16.02.2014 Views

equity carve-out (eco) - The Center for Paper Business and Industry ...

equity carve-out (eco) - The Center for Paper Business and Industry ...

equity carve-out (eco) - The Center for Paper Business and Industry ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

EQUITY CARVE-OUT (ECO) AS A FINANCIAL<br />

INSTRUMENT FOR CORPORATE RESTRUCTURING, WILL IT<br />

WORK FOR THE PULP AND PAPER INDUSTRY?<br />

V.R. (PERRY) PARTHASARATHY, PhD<br />

WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY<br />

PORT WENTWORTH, GA 31407<br />

2007 TAPPI Engineering, Pulping <strong>and</strong> Environmental Conference, Jacksonville, Florida, USA<br />

October 21 to 24, 2007


BREAKING UP IS GOOD TO DO.<br />

Restructuring through spin-offs <strong>and</strong> <strong>equity</strong> <strong>carve</strong>-<strong>out</strong>s can enhance<br />

Shareholder Value Creation (SVC)


o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Restructuring usually eliminates diffusion of management goals, a<br />

problem that goes h<strong>and</strong> in h<strong>and</strong> with big, diversified companies.<br />

When the aim is to focus on being the best at one or two things,<br />

restructuring make sense.<br />

Spin-Offs (SO) <strong>and</strong> Equity Carve-Outs (ECO) are used by large<br />

corporations <strong>for</strong> restructuring purposes. Used judiciously, SO <strong>and</strong><br />

ECO are important financial instruments that help corporations<br />

increase value.


CORPORATE EQUITY CLAIMS<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are three types of corporate <strong>equity</strong> claims:<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Tracking (or Targeted) Stock (TS),<br />

Majority-owned Equity Carve-Out (ECO) <strong>and</strong><br />

Spin-offs (SO).


CORPORATE EQUITY CLAIMS<br />

<strong>The</strong> Tracking Stock (TS) is a class of common stock that is linked to<br />

the per<strong>for</strong>mance of a specific business group within the diversified firm.<br />

Equity Carve-<strong>out</strong>s (ECO) are an IPO of a stake in a subsidiary. <strong>The</strong><br />

parent usually keeps majority ownership.<br />

Spin-offs (SO) occur when the entire ownership of a subsidiary is<br />

divested as a dividend to shareholders.


TRACKING STOCK (TS)<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

<strong>The</strong> financial reporting is separate <strong>for</strong> the TS from the parent but the<br />

control remains in the h<strong>and</strong>s of the parent company.<br />

TS is typically distributed as a dividend to shareholders of the parent<br />

company <strong>and</strong> can also take the <strong>for</strong>m of an Initial Public Offering<br />

(IPO).<br />

Even during its hay day, only two Pulp <strong>and</strong> <strong>Paper</strong> Companies had<br />

taken advantage of this instrument but that did not result in the<br />

enhancement of their corporate value.<br />

By 2006, the TS as a corporate restructuring tool had disappeared<br />

altogether <strong>and</strong> none was issued between 2001 <strong>and</strong> 2006.


EQUITY CARVE-OUT (ECO)<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

<strong>The</strong> ECO is different from TS in that <strong>equity</strong> partition creates welldefined<br />

<strong>equity</strong> claims on assets.<br />

ECO is the sale of a subsidiary by a publicly traded company by<br />

carving <strong>out</strong> a portion of its <strong>out</strong>st<strong>and</strong>ing shares through IPO.<br />

While the parent firm usually retains a controlling interest in the<br />

partitioned subsidiary, each ECO, however will have its own board,<br />

operating CEO, <strong>and</strong> will issue its own financial statement.<br />

Equity Carve-Outs (ECO) increase the access to capital markets,<br />

enabling ECO subsidiary strong growth opportunities while avoiding<br />

the negative signaling associated with a seasoned offering (SEO) of<br />

parent <strong>equity</strong>.


