10.04.2014 Views

Bass River Elementary - Chignecto-Central Regional School Board

Bass River Elementary - Chignecto-Central Regional School Board

Bass River Elementary - Chignecto-Central Regional School Board

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Bass</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Elementary</strong><br />

<strong>Chignecto</strong>-<strong>Central</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>Board</strong><br />

Impact Assessment Report<br />

September 2012


INDEX<br />

Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 1<br />

<strong>School</strong> Information<br />

Enrolment History and Projections ............................................................................................ 2<br />

Population Patterns ................................................................................................................... 2<br />

Capital Construction Planning .................................................................................................... 3<br />

Physical Condition of Building .................................................................................................... 3<br />

Floor Plan ................................................................................................................................... 4<br />

Completed Major Maintenance Projects ................................................................................... 4<br />

Operational & Capital Requirements ......................................................................................... 4<br />

<strong>School</strong> Configuration .................................................................................................................. 4<br />

Building Use ............................................................................................................................... 4<br />

Determining Factors .................................................................................................................. 5<br />

Impact Analysis<br />

Capability to Deliver Public <strong>School</strong> Program<br />

Facility ........................................................................................................................................ 6<br />

Public <strong>School</strong> Programming ....................................................................................................... 6<br />

Educational Benefits .................................................................................................................. 7<br />

Transportation ........................................................................................................................... 7<br />

Extra-curricular Activities ........................................................................................................... 7<br />

Operational and Capital Requirements ..................................................................................... 7<br />

Catchment Area ......................................................................................................................... 7<br />

Operating Costs<br />

Operating Cost per Square Foot ................................................................................................ 7<br />

Operating Cost per Student ....................................................................................................... 8<br />

Staffing Costs ............................................................................................................................. 8<br />

Provincial Funding ...................................................................................................................... 8<br />

Operational Services Efficiencies ............................................................................................... 9<br />

Major Maintenance Identified ................................................................................................... 9<br />

Operational Efficiencies – Education ....................................................................................... 10<br />

Total Projected Operational Efficiencies.................................................................................. 10<br />

Impact on the Community....................................................................................................... 10<br />

Educational Services ................................................................................................................ 10<br />

Community Use of <strong>School</strong> ........................................................................................................ 11<br />

Infrastructure Development in the Community Area .............................................................. 11<br />

Small Rural <strong>School</strong>s .................................................................................................................. 12<br />

Proposed Receiving <strong>School</strong> Information .............................................................................................. 13


Closing ................................................................................................................................................. 17<br />

Appendices............................................................................................................................................ 18<br />

Appendix 1 – <strong>School</strong> Identification Reports<br />

Appendix 2 – Evaluation Process for Condition of <strong>School</strong>s<br />

Appendix 3 – Educational Spaces Ranking<br />

Appendix 4 – Determining Factors<br />

Appendix 5 – Data Sources


<strong>Chignecto</strong>-<strong>Central</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>Board</strong><br />

<strong>School</strong> Review Impact Assessment Report<br />

<strong>Bass</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Elementary</strong><br />

A joint committee of Educational and Operational Services presented in March 2012 an Identification<br />

Report to the <strong>Chignecto</strong>-<strong>Central</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>Board</strong>. This report was the first phase of a <strong>School</strong><br />

Review Process through the Nova Scotia Education Act as indicated by Sections 13-23 of the Ministerial<br />

Education Act Regulations.<br />

The Identification Report was the initial phase of the review process. This report utilized a number of<br />

factors in determining which CCRSB schools may be considered for further review. One of these schools<br />

was <strong>Bass</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Elementary</strong> in <strong>Bass</strong> <strong>River</strong>, Nova Scotia. An Impact Assessment Report would be<br />

developed for this school and presented to the <strong>Chignecto</strong>-<strong>Central</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>Board</strong> no later than<br />

September 30, 2012.<br />

There are two options being considered for <strong>Bass</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Elementary</strong> with this review. The first is status<br />

quo and current operations continue. The second is moving students to West Colchester Consolidated<br />

<strong>School</strong>, also located in the community of <strong>Bass</strong> <strong>River</strong>.<br />

Part 1 of this report includes school information from the <strong>Bass</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Elementary</strong> Identification Report<br />

used as a basis for determining the further review. Part 2 is an Impact Analysis. Part 3 provides<br />

information on West Colchester Consolidated <strong>School</strong>, the proposed receiving school under Option 2.<br />

<strong>School</strong> Review Impact Assessment Page 1<br />

September 26, 2012


Part 1: <strong>School</strong> Information<br />

The information in Part 1 is provided as part of the Identification Report within the first phase of the<br />

<strong>School</strong> Review Process. Sections of the report, with additional descriptions where applicable, have been<br />

provided in this section. The complete Identification Reports are attached with this Impact Assessment<br />

in the appendices for <strong>Bass</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Elementary</strong> and West Colchester Consolidated <strong>School</strong>s.<br />

<strong>School</strong>:<br />

<strong>Bass</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Elementary</strong><br />

<strong>School</strong> Configuration: P-4<br />

Address:<br />

139 Maple Avenue, <strong>Bass</strong> <strong>River</strong>, N.S. B0M 1B0<br />

Principal:<br />

Kevin Harnish<br />

Enrolment History and Projections 1<br />

Enrolments<br />

Past Enrolments<br />

Projected Enrolments<br />

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016<br />

# 33 32 26 23 22 20 18 19 21 21<br />

Yr to Yr %<br />

Change 0% -3.0% -18.8% -11.5% -4.3% -9.1% -10.0% 5.6% 10.5% 0%<br />

For the Identification Report the enrolments for <strong>Bass</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Elementary</strong> were based on a Primary to Grade 3<br />

Configuration. The 2011-2012 school years was changed to a Primary to Grade 4 configuration, with an<br />

associated adjustment at West Colchester Consolidated <strong>School</strong>.<br />

Population Patterns 2<br />

Population<br />

Colchester County<br />

Age 2001 2006<br />

0-19 12,735 11,775<br />

20-44 16,650 15,435<br />

45-64 12,635 14,670<br />

65-74 3,835 4,250<br />

75 & over 3,460 3,895<br />

<strong>School</strong> Review Impact Assessment Page 2<br />

September 26, 2012


The census data above indicates that the population has decreased from 2001 to 2006 up to the age of<br />

44. The population of persons 45 years of age and above has increased.<br />

Capital Construction Planning 3<br />

The Province of Nova Scotia has begun a new Capital Construction Submission. The CCRSB submission<br />

did not include any requirements for <strong>Bass</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Elementary</strong>.<br />

Physical Condition of Building 4<br />

Accessibility 2/6<br />

Cladding 1/8<br />

Doors & Windows 0/6<br />

Grounds 2/6<br />

Electrical 6/12<br />

Fire Alarm & P/A 1/4<br />

Heating 4/8<br />

Interior 8/24<br />

Plumbing 4/6<br />

Roofing 7/14<br />

Ventilation 3.5/6<br />

Total 38.5/100<br />

<strong>Bass</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Elementary</strong> is the eighth lowest ranked school within the CCRSB for building condition. The<br />

higher the cumulative points the better indicator of school condition. A more detailed description can<br />

be found in the appendices under “Evaluation Process for Condition of <strong>School</strong>s”.<br />

<strong>Bass</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Elementary</strong> is located in <strong>Bass</strong> <strong>River</strong>, Nova Scotia within the Cobequid Family of <strong>School</strong>s. The<br />

facility was constructed in 1912 and is currently 99 years old. It is a two story building with a total size<br />

of 5,953 square feet.<br />

The wood shingle cladding is original to the building and requires painting and/or replacement.<br />

Windows appear original (with the addition of aluminum storms) and, along with the wooden exterior<br />

doors, will require replacement. The asphalt shingle roof has reached 50% of its normal useful life.<br />

