26.02.2014 Views

gas for energy Reliability matters (Vorschau)

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2013_11_Anzeigeg4e_OH.indd 1 07.11.2013 07:22:16<br />

03–2013<br />

www.<strong>gas</strong>-<strong>for</strong>-<strong>energy</strong>.com<br />

<strong>gas</strong><strong>for</strong><strong>energy</strong><br />

ISSN 2192-158X<br />

Magazine <strong>for</strong> Smart Gas Technologies,<br />

Infrastructure and Utilisation<br />

DIV Deutscher Industrieverlag GmbH<br />

Gas quality<br />

in <strong>gas</strong> systems<br />

reliability <strong>matters</strong><br />

The natural <strong>gas</strong> business is demanding. Service<br />

organizations need a proven solution to measure <strong>gas</strong><br />

flow and correct <strong>for</strong> volume in custody transfer and<br />

secondary metering applications. With decades of<br />

natural <strong>gas</strong> measurement and control experience,<br />

RMG by Honeywell has developed the ERZ 2000-NG,<br />

the approved and best-in-class <strong>gas</strong> flow measurement<br />

solution <strong>for</strong> all areas of <strong>gas</strong> volume conversion. Competitively priced and offering a low total<br />

cost-of-ownership, it meets a wide range of application requirements throughout the natural <strong>gas</strong><br />

industry. For further in<strong>for</strong>mation please go to www.rmg.com/erz2000-ng-en<br />

To learn more about products and solutions from RMG by Honeywell,<br />

visit www.rmg.com or www.honeywellprocess.com or contact your account manager.<br />

© 2013 Honeywell International Inc. All rights reserved


A CLOSE-UP VIEW OF THE<br />

INTERNATIONAL GAS BUSINESS<br />

This magazine <strong>for</strong> smart <strong>gas</strong> technologies, infrastructure and utilisation<br />

features technical reports on the European natural <strong>gas</strong> industry as well as<br />

results of research programmes and innovative technologies. Find out more about<br />

markets, enterprises, associations and products of device manufacturers.<br />

Each edition is completed by interviews with major company leaders and<br />

interesting portraits of key players in the European business.<br />

READ MORE ABOUT<br />

Gas applications Grid infrastructure Measurement<br />

Gas quality issues Pipeline construction Regulation<br />

Bio<strong>gas</strong> injection Corrosion protection Smart metering<br />

on the annual<br />

Save 25% subscription<br />

<strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> is published by DIV Deutscher Industrieverlag GmbH, Arnulfstr. 124, 80636 München<br />

KNOWLEDGE FOR THE<br />

FUTURE<br />

Order now by fax: +49 931 / 4170-494 or send in by mail<br />

Deutscher Industrieverlag GmbH | Arnulfstr. 124 | 80636 München<br />

Yes, I want to read <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> on a regular basis. During the first year I will benefit from a 25%<br />

discount on the annual subscription fees. I subscribe to the technical trade journal <strong>for</strong> at least one<br />

year (4 issues)<br />

as a printed magazine at the annual price<br />

of € 144.00 plus shipping (€ 12.00 within<br />

Germany / € 14.00 outside of Germany)<br />

as an e-paper magazine (single user) at<br />

the annual price of € 144.00.<br />

as a printed plus an e-paper magazine<br />

(single user) at the annual price of € 199.20<br />

(within Germany) / € 201.20 (outside of<br />

Germany) incl. shipping.<br />

Special offer <strong>for</strong> students (proof of entitlement)<br />

as a printed magazine at the annual price of<br />

€ 72.00 plus shipping (€ 12.00 within Germany /<br />

€ 14.00 outside of Germany).<br />

as an e-paper magazine (single user)<br />

at the annual price of € 72.00.<br />

as a printed plus an e-paper magazine<br />

(single user) at the annual price of € 105.60<br />

(within Germany) / € 107.60 (outside of Germany)<br />

incl. shipping.<br />

Company/Institution<br />

First name, surname of recipient (department or person)<br />

Street/P.O. Box, No.<br />

Country, postalcode, town<br />

Reply/Antwort<br />

Readers’ Service <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong><br />

Postfach 91 61<br />

97091 Wurzburg<br />

GERMANY<br />

Phone<br />

E-Mail<br />

Line of business<br />

Fax<br />

Please note: According to German law this request may be withdrawn within 14 days after order date in writing<br />

to Readers’ Service <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong>, P.O. Box 91 61, 97091 Wurzburg, Germany. After the first period the agreement can be<br />

terminated in writing with 2 months notice to the end of each year. In order to accomplish your request and <strong>for</strong> communication<br />

purposes your personal data are being recorded and stored.<br />

In order to accomplish your request and <strong>for</strong> communication purposes your personal data are being recorded and stored.<br />

It is approved that this data may also be used in commercial ways by mail, by phone, by fax, by email, none.<br />

This approval may be withdrawn at any time.<br />

✘<br />

Date, signature<br />

PAGFE2014


EDITORIAL<br />

EU internal <strong>energy</strong> market –<br />

Challenge or illusion?<br />

Implementation of the internal <strong>energy</strong> market by 2014 – the EU<br />

likes to set itself targets. On the one hand, these are a good<br />

incentive to make progress. On the other hand, they bear the<br />

risk of hasty or incomplete action or of still being pursued even<br />

though practice and experience point to revision.<br />

Some Member States are lagging behind in the implementation<br />

of the Third Package on the internal electricity and <strong>gas</strong><br />

markets, but large progress has nevertheless been made both<br />

in the transposition and the application of the laws.<br />

ACER, ENTSOG, the European Commission and the market<br />

participants have worked hard on the development of rules<br />

and network codes <strong>for</strong> cross-border <strong>gas</strong> transport. Not all but<br />

many of them will be adopted by 2014. Then they will be put to<br />

the test provided that Member States have duly implemented<br />

them.<br />

Hub trading has greatly increased. The Commission reported<br />

on the first quarter of 2013 that in the UK, the Netherlands,<br />

Belgium, Germany, France, Austria and Italy 80% of the <strong>gas</strong><br />

consumed in these countries was delivered via hubs. On the<br />

second quarter, the Commission reported an increase in hubtraded<br />

volumes in Poland and the beginning of hub activities<br />

in Hungary.<br />

The retail market has seen a considerable rise in the number of<br />

suppliers, thus increasing the choice also <strong>for</strong> households. In<br />

some countries, the choice has become so wide that despite<br />

the availability of comparison tools (which are not always<br />

reliable) it is difficult to make a decision.<br />

So, what’s the problem?<br />

Firstly, the implementation of the Third Package in all Member<br />

States remains a challenge. The Commission helps and pushes<br />

with infringement procedures being the last resort. Additional<br />

rules and network codes need to prove practicable and efficient.<br />

They may require adaptation.<br />

Secondly, there are a number of counterproductive developments<br />

that hamper the market. For example, price regulation<br />

limits the fluctuation of prices and the natural mechanism of<br />

supply and demand. The wish <strong>for</strong> price stability often ignores<br />

the fact that a variable price can finally be a lower price.<br />

Subsidies are another counter-mechanism that can distort<br />

competition and prevent the market from developing the<br />

most cost-efficient solutions.<br />

Both price regulation and subsidies, in particular <strong>for</strong> renewable<br />

<strong>energy</strong> sources, have contributed to <strong>gas</strong>-fired power stations<br />

having become uneconomic<br />

in many countries. During<br />

peak periods or when<br />

the wind is not blowing<br />

or the sun not<br />

shining, they can<br />

be switched on<br />

Beate Raabe<br />

Secretary General<br />

of Euro<strong>gas</strong>


EDITORIAL<br />

flexibly. That is their selling point, but the dilemma in the face of<br />

distorted wholesale prices is clear. This is why in some countries<br />

the creation of capacity remuneration mechanisms are<br />

considered, i.e. the creation of incentives to keep otherwise uneconomic<br />

power generation capacity available <strong>for</strong> times of need.<br />

If market distortions cannot be removed or not quickly enough,<br />

capacity remuneration mechanisms can be an effective solution,<br />

but they should not themselves distort the market.<br />

The Commission has expressed strong concern and has recommended<br />

giving preference to demand-side response measures<br />

(electricity customers agree that certain appliances are<br />

switched off at certain times) and better interconnection of the<br />

Member States be<strong>for</strong>e resorting to capacity remuneration<br />

mechanisms. However, the question is whether the first two<br />

solutions are always the most cost-efficient solutions and<br />

whether all three options should not be considered at the<br />

same time.<br />

As regards climate protection, there have also been some counter-productive<br />

developments in recent years. The emissions<br />

trading system should have ensured that low-carbon <strong>energy</strong><br />

has a cost advantage over high-carbon <strong>energy</strong>. However, due to<br />

the economic crisis and a lack of optimisation between different<br />

climate policies there is a surplus of allowances the price of<br />

which is currently around EUR 5 per tonne. This price is not a<br />

great incentive to invest in <strong>energy</strong> efficiency or low-carbon<br />

technologies. Moreover, large quantities of coal have become<br />

available in the United States who has been switching its power<br />

generation from coal to home-produced shale <strong>gas</strong>. These large<br />

amounts of coal are sold cheaply on the European market,<br />

which has led to the paradoxical situation that both the market<br />

share of renewable <strong>energy</strong> sources and coal have been rising in<br />

the EU and that of <strong>gas</strong> has gone down. Whilst carbon dioxide<br />

emissions dropped sharply in the U.S., they are rising again in<br />

some EU Member States, <strong>for</strong> example in Germany.<br />

All this highlights the ef<strong>for</strong>ts required to ensure that a wellfunctioning,<br />

low-carbon EU <strong>energy</strong> market is not an illusion, and<br />

to avoid that part of what has already been achieved is even<br />

lost. It is important that Member States recognise the need to<br />

adapt current policies and replace national regulation and subsidies<br />

with more competition and more Europe. This should be<br />

done as soon as possible because investors urgently need a<br />

clear and common political signal where EU policy is heading.<br />

Beate Raabe<br />

Secretary General of Euro<strong>gas</strong>


The Gas Engineer’s<br />

Dictionary<br />

Supply Infrastructure from A to Z<br />

The Gas Engineer’s Dictionary will be a standard work <strong>for</strong> all aspects of<br />

construction, operation and maintenance of <strong>gas</strong> grids.<br />

This dictionary is an entirely new designed reference book <strong>for</strong> both engineers<br />

with professional experience and students of supply engineering. The opus<br />

contains the world of supply infrastructure in a series of detailed professional<br />

articles dealing with main points like the following:<br />

• bio<strong>gas</strong> • compressor stations • conditioning<br />

• corrosion protection • dispatching • <strong>gas</strong> properties<br />

• grid layout • LNG • odorization<br />

• metering • pressure regulation • safety devices<br />

• storages<br />

Editors: K. Homann, R. Reimert, B. Klocke<br />

1 st edition 2013, 452 pages with additional in<strong>for</strong>mation and complete ebook,<br />

hardcover, ISBN: 978-3-8356-3214-1<br />

Price € 160,–<br />

DIV Deutscher Industrieverlag GmbH, Arnulfstr. 124, 80636 München<br />

www.di-verlag.de<br />

Order now!<br />

KNOWLEDGE FOR THE<br />

FUTURE<br />

Order now by fax: +49 201 / 820 02-34 or send in a letter<br />

Deutscher Industrieverlag GmbH | Arnulfstr. 124 | 80636 München<br />

Yes, I place a firm order <strong>for</strong> the technical book. Please send<br />

— copies of the The Gas Engineer’s Dictionary<br />

– Supply Infrastructure from A to Z.<br />

1st edition 2013, plus ebook (ISBN: 978-3-8356-3214-1)<br />

at the price of € 160,- (plus postage and packing extra)<br />

Company/Institution<br />

First name, surname of recipient (department or person)<br />

Street/P.O. Box, No.<br />

Country, Postalcode, Town<br />

reply / Antwort<br />

Vulkan-Verlag GmbH<br />

Versandbuchhandlung<br />

Postfach 10 39 62<br />

45039 Essen<br />

GERMANY<br />

Phone<br />

E-Mail<br />

Line of business<br />

Fax<br />

Please note: According to German law this request may be withdrawn within 14 days after order date in writing<br />

to Vulkan Verlag GmbH, Versandbuchhandlung, Postfach 10 39 62, 45039 essen, Germany.<br />

In order to accomplish your request and <strong>for</strong> communication purposes your personal data are being recorded and stored.<br />

It is approved that this data may also be used in commercial ways by mail, by phone, by fax, by email, none.<br />

this approval may be withdrawn at any time.<br />

Date, signature<br />

PATGED2013


TABLE OF CONTENTS 3 – 2013<br />

6 HOT SHOT<br />

Interior view of a fuel cell<br />

Reports<br />

10 TRADE & INDUSTRY<br />

Inspection of the Nord Stream<br />

Pipelines<br />

20 TRADE & INDUSTRY<br />

Shah Deniz Consortium announces<br />

25-year sales agreements with<br />

European <strong>gas</strong> purchasers<br />

GAS QUALITY<br />

26 Natural <strong>gas</strong> interchangeability in China: some experimental<br />

research<br />

by Y. Zhan and Ch. Qin<br />

GAS QUALITY<br />

36 Admissible hydrogen concentrations in natural<br />

<strong>gas</strong> systems<br />

by K. Altfeld and D. Pinchbeck<br />

GAS STORAGE<br />

48 Modern technical measurement concepts <strong>for</strong> the<br />

underground storage of natural <strong>gas</strong><br />

by A. Zajc and M. Friedchen<br />

Columns<br />

1 Editorial<br />

6 Hot Shot<br />

70 Diary<br />

4 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> Issue 3/2013


3 – 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />

26 R E P O R T<br />

Natural Gas interchangeability<br />

in China<br />

48 R E P O R T<br />

Technical measurement<br />

concepts <strong>for</strong> the underground<br />

storage of natural <strong>gas</strong><br />

68 PRODUCTS<br />

Software package offers<br />

versatile product monitoring<br />

MICRO CHP<br />

54 Seven things you need to know about Micro-CHP<br />

in Europe<br />

by S. Dwyer<br />

BIOGAS<br />

58 Ensuring operational safety of the natural <strong>gas</strong> grid by<br />

removal of oxygen from bio<strong>gas</strong> via catalytic oxidation of<br />

methane<br />

by F. Ortloff, F. Graf and Th. Kolb<br />

News<br />

visit us at our website:<br />

www.<strong>gas</strong>-<strong>for</strong>-<strong>energy</strong>.com<br />

8 Trade & Industry<br />

22 Events<br />

24 Personal<br />

66 Associations<br />

68 Products & Services<br />

Issue 3/2013 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> 5


HOT SHOT<br />

Interior view of a fuel cell<br />

Interior view of a fuel cell<br />

In a chemical reaction liquid or<br />

<strong>gas</strong>eous <strong>energy</strong> can be converted<br />

into electrical power.<br />

Source: DLR


TRADE & INDUSTRY<br />

Finngulf LNG<br />

included in the list of<br />

projects that may qualify<br />

<strong>for</strong> EU funding<br />

Bestobell secures<br />

major marine contract<br />

UK-based Bestobell Valves, part of the President<br />

Engineering Group (PEGL), has won a major new<br />

contract to supply cryogenic valves to TGE (Marine<br />

Gas Engineering) in Germany <strong>for</strong> two fuel-efficient<br />

dual-fuel cruise liners.<br />

The valves are destined <strong>for</strong> Mitsubishi Heavy<br />

Industries in Japan where the 984ft long vessels are<br />

being built, on behalf of Aida cruise lines of Germany.<br />

Aida’s new cruise ships will be able to run on LNG<br />

(liquefied natural <strong>gas</strong>), which offers greater fuel efficiency,<br />

as well as marine diesel oil or heavy fuel oil.<br />

Bestobell Valves will supply around 40 globe valves,<br />

non-return valves and check valves <strong>for</strong> the contract,<br />

which are currently being made at its factory in Sheffield<br />

ready to be shipped out to TGE in August this<br />

year <strong>for</strong> incorporation in their fuel system.<br />

T<br />

he list of Projects of Common Interest (PCI)<br />

adopted by the European Commission does not<br />

yet provide a final decision on whether Finland or<br />

Estonia will receive investment funding <strong>for</strong> a Gulf of<br />

Finland LNG import terminal. The final decision will<br />

be made with the EU-wide application process taking<br />

place in 2014, in which all the PCI-candidates are<br />

eligible to apply. Finland and Estonia are both seeking<br />

EU investment funding <strong>for</strong> a liquefied natural<br />

<strong>gas</strong> (LNG) import terminal. Both projects are<br />

included in the list of eligible projects published by<br />

the EU, but funding can only be granted to one of<br />

the projects.<br />

A condition set <strong>for</strong> EU financial support is that the<br />

terminal must serve multiple EU countries. The Balticconnector<br />

<strong>gas</strong> pipeline planned by Gasum will enable<br />

the interconnection of the Finnish and Baltic <strong>gas</strong> networks,<br />

which means the Baltic States would also benefit<br />

from the Finnish terminal.<br />

The Finngulf LNG terminal project and the Balticconnector<br />

<strong>gas</strong> pipeline comprise one of the largest<br />

infrastructure undertakings in Finland. The import terminal<br />

would increase diversity and flexibility in natural<br />

<strong>gas</strong> sourcing and enable new uses <strong>for</strong> natural <strong>gas</strong> outside<br />

the natural <strong>gas</strong> network.<br />

Granted PCI status, the Finnish and Estonian terminal<br />

projects can next apply <strong>for</strong> financial investment<br />

support in the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) process<br />

covering all of Europe’s <strong>gas</strong> and electricity infrastructure<br />

projects and beginning in early 2014. Representatives<br />

of Gasum and the state of Finland will also<br />

continue negotiations to reach a compromise with<br />

Estonia. In this the countries could make a mutual<br />

decision on which one will proceed to the CEF application<br />

already by the end of this year.<br />

Gasum is making preparations <strong>for</strong> its own investment<br />

decision following the decision on EU financial<br />

support in late 2014. From there terminal construction<br />

would progress in phases, and LNG imports could<br />

begin in late 2016, which is when the Balticconnector<br />

would also be operational. The terminal would operate<br />

on full capacity at the end of 2018.<br />

8 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> Issue 3/2013


TRADE & INDUSTRY<br />

WELTEC BIOPOWER<br />

develops 1.6 MW of green<br />

<strong>energy</strong> in France<br />

Together with the partner Domaix Energie in Alsace,<br />

the company from Germany has started rolling out<br />

four agricultural bio<strong>gas</strong> plant projects in France.<br />

Apart from agricultural substrates, the bio<strong>gas</strong> plants,<br />

whose construction has already started, will use sludge<br />

and food leftovers. This documents the trend that<br />

French bio<strong>gas</strong> plants are increasingly fermenting industrial<br />

leftovers. Since the introduction of the separation<br />

and utilisation of kitchen waste from large catering<br />

establishments in France at the end of 2011, organic<br />

waste from schools and company cafeterias must be<br />

used <strong>for</strong> the production of <strong>energy</strong>.<br />

Accordingly, WELTEC will integrate hygienisation<br />

units in order to utilise the substances of category 3<br />

according to the EU directive. Another common feature<br />

concerns the use of the heat: In all four bio<strong>gas</strong> plants,<br />

the residual heat will be used in a digestate dryer in<br />

order to reduce the amount of liquid manure and market<br />

the dried digestate.<br />

Thanks to the heat utilisation concept, the four<br />

bio<strong>gas</strong> plants have an efficiency of at least 70 percent,<br />

enabling the operators to benefit from the heat and<br />

power bonus, which is up to € 0.04/kWh in France.<br />

11.-13.2.2014<br />

Essen /Germany<br />

DEVELOPMENTS AND TRENDS IN THE<br />

ENERGY INDUSTRY – DO YOU KNOW<br />

WHERE THE MARKET GOES?<br />

European Electricity Market European Electricity Grid<br />

International Gas Market Small Scale LNG<br />

Power Trading in Europe<br />

PROGRAMME AND REGISTRATION UNDER<br />

www.e-world-essen.com/congress<br />

Issue 3/2013 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> 9


TRADE & INDUSTRY<br />

Record-setting "PIG" run <strong>for</strong> the integrity inspection<br />

of the Nord Stream Pipelines<br />

Nord Stream has concluded a comprehensive inspection<br />

of the internal condition of both pipelines, as<br />

part of its long-term safety and pipeline integrity management<br />

strategy.<br />

A measurement tool about 7 m long and weighing<br />

more than 7 t was sent through the pipeline from Russia<br />

to Lubmin, Germany, travelling at 1.5 m a second propelled<br />

by the <strong>gas</strong> pressure. The pipeline inspection gauge<br />

(PIG) collected high-resolution data on material integrity<br />

along the 1,224 km route. The journey <strong>for</strong> Russia to Germany<br />

took ten days.<br />

This was the first time that a pipeline of this length and<br />

a wall-thickness of up to 41 mm has been analysed in this<br />

way. For the inspection run, a device with one of the<br />

strongest magnetic fields was developed by ROSEN Group<br />

in Lingen, Germany. The “intelligent PIG” has an array of<br />

electronic sensors, which screen the material integrity and<br />

the geometry of the pipeline. The PIG has collected over<br />

one Terabyte of data on its journey from Russia, and the<br />

data was recorded at a rate equivalent to 12 Megabits per<br />

second, 30 times faster than cellular data networks.<br />

The high-resolution measurement technology can<br />

detect smallest changes in the condition of the pipelines.<br />

The exact geographical position of the pipelines is also<br />

being documented. The first evaluation of the results<br />

confirms that the pipelines have moved only minimally<br />

while being operated under full pressure and that there<br />

has been no corrosion or de<strong>for</strong>mation.<br />

In 2012 and early summer of 2013, Nord Stream had<br />

already examined the external condition of both pipelines.<br />

This external visual and instrumental inspection of<br />

the pipeline was conducted via remotely operated vehicles<br />

(ROVs) followed by support vessels. The results of the<br />

internal and external inspections <strong>for</strong>m the baseline data<br />

<strong>for</strong> regular inspection cycles in the coming years. This will<br />

allow any potential changes in the position of the pipes,<br />

minimal corrosion and even the smallest mechanical<br />

defects to be detected at an early stage.<br />

10 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> Issue 3/2013


19. EUROFORUM-Annual Conference<br />

4 to 6 December 2013,<br />

Kempinski Hotel Bristol Berlin – Germany<br />

<strong>gas</strong><br />

Meet the decision makers of the<br />

European <strong>gas</strong> industry!<br />

A selection of the experts panel …<br />

The European Gas Market –<br />

Facing the current challenges in Europe!<br />

6 December 2013<br />

Ali Arif Aktürk,<br />

NaturGaz<br />

Klaus-Dieter Barbknecht,<br />

VNG – Verbundnetz Gas<br />

Rashid Al-Marri,<br />

South Hook Gas<br />

Peter Drasdo,<br />

Fluxys TENP<br />

• The structure of the European <strong>gas</strong> market – characteristics and specificities<br />

• Roadmap to a Single Gas Market in 2014: further steps<br />

• New sources – new routes – new partners <strong>for</strong> Europe<br />

• The importance of continuing investments in E&P<br />

• Development of trading markets and the supply & demand situation<br />

• The particular importance of LNG <strong>for</strong> the European Gas Market<br />

• The Future of L-Gas Network: is a new Policy necessary <strong>for</strong> Gas Trading?<br />

• One grid from Italy to Belgium – is this the transition to an independent super TSO?<br />

• The impact of the new market models<br />

• Emerging Gas Markets: how competition improves<br />

Presentations planned from the following countries:<br />

Hans-Peter Floren,<br />

OMV<br />

Bart Jan Hoevers,<br />

Gasunie Transport<br />

Ireneusz Łazor,<br />

Polish Power Exchange<br />

Jayesh Parmar,<br />

Baringa Partners<br />

Don´t miss the Pre Conference on<br />

The German Gas Market<br />

Angela Merkel‘s re-election:<br />

Implications <strong>for</strong> Germany‘s <strong>energy</strong><br />

re<strong>for</strong>m and the German <strong>gas</strong> market<br />

(Conference Language: German)<br />

Beate Raabe,<br />

Euro<strong>gas</strong><br />

www.erd<strong>gas</strong>-<strong>for</strong>um.com/programme<br />

Infoline: +49 (0) 2 11/96 86–34 36 [Olivia Eberwein]


TRADE & INDUSTRY<br />

ista signs cooperation<br />

agreement with<br />

Spanish <strong>energy</strong> utility,<br />

Gas Natural Fenosa<br />

The <strong>energy</strong> service provider, ista, and the leading Spanish<br />

<strong>gas</strong> utility, Gas Natural Fenosa, have signed a<br />

cooperation agreement <strong>for</strong> the Spanish market. According<br />

to this agreement, ista will install 60,000 heat allocation<br />

meters in Gas Natural Fenosa properties and per<strong>for</strong>m<br />

the meter-reading, billing and device management.<br />

The EU Energy Efficiency Directive (EED), which came<br />

into <strong>for</strong>ce at the end of 2012, is to be already transposed<br />

into national law by June 2014. The directive sets binding<br />

targets <strong>for</strong> the efficient use of <strong>energy</strong>, especially in the<br />

building sector, and prescribes, among other things, that<br />

consumers throughout Europe have to be in<strong>for</strong>med individually<br />

and regularly about their <strong>energy</strong> consumption.<br />

Roughly 15 % of <strong>energy</strong> can be saved through the individual<br />

metering and billing of consumption data alone.<br />

Roughly 200 households in Germany currently receive<br />

monthly consumption data, which can be retrieved at any<br />

time online or using a smartphone, in Europe’s largest<br />

model project conducted in conjunction with Deutsche<br />

Energie-Agentur GmbH (dena – German Energy Agency),<br />

the German Tenant Organisation (DMB) as well as the Federal<br />

Ministry of Transport, Building and Urban Affairs. Initial<br />

results in early 2014 should once again prove that providing<br />

consumption in<strong>for</strong>mation during the year can make a<br />

vital contribution to greater <strong>energy</strong>, CO 2 and cost efficiency,<br />

in particular with regard to the cost/benefit ratio.<br />

GDF SUEZ strengthens<br />

strategic partnership<br />

with Mitsui in Australia<br />

GDF SUEZ and Mitsui & Co., Ltd. (“Mitsui”) have<br />

agreed to strengthen their existing partnership in<br />

Australia. As part of the agreement, Mitsui will acquire a<br />

28 % equity interest in five assets from GDF SUEZ Australian<br />

Energy, a wholly owned subsidiary of GDF SUEZ.<br />

GDF SUEZ Australian Energy owns and operates<br />

3,540 MW of renewable, <strong>gas</strong> fired and brown coalfired<br />

generating units in Victoria, South Australia and<br />

Western Australia.<br />

Both companies already have a strong, long-term<br />

partnership following a successful track record of joint<br />

investment and cooperation <strong>for</strong> projects in Canada,<br />

Europe, the Middle East, Africa, Asia as well as an existing<br />

partnership agreement in Australia, where Mitsui<br />

has owned 30 % of the Loy Yang B power station and<br />

21 % of Kwinana power station since 2004. This transaction<br />

will extend the existing partnership with Mitsui<br />

to the entire Australian portfolio.<br />

The transaction, which comprises four, principally<br />

merchant, assets with a total capacity of 2,463 MW<br />

and the Simply Energy retail business, will create a<br />

common ownership plat<strong>for</strong>m across the Australian<br />

generation asset portfolio.<br />

This new partnership, which is in line with the<br />

Group’s trans<strong>for</strong>mation strategy, will contribute to the<br />

Group’s 2013-14 portfolio optimisation program and will<br />

lead to a reduction in the Group’s net debt upon completion<br />

of the transaction, which is expected this month.<br />

Prysmian Group signs major contracts<br />

with Brazilian Petrobras<br />

Prysmian Group has been awarded new major contract<br />

worth a total of up to approximately $ 260 Million<br />

related to a frame agreement <strong>for</strong> Umbilical products<br />

<strong>for</strong> offshore oil and <strong>gas</strong> extraction, by Brazilian oil company<br />

Petrobras.<br />

The award refers to a frame agreement <strong>for</strong> 360 km of<br />

Umbilicals, most of it to be used in pre-salt fields, in 16<br />

different cross sections and related ancillaries, offshore<br />

services and qualifications, worth approximately $ 260<br />

Million with 50 % minimum purchasing commitment and<br />

call-off orders to be placed within a two-year period.<br />

The Group has also been awarded by Petrobras the<br />

extension to 2016 of the existing frame agreement <strong>for</strong><br />

flexible pipes, worth a total of $ 95 Million of which $ 20<br />

Million have already been called off <strong>for</strong> the Macabu,<br />

Jubarte and Marlim Leste fields.<br />

Both the Umbilicals and the Flexible Pipes <strong>for</strong> the new<br />

contracts will be manufactured in the Group’s state-ofthe<br />

art- plants in Vila Velha, Brazil, an industrial plant with<br />

high production capacity and a strategic location (on the<br />

Vitoria channel - Espirito Santo State) fully dedicated to<br />

Subsea Umbilicals, Risers and Flowlines (SURF).<br />

12 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> Issue 3/2013


TRADE & INDUSTRY<br />

Bilfinger automates power-to-<strong>gas</strong> pilot<br />

plant <strong>for</strong> E.ON<br />

Bilfinger is responsible <strong>for</strong> automation technology at<br />

the Falkenhagen power-to-<strong>gas</strong> pilot plant, which<br />

E.ON will use to feed hydrogen into the natural <strong>gas</strong><br />

grid <strong>for</strong> the first time. The automation solution installed<br />

by subsidiary Bilfinger GreyLogix ensures that the plant<br />

is operational around the clock and monitors the volume<br />

of hydrogen being fed into the grid.<br />

The pilot converts up to two megawatts of<br />

electrical output to hydrogen per hour and subsequently<br />

feed it into the natural <strong>gas</strong> grid. With this<br />

project, E.ON hopes to gain further expertise in<br />

the storage of regenerative <strong>gas</strong> in the natural <strong>gas</strong><br />

infrastructure. With such expertise, it is possible to<br />

store over-capacity from fluctuating renewable <strong>energy</strong><br />

sources and to access it when needed.<br />

In order to tap into new technologies and markets,<br />

research and development ef<strong>for</strong>ts have been intensified.<br />

As lead investor, Bilfinger supports the young<br />

start-up company Sunfire from Dresden. Sunfire<br />

develops concepts <strong>for</strong> using renewable <strong>energy</strong> to<br />

convert carbon dioxide and water into fuel (power-toliquids)<br />

or <strong>gas</strong> (power-to-<strong>gas</strong>).<br />

14 – 16 JANUARY 2014<br />

NUREMBERG, GERMANY<br />

· World’s largest BIOGAS trade fair<br />

· 3 days with plenary sessions, workshops, best-practice<br />

· Excursions 17 January 2014<br />

Main Topics:<br />

· Bio<strong>gas</strong> as a part of the <strong>energy</strong> turn around<br />