EQUITY CARVE-OUT (ECO)<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

In a twelve-year period between 1988 <strong>and</strong> 1999, the US stock market has seen 50 Carve<strong>out</strong>s,<br />

or ab<strong>out</strong> 10% of the IPOs issued.<br />

While the number of IPOs issued had increased at least three fold between the years<br />

1997 <strong>and</strong> 2006, the IPOs <strong>for</strong> ECO were not that many (Exhibit 1).<br />

Over the years, ECO as a corporate restructuring vehicle has shifted, <strong>for</strong> financial gain to<br />

strategic realignment.<br />

Percent<br />

Strategic<br />

Reasons<br />

Financial<br />

Reasons<br />

Strategic<br />

Reasons<br />

Financial<br />

Reasons<br />

EXHIBIT 1.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Trend in Asset<br />

Disaggregation<br />

Number<br />

of Events<br />

100%<br />

80%<br />

60%<br />

SPIN-OFF<br />

EQUITY CARVE-OUT (ECO)<br />

17 26 83 10 15 7<br />

88 50<br />

42<br />

80 44 25<br />

40%<br />

20%<br />

12<br />

50<br />

58<br />

80 20 44 56 25<br />

75<br />

1988-1993 1994-1996 1997-2006<br />

1988-1993 1994-1996<br />

1997-2006<br />

Source: Bloomberg, Financial Executives Research Foundation , Compustat Inc., Compustat SDC, BDCI SDC, Analysis<br />

BDCI Analysis


EQUITY CARVE-OUT (ECO)<br />

One thing sure ab<strong>out</strong> ECO is the inherent assumption that the asset that is being <strong>carve</strong>d-<strong>out</strong><br />

could not derive its full asset value under the existing corporate structure <strong>and</strong> a <strong>carve</strong>-<strong>out</strong> will<br />

accurately value the subsidiary if, part of the <strong>equity</strong> is <strong>carve</strong>d <strong>out</strong> <strong>and</strong> sold in an IPO (Exhibit 2).<br />

EXHIBIT 2.<br />

Equity Carve-Out<br />

(Pros <strong>and</strong> Cons)


EQUITY CARVE-OUT (ECO)<br />

o<br />

o<br />

Common <strong>equity</strong> is the cheapest yet the largest value distribution in the Enterprise<br />

Valuation of a company with multiple business segments.<br />

ECO gives a corporate parent an opportunity to get <strong>equity</strong> <strong>and</strong> at the same time<br />

increase its market capitalization by virtue of restructuring one of the units as a<br />

<strong>carve</strong>d-<strong>out</strong> entity<br />

TOTAL = 2000<br />

Convertible Securities<br />

200 250<br />

250<br />

Operation D<br />

Corporate<br />

Overhead<br />

1750<br />

*all values in million US$<br />

400<br />

Debt<br />

EXHIBIT 3.<br />

Valuation of an<br />

Enterprise with<br />

Multi-<strong>Business</strong><br />

Segments<br />

350<br />

Operation C<br />

450<br />

Operation B<br />

750*<br />

Operation A<br />

200<br />

1150<br />

Preferred<br />

Stock<br />

Common<br />

Equity Stock<br />

Value of the<br />

Enterprise<br />

Value<br />

Operating Units<br />

Value<br />

Distribution<br />

Source: “Valuation” – Measuring <strong>and</strong> Managing the Value of Companies: McKinsey & Company, Inc.,


EQUITY CARVE-OUT (ECO)<br />

o<br />

o<br />

<strong>The</strong>rmo-Electron (TE) is the most successful company to leverage ECO to deliver<br />

high returns to its shareholders.<br />

In 1982, TE was just a US $200 million company. By 1997, its market value was<br />

$5200 million (a whopping 2500%) through frequent <strong>equity</strong> partition of business<br />

segments <strong>and</strong> owning controlled interest in the ECO subsidiaries<br />

EXHIBIT 4.<br />

<strong>The</strong>rmo Electron’s<br />

ECO Examples


EQUITY CARVE-OUT (ECO)<br />

Equity Carve-Outs (ECO) <strong>out</strong> per<strong>for</strong>med SO on three financial metrics, Total Shareholder Return<br />

(TSR), change in leading P/E ratio <strong>and</strong> Return on Invested Capital (ROIC).<br />

EXHIBIT 5.<br />

Comparison of<br />

Per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

Metrics <strong>for</strong> ECO<br />

<strong>and</strong> SO


EQUITY CARVE-OUT (ECO)<br />

<strong>The</strong> Booz-Allen & Hamilton <strong>and</strong> SMU/<strong>The</strong> McKinsey Company studies which<br />

compared 78 merger deals between 1997 <strong>and</strong> 1998 <strong>and</strong> between 2002 <strong>and</strong><br />

2003 <strong>and</strong> worth more than $1 billion each, concluded that<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

48% of the mergers failed to deliver the promised cost savings over<br />

the two-year post-merger period.<br />

52 percent of them had fallen short of achieving the revenue growth.<br />

Almost one-third of the companies delivered less than 40% of<br />

the cost-savings that were used as the basis <strong>for</strong> the mergers.<br />

<strong>The</strong> previous pulp <strong>and</strong> paper industry mergers (<strong>and</strong> the premiums<br />

paid to acquire the companies) had been justified under potential<br />

cost savings rather than revenue growth put a big dent on their<br />

chance <strong>for</strong> success which came <strong>out</strong> to be true.


