
18
New Instrument and Laboratory Capabilities Required<br />
While many of the studies proposed can utilize existing<br />
tools and techniques, there are four facilities which require<br />
development:<br />
1. Long-lived, Broad-band Ocean Bottom Seismomet.ers. The<br />
tomographic studies require on the order of 100 OBS's that can<br />
remain on the seafloor for periods of a year or more and can<br />
respond to a wide range of frequencies. A similar number of<br />
comparable instruments are needed for surface wave and eart.hquake<br />
studies. These instruments do not presently exist.. and<br />
a development program should be initiated as soon as possible.<br />
2. Off-axis Basement Sampling. Rapid alteration and burial<br />
of rock surfaces as oceanic crust moves away from the ridge<br />
crest limits accessibility to off-axis basalts and peridotites.<br />
A tool such as a portable rock coring device is required which<br />
can rapidly and inexpensively obtain rock samples from the<br />
seafloor. Important attributes of this device are the capabilities<br />
of obtaining cores of 1 to 10 m length and real-time site<br />
evaluation through the use of video cameras and sub-bottom<br />
profilers.<br />
3. Instrumentation for Low Deviatoric Stress, High Temperature,<br />
High Pressure Experimentation. Current experiments are<br />
performed at high deviatoric stress for short time periods. To<br />
better simulate mantle conditions, a capability for long duration,<br />
low deviatoric stress experiments at high temperatures and<br />
pressures is required. It would be desirable if such a facility<br />
could accommodate experiments with partially molten materials.<br />
4. Shiptime. The time involved with deployment, surveying,<br />
and maintaining equipment utilized in these experiments requires<br />
on the order of 8 months of shiptime each year for at least a<br />
decade.<br />
5. Aerogravity Capabilities. If the capabilities for<br />
swathmapping tools for high resolution bathymetry are extended<br />
to ship-track spacings of 10 km or more. then traditional surface<br />
ship sampling of magnetics and gravity will not be obtained<br />
at sufficiently dense spacings to map crustal structure. Therefore,<br />
reliable aerial gravity techniques must be developed which<br />
can be used in conjunction with high resolution navigational<br />
techniques such as CPS.<br />
Planning Considerations<br />
Development of new instruments requires several years before<br />
they will be routinely operational and must therefore be<br />
initiated at once. These include the OBS's, which need to be<br />
designed and tested and require development of sophisticated<br />
19
telemetering capabilities, and the high temperature/pressure<br />
apparatus. Rock coring devices are presently being designed,<br />
and merely lack the funding for prototype fabrication and<br />
testing.<br />
There are few limitations on the actual implementation of<br />
the field programs, once the equipment items are available. The<br />
requirements of the seismic tomography experiments, which<br />
include the distribution of natural teleseismic sources at a<br />
wide range of distances and azimuths from the study area, seem<br />
to be the major constraint in site selection. For each of the<br />
studies, it would be ideal to examine the behavior of the<br />
upwelling/melting processes as a function of the major tectonic<br />
variables, such as spreading rate. In most cases, the various<br />
field studies can be combined and integrated for the same<br />
region.<br />
Coordination With Other Research <strong>Program</strong>s<br />
The mechanisms of melt production and heat transport beneath<br />
a spreading center provide the fundamental regulation of all<br />
other processes associated with oceanic crust accretion,<br />
lithosphere evolution, and hydrothermal circulation. As such,<br />
there are obvious linkages between these studies and those aimed<br />
at the larger time-scale and spatial-scale phenomena associated<br />
with these particular processes. In particular, tectonic cycles<br />
and along-axis variations in crustal accretion processes may be<br />
directly controlled by magma delivery. The scales of inquiry<br />
necessary for mantle dynamics make it possible to coordinate<br />
with the regional and global scale mapping and sampling studies<br />
necessary to look at shallower processes. In addition, many of<br />
the experimental observations and laboratory models required for<br />
investigation of these studies are closely related to those<br />
necessary for understanding magma chamber dynamics. Although<br />
the scale of inquiry is much larger, most of the instrumentation<br />
necessary for these studies has direct application to the other<br />
areas of investigation at smaller scales. Finally, the<br />
information being obtained by study of analogue systems, such as<br />
ophiolites, and by the ODP operations are highly complementary<br />
to the objectives of this program.<br />
20
GROUP 2:<br />
GEOMETRY AND DYNAMICS OF MAGMA CHAMBERS<br />
Members:<br />
Robert Detrick, Co-Chairman<br />
Charles Langmuir, Co-Chairman<br />
Wilfred Bryan, Charles Cox, Karl Gronvold,<br />
John Malpas, Stewart McCallum, Janet Morton,<br />
Adolphe Nicolas, Michael Purdy, Kristin Rohr,<br />
John Sinton<br />
Primary Motivation and Goals<br />
Sixty percent of the earth's surface is created at ocean<br />
ridges, as magmas generated within the mantle are cooled at the<br />
boundary layer between the mantle and the ocean. The way in<br />
which magmas are transformed into oceanic crust at spreading<br />
centers has important implications for the mechanisms of heat<br />
and material transport from deep within the earth to the<br />
lithosphere, hydrosphere and biosphere. This transfer process<br />
through time has been one of the major ways the earth's<br />
temperature has been controlled and has played a pivotal role in<br />
the creation of continents and the control of the composition of<br />
seawater. Despite the significance of this process for the<br />
whole earth system, it is poorly understood. On land, processes<br />
associated with the injection of magma into the crust can be<br />
continuously monitored at volcano observatories. In contrast.<br />
although the amount of material emplaced at ocean ridges exceeds<br />
by orders of magnitude that erupted on land, we are not even<br />
sure what an ocean ridge volcano actually is: we do not know<br />
its size, the timing and quantity of lava in individual<br />
eruptions, the number of volcanic edifices fed by the same magma<br />
chamber, or how the ocean crust is actually created through the<br />
processes of magma solidification. A primary objective of<br />
further study of the mid-ocean ridge is to understand the<br />
processes that transform magma into ocean crust.<br />
Most models of crustal accretion require the presence of a<br />
molten zone, or magma chamber, in the crust beneath the axis.<br />
In these magma chambers, magmas derived from the upper mantle<br />
differentiate to create the lower ocean crust before they erupt<br />
on the sea floor. Magma chambers are also the heat engines that<br />
drive hydrothermal circulation with its metallogenic and<br />
biological conseqences. They directly control the igneous<br />
structure and composition of oceanic crust. In addition, their<br />
variations in time and space provide important constraints on<br />
magma transport from the upper mantle and on the nature and<br />
distribution of hydrothermal activity.<br />
21
Research over the past few years has provided a definition<br />
of how small parts of the system work. However. major advances<br />
in geophysical and geochemical techniques now allow us to<br />
envision a coordinated. long-term program on a global scale<br />
which will provide an integrated understanding of the processes<br />
of crustal accretion.<br />
Critical Problems<br />
In order to understand the processes that transform mantle<br />
melt into oceanic crust and the role of crustal magma chambers.<br />
there are eight critical problems that must be addressed:<br />
1. What is the global distribution of magma chambers along<br />
oceanic ridges. and how does this distribution correlate with<br />
tectonic segmentation. spreading rate. and mantle temperature?<br />
2. What are the variations in the size. shape and physical<br />
properties of ridge crest magma chambers?<br />
3. What are the internal dynamics of magma chambers?<br />
4. How are the magma chambers cooled?<br />
5. What is the spacing of input of magma from the mantle<br />
and output through eruption at the seafloor?<br />
6. What is the temporal variability of magmatic processes?<br />
7. What are the relationships among magmatism. tectonism<br />
and hydrothermal activity?<br />
8. Is the ophiolite model a valid structural analogue for<br />
oceanic crust?<br />
In order to address these problems several different<br />
physical processes must be studied Isee Figure 1):<br />
Magma formation and transport affects the composition of the<br />
mantle melt and the temporal and spatial supply of magma to the<br />
crust.<br />
Magma differentiation and crystallization modifies the<br />
magmas delivered from the upper mantle before they solidify to<br />
form oceanic crust.<br />
Hydrothermal circulation and conductive cooling transfer<br />
heat out of the magma chamber and control its crystallization<br />
history.<br />
Volcanism delivers magma and heat to the sea floor.<br />
Tectonism causes faulting and fissuring that control the<br />
morphology of the spreading center and the locus and style of<br />
volcanism.<br />
22
FORMATION OF OCEAN CRUST<br />
AT SPREADING CENTER<br />
VOLCANISM<br />
HYDROTHERMAL ISM<br />
TECTON ISM<br />
\~.......I'-----"--/<br />
DIFFERENTIATION<br />
AND<br />
CRYSTALLIZATION<br />
MAGMA FORMATION<br />
AND TRANSPORT<br />
FIGURE 1<br />
23
Strategies For Solving The Critical Problems<br />
We envision a strategy with four major components.<br />
1. Global Reconnaissance. The first component would<br />
include reconnaissance studies of substantial lengths of the<br />
mid-ocean ridge system in order to obtain a measure of the world<br />
wide variability of ocean ridge morphologic, structural and<br />
chemical characteristics. The reonnaissance would include<br />
bathymetric surveys over a distance of approximately 1000 km<br />
continuously along the strike of the ridge, with a swath width<br />
of several times the active accretion zone; multichannel seismiC<br />
(MCS) surveys along the axis to define the lateral continuity<br />
and width of the axial low velocity zone and any variations in<br />
seismically estimated crustal thickness; petrological sampling<br />
with approximately one station for every 10 to 20 km of ridge<br />
length, in order to determine the regional geochemical signature<br />
and to explore quantitative relationships among petrology,<br />
bathymetry, and the MCS axial reflector, and continuous<br />
surveying of along-axis water column temperature and chemical<br />
anomalies, in order to determine the distribution of<br />
hydrothermal activity. Such reconnaissance surveys should cover<br />
ridges which vary in their spreading rate, in their tectonic<br />
style (i .e., fracture zone spacing, presence or absence of rift<br />
valley, back-arc settings L and in the ambient mantle<br />
temperature (i.e., hot spots such as Ic.:land and cold spots such<br />
as the Australian!Antarctic Discordance). Approximately ten<br />
such surveys will be necessary to obtain adequate global<br />
coverage. These surveys will lead to coverage of about<br />
20 percent of the entire system of ocean ridges. They will<br />
determine the global distribution of magma chambers and provide<br />
the data necessary to develop quantitative relationships among<br />
spreading rate, gross tectonic fabric, magma chambers and<br />
geochemistry.<br />
2. Eruption Detection. The second component stems from<br />
the recognition that the ocean ridge volcano observatory should<br />
be located in an area of active volcanism. To find such a<br />
location we need to know the periodicity in space and time of<br />
volcanic eruptions on the sea floor, and the relationship of<br />
such eruptions to hydrothermal activity. There is at the moment<br />
no such information for submarine ocean ridges. Calculation of<br />
magma production rates and analogy with terrestrial volcanos<br />
suggests we should be able to find an active volcanic area which<br />
would remain active on the time scale of a decade. To find such<br />
a location, however, requires effective eruption monitoring.<br />
Two approaches could be explored: (a) long term monitoring of<br />
hydrothermal plumes and (b) acoustic monitoring. In addition to<br />
locating active ridge segments, such monitoring will provide<br />
data concerning regional eruption frequency and spatial<br />
systematics.<br />
24
3. Regional Surveys. The third component is more intensive<br />
mapping and sampling of smaller (300 km) areas within the<br />
reconnaissance surveys. About five such areas should be<br />
selected. A critical addition in these smaller areas would be<br />
the extension of mapping and sampling to older crust extending<br />
approximately 150 km to either side of the ridge axis. In these<br />
areas, there would be higher resolution bathymetry, multichannel<br />
seismics and sampling, with the addition of side scan sonar,<br />
electromagnetic surveys, and airborne gravity and magnetics.<br />
Certain areas within these regions would also be the sites of<br />
seismic refraction experiments, and observations and sampling by<br />
a deep-tow package, submersible or remotely operated vehicle<br />
(ROV). One spreading cell in the region should have continuous<br />
along-axis photo coverage of the accretion zone. More intensive<br />
eruption monitoring should take place at promising locations<br />
