05.04.2014 Views

WJEC ENGLISH LITERATURE

WJEC ENGLISH LITERATURE

WJEC ENGLISH LITERATURE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

GCE TEACHER GUIDANCE<br />

LT2 Internal Assessment


<strong>WJEC</strong> <strong>ENGLISH</strong> <strong>LITERATURE</strong><br />

INTERNAL ASSESSMENT<br />

LT2<br />

TEACHER GUID ANCE<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

We are grateful to the centres which provided us with the examples of students’ work which<br />

appear in this booklet as work-in-progress responses to the new LT2 internal assessment<br />

unit.<br />

The guidance in this booklet is directed at offering advice and support for LT2 Section A and<br />

Section B in terms of:<br />

1. Text selection<br />

2. Task setting<br />

3. Assessing student responses.<br />

We recommend that you also refer to the advice relating to LT2 in the Teachers’ Guide:<br />

http://www.wjec.co.uk/uploads/publications/5482.pdf .<br />

LT2 Section A: Prose Study (1500 words approximately)<br />

1. Text selection<br />

Ce ntres should nominate for <strong>WJEC</strong> approval core texts (for detailed study, by an author<br />

from the list of specified authors) and partner texts (for wider reading) for this prose study,<br />

by the date advertised online in the specification, Teachers’ Guide and GCE English<br />

Literature Teachers’ Bulletin.<br />

The term 'prose text' for both core and partner texts will be taken to include the novel, a<br />

collection of short stories, autobiography and memoir, travel writing and essays. In choosing<br />

the partner text, please remember that the texts chosen should be of sufficient<br />

substance and challenge for Key Stage 5 students.<br />

Nominations will not be accepted for texts which <strong>WJEC</strong> considers to be of insufficient<br />

substance and challenge for A level study, e.g. texts already established as popular<br />

options at Key Stages 3 and 4, or popular fiction which offers little in terms of widening<br />

students’ knowledge and understanding of writers’ use of literary concepts and contexts,<br />

form, structure and language.<br />

Remember that the text chosen for partner text in Section A is one of the six texts to be read<br />

across the AS course, and one of the twelve texts to be read across the A level course as a<br />

whole.<br />

Teachers should act as the ‘first filter’ for accepting texts selected for independent reading,<br />

and should consider carefully whether the text selected by the student enriches the<br />

student’s A level English curriculum as a whole. It is important to remember the<br />

following:<br />

• If the collection of short stories is the core text, it should be studied as a<br />

whole text, with candidates making reference to a range of stories.<br />

• If the collection of short stories is the partner text, candidates would have<br />

more opportunity to illuminate their core text study if a number of short stories<br />

1


from the collection were considered and referred to in the essay. Exceptions<br />

to this would be where a single, longer story such as The Awakening is<br />

chosen.<br />

2. Task-setting<br />

Te achers should note the following:<br />

• Tasks should allow students to address equally the relevant assessment<br />

objectives<br />

• Tasks should be focused on comparisons of the two chosen prose texts, with the<br />

emphasis falling on the core text<br />

• Tasks should offer candidates one or more readings with which to engage, or<br />

allow candidates the opportunity to engage with critical discussion<br />

• Tasks should allow students to consider the importance of contexts in the writing<br />

and receiving of both core and partner text, with the emphasis falling on the core<br />

text.<br />

• Setting a single task for the whole group should be avoided: individual interests<br />

should be taken account of, and students should be encouraged to formulate<br />

their own titles, with careful monitoring by the teacher.<br />

• It is not a requirement to nominate tasks to <strong>WJEC</strong>.<br />

Some useful approaches might be to:<br />

• foreground the core text in the wording of the task<br />

• remember that the focus on the partner text should be to illuminate the core text<br />

• use a quotation on the core text as a focus for the essay in order to give<br />

candidates an opportunity to address AO3<br />

• use the word ‘present’ or ‘presentation’ in order to remind candidates to treat the<br />

texts as literary constructs<br />

• give the students as narrow a focus as possible on the texts in order to stay within<br />

the suggested 1500 word limit<br />

Tasks could be set on texts by the same author, e.g. Forster's A Room with a View and<br />

Where Angels Fear to Tread, or Austen's Pride and Prejudice and Emma.<br />

Tasks could be set on texts from the same period or different periods by different<br />

authors, one or both from the prescribed list of 1800-1945, e.g. Jane Eyre and Wide<br />

Sargasso Sea, The Return of the Native and Wuthering Heights, The Remains of the Day<br />

and A Room with A View.<br />

Alternatively, candidates could study texts of different prose genres by the same author,<br />

e. g. a novel and short stories by D.H. Lawrence, or short stories and travel writing by D.H.<br />

Lawrence, or texts of different prose genres by different authors.<br />

To ensure a firm focus on the core text, rather than an equal treatment of core and partner<br />

texts, questions may be pointed towards a detailed discussion of the core text.<br />

2


Example taken from the specification’s Internal Assessment Guidance section:<br />

‘The journey away from the familiar social setting is the key to change in Forster's novels.'<br />

Basing your response on a comparison of 'A Room with a View' and one other novel by<br />

Forster, discuss to what extent you agree with this view.<br />

This question works well as long as the student appreciates the relationship between core<br />

and partner texts.<br />

This could be re-worded:<br />

‘The journey away from the familiar social setting is the key to change’. Basing your<br />

response on a detailed discussion of 'A Room with a View' and wider reference to one other<br />

novel by Forster, discuss to what extent you agree with this view of Forster’s novels.<br />

It is sometimes helpful to begin the question with a quotation, in order to engage the student<br />

with critical discussion and as a strategy for focusing on the core text. However, there are<br />

several possible approaches to task-setting, with some suggestions below:<br />

• Compare the ways in which Forster and Salinger explore the theme of repression,<br />

through detailed discussion of ‘A Room with a View’ and wider reference to ‘The<br />

Catcher in the Rye’.<br />

• What connections have you found between ‘Tender is the Night’ (core text) and ‘The<br />

Great Gatsby’ (partner text) in terms of Fitzgerald’s presentation of a decadent<br />

society?<br />

• Explore Hardy’s tragic vision of life, through a detailed discussion of ‘Tess of the<br />

d’Urbervilles’ and a wider consideration of ‘The Mayor of Casterbridge’.<br />

• It has been said that Dickens’ characters are developed at the expense of plot<br />

credibility. Discuss this view with detailed reference to ‘Great Expectations’ and<br />

consider to what extent this view could similarly be applied to your partner text.<br />

3. Assessing student responses<br />

The weighting of assessment objectives for this section is summarised below:<br />

LT2 % AO1 AO2 AO3 AO4<br />

SECTION A 20 (10) 5 (2.5) 5 (2.5) 5(2.5) 5 (2.5)<br />

The Prose Study is marked out of 40. The relevant assessment objectives for this section -<br />

AO1, AO2, AO3, AO4 - are weighted equally at 10 marks each.<br />

Teachers should use the LT2 Section A Assessment Grid (see specification and Section 6 of<br />

this Guide) to try to find the ‘best fit’ for assessment, giving an holistic mark to cover all the<br />

AOs which should be recorded on a coversheet for each stude nt, and also r ecorded for the<br />

moderation sample on the moderation sample form (see the Internal Assessment Guidelines<br />

of the specification for advice on administration, and examples of both forms).<br />

3


Applying the assessment objectives<br />

AO1 (10 marks)<br />

• articulate creative, informed and relevant responses to literary texts, using appropriate<br />

terminology and concepts, and coherent, accurate written expression<br />

There are three strands to this AO:<br />

(i) creative, informed and relevant<br />

(ii) appropriate terminology and concepts<br />

(iii) coherent, accurate written expression<br />

'Creative' will be addressed in candidates' individual interpretations of prose texts and their<br />

ability to make connections between prose texts. These interpretations and connections<br />

should be underpinned by relevant material and informed judgements.<br />

'Appropriate' terminology and concepts should include a reasonable range of terms<br />

and ideas from the 'tool-kit' acquired in the course of prose analysis study. See the<br />

tool-kit of commonly used terms in the Appendix of the Teachers’ Guide<br />

http://www.wjec.co.uk/uploads/publications/5482.pdf<br />

for some suggestions. The Assessment Grid for LT2 Section A (see page 26 of this Guide)<br />

shows the importance of 'relevant' use of concepts and terminology. This AO allows<br />

candidates to show the skill of 'using literary critical concepts and terminology with<br />

understanding and discrimination' (specification, page 10).<br />

'Coherent, accurate' writing will support the expression of ideas and construction of an<br />

argument, and to allow candidates to 'communicate fluently, accurately and effectively'<br />

(specification, page 10).<br />

AO2 (10 marks)<br />

• demonstrate detailed critical understanding in analysing the ways in which structure, form<br />

and language shape meanings in literary texts<br />

This AO enables candidates to show their knowledge and understanding of 'the functions<br />

an d effects of structure, form and language in texts' (specification, page 11). It is worth<br />

emphasising that detailed analysis of structure, form and language is required only for the<br />

core text, i.e. the core text from the prescribed list of prose authors for Section A.<br />

AO3 (10 marks)<br />

• explore connections and comparisons between different literary texts, informed by<br />

interpretations of other readers<br />

There are two strands to this AO:<br />

(i) making connections and comparisons between texts<br />

(ii) informed by interpretations of other readers.<br />

It should be noted that interpretations of 'other readers' should primarily inform students'<br />

reading of the core text. However, students’ independent interpretations and approaches to<br />

the text are as valid and important as their reference to critics. It is recommended good<br />

practice to include a bibliography with each piece of work.<br />

AO4 (10 marks)<br />

• Demonstrate understanding of the significance and influence of the contexts in which<br />

literary texts are written and received.<br />

When marking responses, teachers should consider whether the student has addressed<br />

context in one or more of the following three ways:<br />

4


a) the influences on the writing of the texts; these may be cultural/social/political;<br />

b) how a reader might receive the texts;<br />

c) the partner text itself providing context for the core text.<br />

Candidates may show some awareness of all three ways but they are not expected to<br />

address them equally.<br />

LT2 Section B: Creative Reading (1500 words approximately in total - 750 each<br />

for Creative Writing Response and Commentary)<br />

1. Text selection<br />

It is important to bear in mind the first of the Aims on page 8 of the specification:<br />

• To encourage AS and A level students to develop their interest in and enjoyment<br />

of literature and literary studies through reading widely and independently both<br />

set texts and others that they have selected for themselves.<br />

Wherever possible, students should be encouraged to choose a stimulus prose text from<br />

their independent wider reading. The stimulus text should not be regarded as a class<br />

text for formal study. The student’s own writing should have primary attention.<br />

This section of the course is unique in that it does not assess knowledge and understanding<br />

of a text/texts but:<br />

(i) the creativity of a candidate’s response to his/her wider reading<br />

(ii) the candidate’s ability to comment on his/her response as a literary construct<br />

and the influence of the stimulus text.<br />

If the class text study approach is adopted, it may have the effect of restricting the<br />

opportunities for students to make independent choices and to write in a genre/style/form etc<br />

that particu larly interests them. The stimulus text does not have to be nominated in advance<br />

but must be named on the coversheet. (Please note: from 2010 the stimulus texts must<br />

be nominated.)<br />

Teachers are entrusted with the task of approving the text chosen by the student. It should<br />

be borne in mind that this text is one of the stipulated six texts for AS and the expectation is<br />

that the texts chosen should be of sufficient substance and challenge for Key Stage 5<br />

students.<br />

2. Task-setting<br />

It is not a requirement that students should model the style/genre of the stimulus text: they<br />

are free to write in any literary genre, (i.e. as listed in the specification) and need only use the<br />

stimulus text as a source of inspiration for their own writing. Teachers should avoid tasks<br />

which encourage derivative writing.<br />

The following approaches should be avoided by teachers and students:<br />

Re-creative writing:<br />

• extra chapters<br />

• prequel/sequel<br />

• prologues/epilogues<br />

5


• pastiche<br />

• modernising original/<br />

• diaries /monologues of characters from the stimulus text.<br />

Please remember that the student’s own text should be regarded as the core text and the<br />

stimulus text as the partner text.<br />

Examples of writing in different genres from that of the stimulus text<br />

• Student reads Enduring Love by Ian McEwan and writes poetry on the theme of<br />

obsession. In her commentary, she will discuss her own writing primarily,<br />

concentrating on the effects and stylistic choices she has created/used. She will<br />

make reference to the ideas and genre of the stimulus text.<br />

• Student reads The Handmaid's Tale by Margaret Atwood and writes a drama script<br />

on the theme of religious conflict/ dystopia. In his commentary, he will discuss the<br />

effects he wanted to create, showing understanding of the different contexts in<br />

which his text and the stimulus text were written and might be received.<br />

3. Assessing student responses<br />

The weighting of assessment objectives for this section is summarised below:<br />