The electrical system is representative of a facility of this age and is at or near capacity. The heating fuel<br />

tank was replaced while the oil furnace has reached half its expected life. The interior floors, walls, and<br />

ceilings would benefit from a complete refurbishment. The plumbing and ventilation systems are<br />

representative of a building of this age. Ventilation is minimal with washroom exhaust only. There is no<br />

fire alarm or PA system installed in the facility.<br />

<strong>School</strong> Review Impact Assessment Page 3<br />

September 26, 2012


Walkways and pavement are in need of upgrades. The playground equipment consists of two sets of<br />

swings and one wooden playground structure and some climbing bars/slides.<br />

There is no wheelchair accessibility to the second floor and only one ramped entry to the main level.<br />

Floor Plan 5<br />

Figure 1 is a floor plan for the school, which may not include all revisions or changes presently at the<br />

school.<br />

Completed Major Maintenance Projects within the previous five years 6<br />

There were none planned.<br />

Operational and Capital Requirements 15<br />

There is one project on the 2011/2012 Major Maintenance Repair Projects List:<br />

Exterior Painting and Cladding $35,000<br />

<strong>School</strong> Configuration 7<br />

Regular Classrooms 6<br />

Library 1<br />

Building Use 8<br />

a. Age 99 (1912)<br />

b. Square Footage 5,953<br />

c. Additions n/a<br />

d. Percentage of Bussed Students 86% (19)<br />

e. Original Number of Classrooms 6<br />

f. Estimated Classroom Capacity 22<br />

g. Original Capacity (e x f) 132<br />

h. Current Enrolment 22<br />

i. Projected Enrolment (5 Years) 23<br />

j. Current Capacity Utilization (h / g x 100%) 17%<br />

k. Projected Capacity Utilization (i / g x 100%) 17%<br />

<strong>School</strong> Review Impact Assessment Page 4<br />

September 26, 2012


Determining Factors 9<br />

As required by the Education Act and as part of the Capital Construction process <strong>Bass</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Elementary</strong><br />

must undergo a review based on the following criteria:<br />

• <strong>School</strong>s with a past-enrolment decline exceeding the CCRSB average enrolment decline over the<br />

past 5-year fiscal period.<br />

• The physical facilities are unable to support the complete 2003/2004 Public <strong>School</strong> Program.<br />

• Capacity utilization currently is 50% or less of original school capacity.<br />

• Projected capacity utilization at the end of the next 5 year fiscal period will be 50% or less of<br />

original school capacity.<br />

• <strong>School</strong>s rated within the lowest 15% of the building condition index.<br />

• From the wages expenditures assigned to a school, schools within the highest 15% of the wage<br />

costs per student within the CCRSB.<br />

• (No) alternative educational facility within 30 minutes of travel time between elementary and<br />

junior high schools, and 45 minutes travel time for a high school commonly known as an isolated<br />

school.<br />

<strong>School</strong> Review Impact Assessment Page 5<br />

September 26, 2012


Part 2: Impact Analysis<br />

Capability to Deliver a Public <strong>School</strong> Program<br />

Facility 10<br />

<strong>Bass</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Elementary</strong> has Primary to Grade Four configuration. The school received a rating of 2 out of<br />

5 within the Identification Report regarding the capability to deliver the Public <strong>School</strong> Program. This<br />

indicated that some of the education spaces meet the program requirements with approximately 40-<br />

50% of the program spaces being adequate.<br />

The inadequate program spaces included those with the physical education and the music programs.<br />

For both of these programs, students are transported to West Colchester Consolidated <strong>School</strong>. A bus<br />

driver, with additional cleaning duties, is based at West Colchester Consolidated for transporting<br />

students during the school day, twice a week for music and similarly for physical education.<br />

A former classroom is utilized for the library program component. This room also has computers<br />

available for technology participation for students. Another classroom is used by the C@P program for<br />

community internet access.<br />

Public <strong>School</strong> Programming 11<br />

The Public <strong>School</strong> Program is not currently being met at <strong>Bass</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Elementary</strong>.<br />

• No music room; students travel by bus to West Colchester Consolidated for music classes twice a<br />

week.<br />

• No gymnasium; students travel by bus to West Colchester Consolidated for gym class twice a week.<br />

• No cafeteria service; a hot lunch is available to the students once a week when they travel to West<br />

Colchester Consolidated for music/gym.<br />

The following are the class configurations at <strong>Bass</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Elementary</strong> as of September 30, 2011.<br />

Class Configuration Enrolment<br />

Primary/1/2 (3/5/8) 16<br />

Grades 3/4 (6/7) 13<br />

The data for the identification report indicated <strong>Bass</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Elementary</strong> as Primary to Grade 3 which<br />

included combined Primary/Grade 1 and Grades 2/3. For the 2011/2012 school year the school became<br />

a Primary to Grade 4 location during the class configuration process due to the small number of<br />

students in each grade. This required an associated adjustment with Grade 4 students attending West<br />

Colchester Consolidated.<br />

The pupil to teacher ratio (PTR) is 14.5.<br />

<strong>School</strong> Review Impact Assessment Page 6<br />

September 26, 2012


Educational Benefits 12<br />

There are no educational programming advantages to <strong>Bass</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Elementary</strong> remaining operational at<br />

its current location. Programming would have the benefit of eliminating transportation issues and<br />

travelling between the two schools for music and physical education.<br />

Transportation 13<br />

<strong>Bass</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Elementary</strong> and West Colchester Consolidated <strong>School</strong>s are approximately 500 meters apart.<br />

The major change would be a reduction of inter-school transportation services for music and physical<br />

education programs.<br />

Student Transportation Services are outlined in CCRSB Operations Services Policy OS-T-01 which can be<br />

found at http://www.ccrsb.ca/index.php?q=node/221 and the associated Transportation Procedures<br />

that can be located at http://www.ccrsb.ca/sites/default/files/OS-T-01%20Student%20Transportation-<br />

Procedure-Revised-December10'08_0.pdf<br />

Extracurricular Activities 14<br />

The age of students within Primary to Grade Four and the total enrolment does not lend itself to a large<br />

involvement in extracurricular activities. The only extra-curricular activity is after –school crafts offered<br />

once a week for one hour from January to March.<br />

Operational and Capital Requirements 15<br />

There is one project indicated on the 2011/2012 Major Maintenance Repair Projects list for <strong>Bass</strong> <strong>River</strong><br />

<strong>Elementary</strong>:<br />

Exterior Painting and Cladding Repair $35,000<br />

Catchment Area 16<br />

The catchment or school boundary area for <strong>Bass</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Elementary</strong> is indicated in Figure 2. This<br />

represents no change to the current catchment area for the school.<br />

Operating Costs<br />

Operating Cost per Square Foot 17<br />

The Operating Costs for <strong>Bass</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Elementary</strong> per square foot is $2.68 per sq. ft.<br />

This is derived from a three-year average of annual facility operating costs, including routine<br />

maintenance and utilities $15,977. In comparison with other schools <strong>Bass</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Elementary</strong> is the 23rd<br />

costliest to operate.<br />

<strong>School</strong> Review Impact Assessment Page 7<br />

September 26, 2012


<strong>Bass</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Elementary</strong><br />

CROSS ROAD MOUNTAIN<br />

D R A F T<br />

CCRSB<br />

<strong>School</strong><br />

Catchment<br />

Areas<br />

Webb Road<br />

Silica Road<br />

<strong>Bass</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Elementary</strong><br />

WESTCHESTER<br />

MOUNTAIN<br />

= <strong>School</strong><br />

SUTHERLAND LAKE<br />

CASTLEREAGH<br />

L<br />

Highway-104<br />

2009 - nmb F O R C C R S B U S E O N L Y<br />

Old Castlereagh Road<br />

LORNEVALE<br />

New Castlereagh Road<br />

New Brittain Road<br />

Mines <strong>Bass</strong> <strong>River</strong> Road<br />

Back Road<br />

Mines <strong>Bass</strong> <strong>River</strong> Road<br />

MONTROSE<br />

<strong>Bass</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Elementary</strong> <strong>School</strong><br />

