08.02.2014 Views

Link to 3C Final Report - The Ohio State University

Link to 3C Final Report - The Ohio State University

Link to 3C Final Report - The Ohio State University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Ohio</strong> & Lake Erie Regional Rail - <strong>Ohio</strong> Hub Study<br />

Technical Memorandum & Business Plan<br />

2. Engineering Assessment and Capital Cost Estimates<br />

<strong>The</strong> Study Team conducted an Engineering Assessment in cooperation with Amtrak, the <strong>Ohio</strong><br />

Rail Development Commission, and the Indiana, Michigan and New York Departments of<br />

Transportation. In addition, railroad representatives attended Study Team meetings and<br />

participated in field reviews. <strong>The</strong> Engineering Assessment provides an evaluation of the current<br />

condition of the railroad infrastructure and rights-of-way; identifies improvements needed <strong>to</strong><br />

support the Modern (79-mph) and High-Speed (110-mph) passenger service scenarios; and<br />

provides capital cost estimates for route segment and alternative system configurations.<br />

In addition <strong>to</strong> the Engineering Assessment, this Chapter identifies rolling s<strong>to</strong>ck (equipment) costs<br />

and land costs. Land costs have been presented as a placeholder for access <strong>to</strong> railroad rights-ofway.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Engineering Assessment and its findings and recommendations are preliminary and have not<br />

been discussed in detail with the railroads. As discussed earlier, the Study is conceptual, the<br />

project is un-funded and formal negotiations with the railroads have not been initiated. Future<br />

Engineering Assessments will require considerably more discussion <strong>to</strong> ensure railroad<br />

concurrence. <strong>Final</strong> design concepts and recommended capital plans will depend on detailed<br />

operations analyses, design coordination and in-depth discussions with the freight railroads. As<br />

the project moves beyond the feasibility phase, railroad involvement and coordination will<br />

become increasingly important.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Engineering Assessment was conducted at a feasibility level of detail and accuracy. Exhibit<br />

2-1 highlights the levels of accuracy associated with typical phases of project development and<br />

engineering design. A low level of accuracy is associated with the evaluation of project<br />

feasibility; while the highest level of accuracy is achieved during final design and production of<br />

construction documents. <strong>The</strong> <strong>Ohio</strong> & Lake Erie Regional Rail – <strong>Ohio</strong> Hub Study is the first step<br />

in the project development process.<br />

Exhibit 2-1: Engineering Project Development Phases and Levels of Accuracy<br />

Development<br />

Phases<br />

Approximate Engineering<br />

Design Level*<br />

Approximate Level<br />

of Accuracy**<br />

Feasibility Study 0% +/- 30% or worse<br />

Project Definition/Advanced<br />

Planning<br />

1-2% +/- 25%<br />

Conceptual Engineering 10% +/- 20%<br />

Preliminary Engineering 30% +/- 15%<br />

Pre-<strong>Final</strong> Engineering 65% +/- 15%<br />

<strong>Final</strong> Design/Construction<br />

Documents<br />

100% +/- 10% or better<br />

*Percent of <strong>Final</strong> Design. **Percent of actual costs <strong>to</strong> construct.<br />

Table prepared by HNTB<br />

Section 2. Engineering Assessment and Capital Cost Estimates 2-1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!