· Trends in the construction of bio<strong>gas</strong> plants<br />

· New challenges in environmental and safety issues<br />

· International: The future of export business<br />

Main speaker Prof. Dr. Claudia Kemfert, (DIW Berlin)<br />

News: www.bio<strong>gas</strong>tagung.org/en<br />

23 rd CONVENTION AND TRADE FAIR<br />

www.bio<strong>gas</strong>tagung.org<br />

www.bio<strong>gas</strong>tagung.org<br />

Issue 3/2013 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> 13<br />

Bio<strong>gas</strong> kann´s<br />

Fit für die Zukunft<br />

Bio<strong>gas</strong> can do it


TRADE & INDUSTRY<br />

Aid <strong>for</strong> investment projects of GAZ-SYSTEM S.A.<br />

The European Commission declared compatible with<br />

the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union<br />

individual aid <strong>for</strong> GAZ-SYSTEM S.A. <strong>for</strong> the implementation<br />

of the following tasks:<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

Hermanowice – Strachocina Gas Pipeline,<br />

Strachocina – Pogórska Wola Gas Pipeline,<br />

Zdzieszowice – Wrocław Gas Pipeline,<br />

Skoczów – Komorowice – Oświęcim Gas Pipeline,<br />

Modernisation of the transmission system in Lower<br />

Silesia in order to improve its functioning and to<br />

ensure the optimal use of the Polish-German interconnection,<br />

Lwówek – Odolanów Gas Pipeline.<br />

A potential award of subsidies from the European<br />

Regional Fund will be possible in case of the availability<br />

of funds within the “Infrastructure and Environment”<br />

Programme. The investment projects are on the reserve<br />

list of individual projects of the “Infrastructure and Environment”<br />

Programme. Expected support from the European<br />

funds <strong>for</strong> the implementation of subsequent<br />

investment projects of GAZ-SYSTEM S.A. constitutes<br />

public aid in the meaning of Article 107.1 of the Treaty<br />

on the Functioning of the European Union. The total<br />

amount of such aid may amount to PLN 1,949.57 million,<br />

assuming the aid intensity at the level of 45.67%.<br />

The above mentioned projects are to be implemented<br />

in the years 2013–2020 as the elements of the North-South<br />

Gas Corridor. The prepared investment projects will contribute<br />

to the development of the Polish <strong>gas</strong> transmission<br />

system. They will affect the effectiveness of the system by<br />

increasing its transmission capacity, at the same time ensuring<br />

a higher security of supplies. In addition, the implementation<br />

of the above mentioned six investment projects also<br />

constitutes a significant input in promoting strategic objectives<br />

of the EU <strong>energy</strong> policy, such as: development of the<br />

basic infrastructure necessary <strong>for</strong> the functioning of the<br />

internal market of natural <strong>gas</strong>, increased security of supplies<br />

and diversification of sources, and the development of<br />

interconnections between Member States.<br />

GAZ-SYSTEM S.A. finances up to 30 % of its investment<br />

expenditures from the EU funds.<br />

OMV and Montanuniversität Leoben<br />

expand cooperation<br />

The oil and <strong>gas</strong> company OMV and Montanuniversität<br />

Leoben/Austria announced that are expanding<br />

their existing cooperation and working together<br />

on introducing a new degree program – the International<br />

Petroleum Academy. OMV is doubling investment<br />

in research and teaching. The Petroleum Academy<br />

will increase student numbers and facilitate a<br />

more international pool of graduates. The next three<br />

years will see OMV’s annual investment in the university<br />

increase to around 10 mn €.<br />

OMV launched a job initiative in July 2013, as the<br />

company’s growth plans will require an additional 1,600<br />

technical employees <strong>for</strong> the exploration and production<br />

of oil and <strong>gas</strong> by 2016. There is strong demand <strong>for</strong> petroleum<br />

engineering and geosciences graduates in addition<br />

to experienced experts.<br />

NDT Systems & Services opens pipeline<br />

inspection data analysis center in Mexico City<br />

NDT Systems & Services, a leading supplier of ultrasonic<br />

pipeline inspection and integrity services,<br />

announces the opening of its Global Data Analysis<br />

Center in Mexico City, Mexico.<br />

The new operational unit will serve as the company's<br />

global hub <strong>for</strong> analysis of pipeline data gathered by pipeline<br />

inspections worldwide. A team consisting of more<br />

than 50 analysts will analyze inspection data that are predominantly<br />

captured with ultrasonic technology, which<br />

is used to detect corrosion or cracks in liquid pipelines.<br />

Quality control and report production will be maintained<br />

at NDT sites in the US, Germany, Malaysia and Dubai.<br />

14 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> Issue 3/2013


TRADE & INDUSTRY<br />

Wintershall takes over<br />

Brage operatorship<br />

Gazprom and<br />

Vietnam strengthening<br />

long-term partnership<br />

As part of Gazprom's delegation visit to Vietnam, Alexey<br />

Miller, Chairman of the Gazprom Management Committee<br />

held a working meeting with Nguyen Tan Dung, Prime<br />

Minister of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam.<br />

The parties discussed the prospects <strong>for</strong> interaction<br />

between Gazprom and Petrovietnam Oil and Gas Group in<br />

joint projects <strong>for</strong> oil and <strong>gas</strong> resource development offshore<br />

Vietnam and in the Russian Federation.The parties highly<br />

evaluated the work done by the companies in relation to<br />

launching commercial <strong>gas</strong> production from the fields of<br />

licensed blocks 05.2 and 05.3 offshore Vietnam.<br />

In addition, the meeting emphasized the importance<br />

of the Agreement signed by Gazprom and Petrovietnam<br />

on establishing a joint venture <strong>for</strong> implementing the project<br />

on natural <strong>gas</strong> use as a vehicle fuel in the Republic of<br />

Vietnam.<br />

The meeting addressed the agreements reached by<br />

Gazprom and Petrovietnam <strong>for</strong> speeding up the negotiating<br />

process surrounding liquefied natural <strong>gas</strong> supplies to<br />

Vietnam within the Vladivostok-LNG project and the intention<br />

to sign a Framework Agreement concerning LNG supplies<br />

be<strong>for</strong>e the end of 2013.<br />

Summarizing the results of the negotiations, Alexey<br />

Miller and Nguyen Tan Dung confirmed their commitment<br />

to strengthen the mutually beneficial long-term<br />

partnership. The parties shared the opinion that the companies'<br />

interaction in Vietnam and Russia had a high<br />

development potential.<br />

W<br />

intershall Norge is taking over the operatorship<br />

of the Brage oil field on the Norwegian<br />

Continental Shelf (NCS) from Statoil. The Brage<br />

plat<strong>for</strong>m off Bergen is the first major production<br />

plat<strong>for</strong>m operated by Wintershall Norge. Since the<br />

transfer of equity in the fields Brage, Gjøa and Vega<br />

to the wholly owned BASF subsidiary at the end of<br />

July as part of the asset swap with Statoil, Wintershall<br />

Norge has raised its daily production from<br />

3,000 boe to 40,000 boe. The asset swap thus<br />

turned Wintershall into a major producer on the<br />

NCS. With the operatorship of Brage, Wintershall<br />

now executes the complete E&P lifecycle in Norway:<br />

from exploration, drilling and the development<br />

of oil and <strong>gas</strong> discoveries to production.<br />

Looking at<br />

the big picture<br />

Seminar Flow<br />

Metering in Pipelines<br />

on 25. March 2014<br />

In cooperation with<br />

7th Workshop<br />

Gas Flow Measurement<br />

Industrial <strong>gas</strong> application<br />

26./27. March 2014 · KCE-Akademie, Rheine<br />

Seminar, workshop and documents are in German language.<br />

Application and further in<strong>for</strong>mation:<br />

www.kce-akademie.de<br />

KÖTTER Consulting Engineers GmbH & Co. KG<br />

Bonifatiusstraße 400 • D-48432 Rheine • Germany<br />

Tel.: +49 5971 9710-0 • E-Mail: info@koetter-consulting.com<br />

Issue 3/2013 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> 15


TRADE & INDUSTRY<br />

Gas discovery in Iskrystall<br />

Statoil ASA has together with its partners Eni Norge AS and<br />

Petoro AS made a <strong>gas</strong> discovery in the Iskrystall prospect<br />

in PL608 in the Barents Sea. Well 7219/8-2, drilled by the drilling<br />

rig West Hercules, has proved an approximately 200 metre <strong>gas</strong><br />

column. Statoil estimates the volumes in Iskrystall to be<br />

between 6 and 25 million barrels of oil equivalents (o.e.).<br />

Iskrystall was the second of the four prospects to be<br />

drilled in the Johan Castberg area this year with the aim<br />

of proving additional volumes <strong>for</strong> the Johan Castberg<br />

field development project. The first prospect Nunatak<br />

resulted in a small <strong>gas</strong> discovery.<br />

A comprehensive data acquisition program was per<strong>for</strong>med<br />

in the Iskrystall well including coring, wire line<br />

logging and fluid sampling. This gives valuable geological<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation about the Johan Castberg area.<br />

Statoil and the partners in the Johan Castberg project in<br />

the Barents Sea decided in June 2013 to delay the investment<br />

decision <strong>for</strong> the project to further mature the resource base<br />

and field development plans <strong>for</strong> the project. In addition there<br />

are uncertainties in the tax frame work <strong>for</strong> the project. It is<br />

necessary to conclude the remaining exploration wells and<br />

ongoing work on field development plans, until the partners<br />

are ready to make an investment decision <strong>for</strong> the project.<br />

After completion of Iskrystall, the West Hercules rig<br />

will move back to the production license 532 to drill the<br />

Skavl prospect. Skavl is situated approximately 5 km<br />

south of the Skrugard discovery (now part of Johan Castberg).<br />

Statoil is operator <strong>for</strong> production licence 608 with<br />

an ownership share of 50%. The licence partners are Eni<br />

Norge AS (30%) and Petoro AS (20%).<br />

16 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> Issue 3/2013


TRADE & INDUSTRY<br />

Ukrainian <strong>gas</strong> pipe<br />

among EU’s Key <strong>energy</strong><br />

infrastructure projects<br />

A<br />

project involving Ukrainian <strong>gas</strong> transport system has<br />

made it to the list of 250 key <strong>energy</strong> infrastructure<br />

projects, adopted by the European Commission on October<br />

14, 2013. The projects will receive funding of € 5.85<br />

billion during 2014-2020. Financing these <strong>energy</strong> infrastructure<br />

projects would create most benefits to European<br />

consumers, according to EU Energy Commissioner<br />

Günther Oettinger.<br />

Ukrainian <strong>energy</strong> infrastructure project will involve<br />

the construction of a connecting Adamowo-Brody pipeline.<br />

It will extend <strong>for</strong> 371 kilometers joining the JSC<br />

Uktransnafta’s Handling Site in Brody (Ukraine) and Adamowo<br />

Tank Farm (Poland). The pipeline’s maximum technical<br />

capacity will reach 10, 20 and 30 million tonnes per<br />

year, respectively – "depending on the three consecutive<br />

stages of the project implementation."<br />

The completion of the 250 projects will help the EU members<br />

"integrate their <strong>energy</strong> markets, enable them to diversify<br />

their <strong>energy</strong> sources and help bring an end to the <strong>energy</strong> isolation<br />

of some Member States," reads the europe.eu note. Moreover,<br />

the projects will "enable the <strong>energy</strong> grid to uptake increasing<br />

amounts of renewables," helping reduce CO 2 emissions.<br />

Ukraine is a major transporter of imported Russian <strong>gas</strong> to<br />

Europe. Its vast pipe network (nearly 40,000 kilometers long)<br />

allows the country to transport, store, and distribute <strong>gas</strong> to<br />

many European countries. Ukraine’s pipelines go from Russia<br />

to Belarus, Hungary, Moldova, Poland, Romania, and Slovakia.<br />

Ukraine obtained its first <strong>gas</strong> pipe back in 1924. Its <strong>gas</strong> transport<br />

infrastructure has been developing rapidly ever since.<br />

Presently, Ukraine possesses 13 underground <strong>gas</strong> storage<br />

facilities with total capacity of more than 31 billion<br />

cubic meters, reports epravda.com.ua.<br />

WINGAS and E.ON bring<br />

highly efficient natural <strong>gas</strong><br />

CHP plant on stream<br />

WINGAS and E.ON Energy Projects brought the new,<br />

highly efficient combined heat and power (CHP)<br />

plant in Lubmin on stream. The CHP plant, located right at<br />

the landing terminal of the Nord Stream Baltic Sea pipeline,<br />

has a useful heat output of about 47 MW and an electrical<br />

output of about 39 MW. The plant generates up to 200,000<br />

MW hours of electricity a year – enough to provide a<br />

secure supply <strong>for</strong> 50,000 households <strong>for</strong> a whole year.<br />

A highly efficient <strong>gas</strong> turbine developed by Siemens is<br />

being deployed in Lubmin <strong>for</strong> the first time. It allows the<br />

plant to reach full load capacity in just ten minutes.<br />

Lubmin, a central <strong>energy</strong> hub, offers ideal conditions <strong>for</strong><br />

the construction of a natural <strong>gas</strong>-based CHP plant thanks<br />

to the existing infrastructure; the Baltic Sea pipeline delivers<br />

a reliable supply of natural <strong>gas</strong> right there. In addition,<br />

the waste heat generated in the <strong>gas</strong> turbine is used to<br />

reheat the <strong>gas</strong>, which cools down while traveling through<br />

the Baltic Sea pipeline, be<strong>for</strong>e its onward transportation<br />

over land. With the combined generation of electricity and<br />

heat, the overall efficiency of the plant is over 85%. This<br />

means that the Lubmin CHP plant saves around 40,000<br />

tons of CO 2 a year compared to the separate generation of<br />

heat and electricity – that is as much as 13,000 cars a year.<br />

South Stream designing in Slovenia to be sped up<br />

The Gazprom headquarters hosted a working meeting<br />

between Alexey Miller, Chairman of the Company's Management<br />

Committee and Samo Omerzel, Minister of Infrastructure<br />

and Spatial Planning of the Republic of Slovenia. The<br />

parties discussed issues concerning the current status of<br />

cooperation between Russia and Slovenia in the <strong>gas</strong> sector.<br />

Special attention was paid to the South Stream project<br />

implementation in the Republic of Slovenia. At present,<br />

the work is nearing completion on the spatial planning<br />

and environmental impact assessment (EIA) procedures<br />

conducted under the national laws of Slovenia <strong>for</strong><br />

the <strong>gas</strong> pipeline sections from the boarders with Hungary<br />

and Italy. The meeting resulted in the decision to<br />

speed up the designing of the Slovenian section of the<br />

<strong>gas</strong> pipeline carried out by the South Stream Slovenia<br />

LLC joint company.<br />

18 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> Issue 3/2013


CEB®<br />

... Think Future<br />

March 6 th — 8 th , 2014<br />

Trade Fair Center<br />

Stuttgart<br />

Trade Fair and Conference <strong>for</strong>...<br />

Energy efficient<br />

Building<br />

Technical<br />

building equipment<br />

Regenerative<br />

<strong>energy</strong> production<br />

www.ceb-expo.de


TRADE & INDUSTRY<br />

Shah Deniz Consortium announces 25-year sales<br />

agreements with European <strong>gas</strong> purchasers<br />

The Shah Deniz consortium announced that 25-year<br />

sales agreements have been concluded <strong>for</strong> just<br />

over 10 billion cubic metres a year (BCMA) of <strong>gas</strong> to be<br />

produced from the Shah Deniz field in Azerbaijan as a<br />

result of the development of Stage 2 of the Shah Deniz<br />

project. Nine companies will purchase this <strong>gas</strong> in Italy,<br />

Greece and Bulgaria.<br />

The Shah Deniz Stage 2 project is set to bring <strong>gas</strong><br />

directly from Azerbaijan to Europe <strong>for</strong> the first time,<br />

opening up the Southern Gas Corridor. In total 16 BCMA<br />

of Shah Deniz Stage 2 <strong>gas</strong> will be delivered through<br />

more than 3500 km of pipelines through Azerbaijan,<br />

Georgia, Turkey, Greece, Bulgaria, Albania and under the<br />

Adriatic Sea to Italy. The agreements <strong>for</strong> European <strong>gas</strong><br />

sales follow the signing of agreements with BOTAS in<br />

2011 to sell 6 BCMA of <strong>gas</strong> in Turkey.<br />

The buyers who have agreed to buy the <strong>gas</strong> are:<br />

Axpo Trading AG, Bulgargaz EAD, DEPA Public Gas Corporation<br />

of Greece S.A., Enel Trade SpA, E.ON Global<br />

Commodities SE, Gas Natural Aprovisionamientos SDG<br />

SA, GDF SUEZ S.A., Hera Trading srl and Shell Energy<br />

Europe Limited. Of the total 10 BCMA, around 1 BCMA<br />

will go to buyers intending to supply to each of Bulgaria<br />

and Greece and the rest will go to buyers intending to<br />

supply Italy and adjacent market hubs.<br />

The completion of these agreements follows<br />

expressions of interest from many different companies<br />

<strong>for</strong> Shah Deniz <strong>gas</strong> and marks the completion of the<br />

Shah Deniz 2 <strong>gas</strong> sales process. The <strong>gas</strong> sales agreements<br />

will enter into <strong>for</strong>ce following the final investment<br />

decision on the Shah Deniz Stage 2 project<br />

which is targeted <strong>for</strong> late this year.<br />

20 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> Issue 3/2013


TRADE & INDUSTRY<br />

Marketing of natural <strong>gas</strong><br />

storage facility Inzenham-West<br />

concluded<br />

RWE Dea Speicher GmbH (RDS) has successfully<br />

marketed the entire working <strong>gas</strong> capacity of its<br />

natural <strong>gas</strong> storage facility Inzenham/West near<br />

Rosenheim, Bavaria, <strong>for</strong> the years 2014 to 2016. The<br />

Inzenham-West storage facility and its new customers<br />

will there<strong>for</strong>e continue to make an essential<br />

contribution to supply security in Bavaria.<br />

Based on a broad market appeal and constructive<br />

talks with various interested parties, RWE Dea Speicher<br />

GmbH (RDS) managed to successfully conclude<br />

the marketing activities <strong>for</strong> its storage facility at Inzenham-West.<br />

In the process, the entire working <strong>gas</strong><br />

capacity of 4,625 MWh was fully placed on the market<br />

<strong>for</strong> the next storage years 14/15 and 15/16. For a further<br />

eight years, it was possible to sell nearly half of<br />

the storage volume on a long-term basis.<br />

British Gas and Landis+Gyr<br />

announce Smart meter deal<br />

British Gas customers are set to benefit from a £600m<br />

deal between British Gas and Landis+Gyr. The landmark<br />

deal means Landis+Gyr will supply the majority of<br />

the 16 million smart meters British Gas will install in its<br />

customers’ homes.<br />

By 2020 smart meters will be rolled out as standard to<br />

homes and businesses across the country as part of a<br />

Government initiative. They will replace current <strong>gas</strong> and<br />

electricity meters and offer the benefits of:<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

An in-home display showing how much <strong>gas</strong> and electricity<br />

is being used as customers are using it – and<br />

the cost in pounds and pence<br />

Estimated savings of around 5% (£65) per year<br />

Meter readings sent directly to <strong>energy</strong> suppliers, putting<br />

an end to estimated bills<br />

British Gas adopted a strategy to introduce smart meters<br />

into homes and businesses early in order to bring these<br />

benefits to customers as soon as possible.<br />

THE BEST PROTECTION<br />

FOR A LIFETIME<br />

Admittedly, we<br />

copied from nature …<br />

DEKOTEC ®<br />

Heat Shrink<br />

Sleeve<br />

DENSO is the inventor of the PETROLATUM Tape in the 1920‘s. Original DENSOLEN ® Tapes<br />

and Tape Systems, DENSOLID ® -Polyurethane Coatings and DEKOTEC ® Innovative Hotmelt and Mastic<br />

… to create the best<br />

protection <strong>for</strong> you!<br />

Find out more:<br />

denso.de<br />

Shrink-Sleeve Technology. Leader in Innovation since more than 90 years. Made in Germany.<br />

DENSO GmbH<br />

Felderstraße 24<br />

Member of:<br />

Certified by:<br />

51371 Leverkusen | Germany<br />

A Member of<br />

Denso Group Germany -<br />

+49 214 2602-0<br />

MEMBER OF<br />

Denso Group<br />

Germany<br />

The Inventor Issue 3/2013 of Passive <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> +49 21214 2602-217<br />

dekotec.net<br />

Corrosion Prevention<br />

sales@denso.de<br />

®<br />

Certified<br />

DIN EN ISO 9001


EVENTS<br />

Annual Balkans Oil & Gas 2013<br />

IRN held the 2 nd Annual Balkans Oil & Gas 2013 Summit on<br />

24 th -25 th September in the Hotel Grande Bretagne in Athens,<br />

with key executives of the oil and <strong>gas</strong> industry giving<br />

insights and revealing future plans of the Balkans countries.<br />

With more than 100 companies attending the summit<br />

and an outstanding panel of speakers, IRN gathered their<br />

excellences Alen Leveric, Deputy Minister of Economy in<br />

Croatia, Vladan Dubljevic, Deputy Minister <strong>for</strong> Mining and<br />

Geological Researches at the Ministry of Economy in Montenegro<br />

and Konstantinos Mathioudakis, General Secretary of<br />

Energy and Climate Change at the Ministry of Environment,<br />

Energy & Climate Change in Greece along with the Chairman<br />

& CEO of Energean Oil and Gas, Mathios Ri<strong>gas</strong>, the CEO<br />

of Bulgartransgaz, Kiril Temelkov, the President & CEO of<br />

Stream Oil & Gas, Dr. Sotirios Kapotas and many other exploration<br />

directors in Balkans such as Max Torres from Repsol.<br />

Held under the auspices of the Ministry of Economy in<br />

Montenegro, the Ministry of Environment, Energy & Climate<br />

Change in Greece, the Ministry of Economy in Croatia<br />

and the Federal Ministry of Energy, Mining and Industry in<br />

Bosnia & Herzegovina, the event gathered the elite of Balkans<br />

businessmen, international <strong>energy</strong> experts, economists<br />

and senior representatives from more than ten IOCs<br />

looking to get investment in the upcoming developments.<br />

Gastech student programme application process now open<br />

The Gastech Student Programme 2014 is now welcoming<br />

applications from prospective candidates to participate<br />

in the 2014 programme. Designed to facilitate potential<br />

careers in the <strong>gas</strong> industry, the student programme will take<br />

place on 25 March 2014 running within the Gastech Conference<br />

& Exhibition from 24-27 March 2014 in KINTEX 1, Korea.<br />

Established in 2006, the Gastech Student Programme<br />

offers 60 university students from around the world, with<br />

the opportunity to receive an introduction into the natural<br />

<strong>gas</strong> sector and to learn about the career opportunities<br />

available to them, first hand from senior industry figures.<br />

The Programme is engineered to provide attendees<br />

with a thorough overview of the industry, focussing on<br />

global Gas & LNG markets, LNG Projects, Shipping and<br />

Contracts. Interactive elements include a Problem Solving<br />

Exercise, encouraging students to troubleshoot in<br />

small groups and present their findings.<br />

Previous participants in the Gastech Student Programme<br />

have spoken highly of their experience and of the valuable<br />

insight into the industry that the programme has provided them.<br />

Pipeline Technology Conference moves to Berlin<br />

To be eligible to take part in the Student Programme,<br />

prospective candidates must be:<br />

■■<br />

In their final year of studying or in their first year since<br />

graduating<br />

■■<br />

Must not have prior experience of working in the<br />

industry (unpaid internships are acceptable)<br />

■■<br />

Students must not have any employment or internships<br />

already lined up<br />

■■<br />

Post graduates are welcome to apply as long as they<br />

do not have prior industry experience<br />

■■<br />

Must not have attended a previous Gastech Student<br />

Programme<br />

Candidates are required to summarise in no more than<br />

500 words, why they should be selected to attend the<br />

Gastech 2014 Student Programme and what they hope<br />

to both contribute and gain from the experience.<br />

The official closing date <strong>for</strong> the Gastech Student Programme<br />

application process is November 2013.<br />

More in<strong>for</strong>mation about the Gastech Student Programme:<br />

www.<strong>gas</strong>techkorea.com/studentprogramme<br />

Having grown up as part of<br />

HANNOVER MESSE, Europe’s<br />

leading pipeline conference and<br />

trade show, Pipeline Technology<br />

Conference (ptc), will move to the<br />

capital Berlin next year.<br />

The ptc has grown steadily over the years and, in addition<br />

to the conference itself and the accompanying exhibition,<br />

it is now also directly followed by several special<br />

workshops and in-depth seminars. International participants<br />

from over 30 different countries use the opportunity<br />

to come to Europe and obtain in<strong>for</strong>mation about<br />

cutting-edge technologies and new pipeline projects.<br />

The ptc 2014 will take place from May 12-14, 2014 in<br />

the Convention Center of the Estrel Berlin and, in addition<br />

to the usual topics, will focus specifically on the areas of<br />

onshore and offshore construction and pipeline safety.<br />

More in<strong>for</strong>mation on participating in the event as a<br />

speaker, visitor or exhibitor, can be found at www.pipeline-conference.com.<br />

22 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> Issue 3/2013


EVENTS<br />

E-world 2014<br />

How is the <strong>energy</strong> market in Europe developing?<br />

That will be one of the central questions at the<br />

E-world Congress 2014 which will take place at Messe<br />

Essen on February 11 - 13, 2014 parallel to the premier<br />

European fair, E-world <strong>energy</strong> & water. In 25 conferences,<br />

international experts from the political and<br />

economic fields will provide in<strong>for</strong>mation about topical<br />

questions in the sector. Because the markets are coming<br />

closer together, ever greater consideration is focusing<br />

not only on the national electricity and <strong>gas</strong> supply<br />

but also much more on the European electricity and<br />

<strong>gas</strong> supply as a whole. High-ranking representatives of<br />

the European Commission will also examine the future<br />

of these supply grids within the framework of the congress.<br />

Moreover, the congress will provide the housing<br />

industry with its own conference <strong>for</strong> the first time. The<br />

main subjects will be <strong>energy</strong>-related building renovation<br />

as well as <strong>energy</strong> procurement.<br />

In cooperation with Süddeutsche Zeitung ("South German<br />

Newspaper"), the "Energy Industry Leadership<br />

Meeting" already on the day be<strong>for</strong>e the fair (February<br />

10, 2014) will examine options <strong>for</strong> the strategic setting<br />

of the points <strong>for</strong> the <strong>energy</strong> world of tomorrow. Three<br />

central ideas will characterise the programme of lectures:<br />

"Fresh Wind <strong>for</strong> the Energy Turnaround", "Germany<br />

as a European Energy and Economic Location" as<br />

well as "Regulatory Perspectives <strong>for</strong> Creating International<br />

and National Infrastructures". The speakers will<br />

include Hannelore Kraft (Minister-President of North<br />

Rhine-Westphalia), Andreas Mundt (President of Bundeskartellamt<br />

- "Federal Cartel Office"), Dr. Frank Mastiaux<br />

(Chairman of the Board of EnBW AG) as well as<br />

Prof. Dr. Claudia Kempfert (Energy Market Expert at<br />

Deutsches Institut für Wirtschafts<strong>for</strong>schung - "German<br />

Institute <strong>for</strong> Economic Research").<br />

EnergieAgentur.NRW ("North Rhine-Westphalia<br />

Energy Agency") will once again stage the 18 th Expert<br />

Congress on "Future Energies" in cooperation with the<br />

EnergieRegion.NRW ("North Rhine-Westphalia Energy<br />

Region") and EnergieForschung.NRW ("North Rhine-<br />

Westphalia Energy Research") clusters. Topical specialist<br />

subjects from the area of future energies will be on the<br />

agenda at the all-day congress on the first day of the fair<br />

(February 11, 2014). After the opening by Johannes Remmel<br />

(North Rhine-Westphalia Minister of Climate Protection),<br />

the plenary session in the morning will offer lectures<br />

about trends, markets and new developments. Five<br />

parallel <strong>for</strong>ums will take place in the afternoon.<br />

The conference entitled "European Electricity Market"<br />

will also take place on the same day. It will examine<br />

the development status of a uni<strong>for</strong>m internal electricity<br />

market in the European Union, as Günther Oettinger (EU<br />

Energy Commissioner) proposed in 2011. In this respect,<br />

the lecture delivered by Prof. Dr. Klaus-Dieter Borchardt<br />

(Director of the Internal Energy Market Division of the<br />

European Commission) will certainly be particularly<br />

interesting <strong>for</strong> the sector. The conference will be compered<br />

by Dr. Roman Dudenhausen (Chairman of<br />

con|<strong>energy</strong> ag, Essen).<br />

High-ranking European experts will be expected<br />

also on the occasion of the conference called "International<br />

Gas Market" on the second day of the fair (February<br />

12, 2014). For example, Philip Lowe (Director-General<br />

<strong>for</strong> Energy at the European Commission) will<br />

explain what role <strong>gas</strong> will play in the future planning of<br />

the EU's <strong>energy</strong> policy. In this context, Prof. Jonathan<br />

Stern from the Ox<strong>for</strong>d Institute <strong>for</strong> Energy Studies will<br />

explain the future role of Russia <strong>for</strong> the European <strong>gas</strong><br />

supply. On the other hand, Dr. Friedbert Pflüger (Director<br />

of the Centre <strong>for</strong> Energy and Resource Security -<br />

EUCERS, London) will examine the significance of shale<br />

<strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> the <strong>energy</strong> reliability in Europe.<br />

The conference entitled "Small-Scale LNG" will be<br />

dedicated to the trend subject of liquefied natural <strong>gas</strong><br />

(LNG). For example, this will deal with the question of<br />

whether liquefied natural <strong>gas</strong> can be treated as a fuel<br />

alternative to oil and with efficient solutions <strong>for</strong> transport.<br />