Maple Avenue<br />

. .<br />

Gerrish Valley Road<br />

Highway-2<br />

Unknown<br />

Starratt Road<br />

Brown Road<br />

Wharf Road<br />

Economy <strong>River</strong> Road<br />

Highway-2<br />

Wyvern Road<br />

<strong>River</strong> Phillip Road<br />

Elliot Lane<br />

Economy Point Road<br />

Highway-2<br />

Bentley Branch Road<br />

0 1 2<br />

3<br />

4 5 km<br />

LOWER<br />

ECONOMY<br />

CARRS<br />

BROOK<br />

UPPER<br />

ECONOMY<br />

Little York Road<br />

OOK<br />

Lynn Road<br />

LOWER<br />

FIVE<br />

ISLANDS<br />

LYNN<br />

FIVE ISLANDS<br />

POISON LAKE<br />

BASS RIVER<br />

HIGHLAND<br />

VILLAGE<br />

FIVE HOUSES<br />

SIMPSON LAKE<br />

ECONOMY<br />

MCCORMACK LAKE<br />

PORTAPIQUE<br />

LITTLE BASS RIVER<br />

Blue Sac Road<br />

OWER FIVE ISLANDS


Operating Cost per Student 18<br />

Operating Cost per Student $ 772.05<br />

CCRSB Highest Operating Cost Per Student $1,114.60<br />

CCRSB Lowest Operating Cost Per Student $ 200.73<br />

CCRSB Median Operating Cost per Student $ 560.39<br />

Staffing Costs 19<br />

The staffing costs are the net savings based on the transfer of students to the receiving school.<br />

The net educational cost savings with 0 FTE NSTU reductions $ 0<br />

The net administrative assistant cost savings based on 25 hr./wk. NSGEU $ 0<br />

The net administrative allowance cost savings (principal/VP) NSTU $ 4,547<br />

The net school monitor cost savings per day based on 0.75 hr. /day NSGEU $ 0<br />

The net educational assistant cost of 0 hrs./day NSGEU $ 0<br />

The net In-school Suspension Support of 0 hrs./day $ 0<br />

Subtotal $ 4,457<br />

The net custodial CUPE staff costs savings of .375 FTE $ 16,099<br />

Provincial Funding 29<br />

The funding formula for <strong>School</strong> <strong>Board</strong>s, known as the HOGG funding model, was revised for the 2012-13<br />

fiscal year. A number of the revisions had an impact on the funding allocation for CCRSB as it relates to<br />

Property Services associated funding, including but not limited to:<br />

1. Property Services funding allocation was previously based on theoretical square footage dependent<br />

on the number of students. One of the changes implemented was to use a 75%/25% split; 75%<br />

based on enrolment and 25% based on actual square footage.<br />

2. New recognition was provided related to "isolated schools" and "small high schools".<br />

3. Previously there was funding allocated for "small schools". This funding continues to be provided,<br />

on a grand fathered basis only, for ten of our schools. No new "small schools" will receive this<br />

funding unless they also meet the definition of "isolated".<br />

<strong>School</strong> Review Impact Assessment Page 8<br />

September 26, 2012


Therefore, with any school closure there is a potential for a reduction in CCRSB's funding allocation. In<br />

the 2012-13 fiscal years, that reduction would have equated to $10,200 for <strong>Bass</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Elementary</strong><br />

<strong>School</strong>. This would be due to the lost revenue from the grand fathering of previously identified "small<br />

schools" and the funding related to 25% of actual square footage.<br />

<strong>Bass</strong> <strong>River</strong> and West Colchester Consolidated are treated as one campus and therefore all educational<br />

costs for both sites are tracked to the West Colchester Consolidated school site.<br />

Operational Services Efficiencies 20<br />

A consolidation of <strong>Bass</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Elementary</strong> within West Colchester Consolidated indicates there are cost<br />

efficiencies.<br />

Property Services annual operating cost reduction $ 15,977<br />

Transportation Services – reduction operating expense $ 1,000<br />

Custodial Staffing Costs Reduction of .375 CUPE FTEs $ 16,099<br />

Total $ 33,076<br />

Major Maintenance Identified 28<br />

There would also be a potential cost avoidance of the noted Major Maintenance Repair Projects of<br />

$35,000. The age and building condition of this school suggests there could be increasing maintenance<br />

projects coming forward in the near future on a planned or emergency basis.<br />

<strong>Bass</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Elementary</strong> <strong>School</strong> ceasing operations would enable any potential funds being considered for<br />

its projects to be directed to maintenance at other schools. The normal funding allocation within the<br />

CCRSB for all Major Maintenance Projects was reduced from approximately $1 million to $720,000 with<br />

the 2012/2013 budget.<br />

Operational Efficiencies – Education 21<br />

The net savings from Education Services is $ 4,547<br />

<strong>School</strong> Review Impact Assessment Page 9<br />

September 26, 2012


Total Projected Operational Efficiencies 22<br />

Operational Services Efficiencies combined with Education Operational Efficiencies results projected net<br />

annual efficiencies of:<br />

Relocating all students to the other facilities:<br />

Operational Services $ 33,076<br />

Educational Services $ 4,457<br />

Subtotal $ 37,533<br />

This must be balanced by the anticipated provincial funding<br />

reductions with no longer operating BRE. $ 10,200<br />

Total Projected Operational Efficiencies $ 27,333<br />

There would be a cost avoidance for major maintenance identified of $35,000.<br />

Impact on the Community 31<br />

The closure of a school may potentially impact a community in two major areas. The first is community<br />

identity as the presence of a school, similar to a bank, post office and a grocery store, is an important<br />

component for residents. The school is often regarded with pride and makes the home community<br />

distinct from neighbouring communities. Secondly, residents may also feel that the school is an<br />

attraction in maintaining and developing economic activity in a community.<br />

The physical presence of a school may also be considered integral to the community for its use with nonschool<br />

related activities. These can include use for community events by non-profit groups,<br />

organizations, private/commercial firms and individuals.<br />

The situation with <strong>Bass</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Elementary</strong> is different. Primary to Grade 9 educational services would<br />

continue to be offered in the <strong>Bass</strong> <strong>River</strong> Community. Students would be combined at West Colchester<br />

Consolidated which is in close proximity to <strong>Bass</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Elementary</strong>.<br />

It should be noted that if <strong>Bass</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Elementary</strong> is found surplus to the needs of the school board it<br />

would be returned to the operational responsibilities of the Municipality of the County of Colchester.<br />

The County could still choose to operate the facility and the community use could be maintained.<br />

Educational Services 23<br />

The impact on the community may be minimal as the West Colchester Consolidated option is within the<br />

community of <strong>Bass</strong> <strong>River</strong> and very close to <strong>Bass</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Elementary</strong>. There should not be a large sense of<br />

loss by the community of educational services within the community as the school infrastructure for<br />

<strong>School</strong> Review Impact Assessment Page 10<br />

September 26, 2012


Primary to Grade Four remains in <strong>Bass</strong> <strong>River</strong>. There may be a sentimental factor in closing a<br />

longstanding community building.<br />

The agreement to use <strong>Bass</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Elementary</strong> as a C@P site has expired though operations continued. It<br />

could remain at the current location under the auspices of Colchester County’s operation of the<br />

building.<br />

Community Use of <strong>School</strong> 24<br />

The community use of <strong>Bass</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Elementary</strong> <strong>School</strong> is almost predominately with the external grounds<br />

on an unscheduled basis. West Colchester Consolidated is indicated as the preferred location by the<br />

community for the use of internal facilities such as the gymnasium.<br />

• C@P Site – Federal funds for C@P sites are in question due to announced budget restrictions;<br />