within the regional area. Studies on the regional scale will<br />
begin to address the size, shape, physical properties and<br />
temporal variability of magma chambers and eruptive units, and<br />
will provide more detailed relationships between magmatism and<br />
tectonics.<br />
4. Seafloor Volcano Observatory. The final component is<br />
the establishment of a long term ocean ridge volcano observatory<br />
along an active portion of a spreading center. The scale of<br />
this observatory should be that of a spreading center cell, or<br />
a length of about 50 km. Realistically, one such observatory<br />
could be well established by the end of a decade of study. The<br />
observatory would be completely mapped and heavily instrumented.<br />
Mapping should include complete photo coverage; identification,<br />
sampling and analysis of individual lava flows; and detailed<br />
maps of faults, fissures, gravity, magnetics and bathymetry.<br />
All these aspects should be monitored for changes through time.<br />
Instruments should include strain and tilt meters, geodetic<br />
measurements, continuous gravity and magnetic monitoring,<br />
permanent seismic stations, and hydrothermal monitoring. In<br />
addition, there should be three-dimensional structural<br />
information gained by 3-D multichannel seismic surveys, seismic<br />
tomography, and electromagnetic measurements. The observatory<br />
would also be a prime candidate for crustal drilling. It is the<br />
key ingredient to understanding how ocean ridge volcanoes<br />
actually work.<br />
Although the establishment of the volcano observatory would<br />
be towards the end of the decade-long program, all other<br />
components of the program could proceed in parallel. The Juan<br />
de Fuca <strong>Ridge</strong> and the East Pacific Rise between 90 and 130N<br />
have had their reconnaissance survey, and funded programs consistent<br />
with the regional 300-km scale of study are underway.<br />
Thus, more intensive efforts in these areas could proceed at the<br />
same time as reconnaissance programs at other locations.<br />
Development of instruments for the volcano observatory and<br />
eruption monitoring should also begin immediately.<br />
25
Related Studies<br />
In addition to these strategies which relate directly to the<br />
active ocean ridge system, there are two other areas of study<br />
which should provide important constraints which cannot be<br />
obtained in any other way. The first involves the study of<br />
ophiolites, which may be appropriate structural analogues for<br />
ocean crust and uppermost mantle, and are exposed in ways that<br />
never occur in the oceans, providing a unique three dimensional<br />
perspective. Detailed structural and geochemical investigations<br />
of these bodies can provide important constraints on the nature<br />
and scale of melt segregation processes in the uppermost<br />
mantle, on the size and internal dynamics of magma chambers, and<br />
on the critical interface between crustal magma bodies and<br />
circulating water systems.<br />
The second important objective is at least one deep crustal<br />
drill hole which extends all the way to the mantle. To date,<br />
the principal stratigraphic units in the ocean crust have been<br />
defined on the basis of characteristic velocities of transmitted<br />
seismic waves. Each of these layers is assumed to be composed<br />
of rock which has a seismic velocity similar to that of the<br />
layer, and analogous to the layers observed in ophiolites. But<br />
the bulk seismic properties of a rock may be very different from<br />
that of individual samples, since the bulk properties integrate<br />
the effect of cracks, veins and zones of alteration. Thus the<br />
assumption that ophiolites accurately represent the stratigraphy<br />
and composition of ocean crust has yet to be tested by actual<br />
observation and sampling of a deep section of ocean crust. Such<br />
a hole also is essential to provide "ground truth" against which<br />
we may test the correspondence between actual observed<br />
lithologic boundaries and the boundaries obtained by<br />
conventional seismic surveys in the vicinity of the hole.<br />
Continuous core sampling through layer 3 gabbro can also<br />
provide much mineralogical and geochemical information on the<br />
nature and rates of crystallization within a crustal magma<br />
chamber, and is the only way we can determine the bulk<br />
composition of the ocean crust. Also, the presumed connection<br />
between fractionated basalts I in layer 2) and crystallization<br />
processes in the chamber can be tested. Finally, if the hole<br />
does successfully penetrate the underlying mantle peridotite, we<br />
would for the first time have a coherent set of samples with<br />
which to trace the evolution of a melt from its origin as a<br />
mantle partial melt, through the deep crustal accretion zone, to<br />
its extrusion on the seafloor.<br />
1.<br />
out full<br />
imaging<br />
Data To Be Collected<br />
Morphology and Sampling. It will be necessary to carry<br />
coverage bathymetric mapping and side scan sonar<br />
at a wide range of resolutions, from the regional, to<br />
26
provide efficient and economically feasible coverage of<br />
thousands of kilometers of rise crest. to the highly detailed<br />
(on the scale of meters) to produce the "base map" for long term<br />
observatory-type studies. Rock sampling strategies will vary<br />
from reconnaissance dredging to the use of submersibles and ROVs<br />
to recover samples on the scale of individual flows. Shipboard<br />
rock analyses will be needed to permit rapid response to sample<br />
data acquired during mapping of active volcanic features, and to<br />
allow real-time optimisation of regional reconnaissance<br />
surveys. The need to construct precise and complete geologic<br />
maps will require large area photographic coverage using either<br />
deep tow vehicles or submersibles, as well as high resolution<br />
side-scan sonar systems. The necessary photographic<br />
capabilities exist within the community in the form of various<br />
deep-tow still or video camera systems and submersibles. The<br />
tools for mapping the morphology, e.g" SEABEAM, SEAMARC I and<br />
II, and GLORIA, are available, but improvements in resolution<br />
and swath width capabilities would be extremely beneficial to<br />
this program. Sampling techniques require development to<br />
provide a compromise between the detail and expense of manned<br />
submersibles and the blind approach of conventional dredging.<br />
Again ROV's may be the solution here, but wire-line rock drills<br />
may be required for effective off-axis operation. Rock dating<br />
in the age range 0 to 1 Myr may well be needed to define the<br />
sequence of volcanic and tectonic events associated with near<br />
surface magma injection and eruption. Possible techniques<br />
include thermoluminescence, U-Th disequilibrium, 14C dating<br />
of hard parts of vent fauna, and secular variation of the<br />
magnetic field.<br />
2. .Structural Measurements. Four approaches are needed to<br />
map the structure of the uppermost 5 to 10 km beneath the rise<br />
crest.<br />
Seismic Methods: Two techniques will be applicable. Multichannel<br />
seismic (MCS) reflection profiling provides the capability<br />
to map boundaries within the igneous crust and to image the<br />
axial magma chamber. The MCS capability I perhaps with shipboard<br />
processing capability) allows the regional mapping of the rise<br />
crest to detect the presence or absence of the axial magma<br />
chamber (AMC) reflector as well as high spatial resolution of<br />
the AMC when used in tight grid surveys. Seismic tomography<br />
experiments using networks of ocean bottom instruments and both<br />
earthquake and explosive sources will give images of the lateral<br />
velocity variations in three dimensions and define the size and<br />
shape of the AMC as well as providing constraints on its<br />
internal structure. As far as is possible, detailed MCS surveys<br />
and tomography experiments should be coordinated and integrated<br />
efforts.<br />
27
Electromagnetic Methods: Because of the huge changes in<br />
conductivity that occur in hot rock when there are small<br />
percentages of melt or water, electromagnetic methods hold<br />
considerable promise for the location and definition of both<br />
the AMC and regions of partial melt and the orientation of<br />
dike swarms relative to the underlying ridge axis. Both<br />
active electromagnetic measurements using deep-towed sources<br />
and passive magnetotelluric experiments will be necessary.<br />
Magnetics and Gravity: Maps of the magnetic and gravity<br />
field on a regional scale are needed, perhaps from the air, if<br />
adequate navigational capability is available and aerogravimeters<br />
are developed. Deep-tow magnetic surveys for high<br />
resolution mapping of the magnetic fabric of the shallow crust<br />
will also be necessary.<br />
3. Monitoring of Active Processes. Measurements of the<br />
total heat flux will be required and this may require both<br />
monitoring of active venting and the mapping of temperature<br />
anomalies within plumes on a regional scale. The capability<br />
must be developed to recognize and approximately locate active<br />
eruptive episodes (perhaps by acoustic or plume detection<br />
methods) . At appropriate sites long term (several year) seismic<br />
monitoring using large networks of ocean bottom seismometers<br />
will be necessary to define both the scale and timing of magma<br />
movement at shallow depths and the accompanying faulting.<br />
Geodetic measurements are crucial to detailed definition of the<br />
AMC inflation-deflation-rifting processes as are tilt and strain<br />
measurements. Sea floor gravity and magnetics measurements<br />
through time at specific localities will provide information on<br />
the cooling history of lava flows. These efforts require<br />
substantial new instrument development. in addition to adaption<br />
and refinement of instrumentation that is presently in use on<br />
subaerial volcanos. All these long-term monitoring experiments<br />
require development of large volume data storage capabilities,<br />
with perhaps the provision for real time data transmission.<br />
Drill holes will provide sites for downhole monitoring and<br />
measurement experiments. The utility of these holes will be<br />
greatly enhanced if techniques are devised for simple wire-line<br />
re-entry from conventional research vessels.<br />
Needed Laboratory, Theoretical and Numerical Experiments<br />
1. Studies of experimental phase equilibria at pressures<br />
of 2 to 10 kbars; mantle melting experiments up to pressures of<br />
40 kbar.<br />
2. Laboratory measurements of physical properties (seismic<br />
velocity, density, viscosity, electrical conductivity) for rocks<br />
at high temperatures, partial melts, and magma.<br />
28
3. Adaptation of tomographic inversion techniques to<br />
include amplitude information. Improved numerical techniques<br />
for seismic processing and modeling in laterally heterogeneous<br />
media.<br />
4. Development of numerical modeling methods to calculate<br />
the evolution of the chemistry of magmas.<br />
5. Careful inter-laboratory calibration of geochemical and<br />
petrologic data.<br />
6. Experimental and theoretical studies of fluid dynamics<br />
with reference to ma~ma chamber processes are required for the<br />
development and verification of models suggested by field.<br />
petrologic and geophysical evidence.<br />
7. Development of standard data formats to facilitate data<br />
exchange and the establishment of a global data repository.<br />
Interdisciplinary Implications<br />
A program of the magnitude outlined here will generate a<br />
very large data set in a variety of fields. Individually. the<br />
procedures outlined above will answer many of the critical<br />
questions concerning the transformation of magma into ocean<br />
crust. Theoretical modeling. constrained by the observations.<br />
is an important component of the study. and will address<br />
especially the question of internal dynamics of magma chambers.<br />
These diverse observations and theoretical studies must be<br />
synthesized to arrive at a model or series of models for the<br />
transformation of mantle melt into oceanic crust. Magmatic<br />
processes occurring at the crustal level are closely coupled to<br />
other first order processes at the oceanic ridge system. The<br />
nature of the processes occurring at the interface between the<br />
magma chamber and the overlying region of seawater circulation<br />
are presently poorly known. but are of particular importance to<br />
understanding the magmatic and hydrothermal systems. The<br />
knowledge gained concerning the spatial and temporal supply of<br />
magma to the crust and the geometry and structure of the<br />
hydrothermal plumbing system will help constrain these models of<br />
the magmatic system. Hydrothermal systems have the potential to<br />
generate ore deposits. support diverse biologic communities and<br />
affect global ocean chemistry. Since some type of magmatic heat<br />
source is the driving mechanism for hydrothermal systems. our<br />
increased understanding of this magmatic system will help answer<br />
critical problems in these other areas. Intense monitoring of<br />
subaerial volcanos over the past 2 to 3 decades has provided a<br />
clear understanding of these volcanic processes at a few places<br />
on land. The technology now exists to apply similar monitoring<br />
and mapping techniques to the oceanic ridge system and achieve<br />
an understanding of the fundamental magmatic and thermal<br />
processes occurring at the largest volcanic and hydrothermal<br />
system on the planet.<br />
29
GROUP 3:<br />
RIDGE CREST SEGMENTATION, TECTONIC CYCLES<br />
AND LITHOSPHERE EVOLUTION<br />
Members:<br />
Rodey Batiza, Co-Chairman<br />