LT2 % AO1 AO2 AO3 AO4<br />

SECTION B 20 (10) 10 (5) 5 (2.5) 5 (2.5)<br />

The 40 marks for this section are divided equally between task (i), the creative writing<br />

response, for which there is only one Assessment Objective, AO1, and task (ii), the<br />

commentary, which is assessed by AO2 and AO4. It should b e noted that the 20 marks<br />

available for the commentary should be notionally awarded as 10 each for the two relevant<br />

assessment objectives, AO2 and AO4.<br />

Teachers should use the LT2 Section B Assessment Grid (see specification and Section 6 of<br />

this Guide) to try to find the ‘best fit’ for assessment, and should give an holistic mark to<br />

cover both objectives. The separate marks for the writing and for the commentary should be<br />

recorded and totalled on a coversheet for each student, and also recorded for the<br />

moderation sample on the moderation sample form (see the Internal Assessment Guidelines<br />

of the specification for advice on administration, and examples of both forms).<br />

How to assess (ii) the Commentary<br />

This task of approximately 750 words is also worth 20 marks.<br />

Candidates should focus on:<br />

• their use of structure, form and language<br />

(detailed analysis as their text is the core)<br />

• the features of the stimulus prose text<br />

(wider reference to some features of the stimulus, partner text)<br />

• what effects were aimed at<br />

(in terms of genre, audience and purpose)<br />

• the significance and influence of relevant contexts.<br />

6


Commentary: Key points to remember:<br />

Candidates should:<br />

• Focus primarily on their own text, commenting in detail on its genre, language,<br />

form, structure and ideas<br />

• Include some wider reference to the stimulus text in terms of<br />

genre/language/form/structure/ideas.<br />

Candidates should not see the commentary as an exercise in comparing their work<br />

with the stimulus tex t, but think of the stimulus as an influence only.<br />

Matching the 2 Assessment Objectives (weighted equally at 10 marks each) to<br />

the commentary task:<br />

• AO2: (detailed critical understanding)<br />

The commentary should discuss features of genre, language, form and structure in<br />

both the candidate's own text (core text) and the stimulus text (partner text), but with<br />

detailed analysis of their own text and wider reference to the stimulus text.<br />

Overview: Candidates should show an engagement with the craft of writing in both<br />

texts.<br />

• AO4: (context)<br />

In addressing AO4, candidates should consider the significance/influence of the<br />

following as appropriate:<br />

• any influences relevant to the writing of the stimulus text, e.g.<br />

social/political/historical etc.<br />

• the influences of the stimulus text on the candidate's own writing, in terms of ideas,<br />

attitudes and values.<br />

• the context in which the candidate's own writing (the core text) was composed and<br />

might be received.<br />

Overview: Candidates should show a clear awareness of contextual influences in the<br />

writing of both texts.<br />

7


LT2 SECTION A: PROSE STUDY<br />

Candidate A<br />

Core text: Tess of the d’Urbervilles<br />

Partner Text: The Handmaid’s Tale<br />

8


“‘Tess of the d’Urbervilles’ is primarily a novel about a female victim of male power.”<br />

Explore this idea in Hardy’s novel and consider how Atwood’s ‘The Handmaid’s Tale’<br />

illuminates your understanding of the core text.<br />

Fr om the opening chapters of Hardy’s ‘Tess of the d’Urbervilles’ it might be argued that the<br />

protagonist’s life is controlled by patriarchy. Despite the novel’s title presenting Tess as the<br />

central character, the opening chapter is dominated by two men whose conversation on ‘an<br />

useless piece of information’ controls Tess’s fate for the remainder of the novel. Hardy ties in<br />

this male dominance with the history of the land as he describes the ‘killing…of a beautiful<br />

white hart’ by ‘Thomas de la Lynd’, proleptically preparing the reader for another pure and<br />

beautiful creature who will be hunted by violent men. It is not only Tess who is the victim of<br />

male power as the rare occurrence of the dancing ‘members being solely women’ is because<br />

of ‘a sarcastic attitude on the part of male relatives’. It seems as if Hardy is not merely<br />

suggesting that Tess herself is a victim of male dominance as he draws the reader’s<br />

attention to the overarching patriarchal control of Victorian society, marginalising women.<br />

The rather clichéd presentation of the Victorian villain, Alec d’Urberville, with his ‘wellgroomed-moustache<br />

with curled points’ addresses Tess as ‘my big Beauty’ at their first<br />

meeting. The use of the possessive pronoun suggests that Alec immediately considers Tess<br />

to belong to him and his comment on her beauty implies that he views her as a sexual<br />

object. Atwood, in her dystopian novel ‘The Handmaid’s Tale’, strips Offred of her sexuality<br />

through the use of the dress ‘prescribed’ by the male dominated regime of Gilead despite<br />

her desire to use her sexuality to empower her, wishing the guards would stand ‘stiffly’<br />

watching her ‘retreating shape(s)’. The power of Tess’s sexuality, however, is used against<br />

her as Alec sexually feeds her strawberries and eroticises her through placing the ‘roses in<br />

her bosom’ underlining his view of her as an object to be enjoyed rather than an equal to<br />

respect.<br />

Whereas the narrator slowly zooms in on Tess in the novel’s second chapter, at the end of<br />

‘The Maiden’ the narrator draws back offering a philosophical discussion rather than a<br />

description of the scene. The continuous questions, ‘where was Tess’s guardian angel?<br />

where was Providence?’ not only suggest a critique of the ultimate patriarchal power in<br />

questioning the idea of a God but also present Tess as a victim. The delicate language<br />

emphasising her purity and innocence, ‘sensitive as gossamer…blank as snow’ and the<br />

stress on the ‘feminine tissue’ invokes the reader’s sympathies and Hardy seems to remind<br />

us of her innocence as a victim. Atwood presents Offred similarly as a victim through her<br />

loneliness and her lack of power. Moreover, theology is used to suppress Offred and make<br />

her powerless, and as Tess is raped not only is she entirely alone but biblical ideas ‘do(es)<br />

not mend the matter.’ Both texts seem to suggest the dangers of Christian beliefs which is<br />

perhaps more shocking for Hardy’s contemporaries but no less powerful than Atwood’s<br />

warnings of the religious right in eighties America. Ultimately, both Atwood and Hardy use<br />

this powerlessness to create a sense of sympathy towards the novels’ main characters and,<br />

consequently, for us to view them as victims of male power.<br />

The appearance of Angel Clare seems to suggest that not all men control women. The<br />

sensuous descriptions of the garden, ‘damp and rank with juicy grass’ reflects both Tess and<br />

Angel’s feelings. Some have suggested that through the use of the ‘garden’ Hardy is making<br />

reference to ‘the Edenic myth’ where there is no guilt or fear and thus a greater equality in<br />

the relationship than with Alec. However, Angel could be seen here as a seducer, taking on<br />

the role of Eve, as he lures Tess into the garden, suggesting again that Tess is a victim of<br />

male dominance. Hardy’s descriptions of nature in the Var valley reflect Tess’s happiness,<br />

caused not by male power but by love. This is undermined by Hardy’s presentation of Angel<br />

on his and Tess’s wedding night. His judgemental attitude highlighted by his cruel laughter,<br />

‘as unnatural and ghastly as a laugh in hell’ and the narrator’s description of Tess as a<br />

‘species’, de-humanising her, reiterate the same idea that Tess is indeed a victim of male<br />

Comment [r1]: AO1 grasp of<br />

concepts<br />

Comment [r2]: A02<br />

overview, beginning to see<br />

some detailed understanding<br />

Comment [r3]: AO1<br />

terminology<br />

Comment [r4]: AO2 apt<br />

texrual support, detailed critical<br />

understanding<br />

Comment [r5]: A04<br />

significance of social/cultural<br />

contexts<br />

Comment [r6]: A02<br />

evaluates<br />

Comment [r7]: A04 cultural<br />

context<br />

Comment [r8]: A02 sound<br />

analysis of language<br />

Comment [r9]: A04 literary<br />

context<br />

Comment [r10]: A03<br />

productive connection<br />

Comment [r11]: A03 specific<br />

and productive<br />

Comment [r12]: A02<br />

form,structure<br />

Comment [r13]: A01<br />

focussed – effectively<br />

structured<br />

Comment [r14]: A02<br />

analysis and evaluation of<br />

language<br />

Comment [r15]: A03<br />

connection<br />

Comment [ r16]: A02/A03/A0<br />

4 overview/sophisticated<br />

connection/context of partner<br />

illuminates core text; religious<br />

and political contexts; original<br />

readers’ responses<br />

Comment [r17]: A02/A03<br />

overview/connection<br />

Comment [r18]: A03 other<br />

readings<br />

Comment [r19]: A03<br />

informed by relevant<br />

interpretations<br />

Comment [r20]: A03<br />

absorbs critical opinions<br />

Comment [r21]: A02<br />

language<br />

9


power. She again becomes an object to judge and to cast aside as Angel, through his cold<br />

and distant educated language, calls her an ‘unapprehending peasant woman, who have<br />

never been initiated into the proportions of social things.’ Unlike Offred, for whom Atwood<br />

gives some sense of freedom through her ability to pun and playfully deconstruct the<br />

language of male power, Hardy gives Tess no such ability as she suffers unjustly under<br />

Angel’s educated voice.<br />

Despite the fact that Hardy seems to present Tess as a victim of male dominance, there is<br />

much more to the novel than that and much more to Tess’s suffering. It might be argued that<br />

it is not only under men that Tess suffers but also by the members of her own sex. Even in<br />

what is considered to be a feminist novel, Atwood presents the animosity between Offred<br />

and Serena Joy, ‘she didn’t step aside to let me in’ and it is Car Darch’s jealousy that leads<br />

to Alec’s rape at the end of ‘The Maiden’. Moreover, it could be argued that the abuse of<br />

male power isn’t to blame for Tess’s tragedy but fate. Even before she meets Alec, the<br />

narrator suggests that she is ‘doomed’ to meet him first and not Angel. The continual<br />

reference to her ‘strange destiny’ follows Tess to her death as the ‘President of the<br />

Immortals’ ends his ‘sport with Tess.’ Despite the reference to fate here as male, there is a<br />

sense throughout the novel that Tess is made a victim by more impersonal forces as she is<br />

presented as doomed from the outset.<br />

To consider the novel only in terms of female suffering denies the richness of Hardy’s work.<br />

Hardy’s evocative descriptions of the landscape alert the reader to a changing world as the<br />

in dustrial revolution takes hold. It is not only Tess who is violated by this new world,<br />

presented in the guise of Alec, the Stoke-d’Urberville, but also nature itself as the field<br />

animals suffer ‘under the teeth of the unerring reaper’ in ‘Maiden no More’. Hardy’s<br />

description of the reaper foresees the twentieth century’s factory conveyor belt, dehumanising<br />

those who work ‘with clock-like monotony’ because of it. Nature however, isn’t<br />

benign. The name ‘Flintcomb-Ash’ itself creates the hardness and coldness of natures<br />

treatment of the women who work there. In the detailed descriptions of nature, though Tess<br />

becomes often a mere speck, ‘Thus Tess walks on’, the fact that Hardy zooms in on her<br />

reveals her significance and value, ‘a figure which is part of the landscape; a field-woman<br />

pure and simple.’ There is a sense of suffering here perhaps but also of beauty and strength<br />

and fortitude. Woman is not merely presented as a victim but as a strong and stoical figure.<br />

‘Tess of the D’Urbervilles’ can be read as a novel of the suffering of women at the hands of<br />

men yet the denouement of the novel suggests that there is much more here. Although not<br />

immediately clear, just as Atwood plays with narrative technique, using fairytales and the<br />

unreliable narrator for example, Hardy also plays with his use of the narrative voice. At<br />

times, the narrator gives us a socio-historical account of a place or an area. At other times,<br />

the narrative seems like an extract from a travel journal while, as previously discussed, there<br />

are philosophical musings and a consideration of a variety of issues such as organised<br />

religion, pagan beliefs and the idea of fate. It is interesting that at the end of the novel, as the<br />

rhythm slows and time stands still through the short sentence, ‘It was a black flag’, signifying<br />

Tess’s death, Angel and Liza-Lu, ‘arose, joined hands, and went on.’ Hardy seems to<br />

suggest that neither fate, nor history, nor religion, nor philosophy can make sense of human<br />

suffering. The only option available is simply to arise and go on. Perhaps Atwood alludes to<br />

the same idea at the end of ‘The Handmaid’s Tale’ as Offred steps up into the ‘darkness<br />

within; or else the light.’ The uncertainty of what faces her is the same human condition that<br />

