03.05.2014 Views

immigrants' use of prestige brands to convey status - Emerald

immigrants' use of prestige brands to convey status - Emerald

immigrants' use of prestige brands to convey status - Emerald

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Method<br />

To more accurately capture ethnic identity and behavior in<br />

natural settings, this study employed field research conducted<br />

in retail shops located in ethnic neighborhoods (in the<br />

Chicago area). This approach allowed for a realistic<br />

examination <strong>of</strong> the effects <strong>of</strong> ethnic identity on shopping<br />

behavior (Forsythe et al., 1999). Retail s<strong>to</strong>re cus<strong>to</strong>mers were<br />

randomly selected in retail sites and they received a gift card<br />

($2) as an incentive. This study included only female<br />

cus<strong>to</strong>mers in order <strong>to</strong> eliminate the potential for gender<br />

bias. The surveys were prepared in English, Spanish, and<br />

Korean due <strong>to</strong> the large Korean population in the region.<br />

Translation and back-translation techniques were <strong>use</strong>d and<br />

bilingual researchers cross-examined both versions. The<br />

questionnaire <strong>to</strong>ok about 10 minutes <strong>to</strong> complete. Usable<br />

survey collection resulted in a <strong>to</strong>tal <strong>of</strong> 324. Two ethnic<br />

groups, Hispanics (n ¼ 173) and Asians (n ¼ 151)<br />

participated in this study. Demographic characteristics <strong>of</strong><br />

the respondents are presented in Table I.<br />

Measurements<br />

A price-brand <strong>prestige</strong> scale (Netemeyer et al., 1995)<br />

consisted <strong>of</strong> six questions; coefficient alpha reliability for the<br />

scale was 0.79 in this study. Participants were asked <strong>to</strong><br />

indicate the degree <strong>to</strong> which they agreed with each statement.<br />

The statements were measured on a five-point Likert-type<br />

scale (1 ¼ strongly disagree; 5 ¼ strongly agree). In this scale,<br />

a high score indicates that a consumer generally believes that<br />

purchasing high-priced <strong>brands</strong> lead <strong>to</strong> greater enjoyment and<br />

better impressions <strong>of</strong> her <strong>status</strong>. A lower score suggests that a<br />

Table I Demographic characteristics <strong>of</strong> participants<br />

Characteristics n Percent<br />

Residency in the USA<br />

Less than 3 years 55 17.0<br />

3-10 years 89 27.5<br />

11-15 years 51 15.7<br />

16-20 years 55 17.0<br />

Over 20 years 72 22.2<br />

Age<br />

25 years or less 116 35.8<br />

26-35 98 30.2<br />

36-45 51 15.7<br />

46-55 34 10.5<br />

Over 56 25 7.7<br />

Individual income<br />

Below $15,000 133 34.9<br />

$15,001-25,000 78 24.0<br />

$25,001-35,000 64 19.8<br />

$35,001-45,000 49 15.1<br />

Education<br />

Elementary 24 7.4<br />

Middle school 38 11.7<br />

High school 116 35.8<br />

Associate degree 66 20.4<br />

Undergraduate and beyond 80 24.7<br />

Note: n ¼ 324<br />

Immigrants’ <strong>use</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>prestige</strong> <strong>brands</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>convey</strong> <strong>status</strong><br />

Lynn Eunjung Kwak and Jane Z. Sojka<br />

consumer does not see a general association between price<br />

and <strong>prestige</strong>. A principal component fac<strong>to</strong>r analysis among<br />

these items resulted in one fac<strong>to</strong>r (see Table II). Fac<strong>to</strong>r<br />

loadings ranged from 0.57 <strong>to</strong> 0.79. Respondents were asked<br />

“how strongly do you identify with your ethnic culture?” <strong>to</strong><br />

measure their strength <strong>of</strong> ethnic identification. The statement<br />

was also measured on a five-point Likert-type scale<br />

(1 ¼ strongly disagree; 5 ¼ strongly agree).<br />

Results<br />

H1 through H5 were tested using regression analyses. The<br />

results (see Table III) indicated that the strength <strong>of</strong> ethnic<br />

identification (b ¼ 0.10, p , 0.05) and higher income<br />

(b ¼ 0.12, p , 0.05) predicted a preference for high-priced<br />

<strong>prestige</strong> <strong>brands</strong>. Age (b ¼ 20.27, p , 0.05) negatively related<br />

<strong>to</strong> the preference for high-priced <strong>prestige</strong> <strong>brands</strong>. Therefore,<br />

H1 (a degree <strong>of</strong> ethnic identification), H4 (income level), and<br />

H5 (age) were supported. These independent variables were<br />

significantly related <strong>to</strong> a preference for high-priced <strong>prestige</strong><br />

<strong>brands</strong>. Length <strong>of</strong> residency in the USA (b ¼ 0.09, p . 0.05)<br />

and education (b ¼ 20.05, p . 0.05) were not related <strong>to</strong><br />

preference for high-priced <strong>prestige</strong> <strong>brands</strong>. Therefore, H2 (the<br />

length <strong>of</strong> residency in the USA will have no relation <strong>to</strong> a<br />

Table II Question items and fac<strong>to</strong>r loadings for price-brand <strong>prestige</strong><br />

Items<br />

Journal <strong>of</strong> Consumer Marketing<br />

Volume 27 · Number 4 · 2010 · 371–380<br />

Fac<strong>to</strong>r Cronbach’s<br />

loading a<br />

People notice when you buy the most expensive<br />

brand <strong>of</strong> a product 0.57 0.79<br />

Buying the most expensive brand <strong>of</strong> a product<br />

makes me feel classy 0.68<br />

I enjoy the <strong>prestige</strong> <strong>of</strong> buying a high-priced<br />

brand 0.70<br />

It says something <strong>to</strong> people when you buy the<br />

high- priced version <strong>of</strong> a product 0.74<br />

I have purchased the most expensive brand <strong>of</strong> a<br />

product just beca<strong>use</strong> I knew other people<br />

would notice 0.79<br />

Even for a relatively inexpensive product, I<br />

think that buying a costly brand is impressive 0.70<br />

Eigenvalues 2.97<br />

Percentage <strong>of</strong> variance 49.54<br />

Table III Regression analysis <strong>of</strong> the demographic characteristics on the<br />

preference for high-priced <strong>prestige</strong> <strong>brands</strong><br />

Standardized coefficients<br />

Demographic characteristics b t p<br />

Strength <strong>of</strong> ethnic identification 0.10 1.97 0.04<br />

Length <strong>of</strong> residency 0.09 1.73 0.08<br />

Education 20.06 20.05 0.34<br />

Income 0.12 2.05 0.04<br />

Age 20.27 24.50 0.00<br />

(constant) 2.8 11.35<br />

R 2 0.08<br />

F 4,313 ¼ 6.87,<br />

p # 0.05<br />

Adjusted R 2 .06<br />

374

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!