Jeff Fox, Co-Chairman<br />
Jean Francheteau, William Haxby, Jeffrey Karson,<br />
Clive Lister, Peter Lonsdale, Kenneth MacDonald,<br />
Bruce Malfait. John Mutter, Ned Ostenso,<br />
Marc Parmentier, Jason Phipps Morgan, Hans Schouten,<br />
Roger Searle, Jean Sempere, Fred Spiess, Robert Tyce<br />
Introduction<br />
The ocean lithosphere, which covers about 60% of our planet,<br />
is created mostly at mid-ocean ridges and associated spreading<br />
centers. Knowing the structure and composition of this<br />
lithosphere is fundamental to a full understanding of the ocean<br />
basins, and ultimately to our understanding of planetary geology<br />
as a whole. The oceanic lithosphere is the solid flour of the<br />
ocean basins; it defines their shapes, and thus provides a major<br />
control on the distribution of seafloor sediments, ocean<br />
currents, and biological organisms and communities. Processes<br />
operating at the ridge axis emplace much of the mineral wealth<br />
of the world's oceans, and provide a major source and sink of<br />
dissolved elements in the oceans. The mid-ocean ridges comprise<br />
a major proportion of the active plate boundaries of the world,<br />
so understanding the dynamic processes of the ridges is a vital<br />
contribution to understanding global geology. And ultimately,<br />
the lithosphere that was created at the ridge axis interacts<br />
with and may even become accreted to the continents at<br />
subduction zones and volcanic areas.<br />
Over the past ten to fifteen years, many detailed, localized<br />
studies have been made at various parts of the mid-ocean ridge<br />
axis, using a variety of steadily improving technologies. These<br />
studies have shown that the ridge is far from uniform, and often<br />
varies surprisingly rapidly in both space and time and displays<br />
a distinct segmentation. We have begun to realize that a full<br />
understanding of the ridge, and of the underlying mantle<br />
processes that give rise to it. will depend on extending our<br />
studies from very local areas to fully regional and even global<br />
scales, while continuing to examine critical processes in great<br />
detail locally. In parallel with the development of this new<br />
awareness of the nature of the scientific problem, we have seen<br />
the development of wide-swath seafloor imaging devices that can<br />
be routinely deployed to survey whole regions of the seafloor<br />
quite rapidly. With the advent of these advances in scientific<br />
awareness and technology, it is therefore very timely to make a<br />
renewed, concerted, and vigorous thrust towards understanding<br />
the lithosphere dynamics of mid-ocean ridges.<br />
30
Consequently, the sin;J1e most important objective within<br />
this theme is to understan the processes that control the<br />
segmentation and episodicity of lithosphere accretion. Within<br />
our overall objective we recognize three major sets of problems:<br />
1. the nature, generation and evolution of ridge<br />
segmentation;<br />
2. the determination and explanation of the physical<br />
processes that operate along and between individual ridge<br />
segments; and,<br />
3. the early thermo-mechanical evolution of the oceanic<br />
lithosphere.<br />
1. The Nature, Generation and Evolution of <strong>Ridge</strong> Segmentation.<br />
Recently there has been a watershed of new ideas<br />
concerning the processes which control the accretion of oceanic<br />
crust and lithosphere at mid-ocean ridges. One important<br />
insight is that along-strike and temporal variations in tectonic<br />
and magmatic activity are at least as important as the<br />
well-documented variations in structure perpendicular to strike<br />
(i.e.. aging and deepening of the lithosphere). The rise axis<br />
undulates up and down hundreds of meters along strike, the deep<br />
regions of the rise occurring at transform faults and other<br />
ridge axis discontinuities such as the recently discovered<br />
overlapping spreading centers and "zero-offset" transform<br />
faults. Those discontinuities define a tectonic and volcanic<br />
segmentation of the ridge axis on the order of tens to several<br />
hundred kilometers which appears to be a global phenomenon.<br />
Segmentation defines a three-dimensional rather than<br />
two-dimensional process of volcanism, tectonism, and crustal<br />
accretion, systematically spaced along the present plate<br />
boundary. As this process has been discovered only recently,<br />
there are a number of outstanding questions.<br />
For example, what are the causes of ridge crest segmentation<br />
and how do the segments evolve in time and space? Is segmentation<br />
related to melting anomalies in the upper mantle which<br />
deliver basaltic magma to the ridge? Do the mid-sections of the<br />
segments overlie zones of high melt flux, while the ends of the<br />
segments represent null points of magma replenishment? What is<br />
the relationship between the axial magma chamber and<br />
segmentation? Do thermoelastic stresses in the lithosphere also<br />
contribute to segmentation of the ridge due to lateral thermal<br />
contraction of the plate as it cools? Are accretionary<br />
processes at spreading segments which terminate against major<br />
transform faults conditioned by these boundaries and thus more<br />
stable? Are other kinds of discontinuities the consequence of<br />
waxing and waning phases of melt generation? Do these phases<br />
migrate laterally? How stable are the segments with small<br />
offsets and does their persistence and/or temporal variability<br />
relate to upper mantle processes? What is the response of the<br />
architecture and segmentation of the ridge axis to changes in<br />
plate motion?<br />
31
2. Characterization of Individual Segments and their<br />
Boundaries. Once the characteristics of segmentation are known<br />
in detail, it will be of great interest to determine the spatial<br />
and temporal stability of the segment. This includes possible<br />
cyclic or episodic interplay among volcanic and tectonic<br />
processes within a single segment as well as the dynamic<br />
interaction between individual segments focused at their<br />
boundaries. The nature of the lithosphere created by individual<br />
segments may vary along the strike of the segment and with time<br />
in a periodic or episodic manner as suggested by the diverse<br />
morphologies and petrologic characteristics of individual<br />
segments. Individual processes that must be understood are the<br />
nature of faulting and fissuring, the depth of the brittle to<br />
ductile transition, and the thermo-mechanical and stress<br />
characteristics of young lithosphere. In addition, it is<br />
necessary to better understand processes of magma generation,<br />
ascent, storage, eruption and intrusion and how these interact<br />
with tectonic processes within a segment. Are the deeper<br />
processes that control magma generation and spreading coherent<br />
over distances larger than a single segment- or do segments<br />
behave independently? If so, is this primarily due to the<br />
interaction of the upper mantle with the young and evolving<br />
lithosphere, or the termporal and spatial variability of upper<br />
mantle processes?<br />
3. Thermal and Mechanical Processes Affecting the<br />
Evolution of Oceanic Lithosphere. The oceanic lithosphere is<br />
defined as the cool, mechanically strong boundary layer that<br />
overlies weaker ductile mantle. A thorough understanding of the<br />
spreading process requires knowledge of the mechanisms affecting<br />
the creation and subsequent evolution of the lithosphere. It is<br />
first necessary to understand the cooling processes, including<br />
hydrothermal convection and thermal conduction, that cause the<br />
lithosphere to form and thicken. Simultaneously, distributed<br />
horizontal extension or stretching will thin the lithosphere.<br />
These processes will be interrelated: for example, the<br />
stretching process will create faults and fissures that will<br />
allow seawater to penetrate the crust and mantle. The<br />
importance of these processes emphasizes the need to understand<br />
the temporal and spatial distribution, both along and across<br />
strike, of faulting and extensional deformation.<br />
Deformation of the lithosphere will be controlled by the<br />
mechanical properties of the rock comprising it and the forces<br />
or stresses acting upon it. Stresses within the lithosphere<br />
will result from differential contraction due to cooling, normal<br />
and shear stresses exerted at the base of the lithosphere by<br />
mantle flow and melt segregation processes, forces due to ridge<br />
axis topography, and forces transmitted to the ridge axis<br />
through the lithospheric stress guide. One important objective<br />
of mid-ocean ridge studies is to understand the relative<br />
importance of these various forces in controlling deformation at<br />
the ridge axis.<br />
32
Thermal stresses have been suggested as a mechanism controlling<br />
ridge segmentation and may also generate permeability that<br />
promotes hydrothermal cooling. Shear stresses at the base of<br />
the lithosphere due to mantle flow may control the distribution<br />
of horizontal extension or necking and associated differential<br />
vertical movements of the seafloor. A better understanding of<br />
the temporal and spatial distribution of extension will help<br />
clarify the relative roles of tectonic and magmatic processes in<br />
producing pervasive ridge-parallel linear abyssal hill topography,<br />
and will provide a clearer idea of how episodic movement<br />
at a ridge axis is converted to continuous motion of the plate.<br />
Horizontal forces arising from ridge axis topography have been<br />
suggested as a mechanism controlling ridge segment stability and<br />
propagation. Temporal evolution of ridge segment geometries is<br />
also thought to be influenced by changes in plate boundary<br />
forces transmitted to the ridge axis through the lithosphere.<br />
Stresses generated during spreading on one segment and<br />
transmitted through the lithosphere may control the next<br />
spreading episode on an adjacent ridge segment.<br />
Data Collection<br />
Because of the wide variety of time and space scales over<br />
which the processes of interest operate, we see a need to carry<br />
out field studies at similarly appropriate scales. These will<br />
range from global scale, utilizing for example satellite data<br />
and worldwide syntheses of surface data, through the vitally<br />
important. newly recognized dimension of regional scales, to the<br />
more traditional scale of localized, highly detailed studies.<br />
It will. be important at all scales to insure that observations<br />
and samples are carried out in a sufficiently regular and<br />
closely-spaced fashion, and in particular that the sampling of<br />
periodic phenomena is complete and un-aliased.<br />
1. Global-scale Studies. There is a need for a global<br />
perspective on the lithosphere generation process, of the sort<br />
that can be acquired only by a complete inventory and systematic<br />
description of all active sites of ocean-crust accretion.<br />
Satellite observations can provide a data set with uniform<br />
coverage and accuracy, but at present of only low resolution.<br />
New shipboard observations are required to provide sufficient<br />
resolution for definition of the significant classes of<br />
accreting plate boundaries, fine-scale delineation of the plan<br />
pattern of their axes, and description of along-strike variations<br />
of such basic properties as depth, sediment thickness, and<br />
amount of hydrothermal discharge. Accordingly, we believe it is<br />
essential to accurately map the location of spreading axes on a<br />
global basis. We propose that a feasible program would consist<br />
of wide swath sonar and bathymetric imaging on a single<br />
longitudinal pass plus a seismic profile where appropriate,<br />
combined with regularly spaced geological sampling, photography<br />
and CTD measurements.<br />
33
2. Regional Surveys. Regional surveys should encompass<br />
several spreading segments and extend to at least 5 m. y. old<br />
crust. To characterize the physiography, full multibeam<br />
bathymetry and side-scan sonar coverage should be obtained, in<br />
conjunction with the acquisition of ship and airborne gravity<br />
and magnetic measurements (with a nominal spacing of not more<br />
than 5 km). These surveys should be followed or accompanied by<br />
the acquisition of marine seismic data, including multichannel<br />
seismic imaging along the ridge crest and along critical<br />
isochrons on the ridge flanks out to the 5 m. y. isochrons.<br />
Flow-line crossings should be conducted along several transects<br />
within each segment - adjacent to segment boundaries, across the<br />
center of a segment, and in I laces dominated by tectonism or<br />
volcanism. A suite of seismic refraction experiments should be<br />
conducted at several locations to define the deep structure of<br />
the ridge axis and of young oceanic lithosphere. These should<br />
be done at critical isochrons surveyed by reflection profiling.<br />
Microearthquake studies using arrays of on-bottom instruments<br />
should be made to describe the tectonics within the area of the<br />
seismic refraction experiments. The initial morphologic surveys<br />
will be used to guide systematic basement sampling on and<br />
off-axis, in conjunction with near-bottom photography, and other<br />
relevant in situ geophysical measurements.<br />
3. Detailed Local Studies. Detailed studies will be<br />
necessary at both the centers and the edges of spreading segments<br />
and may be separated into two groups: (1) studies that<br />
define the present architecture of the lithosphere and<br />
(2) studies that measure ongoing processes.<br />