Provincial funds are still available. C@P site hours historically are June – September: Monday,<br />

Tuesday and Friday from 4:00 p.m. – 7:00 p.m.; Saturday 11:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m.; July & August:<br />

Monday, Tuesday, Thursday and Friday from 10:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m., Wednesday from 12:30 p.m. –<br />

7:30 p.m. During these hours staff is on-site. Programs offered: Programs for Youth, Technology<br />

training for senior.<br />

• Satellite Library is located at the C@P site. Public can borrow books, every 3 rd Thursday from 2:00<br />

p.m. – 7:00 p.m. When the library is open, staff oversees the C@P site during those hours. This is<br />

also a book exchange site for the Colchester-East Hants <strong>Regional</strong> Library.<br />

• Playground – Presently there are two sets of swings and one wooden playground structure and<br />

some climbing bars/slides at <strong>Bass</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Elementary</strong> (some of this equipment could be moved).<br />

Playground equipment, four sets of swings and a small slide, from another school deemed to be<br />

surplus to the needs of the <strong>Board</strong> was moved to West Colchester Consolidated for future<br />

installation.<br />

Funds were raised for further development at West Colchester Consolidated and they have secured<br />

approximately $83,000 from various funding sources for a playground/community park. Presently,<br />

West Colchester Consolidated does not have playground equipment.<br />

Infrastructure Development in the Community Area 25<br />

In April 2012 the Municipality of the County of Colchester was contacted regarding infrastructure plans,<br />

including, commercial, industrial or residential planning for the area. Specific information was<br />

requested about any approved development plans for the <strong>Bass</strong> <strong>River</strong> area.<br />

In its response the Municipality indicated there are no current plans for infrastructure development for<br />

the next five years which could change the enrolment or population patterns within <strong>Bass</strong> <strong>River</strong><br />

<strong>Elementary</strong> or West Colchester Consolidated <strong>School</strong>s.<br />

<strong>School</strong> Review Impact Assessment Page 11<br />

September 26, 2012


Small Rural <strong>School</strong>s 32<br />

The <strong>Chignecto</strong>-<strong>Central</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>Board</strong> understands the benefits of small, rural schools and<br />

continues to be very supportive of the educational environment that these schools provide for our<br />

students. The very small schools that are involved in this review process certainly provide a rich,<br />

community oriented and positive learning experience for our students. If the review process does result<br />

in the closing of this very small school, the receiving school(s), in all cases, would still provide the same<br />

rich, community oriented, positive learning environment that is so prevalent across our <strong>Board</strong>. In fact,<br />

some would say that attendance in a slightly larger school may have positive benefits in relation to<br />

socialization and exposure to a wider variety of teachers.<br />

<strong>School</strong> Review Impact Assessment Page 12<br />

September 26, 2012


Part 3: Proposed Receiving <strong>School</strong> Information<br />

This section includes information about the school to which students from <strong>Bass</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Elementary</strong> would<br />

relocate under Option Two.<br />

<strong>School</strong>:<br />

Address:<br />

Principal:<br />

West Colchester Consolidated<br />

27 Maple Avenue, <strong>Bass</strong> <strong>River</strong>, N.S. B0M 1B0<br />

Kevin Harnish<br />

Enrolment History and Projections 1<br />

West Colchester Consolidated<br />

Past Enrolments<br />

Projected Enrolments<br />

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016<br />

# 140 127 128 122 119 121 124 116 110 109<br />

Yr. to Yr.<br />

%<br />

Change 0% -9.3% 0.8% -4.7% -2.5% 1.7% 2.5% -6.5% -5.2% -0.9%<br />

2012 Combined Projected Enrolments – 145<br />

(<strong>Bass</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Elementary</strong> & West Colchester Consolidated)<br />

<strong>School</strong> Configuration 7<br />

Regular Classrooms 11<br />

Gymnasium 1<br />

Labs 3<br />

Library 1<br />

Music 1<br />

<strong>School</strong> Review Impact Assessment Page 13<br />

September 26, 2012


Current Grades 26<br />

Grade Configuration Enrolment<br />

Grade 5 23<br />

Grade 6 24<br />

Grade 7 28<br />

Grade 8 20<br />

Grade 9 17<br />

Proposed Grades – Projected September 2012 Enrolments 27<br />

Grade Configuration Enrolment<br />

Primary 6<br />

Grade 1 3<br />

Grade 2 5<br />

Grade 3 8<br />

Grade 4 8<br />

Grade 5 20<br />

Grade 6 23<br />

Grade 7 24<br />

Grade 8 28<br />

Grade 9 20<br />

Capability to Deliver a Public <strong>School</strong> Program<br />

Facility 10<br />

There should not be any changes to the school configuration at West Colchester Consolidated. This is<br />

due to the current configuration of grades 5-9 at West Colchester Consolidated and grades Primary-4 at<br />

<strong>Bass</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Elementary</strong>.<br />

The current additional capacity at the school has enhanced some of the educational services at West<br />

Colchester Consolidated. There would need to be a reorganization of some of the current space<br />

allocation enabling classrooms for P/1/2 and 3/4. For example, the possibility of combining a computer<br />

lab, currently utilizing an additional classroom, within the library has potential. The designation of lower<br />

grades on the first floor of the school and higher grades on the upper floor is possible.<br />

There should be no change to the physical education program as <strong>Bass</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Elementary</strong> students are<br />

already scheduled for its use. There would be no travel requirement from BRE to WCC to attend gym.<br />

<strong>School</strong> Review Impact Assessment Page 14<br />

September 26, 2012


There would be a reduction in the administrative designation of the vice principal at the <strong>Bass</strong> <strong>River</strong><br />

<strong>Elementary</strong> site as the population criteria for a consolidated school would not be large enough.<br />

The installation of an external playground area for elementary students would be beneficial. The types<br />

and locations of playgrounds and associated equipment for elementary use continue to evolve. The<br />

playground equipment for elementary use tends to be smaller and in a more compact area.<br />

The school received a rating of 4 out of 5 within the Identification Report regarding the capability to<br />

deliver the Public <strong>School</strong> Program. This indicated that 80% to 90% of the educational spaces are<br />

adequate. A typical classroom is approximately 900 square feet.<br />

Extra-Curricular Activities 14<br />

A list of extra-curricular activities is included in the appendices.<br />

Physical Condition of Building 4<br />

Accessibility 5/6<br />

Cladding 6/8<br />

Doors & Windows 5/6<br />

Grounds 5.5/6<br />

Electrical 6/12<br />

Fire Alarm & P/A 1/4<br />

Heating 4/8<br />

Interior 12/24<br />

Plumbing 4/6<br />

Roofing 11.5/14<br />

Ventilation 3.5/6<br />

Total 63.5/100<br />

The West Colchester Consolidated <strong>School</strong>, built in 1961, is a fully accessible facility. Exterior cladding is a<br />

mixture of brick and metal and is considered durable. Most windows and doors are recent upgrades<br />

with only a few replacements required in the short term. The metal gym roof was replaced in 2008 and<br />

approximately 30% of the remaining roof will require replacement in the short term.<br />

