SOUTHEAST Sector Plan - City of Oklahoma City

SOUTHEAST
Sector Plan
An amendment to the
OKC Plan, 2000-2020
The City of
OKLAHOMA CITY
As Adopted February 22, 2007

Southeast Sector Plan
CONTRIBUTORS
Southeast Sector Plan Team Members
Sen. Cliff Aldridge
Jim Allen
Derrick Ashong
Rep. Gary Banz
Betty Bauer
J. Dwight Burchett
Ed Burnett
John M. Byrd
Carol Cline
JJ Cook
Roy Copeland
Jeremy Cox
Steve Cusack
Bill Dalke
Ryan Epley
Kristi Gifford
Linda Harrell
Mike Houlette
James Jordan
Sunnie Killian
Robert Krueger
Walt Kula
Tom Leatherbee
Wilburn Lee
Michelle Liu
Paul McDoulett
Jim McWhirter
Gregory T. Metty
Tracy J Moore Brice
LouAnna Munkres
Carol Murray
Fran Olsen Sharp
Marilyn Petricek
William & Barbara Phelps
Dan Reeves
John Sharp
Art Snider
Michael Starega
Carl Sullivan
Gene Thomas
Miles Walker
James Wheatley
Councilman Pete White
Ray & LeAnn White
Perry L Williams
City of Oklahoma City Planning Department
John Dugan, Planning Director
Aubrey Hammontree, Project Planner
Kelly Driscoll
Lanc Gross
Other Assistance
Charles Allen, Major, Santa Fe Division, Oklahoma City Police Department
Bob Fabian, Geologist, Planning &Management Division, Oklahoma Water Resources Board
Monte Hannon, Water Quality Superintendent, Oklahoma City Water / Wastewater Utilities
Department
Bryan Heirston, Deputy Chief, Oklahoma City Fire Department
Allen Jones, Chief Plant Operator, Oklahoma City Water Department
James Linn II, Oklahoma City Water and Wastewater, Solid Waste Management Division
Shea Otley, State Historic Preservation Office
Paul Ryckbost, Project Manager, GO Bond Program, Oklahoma City Public Works
Bret Weingart, Assistant Director, Oklahoma City Water / Wastewater Utilities Department
Special Thanks
Senior Minister Kevin Pigg and Robert Krueger for hosting all SE Sector Plan Team and
Community Meetings at Harmony Christian Church.

Southeast Sector Plan
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The increased rate of suburban growth and acreage development have presented
new challenges to our expanding city. The previous Comprehensive Plan, adopted in 2000,
outlined general policies for rural and urban growth that were not adequate to address the
distinctly different issues within specific areas of the city. Therefore, the Planning
Commission requested that the Planning Department develop detailed plans to aid them in
making decisions about the numerous developments proposed in the city’s highest areas of
growth. The Planning Department divided the outlying areas of Oklahoma City into six
geographic boundaries, or sectors. The Southeast Sector Plan addresses one of these six
sectors.
The Sector Plans are formed through an open public process utilizing a volunteer
“Plan Team” composed of interested parties from the community. The Plan Team identifies
the issues and concerns that they perceive will impact the future growth and development of
the sector within a 30 year period, and develop strategies and recommendations to address
these concerns. This plan is divided into six chapters that include the purpose and intent of
the plan, background information about the area, issues of concern within the planning
period, and strategies and policy recommendations to accomplish the goals in the plan.
The next several paragraphs highlight the major issues that are specific to the
Southeast Sector. This Sector is experiencing moderate residential growth, and has enough
undeveloped land to accommodate the housing needs anticipated within the next 30 years.
However, the Plan Team feels that it is imperative to maintain the sector’s low density and
rural character to protect economic and environmental resources. Major features within the
Southeast Sector include Lake Stanley Draper, the West Elm Creek Reservoir preserve,
North Deer Creek Reservoir and Tinker Air Force Base (Tinker), which is a major economic
contributor to the Central Oklahoma region.
There is a clear separation between the urban growth and rural/agricultural land use
areas within the Sector. The western and northwestern portion of the sector is serviced by
city water and sewer, and supports a concentration of commercial, residential and industrial
development surrounding and including Tinker. The remainder of the Sector is blanketed by
rural acreage development and includes two reservoirs and a future reservoir preserve
supported by a network of creeks and streams. Between these two distinctly different
development areas, conflicts may occur when proposed development challenges the
characteristics that make them unique.
There is limited area remaining in the western and northwestern portion of the Sector
that can support new commercial, industrial and higher density residential development.
The Plan Team designated the area east of Tinker, between I-240 and I-40 to be ideal for
future expansion of the Air Force Base and supporting uses, and new high-tech industrial
development. This designation supports anticipated transportation and access needs and
minimizes the existing traffic and circulation challenges within this area. Such development
of this section of land is essential, considering its confinement within two interstate
highways and an active military base.
The existing infrastructure has constraints that challenge the Southeast Sector’s
ability to effectively support increasing densities within its rural areas. New development
only should be allowed with careful consideration of its impacts, and the incorporation of
i

Southeast Sector Plan
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
necessary mitigation measures and improvements. The low densities within the eastern twothirds
of the sector are beneficial to the health and sustainability of the natural environment,
which includes a distinctly unique forest ecotype, numerous species of flora and fauna, and
an abundant supply of high quality surface and ground water. In addition, this undeveloped
land area serves to recharge a major aquifer that provides water to several municipalities.
Fortunately, the Southeast Sector’s primary framework is structured in a way that can
support its critical functions and provide for the future sustainability of both the natural and
built environment. The success of Tinker, in part, depends upon the compatibility of its
surrounding development. Although the Military Base itself requires and generates a certain
amount of industrial, commercial and residential development activity, the surrounding lowdensity
development, Lake Draper, and the West Elm Creek Reserve are beneficial to Tinker.
These large areas of natural open space provide important habitat for wildlife, which
otherwise would be drawn to Tinker. Wildlife can create hazards for airfield operations, such
as deer on runways or birds in flight paths. Additionally, the proximity of these large natural
open spaces are beneficial for the Base’s operations, which are best suited to occur within
low-density areas of a city.
The major issues presented within the Southeast Sector are addressed by these
fundamental recommendations:
Protect, preserve and enhance the sector’s natural resources and the recreational
amenities they present (including Lake Draper, West Elm Creek Reservoir, North Deer
Creek Reservoir, stream corridors and undeveloped open space) to provide for
− the future benefit of the community and
− the sustainability of the environment.
Protect and preserve the rural character of the sector by considering all impacts of
development proposals, and providing necessary improvements to infrastructure
concurrent with new development to
− sustain quality in the built environment,
− provide efficient and effective delivery of services, and
− promote the health and safety of the community.
Allow for the expansion of Tinker and the expansion of specialized industrial
development within a strategic area to
− promote economic development,
− sustain continued success of the Air Force Base, and
− prevent adverse impacts of development.
Strategies to accomplish these goals are contained within the recommended policies
and actions outlined in the individual chapters of this plan. The Plan Team developed many
strategies involving the participation and coordination of multiple special interest groups
and agencies. The Plan Team identified Capital Improvements projects that should be
considered a priority by City Council, and those that should be included in the next General
Obligation Bond Issue. This plan intends to serve as a guide to enable more informed
development, investment, and policy decisions shaping the quality of life in the Southeast
Sector’s future.
ii

Southeast Sector Plan
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................. 1
1.1 Purpose ............................................................................................. 1
1.2 Planning Process ............................................................................... 2
1.3 Description ........................................................................................ 3
1.4 Vision................................................................................................. 6
2. ENVIRONMENTAL AND NATURAL RESOURCES ............................................. 7
SUMMARY..............................................................................................................................7
2.1 Goals ................................................................................................. 7
2.2 Assessment Of The Issues ................................................................. 7
2.2.1 Environmental Assets........................................................................................ 7
2.2.2 Water Quality and Water Resources ................................................................ 8
2.2.3 Preservation of Trees and Open Space............................................................ 9
2.3 Assessment Of The Environment........................................................ 9
2.3.1 Ecoregion............................................................................................................ 9
2.3.2 Climate..............................................................................................................10
2.3.3 Soils ..................................................................................................................11
2.3.4 Floodplains and Stream Corridors..................................................................11
2.3.5 Impaired Lakes and Streams..........................................................................12
2.3.6 Threatened and Endangered Species............................................................13
2.3.7 Groundwater ....................................................................................................13
2.3.8 Oil / Gas and Storage Tanks...........................................................................15
2.3.9 Hazardous Materials .......................................................................................16
2.3.10 Department of Environmental Quality Permits.............................................17
2.4 History And Landmarks....................................................................19
2.4.1 Historical Features...........................................................................................19
2.4.2 Lake Stanley Draper ........................................................................................20
2.4.3 West Elm Creek Reservoir...............................................................................22
CONCERNS.......................................................................................................................... 23
ACTIONS.............................................................................................................................. 24
3. DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN ....................................................................... 27
SUMMARY........................................................................................................................... 27
3.1 Development Issues, Influences and Opportunities..........................27
3.1.1 Tinker Air Force Base.......................................................................................27
3.1.2 Former General Motors Site............................................................................27
3.1.3 Economic Development / Employment Corridors .........................................28
3.2 Current Land Use & Zoning ..............................................................28
3.2.1 Land Use...........................................................................................................28
iii

