Advocate Jan 2014

Recommendations

Info

56 VOL. 72 PART 1 JANUARY 2014 THE ADVOCATE competency, confidentiality, marketing, party/witness/juror/judicial communications and others. Courthouse Libraries B.C. helps lawyers improve their competency, both in the classic legal research sense and with help in understanding technology. The definition of “competence” has evolved from the old Professional Conduct Handbook (“the Handbook”) concept of substantive/procedural knowledge plus other “skills to represent the client’s interests effectively”, 2 to a more fulsome definition of “competent lawyer”. Chapter 3.1-1 of the Code enumerates attributes that a competent lawyer must possess, including investigatory, legal research and effective practice management skills, plus the ability to perform all functions in a cost-effective manner. Our training programs, which we deliver to hundreds of lawyers yearly throughout B.C., emphasize not only cost-effective legal research skills but also skills that go to a broader concept of competency, such as using social media for gathering evidence in litigation. We use examples like Beattie v. Beattie, 3 which show that a reasonable understanding of social media is no longer really elective but mandatory in areas of practice like family law. Social media evidence can be fundamental to a case. Read Beattie, and you will not escape concluding that • conspicuous tweeting was the petitioner’s great undoing in her attempt to secure further spousal support based on need; and • any counsel who could have missed the evidentiary feast of Twitter boasts about Lexus ISC convertibles, red carpet galas, spa weekends and a knack for “killing pitchers of Raspberry Mojitos” would have serious self-doubt as to their own competency when confronted with this information after the fact. CLIMBING THE MOUNTAIN WHILE AVOIDING THE CLIFF We can promote competence with technology and acknowledge contradictions such as whether you use or avoid social media, it is at your peril. We stand on the brink of conceding that one cannot safely eschew technology and still run a litigation practice. But we see how a vigorous drive toward technological competency can also risk other ethical pitfalls. 4 It’s understandable how enthusiasm may be blunted by the inherently guarded nature of professional regulations. Once you decide to reach the altitude of “reasonable understanding” and join Facebook to scour for evidence damaging to another party’s guardianship bid, what’s to say you don’t fall off some ethical cliff on the other side? Did you camouflage your purpose in your online investigations or breach a
THE ADVOCATE VOL. 72 PART 1 JANUARY 2014 57 term of service to inveigle your way into viewing private information? There is tension between tech-savvy competence—knowing what you can do—and compliance with other ethical norms—what you may do. In the context of fast-paced technological innovation, it’s rarely the case that ethical and competency norms are simultaneously apparent. E-mail was long in use before the Law Society of British Columbia’s Ethics Committee finally opined in April 1998 5 that e-mail communication was not, in and of itself, a violation of the ethical duty of confidentiality under the old Professional Conduct Handbook. Likewise, the use of thirdparty service providers for electronic data storage and processing of confidential client information, or “cloud computing”, was commonplace for many practitioners before the due diligence guidelines of the Cloud Computing Working Group were issued over two years ago. As we devise another year of training programs for 2014, we look forward to offering guidance through training and other library resources to make your ascent to competence less perilous. Please visit our Stream blog 6 for a January 2014 post on tips for using social media responsibly in litigation. ENDNOTES 1. Also called “Web 2.0”, the social web refers to the online manifestation of social relations through networking services like Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn and other sites where user-generated content is key. 2. Chapter 3, Rule 1(c) of the former Professional Conduct Handbook. 3. 2013 SKQB 127. 4. Simon Chester, Doug Jasinski and Steve Matthews presented interesting materials on “Ethically Growing Your Practice with Social Media” at the 2013 Pacific Legal Technology Conference. They cover a range of ethical pitfalls relating to the social web. Materials are available for a fee through the Trial Lawyers Association of B.C. 5. “Advice to the Profession Regarding Transmission of Confidential Information over the Internet”, (1998) 3 Benchers Bulletin (June–July) at 8. 6. The Stream features practice-oriented posts from Courthouse Libraries B.C. staff and guest bloggers. See online: . t t t t t
Page 1 and 2:
THE ADVOCATE JANUARY 2014 VOL. 72 P
Page 3 and 4:
THE ADVOCATE VOL. 72 PART 1 JANUARY
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8: THE ADVOCATE “Of interest to the
Page 9 and 10: THE ADVOCATE VOL. 72 PART 1 JANUARY
Page 57: THE ADVOCATE VOL. 72 PART 1 JANUARY
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Because not everyone is this lucky.
show all

Advocate Jan 2014

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?