The first group of studies requires geological mapping of<br />
the surface of the seafloor as well as investigations of the<br />
crust and mantle at depth. The geological mapping must be<br />
constrained by high resolution bathymetric and side scan sonar<br />
mapping base and include the areal extent of outcropping<br />
basement and surficial units, the locations and orientations of<br />
faults, fissures, ductile deformation features and any movement<br />
indicators on them, and active hydrothermal systems. Direct<br />
outcrop sampling is necessary for geochemical studies and<br />
oriented samples are essential for structural and magnetic<br />
studies. Detailed sampling and mapping of fault scarps could<br />
yield data on the volcanic and possibly plutonic stratigraphy of<br />
the crust. the crack structure and history of subsurface rocks,<br />
the alteration history of the crust, and the deep structure of<br />
hydrothermal systems. Developing a three-dimensional picture of<br />
the lithosphere is an integral part of these studies and it is<br />
likely that the most important data will come from direct<br />
sampling by deep drilling (kilometers depth) and shallower holes<br />
Ieven a few meters). Downhole logging and other experiments are<br />
needed to define the physical properties of rocks at depth.<br />
Correlations between physical properties and geophysical interfaces<br />
mapped from the regional surveys could produce a quantum<br />
leap in interpreting seismic structure. Gravity, magnetic and<br />
34
electromagnetic fields must be measured directly on the seafloor<br />
or in boreholes.<br />
The second class of data that must be collected is related<br />
to defining dynamic processes that can constrain modes of<br />
crustal deformation. These studies are more difficult to do<br />
because they require measurements over relatively long periods<br />
of time (years) mostly with devices that have not been previously<br />
used. These include measurements of strain and elevation<br />
changes in actively deforming areas with geodetic surveys and<br />
possibly strain meters and tilt meters, as well as long-term<br />
electromagnetic field measurements. Detailed locations and<br />
focal mechanisms for microearthquakes are needed to define fault<br />
geometry and kinematics in the brittle crust. These would be<br />
especially useful in conjunction with surface mapping and<br />
borehole monitoring.<br />
Laboratory, Theoretical, and Numerical Developments<br />
Important laboratory measurements that influence our understanding<br />
of mid-ocean ridge processes include both mechanical<br />
and electrical properties of rocks. We need a better<br />
understanding of the ductile strength or viscosity of crust and<br />
mantle rock particularly as a function of temperature, composition<br />
and degree of partial melting. Knowing the frictional<br />
resistance to sliding on existing faults and the critical stress<br />
intensity factor required to create new faults is essential for<br />
determining the brittle strength of the lithosphere. Elastic<br />
wave velocities, especially their dependence on temperature,<br />
degree of partial melting, and composition are important to<br />
interpreting the seismic velocity structure of ridge segments.<br />
Electrical properties, particularly the conductivity, will be<br />
needed to interpret electromagnetic observations. Laboratory<br />
studies will also be required for chemical and isotopic analysis<br />
and to develop new dating techniques, particularly ones which<br />
allow us to establish ages in the range of 0 to 10 years.<br />
Theoretical modelling studies and physical experiments allow<br />
us to examine simple physical systems or processes that may be<br />
important at ridge segments. Physical experiments include wax<br />
models, convection experiments, and porous flow/compaction<br />
experiments. Theoretical studies include convective and necking<br />
instability, crack propagation and fault growth. These ongoing<br />
types of studies will continue to provide new physical insight<br />
and understanding. Large-scale numerical experiments made<br />
possible by new developments in computer technology will allow<br />
us to theoretically model the interaction of individual<br />
processes.<br />
Seismic tomographic methodologies should be advanced to<br />
include amplitude effects. Multichannel seismic imaging of the<br />
subsurface requires major developments to account for scattering<br />
35
and rough topography. We further require the development of<br />
forward numerical modelling and inverse methods appropriate when<br />
the heterogeneities are on the order of seismic wavelengths of<br />
200 to 500 m, and that also account for the effects of surface<br />
and volume scattering, attenuation, and anisotropy at these<br />
scales. The integrated analysis of swath mapping, acoustic<br />
imaging, multichannel profiling, and aero-gravity and magnetics<br />
data will require the development of an interactive computer<br />
imaging and data analysis capacity.<br />
Marine Data Acquisition<br />
Our ability to initiate the measurement and sampling<br />
programs discussed above rests on the fact that new techniques,<br />
some brought into play only recently, are available to gather<br />
many of the types of data we need. These include multibeam echo<br />
sounding systems, acoustic and optical imaging techniques, ocean<br />
bottom seismographs, magnetometers, shipboard and airborne<br />
gravimeters and methods for controlled sampling of loose rock.<br />
The rates of coverage and the resolution of existing versions of<br />
these systems, while adequate for some purposes, leave much room<br />
for improvements and specific ideas exist as to how such<br />
improvements could be made. Beyond these existing instrument<br />
types there are new concepts emerging that could contribute<br />
substantially to our understanding of the generation and<br />
evolution of the lithosphere, and that could be available within<br />
the next few years. These include devices for obtaining<br />
oriented, fresh rock samples from selected outcrops; systems for<br />
measuring strain, tilt and elevation changes; and high<br />
resolution on-bottom gravimeters.<br />
Two challenging areas for the future lie in implementing an<br />
ability to locate and react rapidly to the occurrence of<br />
transient events {volcanic eruptions, earthquakes}; and in<br />
developing means for using deep drill holes after departure of<br />
the drilling ship. Under-way monitoring of hydrothermal venting<br />
would allow us to detect hydrothermal activity while conducting<br />
large-scale surveys.<br />
In addition to the measurement instruments required for<br />
particular types of data acquisition, there are several recent<br />
supporting technological advances that will enhance our ability<br />
to carry out sea foor tasks effectively. Fiber optic cables,<br />
remote operated cable connected and autonomous vehicles,<br />
improved computing and recording capacity for shipboard and sea<br />
floor data handling, and continuous high-accuracy satellite<br />
navigation will all help open new opportunities.<br />
Finally, it is clear that this program embodies significant<br />
ship requirements supporting a wide range of capability. For<br />
global and regional surveys we will need the use of a ship with<br />
well integrated survey capabilities for extensive periods. This<br />
36
capability should include at least swath bathymetry, acoustic<br />
imagery, and multichannel seismics. Ship support for handling<br />
seafloor work vehicles, remotely controlled sampling systems,<br />
bottom landers, and autonomous vehicles will also be required,<br />
and might well involve a second ship.<br />
Strategy<br />
Simultaneous efforts are deemed important on all scales.<br />
Development of an integrated survey capability should begin<br />
immediately followed by initiation of a global survey effort<br />
building upon existing data sets. This will be important in<br />
order to identify secondary regional sites. Primary regional<br />
site surveys should be identified and undertaken simultaneously,<br />
based on expansion of existing regional coverage in selected<br />
sites. Within these primary regional sites, initial detailed<br />
sites should be selected for development and deployment of<br />
needed capabilities as soon as they become available. Secondary<br />
regional and detailed sites should be identified from global and<br />
regional survey data.<br />
Planning these extensive survey efforts will require<br />
compilation and analysis of existing data sets. International<br />
and institutional collaboration should be fostered at all levels<br />
to insure that all possible data can be included. Plans for<br />
integration of new and existing data sets will also be required,<br />
along with consideration of standard format for data collection<br />
and exchange.<br />
Coordination<br />
Spatial and temporal measurements of ridge crest processes<br />
can contribute to our understanding of evolution of the lithosphere.<br />
Coordination of programs of data acquisition will be<br />
essential to maximizing the integration of data sets as well as<br />
overall coverage. Survey planning should include consideration<br />
of geological. geophysical, biological, and physical oceanographic<br />
requirements so that studies at selected sites will<br />
address the broadest range of objectives.<br />
Global and regional surveys should include techniques for<br />
detecting hydrothermal plumes, and for water and seafloor<br />
sampling capabilities so that survey work can be interrupted for<br />
more detailed study in the event of a major discovery. Detailed<br />
surveys will involve surface and bottom stations as well as<br />
underway survey work with various simultaneous efforts being not<br />
only possible but desirable. Here simultaneous measurements of<br />
seismic, stress-strain, and vent activity can teach us much<br />
about ridge crest processes.<br />
37
GROUP 4:<br />
SUBSEAFLOOR HYDROTHERMAL PROCESSES<br />
Members:<br />
Johnson Cann. Co-Chairman<br />
John Edmond. Co-Chairman<br />
Alan Chave. John Delaney. David Janecky.<br />
Marc Langseth. Robert Lowell. Russell McDuff.<br />
Peter Rona. William Seyfried. Wayne Shanks.<br />
Norman Sleep. Geoffrey Thompson. Richard von Herzen<br />
Motivation and Goals<br />
Seafloor hydrothermal systems are a central component of a<br />
dynamic process that transfers energy and mass through the crust<br />
of the earth. Chemical and thermal exchanges between the ocean<br />
and the oceanic crust in hydrothermal systems play a major role<br />
in the cooling of the earth. the genesis of many types of ore<br />
deposits. control of geochemical mass balances that influence<br />
the composition of the oceans. and the ecology of associated<br />
chemosynthetic animal communities. An order of magnitude<br />
estimate of the flow rate of seawater shows that the entire<br />
ocean is cycled through the oceanic crust every few million<br />
years. equivalent to a flow rate of several million gallons per<br />
second. The thermal power output of this system is about 10<br />
million megawatts. Previous and current research on seafloor<br />
hydrothermal systems has begun to address the complexity of the<br />
physical. chemical. and biological components involved in the<br />
interactions between circulating seawater and the lithosphere.<br />
New approaches are required to understand the physics and<br />
chemistry of t.he individual processes which produce t.emporal and<br />
spatial variability of hydrothermal circulation. and the<br />
geological products of rock-water interactions.<br />
Rocks and sediments which make up the seafloor are permeable.<br />
allowing wat.er to penetrate t.hrough t.he seafloor and into<br />
the oceanic lithosphere. The downwelling seawater is heated<br />
when it. flows near the magmat.ic sources which drive hydrothermal<br />
circulation. The most prominent locus of magmatic activity is<br />
the ridge system which extends through all the ocean basins. In<br />
addition. magmatic activity is associated with volcanic centers.<br />
Research into hydrothermal flow complements the investigations<br />
of magmatic systems proposed by Working Groups 1 and 2 and will<br />
reveal the intertwined dynamics of the magma-hydrothermal system.<br />
In fact. it is likely that hydrothermal activity strongly<br />
affects the depth and geometry of crustal magma chambers on<br />
mid-ocean ridges. A primary objective in the future study of<br />
the global mid-ocean ridge system is to understand the physical.<br />
chemical. and biological processes involved in the interactions<br />
between circulating seawater and the lithosphere.<br />
38
In order to understand subseafloor hydrothermal systems,<br />
energy transfer processes between the oceanic mantle and the<br />
seafloor must be defined. Because the individual components of<br />
hydrothermal systems are intimately connected to both<br />
deep-seated and near-surface processes, the critical problems<br />
cannot be easily separated or prioritized. Rather, a number of<br />
first order problems must be identified and addressed in a<br />
cohesive manner. The problems can be viewed as fundamental and<br />
inter-related, and work proposed below reflects our considerable<br />
ignorance concerning details of how hydrothermal systems<br />
operate.<br />
We have identified four primary areas about which future<br />
research might center.<br />
1. . Heat Transfer into Hydrothermal Systems. Does heat<br />
flow by conduction through the roof of a crustal magma chamber,<br />
or by propagation of cracks into hot rock? How closely coupled<br />
is magmatic and hydrothermal activity? How does the<br />
hydrothermal system respond to lava eruption, dike injection, or<br />
magma chamber replenishment events?<br />
2. The Hydrothermal Plumbing System. To what depth does<br />