Angel and Liza-Lu face at the end of ‘Tess’ and which faces all of us in a world of suffering,<br />

seemingly devoid of meaning.<br />

Comment [r22]: A02<br />

language shapes meaning,<br />

implicit meanings<br />

Comment [r23]: A01<br />

terminology<br />

Comment [r24]: A04 context<br />

of partner illuminates core<br />

Comment [r25]: A03<br />

comparison<br />

Comment [r26]: A03 other<br />

readings<br />

Comment [r27]: A04<br />

significant and productive<br />

comparison<br />

Comment [r28]: A03 clear<br />

and confident judgements,<br />

explores interpretations<br />

Comment [r29]: A02<br />

confident handling of implicit<br />

meanings<br />

Comment [r30]: A02/A03/A0<br />

4 confident handling and<br />

overview/other<br />

readings/relevant social<br />

context<br />

Comment [r31]: A04 social<br />

context<br />

Comment [r32]: A02 sound<br />

analysis<br />

Comment [r33]: A02<br />

language<br />

Comment [r34]: A02 form<br />

(narrative technique)<br />

Comment [ r35]: A02/A03<br />

detailed critical<br />

understanding/offers<br />

alternative reading to task<br />

Comment [r36]: A02<br />

structured, accurate, fluent<br />

Comment [r37]: A03 specific<br />

connection<br />

Comment [ r38]: A02<br />

overview, awareness of<br />

structure and form<br />

Comment [r39]: A02<br />

structure<br />

Comment [r40]: A02 implicit<br />

meanings<br />

Comment [r41]: A01/A02/A0<br />

3 confident, accurate,<br />

fluent/sound analysis and<br />

evaluation/specific and<br />

productive connection<br />

10


Principal Moderator’s Comments<br />

“‘Tess of the d’Urbervilles’ is primarily a novel about a female victim of male power.”<br />

Explore this idea in Hardy’s novel and consider how Atwood’s ‘The Handmaid’s Tale’<br />

illuminates your understanding of the core text.<br />

Using a critical quotation to focus the essay allows the candidate to consider different<br />

opinions while also focussing clearly on the core text. Moreover, the way the partner text<br />

should be used is clarified in the task itself. There could be a danger here of by-passing<br />

close analysis of the writers’ techniques and merely dealing with the novels’ ideas. Perhaps<br />

the second half of the task could be re-phrased as, ‘Explore how Hardy presents this idea…’<br />

in order to tackle AO2.<br />

AO1 From the outset the essay focuses on the set task and continues to do so throughout.<br />

The written expression is accurate and fluent and terminology, which can be rather<br />

sophisticated at times, is used in order to illuminate the understanding of the texts. The<br />

response is creative in the way that the student manages to continually explore the critical<br />

quotation with the lightness of touch given to the partner text. When it is used, it is always<br />

with a clear focus and purpose. The essay is well controlled throughout and the argument is<br />

sustained which creates a fluent response. High Band 4.<br />

AO2 Analysis is detailed and productive with some insightful comments on form, structure<br />

and language. Indeed, there is a sound understanding here of the detail of the texts with<br />

some close attention paid to the use of language in specific chapters. Hardy’s narrative<br />

techniques are also considered and the way parts of the novel are structured along with an<br />

awareness of the way form creates meaning, such as the consideration of the use of<br />

rhetorical questions at the end of the ‘The Maiden’. The sophisticated overviews, aware<br />

throughout of how Hardy shapes meaning, are a sign of a confident candidate. Implicit<br />

meanings are explored and there is some considered analysis and evaluation of writers’<br />

techniques.<br />

High Band 4.<br />

AO3 The essay strikes the correct balance between core and partner texts with a willingness<br />

to allow ‘Tess of the d’Urbervilles’ to remain the focus. Connections are only made when<br />

necessary and the detail is always used in order to illuminate the core text. This is done<br />

through the use of language, form and structure as well as using the different contexts of the<br />

texts to compare and illuminate meanings. There is a continual awareness of different<br />

readings, mostly as a response to the critical opinion offered in the wording of the task. The<br />

word ‘explore’ in the task encourages this and the ideas of female conflict, fate, nature and<br />

religion show some sophisticated awareness of other readings of the text other than ‘female<br />

victim of male power.’ It would be better practice to use quotations by critics correctly and to<br />

include a bibliography. High Band 4.<br />

AO4 Contextual detail is woven into the essay and illuminates the texts. This is seen in the<br />

ways that the Victorian era is considered with its social, cultural and political contexts, from<br />

patriarchal power to the industrial revolution. The context of ‘The Handmaid’s Tale’ is used to<br />

illuminate the core text through the discussion of religion. Context is also used in terms of<br />

how the original audiences might have responded in the periods that they were published.<br />

The contexts are used throughout in order to illuminate the core text and to focus on the set<br />

task. High Band 4.<br />

Final Mark 40/40 High Band 4<br />

11


LT2 SECTION A: PROSE STUDY<br />

Candidate B<br />

Core text: Frankenstein<br />

Partner Text: Brave New World<br />

12


"How does Mary Shelley present suffering in "Frankenstein"? In the course of your<br />

answer you should refer to "Brave New World".<br />

In “Frankenstein” Mary Shelley presents us with a number of characters who could be said<br />

to suffer. Initially we are offered Victor’s narrative as told to Walton aboard the stricken ship.<br />

In Victor, we are presented with a character who wants to reform the world. His ambition to<br />

discover that “spark” which creates life locates him within the contemporaneous “Principle of<br />

Life Debate” and perhaps makes him a rather exciting and charismatic character. It is easy<br />

to read Victor as the quintessential Promethean rebel; that character who is prepared to<br />

suffer extraordinary punishment for his endeavours. He describes how his, “cheek had<br />

grown pale with study, and (his) person had become emaciated with confinement”<br />

demonstrating that his very health suffers in the pursuit of science. The “confinement”<br />

suggests the solitude that Victor must endure and, indeed, he locates himself in a “solitary<br />

chamber” hinting at something that is almost like a cell or prison.<br />

In many ways Shelley presents Victor as a suffering Romantic Hero; a man who refuses to<br />

be bound by society’s expectations and limits and who turns to his own imagination and<br />

creativity; he desires to create a “new species” that will have an “excellent nature”; perhaps<br />

an acknowledgement of the corruption of man as he is. John the Savage in “Brave New<br />

World” also embodies these ideas; a man who recognises the corruption of society and who<br />

desires to radically reform it. Whilst John’s destruction of soma and his repugnant horror at<br />

the “bestial stupidity” of the Deltas, suggesting that the Deltas are made animals, may not<br />

seem as significant as Victor’s experiments, both can be seen as vehicles used by the<br />

authors to critique the nature of society.<br />

We understand that Victor is a rebel and within the context of the early 19 th Century, with its<br />

rigid social codes and hierarchies, this rebellion must have seemed a rather exciting<br />

prospect. Victor is prepared to over-reach, but in so doing he is punished and doomed to<br />

suffer. Suffering as a result of “difference” and a rejection of normal society is also reflected<br />

through John. His self-inflicted violence and isolation hint at the desolation of such extreme<br />

suffering, “His back was horizontally streaked with crimson, and from weal to weal ran thick<br />

trickles of blood.” The violence of the imagery and the vividness of the blood encourage us<br />

to understand how low John has become. Indeed, there is sympathy created for John’s<br />

plight and we are encouraged to view the World State through John’s eyes; we are acutely<br />

aware of its shallowness and absurdity when he discusses the “feelies” with Mond, “but the<br />

new ones are stupid and horrible”. The simplicity of John’s diction reveals his inability to<br />

comprehend the desensitized nature of the World State and he relies instead on<br />

Shakespearian expletives, “Goats and Monkeys”. John is destined never to fit in and as a<br />

result he suffers.<br />

John’s experience helps us to understand the depth of Victor’s suffering. Like John, Victor<br />

falls and is destined to live in isolation. Victor’s downfall, a result of his scientific aspirations,<br />

elicits a sympathetic response from the reader. Indeed, Victor states, “I was cursed by some<br />

devil, and carried about with me my external hell” conveying that Victor is destined to be<br />

forever burdened by his actions. The images of the “devil” and “hell” reflect Victor’s fall, like<br />

Satan’s, and the knowledge of his own “evil” means that his suffering is all consuming and<br />

intense. Victor destroys his own family and, as a result, he desires his own death, “soon will<br />

death extinguish these throbbings, and relieve me from the mighty weight of anguish that<br />

bears me to the dust”. Shelley, throughout the account of Victor’s suffering, repeats the idea<br />

that Victor is made heavy by the knowledge of his actions and their consequences. Similarly,<br />

John’s suicide in “Brave New World” encourages us to emapthise with the character’s<br />

suffering; the desolate image of John’s body moving, “Slowly, yet slowly, like two unhurried<br />

compass needles”, indicating that John has never been able to locate a place where he can<br />

fit in, encourages us to understand why it is impossible for these characters to live with the<br />

burden of their suffering. Whilst we do sympathise with John’s suffering, we recognise that it<br />

13


is perhaps not as acute as Victor’s. As critics comment: it is the depth to which Victor sinks<br />

that makes him so great; he suffers in a way that the reader can not even conceive of.<br />

In contrast, however, we can also understand that Victor’s suffering is self-inflicted. In this<br />

way we are aware that Victor brings about his own downfall. Victor rejects his family,<br />

lamenting the “silken cord” that suffocated his childhood and in that image acknowledges<br />

that his family spoiled and indulged him; Victor has an idyllic childhood, but rejects it. His<br />

desperate need to leave the private sphere, hints at an inability to develop relationships. In<br />

the 1818 version of “Frankenstein” Elizabeth and Victor are cousins and this has lead critics<br />

to speculate about the incestuous nature of the relationship. Certainly, the dream of kissing<br />

Elizabeth in which, “her features appeared to change, and (he) thought he held the corpse of<br />

(his) dead mother in (his) arms” suggest an unresolved and perhaps inappropriate blurring<br />

between his mother and future wife. In this way, we can read Victor’s experiments as an<br />

attempt to usurp the role of women, making his creation inevitably an unnatural monster.<br />

Victor is characterized, in many ways, as arrogant and foolish; a man who deliberately<br />

occupies the periphery of society. Bernard in “Brave New World” is a character who displays<br />

similar contemptible traits and could be said to create his own suffering. Like Victor, he is<br />

self-indulgent and self-obsessed. Bernard even remarks that John is his “victim” friend and<br />

that, “One of the principle functions of a friend is to suffer”. Bernard’s friendship with John is<br />

self-seeking and he wants to use the savage to garner popularity. This parallels Victor, who<br />

describes how “No father could claim the gratitude of his child so completely” as he will with<br />

his creation, hinting that his motives are not altruistic, for the sake of humanity, but are in fact<br />

egotistical.<br />

Victor sets himself upon a dangerous and destructive path and his hubris means that he is<br />

unable to recognise his own failings. Victor’s disappointment on beholding the monster, and<br />

his description of the “catastrophe” in the creation of a “wretch” seem naïve given that he<br />

expressed doubts about his own process and whether he should “attempt the creation of a<br />

being” like himself; Victor misappropriates the “new” science and goes too far. In “Brave New<br />

World” this misuse of science is mirrored; Huxley was incredibly suspicious about “false<br />

science”; those theories, like Freud’s, that purport to explain all human behaviour without<br />

taking into account individuality and difference. Science, for Huxley, should be dynamic, but<br />

in the World State science is used to create stability and inertia. The lack of consideration for<br />

difference is satirized in the Hatchery, “The bulging ranks of row on receding row and tier<br />

above tier of bottles glinted” and Huxley’s contempt for this process is highlighted in the<br />

images of death that are used to describe the Conditioning Centre, “The light was frozen,<br />

dead, a ghost” and hands are “gloved with a pale corpse-coloured rubber”. It is ironic that a<br />

location where embryos are developed is described in terms of death and decay, indicating<br />

that this is an entirely dehumanizing experience and process. We can, therefore, appreciate<br />

that both texts can be read as a critique of “false science”. We understand that Victor is at<br />

the forefront of scientific endeavour, but as critics have suggested, he fails when he does not<br />

take responsibility for his actions.<br />

Ultimately, if we are to consider suffering in the novel, perhaps we should turn to the<br />

monster’s experience. The monster can be considered the most isolated character in<br />