Southeast Sector Plan
TABLE OF CONTENTS
3.2.2 Zoning...............................................................................................................29
3.3 Land Use Analysis............................................................................33
3.4 Proposed Land Use Plan ..................................................................34
CONCERNS.......................................................................................................................... 39
ACTIONS.............................................................................................................................. 39
4. PUBLIC SERVICES AND INFRASTRUCTURE.................................................... 45
SUMMARY........................................................................................................................... 45
4.1 Police Protection .............................................................................45
4.1.1 Police Staffing within the Southeast Sector ..................................................46
4.1.2 Crime Incidents ................................................................................................46
4.2 Fire Protection And Emergency Services..........................................48
4.2.1 Fire Stations within the Southeast Sector .....................................................48
4.2.2 Emergency Medical Response........................................................................48
4.2.3 Fire Control and Prevention Measures...........................................................49
4.2.4 Additional Fire Protection Requirements .......................................................49
4.2.5 Public Safety Capital Sales Tax.......................................................................50
4.3 Transportation .................................................................................50
4.3.1 Current Conditions...........................................................................................50
4.3.2 Assessment of Transportation Needs ............................................................52
4.4 Water Supply ...................................................................................54
4.5 Sanitary Sewer.................................................................................55
4.6 Solid Waste .....................................................................................56
4.7 Parks, Recreation And Open Space..................................................57
4.8 Schools ............................................................................................58
CONCERNS.......................................................................................................................... 59
ACTIONS.............................................................................................................................. 61
5. COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT ....................................................................... 65
SUMMARY........................................................................................................................... 65
5.1 Neighborhood Associations..............................................................65
5.2 Public Notifications .........................................................................66
5.2.1 Rezoning...........................................................................................................66
5.2.2 Plat Approval ....................................................................................................66
CONCERNS.......................................................................................................................... 66
ACTIONS.............................................................................................................................. 66
iv

Southeast Sector Plan
TABLE OF CONTENTS
6. PLAN IMPLEMENTATION............................................................................... 69
6.1 One-time Plan Actions .....................................................................69
6.1.1 Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Regulations............................................69
6.1.2 Recommended Capital Improvements Projects (CIP) ...................................70
6.2 Ongoing Plan Actions.......................................................................71
6.2.1 Environment.....................................................................................................71
6.2.2 Land Use and Development Standards .........................................................72
6.2.3 Parks and Recreation......................................................................................73
6.2.4 Public Services.................................................................................................73
6.2.5 Schools .............................................................................................................74
6.2.6 Community Involvement..................................................................................75
7. APPENDIX..................................................................................................... 77
7.1 References ......................................................................................77
7.2 Resources ........................................................................................77
INDEX OF MAPS
Map 1: Project Boundary Map ........................................................................................... 3
Map 2:
Ecoregions............................................................................................................10
Map 3: Soils ......................................................................................................................11
Map 4: Floodplains ...........................................................................................................12
Map 5: Aquifers and Recharge Rates .............................................................................14
Map 6: Oil / Gas and Storage Tanks ...............................................................................16
Map 7:
Hazardous Materials............................................................................................17
Map 8: Department of Environmental Quality Permits ..................................................18
Map 9: Lake Draper Planned Unit Development Conceptual Map ..............................20
Map 10: Lake Draper Plan ................................................................................................21
Map 11: West Elm Creek Reservoir...................................................................................23
Map 12: Land Use (June, 2005) ........................................................................................31
Map 13: Zoning (August, 2006).........................................................................................32
Map 14: Land available for development .........................................................................37
Map 15: Proposed Land Use Plan, 2030..........................................................................38
Map 16: Police Patrol Divisions and Briefing Stations .....................................................46
Map 17: Concentration of Major Crimes by quarter section, 2000 - 2005....................47
Map 18: Fire Stations and Fire District Location Map......................................................48
v

Southeast Sector Plan
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Map 19: Major Streets and Traffic Signals........................................................................51
Map 20: Capital Improvements Projects, 1995-2000 .....................................................51
Map 21: Traffic Volumes, Bryant Avenue to Hiwasse Road, 2004..................................53
Map 22: Traffic Volumes, Henney Road to Harrah Road, 2004......................................54
Map 23: Water Mains .........................................................................................................55
Map 24: Sanitary Sewer .....................................................................................................56
Map 25: Solid Waste Collection and Landfill Location.....................................................57
Map 26: Parks and Recreational Facilities .......................................................................57
Map 27: Southeast Sector Area Trails...............................................................................58
Map 28: School Districts, Types, and Location.................................................................59
Map 29: Neighborhood Associations.................................................................................65
Map 30: Recommended Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) .........................................71
INDEX OF TABLES
Table 1: Population and Housing Growth .......................................................................... 4
Table 2: Selected Demographic Data, US Census 2000 .................................................. 5
Table 3: Tests for Water Quality ......................................................................................... 9
Table 4: Climate Summaries ............................................................................................10
Table 5: Impaired Waterbodies ........................................................................................13
Table 6: Threatened and Endangered Species ...............................................................13
Table 7: Department of Environmental Quality Permits, Address and Type .................18
Table 8: Land Use in the Southeast Sector, June 2005 .................................................28
Table 9: Zoning in the Southeast Sector (March, 2006) ................................................29
Table 10: Housing Units Needed, 2006 – 2030 ...............................................................33
Table 11: Land Available for Development within Plan Designations .............................33
Table 12: Land Needed to Accommodate Expected Growth ............................................34
Table 13: Average Number of Officers on Duty, Santa Fe Division ..................................46
Table 14: Major Crime Incidence by Crime Category, 2005 .............................................47
Table 15: Additional Fire Protection Requirements ..........................................................50
Table 16: School Enrollment by District .............................................................................58
vi

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 1
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 PURPOSE
The Planning Department’s ultimate role is to develop a Comprehensive Plan to guide
the development of the city. On September 28, 2000, the Oklahoma City Planning
Commission adopted the Oklahoma City Comprehensive Plan 2000-2020. Four years later,
the Planning Commission saw a need to update the Comprehensive Plan’s policies and
recommendations addressing growth in
outlying areas of the city, and initiated the
process for developing Sector Plans.
The Planning Department is charged
with facilitating the development of Sector
Plans for six areas of the City (*excluding
the Central City). Plan updates for the
Central City will be handled through
neighborhood and corridor plans.
Each of the city’s six sectors has
unique social, historic and environmental
characteristics, specific growth and
development concerns, and public service
needs. The sector planning process will
develop policies, strategies and land use
designations to support, promote and
advocate detailed plans within those areas.
City of Oklahoma City – Sector Planning Areas
There are six sector planning areas defined within the city
limits. This document addresses the Southeast Sector
(shown as SE) *Central City (shown as CC in darker shade)
is excluded from sector plans and will be addressed
through special area and corridor plans.
These plans will include recommendations for the types of new development that can
occur, where this growth will be, and what services and facilities will be needed to serve this
growth. When completed, the sector plans will be used by City officials, citizens, and private
businesses to guide long-term decisions about future growth and development in the City’s
fastest growing areas.
The sector planning process is a collaborative effort led by Planning Staff and
involving City Council and Planning Commission members, neighborhood leaders, area
developers, school representatives, and other interested persons. An initial public meeting
is held, at which participants can express their ideas about their area’s growth and
development. Participants also have an opportunity to volunteer for a Plan Team that
develops the policies to be included in the area’s long range plan in a series of small group
meetings. After the Plan Team completes its work, the draft sector plans are presented at
follow-up public meetings for citizen review. When this public phase is completed, the plans
are presented to Planning Commission for approval and Council for acceptance as
amendments to the City’s Comprehensive Plan.
This document addresses the Southeast Sector. Planning Commission adopted the
Southwest Sector plan on March 23, 2006. Sector Plans for Northeast, North, Northwest,
and South will follow.
INTRODUCTION 1