Some electrical system upgrades have been performed with more required. The PA and fire alarms are<br />

original systems and are in working condition. The oil tank has been replaced while the boiler is at 50%<br />

of its normal useful life. Flooring, ceilings, interior doors, and finishes would benefit from<br />

refurbishment. The plumbing is representative of a facility of this age. Ventilation is indicative of a<br />

facility of this era with exhaust air only and operates as designed. Minor upgrades are required in the<br />

washrooms. An additional washroom for potential use of lower elementary grade students was<br />

completed in 2012.<br />

<strong>School</strong> Review Impact Assessment Page 15<br />

September 26, 2012


The addition of an elevator allows access to all three levels of the facility. There is no playground<br />

equipment as would normally be found in an elementary school. Swings and a slide from a school<br />

surplus to the <strong>Board</strong> have been transferred to the school.<br />

There is a sports field and track on site.<br />

Floor Plan 5<br />

Figure 3 is a floor plan for West Colchester Consolidated and may not reflect all revisions which have<br />

occurred at the school.<br />

Completed Major Maintenance Projects within the previous five years 6<br />

2007/2008 Diesel Tank Replacement 15,000<br />

2008/2009 Roofing (gym section) 100,000<br />

2008/2009 Driveway Paving 110,000<br />

2008/2009 Roofing – Section 80,000<br />

2010/2011 Roofing Replacement-Sections 115,000<br />

2011/2012 Roofing Replacement – Section 95,000<br />

2012/2012 Additional Washroom 41,000<br />

Operational and Capital Requirements 15<br />

The following projects are indicated on the 2011/2012 Major Maintenance Repair Projects list:<br />

Roofing Replacement – Section $ 95,000<br />

Windows & Siding 75,000<br />

Fire Alarm System Replacement 60,000<br />

Boiler Replacement 125,000<br />

Total $355,000<br />

<strong>School</strong> Review Impact Assessment Page 16<br />

September 26, 2012


Building Use 8<br />

a. Age 50 (1961)<br />

b. Square Footage 24,184<br />

c. Additions n/a<br />

d. Percentage of Bussed Students 77% (92)<br />

e. Original Number of Classrooms 11<br />

f. Estimated Classroom Capacity 22/30<br />

g. Original Capacity (e x f) 282<br />

h. Current Enrolment 119<br />

i. Projected Enrolment (5 Years) 109<br />

j. Current Capacity Utilization (h / g x 100%) 42%<br />

k. Projected Capacity Utilization (i / g x 100%) 39%<br />

Transportation<br />

There would be no transportation changes for West Colchester Consolidated <strong>School</strong> students.<br />

Student Transportation Services are outlined in CCRSB Operations Services Policy OS-T-01 which can be<br />

found at http://www.ccrsb.ca/index.php?q=node/221 and the associated Transportation Procedures<br />

that can be located at http://www.ccrsb.ca/sites/default/files/OS-T-01%20Student%20Transportation-<br />

Procedure-Revised-December10'08_0.pdf<br />

Catchment Area 16<br />

The catchment or school boundary area for a combined <strong>Bass</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Elementary</strong> and West Colchester<br />

Consolidated <strong>School</strong> is indicated in Figure 4. This represents no change to the current catchment areas<br />

for the schools.<br />

Closing<br />

The Nova Scotia Department of Education provides guidelines for provincial school boards regarding the<br />

school review process. <strong>School</strong> boards use these guidelines in the development of their process when<br />

considering a school(s) continues providing education services within a community. The process is most<br />

often an arduous one and it is important that pertinent information is available on which to base a<br />

decision.<br />

This Impact Assessment Report has been written to provide CCRSB with the pertinent information<br />

necessary to make a decision regarding the future operation of <strong>Bass</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Elementary</strong> <strong>School</strong>.<br />

<strong>School</strong> Review Impact Assessment Page 17<br />

September 26, 2012


West Colchester Consolidated<br />

2009 - nmb F O R C C R S B U S E O N L Y<br />

Valley Road<br />

Highway-104<br />

Westchester Road<br />

Mines <strong>Bass</strong> <strong>River</strong> Road<br />

Reid Road<br />

Highway-104<br />

Back Road<br />

0 1 2<br />

3<br />

4 5 km<br />

..<br />

.<br />

Highway-2<br />

Wentworth Collingwood Road<br />

Unknown<br />

Economy <strong>River</strong> Road<br />

Economy Point Road<br />

Gerrish Valley Road<br />

RODNEY<br />

FIVE ISLANDS<br />

WYVERN<br />

LOWER<br />

ECONOMY<br />

ECONOMY<br />

CARRS<br />

BROOK<br />

WILLIAMSDALE<br />

BASS RIVER<br />

UPPER<br />

ECONOMY<br />

LITTLE<br />

BASS<br />

RIVER<br />

SUTHERLAND<br />

LAKE<br />

FOLLY<br />

MOUNTAIN<br />

CASTLEREAGH<br />

HIGHLAND<br />

VILLAGE<br />

Soley Cove Road<br />

New Brittain Road<br />

Little York Road<br />

Highway-2<br />

Lynn Road<br />

LOWER<br />

FIVE<br />

ISLANDS<br />

LYNN<br />

MCCORMACK<br />

LAKE<br />

ROSE<br />

ATKINSON<br />

LOWER GREENVILLE<br />

D R A F T<br />

OK<br />

R FIVE ISLANDS<br />

SIMPSON LAKE<br />

CCRSB<br />

<strong>School</strong><br />

Catchment<br />

Areas<br />

WENTWORTH<br />

West Colchester Consolidated<br />

= <strong>School</strong><br />

HART LA<br />

FOLLY LAKE<br />

LONDONDERRY<br />

EAST FO<br />

LORNEVALE<br />

LONDONDERRY STATION<br />

MONTROSE<br />

EAST VILLAGE<br />

West Colchester Consolidated <strong>School</strong><br />

GREAT VILLAGE GLENHOLME<br />

LITTLE DYKE<br />

LOWER DEBERT


APPENDICES<br />

<strong>School</strong> Review Impact Assessment Page 18<br />

September 26, 2012


<strong>Bass</strong> <strong>River</strong> <strong>Elementary</strong><br />

Configuration Location Principal Vice-Principal<br />

P-4<br />

139 Maple Avenue<br />

<strong>Bass</strong> <strong>River</strong>, N.S.<br />

BOM 1BO<br />

Kevin Harnish<br />

Lisa McCully<br />

Building Use<br />

a. Age 99 (1912)<br />

b. Square Footage 5,953<br />

c. Additions n/a<br />

d. Percentage of Bussed Students 86% (19)<br />

e. Original Number of Classrooms 6<br />

f. Average Number of Students Per Classroom 22<br />

g. Original Capacity (e x f) 132<br />

h. Current Enrolment (as of September 30, 2011) 22<br />

i. Projected Enrolment (5 Years) 23<br />

j. Current Capacity Utilization (h / g x 100%) 17%<br />

k. Projected Capacity Utilization (i / g x 100%) 17%<br />

Regular<br />

Classrooms<br />

Library<br />

6 1<br />

<strong>School</strong> Review Impact Assessment Page 19<br />

September 26, 2012


Geographic Locations / Community Use<br />

Eligible for community use through the <strong>Chignecto</strong>-<strong>Central</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>Board</strong>’s Use of <strong>School</strong><br />

Facilities Policy (OS-G-09).<br />

Two Closest <strong>School</strong>s<br />

1. Great Village <strong>Elementary</strong> – 17 km<br />

2. Chiganois <strong>Elementary</strong> – 28 km<br />

Capital Construction Plans<br />

N/A – The Province of Nova Scotia has begun a new Capital Construction Submission.<br />

Major Maintenance (from the 2011/2012 list)<br />

Exterior Painting & Cladding Repair $35,000<br />

Property Services Building Condition Index<br />

Accessibility 2/6<br />

Cladding 1/8<br />

Doors & Windows 0/6<br />

Grounds 2/6<br />

Electrical 6/12<br />

Fire Alarm & P/A 1/4<br />

Heating 4/8<br />

Interior 8/24<br />

Plumbing 4/6<br />

Roofing 7/14<br />

Ventilation 3.5/6<br />

Total 38.5/100<br />

Ranked 8 out of 76 schools<br />

<strong>School</strong> Review Impact Assessment Page 20<br />

September 26, 2012


Enrolments<br />

Past Enrolments<br />

Projected Enrolments<br />

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016<br />

# 33 32 26 23 22 20 18 19 21 21<br />

Yr. to Yr.<br />

%<br />

Change 0% -3.0% -18.8% -11.5% -4.3%<br />

-9.1%<br />

-10.0% 5.6% 10.5% 0%<br />

Trends<br />

(as of September 30 th )<br />

Past Enrolments<br />

Projected Enrolments<br />

<strong>Board</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>Board</strong> <strong>School</strong><br />

