U. S. Senate Minority Report: - Klimaforschung
U. S. Senate Minority Report: - Klimaforschung
U. S. Senate Minority Report: - Klimaforschung
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
alarmists’. The solar effect is huge and overwhelming and there must be time delays in<br />
absorbance and build up in energy received by earth and ocean masses. But the warmer the<br />
Earth gets, the faster it radiates heat out into space. This is a self-correcting, self-healing<br />
process,” Duffy wrote. “So what are the key players in ‘Climate Change’? The major<br />
driver is the sun. Warming depends on the sun. Cooling is due to the lack of sun’s energy.<br />
Radiant energy enters the earth’s atmosphere. Air (on a dry basis) consists mainly of<br />
nitrogen 78.08% and oxygen 20.94%. Of the 0.98% remaining, 95% of that (i.e. 0.934%),<br />
or almost all is the inert gas argon. Carbon dioxide CO2 is a trace. It is less than 400ppm<br />
(parts per million) or 0.04% of all the atmosphere (on a dry basis). Surprisingly, less than a<br />
fifth of that is man-made CO2 (0.008% of the total), and that is only since the beginning of<br />
the industrial era and the rapid increase in world population,” Duffy concluded. (LINK)<br />
(LINK)<br />
Dr. G LeBlanc Smith, a retired Principal Research Scientist with Australia's<br />
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO) who<br />
specializes in geosciences and sedimentology, rejected global warming fears in 2008. “I<br />
have yet to see credible proof of carbon dioxide driving climate change, yet alone manmade<br />
CO2 driving it. The atmospheric hot-spot is missing and the ice core data refute this.<br />
When will we collectively awake from this deceptive delusion?” Smith asked in an August<br />
16, 2008, essay. “I contend that those professional scientists and advisors that are<br />
knowingly complicit in climate science fraud and all that is derived from it, will continue to<br />
be exposed by the science itself,” Smith explained. “There is no atmospheric hot-spot from<br />
‘greenhouse CO2’ despite over 20 years of serious looking for it. Occam's razor would<br />
point to the sun as the driver of climate change of significance. Human generated carbon<br />
dioxide is arguably around 3% of the total carbon dioxide budget, and in the light of the<br />
above, we are effectively irrelevant to the natural climate change continuum,” he added.<br />
(LINK)<br />
Research scientist William Hunt has worked for the National Oceanic and<br />
Atmospheric Administration and served as a wildlife biologist and a geologist. Hunt<br />
produced a 2007 audio series titled “Global Warming Exposed!” and is set to release a<br />
book titled Global Warming Challenged-Science or Myth? Hunt dissented in 2007. In<br />
2007 Hunt dissented from the view that mankind is driving a climate crisis. “Scientists and<br />
activists alike have jumped on the [global warming] bandwagon. It’s become a fad, a trend,<br />
a wave of enthusiasm and the scientists are going along with the fad to get research grants<br />
and the media limelight,” Hunt wrote on January 22, 2007 in an article titled “The<br />
Nonsense of Global Warming.” “The facts, such as we can observe and calculate them, do<br />
not support the idea of man-made global warming. Natural processes completely eclipse<br />
anything that man can accomplish- a minor rainstorm expends more energy than a large<br />
nuclear explosive releases and the lowest category of hurricane expends more energy than<br />
all of the nuclear weapons ever produced in a short time,” Hunt wrote. “Most geologists<br />
and indeed, most scientists in the U.S., do not accept the idea that global warming resulting<br />
from human activities is a viable theory -because most have an appreciation for the kind of<br />
power inherent in natural systems. Conversely, most biologists do accept the idea of mancaused<br />
global warming and quote scientists in other fields, without understanding those<br />
other fields sufficiently to make a logical judgment as to whether the studies were<br />
reasonable in their methods and claims. They simply take it on faith that the scientists<br />
propounding global warming are correct in their methods and assumptions,” Hunt<br />
28