U. S. Senate Minority Report: - Klimaforschung
U. S. Senate Minority Report: - Klimaforschung
U. S. Senate Minority Report: - Klimaforschung
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
the reasons for the unusually cold winter that was experienced across much of the Northern<br />
Hemisphere. An extremely low number of solar flares and sunspots may be linked to the<br />
current cooling trend globally,” Dahl explained. A May 20, 2008 article in the Star Tribune<br />
noted: “Meteorologist, Dave Dahl, is of kindred global warming spirit with [skeptical<br />
meteorologist Mike] Fairbourne.” (LINK) & (LINK) & (LINK) & (LINK)<br />
Economist Colin Robinson is the founder of the Department of Economics at the<br />
University of Surrey in the UK and an emeritus professor of economics. Robinson is<br />
also a Fellow of the Royal Statistical Society who has authored 25 books and 160<br />
journal papers with a focus on energy policy. Robinson recently dissented from the<br />
“consensus” on man-made global warming. “One does not have to be a ‘climate change<br />
denier’ to see that a degree of skepticism about the present consensus might be in order. In<br />
that sense, I think that the skeptics are right,” Robinson wrote in April 2008. “Most likely,<br />
now – as in the past – many analysts have become carried away by the results of their<br />
models, which purport to look into a far distant future, and have convinced themselves that<br />
they must embark on a crusade to enlighten others. Dissent must be discouraged and<br />
indeed, in a mild version of the Inquisition, the views of anyone who questions the<br />
conventional wisdom should be disregarded and, if possible, suppressed. In such a climate,<br />
we need skepticism even if it brings condemnation by the top echelons of the Royal<br />
Society,” Robinson explained. “The scientific establishment regards anyone who questions<br />
the consensus about climate change and its effects in much the same way as heretics are<br />
regarded by religious movements. Indeed, in many ways, upholders of the consensus view<br />
are a religious movement,” Robinson continued. “In an echo of earlier times, the climate<br />
change prophets have in recent years tried to silence counter views and suppress dissent.<br />
August members of the Royal Society, a body once noted for its cultivation of debate in<br />
science, are now leaders of the ‘science is settled’ camp: the only debate they consider to<br />
be legitimate is about choice among the different forms of the centralized action they<br />
believe is required to deal with the problems they foresee,” he added. “Human myopia<br />
cannot be overcome simply by well-meaning attempts to build models that purport to peer<br />
decades and centuries ahead. Action taken now, in anticipation of supposed long run<br />
trends, may concentrate on the wrong issues and make matters worse rather than better,” he<br />
concluded. (LINK) & (LINK)<br />
Meteorologist Patrick Carroll, a retired Environment Canada meteorologist, publicly<br />
rejected global warming fears in 2008. “The IPCC theory of anthropogenic warming is a<br />
hoax that is rapidly falling into disfavour among atmospheric scientists,” Carroll wrote on<br />
June 9, 2008 in Canada’s The Hill Times. “Liberal Leader Stéphane Dion (of Canada) is a<br />
gullible fool in continuing to believe that CO2 emissions drive climate change. He is<br />
whistling past a political graveyard if he thinks that Canadians will accept billions more in<br />
taxes to reduce and sequester CO2 emissions when there is zero proof that such activities<br />
will have any measurable, let alone detectable, effect on global temperatures. In short, Dion<br />
has been a victim of the alarmist propaganda emanating from the IPCC and radical<br />
environmentalists such as David Suzuki,” Carroll explained. “If Dion had advisers who<br />
were keeping up with the latest research and climate data, he would have been informed by<br />
now that the IPCC theory of anthropogenic warming is a hoax that is rapidly falling into<br />
disfavour among atmospheric scientists. Instead, he continues to blunder along listening to<br />
clueless alarmists like Mr. Suzuki,” he added. (LINK)<br />
42