22.03.2014 Views

U. S. Senate Minority Report: - Klimaforschung

U. S. Senate Minority Report: - Klimaforschung

U. S. Senate Minority Report: - Klimaforschung

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Hyslop got selected, and Wheeler Calhoun’s data got quoted daily in the Gazette-Times,”<br />

Decker wrote. (LINK) & (LINK) & (LINK) & (LINK)<br />

Soil scientist and geologist Viv Forbes, the chairman of Australian based “The<br />

Carbon Sense Coalition,” dissented from man-made climate fears. “There is no evidence<br />

that carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is driving surface temperature, and there is plenty of<br />

evidence to show that current levels of temperature and carbon dioxide are neither extreme<br />

nor of concern,” Forbes wrote on July 1, 2007. “Even if the water vapor and carbon dioxide<br />

produced by man did cause some slight warming of the earth, is this a problem? Eons of<br />

geological history show that a warm, moist, carbon-rich atmosphere encourages all life on<br />

earth. These periods are referred to as ‘Golden Ages’. The cold barren periods are those to<br />

be feared – they get called ‘The Dark Ages’,” Forbes explained. “It is unbelievable that<br />

many in politics and the media are whipping up public hysteria about ‘global warming’<br />

when the best evidence suggests that for the 100 years ending in the year 2000, the century<br />

of coal, steel, electricity, the internal combustion engine, jet planes, two world wars and a<br />

population explosion, the average surface temperature rose by only 0.6 deg, and there has<br />

been NO increase in temperature since 1998. In many areas, surface temperatures have<br />

been falling for decades,” he continued. “The output of a complex computer simulation of<br />

the atmosphere is not ‘evidence’. It is a fluttering flag of forecasts, hung on a slim flagpole<br />

of theory, resting on a leaky raft of assumptions, which is drifting without the rudder of<br />

evidence, in cross currents of ideology emotion and bias, on the wide deep and restless<br />

ocean of the unknown,” Forbes added. (LINK)<br />

Italian Air Force Meteorologist Guido Guidi, who managed weather stations that<br />

were part of the global climate monitoring system and runs the “Climate Monitor”<br />

website, dissented in 2008. “Despite the continued substantial margin of uncertainty in<br />

understanding the dynamics of climate -- including the weight of the anthropogenic factor -<br />

- the long wave of publications of the 4th <strong>Report</strong> of 'IPCC last year is having its effect. No<br />

matter how many scientists are not yet convinced of the responsibilities of humankind in<br />

climate change, no matter the distance between the reality of the observations and<br />

projections resulting from (computer) simulations, no matter the hundreds of thousands of<br />

pages written to rebut the arguments underlying this [man-made global warming]<br />

conviction,” Guidi wrote on November 1, 2008. (LINK) “If the temperature does not<br />

increase again, I see it getting hard for those who support the theory of man-made global<br />

warming," Guidi wrote on September 24, 2008. (LINK)<br />

A team of scientists signed a June 11, 2007, Cornwall Alliance “Open Letter”<br />

debunking man-made global warming fears. “Natural causes may account for a large<br />

part, perhaps the majority, of the global warming in both the last thirty and the last one<br />

hundred fifty years, which together constitute an episode in the natural rising and falling<br />

cycles of global average temperature. Human emissions of carbon dioxide and other<br />

greenhouse gases are probably a minor and possibly an insignificant contributor to its<br />

causes,” the scientists declared. “Reducing carbon dioxide emissions would have at most<br />

an insignificant impact on the quantity and duration of global warming and would not<br />

significantly reduce alleged harmful effects. Government-mandated carbon dioxide<br />

emissions reductions not only would not significantly curtail global warming or reduce its<br />

harmful effects but also would cause greater harm than good to humanity–especially the<br />

poor–while offering virtually no benefit to the rest of the world’s inhabitants,” the open<br />

32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!