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 1
1.2 PLANNING PROCESS
The Southeast Sector planning process began on November 8, 2005 with a public
meeting at Harmony Christian Church, at 7100 S. Choctaw Road. 67 area residents,
property owners, business interests, public & elected officials and others interested in plans
for the growth and development of Oklahoma City’s Southeast Sector attended the meeting.
At the meeting, the Planning Department made a short presentation summarizing
development trends and potential issues within the area. This was followed by a question
and answer period, and discussion of other concerns and ideas about the area’s future
growth and development. The Planning Department distributed a questionnaire to capture
attendees’ primary concerns and expectations for the Plan, and sign-up sheets for
interested parties to volunteer to be a part of a Plan Team.
At this meeting and over the next several weeks, over forty individuals volunteered to
serve on the Southeast Sector Plan Team. From November 22, 2005 through May 16,
2006, the Plan Team carried out extensive discussions on a wide array of planning issues
related to the growth and development of the Southeast Sector. Among the issues
discussed by the Plan Team were:
→ Amount and location of expected growth in the Southeast Sector over the next thirty years;
→ Public facility and service improvements, such as streets and roads, parks, fire and police service,
water and sewer availability and systems, and solid waste service;
→ Water quality and quantity related to private water wells serving rural residences;
→ Protecting natural resources, wooded areas, streams, and lakes;
→ Promoting high-quality development through such measures as protecting views, creating
appearance corridors, and the incorporating more landscaping, open space, and trails in new
development; and
→ Keeping area residents and businesses informed about development proposals in the area.
The Plan Team developed a draft plan incorporating recommended policies
addressing these and other issues in the Southeast Sector. Reviews from City Departments,
Public Agencies, and the Mayor’s Quality Housing Task Force contributed to the
development of the plan. The Planning Department and Plan Team presented the final draft
plan in a public meeting on December 19, 2006 to receive comments from residents and
property owners within the Southeast Sector.
On February 8, 2007, the City of Oklahoma City Planning Commission held a public
hearing to receive citizen comments on the Southeast Sector Plan. On February 22, 2007,
the Planning Commission adopted the Southeast Sector Plan as part of the City’s
Comprehensive Plan. The Mayor and City Council received the plan on March 6, 2007.
The Southeast Sector Plan provides direction for decisions by Planning Commission,
City Council, and private developers as to the amount and location of future growth and
development in the Southeast Sector. The Plan will also guide the location and timing of
public improvements to meet current needs and the demands created by future growth. The
priorities for capital improvements outlined in the Plan will be implemented through
proposed projects in the City’s Capital Improvement Programs and expenditures for public
services in the City’s annual budgets.
2 INTRODUCTION

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 1
1.3 DESCRIPTION
The Southeast Sector Planning area includes 142.2 square miles located in the far
southeastern portion of Oklahoma City. Distinguishing features within the sector include
Tinker Air Force Base, Lake Stanley Draper, and a predominant land use of rural acreage
and agricultural development.
Map 1: Project Boundary Map
Plan Team members characterize the area as largely rural with vast amounts of open
space and desirable views of rolling hills and woodlands. They describe this area as having
many natural assets deserving of preservation. Members of the Plan Team stated that they
are proud of the diverse character the Southeast Sector offers its residents and visitors.
Plan Team members and members of the community characterized the sector
differently based on individual perspectives as developers, rural or urban residents. Despite
seemingly conflicting interests, these groups expressed a common desire for growth that is
well-planned, with appropriate densities and development standards that highlight and
protect the character of the sector.
Overlapping city boundaries and school districts lend a mixed identity to the
Southeast Sector. Within the sector, eight separate school districts are represented. The
Southeast Sector is adjacent to cities such as: Midwest City, Del City, Valley Brook, Choctaw,
Nicoma Park, Harrah, Moore, Norman, and McLoud.
INTRODUCTION 3

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 1
The area has experienced steady growth over the past ten years. The rate of growth
is projected to slightly decrease throughout the 30-year planning period.
Table 1: Population and Housing Growth
Year Housing Units Population Source
1990 7,580 21,731 US Census, 1990
2000 10,143 26,860 US Census, 2000
2006 12,483 30,999 Planning Dept estimate (July 2006)
2010 13,731 35,000 Planning Dept projections
2020 16,779 41,872 Planning Dept projections
2030 19,910 48,735 Planning Dept projections
Comparing year 2000 Census data to all of Oklahoma City shows higher household
incomes, housing values, and owner occupied percentages, along with lower vacancy rates
within the Southeast Sector.
The median age is nearly the same for all of Oklahoma City and the Southeast Sector,
although the population aged 65 and over is lower within the Southeast Sector.
Percentages in the 5-17, 25-44, and 45-64 age groups are all higher in the Southeast
Sector than Oklahoma City as a whole. Thus, the Southeast Sector has a higher proportion
of young to middle-aged families with school-aged children than compared with Oklahoma
City. Average household size is higher in the Southeast Sector (2.84) than Oklahoma City
(2.41) and the national average of 2.59. The percentage of single parent families is
significantly lower in the Southeast Sector than for Oklahoma City and the metro.
The Southeast Sector is less ethnically diverse than compared with Oklahoma City
and the metro area, with only 20.3% minorities (other than non-Hispanic white).
The Southeast Sector median household income is nearly $14,000 higher than
Oklahoma City as a whole. The percentage of persons below poverty in Oklahoma City is two
times higher than those below poverty in the Southeast Sector.
The sector’s percentage unemployed is significantly less than Oklahoma City. High
median income, housing values and owner occupancy levels coupled with low
unemployment indicate a strong housing and economic base for the Southeast Sector.
4 INTRODUCTION

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 1
Table 2: Selected Demographic Data, US Census 2000
INTRODUCTION 5

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 1
1.4 VISION
The mission of the Plan Team is “to plan for future growth and orderly development
of the Southeast Sector, so that we can preserve the environment and protect our quality of
life”. The Plan Team developed a vision of how the Southeast Sector would be described if
planning goals are met.
Effective Planning for Future Growth
The Southeast Sector is a well-planned area
− with development that conforms to the plan;
− where development and infrastructure are coordinated and compatible;
− where infrastructure improvements are strategically implemented by areas of priority;
− and where full and timely planning and development information is provided to those
involved and affected by planning decisions.
Character and Natural Resources
As the Southeast Sector grows and develops,
− its rural character and open space are preserved and
− its environmental resources are protected.
Emergency Services and Infrastructure
Within the Southeast Sector,
− citizens and property are safe and protected, with efficient and timely emergency
response to calls for service from rural residents and businesses;
− high quality streets and well-planned access points for new development promote
efficient traffic circulation;
− roads are repaired and maintained through coordination between City and County
agencies to increase safety and ease of travel while decreasing delays; and
− the quality of infrastructure (roads, water, sewer, fire and police facilities and
schools) is adequate for current development and anticipated growth, with facilities
in place as development occurs.
Transportation and Development Corridors
Within the Southeast Sector,
− transportation corridors along Interstate-240 (I-240) and Interstate-40 (I-40) provide
desired, commercial development that preserves view sheds and protects the rural
character of the area; and
− the transportation system provides choices to residents and businesses as to modes
of travel and travel routes that provide good access within and between area
neighborhoods and to outside destinations, including jobs.
Involved Community
The Southeast Sector has strong citizen involvement with
− full participation by residents and area businesses in making planning decisions that
affect the area; and
− strong neighborhood associations that engender quality, safety, and pride in
ownership.
6 INTRODUCTION

