Link to 3C Final Report - The Ohio State University
Link to 3C Final Report - The Ohio State University
Link to 3C Final Report - The Ohio State University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Ohio</strong> & Lake Erie Regional Rail - <strong>Ohio</strong> Hub Study<br />
Technical Memorandum & Business Plan<br />
2.3.2 Contingencies<br />
Contingencies for project development, design, engineering and construction have been added <strong>to</strong><br />
the cost estimates. Contingencies were applied as a percentage of the base capital cost of each<br />
infrastructure element. <strong>The</strong> contingency costs include:<br />
• Construction contingency 15%<br />
• Design contingency 0%<br />
• Design engineering 7%<br />
• Program Management 3%<br />
• Construction management and inspection 4%<br />
• Owner’s management – environmental, etc. 2%<br />
• Insurance 0%<br />
2.3.3 Placeholders<br />
In addition <strong>to</strong> the cost categories, the capital costs include placeholders as conservative estimates<br />
for large and/or complex engineering projects. At the low end, these include costs for new<br />
railroad connections, interlockings and signal improvements; at the high end, these include new<br />
highway bridges, river crossings, rail over rail grade separations, along with major capacity<br />
improvements in the yards and terminal areas.<br />
Placeholders provide lump sum budget approximations based on expert opinion rather than on an<br />
engineering estimate. Placeholders are used where detailed engineering requirements are not<br />
fully known. <strong>The</strong> following highlights some of the key placeholder costs that have been assumed<br />
in this analysis. <strong>The</strong>se costs will require special attention during the project development phase<br />
and include:<br />
• Connections for incorporating segments of the W&LE in<strong>to</strong> the proposed Cleveland-<br />
Pittsburgh alignment.<br />
• Connection track for incorporating the Freedom Secondary in<strong>to</strong> the proposed<br />
Youngs<strong>to</strong>wn alignment.<br />
• Costs for earthmoving and an <strong>Ohio</strong> Turnpike bridge for adding a third track <strong>to</strong> the<br />
Alliance line.<br />
• Capacity improvements on the Cleveland <strong>to</strong> Berea segment, including a new movable<br />
drawbridge bridge over the Cuyahoga River in down<strong>to</strong>wn Cleveland.<br />
• On the Berea <strong>to</strong> Toledo line, new interlockings at the Huron and Vermillion river bridges;<br />
a flyover at Vickers and a new Maumee River bridge<br />
• On the Toledo <strong>to</strong> Detroit line via either CN or CSX alignments, Airline Yard capacity<br />
enhancements, signal improvements and realignment of yard tracks.<br />
• On the CN from Toledo <strong>to</strong> Detroit, mainline capacity improvements, River Rouge Yard<br />
improvements and a new lift bridge over the River Rouge.<br />
• Between Cleveland and Buffalo, track improvements and capacity enhancements through<br />
the CSX Collinwood Yard, a flyover at Ashtabula and reconfiguration of tracks and<br />
signals at Erie.<br />
Section 2. Engineering Assessment and Capital Cost Estimates 2-13