Keynote lectures will be given, amongst others, by<br />

David Graebe (Head of Gas <strong>for</strong> Transport at Gazprom<br />

Germania), Ulco Vermeulen (Director of Business Development<br />

and Participations at Gasunie) as well as Nilgün<br />

Parker from the Federal Ministry of Transport, Building<br />

and Urban Development.<br />

In 2014, a purely scientific conference with the title of<br />

"SmartER Europe" which will be staged together with the<br />

University of Duisburg Essen will also take place <strong>for</strong> the first<br />

time. In the three main areas of "Energy Economics", "Energy<br />

In<strong>for</strong>matics" and "Energy Techniques", researchers and scientists<br />

should exchange their opinions about topical research<br />

subjects on the third day of the fair (February 13, 2014).<br />

www.e-world-essen.com/kongress/programm/<br />

Issue 3/2013 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> 23


PERSONAL<br />

Fine Tubes welcomes Graham Maxa<br />

as new finance director<br />

Fine Tubes announces<br />

the appointment of<br />

Graham Maxa as the<br />

company’s new Finance<br />

Director.<br />

Based at Fine Tubes’<br />

Head Office in Plymouth,<br />

Graham will have<br />

a key role to play in<br />

helping to drive the<br />

company <strong>for</strong>ward following<br />

last year’s<br />

change of ownership. In particular, he will have specific<br />

responsibility <strong>for</strong> the financial direction of the<br />

company’s strategic plans in addition to maintaining<br />

day-to-day financial controls.<br />

A member of the Chartered Institute of Management<br />

Accountants, Graham has over 20 years’ experience<br />

with a wide range of manufacturing and engineering<br />

companies. Most recently he held the position<br />

of Group Financial Controller at Prodrive, the<br />

specialist engineering and motorsport company with<br />

headquarters in Ox<strong>for</strong>dshire and operations across<br />

the UK as well as in Australia.<br />

Wim Groenendijk as<br />

GLE president<br />

T<br />

he GLE members unanimously elected Wim<br />

Groenendijk, Vice-President International & Regulatory<br />

Affairs, N.V. Nederlandse Gasunie, as GLE President.<br />

Wim Groenendijk has been a member of the<br />

ENTSOG Board during its first term (2010-2012) and<br />

has been a member of the GIE Board since 2011. The<br />

election of Wim Groenendijk has coincided with decisions<br />

on further support of the European small scale<br />

LNG development. GLE members agreed to develop<br />

a map showing the small scale LNG infrastructure in<br />

Europe. The map will support the Clean Power <strong>for</strong><br />

Transport package from the European Commission<br />

not only by showing existing small scale LNG infrastructure<br />

and projects but also by identifying missing<br />

links in the network. In addition to the transport sector,<br />

the study shall support the development of the<br />

use of LNG in off pipeline locations. The map shall be<br />

available by the end of 2013 and DNV (Det Norske<br />

Veritas BV) was awarded the contract.<br />

The scope of work of the GLE small scale LNG<br />

map is accessible at: http://www.gie.eu/index.php/<br />

news/gle-news<br />

The GLE position paper ‘Overcoming barriers in<br />

the Small Scale LNG development’ is available at:<br />

http://www.gie.eu/index.php/publications/gle<br />

Johanna Lamminen<br />

appointed executive vice<br />

president at Gasum<br />

Johanna Lamminen, CEO of Danske Bank Plc, has been<br />

appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Financial<br />

Officer at Gasum. She took up the post on 1 September<br />

2013. Gasum’s CEO Antero Jännes will continue in his present<br />

post until the end of February 2014, when he will<br />

retire according to the terms of his service contract.<br />

Johanna Lamminen has long experience within the<br />

finance sector. In addition to having worked <strong>for</strong> Danske<br />

Bank, she has also worked <strong>for</strong> Evli Bank and <strong>for</strong> other companies<br />

in economy, finance and organisational development<br />

positions.<br />

Johanna Lamminen holds a Licenciate in Science<br />

(Technology) from Tampere University of Technology<br />

and completed an MBA degree in 1999.<br />

24 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> Issue 3/2013


PERSONAL<br />

Appointments<br />

to the supervisory<br />

board of Gasunie<br />

Martika Jonk, partner at CMS Derks Star Busmann,<br />

Amsterdam, and Willem Schoeber, member of<br />

the Management Board of EWE AG, Oldenburg,<br />

Germany until 1 June 2013, have been appointed<br />

members of the Supervisory Board of Gasunie with<br />

effect from 1 October 2013.<br />

It was previously announced that with effect from<br />

1 January 2014, Hans Smits, CEO of the Port of Rotterdam<br />

Authority until 1 January 2014, will join the<br />

Supervisory Board of Gasunie in the role of chairman.<br />

With the announcement of these appointments,<br />

the Supervisory Board will consist of the following<br />

individuals from 1 January 2014:<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

Hans Smits, chair<br />

Rinse de Jong<br />

Martika Jonk<br />

Jolanda Poots-Bijl<br />

Dr. Willem Schoeber<br />

Jean Vermeire<br />

Managing director of ONTRAS<br />

Uwe Ringel appointed as<br />

new co-chair of the PTC<br />

Uwe Ringel will succeed Heinz Watzka as cochair<br />

of the Pipeline Technology Conference.<br />

He started his professional career in 1984 as<br />

Engineer <strong>for</strong> <strong>gas</strong> supply technology (FH; University<br />

<strong>for</strong> Applied Science) within the Dispatching<br />

Department of the present VNG – Verbundnetz<br />

Gas AG, Leipzig. Since 1990 Ringel worked in the<br />

Gas Purchase Department. 2002 he changed into<br />

the Gas Transmission Department where he was<br />

the responsible Director from 2004 to 2005.<br />

Since January 2006 Uwe Ringel was Managing Director of<br />

the Network Marketing Department in the newly established<br />

network company ONTRAS Gas Transport GmbH, Leipzig. In<br />

2008 he moved within the group to VNG AG as Head of<br />

Technology/Operations. Since May 2010 Uwe Ringel is the<br />

Managing Director of the Technology Division of ONTRAS.<br />

Ringel is also Member of the Board of the German<br />

DVGW Deutscher Verein des Gas- und Wasserfaches e. V.,<br />

Regional Group of Middle Germany.<br />

GIE appoints Thierry Deschuyteneer<br />

as new executive secretary<br />

The GIE Board has appointed Thierry Deschuyteneer as<br />

new GIE Executive Secretary as of 1 October 2013. Thierry<br />

Deschuyteneer has worked <strong>for</strong> more than 10 years <strong>for</strong> Fluxys<br />

in technical and regulatory departments. In this function he<br />

followed closely the European regulatory developments and<br />

European <strong>energy</strong> policy initiatives. During the last 3 years, he<br />

chaired the GIE Communication & Strategy Task Force and<br />

acted as Vice-Chair of the GasNaturally initiative.<br />

Hans-Joachim Polk new managing director of RWE Dea UK<br />

Hans-Joachim Polk is the new Managing Director of<br />

RWE Dea UK. Polk joined RWE Dea AG as early as late<br />

1991, immediately after earning his Master's degree in crude<br />

oil and natural <strong>gas</strong> exploration and production technology<br />

at Clausthal-Zellerfeld University. In the course of his professional<br />

career, Polk spent three and a half years working <strong>for</strong><br />

RWE Dea in Cairo be<strong>for</strong>e returning to Germany, where he<br />

was responsible as Head of Operations <strong>for</strong> production from<br />

Germany’s largest oilfield, Mittelplate and as Senior Vice<br />

President Field Development RWE Dea. In the past 2 years<br />

as Managing Director of RWE Dea Norge, Polk optimised<br />

the licence portfolio and intensified exploration<br />

activities in Norway. It was possible to achieve<br />

major oil and <strong>gas</strong> strikes during this period.<br />

Polk is successor to René Pawel who will be<br />

relocating to RWE Dea’s Headquarters in Hamburg<br />

as Senior Vice President <strong>for</strong> Production in Europe.<br />

With immediate effect, Pawel will be responsible<br />

<strong>for</strong> the entire operations in Germany, Denmark,<br />

Norway, and the United Kingdom. The scope of his<br />

activities comprises both the production of crude<br />

oil and natural <strong>gas</strong> as well as the storage of <strong>gas</strong>.<br />

Issue 3/2013 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> 25


REPORTS<br />

Gas quality<br />

Natural <strong>gas</strong> interchangeability<br />

in China: some experimental<br />

research<br />

by Yangjun Zhang and Chaokui Qin<br />

Because of the difference between <strong>gas</strong> appliances in current China market and those research targets many<br />

years ago, the well-established index- and diagram-based methods to predict interchangeability cannot be<br />

taken as applicable to natural <strong>gas</strong>es from different sources. 9 cookers and 6 water heaters were sampled and<br />

tested to evaluate response to varying constituents. Some efficiency and CO emission changes were observed.<br />

Results suggested further theoretical analysis and criterion be required to quantitatively define <strong>gas</strong><br />

interchangeability.<br />

1. INTRODUCTION<br />

Natural <strong>gas</strong> industry in China witnessed unprecedentedly<br />

rapid development in past 15 years. By the end of<br />

2011 overall natural <strong>gas</strong> consumption increased to 108<br />

billion cubic meters (BCM) annually from 24.5 BCM in<br />

2000 [1]. The large-scale development of <strong>gas</strong> industry in<br />

China dated back to late 1990s when the first transmission<br />

<strong>gas</strong> pipeline was put into operation in 1997, carrying<br />

3.6 BCM from Shanxi to Beijing each year. In 2004 a<br />

3900km-long Western Gas (NO.1) pipeline was finished<br />

and its annual transmission capacity was 12 BCM. The<br />

second stage of Shanxi-Beijing pipeline was put into<br />

operation with its capacity 12 BCM in 2005 [2]. Western<br />

Gas (NO.2) pipeline construction was initiated in 2008<br />

and finished in 2012, and its capacity was 30 BCM. Natural<br />

<strong>gas</strong> from Burma began to supply China in July, 2013.<br />

It has been planned that natural <strong>gas</strong> from Russia can be<br />

delivered to China by 2018. Table 1 and Figure 1 summarized<br />

some distant pipelines in China.<br />

Liquefied natural <strong>gas</strong> (LNG) began to play an important<br />

role to satisfy rapidly-increasing demand in south-<br />

Table 1. Some long-distance pipeline projects in China<br />

Beginning Year Finish Year Origin location End location Length (km) Capacity<br />

(BCM/year)<br />

1 1992 1997 Shanxi Beijing 868 3.6<br />

2 2000 2004 Xinjiang Shanghai 3900 12<br />

3 2004 2005 Shanxi Beijing 918 12<br />

4 2007 2009 Sichuan Shanghai 2206 12<br />

5<br />

2008 2012 Kazakhstan Shanghai/<br />

Guangdong<br />

4895 30<br />

6 2010 2013 Burma Yunnan/Guizhou 1727 12<br />

7 2013 2018 Russia 38<br />

26 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> Issue 3/2013


Gas quality<br />

REPORTS<br />

eastern China. In 2006 the first LNG terminal in Dapeng<br />

(Guangdong) was put into operation, annual capacity<br />

being 3.7 million tons (MMT). From then on several terminals<br />

in Shanghai, Jiangsu, Dalian, Zhejiang were put<br />

into operation (as shown in Figure 1), and the total<br />

capacity increased to 24.2 MMT/a. It was expected that<br />

10 terminals would be constructed along Chinese<br />

coasts, and the total receiving capacity would climb up<br />

to 50.9 MMT/a by 2017 [3].<br />

The supply pattern of natural <strong>gas</strong> in China can be<br />

summarized as “west-originated to east, north-originated<br />

to south, sea-originated to land”. Accompanied with<br />

gradual <strong>for</strong>mation of long-distance pipelines and introduction<br />

of LNG, more and more areas will be or have<br />

been faced up with a fact that they are supplied with<br />

<strong>gas</strong>es from different sources. For example, there are 5 <strong>gas</strong><br />

sources in Shanghai and 6 <strong>gas</strong>es in Guangdong. In Beijing,<br />

there are also 4 sources.<br />

The constituent differences of <strong>gas</strong>es from different<br />

sources may introduce an uncertainty related to per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

of appliances in end-users. There are as much as<br />

80 <strong>gas</strong> sources in China (including some potential<br />

sources), and their distribution in <strong>gas</strong> specification is illustrated<br />

in Figure 2 and Figure 3. The distribution of 80<br />

<strong>gas</strong> sources is so wide, and LNG is generally richer than<br />

pipeline natural <strong>gas</strong> (PNG) and offshore <strong>gas</strong> (OSG). CH 4<br />

vary from 72% to 100%, C 2H 6 and N 2 can account up to<br />

20%. In Chinese national standard GBT13611-2006 [4], it<br />

was prescribed that Wobbe index of natural <strong>gas</strong> must fall<br />

within 45.67 MJ/m 3 ~54.78 MJ/m 3 . But no specific limit<br />

with regard to constituent variation was strictly defined.<br />

Figure 1. Distribution of <strong>gas</strong> pipeline in China<br />

Figure 2. Properties of <strong>gas</strong> sources in China<br />

Figure 3. The various <strong>gas</strong> constituents of <strong>gas</strong> sources in China<br />

Issue 3/2013 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> 27


REPORTS<br />

Gas quality<br />

There<strong>for</strong>e natural <strong>gas</strong> interchangeability problem arises in<br />

recent years. Both appliance manufacturers and local<br />

delivery companies show their concern with the problem<br />

if serious combustion-related difficulties may result and if<br />

it is necessary to strictly limit individual constituents.<br />

2. HISTORY OF GAS INTERCHANGE-<br />

ABILITY RESEARCH: A REVIEW<br />

Technically natural <strong>gas</strong> interchangeability can be treated<br />

as some kind of extension of <strong>gas</strong> interchangeability. A<br />

brief review of interchangeability research will be helpful<br />

as how to configure out theoretical and experimental<br />

approach, so as to answer following questions: will constituent<br />

difference of <strong>gas</strong>es from different sources lead to<br />

difficulties of various burners? Can appliance manufacturers<br />

have enough capacity to deal with such differences?<br />

In 1915, a large-scale survey in US was per<strong>for</strong>med,<br />

finally leading to four kinds of instability phenomena, viz.<br />

lift, flash-back, yellow-tip and incomplete combustion.<br />

On a diagram with primary-air and port intensity as coordinates,<br />

four curves represent these limits of instabilities.<br />

It was put <strong>for</strong>ward the relationship between operation<br />

point of a specific appliance and four curves can determine<br />

a margin with which the appliance would operate<br />

stably. In 1926 an Italian engineer Wobbe established an<br />

index to evaluate influence of <strong>gas</strong> properties upon heat<br />

input rating of a burner. In 1927 American Gas Association<br />

(AGA) initiated a 6-year research project, finally leading to<br />

“C index” approach. Shortly soon it was suggested that<br />

flame speed should be included as an influencing factor<br />

in 1934. In 1941 Knoy derived a mathematical <strong>for</strong>mula to<br />

predict interchangeability of liquefied petroleum <strong>gas</strong><br />

(LPG). In 1946 AGA laboratory (AGAL) published “Research<br />

Bulletin 36” which put <strong>for</strong>ward three indexes to quantitatively<br />

describe the degree of unstable phenomena<br />

related with atmospheric combustion. But incomplete<br />

combustion was not considered due to some technical<br />

reasons. The <strong>gas</strong> burners used by AGAL were made of<br />

cast-iron, with round-ports and ribbon-ports. In 1951<br />

Weaver published a 6-index method to predict interchangeability,<br />

after analyzing relationship between flame<br />

speed and experimental results of AGAL. Basically Weaver<br />

indexes represent the relative tendency of unstable combustion<br />

when interchanged.<br />

A research project presided by Delbourg (Gaz de<br />

France, GDF) was initiated in 1950 and a diagram-based<br />

method was established to predict interchangeability of<br />

manufactured <strong>gas</strong>, natural <strong>gas</strong>-air mixture, propane-air<br />

mixture, etc, in 1956. Combustion Potential (CP) was put<br />

<strong>for</strong>ward to represent influence of inner cone height and<br />

its impact upon lift, flash-back and CO emission. On a<br />

diagram with corrected Wobbe index and CP as independent<br />

coordinate, Delbourg triangle defines an area<br />

within which a specific burner can operate satisfactorily.<br />

Two additional indexes were combined to judge if sooting<br />

and yellow-tip would be encountered.<br />

Another diagram-based method was put <strong>for</strong>ward in<br />

1956 by Gilbert and Prigg to consider constituent<br />

changes resulting from manufactured <strong>gas</strong> process and<br />

raw materials. On G-P diagram flame speed was abscissa<br />

and Wobbe index was y-axis, both of which can be calculated<br />

directly from <strong>gas</strong> constituent. Four groups of<br />

<strong>gas</strong>es, G4, G5, G6, and G7 were experimentally tested on<br />

typical burners to establish limits of various <strong>gas</strong>es. In<br />

1964 Harris and Lovelace put <strong>for</strong>ward a modified diagram<br />

to take into account introduction of natural <strong>gas</strong><br />

into England and future potential of substitute natural<br />

<strong>gas</strong> (SNG). Later in 1978 their approach was refined by<br />

Dutton and allowable areas <strong>for</strong> long-term and shortterm<br />

operation were experimentally determined. Dutton<br />

method is still adopted to decide whether a <strong>gas</strong> can<br />

be introduced into networks in England.<br />

In 1980s Harsha, P. T. [5] pointed out that applicability<br />

of multi-index methods remained to be further clarified<br />

since most of these approaches were based upon experimental<br />

results from appliances popular at the time when<br />

experiments were carried out. In 1990s Liss, W.E. [6] suggested<br />

that interchangeability research should be<br />

emphasized again to evaluate the diversity of natural<br />

<strong>gas</strong>es including LNG and coal-based natural <strong>gas</strong>. Ted A.<br />

Williams [7] systematically summarized interchangeability<br />

researches available and concluded that the main target<br />

of research should be transferred from natural<br />

<strong>gas</strong>es—manufactured <strong>gas</strong> to constituent differences<br />

between natural <strong>gas</strong>es from different sources, such as<br />

pipeline <strong>gas</strong> and LNG.<br />

In 2003 National Petroleum Committee (NPC) published<br />

a report “Balancing Natural Gas Policy-Fueling the<br />

Demands of a Growing Economy” to call <strong>for</strong> necessity to<br />

refresh interchangeability method so as to introduce nonconventional<br />

<strong>gas</strong>. In Europe EASEE-<strong>gas</strong> published EASEE<strong>gas</strong><br />

CBP 2005-001/02 to put <strong>for</strong>ward Common Business<br />

Practice in regard to <strong>gas</strong> specifications. Halchuk-Harrington<br />

et al [8] recommended that the concept of “interchangeability”<br />

should be extended to include ALL appliances,<br />

including <strong>gas</strong>-turbine, <strong>gas</strong>-engines. Furthermore it was<br />

pointed out that most researches available were based<br />

upon fuel <strong>gas</strong> rather than natural <strong>gas</strong>, targeting at establishing<br />

standards <strong>for</strong> peak-shaving plants and blending<br />

plants. In addition natural <strong>gas</strong> considered in previous<br />

research was apparently different from current <strong>gas</strong>es, and<br />

only a small portion of <strong>gas</strong>es had similar constituents with<br />

today’s natural <strong>gas</strong> and LNG. In 2009 Ennis C.J. et al [9] compared<br />

<strong>gas</strong> constituents and interchangeability methods in<br />

US with those in Europe. Test <strong>gas</strong>es were compared to help<br />

understand interchangeability approaches and their applicability.<br />

It was concluded that it essential to re-evaluate<br />

28 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> Issue 3/2013


Gas quality<br />

REPORTS<br />

present theories so as to justify what can be accepted<br />

when interchanged. In 2010 BP published “Gas interchangeability<br />

and quality control” to include some experiments<br />

incorporating pipeline <strong>gas</strong> and LNG.<br />

Previous research revealed that all the interchangeability<br />

results are based upon experiments according to<br />

realistic <strong>gas</strong> constituents and <strong>gas</strong> appliances. Both final<br />

judgment criteria as “Yes” or “No” and testing method<br />

vary from a country to another. Un<strong>for</strong>tunately, in this field<br />

no systematic research had been carried out and no reliable<br />

conclusion can be referred in China. On the other<br />

hand, the supply amount of natural <strong>gas</strong> and appliance<br />

increased dramatically in past decade.<br />

Some experiments were per<strong>for</strong>med in Tongji University<br />

from 2011 to measure per<strong>for</strong>mance response of <strong>gas</strong><br />

cookers and water heaters to different <strong>gas</strong>es. Despite no<br />

well-established conclusion has been arrived, the work<br />

turned out to reflect present status of potential influence<br />

resulting from varying constituents.<br />

3. EXPERIMENT PROCEDURES<br />

3.1 Technical approaches<br />

Figure 4. The relationship between <strong>gas</strong> appliance test standard and<br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

Pressure regulator<br />

PNG<br />

Gas meter<br />

The <strong>gas</strong> interchangeability was literally defined as the<br />

ability of one <strong>gas</strong> to substitute another one on some<br />

appliances without materially changing the operation of<br />

appliances, including per<strong>for</strong>mance and emission, etc. For<br />

a specific appliance, the standards to which it is subjected<br />

always prescribe per<strong>for</strong>mance (including efficiency, emission,<br />

safety issues, etc.) in terms of minimum requirements.<br />

The testing procedures involved are also included.<br />

For example, a <strong>gas</strong> cooker must have efficiency higher<br />

than 50% (or 55%) and its CO emission (air-free) must be<br />

lower than 500ppm according to relevant Chinese standards.<br />

The per<strong>for</strong>mance data should be measured when<br />

fuelled by 2kPa of 12T-0 (Chinese classification number,<br />

equivalent to G20). For a “qualified” cooker which has<br />

efficiency 52% and CO 300ppm when fuelled by <strong>gas</strong> “A”,<br />

its efficiency drops to 48% while CO emission remains<br />

350ppm when fuelled by <strong>gas</strong> “B”. It is quite difficult to<br />

conclude if <strong>gas</strong> “B” can substitute <strong>gas</strong> “A”. In other words,<br />

both objective and subjective issues are involved in the<br />

field of interchangeability research. As shown in Figure 4,<br />

the detailed parameters used to describe per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

also change from one kind of appliance to another. For<br />

atmospheric appliances in China, publicly accepted issues<br />

include lift, flash-back, yellow-tip, and CO emission but<br />

no consideration was taken to efficiency across the world.<br />

In this paper the sampled appliances were domestic<br />

cookers and water heater incorporating atmospheric<br />

combustion. Related standards include “GB 16410-2007<br />

Domestic <strong>gas</strong> stove” [10] and “GB6932-2001 Domestic <strong>gas</strong><br />

instantaneous water heater” [11].<br />

C 4H 10<br />

C 3H 8<br />

C 2H 6<br />

CH 4<br />

Figure 5. Gas blending system<br />

3.2 TEST RIG<br />

CO 2<br />

N 2<br />

3.2.1 Gas blending system<br />

The test <strong>gas</strong>es were supplied by <strong>gas</strong>-blending system<br />

through which CH 4, C 2H 6, C 3H 10, C 4H 10 and N 2, CO 2, were<br />

blended to ensure exactly the same constituents as test<br />

<strong>gas</strong>es. Also the same Wobbe indexes and CP were<br />

achieved. Gas-blending system including a 5m 3 storage<br />

tank was shown in Figure 5. The purities of individual<br />

components involved were as follows: CH 4 99.9%, C 2H 6<br />

99.5%, C 3H 10 99.95%, C 4H 10 99.95%, N 2 99.999%, CO 2<br />

99.6%. After all the individual components were fed into<br />

the storage tank, the mixture remained 3-5 hours while<br />

propeller was working. Then <strong>gas</strong> was sampled and analyzed<br />

by <strong>gas</strong> chromatography. When the constituents of<br />

blended <strong>gas</strong> fell within allowable limitations compared<br />

with test <strong>gas</strong>es (listed in Table 2) [12], and the Wobbe<br />

indexes, heating values, of blended <strong>gas</strong>es differed not<br />

much from those of test <strong>gas</strong>es, the blended <strong>gas</strong> could be<br />

regarded as identical to test <strong>gas</strong>es.<br />

Storage tank<br />

to Burners<br />

Issue 3/2013 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> 29


REPORTS<br />

Gas quality<br />

Table 2. Accuracy and reproducibility of <strong>gas</strong> chromatography<br />

Component range<br />

(mole %)<br />

Reproducibility (%) Accuracy (%)<br />

0~0.1 0.01 0.02<br />

0.1~1.0 0.04 0.07<br />

1.0~5.0 0.07 0.10<br />

5.0~10 0.08 0.12<br />

>10 0.20 0.30<br />

Gas storage tank<br />

aluminum pot<br />

thermometer<br />

U-shape pressure gauge<br />

stirrer<br />

thermometer<br />

<strong>gas</strong> meter<br />

<strong>gas</strong> cooker<br />

Figure 6. Illustration of <strong>gas</strong> cooker test rig<br />

<strong>gas</strong> stoarge tank<br />

<strong>gas</strong> meter<br />

water heater<br />

U-shape pressure gauge<br />

sample ring<br />

flue <strong>gas</strong> measurement<br />

flue <strong>gas</strong> measurement<br />

3.2.2 Test system<br />

According to Ref[10] and Ref[11], a <strong>gas</strong> cooker test system<br />

and a water heater test system, as shown in Figure 6 and<br />

Figure 7 respectively, were set up to measure heat input<br />

rating, thermal efficiency, flame shape and pollutant<br />

emissions.<br />

3.3 Test <strong>gas</strong> constituents and sampled <strong>gas</strong><br />

appliances<br />

Three different types of natural <strong>gas</strong>es, namely OSG,<br />

PNG and LNG, will be introduced into Guangdong<br />

networks successively from 2009 to 2020. Accordingly<br />

10 <strong>gas</strong>es which have been presently available<br />

and are planned were selected as test <strong>gas</strong>es in this<br />

paper. The detailed constituents of 10 test <strong>gas</strong>es<br />

were listed in Table 3, among which PNG1 has the<br />

lowest Wobbe index and LNG5 has the highest<br />

Wobbe index, and PNG3, LNG2 similar to 12T-0 (G20)<br />

were in the middle of all <strong>gas</strong>es.<br />

9 sets of <strong>gas</strong> cookers covering 9 different brands<br />

and three types of ports (namely, round, square, ribbon),<br />

and 6 sets of water heaters covering 3 different<br />

brands were selected as representatives of popular<br />

burner structures in Guangdong. The popular structure<br />

of <strong>gas</strong> cookers in China markets includes injector<br />

made of cast-iron, diffusion/distribution head made of<br />

aluminum or cast-iron, together with burner head<br />

made of casting copper alloys. Furthermore port intensity<br />

of Chinese <strong>gas</strong> cooker was usually designed to be<br />

7.0~9.0 W/mm 2 , much narrower than its US counterpart<br />

in 1950s (4.5~16.8W/mm 2 ) [5].<br />

Figure 7. Illustrative schematic of water heater testing rig<br />

Table 3. Constituents and properties of natural <strong>gas</strong>es <strong>for</strong> Guangdong test<br />

Mole% CH4 C2H6 C3H8 C4H10 CO2 N2 HV (MJ/m 3 ) WI (MJ/m 3 )<br />

PNG1 96.00 0.70 0.20 0.10 2.30 0.70 37.04 48.3<br />

PNG2 92.79 4.00 0.30 0.30 1.80 0.80 38.39 49.4<br />

PNG3 98.90 0.20 0.22 0.20 0.00 0.46 37.70 50.7<br />

OSG1 85.99 9.61 0.20 0.00 3.60 0.60 39.10 48.8<br />

OSG2 84.40 4.70 2.40 5.20 0.90 2.40 43.84 52.4<br />

LNG1 98.50 0.00 0.30 0.10 0.00 1.10 37.63 50.1<br />

LNG2 97.00 1.90 0.30 0.10 0.00 0.70 38.30 50.6<br />

LNG3 90.70 7.50 0.30 0.10 0.20 1.20 39.68 51.1<br />

LNG4 89.40 6.00 3.20 1.10 0.00 0.30 42.12 52.9<br />

LNG5 86.60 9.00 2.90 0.90 0.10 0.50 42.53 53.0<br />

30 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> Issue 3/2013


Gas quality<br />

REPORTS<br />

Figure 8. Measured per<strong>for</strong>mances of <strong>gas</strong> cookers when fuelled by different <strong>gas</strong>es:<br />

(a) heat input rating, (b)thermal efficiency, (c) CO emission, (d) NOx emission<br />

4. RESULTS AND ANALYSIS<br />

4.1 Gas cooker<br />

4.1.1 Heat input rating<br />

Measured heat input rating of all sampled cookers under<br />

different <strong>gas</strong>es was shown in Figure 8(a). It can be found<br />

that heat input rating increases almost linearly with the<br />

increasing Wobbe index <strong>for</strong> all cookers. This suggested<br />

the heat input rating of cookers change consistently with<br />

Wobbe index, and it also can be precisely predicted by<br />

Wobbe index; on the other hand, it also means that<br />

experiment results are quite accurate and reliable.<br />

4.1.2 Thermal efficiency<br />

Figure 8(b) shows the change of thermal efficiency<br />

with varying <strong>gas</strong> constituents. Obviously the change of<br />

thermal efficiency of <strong>gas</strong> cookers does not give any<br />

regular pattern.<br />

According to Ref [10], thermal efficiency of <strong>gas</strong> cooker<br />

must be measured by use of both upper-limit pot and<br />

lower-limit pot according to by heat input rating. Then the<br />

thermal efficiency is calculated by interpolation of heat<br />

intensity in terms of bottom area, viz. kJ/mm 2 . In fact such<br />

procedure considers the flame and heat transfer in a more<br />

objective way. However it tends to make the continuously<br />

changing issue discrete. Secondly, the specific process of<br />

combustion and heat transfer were greatly influenced by<br />

burner structure and those <strong>gas</strong> constituents which will<br />

seriously affect flame characteristics, such as flame luminosity,<br />

height and speed. That is the reason why in most<br />

published papers thermal efficiency was not taken as a<br />

quantitative index to evaluate interchangeability in China.<br />

It was prescribed in Ref [10] that thermal efficiency<br />

must not be lower than 55% (<strong>for</strong> on-top cooker) or 50%<br />

(<strong>for</strong> embedded cooker). From the experiment results it<br />

can be concluded that with the change of <strong>gas</strong> constituents,<br />

thermal efficiency of all samples are not very satisfactory.<br />

For all 9*10=90 operation points, only 75% (67<br />

operation points) can be considered as “qualified” in<br />

Issue 3/2013 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> 31


REPORTS<br />

Gas quality<br />

terms of efficiency, but there is no one <strong>gas</strong> cooker which<br />

can give “qualified” thermal efficiency under all tested<br />

<strong>gas</strong>es. In other words, a lot of works remain to be finished<br />

<strong>for</strong> the manufacturers be<strong>for</strong>e a cooker with enough flexibility<br />

becomes available.<br />

Table 4. Test results of lifting <strong>for</strong> <strong>gas</strong> cookers<br />

C-A-1<br />

C-H-1<br />

PNG2 LNG1 LNG2<br />

PNG1 PNG2 OSG1<br />

PNG1 PNG2 PNG3<br />

4.1.3 CO emission<br />

From the very beginning of interchangeability CO emission<br />

has been a significant issue to characterize appliance per<strong>for</strong>mance.<br />

Usually there are clearly defined limits on CO emissions<br />

<strong>for</strong> safety reasons. Figure 8(c)<br />

illustrates CO emission of all samples<br />

under different <strong>gas</strong>es. The change of<br />

CO emission with the <strong>gas</strong> constituent<br />

doesn’t follow any regular pattern. A<br />

slightly increasing trend of CO emission<br />

with increasing Wobbe index was<br />

observed, though the values of CO <strong>for</strong><br />

most samples fell below 500ppm. In Ref<br />

[10] it is prescribed that CO emission (airfree)<br />

must not be higher than 500ppm.<br />

And it can be found that 6 samples<br />

can maintain lower CO emission<br />

under all tested <strong>gas</strong>es, accounting <strong>for</strong><br />

67%. For all 90 operation points, 78<br />

operation points (about 87%) can be<br />

considered as “qualified” in terms of<br />

CO emission. So it can be concluded<br />

that well-adjusted initial state of <strong>gas</strong><br />

cookers can be flexible enough not to<br />

materially increasing CO emission.<br />

4.1.4 NOx emission<br />

C-D-1<br />

LNG1 LNG2 OSG1<br />

PNG1 PNG2 PNG3<br />

Figure 8(d) shows the NOx emission<br />

of samples under different <strong>gas</strong>es.<br />

NOx emission of sampled cookers is<br />

found to increase with increasing<br />

Wobbe index, but NOx can be lower<br />

than 90ppm under most test <strong>gas</strong>es.<br />

Anyway currently there is no mandatory<br />

requirement to specify the<br />

allowable NOx emission.<br />

4.1.5 Lift<br />

C-I-1<br />

LNG1<br />

OSG1<br />

For natural <strong>gas</strong> interchangeability<br />

research, lift has always been a focus<br />

issue due to the potential incomplete<br />

combustion or even explosion hazard.<br />

In Ref [10] lift is visually checked<br />

immediately 15s after ignition. The<br />

experiment results are shown in<br />

Table 4. It can be found that lift tends<br />

to happen to samples when fuelled<br />

by lean <strong>gas</strong> such as PNG1, PNG2, OSG1<br />

and LNG1. This can be attributed to<br />

the smaller flame speed resulting<br />

from higher inert contents.<br />

32 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> Issue 3/2013


Gas quality<br />

REPORTS<br />

Figure 9. Measured per<strong>for</strong>mances of water heaters when fuelled by different <strong>gas</strong>es:<br />