Shelley’s novel. From the start, at his birth, he is rejected by his “father”, “he muttered some<br />

inarticulate sounds, while a grin wrinkled his cheeks… one hand was stretched out”. To the<br />

reader, this description is reminiscent of a child looking for warmth and affection and evokes<br />

a sense of vulnerability, but Victor reads the signs as threatening. In many ways we can read<br />

the monster as part of Victor; a dark part of the creator that is given a form in the monster.<br />

This makes the rejection all the more profound and helps us to sympathise with the<br />

monster’s suffering.<br />

14


The monster is judged by all who come across him; Victor exclaims that on first seeing his<br />

creation “breathless horror and disgust filled (his) heart”. Victor is rendered speechless by<br />

his own work and we understand just how repulsively deformed this being is. The De Laceys<br />

are also guilty of rejecting the monster; the monster is attacked by Felix, causing him to<br />

lament that his, “heart sunk within (him) as with bitter sickness”. The language used by<br />

Shelley to describe the monster and his experiences convey a sense of the desolation of his<br />

existence and suggest a critique of the ways in which society judges according to<br />

appearance. Like the monster, John is destined to always been an outsider; he is judged on<br />

the reservation and in the World State and his experiences demonstrate the corrupting<br />

influence of society. The death of John’s mother is undignified; Huxley’s describes the ward<br />

as “maggoty” with children that “swarmed” and “crawled”. The insect imagery used to<br />

describe the children suggests the debasing and demeaning nature of the World State and<br />

the corrupting influence of the popular culture and America. John’s experiences of the<br />

shallowness of the World State serve to heighten our understanding of the pitiless society<br />

that the monster inhabits.<br />

It is perhaps also true that, through the monster, Shelley presents us with a symbol of the<br />

French Revolution; a “man” who suffers extraordinary social injustice and eventually rebels<br />

agains t that injustice in bloody revolt. It is hard to know whether Shelley is presenting these<br />

revolutionary ideas as inevitable and desirable, but certainly we can understand the<br />

degrading and humiliating experience of rejection. The monster learns the injustice of<br />

humanity, sheltering in the hovel, and, it could be argued, is made monstrous because of his<br />

education.<br />

The monster’s suffering is made most clear at the end of the novel when he speaks with<br />

Walton. Until this point, the monster has not even been afforded his own voice; his story<br />

being embedded in the narratives of Victor and Walton. At the close of the novel, Shelley<br />

en courages us to understand that the monster’s suffering has been greater than Victor’s. He<br />

states that his heart was “fashioned to be susceptible of love and sympathy” but was<br />

“wrenched by misery to vice and hatred” and he describes the “torture” of the change. The<br />

monster’s language is eloquent and convincing and here he reveals to the reader that the<br />

change in character was experienced as physical torment and agony. In the same way,<br />

John’s final suffering is made clear when he is made the subject of the detested “feelies”; a<br />

final shameful betrayal by society. We understand that John has suffered, but he is<br />

nonetheless an extremely flawed character. Like Victor, John is unable to form relationships,<br />

attacking Lenina. He is often characterized as rather arrogant, even though he often<br />

misunderstand his reading, muddling Puck and Ariel and failing to learn from his reading of<br />

“Othello”. Ultimately it is Shelley’s character who conveys a true depth of suffering. The<br />

monster declares, “even that enemy of God and man had friends and associates in his<br />

desolation; I am alone”. The allusion to Satan’s fall and suffering characterizes the monster<br />

as the true sufferer of this novel and John’s experiences only serve to heighten our<br />

appreciation of the monster’s true torment.<br />

15


Principal Moderator’s Comments<br />

How does Shelley present suffering in ‘Frankenstein’? In the course of your answer<br />

you should refer to ‘Brave New World’.<br />

Th e set task gives the candidate a clear focus for the essay and foregrounds ‘Frankenstein’<br />

as the core text. Explaining the role of the partner text might have been more helpful as<br />

would giving the student something more to consider rather than merely ‘How does Shelley<br />

present…’. Considering the significance of suffering would allow some focus on the second<br />

part of AO3. A better worded task might be: Explore the presentation and significance of<br />

suffering in ‘Frankenstein’. In the course of your answer, consider the ways in which ‘Brave<br />

New World’ illuminates your understanding of the core text.<br />

AO1 Despite too much discussion of the partner text, the essay is well organised and<br />

structured and reads fluently. Terminology and concepts are clearly understood and<br />

confidently considered. The attention given to character rather than to suffering on the whole<br />

weakens this AO a little as it loses some focus as a consequence. The essay is rather long<br />

(approximately 400 words over the suggested limit) and this compromises the quality of the<br />

essay as it lacks the close focus required. This, again, could be tackled through giving less<br />

space to the partner and some added development to some ideas in discussing<br />

‘Frankenstein’. Band 4.<br />

AO2 There’s some very good analysis of language throughout, exploring how meaning is<br />

created. Moreover, some of Shelley’s and Huxley’s techniques to present suffering are<br />

considered and evaluated, particularly in terms of the characters. This leads to some good<br />

response to implicit meanings while the candidate also reveals an overview of some of the<br />

ideas, such as Victor’s presentation as the ‘quintessential Promethean rebel’ for example.<br />

There is a tendency for the essay to read as a character study rather than as an essay on<br />

suffering in ‘Frankenstein’ which affects the quality of the overview. There is little on<br />

structure which could be explored through some consideration of narrative technique. The<br />

space given to ‘Brave New World’ weakens the analysis of the core text where ideas are, at<br />

times, left undeveloped. The essay’s third paragraph is a good example of this lack of detail<br />

on the core text. Low Band 4.<br />

AO3 Throughout the essay the candidate seeks to make relevant connections between core<br />

and partner texts and comparisons can be intelligent and thoughtful, showing some<br />

awareness of how the partner text illuminates ‘Frankenstein’. Comments such as ‘John’s<br />

experience helps us to understand the depth of Victor’s suffering’ with the analysis that<br />

follows on ‘Frankenstein’ offer a good example of how the relationship between core and<br />

partner can be developed. It is a pity that the exploration on ‘Brave New World’ is too<br />

detailed as it doesn’t always serve to highlight the core text, almost becoming a separate<br />

discussion. This candidate makes clear and confident judgements and offers some<br />

alternative readings of the text while absorbing some critical opinion. There could be some<br />

more detail here again as with the idea of the monster as a symbol of the French Revolution.<br />

Low Band 4.<br />

AO4 This is the strongest aspect of the essay with specific and productive connections being<br />

made between texts and contexts. There is a sound appreciation of the significance and<br />

influence of ideas such as the Romantic Hero, the French Revolution and the ways that the<br />

authors criticise society. The discussion of the scientific contexts of both texts is particularly<br />

illuminating as the partner text is used here to illuminate the understanding of the core.<br />

High Band 4.<br />

Final Mark 34/40 Band 4<br />

16


LT2 SECTION A: PROSE STUDY<br />

Candidate C<br />

Core text: The Awakening<br />

Partner Text: The Tenant of Wildfell Hall<br />

17


How do Kate Chopin and Anne Bronte use their protagonists to critique the<br />

position of women in conventional 19 th Century marriages?<br />

Both Edna in ‘The Awakening’, and Helen in ‘The Tenant of Wildfell Hall’ defy expectations<br />

of the stereotypical Victorian woman. During the reign of Queen Victoria, a woman’s place<br />

was considered to be in the home. A good and virtuous woman’s life revolved around the<br />

domestic sphere of the home and family; she was expected to be diligent and pious.<br />

Domesticity and motherhood were portrayed as sufficient emotional fulfilment for women,<br />

and marriage signified a woman’s maturity and respectability. However, towards the end of<br />

the century, the ‘first-wave’ of feminism began to emerge, with the aim of gaining better<br />

education and employment for middle-class women.<br />

In terms of literature, Romanticism had become prominent as a movement. This can be seen<br />

in ‘The Awakening’ through Chopin’s use of exotic locations, use of colour and an emphasis<br />

on nature. Naturalism is also evident in ‘The Awakening’ as Kate Chopin portrays Edna’s<br />

search for individuality and freedom, and the contradiction between these; Edna is portrayed<br />

as hostage to her biology. Moreover, we must also be aware that the literary movements of<br />

the 19 th century likewise affected Chopin’s predecessors. Anne Bronte, for example,<br />

produced one of the first feminist novels and overturned sexual politics of the time. This<br />

unification of ideas led certain critics to deem ‘The Tenant of Wildfell Hall’ “utterly unfit to be<br />

put into the hands of girls”. Literature emerged as an outlet for self expression; the<br />

unreserved, forthright Helen Graham and Edna Pontellier set a new standard of behaviour<br />

for 19 th century women.<br />

Living in a state no more satisfying than slavery, women of the 19 th century were held under<br />

man-made laws to become dependant on men: first as a daughter and then as a wife. Once<br />

married, their husbands had full right to their money, inheritance, earning and full rights to<br />

th eir wife. Every man had the right to force his wife into sex and into childbirth. This is<br />

exemplified early in ‘The Awakening’, when Mr. Pontellier regards Edna as the “sole object<br />

of his existence”. The use of “object” dehumanises Edna, and brings her down to the level of<br />

an inanimate being or “object”. Additionally, although (according to Leonce) “Edna was not a<br />

mother woman,” it is made clear that Edna is not abused by Leonce. It is also evident that<br />

Edna is not criticised by other characters in the novel for not attending to her children’s<br />

needs.<br />

Edna is childlike and overly imaginative “She had pictured him [Robert] seeking her at the<br />

very first hour,” and soon realises the discrepancy between her romantic visions and the<br />

reality of her situation. Edna fails to consider the needs and desires of anyone else;<br />

especially those of her children, leaving them in the care of their grandmother without a<br />

second thought. Her children are also described as “sturdy little fellows” and “if one of the<br />

litt le Pontellier boys took a tumble whilst at play, he was not apt to rush crying to his mother’s<br />

arms for comfort, he would more likely pick himself up, wipe the water out of his eyes and<br />

the sand out of his mouth and go on playing.” This independence shown by the children can<br />

only be a result of their mother’s lack of maternal care and love for them. As Sheri Metzger<br />

states, ‘Edna attempts to reject this patriarchal society, but she does not have the freedom to<br />

do so. Edna cannot escape society and her marriage; all she can do is escape her life’.<br />

Typical women of the 19 th century “worshipped their husbands” and could be seen “fluttering<br />

about with extended, protecting wings.” However, of course, their wings were only intended<br />

to exist for protecting, and not flying, showing us that 19 th century women were not expected<br />

to break away from conventions and were tied down to family life.<br />

18


On the other hand, Edna’s polar opposite, Helen Graham, a ‘mother woman’, epitomises the<br />

ideal for a 19 th century woman. To protect her son from “one degrading vice at least” she<br />

puts an emetic into a glass of wine to deter him from drinking. Despite this, the society in<br />

which she lives in persecutes her for acting the way she does towards her son, claiming that<br />

she will make “the poor child will be the veriest milksop that was ever sopped” and asking<br />

“only think what a man you will make of him.”<br />

Despite this, the culture that they have both been immersed in has an effect on the<br />

protagonists’ actions towards their children. In the unrestrained Creole society, there is only<br />

comment on Edna’s lack of maternal responsibility from her husband. Despite this, Creole<br />

society has gendered expectations of Edna, and she enunciates that her self will, will not be<br />

confined by society’s demands: “I don’t want anything but my own, That is wanting a good<br />

deal of course, when you have to trample upon the lives, the hearts the prejudices of<br />

others…” Although Chopin was socially ostracised for her portrayal of Edna as a 19 th<br />

Century woman, and Edna was deemed a very controversial character, her actions were the<br />

culmination of being married to a husband she didn’t love, dealing with motherhood, and the<br />

result of gendered expectations that she could not (and did not want to) fulfil.<br />

In contrast to ‘The Tenant of Wildfell Hall’ however, Creole society was lenient with Edna,<br />

and how comfortably she let the “pressures” of motherhood provoke her appetite for<br />

independence. Helen, the stronger of the two protagonists, in the same way as Edna, did not<br />

give into society either. However, the affliction she had to grapple with was that of her<br />

abusive, controlling husband.<br />

The Matrimonial Causes Act of 1857 gave men the right to divorce their wives on the<br />

grounds of adultery. However, married women were not able to obtain a divorce if they<br />

discovered that their husbands had been unfaithful, they had to prove that he had committed<br />

adultery as well as incest, bigamy, cruelty or desertion. Once divorced, the children became<br />

the man’ s property and the mother could be prevented from seeing her children.<br />

