PDF Version - Glidewell Dental Labs
PDF Version - Glidewell Dental Labs
PDF Version - Glidewell Dental Labs
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The rubber dam has been used for dozens of reasons: to<br />
provide a clear field; saliva and muscle control; aspiration<br />
and infection prevention; gingival isolation from caustic<br />
agents; and treatment time-saver. 1−9 Many clinicians and<br />
educators have insisted that the rubber dam should be<br />
routinely used in quality dentistry and medical-legal protection,<br />
even though good dental care (including successful<br />
malpractice defense) can be accomplished without<br />
it. 9−12 Although actively promoted in dental schools and<br />
literature, very few practitioners routinely use a rubber<br />
dam. 3,11<br />
Most dental literature describes the rubber dam in positive<br />
terms, but little is mentioned about its many hazards<br />
to the patient and staff or the many superior alternatives<br />
to its use. Because most literature stresses only the benefits<br />
of the rubber dam, this article will emphasize the<br />
dangers related to its use in an effort to encourage a balanced<br />
perspective.<br />
Figure 1: Most dams are made from latex and tend to tear.<br />
In the early days of dentistry, practitioners had few ways<br />
of controlling the oral environment during restorative<br />
work. The instruments and materials available to the<br />
dentist of the 1860s−1930s were used for lengthy procedures<br />
during which a completely dry and clearly visible<br />
field was needed. The rubber dam was developed for this<br />
purpose and numerous techniques were devised for its<br />
use. These techniques, compromises of classical dam<br />
technique, included the split dam, mini dam, double dam<br />
and large hole techniques. 4,13 In earlier times, use of the<br />
rubber dam was necessary to ensure a quality restoration<br />
or course of treatment. Today, such necessities are rare.<br />
Hazards<br />
The use of the rubber dam presents hazards that can<br />
be classified into three categories: material limitations,<br />
improper application and inadequate design situations.<br />
Figure 2: Damaged gingiva from a rubber dam clamp sliding apically<br />
Material Limitations of the Rubber Dam<br />
Most rubber dams are made from latex and tend to tear,<br />
leak and disintegrate as they quickly age, a process accelerated<br />
by a few days of exposure to air and its pollutants<br />
(0 3<br />
, NO 2<br />
) (Fig. 1). 4,14 Latex tends to decompose or melt<br />
near flame and under high-intensity lights (e.g., during<br />
bleaching). It is difficult to patch in the event of rips, it<br />
sticks to numerous restorative materials (impression putty,<br />
adhesives), and it can lose its integrity when exposed<br />
to certain solvents (e.g., alcohol, methacrylate). 2,19<br />
Figure 3: Radiograph of a rubber dam clamp and amalgam swallowed<br />
by a patient<br />
Rubber Dam Hazards45