12.02.2014 Views

PDF Version - Glidewell Dental Labs

PDF Version - Glidewell Dental Labs

PDF Version - Glidewell Dental Labs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The rubber dam has been used for dozens of reasons: to<br />

provide a clear field; saliva and muscle control; aspiration<br />

and infection prevention; gingival isolation from caustic<br />

agents; and treatment time-saver. 1−9 Many clinicians and<br />

educators have insisted that the rubber dam should be<br />

routinely used in quality dentistry and medical-legal protection,<br />

even though good dental care (including successful<br />

malpractice defense) can be accomplished without<br />

it. 9−12 Although actively promoted in dental schools and<br />

literature, very few practitioners routinely use a rubber<br />

dam. 3,11<br />

Most dental literature describes the rubber dam in positive<br />

terms, but little is mentioned about its many hazards<br />

to the patient and staff or the many superior alternatives<br />

to its use. Because most literature stresses only the benefits<br />

of the rubber dam, this article will emphasize the<br />

dangers related to its use in an effort to encourage a balanced<br />

perspective.<br />

Figure 1: Most dams are made from latex and tend to tear.<br />

In the early days of dentistry, practitioners had few ways<br />

of controlling the oral environment during restorative<br />

work. The instruments and materials available to the<br />

dentist of the 1860s−1930s were used for lengthy procedures<br />

during which a completely dry and clearly visible<br />

field was needed. The rubber dam was developed for this<br />

purpose and numerous techniques were devised for its<br />

use. These techniques, compromises of classical dam<br />

technique, included the split dam, mini dam, double dam<br />

and large hole techniques. 4,13 In earlier times, use of the<br />

rubber dam was necessary to ensure a quality restoration<br />

or course of treatment. Today, such necessities are rare.<br />

Hazards<br />

The use of the rubber dam presents hazards that can<br />

be classified into three categories: material limitations,<br />

improper application and inadequate design situations.<br />

Figure 2: Damaged gingiva from a rubber dam clamp sliding apically<br />

Material Limitations of the Rubber Dam<br />

Most rubber dams are made from latex and tend to tear,<br />

leak and disintegrate as they quickly age, a process accelerated<br />

by a few days of exposure to air and its pollutants<br />

(0 3<br />

, NO 2<br />

) (Fig. 1). 4,14 Latex tends to decompose or melt<br />

near flame and under high-intensity lights (e.g., during<br />

bleaching). It is difficult to patch in the event of rips, it<br />

sticks to numerous restorative materials (impression putty,<br />

adhesives), and it can lose its integrity when exposed<br />

to certain solvents (e.g., alcohol, methacrylate). 2,19<br />

Figure 3: Radiograph of a rubber dam clamp and amalgam swallowed<br />

by a patient<br />

Rubber Dam Hazards45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!