05.03.2014 Views

IIC-Vol.29No.1-1998

IIC-Vol.29No.1-1998

IIC-Vol.29No.1-1998

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>IIC</strong> International Review of Intellectual Property and<br />

Competition Law<br />

Volume 29<br />

No. 1/<strong>1998</strong>/<br />

Pp. 1-138<br />

Contents<br />

Articles<br />

Ulrich Schatz<br />

29 (<strong>1998</strong>)<br />

Patentability of Genetic Engineering Inventions in<br />

European Patent Office Practice<br />

Willy Alexander<br />

Intellectual Property and the Free Movement of<br />

Goods - 1996 Case Law of the Court of Justice<br />

Indunil Abeyesekere<br />

Copyright Law and Practice in Sri Lanka<br />

Decisions<br />

EU<br />

Court of Justice of the European<br />

Communities November 4, 1997<br />

"Dior v. Evora" - Trademark rights and copyright -<br />

Action brought by owner of those rights to stop<br />

reseller advertising further commercialization of<br />

goods - Case No. C-337/95 - Parfums Christian<br />

Dior SA and Parfums Christian Dior BV v. Evora<br />

BV<br />

EU<br />

Court of Justice of the European<br />

Communities November 11, 1997<br />

"Sabèl" - Approximation of laws relating to trade<br />

marks - Likelihood of confusion. Likelihood of<br />

association - Case No. C-251/95 - Sabèl BV v. Puma<br />

AG, Rudolf Dassler Sport<br />

"Polymer Powders" - Inventive step - Combination


EPO<br />

Technical Board of Appeal 3.3.3 February<br />

14, 1996<br />

"Polymer Powders" - Inventive step - Combination<br />

of physical and compositional features not in<br />

accordance with prior art teaching - Problem<br />

solution approach - Late filed material confirming<br />

evidence previously submitted - Limits on<br />

investigative function of Boards of Appeal - Rule<br />

71a EPC - Case No. T 39/93 - SNF Floerger v.<br />

Allied Colloids Limited<br />

EPO<br />

Technical Board of Appeal 3.3.4<br />

May 8, 1996<br />

"Modifying Plant Cells" - Support by description -<br />

Fair generalisation - Sufficiency of disclosure -<br />

Case No. T 694/92 - Unilever N.V. et al. v. Mycogen<br />

Plant Science, Inc.<br />

EPO<br />

Technical Board of Appeal 3.2.1<br />

June 20, 1996<br />

"Identification of Real Opponent" - Opposition<br />

filed by professional representative acting on his<br />

own behalf and with avowed purpose of<br />

supplementing his professional training -<br />

Admissibility of opposition - Presumption<br />

established by Art. 99(1) EPC that real opponent is<br />

the person who lodged the opposition - Case No. T<br />

798/93 - Lohr Industrie v. Umberto Monti, Ing.<br />

EPO<br />

Technical Board of Appeal 3.4.1<br />

July 10, 1996<br />

"Amended Divisional Application" - Feature added<br />

to claim of divisional application - Amended<br />

claimed combination within protection claimed in<br />

parent and divisional application as filed - Case<br />

No. T 873/94 - In re Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba<br />

EPO<br />

Technical Board of Appeal 3.4.1<br />

October 1, 1996<br />

"Gas Laser Device" - Opponent need only<br />

substantiate opposition ground against single<br />

claim of each request on file - Case No. T 926/93 -<br />

Siemens AG v. Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha<br />

EPO<br />

Legal Board of Appeal December 4, 1996<br />

"Suspension of Proceedings" - Parties to appeal<br />

against decision rejecting request for suspension of<br />

grant proceedings - Case No. J 28/94 - In re<br />

Soludia, S.A.<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Court of Appeal<br />

November 9, 1995<br />

"Aumac's Patent" - Right to sue for invalidity of<br />

European patent - In re Aumac Limited's Patent<br />

"Zeneca" - Date of applicability of TRIPs


Brazil<br />

Ninth Federal Court, Rio de Janeiro July 30,<br />

1997<br />

"Zeneca" - Date of applicability of TRIPs<br />

Agreement - Period of protection - Case No.<br />

97.0003260-4 - Zeneca Limited v. Patent Director,<br />

INPI - Instituto Nacional da Propriedade Industrial<br />

Comment by Gustavo Starling Leonardos<br />

South Africa<br />

Supreme Court (Appellate Division)<br />

August 27, 1996<br />

"McDonald's" - Passing off - Protection of<br />

well-known foreign marks without domestic use -<br />

Definition of "well known" - Case No. 547/95 -<br />

McDonald's Corporation v. Joburgers Drive-In<br />

Restaurant (Pty) Limited and Ors<br />

Austria<br />

Supreme Court<br />

April 25, 1995<br />

"Wirobit" - Trademark assignment - Rights of<br />

assignee - Infringement by advertising in foreign<br />

trade journal - Case No. 4 Ob 3/95<br />

Germany<br />

Federal Supreme Court<br />

July 6, 1995<br />

"Filling Material" - Telle-quelle protection -<br />

Distinctiveness within meaning of Art.<br />

6quinquiesB, Paris Convention - Case No. I ZB<br />

27/93<br />

United Kingdom<br />

House of Lords<br />

July 24, 1996<br />

"Shevill" - Applicable law in case of torts - Shevill<br />

and others v. Presse Alliance SA<br />

Sweden<br />

Supreme Court<br />

February 22, 1996<br />

"Bulletin Board Services" - Copyright protection<br />

for bulletin board software Comment by Gunnar<br />

W.G. Karnell<br />

Germany<br />

Federal Supreme Court<br />

April 18, 1996<br />

"Wooden Chairs" - Design protection for chairs -<br />

Case No. I ZR 160/94<br />

Australia<br />

Federal Court of Australia (Full Court)<br />

October 30, 1996<br />

"Weight Watchers Programs" - Compilation of<br />

information from the public domain - Earlier<br />

unfair use - Skybase Nominees Pty Ltd and<br />

Another v. Fortuity Pty Ltd<br />

Book reviews<br />

From GATT to TRIPs - The Agreement on


Friedrich-Karl Beier & Gerhard Schricker<br />

(eds.)<br />

From GATT to TRIPs - The Agreement on<br />

Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property<br />

Rights<br />

Sam Ricketson<br />

Romuald & Margarete Singer & Raph<br />

Lunzer<br />

The European Patent Convention: Revised English<br />

Edition<br />

David C. Musker<br />

Horst Peter Götting<br />

Persönlichkeitsrechte als Vermögensrechte<br />

Dieter Stauder

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!