25.02.2014 Views

andrew of caesarea and the apocalypse in the ancient church of the ...

andrew of caesarea and the apocalypse in the ancient church of the ...

andrew of caesarea and the apocalypse in the ancient church of the ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

-32-<br />

tradition rema<strong>in</strong>ed even well after written gospels existed <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> présence <strong>of</strong> float<strong>in</strong>g<br />

logia <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> second century Fa<strong>the</strong>rs confirais <strong>the</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g rich oral tradition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> "words<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lord."<br />

Until <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> second century, <strong>the</strong> term "Scriptures," referred exclusively to <strong>the</strong><br />

Jewish scriptures. Just as <strong>the</strong>y had been <strong>the</strong> sole Scriptures for Christ <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> apostles <strong>the</strong>y<br />

rema<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>the</strong> only Holy Scripture <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Church for many décades. Christ himself had quoted<br />

<strong>the</strong>m, appealed to <strong>the</strong>m, <strong>in</strong>terpreted <strong>the</strong>m <strong>and</strong>, most <strong>of</strong> ail, fulfilled <strong>the</strong>m. The Law <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Prophets had been normative for so long that it was difficult to conceive <strong>of</strong> any o<strong>the</strong>r writ<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

achiev<strong>in</strong>g such high status. Although it appears that Christian documents were read with<strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> context <strong>of</strong> Christian worship services by <strong>the</strong> early second century, ano<strong>the</strong>r hundred years<br />

passed before <strong>the</strong>y were recognized as possess<strong>in</strong>g a level <strong>of</strong> authority that placed <strong>the</strong>m on par<br />

with <strong>the</strong> Old Testament.<br />

Christian writ<strong>in</strong>gs were clearly subord<strong>in</strong>ate to <strong>the</strong> revered Jewish Scriptures, writ<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

which <strong>the</strong> Church had appropriated as its own. Scripture was sacrosanct. Scripture was<br />

unalterable. Scripture was holy. Even <strong>the</strong> four gospels — while respected as "<strong>the</strong> memoirs <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> apostles" 99 were not truly considered Holy Scripture <strong>in</strong> this highest <strong>and</strong> most déf<strong>in</strong>itive<br />

sensé until <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> second century. 100 The earliest évidence support<strong>in</strong>g this conclusion<br />

can be found with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> gospels <strong>the</strong>mselves. The evangelists <strong>the</strong>mselves <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir disciples<br />

never thought <strong>of</strong> ei<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>ir own writ<strong>in</strong>gs or <strong>the</strong> earlier sources <strong>the</strong>y relied upon for <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

gospels as Scripture. Our présent gospels are <strong>the</strong> products <strong>of</strong> a certa<strong>in</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> editorial<br />

Eusebius records Papias as writ<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Papias' no longer extant work Exposition <strong>of</strong> Dom<strong>in</strong>ical Oracles: "I do<br />

not suppose that <strong>in</strong>formation from books would help me so much as <strong>the</strong> word <strong>of</strong> a liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> surviv<strong>in</strong>g voice."<br />

E.H. 3.39.3-4. Eusebius, The Ecclesiastical History (2 vols.), trans. Kirsopp Lake (vol. 1) <strong>and</strong> J.E.L. Oulton<br />

(vol. 2), Loeb Classical Library séries, vols. 153 <strong>and</strong> 265 (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1926, 1932,<br />

repr<strong>in</strong>t 1998, 1994), 1:293. See Harry Gamble who comments that <strong>the</strong> same sentiments were also found <strong>in</strong><br />

pagan literature <strong>and</strong> cites L. Alex<strong>and</strong>er "The Liv<strong>in</strong>g Voice: Skepticism towards <strong>the</strong> Written Word <strong>in</strong> early<br />

Christian <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> Graeco-Roman Texts," <strong>in</strong> The Bible <strong>in</strong> Three Dimensions, éd. D.J.A. Cl<strong>in</strong>es (Sheffield: JSOT<br />

Press, 1990), 221-247. Harry Gamble, Books <strong>and</strong> Readers <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Early Church: A History <strong>of</strong> Early Christian<br />

Texts, (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1995), 31-32. Gamble believes that Papias seems to be stat<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

préférence for first-h<strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>and</strong> personal <strong>in</strong>struction, <strong>and</strong> was not necessarily disparag<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> written<br />

word.<br />

19 Just<strong>in</strong> Martyr, First Apology 67.3. Just<strong>in</strong> Martyr, The First Apology, trans. M. Dods <strong>and</strong> G. Reith, The<br />

Apostolic Fa<strong>the</strong>rs with Just<strong>in</strong> Martyr <strong>and</strong> Irenaeus, eds. Alex<strong>and</strong>er Roberts <strong>and</strong> James Donaldson. Ante-Nicene<br />

Fa<strong>the</strong>rs séries, vol. I (Gr<strong>and</strong> Rapids: Wm B. Eerdmans Publish<strong>in</strong>g Company, repr<strong>in</strong>ted 1989), 186.<br />

100<br />

One h<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> this fact is that <strong>the</strong> term "New Testament" first appears around this time, plac<strong>in</strong>g Christian<br />

writ<strong>in</strong>gs on par with <strong>the</strong> Jewish Scriptures. The term was co<strong>in</strong>ed by an unknown author writ<strong>in</strong>g aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong><br />

Montanists <strong>in</strong> 192 CE. He was quoted by Eusebius Ecclesiastical History 5.16.3.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!