Nevertheless, it was frowned upon by society if a man divorced his wife, and social<br />

expectations saw that this was achieved.<br />

This is made particularly clear in ‘The Awakening’. Leonce is working away, and Edna, in the<br />

midst of her turmoil, decides that she is going to move out of their home and into the ‘pigeon<br />

house’. When Mr. Pontellier hears of Edna’s decision, “he immediately wrote her a letter of<br />

unqualified disapproval and remonstrance.” This shows that social expectations had an<br />

impact on Leonce’s behaviour. “Furthermore in one of the daily newspapers appeared a brief<br />

notice to the effect that Mr. and Mrs. Pontellier were contemplating a summer sejourn<br />

abroad… Mr. Pontellier had saved appearances” Chapter thirty two highlights the<br />

importance of reputation (and preserving it) within Victorian society.<br />

However, for Edna, the ‘pigeon house’ represents everything that their “handsome”<br />

residence on Esplanade Street was not. “The Pigeon House pleased her. It at once<br />

assumed the intimate character of a home, while she herself invested it with a charm which it<br />

reflected like a warm glow.” As Spark notes suggests, “Edna's strength comes from her<br />

rejection of her social role. Her new house is more modest, and its small size disallows the<br />

en tertaining that was such a part of her former life.” Moreover, it is evident that the types of<br />

house the characters live in reflect their social status. Edna’s house on Esplanade Street is<br />

very much for the family, however characterising an element of falseness, as it is not the<br />

happy family home it seems. Although, in the Pigeon House, Edna is separated from society<br />

and is very much alone; thus highlighting her new thirst for independence.<br />

Both women fell in love very quickly with their husbands; in both cases Edna and Helen were<br />

fiercely independent and wanted to rebel against their parents. Contradictory to this, Helen<br />

accepted her role as wife and homemaker although she walked into an abusive marriage<br />

19


with a violent husband, whereas for Edna marriage merely wasn’t everything she expected it<br />

to be. Although it could have been a very happy marriage, as Leonce looked after Edna, she<br />

still continued to rebel and began to secede from her husband and neglect her children,<br />

resulting in negative emotional turmoil; the swan song leading up to her suicide.<br />

Similarities between the two protagonists become more conspicuous in the second part of<br />

the book, as Helen begins to search for a husband. Helen states that “For without approving<br />

I cannot love” and “I ought to respect and honour the man I marry as well as love him, for I<br />

cannot love him without”. This is reminiscent of Edna because she needs to have feelings in<br />

order for her to be in love. If she feels no passion or romance, she cannot commit herself.<br />

This is her justification for pursuing Alcee Arobin. She wanted romance and excitement –<br />

two of the attributes Leonce provide. On the contrary, Helen is again shown as the stronger<br />

character as she was presented with Mr Boarham a respected member of society that her<br />

Aunt approved of and was prepared to give her “everything” he thought she would desire.<br />

Despite this, Helen had the strength and forthright will to decline his hand in marriage,<br />

whereas it seems that Edna effortlessly agreed to marry Leonce; a rash decision, made only<br />

in passion.<br />

To conclude, Chopin and Bronte use Victorian society and how it impacts on their main<br />

protagonists to critique their position in 19 th century marriages. Both writers provide their<br />

novels with daring, thought provoking women to act as the catalyst to the main events within<br />

the narrative. ‘The Awakening’ gives us a pioneering heroine who undergoes a sexual<br />

awakening, epitomising the changing role of women. Helen in ‘The Tenant of Wildfell Hall’<br />

presents the strongest expression of feminist ideas early in the novel. She and Gilbert<br />

debate over the sheltering of girls against the exposure of boys to the real world. The novel<br />

is a feminist novel; it voices Helen’s passions despite being initially narrated by a male<br />

character. Not only does this make Helen’s actions more credible but makes us put into<br />

consideration whether Bronte intended to imply that men could see that the roles of women<br />

were changing at the time as well.<br />

20


Principal Moderator’s Comments<br />

How do Kate Chopin and Anne Bronte use their protagonists to critique the position<br />

of women in conventional 19 th Century marriages?<br />

The<br />

task is appropriate and focussed: the position of women is narrowed down to the more<br />

manageable topic of the position of women in marriage. But it could make clearer which text<br />

is the core. Perhaps it would help to rephrase the task as follows: ‘With the emphasis on<br />

The Awakening, and with wider reference to The Tenant of Wildfell Hall, discuss the ways in<br />

which Chopin and Bronte use their protagonists to critique the position of women in<br />

conventional 19 th Century marriage’.<br />

AO1 Written expression is accurate and clear. The response is reasonably structured,<br />

though the final paragraph is rather disappointing and could have given more focus to the<br />

‘how’ in the task. It also gives too much weight to the partner text. There is a clear grasp of<br />

key concepts, though they are not always considered very deeply. There is some use of<br />

appropriate terminology, but this is limited because of lack of attention to AO2. Band 3/4<br />

borderline<br />

AO2 This is the weakest area. There is some discussion of the effects of language but<br />

generally this response neglects detailed critical analysis of techniques. There is, for<br />

example, very little reference to structure or narrative method. Band 2<br />

AO3 There are some clear, general similarities and differences mentioned in the body of the<br />

essay, though it is fair to say that some comparisons are discussed in more detail and<br />

explored to some extent towards the end. But here the focus is more on the characterisation<br />

than on ‘how’ characters are used to critique the position of women. The ‘explore’ aspect of<br />

AO3’s comparisons is not taken very far. More use could have been made of the partner<br />

text to ‘illuminate’ the reading of the core text. There are references to other readers (notably<br />

Metzger and Spark Notes) but these are not discussed as other ‘interpretations’ which might<br />

have informed the student’s response. Other readings should be engaged with. High Band<br />

2<br />

AO4 This is the strongest area. The essay begins with a detailed discussion of social and<br />

literary contexts, then goes on to make some specific and productive connections between<br />

the texts and their contexts. The problem is that context dominates the response to such an<br />

extent that other AOs suffer, particularly AO2. High Band 4<br />

Final Mark 26/40 Band 3<br />

21


LT2 SECTION B: CREATIVE READING<br />

Candidate A<br />

Stimulus text: Faulkner: Dry September<br />

22


A Lynching - 20th October 1894<br />

I<br />

The scene becomes a spectacle.<br />

No Ferris wheels or candy floss,<br />

No roller coaster rides,<br />

No coconut shies or freak shows,<br />

No acrobatic style.<br />

Instead a sole black body swings from<br />

left to right while people<br />

Stare and silent clap.<br />

Hi s fingers will become treasured things<br />

th at people twist in their hands,<br />

ov er and over.<br />

His toes will be their coins,<br />

kept in pockets as souvenirs of this common<br />

entertainment.<br />

His two ears will be thrown around<br />

like rolling dice.<br />

His body loses identity,<br />

is just one black shadow on the society.<br />

Hundred eyes now watch<br />

gouged out holes,<br />

where eyes once were.<br />

His sight is lost –<br />

the others were blinded before.<br />

II<br />

I know not why.<br />

I know only what,<br />

What I did not do.<br />

Did not touch nor look nor speak to her<br />

and now they do not think.<br />

They chased me down like<br />

A wild animal running from spitting hunters.<br />

I hid away, as if guilty, with<br />

No chance to defend.<br />

Yet they caught me,<br />

under the sticky leaves of the tree,<br />

under the spotted sky of ebony.<br />

M y heart jumped out of my mouth - a desperate attempt to<br />

escape certain fate.<br />

My hands stuff it back in,<br />

hiding my fear under my thick fingers.<br />

Momma always told me never to let them see<br />

that big ol' heart of mine -<br />

the whites'll just rip it straight out.<br />

23


Next day, my fate arrives.<br />

The rope wraps round,<br />

coarsely rubbing against my skin.<br />

They stare and stare<br />

Until all I see is eyes,<br />

lidless white eyes<br />

with black holes.<br />

III<br />

Consuming lies cannot leave her,<br />

Eating up her skin like a dusty fever.<br />

Sitting alone she doesn’t know<br />

W hat happened to the black man, dirty Negro.<br />

Prejudice runs through her veins,<br />

Created by the South where it never rains.<br />

No water to redeem them all,<br />

Religious morals no-one can recall.<br />

Lost in the rush to kill -<br />

Caught up in the swirling thrill.<br />

Her lie spread like quick fire<br />

And only he knew she was a liar.<br />

For he would never do nothing like that<br />

But now he was hung, still wearing his hat.<br />

Not one person opened their eyes<br />

To realise her stories were lies<br />

So now his wife uncontrollably wails and cries.<br />

You cannot take back what was said,<br />

so what was going through her head?<br />

One life cost with one lie<br />

One simple little word - why?<br />

IV<br />

He was leader of the pack,<br />

king of the cards, with a crown of<br />

desert-grown cactus thistles.<br />

His weather-beaten wrinkled skin,<br />

was worn in with tired anger.<br />

His sullen eyes stared upwards, with their<br />

Black circles sparkling with malice.<br />

Surrounded by identical men topped with bowler hats,<br />

he felt them breathe in unison,<br />

lik e a gust of wind blowing the body to and fro.<br />

Their bodies stood like white pillars,<br />

chalky and sturdy - above ground -<br />

not rooted to earth like the tree's tentacles<br />

which spread through the worms and rocks.<br />

It was done in the dust.<br />

24


Death, without worry.<br />

V<br />

The tree’s earthy base is covered in hardening dust,<br />

While the shadows cast spread across in darkening black.<br />

The men surround the tree with shirts of starched white,<br />

As sweat accumulates on necks from suffocating heat,<br />

Standing underneath a dense clouded sky of grey.<br />

Blank faces outside, whilst hearts inside heavily beat.<br />

One man watches from further back feeling for the black,<br />

Without being able to describe his thoughts of grey<br />

Which don’t fit into society’s rules of black and white.<br />

Surrounded by white faces covered in engrained dust<br />

He feels lost within the sea, he feels heated<br />

At being unable to change the world - he is beaten.<br />

VI<br />

I am the rope which hangs limpless on the tree.<br />

I am the rope which slowly works its way round your neck.<br />

Python-like I tighten my grip.<br />

Tighten, tighten, till my grooves cut grooves in your skin.<br />

You clutch at me desperately like I'm a parting lover:<br />

we are inseparable now.<br />

So close I feel your breath,<br />

which is starting to escape you.<br />

You start to rise with me,<br />

Start to lose breath,<br />

To feel pain,<br />

to be gone.<br />

No w you hang limpless on the tree.<br />

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />

25


Commentary<br />

Having read William Faulkner’s ‘Dry September’, I was immediately inspired by the use of<br />

different narrative perspectives to portray one scene. My decision to write poetry meant that<br />

I was more stimulated by the subject matter than the style, choosing to centre my poetry<br />

around the lynching of a black man in America in the late nineteenth century. Moreover, the<br />

subject matter was chosen due to a newspaper article which detailed the appalling nature of<br />

lynchings, which included describing how the victims’ ‘ears, fingers and toes became<br />

souvenirs’ and furthermore, that some victims had their eyes gouged out. The subject was a<br />

challenging one, as it is a complex and emotional topic which still presents difficulties in<br />

today’s society.<br />

As usually a prose writer, the experimentation with poetry was a demanding experience as I<br />

found it difficult to shift my style into a more poetical approach. For example, the use of the<br />

word ‘prejudice’ in III caused me some difficulty as I discovered what a powerful word the<br />

abstract noun is, requiring the rest of the poem to withstand this. The use of the different<br />

perspectives meant that it was possible to meddle with various voices and narrative<br />

techniques. The difference between the black man’s voice in II and the rope’s narration in<br />

VI is startling; despite both poems being in the first person, the subtle simplicity of II<br />

contrasts the disturbing speech of the rope who appeals to the victim as ‘a parting lover’.<br />

Additionally, the use of different rhyming patterns created unique effects on the narrator’s<br />

manner. For example in III, with the woman who has falsely accused the black man, the use<br />

of trite rhyming couplets creates an uncomfortable sense of falsity. The use of rhetorical<br />

questions in that particular poem enabled me to address the reader and to stimulate<br />

questions for them in why the woman lied about what the victim did to her. I considered her<br />

words, ‘dirty Negro’, in depth as they are dreadful words for us in today’s society; however,<br />

I wanted to capture her particular voice and believe that those words achieved that. In a<br />

similar vein, in II, the narrator references his Momma’s saying, revealing parts of his past<br />

and the constant division in society which had been established.<br />

The imagery in the collection of poems was intended to have repeated themes which will be<br />

emphasised to the reader. The idea of contrast between black and white was significant, not<br />

just between the races but also in metaphorical terms, such as the contrast between the<br />

men’s white shirts and the tree’s shadows in V. The concept of eyes as an image was<br />

extremely important; having learnt that often victims’ eyes were gouged out, the connection<br />

between this and the moral blindness of the white perpetrators stuck in my mind. This<br />

image can be seen in I and II, for instance ‘His sight is lost –/ the others were blinded<br />

before’, combined with the close alliteration for emphasis. The pathetic fallacy in V is<br />

another expression of the tension and pressure within America at the time, which was an<br />

inspiration from ‘Dry September’, where the use of oppressive heat combined with ‘dust’<br />

reflects this. The interjections of unusual details was another style literary technique which I<br />

was inspired to emulate; for example, the ‘recurrent surges of stale pomade and lotion’ in<br />

the short story or the ‘crown of/ desert-grown cactus thistles’ from IV.<br />

My decision to allow the victim of the lynching to have a narration of his own, in contrast to<br />