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 2
2. ENVIRONMENTAL AND NATURAL RESOURCES
SUMMARY
The Plan Team expressed that the natural environment within the Southeast Sector
is a strong part of the area’s identity and a unifying characteristic that should be preserved.
Its diverse character is illustrated in the western part of the sector by an urban and
industrial development pattern, and a largely rural character in the eastern two-thirds of the
sector. The Plan Team identified basic concerns, and developed recommendations and
strategies that support, promote and advocate the protection of environmental and natural
resources, and aimed at preserving the sector’s character.
This section provides information about the environmental baseline in the Southeast
Sector and highlights its significant natural and historical assets. Baseline information is
also provided for potential environmental constraints such as hazardous materials locations
and floodplains. The major concerns developed by the Plan Team are largely related to
negative impacts of unmanaged development. Without proper guidance, development could
negatively impact the existing cultural and natural resources and jeopardize the character
and ecological value of the existing and proposed reservoirs. Specific actions recommended
to address these concerns call for the
incorporation of water quality test and standards into zoning regulations;
preservation of natural areas and open space, and
implementation of measures to preserve and enhance natural resources in concert with
new development.
2.1 GOALS
The team’s assessment of the environmental issues within the Southeast Sector
culminated with the following goals:
Maintain high environmental standards in order to
− preserve a rural character and appropriate rural density for development;
− protect the development and uses around Lake Draper; and
− maintain the availability and quality of groundwater as new development occurs.
2.2 ASSESSMENT OF THE ISSUES
During Plan Team meetings, discussions of planning policies often came back to
environmental and natural resource concerns. The Plan Team categorized these issues into
three categories: Environmental Assets; Water Quality and Water Resources; and the
Preservation of Trees and Open Space.
2.2.1 Environmental Assets
The Plan Team identified several unique environmental assets and natural resources
within the Southeast Sector. These assets help define the character of the sector, and are
important features to retain and preserve as new development occurs.
ENVIRONMENTAL AND NATURAL RESOURCES 7

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 2
Abundance of natural geological formations called “Rose Rocks”
Lake Draper and recreational amenities
Potential West Elm Creek Reservoir
Dedicated Motor Cross Trails
Crosstimbers Campsite
Multi-modal Trails (hiking, biking, equestrian, etc.)
Potential for “Agritourism”
Presence of numerous Archeological Sites
Abundance of undeveloped land
Possible Historical Sites & Buildings eligible for Historic Register
Tinker Air Force Base
Presence of Native American Tribes
Cemeteries
The Plan Team identified both positive and negative issues related to these assets.
Future policy decisions should support the continued development of the positive issues,
and be sensitive to the negative issues listed below.
Positive
− Natural Resources within the sector may direct increased attention to the area that
could draw new development and spur more community involvement.
− Increased development and community involvement could empower developers,
investors, and businesses within the Southeast Sector with an increased ability to
market, educate, and maintain the quality of the area. In turn, this could increase the
ability of the sector’s residents and businesses to preserve the sector’s natural
resources and environmental assets.
Negative
− Development within the sector may have adverse affects on the environment, such as
water, noise and air pollution, soil erosion, litter, and disruption of wildlife.
− Some of the area’s assets, such as the Motor Cross Trails and possible Agritourism
practices and enterprises may generate these negative effects.
− Extension of city services for the expansion of Tinker Air Force Base could encourage
increased residential and commercial development that may encroach on the base.
Increased development adjacent to the base may impact habitat and displace wildlife.
The base is negatively affected by encroachment of wildlife into areas of operation, and
by residential development within its flight patterns and noise contours.
2.2.2 Water Quality and Water Resources
Residents within the largely rural area of the Southeast Sector obtain water from
wells, as city water service only extends to just east of Tinker Air Force Base. As
development within the Southeast Sector increases, there is a perceived threat to the
quality and availability of groundwater. Additionally, the Southeast Sector has many natural
and man-made bodies of surface water, including one of the city’s three urban reservoirs –
Lake Stanley Draper. Maintaining a high water quality and availability is a primary concern
for those who reside, work, farm and recreate within the area.
8 ENVIRONMENTAL AND NATURAL RESOURCES

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 2
A variety of tests can be conducted for water wells to determine if undesirable
constituents are present. Tests for coliform are the only water quality test required when
selling a property with a well. Table 3 lists the cost and types of water quality tests
available.
Table 3: Tests for Water Quality
Type of test Requirement Cost
Coliform Currently required when selling property with a well $10.00
pH, dissolved solids, chlorides, nitrates,
and sulfur compounds
Not currently required $75.00
Arsenic Not currently required $30.00
Coliform bacteria in water can come from septic tank leakage, from rainwater picking up
animal wastes that then seep into the aquifer, or overflow of public sewer systems.
Coliform bacteria can cause intestinal diseases such as cholera.
pH refers to the acidity of the water. Pure water has a pH of 7.0 and desirable levels lie
in the range of 6.5 to 8.5. Water with pH levels lower or higher than this range can cause
corrosion of water pipes.
Dissolved solids come from chemical compounds naturally occurring in the aquifer.
These can give water a cloudy or milky appearance.
Chlorides indicate salty water. All groundwater in aquifers becomes salty below a certain
depth. High chlorides can also be caused by oilfield contaminants. Chlorides affect the
taste of water.
Nitrates are picked up from fertilizer on lawns or from agricultural activities. Nitrates
affect the ability of hemoglobin in the blood to transmit oxygen, people affected by nitrate
levels will complain of tiredness.
Sulfur compounds in water come from chemicals naturally occurring in the aquifer, most
commonly gypsum. Sulfate acts as a diuretic in the body. It can turn water white and as
hydrogen sulfide will produce a rotten egg like odor.
2.2.3 Preservation of Trees and Open Space
The Southeast Sector has an abundance of open space, typified by rolling hills and
wooded areas. As development increases, residents and property owners foresee the
preservation of trees and open space to be essential in maintaining the character of the
area and comfort of its citizens.
2.3 ASSESSMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT
2.3.1 Ecoregion
Ecoregions are defined as “relatively homogenous areas that can be mapped using
factors such as land surface form, soils, land use and potential natural vegetation.” The
majority of the Southeast Sector area lies within the Crosstimbers Ecoregion. This region
includes a mixture of tall grass prairies and oak woodlands in roughly the central one-third of
Oklahoma. The Crosstimbers vegetation is made up of open stands of trees (Blackjack Oak
and Post Oak), with an understory of woody plants, mid and tall grasses, and forbs. The
westernmost portion of the Southeast Sector is within the Central Great Plains ecoregion.
ENVIRONMENTAL AND NATURAL RESOURCES 9

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 2
This ecoregion is dominated by mixed grass prairie, with trees concentrated along streams.
Map 2 illustrates the Southeast Sector’s ecoregions.
Map 2: Ecoregions
2.3.2 Climate
The Southeast Sector is almost evenly divided between Oklahoma and Cleveland
counties, with a very small eastern portion in Pottawatomie County. Table 4 includes
climate summaries for Cleveland and Oklahoma counties.
Table 4: Climate Summaries
Climate Variables Oklahoma County Cleveland County
Temperature
Average annual 61° F 61° F
Average maximum 72° F 73° F
Average minimum 49° F 49° F
Precipitation
Other
Average annual 36.21 inches 37.29 inches
Average annual snowfall 7.0 inches 6.8 inches
Average wind speed 7 mph 10 mph
Tornadoes (1950 – 2003) 86 55
Sunshine 55-80% 55-80%
Thunderstorm Days 49 49
10 ENVIRONMENTAL AND NATURAL RESOURCES

Southeast Sector Plan
2.3.3 Soils
CHAPTER 2
There are two major soil series within the Southeast Sector, Stephenville and
Renfrow. The Stephenville soil series, which is present in the majority of the Southeast
Sector, is moderately deep, well-drained moderately permeable upland soils, with slight to
moderate slopes. The Renfrow soil series is very deep, well-drained, very slowly permeable
soils, with very slight slopes. Map 3 shows the distribution of these soil series.
Map 3: Soils
2.3.4 Floodplains and Stream Corridors
A considerable amount of land within the Southeast Sector is within the 100-year
floodplain, as shown in Map 4. Careful consideration should be given to any development
within these areas, as it could increase flooding downstream by replacing vegetated areas
with rooftops and paving. The same consideration should be given for developments
adjacent to any of the numerous stream corridors within the Southeast Sector. Vegetation
along streams filters pollutants from surface water, reducing the amount contaminants
carried into the streams by runoff. If vegetated areas are reduced or removed, it could lead
to an increase in stream contaminants that could have detrimental effects on wildlife and
human health.
Within the area a stakeholder group named “Greenprint: East Metro Watershed” has
formed to address water quality and quantity issues in the areas of Crutcho, Soldier and
Cherry Creek tributaries.
The undesirable effects of increased stormwater run off can be mitigated in many
ways. Detention ponds are one method of controlling stormwater runoff from developments.
A detention pond stores accumulated stormwater runoff from a development and slowly
releases it downstream. Under the City’s current drainage regulation, on-site detention is
only required of developments in watersheds with known or projected flooding of structures.
ENVIRONMENTAL AND NATURAL RESOURCES 11