(a) heat input rating, (b)thermal efficiency, (c) CO emission, (d) NOx emission<br />

4.2 Water heater<br />

As illustrated in Figure 9(a) heat input rating of all sampled<br />

water heaters were found to increase linearly with<br />

Wobbe index increment. Compared with <strong>gas</strong> cookers,<br />

the increasing degree of input rating is somewhat different,<br />

though Wobbe index can also be used to predict<br />

changing trend of heat input rating.<br />

Thermal efficiency measurement results were<br />

shown in Figure 9(b), it can be found that variations of<br />

efficiency remain within 4~5 percentage points. It was<br />

specified that efficiency of third-/second-/first- class<br />

water heater should not be lower than 84%, 88% and<br />

96%, respectively. Two condensing water heaters<br />

(W-A-1 and W-C-2) gave efficiency higher than 96%<br />

and can be labeled as “qualified” under all 10 <strong>gas</strong>es.<br />

Efficiency of W-C-1 dropped below 88% under PNG1<br />

and LNG1. The remaining 3 water heaters can give efficiency<br />

higher than 88%.<br />

As shown in Figure 9(c), only 5 measured points were<br />

observed to give CO emission above 600ppm (allowable<br />

highest concentration) which is specified by Ref [11]. All<br />

the other 4 water heaters can be termed as “qualified”<br />

under 10 <strong>gas</strong>es, accounting <strong>for</strong> 67%.<br />

NOx emission did not give any regular pattern with<br />

change of <strong>gas</strong> constituents. Except <strong>for</strong> W-B-1 gave a<br />

90ppm+ under LNG4 and LNG5, all the other water heaters<br />

can keep an emission lower than 90ppm. An apparent<br />

trend can be found that NOx emission increase with<br />

increasing Wobbe index of <strong>gas</strong>es.<br />

5. CONCLUSIONS<br />

Most interchangeability research available was per<strong>for</strong>med<br />

by means of experiments on appliances popular<br />

at the time when the research was done. Because the<br />

structure, material, designing parameters of burners in<br />

current Chinese market differ much from those <strong>gas</strong> appliances<br />

almost 50 years ago, it is quite doubtful whether<br />

the well-established prediction methods (index- or diagram-based)<br />

can be applicable to present Chinese <strong>gas</strong>es<br />

from different sources.<br />

Issue 3/2013 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> 33


REPORTS<br />

Gas quality<br />

9 <strong>gas</strong> cookers and 6 water heaters were experimentally<br />

tested and heat input rating, thermal efficiency, CO<br />

and NOx emission were measured when fuelled by 10<br />

<strong>gas</strong>es which have been/will be supplied in Guangdong.<br />

The testing procedure and facilities involved strictly follow<br />

related national standards. The conclusions can be<br />

summarized as follows:<br />

(1) The per<strong>for</strong>mance of domestic appliances (including<br />

cookers and water heaters) are found to change with variable<br />

<strong>gas</strong> constituents. None of the 9 cookers can give satisfactory<br />

thermal efficiency under all 10 <strong>gas</strong>es investigated.<br />

1/3 of cookers were found to emit higher concentration of<br />

CO and 44.4% of sampled cookers would have lift flame<br />

under low Wobbe index <strong>gas</strong>es. Only 3 cookers can keep<br />

“qualified” in terms of both CO emission and lift, even if<br />

thermal efficiency was not taken as a necessary measurement<br />

index. 3 out of the 6 sampled water heaters can<br />

maintain second-class efficiency under all 10 <strong>gas</strong>es while<br />

giving “qualified” CO emission. Half of sampled water heaters<br />

would degrade with changing <strong>gas</strong> constituents.<br />

(2) If a <strong>gas</strong> cooker was well-adjusted at the beginning<br />

of measurement, CO and NOx emission would not change<br />

materially. And most sampled appliances can tolerate the<br />

variation range of constituents. Gas cookers tended to<br />

decrease efficiency when <strong>gas</strong> constituents were changed,<br />

and more likely to become “unqualified”. For water heaters<br />

tested, thermal efficiency could be maintained within a<br />

range permitted by administrative requirement, and it<br />

seemed no serious problem would occur.<br />

The criterion as to decide whether a <strong>gas</strong> can be substituted<br />

by another one on a specific appliance depends on<br />

both the standard to which the appliance is subjected and<br />

the allowable margin, the latter of which is not fixed in terms<br />

of quantitative indexes around the world. The work in this<br />

paper can be considered as an initiating point to explore what<br />

would happen to domestic appliances if the <strong>gas</strong> constituents<br />

change to certain extent in China. Both theoretical analysis<br />

and experiments are needed to further reveal applicable<br />

index- or diagram-based method <strong>for</strong> Chinese <strong>gas</strong> industry.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

[1] BP Company. BP Statistical Review of World Energy<br />

June 2012 [2012-06].<br />

[2] Nobuyuki Hi<strong>gas</strong>hi. Natural Gas in China Market evolution<br />

and strategy [2009-06].<br />

[3] Energy In<strong>for</strong>mation Administration. China Energy<br />

Data, Statistics and Analysis - Oil, Gas, Electricity, Coal<br />

[2010-11].<br />

[4] General Administration of Quality Supervision,<br />

Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic<br />

of China (AQSIQ). GB/T 13611-2006 Classification and<br />

essential property of city <strong>gas</strong>. Beijing: China Standard<br />

Press, 2006. (in Chinese)<br />

[5] Harsha, P. T., Edelman, R. B., and France, D. H.: Catalogue<br />

of Existing Interchangeability Prediction Methods.<br />

Gas Research Institute, 1980.<br />

[6] Liss, W. E., Thrasher, W. H.: Variability of Natural Gas<br />

Composition In Select Major Metropolitan Areas Of<br />

The United States, Final Report, GRI-92/0123. Gas<br />

Research Institute, 1992.<br />

[7] Williams, T.A.: AGA Interchange Background: Technical<br />

issues and research need in <strong>gas</strong> interchangeability<br />

in the US [2006-06].<br />

[8] Halchuk-Harrington, R. and Wilson, R.: AGA Bulletin 36<br />

and Weaver Interchangeability Methods: Yesterday’s<br />

Research and Today’s Challenges [2006-05].<br />

[9] Ennis, C. J., Botros, K. K. and Engler, D.: On the Difference<br />

between US Example Supply Gases, European Limit<br />

Gases, and their Respective Interchangeability Indices<br />

[2009-05].<br />

[10] General Administration of Quality Supervision,<br />

Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic<br />

of China (AQSIQ).GB 16410-2007 Domestic <strong>gas</strong> stove.<br />

Beijing: China Standard Press. 2007. (in Chinese)<br />

[11] General Administration of Quality Supervision,<br />

Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic<br />

of China (AQSIQ). GB 6932-2001 Domestic <strong>gas</strong> instantaneous<br />

water heater. Beijing: China Standard Press.<br />

2001. (in Chinese)<br />

[12] General Administration of Quality Supervision,<br />

Inspection and Quarantine of the People's Republic<br />

of China (AQSIQ). GBT13610-2003 Gas composition<br />

analysis by <strong>gas</strong> chromatography. Beijing: China<br />

Standard Press. 2003. (in Chinese)<br />

AUTHORS<br />

Yangjun Zhang, Ph.D. candidate<br />

Gas Research Institute<br />

China | Tongji University<br />

Phone: +86 21 69583802<br />

E-mail: zyjtongji@163.com<br />

Prof. Dr. Eng. Chaokui Qin<br />

Gas Research Institute<br />

China | Tongji University<br />

Phone: +86 21 69583802<br />

E-mail: chkqin@tongji.edu.cn<br />

34 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> Issue 3/2013


www.industrial-valves.de<br />

From Experts <strong>for</strong> Experts…<br />

The German journal “Industrial Valves” reports<br />

in English language on developments and<br />

solutions in valve technology <strong>for</strong> industrial<br />

applications. The prime emphasis of each issue<br />

is made up of up-to-date, practically orientated<br />

technical articles by highly capable authors.<br />

Other important features include company and<br />

product news.<br />

The journal provides highly topical in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

on valves and their components in the chemicals<br />

and processing industries, in power generating<br />

plant and thermal process applications, in the<br />

oil and <strong>gas</strong> field, in the water industry, wastewater<br />

management, in sterile applications and<br />

in industry in general.<br />

“Industrial Valves” also contains an extensive<br />

Buyer´s Guide <strong>for</strong> valves, actuators and access ories<br />

which is available at www.industrial-valves.de,<br />

too.<br />

Get your FREE ISSUE<br />

Download complete issues of Industial Valves<br />

www.industrial-valves.de<br />

Industrial Valves is published by Vulkan-Verlag GmbH, 45128 Essen, Germany<br />

For advertising, please contact:<br />

Helga Pelzer (Mrs.)<br />

Phone: +49 201 8200235<br />

h.pelzer@vulkan-verlag.de<br />

For Press in<strong>for</strong>mations, please contact:<br />

Wolfgang Mönning (Mr.)<br />

Phone: +49 201 8200225<br />

w.moenning@vulkan-verlag.de


REPORTS<br />

Gas quality<br />

Admissible hydrogen<br />

concentrations in<br />

natural <strong>gas</strong> systems<br />

by Klaus Altfeld and Dave Pinchbeck<br />

There are proposals to inject hydrogen (H 2) from renewable sources in the natural <strong>gas</strong> network. This measure<br />

would allow the very large transport and storage capacities of the existing infrastructure, particularly high-pressure<br />

pipelines, to be used <strong>for</strong> indirect electricity transport and storage.<br />

1. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS<br />

The results of this study show that an admixture of up to<br />

10 % by volume of hydrogen to natural <strong>gas</strong> is possible in<br />

some parts of the natural <strong>gas</strong> system. However there are<br />

still some important areas where issues remain:<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

underground porous rock storage: hydrogen is a<br />

good substrate <strong>for</strong> sulphate-reducing and sulphurreducing<br />

bacteria. As a result, there are risks associated<br />

with: bacterial growth in underground <strong>gas</strong> storage<br />

facilities leading to the <strong>for</strong>mation of H 2S; the consumption<br />

of H 2, and the plugging of reservoir rock. A<br />

limit value <strong>for</strong> the maximum acceptable hydrogen<br />

concentration in natural <strong>gas</strong> cannot be defined at the<br />

moment. (H 2-related aspects concerning wells have<br />

not been part of this project);<br />

steel tanks in natural <strong>gas</strong> vehicles: specification UN ECE<br />

R 110 stipulates a limit value <strong>for</strong> hydrogen of 2 vol%;<br />

<strong>gas</strong> turbines: most of the currently installed <strong>gas</strong> turbines<br />

were specified <strong>for</strong> a H 2 fraction in natural <strong>gas</strong> of<br />

1 vol% or even lower. 5 % may be attainable with<br />

minor modification or tuning measures. Some new or<br />

upgraded types will be able to cope with concentrations<br />

up to 15 vol%;<br />

<strong>gas</strong> engines: it is recommended to restrict the hydrogen<br />

concentration to 2 vol%. Higher concentrations<br />

up to 10 vol% may be possible <strong>for</strong> dedicated <strong>gas</strong><br />

engines with sophisticated control systems if the<br />

methane number of the natural <strong>gas</strong>/hydrogen mixture<br />

is well above the specified minimum value;<br />

many process <strong>gas</strong> chromatographs will not be capable<br />

of analysing hydrogen.<br />

Investigations have been conducted to evaluate the<br />

impact of hydrogen as related to the above topics. At<br />

present it is not possible to specify a limiting hydrogen<br />

value which would generally be valid <strong>for</strong> all parts of the<br />

European <strong>gas</strong> infrastructure and, as a consequence, we<br />

strongly recommend a case by case analysis. Some practical<br />

recommendations are given at the end of the paper.<br />

2. INTRODUCTION<br />

In certain parts of Europe we have the situation already<br />

where the generation of 'renewable' electricity from<br />

wind and solar <strong>energy</strong> has led, from time to time, to production<br />

plants being shut down because the electricity<br />

generated exceeds local requirements and the transportation<br />

or storage capacities are inadequate. It's a problem<br />

that will become even more severe in the future because<br />

construction of new electricity lines and high-capacity<br />

pumped storage power plants is a costly and very lengthy<br />

process. Projects are there<strong>for</strong>e being discussed in which<br />

the surplus electricity is used to power electrolysers that<br />

will split water into its component parts, with the hydrogen<br />

being directly injected into natural <strong>gas</strong> pipelines <strong>for</strong><br />

both storage and transportation. The concept has<br />

become known as "Power to Gas" or P2G.<br />

It is becoming more widely accepted that hydrogen<br />

could become an important <strong>energy</strong> carrier in the <strong>energy</strong><br />

mix in the quest <strong>for</strong> sustainability, because it offers several<br />

benefits related particularly to the potential <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong><br />

storage. Indeed it's possible that, with the existing infrastructure,<br />

hydrogen/natural <strong>gas</strong> mixtures could be transported,<br />

stored and converted into electricity where<br />

36 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> Issue 3/2013


Gas quality<br />

REPORTS<br />

required. However, if the addition of small quantities of<br />

hydrogen, up to 10 %, to natural <strong>gas</strong> pipelines is to be<br />

accepted, it must guarantee a technically feasible, economically<br />

viable and, crucially, safe system of storage,<br />

transportation and use.<br />

It's clear that the European natural <strong>gas</strong> pipeline network<br />

has the potential to offer such a solution and several studies,<br />

including the EC-supported NaturalHy [1] project, have<br />

examined the feasibility of using it as a means of widespread<br />

hydrogen storage and transportation. However a number of<br />

crucial aspects were not sufficiently addressed in earlier<br />

studies and work remains to examine these bottlenecks in<br />

the interaction between hydrogen and the wider European<br />

natural <strong>gas</strong> network, including aspects of utilisation.<br />

The volume of hydrogen that may be added to natural<br />

<strong>gas</strong> is limited. There are already some very low 'ad hoc'<br />

limits in place, but studies [1] have shown that, with certain<br />

restrictions, admixture up to 10 % is not critical in<br />

most cases. However, there are bottlenecks which this<br />

project sets out to identify, proposing, where possible,<br />

solutions so that the natural <strong>gas</strong> infrastructure can be<br />

developed sufficiently to support the storage and transport<br />

of hydrogen-natural <strong>gas</strong> mixtures in a move towards<br />

a low carbon economy. This will, of course, cause natural<br />

<strong>gas</strong> and electricity networks to become even more interdependent,<br />

as shown in Figure 1, and the project highlights<br />

the R&D that will be necessary to achieve a robust<br />

solution based on the existing natural <strong>gas</strong> grid and its<br />

various constituent components.<br />

The project was initiated by E.ON New Build and Technology<br />

GmbH, under the auspices of GERG, the European<br />

Gas Research Group, and has been conducted on behalf of<br />

a consortium of interested parties from a range of relevant<br />

industry sectors, including; <strong>gas</strong> industry; <strong>energy</strong> transmission,<br />

power generation, equipment manufacturers, institutes,<br />

etc. (See annex 1). Most of the work, which has consisted<br />

of reviews of existing work and literature searches,<br />

was carried out by a few, specially selected 'active' partners.<br />

No experimental work was involved but the collated, existing<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation has been substantially augmented by inhouse<br />

knowledge from both 'active' and project partners.<br />

3. COMBUSTION OF DIFFERENT GASES:<br />

GENERAL REMARKS<br />

The most important combustion parameters are Wobbe<br />

index, methane number and laminar flame speed.<br />

H-<strong>gas</strong>es only are considered in this study.<br />

3.1 Wobbe index<br />

The Wobbe index (W) is an indicator of the interchangeability<br />

of different fuel <strong>gas</strong>es. Regardless of calorific value,<br />

<strong>gas</strong>es with the same W produce the same heat load in a<br />

Coalfluctuating<br />

fluctuating<br />

Figure 1. Convergence of power and <strong>gas</strong> infrastructures<br />

<strong>gas</strong> burner. There<strong>for</strong>e W is by far the most important<br />

combustion parameter <strong>for</strong> <strong>gas</strong> appliances (except<br />

engines) and is specified in all countries. Admixture of<br />

hydrogen slightly decreases W (10 % hydrogen lowers W<br />

by some 3 %). Figure 2 illustrates the W of pure methane,<br />

biomethane (simplified analysis: C1=methane: 96 %; CO 2:<br />

4 %) and a "medium rich" LNG (C1: 92 %; C2: 5 %; C3: 2 %;<br />

C4: 1 %). (N.B.: % always means vol% in this paper).<br />

The W range is 13.8 kWh/m 3 -15.4 kWh/m 3 <strong>for</strong> the<br />

<strong>gas</strong>es without hydrogen admixture and 13.5-15.0 kWh/m 3<br />

if 10 % hydrogen is admixed (Wobbe index reference<br />

temperatures: 0 °C (volume), 25 °C (combustion), 1.02325<br />

bar). It is obvious that the variations caused by the different<br />

<strong>gas</strong>es are significantly higher than the effects caused<br />

by 10 % hydrogen. However, if biomethane is considered,<br />

local Wobbe specifications can prevent hydrogen injection<br />

because biomethane has already a low Wobbe index<br />

(H-<strong>gas</strong>es only are considered in this study).<br />

-<br />

-<br />

Issue 3/2013 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> 37


REPORTS<br />

Gas quality<br />

4,9<br />

Wobbe index [kWh/m 3 ]<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

14,5<br />

0<br />

14,9 14,5<br />

15,4<br />

15<br />

13,8 13,5<br />

15,4<br />

15<br />

13,8 13,5<br />

methane biomethane "medium rich" LNG<br />

without hydrogen<br />

Figure 3 shows the MN of the <strong>gas</strong>es described in<br />

chapter 3.1 without/with 10 % hydrogen admixture.<br />

Again it can be concluded that the MN of different<br />

<strong>gas</strong>es without H 2 show a greater variation (from 100 to<br />

e.g. 74) than the effect of 10 % hydrogen (reduction by ≤<br />

10). However, if the natural <strong>gas</strong> already has a low MN<br />

(e.g. rich LNG) the admixture of 10 % hydrogen can<br />

result in an unacceptably low MN from a <strong>gas</strong> engine<br />

operator's perspective (combined heat and power<br />

plants, dedicated natural <strong>gas</strong> vehicles).<br />

Although the MN is an important parameter <strong>for</strong><br />

<strong>gas</strong> engines it has not been specified in most of the<br />

EU member states. This may be changed as a result<br />

of the CEN TC 234 activities in developing a European<br />

<strong>gas</strong> quality standard which includes the methane<br />

number.<br />

without hydrogen<br />

<strong>gas</strong> with 10%<br />

hydrogen admixture<br />

3.3 Laminar flame speed<br />

110<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

90<br />

10<br />

0<br />

100<br />

90<br />

103<br />

methane biomethane "medium rich" LNG<br />

70<br />

100<br />

Figure 2. Wobbe index of different <strong>gas</strong>es without /<br />

with 10% hydrogen admixture<br />

methane number<br />

103<br />

94<br />

74<br />

methane biomethane 70 "medium rich" LNG<br />

Figure 3. Methane number of different <strong>gas</strong>es<br />

without / with 10% hydrogen admixture<br />

94<br />

<strong>gas</strong> with 10%<br />

hydrogen admixture<br />

74<br />

70<br />

without hydrogen<br />

<strong>gas</strong> with 10%<br />

hydrogen admixture<br />

Flame speed is a complex combustion parameter<br />

related to flash back and flame stability. Both laminar<br />

and turbulent flame speeds may be defined but, un<strong>for</strong>tunately,<br />

they are difficult to measure and are not, there<strong>for</strong>e,<br />

specified in technical rules and standards.<br />

Figure 4 illustrates that the experimental data <strong>for</strong><br />

laminar flame speed, from different authors [3, 4, 5, 6, 7,<br />

8], have significant deviations but there is a trend to<br />

increasing flame speed with increasing hydrogen addition.<br />

There is typically a ~5 % increase of the laminar<br />

flame speed <strong>for</strong> hydrogen admixture of 10 %. This<br />

increasing trend is also true <strong>for</strong> different air ratios and<br />

combustion conditions. Relevant in<strong>for</strong>mation, depending<br />

on the device, the addition of hydrogen to natural<br />

<strong>gas</strong> can also change the fuel-air ratio, which may<br />

change the flame speed significantly, as shown in Figure<br />

5 (Chapter 5.5).<br />

With regard to <strong>gas</strong> turbines, turbulent flame speed is<br />

an important parameter. However, relevant in<strong>for</strong>mation is<br />

limited, but calculations [9] suggest that hydrogen has a<br />

stronger influence on turbulent flame speed. Hydrogen<br />

admixture of 10 % may result in a ~10 % increase in turbulent<br />

flame speed.<br />

without hydrogen<br />

<strong>gas</strong> with 10%<br />

hydrogen admixture<br />

4. NON-CRITICAL ASPECTS<br />

3.2 Methane number<br />

The methane number (MN) describes the knock behaviour<br />

of fuel <strong>gas</strong>es in internal combustion engines and<br />

strongly depends on the specific <strong>gas</strong> composition and<br />

especially the amounts of higher hydrocarbons (C3, C4,<br />

C5) and hydrogen in the fuel <strong>gas</strong>. The MN of pure methane<br />

is 100, <strong>for</strong> pure hydrogen it's 0 and <strong>for</strong> rich LNG:<br />

65-70, according to the AVL method [2].<br />

methane biomethane "medium rich" LNG<br />

Various studies have shown that most parts of the natural<br />

<strong>gas</strong> system can cope well with hydrogen addition of<br />

up to 10 %, with no adverse effects and, as a result, they<br />

do not feature prominently in this paper. However, the<br />

whole system has been analysed and, <strong>for</strong> completeness,<br />

the components or particular aspects which should<br />

cause no problems are listed below:<br />

■■<br />

natural <strong>gas</strong> transmission pipelines and compressors,<br />

despite concerns about hydrogen embrittlement;<br />

38 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> Issue 3/2013


Gas quality<br />

REPORTS<br />

0,8<br />

0,8<br />

0,7<br />

0,7<br />

0,6<br />

0,6<br />

laminar flame speed [m/s]<br />

0,5<br />

0,5<br />

0,4<br />

0,4<br />

0,3<br />

0,3<br />

0,2<br />

0,2<br />

0,1<br />

0,1<br />

air ratio λ = 1<br />

air ratio pressure p = 1 atm<br />

pressure atm<br />

0<br />

0 5 10 15 20 25 30<br />

10 15 20 25 30<br />

Figure 4. Laminar flame speed<br />

versus hydrogen<br />

fraction in methane<br />

Hu<br />

Hu<br />

2009<br />

2009<br />

Cammarotta<br />

Cammarotta<br />

2009<br />

2009<br />

Miao<br />

Miao<br />

2008<br />

2008<br />

vol-% H 2 in CH 4<br />

vol-% 2 in CH<br />

Hermanns 4<br />

Hermanns<br />

2007<br />

2007<br />

Huang<br />

Huang<br />

2006<br />

2006<br />

Guenther<br />

Guenther<br />

1971<br />

1971<br />

GRI 3.0<br />

GRI 3.0<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

<strong>gas</strong> distribution pipework systems, including metering<br />

and billing equipment, seals, etc., where leakage<br />

was shown to be negligible;<br />

in-house pipework systems, with no problems<br />

reported at all;<br />

industrial applications, where no specific problems<br />

are anticipated if the Wobbe index of the <strong>gas</strong> mixture<br />

is well within the specified range. (See chapter 7);<br />

safety parameters (e.g. flammability limits, ignition<br />

<strong>energy</strong>, flame speed) affected only marginally; the<br />

increase of risk is very small. However special attention<br />

must be given to <strong>gas</strong> detection devices. (See chapter<br />

5.7). A re-assessment of the ATEX Zoning may be<br />

required, depending on the methods used;<br />

some standards recommend a maximum content of<br />

hydrogen and other components of 5 % (ISO 6976).<br />

More details are available in the full report 1 , although this<br />

is confidential to the project members.<br />

5. SENSITIVE COMPONENTS<br />

It's useful here to define what is meant by "sensitive components"<br />

and it's simply those elements of the <strong>gas</strong> system<br />

which are affected, or in the longer term, could<br />

deteriorate or could cause adverse effects in the presence<br />

of hydrogen admixtures up to 10 % in natural <strong>gas</strong>.<br />

As such, they are considered as limiting factors to the<br />

introduction of hydrogen into the natural <strong>gas</strong> system and<br />

require some investigation if they are to be understood<br />

and resolved. The specific effects vary depending on the<br />

component and may relate to the way processes operate,<br />

accuracy, susceptibility to corrosion effects, etc. As far as<br />

possible, all of the components known to be sensitive<br />

have been considered and are detailed below.<br />

5.1 Underground storage<br />

Gas storage is a key component in the natural <strong>gas</strong> chain<br />

and, in a future scenario, its various facilities could come<br />

into contact with natural <strong>gas</strong>/hydrogen mixtures. Little<br />

consideration has been given to this prospect until very<br />

recently, and experts have been reluctant to suggest a limit<br />

value <strong>for</strong> hydrogen addition because of the difficulty of<br />

identifying and quantifying the relevant processes among<br />

all possible reactions in underground storage facilities.<br />

There are three aspects to underground storage: inner<br />

reservoir phenomena, phenomena linked to the well and<br />

the phenomena of interactions between well and reservoir.<br />

This review focuses only on inner reservoir phenomena<br />

and excludes well phenomena and phenomena of<br />

interactions between well and reservoir. Wells, which link<br />

reservoirs to the surface, were excluded from the study<br />

but they are the subject of a parallel exercise 2 [10].<br />

1 Copies are available to the general public from GERG at a cost of €500<br />

(€200 <strong>for</strong> universities)<br />

2 DGMK - Deutsche Wissenschaftliche Gesellschaft für Erdöl, Erd<strong>gas</strong> und<br />

Kohle e.V.<br />

Issue 3/2013 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> 39


REPORTS<br />

Gas quality<br />

Approximately twenty reservoir phenomena have<br />

been identified, all of which could impact reservoir<br />

exploitation. They have been ranked in importance,<br />

based on data found in the literature and from user<br />

experience, and, as a result, the review has been<br />

focused on four major types of storage or reservoirs,<br />

namely: aquifers, oil and <strong>gas</strong> depleted fields, salt caverns<br />

and lined rock caverns.<br />

The most serious issue, or potential issue, identified,<br />

particularly in aquifers and oil/<strong>gas</strong> depleted fields, is<br />

the potential <strong>for</strong> bacterial growth [11]. The associated<br />

issues are principally loss of <strong>gas</strong> volume and disappearance<br />

of injected hydrogen, whether partial or total.<br />

There is also potential <strong>for</strong> damage to the cavity itself,<br />

and production of H 2S.<br />

No problems were identified with salt cavern storage,<br />

so they could possibly be used <strong>for</strong> storage of<br />

hydrogen and natural <strong>gas</strong> mixtures, if necessary. However,<br />

it's important to note the potential <strong>for</strong> leaks from<br />

steel-lined rock caverns and we await results from the<br />

above-mentioned project. [10]<br />

It's clear then that the effect of bacteria is the main<br />

concern <strong>for</strong> underground storage of hydrogen and natural<br />

<strong>gas</strong> mixtures, specifically in aquifers and depleted<br />

fields, as the interaction phenomena are not well understood,<br />

nor is it easy to identify specific bacterial species<br />

and to know, or measure, their quantities in situ.<br />

In summary, it's not possible at the moment to<br />

define a limit value <strong>for</strong> the maximum acceptable<br />

hydrogen admixture <strong>for</strong> natural <strong>gas</strong> stored underground.<br />

Clearly more work is required on a number of<br />

aspects. (See chapter 6.1)<br />

5.2 CNG steel tanks, metallic and<br />

elastomer seals<br />

Addition of even small quantities of hydrogen to natural<br />

<strong>gas</strong> networks is currently a show-stopper with<br />

regard to steel CNG vehicle tanks. The potential <strong>for</strong><br />

harmful interaction between hydrogen and steel has<br />

been known <strong>for</strong> many years and severe restrictions<br />

have long been in place. According to UNECE 3 Regulation<br />

110 <strong>for</strong> CNG vehicles, the H 2 content in CNG is<br />

limited to 2 vol %, if the tank cylinders are manufactured<br />

from steel with an ultimate tensile strength<br />

exceeding 950 MPa. This limit stems from the risk of<br />

hydrogen embrittlement which is known to cause<br />

accelerated crack propagation in steel and is, there<strong>for</strong>e,<br />

a critical safety issue. It's worth mentioning that<br />

the same 2 % limit is echoed in the corresponding ISO<br />

standard 11439 [12] and under DIN 51624, the German<br />

national standard <strong>for</strong> natural <strong>gas</strong> as a motor fuel.<br />