‘Dry September’, was to give the black man a voice in the history of the lynchings. Obstacles<br />

lay in getting each narrator’s manner correct, especially in the leader of the white men as I<br />

found it difficult to ascertain his exact expression; therefore, I moved more into description<br />

of his physical appearance and his senses, allowing the reader to infer his beliefs from this.<br />

To show the grey areas which is represented as the barber in ‘Dry September’, the man in V<br />

re veals an outsider who is swept up in the mob mentality and is unable to express his true<br />

26


disdain of what is occurring, due to his concerns for his own safety. The order the poems<br />

are presented was significant as well, with the finish on the rope’s perspective to leave the<br />

reader with an uneasy emotion, combined with the residues of violence. In addition, the<br />

rope’s addressing the victim as ‘you’ also seems to speak to the reader, placing the reader in<br />

an unusual position.<br />

The collection of poems attempt to represent the different perspectives of the significant<br />

events in America’s past, which is a constantly appropriate theme due to the perpetual<br />

racism which remains in modern society.<br />

27


Principal Moderator’s Comments<br />

Creative Writing Response: A Lynching – 20 th October 1894<br />

AO1 This is a creative response to the selected Faulkner short story in the way that the<br />

student has tried to go beyond the stimulus text by finding different viewpoints and different<br />

voices with which to treat the subject. The poem is carefully structured in six parts: part I<br />

setting the scene; part II giving the black man’s view-point; part III, the female accuser’s; part<br />

IV the lynch mob’s leader; part V, the bystander’s, caught up in the frenzy; and part VI,<br />

imaginatively giving the final part, the death, to the rope. On the whole, this works well and is<br />

effective because the different parts have been given distinctive forms and voices. Individual<br />

parts are also thoughtfully structured. For example, part I prepares the reader for the<br />

lynching by the repetition of the negatives and the contrasting section beginning with<br />

‘Instead’. The shocking nature of what is to come is underlined by the effective images made<br />

of casual words in the next verse, words such as ‘twist in their hands’, ‘kept in pockets’ and<br />

‘thrown around/like rolling dice’. Perhaps the play on eyes and moral blindness in the last<br />

verse of this section is more clumsily handled. Mostly the writer has a good sense of line,<br />

uses repetition effectively and some of the descriptions are especially vivid e.g. ‘under the<br />

spotted sky of ebony’. There are places where the writing is not so controlled; the last four<br />

lines of part III, for example, come close to doggerel – though the commentary attempts to<br />

justify this. The ending of the poem is very thoughtful; the rope as a parting lover, the<br />

shortening lines and then the quiet repetition of the opening line of this part. In places there<br />

is surely a degree of sophistication in the use of structure, form and language. Band 4<br />

17/20<br />

Commentary<br />

AO2 There is sound analysis and some evaluation of structure, form and language;<br />

however, the emphasis is on structure and form and it would have been useful to have had a<br />

little more close analysis of the effects of language. Although the claim is that the stimulus<br />

te xt inspired the response’s subject matter, there are also a few useful references to certain<br />

features of the stimulus text and the ways in which they have affected the style and narrative<br />

approaches of the poem. Band 4<br />

AO4 This student refers to one Faulkner story whereas we would expect reference to more<br />

than one story. This approach limits discussion of the context of the stimulus text which is<br />

barely touched on in the commentary. Nevertheless, there is some discussion of the<br />

contextual influence of ‘Dry September’ and mention made of an influential newspaper<br />

article. What other ideas influenced the attitudes and intentions of the poem are only briefly<br />

touched on. And it would have been interesting to learn why someone who calls herself<br />

‘usually a prose writer’ chose this long poem form. Generally, this commentary addresses<br />

AO2 effectively but pays less attention to AO4.<br />

Low Band 3<br />

Commentary mark 15/20<br />

Final Mark 32/40 Low Band 4<br />

28


LT2 SECTION B: CREATIVE READING<br />

Candidate B<br />

Stimulus text: McEwan: Atonement<br />

29


Foolish Affairs<br />

Dearest John,<br />

I know I have not written for a while, but after the incident this summer I felt that it<br />

would be easier on mother if I did not have contact with anyone in the family, at least until<br />

Christmas, when I felt you all would be in a particularly giving mood. I have missed you<br />

deeply though; and it has broken my heart not to be able to talk to you, especially in a time<br />

where I have needed a stable rock to cling in this new ocean of unfamiliarity. But let us not<br />

suffocate in intricate mistakes we cannot repair… How is life? And your Wife? I assume the<br />

baby has been born by now and hope all is well with both of them, although I’m certain you<br />

are making the most marvelous husband and father, with your vigilant and altruistic manner.<br />

As for myself, after a challenging beginning to this semester, things began to pick up and I<br />

cannot imagine life as anything but a student. Cambridge Colleges are thoroughly radiant<br />

and Kings is no exception. Oh you would love it here! The eastern cloisters of the college –<br />

dozen of stone washed bricks – elevate the dorms like an architectural Saint Christopher;<br />

the symmetry of the nostalgic never-ending promenade somehow reminds me of the<br />

imperishable taste of milk chocolate although I have no idea why! Laid out neatly before the<br />

building, the blades of grass in the fields between the river and Kings bow down before its<br />

elegant, well-proportioned perfection. Just being here makes me laugh at my frivolous<br />

anxiety about coming here. The whole town itself is a monument of youthfulness, given away<br />

by subtle hieroglyphs: the wind-swept flyer that joyously and unselfconsciously dances<br />

along; the scars of carelessly cast circles of chewing gum; the short bursts of buzzing chatter<br />

between lectures and the youthful clicks of bicycle chains which feel like being tickled in the<br />

crease of your elbow. Here, the ambiance is so thick with ambition and promise it is<br />

practically edible! The whole town is gorgeous, and there are so many things I could show<br />

you, were you ever to visit me.<br />

As I’m sure you can tell, I’ve fallen in love with Cambridge, although our love has not been<br />

exclusive. It happened in the second week of term, after I had accidently over-slept and<br />

missed the beginning of my first lecture. Knowing it was better to miss it than face the<br />

embarrass ment of arriving late, and determined not to be late for my next lecture, I decided<br />

to head int o town. The humble tranquility of the mid-lecture silence was broken only by the<br />

chime of my worn heels and the more audible and confident thump of two tan leather deck<br />

shoes. Compared to my dainty steps, the shoes seemed to take steps of monstrous<br />

proportions. The man in the shoes was tall and confident, and, although I tried to avert my<br />

eyes from his burning gaze, there was a tacit, mutual desire for each other that would have<br />

been obvious to onlookers, had there been anyone else in the street. When I could help<br />

myself no longer, I became transfixed by his maintenance of the undulating stride and a<br />

supercilious stare that gazed above the distant horizon, causing his head to marginally tilt<br />

30


toward the heavens. As we got closer to passing one another, our paces slowed as if our<br />

feet had a mind of their own, and we made eye contact that remained unbroken until we<br />

were no longer in front of one another. Despite the unusual wideness of Kings Parade, we<br />

passed with such proximity, I would only have had to turn my head to kiss him.<br />

I didn’t, of course, but I did see him again that evening in a bar, conversing with someone I<br />

knew relatively well. With a new sense of intrepidity – brought on by the morning’s glance<br />

and my ever-growing love for Cambridge – I sauntered over and introduced myself to him,<br />

but no sooner had I, then my acquaintance abandoned me with him. It didn’t matter as I think<br />

he remembered me, and so we got talking. Jeff, I learnt, had vehement and intransigent<br />

disagreement with the war. I don’t know why I chose to talk about such political issues with<br />

him rather than the normal pleasantries, but I felt I already knew him and was more<br />

interested in him showing me the confident side that had attracted me so much in the<br />

cobbled streets. In hindsight, I guess this was foolish; had I asked him the obvious question<br />

of “what are you majoring in?” I would have found out that he was not a mature student like I<br />

had assumed but a professor. I didn’t, however, and our hours long chat that night began our<br />

beautiful if foolish affair.<br />

His self-assurance had cajoled me into immediately falling for him, but - like giving into the<br />

craving for cake and having to face the hard work at the gym later – the momentary pleasure<br />

was forgotten and replaced by the consequences of my weakness…<br />

Word count: 859<br />

31


Commentary<br />

“Like giving into the craving for cake and having to face the gym later.” In this opening<br />

extract of an unwritten book, much is revealed and foreshadowed about the rest of the novel.<br />

Inspired by Ian McEwan’s Atonement, I based my extract around the theme of Forbidden<br />

Romance – much like Cecilia’s and Robbie’s – using careful characterisation and vivid<br />

descriptions of scenery to make the relationship between a professor and student as exciting<br />

as possible.<br />

By setting the novel in Cambridge, the traditional image that is portrayed is immediately<br />

juxtaposed<br />

with the scandal of the affair between a married lecturer and a student. Also, as<br />

Cambridge is a small community, based mainly around the University – often described as<br />

the Cambridge bubble – when the details of the relations surface, they spread quickly due to<br />

the close-knit society, creating more shock and exclusion because everyone knows. In this<br />

unfinished letter, I have particularly tried to make the place seem heavenly using ethereal<br />

vocabulary such as “elevate”, “radiant”, “imperishable” and “perfection”. This is emphasised<br />

by the biblical allusion of “Saint Christopher”, which is effective because the simile linking to<br />

the support of Jesus against a raging river creates a divine image by relating the buildings to<br />

Jesus. Furthermore, the magnificence of the building is also exaggerated by the<br />

personification as “the blades of grass… bow down.” The contrast between the tall buildings<br />

and the flat, plain greenery illuminate the buildings grandness and by talking about “Blades”<br />

as if they were individuals, it’s as if there is a population of people in awe of the building. The<br />

scandal therefore becomes more abnormal because it takes place here. Through her<br />

description of the city, it also denotes how ignorant she is to the outside world. She refers to<br />

Cambridge being a “town” twice in this letter, when it really is a city. This shows her lack of<br />

recognition of the real world.<br />

In addition to my descriptions, I tried to develop the plot by making it an improbable couple,<br />

shown though careful characterisation, although it was difficult to layer a character is such a<br />

confined word restriction. Jeff, the professor, is portrayed as being confident. In their first<br />

encounter, he had an “undulating stride and a supercilious stare that gazed above the<br />

distant horizon, causing his head to marginally tilt toward the heavens.” The sibilance of this<br />

quote gives an early indication of his later deception and slyness by resembling the sound of<br />

a snake’s hiss. Also, the end of the quote shows how he looks down his nose at people and<br />

the word “heavens” not only displays that Josephine, the author of the letter, thinks Jeff is<br />

heavenly, but it also alludes back to the beginning of the extract suggesting that maybe the<br />

reason why she finds Cambridge heavenly is because of him. In contrast, Josephine<br />

32


appears shy, small and naïve. This is first shown through her similes, for example when<br />

describing the college as being like “the imperishable taste of milk chocolate.” Besides<br />

showing us how much she adores Cambridge, this portrays Jo as childish, as chocolate and<br />

other sweets are principally eaten by children as most adults grow out of their sweet tooth.<br />

Another simile she uses is that the click of bikes “feels like being tickled in the creases of<br />

your elbow.” Being tickled and giggling again creates an image of childish amusement. Even<br />

the reason for her first sighting of Jeff makes her seem shy and childishly unorganised; she<br />

misses the start of her lecture by lying in and can’t “face the embarrassment of arriving late.”<br />

Hence, she does not like drawing attention to herself. The language of the piece at first<br />

seems odd but what I was trying to demonstrate was – through her word choice of “subtle<br />

hieroglyphs”, “frivolous anxiety” and “vehement and intransigent disagreement” - Josephine<br />

trying to appear more mature than she is, and display a new found intellect by using this<br />

overly elaborate and complex vocabulary. This, in fact, only makes her seem more<br />

immature, like a child trying on her mother’s high heels. Indeed, the difference in the<br />

personalities is shown through the symbolism of their walk. While her “dainty steps” create a<br />

