IIC-Vol.29No.1-1998
IIC-Vol.29No.1-1998
IIC-Vol.29No.1-1998
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>IIC</strong> International Review of Intellectual Property and<br />
Competition Law<br />
Volume 29<br />
No. 1/<strong>1998</strong>/<br />
Pp. 1-138<br />
Contents<br />
Articles<br />
Ulrich Schatz<br />
29 (<strong>1998</strong>)<br />
Patentability of Genetic Engineering Inventions in<br />
European Patent Office Practice<br />
Willy Alexander<br />
Intellectual Property and the Free Movement of<br />
Goods - 1996 Case Law of the Court of Justice<br />
Indunil Abeyesekere<br />
Copyright Law and Practice in Sri Lanka<br />
Decisions<br />
EU<br />
Court of Justice of the European<br />
Communities November 4, 1997<br />
"Dior v. Evora" - Trademark rights and copyright -<br />
Action brought by owner of those rights to stop<br />
reseller advertising further commercialization of<br />
goods - Case No. C-337/95 - Parfums Christian<br />
Dior SA and Parfums Christian Dior BV v. Evora<br />
BV<br />
EU<br />
Court of Justice of the European<br />
Communities November 11, 1997<br />
"Sabèl" - Approximation of laws relating to trade<br />
marks - Likelihood of confusion. Likelihood of<br />
association - Case No. C-251/95 - Sabèl BV v. Puma<br />
AG, Rudolf Dassler Sport<br />
"Polymer Powders" - Inventive step - Combination
EPO<br />
Technical Board of Appeal 3.3.3 February<br />
14, 1996<br />
"Polymer Powders" - Inventive step - Combination<br />
of physical and compositional features not in<br />
accordance with prior art teaching - Problem<br />
solution approach - Late filed material confirming<br />
evidence previously submitted - Limits on<br />
investigative function of Boards of Appeal - Rule<br />
71a EPC - Case No. T 39/93 - SNF Floerger v.<br />
Allied Colloids Limited<br />
EPO<br />
Technical Board of Appeal 3.3.4<br />
May 8, 1996<br />
"Modifying Plant Cells" - Support by description -<br />
Fair generalisation - Sufficiency of disclosure -<br />
Case No. T 694/92 - Unilever N.V. et al. v. Mycogen<br />
Plant Science, Inc.<br />
EPO<br />
Technical Board of Appeal 3.2.1<br />
June 20, 1996<br />
"Identification of Real Opponent" - Opposition<br />
filed by professional representative acting on his<br />
own behalf and with avowed purpose of<br />
supplementing his professional training -<br />
Admissibility of opposition - Presumption<br />
established by Art. 99(1) EPC that real opponent is<br />
the person who lodged the opposition - Case No. T<br />
798/93 - Lohr Industrie v. Umberto Monti, Ing.<br />
EPO<br />
Technical Board of Appeal 3.4.1<br />
July 10, 1996<br />
"Amended Divisional Application" - Feature added<br />
to claim of divisional application - Amended<br />
claimed combination within protection claimed in<br />
parent and divisional application as filed - Case<br />
No. T 873/94 - In re Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba<br />
EPO<br />
Technical Board of Appeal 3.4.1<br />
October 1, 1996<br />
"Gas Laser Device" - Opponent need only<br />
substantiate opposition ground against single<br />
claim of each request on file - Case No. T 926/93 -<br />
Siemens AG v. Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha<br />
EPO<br />
Legal Board of Appeal December 4, 1996<br />
"Suspension of Proceedings" - Parties to appeal<br />
against decision rejecting request for suspension of<br />
grant proceedings - Case No. J 28/94 - In re<br />
Soludia, S.A.<br />
United Kingdom<br />
Court of Appeal<br />
November 9, 1995<br />
"Aumac's Patent" - Right to sue for invalidity of<br />
European patent - In re Aumac Limited's Patent<br />
"Zeneca" - Date of applicability of TRIPs
Brazil<br />
Ninth Federal Court, Rio de Janeiro July 30,<br />
1997<br />
"Zeneca" - Date of applicability of TRIPs<br />
Agreement - Period of protection - Case No.<br />
97.0003260-4 - Zeneca Limited v. Patent Director,<br />
INPI - Instituto Nacional da Propriedade Industrial<br />
Comment by Gustavo Starling Leonardos<br />
South Africa<br />
Supreme Court (Appellate Division)<br />
August 27, 1996<br />
"McDonald's" - Passing off - Protection of<br />
well-known foreign marks without domestic use -<br />
Definition of "well known" - Case No. 547/95 -<br />
McDonald's Corporation v. Joburgers Drive-In<br />
Restaurant (Pty) Limited and Ors<br />
Austria<br />
Supreme Court<br />
April 25, 1995<br />
"Wirobit" - Trademark assignment - Rights of<br />
assignee - Infringement by advertising in foreign<br />
trade journal - Case No. 4 Ob 3/95<br />
Germany<br />
Federal Supreme Court<br />
July 6, 1995<br />
"Filling Material" - Telle-quelle protection -<br />
Distinctiveness within meaning of Art.<br />
6quinquiesB, Paris Convention - Case No. I ZB<br />
27/93<br />
United Kingdom<br />
House of Lords<br />
July 24, 1996<br />
"Shevill" - Applicable law in case of torts - Shevill<br />
and others v. Presse Alliance SA<br />
Sweden<br />
Supreme Court<br />
February 22, 1996<br />
"Bulletin Board Services" - Copyright protection<br />
for bulletin board software Comment by Gunnar<br />
W.G. Karnell<br />
Germany<br />
Federal Supreme Court<br />
April 18, 1996<br />
"Wooden Chairs" - Design protection for chairs -<br />
Case No. I ZR 160/94<br />
Australia<br />
Federal Court of Australia (Full Court)<br />
October 30, 1996<br />
"Weight Watchers Programs" - Compilation of<br />
information from the public domain - Earlier<br />
unfair use - Skybase Nominees Pty Ltd and<br />
Another v. Fortuity Pty Ltd<br />
Book reviews<br />
From GATT to TRIPs - The Agreement on
Friedrich-Karl Beier & Gerhard Schricker<br />
(eds.)<br />
From GATT to TRIPs - The Agreement on<br />
Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property<br />
Rights<br />
Sam Ricketson<br />
Romuald & Margarete Singer & Raph<br />
Lunzer<br />
The European Patent Convention: Revised English<br />
Edition<br />
David C. Musker<br />
Horst Peter Götting<br />
Persönlichkeitsrechte als Vermögensrechte<br />
Dieter Stauder