3 United Nations Economic Commission <strong>for</strong> Europe<br />

In Europe, quenched and tempered steel 34CrMo4<br />

is employed exclusively <strong>for</strong> CNG tanks and is compatible<br />

with hydrogen, provided that the tensile strength<br />

of the steel is less than 950 MPa, and that the inner<br />

surfaces of the cylinder have been inspected <strong>for</strong> allowable<br />

defects. However, existing steel CNG tanks are<br />

made predominantly of steel grades with a tensile<br />

strength greater than 950 MPa, because these materials<br />

allow smaller wall thicknesses and thus reduced<br />

weight of the cylinders, which is preferred <strong>for</strong> vehicle<br />

use. In addition, CNG tanks are not inspected <strong>for</strong> surface<br />

defects (simply since there is no need <strong>for</strong> it.)<br />

A key aspect here is that, under UNECE rules, car<br />

manufacturers are held responsible <strong>for</strong> the suitability of<br />

car components, including CNG tanks. This inevitably<br />

means that CNG vehicles will only be fuelled with natural<br />

<strong>gas</strong>es containing more than 2 % hydrogen when<br />

substantial tests have proved that it's safe and the existing<br />

regulations have been amended accordingly.<br />

A complete screening of the existing tank population<br />

will be complex, as tests must prove that the storage<br />

tanks are safe under daily conditions, from -40 to<br />

+85 °C, including exposure to frequent cyclic loads<br />

induced by the fueling process and consumption and,<br />

finally, a lifetime of 20 years. So, clearly this will be a<br />

long-term process where, at the moment, final success<br />

cannot be guaranteed.<br />

In addition to the well-known embrittlement difficulties<br />

with hydrogen, there are concerns regarding leak<br />

tightness of seals, both metallic and polymer. All <strong>gas</strong> carrying<br />

components inside the vehicle are currently<br />

designed and tested <strong>for</strong> a maximum 2 % H 2. As a result, all<br />

such components are potentially critical and their ability<br />

to cope with higher H 2 fractions remains to be tested.<br />

5.3 Gas engines<br />

Despite the limited availability of published in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

in this area, the physics of combustion, supported by<br />

experimental evidence from real engines, shows that<br />

the increase in flame speed and reactivity caused by<br />

hydrogen addition to natural <strong>gas</strong> typically increases incylinder<br />

peak pressures. As described in chapter 3.2 the<br />

methane number decreases if the proportion of hydrogen<br />

(or higher hydrocarbons) is increased.<br />

This can result in:<br />

■■<br />

increased combustion and end-<strong>gas</strong> temperature,<br />

which leads directly to enhanced sensitivity <strong>for</strong> engine<br />

knock and increased NOx emissions;<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

improved engine efficiency, but with increased engine<br />

wear and increased (non-compliant) NOx emissions;<br />

reduced power output or tripping, <strong>for</strong> engines with<br />

knock control;<br />

40 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> Issue 3/2013


Gas quality<br />

REPORTS<br />

■■<br />

an adverse effect on lambda sensors which can<br />

cause an inaccurate (low) measurement of oxygen in<br />

the exhaust <strong>gas</strong>. (This will cause the control system<br />

to change the air: fuel ratio, resulting in a leaner mixture<br />

than intended, thus influencing per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

and increasing both emission levels, especially NOx,<br />

and the possibility of misfiring).<br />

That even low fractions of hydrogen can precipitate<br />

engine knock, compared to the natural <strong>gas</strong> to which it<br />

has been added, directly implies one limitation on hydrogen<br />

fraction: if the knock resistance of the fuel is at the<br />

lowest value acceptable <strong>for</strong> an engine or population of<br />

engines and no adaption of engine operation is possible,<br />

then no hydrogen can be added to this <strong>gas</strong>.<br />

For natural <strong>gas</strong>es with a relatively high knock resistance,<br />

such that the engines that use it have a substantial<br />

knock "reserve", the question of maximum hydrogen<br />

addition is complicated by other per<strong>for</strong>mance issues,<br />

partially related to the large diversity of engine types<br />

and field adjustments of the installed base. At the least,<br />

installed base engines are not expected to have controls<br />

to adapt engine conditions <strong>for</strong> (fluctuating fractions<br />

of) hydrogen addition.<br />

One of these per<strong>for</strong>mance issues regards NOx<br />

emissions; many <strong>gas</strong> engines that are not capable of<br />

adapting their operating conditions <strong>for</strong> hydrogen<br />

addition (air-fuel ratio, timing), and are at the permitting<br />

limit <strong>for</strong> NOx, can also admit no hydrogen. A<br />

more complex issue regards the consequences of the<br />

higher cylinder pressure <strong>for</strong> engine/component lifetime,<br />

reliability and maintenance requirements, which<br />

are more difficult to quantify. However, these issues<br />

are not hydrogen specific; <strong>for</strong> example, the admixture<br />

of LPG leads to similar effects.<br />

There are recommendations that 2 - 5 % hydrogen<br />

addition should be acceptable <strong>for</strong> engines, depending<br />

on the source of the <strong>gas</strong>. However, given the large and<br />

unknown variation in operating conditions of the<br />

installed base of engines, and the dependence of knock<br />

and NOx emissions on the <strong>gas</strong> composition supplied to<br />

any given engine, it is strongly recommended that a case<br />

by case approach be used to determine the maximum<br />

allowable hydrogen fraction. (See chapter 7).<br />

Most of the above has been derived from experience<br />

with stationary engines. Of course, the physical effects<br />

are the same <strong>for</strong> engines used in the transportation sector<br />

and, hence, the conclusions made here remain valid.<br />

5.4 Gas turbines<br />

It is widely understood that there are strict limitations to<br />

the degree to which hydrogen may be added to <strong>gas</strong><br />

turbine fuel. It is normal <strong>for</strong> customers to specify a particular<br />

fuel, often depending on what is available locally,<br />

sometimes even process <strong>gas</strong>, so that the <strong>gas</strong> turbine<br />

combustion system could be carefully specified and<br />

tuned <strong>for</strong> optimum operation.<br />

Current fuel specifications <strong>for</strong> many <strong>gas</strong> turbines<br />

place a limit on hydrogen volume fraction in natural<br />

<strong>gas</strong> below 5 %. Exceptions are dedicated (syn<strong>gas</strong>) <strong>gas</strong><br />

turbines that can accept very high hydrogen fractions<br />

(> 50 %) and some specific <strong>gas</strong> turbines which are<br />

capable of burning natural <strong>gas</strong> containing 10 % hydrogen<br />

and even more.<br />

A large amount of literature exists on new <strong>gas</strong> turbine<br />

developments <strong>for</strong> <strong>gas</strong>es containing high and<br />

mostly fixed fractions of hydrogen. However, literature<br />

relevant to hydrogen admixture in natural <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> the<br />

installed <strong>gas</strong> turbines is very rare.<br />

From an end-user point of view, Abbott et al [13]<br />

conclude that fuel composition variation can have an<br />

adverse impact on <strong>gas</strong> turbine operation, despite<br />

being within the range allowed in the grid and manufacturers’<br />

specifications. The indication is, there<strong>for</strong>e,<br />

that <strong>for</strong> some <strong>gas</strong> turbines there is little or no margin<br />

<strong>for</strong> additional variations in fuel quality which rein<strong>for</strong>ces<br />

the view that addition of even very low fractions of<br />

hydrogen to natural <strong>gas</strong> is likely to increase such issues<br />

<strong>for</strong> the installed <strong>gas</strong> turbine fleet.<br />

It seems clear that, <strong>for</strong> the installed base <strong>gas</strong> turbines,<br />

1 % must be considered as the general limit <strong>for</strong><br />

hydrogen admixture to natural <strong>gas</strong> in a first step. Again,<br />

a case by case approach is required with special attention<br />

given to early or highly optimised DLN 4 burners.<br />

After tuning and/or modifications much of the installed<br />

base may be capable of tolerating 5 % to 10 % volume<br />

hydrogen admixture.<br />

Clearly, further work will be necessary to modify<br />

this situation.<br />

As with <strong>gas</strong> engines, admixture of hydrogen to natural<br />

<strong>gas</strong> fuels that are towards the extremes of current acceptability<br />

will prove more problematic than admixture to<br />

"mid-range" fuels. The development of criteria that limit<br />

the amount of hydrogen addition to extreme fuels while<br />

allowing more addition to mid-range fuels may aid the<br />

introduction of hydrogen to the natural <strong>gas</strong> network.<br />

5.5 Specific <strong>gas</strong> burners in the domestic sector<br />

The risk when mixing 10 % H 2 with natural <strong>gas</strong><br />

depends on the combination of two factors: the primary<br />

air excess and the initial Wobbe index. There<strong>for</strong>e,<br />

atmospheric burners used with low-Wobbe <strong>gas</strong><br />

are more sensitive to H 2, if they have been adjusted<br />

with G20 (methane).<br />

4 Dry low NOx<br />

Issue 3/2013 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> 41


REPORTS<br />

Gas quality<br />

Table 1. Overall sensitivity from different sources<br />

by appliance type <strong>for</strong> 10% hydrogen in the<br />

natural <strong>gas</strong><br />

Laminar flame velocity (m/s)<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

Addi5on of H2 <br />

Effect on flame <br />

velocity <br />

Effect on air raDo<br />

Rich premixed <br />

combusDon<br />

Lean premixed <br />

combusDon<br />

Figure 5. Flame speed and air ratio <strong>for</strong> different <strong>gas</strong>es<br />

77% CH4, 23% H2 (G222)<br />

80% CH4, 10% C2H6, 10% H2<br />

90% CH4, 10% H2<br />

100% CH4 (G20, methane)<br />

Addi5on of H2 <br />

Effect on flame <br />

velocity <br />

Effect on air raDo<br />

0<br />

0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5<br />

Air ra5o ( )<br />

BOILERS with<br />

full premix<br />

BOILERS without<br />

full premix<br />

COOKERS and OVEN<br />

WATER HEATERS<br />

SPACE HEATERS<br />

NEW TECHNOLOGIES<br />

PRE-GAD APPLIANCES<br />

1 <strong>for</strong> W > 48 MJ<br />

Theory<br />

CE<br />

approval 1<br />

Long term<br />

effects<br />

Testing<br />

No impact<br />

No impact but lack of tests<br />

Not known<br />

Impact<br />

The addition has a direct and indirect effect on the<br />

flame speed in burners used in domestic appliances:<br />

■■<br />

it slightly increases the flame speed, as shown in Figure<br />

5<br />

■■<br />

it increases the air ratio if rich premix burners are considered<br />

(unless there is a system that controls it) and<br />

so indirectly changes the flame speed.<br />

Figure 5 shows that, <strong>for</strong> rich premixed combustion, the<br />

addition of H 2 will result in both direct and indirect increase<br />

of the flame speed. For lean premix combustion, there will<br />

be an increase because of H 2 and an indirect decrease<br />

because of the air ratio. So a larger H 2 impact is expected<br />

with rich premixed combustion (atmospheric burners).<br />

All GAD 5 appliances (i.e. since the beginning of the<br />

90’s) have been routinely tested with test <strong>gas</strong> G222,<br />

which is a mixture of 23 % H 2/77 % CH 4, and this gives<br />

a strong indication that such a high H 2 content in natural<br />

<strong>gas</strong> is acceptable, at least in the short-term. There<br />

are however, some limitations to that conclusion<br />

amongst which are:<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

the possible long term impacts, which are not known;<br />

the fact that some countries may have <strong>gas</strong>es in<br />

which the Wobbe index can be lower than that of<br />

the G222 test <strong>gas</strong>.<br />

5 Gas Appliances Directive (Directive 2009/142/EC on appliances burning<br />

<strong>gas</strong>eous fuels)<br />

Table 1 summarises the current overall situation and it's<br />

clear that some uncertainties remain. (N.B. The results are<br />

valid <strong>for</strong> <strong>gas</strong> grids with a Wobbe number exceeding 14<br />

kWh/m 3 (equivalent to 48 MJ/m 3 at a reference temperature<br />

of 15 °C/15 °C), 1.01325 bar).<br />

On this basis, injection of 10 % of H 2 in natural <strong>gas</strong> grids<br />

(H <strong>gas</strong>) seems to be a reasonable future prospect <strong>for</strong> the<br />

domestic and commercial appliances considered. A "safety<br />

margin" should be taken into account. (See chapter 7).<br />

However, the uncertainties need to be clarified, and in<br />

that regard, it would be beneficial to initiate some additional<br />

tests to acquire more data, as detailed in 6.5.<br />

5.6 Gas chromatographs<br />

There is a problem with the current generation of process<br />

<strong>gas</strong> chromatographs (PGC) which use helium as the carrier<br />

<strong>gas</strong> and, as a result, are unable to detect hydrogen<br />

because of the relative proximity of their thermal conductivities<br />

(helium = 151 W/m*K; hydrogen = 180 W/m*K.).<br />

It's possible to solve this by retrofitting an additional<br />

separating column of argon as a carrier <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> hydrogen<br />

detection or by using new process <strong>gas</strong> chromatographs<br />

licensed <strong>for</strong> the metering of hydrogen. Another possibility<br />

might be to use PGCs with two single separating columns<br />

and two types of carrier <strong>gas</strong>. Some manufacturers<br />

have already developed new <strong>gas</strong> chromatographs ready<br />

<strong>for</strong> a hydrogen content up to 10 %.<br />

42 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> Issue 3/2013


Gas quality<br />

REPORTS<br />

5.7 Leak detection<br />

Gas detection devices designed <strong>for</strong> natural <strong>gas</strong> may not<br />

be accurate <strong>for</strong> mixtures of natural <strong>gas</strong> and H 2. Some <strong>gas</strong><br />

detection devices will be more sensitive <strong>for</strong> H 2 than <strong>for</strong><br />

natural <strong>gas</strong> while others are not sensitive at all to H 2 and<br />

will only react to the fact that the methane is diluted.<br />

Semiconductor technology is suitable <strong>for</strong> detection<br />

of hydrogen/natural <strong>gas</strong> mixtures as it can identify<br />

methane as well as hydrogen. Most devices <strong>for</strong> measurement<br />

of the lower explosion limit of a <strong>gas</strong> mixture<br />

are configured <strong>for</strong> methane. Alarms are triggered upon<br />

reaching 10 % or 20 % of the lower explosion limit, i.e.<br />

0,44 % or 0,88 % methane in air. The lower explosion<br />

limit declines slightly (4,36 %) with admixture of 10 %<br />

hydrogen. Limitations to the functionality are there<strong>for</strong>e<br />

not expected. Manufacturers generally understand how<br />

the addition of H 2 to natural <strong>gas</strong> affects the accuracy of<br />

their equipment and devices can be adjusted and calibrated<br />

<strong>for</strong> use with hydrogen.<br />

FID devices (flame ionization detection - based on a<br />

hydrogen flame) and thermal conduction sensors have<br />

been designed <strong>for</strong> the specific detection of hydrocarbons,<br />

which means that these technologies can be<br />

applied only <strong>for</strong> low admixtures of hydrogen.<br />

The usual safety and screening methods with <strong>gas</strong><br />

detector devices and detectors currently used <strong>for</strong> pipeline<br />

grid inspections (by foot, by vehicle, by helicopter)<br />

are typically FID or, in the case of helicopters, DIAL (differential,<br />

infrared laser, absorption spectroscopy); neither of<br />

these technologies is capable of detecting hydrogen but<br />

would be acceptable, in terms of accuracy, in situations<br />

with hydrogen admixtures up to 5 % in natural <strong>gas</strong>, as the<br />

main component of the <strong>gas</strong> remains methane.<br />

We must conclude there<strong>for</strong>e that the addition of H 2<br />

to natural <strong>gas</strong> changes the accuracy of <strong>gas</strong> detectors.<br />

Some will react on the safe side and others won't. It is<br />

essential, there<strong>for</strong>e, to re-calibrate <strong>gas</strong> detection devices<br />

when H 2 could be present in natural <strong>gas</strong> to ensure that<br />

they will react on the safe side.<br />

6. PROPOSALS FOR FURTHER<br />

RESEARCH<br />

6.1 Underground storage<br />

As bacteria are considered to cause the most severe<br />

problems, there have been attempts at eradication with<br />

disinfectants, but trials have been inconclusive to date,<br />

(froth/foam <strong>for</strong>mation had caused problems). It is proposed<br />

now that more investigation is needed to overcome<br />

this problem.<br />

An alternative solution may be to separate the<br />

hydrogen from the natural <strong>gas</strong> be<strong>for</strong>e injection into<br />

storage and to store the hydrogen separately, and then<br />

to mix hydrogen and natural <strong>gas</strong> be<strong>for</strong>e injection in the<br />

<strong>gas</strong> network. (N.B. This separation of hydrogen from the<br />

natural <strong>gas</strong>/hydrogen mixture, using specially developed<br />

membranes, was investigated in some detail in<br />

the NaturalHy [1] project and was found to be both<br />

problematic and expensive.)<br />

There appears to be potential <strong>for</strong> estimating the<br />

impact of hydrogen addition following earlier attempts at<br />

numerical simulation by Maurer [14] and Bonnaud [15].<br />

It may also be instructive to define a model <strong>for</strong> each<br />

kind of reservoir, to run simulations with various scenarios<br />

and to compare results with current projects such as<br />

HyUnder 6 or Underground Sun Storage 7 .<br />

6.2 CNG tanks, metallic and elastomer seals<br />

For the existing fleet of CNG vehicles, with steel tanks<br />

(type 1), the hydrogen limit <strong>for</strong> admixture with natural<br />

<strong>gas</strong> is set in accordance with ECE-R110 and DIN51624<br />

and CNG customers must be able to rely on the availability<br />

of compatible fuel.<br />

A dedicated research program, which may help to determine<br />

a higher limit <strong>for</strong> the existing fleet would be of limited<br />

suitability as it cannot replace the certification procedure<br />

covering the complete set of relevant specifications. So, a<br />

backdated fleet approval <strong>for</strong> higher hydrogen contents on<br />

the basis of a test program cannot be expected.<br />

Amendment of the existing regulations would imply<br />

that all CNG vehicle components in the field must be<br />

thoroughly investigated under all operation conditions,<br />

including all relevant parameters of durability such as<br />

hydrogen partial pressure, assembly temperature<br />

between -40 and +85 °C, relative humidity etc., in order to<br />

be approved <strong>for</strong> higher hydrogen contents. The enormity<br />

of this task suggests that it will probably never happen.<br />

It may be useful also to analyse the theory and<br />

assumptions that led to the current 2 % limit.<br />

In the future it may be possible to introduce CNG<br />

vehicles which are specifically designed to tolerate<br />

higher hydrogen content. As this is linked to higher<br />

expenditure, it will be implemented only when the<br />

introduction of higher hydrogen fractions in natural <strong>gas</strong><br />

becomes a realistic prospect.<br />

If we assume increasing market penetration of such<br />

advanced CNG cars and the normal, progressive phase<br />

out of older models, a gradual transition to the acceptance<br />

of higher hydrogen levels in CNG would appear<br />

feasible. It is worth mentioning that this will be a longterm<br />

process as, <strong>for</strong> example, CNG vehicle tanks have a<br />

life-time guarantee of 20 years.<br />

6 www.hyunder.eu<br />

7 www.undergroundsunstorage.at (operational October 2013)<br />

Issue 3/2013 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> 43


REPORTS<br />

Gas quality<br />

6.3 Gas engines<br />

To allow higher fractions of hydrogen, engine configuration/adjustment/controls<br />

must be adapted to remove<br />

the physical cause of the issues:<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

<strong>for</strong> engine knock, NOx and engine wear, the peak<br />

pressures and temperatures must be lowered to those<br />

that will negate the effects of hydrogen. However, it's<br />

clear that unless the hydrogen fraction, and the natural<br />

<strong>gas</strong> composition to which it is added, can be constant,<br />

adaptations will have to accommodate fluctuating<br />

amounts of hydrogen;<br />

modern controls <strong>for</strong> air-fuel ratio and/or ignition timing<br />

that make use of exhaust NOx sensors, temperature<br />

sensors or pressure sensors in the combustion<br />

chamber may compensate <strong>for</strong> fluctuating hydrogen<br />

fractions in the fuel. However, the adequacy of such<br />

solutions and the adaptability to the various engine<br />

types must be examined.<br />

So, to enable the fluctuating hydrogen content in natural<br />

<strong>gas</strong> to be increased, further work is required to resolve a<br />

number of issues:<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

effect of hydrogen on knock resistance and pre-ignition<br />

– a better method of accounting <strong>for</strong> the effects of<br />

hydrogen addition to the knock resistance of natural<br />

<strong>gas</strong> is required;<br />

the way in which engine control systems handle the<br />

effect of hydrogen on NOx emissions and combustion<br />

pressures must be examined. The installed base has a<br />

diversity of control systems with various components.<br />

Their response to, and the ways they handle, hydrogen<br />

admixture vary. Different engine types with different<br />

control hardware and software may require different<br />

adaptations;<br />

risk of occurrence of explosions in intake, crankcase<br />

and exhaust will increase with hydrogen admixture.<br />

The effects and measures that should be taken must<br />

be identified.<br />

6.4 Gas turbines<br />

Tests on <strong>gas</strong> turbines are required with specific attention<br />

being paid to starting, flame stability (pulsations and<br />

flashback) and emission issues. Two possible approaches<br />

are to build experience:<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

with new turbines and expand conclusions to the<br />

installed base;<br />

from pilot hydrogen projects that inject hydrogen in<br />

the natural <strong>gas</strong> grid.<br />

For turbines and many other industrial processes it's important<br />

also to know the range and rate of change of the<br />

hydrogen content in natural <strong>gas</strong>. Consequently, this question<br />

has to be addressed be<strong>for</strong>e considering widespread<br />

injection of hydrogen in the <strong>gas</strong> network. (See chapter 7).<br />

The development of criteria that limit the amount of<br />

hydrogen addition to extreme fuels while allowing more<br />

addition to mid-range fuels may be beneficial. Consideration<br />

should be given as to whether common criteria may<br />

be applicable to <strong>gas</strong> turbines, <strong>gas</strong> engines and other<br />

combustion processes.<br />

6.5 Specific <strong>gas</strong> burners<br />

With regard to domestic applications, uncertainties<br />

remain which need to be clarified so it would be useful to<br />

acquire more data from additional series of tests on:<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

atmospheric burners, as the majority of the technologies<br />

on the market use these burners and the available<br />

test results do not sufficiently cover all segments<br />

of appliances;<br />

new technologies, especially those with features not<br />

previously present in the tests;<br />

pre-GAD appliances, <strong>for</strong> which we have don't have a<br />

documented safety margin, such as CE approval.<br />

Further investigations are recommended:<br />

■■<br />

on potential long-term effects of hydrogen addition<br />

to natural <strong>gas</strong>, such as overheating of burners and<br />

heat exchangers;<br />

■■<br />

to clarify the impact <strong>for</strong> Wobbe numbers below 14<br />

kWh/m 3 (under which CE approval results cannot<br />

be used).<br />

Finally, it is strongly recommended that, in EN 437, there<br />

should be a definition of new test <strong>gas</strong>es and test procedures<br />

<strong>for</strong> approval of appliances that operate with hydrogen/natural<br />

<strong>gas</strong> mixtures; this would seem to be a fundamental<br />

requirement <strong>for</strong> preparing the future market.<br />

6.6 Leak detection<br />

Special attention must be given to <strong>gas</strong> detection devices<br />

because some are not sensitive to hydrogen. As a result,<br />

they see only the diluting effect of addition of H 2 to natural<br />

<strong>gas</strong> and will there<strong>for</strong>e give an inaccurate response.<br />

For measuring systems which are not able to detect<br />

hydrogen explicitly, such as FID and DIAL, modification or<br />

replacement is recommended <strong>for</strong> admixtures of hydrogen<br />

of more than 10 vol.%. This statement is a first recommendation<br />

and certainly needs further investigation.<br />

7. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS FOR<br />

HYDROGEN INJECTION<br />

In general, a case by case analysis is necessary be<strong>for</strong>e<br />

injecting hydrogen in the natural <strong>gas</strong> network.<br />

44 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> Issue 3/2013


Gas quality<br />

REPORTS<br />

For the time being, porous rock underground <strong>gas</strong><br />

storage is a "show stopper".<br />

Most <strong>gas</strong> chromatographs will require modification.<br />

It is recommended that manufacturers' specifications<br />

should always be followed, particularly when <strong>gas</strong> turbines<br />

or <strong>gas</strong> engines are connected to the network.<br />

However, on the basis that much of the natural <strong>gas</strong> system<br />

can tolerate admixture of up to 10 % by volume of hydrogen,<br />

depending on the specific local situation, the following maximum<br />

hydrogen concentrations are recommended:<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

2 % - if a CNG filling station is connected;<br />

5 % - if no filling station, no <strong>gas</strong> turbines and no <strong>gas</strong><br />

engines with a hydrogen specification < 5 % are<br />

connected;<br />

10 % - if no filling station, no <strong>gas</strong> turbines and no <strong>gas</strong><br />

engines with a hydrogen specification < 10 % are<br />

connected.<br />

N.B. For both 5 % and 10 %, care should be taken to<br />

ensure that the Wobbe index and methane number of<br />

the natural <strong>gas</strong> / hydrogen mixture are not close to the<br />

existing limit values <strong>for</strong> the network ("safety margins" <strong>for</strong><br />

Wobbe index and methane number).<br />

Injection of hydrogen should be carefully controlled<br />

to avoid sudden increases of the hydrogen concentration<br />

in the natural <strong>gas</strong> (e.g. speed of change < 2 % / min).<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

The authors would like to thank GERG 8 and the project<br />

partners, as detailed in the annex, <strong>for</strong> their support<br />

and, in particular, the following active partners <strong>for</strong><br />

their specific contributions:<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

G. Müller-Syring, S. Schütz, DBI-GUT, (<strong>gas</strong> distribution<br />

systems, <strong>gas</strong> metering / billing)<br />

J. Schweitzer, M. Näslund, DGC, (domestic / commercial<br />

<strong>gas</strong> applications)<br />

A. Dijks, A. D. Bloemsma, H. de Vries, DNV Kema, (<strong>gas</strong><br />

turbines / <strong>gas</strong> engines, analysis of safety relevant <strong>gas</strong><br />

parameters)<br />

K. Altfeld, M. Hoppe, E.ON New Build & Technology<br />

GmbH, (CNG tanks / compressors, valves etc.)<br />

F. Lebovits, L. Nadau, R. Batisse, Nicolas Richard, GdF<br />

Suez, (transmission pipelines / underground storage /<br />

industrial applications)<br />

H. Rijpkema, W. H. Bouwman, Kiwa Technology, (inhouse<br />

installations)<br />

REFERENCES<br />

[1] Florisson, O. et al.: NaturalHy – Preparing <strong>for</strong> the hydrogen<br />

economy by using the existing natural <strong>gas</strong> sys-<br />

tem as a catalyst; An integrated project, Final Publishable<br />

Activity Report: http://www.naturalhy.net/<br />

[2] Christoph, K.; Cartellieri, W. and Pfeifer, U.: Bewertung<br />

der Klopffestigkeit von Kraft<strong>gas</strong>en mittels der Methanzahl<br />

und deren praktische Anwendung bei Gasmotoren.<br />

MTZ 33, (1972), Nr. 10, pp. 389–429.<br />

[3] Cammarota, F.; Benedetto, A. D.; Sarli, V. D.; Salzano, E.<br />

and Russo, G.: Combined effects of initial pressure and<br />

turbulence on explosions of hydrogen-enriched<br />

methane/air mixtures. Journal of Loss Prevention in<br />

the Process Industries 22 (2009), Nr. 5, 607–613<br />

[4] Günther, R. and Janisch, G.: Meßwerte der Flammengeschwindigkeit<br />

von Gasen und Gasgemischen.<br />

Chemie Ingenieur Technik 43 (1971), Nr. 17, 975–978<br />

[5] Hermanns, R. T. E.: Laminar Burning Velocities of Methane-Hydrogen-Air<br />

Mixtures, Technische Universität<br />

Eindhoven, Diss., 2007<br />

[6] Hu, E.; Huang, Z.; He, J.; Jin, C. and Zheng, J.: Experimental<br />

and numerical study on laminar burning characteristics<br />

of premixed methane-hydrogen-air flames. International<br />

Journal of Hydrogen Energy 34 (2009), Nr. 11, 4876–4888<br />

[7] Huang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Zeng, K.; Liu, B.; Wang, Q. and Jiang,<br />

D.: Measurements of laminar burning velocities <strong>for</strong><br />

natural <strong>gas</strong>-hydrogen-air mixtures. Combustion and<br />

Flame 146 (2006), Nr. 1–2, 302–311<br />

[8] Miao, H.; Jiao, Q.; Huang, Z. and Jiang, D.: Effect of initial<br />

pressure on laminar combustion characteristics<br />

of hydrogen-enriched natural <strong>gas</strong>. International Journal<br />

of Hydrogen Energy 33 (2008), Nr. 14, 3876–3885<br />

[9] Brower M.; Petersen E.; Metcalfe W.; Curran H. J.; Füri M.;<br />

Bourque G.; Aluri N. and Güthe F.: Ignition delay time<br />

and laminar flame speed calculations <strong>for</strong> natural <strong>gas</strong>/<br />

hydrogen blends at elevated pressures, ASME Paper<br />

GT2012-69310, Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo<br />

2012, June 11-15, 2012, Copenhagen, Denmark<br />

[10] DGMK Research Report – Influence of hydrogen on<br />

underground <strong>gas</strong> storages, Project 752, expected<br />

end of year 2013<br />

[11] M. Wagner and Dr. H. Ballerstedt: Influence of Bio-methane<br />

and Hydrogen on the Microbiology of Underground<br />

Gas Storage / Einfluss von Bio<strong>gas</strong> und Wasserstoff<br />

auf die Mikrobiologie in Untertage<strong>gas</strong>speichern,<br />

Literature Study / Literaturstudie (DGMK-Project 756) /<br />

DGMK-Projekt 756, 2013, ISBN 978-3-941721-36-4 9<br />

[12] ISO Standard 11439: Gas cylinders - High pressure<br />

cylinders <strong>for</strong> the on-board storage of natural <strong>gas</strong> as a<br />

fuel <strong>for</strong> automotive vehicles<br />

[13] Abbott, D. J.; Bowers, J. P. and James, S. R.: The impact<br />

of natural <strong>gas</strong> composition variations on the operation<br />

of <strong>gas</strong> turbines <strong>for</strong> power generation, 6 th International<br />

Gas Turbine Conference, 17.-18. October 2012,<br />

Brussels, Belgium<br />

8 The European Gas Research Group (www.gerg.eu)<br />

9 Available from: www.dgmk.de/upstream/agber_untertagespeichert.html<br />

Issue 3/2013 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> 45


REPORTS<br />

Gas quality<br />

[14] Maurer, O.: Etude de la distribution des espèces soufrées<br />

et de la <strong>for</strong>mation de l’hydrogène sulfuré dans<br />

les stockages de gaz naturel en aquifère, ENPC thesis,<br />

décembre 1992<br />

[15] Bonnaud, E.: Hétérogénéités compositionnelles<br />

dans les réservoirs de gaz acides. Compréhension et<br />

modélisation du rôle d’un aquifère actif, Ph.D. Thesis,<br />

École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris -<br />

Spécialité "Hydrologie et Hydrogéologie quantitatives",<br />

June 29 2012<br />

BIBLIOGRAPHY<br />

Recommended further reading:<br />

1. Power to Gas<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

G. Linke, K. Steiner, M. Hoppe, H. Mlaker, E.ON Ruhr<strong>gas</strong>,<br />

Power Storage in Smart Natural Gas Grids: Fiction or<br />

Fact? EGATEC, Copenhagen, May 2011<br />

K. Altfeld, P. Schley, E.ON Ruhr<strong>gas</strong>, Development of natural<br />

<strong>gas</strong> qualities in Europe, GWF international 2011<br />

Judd R., Pinchbeck D., Power to Gas Research Roadmap.<br />

Offering a solution to the <strong>energy</strong> storage problem?<br />

Gas <strong>for</strong> Energy, Issue 2/2013<br />

2. Underground storage<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

K. Schulze, Hydrogen and bacteria – the big unknown,<br />

4 th RWE Dea Research and Development Day, Hamburg<br />

16 th May 2013, Wietze Lab<br />

M. Pichler, Assessment of hydrogen-rock interactions<br />

during geological storage of CH 4-H 2 mixtures; Master<br />

thesis, Department Mineral Resources & Petroleum<br />

Engineering Chair of Reservoir Engineering, 2013<br />

J.-L. Garcia, Les bactéries méthanogénèses – The Methanogenic<br />

Archaea, C. R. Acad. Agric. Fr. 1998, 84, 23-33<br />

3. CNG tanks<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

UN ECE Regulation No. 110: Uni<strong>for</strong>m provisions concerning<br />

the approval of:<br />

■ Specific components of motor vehicles using<br />

compressed natural <strong>gas</strong> (CNG) in their propulsion<br />

system;<br />

■ Vehicles with regard to the installation of specific<br />

components of an approved type <strong>for</strong> the<br />

use of compressed natural <strong>gas</strong> (CNG) in their<br />

propulsion system.<br />

Barthélémy, H.: Compatibility of Metallic Materials with<br />

Hydrogen. Review of the Present Knowledge, International<br />

Conference on Hydrogen Safety, San Sebastián,<br />

Spain, Sept. 2007<br />

■■<br />

EU-Project "Integrated Gas Powertrain", Final report,<br />

2012. http://www.in<strong>gas</strong>-eu.org<br />

4. Gas engines<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

K. Gillingham; Stan<strong>for</strong>d University Department of Management<br />

Science & Engineering, Hydrogen Internal<br />

Combustion Engine Vehicles: A Prudent Intermediate<br />

Step or a Step in the Wrong Direction?<br />

S. Orhan Akansua; Z. Dulgerb, N. Kahramana, T. Nejat<br />

Vezirogluc; Internal combustion engines fuelled by<br />

natural <strong>gas</strong>-hydrogen mixtures; International Journal<br />

of Hydrogen Energy 29 (2004)<br />

Klell, M., Eichsleder, H. and Sartory, M., Mixtures of hydrogen<br />

and methane in the internal combustion engine<br />

– Synergies, potential and regulations, International<br />

Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 37(2012)<br />

■■<br />

DIN 51624; Kraftstoffe für Kraftfahrzeuge – Erd<strong>gas</strong> –<br />

An<strong>for</strong>derungen und Prüfverfahren Automotive<br />

fuels – Compressed natural <strong>gas</strong> – Requirements<br />

and test methods<br />

5. Gas turbines<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

M. Andersson, J. Larfeldt, A. Larsson, Co-firing with<br />

hydrogen in industrial <strong>gas</strong> turbines, SGC Rapport, 2013<br />

C. Marchmont, S. Florjancic, Alstom Baden, Switzerland,<br />

Alstom <strong>gas</strong> turbine technology trends, Proceedings of<br />

ASME Turbo Expo, 2012 GT2012 June 11-15, 2012,<br />

Copenhagen, Denmark<br />

S. J. Wu, P. Brown, I. Diakunchak, A. Gulati, Siemens<br />

Power Generation, Inc., Orlando, USA, M. Lenze, B.<br />

Koestlin, Siemens Power Generation Inc., Muelheim,<br />

Germany; Advanced <strong>gas</strong> turbine combustion system<br />

development <strong>for</strong> high hydrogen fuels, Proceedings of<br />

GT2007 ASME Turbo Expo 2007: Power <strong>for</strong> Land, Sea<br />

and Air; May 4-17, 2007, Montreal, Canada<br />

6. Gas burners<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

Nitschke-Kowsky, P., Wessing, W., E.ON Ruhr<strong>gas</strong> AG.<br />

Impact of hydrogen admixture on installed <strong>gas</strong><br />

appliances. World Gas Conference (WGC), Kuala<br />

Lumpur, 2012<br />

EN 437 Test <strong>gas</strong>es. Test pressures. Appliance categories<br />

Huang, Z., et al. Measurements of laminar burning<br />

velocities <strong>for</strong> natural <strong>gas</strong>-hydrogen-air mixtures, Combustion<br />

and Flame 146(2006)<br />

Di Sarli, V. and Di Benedetto, A., Laminar burning velocity<br />

of hydrogen-methane-air/ premixed flames, International<br />

Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 32 (2007)<br />

Ayoub, M. et al., An experimental study of mild flameless<br />

combustion of methane/hydrogen mixtures,<br />

International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 37 (2012)<br />

