19.03.2014 Views

CIA 4U1 Key Chapter 4: Costs of Production CHAPTER 4 Page 95 a ...

CIA 4U1 Key Chapter 4: Costs of Production CHAPTER 4 Page 95 a ...

CIA 4U1 Key Chapter 4: Costs of Production CHAPTER 4 Page 95 a ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>CIA</strong> <strong>4U1</strong><br />

<strong>Key</strong> <strong>Chapter</strong> 4: <strong>Costs</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Production</strong><br />

<strong>CHAPTER</strong> 4<br />

<strong>Page</strong> <strong>95</strong><br />

a. With Process A, total daily costs <strong>of</strong> employing labour and capital are $400 [= ($80 x 2<br />

workers) + ($40 x 6 machines)]. With Process B, these costs are $360 [= ($80 x 3<br />

workers) + ($40 x 3 machines)]. Because Process B minimizes daily costs and maximizes<br />

productive efficiency, it will be chosen by the owner.<br />

b. $400 [= ($80 x 3) + ($40 x 3) + $30 + $10]<br />

c. $200 [= (.06 x 10 000) - $400].<br />

d. Implicit costs are $180 [= ($150 + $30)]. Economic costs are $580 [= ($400 + $180)]<br />

e. $20 [= ($600 - $580)].<br />

f. No, the owner should not consider closing, since the shop is making a positive<br />

economic pr<strong>of</strong>it.<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 99<br />

a. Marginal product is 50 [= (50 – 0)] pots for the first worker, 150 [= (200 – 50)] pots for<br />

the second worker, 70 [= (270 – 200)] pots for the third worker, 30 [= (300 – 270)] pots<br />

for the fourth worker, and -60 [= (240 – 300)] pots for the fifth worker.<br />

b. Marginal product rises when the first and second workers are hired. Marginal product<br />

falls and is positive when the third and fourth workers are hired. Marginal product is<br />

negative when the fifth worker is hired.<br />

c. This is because it becomes increasingly difficult for each <strong>of</strong> these new workers to raise<br />

output given the potter's fixed inputs.<br />

d. Average product is 50 [= (50/1)] pots with one worker, 100 [= (200/2)] pots with two<br />

workers, 90 [= (270/3)] pots with three workers, 75 [= (300/4)] pots when four workers<br />

are employed, and 48 [= (240/5)] pots when five workers are employed.<br />

e. Marginal and average product are the same when the first worker is hired. As marginal<br />

product is rising (when the second worker is hired), marginal product is greater than<br />

average product. As marginal product falls (when the last three workers are hired),<br />

marginal product is less than average product.<br />

f.


<strong>CIA</strong> <strong>4U1</strong><br />

<strong>Key</strong> <strong>Chapter</strong> 4: <strong>Costs</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Production</strong><br />

Total Product Curve<br />

350<br />

300<br />

Pots Produced per Week<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

TP<br />

50<br />

0<br />

0 1 2 3 4 5 6<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> Workers Employed per Week<br />

Marginal and Average Product Curves<br />

200<br />

150<br />

Pots Produced per Week<br />

100<br />

50<br />

AP<br />

0<br />

0 1 2 3 4 5 6<br />

-50<br />

MP<br />

-100<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> Workers Employed per Week<br />

g. Marginal product reaches its peak where diminishing marginal returns set in. Total<br />

product rises less rapidly and finally becomes negatively sloped once diminishing<br />

marginal returns set in. Average product reaches its maximum where it equals marginal<br />

product. Then, because <strong>of</strong> diminishing marginal returns, with marginal product falling<br />

and below average product, average product declines.