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 2
Map 4 shows that detention is required in the northwest portion of the Southeast Sector,
near Crutcho Creek and Tinker Air Force Base.
Other methods include retention/infiltration ponds, underground tanks and vaults,
and swales. A retention/infiltration pond collects stormwater and allows the water to soak
into the soil, recharging the groundwater. Underground tanks and vaults can function like a
detention pond, slowly releasing the water downstream, or can allow the water to infiltrate
into the soil. Swales can be used in combination with other stormwater methods. They
often act as the first filter on contaminants before the water moves to the next stormwater
management structure.
Map 4: Floodplains
2.3.5 Impaired Lakes and Streams
According to The State of Oklahoma 2004 Water Quality Assessment Report by the
Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), two water bodies within the Southeast Sector
are impaired; Lake Draper and Crutcho Creek. As detailed in Table 5, the only impairment
reported for Lake Draper was turbidity of the water. Many large bodies of water in this region
experience turbidity. It should be noted that no chemical or biological impairments were
reported for Lake Draper, and overall the lake has exceptional water quality.
12 ENVIRONMENTAL AND NATURAL RESOURCES

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 2
Table 5: Impaired Waterbodies
Water Body Impairment Source
Lake Draper Turbidity Unknown
Crutcho Creek
Dissolved Oxygen,
Enteroccoccus,
Escherichia coli, Oil and
Grease
2.3.6 Threatened and Endangered Species
Unknown, Land application of wastewater biosoilds (nonagricultural,
Municipal (urbanized high density area), Municipal
point source discharge, Discharges from biosoilds (SLUDGE)
storage, application or disposal
There are at least seven threatened or endangered species that are likely to inhabit
areas within the Southeast Sector. The sector’s low density and abundance of tree cover
and water provides a suitable habitat for many of these species. The Plan Team has
targeted Lake Draper and undeveloped wooded areas around the lake and stream corridors
as areas of preservation and careful development practices in order to protect fish and
wildlife. According to the US Fish and Wildlife Service, the following threatened or
endangered bird and fish species are present in Cleveland, Oklahoma and Pottawatomie
counties.
Table 6: Threatened and Endangered Species
Common Name
American peregrine falcon
Arkansas River shiner
Bald eagle
Black-capped Vireo
Least Tern
Piping Plover
Whooping Crane
Listing Status
Delisted, recovered, being monitored for 5 years
Threatened
Proposed delisting, threatened
Endangered
Endangered
Endangered, threatened
Endangered, Experimental population, non-essential
Several “Oklahoma Species of Special Concern” are found within the area. Species
with this ranking are found to be especially vulnerable to extirpation because of limited
range, low population, and other factors. Or the species have been identified by technical
experts as possibly threatened of extirpation but additional information is needed. Some of
these sensitive species within the area include the Texas horned lizard, loggerhead shrike,
Swainson’s hawk, barn owl and burrowing owl.
2.3.7 Groundwater
The majority of the Southeast Sector is not serviced by the city’s water system.
Residents and property owners outside of the city water service boundary use groundwater
wells served by the Central Oklahoma Aquifer (also known as the Garber-Wellington Aquifer).
A report from the Association of Central Oklahoma Governments (ACOG) shows that
domestic wells drilled within the aquifer from 1981 to 2005 averaged a depth of 150 feet.
ENVIRONMENTAL AND NATURAL RESOURCES 13

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 2
The Central Oklahoma aquifer covers approximately 2,900 square miles of central
Oklahoma and all or part of the following counties; Cleveland, Logan, Oklahoma, and
Pottawatomie. The main source for groundwater recharge is by infiltration of precipitation
and percolation of surface water into permeable layers of rock or sand. Map 5 shows
aquifers that serve the Southeast Sector and their average recharge rate where known.
Map 5: Aquifers and Recharge Rates
A portion of the North Canadian alluvial aquifer is found in the Southeast Sector near
the North Deer Creek Reservoir. Alluvial aquifers are particularly vulnerable to drought and
the infiltration of pollutants.
The Central Oklahoma Aquifer is approximately 280 million years old and was formed
by ancient river systems. These ancient rivers deposited nearly 1,000 feet of sandstone and
shale while flowing from east to west. Garber Sandstone and the Wellington Formation
make up a large portion of the aquifer, which has a maximum thickness of 1,000 feet with a
base of freshwater found between 500 and 1,000 feet. In places, Permian rocks of the
Chase, Council Grove and the Admire groups are a part of the Central Oklahoma Aquifer.
Wells in the Central Oklahoma Aquifer can yield 100 to 300 gallons per minute, with some
capable of more than 500 gallons per minute.
Bob Fabian, a Geologist in the Planning and Management Division at the Oklahoma
Water Resources Board, commented about the quality and capacity of the Garber-Wellington
aquifer during a phone interview with Planning staff:
Quality
– The Garber-Wellington consists of alternating layers of sandstone and shale with
water being stored in many of the sandstone layers. Many of the common water
quality and contamination issues are associated with people storing chemicals
around wells, applying too much fertilizer or yard chemicals around their well, and
conducting other activities around the well. In addition many of the older domestic
14 ENVIRONMENTAL AND NATURAL RESOURCES

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 2
water wells, those constructed prior to the 1980’s, might not be constructed to
current standards and thus provide a potential pathway for chemicals to reach the
aquifer. There may be areas within the SE Sector where contamination associated
with various industries has occurred.
– Contamination usually occurs at the shallowest layers. If a well becomes
contaminated, then that well should be properly plugged. New water wells drilled in
areas where contamination is suspected can still be safely used by sealing off the
contaminated water zones and obtaining water from the water zones below the
contamination. Within the Garber-Wellington aquifer, there are isolated problems
with arsenic, but these areas are primarily in the western portion of Oklahoma
County.
– More development increases the potential for water quality issues, but individuals
can do a number of things to help reduce the risk of contamination to the aquifer.
There is a “Blue Thumb” program developed by the Department of Environmental
Quality aimed educating individuals and communities on how to protect their sources
of water. The USGS office in Oklahoma City has conducted detailed studies on water
quality of the aquifer.
Capacity
– As a general rule, the aquifer is thick and contains large quantities of water. Water
use from the aquifer has not reached the levels where the aquifer is experiencing any
depletion.
– Most of the problems with accessing water through wells are associated with the
fluctuation of the water table during times of drought. Many older wells are shallow,
and can be affected during those times of drought. New wells should be drilled to
adequate depths to avoid potential contaminant plumes near the surface of the
aquifer, and to protect against seasonal fluctuations in water levels caused by
drought.
Due to the substantial thickness and capacity of this aquifer, it should provide ample
groundwater for years to come. Approximately 90 percent of the Southeast Sector serves as
an aquifer recharge area. By preserving the natural environment within the Southeast
Sector these recharge areas are supported and maintained.
2.3.8 Oil / Gas and Storage Tanks
There are several registered and closed oil and gas and storage tanks within the
Southeast Sector, as shown in Map 6. The majority of these are concentrated in the
industrial area bounded by SE 59th Street on the north, SE 89th Street on the south,
Sunnylane on the east and Bryant Avenue on the west. Oil and gas and storage tanks are
sources of potential groundwater and surface water contamination. The Plan Team has
expressed this concern, particularly in reference to the close proximity of industrial
developments to Lake Draper and the future West Elm Creek Reservoir area.
ENVIRONMENTAL AND NATURAL RESOURCES 15

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 2
Map 6: Oil / Gas and Storage Tanks
*Note: This map does not include any storage tanks within Tinker Air Force Base property.
2.3.9 Hazardous Materials
Map 7 shows the businesses within the Southeast Sector that the Fire Department
reports as storing hazardous materials. Similar to the oil and gas tanks, hazardous material
storage is concentrated in the industrial areas within the northwest portion of the Southeast
Sector. There are additional sites not shown on this map where spills and cleanup activity
has been reported to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), many of which have
occurred in this same portion of the sector. The location of these sites can be found on the
EPA’s website at www.epa.gov/enviro/emef.
16 ENVIRONMENTAL AND NATURAL RESOURCES

