18.04.2014 Views

download deliverable - AIDE

download deliverable - AIDE

download deliverable - AIDE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Deliverable D4.2.1 Dissemination Level PU Contract N. IST-1-507674-IP<br />

For IVIS, distraction is clearly the most critical HMI issue. Although the phenomenon has<br />

been studied a lot we need to continue working e.g. on valid and efficient methods for<br />

assessing distraction.<br />

3) What are the main driving forces in this field?<br />

The main, sometimes competing factors here are the market and public safety. They need to<br />

be balanced.<br />

4) What types of HMI personalization are desirable/ feasible?<br />

Personalization could be considered in two steps:<br />

iii) 1 st step: “cosmetic” functions (mainly regarding skins, graphics,<br />

ergonomics aspects etc).<br />

iv) 2 nd step: more advanced dynamic personalization of the system (for the<br />

time being these more complex features are under investigation mainly in<br />

European projects like <strong>AIDE</strong> and their consideration is only in an early<br />

stage).<br />

‣‣ Friedemann Kuhn (EUCAR SGI)<br />

Topics/Questions<br />

1) What are, in your view, the key features of a future adaptive integrated drivervehicle<br />

interface? Does the HMI need to be adaptive and/or integrated at all?<br />

• Yes, the HMI should be both integrated and adaptive. Due to an increase of<br />

functions in future vehicles integration will be needed. Integration is needed from<br />

a packaging, cost and safety perspective.<br />

• Integrated HMI: several functions share the same interface to the driver. The<br />

more functions that will be available in our vehicles the bigger the need of<br />

integration of functions. Modularity is important. Integration is necessary if the<br />

number of functions will grow in the pace we foresee, for several reasons: safety,<br />

cost, efficiency and styling. The level of integration can be discussed, most of the<br />

SGI members felt that a well balanced approach needs to be found.<br />

• Adaptive HMI, the HMI could be adaptive to:<br />

i. the driver/user<br />

ii. the situation – some members in SGI thought this was difficult and were<br />

not convinced that this is useful. Having the systems adapted to the<br />

situation could make the driver confused. The vehicle will not behave as<br />

25/07/2005 24 ICCS

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!