hydrothermal circulation extend? What is the nature of the<br />
sub-surface permeability structure, and the scale and distribution<br />
of fracture networks? How is the plumbing system affected<br />
by chemical reactions and biological processes?<br />
3. Temporal Variability. What is the correlation between<br />
temporal variations in temperature, flow rate, and chemical<br />
composition of venting fluids? Does the variability reflect<br />
changes in the permeability structure and if so are the changes<br />
associated with chemical, biological or tectonic processes?<br />
Does the variability reflect changes in heat input?<br />
4. Spatial Variability. How do differences in mass flow<br />
rate, temperature, and chemical composition relate to differences<br />
in the magmatic and tectonic environment? To what extent<br />
might these differences reflect the transiency of the systems?<br />
Beneath these four first order problems lie a number of<br />
closely connected, secondary questions. Subsidiary in this<br />
context does not refer to relative geological and/or economic<br />
importance, but encompasses a relationship to the more<br />
fundamental questions listed above. These include:<br />
o What are the relationships between the components of<br />
mass flow in hydrothermal systems, including possible direct<br />
magmatic contributions to global geochemical cycles?<br />
o What is the nature of the chemical reactions between<br />
hydrothermal fluids and sediments?<br />
39
o What are the physical differences and relationships<br />
between high and low temperature hydrothermal systems? Onand<br />
off-axis systems? Bare and sedimented ridge systems?<br />
o What are the physical and chemical controls on the<br />
distribution and characteristics of sulfide mineral deposits?<br />
o What is the biological contribution to surface and<br />
subsurface chemical reactions?<br />
o What determines whether there is diffuse or organized<br />
(i.e.• black smoker) discharge?<br />
Background<br />
Background information on seafloor hydrothermal systems<br />
pertinent to the processes program is contained in the position<br />
papers by Cann and Edmond. and others. in Appendix II. The<br />
most important points are highlighted here for reference. but<br />
the pertinent papers should be consulted for details.<br />
1. Hydrothermal circulation is pervasive both on and off<br />
of mid-ocean ridge systems throughout the world oceans. as<br />
revealed by heat flow and temperature data.<br />
2. Alteration products from hydrothermal activity are<br />
widespread in seafloor rocks and their ophiolite analogs.<br />
3. luid chemistry for high temperature vents (up to<br />
400 0 C) has given information about the results of the<br />
alteration process anq the geometry of the systems.<br />
4. Laboratory experiments and theoretical modeling have<br />
constrained mechanisms of the alteration process.<br />
Approaches<br />
Several kinds of field data need to be obtained to elucidate<br />
the most important chemical and physical processes associated<br />
with hydrothermal systems.<br />
1. Detailed geological maps based on 3-D imaging<br />
techniques must be compiled with a spatial resolution of less<br />
than 1 m. and sampling of individual vent systems relating local<br />
geology to biological assemblages needs to be conducted with a<br />
similar accuracy. These must be coupled with precision dating<br />
of lava flows. hydrothermal products. vent fluids. biological<br />
communities. and other features. Analyses of ancient sediments<br />
and altered igneous rocks for paleochemical tracers to define<br />
the nature of hydrothermal activity through time should also be<br />
obtained. The results of related geological investigations of<br />
40
fossil hydrothermal systems in ophiolites and in other terrains<br />
must be integrated with seafloor studies.<br />
2. Geophysical data related to the subseafloor geometry<br />
and structure of porosity and permeability are essential. These<br />
data include seismic imaging, controlled source electromagnetic<br />
sounding, static magnetic properties of rocks. and density<br />
contrasts using seafloor and borehole gravimeters, all with<br />
instruments developed for high resolution.<br />
3. Heat flow, pore pressure, thermo-physical property. and<br />
chemical concentration gradient data in sediments associated<br />
with sediment-hosted hydrothermal systems must be collected.<br />
4. Measurements of vent flow parameters covering the full<br />
range from diffusive to jet-like flow are needed. The required<br />
observations include direct. non-intrusive measurements of fluid<br />
flow rates and fluxes, accurate and representative temperature<br />
data, and subseafloor pore lJressure and chemical concentration<br />
gradient data. Determinations of mixing rates at the sea floor<br />
and in sub-bottom regions, compositions of the different parts.<br />
and fluxes of chemical species are also important. Measurements<br />
of the total heat output of the entire exhalative zone of axial<br />
hydrothermal systems over time should be combined with<br />
observations of the acoustic and seismic signatures of active<br />
vents.<br />
5. The chemical composition of reactants and products.<br />
such as fluid components. hydrothermal precipitates, and altered<br />
rocks need to be measured. Inorganic. organic and isotopic<br />
analyses of these components must be integrated with these data.<br />
6. Measurements should be collected below the seafloor,<br />
including within ODP drill holes, of in situ physical parameters<br />
and chemical properties. These include standard and innovative<br />
wireline logs, geophysical experiments and geochemical<br />
measurements of many different kinds. Geophysical experiments<br />
may be required between boreholes. New, high temperature<br />
instruments are clearly necessary.<br />
7. These types of data must be combined with geophysical<br />
and petrological measurements of magma chamber properties, as<br />
well as geochemical and physical oceanographic measurements of<br />
surface plumes, to provide a coherent. large-scale picture of<br />
the entire seafloor hydrothermal system.<br />
In conjunction with field programs, laboratory. theoretical.<br />
and numerical developments must focus on specific geologic,<br />
geochemical and geophysical processes to constrain subseafloor<br />
water-rock interactions.<br />
41
o Laboratory experiments must test and generate thermodynamic<br />
and kinetic data for mineral reactions at elevated<br />
temperatures, pressures, and for varying salinity (0.5 to 2<br />
times that of seawater). Near-supercritical conditions should<br />
be emphasized. These experiments must address such issues as<br />
aqueous speciation (inorganic and organic), solid-solution<br />
relations for key alteration phases such as feldspar, chlorite,<br />
and epidote, and fluid-mineral trace element distributions.<br />
Analytical techniques must be developed to obtain more accurate<br />
measurements of trace element and isotopic systematics of<br />
hydrothermal alteration products. Ion and proton microprobe<br />
techniques are expected to be especially useful.<br />
o Numerical techniques and supporting data are required<br />
to permit the modeling in three dimensions of fluid flow in<br />
inhomogeneous ocean crustal rocks. Explicit account must be<br />
made of the temporal and spatial distributions of primary and<br />
secondary permeability (on macro to micro scales) and<br />
pressure-volume-temperature composition properties of fluids.<br />
The effect of different and variable heat transfer mechanisms<br />
must also be included.<br />
o Physical and chemical models of subseafloor hydrothermal<br />
processes must be coupled to include the interconnectedness<br />
of chemical and physical controls on fluid<br />
circulation.<br />
o Techniques must be developed to permit dating of<br />
fluids, igneous materials, and hydrothermal products. These<br />
techniques must make use of absolute and relative dating schemes<br />
and permit timing of events on scales of 1 to 1.000,000 years.<br />
Many of the measurement capabilities required to characterize<br />
seafloor hydrothermal systems need to be improved and<br />
refined.<br />
o Precise and routine positioning on the seafloor is<br />
essential for establishing spatial and temporal relationships.<br />
o Instruments for geophysical measurements and experiments,<br />
including seismic, controlled source electromagnetic,<br />
and passive acoustic, need to be optimized for characterizing<br />
the relevant spatial scales. The high data rates involved<br />
require rapid incorporation of evolving technologies for<br />
instrument control and data storage. Accurate and innovative<br />
permeability measurements in crustal rocks and sediments are<br />
also essential. Remotely operated vehicles (ROV's) should<br />
be developed into powerful tools for mapping, sampling, and<br />
experimental servicing.<br />
o Improved water sampling equipment is needed for use at<br />
high temperature vents and in boreholes. These need to be<br />
42
instrumented to record the environmental conditions during<br />
sampling. Contamination of samples with seawater, even from the<br />
small sampler dead volumes, presently precludes a number of key<br />
measurements. Chemical sensors and procedures for making<br />
in situ measurements need to be developed, both for documenting<br />
temporal variability of active vents and to provide data free of<br />
artifacts introduced by continued reaction within discrete<br />
samplers.<br />
Strategy<br />
We advocate a balanced, three-pronged, simultaneous approach<br />
in the fi rst stages:<br />
1. Exploration, a continued search for new and varied<br />
hydrothermal systems in a wide suite of geological environments,<br />
including island arc and back-arc terrains.<br />
2. Development of new sampling tools, chemical sensors and<br />
laboratory measurement techniques needed for the investigation<br />
of diverse physical and chemical processes, together with<br />
improvements in forward modeling and inversion techniques. New<br />
tool development should include both deep and shallow drilling<br />
capabilities for a high temperature environment.<br />
3. Initial deployment of instrumentation to make temporal<br />
measurements at specific vents and characterize the principal<br />
processes. These are essential as a guide in organizing future<br />
experiments, and devising new sensor technologies and<br />
approaches.<br />
We are in the initial stages of exploration for active<br />
hydrothermal systems, and already have discovered several major<br />
seafloor sulfide deposits. We predict that additional exploration<br />
will lead to near-term discovery of seafloor hydrothermal<br />
systems of unprecedented size and intensity, which would not<br />
only produce mineral deposits of potentially economic proportions,<br />
but would also yield major perturbations of the global<br />
geochemical cycle. Other discoveries are likely in back-arc,<br />
island arc, and seamount areas, where the systems will have very<br />
different characters from those of the open oceans. Many major<br />
fossil hydrothermal deposits are in sediment-dominated systems,<br />
and exploration in such areas may be especially interesting.<br />
In parallel with the program of exploration for new systems,<br />
testing of new instruments (chemical and physical sensors) and<br />
of instrumented packages for down-hole and/or long-term deployment<br />
must begin using submersibles, drillship time, ROVs, and<br />
limited-duration bottom moorings. ROVs (remotely operated<br />
vehicles) represent a particularly exciting prospect for undersea<br />
investigation of ridge crest hydrothermal systems. In the<br />
43
near future, it may be possible to design free swimming vehicles<br />
to conduct complex sampling and monitoring operations of hot<br />
spring emanations. Eventually, advanced robotics, artificial<br />
intelligence, and utilization of natural heat for power might<br />
lead to independent and long-term ocean bottom instrument<br />
packages.<br />
A later phase should include detailed studies of specific<br />
sites. We would anticipate that three sites should be chosen<br />
for initial study, identified as different based on our present<br />
knowledge of hydrothermal systems. We recommend that one of the<br />
sites should be a classic black-smoker, bare-rock site, with<br />
relatively small sulfide deposits, a second location should be<br />
selected on a sedimented ridge crest with more massive<br />
mineralization, and a third should include a low temperature<br />
hydrothermal system, possibly located off of the ridge axis.<br />
At these locations, intensive studies would include detailed<br />
geological mapping, determination of the temporal variability of<br />
the flow, testing of new instrumental configurations, and<br />
limited drilling. The contrasts between the sites will allow<br />
characterization of the fundamental differences between small<br />
(young?) and large (old?) bare rock systems, and between those<br />
and the sediment-hosted systems.<br />
Other kinds of targets can be envisaged, such as vents with<br />
salinity significantly above or below that of seawater, with<br />
unusually high or low temperature venting, back-arc or island<br />
arc terrains, unusually shallow water and deep water sites, and<br />
regions associated with seamount volcanos.<br />
As the exploration and initial seafloor experimentation<br />
phases, and subsequent long-term studies, develop and become<br />
more mature after the first few years, increased knowledge<br />
should enable the selection of one or more sites which have the<br />
most promise of augmenting our understanding of the sub-seafloor<br />
systems. At these sites, measurement and sampling should be<br />
done with the full array of techniques which are then available.<br />