Pre-Merger Revenue Growth<br />

EQUITY CARVE-OUT (ECO)<br />

ECO on average has the strongest TSR or SVC per<strong>for</strong>mance of any restructuring vehicle <strong>and</strong> the track<br />

r<strong>eco</strong>rd of ECO on ROIC are far superior to Spin-offs (SO).<br />

Positive<br />

Slow Down of<br />

Solid Per<strong>for</strong>mers<br />

4<br />

3<br />

Great Earners Unfazed<br />

2<br />

EXHIBIT 6.<br />

Very Few<br />

Companies<br />

Achieved Success<br />

Through Mergers<br />

1<br />

-2 -1<br />

0<br />

1<br />

2 3<br />

0<br />

-1<br />

-2<br />

Bad Remains Bad<br />

Negative<br />

-3<br />

Very Few Players Per<strong>for</strong>m<br />

Negative<br />

Post-Merger Revenue Growth<br />

Positive<br />

Sample of more than 160 acquisitions by 157 publicly traded companies across 11 industries. Revenue growth calculated <strong>for</strong> combined entity<br />

5 years be<strong>for</strong>e <strong>and</strong> after mergers (1996-2005)<br />

Source: <strong>The</strong> McKinsey Quarterly 2001, Number 4.


EQUITY CARVE-OUT (ECO)<br />

o<br />

o<br />

o<br />

To deliver superior shareholder return, P&P industry can use, ECO as a<br />

corporate restructuring vehicle.<br />

For ECO to be successful, the parent company should have multi-segmented<br />

businesses <strong>and</strong> that the subsidiary can be separated easily from the parent<br />

with<strong>out</strong> creating huge transfer-pricing issues <strong>and</strong> also the subsidiary should<br />

have good prospects.<br />

Out of the eighteen large U.S. <strong>and</strong> Canadian pulp <strong>and</strong> paper companies, only<br />

six are truly multi-segmented businesses <strong>and</strong> only these companies can do an<br />

ECO or spin-off.


EQUITY CARVE-OUT (ECO)<br />

<strong>The</strong> majority-owned ECO is the most appropriate <strong>for</strong> P&P industry<br />

because:<br />

Out of the six P&P companies that are truly multi-segmented businesses, five of them<br />

have debt to <strong>equity</strong> ratio over 1.5 <strong>and</strong> there<strong>for</strong>e suffer huge capital constraints.<br />

ECO will allow the parent companies to raise capital at a fair-price <strong>and</strong> to fund projects<br />

that might otherwise depress earnings.


EQUITY CARVE-OUT (ECO)<br />

<strong>The</strong> majority-owned ECO is the most appropriate <strong>for</strong> P&P industry<br />

because:<br />

Certain businesses in pulp <strong>and</strong> paper companies, woodl<strong>and</strong>s or lumber, <strong>for</strong> example, can<br />

readily be separated with<strong>out</strong> involving transfer price problems.<br />

Be<strong>for</strong>e the ECO, both the boards need to review contractual agreements, including those<br />

establishing transfer prices, <strong>and</strong> agree on sharing other supports such as R&D, sales<br />

<strong>and</strong> marketing, <strong>and</strong> certain manufacturing resources, etc.


EQUITY CARVE-OUT (ECO)<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

Restructuring of corporations is usually carried-<strong>out</strong> to improve<br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance.<br />

A majority-owned <strong>equity</strong> <strong>carve</strong>-<strong>out</strong> is one such <strong>equity</strong> claim that would<br />

allow the <strong>carve</strong>d-<strong>out</strong> business units to improve per<strong>for</strong>mance by<br />

exposing them to the capital market <strong>and</strong> attracting new investors.<br />

ECO brings a new management team into the organization. This usually<br />

results in improvement in operating per<strong>for</strong>mance, providing<br />

incentives <strong>for</strong> managers <strong>and</strong> increasing their strategic flexibility.


EQUITY CARVE-OUT (ECO)<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

While mergers can be used as one of the tools to improve the<br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance of the pulp <strong>and</strong> paper industry, <strong>for</strong> companies with<br />

multi-segmented businesses, the ECO offers the best valueenhancing<br />

proposition<br />

If judiciously applied, ECO can help corporate management to increase<br />

value of both the parent <strong>and</strong> the <strong>carve</strong>d-<strong>out</strong> subsidiary.


Thanks.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!