46 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> Issue 3/2013


Gas quality<br />

REPORTS<br />

■■<br />

Levinsky, H. B., Consequences of "new" <strong>gas</strong>es <strong>for</strong> the<br />

behaviour of <strong>gas</strong> utilization equipment, 2004, International<br />

Gas Research Conference, Vancouver<br />

7. Safety<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

De Vries, H., Florisson, O. and G. C. Tiekstra, Safe<br />

operation of natural <strong>gas</strong> appliances fuelled with<br />

hydrogen/natural <strong>gas</strong> mixtures (progress obtained<br />

in the NaturalHy-project), International Conference<br />

on Hydrogen Safety (ICHS 2007), San Sebastian,<br />

Spain, September<br />

Jurdik, E., Darmeveil, H. and Levinsky, H. B., Flashback<br />

in mixtures of molecular hydrogen and natural<br />

<strong>gas</strong>, 2004 International Gas Research Conference,<br />

Vancouver<br />

Lowesmith, B. J., Hankinson, G., Large scale high pressure<br />

jet fires involving natural <strong>gas</strong> and natural<strong>gas</strong>/<br />

hydrogen mixtures, Process Safety and Environmental<br />

Protection, Volume 90, Issue 2, March 2012<br />

AUTHORS<br />

Dr.-Ing. Klaus Altfeld<br />

Head of Gas Quality<br />

E.ON New Build & Technology GmbH<br />

Essen | Germany<br />

Phone: +49 201 184-8385<br />

E-mail: klaus.altfeld@eon.com<br />

Dave Pinchbeck<br />

Managing Director<br />

D Pinchbeck Consultancy Ltd.<br />

Melton Mowbray | England<br />

E-mail: davepinchbeck@hotmail.com<br />

(Former Secretary General,<br />

GERG Group, now retired)<br />

Annex 1. Partners<br />

Active partners<br />

DBI-GUT<br />

DGC<br />

DNV Kema Nederland BV<br />

E.ON New Build & Technology GmbH<br />

GdF Suez<br />

Kiwa Technology<br />

Project partners<br />

Alliander N.V.<br />

BP Exploration Operating Company<br />

DBI-GUT<br />

DGC<br />

DNV Kema Nederland BV<br />

DVGW e.V.<br />

E.ON Gas Storage GmbH<br />

E.ON New Build & Technology Ltd<br />

E.ON New Build & Technology GmbH<br />

Ena<strong>gas</strong> S.A.<br />

Energinet<br />

Euromot<br />

EUTurbines<br />

Fluxys S.A. (ARGB)<br />

Gas Natural sdg<br />

Gassco AS<br />

Gasum Oy<br />

GdF Suez<br />

GL Noble Denton<br />

Infraserv GmbH & Co<br />

Ital<strong>gas</strong><br />

ITM Power GmbH<br />

Kiwa Technology<br />

National Grid plc<br />

Natur<strong>gas</strong> Energia Distribucion, Sau<br />

OGE GmbH<br />

ÖVGW<br />

RWE Dea AG<br />

Shell Global Solutions International B.V.<br />

Snam Rete Gas S.p.A.<br />

SVGW<br />

Volkswagen AG<br />

KOGAS - Korea Gas Corporation<br />

Germany<br />

Denmark<br />

The Netherlands<br />

Germany<br />

France<br />

The Netherlands<br />

The Netherlands<br />

U.K.<br />

Germany<br />

Denmark<br />

The Netherlands<br />

Germany<br />

Germany<br />

U.K.<br />

Germany<br />

Spain<br />

Denmark<br />

Belgium<br />

Belgium<br />

Belgium<br />

Spain<br />

Norway<br />

Finland<br />

France<br />

U.K.<br />

Germany<br />

Italy<br />

U.K.<br />

The Netherlands<br />

U.K.<br />

Spain<br />

Germany<br />

Austria<br />

Germany<br />

The Netherlands<br />

Italy<br />

Switzerland<br />

Germany<br />

South Korea<br />

Issue 3/2013 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> 47


REPORTS<br />

Gas storage<br />

Modern technical measurement<br />

concepts <strong>for</strong> the underground<br />

storage of natural <strong>gas</strong><br />

by Achim Zajc and Michael Friedchen<br />

In the following contribution, the impact of restructuring and unbundling of the <strong>energy</strong> transportation companies<br />

based on the storage of natural <strong>gas</strong> in underground storages and here in particular the example of the EWE underground<br />

<strong>gas</strong> storage Jemgum from the point of view of measurement are considered. Starting from a conceptual<br />

overview, the detailed tasks of metering, such as accurate determination of the volume, determine the <strong>gas</strong> quality<br />

and the provision of process- as well as legal custody privacy and security. In summary, the authors give an outlook<br />

how they rated the future developments of measurement technology <strong>for</strong> underground <strong>gas</strong> storage.<br />

1. INTRODUCTION<br />

Large underground <strong>gas</strong> storage facilities are also generally<br />

referred to as natural <strong>gas</strong> storage. Around 50 natural<br />

<strong>gas</strong> storage facilities are in operation with an operational<br />

<strong>gas</strong> volume of approx. 20.5 billion m 3 . This puts<br />

Germany in 4 th place in international terms. Only<br />

Ukraine, Russia and the USA have larger volumes of<br />

operating <strong>gas</strong> [1].<br />

Because of the increased dependency on imports<br />

and the very dynamic competition in the natural <strong>gas</strong><br />

market, natural <strong>gas</strong> storage is gaining increasing importance<br />

in Germany and Europe. The decline in natural <strong>gas</strong><br />

extraction in Western Europe and the ever-changing<br />

market conditions make natural <strong>gas</strong> storage both attractive<br />

and necessary.<br />

Demand <strong>for</strong> natural <strong>gas</strong> is by no means constant and<br />

varies significantly on the basis of daily and seasonal temperature<br />

variations and economic influences. To ensure<br />

that consumers can always rely on a secure, adequate<br />

and cost-efficient supply of natural <strong>gas</strong>, production and<br />

sales variations can be balanced using natural <strong>gas</strong> storage,<br />

among other things. [2]<br />

The rising dependency on imports and the very<br />

dynamic competition in the natural <strong>gas</strong> market mean<br />

that capacities have been increased drastically in recent<br />

years, as Figure 1 shows.<br />

The liberalisation of the <strong>gas</strong> market and the unbundling<br />

of <strong>energy</strong> supply companies, controlled by EU<br />

directives (2009/73/EC) explains why the classic function<br />

of natural <strong>gas</strong> storage facilities is changing. Thus,<br />

what used to be one of the central functions of <strong>energy</strong><br />

supply companies, security of supply, is now becoming<br />

of secondary importance. A shocking report appeared<br />

at the beginning of April 2013: "Security of supply: GER-<br />

MANY'S NATURAL GAS STORAGE FACILITIES ARE<br />

ALMOST DEPLETED" [3].<br />

It is thus all the more important to find extremely<br />

robust and reliable technical measurement solutions in<br />

terms of precision, data availability, data separation, security<br />

and management. This is precisely what the measurement<br />

concept of RMG by Honeywell aims to achieve.<br />

2. TECHNICAL MEASUREMENT<br />

CONCEPT FOR THE EWE<br />

UNDERGROUND GAS STORAGE<br />

FACILITY IN JEMGUM<br />

2.1 The EWE underground <strong>gas</strong> storage facility in<br />

Jemgum [4]<br />

EWE GASSPEICHER GmbH, which is located in Oldenburg,<br />

has a storage capacity of around 1.75 billion cubic meters<br />

of operating <strong>gas</strong>, making it one of the major storage<br />

operators in the German/European natural <strong>gas</strong> market.<br />

Storage capacity is divided between underground natural<br />

<strong>gas</strong> storage caverns in Nüttermoor and Huntorf in<br />

North-West Germany and in Rüdersdorf near Berlin.<br />

48 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> Issue 3/2013


Gas storage<br />

REPORTS<br />

bn m 3 (Vn)<br />

22<br />

20<br />

18<br />

16<br />

Operating volume<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

Former oil and <strong>gas</strong> deposits<br />

Aquifer<br />

Caverns<br />

Operation Planning<br />

Source:<br />

Operators, Yearbooks of Europäische Rohstoff- und<br />

Energiewirtschaft (VGE Verlag GmbH)<br />

Figure 1. Development of the operating volume of natural <strong>gas</strong> storage facilities [1]<br />

Another storage cavern is currently under construction<br />

in the region of Emden / Bunde / Oude Statenzijl at<br />

Jemgum. The first construction phase of the Jemgum<br />

storage facility will see EWE GASSPEICHER increase its<br />

overall capacity of around 1.75 billion cubic metres by a<br />

further 320 million cubic metres of operating volume.<br />

Since the first of April, four of the initial eight caverns in the<br />

first phase have been in the process of being filled with <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong><br />

the first time. The remaining four caverns will be filled after the<br />

end of the sol-phase in the coming year. The plan is that the<br />

first caverns should be ready <strong>for</strong> output in November 2013.<br />

Figure 2 [5] contains a schematic diagram of the<br />

natural <strong>gas</strong> storage. The measurement equipment is<br />

located in the area of the <strong>gas</strong> operating equipment<br />

(marked with a red circle).<br />

2.2 Overview of the technical measurement<br />

concept<br />

The natural <strong>gas</strong> storage facility is connected to three<br />

transport pipelines, while a fourth connection is available<br />

as a reserve <strong>for</strong> connecting another transport pipeline.<br />

Figure 3 shows the technical measurement solution<br />

from RMG by Honeywell. The <strong>gas</strong> operating equipment is<br />

designed <strong>for</strong> the following parameters:<br />

Figure 2. Schematic<br />

diagram of<br />

natural <strong>gas</strong><br />

storage in<br />

Salzstock [5]<br />

Issue 3/2013 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> 49


REPORTS<br />

Gas storage<br />

Figure 3. Overview of the technical measurement concept<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

Operating pressure in the measured sections: 55-90 barg<br />

Intake capacity per measured section: 175,000 m 3 (Vn)/h<br />

Output capacity per measured section: 250,000 m 3 (Vn)/h<br />

data integrity of the individual line network operators.<br />

This demonstrates just how sensitive data security and<br />

management are in such projects.<br />

The various sections of the three measured section<br />

groups were implemented with a diameter of 250 mm<br />

(DN 250, ANSI 600). The fourth measured section group is<br />

intended <strong>for</strong> future expansion and is not used at present.<br />

In principle, the system solution can be divided into<br />

three parts:<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

■■<br />

Gas quality measurement<br />

Gas volume measurement<br />

Data management<br />

In the final analysis, the challenge lay in generating a<br />

measurement system that allows as many line network<br />

operators to be served as possible under weights and<br />

measures regulations. It was also necessary to ensure that<br />

all line network operators only have access to the data to<br />

which they are entitled.<br />

This is why all line network operators were kept separate<br />

in terms of measurement data, thus ensuring the<br />

2.2.1 Gas quality measurement<br />

Two type PGC 9000VC process <strong>gas</strong> chromatographs<br />

from RMG by Honeywell are used to determine the<br />

quality of the natural <strong>gas</strong> (Figure 4). Each of the process<br />

<strong>gas</strong> chromatographs is designed to analyse four process<br />

streams. In other words, the four process streams are<br />

analysed sequentially. Each analysis takes about three<br />

minutes. The chemical composition of the next process<br />

stream is then analysed, thus determining the calorific<br />

value of all four process streams. This means that the<br />

first process stream is analysed once again after a further<br />

9 minutes (three analyses). This yields four individual<br />

measurements per process stream and hour, which<br />

are used to <strong>for</strong>m the mean value.<br />

Figure 3 underlines the redundant structure of natural<br />

<strong>gas</strong> quality measurement. Each process stream (one to<br />

four) is linked with process <strong>gas</strong> chromatograph 1. Each of<br />

50 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> Issue 3/2013


Gas storage<br />

REPORTS<br />

Figure 4. 4-stream process <strong>gas</strong> chromatograph PGC 9000 VC from RMG by Honeywell<br />

these process streams is also linked with process <strong>gas</strong><br />

chromatograph 2. In the event that one of the two process<br />

<strong>gas</strong> chromatographs fails or needs to be serviced,<br />

the chromatograph still in operation can be used to<br />

measure <strong>gas</strong> quality. This enables the greatest possible<br />

availability and flexibility to be achieved.<br />

The process <strong>gas</strong> chromatograph separates the natural<br />

<strong>gas</strong> into the following chemical components:<br />

■■<br />

Nitrogen (N 2)<br />

■■<br />

Carbon dioxide (CO 2)<br />

■■<br />

Methane (CH 4)<br />

■■<br />

Ethane (C 2H 6)<br />

■■<br />

Propane (C 3H 8)<br />

■■<br />

N-butane (n-C 4H 10)<br />

■■<br />

Isobutane (i-C 4H 10)<br />

■■<br />

Neopentane (neo-C 5H 12)<br />

■■<br />

N-pentane (n-C 5H 12)<br />

■■<br />

Isopentane (i-C 5H 12)<br />

■■<br />

N-hexane (n-C 6H 14)<br />

Subsequent detection and identification of the percentage<br />

molar proportion enables the calorific value to be<br />

calculated according to ISO 6976 [6]. The process <strong>gas</strong><br />

chromatographs are calibrated and subjected to intensive<br />

tests in the test centre run by RMG by Honeywell.<br />

The previously calibrated process <strong>gas</strong> chromatograph will<br />

be tested using genuine natural <strong>gas</strong> with a known chemical<br />

composition. The determined calorific value may not<br />

vary from the comparative sample by more than 0.1%.<br />

2.2.2 Gas volume measurement<br />

Gas volume measurement in the <strong>gas</strong> operating equipment<br />

involves three separate measurement section<br />

groups, each of which is assigned to a separate network<br />

connection.<br />

Each group consists of two parallel measurement sections,<br />

each with two MID-approved ultrasound <strong>gas</strong><br />

meters connected in bidirectional series (Figure 4). A<br />

fourth measured section group is not implemented but is<br />

prepared <strong>for</strong> a future expansion of capacity.<br />

Figure 5 illustrates the bidirectional connection of<br />

two ultrasound <strong>gas</strong> meters in series with the three measurement<br />

section groups. Two different types of meter are<br />

Issue 3/2013 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> 51


REPORTS<br />

Gas storage<br />

used. The first is the USZ 08 ultrasound <strong>gas</strong> meter from<br />

RMG by Honeywell and second a Flowsic 600 ultrasound<br />

<strong>gas</strong> meter from Sick. The USZ 08 ultrasound <strong>gas</strong> meter<br />

uses tried-and-tested 6-path technology with all modern<br />

diagnostic functions [7].<br />

Naturally, ultrasound <strong>gas</strong> meters are ideally suited to<br />

such an application. Firstly the loss of pressure is minimal<br />

and, secondly, unlike other meters such as turbine wheel<br />

<strong>gas</strong> meters, the meters can be operated in both directions<br />

with extremely high measurement per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

and easy ducting (without diversion). In addition, <strong>for</strong> reasons<br />

of redundancy and increased availability in each<br />

measurement section group, two series circuits are operated<br />

in parallel. This means that if maintenance is required<br />

in one measurement section group, the relevant measurement<br />

section can be disconnected without impairing<br />

measurement or disrupting it in extreme cases. The ultrasound<br />

<strong>gas</strong> meters were calibrated on a high-pressure test<br />

bench prior to commissioning. During commissioning,<br />

the meters were once again tested under weights and<br />

measures regulations.<br />

Figure 5. USZ 08 ultrasound <strong>gas</strong> meter from RMG<br />

by Honeywell with a Flowsic 600<br />

ultrasound <strong>gas</strong> meter from Sick connected<br />

in series [8]<br />

Figure 6. Switching cabinets from RMG by<br />

Honeywell with MRG 2203 type<br />

measurement registration devices, DSfG<br />

and profibus gateways, Ethernet routers,<br />

and type ERZ 2104 flow computers and<br />

type GC9000 VC analysers, installed in the<br />

electrical equipment room of the <strong>gas</strong><br />

operating equipment [9]<br />

2.2.3 Data management<br />

At present, communication involves six high-redundancy<br />

DSfG bus systems, a figure that will rise to eight in the<br />

final configuration level. This configuration will ensure the<br />

high availability the measurement data and render measurement<br />

data loss almost impossible. At the same time,<br />

all evaluation devices are connected via Ethernet and are<br />

visualised by means of an RMG by Honeywell evaluation<br />

unit. This dispenses with the need to use the individual<br />

devices when carrying out audits. Local auditing tasks are<br />

made much easier as a result.<br />

A profibus is used to connect to the higher management<br />

system. This ensures a high-redundant, calibratable<br />

measurement of <strong>gas</strong> volumes and quality and measurement<br />

data registration (MRG 2203 from RMG by Honeywell),<br />

as well as data communications <strong>for</strong> specific line<br />

network operators that can be selected in detail. ERZ<br />

2104 type flow computers from RMG by Honeywell were<br />

used <strong>for</strong> conversion purposes.<br />

All line network operators are kept separate in terms<br />

of measurement data, thus ensuring the data integrity of<br />

the individual line network operators. Data was separated<br />

through the use of communication units, such as the<br />

DSfG-DFY from RMG by Honeywell.<br />

Reliable measurement and analysis technology, as<br />

well as evaluation, registration and data transmission<br />

devices from RMG by Honeywell, enable high levels of<br />

redundancy, flexible communication, secure line network-specific<br />

data communications and convenient local<br />

auditing services.<br />

3. SUMMARY AND OUTLOOK<br />

In summary it may be said that the high degree of flexibility<br />

and integration capacity of the RMG by Honeywell<br />

products and the engineering per<strong>for</strong>mance enabled a<br />

very robust and highly efficient and reliable redundant<br />

system solution to be implemented <strong>for</strong> an extremely<br />

complex task under weights and measures regulations<br />

<strong>for</strong> the <strong>gas</strong> operating equipment used in the EWE natural<br />

52 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> Issue 3/2013


Gas storage<br />

REPORTS<br />

<strong>gas</strong> storage facility in Jemgum. This system solution<br />

ensures a high level of data security and management<br />

among a large number of line network operators.<br />

Based on the example of this <strong>gas</strong> storage facility, it<br />

was possible to show that a <strong>for</strong>ward-looking system solution<br />

can be achieved <strong>for</strong> the operation of a natural <strong>gas</strong><br />

storage facility in particular under the changes in market<br />

requirements (liberalisation of the <strong>gas</strong> market).<br />

4. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

The authors would like to thank EWE GASSPEICHER GmbH<br />

<strong>for</strong> supporting this publication.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

[1] "Untertage-Gasspeicherung in Deutschland" (Underground<br />

Gas Storage in Germany), ERDÖL ERDGAS<br />

KOHLE Volume 128, 2012, Issue 11<br />

[2] http://www.ewe-<strong>gas</strong>speicher.de/erd<strong>gas</strong>speicherung.php<br />

[3] http://www.handelsblatt.com/unternehmen/<br />

industrie/versorgungssicherheit-deutschlandserd<strong>gas</strong>speicher-sind-fast-leer/8029294<br />

[4] http://www.ewe-<strong>gas</strong>speicher.de/speicher-jemgum-h.php<br />

[5] Approved graphic from EWE GASSPEICHER GmbH<br />

[6] EN ISO 6976, International Standard: @Natural <strong>gas</strong> --<br />

Calculation of calorific values, density, relative density<br />

and Wobbe index from composition@, 2005<br />

[7] Zajc, A.: "Übersicht der Erd<strong>gas</strong>messung mit Ultraschall<br />

unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der<br />

Online- oder "Live-Validierung" (Overview of natural<br />

<strong>gas</strong> measurement with ultrasound with special reference<br />

to online or "live" validation), gwf-Gas Erd<strong>gas</strong>,<br />

June 2012, 416<br />

[8] Approved photo from EWE GASSPEICHER GmbH<br />

[9] Approved photo from EWE GASSPEICHER GmbH<br />

AUTHORS<br />

Dr. Achim Zajc<br />

Product Marketing Manager<br />

Gas Metering<br />

Honeywell Process Solutions<br />

RMG Messtechnik GmbH<br />

Butzbach | Germany<br />

Phone: +49 6033 897 138<br />

E-mail: achim.zajc@honeywell.com<br />

Michael Friedchen<br />

Sr. Project Manager<br />

System Solutions<br />

Honeywell Process Solutions<br />

RMG Messtechnik GmbH<br />

Butzbach | Germany<br />

Phone: +49 6033 897 140<br />

E-mail: michael.friedchen@honeywell.com<br />

Import of Network Graph and Data (Text,<br />

CSV, XML, ODBC, ArcView, MapInfo,<br />

many GIS / CAD Systems), Import of<br />

Background Images (DXF, BMP, TIFF<br />

etc.), Show Maps and Elevation Data<br />

from Internet or Intranet Resources<br />

(WMS, OSM and others)<br />

STANET Network Simulation<br />

Gas, Water, District Heating,<br />

Steam, Waste Water, Electricity<br />

Stationary and Dynamic Simulation,<br />

Consumption Modeling based on Time,<br />

Temperature, Measurements and<br />

Consumption Billing, Events/Rules<br />

(PLC-Simulation), Mixtures of Qualities<br />

& Substances, Fire Flow Simulation,<br />

District Heating Simulation including<br />

Low Load and Condensation, Diameter<br />

Optimization, Height Interpolation,<br />

Routing and Capacity Analysis, Time<br />

Charts and Spatial Charts, Reports,<br />

Scenario Comparison<br />

Easy to use, Complete Help System, fast and scalable (more than 1 Mio Pipes)<br />

FISCHER-UHRIG ENGINEERING · BERLIN · GERMANY<br />

WWW.STAFU.DE<br />

INFO@STAFU.DE<br />

TEL.: +49 30 300 993 90 FAX: +49 30 308 24 212<br />

Please contact <strong>for</strong> a free evaluation version<br />

Issue 3/2013 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> 53


REPORTS<br />

Micro-CHP<br />

Seven things you need to know<br />

about Micro-CHP in Europe<br />

by Scott Dwyer<br />

In the past, Micro-CHP (5kWe and below) has been guilty of over-promising and under-delivering - not living up<br />

to the big opportunity many in the <strong>gas</strong> industry felt it offered. However, product choice in Europe has been<br />

steadily increasing over the last three years and some major global brands are now committing themselves to<br />

bringing micro-CHP product to market. The <strong>gas</strong> industry is showing some signs of the type of engagement<br />

needed to drive the European micro-CHP market towards success, but these examples are still limited to a<br />

handful of companies and countries. Gas industry involvement and support will be key if the technology is to<br />

achieve its full potential in a region containing 740 million people and 190 million buildings. New business<br />

models are also being proposed <strong>for</strong> capturing additional value from micro-CHP – leading to increasing interest<br />

in what ultimately remains an industry defined by much uncertainty. For those wanting to consider where the<br />

value could be <strong>for</strong> them, here are seven things you should know about Micro-CHP in Europe.<br />

1. GERMANY IS EUROPE’S LEADING<br />

MARKET<br />

With fifteen micro-CHP systems to choose from, the<br />

market has moved on from 2009 when there were only<br />

a few products available <strong>for</strong> larger homes or small<br />

businesses. However, of these fifteen, eleven are only<br />

available to customers in Germany. This is due to several<br />

reasons: higher electricity prices in Germany<br />

making self-generation of power more attractive,<br />

supportive policy, and a greater willingness of<br />

customers to innovate with their heating systems. In<br />

the short-term, Germany will continue to be the<br />

dominant market in Europe <strong>for</strong> micro-CHP, remaining<br />

Manufacturer<br />

BDR Thermea<br />

Kirsch Energy Systems<br />

Product name<br />

Technology<br />

Capacity<br />

(kWe)<br />

First<br />

commercialised<br />

Senertec Dachs ICE 5.5 Germany, 1997<br />

Ecogen / eVita SE 1 UK, 2010<br />

Senertec Stirling SE SE 1 Germany, 2011<br />

L4.12 ICE 4 Germany, 2011<br />

Nano ICE 1.8 Germany, 2013<br />

Lion Energy Powerblock SE 1.5 Germany, 2011<br />

Proenvis<br />

Primus 1.4 ICE 4 Germany, 2011<br />

Primus 5.2 ICE 1.9 Germany, 2013<br />

RMB Neotower ICE 5 Germany, 2011<br />

Vaillant<br />

Ecopower 3.0 ICE 3 Germany, 2009<br />

Ecopower 4.7 ICE 4.7 Germany, 2005<br />

Vaillant / Honda Ecopower 1.0 ICE 1 Germany, 2010<br />

Viessmann<br />

Vitotwin SE 1 Germany, 2011<br />

Vitobloc EM-5/12 ICE 5 Germany, 2012<br />

Yanmar CP5 ICE 5 Japan, 2002<br />

Table 1. Micro-CHP<br />

products available<br />

in Europe<br />

in 2013<br />

Source: Delta-EE, 2013<br />

Key: ICE = internal combustion<br />

engine, SE =Stirling Engine<br />

54 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> Issue 3/2013


Micro-CHP<br />

REPORTS<br />

Figure 1. European micro-CHP market share by<br />

manufacturer (2005-2012)<br />

Source: Delta-EE, 2013<br />

Note: * = no longer trading<br />

Figure 2. Global micro-CHP sales by country<br />

(2005-2012)<br />

Source: Delta-EE, 2013<br />

the launch market of choice <strong>for</strong> many companies looking<br />

to introduce their products.<br />

More product is expected to arrive from 2014<br />

onwards – again, mainly in Germany. However, we<br />

should see launches extending into new markets as<br />

well, which will be crucial if manufacturers are to<br />

increase volumes and thus help bring prices down.<br />

2. EUROPE’S MARKET LEADERS<br />

ARE ITS #2 AND #3 BOILER<br />

MANUFACTURERS – BUT THEY STILL<br />

LAG BEHIND THE GLOBAL LEADER,<br />

JAPAN’S HONDA<br />

BDR Thermea is Europe’s market leader in micro-CHP,<br />

having sold almost 30,000 systems to date. As one of<br />

the "Big 5" European heating equipment manufacturers<br />

(number 3 in Europe with an annual turnover of around<br />

€ 1.8 billion), its portfolio features several micro-CHP<br />

products utilising various technologies. This includes<br />

5.5 kWe internal combustion engine (ICE) (under the<br />

"SenerTec" brand), 1kWe Stirling engine products (available<br />

under "Baxi", "Brötje", "Remeha", and "SenerTec"<br />

brands), and also 1kWe fuel cell product (under the "Baxi<br />

Innotech" brand) that’s still pre-commercial but due to<br />

launch in Germany from 2014.<br />

Vaillant – another of the "Big 5" and number 2 in<br />

Europe with total annual turnover of around € 2.3 billion<br />

– also has a variety of micro-CHP products in its portfolio.<br />

These include three ICE products of varying outputs: a<br />

1kWe system (sold in partnership with Honda) as well as<br />

larger 3 kWe and 4.7 kWe systems. Vaillant are also developing<br />

1 kWe Stirling engine and fuel cell products. The<br />

remaining players in the "Big 5" – Viessmann, Bosch, and<br />

Ariston – are also all involved in either selling or developing<br />

micro-CHP products. Nevertheless, they are all still far<br />

behind Honda of Japan which still dominate the global<br />

market, having sold more than 120,000 of its 1 kWe ICE<br />

micro-CHP since its home market launch in 2002.<br />

3. THE SIZE OF THE OPPORTUNITY IS<br />

AN ANNUAL HEATING MARKET OF<br />

8 MILLION GAS BOILERS – WORTH<br />

AROUND €25 BILLION EACH YEAR<br />

Those companies involved in <strong>gas</strong>-fired micro-CHP see it<br />

as the natural successor to the conventional - and hugely<br />

popular - <strong>gas</strong> boiler. Across Europe, around 8 million boilers<br />

are sold each year, with the market value estimated at<br />

around € 25 billion. While micro-CHP won’t be a perfect<br />

replacement <strong>for</strong> each of those boilers, taking just 4 % of<br />

the market would make it a billion euro industry. The<br />

small commercial and multi-family home markets offer<br />

micro-CHP vendors further potential <strong>for</strong> sales (Germany<br />

alone has almost 3.5 million multi-family homes).<br />

4. JAPAN IS THE GLOBAL LEADER IN<br />

MICRO-CHP AND ITS COMPANIES<br />

HAVE THEIR SIGHTS SET ON EUROPE<br />

Japanese sales of micro-CHP now outnumber those in<br />

Europe by around 10 to 1. This has been achieved through<br />

concerted support from Government, encompassing<br />

both R&D and a staged market introduction phase.<br />

Another reason <strong>for</strong> Japan’s leading position is the fact<br />

that the manufacturers and the <strong>gas</strong> industry have joined<br />

<strong>for</strong>ces, helping to find synergies in the supply chains and<br />

creating a single, recognisable "brand" <strong>for</strong> micro-CHP. This<br />