“chime”, his “monstrous stride” creates a “thump”. The juxtaposition between the chime and<br />

thump emphasises, in addition to their difference in size, status and confidence, the fact<br />

immediately showing that Jeff will be the dominant half of the relationship. The word choice<br />

“monstrous” also foreshadows how Jeff may treat Jo later in the novel. Using the steps to<br />

symbolise personality traits or emotions may have become a motif in the novel, although (as<br />

I stated earlier) with just 750 words, I did not have space to have it reappear.<br />

An equally important aim was to make the author untrustworthy (much like Briony in<br />

Atonement), as this immediately makes the work more readerly; it is the reader’s choice as<br />

to how far they believe Josephine. Moreover, by writing it as a letter about what has<br />

happened, it gives Jo the benefit of hindsight and the opportunity to foreshadow future<br />

events in the novel. In real time they are actually in the past, Josephine just hasn’t spoken<br />

about them yet! For example, it is hinted that before leaving for Cambridge, there was<br />

trouble at home – “mistakes we cannot repair” – and this conversely makes Jo’s apparent<br />

kindness and innocence questionable, because she must have done something to make her<br />

feel she had to give her family space, and for them not to write or visit. The curiosity growing<br />

for the reader is embellished by the ellipsis, which creates a pause in which the reader has<br />

time to envision what might have happened. This is quickly followed by “And your Wife?” By<br />

avoiding personalising her by giving her name, it suggests she feels contempt for the<br />

woman, possible hinting at the cause of the fight in the family. This is emphasised by the<br />

capitalisation of Wife as if that is her name, or at least all Jo thinks about her; she’s just the<br />

wife to her brother, nothing more. Furthermore, by having an unreliable author, other things<br />

33


are brought to question: when Jo speaks of a “tacit, mutual desire”, she might have been<br />

trying to make herself believe that there was an immediate attraction – love at first sight –<br />

when really there wasn’t, and when she “think[s] he remembered me,” she might be<br />

misjudging his politeness of answering her questions, as it is unrealistic to believe he would<br />

remember every single (insignificant) student he walks by.<br />

In conclusion, I have tried to make my extract interesting and readerly through use of an<br />

unreliable author, contrasting characterisation and by setting the action in such a prestigious<br />

place as Cambridge, so that when Josephine indulges in her “cake,” the consequences are<br />

more exciting and even more dire.<br />

Word Count: 1062<br />

34


Principal Moderator’s Comments<br />

Creative Writing Response: Foolish Affairs<br />

AO1 This is quite a shaped response; as the letter develops, so more is revealed about the<br />

writer’s reasons for excitement and for being in love with Cambridge. It begins with<br />

pleasantries and an account of the place and then becomes more personal and self-<br />

This is also thoughtfully structured in terms of its position as the opening of the<br />

revealing.<br />

novel. Some questions about the past are raised and suggestions of what might be<br />

foreshadowed offered. The language seems deliberately chosen for a purpose. We learn<br />

from the commentary, that the language is meant to reveal a rather pretentious and<br />

immature person and, to some extent, this is achieved. The problem is that the formality is<br />

overdone and the language does not give the reader a sense of the period in which this<br />

novel might be set. The reference to ‘the war’ suggests the setting is contemporary but there<br />

are few clues to this in the style of the letter writer. There are also few details in the<br />

descriptions of the place which suggest the contemporary world. The description of<br />

Cambridge is rather generalised and vague. There is an interesting use of similes, some<br />

more successful than others. Despite the explanation in the commentary, the reference to<br />

‘Saint Christopher’ remains unconvincing. The writing is controlled, and generally accurate<br />

and clear.<br />

Low Band 4 16/20<br />

Commentary<br />

AO2 This commentary is in excess of the suggested word count. There is detailed analysis<br />

of the language of the core text and its effects, supported by the confident use of terms such<br />

as personification, similes and symbolism. There is also evidence that the writer has thought<br />

ab out how this letter might function as the opening to a novel, so there is some attention to<br />

structure. However, there could have been more attention given to the structure of the letter<br />

itself. It is not quite clear how the ‘untrustworthy narrator’ has been achieved. There is a<br />

tendency in the commentary to read more into the effects of the writing than might actually<br />

have been noticed by the reader. Although the emphasis quite rightly falls on the student’s<br />

own writing, there could be a little more reference to features of the stimulus text and how<br />

they might have influenced the creative response.<br />

High Band 3<br />

AO4 There is an emphasis on Cambridge as a contextual influence on the style and<br />

ambience of the letter. Though the descriptions are rather vague and generalised and one<br />

doesn’t get much of a sense of Cambridge as a real place. The commentary suggests this is<br />

deliberate to some degree (to reveal aspects of the letter writer’s personality and as part of<br />

the Romance theme), nevertheless it is hard not to imagine that someone actually in<br />

Cambridge wouldn’t be more aware of the present realities of the place. Perhaps some<br />

research would have helped here. Generally, the commentary concentrates on AO2, so that<br />

there is much less attention to the contextual influences on the writer’s ideas and style.<br />

There is also no mention of the context of the stimulus text. More could also have been<br />

written about the contextual influences of the stimulus text on the creative response. This is<br />

the weaker of the AOs. Band 2<br />

Mark for Commentary 12/20<br />

Final Mark 28/40 Band 3<br />

35


LT2 SECTION B: CREATIVE READING<br />

Candidate C<br />

Stimulus text: Fitzgerald: The Great Gatsby<br />

36


The last tube train<br />

It was nearly 2AM, and Jan was about to miss the last tube train. He had stayed out too late<br />

and was sluggishly drunk, his vision blurred and his movement slow. The tunnels leading to<br />

the tube platforms seemed like a labyrinth to him; he staggered around corners, down stairs<br />

and up escalators, searching in vain for the westbound train to Hammersmith.<br />

He knew, at the back of his blurring, swimming mind that he was going to pay for this in the<br />

morning. He had to be in Hampstead, right on the other side of the city, to start a construction<br />

job at 7 in the morning. He hoped his supervisor wouldn’t notice his bleary eyes, or be too<br />

angry. More xenophobic than most, the boss told his building team to ‘F*** off home to<br />

Poland’ at every available opportunity.<br />

The tinny sound of jazz music drifted out of one of the tube alleys. Jan loped towards it,<br />

hoping to ask for directions from someone. But the busker playing the jazz music was already<br />

asleep – or passed out – under a big black bin bag, the dulcet tones of Louis Armstrong<br />

flitting out of the CD player through his dreams.<br />

Baffled, the young man found himself again at the entrance to the tube station, no closer to<br />

reaching his destination. He resigned himself to walking home, or at least trying to find a<br />

night bus. The tube entrance had been quiet before, but the hall was now crowded with a<br />

group of teenage boys, leaning in a nonchalant yet menacing way against the walls.<br />

He thought of asking for directions, but thought better of it. The boys faces were almost<br />

completely covered, their heads lowered, sinister black hoods concealing their identity. He<br />

stumbled out of the station, trying hard not be noticed. But his feet were unsteady, and he<br />

tripped over, toppling to the ground.<br />

The boys looked up. They jeered at the pathetic sight of a dishevelled, semi-conscious man<br />

wincing on the concrete floor. They circled him, laughing at his weak attempts to stand back<br />

up, kicking him as he tried to struggle to his feet. Jan yelled, cursing at the children to leave<br />

him alone. Couldn’t they tell he had a job he needed to get to the next morning? What kind of<br />

country was it where young children kicked and jeered at an innocent man, gleeful at his<br />

humiliation? He closed his eyes and remembered the day he stepped onto the bus in<br />

Bialystok, afraid but full of excitement and hope, and a strong feeling in his heart that<br />

everything would be better in England, that he could follow his dreams.<br />

A final, sharp kick in his chest left him winded and gasping on the floor, unable to move. A<br />

dozen bellowing youths sprinted out the train station, roaring with laughter. And Jan was left<br />

alone on the floor of the tube station, still hoping he would not be late for work the next<br />

morning.<br />

37


Commentary<br />

At first, this short story may seem to have little to do with The Great Gatsby. I<br />

originally intended to set it in America. However, I decided that I wanted to set the story in a<br />

completely different environment that I was able to relate to more closely, but to address<br />

some of the common themes at the same time. I wanted to show that in a way, the message of<br />

the novel is universal.<br />

In the same way that Gatsby idealises Daisy, Jan idealises England. He sees it as<br />

beacon of hope and opportunity, somewhere to start afresh. Gatsby thinks that life with Daisy<br />

will be perfect and pure; he instils in her a lofty perfection which she cannot live up to. Both<br />

characters discover that they cannot reconcile the reality of their situations with their dreams.<br />

I used the flashback device, a technique often used in The Great Gatsby, to recall happier<br />

times and underline the difference between Jan’s image of England and the reality.<br />

I also wanted to portray a sense of hopelessness in my story. The imagery of the tube<br />

tunnels and the use of words like ‘sluggishly’, ‘blurring’ and ‘slow’ is intended to evoke a<br />

sense of inertia. Jan seems to be moving through life aimlessly, his only goal to arrive for<br />

work on time each day. The line ‘He staggered around corners, down stairs and up escalators’<br />

shows the pointlessness of his life. The word ‘labyrinth’ implies a never ending and<br />

frustrating quest. Jan thought that his journey would end happily in England, but he is still on<br />

a journey that doesn’t appear to be leading anywhere. The tube station is a metaphor for his<br />

life. I was inspired by a line in The Great Gatsby - ‘Boats against the current, borne back<br />

ceaselessly into the past’ when writing this part of the story. Jan is floating through life, still<br />

clinging on to an idealised image. The description of his ‘swimming mind’ adds to this idea.<br />

Wealth and material excess is another important part of The Great Gatsby. The jazz<br />

music of Gatsby’s parties represented the hedonism of the Roaring Twenties. However, there<br />

was another side to 1920s America; one of poverty, racism and intolerance. Not everyone<br />

benefited from the economic boom. The jazz music playing from the busker’s radio is<br />

intended to represent the irony of Jan’s situation – he came to England searching prosperity,<br />

but found only poverty. The alliteration and hard plosives of ‘big black bin bag’ create a<br />

gloomy, dark image not normally associated with light-hearted jazz music. I also wanted to<br />

portray the intolerance towards foreigners that also existed in 1920s America. Jan’s rhetorical<br />

questions show his sadness and dismay at the cruel attitude of the teenage boys. The line<br />

‘more xenophobic than most’ shows that he is used to widespread hostility. I also wanted to<br />

evoke pity; the sibilance of ‘dishevelled, semi-conscious…wincing’ is intended to bring out<br />

Jan’s vulnerability.<br />

38


Principal Moderator’s Comments<br />

Creative Writing Response: The Last Tube Train<br />

AO1 The creative response is generally accurate and clear. It follows a drunken Polish<br />

immigrant attempting to find the correct platform in order to catch the last tube train of the<br />

evening only to be accosted by a gang of youths by whom he is badly beaten and left. The<br />

use of description creates some sense of character and his situation through phrases such<br />

as ‘sluggishly drunk’ and the use of setting, the station ‘seemed like a labyrinth’. The use of<br />

language creates fairly convincingly Jan’s ‘lostness’ in the early part of the story. Moreover,<br />

a sense of waste and disappointment is revealed through the use of backstory and the<br />

innocence of the protagonist. Much of the piece is rather clichéd, such as the xenophobic<br />

boss, the gang in their ‘sinister black hoods’ and the way that they lean in a ‘nonchalant yet<br />

menacing way’. The backstory of Jan’s hopes could have been implied rather than<br />

explained. It is a shaped response and clearly structured without being particularly ambitious<br />

while some of the areas discussed in the commentary aren’t clear enough for the reader, as<br />

with the jazz music for example. This seems a rather strained attempt to use the stimulus<br />

text. Generally, however, it is an appropriate creative response to ‘The Great Gatsby’. There<br />

could have been some change of pace and tension created with the threat of the youths as<br />

the narrative tends to meander on to the end of the story. Band 3 13/20<br />

Commentary<br />

AO2 The candidate is clearly aware of how language creates meaning and has some<br />

detailed discussion of this aspect in the third paragraph of the commentary. At times, too<br />

much is intended by some of the choices the writer has made, particularly in the use of the<br />

stimulus. The idea of the ‘swimming mind’ doesn’t seem to tie very clearly to the fact that Jan<br />

is floating through life. However, the consideration of ‘sluggishly’, ‘blurring’and ‘slow’ is clear<br />

and effective along with the use of the word ‘labyrinth’ to create the sense of being lost.<br />

There is some sense of form and structure through the use of flashback in order to create<br />

character and theme and the attempt to lead the reader towards a sense of pity for Jan.<br />

