21.02.2014 Views

Better Public Services Advisory Group Report - November 2011

Better Public Services Advisory Group Report - November 2011

Better Public Services Advisory Group Report - November 2011

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Leadership<br />

2.11 One of the defining characteristics of the current New Zealand public management<br />

system is how it concentrates decision-rights and accountabilities with the chief<br />

executives of agencies (or boards of Crown entities). These arrangements support a<br />

strong ability to deliver against the “vertical” commitments within a single agency but have<br />

constrained “horizontal” leadership – within sectors, across functional areas and for the<br />

system as a whole.<br />

2.12 Whilst there is some good leadership capability and capacity within the New Zealand<br />

state services currently, a much better level of leadership is required. In the <strong>Advisory</strong><br />

<strong>Group</strong>’s view, the results from recent agency reviews undertaken through the<br />

Performance Improvement Framework (PIF) process suggest that some of the most<br />

critical leadership capabilities are relatively weak.<br />

• Leadership teams are focused on the components of the business, not on<br />

governance.<br />

• Leaders are responsive to Ministers but are weaker in their ability to provide more<br />

strategic advice that is robust over time and that will meet future needs.<br />

• Leaders do not work effectively across organisational boundaries.<br />

• Leaders struggle to manage the people and change elements of their role.<br />

• Leaders are not using information effectively to drive their business, and lack the<br />

metrics to determine the effectiveness and efficiency of their business model and<br />

operations.<br />

2.13 The current New Zealand public management system has underperformed in driving<br />

results across departments, capturing economies of scale across agency boundaries,<br />

fostering scarce skill sets and talent for the benefit of the system, developing consistent<br />

interfaces for citizens and businesses and prioritising and planning across the whole<br />

public sector. For leaders to exercise effective horizontal leadership, the <strong>Advisory</strong> <strong>Group</strong><br />

considers that decision-rights will have to be rebalanced to provide a clear mandate for<br />

leading across agency boundaries.<br />

2.14 The State Sector Act 1988 supports a politically neutral public service, and devolves<br />

responsibility to chief executives for running government departments. Again, an overemphasis<br />

on clear vertical lines of accountability can get in the way of flexibility across<br />

the state services.<br />

21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!