US-built box crane - WorldCargo News Online
US-built box crane - WorldCargo News Online
US-built box crane - WorldCargo News Online
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
PORT NEWS<br />
APM Terminals for Dunkirk<br />
The Dunkirk Port Authority (PAD) has<br />
selected APM Terminals (APMT) to take<br />
over the management of the NFTI-ou<br />
container terminal. APMT was one of<br />
four companies reported to have responded<br />
to PAD’s tender for the<br />
underutilised deepwater facility in the<br />
western harbour, the others being DPI,<br />
CMA-CGM and Australia’s IIM (see<br />
<strong>WorldCargo</strong> <strong>News</strong> July 2005, p4).<br />
APMT parent company AP Møller-<br />
Maersk is already involved in Dunkirk<br />
through ro-ro operator Norfolkline,<br />
Maersk Logistics and DailyFresh Logistics,<br />
while Maersk Sealand’s AE7 and TA3<br />
strings call at NFTI-ou.<br />
As previously reported, PAD has been<br />
searching for a new partner at the terminal<br />
since 2003, when IFB reduced its stake<br />
by half in order to restructure its operations<br />
in Belgium. At the time NFTI-ou<br />
was set up in 2001, IFB owned 60 per<br />
cent and PAD 40 per cent of the shares,<br />
but reluctantly PAD had to increase its<br />
stake to 70 per cent.<br />
It is not yet clear what stake APMT<br />
will take in NFTI-ou, but clearly PAD<br />
wants to resume as a minority partner. It<br />
says that the agreement with APMT leaves<br />
open the possibility of other new shareholders<br />
at NFTI-ou.<br />
The terminal is expected to handle<br />
around 220,000 TEU this year, compared<br />
to 200,000 TEU in 2004. One of the<br />
objectives of the agreement with APMT<br />
Itapoá deal<br />
Hamburg-Süd’s Brazilian subsidiary,<br />
Aliança Navegação e Logística Ltda, and<br />
Grupo Battistella have announced their<br />
participation in the building of a new<br />
container terminal in Porto de Itapoá in<br />
Brazil’s Santa Catarina province. Aliança<br />
and Battistella will invest 44 per cent of<br />
the <strong>US</strong>$100 mill required to build the<br />
facility, with the remaining 56 per cent<br />
supplied by the Inter-American Development<br />
Bank .<br />
Tecon Santa Catarina (TSC), will be<br />
constructed in the Bay of Babitonga near<br />
the port of São Francisco do Sul. Container<br />
traffic in the Santa Caterina region<br />
has been growing recently by 15<br />
per cent/year.<br />
The 3-berth TSC is expected to become<br />
operational by early 2007 and, with<br />
depth of 16m alongside, will reportedly<br />
be able to handle vessels with a capacity<br />
of up to 9000 TEU.<br />
In its first phase TSC will have installed<br />
capacity to handle 300,000 containers/<br />
year. Currently around 700,000 containers/year<br />
are handled in São Francisco do<br />
Sul, Itajaí and Imbituba.<br />
Six companies have submitted request for<br />
qualification (RFQ) documents to build<br />
and operate a second container terminal<br />
at Tuticorin port in south India.<br />
PSA International. of Singapore in<br />
association with South India Corporation<br />
Agencies Ltd. (SICAL), its Indian joint<br />
venture partner, would appear to have an<br />
edge over other likely bidders as they already<br />
operate the existing container terminal<br />
at Tuticorin.<br />
The other bidders are Chettinad Logistics<br />
Pvt Ltd., Afcons Infrastructure in<br />
conjunction with United Liner Agencies,<br />
ABG Heavy Industries, Larsen & Toubro<br />
Ltd and Oceanic Transport of the UK.<br />
The Indian government’s policy is not<br />
to allow a terminal operator to bid for a<br />
second container terminal at a port where<br />
it is already running the first terminal.<br />
However, PSA-SICAL’s concession agreement<br />
for the first terminal says it will be<br />
allowed to bid for a second container terminal<br />
at the port if the port authorities<br />
decide to convert Berth 8 into a container<br />
terminal (see <strong>WorldCargo</strong> <strong>News</strong> June 2005,<br />
p10) and it is that berth that the Tuticorin<br />
Port Trust (TPT) is offering for the second<br />
terminal.<br />
TPT believes a second container ter-<br />
PAD is hoping that throughput at NFTI-ou will increase to 500,000 TEU/year by 2010<br />
is to increase throughput to at least 0.5<br />
mill TEU/year by 2010.<br />
Priorities for investment include three<br />
more post-Panamax gantry <strong>crane</strong>s, to station<br />
along the deep water Quai de Flandres<br />
extension and realise some of NFTI-ou’s<br />
massive potential. Apart from its<br />
infrastructural advantages (plenty of land,<br />
easy ship access, deep berths, etc), NFTIou<br />
is still unique in the context of French<br />
maritime container terminals in that it<br />
employs all its own <strong>crane</strong> drivers, stevedores,<br />
technical and administraion staff<br />
(hence “ou” standing for organisme unifié).<br />
Six in for Tuticorin<br />
PSA-SICAL, operator of the existing Tuticorin<br />
Container Terminal, is the favourite to win<br />
the bid for the port’s second terminal<br />
minal is required at the port because the<br />
first terminal may not be able to handle<br />
the growing traffic. The existing terminal<br />
has a quay length of 340m, which limits<br />
the number of vessels it can receive. In<br />
the year to last March, it handled 307,000<br />
TEU registering a growth of 21 per cent<br />
over the previous year.<br />
Converting Berth 8 into a container<br />