Issue 3/2013 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> 55


REPORTS<br />

Micro-CHP<br />

50.000 <br />

ICE ORC PEMFC SE SOFC <br />

5. SOME IN THE GAS INDUSTRY ARE<br />

PIONEERING NEW WAYS OF HELPING<br />

THE PRODUCT TO MARKET<br />

0 <br />

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 <br />

Figure 3. Global micro-CHP sales by technology<br />

(2005-2012)<br />

Source: Delta-EE, 2013<br />

Key: ICE = internal combustion engine, SE =Stirling Engine, ORC =<br />

organic Rankine cycle, PEMFC = proton exchange membrane fuel<br />

cell, SOFC = solid oxide fuel cell.<br />

collaboration has been helped by the vertical integration<br />

of the <strong>gas</strong> industry and the recent <strong>energy</strong> policy move<br />

away from nuclear.<br />

Japan is now targeting Europe with its micro-CHP<br />

products and know-how – seen as a way of reducing the<br />

cost of the technology in its domestic market, as well as<br />

driving growth in the country’s export economy.<br />

There are a number of reasons why companies from the<br />

<strong>gas</strong> industry are actively engaged in trying to help micro-<br />

CHP succeed. One common reason is to secure the share<br />

of <strong>gas</strong> in the residential heating market while still meeting<br />

the obligations set by the gradual policy push towards<br />

more <strong>energy</strong> efficient, low-carbon options. Another<br />

strong motivator <strong>for</strong> <strong>gas</strong> industry involvement in micro-<br />

CHP is the realisation that it can help with customer retention<br />

and provide additional value beyond units of <strong>gas</strong> and<br />

electricity, such as with balancing supply and demand.<br />

European <strong>gas</strong> industry involvement in micro-CHP so<br />

far has spanned the entire value chain: from providing<br />

small financial incentives (such as provided by Win<strong>gas</strong><br />

and E.ON) and assisting in product development (as EWE<br />

has done with fuel cell developer CFCL), to supporting<br />

laboratory and field tests (GDF Suez’s approach) as well as<br />

selling and installing product (like British Gas).<br />

New micro-CHP business models are also being tried<br />

and tested by current market players and innovative new<br />

entrants. With high prices and weak returns, a lack of<br />

product, and route-to-market challenges so far limiting<br />

the customer base, novel ways of selling are being sought<br />

as a means to bypass these barriers.<br />

100 <br />

90 <br />

Rankine cycle <br />

S-rling Engines <br />

Thermal Efficiency, LHV (%) <br />

80 <br />

70 <br />

60 <br />

50 <br />

40 <br />

30 <br />

Stirling engine <br />

Pico-­‐turbine <br />

Internal combustion engine <br />

PEM fuel cell <br />

SO fuel cell <br />

Internal combus-on engines <br />

Rankine-­‐cycle engines <br />

PEM Fuel Cells <br />

Pico-­‐turbines <br />

20 <br />

Solid Oxide Fuel Cell <br />

10 <br />

0 <br />

0 20 40 60 80 100 <br />

Electrical Efficiency, LHV (%) <br />

Reference showing 85% <br />

overall efficiency <br />

Figure 4. Micro-CHP product efficiencies grouped by technology<br />

Source: Delta-EE, 2013<br />

56 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> Issue 3/2013


www.<strong>gas</strong>-<strong>for</strong>-<strong>energy</strong>.com<br />

Micro-CHP REPORTS<br />

Order now!<br />

6. THERE IS AN INCREASING RANGE OF<br />

TECHNOLOGIES TO CHOOSE FROM<br />

BUT ICE STILL DOMINATES IN EUROPE<br />

There are generally five types of micro-CHP technology.<br />

All are at various stages of commercialisation in Europe<br />

but ICE – the most mature of them all – remains the bestselling<br />

one. Despite its maturity, ICE does have several<br />

drawbacks <strong>for</strong> residential applications which have led to<br />

the pursuit of other technologies (such as Stirling engine,<br />

Rankine cycle, pico-turbines, and fuel cells). Each has its<br />

own strengths and weaknesses and, crucially, each is<br />

suited to certain building types with particular <strong>energy</strong><br />

demands. This means that provided there is a <strong>gas</strong> connection,<br />

there is an increasing chance that there will be a<br />

micro-CHP product suited <strong>for</strong> your building.<br />

7. IT'S A MARKET OFFERING GREAT<br />

POTENTIAL YET CHARACTERISED<br />

BY HUGE UNCERTAINTY<br />

Although the market today remains limited with huge<br />

uncertainty shrouding just how much growth potential<br />

exists, a number of major corporations remain committed<br />

to micro-CHP. These include many of Europe’s major<br />

<strong>energy</strong> utilities (E.ON, RWE, British Gas, GDF Suez, SSE),<br />

some of its biggest heating equipment manufacturers<br />

(BDR Thermea, Bosch, Vaillant, Viessmann, Ariston), as well<br />

as some high-profile global brands from Japan (Aisin-<br />

Seiki - part of the Toyota group, JX, Panasonic, and<br />

Toshiba). With the combined resources of all these organisations,<br />

it seems implausible to think that they won’t be<br />

able to kick-start the fledgling micro-CHP market in<br />

Europe. To unlock micro-CHP’s potential, they will need a<br />

stable policy environment, ensure their products reach<br />

the market on time and at a reasonable cost, and foster<br />

greater involvement from the wider <strong>energy</strong> industry.<br />

The <strong>gas</strong> industry is already active in the type of<br />

engagement needed to drive the micro-CHP market –<br />

but such examples remain isolated. Continued and intensified<br />

<strong>gas</strong> industry involvement and support will be<br />

needed if the future growth potential of micro-CHP in<br />

Europe is to be realised.<br />

AUTHOR<br />

Dr. Scott Dwyer<br />

Delta Energy & Environment Ltd.<br />

Edinburgh | United Kingdom<br />

Phone: +44 131 625 3213<br />

E-mail: scott.dwyer@delta-ee.com<br />

<strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> is published by DIV Deutscher Industrieverlag GmbH, Arnulfstr. 124, 80636 München, Germany<br />

A close up view of<br />

the international<br />

<strong>gas</strong> business<br />

This magazine <strong>for</strong> smart <strong>gas</strong> technologies, infrastructure and<br />

utilisation features technical reports on the European natural<br />

<strong>gas</strong> industry as well as results of research programmes and innovative<br />

technologies. Find out more about markets, enterprises,<br />

associations and products of device manufacturers.<br />

Each edition is completed by interviews with major company<br />

leaders and interesting portraits of key players in the European<br />

business.<br />

READ MORE ABOUT<br />

Gas applications Grid infrastructure Measurement<br />

Gas quality issues Pipeline construction Regulation<br />

Bio<strong>gas</strong> injection Corrosion protection Smart metering<br />

KNOWLEDGE FOR THE<br />

FUTURE<br />

Issue 3/2013 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> 57


REPORTS<br />

Bio<strong>gas</strong><br />

Ensuring operational safety of<br />

the natural <strong>gas</strong> grid by removal<br />

of oxygen from bio<strong>gas</strong> via<br />

catalytic oxidation of methane<br />

by Felix Ortloff, Frank Graf and Thomas Kolb<br />

In Europe, in particular in Germany, bio<strong>gas</strong> features a strong growth. The overall bio<strong>gas</strong> capacity in Germany is<br />

to be increased to a level which will af<strong>for</strong>d a recompression of bio<strong>gas</strong> from local <strong>gas</strong> distribution networks or<br />

direct injection of bio<strong>gas</strong> into the high pressure transportation network in future. Due to the fact that bio<strong>gas</strong><br />

typically contains certain amounts of oxygen, german authorities have set up a threshold value of 10 ppmv,<br />

following EASEE-<strong>gas</strong> recommendations, in order to protect the <strong>gas</strong> infrastructure and <strong>gas</strong> storages from<br />

corrosion. Since a small amount of oxygen is inevitable, some promising new options <strong>for</strong> the removal of oxygen<br />

have been identified within a recent DVGW survey. One promising alternative to state of the art technologies is<br />

the catalytic oxidation of methane. Currently detailed investigations are being per<strong>for</strong>med in a catalytic test rig at<br />

the Engler-Bunte-Institute, in order to gain some basic design data <strong>for</strong> the implementation of a catalytic oxygen<br />

removal unit based on the utilization of biomethane in a technical scale.<br />

1. INTRODUCTION<br />

The production and injection of bio<strong>gas</strong> into the natural <strong>gas</strong><br />

grid is politically promoted in Germany [1]. Also in other<br />

european countries, some ef<strong>for</strong>ts are currently being undertaken<br />

to increase the overall bio<strong>gas</strong> capacity. For Germany,<br />

the Gas Grid Access Regulation Act (GasNZV) sets up ambitious<br />

goals by defining the annual amount of injected<br />

bio<strong>gas</strong> to be about 6 billion m 3 STP by the year 2020 (in<br />

2030: 6 billion m 3 STP) [2]. In the last years about 130 injection<br />

plants have been installed in Germany with a total<br />

annual injection rate of about 0.7 billion m 3 STP. If the political<br />

goals will be achieved, an increasing amount of bio<strong>gas</strong><br />

has to be recompressed from the local <strong>gas</strong> distribution grids<br />

into the national <strong>gas</strong> transportation network due to capacity<br />

limitations, especially in the summer season (Figure 1).<br />

In recent DVGW bio<strong>gas</strong> monitoring programs oxygen<br />

contents in the injected bio<strong>gas</strong> ranging from lower than<br />

0.1 vol.-% up to 1.8 vol.-% have been reported [3]. Thus, a<br />

higher concentration of oxygen has to be expected in<br />

the transportation network in future, where the total<br />

amount is limited to 10 ppmv <strong>for</strong> transport pipelines connected<br />

to underground storages and/or cross border<br />

transmission by federal law, following EASEE-<strong>gas</strong> recommendations<br />

[4, 5]. By exceeding this threshold, corrosion<br />

in <strong>gas</strong> installations may occur. Even worse, storage infrastructure<br />

(particularly pore storages) may be damaged by<br />

deposition of oxidized minerals as well as elemental sulfur,<br />

caused by the oxidation of hydrogen sulfide [6, 7].<br />

There<strong>for</strong>e, critical points of oxygen intake during the<br />

bio<strong>gas</strong> production and purification process were identified<br />

within a DVGW research project [8]. Recommendations on<br />

the optimization of the bio<strong>gas</strong> upgrading chain against<br />

the background of preventing oxygen intake were given.<br />

Since a small remaining amount is inevitable, options <strong>for</strong><br />

the removal of the oxygen from bio<strong>gas</strong> were presented.<br />

Up to now, oxygen is usually removed by adsorption<br />

based processes (e. g. on Cu, Cr) or by catalytic oxidation<br />

of hydrogen. The amount of oxygen in bio<strong>gas</strong> typically<br />

exceeds the threshold value <strong>for</strong> economical application<br />

of adsorption based processes [8]. One promising alternative<br />

is the catalytic oxidation of methane. The most<br />

important advantage of the utilization of methane<br />

instead of hydrogen as a fuel <strong>for</strong> the oxidation reaction<br />

58 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> Issue 3/2013


Bio<strong>gas</strong><br />

REPORTS<br />

Figure 1. Overview over a typical bio<strong>gas</strong><br />

plant setup, points of oxygen<br />

intake and spreading of the oxygen<br />

load in the <strong>gas</strong> grid infrastructure<br />

( : possible installation points <strong>for</strong><br />

O2-removal units)<br />

is that methane is available in situ, whereas hydrogen<br />

has to be supplied, stored and added separately.<br />

Besides, the utilization of methane appears to be the<br />

more sustainable as well as the economically and technically<br />

preferred option [8].<br />

Hence, experimental investigations on the removal<br />

of oxygen are currently being per<strong>for</strong>med at Engler-<br />

Bunte-Institute in lab scale [9]. The examinations focus<br />

on the selection of suitable and economically feasible<br />

catalyst materials and on determination of required<br />

reaction conditions <strong>for</strong> compliance with the limiting<br />

value of 10 ppmv oxygen in the <strong>gas</strong> grid and there<strong>for</strong>e<br />

consequently also in the bio<strong>gas</strong>.<br />

2. SOURCES FOR OXYGEN INTAKE<br />

It is common, that several process steps in the bio<strong>gas</strong><br />

purification chain can cause oxygen intake into the<br />

bio<strong>gas</strong>. Besides oxygen intake during the feeding of<br />

biomass into the fermenter and the desulfurization<br />

process (especially when carried out by injecting<br />

ambient or oxygen enriched air directly into the <strong>gas</strong><br />

phase of the fermenter), physical scrubbing processes<br />

act as main sources <strong>for</strong> oxygen [8]. Figure 1 illustrates<br />

a typical configuration of a bio<strong>gas</strong> plant with a physical<br />

scrubber <strong>for</strong> CO 2-removal. Common points of oxygen<br />

intake are indicated.<br />

The design of the biomass feeding system depends<br />

on the nature of the substrate. In case of predominantly<br />

solid substrates, solid dosing systems, e. g. screw conveyors<br />

are applied. Such systems are not completely <strong>gas</strong><br />

tight. Despite the substrate is compressed in the conveyor,<br />

it still exhibits certain porosity. As a result a small<br />

amount of ambient air is fed into the fermenter. Oxygen<br />

contents in a range of 0.1 vol.-% up to 0.4 vol.-% were<br />

calculated by taking into account the apparent density<br />

and the void fraction of typical solid substrates [8]. Nevertheless,<br />

nearly all of the oxygen is consumed by the<br />

reduction reaction of hydrogen sulfide to elemental sulfur<br />

directly in the fermenter:<br />

2 H 2S (g) + O 2(g) → 2 S (s) + 2 H 2O (g) (1)<br />

Hence typical oxygen contents are low (about 0.1 vol. %)<br />

downstream of the fermentation process. When liquid<br />

substrates are applied oxygen intake by the feeding system<br />

can be neglected [8].<br />

In some cases, the desulfurization process is carried<br />

out by supplemental injection of ambient or oxygen<br />

enriched air directly into the <strong>gas</strong> phase of the fermenter.<br />

Thus the remaining amount of H 2S can be reduced to<br />

about 50 - 100 ppmv following eq. 1. However, oxygen<br />

has to be fed in slight excess to the stoichiometric necessary<br />

amount, resulting in relatively high oxygen contents<br />

Issue 3/2013 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> 59


REPORTS<br />

Bio<strong>gas</strong><br />

biomethane (+ H 2 O (g) )<br />

Q . WT-01<br />

WT-03<br />

Q .<br />

K-01<br />

K-03<br />

K-02<br />

WT-02<br />

„lean <strong>gas</strong>“<br />

CO 2 + H 2 S + H 2 O (g)<br />

+ Luft (+CH 4 )<br />

raw bio<strong>gas</strong><br />

V-01 V-02<br />

D-03<br />

V-03<br />

air<br />

D-01 D-02<br />

P-01<br />

condensate<br />

K-01: Absorption<br />

column<br />

K-02: Flash<br />

K-03: Desorption<br />

column<br />

Figure 2. Common configuration of a physical absorption process <strong>for</strong> bio<strong>gas</strong> upgrading (in this case the<br />

Genosorb ® 1753 solvent is applied)<br />

in the raw bio<strong>gas</strong> (0.2 to 0.4 vol.-%). In respect of preventing<br />

oxygen contamination, alternative processes <strong>for</strong> desulfurization,<br />

such as desulfurization with ferric salts (FeCl),<br />

should be preferred.<br />

Not least, physical scrubbing processes cause a<br />

distinct increase of the oxygen content. When<br />

applied <strong>for</strong> bio<strong>gas</strong> upgrading, such processes usually<br />

exhibit a configuration as shown in Figure 2. The raw<br />

Figure 3. Residual contents of oxygen in bio<strong>gas</strong>,<br />

measured in a recent bio<strong>gas</strong> monitoring<br />

program [10]<br />

bio<strong>gas</strong> is compressed and fed into an absorption column,<br />

where carbon dioxide is removed from the <strong>gas</strong><br />

stream by sorption into the washing liquid. Water and<br />

Genosorb® 1753 currently are state-of-the-art solvents.<br />

After passing a flash-drum, the solvent is<br />

regenerated in a desorption column where a stripping<br />

medium, which is ambient air in most cases, is<br />

inserted in order to lower CO 2 partial pressure in the<br />

<strong>gas</strong> phase and there<strong>for</strong>e enhance CO 2 desorption.<br />

Hence, oxygen and nitrogen are absorbed into the<br />

solvent and further on released in the actual absorption<br />

column into the bio<strong>gas</strong> stream.<br />

Within the DVGW survey [8] the resulting oxygen<br />

contents were calculated on basis of process modeling<br />

tools, such as ASPEN Plus®. Hence, in a setup as shown in<br />

Figure 2, residual oxygen contents in a range of 0.5<br />

vol.-% up to 1.2 vol.-% were computed to end up in the<br />

upgraded bio<strong>gas</strong>. Confirmation is given by recent<br />

bio<strong>gas</strong> monitoring programs [10], where oxygen contents<br />

ranging from lower than 0.1 vol.-% up to 1.8 vol.-%<br />

have been reported, as shown in Figure 3.<br />

It is mandatory, that such high oxygen loads have<br />

to be removed prior to the injection into the high pressure<br />

<strong>gas</strong> grid. Figure 1 also shows possible installation<br />

locations ( ) <strong>for</strong> potential oxygen removal units. Two<br />

can seriously be taken under consideration, oxygen<br />

removal directly within the bio<strong>gas</strong> plant or alterna-<br />

60 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> Issue 3/2013


Bio<strong>gas</strong><br />

REPORTS<br />

Bunder-Tief<br />

Steinitz<br />

Ochtrup<br />

Werne-Stockum<br />

Broichweiden<br />

Reckrod<br />

Lampertheim<br />

Kienbaum<br />

Gas grid intersection<br />

points<br />

Ø Gas flow rate<br />

in m 3 /h (Winter)<br />

Ø Gas flow rate<br />

in m 3 /h (Summer)<br />

Kienbaum 768.000 315.000<br />

Steinitz 331.000 136.000<br />

Werne-Stockum 198.000 81.000<br />

Lampertheim 123.000 50.000<br />

Bunder-Tief 79.000 32.000<br />

Ochtrup 49.000 20.000<br />

Broichweiden Süd 37.000 15.000<br />

Reckrod 5.000 2.000<br />

No. of possible injecting plants<br />

200<br />

200<br />

Kienbaum<br />

Winter (01/2011) Summer (07/2011)<br />

Steinitz<br />

150<br />

100<br />

Werne-Stockum<br />

Lampertheim<br />

Bunder-Tief<br />

Ochtrup<br />

Broichweiden<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

Reckrod<br />

0<br />

50<br />

0<br />

100 1000 5000 10000<br />

100 1000 5000 10000<br />

Oxygen content in the bio<strong>gas</strong> in ppmv<br />

Oxygen content in the bio<strong>gas</strong> in ppmv<br />

No. of possible injecting plants<br />

Figure 4. Assessment of the possible number of injection plants at representative intersection points as a<br />

function of residual oxygen content in the bio<strong>gas</strong><br />

tively at the point of recompression. A third option<br />

(neglecting the violation of the threshold value in the<br />

actual grid piping) would be to install the removal<br />

units prior to <strong>gas</strong> storages and at points of cross border<br />

<strong>gas</strong> exchange, respectively. However, this option<br />

suffers the strong dilution of oxygen in combination<br />

with the large <strong>gas</strong> flow rates, which both result in<br />

excessively large removal systems.<br />

Removal of oxygen directly on-site of bio<strong>gas</strong> plants<br />

has the advantage, that synergy effects can be incorporated.<br />

In case several bio<strong>gas</strong> plants inject their <strong>gas</strong><br />

to one and the same distribution network, removal of<br />

oxygen is an option at the point of recompression.<br />

Hence, within this option additional process steps,<br />

such as drying, adaption of calorific value e. g. would<br />

need to be installed.<br />

3. AVOIDANCE VERSUS REMOVAL OF<br />

OXYGEN<br />

Despite of the sometimes relative large oxygen content in<br />

bio<strong>gas</strong>, it is often misleadingly expected, that the threshold<br />

value of 10 ppmv oxygen can simply be met by diluting<br />

bio<strong>gas</strong> with natural <strong>gas</strong> in the <strong>gas</strong> grid. This misjudgment is<br />

due to the large flow capacity of the <strong>gas</strong> transportation network.<br />

Against this background some simplified calculations<br />

were per<strong>for</strong>med, taking the ordinary <strong>gas</strong> flow rates of representative<br />

intersection points in Germany’s <strong>gas</strong> grid infrastructure<br />

into consideration. Additionally, the flow rates in the winter<br />

and in the summer period were incorporated (see Figure 4)<br />

to give an impression on the maximum number of bio<strong>gas</strong><br />

plants that could possibly inject their <strong>gas</strong> until the threshold<br />

value of 10 ppmv is exceeded at the selected locations.<br />

Issue 3/2013 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> 61


REPORTS<br />

Bio<strong>gas</strong><br />

As can be seen in Figure 4, the oxygen problem can<br />

hardly be ignored. Especially in comparison with the<br />

a<strong>for</strong>ementioned goals of substituting 6 billion m 3 STP of<br />

the natural <strong>gas</strong> demand by the year 2020, which would<br />

mean to install a total number of about 1.500 plants with<br />

an average bio<strong>gas</strong> capacity of about 500 m³/h (STP).<br />

Mainly in the summer time, when the natural <strong>gas</strong> consumption<br />

is comparatively low and the amount of recompressed<br />

bio<strong>gas</strong> is expected to be high, only few plants<br />

could inject their <strong>gas</strong> at which only very low oxygen<br />

contents of about 100 ppmv would be tolerable. A more<br />

realistic assumption of an average oxygen content of<br />

about 1.000 pmmv results in total quantity of about 10<br />

plants in summer and about 30 plants in winter, not taking<br />

the expected reduction of natural <strong>gas</strong> consumption<br />

nor local oxygen concentrations into account. Bio<strong>gas</strong><br />

plants with physical scrubbers and oxygen contents of<br />

about 5.000 ppmv could hardly inject any bio<strong>gas</strong> into the<br />

transportation network, regardless of the season.<br />

4. STATE-OF-THE-ART TECHNOLOGIES<br />

FOR OXYGEN REMOVAL<br />

There are several ways to remove oxygen from <strong>gas</strong><br />

streams. Besides some physical processes, such as sorption<br />

on molecular sieves or activated carbon, membrane<br />

separation or certain cryogenic solutions, only<br />

chemical processes are suitable to meet the requirements<br />

of a residual oxygen content of 10 ppmv. This is<br />

due to the fact that physical processes all unite in the<br />

necessity <strong>for</strong> a distinct concentration gradient, which is<br />

comparatively small in the case of the removal of oxygen<br />

from bio<strong>gas</strong>. This prohibits any physical process to<br />

become economically feasible.<br />

However some chemical processes are commercially<br />

available and can be denoted as state-of-the-art technologies.<br />

There are mainly two options. The first is a<br />

continuous adsorption based processes, commonly<br />

using copper (eq. 2) or chromium as adsorption materials.<br />

These are placed in at least two or more fixed bed<br />

adsorption columns, necessary <strong>for</strong> alternating loading<br />

and regeneration.<br />

2 Cu + O 2 → 2 CuO (2)<br />

For regeneration, a reducing agent is required. Usually<br />

hydrogen is applied (eq. 3), which is not available at<br />

bio<strong>gas</strong> plants and there<strong>for</strong> has to be applied from an<br />

external source.<br />

CuO + H 2 → Cu + H 2O (3)<br />

For copper based adsorption processes a minimum operation<br />

temperature of 150 °C needs to be maintained. The<br />

maximum temperature is limited to 250 °C in order to<br />

avoid thermal damage of the bed material. As a result of<br />

the strong exothermic oxidation reaction, the oxygen<br />

amount in the feed <strong>gas</strong> is limited to 1 vol.-%. Besides, the<br />

actual oxygen uptake capacity of commercially available<br />

adsorbents is comparatively low with 5 - 10 l/kg (STP). For<br />

these reasons, suchlike processes are typically applied in<br />

advance of oxygen sensitive applications in the context<br />

of fine purification where low oxygen contents (


Bio<strong>gas</strong><br />

REPORTS<br />

Table 1. Overview over state-of-the-art technologies and comparison with new catalytic approaches <strong>for</strong><br />

removal of oxygen from bio<strong>gas</strong><br />

Adsorption<br />

State-of-the-art<br />

Oxidation of<br />

Hydrogen<br />

Oxidation of<br />

Methane<br />

New approaches<br />

Oxidation of LPG<br />

(Re<strong>for</strong>ming)<br />

+ H2/CO Ox.<br />

T in °C 150 - 250 80 250 - 350 200 - 300 800 / 250<br />

O2: Fuel Ratio 1:2 1:2 2:1 5,5:1 2:1<br />

Equipment<br />

Requirements<br />

↑ ↓ ↓ → →<br />

Process Scheme<br />

Investment -- ++ + + -<br />

Operating Costs - - + 0 0<br />

Alternating<br />

Loadings<br />

+ 0 ++ 0 -<br />

vance in industry <strong>for</strong> catalytic oxidation units, operating in<br />

excess fuel conditions, especially when methane is to be<br />

incorporated as a reducing agent <strong>for</strong> oxygen.<br />

The third option represents an in-situ generation of<br />

hydrogen and carbon monoxide out of methane (eq. 7, 8).<br />

This is an attempt to incorporate a minor partial flow of<br />

bio<strong>gas</strong>, however, re<strong>for</strong>m it completely and afterwards mix<br />

it with the actual bio<strong>gas</strong> stream. Hence hydrogen and<br />

carbon monoxide are available <strong>for</strong> oxygen removal (eq. 4,<br />

9). In contrast to the first two options, a small second catalytic<br />

reaction unit, operated at high temperatures is necessary.<br />

The typical operation temperature of a catalytic<br />

re<strong>for</strong>ming unit <strong>for</strong> natural <strong>gas</strong> (commercially per<strong>for</strong>med<br />

with a nickel catalyst) in a technical scale is about 800 °C.<br />

CH 4 + H 2O → CO + 3 H 2 (7)<br />

CH 4 + CO 2 → 2 CO + 2 H 2 (8)<br />

Table 1 also shows some qualitative evaluation of the<br />

presented alternatives. Besides the required temperatures<br />

and the oxygen to fuel ratio, an evaluation of equipment<br />

requirements, pricing and process dynamics is<br />

given. The comparison of the most promising alternative:<br />

the utilization of methane vs. the state-of-the-art technology<br />

oxidation of hydrogen is of special interest. As a<br />

consequence of the higher reaction temperature a larger<br />

heat exchanger is needed in the methane case, which<br />

results in higher investment. Conversely, the lower fuel<br />

costs <strong>for</strong> methane lead to lower operating costs. For the<br />

hydrogen fuel costs, delivery, storage, injection and mixing<br />

with the bio<strong>gas</strong> stream also have to be incorporated.<br />

Concerning variation of oxygen contents, the utilization<br />

of methane is the most promising alternative, because<br />

methane is available anyhow and there<strong>for</strong> the fuel concentration<br />

has not to be adapted to the oxygen content.<br />

At present, a DVGW-research project [9] is undertaken,<br />

focusing on the development of design data <strong>for</strong> a catalytic<br />

oxygen removal unit by oxidation of methane. For<br />

this purpose, a lab scale catalytic test rig was built. Key<br />

aspect of the ongoing experiments is the identification of<br />

an appropriate kinetic approach as well as the determination<br />

of kinetic data <strong>for</strong> a set of reference catalysts on<br />

noble metal basis <strong>for</strong> typical bio<strong>gas</strong> compositions and<br />

working pressures.<br />

Some of the results are given in Figure 5 [12],<br />

which shows a variation of the oxygen content in a<br />

balance of methane in a range of 0.1 vol.-% to 0.8<br />

vol.-% (blue curves) and a variation of operation pressure<br />

from 1 bar to 10 bar (red curves) <strong>for</strong> a platinum<br />

catalyst. As a typical behavior, it can be observed,<br />

that an increase of the oxygen content in the feed<br />

results in a higher temperature, necessary <strong>for</strong> the<br />

desirable complete conversion of oxygen. At ambient<br />

pressure and the given residence time, this temperature<br />

ranges between 250 °C and 350 °C. In contrary,<br />

Issue 3/2013 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> 63


REPORTS<br />

Bio<strong>gas</strong><br />

Figure 5. Oxygen conversion in the lab scale test rig<br />

at Engler-Bunte-Institute as a function of<br />

feed composition and system pressure<br />

partial pressure in the <strong>gas</strong> has a crucial impact on the<br />

reaction rate – even though methane is available in<br />

large excess. This seems surprisingly at first.<br />

In literature the reaction mechanism <strong>for</strong> the oxidation<br />

of methane is described by the so called Eley-Rideal<br />

mechanism [13, 14], which indeed assumes methane to<br />

have a limiting influence on reaction rate due to weak<br />

absorption interactions with the catalytic surface. Eley-<br />

Rideal presumes oxygen to be sufficiently absorbed on<br />

the catalytic surface at any time. However, these observations<br />

are based on examinations per<strong>for</strong>med in excess<br />

of air or oxygen. Thanks to the new experiments, the<br />

validity of Eley-Rideal <strong>for</strong> the oxidation of methane can<br />

be extended to oxygen partial pressures as low as<br />

approximately 1 mbar.<br />

In addition to the examinations with methane, a variation<br />

of fuel <strong>gas</strong>es was carried out. As an overview,<br />

Figure 6 [12] shows the relative stability of the potential<br />

fuel components <strong>for</strong> oxygen removal. For reasons of<br />

comparability, the fuel <strong>gas</strong> content in the feed <strong>gas</strong> was<br />

defined to be 0.25 vol.-% <strong>for</strong> all fuels.<br />

Methane exhibits the highest stability. There<strong>for</strong> the<br />

highest reaction temperature is necessary. Higher<br />

hydrocarbons follow the sequence: ethane > propane ><br />

butane. Carbon monoxide lies between propane and<br />

butane. Hydrogen features the highest reactivity and<br />

allows a complete conversion of 1.000 ppmv of oxygen<br />

at about 50 °C.<br />

6. PERSPECTIVES<br />

Further on, experiments with other catalysts will be<br />

carried out in order to identify more cost effective<br />

materials which still feature sufficient activity <strong>for</strong> the<br />

oxidation of methane. Thereafter, sulfur tolerance in<br />

respect to contamination of the feed <strong>gas</strong> with hydrogen<br />

sulfide will be regarded, be<strong>for</strong>e the test rig will<br />

be moved directly on-site of a bio<strong>gas</strong> plant and fed<br />

with actual bio<strong>gas</strong>.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS<br />

Figure 6. Relative comparison of the activity of<br />

different fuel <strong>gas</strong>es on the conversion of<br />

oxygen<br />

when traces of methane are to be removed from air<br />

streams, a minimum of 400 °C is usually required with<br />

platinum catalysts. Taking into account the variation<br />

of pressure leads to the conclusion, that the methane<br />

The authors are thankful <strong>for</strong> the funding from DVGW<br />

(German Technical and Scientific Association <strong>for</strong> Gas<br />

and Water).<br />

REFERENCES<br />

[1] Gesetz zur Neuregelung des Rechts der Erneuerbaren<br />

Energien im Strombereich, Artikel 1: Gesetz für<br />

den Vorrang Erneuerbarer Energien (EEG). Bundesgesetzblatt<br />

2008, Teil I, Nr. 49<br />

[2] Gasnetzzugangsverordnung; Teil 6 Bio<strong>gas</strong>, § 31<br />

(09/2010)<br />

64 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> Issue 3/2013


Bio<strong>gas</strong><br />

REPORTS<br />

[3] Köppel, W; Graf, F.: Results of a DVGW Bio<strong>gas</strong> Monitoring<br />

