Kansas Supreme Court - 105567 - In re Baca
Kansas Supreme Court - 105567 - In re Baca
Kansas Supreme Court - 105567 - In re Baca
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
"Mitigating circumstances a<strong>re</strong> any considerations or factors that may justify a<br />
<strong>re</strong>duction in the deg<strong>re</strong>e of discipline to be imposed. <strong>In</strong> <strong>re</strong>aching its <strong>re</strong>commendation for<br />
discipline, the Hearing Panel, in this case, found the following mitigating circumstances<br />
p<strong>re</strong>sent:<br />
"Absence of a Prior Disciplinary Record. The Respondent has not p<strong>re</strong>viously<br />
been disciplined.<br />
"Personal or Emotional Problems if Such Misfortunes Have Contributed to<br />
Violation of the <strong>Kansas</strong> Rules of Professional Conduct. The Respondent has suffe<strong>re</strong>d in<br />
his past, and continues to suffer, personal problems. Additionally, it appears that the<br />
Respondent's personal problems have contributed the Respondent's violation of KRPC<br />
8.4.<br />
"The P<strong>re</strong>sent and Past Attitude of the Attorney as Shown by His or Her<br />
Cooperation During the Hearing and His or Her Full and F<strong>re</strong>e Acknowledgment of the<br />
Transg<strong>re</strong>ssions. The Respondent cooperated during the hearing. He acknowledged his<br />
wrongdoing and admitted two rule violations. Additionally, the Respondent cooperated<br />
with the law enforcement agencies by voluntarily sur<strong>re</strong>ndering himself to out-of-state<br />
authorities.<br />
"<strong>In</strong>experience in the Practice of Law. The Missouri <strong>Sup<strong>re</strong>me</strong> <strong>Court</strong> admitted the<br />
Respondent to the practice of law in 2007. The <strong>Kansas</strong> <strong>Sup<strong>re</strong>me</strong> <strong>Court</strong> admitted the<br />
Respondent to the practice of law in 2008. Thus, the Respondent is inexperienced in the<br />
practice of law. However, it is worth noting that the Respondent's level of experience in<br />
the practice of law is not <strong>re</strong>levant to his misconduct. The Respondent's misconduct is<br />
completely <strong>re</strong>moved from the practice of law.<br />
"Imposition of Other Penalties or Sanctions. The Respondent has experienced<br />
other sanctions for his conduct. The Respondent was disbar<strong>re</strong>d in Missouri. The<br />
Respondent lost his job as a member of the legal department of an insurance company.<br />
The District <strong>Court</strong> of Jefferson County, Colorado, sentenced the Respondent to a four<br />
year term of probation. The terms and conditions of the Respondent's probation a<strong>re</strong><br />
<strong>re</strong>strictive. For a period of months, the Respondent was not allowed to see his own<br />
8