2007-2011 -4.2% -33.3%<br />

2002-2011 -15.4% -62.7%<br />

2012-2016 -3.6% 5.0%<br />

Staff 2011 Staff 2011<br />

NSTU – Teachers 11.4 Administrative Assistant 1.0<br />

Educational Assistants 1 Librarian 0.3<br />

Custodial Staff 0.4<br />

Administrative<br />

Assistant,<br />

Librarian, EA’s<br />

and Teachers<br />

include West<br />

Colchester<br />

Consolidated<br />

Population<br />

Colchester County<br />

Age 2001 2006<br />

0-19 12,735 11,775<br />

20-44 16,650 15,435<br />

45-64 12,635 14,670<br />

65-74 3,835 4,250<br />

75 & over 3,460 3,895<br />

<strong>School</strong> Review Impact Assessment Page 21<br />

September 26, 2012


Programs: (The ability as a facility to deliver the public school program.)<br />

Minor<br />

Major<br />

Rating: 1 2 3 4 5<br />

Costs<br />

X<br />

Annual total infrastructure operating costs per square foot and average for three years<br />

2008 2009 2010 Average Square Feet $ Per Sq. Ft.<br />

$17,236 $14,574 $16,122 $15,977 5,953 $2.68<br />

Ranked 23 out of 76 schools<br />

Annual wage costs per year includes CUPE, Non-Union, NSGEU, Teacher and average for three years<br />

2008 2009 2010 Average $ Per Student<br />

$14,672* $15,761* $15,890* $15,441* $772.05<br />

Ranked 7 out of 76 schools<br />

*Only includes salaries and benefits tracked to the school site and do not include any regional or family<br />

based costs.<br />

Recommendation<br />

X<br />

Determining factors does indicate further review<br />

Determining factors do not indicate further review<br />

Determining Factors<br />

• <strong>School</strong>s with a past enrolment decline exceeding the CCRSB average enrolment decline over the past<br />

5 year fiscal period.<br />

• The physical facilities are unable to support the complete 2003/2004 Public <strong>School</strong> Program.<br />

• Capacity utilization currently is 50% or less of original school capacity.<br />

• Projected capacity utilization at the end of the next 5 year fiscal period will be 50% or less of original<br />

school capacity.<br />

• <strong>School</strong>s rated within the lowest 15% of the building condition index.<br />

• From the wages expenditures assigned to a school, schools within the highest 15% of the wage costs<br />

per student within the CCRSB.<br />

• (No) Alternative educational facility within 30 minutes of travel time between elementary and junior<br />

high schools, and 45 minutes travel time for a high school commonly known as an isolated school.<br />

<strong>School</strong> Review Impact Assessment Page 22<br />

September 26, 2012


Extra-Curricular Activities<br />

Ball Hockey<br />

Arts & Crafts<br />

<strong>School</strong> Dances<br />

Activity<br />

Frequency<br />

Once a week for an hour from<br />

November – June<br />

Once a week for an hour from<br />

October – June<br />

Once a month at West Colchester<br />

Consolidated<br />

<strong>School</strong> Review Impact Assessment Page 23<br />

September 26, 2012


West Colchester Consolidated<br />

Cobequid Family of <strong>School</strong>s<br />

Configuration Location Principal Vice-Principal<br />

4-9<br />

27 Maple Avenue<br />

<strong>Bass</strong> <strong>River</strong>, N.S.<br />

BOM 1BO<br />

Kevin Harnish<br />

Lisa McCully<br />

Building Use<br />

a. Age 50 (1961)<br />

b. Square Footage 24,184<br />

c. Additions n/a<br />

d. Percentage of Bussed Students 77% (92)<br />

e. Original Number of Classrooms 11<br />

f. Average Number of Students Per Classroom 22/30<br />

g. Original Capacity (e x f) 282<br />

h. Current Enrolment (as of September 30, 2011) 119<br />

i. Projected Enrolment (5 Years) 109<br />

j. Current Capacity Utilization (h / g x 100%) 42%<br />

k. Projected Capacity Utilization (i / g x 100%) 39%<br />

Regular<br />

Classrooms<br />

Gymnasium<br />

Labs<br />

Library<br />

Music<br />

11 1 3 *1 *1<br />

<strong>School</strong> Review Impact Assessment Page 24<br />

September 26, 2012


Geographic Locations / Community Use<br />

Eligible for community use through the <strong>Chignecto</strong>-<strong>Central</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>Board</strong>’s Use of <strong>School</strong><br />

Facilities Policy (OS-G-09).<br />

Two Closest <strong>School</strong>s<br />

1. Chiganois <strong>Elementary</strong> – 28 km<br />

<strong>Central</strong> Colchester Junior High – 39 km<br />

2. Debert <strong>Elementary</strong> – 31 km<br />

<strong>Central</strong> Colchester Junior High – 39 km<br />

Capital Construction Plans<br />

n/a – The Province of Nova Scotia has begun a new Capital Construction Submission.<br />

Major Maintenance (from the 2011/2012 list)<br />

Roofing Replacement – Section $ 95,000<br />

Upgrade Washroom 40,000<br />

Windows & Siding 75,000<br />

Boiler Replacement 125,000<br />

Total $335,000<br />

Property Services Building Condition Index<br />

Accessibility 5/6<br />

Cladding 6/8<br />

Doors & Windows 5/6<br />

Grounds 5.5/6<br />

Electrical 6/12<br />

Fire Alarm & P/A 1/4<br />

Heating 4/8<br />

Interior 12/24<br />

Plumbing 4/6<br />

Roofing 11.5/14<br />

Ventilation 3.5/6<br />

Total 63.5/100<br />

Ranked 34 out of 76 schools<br />

<strong>School</strong> Review Impact Assessment Page 25<br />

September 26, 2012


Enrolments<br />

Past Enrolments<br />

Projected Enrolments<br />

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016<br />

140 127 128 122 119 121 124 116 110 109<br />

Yr. to Yr.<br />

%<br />

Change 0% -9.3% 0.8% -4.7% -2.5% 1.7% 2.5% -6.5% -5.2% -0.9%<br />

Trends<br />

(as of September 30 th )<br />

Past Enrolments<br />

Projected Enrolments<br />

<strong>Board</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>Board</strong> <strong>School</strong><br />

2007-2011 -4.2% -15.0%<br />

2002-2011 -15.4% -27.4%<br />

2012-2016 -3.6% -9.9%<br />

Staff 2011 Staff 2011<br />

NSTU – Teachers 11.4 Administrative Assistant 1<br />

Educational Assistants 1 Librarian 0.3<br />

Custodial Staff 2<br />

Administrative<br />

Assistant, EA’s,<br />

Librarian &<br />

Teachers include<br />

<strong>Bass</strong> <strong>River</strong><br />

<strong>Elementary</strong><br />

Population<br />

Colchester County<br />

Age 2001 2006<br />

0-19 12,735 11,775<br />

20-44 16,650 15,435<br />

45-64 12,635 14,670<br />

65-74 3,835 4,250<br />

75 & over 3,460 3,895<br />

<strong>School</strong> Review Impact Assessment Page 26<br />

September 26, 2012


Programs: (The ability as a facility to deliver the public school program.)<br />

Minor<br />

Major<br />

Rating: 1 2 3 4 5<br />

x<br />

Costs<br />

Annual total infrastructure operating costs per square foot and average previous three years<br />

