08.02.2014 Views

Link to 3C Final Report - The Ohio State University

Link to 3C Final Report - The Ohio State University

Link to 3C Final Report - The Ohio State University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Ohio</strong> & Lake Erie Regional Rail - <strong>Ohio</strong> Hub Study<br />

Technical Memorandum & Business Plan<br />

2.3.2 Contingencies<br />

Contingencies for project development, design, engineering and construction have been added <strong>to</strong><br />

the cost estimates. Contingencies were applied as a percentage of the base capital cost of each<br />

infrastructure element. <strong>The</strong> contingency costs include:<br />

• Construction contingency 15%<br />

• Design contingency 0%<br />

• Design engineering 7%<br />

• Program Management 3%<br />

• Construction management and inspection 4%<br />

• Owner’s management – environmental, etc. 2%<br />

• Insurance 0%<br />

2.3.3 Placeholders<br />

In addition <strong>to</strong> the cost categories, the capital costs include placeholders as conservative estimates<br />

for large and/or complex engineering projects. At the low end, these include costs for new<br />

railroad connections, interlockings and signal improvements; at the high end, these include new<br />

highway bridges, river crossings, rail over rail grade separations, along with major capacity<br />

improvements in the yards and terminal areas.<br />

Placeholders provide lump sum budget approximations based on expert opinion rather than on an<br />

engineering estimate. Placeholders are used where detailed engineering requirements are not<br />

fully known. <strong>The</strong> following highlights some of the key placeholder costs that have been assumed<br />

in this analysis. <strong>The</strong>se costs will require special attention during the project development phase<br />

and include:<br />

• Connections for incorporating segments of the W&LE in<strong>to</strong> the proposed Cleveland-<br />

Pittsburgh alignment.<br />

• Connection track for incorporating the Freedom Secondary in<strong>to</strong> the proposed<br />

Youngs<strong>to</strong>wn alignment.<br />

• Costs for earthmoving and an <strong>Ohio</strong> Turnpike bridge for adding a third track <strong>to</strong> the<br />

Alliance line.<br />

• Capacity improvements on the Cleveland <strong>to</strong> Berea segment, including a new movable<br />

drawbridge bridge over the Cuyahoga River in down<strong>to</strong>wn Cleveland.<br />

• On the Berea <strong>to</strong> Toledo line, new interlockings at the Huron and Vermillion river bridges;<br />

a flyover at Vickers and a new Maumee River bridge<br />

• On the Toledo <strong>to</strong> Detroit line via either CN or CSX alignments, Airline Yard capacity<br />

enhancements, signal improvements and realignment of yard tracks.<br />

• On the CN from Toledo <strong>to</strong> Detroit, mainline capacity improvements, River Rouge Yard<br />

improvements and a new lift bridge over the River Rouge.<br />

• Between Cleveland and Buffalo, track improvements and capacity enhancements through<br />

the CSX Collinwood Yard, a flyover at Ashtabula and reconfiguration of tracks and<br />

signals at Erie.<br />

Section 2. Engineering Assessment and Capital Cost Estimates 2-13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!