05.04.2014 Views

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 - Paper Audit ...

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 - Paper Audit ...

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 - Paper Audit ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A3. The judgments applied in different valuation situations <strong>of</strong>ten will be different. The<br />

examples in this appendix illustrate, in qualitative terms, the judgments a reporting<br />

entity that measures assets and/or liabilities at fair value might apply in varying<br />

valuation situations.<br />

The Valuation Premise<br />

A4. The valuation premise used to measure the fair value <strong>of</strong> an asset depends on<br />

the highest and best use <strong>of</strong> the asset by market participants. If the asset would provide<br />

maximum value to market participants principally through its use in combination with<br />

other assets as a group (highest and best use is “in-use”), the asset would be measured<br />

using an in-use valuation premise. If the asset would provide maximum value to market<br />

participants principally on a standalone basis (highest and best use is “in-exchange”),<br />

the asset would be measured using an in-exchange valuation premise.<br />

A5. When measuring the fair value <strong>of</strong> an asset in-use, the in-use valuation premise can<br />

be incorporated in the measurement differently, depending on the circumstances. For<br />

example:<br />

a. The fair value <strong>of</strong> the asset might be the same whether using an in-use or an<br />

in-exchange valuation premise. For example, that might be the case if the asset<br />

is a business (such as a reporting unit) that market participants would continue<br />

to operate. In that case, the transaction would involve the business in its entirety.<br />

The use <strong>of</strong> the assets as a group in the context <strong>of</strong> an ongoing business would<br />

generate synergies that would be available to market participants (market<br />

participant synergies).<br />

b. The in-use valuation premise might be incorporated in the fair value <strong>of</strong> the asset<br />

through adjustments to the value <strong>of</strong> the asset in-exchange. For example, that<br />

might be the case if the asset is a machine and the fair value measurement is<br />

determined using an observed price for a similar machine (not installed or<br />

otherwise configured for use), adjusted for transportation and installation costs so<br />

that the fair value measurement reflects the current condition and location <strong>of</strong> the<br />

machine (installed and configured for use).<br />

c. The in-use valuation premise might be incorporated in the fair value <strong>of</strong> the asset<br />

through the market participant assumptions used to measure the fair value <strong>of</strong> the<br />

asset. For example, if the asset is work-in-process inventory that is unique and<br />

market participants would complete the inventory into finished goods, the fair<br />

value <strong>of</strong> the inventory would assume that any specialized machinery necessary<br />

to complete the inventory into finished goods would be available to market<br />

18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!