19.03.2014 Views

Kellogg community college nursing student handbook

Kellogg community college nursing student handbook

Kellogg community college nursing student handbook

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Sometimes the content of a question may be judged to be so important that it is included in the<br />

exam for the purpose of reinforcing the concept. Such items are often referred to as mastery<br />

items, and they should be identified before the test is administered. Simply because 100% of the<br />

<strong>student</strong>s answered an item correctly does not mean it is a mastery item; it may just be too easy.<br />

Also, identifying mastery items prior to administering an exam allows <strong>student</strong>s’ knowledge of<br />

<strong>student</strong>s’ knowledge of essential content to be evaluated. If only a few of the <strong>student</strong>s answer a<br />

mastery item correctly, then the class as a whole does not understand the content, and it should<br />

be re-taught.<br />

Caputi, L., Engelmann, L. (2011). Teaching Nursing: The Art and Science. College of DuPage<br />

<br />

Item Discrimination<br />

Point Biserial Correlation Coefficient (PBCC)<br />

The point biserial correlation coefficient (PBCC) is a calculation that measures the ability of a test<br />

item to distinguish between those who know the content and those who do not know the content.<br />

The point biserial correlation coeffient calculation is the preferred measure of discrimination as it<br />

includes the variance of the entire group, not just the high and low-scoring <strong>student</strong>s. The PBCC<br />

ranges from -1 to +1. The closer the PBCC is to +1, the better the item is at discriminating<br />

between those <strong>student</strong>s who know and those who do not. A negative discriminator indicates that<br />

the lower- scoring <strong>student</strong>s answered the item correctly more often than higher-scoring <strong>student</strong>s.<br />

An acceptable PBCC described in the literature is 0.20 (Haladyna, 1997). Because a group of<br />

<strong>nursing</strong> <strong>student</strong>s is often more homogenous because they have the same prerequisites to enter a<br />

particular <strong>nursing</strong> program, less variance exist among the group members. Therefore, a lower<br />

PBCC of 0.15 is acceptable in schools of <strong>nursing</strong>. Based on this knowledge, PBCC levels or 0.15<br />

and higher are acceptable (Morrison et all., 1996).<br />

Range for PBCC<br />

Range from -1 to +1<br />

0.30 - & above – Excellent Item<br />

0.20 – 0.29 – Good<br />

0.15 – 0.19 – Acceptable<br />

0.10 – 0.14 Poor & Revise<br />

(Sportsman, 2013)<br />

Actions for Poor Test Items<br />

The following information is recommended for use in determining what action to take for poor test<br />

items:<br />

1. PBCC unacceptable & p value < 0.30 = give credit for more than one answer, work on<br />

question to improve.<br />

2. PBCC acceptable & p value > 0.30 = do nothing, the question is OK<br />

3. PBCC unacceptable & p value > 0.30 = do not give points back, work on the question to<br />

improve.<br />

4. PBCC acceptable & p value < 0.30 = do not nullify or give points, revisit the concept in class as<br />

<strong>student</strong>s did not grasp the concept.<br />

(Sportsman, 2013)<br />

Page 35 of 46

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!