22.03.2014 Views

U. S. Senate Minority Report: - Klimaforschung

U. S. Senate Minority Report: - Klimaforschung

U. S. Senate Minority Report: - Klimaforschung

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

equations that describe a gas dynamics problem: the equation of state, and five nonlinear<br />

differential equations expressing the conservation of mass, momentum and energy. Key to<br />

these for the atmosphere are: 1. the future flow of heat from the sun as a function of time<br />

and space and 2. the absorbent and reflective nature of the atmosphere as a function of time<br />

and space. We don’t have a clue about these. For any computer model to produce answers,<br />

many extremely questionable assumptions must be made. As McAllister noted, ‘Why can’t<br />

the current scientific models accurately predict next week’s weather?’” he asked. (LINK) &<br />

(LINK)<br />

Prominent Hungarian Physicist and environmental researcher Dr. Miklós Zágoni<br />

reversed his view of man-made warming and is now a skeptic. Zágoni was once<br />

Hungary’s most outspoken supporter of the Kyoto Protocol. After researching climate<br />

issues further he converted to a man-made global warming skeptic. After studying the<br />

theory developed by Hungarian Ferenc Miskolczi, an atmospheric physicist with 30 years<br />

of experience and a former researcher with NASA's Ames Research Center, Zágoni<br />

stopped calling global warming a crisis, and has instead focused on presenting the new<br />

theory to other climatologists, the March 6, 2008, article in Daily Tech reported. Zágoni<br />

wrote to EPW on May 3, 2008, "The present-day greenhouse theory is incorrect in the<br />

sense that it is incomplete: it does not contain all the real energetic constraints and<br />

boundary conditions. As former NASA atmospheric scientist Ferenc Miskolczi has showed<br />

in a new analysis, the Earth maintains a balanced greenhouse effect with controlled surface<br />

temperature, which cannot be changed solely by changing the atmospheric longwave<br />

absorber concentration. It can be changed only if the incoming available energy changes.<br />

Anthropogenic greenhouse gas emission cannot generate global warming, neither in the<br />

past, nor in the future. The 1 degree Celsius temperature rise from the mid-1800s is mainly<br />

due to natural causes; its origin is somewhere in the ocean's heat exchange and/or in the<br />

change of solar constant and the planetary albedo. Further 3-6 degree global warming is<br />

physically more than unlikely: it is impossible. The new greenhouse equations of Dr.<br />

Miskolczi can be read at the official website of the Quarterly Journal of the HMS, Vol. 111.<br />

No.1., 2007 (LINK) “To put it in a language that IPCC will understand: Extra CO2 does<br />

not result extra 'radiative forcing' in the final account, as the energy constraint rules it back<br />

to its equilibrium value. Nature's regulatory instrument is water vapor: more carbon dioxide<br />

leads to less moisture in the air, keeping the overall GHG content in accord with the<br />

necessary balance conditions. So, contrary to the common wisdom, there is no positive<br />

H2O-temperature feedback on global scale: in Earth-type atmospheres uncontrolled<br />

runaway warming is not possible. This new theory seems to be only a little step forward in<br />

the two-hundred year old greenhouse science, but its consequences are revolutionary:<br />

actually it stops the possibility of man-made global warming.”<br />

Field Geologist Louis A.G. Hissink is the editor of The Australian Institute of<br />

Geoscientists Newsletter and is currently working on the ore-reserve feasibility study<br />

of the Koongie Park Base Metals project in Western Australia. Hissink, who earned a<br />

masters in geology, recently dissented from man-made climate fears. “The assumption that<br />

humanity, from its burning of hydrocarbons, is raising the surface temperature of the earth<br />

by affecting its greenhouse effect, is not supported by theory nor the physical evidence. No<br />

gas is capable of storing heat so the assumption a gas could is to misunderstand basic<br />

physics and the greenhouse effect,” Hissink told EPW on January 21, 2008. “The global<br />

mean temperature derivations from the surface meteorological stations confuse the thermal<br />

24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!