2008 2009 2010 Average Square Feet $ Per Sq. Ft.<br />

$66,355 $47,735 $48,413 $54,168 24,184 $2.24<br />

Ranked 49 out of 76 schools<br />

Annual wage costs per year includes CUPE, Non-Union, NSGEU, Teacher and average for three years<br />

2008 2009 2010 Average $ Per Student<br />

$934,038* $1,155,561* $1,051,407* $1,047,002* $830.95<br />

Ranked 5 out of 76 schools<br />

*Only includes salaries and benefits tracked to the school site and do not include any regional or family<br />

based costs.<br />

Recommendation<br />

Determining factors does indicate further review<br />

X<br />

Determining factors do not indicate further review<br />

Determining Factors<br />

• <strong>School</strong>s with a past enrolment decline exceeding the CCRSB average enrolment decline over the past<br />

5 year fiscal period.<br />

• <strong>School</strong>s with a projection decline exceeding the CCRSB average projected enrolment decline over the<br />

next 5 year fiscal period.<br />

• Capacity utilization currently is 50% or less of original school capacity.<br />

• Projected capacity utilization at the end of the next 5 year fiscal period will be 50% or less of original<br />

school capacity.<br />

• From the wages expenditures assigned to a school, schools within the highest 15% of wage costs per<br />

student within the CCRSB.<br />

<strong>School</strong> Review Impact Assessment Page 27<br />

September 26, 2012


Extra-Curricular Activities<br />

Activity Number of Students Frequency<br />

Guitar Club 10 1 hour each week<br />

Leadership Group 20 10 months<br />

Yearbook Group 2 One day a week – February-May<br />

Girls Basketball 12-15 2 hours per week plus games<br />

Boys Basketball 12-15 2 hours per week plus games<br />

Cross Country Running 15-20 2 hours per week<br />

Girls Soccer 17 2 hours per week plus games<br />

Boys Soccer 17-20 2 hours per week plus games<br />

Track & Field 15-20 2 hours per week plus games<br />

Girls Volleyball 10 4 hours twice each week plus games<br />

Ski Club 20 Once a week from January-March<br />

Baseball 20<br />

Five days a week during May & June<br />

during lunch time<br />

Musical 30-40 2 hours per week from April-June<br />

Exploratory 20<br />

6 weeks each term for one hour per<br />

week. Includes: sewing, art,<br />

softball, wall hanging, outdoor<br />

experience, floor hockey and<br />

handcrafts<br />

<strong>School</strong> Review Impact Assessment Page 28<br />

September 26, 2012


Appendix 2<br />

<strong>School</strong> Review Process<br />

Evaluation Process for Condition of <strong>School</strong>s<br />

The relative condition of these schools was determined by calculating a condition index for<br />

each of the schools identified.<br />

Background information on the calculation of the condition index is as follows:<br />

- Eleven building “system” categories were assigned a maximum point value according to<br />

the approximate cost percentage that would be represented in a building replacement<br />

or renovation project. For example, if the total roof system required replacement it<br />

would represent 14% of construction costs.<br />

The assigned percentages of the building system categories and associated evaluation<br />

considerations are as follows:<br />

- Accessibility (6%) – Maximum points for accessibility to all areas of building including<br />

washrooms on all levels. Accessibility at all entrances also required.<br />

- Cladding (8%) – Durable materials such as brick and steel assigned a greater value than<br />

those requiring increased maintenance such as wood.<br />

- Doors & Windows (6%) – Exterior doors and windows and associated hardware<br />

evaluated.<br />

- Grounds (6%) – Access roadways, parking lots, walkways, and play fields assessed.<br />

- Electrical (12%) – Supply and distribution system and lighting evaluated.<br />

- Fire Alarm and Communication Systems (4%)<br />

- Heating (8%) – Heating equipment, distribution system, and associated controls<br />

assessed.<br />

- Interior (24%) – Flooring, ceilings, interior doors and finishes evaluated.<br />

- Plumbing (6%) – Distribution system and fixtures assessed.<br />

- Roofing (14%) - Condition and age of roofing systems considered.<br />

- Ventilation (6%) - Existing system evaluated.<br />

Property Services staff assigned values to all eleven categories on the basis of condition. For<br />

example, if the total roof system required replacement 0 points would be assigned. If 50% of<br />

the roof area required replacement, seven points would be assigned.<br />

<strong>School</strong> Review Impact Assessment Page 29<br />

September 26, 2012


Appendix 3<br />

<strong>School</strong> Review Process<br />

Educational Spaces Ranking<br />

Source – CCRSB staff qualitative assessment. The assessment rating is on a scale of 1 to 5 with<br />

5 being the highest rating compared to the current Department of Education requirements.<br />

Ranking 1 - The majority of educational spaces do not meet program requirements<br />

(0% to 30% of the characteristics are adequate).<br />

Ranking 2 - Some of the educational spaces meet program requirements (40% to 50%<br />

of the characteristics are adequate).<br />

Ranking 3 - Most educational spaces meet program requirements (60% to 70% of the<br />

characteristics are adequate).<br />

Ranking 4 - Educational spaces meet program requirements (80% to 90% plus of the<br />

characteristics are adequate).<br />

Ranking 5 - All educational spaces are considered superior and modern (100% of the<br />

characteristics are adequate).<br />

<strong>School</strong> Review Impact Assessment Page 30<br />

September 26, 2012


Appendix 4<br />

<strong>School</strong> Review Process<br />

Determining Factors<br />

1. <strong>School</strong>s constructed within the last 15 years will not be subject to review.<br />

Source - Age of school, as of September 2011.<br />

2. P3 schools will not be subject to review.<br />

3. <strong>School</strong>s which have undergone a provincially approved addition or alteration<br />

project within the last 10 years will not be subject to review.<br />

Source – Prior NS Department of Education Capital Construction Plans<br />

4. <strong>School</strong>s to have operational parameters changed by replacement by the province<br />

with a new school or through a provincial addition and alteration approved project<br />

will not be subject to review.<br />

Source - Nova Scotia Department of Education Approved Capital Construction Plan<br />

5. <strong>School</strong>s with a past enrolment decline exceeding the CCRSB average enrolment<br />

decline over the past 5 year fiscal period.<br />

Source – Family of <strong>School</strong>s past enrolment data.<br />

6. <strong>School</strong>s with a projection decline exceeding the CCRSB average projected<br />

enrolment decline over the next 5 year fiscal period.<br />

Source – Family of <strong>School</strong>s, enrolment projections<br />

7. The physical facilities are unable to support the complete 2003/2004 Public <strong>School</strong><br />

Program.<br />

Source - CCRSB staff qualitative assessment. The assessment rating is on scale of 1<br />

to 5 with 5 being the highest rating as compared to the current Department of<br />

Education requirements.<br />

8. Capacity utilization currently is 50% or less of original school capacity.<br />

Source - CCRSB Educational Services enrolment projections and school capacity<br />

using original design enrolment size where known or alternatively original number<br />

of classroom educational spaces and with 22 students assigned per space for P – 6<br />

and 30 students for 7 -12.<br />

9. Projected capacity utilization at the end of the next 5 year fiscal period will be 50%<br />

or less of original school capacity.<br />

<strong>School</strong> Review Impact Assessment Page 31<br />

September 26, 2012


Source -CCRSB Educational Services enrolment projections and school capacity<br />

using original design enrolment size where known or alternatively original number<br />

of classroom educational spaces and with 22 students assigned per space for P – 6<br />

and 30 students for 7 -12.<br />

10. <strong>School</strong>s rated within the lowest 15% of the building condition index.<br />

