28.04.2014 Views

WC500165698

WC500165698

WC500165698

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Summary of advice<br />

The PRAC acknowledged that regarding the cancer signal, 3 reviews of mechanistic studies, one metaanalysis<br />

of randomized trials and observational studies, 3 clinical trials and 8 observational studies had<br />

been conducted. For insulin glargine in particular, publications of 2 non-clinical studies, one clinical trial<br />

and 7 observational studies were assessed. Regarding the signal of cardiovascular morbidity, a series<br />

of papers retrieved following a literature search were reviewed. Overall, 7 mechanistic studies, 11<br />

randomized trials, 2 meta-analyses of randomized trials and 22 observational studies were assessed.<br />

In addition to assessing these publications, the MHRA performed a Drug Utilisation Study using the<br />

Clinical Practice Research Datalink to examine how insulin is being used to treat type 2 diabetes in the<br />

UK, and compared this with recommendations for use of insulin described in national clinical guidance.<br />

The PRAC stressed that the cancer risk associated with insulin use in the treatment of type 2 diabetes<br />

is the focus of highly-active and fast-moving research. Nonetheless, the currently available studies of<br />

relevance have too many methodological limitations to allow a conclusion to be reached on causality.<br />

From the assessment of cardiovascular morbidity, although there is currently very little evidence that<br />

use of insulin in type 2 diabetes leads to a reduction in MACE, there is also no consistent evidence of<br />

cardiovascular harm from use of insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes, while acknowledging some<br />

exceptions (ACCORD trial).<br />

Overall, no regulatory action is considered necessary. The PRAC considered that at this stage, given<br />

the limitations of the evidence currently available and in anticipation of the study results that will<br />

become available from a range of studies, no revisions are required to the RMPs for insulin-containing<br />

products.<br />

12. Organisational, regulatory and methodological matters<br />

12.1. Mandate and organisation of the PRAC<br />

12.1.1. PRAC Rules of Procedure<br />

<br />

Revision of the Rules of Procedure<br />

The PRAC adopted a revised version of the rules of procedure following incorporation of Regulation<br />

(EU) 1235/2010 and Directive 2010/84/EU into the Agreement on the European Economic Area (“the<br />

EEA Agreement”). The PRAC Rules of Procedure have been amended to be in line with other EMA<br />

Scientific Committees to reflect the involvement of Members nominated by the EEA-EFTA countries in<br />

the PRAC. They will be published after receiving a favourable opinion from the Commission and the<br />

EMA Management Board.<br />

Post meeting note: the revised Rules of Procedure received a favourable opinion from the EMA<br />

Management Board at its 20 March 2014 meeting and by the EC on 9 April 2014 and will be published<br />

on the EMA website.<br />

12.2. Pharmacovigilance audits and inspections<br />

12.2.1. Pharmacovigilance Inspections<br />

12.2.1.1. Union Procedure on Follow-up to Pharmacovigilance Inspections<br />

<br />

<br />

Union procedure on the coordination of EU pharmacovigilance inspections<br />

Union procedure on sharing of pharmacovigilance inspection information<br />

Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC)<br />

EMA/PRAC/253432/2014 Page 38/64

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!