27.03.2014 Views

Media_Freedom_in_Uganda_Analysis_of_inequitable_legal_limitations

Media_Freedom_in_Uganda_Analysis_of_inequitable_legal_limitations

Media_Freedom_in_Uganda_Analysis_of_inequitable_legal_limitations

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MEDIA FREEDOM IN UGANDA<br />

Introduction<br />

The analysis discusses the <strong>limitations</strong> to media freedom <strong>in</strong> <strong>Uganda</strong> reflected <strong>in</strong><br />

the various provisions <strong>of</strong> a wide range <strong>of</strong> laws. It notes that whereas not all laws<br />

mentioned here<strong>in</strong> are <strong>in</strong>imical to media freedom, most possess retrogressive<br />

provisions that are not <strong>in</strong>-tandem with <strong>Uganda</strong>’s <strong>in</strong>ternational human rights<br />

obligations, are contrary to, and seek to water down the Constitutional guarantees<br />

on freedom <strong>of</strong> expression embedded <strong>in</strong> the Constitution <strong>of</strong> the Republic <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Uganda</strong>, 1995.<br />

The analysis is divided <strong>in</strong>to two parts with the first part entail<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />

<strong>legal</strong> obligations and standards that govern freedom <strong>of</strong> expression and media<br />

rights. These are reflected <strong>in</strong> the various <strong>in</strong>ternational human rights <strong>in</strong>struments at<br />

the UN, African Union and East African Community spheres that <strong>Uganda</strong> is party<br />

to. Part two <strong>of</strong> the analysis discusses the national <strong>legal</strong> framework, a dissection <strong>of</strong><br />

the diverse laws impact<strong>in</strong>g both directly and <strong>in</strong>directly on freedom <strong>of</strong> expression<br />

and media rights.<br />

Also discussed are the different <strong>in</strong>stitutions both nationally and <strong>in</strong>ternationally<br />

and how they can be used to bastion the defence <strong>of</strong> media rights and freedom<br />

<strong>of</strong> expression. These <strong>in</strong>clude treaty bodies, judicial and quasi-judicial mechanisms<br />

such as the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights; African Court on<br />

Human Rights and Justice among others. The analysis concludes that unless these<br />

unjustly restrictive provisions are amended or struck out from law books, they<br />

rema<strong>in</strong> an obstacle to exercis<strong>in</strong>g freedom <strong>of</strong> expression and media rights. As<br />

such, the centrality <strong>of</strong> these judicial and quasi judicial <strong>in</strong>stitutions <strong>in</strong> the effort to<br />

promote and protect freedom <strong>of</strong> expression cannot be under stated.<br />

8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!