AT model

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Comparative Results Single Circuit vs. Circuit Split Motivation Challenges Approach Methodology MV Modeling Detailed Modeling NN Modeling RT Enabled High Fidelity Integration CPU Comparison Conclusion 24
CPU Comparisons Motivation Challenges Approach Methodology MV Modeling Detailed Modeling NN Modeling RT Enabled High Fidelity Integration CPU Comparison Conclusion • Calculation time for a NEDC cycle with Explicit solver for all models: – Detailed Engine & Kinetic AT: 63 h – MV Engine & Kinetic AT: 39 h • Calculation time with Circuit Split (Engine with Explicit, AT with Quasi Steady solver) – Detailed Engine & Kinetic AT: 7.5 h – MV Engine & Kinetic AT: 20 min – MV Engine, Kinetic AT & Vehicle Model: 29 min 25
Page 1 and 2: Virtual Integration of Engine, Vehi
Page 3 and 4: Motivation Motivation Challenges Ap
Page 5 and 6: Approach Motivation Challenges Appr
Page 7 and 8: Detailed Engine Model Motivation Ch
Page 9 and 10: Results, DI Example Motivation Chal
Page 11 and 12: Reduction of Detailed DOC and SCR M
Page 13 and 14: SIL/HIL Enabled NN-AT Model DOC Res
Page 15 and 16: SIL/HIL Enabled NN-AT Model SCR Res
Page 17 and 18: Computational Speed Comparison (NED
Page 19 and 20: A New Way of Submodel Integration C
Page 21 and 22: Integrated Model: Vehicle + Engine
Page 23: Comparative Results Single Circuit
Page 27 and 28: Conclusions Motivation Challenges A
Page 29: Conclusions Motivation Challenges A

AT model

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?