Source - Property Services - Building condition index for associated systems<br />

including: accessibility, cladding, doors and windows, grounds, electrical, fire alarm<br />

and P/A, heating, interior, plumbing, roofing and ventilation. With 76 schools<br />

within the CCRSB, 15% represents the 12 lowest rated schools.<br />

11. <strong>School</strong>s within the highest 15% operating costs per square foot within the CCRSB,<br />

averaged over the last three years.<br />

Source - CCRSB financial records. From the total operating expenditures of all costs<br />

related to maintaining and operating the building including maintenance, utilities,<br />

custodial, snow removal and operational (non-educational costs), With 76 schools<br />

within the CCRSB, 15% represents the 12 with the highest cost per square foot.<br />

12. From the wages expenditures assigned to a school, schools within the highest 15%<br />

of wage costs per student within the CCRSB.<br />

Source - CCRSB financial records. With 76 schools within the CCRSB, 15%<br />

represents the 12 with the highest wage cost per student.<br />

13. (No) Alternative educational facility within 30 minutes of travel time between<br />

elementary and junior high schools, and 45 minutes travel time for a high school<br />

commonly known as an isolated school.<br />

Source - Department of Education proposed funding formula<br />

Those schools indicated for further review through an Impact Assessment Report may<br />

contain data, statistics or other information about any of the following:<br />

- Current municipal or provincial plans for infrastructure development within the<br />

<strong>Chignecto</strong>-<strong>Central</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>Board</strong>.<br />

Source: Municipal reference for clearly defined and approved developments<br />

within the next five years.<br />

- Factors relating to student transportation to and from a CCRSB school;<br />

14. Bus transportation to an alternative school would significantly exceed CCRSB travel<br />

time procedures of one hour or be cost prohibitive. (To be identified with schools<br />

determined for further review within the impact Assessment component.)<br />

Source: CCRSB staff assessment<br />

<strong>School</strong> Review Impact Assessment Page 32<br />

September 26, 2012


- Proposed development, including residential or economic development within<br />

the <strong>Chignecto</strong>-<strong>Central</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>Board</strong>.<br />

15. Municipal approved residential development which will change enrolment or<br />

population patterns. (To be identified with schools determined for further review<br />

within the impact assessment component.)<br />

Source - Municipal reference for clearly defined and approved developments within<br />

the next five years.<br />

<strong>School</strong> Review Impact Assessment Page 33<br />

September 26, 2012


APPENDIX 5<br />

Data Sources<br />

1. <strong>School</strong> Information - Enrolment History and Projections<br />

Staffing projections for the following year are calculated through Educational Services.<br />

Each school keeps data which contains September 30 th enrolment from a number of<br />

years in the past, right up to the present. The projected enrolment for the next school<br />

year is calculated using a formula based on enrolment trends (either positive or<br />

negative) for each school for the last 6 years.<br />

2. <strong>School</strong> Information - Population Patterns<br />

Statistics Canada 2006 Census<br />

3. <strong>School</strong> Information - Capital Construction Planning<br />

Includes schools currently undergoing Additions and Alterations as approved by the<br />

Nova Scotia Department of Education. Other projects may be considered in the future<br />

following a Request for Submissions from the Department of Education – submitted<br />

April 2012.<br />

4. <strong>School</strong> Information - Physical Condition of Building<br />

Data provided by CCRSB Property Services Department.<br />

of ratings of components.<br />

Appendix 2 notes explanation<br />

5. <strong>School</strong> Information - Floor Plan<br />

Plans may be from fire plans at school or from construction plans, more often the<br />

former depending on a year a school was built.<br />

6. <strong>School</strong> Information -Completed Major Maintenance Projects within the previous five<br />

years<br />

Information obtained from the <strong>Chignecto</strong>-<strong>Central</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>Board</strong>’s Major<br />

Maintenance List as indicated by annual approved Budget documents.<br />

7. <strong>School</strong> Information - <strong>School</strong> Configuration<br />

Data provided by CCRSB Property Services Department<br />

8. <strong>School</strong> Information - Building Use<br />

Information obtained from staff historical data. Capacity utilization determined through<br />

calculation of enrolment/capacity. There is no historical consistency of classroom sizes<br />

<strong>School</strong> Review Impact Assessment Page 34<br />

September 26, 2012


and enrollment. A conservative assumption used within the Identification Reports is 22<br />

students maximum for elementary schools and 30 students for middle and high schools.<br />

9. <strong>School</strong> Information - Determining Factors<br />

See Appendix 4<br />

10. Capability to deliver public school program – Facility<br />

See Appendix 3 as determined by Educational Services<br />

11. Capability to deliver public school program - Public <strong>School</strong> Programming<br />

See Appendix 3 and as determined by Educational Services<br />

12. Capability to deliver public school program - Educational Benefits<br />

See Appendix 3 and as determined by Educational Services<br />

13. Capability to deliver public school program- Transportation<br />

Determined by CCRSB Student Transportation Services<br />

14. Capability to deliver public school program - Extracurricular Activities<br />

Provided by Educational Services Staff<br />

15. Capability to deliver public school program - Operational and Capital Requirements<br />

Information obtained from the <strong>Chignecto</strong>-<strong>Central</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>Board</strong>’s Major<br />

Maintenance List as indicated by annual approved Budget documents.<br />

16. Capability to deliver public school program - Catchment Area<br />

Developed by Student Transportation Staff according to CCRSB Student Transportation<br />

Policies and Procedures<br />

17. Operating Costs - Operating Cost per Square Foot<br />

Data provided by CCRSB Financial Services Department based on 2011/2012 fiscal year.<br />

18. Operating Costs - Operating Cost per Student<br />

Data provided by CCRSB Financial Services Department based on 2011/2012 fiscal year<br />

19. Operating Costs - Staffing Costs<br />

Data provided by CCRSB Financial Services and Educational Services Departments<br />

<strong>School</strong> Review Impact Assessment Page 35<br />

September 26, 2012


20. Operating Costs - Property Services Efficiencies<br />

Data provided by CCRSB Financial Services and Property Services Departments<br />

21. Operating Costs Operational Efficiencies – Education<br />

Calculation based on data provided by CCRSB Financial and Educational Services<br />

Departments<br />

22. Total Projected - Operational Efficiencies<br />

Calculation based on data provided by CCRSB Financial Services and Property Services<br />

Departments<br />

23. Impact on the Community – Educational Services<br />

Provided by Educational Services<br />

24. Impact on the Community – Community Use of <strong>School</strong><br />

Provided by Educational Services<br />

25. Impact on the Community – Infrastructure Development in the Community Area<br />

Response from Municipality in which school resides<br />

26. Proposed Receiving <strong>School</strong> Information - Current Class Configuration<br />

Provided by Educational Services<br />

27. Proposed Receiving <strong>School</strong> Information- Proposed Class Configuration – September<br />

2012<br />

Provided by Educational Services<br />

28. Capability to deliver public school program – Operational & Capital Requirements<br />

Information obtained from the <strong>Chignecto</strong>-<strong>Central</strong> <strong>Regional</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>Board</strong>’s Major<br />

Maintenance List as indicated by annual approved Budget documents.<br />

29. Capability to deliver public school program – Transportation<br />

Determined by CCRSB Student Transportation Services<br />

30. Capability to deliver public school program – Catchment Area<br />

Determined by CCRSB Student Transportation Services<br />

<strong>School</strong> Review Impact Assessment Page 36<br />

September 26, 2012


31. Impact on the Community<br />

Provided by Operational Services<br />

32. Small Rural <strong>School</strong>s<br />

Provided by Educational Services<br />

33. Middle <strong>School</strong> Configuration<br />

Data provided by Operational and Educational Services Departments<br />

34. Facility Schedule Considerations<br />

Related to East Pictou Middle <strong>School</strong> Impact Assessment<br />

<strong>School</strong> Review Impact Assessment Page 37<br />

September 26, 2012


<strong>School</strong> Review Impact Assessment Page 38<br />

September 26, 2012

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!