30.10.2012 Views

Edited by Chris Jenks - carlosmoreno.info

Edited by Chris Jenks - carlosmoreno.info

Edited by Chris Jenks - carlosmoreno.info

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ADVERTISING: THE RHETORICAL IMPERATIVE<br />

particular forms of success, appear to have been abandoned for ads which<br />

are seemingly purely <strong>info</strong>rmative in the face of these guidelines and the<br />

concerns which give rise to them.<br />

This essay will be concerned with the understanding of advertising as<br />

either persuasive or <strong>info</strong>rmative. First, it will look at the etymology of the<br />

word ‘advertising’, charting its development from the supposedly ‘innocent’<br />

sense of <strong>info</strong>rming (in Latin and in Shakespeare, for example), to the more<br />

suspicious and potentially morally questionable sense it has acquired of<br />

‘persuading’ and ‘influencing’. Second, it will show how the supposedly<br />

innocent sense has never existed and can never have existed apart from the<br />

sense of influencing. Third, the essay will assess the implications of this<br />

argument for the work of certain influential, if not canonical, texts on<br />

advertising. The work of Galbraith, Williamson and Williams will be<br />

examined here. And, fourth, the implications of this debate for advertising<br />

in general, and cigarette advertising in particular, will be drawn out.<br />

ETYMOLOGY<br />

The word ‘advertising’ comes from the Latin adverto and advertere; ad<br />

meaning ‘to’ and vertere meaning ‘to turn’. Our word has the root sense<br />

of turning to, of turning to something. It includes the idea of turning one’s<br />

attention to something, of drawing or calling attention to something. This<br />

idea may be developed to give the sense of giving notice of something, of<br />

telling someone about something. All may be subsumed in the general<br />

sense of <strong>info</strong>rming. It could be claimed that this is an ‘innocent’ sense.<br />

Without in the least wishing to suggest that the past is some honeytoned<br />

liberal idyll in which advertising itself is innocent, a gentle tap on<br />

the shoulder that draws attention to something, this innocent sense may be<br />

found in literature. As is presumably well known, Shakespeare uses the<br />

word ‘advertisement’ in Henry IV, Part I, written around 1590. In Act<br />

three, scene two, line 172, Sir Walter Blunt tells the King that Douglas and<br />

the English rebels have met at Shrewsbury. The King replies <strong>by</strong> saying that<br />

‘this advertisement is five days old’. Clearly, he means that this,<br />

<strong>info</strong>rmation is five days old: the word ‘advertisement’ is being used in the<br />

sense of ‘<strong>info</strong>rmation’. Shakespeare also uses the word ‘advertisement’ in<br />

All’s Well That Ends Well, written a few years later, and in the same sense.<br />

In Act four, scene three, line 197, there is a reference to an ‘advertisement<br />

to a proper maid’: the ‘advertisement’ is a letter which <strong>info</strong>rms someone<br />

about someone else—the letter is drawing the woman’s attention to some<br />

piece of <strong>info</strong>rmation about somebody else.<br />

Early forms of what would be recognised as advertising conform to this<br />

sense of the word. At the end of the fifteenth century, the first posted<br />

advertisements began to appear. These were handwritten announcements<br />

and they were posted up on church and cathedral doors <strong>by</strong> clergymen<br />

27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!