22.02.2014 Views

Warm Homes Evaluation Summary - Bradford Metropolitan District ...

Warm Homes Evaluation Summary - Bradford Metropolitan District ...

Warm Homes Evaluation Summary - Bradford Metropolitan District ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

BRADFORD AND DISTRICT WARM HOMES HEALTHY PEOPLE PROGRAMME EVALUATION SUMMARY<br />

5<br />

Theme 5 – Flexibility, trust and goodwill<br />

There was total commitment by partners to make the programme and<br />

partnership work.<br />

Goodwill from individuals, and between partners impacted on every aspect of<br />

this programme.<br />

Partners felt that the Council worked well, worked flexibly, with a real respect<br />

for them and trust in what they were doing.<br />

Processes used were designed to be as flexible as possible, whilst meeting the<br />

Department of Health criteria. The Council managed the programme well.<br />

The absence of unnecessary bureaucracy was welcomed by all.<br />

Partners felt this allowed them to get on and provide the best and most<br />

responsive service.<br />

“I found that the team at the Council were excellent. It was very, very clear<br />

and yet they allowed the autonomy to work out what we would do. We could<br />

make our own professional judgement.”<br />

A number of challenges were highlighted however:<br />

There were no common systems for finance or outputs. As a result it is<br />

not possible to give fully accurate simple figures for total services in the<br />

evaluation report.<br />

Some partners felt that they would have appreciated more guidance on<br />

expectations, attending meetings, what data to collect and monitoring to<br />

undertake, finance, and spend processes.<br />

6<br />

Theme 6 – Effect of timescales<br />

All respondents said the speed had been too fast and they would have liked<br />

more time to plan.<br />

There were occasions when existing bureaucracy within agencies got in the<br />

way.<br />

As a result, at times they felt it was a ‘leap of faith’ as to whether their plans<br />

would work.<br />

However the evaluation found that the speed may have had a beneficial impact on<br />

the programme and helped the programme work well:<br />

The speed resulted in the lack of unnecessary bureaucracy.<br />

There was a focus on action not process; people just got on with doing the job<br />

and delivering to vulnerable and needy people.<br />

7<br />

“The partnership working was good, all set up really quickly. Sometimes you<br />

can over-plan stuff. Working relationships in the area are really good and in<br />

reality it all worked out in the end. I’d rather have that than have 6 months of<br />

planning.”

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!