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 2
Map 7: Hazardous Materials
*Note: This map does not include any hazardous materials within Tinker Air Force Base property.
2.3.10 Department of Environmental Quality Permits
Map 8 shows the location and type of permits issued by the Oklahoma Department of
Environmental Quality (DEQ). Permits are issued for regulated activities as well as pollution
incidents. The Oklahoma DEQ issues permits dealing with air and water quality. Air quality
permits must be issued for facilities with air contaminant emissions greater than five tons
per year. Water quality permits are issued for municipal and industrial wastewater and
stormwater discharges. Wastewater permits are issued for discharges, disposals, retention
facilities and land applications. Stormwater permits are issued for industrial facilities,
construction activities and small municipal discharges.
Maps 6, 7, and 8 all show a concentration of activity in the northwest portion of the
Sector. This is to be expected, since the area is currently zoned industrial and is also
designated as such in the 2020 general land use plan.
ENVIRONMENTAL AND NATURAL RESOURCES 17

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 2
Map 8: Department of Environmental Quality Permits
*Note: This map does not include DEQ Permits issued within Tinker Air Force Base property.
Table 7: Department of Environmental Quality Permits, Address and Type
Permit Facility Name and Address Year Type
AQ-3 6500 S Interpace 1999
AQ-1 Painting Facility, 6501 SE 74th St 1999
AQ-2 Chassis Products PLT, 4500 SE 59th St 1999
TX-1 Bodycote (Southwest) Inc., 6924 S Eastern Ave 1999 Ammonia
TX-1 Lamson & Sessions, 6500 S Interpace 1999 Anitmony Compounds
TX-4 Electric Submersible Pumps Inc, 5500 SE 59th St 1999 Chromium, Copper Nickel, Manganese
PD-1 Dolese Bros Co, 7000 S Sunnylane Rd 1999 Chromium, Copper Nickel, Manganese
PD-1 Georgia Gulf Chemicals & Vinyl, 5200 SE 59th 1999 Chromium, Copper Nickel, Manganese
TR-1 Barnes School, 10551 SE 29th St 1999 Lagoon (Total Retention)
TR-1 Imperial Oaks Mobile Home Park, 9628 SE 29th 1999 Lagoon (Total Retention)
TR-1 Lucky Food Mart, 14944 S Sunnylane Rd 2001 Total Retention
TR-1 Southwest Electric Company, 6501 SE 74th St 2001 Total Retention
18 ENVIRONMENTAL AND NATURAL RESOURCES

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 2
Permit Facility Name and Address Year Type
PD-1 TAFB Batch P, Midwest Blvd & SE 59th St 1999 Chromium, Copper Nickel, Manganese
PD-15 Tinker AFB- SW Treatment Plant, 7701 Arnold St 1999 Chromium, Copper Nickel, Manganese
TS-1 Tinker Air Force Base, 7701 E 2nd St 2001 Total Retention
2.4 HISTORY AND LANDMARKS
2.4.1 Historical Features
There have been considerable archeological assets unearthed throughout the Central
Oklahoma region. These findings illustrate how prehistoric peoples lived and further
illuminate our region’s history. Tinker Air Force Base has two prehistoric archeological sites
and two historic archeological sites. It is advisable that any development that would
potentially disturb archeological sites within the Southeast Sector should first contact the
Oklahoma Archeological Survey online at http://www.ou.edu/cas/archsur/home.htm or by
calling (405) 325-7211.
In the 1830’s Oklahoma served as
the relocation area of Native Americans
living east of the Mississippi River as a
part of the Indian Removal Act. The map
below illustrates Oklahoma and Indian
territories as of 1894. The Southeast
Sector, and Oklahoma City as a whole
were a part of the “unassigned lands” that
the Creek and Seminoles ceded to the US
government, and did not serve as part of
the relocation area.
According to the Oklahoma State
Historic Preservation Office, there are no areas within the sector on the Register of Historic
Places. Tinker Air Force Base has five individually eligible buildings and one historic district
with seven contributing buildings. The preservation office also keeps records of Centennial
Farms, those that have been operated for one hundred years or more by members of the
same family. The following is a list of centennial farms by county.
Cleveland
Bugher Forty
James C. Burkett Farm
The Hall Homestead
Howell Farm
Hughes Farm
John D. Shroyer Homestead
Burkett Williamson Farm
W. Williamson Farm
Oklahoma
Boling Farm
Circle Bar K Ranch
Craun Farm
Kelly Farm
Mason Homestead
Moore Acres
Mounts Farm
Nordstrom Farm
Spencer's Homestead
Pottawatomie
Bartosh Ranch
Bradburn-Akin Farm
Joseph Almeron Ford Farm
Neal Farms
Peters Farm
Arthur Pratt Farm
States Home Place
ENVIRONMENTAL AND NATURAL RESOURCES 19

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 2
2.4.2 Lake Stanley Draper
Lake Draper, built in 1963 as a reservoir, has a 34-foot average depth, with the
maximum depth at 98 feet. The lake measures 2,900 surface acres and features the
following recreational opportunities; picnicking, fishing, jet skiing, boating, sailing, camping,
and the Crosstimbers Motorized Off Road Vehicle Facility. Map 10, from the Oklahoma City
Water and Wastewater Utilities Department, shows the location of these features. Because
the lake supplies drinking water, swimming is prohibited.
The Oklahoma Water Resources Board (OWRB) 2003-2004 Beneficial Uses Report,
states that Lake Draper supports the beneficial uses of Agriculture, Primary Body Contact
Recreation, Fish Consumption, and Aesthetics (for its color), and is currently sustaining Fish
and Wildlife Propagation.
A Planned Unit Development (PUD) was submitted by the Oklahoma City Water
Utilities Trust for the north shore of Lake Draper. The PUD was accepted on May 4, 2004.
Map 9 illustrates the conceptual plans for the Lake Draper PUD. The PUD includes plans for
a retail area, golf course, passive recreation and RV/camping area.
Map 9: Lake Draper Planned Unit Development Conceptual Map
20 ENVIRONMENTAL AND NATURAL RESOURCES

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 2
Map 10: Lake Draper Plan
ENVIRONMENTAL AND NATURAL RESOURCES 21

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 2
2.4.3 West Elm Creek Reservoir
The proposed West Elm Creek Reservoir located on West Elm Creek southwest of
Lake Stanley Draper, is a potential future water supply for Oklahoma City in 20 to 35 years.
Due to its limited watershed of 16 square miles, the lake is not anticipated to have a
dependable yield. If fully developed, the lake would impound 3,300 acres at normal
conservation pool and have conservation storage of 103,600 acre-feet.
The Plan Team requests that a full land use and environmental study be conducted
to assess the following:
Utilization of land use and future opportunities for development
Future water needs (area, volume, economics of reservoir)
Preservation of environmental conservation area
This process should be initiated by the Oklahoma City Water Trust, involving
stakeholders and experts, such as Tinker Air Force Base, and Oklahoma Department of
Wildlife Conservation. The Plan Team recommends that any land within the take area for
the proposed reservoir that may become available for development should first be offered to
the previous landowners to purchase.
The watershed area for the West Elm Creek Reservoir is designated as an
Environmental Conservation area in The OKC Plan, 2000-2020. The Plan limits land uses to
residential acreage, agricultural and recreation within Environmental Conservation areas.
Future development proposals within this area should be reviewed on a case-by-case basis
to protect water quality and quantity, trees and open space.
Lake Stanley Draper and a large portion of the proposed reservoir are within overlay
zoning districts containing development restrictions that protect airport environs. These
overlays, called Airport Environs 1 (AE-1) and Airport Environs 2 (AE-2), are based on flight
paths and noise contours from Tinker air traffic. Tinker’s flight paths and noise contours
have been modified due to changes in aircraft and technologies. However, the City’s
overlays have not been updated to reflect these modifications.
The Department of Defense, along with the City of Oklahoma City, the City of Midwest
City, Oklahoma County, and the Association of Central Oklahoma Governments (ACOG) have
partnered in a Joint Land Use Study (JLUS) to address the West Elm Creek area and other
interface issues. The West Elm Creek area is beneficial to base operations, and Tinker is
investigating potential mechanisms for its preservation, such as through conservation
easements. JLUS may recommend land uses that encourage the preservation of the
Environmental Conservation area and AE Zones in their existing configuration. This process
will include significant stakeholder input, which will include the Plan Team’s goals and
objectives.
The Plan Team feels that land uses within the West Elm Creek Reservoir area and the
Airport Environs Overlay Zoning District should restrict higher density residential or
commercial development. The Plan Team desires for the area to be preserved in its natural
state to serve as a safe haven for wildlife and protect Tinker from encroachment. Map 11
22 ENVIRONMENTAL AND NATURAL RESOURCES

