Trends in U.S. Cultural Exchange and International Programming

More documents

Recommendations

Info

1. Overview of Engagement Practices Slide 23 2. Frequency of Engagement Slide 24 3. Types of Cultural Engagement by Frequency Slide 25 4. Guest Artists and Collaborators Slide 26 5. Average Budget for Cultural Exchanges Slide 27 by Project 6. World Geographic Regions of Engagement Slide 28 7. Engagement by Geographic Sub-Region Slide 29 8. Most Challenging Regions of Engagement Slide 30 9. Factors Effecting Geographic Engagement Slide 31 © AIMEE FULLMAN 2009 22
‣ 47% (where n=134) of respondents indicated that they participated in international programming or exchanges more than twice annually. ‣ International collaboration was the most frequently mentioned exchange type followed by hosting a foreign guest artist (which contradicts the severity of the barriers to bringing in foreign artists), and performing abroad. ‣ The majority of exchanges (50.7% where n=71) are conducted on a budget of less than $25,000. ‣ Over 130 countries of engagement were individually mentioned. Geographic trends indicate that Europe and Asia are the most likely regions of engagement. ‣ Exchanges are facilitated by good partnerships, U.S. government financial and logistic support, and proper funding. ‣ Exchanges are impeded by lack of funding, visas, difficulties with customs and political factors. ‣ The United States is considered to be the most difficult country with which to engage with due to challenges in bringing in foreign performers. © AIMEE FULLMAN 2009 23
Page 2 and 3: I. Context Slide 3 II. Overview of
Page 4 and 5: ‣ American artists and cultural o
Page 6 and 7: ‣ Since 9-11 there have been nume
Page 8 and 9: ‣ The survey was conducted betwee
Page 10 and 11: 1. Overview Slide 11 2. By Organiza
Page 12 and 13: Nonprofit (501 c 3) 43.3% Local Art
Page 14 and 15: $50,000,000-100,000,000 2.1% $25,00
Page 16 and 17: 1. A Role for Arts and Culture Slid
Page 18 and 19: Personal Contacts 76.7% Other Resea
Page 20 and 21: Other 74.6% Financial Viability App
Page 24 and 25: 50-100 0.0% 11-24 3.7% 100+ 3.7% 25
Page 26 and 27: % of Respondents 40% 35% 30% 25% 20
Page 28 and 29: Pacific and Oceania, 3.9% Global, 4
Page 30 and 31: MOST DIFFICULT EASIEST 1. USA 2. Af
Page 32 and 33: 1. Measuring Success Slide 33 2. Co
Page 34 and 35: Experience of the Participants Othe
Page 36 and 37: ‣ Artists and cultural organizati
Page 38 and 39: Computer 69.4% Internet 43.5% Photo
Page 40 and 41: Directory of Exchange Opportunities
Page 42 and 43: How complicated it would be 43.8% C
Page 44 and 45: 7. Translation capacity is essentia
Page 46 and 47: ‣ Large data gaps on the practice

Trends in U.S. Cultural Exchange and International Programming

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?