12.02.2014 Views

US-built box crane - WorldCargo News Online

US-built box crane - WorldCargo News Online

US-built box crane - WorldCargo News Online

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PORT NEWS<br />

APM Terminals for Dunkirk<br />

The Dunkirk Port Authority (PAD) has<br />

selected APM Terminals (APMT) to take<br />

over the management of the NFTI-ou<br />

container terminal. APMT was one of<br />

four companies reported to have responded<br />

to PAD’s tender for the<br />

underutilised deepwater facility in the<br />

western harbour, the others being DPI,<br />

CMA-CGM and Australia’s IIM (see<br />

<strong>WorldCargo</strong> <strong>News</strong> July 2005, p4).<br />

APMT parent company AP Møller-<br />

Maersk is already involved in Dunkirk<br />

through ro-ro operator Norfolkline,<br />

Maersk Logistics and DailyFresh Logistics,<br />

while Maersk Sealand’s AE7 and TA3<br />

strings call at NFTI-ou.<br />

As previously reported, PAD has been<br />

searching for a new partner at the terminal<br />

since 2003, when IFB reduced its stake<br />

by half in order to restructure its operations<br />

in Belgium. At the time NFTI-ou<br />

was set up in 2001, IFB owned 60 per<br />

cent and PAD 40 per cent of the shares,<br />

but reluctantly PAD had to increase its<br />

stake to 70 per cent.<br />

It is not yet clear what stake APMT<br />

will take in NFTI-ou, but clearly PAD<br />

wants to resume as a minority partner. It<br />

says that the agreement with APMT leaves<br />

open the possibility of other new shareholders<br />

at NFTI-ou.<br />

The terminal is expected to handle<br />

around 220,000 TEU this year, compared<br />

to 200,000 TEU in 2004. One of the<br />

objectives of the agreement with APMT<br />

Itapoá deal<br />

Hamburg-Süd’s Brazilian subsidiary,<br />

Aliança Navegação e Logística Ltda, and<br />

Grupo Battistella have announced their<br />

participation in the building of a new<br />

container terminal in Porto de Itapoá in<br />

Brazil’s Santa Catarina province. Aliança<br />

and Battistella will invest 44 per cent of<br />

the <strong>US</strong>$100 mill required to build the<br />

facility, with the remaining 56 per cent<br />

supplied by the Inter-American Development<br />

Bank .<br />

Tecon Santa Catarina (TSC), will be<br />

constructed in the Bay of Babitonga near<br />

the port of São Francisco do Sul. Container<br />

traffic in the Santa Caterina region<br />

has been growing recently by 15<br />

per cent/year.<br />

The 3-berth TSC is expected to become<br />

operational by early 2007 and, with<br />

depth of 16m alongside, will reportedly<br />

be able to handle vessels with a capacity<br />

of up to 9000 TEU.<br />

In its first phase TSC will have installed<br />

capacity to handle 300,000 containers/<br />

year. Currently around 700,000 containers/year<br />

are handled in São Francisco do<br />

Sul, Itajaí and Imbituba.<br />

Six companies have submitted request for<br />

qualification (RFQ) documents to build<br />

and operate a second container terminal<br />

at Tuticorin port in south India.<br />

PSA International. of Singapore in<br />

association with South India Corporation<br />

Agencies Ltd. (SICAL), its Indian joint<br />

venture partner, would appear to have an<br />

edge over other likely bidders as they already<br />

operate the existing container terminal<br />

at Tuticorin.<br />

The other bidders are Chettinad Logistics<br />

Pvt Ltd., Afcons Infrastructure in<br />

conjunction with United Liner Agencies,<br />

ABG Heavy Industries, Larsen & Toubro<br />

Ltd and Oceanic Transport of the UK.<br />

The Indian government’s policy is not<br />

to allow a terminal operator to bid for a<br />

second container terminal at a port where<br />

it is already running the first terminal.<br />

However, PSA-SICAL’s concession agreement<br />

for the first terminal says it will be<br />

allowed to bid for a second container terminal<br />

at the port if the port authorities<br />

decide to convert Berth 8 into a container<br />

terminal (see <strong>WorldCargo</strong> <strong>News</strong> June 2005,<br />

p10) and it is that berth that the Tuticorin<br />

Port Trust (TPT) is offering for the second<br />

terminal.<br />

TPT believes a second container ter-<br />

PAD is hoping that throughput at NFTI-ou will increase to 500,000 TEU/year by 2010<br />

