Edited by Chris Jenks - carlosmoreno.info
Edited by Chris Jenks - carlosmoreno.info
Edited by Chris Jenks - carlosmoreno.info
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ADVERTISING: THE RHETORICAL IMPERATIVE<br />
particular forms of success, appear to have been abandoned for ads which<br />
are seemingly purely <strong>info</strong>rmative in the face of these guidelines and the<br />
concerns which give rise to them.<br />
This essay will be concerned with the understanding of advertising as<br />
either persuasive or <strong>info</strong>rmative. First, it will look at the etymology of the<br />
word ‘advertising’, charting its development from the supposedly ‘innocent’<br />
sense of <strong>info</strong>rming (in Latin and in Shakespeare, for example), to the more<br />
suspicious and potentially morally questionable sense it has acquired of<br />
‘persuading’ and ‘influencing’. Second, it will show how the supposedly<br />
innocent sense has never existed and can never have existed apart from the<br />
sense of influencing. Third, the essay will assess the implications of this<br />
argument for the work of certain influential, if not canonical, texts on<br />
advertising. The work of Galbraith, Williamson and Williams will be<br />
examined here. And, fourth, the implications of this debate for advertising<br />
in general, and cigarette advertising in particular, will be drawn out.<br />
ETYMOLOGY<br />
The word ‘advertising’ comes from the Latin adverto and advertere; ad<br />
meaning ‘to’ and vertere meaning ‘to turn’. Our word has the root sense<br />
of turning to, of turning to something. It includes the idea of turning one’s<br />
attention to something, of drawing or calling attention to something. This<br />
idea may be developed to give the sense of giving notice of something, of<br />
telling someone about something. All may be subsumed in the general<br />
sense of <strong>info</strong>rming. It could be claimed that this is an ‘innocent’ sense.<br />
Without in the least wishing to suggest that the past is some honeytoned<br />
liberal idyll in which advertising itself is innocent, a gentle tap on<br />
the shoulder that draws attention to something, this innocent sense may be<br />
found in literature. As is presumably well known, Shakespeare uses the<br />
word ‘advertisement’ in Henry IV, Part I, written around 1590. In Act<br />
three, scene two, line 172, Sir Walter Blunt tells the King that Douglas and<br />
the English rebels have met at Shrewsbury. The King replies <strong>by</strong> saying that<br />
‘this advertisement is five days old’. Clearly, he means that this,<br />
<strong>info</strong>rmation is five days old: the word ‘advertisement’ is being used in the<br />
sense of ‘<strong>info</strong>rmation’. Shakespeare also uses the word ‘advertisement’ in<br />
All’s Well That Ends Well, written a few years later, and in the same sense.<br />
In Act four, scene three, line 197, there is a reference to an ‘advertisement<br />
to a proper maid’: the ‘advertisement’ is a letter which <strong>info</strong>rms someone<br />
about someone else—the letter is drawing the woman’s attention to some<br />
piece of <strong>info</strong>rmation about somebody else.<br />
Early forms of what would be recognised as advertising conform to this<br />
sense of the word. At the end of the fifteenth century, the first posted<br />
advertisements began to appear. These were handwritten announcements<br />
and they were posted up on church and cathedral doors <strong>by</strong> clergymen<br />
27