Our goal is no less than the comprehensive description of how a<br />
sub-seafloor hydrothermal system is working, enabling us to<br />
estimate those characteristics which are most critical for<br />
determining the variability and similarity among all such<br />
systems. Only then can we make confident predictions of other<br />
systems not yet studied in detail or only partially<br />
characterized, and the extent to which they contribute to the<br />
overall heat and mass transfers on the entire mid-ocean ridge.<br />
44
GROUP 5:<br />
BIOLOGY OF HYDROTHERMAL SYSTEMS<br />
Members:<br />
James Childress, Co-Chairman<br />
George Somero, Co-Chairman<br />
John Baross, Daniel Desbruyeres, Fredrick Grassle,<br />
Eric Hartwig, Robert Hessler, Holger Jannasch,<br />
Richard Lutz, Michael Reeve, Gary Taghon,<br />
Philip Taylor<br />
Introduction<br />
Study of deep-sea hydrothermal vents has revealed several<br />
attributes that are extraordinary from a biological perspective.<br />
First, the energy source is geothermal rather than solar, with<br />
chemoautotrophic bacteria at the base of the food chain.<br />
Second, many of the animals have incorporated these bacteria as<br />
symbionts, resulting in unusual adaptations that are proving to<br />
be more widespread than we orginally imagined. Some of these<br />
adaptions enlarge our perceptions of biological possibilities on<br />
this planet. Third, some bacteria survive temperatures well<br />
above those we thought life could tolerate. This phenomenon is<br />
of fundamental importance to our understanding of the basic<br />
structure of living matter. Fourth, the great spatial and<br />
temporal variability in environmental parameters at vents stands<br />
in marked contrast to that usually encountered in the deep sea.<br />
These conditions alter the physiological. behavioral, reproductive,<br />
and dispersal requirements placed on the organisms.<br />
Finally, the vent fauna is largely different from the<br />
surrounding deep-sea fauna, often at high taxonomic levels.<br />
This dichotomy is puzzling, and its explanation will involve<br />
important aspects of ecological adaptation, population genetics<br />
and evolution.<br />
Given the strong dependence of biology on geochemical<br />
processes, vents provide a valuable "natural laboratory" to<br />
address, in detail, questions spanning levels of biological<br />
organization from individual cells to entire ecosystems. Our<br />
central objective is to determine the interactions of organisms<br />
with geological. chemical, and flow environments at mid-ocean<br />
ridges on time scales ranging from seconds to eras and spatial<br />
scales ranging from millimeters to global. The major components<br />
are elaborated in the following sections.<br />
45
Microbiology<br />
What is the qualitative and quantitative role of bacterial<br />
chemosynthesis for the biology of vent communities, and how do<br />
these bacteria affect the geochemistry of these systems?<br />
Chemosynthetic bacteria are the primary producers that<br />
support the complex animal communities found in all vent<br />
environments. Some of the associations between bacteria and<br />
animals have been identified, such as endosymbioses, while more<br />
loose associations involving meio- and macrofauna grazing are<br />
largely unknown. Sites of microbiological production and the<br />
sources of energy to sustain this activity in vent systems are<br />
complex and not yet adequately studied. The vent environments<br />
have markedly different chemical and physical characteristics:<br />
warm to super-heated waters, rock and smoker surfaces,<br />
sediments, water column including plumes, animals, and<br />
subcrustal areas.<br />
Microbiology must be considered within an interdisciplinary<br />
context that would (1) measure the rates of microbial growth and<br />
chemosynthetic activity associated with all vent environments<br />
and identify the complex interactions between microorganisms and<br />
the physical, chemical and geological properties in these<br />
environments, (2) identify the spatial and temporal variations<br />
in physiological characteristics and phylogenetic composition of<br />
unique vent microbial communities, (3) study the physiology of<br />
the diverse groups of aerobic and anaerobic bacterial isolates<br />
with emphasis on their catalytic roles in biogeochemical<br />
processes at various vent sites and assess the contribution of<br />
unusual thermophilic bacterial communities on these transformations,<br />
and (ll) develop the instrumentation for measurement of<br />
microbial activity in situ and apply molecular biological<br />
procedures to vent microbial communities.<br />
Physiology and Biochemistry of Vent Animals<br />
How do vent animals exploit chemosynthetic processes?<br />
Most of the large and dominant animals of the vent communities<br />
have incorporated into specialized tissues chemosynthetic<br />
bacteria (symbionts) which, like certain of the free-living<br />
bacteria discussed above, exploit the energy of reduced compounds<br />
which are contained in the vent water. In these highly<br />
developed symbioses, the host animal transports to the bacterial<br />
symbionts chemosynthetic substrates extracted from the vent<br />
waters; t.he bacteria ret.urn food mat.erials and building blocks<br />
t.o t.heir host. Underst.anding the physiology and biochemistry of<br />
t.hese symbioses is essential for interpreting the ecological and<br />
evolutionary patterns of marine communities and establishing<br />
linkages between the biology and the geochemistry of the vents.<br />
116
There are several key questions about these symbioses. One<br />
concerns the full spectrum of energy sources that these<br />
symbioses can exploit. Hydrogen sulfide is clearly a major<br />
energy source for some of the symbioses, but there is a strong<br />
possibililty that other reduced substances, e.g., methane<br />
(natural gas). hydrogen, manganese, iron, and ammonia, may be<br />
exploited as well. A second major question is how these energy<br />
sources are transported from the ambient water to the symbionts<br />
by the host.<br />
To investigate the exploitation of these energy resources,<br />
detailed studies of the chemistry of the vent waters bathing the<br />
animals must be paired with investigations of the physiological<br />
and biochemical properties of the intact symbioses as well as<br />
those of the separate bacterial and animal components.<br />
The life cycles of symbioses must be studied to learn how<br />
the animal selectively acquires the correct type of symbiont.<br />
and how the animal then regulates the culturing of the symbionts<br />
for its own benefit. How are bacterial numbers regulated? How<br />
does the animal control the release of nutrients from its<br />
symbionts?<br />
To achieve these goals, methodologies must be developed:<br />
(1) to allow maintenance and study of the organisms under<br />
conditions of temperature, pressure, and water chemistry that<br />
stimulate in situ conditions; (2) to permit the isolation,<br />
culturing,-and characterization of the sybmionts; and (3) to<br />
enable the determination of the nutrient exchanges between<br />
symbionts and hosts. These experimental questions must be<br />
applied to additional symbioses as they are discovered at ridge<br />
crests and at other sites where chemosynthetic food chains may<br />
exist. Likewise, these methods will allow precise studies of<br />
the impact of temporal and spatial variations in water chemistry<br />
on the functioning of the symbioses.<br />
How do animals survive in the toxic vent waters?<br />
In addition to serving as energy sources for chemosynthesis,<br />
certain of the reduced substances in the vent waters, notably<br />
hydrogen sulfide, are highly toxic. Thus, exploitation of these<br />
resources by symbiont-containing animals necessitates evolution<br />
of mechanisms for controlling their toxicity. Likewise,<br />
symbiont-free animals that take advantage of the vent milieu<br />
have solved the problems posed by toxic substances in the<br />
water. The ability to control the toxicity of sulfide may be<br />
the critical factor determining whether or not an animal can<br />
survive in and exploit the vent environment. The elucidation of<br />
the mechanisms used to detoxify sulfide and other poisonous<br />
substances in the vent waters will not only provide important<br />
i~sights into the biology of the vent organisms, but also will<br />
yield basic information on detoxification processes applicable<br />
to all animals, including humans.<br />
47
What are the interactions between vent animals and water<br />
chemistry?<br />
Critical to the understanding of the symbioses, indeed, to<br />
all facets of the vent biology program, is detailed study of the<br />
temporal and spatial variability in vent water chemistry. Using<br />
in situ analysis of water chemistry allows the description of<br />
the animals' chemical habitats as well as the animals' effects<br />
on that chemistry. A system for such analyses currently exists<br />
and is capable of analyzing a limited suite of substances<br />
(oxygen, sulfide, silicate) at time scales of minutes to hours.<br />
The full understanding of the interactions of water chemistry<br />
with organisms requires the development of in situ chemical<br />
analyzers capable of examining many more substances and working<br />
at both shorter (seconds) and longer (days and months) time<br />
scales.<br />
Population and Community Ecology<br />
How do vent populations and communities vary in response to<br />
the spatial mosaic and physical variations in the life of<br />
vents? Are there predictable spatial and successional species<br />
patterns?<br />
The answer to these questions requires an ability to plot<br />
faunal distributions throughout the duration of a vent. and to<br />
measure relevant physical parameters such as temperature,<br />
metabolic substrates or toxins, and water flux. Determination<br />
of the causes of these patterns will come from understanding of<br />
colonization processes, metabolic needs and limitations, growth,<br />
population dynamics, food webs, and other inter- and<br />
intra-specific relationships.<br />
The study of species interactions within a community<br />
involves sampling, continuous observation at single vents, and<br />
experimental manipulations such as chemical enrichments,<br />
redirection of flow, controlled anaerobic environments, and<br />
animal inclusions and exclusions.<br />
The central activity of temporal studies is repeated photographic<br />
surveys coupled with environmental assay and sampling of<br />
experimental sites. Improved techniques are necessary to<br />
conduct these activities. Most important is the ability to<br />
return to sites at regular intervals (about 1 year) to sample<br />
and experiment with minimal disturbance to the system. Image<br />
processing techniques developed for this application will<br />
greatly enhance photographic analysis. To maximize our<br />
understanding of the processes that lead to faunal change, this<br />
program must be joined to geological and chemical programs<br />
monitoring seismic events, subterranean precipitation, and<br />
variation in the chemistry and flux of vent waters.<br />
48
Dispersal of Organisms<br />
What are the biological and physical characteristics<br />
responsible for the dispersal and life histories of organisms at<br />
deep-sea hydrothermal vents?<br />
A concerted effort must be devoted to defining the range of<br />
reproductive strategies encountered among vent species and to<br />
obtaining a detailed understanding of the reproductive responses<br />
of vent organisms to environmental signals. Vent spacing, ridge<br />
segmentation, offset distances, and interposing land masses may<br />
provide barriers to gene exchange allowing chance events and<br />
local selection to influence the genetic composition of populations<br />
and species. The role of chance events and natural selection<br />
in the development of vent ecosystems will be understood<br />
through study of dispersal stages and genetic differentiation of<br />
populations.<br />
Vent chemistry and fluctuations in vent flow need to be<br />
related to life history features such as rate of growth, time to<br />
maturity, reproduction and mortality, and selective survival of<br />
post-settlement stages. The influence of hydrothermal plume<br />
dynamics andI or physical currents (mesoscale eddies, along-ridge<br />
transport, etc.) on the transport of various life history stages<br />
of vent organisms needs intense study, as does the distribution<br />
of such stages within both the water column and the benthic<br />
boundary layer. To address these problems it is paramount to<br />
know the duration of vent activity.<br />
Necessary sampling and analytical approaches include in situ<br />
chemical characterization of hydrothermal systems, measurements<br />
of rates of tissue accretion and skeletal deteriorationl<br />
dissolution, in situ organism manipulations, and efficient<br />
sampling of the plankton. In addition it is necessary to<br />
undertake physical oceanographic measurements, settlement and<br />
colonization substrate experiments, interpretative analyses of<br />
larval morphological features, studies of mitochondrial DNA, and<br />
gel electrophoretic studies.<br />
Speciation and Evolution<br />
What is the role of geographic isolation in the evolution of<br />
vent communities on ocean ridges?<br />
Evolution of vent communities is a reflection of long-term<br />
geological processes governing ridge and hydrothermal evolution.<br />
Linear spacing of vents and the isolation of entire ridge<br />
systems results in evolutionary processes on several spatial<br />
scales: separation of populations and species, evolution of one<br />
species into another, introduction of new species to the vent<br />
habitat. and co-evolution of the community members.<br />
49 .