There is also a sense of how setting can be used in order to create meaning. The focus is<br />

clearly on the student’s own writing but the space given to the stimulus text is unfortunately<br />

foregrounded in the second paragraph. This commentary has a clear grasp of the writer’s<br />

use of language, some sense of structure and form and how they create meaning. Band 3<br />

AO4 There are some appropriate links between text and contexts and a good understanding<br />

of the significance of contextual factors. The stimulus text is used thoughtfully here with the<br />

use of the difference between reality and dreams and the use of the flashback. The context<br />

of the setting is also deliberately constructed to symbolise the character’s own life while the<br />

awareness of the flip side of twenties America is interesting as is the idea of prosperity and<br />

poverty. There does seem to be here though a rather tenuous link with the stimulus as the<br />

candidate seems more interested in some of the ideas not presented in the ‘The Great<br />

Gatsby’ so that the use of the stimulus, at times, seems to be an ‘add-on’. This is<br />

emphasised in the ‘intolerance towards foreigners in 1920’s America’ which is a<br />

questionable use of context. However, there is a clear sense of their own context in the use<br />

of immigrant workers and the gang of youths along with the context of the stimulus text<br />

through the roaring twenties and the jazz music. Band 3<br />

Mark for commentary 14/20<br />

Final Mark 27/40 Band 3<br />

39


Appendix 1<br />

LT 2 SECTION B: Guidance on assessing Poetry<br />

Some features to look for when assessing poems<br />

• How much attention has been paid to shape and structure?<br />

• Is the poem written in a particular stanza? This may be traditional or the writer’s own<br />

verse form.<br />

• Has the writer tried to shape material in a controlled way?<br />

• If the poem is written in free verse, how well does the use of lines match the writer’s<br />

meaning or communicate the writer’s effects? In other words, does the writer have an<br />

effective sense of line?<br />

• How has the poem been structured? Is the development controlled by narrative –<br />

chronology of event or experience – or has the writer used a central image or<br />

extended metaphor to hold the poem together?<br />

• How imaginative is the use of language? Are the images, the choice of words<br />

individual, original, startling, appropriate? How creative has the writer been in<br />

exploring ideas and experiences and making links?<br />

• Young writers are very aware of the sound (aural) features of language. How<br />

sensitively has sound been used? Has alliteration/assonance been overdone, used<br />

for its own sake?<br />

• Has rhyme been used unobtrusively mostly, obtrusively when necessary, or has the<br />

compulsion to rhyme driven the direction of the language and meaning?<br />

• Has sound been used to link words and expressions to shape intention and sustain<br />

coherence?<br />

• Do the words show rather than tell? Or if they tell, is the telling new or surprising?<br />

• How necessary are the last lines? Endings can be very difficult: there can be a<br />

tendency to explain all that has gone before, to find a moral, recapitulate or to finish<br />

neatly in a way which narrows down the scope and possibilities of the poem. So<br />

endings can undermine the success of the poem.<br />

Unlike prose responses, a poetry response will usually consist of a number of poems. (Of<br />

course, there will be some long poems submitted.) Assess positively: some poems may be<br />

stronger than others. Reward the strengths of the collection, bearing in mind the key<br />

words of the AO and using the grid to find a best fit.<br />

AO1<br />

Articulate creative, informed and relevant responses to literary texts, using appropriate<br />

terminology and concepts, and coherent, accurate written<br />

expression.<br />

40


Appendix 2<br />

Guidance on <strong>WJEC</strong> administration of coursework<br />

The 5 steps<br />

1. Centres are required to assess their students’ work by applying the relevant assessment<br />

grids, which appear in Appendix 3, and which also appear in the Teachers’ Guide and<br />

specification.<br />

2. It is vital that all candidates complete a coversheet and that both candidate and<br />

teacher sign the coversheet to authenticate the work. According to JCQ regulations, if a<br />

signature is missing, the centre is asked to obtain it, or risk a mark of zero for that candidate.<br />

3. Where possible, internal moderation should take place, with teachers, or just one teacher,<br />

moderating the work of colleagues by inspecting a sample.<br />

4. Once standards within the centre have been agreed, a sample of work must be selected<br />

and sent to the external moderator. Exams officers will receive moderator details. In<br />

addition to the work, a marksheet must be sent, listing the sampled candidates only, in rank<br />

order. The work must be sent by May 15.<br />

5. A moderator’s report on the work of the centre is sent to the Exams Officer normally by<br />

early September.<br />

For advice on how to select the sample, please consult the online Internal Assessment<br />

Manual:<br />

ht tp://www.wjec.co.uk /uploads/publications/2019.pdf<br />

Note: The moderator may contact the centre to request further samples, so you are advised<br />

to keep the rest of the candidates’ work, (those not sent off as the sample) complete with<br />

coversheets, together in a safe place.<br />

The coversheet and marksheet for recording the sample can be downloaded from the<br />

subject area of the website via these links:<br />

http://www.wjec.co.uk/uploads/publications/6369.doc<br />

http://www.wjec.co.uk/uploads/publications/6371.doc<br />

Candidates must record the word count for their responses, and for Section A include a<br />

bibliography where appropriate.<br />

While <strong>WJEC</strong> does not penalise for excessive length, we advise that candidates risk<br />

penalising themselves through a possible loss in focus and organisation. We suggest a<br />

tolerance threshold of 10%, although this is a rough guide only. For example, for a word<br />

count of 750 in Section B, we would tolerate an excess of 100-150, but candidates must<br />

appreciate that producing a much longer piece makes it difficult for moderators (and<br />

teachers) to ensure a fair assessment of all candidates’ work.<br />

There is no requirement to hand-write any of the work, and no particular requirements<br />

regarding word-processing in terms of such matters as line spacing or font. It is important<br />

that the work is easy to assess for both teacher and moderator.<br />

41


AS <strong>ENGLISH</strong> <strong>LITERATURE</strong> LT2 Section A Assessment Grid (Note: all AOs in this section have equal weighting:10 marks each)<br />

AO1<br />

AO2<br />

AO3<br />

AO4<br />

Arti culate creative, informed and Demon strate detailed critical Explore connections and Demonstrate understanding<br />

Ba nds Marks<br />

relevant responses to literary<br />

texts, using appropriate<br />

terminology and concepts, and<br />

understanding in analysing the<br />

ways structure form and<br />

language shape meanings in<br />

comparisons between different<br />

literary texts informed by<br />

interpretations of other<br />

of the significance and<br />

influence of the contexts in<br />

which literary texts are<br />

coherent, accurate written literary<br />

texts<br />

readers.<br />

written and received.<br />

expression<br />

Response to texts lacks<br />

Understands literary texts at a Struggles to make connections<br />

Describes wider context(s) in<br />

1 0-10 relevance, structure and creativity. superficial level. Comments on between texts, Limited personal which a text was<br />

produced, with<br />

Limited understanding of ideas, surface meanings with little response. Can describe other limited or no understanding of<br />

with little or no terminology. connection to language, form and<br />

views with limited or confused significance of contexts.<br />

understanding.<br />

Frequent errors in expression. structure.<br />

Makes some attempt to organise Beginnings of awareness of the Makes basic, usually valid Some awareness of what can<br />

2 11-20 a creative response, particularly link between language/form and connections<br />

between texts, constitute a context.<br />

towards the top of the band. meaning at the bottom of the stronger towards the top of the Beginning to grasp the<br />

Occasional, not always relevant band, stronger towards the top of<br />

band.<br />

importance of contextual factors<br />

use of concepts and terminology. the band. Sometimes supports<br />

Some personal response with<br />

in shaping literary works.<br />

Expression features some views by reference to the links<br />

increasing awareness through the<br />

Attempts to make links between<br />

inaccuracies, particularly marked between meanings and the<br />

band that texts may be<br />

text and contexts.<br />

towards the bottom of the band. author's<br />

technique, with less<br />

interpreted in more than one way.<br />

support towards the bottom of the<br />

band. Occasional implicit<br />

readings.<br />

Makes an appropriate creative Clear grasp of authors' use of Clear and appropriate<br />

Makes clear and appropriate<br />

3 21-30 response to texts. Clear grasp of form, structure and language to comparisons/connections<br />

links between text and contexts.<br />

key concepts. An increasingly create meaning.<br />

between texts, particularly Increasingly detailed knowledge<br />

shaped response with relevant<br />

Increasingly appropriate textual<br />

appropriate towards the top of the and understanding of the<br />

use of concepts and appropriate<br />

band. Increasing evidence that significance and influence of<br />

terminology. Written expression<br />

support. Shows an increasingly<br />

personal reading has been relevant contextual factors.<br />

generally accurate and clear, detailed<br />

critical understanding of informed by other relevant<br />

particularly towards the top of the texts and response to implicit<br />

interpretations.<br />

band.<br />

meanings.<br />

Creative, effectively structured Sound<br />

analysis and evaluation of Specific and productive<br />

Specific and productive<br />

4 31-40 and often individual response to writers'<br />

techniques.<br />

connections<br />

and comparisons connections between texts and<br />

texts, particularly towards the top Overview and detailed critical between texts. Clear and<br />

contexts. Sound, confident<br />

of the band.<br />

understanding of texts with confident<br />

judgements which appreciation of the significance<br />

Incr easingly confident grasp of<br />

concepts and use of terminology.<br />

increasingly confident handling of absorb other critical opinions, and and influence of relevant<br />

Written expression is accurate implicit<br />

meanings.<br />

show some<br />

sophistication at the contexts.<br />

and fluent.<br />

top of the band.<br />

42


AS <strong>ENGLISH</strong> <strong>LITERATURE</strong> LT2 Section B Assessment Grid<br />

Creative Response Commentary (Note: AO1 and AO2 have equal weighting: 10 marks each)<br />

AO 1<br />

AO2<br />

AO4<br />

Ar ticulate<br />

creative, informed and Demonstrate detailed critical<br />

Demonstrate understanding of the<br />

Bands Marks<br />

relevant responses to literary<br />

texts, using appropriate<br />

Marks<br />

understanding in analysing the ways<br />

structure, form and language shape<br />

significance and influence of the<br />

contexts in which literary texts are<br />

terminology and concepts, and<br />

meanings in literary texts<br />

written and received.<br />

coherent, accurate written<br />

expression<br />

Response to texts lacks relevance,<br />

Understands literary texts at a superficial Describes wider<br />

context(s) in which a<br />

1 0-5 structure and creativity. Limited 0-5 level. Comments on surface meanings with text was prod uced, with limited or no<br />

understanding of ideas, with little or<br />

little connection to language, form and understanding<br />

of significance of<br />

no terminology. Frequent errors in<br />

structure.<br />

contexts.<br />

expression.<br />

Makes some attempt to organise a<br />

Beginnings of awareness of the link Some awareness of what can constitute<br />

2 6-10 creative response, particularly 6-10<br />

between language/form and meaning at the a context towards the bottom of the<br />

towards the top of the band.<br />

bottom of the band, stronger towards the band.<br />

Occasional, not always relevant use<br />

of concepts and terminology.<br />

Expression features some<br />

inaccuracies, particularly marked<br />

top of the band.<br />

Sometimes supports views by reference to<br />

the links between meanings and the<br />

author's technique, with less support<br />

Beginning to grasp the importance of<br />

contextual factors in shaping literary<br />

works towards<br />

the top of the band.<br />

Attempts to make links between text and<br />

towards the bottom of the band.<br />

towards the bottom of the band. Occasional<br />

implicit readings.<br />

contexts.<br />

Makes an appropriate creative<br />

Clear grasp of authors' use of form, Makes clear and appropriate links<br />

3 11-15 response to texts. Clear grasp of 11-15<br />

structure and language to create meaning. between text and contexts. Increasingly<br />

key concepts. An increasingly<br />

Increasingly appropriate textual support. detailed knowledge and understanding<br />

shaped response with relevant use<br />

Shows an increasingly detailed critical<br />

of the significance and influence of<br />

of concepts and appropriate<br />

relevant contextual factors.<br />

terminology. Written expression<br />

understanding of texts and response to<br />

generally accurate and clear,<br />

implicit meanings.<br />

particularly towards the top of the<br />

band.<br />

Creative, effectively structured and<br />

Sound analysis and evaluation of writers' Specific and productive connections<br />

4 16-20 often individual response to texts, 16-20 techniques.<br />

between texts and contexts, most<br />

particularly towards the top of the<br />

Overview and detailed critical<br />

productive at the top of the band.<br />

band.<br />

understanding of texts with increasingly Sound, confident appreciation of the<br />

Increasingly confident grasp of<br />

concepts and use of terminology.<br />

confident handling of implicit meanings. significance and influence of relevant<br />

Written expression is accurate and<br />

contexts.<br />

fluent.<br />

43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!