is to increase throughput to at least 0.5<br />

mill TEU/year by 2010.<br />

Priorities for investment include three<br />

more post-Panamax gantry <strong>crane</strong>s, to station<br />

along the deep water Quai de Flandres<br />

extension and realise some of NFTI-ou’s<br />

massive potential. Apart from its<br />

infrastructural advantages (plenty of land,<br />

easy ship access, deep berths, etc), NFTIou<br />

is still unique in the context of French<br />

maritime container terminals in that it<br />

employs all its own <strong>crane</strong> drivers, stevedores,<br />

technical and administraion staff<br />

(hence “ou” standing for organisme unifié).<br />

Six in for Tuticorin<br />

PSA-SICAL, operator of the existing Tuticorin<br />

Container Terminal, is the favourite to win<br />

the bid for the port’s second terminal<br />

minal is required at the port because the<br />

first terminal may not be able to handle<br />

the growing traffic. The existing terminal<br />

has a quay length of 340m, which limits<br />

the number of vessels it can receive. In<br />

the year to last March, it handled 307,000<br />

TEU registering a growth of 21 per cent<br />

over the previous year.<br />

Converting Berth 8 into a container<br />

terminal is expected to cost Rs1.5 bill<br />

(<strong>US</strong>$34.5 mill). Scheduled to be operational<br />

by the end of 2006, it will have a<br />

draft of 10.7m and a capacity to handle<br />

450,000 TEU/year.<br />

The new concessionaires in Le Havre<br />

(Port 2000) and Marseille (Fos 2XL) have<br />

been trying to achieve a similar set-up, so<br />

that their expensive new <strong>crane</strong>s are not<br />

dependent on port authority drivers and<br />

maintenance regimes.<br />

Although the AP Møller-Maersk group<br />

obviously has opportunities for synergies<br />

in lo-lo, ro-ro and inland operations in<br />

Dunkirk, it is not clear how NFTI-ou fits<br />

into the bigger picture as the group has<br />

already taken over operation of the former<br />

Flanders Container Terminal in Zeebrugge,<br />

just 30-40 km along the coast.<br />

Massvlatke 2 tenders<br />

The Port of Rotterdam Authority (HBR)<br />

has started to invite tenders for the design<br />

and construction of Maasvlakte 2, its<br />

new port site of (eventually) 2000 hectares<br />

to be created alongside the current<br />

Maasvlakte. To optimise the logistics of<br />

this huge construction project and encourage<br />

the most bidders, HBR will combine<br />

a large number of operations into<br />

one contract.<br />

The tendering process is expected to<br />

take up to two years and the identity of<br />

the bid winner(s) must be known by summer<br />

2007 along with those of the first<br />

operators at the new facililities.<br />

The Dutch government’s “studies” are<br />

continuing. It has already agreed to contribute<br />

€50 mill to preliminary work and,<br />

once the project gets the definite goahead,<br />

will put in another €450 mill in<br />

exchange for a one third stake. The<br />

Dutch Parliament, for its part, is still investigating<br />

whether the HBR is a “reliable<br />

partner.”<br />

The contract which HBR wants to<br />

award is of the design and build type. Key<br />

elements include a 3000m long hard seawall,<br />

the removal of the 800m long existing<br />

hard seawall (where the ships will later<br />

sail from Maasvlakte 1 to Maasvlakte 2<br />

via the extended Yangtzehaven), construction<br />

of 8000m of soft seawall (artificial<br />

sand dunes), spraying on of 275 mill m 3<br />

of sand (enough for the 700 hectares of<br />

new terminals to be created in the first<br />

phase) and dredging the harbour basin and<br />

access channel via the Yangtzehaven.<br />

As indicated, HBR wants to organise<br />

first phase construction contracts and terminal<br />

lease contracts more or less coterminously,<br />

as a “launch customer” is a<br />

precondition of construction actually proceeding.<br />

In June, HBR reported that 15 companies<br />

- virtually all of the major international<br />

container terminal operators and<br />

container shipping lines - had expressed<br />

interest in operating a terminal there.<br />

Of course, they include lines which<br />

are currently customers of ECT. To guard<br />

against future traffic losses, ECT is prepared<br />

to offer exclusive berths and minority<br />

shareholdings in any new concessions<br />

it wins at Maasvlatke 2.<br />

Fatality in<br />

Tacoma<br />

ILWU stevedore Kimberly Miles was<br />

killed at the Port of Tacoma’s Pierce<br />

County container terminal on August 13<br />

when she was struck by a container falling<br />

from a vessel while walking along<br />

the dock.<br />

Local media have published conflicting<br />

reports on the cause of the accident<br />

with some saying that a “<strong>crane</strong> malfunction”<br />

knocked a container off a deck stow<br />

and others suggesting the <strong>crane</strong> driver<br />

had unintentionally hoisted two containers<br />

coupled vertically, the bottom one of<br />

which knocked another container off the<br />

vessel as the trolley was travelling to shore.<br />

Pierce County terminal is leased to<br />

Evergreen (which owns the <strong>crane</strong>s at this<br />

particular terminal) and is operated for<br />

the carrier by Marine Terminals Corp.<br />

The Washington Department of Labor<br />

and Industries is conducting an investigation<br />

into the accident and its report<br />

has not been made public. However,<br />

<strong>WorldCargo</strong> <strong>News</strong> understands that reports<br />

of a technical <strong>crane</strong> malfunction are incorrect.<br />

<strong>WorldCargo</strong><br />

news<br />

Cranes | Port Services | Lifttrucks<br />

CONTAINER<br />

HANDLING<br />

EQUIPMENT AND SERVICES<br />

Kone<strong>crane</strong>s is your partner to handle containers:<br />

STS <strong>crane</strong>s, RTGs, RMGs, Reachstackers, Toploaders, Forklifts,<br />

Positioning systems and Automation. Of course, tailored<br />

equipment and services to meet your unique requirements is<br />

our speciality.<br />

GET THE JOB DONE<br />

www.kone<strong>crane</strong>s.com<br />

CRANES<br />

KCI Special Cranes Corp. | P.O. Box 662 | FIN-05801 Hyvinkää, FINLAND<br />

Tel. +358 20 427 11 | Fax +358 20 427 2599<br />

PORT SERVICES<br />

KCI Kone<strong>crane</strong>s Port Services | Am Pferdemarkt 31 | D-30853, Langenhagen,<br />

GERMANY | Tel. +49 511 7704 0 | Fax +49 511 7704 477<br />

e-mail: info@noellkci.com<br />

REACHSTACKERS AND LIFTTRUCKS<br />

SMV Kone<strong>crane</strong>s Ab | Box 103 | SE- 285 23 Markaryd, SWEDEN<br />

Tel. +46 433 73300 | Fax +46 433 73310 | e-mail: info@smvlifttrucks.se<br />

www.smvlifttrucks.com<br />

September 2005 9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!