Evolution can be examined by studies of on-going processes<br />
and by analysis of present patter~s in vie~ of hi~torical<br />
events. Extension of the populatIon genetIc studIes to<br />
comparisons on the species level will reveal taxonomic<br />
affinities. Smaller scales of evolution can be identified from<br />
community comparisons between separate segments of a ridge.<br />
Identification of major discontinuities in vent community<br />
composition along or among ridges should allow recognition of<br />
geographic centers of evolution. Fundamental geological<br />
differences among ridges, such as spreading rates, should be<br />
examined in terms of species diversity and adaptions in response<br />
to varying geochemical patterns. Communities in other deep-sea<br />
habitats dependent upon chemosynthetic energy are composed of<br />
different species; they may yield clues to the evolutionary<br />
origin of hydrothermal vent species. Analysis of fossil vent<br />
species in sulfides will give direct evidence of past<br />
evolutionary steps. Sedimented hydrothermal systems may<br />
preserve evidence for relationships between chemistry, bacteria,<br />
and animals.<br />
Specific data requirements include information from geology<br />
and geophysics on past ridge morphology and rifting history to<br />
identify times and methods of isolation. Parallel evolutionary<br />
adaptions to the vent habitat can be identified by comparisons<br />
of systematics and physiology. Traditional and genetic techniques<br />
should be employed in erection of animal phylogenies. A<br />
key technique to aid these studies is the refinement of<br />
mechanisms to identify the genetic differentiation in a variety<br />
of organisms.<br />
Plume Studies<br />
How do hydrothermal plumes contribute to the total biological<br />
productivity associated with vent and other benthic<br />
environments?<br />
Extensive plumes associated with hot vent systems represent<br />
the vertical and horizontal component of hydrothermally derived<br />
biologically important energy sources. These energy sources<br />
support a chemosynthesis based food chain, the significance of<br />
which is not known. The importance of plume systems as a source<br />
of chemosynthetically fixed carbon, and the fate of this organic<br />
carbon needs study. Species composition and feeding rates of<br />
zooplankton consuming plume bacteria and the role, if any,<br />
plumes have on the dispersal and nutrition of vent animal larvae<br />
are critical to understanding this system.<br />
50
Strategy<br />
Biological studies will emphasize four distinct scales of<br />
observation, sampling, and experimentation: (1) point scale of<br />
individual vents, (2) localized scale of vent fields,<br />
(3) regional scale of thousands of kilometers, and (4) global<br />
scale comparing regions.<br />
Required Techniques<br />
To achieve the listed objectives, the development and<br />
improvement of the following techniques are among the<br />
prerequisites:<br />
.!D. situ: (1) Instrumentation for chemical analyses of fluids<br />
on both instantaneous and long-term scales. (2) Instrumentation<br />
for measurement of microbial activity. (3) Measurements of<br />
animal growth rates and of soft and hard-part deterioration.<br />
(4) Organism manipulations for habitat alteration and colonization<br />
experiments. (5) A vehicle (remote or manned) available<br />
for, and capable of. repeated and non-disruptive visits to the<br />
same area. (6) Large- and small-scale photographic mapping.<br />
Laboratory: (1) Probes of the genetic make-up of organisms<br />
(ribosomal ribonucleic acid sequencing, isoenzyme assays,<br />
mitochondrial DNA comparisons, and DNA hybridization).<br />
(2) Equipment for maintenance of animals under simulated vent<br />
conditions. (3) Equipment for measurements of metabolism of<br />
microbes and animals under simulated vent conditions. 4. Image<br />
processing applied to deep-ocean photographs.<br />
Long-term: (1) Long-term bottom stations for continuous<br />
observations of specific sites. (2) Mechanisms for detecting<br />
biological markers in hydrothermal plumes. (3) Mechanisms for<br />
detecting subsurface life.<br />
Summary<br />
The chemosynthetically driven ecosystems of ridge crests can<br />
only be studied effectively if the physiologies, biochemistries,<br />
distributions, ecologies, and evolutionary histories of the<br />
microbial and animal species are linked to geochemical and<br />
geophysical processes. Basic understanding of the organismal<br />
adaptions enabling the tolerance and the exploitation of the<br />
vent waters, and comprehension of the way temporal and spatial<br />
variability in vent flow affect bacterial and animal life are<br />
the chief goals of the vent biology program. These goals can<br />
only be realized through complementary and collaborative programs<br />
in physical oceanography, geochemistry, and geophysics.<br />
Conversely, the success of these other, non-biological programs<br />
necessitates inputs from the biological studies, such as<br />
51
information concerning the effects of the organisms on water<br />
chemistry and the utility of biological observations as<br />
indicators of water chemistry, current regimes, and vent<br />
development.<br />
52
GROUP 6:<br />
WATER COLUMN DYNAMICS AND SEDIMENT PROCESSES<br />
Members:<br />
Jack Dymond, Co-Chairman<br />
John Lupton, Chairman<br />
Edward Baker, Edward Bernard, Robert Collier,<br />
Stephen Hammond, Gary Klinkhammer, Michael Mottl.<br />
David Ross, Richard Thompson<br />
Primary Objective<br />
To determine the distribution and intensity of mid-ocean<br />
hydrothermal venting and the interaction of venting with the<br />
ocean environment.<br />
Critical Problems<br />
1. To quantify the spatial and temporal variability in<br />
hydrothermal output along mid-ocean ridges.<br />
2. To quantify the effects of hydrothermal venting on the<br />
oceanic environment.<br />
Significant Characteristics and Processes of Venting<br />
1. Spatial Variability in Thermal and Chemical Output.<br />
The distribution of venting and flux of hydrothermal effluent<br />
are critical to modelling the ridge-ocean system. It is<br />
necessary to obtain this information on scales ranging from<br />
individual vent fields, to ridge segments, to oceanic basins.<br />
2. Temporal Variability in Hydrothermal Venting. Geophysical<br />
and geochemical evidence demonstrate that hydrothermal<br />
venting is variable over a wide range of time scales. These<br />
variations can be gradual or episodic. Temporal variations in<br />
venting contain important information about sub-seafloor processes.<br />
This variability must also be considered in designing<br />
plume sampling strategies.<br />
3. Global Scale Influence on Ocean Chemistry and Biology.<br />
The oceanic budgets of heat and mass are influenced by hydrothermal<br />
venting. The hydrothermal plumes provide energy,<br />
nutrients, and dispersal mechanisms for biological communities.<br />
53
4. Evolution of the Hydrothermal Plumes. The physical<br />
evolution of hydrothermal plumes depends on the interaction of<br />
the buoyancy and momentum flux of the plume with t.he local<br />
currents and density structure. These interactions determine<br />
the form of the hydrothermal plume. The chemical evolution<br />
includes transformations between dissolved constituents, fine<br />
advected particles and large settling particles. These<br />
transformations are mediated by organisms suspended in the<br />
hydrothermal plume.<br />
5. Low-temperature vs. High-temperature Venting. Although<br />
high~temperature, point-source venting is the most spectacular<br />
form of hydrothermal emission, it may not be the dominant source<br />
of heat and chemicals. The chemistry, biology and physics of<br />
low-temperature (diffuseI systems are different. The variety of<br />
venting types reflects a range of subsurface processes and<br />
produces distinct plume geometries and compositions.<br />
6. Off-axis Venting. Off-axis hydrothermal circulation is<br />
known to exist, but its role in mid-ocean ridge processes is<br />
uncertain.<br />
7. Plume-driven Oceanic Circulation. Heat and momentum<br />
injected by hydrothermal plumes may drive circulation in the<br />
deep ocean. The relevant flows range from local turbulent<br />
entrainment with vertical pumping to large-scale, quasigeostrophic<br />
buoyancy-driven circulation.<br />
8. Hydrothermal Effluents as Passive Tracers. Mapping the<br />
neutrally-buoyant effluent layer is a powerful tool for studying<br />
the physical processes of advection, mixing, and diffusion in<br />
the deep ocean.<br />
9. Sedimentary Records of Hydrothermal Activity. The<br />
sediments are the final repository for most of the materials<br />
injected at mid-ocean ridges. They contain a record of the<br />
variation of hydrothermal activity over geologic time scales.<br />
Depositional processes. bioturbation, and diagenesis determine<br />
the fidelity of this record.<br />
Observational Strategies<br />
Observational strategy is centered on three spatial scales:<br />
vent field (tens to hundreds of meters), ridge segment (100 to<br />
200 kmL and ocean basin (1000 kml. The level of temporal<br />
variability important in each case is proportional to the<br />
spatial scale. At the finest level. investigations will focus<br />
on submersible and surface ship determinations of<br />
vent-field-scale heat and mass flux by near-simultaneous<br />
measurements in the buoyant and neutrally buoyant plume.<br />
Variability on the scale of hours to months should be assessed<br />
by continuous monitoring of individual orifices and by moored<br />
sensors in the near-field plume.<br />
54
On the ridge segment scale, detailed plume mapping probably<br />
by sensors towed from surface ships will inventory the vent<br />
field distribution (both on and off axis ) for comparison to<br />
axial morphology, petrographic heterogeneity, geophysical<br />
variability, and faunal distributions. Techniques of flux<br />
determination developed by the detailed vent field studies will<br />
allow a reliable determination of the total segment - scale<br />
flux. Variability on an annual to decadal scale must be<br />
assessed by repeated surveys of selected segments, although the<br />
contribution of large but infrequent hydrothermal events should<br />
be continuously monitored by an appropriate distribution of<br />
moored sensors. Identification of such events will pinpoint<br />
fruitful locations for geological and geophysical studies.<br />
Basin scale studies have equal along and across-axis<br />
components and are central to the primary objective of<br />
determining the global effect of hydrothermal venting on the<br />
oceanic environment. Along-axis plume surveys, conducted<br />
simultaneously with geophysical surveys and calibrated by a few<br />
detailed segment-scale surveys, will provide a first-order<br />
estimate of the global magnitude and distribution of the<br />
hydrothermal flux. Across-axis surveys of the dispersing plume<br />
will establish the hydrothermal link to oceanic chemistry,<br />
mixing, and circulation. Complementary sediment studies provide<br />
the geologic history of venting.<br />
Data Collection and Measurement Capabilities<br />
We have identified four different scales in space and time<br />
over which data collection must occur.<br />
On the scale of an individual vent orifice or chimney, we<br />
require accurate measurements of the temperature and composition<br />
of the exiting hydrothermal fluids, both high and low temperature,<br />
including an estimate for the hydrothermal end-memberl s)<br />
feeding a vent field. These data are basic for characterizing<br />
the source of any hydrothermal plume. Measurements of mass and<br />
heat flux from individual high-temperature vents are also<br />
essential, along with video recordings of vent orifices to aid<br />
in quantifying the proportion of the total flux which occurs via<br />
hot, focused venting vs. cooler, diffuse venting. Technical<br />
improvements such as acoustic or electromagnetic flowmeters<br />
should be investigated for this application.<br />
On the scale of a vent field, on the order of 100 m x 100 m,<br />
we require detailed mapping of topography, geological and hydrothermal<br />
features, and physical and chemical parameters in the<br />
buoyant, rising plume( s) on a scale of a few meters to a few<br />
hundred meters. Fine-scale measurements of temperature,<br />
velocity. composition, and particle distribution are required<br />
because the rising plume is characterized by large gradients in<br />
space and time. Measurements on this scale should produce the<br />
55
most accurate estimates of heat and chemical flux from individual<br />
vent fields. They also are required for optimal placement<br />
of moorings designed to monitor variation in vent-field plumes<br />
with time.<br />
Vent-field monitoring is appropriate over time scales of<br />
weeks to months or longer, in order to measure possible<br />
variations in output resulting from subsurface processes. It<br />
should include thermistors, current meters, transmissometers,<br />
and chemical sensors. Sediment traps and novel remote sensors<br />
such as electromagnetic and acoustic doppler current meters,<br />
acoustic backscattering and tomography devices for measuring<br />
plume structure, and various chemical sensors would also be<br />
useful.<br />
Particles represent a major problem, both in characterizing<br />
their concentration and size distribution and in preventing<br />
their reaction with ambient water after sampling. .!.!:!. situ<br />
pumping and filtration as well as laser particle sizing should<br />
be developed or adapted to solve these problems.<br />
On the scale of one to several ridge segments, or about<br />
200 km along the axis, measurements have traditionally been made<br />
from surface ships. We recommend development of an apparatus<br />
for efficiently detecting and characterizing hydrothermal .<br />
plumes. The apparatus should be compatible with high-speed<br />
("'8 kts) geophysical surveys as well as with slower and more<br />
detailed vent-field surveys. It should at least measure<br />
temperature, conductivity, and light transmittance every 30 m<br />
over the lower 600 m of the water column and also higher, to<br />
detect both normal plumes and larger transient plumes as<br />
discovered in August 1986 on the S. Juan de Fuca <strong>Ridge</strong>. It<br />
could consist of an ROV, or of a towed fiber optic sensor array,<br />
with power supply and data processing equipment located on the<br />
ship rather than on the cable to reduce drag. The apparatus<br />
should be designed to accommodate additional chemical sensors as<br />
they become available.<br />
