06.04.2014 Views

Advocate Jan 2014

Advocate Jan 2014

Advocate Jan 2014

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

14 VOL. 72 PART 1 JANUARY <strong>2014</strong><br />

THE ADVOCATE<br />

it is the responsibility of Council to address, and act on the basis of, facts<br />

relevant to the merits of the question before it for decision, and not make<br />

such decisions on the basis of speculation, or extraneous or irrelevant<br />

allegations. 6<br />

During the very council meetings devoted to the serious question of<br />

whether the council could sanction the mayor for his admitted criminal<br />

behaviour and ever-escalating bizarre conduct, Ford intimidated at least<br />

one council member (standing menacingly in front of him and not allowing<br />

him to pass), actively taunted members of the public (getting his newly<br />

appointed driver to videotape the public gallery while the mayor and his<br />

brother, councillor Doug Ford, yelled at members of the public), made outrageous<br />

hand gestures designed to taunt other members of council and<br />

charged wildly across the council floor. Who needed speculative or extraneous<br />

evidence in these circumstances?<br />

The principles of the bylaw under consideration state:<br />

(1) The majority of members have the right to decide;<br />

(2) The minority of members have the right to be heard;<br />

(3) All members have the right to information to help make decisions,<br />

unless otherwise prevented by law;<br />

(4) Members have a right to an efficient meeting;<br />

(5) All members have the right to be treated with respect and courtesy;<br />

and<br />

(6) All members have equal rights, privileges and obligations.<br />

How, then, can a majority of members exercising a right to amend a<br />

bylaw after the minority is given an opportunity to be heard be said to be<br />

participating in a coup d’état? The notion is, like most of what Rob Ford<br />

says, complete nonsense.<br />

Sir Winston Churchill famously noted that “democracy is the worst form<br />

of government, except for all those other forms that have been tried from<br />

time to time”. Less commonly quoted is his preface to that statement,<br />

namely that “no one pretends that democracy is perfect or all-wise”. Rob<br />

Ford is apparently that no one. Not only is he prepared to pretend democracy<br />

is perfect and all wise but also that its very foundation is at jeopardy<br />

because he smoked crack cocaine and the majority of Toronto City Council<br />

decided to do something about it.<br />

Any imperfections in the process adopted by the majority of members<br />

of council (a huge majority, in fact) to strip an out-of-control mayor from<br />

causing further embarrassment and harm to the city he is duty bound to<br />

serve must surely be in the interests of the city. Ford was not elected to<br />

break the law or to be a vulgar idiot unable to function at a basic level of<br />

decency. Any argument that council stepped onto a slippery slope to under-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!