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 2
shows the location of the proposed West Elm Creek Reservoir, its take boundary, and the
Airport Environs Overlay Zoning Districts.
Map 11: West Elm Creek Reservoir
CONCERNS
The future growth of Tinker AFB may spur new private industrial, commercial or higher
density residential development within environmentally sensitive areas of the Southeast
Sector. If not regulated, this new development could contribute to an unnecessary loss of
trees, open space, and wildlife.
Unmanaged development may compromise the character of the sector by decreasing
open space and trees and increasing traffic and noise.
Future development may have negative impacts on groundwater and drainage, such as
− Decreased quantity and quality of aquifer reserves;
− Decreased groundwater and surface water quality due to contamination from oil/gas
wells and tanks, hazardous material storage, and non-point source pollution around
water wells;
− Decreased streamside vegetation leading to increases in stream pollution;
− Increased stormwater run-off to neighboring properties from construction; and
ENVIRONMENTAL AND NATURAL RESOURCES 23

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 2
− Increased channelization and engineering of natural floodways and streams.
The loss of historic assets in the face of development pressures will compromise the
sense of community within the Southeast Sector.
The Planned Unit Development for the north shore of Lake Draper allows higher intensity
development than desired by the Plan Team, and may cause negative environmental
impacts to the lake.
Undesirable development may occur around the future West Elm Creek Reservoir, and
may impact the character and environmental soundness of the area by the time it is
constructed.
ACTIONS
Water Quality and Quantity
Developers should provide water flow and water quality results from test wells drilled on
the proposed development property. The testing should be performed in accordance
with all applicable federal and state statutes, as well as City of Oklahoma City ordinances
and regulations. The testing should be conducted, and the results presented in
accordance with policy guidelines and recommendations established by the Oklahoma
City Planning Commission.
Develop specific standards for groundwater analysis and for acceptable measures to
remediate identified water supply or water quality problems. Incorporate these
standards into the R-A zoning district regulations and the subdivision regulations for rural
development through appropriate amendments.
Continue to promote the actions set forth in the 2000-2020 Oklahoma City
Comprehensive Plan to preserve and protect water quality.
Restrict agricultural land within Environmental Conservation areas from crop production
to protect watersheds from pesticides and fertilizers.
Preservation of Trees and Open Space
The landscape character (rolling hills, native prairie, Post and Blackjack Oaks) should be
preserved to the extent reasonable and feasible.
Designate specific areas for tree, water and open space preservation through overlay
districts. Establish remediation measures when development does not preserve existing
trees and open space. Remediation measures could include but are not limited to:
− Tree banking (areas set aside as a permanent receiver sites for tree plantings);
− Planting of trees similar in species, character, and quantity; and
− Wetlands preservation and creation
Encourage private and/or public preservation of wooded areas, native prairie, and
wetlands as a focus of neighborhood open space, recreational areas, and for viewing
wildlife. Public preservation programs will be subject to the availability of funds.
Environmental Effects of Development
Planning Commission should consider disturbances of noise, the landscape or the
character of the Southeast Sector when approving development proposals.
Maintain at least a 50-foot building setback from stream banks. The required setback
will be increased when the area within a floodplain extends outward from the stream
bank more than 50 feet. Alternatively, place structures outside of the 100-year
floodplain, whichever requirement provides the greater protected area for stream
24 ENVIRONMENTAL AND NATURAL RESOURCES

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 2
corridors and wetlands. These setbacks should be maintained in a natural or enhanced
condition as to control erosion, improve water quality, protect prime wildlife habitat, slow
run-off and reduce flooding. This statement is not intended to restrict the placement of
trails or other recreational facilities along stream courses or water bodies.
Encourage trails, preservation of stream corridors, open space, and trees in new
neighborhoods.
Identify, preserve and maintain community and historic assets, and explore the use of
easements through the Farmland Protection program to preserve historic farms from
urban or acreage development.
Protect the areas surrounding Tinker Air Force Base from encroachment. The
Department of Defense and adjacent communities are engaged in a Joint Land Use
Study (JLUS) to define compatible development. The recommendations of the study
should be incorporated into the Southeast Sector Plan.
Lake Stanley Draper
Establish a design overlay for the Lake Draper PUD that contains additional design
standards and regulations addressing the aesthetics of the proposed development and
mitigating negative impacts on surrounding development.
Restrict commercial and industrial development around Lake Draper to preserve the
natural environment.
Limit residential development around Lake Draper to low densities with septic service.
Require the preservation of significant trees impacted by new development around Lake
Draper.
Encourage the revegetation of shorelines and continued monitoring by the City of
Oklahoma City and the Oklahoma Water Resources Board to promote a balanced
ecosystem within and around Lake Draper.
Confine off road vehicles to the Crosstimbers Motorized Off Road Vehicle Facility, and
prohibit the further expansion of the facility.
Develop Lake Draper as a Regional Park with educational opportunities for children, the
development of additional low impact recreational uses such as hiking, walking, and
equestrian trails and facilities such as campgrounds, and preserve the natural character
of the lake to the maximum extent possible. This type of development is compatible with
Tinker’s recommendations within the overlapping Accident Potential Zones (APZ).
Improve lighting around public access points, parking areas and trails around Lake
Draper to help reduce crime.
Explore developing User Access Fees through car tags, membership associations, and or
volunteer groups to generate funds for ongoing maintenance.
West Elm Creek Reservoir
Perform an Environmental and Land Use Study to determine the appropriate utilization of
the land and potential for future development.
Consider partnering with Tinker to establish a conservation easement or similar
arrangement that would safeguard the area from development.
Consider implementing appropriate interim uses that benefit the public until the reservoir
is developed. Potential uses include:
− public campgrounds,
− hiking,
ENVIRONMENTAL AND NATURAL RESOURCES 25

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 2
− horseback riding trails,
− tree bank, and
− drop zone for Tinker Air Force Base.
Improve access from interstates and surrounding areas to West Elm Creek Reservoir if
and when it is developed.
26 ENVIRONMENTAL AND NATURAL RESOURCES

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 3
3. DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN
SUMMARY
This section describes the existing land use and zoning framework guiding
development. A large amount of land area within the Southeast Sector remains
undeveloped, with residential acreages comprising most of the developed areas. An analysis
of land use and development patterns indicates ample capacity for additional residential,
industrial, and commercial development within the Southeast Sector over the planning
period.
The Plan Team expressed concerns that increased development in the area could
burden existing infrastructure and natural areas. Increased zoning conflicts and a potential
for negative aesthetic impacts is another concern as the area continues to develop.
Additionally, the Plan Team expressed concern that environmental conservation areas are
not performing their most beneficial use for citizens and flora/fauna. Recommended actions
include:
adopting measures to facilitate a higher quality in urban and rural developments;
enhancing existing appearance corridors and creating secondary appearance corridors
along major arterials;
limiting future residential development and promoting high-tech industrial development
immediately east of Tinker; and
protecting and enhancing existing conservation areas.
3.1 DEVELOPMENT ISSUES, INFLUENCES AND OPPORTUNITIES
3.1.1 Tinker Air Force Base
Tinker AFB occupies 5,033 acres and supports over 25,000 military, contractor, and
civilian personnel. There are 15.9 million square feet of development within its 716
facilities and 730 dwelling units. It is important to protect Tinker AFB against
encroachment, and to support its future growth. There is limited open land available for
development within the base; therefore, base planners are considering alternatives and
opportunities for expansion onto adjacent land. Areas of focus occur east of Douglas
Boulevard to allow direct access and functionality with existing properties, and south for the
expansion or relocation of community facilities. Tinker officials are working with neighboring
communities on a Joint Land Use Study. This study will address the land use needs of
Tinker and surrounding communities within a long term time frame and a comprehensive
scope.
3.1.2 Former General Motors Site
The vacated General Motors plant is a major opportunity for industrial development
within the Southeast Sector. The site is located south of Tinker Air Force Base, bounded by S
Air Depot Boulevard, SE 74 th , and S Midwest Boulevard. If not re-instated as an automobile
manufacturing facility or similar use, this site would be a prime opportunity for expansion of
Tinker facilities.
DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN 27