terminal is expected to cost Rs1.5 bill<br />
(<strong>US</strong>$34.5 mill). Scheduled to be operational<br />
by the end of 2006, it will have a<br />
draft of 10.7m and a capacity to handle<br />
450,000 TEU/year.<br />
The new concessionaires in Le Havre<br />
(Port 2000) and Marseille (Fos 2XL) have<br />
been trying to achieve a similar set-up, so<br />
that their expensive new <strong>crane</strong>s are not<br />
dependent on port authority drivers and<br />
maintenance regimes.<br />
Although the AP Møller-Maersk group<br />
obviously has opportunities for synergies<br />
in lo-lo, ro-ro and inland operations in<br />
Dunkirk, it is not clear how NFTI-ou fits<br />
into the bigger picture as the group has<br />
already taken over operation of the former<br />
Flanders Container Terminal in Zeebrugge,<br />
just 30-40 km along the coast.<br />
Massvlatke 2 tenders<br />
The Port of Rotterdam Authority (HBR)<br />
has started to invite tenders for the design<br />
and construction of Maasvlakte 2, its<br />
new port site of (eventually) 2000 hectares<br />
to be created alongside the current<br />
Maasvlakte. To optimise the logistics of<br />
this huge construction project and encourage<br />
the most bidders, HBR will combine<br />
a large number of operations into<br />
one contract.<br />
The tendering process is expected to<br />
take up to two years and the identity of<br />
the bid winner(s) must be known by summer<br />
2007 along with those of the first<br />
operators at the new facililities.<br />
The Dutch government’s “studies” are<br />
continuing. It has already agreed to contribute<br />
€50 mill to preliminary work and,<br />
once the project gets the definite goahead,<br />
will put in another €450 mill in<br />
exchange for a one third stake. The<br />
Dutch Parliament, for its part, is still investigating<br />
whether the HBR is a “reliable<br />
partner.”<br />
The contract which HBR wants to<br />
award is of the design and build type. Key<br />
elements include a 3000m long hard seawall,<br />
the removal of the 800m long existing<br />
hard seawall (where the ships will later<br />
sail from Maasvlakte 1 to Maasvlakte 2<br />
via the extended Yangtzehaven), construction<br />
of 8000m of soft seawall (artificial<br />
sand dunes), spraying on of 275 mill m 3<br />
of sand (enough for the 700 hectares of<br />
new terminals to be created in the first<br />
phase) and dredging the harbour basin and<br />
access channel via the Yangtzehaven.<br />
As indicated, HBR wants to organise<br />
first phase construction contracts and terminal<br />
lease contracts more or less coterminously,<br />
as a “launch customer” is a<br />
precondition of construction actually proceeding.<br />
In June, HBR reported that 15 companies<br />
- virtually all of the major international<br />
container terminal operators and<br />
container shipping lines - had expressed<br />
interest in operating a terminal there.<br />
Of course, they include lines which<br />
are currently customers of ECT. To guard<br />
against future traffic losses, ECT is prepared<br />
to offer exclusive berths and minority<br />
shareholdings in any new concessions<br />
it wins at Maasvlatke 2.<br />
Fatality in<br />
Tacoma<br />
ILWU stevedore Kimberly Miles was<br />
killed at the Port of Tacoma’s Pierce<br />
County container terminal on August 13<br />
when she was struck by a container falling<br />
from a vessel while walking along<br />
the dock.<br />
Local media have published conflicting<br />
reports on the cause of the accident<br />
with some saying that a “<strong>crane</strong> malfunction”<br />
knocked a container off a deck stow<br />
and others suggesting the <strong>crane</strong> driver<br />
had unintentionally hoisted two containers<br />
coupled vertically, the bottom one of<br />
which knocked another container off the<br />
vessel as the trolley was travelling to shore.<br />
Pierce County terminal is leased to<br />
Evergreen (which owns the <strong>crane</strong>s at this<br />
particular terminal) and is operated for<br />
the carrier by Marine Terminals Corp.<br />
The Washington Department of Labor<br />
and Industries is conducting an investigation<br />
into the accident and its report<br />
has not been made public. However,<br />
<strong>WorldCargo</strong> <strong>News</strong> understands that reports<br />
of a technical <strong>crane</strong> malfunction are incorrect.<br />
<strong>WorldCargo</strong><br />
news<br />
Cranes | Port Services | Lifttrucks<br />
CONTAINER<br />
HANDLING<br />
EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES<br />
Kone<strong>crane</strong>s is your partner to handle containers:<br />
STS <strong>crane</strong>s, RTGs, RMGs, Reachstackers, Toploaders, Forklifts,<br />
Positioning systems and Automation. Of course, tailored<br />
equipment and services to meet your unique requirements is<br />
our speciality.<br />
GET THE JOB DONE<br />
www.kone<strong>crane</strong>s.com<br />
CRANES<br />
KCI Special Cranes Corp. | P.O. Box 662 | FIN-05801 Hyvinkää, FINLAND<br />
Tel. +358 20 427 11 | Fax +358 20 427 2599<br />
PORT SERVICES<br />
KCI Kone<strong>crane</strong>s Port Services | Am Pferdemarkt 31 | D-30853, Langenhagen,<br />
GERMANY | Tel. +49 511 7704 0 | Fax +49 511 7704 477<br />
e-mail: info@noellkci.com<br />
REACHSTACKERS AND LIFTTRUCKS<br />
SMV Kone<strong>crane</strong>s Ab | Box 103 | SE- 285 23 Markaryd, SWEDEN<br />
Tel. +46 433 73300 | Fax +46 433 73310 | e-mail: info@smvlifttrucks.se<br />
www.smvlifttrucks.com<br />
September 2005 9