13.02.2014 Views

FRONT MATTER.PMD - International Seabed Authority

FRONT MATTER.PMD - International Seabed Authority

FRONT MATTER.PMD - International Seabed Authority

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Foreword Contents<br />

xli<br />

It finally settles the breadth of the territorial sea at 12 nautical miles, with a guaranteed<br />

right of passage for international navigation in those waters; it ensures<br />

unhampered passage of vessels and aircraft through and over archipelagic waters and<br />

vital straits used for international navigation around the world; it secures for coastal<br />

States resource and environmental jurisdiction in a 200 nautical mile exclusive economic<br />

zone without limiting other legitimate activities in that zone by the international<br />

community; it imposes a duty on all States to ensure, through proper conservation and<br />

management measures, the long-term sustainable use of living resources; it provides<br />

for an extended continental shelf jurisdiction, combining scientific and geological criteria<br />

with distance criteria for determining precisely its outer limit and makes provision<br />

for the sharing of revenues from the resources of the shelf beyond the exclusive economic<br />

zone; it guarantees access to and from the sea for land-locked States; it provides<br />

for a regime for archipelagic States; it establishes an innovative regime for the development<br />

of the mineral resources of the deep seabed which is the common heritage of<br />

mankind, and from which eventually mankind as a whole is to benefit; it sets out rules<br />

for the conduct of marine scientific research; it contains the most comprehensive rules<br />

for the protection and preservation of the marine environment and imposes a duty on<br />

all States to protect the oceans from all sources of pollution; and it promotes peaceful<br />

settlement of disputes by establishing mechanisms and procedures for compulsory<br />

settlement of disputes arising from the interpretation and application of the provisions<br />

of the Convention.<br />

Thus the Convention has established certainty in the international law of the sea<br />

in place of the chaos that preceded it. In reviewing the old law and revising or replacing<br />

it where necessary, and by introducing new concepts and norms to meet the current<br />

needs of the international community, the Convention has revolutionized the international<br />

law of the sea. It did so through painstaking negotiation on each important issue<br />

and through the process of consensus building.<br />

The success of the Convention is determined not only by the number of States<br />

Parties – which is already remarkable and beyond all expectations – but also by its<br />

tangible achievements. The fundamental provisions of the Convention are consistently<br />

and uniformly applied in State practice. This is self-evident from a careful examination<br />

of the practice of States in all parts of the world. Those few States who have not<br />

become parties so far have certain specific difficulties peculiar to them. These are<br />

either internal constitutional problems or bilateral issues which cannot be resolved<br />

through a global treaty. On the other hand, in practice, most of these States recognize<br />

that the Convention reflects the current international law of the sea. Indeed, the Convention<br />

is recognized as the pre-eminent source of international law of the sea by<br />

States, the <strong>International</strong> Court of Justice, the <strong>International</strong> Tribunal for the Law of the<br />

Sea and other judicial or arbitral bodies dealing with marine-related issues and has<br />

become the basis for settlement of disputes on marine-related matters.<br />

The Convention has changed the political geography of the world by enclosing<br />

large areas of the oceans under the national jurisdiction of sovereign States. With the<br />

near-universal acceptance of the Convention, the problem today is not that there is no<br />

legal framework for ocean governance but rather how States should act in the discharge<br />

of their responsibilities under the Convention and in the exercise of the rights<br />

and duties ascribed to them for ocean governance.<br />

It is important to understand that the Convention is not a static instrument. It<br />

provides a basic framework for the conduct of relations among States on maritime

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!