<strong>CIA</strong> <strong>4U1</strong><br />

<strong>Key</strong> <strong>Chapter</strong> 4: <strong>Costs</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Production</strong><br />

<strong>Page</strong> 104<br />

a. Variable costs are $0 at a zero output, $100 at an output <strong>of</strong> 50 pots, $200 at 200 pots,<br />

$300 at 270 pots, and $400 at 300 pots. Total cost is $100 [= ($100 + $0)] at 0 pots, $200<br />

[= ($100 + $100)] at 50 pots, $300 [= ($100 + $200)] at 200 pots, $400 [= ($100 + $300)]<br />

at 270 pots, and $500 [= ($100 + $400)] at 300 pots.<br />

b. Marginal cost is $2.00 [= ($100 - $0)/(50 – 0)] when moving from 0 to 50 pots; $0.67<br />

[= ($200 - $100)/( 200 – 50)] from 50 to 200 pots; $1.43 [= ($300 - $200)/(270 – 200)]<br />

from 200 to 270 pots; $3.33 [= ($400 - $300)/(300 – 270)] from 270 to 300 pots.<br />

c. Average fixed cost is $2.00 [= ($100/50) at 50 pots, $0.50 [= ($100/200)] at 200 pots,<br />

$0.37 [= ($100/270)] at 270 pots, and $0.33 [= ($100/300)] at 300 pots. Average variable<br />

cost is $2.00 [= ($100/50)] at 50 pots, $1.00 [= ($200/200)] at 200 pots, $1.11 [=<br />

($300/270)] at 270 pots, and $1.33 [= ($400/300)] at 300 pots. Average cost is $4.00 [=<br />

($200/50)] at 50 pots, $1.50 [= ($300/200)] at 200 pots, $1.48 [= ($400/270)] at 270 pots,<br />

and $1.67 [= ($500/300)] at 300 pots.<br />

d.<br />

Average Fixed Cost Curve<br />

2.50<br />

2.00<br />

1.50<br />

$ per Pot<br />

1.00<br />

0.50<br />

AFC<br />

0.00<br />

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350<br />

Pots Produced per Week


<strong>CIA</strong> <strong>4U1</strong><br />

<strong>Key</strong> <strong>Chapter</strong> 4: <strong>Costs</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Production</strong><br />

Marginal, Average Variable and Average Cost Curves<br />

4.50<br />

4.00<br />

$ per Pot<br />

3.50<br />

3.00<br />

2.50<br />

2.00<br />

1.50<br />

1.00<br />

MC<br />

AC<br />

AVC<br />

0.50<br />

0.00<br />

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350<br />

Pots Produced per Week<br />

e. Yes. The marginal cost and average variable cost curves are J-shaped, and the average<br />

cost curve is bowl-shaped, with the minimum points <strong>of</strong> both average variable cost and<br />

average cost occurring at the curves' intersection with the marginal cost curve.<br />

<strong>Page</strong> 109<br />

a. The percentage increase in the labour input is 50% [= ((9 – 6)/6)) x 100%] and the<br />

percentage increase in the capital input is also 50% [= ((3 – 2)/2)) x 100%], while the<br />

percentage increase in output is 100% [= (240 – 120)/120]. Because the relative increase<br />

in output exceeds the relative increase in each <strong>of</strong> the inputs, the business is experiencing<br />

increasing returns to scale. Long run average cost falls from $5.33 [= ((6 x $100) + (2 x<br />

$20))/120] to $4 [= ((9 x $100) + (3 x $20))/240].<br />

b. The percentage increase in output is 50% [= (180 – 120)/120]. Because the relative<br />

increase in output equals the relative increase in each <strong>of</strong> the inputs, the business is<br />

experiencing constant returns to scale. Long run average cost at 120 units is $5.33 [= ((6<br />

x $100) + (2 x $20))/120] and at 180 units is also $5.33 [= ((9 x $100) + (3 x $20))/180].<br />

c. The percentage increase in output is 33% [= (160 – 120)/120]. Because the relative<br />

increase in output is less than the relative increase in each <strong>of</strong> the inputs, the business is<br />

experiencing decreasing returns to scale. Long run average cost rises from $5.33 [= ((6 x<br />

$100) + (2 x $20))/120] to $6 [= ((9 x $100) + (3 x $20))/160].

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!