08.02.2014 Views

Prace komisji nauk.pdf - Instytut Filologii Angielskiej Uniwersytetu ...

Prace komisji nauk.pdf - Instytut Filologii Angielskiej Uniwersytetu ...

Prace komisji nauk.pdf - Instytut Filologii Angielskiej Uniwersytetu ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ecause of the fact that they create a sort of social group. Such a social group is<br />

characterized by some norms and values that accompany each member in<br />

different situations. The question to deal with here is: can I attribute this group<br />

to a professional group, and is the hunter a type of occupation? The answer is<br />

often confusing. Thinking of the hunters, it seems to us that they work in a<br />

specific profession. Stanisław Grabias (2003: 82) writes about the professional<br />

lect that is “the language of the environment joined by the professional activity”.<br />

Among many professional lects Stanisław Grabias (2003) stresses the language<br />

of the hunters that the author names as a professional group. Stanisław Grabias<br />

(2003) assumes that we talk about hunting as a profession. Further, Stanisław<br />

Grabias (ibid.) adds that such a group uses the professional lect to communicate<br />

to each other. However, the opinion created by Stanisław Grabias is<br />

questionable. During my research I have checked if the profession of hunter<br />

appears in the classification of professions (Dreger 1996). 13 I did not find the<br />

hunter as a type of profession in the above-mentioned classification. Thus, I<br />

cannot define the hunters as a professional group. Hunting discourse, as the<br />

name indicates, is one type of discourse; it belongs to sporting discourse. This<br />

type of discourse appears as the group of hunters.<br />

As was suggested, hunters create a social group and use a sociolect in<br />

social interaction. Although they differ in the language (English, Polish,<br />

German) they use, their sociolect remains the same characteristic factors that are<br />

familiar only for hunters. Therefore, they still share the same set of rules<br />

ascribed to this notion. What is more, the communication between hunters is<br />

swifter and offers more possibilities in overcoming linguistic barriers. The<br />

environment and hunters’ need to communicate determine the basis for their<br />

sociolect. Referring to one of the definitions where sociolect is defined as one<br />

language variety linked with a social group, it can be noticed that the major<br />

13<br />

Dreger, Jadwiga (ed.) (1996) Klasyfikacja zawodów i specjalności. Warszawa:<br />

Ministerstwo Pracy i Polityki Społecznej, Główny Urząd Statystyczny.<br />

42

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!