Learning to be a lawyer in transnational law firms: communities of ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 1. The top 10 transnational law firms, ranked by Revenue at the start of the reported research Source: Firms’ websites and The Lawyer (2009) Firm Country of Origin 2008 Revenue (£M) Lawyers Global Offices European Offices Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom USA 1,380 2,100 22 6 Baker & McKenzie USA 1,374 3,627 70 23 DLA Piper* USA/England 1,319 2,267 59 29 Linklaters England 1,298 2,367 30 17 Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer England 1,287 2,263 28 16 Clifford Chance England 1,262 2,904 28 13 Latham & Watkins USA 1,192 2,150 22 9 Allen & Overy England 1,091 2,122 25 14 Sidley Austin USA 928 1,892 16 4 Jones Day USA 818 2,516 29 7 *DLA Piper is split into dual firm down English and USA lines. Totals here are combined from the two entities. 36
Table 2: The link between institutions, manufacturing firms’ best practices and workers’ economic behaviour. Source: adapted from Whitley (2001, 39-42). Particularistic environments Collaborative environments Arm’s length environments Institutional context No institutions encouraging collaboration or trust between workers or firms and weakly enforced formal and informal institutions Existence of many formal and strictly enforced institutions that tie the fortunes of workers and firms and firms and subcontractors and clients together Flexible institutions that explicitly promote trust and collaboration with legal systems designed to coordinate economic activities rather than excessively control Common firm types produced by institutional context Opportunistic – firms seek short term profits with little investment in the future. Little employee-employer cooperation and no firm-sub-contractor trust Cooperate hierarchy – firms seek to collaborate to build long-term strength. Workers actively involved in firm hierarchies and longterm and collaborative relationships with sub-contractors Isolated hierarchy – firms operate independently and seek to minimise impact of institutions on operations. Little formal employee involvement in the running of firms and limited collaboration with sub-contractors Exemplary country China Germany USA 37
Page 1 and 2: Learning to be a lawyer in transnat
Page 3 and 4: Introduction As part of empirical a
Page 5 and 6: posed by institutions whilst the pe
Page 7 and 8: are displayed in nationally-variabl
Page 9 and 10: England institutions exist which le
Page 11 and 12: training services to law firms. All
Page 13 and 14: and ethos of such programmes is cap
Page 15 and 16: are, however, more useful for allow
Page 17 and 18: ecause, as Table 3 reveals, lawyers
Page 19 and 20: programme as quickly as possible. S
Page 21 and 22: “ …we had the chance be four in
Page 23 and 24: Promoting the right values Despite
Page 25 and 26: junior lawyers working in Italy sai
Page 27 and 28: practices of a lawyer. One lawyer s
Page 29 and 30: transnational law firms that seek t
Page 31 and 32: Notes 1 As such, work on the link b
Page 33 and 34: Djelic, M. L. & Quack, S. (2003) 'T
Page 35: Rosen, R. E. (2002) 'We're All Cons
Page 39 and 40: Table 4. Skills and associated best
Page 41: Table 6: Quotations that outline th

Learning to be a lawyer in transnational law firms: communities of ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?