Monitoring from long-term moorings is also appropriate on<br />
the scale of a ridge segment. primarily to detect large<br />
intermittent, transient plumes such as that noted above, which<br />
had a diameter of 20 km. These moorings could detect a similar<br />
plume if spaced every 10 km. Once detected, it would be<br />
important to track such a plume, possibly with an instrumented,<br />
neutrally buoyant Lagrangrian drifter.<br />
The largest scale with which we are concerned is that of an<br />
ocean basin, equivalent to a 1000 km section of ridge axis. The<br />
apparatus described above, for characterizing plumes, used<br />
either alone or as part of a survey, should be capable of<br />
rapidly determining the presence or absence of plumes along the<br />
ridge axis over these distances. Off-axis advection and<br />
dispersal on the scale of an ocean basin can be evaluated using<br />
56
standard transect sampling and Lagrangian drifters. The<br />
development of Lagrangian drifters with in-situ chemical sensors<br />
would enhance our understanding of the long-term chemical<br />
evolution of hydrothermal emissions. .<br />
Laboratory, TheoreticaL and Numerical Modeling<br />
Laboratory, analytical and numerical simulation models provide<br />
valuable and instructive insight into ridge plume dynamics<br />
and variablity under controlled conditions. Such models will<br />
prove important to the interpretation of field observations and<br />
to the identification of key elements of plume dynamics.<br />
Refined plume models are needed to explain coalescing of<br />
multiple source vent fields and the effects of high frequency<br />
(tidal) cross-flow fluctuations on the spatial structure and<br />
temporal variability of plumes. Models will help predict the<br />
propagation, structural evolution and vorticity dynamics of<br />
episodic mesoscale plumes. Formed intermittently along<br />
mid-ocean ridges, these vent-like features are expected to<br />
display analogous behavior to warm and cold core eddies that<br />
proliferate within the upper ocean. Numerical simulation models<br />
are essential to our understanding of the general abyssal<br />
circulation and its interaction with mid-oceanic ridges. Such<br />
models are further needed to separate truly passive aspects of<br />
large scale plumes from active effects in which the plume<br />
induces modifications to the basin-scale background abyssal<br />
circulation. Models also should be applied to problems of<br />
particle-fluid transport within the heterogeneous media of vent<br />
fields. Modeling experiments are required for understanding the<br />
behavior of suspended particles and biological organisms within<br />
the circulation of oceanic plumes. This type of research is<br />
also essential for determining chemical process rates (such as<br />
metal and methane oxidation rates) within the plume environment<br />
and for providing estimates of the evolution and modification of<br />
advecting plumes. It is anticipated that many of the processes<br />
ubiquitous to hydrothermal vent sites can be accurately<br />
simulated through laboratory, analytical and numerical models.<br />
These models will help in the interpretation of observations<br />
within this convoluted oceanic regime and provide a basis for<br />
field experiments.<br />
Coordination with Other Investigations<br />
Plume studies are linked with other types of mid-ocean ridge<br />
investigations by commonalities in observational strategy and<br />
instrumentation. Improved cables and towed-sensors will<br />
facilitate simultaneous plume-mapping and geophysical surveys<br />
along ridge axes. The spacing and service requirements of seafloor<br />
instruments for both plume measurements and geophysical<br />
monitoring are comparable. Real-time detection of intense,<br />
episodic hydrothermal discharge may be helpful in locating foci<br />
of major crustal movements along ridge crests. Water column<br />
57
studie!; that coordinate plume measurements and biological<br />
sampling will advance our understanding of the ecological role<br />
of the plume in distributing organic matter, bacteria, and<br />
plankton away from the vent field. On the ocean-basin scale,<br />
plume tracer studies complement other global programs committed<br />
to understanding oceanic circulation (WOCE) and chemical fluxes<br />
(GOFS) •<br />
58
APPENDIX I<br />
The Mid-Oceanic <strong>Ridge</strong>:<br />
A Dynamic Global System<br />
Salishan Lodge, Gleneden Beach, Oregon<br />
6-10 April 1987<br />
Participant List<br />
Agnew, Duncan<br />
Scripps Institution of Oceanography<br />
University of California, San Diego<br />
IGPP A-025<br />
La Jolla, CA 92093<br />
Baross, John A.<br />
School of Oceanography WB-1O<br />
University of Washington<br />
Seattle, WA 98105<br />
Batiza, Rodey<br />
Department of Geological Sciences<br />
Northwestern University<br />
Locy Hall<br />
Evanston, IL 60201<br />
Bernard, Edward<br />
NOAA/PMEL<br />
7600 Sand Point Way, N.E" Bldg. 3<br />
Seattle, WA 98115<br />
Bryan, Wilfred B.<br />
Department of Geology and Geophysics<br />
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution<br />
Woods Hole, MA 02543<br />
Buck, .Roger<br />
Lamont-Doherty Geological ObserVatory<br />
Oceanography Building<br />
Palisades, NY 10964<br />
Cann, Johnson R.<br />
Department of Geology<br />
University of Newcastle upon Tyne<br />
Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU<br />
United Kingdom<br />
Chave, Alan<br />
AT&T Bell Labs<br />
600 Mountain Ave" Room 1E-444<br />
Murray Hill, NJ 07974<br />
59
Childress, James<br />
Department of Biological Sciences<br />
University of California, Santa Barbara<br />
Santa Barbara, CA93105.·<br />
Collier, Robert<br />
College of Oceanography<br />
Oregon State University<br />
Corvallis, OR 97330<br />
Cox, Charles<br />
Scripps Institution of Oceanography<br />
University of California, San Diego<br />
IGPP A-030<br />
La Jolla, CA 92093<br />
Delaney, John<br />
School of Oceanography, WB-lO<br />
University of Washington<br />
Seattle, WA 98195<br />
Denlinger, Roger<br />
U. S. Geological Survey<br />
c/o School of Oceanography WB-lO,<br />
University of Washington<br />
Seattle, WA 98195<br />
Desbruyeres, Daniel<br />
IFREMER - Center de Brest<br />
B. P. 337 - 29273 BREST CEDEX<br />
France<br />
Detrick, Robert<br />
Graduate School of Oceanography<br />
University of Rhode Island<br />
Kingston, RI 02881<br />
Dick, Henry<br />
Department of Geology and Geophysics<br />
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution<br />
Woods Hole, MA 02543<br />
Dymond, Jack<br />
College of Oceanography<br />
Oregon State University<br />
Corvallis, OR 97330<br />
Edmond, John<br />
Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and<br />
Planetary Sciences<br />
Massachusetts Institute of Technology<br />
Cambridge, MA 02139<br />
60
Forsyth, Donald<br />
Department of Geological Sciences<br />
Brown University<br />
Providence, RI 02412<br />
Fox, P. Jeff<br />
Graduate School of Oceanography<br />
University of Rhode Island<br />
Naraganssett, RI 02882<br />
Francheteau, Jean<br />
Institut de Physique de Globe<br />
Lab de Geophysique Marine<br />
Univ. Pierre & Marie Curie<br />
2 Place Jussieu<br />
75230 Paris CEDEX 05<br />
France<br />
Fujimoto, Hiromo<br />
Ocean Research Institute<br />
University of Tokyo<br />
1-15-1, MinamidaL Nakano-Ku<br />
Tokyo, 164 Japan<br />
Grassle, Fredrick<br />
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution<br />
Woods Hole, MA 02543<br />
Gronvold, Karl<br />
Nordic Geological Institute<br />
University of Iceland<br />
101 Reykjavik 354 1<br />
Iceland<br />
Gurnis, Michael<br />
Seismology Lab<br />
California Institute of Technology<br />
Mail Code 252/21<br />
Pasadena, CA 91125<br />
Hammond, Stephen<br />
OSU Hatfield Marine Science Center<br />
Newport. OR 97365<br />
Hartwig, Eric<br />
Office of Naval Research<br />
800 N. Quincy Street, Code 112<br />
Arlington, VA 22217<br />
Haxby, William F.<br />
Department of Geology<br />
Lamont-Doherty Geological Observatory<br />
Palisades, NY 10964<br />
61
Hessler. Robert<br />
Scripps Institution of Oceanography<br />
University of California. San Diego<br />
IGPP A-002<br />
La Jolla. CA 92093<br />
Hildebrand. John<br />
Scripps Institution of Oceanography<br />
Institute for Marine Resources<br />
La Jolla. CA 92093<br />
Janecky. David<br />
Los Alamos National Laboratory<br />
INC-7 MS J514<br />
Los Alamos. NM 87545<br />
Jannasch. Holger<br />
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution<br />
Woods Hole. MA 02543<br />
Karson. Jeffrey<br />
Department of Geology<br />
Duke University<br />
Old Chemistry Building<br />
Durham. NC 27706<br />
Katsouros. Ms. Mary Hope<br />
Ocean Studies Board<br />
National Research Council<br />
2101 Constitution Avenue. N.W.<br />
Washington. DC 20418<br />
Klinkhammer. Gary<br />
Department of Earth. Atmospheric. and<br />
Planetary Sciences<br />
Massachusetts Institute of Technology<br />
Cambridge. MA 02139<br />
Langmuir. Charles<br />
Lamont-Doherty Geological Observatory<br />
Palisades. NY 10964<br />
Langseth. Marcus<br />
Lamont-Doherty Geological Observatory<br />
Palisades. NY 10964<br />
Lister. Clive<br />
School of Oceanography. WB-lO<br />
University of Washington<br />
Seattle. WA 98195<br />
62
Lonsdale. Peter<br />
Scripps Institution of Oceanography<br />
University of California. San Diego<br />
IGPP A-005<br />
La Jolla. CA 92093<br />
Lowell. Robert<br />
National Science Foundation<br />
1800 G Street. NW. Room 606<br />
Washington. DC 20550<br />
Lupton. John<br />
Marine Science Institute<br />
University of California. Santa Barbara<br />
Santa Barbara. CA 93106<br />
Lutz. Richard<br />
Biology Department<br />
Rutgers University<br />
New Brunswick. NJ 08900<br />
MacDonald. Kenneth C.<br />
Department of Geological Sciences<br />
University of California. Santa Barbara<br />
Santa Barbara. CA 93106<br />
Malfait. Bruce<br />
National Science Foundation<br />
1800 G Street. NW. Room 605<br />
Washington. DC 20550<br />
Malpas. John<br />
Memorial University of Newfoundland<br />
Marine Sciences Research Laboratory<br />
St. John's. Newfoundland<br />
Canada<br />
Marshall. Ms. Judith<br />
Ocean Studies Board<br />
National Research Council<br />
2101 Constitution Avenue. N.W.<br />
Washington. DC 20418<br />
McCallum. I. Stewart<br />
Department of Geology AJ-20<br />
University of Washington<br />
Seattle. WA 98195<br />
McDuff. Russell<br />
Department of Oceanography. WB-10<br />
University of Washington<br />
Seattle. WA 98195<br />
63
Morton, Janet<br />
U. S. Geological Survey, MS 999<br />
345 Middlefield Road<br />
Menlo Park, CA 94025<br />
Mottl, Michael<br />
Hawaii Institute of Geophysics<br />
University of Hawaii<br />
2525 Correa Road<br />
Honolulu, HI 96822<br />
Mutter, John C.<br />
Lamont-Doherty Geological Observatory<br />
Palisades, NY 10964<br />
Nicolas, Adolphe<br />
Lab Tectonophysique<br />
Universite de Montpellier II<br />
Place Eugene Bataillon<br />
34060 Montpellier<br />
France<br />
Orcutt, John<br />
Scripps Institution of Oceanography<br />
University of California, San Diego<br />
IGPP A-025<br />
La Jolla, CA 92093<br />
Ostenso, Ned<br />
Director, National Sea Grant <strong>Program</strong><br />
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Admin.<br />
Room 918, Building 5<br />
6010 Executive Blvd.<br />
Rockville, MD 20852<br />
Parmentier, E. Marc<br />
Department of Geological Sciences<br />
Brown University<br />
Box 1846<br />
Providence. RI 02912<br />
Phipps Morgan, Jason<br />
Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and<br />
Planetary Sciences<br />
Massachusetts Institute of Technology<br />
Cambridge, MA 02139<br />
Purdy, G. M.<br />
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution<br />
Woods Hole, MA 02543<br />
64
Reeve, Michael<br />
National Science Foundation<br />
1800 G Street, NW, Room 611<br />
Washington, DC 20550<br />
Rohr, Kristin<br />
Pacific Geoscience Centre<br />
P.O. Box 6000<br />
Sidney, British Columbia<br />
V8l 4B2 Canada<br />
Rona, Peter A.<br />
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Admin.<br />
4301 Rickenbacker Causeway<br />
Miami, Fl 33149<br />
Ross, David A.<br />
Chairman, Marine Geology and Geophysics<br />
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution<br />
Woods Hole, MA 02543<br />
Sandwell, David<br />
Institute for Geophysics<br />
University of Texas at Austin<br />
Austin, TX 78751<br />
Schouten, Hans<br />
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution<br />
Woods Hole, MA 02543<br />
Searle, Roger C.<br />
Institute of Oceanographic Sciences<br />
Wormley, Godalming<br />
Surrey GU8 5UB<br />
United Kingdom<br />
Sempere, Jean-Christophe<br />
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution<br />
Woods Hole, MA 02543<br />
Seyfried, William E" Jr.<br />
Department of Geology and Geophysics<br />
University of Minnesota<br />
Minneapolis, MN 55455<br />
Shanks, Wayne<br />
U. S. Geological Survey<br />
12201 Sunrise Valley Drive<br />
Reston, VA 22092<br />
65
Sinton. John<br />
Hawaii Institute of Geophysics<br />
University of Hawaii<br />
Honolulu. HI 96822<br />
Sleep. Norman<br />
Department of Geophysics<br />
Stanford University<br />
Stanford. CA 94305<br />
Solomon. Sean C.<br />
Department of Earth. Atmospheric. and<br />
Planetary Sciences<br />
Massachusetts Institute of Technology<br />
54-522<br />
Cambridge. MA 02139<br />
Somero. George<br />
Marine Biology Research Division. A-002<br />
Scripps Institution of Oceanography<br />
University of California. San Diego<br />
la Jolla. CA 92093<br />
Spiess. Fred<br />
Institute for Marine Resources. A-028<br />
Scripps Institution of Oceanography<br />
University of California. San Diego<br />
la Jolla. CA 92093<br />
Stephen. Ralph A.<br />
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution<br />
Woods Hole. MA 02543<br />
Taghon. Gary<br />
Hatfield Marine Science Center<br />
Oregon State University<br />
Newport. OR 97365<br />
Taylor. Phillip<br />
National Science Foundation<br />
1800 G Street. N. W.<br />
Washington. DC 20550<br />
Thompson. Geoffrey<br />
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution<br />
Woods Hole. MA 02543<br />
Thomson. Richard E.<br />
Institute of Ocean Sciences<br />
P.O. Box 6000<br />
Sidney. British Columbia<br />
V8l 4B2 Canada<br />
66
Tunnicliffe, Verena<br />
University of Victoria<br />
Department of Biology<br />
Victoria, British Columbia<br />
V8W 2Y2 Canada<br />
Tyee, Robert<br />
School of Oceanography<br />
University of Rhode Island<br />
Kingston, RI 02882<br />
Von Herzen, Richard<br />
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution<br />
Woods Hole, MA 02543<br />
Whitehead, John A.<br />
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution<br />
Woods Hole, MA 02543<br />
67