Program; gwf-Gas|Erd<strong>gas</strong> International 151<br />

(2010) 13, 38-46<br />

[4] DVGW-Arbeitsblatt G 260: Gasbeschaffenheit. Jan 2012<br />

[5] EASEE-Gas: CBP 2005-001/02; Harmonization of<br />

Natural Gas Quality<br />

[6] Groneman, U. et al.: Oxygen Content in Natural Gas<br />

Infrastructure; gwf-Gas|Erd<strong>gas</strong> International 151<br />

(2010) 13, 26-32<br />

[7] Wagner, M. et al.: DGMK Research Report 756; Influence<br />

of Bio-methane and Hydrogen on the Microbiology<br />

of Underground Gas Storage – Literature<br />

Study (2013)<br />

[8] Köppel, W. et al.: Vermeidung und Entfernung von<br />

Sauerstoff bei der Einspeisung von Bio<strong>gas</strong> in das Erd<strong>gas</strong>netz.<br />

gwf-Gas|Erd<strong>gas</strong> 153 (2012) 1, 2-11<br />

[9] DVGW-Forschungsvorhaben G1 05 10 F: Entfernung<br />

von Sauerstoff aus Bio<strong>gas</strong> mittels katalytischer Oxidation<br />

von Methan und oxidativer Umsetzung an<br />

Eisensulfiden. (2013-2014)<br />

[10] Köppel et al.: Abschlussbericht DVGW-Forschungsvorhaben<br />

G 1 03 10: Monitoring Bio<strong>gas</strong> II. (09/2013)<br />

[11] Graf, F.; Bajohr, S.: Bio<strong>gas</strong> – Erzeugung, Aufbereitung,<br />

Einspeisung. München: Oldenbourg Industrieverlag<br />

(2011)<br />

[12] Frankovsky, R.; Ortloff, F.: Katalytische Entfernung von<br />

Sauerstoff aus Bio<strong>gas</strong> mittels Oxidation von Methan.<br />

Diplomarbeit, KIT (2013)<br />

[13] Knebel, F. W.: Erd<strong>gas</strong>vorwärmung durch direkte katalytische<br />

Oxidation; Dissertation, Universität Karlsruhe<br />

(TH) (2000)<br />

[14] Reinke, M.: Katalytisch stabilisierte Verbrennung von<br />

CH 4/Luft-Gemischen und H 2O- und CO 2-verdünnten<br />

CH 4/Luft-Gemischen über Platin unter Hochdruckbedingungen;<br />

Dissertation, ETH Zürich (2005)<br />

AUTHORS<br />

Dipl.-Ing. Felix Ortloff<br />

DVGW Research Center at Engler-Bunte-<br />

Institut (DVGW-EBI) Karlsruhe Institute of<br />

Technology (KIT),<br />

Karlsruhe | Germany<br />

Phone: + 49 721 608 4 7071<br />

E-mail: felix.ortloff@kit.edu<br />

Dr. Frank Graf<br />

DVGW Research Center at Engler-Bunte-<br />

Institut (DVGW-EBI) Karlsruhe Institute of<br />

Technology (KIT),<br />

Karlsruhe | Germany<br />

Prof. Dr. Thomas Kolb<br />

Engler-Bunte-Institute, Division of Fuel<br />

Chemistry and Technology (EBI-CEB)<br />

Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT),<br />

Karlsruhe | Germany<br />

Issue 3/2013 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> 65


ASSOCIATIONS<br />

ENTSOG launches Transparency Plat<strong>for</strong>m<br />

The transparency guidelines and congestion management<br />

procedures (Chapter 3 of Annex 1 to Regulation<br />

(EC) No 715/2009 and its amendments) require ENTSOG<br />

to provide a Union-wide central plat<strong>for</strong>m, where all <strong>gas</strong><br />

Transmission System Operators can make their relevant<br />

data publicly available.<br />

ENTSOG has been working, along with its service providers,<br />

on upgrading its Transparency Plat<strong>for</strong>m, operating since<br />

2009 on a voluntary basis. Since 1 st of October, onwards 41<br />

TSOs can use the plat<strong>for</strong>m (www.<strong>gas</strong>-roads.eu) to upload<br />

necessary data and in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

and make them available to all<br />

market participants. The plat<strong>for</strong>m contains technical and<br />

commercial in<strong>for</strong>mation, made available through tables and<br />

maps, needed by all the users of <strong>gas</strong> networks.<br />

ENTSOG will continue to work on further improvements<br />

and user friendliness of this plat<strong>for</strong>m and the<br />

related content. However, <strong>for</strong> the time being, it is the TSOs<br />

responsibility to upload their data correctly, consistently<br />

and in a timely manner.<br />

IGU launches the Wholesale Gas Price Survey - 2013 Edition<br />

The report on "Wholesale Gas Price Formation" first<br />

published in June 2012 <strong>for</strong> the World Gas Conference<br />

in Kuala Lumpur, has now been updated by Study Group 2<br />

of the IGU Strategy Committee (PGCB).<br />

Historically, <strong>gas</strong> prices have not been in the news to<br />

the same extent as oil prices. This is changing as the<br />

share of <strong>gas</strong> in global <strong>energy</strong> consumption continues to<br />

increase, volumes of internationally traded <strong>gas</strong> are<br />

greater than ever be<strong>for</strong>e and different price <strong>for</strong>mation<br />

mechanisms have had serious commercial implications<br />

both <strong>for</strong> producing and consuming nations. The rapid<br />

growth in shale <strong>gas</strong> production in North America and<br />

fundamental shifts in LNG supply patterns across the<br />

global <strong>gas</strong> market relate to strong intercontinental linkages<br />

between supply, demand and price. At the same<br />

time this report sets out the large variations in wholesale<br />

<strong>gas</strong> prices across the world that result from the different<br />

prevailing price <strong>for</strong>mation mechanisms.<br />

The first and the updated reports of the global<br />

review of wholesale <strong>gas</strong> price levels and price <strong>for</strong>mation<br />

mechanisms are also available on the IGU website -<br />

www.igu.org.<br />

ENTSOG and GIE publish<br />

Capacity Map 2013 and System<br />

Development Map 2012<br />

The European Network of Transmission System Operators<br />

<strong>for</strong> Gas (ENTSOG), in cooperation with Gas Infrastructure<br />

Europe (GIE), has published the third edition of<br />

the map dedicated to system development <strong>matters</strong> and<br />

covering the year 2012. At the same time, ENTSOG releases<br />

the 2013 edition of its capacity map and GIE publishes the<br />

revised 2013 edition of its storage and LNG maps.<br />

Through these maps, ENTSOG and GIE, together with<br />

their respective members, go beyond the day-to-day<br />

transparency and further contribute to the analysis of the<br />

dynamics of the European <strong>gas</strong> market.<br />

The new edition of the System Development Map<br />

provides a graphical representation of infrastructure<br />

projects considered by ENTSOG in its TYNDP 2013-<br />

2022 assessment of the infrastructure-related market<br />

integration as well as of demand and supply developments<br />

in 2012.<br />

ENTSOG and GIE are committed to further enhance<br />

the map features in the future and welcome feedback on<br />

this from stakeholders.<br />

The maps are available <strong>for</strong> download at http://www.<br />

entsog.eu/maps and http://www.gie.eu/maps_data.<br />

66 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> Issue 3/2013


ASSOCIATIONS<br />

Euro<strong>gas</strong> predicts stable EU <strong>gas</strong> demand <strong>for</strong> 2013<br />

Gas demand across the European Union is expected<br />

to remain relatively stable in 2013 compared with<br />

2012, according to the latest <strong>for</strong>ecast from Euro<strong>gas</strong>. An<br />

increase in demand of 2.6% was recorded in the first half<br />

of 2013 compared with the same period in 2012.<br />

These latest estimates are the result of an annual survey<br />

covering 90% of the EU <strong>gas</strong><br />

market and carried out by Euro<strong>gas</strong>,<br />

the association representing<br />

the European <strong>gas</strong> wholesale,<br />

retail and distribution sector,<br />

among its members. According<br />

to Euro<strong>gas</strong>, the slight increase in<br />

EU <strong>gas</strong> demand recorded <strong>for</strong> the<br />

first six months of 2013 can be<br />

attributed to the long winter and low temperatures.<br />

Across the EU such colder than usual weather conditions,<br />

particularly in March and May 2013, led to an increase in<br />

<strong>gas</strong> consumption <strong>for</strong> heating. However, even if the exceptionally<br />

long winter raised <strong>gas</strong> demand, other factors<br />

have continued to negatively affect demand.<br />

While industrial production showed signs of recovery<br />

in some member states, important cross-country differences<br />

persist and <strong>gas</strong> demand from the industrial sector<br />

only registered limited increase in the EU as a whole.<br />

Gas use in power generation has continued to slide as a<br />

result of unfavourable market fundamentals. The low coal<br />

price and a weak carbon price continued to favour coal<br />

generation. The effects of the economic crisis and poor<br />

growth continued to result in weak final power demand. In<br />

addition, the growing share of electricity produced from<br />

renewables and a relatively high hydroelectricity production<br />

also reduced the demand <strong>for</strong> <strong>gas</strong> in power generation.<br />

Such factors are still expected<br />

to influence demand in the<br />

second half of the year.<br />

Early indications from the<br />

Euro<strong>gas</strong> data suggest that <strong>gas</strong><br />

demand in Europe is likely to<br />

remain stable throughout 2013,<br />

registering a slight increase of<br />

1% compared with 2012.<br />

Despite the small increase, demand in the second half of<br />

2013 will remain under pressure as <strong>gas</strong> use in the power sector<br />

is expected to remain weak. This issue, coupled with the<br />

still sluggish economic recovery across the EU will have a<br />

detrimental impact on <strong>gas</strong> demand in the rest of 2013. With<br />

regard to heating demand, <strong>for</strong>ecasts <strong>for</strong> the second part of<br />

the year in normal weather conditions do not point to any<br />

significant increase.<br />

On this basis, taking 2013 as a whole, <strong>gas</strong> demand<br />

would correspond to an EU & Switzerland annual consumption<br />

of about 5 130 terawatt-hours or 475 billion<br />

cubic metres.<br />

Shale <strong>gas</strong> chemical disclosure site<br />

reaches 10-well milestone<br />

NGSFacts.org, the voluntary oil & <strong>gas</strong> industry natural<br />

<strong>gas</strong> from shale well disclosure website, has published<br />

its tenth well disclosure sheet.<br />

NGS Facts is a web-based European chemical disclosure<br />

plat<strong>for</strong>m. Launched in June 2013 by the International<br />

Association of Oil and Gas Producers (OGP), it gives public<br />

access to in<strong>for</strong>mation about the contents of the fracturing<br />

fluids being used <strong>for</strong> shale wells in Europe.<br />

OGP is reaching out to increase operator participation.<br />

In order to participate they must commit to submitting<br />

data in a timely manner <strong>for</strong> all of their EEAlocated<br />

NGS-directed hydraulically fractured wells.<br />

A similar website, FracFocus, provides in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

about the contents of the fracturing fluids being used in<br />

US and Canadian shale <strong>gas</strong> wells.<br />

The ten well sites featured on<br />

NGSFacts.org are all in Poland. The<br />

data come from Conoco Phillips/<br />

Lane Energy, ExxonMobil Exploration<br />

and Production Poland Sp.<br />

Zoo, Marathon Oil Polska and<br />

Chevron Polska Energy Resources.<br />

OGP is pleased to announce that Shale Gas Europe<br />

and Eurometaux have <strong>for</strong>mally indicated their support<br />

<strong>for</strong> the initiative.<br />

In addition to providing well disclosure in<strong>for</strong>mation,<br />

NGSFacts answers frequently asked questions about the<br />

exploration and production of unconventional <strong>gas</strong>. The<br />

queries cover central topics such as water, chemicals,<br />

seismicity and greenhouse <strong>gas</strong>.<br />

Issue 3/2013 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> 67


PRODUCTS & SERVICES<br />

Software package offers versatile product monitoring<br />

Emco Wheaton has unveiled an innovative new software<br />

package Drawbar + which will automatically<br />

monitor product levels in individual compartments of<br />

tankers. The software offers the further advantage of being<br />

able to simultaneously monitor levels within any additional<br />

multi-compartmental draw bar trailer which may be connected<br />

to and towed by a tanker mid-application. Ineffective<br />

monitoring of compartments can result in inaccurate<br />

distribution and product recognition at the point of delivery,<br />

potentially affecting profit margins and customer relations.<br />

When adding a multi-compartment drawbar trailer,<br />

it can be even more difficult and time consuming to keep<br />

track. The new Drawbar + from Emco Wheaton, is an<br />

upgrade of its Compartment Volume Monitoring software<br />

which automatically detects any addition of compartments<br />

and alters its display to accommodate them.<br />

If a two-compartment draw bar trailer is connected to a<br />

tanker with four compartments, Drawbar + will immediately<br />

begin to monitor and display the product levels in all six<br />

compartments. During loading, details are entered into the<br />

litre counter and compartment contents are displayed<br />

graphically and numerically. Drawbar + automatically displays<br />

the name, location and volume of the product in each<br />

compartment throughout transportation. Helping with<br />

accurate distribution, the volume is recalculated throughout<br />

the delivery process and any retained product is displayed.<br />

Contact:<br />

Emco Wheaton<br />

www.emcowheaton.com<br />

I-Test ensures <strong>gas</strong> detectors are compliant<br />

The new Crowcon I-Test bump testing and calibration station<br />

is designed specifically to test and verify that Crowcon’s<br />

Gas-Pro portable <strong>gas</strong> detectors are in a compliant state.<br />

Bump testing (<strong>gas</strong> testing) standards globally are becoming<br />

ever-stricter and the demands on fleet managers to control<br />

bump and calibration records are increasingly stringent. The<br />

I-Test simplifies this process as much as possible.<br />

To start with, there’s no need to turn the test <strong>gas</strong> on<br />

and off – a flow regulator automatically pulls in the correct<br />

amount and concentration of <strong>gas</strong><br />

<strong>for</strong> each bump. The I-Test also starts<br />

automatically as soon as a Gas-Pro<br />

detector is inserted without the need<br />

to press any buttons. The device then<br />

verifies that all <strong>gas</strong> sensors are<br />

responding to a known value of <strong>gas</strong><br />

and that the filters are clear and good<br />

<strong>for</strong> use. It also tests that audible and visual alarms are<br />

working, giving the user full confidence that a unit is<br />

compliant <strong>for</strong> site use. In addition, the I-Test in<strong>for</strong>ms the<br />

operator if a <strong>gas</strong> cylinder is empty or has expired.<br />

The accompanying I-Test Manager software tracks<br />

which Gas-Pro units need calibrating and allows storage,<br />

interrogation and convenient presentation of large<br />

amounts of bump testing data. Calibration certificates are<br />

automatically created and stored and many different<br />

types of reports and graphs can be created <strong>for</strong> easy interpretation.<br />

All this in<strong>for</strong>mation is then easily accessible <strong>for</strong><br />

audit and compliance purposes.<br />

Contact:<br />

Crowcon Detection Instruments Limited<br />

E-Mail: eu@crowcon.com<br />

www.crowcon.com<br />

68 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> Issue 3/2013


PRODUCTS & SERVICES<br />

New synergie pipeline enables GIS integration<br />

DNV Software’s new release of Synergi Pipeline software<br />

includes GIS integration, providing pipeline<br />

operators better analyses and decision-making based<br />

on geographically referenced and visualized data via<br />

the web interface.<br />

Obtaining and managing correct and valid in<strong>for</strong>mation<br />

about a pipeline’s risk and condition, including linked<br />

geographic in<strong>for</strong>mation, is a constant challenge in integrity<br />

management. Synergi Pipeline, DNV’s pipeline integrity<br />

management and risk assessment software solution,<br />

produces efficient in<strong>for</strong>mation management and data<br />

reliability while providing consistent application of integrity<br />

procedures.<br />

The new version of Synergi Pipeline (6.2) provides<br />

an interface with clear, intuitive visualization<br />

both of risk and also technical and operational status<br />

of offshore and onshore pipelines. The visualization<br />

is more extensive through integration with the<br />

ArcGIS server, allowing the user to work with all<br />

pipeline data using a web-based viewer. The tool<br />

(EsriViewer) shows a map view of the pipelines with<br />

configurable data layers, such as risk, pipeline features,<br />

inspection data and analysis results and tools<br />

to select and filter the data.<br />

Another main new feature of Synergi Pipeline is the<br />

improved traceability. Users can now understand the<br />

background <strong>for</strong> activities. Furthermore, the analysis<br />

functionality has been improved allowing identification<br />

of interacting corrosion defects, and remaining life analysis<br />

using both deterministic and probabilistic methodologies,<br />

enabling operators to plan mitigating actions<br />

more efficiently.<br />

Contact:<br />

DNV Software<br />

Are Føllesdal Tjønn<br />

E-mail: are.follesdal.tjonn@dnv.com<br />

www.dnv.com<br />

Multi-Gas flow<br />

totalizer software <strong>for</strong><br />

QuadraTherm® 640i/780i<br />

Sierra Instruments releases new free flow totalizer software<br />

module <strong>for</strong> their QuadraTherm® 640i/780i mass<br />

flow meter. Through their QuadraTherm Software Interface<br />

Program (SIP), end users now have an management<br />

tool to totalize and monetize all <strong>gas</strong>es with one instrument.<br />

The flow totalizer software module leverages<br />

QuadraTherm’s high accuracy (+/- 0.5% of full scale) to<br />

give end users the most accurate totalization of multiple<br />

<strong>gas</strong>es from an industrial flow meter.<br />

There are four totalizers visible on the user interface<br />

screen of the SIP software. The user selects one to be<br />

active. Each totalizer is independent of the others, allowing<br />

users to totalize one <strong>gas</strong>, then switch and totalize<br />

another <strong>gas</strong>. End users can switch back to their previous<br />

<strong>gas</strong> to begin totalizing flow with the previous flow total<br />

maintained or reset if necessary.<br />

Contact:<br />

Sierra Instruments<br />

www.sierrainstruments.com<br />

Issue 3/2013 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> 69


DIARY<br />

• European Gas Conference Vienna 2014<br />

27.–31.1.2014, Vienna, Austria<br />

www.european<strong>gas</strong>-conference.com<br />

• E-world <strong>energy</strong> & water<br />

11-13.2.2014, Essen<br />

www.e-world-essen.com<br />

• Pipeline Coating 2014<br />

24-26.2.2014, Vienna, Austria<br />

www.amiplastics.com<br />

• Gastech 2014<br />

24-27.3.2014, Seoul, South Korea<br />

www.<strong>gas</strong>techkorea.com<br />

• Hannover Messe<br />

7-11.4.2014, Hannover, Germany<br />

www.hannovermesse.de<br />

• 9 th Pipeline Technology Conference<br />

12-14.5.2014, Berlin, Germany<br />

www.pipeline-conference.com<br />

• 124 th ÖVGW Annual Conference<br />

21-22.5.2014, Salzburg, Austria<br />

www.ovgw.de<br />

• EGPFE – European Gas Processing Show 2014<br />

14-16.5.2014, Dusseldorf, Germany<br />

www.egpfe.com<br />

• European Gas Production Forum and Exhibition<br />

4-6.6-2014, Dusseldorf, Germany<br />

www.egpfe.com<br />

• 22 th European Biomass Conference and Exhibition<br />

26.6.2014, Hamburg, Germany<br />

www.conference-biomass.com<br />

• KIOGE 2014<br />

7-11-10.2014, Almaty, Kazakstan<br />

www.kioge.com<br />

70 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> Issue 3/2013


uyer’s guide<br />

A close-up view of the<br />

international <strong>gas</strong> business<br />

Gas transmission and distribution<br />

Gas-pressure control and <strong>gas</strong><br />

measurement<br />

Gas quality and <strong>gas</strong> use<br />

Gas suppliers<br />

Trade and in<strong>for</strong>mation technology<br />

DVGW-certified companies<br />

Please contact<br />

Uwe Lätsch<br />

Phone: +49 89 2035366-77<br />

Fax: +49 89 2035366-99<br />

E-mail: laetsch@di-verlag.de<br />

www.<strong>gas</strong>-<strong>for</strong>-<strong>energy</strong>.com


2013<br />

Gas transmission and distribution<br />

Buyer’s Guide<br />

Pipe penetrations<br />

Pipelines and pipeline accessories<br />

Fittings and accessories<br />

Fittings<br />

Corrosion protection<br />

Active corrosion protection<br />

72 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> Issue 3/2013


Gas transmission and distribution<br />

2013<br />

Active corrosion protection<br />

Corrosion protection<br />

Buyer’s Guide<br />

Passive corrosion protection<br />

Gas-pressure control and Gas measurement<br />

Gas-measuring equipment<br />

Issue 3/2013 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> 73


2013<br />

Gas quality and Gas use<br />

Buyer’s Guide<br />

Gas preparation<br />

Filtration<br />

Gas storage, LNG<br />

Gas compression<br />

74 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> Issue 3/2013


dVGW-certified companies<br />

2013<br />

Pipe and pipeline engineering<br />

Filters<br />

Buyer’s Guide<br />

Gas-measuring equipment<br />

System servicing<br />

Issue 3/2013 <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> 75


The international magazine<br />

<strong>for</strong> industrial furnaces,<br />

heat treatment plants<br />

and equipment<br />

The technical journal <strong>for</strong> the entire field of industrial furnace<br />

and heat treatment engineering, thermal plants, systems<br />

and processes.<br />

The publication delivers comprehensive in<strong>for</strong>mation,<br />

in full technical detail, on developments and solutions<br />

in thermal process engineering <strong>for</strong> industrial applications.<br />

Select the subscription offer that you prefer:<br />

• print<br />

• e-paper<br />

• print + e-paper<br />

on the annual<br />

Save 25% subscription<br />

www.heatprocessing-online.com<br />

heat processing is published by Vulkan-Verlag GmbH, Huyssenallee 52-56, 45128 Essen, Germany<br />

KNOWLEDGE FOR THE<br />

FUTURE<br />

Order now by fax: +49 931 / 4170-494 or send in a letter<br />

Deutscher Industrieverlag GmbH | Arnulfstr. 124 | 80636 München<br />

Yes, I want to read heat processing on a regular basis. During the first year I will benefit from a 25%<br />

discount on the annual subscription fees. I subscribe to the technical trade journal <strong>for</strong> at least one<br />

year (4 issues)<br />

as a printed magazine at the annual price<br />

of € 127.50 plus shipping (€ 12.00 within<br />

Germany / € 14.00 outside of Germany)<br />

as an e-paper magazine (single user) at<br />

the annual price of € 127.50.<br />

as a printed plus an e-paper magazine<br />

(single user) at the annual price of € 177.75<br />

(within Germany) / € 179.75 (outside of<br />

Germany) incl. shipping.<br />

Special offer <strong>for</strong> students (proof of entitlement)<br />

as a printed magazine at the annual price of<br />

€ 63.75 plus shipping (€ 12.00 within Germany /<br />

€ 14.00 outside of Germany).<br />

as an e-paper magazine (single user)<br />

at the annual price of € 63.75.<br />

as a printed plus an e-paper magazine<br />

(single user) at the annual price of € 94.88<br />

(within Germany) / € 96.88 (outside of Germany)<br />

incl. shipping.<br />

Company/Institution<br />

First name, surname of recipient (department or person)<br />

Street/P.O. Box, No.<br />

Country, postalcode, town<br />

Reply / Antwort<br />

Readers’ Service heat processing<br />

P.O. Box 91 61<br />

97091 Wurzburg<br />

GERMANY<br />

Phone<br />

E-Mail<br />

Line of business<br />

Fax<br />

Please note: According to German law this request may be withdrawn within 14 days after order date in writing<br />

to Readers’ Service heat processing, P.O. Box 91 61, 97091 Wurzburg, Germany. After the first period the agreement can<br />

be terminated in writing with 2 months notice to the end of each year. In order to accomplish your request and <strong>for</strong> communication<br />

purposes your personal data are being recorded and stored.<br />

In order to accomplish your request and <strong>for</strong> communication purposes your personal data are being recorded and stored.<br />

It is approved that this data may also be used in commercial ways by mail, by phone, by fax, by email, none.<br />

This approval may be withdrawn at any time.<br />

✘<br />

Date, signature<br />

PAHEAT2014


IMPRINT AND INDEX OF ADVERTISERS<br />

IMPRINT<br />

<strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong><br />

Magazine <strong>for</strong> Smart Gas Technologies, Infrastructure and Utilisation<br />

Publication of<br />

Farecogaz – Association of European<br />

Manufacturers of Gas Meters, Gas<br />

Pressure Regulators, Safety Devices<br />

and Stations<br />

GERG – Group Europeen de<br />

Recherches Gazieres<br />

GIE – Gas Infrastructure Europe<br />

Marcogaz – Technical Association of<br />

the European Natural Gas Industry<br />

Editorial team:<br />

Managing Editor: Volker Trenkle<br />

DIV Deutscher Industrieverlag GmbH<br />

Arnulfstraße 124<br />

80636 München<br />

Phone +49 89 203 53 66-56<br />

Fax: +49 89 203 53 66-99<br />

E-Mail: trenkle@di-verlag.de<br />

Editor: Elisabeth Terplan<br />

Phone +49 89 203 53 66-43<br />

Fax: +49 89 203 53 66-99<br />

E-Mail: terplan@di-verlag.de<br />

Office: Birgit Lenz<br />

Phone +49 89 203 53 66-23<br />

Fax: +49 89 203 53 66-99<br />

E-Mail: lenz@di-verlag.de<br />

Publishing House:<br />

DIV Deutscher Industrieverlag GmbH<br />

Arnulfstraße 124<br />

80636 München<br />

Phone +49 89 203 53 66-0<br />

Fax: +49 89 203 53 66-99<br />

E-Mail: info@di-verlag.de<br />

Internet: www.<strong>gas</strong>-<strong>for</strong>-<strong>energy</strong>.com<br />

Head of Division:<br />

Stephan Schalm<br />

Managing Directors:<br />

Carsten Augsburger,<br />

Jürgen Franke<br />

Advertising:<br />

Advertising Sales: Uwe Lätsch<br />

Phone +49 89 203 53 66-77<br />

Fax: +49 89 203 53 66-99<br />

E-Mail: laetsch@di-verlag.de<br />

Advertising Administration:<br />

Eva Feil<br />

Phone +49 89 203 53 66-11<br />

Fax: +49 89 203 53 66-99<br />

E-Mail: feil@di-verlag.de<br />

Layout:<br />

Carolin Sehnem<br />

E-Mail: sehnem@di-verlag.de<br />

Rates:<br />

<strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> is published three<br />

times a year.<br />

• Subscription printed magazine<br />

inside Germany: € 149,–<br />

(€ 140,– + € 9,– shipping)<br />

• Subscription printed magazine<br />

outside Germany: € 150,50<br />

(€ 140,– + € 10,50,– shipping)<br />

• Subscription e-paper magazine:<br />

€ 140,–<br />

As a subscriber of the periodical<br />

gwf Gas | Erd<strong>gas</strong>, or as a member of<br />

Farecogaz, GERG, GIE or Marcogaz,<br />

<strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong> is being delivered at a<br />

prize of € 112,- (e-paper) or at a price<br />

of € 112,– plus shipping (print).<br />

Subscriptions/Single Copy Sales:<br />

Readers’ Service <strong>gas</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>energy</strong><br />

DataM-Services GmbH<br />

Marcus Zepmeisel<br />

Franz-Horn-Str. 2<br />

97082 Würzburg, Germany<br />

E-Mail: leserservice@di-verlag.de<br />

Phone: +49 931 4170-459<br />

Fax: +49 931 4170-494<br />

The magazine and all the contributions<br />

and illustrations contained<br />

therein are secured by copyright. With<br />

the exception of the legally permitted<br />

instances, any utilisation without the<br />

express permission of the publisher<br />

will be punished at law. The opinions<br />

contained in signed articles do not<br />

necessarily reflect the opinion of the<br />

publisher.<br />

Printed by<br />

Druckerei Chmielorz GmbH<br />

Ostring 13<br />

65205 Wiesbaden-Nordenstadt<br />

Germany<br />

DIV Deutscher Industrieverlag GmbH,<br />

München<br />

Printed in Germany<br />

INDEX OF ADVERTISERS<br />

Company<br />

Page<br />

DENSO GmbH, Leverkusen 21<br />

Euro<strong>for</strong>um Deutschland SE,<br />

Düsseldorf 11<br />

E-world <strong>energy</strong> & water GmbH, Essen 9<br />

Fachverband Bio<strong>gas</strong> e.V., Freising 13<br />

Ing.Büro Fischer-Uhrig, Berlin 53<br />

Company<br />

Page<br />

KÖTTER Consulting Engineers<br />

GmbH & Co.KG, Rheine 15<br />

Messe Düsseldorf GmbH, Düsseldorf 17<br />

REECO GmbH, Reutlingen 19<br />

RMG GmbH, Kassel<br />

Cover<br />

Buyers Guide 71 - 75


The Gas Engineer’s<br />

Dictionary<br />

Supply Infrastructure from A to Z<br />

The Gas Engineer’s Dictionary will be a standard work <strong>for</strong> all aspects of<br />

construction, operation and maintenance of <strong>gas</strong> grids.<br />

This dictionary is an entirely new designed reference book <strong>for</strong> both engineers<br />

with professional experience and students of supply engineering. The opus<br />

contains the world of supply infrastructure in a series of detailed professional<br />

articles dealing with main points like the following:<br />

• bio<strong>gas</strong> • compressor stations • conditioning<br />

• corrosion protection • dispatching • <strong>gas</strong> properties<br />

• grid layout • LNG • odorization<br />

• metering • pressure regulation • safety devices<br />

• storages<br />

Editors: K. Homann, R. Reimert, B. Klocke<br />

1 st edition 2013, 452 pages with additional in<strong>for</strong>mation and complete ebook,<br />

hardcover, ISBN: 978-3-8356-3214-1<br />

Price € 160,–<br />

DIV Deutscher Industrieverlag GmbH, Arnulfstr. 124, 80636 München<br />

www.di-verlag.de<br />

Order now!<br />

KNOWLEDGE FOR THE<br />

FUTURE<br />

Order now by fax: +49 201 / 820 02-34 or send in a letter<br />

Deutscher Industrieverlag GmbH | Arnulfstr. 124 | 80636 München<br />

Yes, I place a firm order <strong>for</strong> the technical book. Please send<br />

— copies of the The Gas Engineer’s Dictionary<br />

– Supply Infrastructure from A to Z.<br />

1st edition 2013, plus ebook (ISBN: 978-3-8356-3214-1)<br />

at the price of € 160,- (plus postage and packing extra)<br />

Company/Institution<br />

First name, surname of recipient (department or person)<br />

Street/P.O. Box, No.<br />

Country, Postalcode, Town<br />

reply / Antwort<br />

Vulkan-Verlag GmbH<br />

Versandbuchhandlung<br />

Postfach 10 39 62<br />

45039 Essen<br />

GERMANY<br />

Phone<br />

E-Mail<br />

Line of business<br />

Fax<br />

Please note: According to German law this request may be withdrawn within 14 days after order date in writing<br />

to Vulkan Verlag GmbH, Versandbuchhandlung, Postfach 10 39 62, 45039 essen, Germany.<br />

In order to accomplish your request and <strong>for</strong> communication purposes your personal data are being recorded and stored.<br />

It is approved that this data may also be used in commercial ways by mail, by phone, by fax, by email, none.<br />

this approval may be withdrawn at any time.<br />

Date, signature<br />

PATGED2013

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!