05.03.2014 Views

IIC-Vol.30No.3-1999

IIC-Vol.30No.3-1999

IIC-Vol.30No.3-1999

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>IIC</strong> International Review of Intellectual Property and<br />

Competition Law<br />

Volume 30<br />

No. 3/<strong>1999</strong><br />

Pp. 251-358<br />

Contents<br />

Articles<br />

Friedrich-Karl Beier<br />

Exclusive Rights, Statutory Licenses and<br />

Compulsory Licenses in Patent and Utility Model<br />

Law<br />

Franz Lederer<br />

Equivalence of Chemical Product Patents<br />

Michael Hassemer<br />

Recent Developments in Trademark Protection<br />

Within Mercosur<br />

Decisions<br />

EU<br />

Court of Justice of the European<br />

Communities<br />

June 16, 1998<br />

"Hermès" - Trademark infringement - Provisional<br />

measures within meaning of Art. 50 TRIPS - Case<br />

No. C-53/96 - Hermès International Ltd. v. FHT<br />

Marketing Choice BV<br />

EU<br />

Court of Justice of the European<br />

Communities<br />

September 22, 1998<br />

"Egmont Film" - Copyright and related rights -<br />

Videodisc rental - Case No. C-61/97 - Foreningen af<br />

danske Videogramdistributører, acting for Egmont<br />

Film A/S and Others v. Laserdisken, Hans Kristian<br />

Pedersen and Others<br />

EPO<br />

Technical Board of Appeal<br />

November 15, 1997<br />

"Tandem Repeat Loci" - Multiple request for<br />

search fees - Case No. W 1/97 - In re Promega<br />

Corporation


EPO<br />

Technical Board of Appeal<br />

August 5, 1998<br />

"Herpes Simplex Virus" - Priority date - Scope of<br />

Art. 55(1) EPC - Case No. T 377/95 - Smith Kline<br />

Beecham Biologicals SA v. University Patents, Inc<br />

Office for Harmonization<br />

Second Board of Appeal<br />

November 25, 1998<br />

"Swedish Formula" - Refusal of application must<br />

contain sufficient reasoning - Distinctiveness -<br />

Case No. R 85/1998-2 - In re The Procter & Gamble<br />

Company.<br />

Office for Harmonization<br />

Second Board of Appeal<br />

February 11, <strong>1999</strong><br />

"Optima" - Requirement of distinctiveness for<br />

dictionary word meaning - Case No. R 94/1998-2 -<br />

In re Cobe Laboratories, Inc.<br />

Office for Harmonization<br />

Second Board of Appeal<br />

February 11, <strong>1999</strong><br />

"Smell of Fresh Cut Grass" - Registrability of<br />

distinct olfactory mark - Case No. R 156/1998-2 -<br />

In re Vennootschap onder Firma Senta Aromatic<br />

Marketing<br />

Germany<br />

Federal Supreme Court<br />

September 16, 1997<br />

"Loader" - Responsibility of court in case of expert<br />

having limited specialist knowledge - Case No. X<br />

ZR 54/95<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Court of Appeal<br />

March 20, 1998<br />

"Cause of Action Estoppel" - Validity of European<br />

patent - Exclusive jurisdiction of national courts<br />

over revocation proceedings - Buehler AG v.Chronos<br />

Richardson Ltd.<br />

Germany<br />

Federal Patent Court<br />

January 21, 1997<br />

"CAD/CAM System" - Algorithm - Technical<br />

teaching - Case No. 17 W (pat) 49/94<br />

Germany<br />

Federal Supreme Court<br />

October 23, 1997<br />

"Bonus" - Requirements of distinctiveness - Case<br />

No. I ZB 18/95<br />

France<br />

Supreme Court<br />

December 2, 1997<br />

"Océan Pacific" - Parallel import of trademarked<br />

goods from outside EU unlawful - Océan Pacific<br />

Sunwear et al. v. Carrefour France SNC<br />

"MAC Dog" - Protection of well-known marks -


Germany<br />

Federal Supreme Court<br />

April 30, 1998<br />

"MAC Dog" - Protection of well-known marks -<br />

Right to sue - Case No. I ZR 268/95 - McDonald's<br />

Corporation and McDonald's Deutschland Inc. v.<br />

Dieter Rahmer<br />

United Kingdom<br />

High Court (Chancery Division)<br />

October 29, 1997<br />

"Swiss Chalet" - Protection of descriptive term by<br />

"extended form" of passing off - Chocosuisse,<br />

Kraft Jacobs Suchard and Chocoladefabriken Lindt<br />

& Sprüngli (Schweiz) AG v. Cadbury Limited<br />

Ireland<br />

Supreme Court<br />

February 16, 1998<br />

"Phonographic Performance (Ireland) - Sound<br />

recordings - Establishment of ownership of<br />

copyright - Phonographic Performance (Ireland)<br />

Ltd. v. Cody and Princess Investments Ltd.<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Court of Appeal<br />

February 3, 1998<br />

"Phonographic Performance v. Maitra" - Sound<br />

recordings - Copyright licensing by collecting<br />

society - Judgment in default of defense -<br />

Phonographic Performance Limited v. Maitra and<br />

Others<br />

Germany<br />

Munich Court of Appeals<br />

December 19, 1996<br />

"Graphic Booster" - Computer software -<br />

Publisher liable for journalist revealing trade<br />

secret - Case No. 29 U 3838/95 (final)<br />

Book reviews<br />

Union des Avocats Europeens (UAE) -<br />

European Lawyers' Union (ELU) (ed.)<br />

Le droit des autoroutes de l'information et du<br />

multimédia: un nouveau défi - The Law of<br />

Information Super-Highways and Multimedia: A<br />

new Challenge Gisbert Hohagen

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!