30.04.2014 Views

Judicial Compensation in New York: A National Perspective, Report

Judicial Compensation in New York: A National Perspective, Report

Judicial Compensation in New York: A National Perspective, Report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

REPORT TO THE CHIEF JUDGE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 3<br />

4. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS<br />

• Reliance on legislative and appropriation processes to set judicial salaries greatly<br />

<strong>in</strong>creases the likelihood that judicial pay issues will be held captive to unrelated differences<br />

between the political branches of government, or to dissatisfaction with<br />

specific court decisions.<br />

• <strong>Judicial</strong> salary issues should be <strong>in</strong>sulated from the political process. <strong>Judicial</strong> pay levels<br />

should be set regularly and justified based on accepted, easy to measure, objective<br />

benchmarks that render the process more transparent and less political.<br />

• Permanent bipartisan/nonpartisan compensation commissions, such as the one<br />

proposed by the <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> State Judiciary, are the best vehicles for achiev<strong>in</strong>g credible<br />

review of judicial salaries.<br />

• <strong>Judicial</strong> salaries <strong>in</strong> <strong>New</strong> <strong>York</strong> should be adjusted to fair and competitive levels, and<br />

Chief Judge Kaye’s legislative proposal to establish a permanent commission-based<br />

system for the regular adjustment of judicial salaries should be enacted.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!