download deliverable - AIDE

Deliverable D4.2.1 Dissemination Level PU Contract N. IST-1-507674-IP
• Driver impairment (fatigue).
Finally, for the scenario description three different conflict situations were considered:
• Conflict between concurrent actions;
• Conflict between one action and DVE conditions;
• Conflict between multiple actions and DVE conditions.
In order to get a better impression of the scenario description, one exemplary is given in the
following:
AIDE design scenario 1.6: Conflict between two output messages
Action/s = {OP i , OP j }, where
i=1...3
OP 1 = Mandatory messages or important info related to the instant driving task
OP 2 = Temporary info related to the driving task, requiring an action in the near future
OP 3 = Permanent status-info related to the driving task, not requiring an action in the near future
OR output messages related to the secondary task
DVE Condition/s: DVE 1-5 =LOW/NO
Flow of events 1
1. OP i is executed
2. OP j is initiated
Possible AIDE solution(s)
1. OP i and OP j are presented in different modalities.
2. OP j is delayed until OP i has finished
Example:
Conflict scenario: A route guidance message is given. While the message is executed, an
incoming phone call is initiated.
Possible solution: The phone call is delayed until the route guidance message has finished.
Table 1 AIDE Design scenarios – Conflict between two output messages.
This description format is unique today and offers the possibility to handle the integrated
in-vehicle HMI taking into account the different HMI strategies of the OEM's.
The categorizations which lead to a generalized description of the functional extent of the
system form a suitable basis for further system architecture development and fulfil the most
important requirements with respect to scalability and flexibility. That is a crucial condition
for an introduction of AIDE functionality in future vehicles.
3.3. Evaluation of Adaptive Integrated HMIs
Presenter: Klauss Bengler, BMW.
BMW as a member of AIDE project and a representative of one of the major automotive
industries communicated the current state of the art on the integration fields and described the
adaptation approaches adopted from several up-to-date European and United States funded
projects.
Integration need occurred when several separate systems including in-vehicle
entertainment and safety systems were installed in the car. Today more and more IVIS (invehicle
information systems) and ADAS (adaptive driver assistance systems) applications are
integrated in vehicles which individually interact with the driver and sometimes even
dedicated I/O devices are used. The need for the development of a homogenous driver support
system which integrates different ADAS and IVIS functions emerges imperatively.
25/07/2005 14 ICCS