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 3
3.1.3 Economic Development / Employment Corridors
The section of I-240 leading east to Tinker AFB is a densely developed commercial
and industrial corridor. This area’s economic development potential will continue to drive
additional employment and residential growth in adjacent areas. There is limited land
available for Urban Growth adjacent to this corridor outside of the Environmental
Conservation designation.
3.2 CURRENT LAND USE & ZONING
3.2.1 Land Use
Although the Southeast Sector has been experiencing growth, thirty-two percent of
the area is available for future development. Table 8 tabulates land area by land use
categories within the Sector. The category labeled “available for future development”
includes land that is currently undeveloped or in agricultural use, but does not include area
within the West Elm Creek Reservoir’s take boundary. Map 12 shows the land use in the
Southeast Sector as of 2005.
Table 8: Land Use in the Southeast Sector, June 2005
Land Use Category Acres Percent
Total Residential 37,829.23 43.74
− Acreage 36,504.6 42.21
− Duplex/townhouse 341.48 .39
− Urban single family 983.14 1.14
Open space 3,762.22 4.35
Public and Institutional 4,597.60 5.32
Office 8.67 0.01
Commercial 958.20 1.11
Transportation 14.23 0.02
Utilities 126.62 0.15
Industrial 1,554.25 1.80
Oil and Gas 185.35 0.21
Right-of-way 4,482.52 4.93
Water 3067.20 3.55
West Elm Creek take area 6,686.73 7.73
Available for future development* 27,677.18 32
90,950
* Note: This includes properties that are not currently available for purchase and land that is not
developable due to terrain or other constraints.
28 DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN

Southeast Sector Plan
3.2.2 Zoning
CHAPTER 3
The predominant zoning category for the Southeast Sector is Agricultural (AA). Since
AA is the City’s default zoning category for properties in rural fringe areas, this is in keeping
with the area’s largely undeveloped nature.
Planned Unit Development is a category of zoning that involves special regulations
tailored to the unique characteristics of individual parcels. This district provides for flexibility
in the development of property not available under the regulations of standard zoning
districts. These properties are often subject to special provisions intended to ensure that
the proposed development is compatible with surrounding properties. These provisions may
include limitations on permitted uses and intensity of development, controls on traffic
access, additional landscaping signage restrictions, extra setbacks, height limitations, and
specifications as to building materials. These developments are generally large scale and
often include a mix of residential and non-residential uses.
A large portion of the Southeast Sector surrounding Tinker Air Force Base lies within
the Airport Environs Zones. The overlay zones of Airport Environs are meant to protect
public health, safety and welfare of residents living around airports. Areas within Airport
Environs Zone 1 are exposed to a projected annual average noise level in excess of sixty-five
decibels (as measured by weighted day-night sound level methodology). Areas within Airport
Environs Zone 2 are exposed to a projected annual average noise level in excess of sixty
decibels. Within Airport Environs Zone 1 one and two family residential uses and
institutional uses such as schools and churches are prohibited. Both Airport Environs Zones
allow agricultural, industrial, commercial, open space and recreational land uses.
Table 9 provides an analysis of Zoning within the Southeast Sector.
Table 9: Zoning in the Southeast Sector (March, 2006)
Zoning Category Zoning Districts Acres Percent
Agricultural AA 58,064.70 68.01
Commercial C-1, C-2, C-3, C-4, C-HC 257.85 0.30
Industrial I-1, I-2, I-3 3,187.81 3.73
Planned Unit Development PUD, SPUD 4,572.71 5.36
Single Family R-1, R-1ZL 14,720.92 17.24
Other Urban R-2, R-3, R-3M, R-MH1, R-MH2 4,576.73 5.36
85,380.73
It should be noted that the total acres calculated in Table 7 and Table 8 have a
discrepancy of 5,569 acres. This land is not calculated into the zoning categories tabulated
in Table 8, since zoning district designations do not apply within street rights-of-way. In
comparing land use and zoning data for the Southeast Sector, the following may be
concluded:
DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN 29

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 3
The amount of land in residential use greatly exceeds the amount zoned as residential.
This is due to the largely rural character of the eastern portion of the sector. There are
many acreage residences on land zoned as agricultural.
The area zoned as industrial exceeds of the amount of land currently developed as
industrial. Industrial land use represents just less than 50 percent of the area zoned as
industrial.
The area of land in commercial use greatly exceeds the amount zoned as commercial.
This is in large part due to commercial uses within industrial zoned areas.
30 DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 3
Map 12: Land Use (June, 2005)
LAND USE MAP
DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN 31

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 3
Map 13: Zoning (August, 2006)
ZONING MAP
32 DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 3
3.3 LAND USE ANALYSIS
Map 14 provides a basis for comparing expected housing growth over the next
twenty-five years with the amount of land available for new housing development. The nonresidential
category on the map includes current commercial, industrial, office and public
uses, as well as property already zoned for these uses. The area shown as Environmental
Conservation on Map 14 is not included in the total land available for development
calculations. The results of an analysis of housing needs and land availability prepared by
Planning Department staff are summarized in Tables 10, 11 and 12.
Table 10: Housing Units Needed, 2006 – 2030
Housing Needs
# of Units
Projected number of total housing units in 2030 19,910
− less housing units in 2006 (July planning department estimate) 12,483
Units estimated will be added during planning period 7,427
− less housing unit capacity of lots available for building permits 449
− less housing unit capacity of lots in plats currently being processed 1,740
Additional units to be accommodated within land available for development 5,238
Table 11 shows the land available for development within the Plan Designations of
Rural and Urban Growth Areas. From the total acres within the Rural and Urban Growth
areas existing residential lots, preliminary plats, existing non-residential and floodplains are
subtracted to arrive at a total acreage available for development. The non-residential
category in the table includes current commercial, industrial, office and public uses, as well
as property already zoned for these uses.
Table 11: Land Available for Development within Plan Designations
Area in Acres Rural Urban Growth
Total 54,867 3,478
− less existing residential lots 17,959 800
− less preliminary plats 841 82
− less existing non-residential 122 36
− less floodplain 4,946 99
Total land available within Plan Designation 30,999 2,461
Total land available for development = 33,460 acres
As evidenced in Table 12, the total land available (33,460 acres) to accommodate
the additional 5,238 housing units estimated to be needed by 2030 has the capacity to
support more than twice that number of units. Therefore, the amount of land available
within the Southeast Sector is more than adequate to meet the projected housing needs for
2030 and beyond.
DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN 33

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 3
Table 12: Land Needed to Accommodate Expected Growth
Plan
Designation
Rural
Urban
Growth
Total Land
Available
30,999 acres
2,461 acres
Maximum Number of
Housing Units
Feasible
6,200
(at 0.2 units per acre)
7,383
(at 3.0 units per acre)
Estimated Number of
Housing Units Needed
2006-2030
Land Needed
786 (15%) 3,930 acres
4,452 (85%) 1,484 acres
Total 33,460 acres 13,583 units 5,238 units 5,414 acres
3.4 PROPOSED LAND USE PLAN
The Proposed Land Use Plan and accompanying map are meant to guide
development and give a general overview of land uses to the year 2030.
Areas designated as Urban Growth on Map 15: Proposed Land Use Plan, 2030
include areas of more recent and on-going development which are served by the three basic
urban services or where such service will be made available within the time period covered
by the Plan:
public provided water supply,
sewage treatment and
fire protection.
Predominant uses within the Urban Growth Area are single-family homes, apartments
of moderate densities, regional and community shopping centers, low-rise office buildings
and industrial development in selected areas. This designation has been expanded north of
I-40 to Anderson Road.
The Plan Team recommends that the area bounded by I-40 on the north, I-240 on the
south, S Post Road on the west, and S Anderson Road on the east be designated as
specialized Urban Growth. This designation encourages a predominant use of high-tech
industrial/office parks developed as Planned Unit Developments (PUD) that are compatible
with and complementary to surrounding residential development. The specialized Urban
Growth designation discourages residential subdivisions, but allows for limited residential
development as part of a PUD.
This plan recommends that transportation studies be conducted for the interstates
and section line roads adjacent to the proposed specialized Urban Growth designation.
Currently, traffic congestion and access issues exist due to the volume of traffic generated
by the Base and residential subdivisions. Limiting future residential development within the
specialized Urban Growth area will help address future traffic demands.
Areas designated as Industrial are meant to capitalize on existing transportation
corridors of Interstates 40 and 240 for manufacturing activities. An aircraft maintenance
and repair facility, called the Maintenance Repair Overhaul and Technology Center (MROTC),
has recently been constructed at S Douglas Boulevard and SE 59 th Street. The MROTC is a
34 DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 3
major military and commercial aircraft facility containing several hangars along with
education and training facilities. Industrial land use designation has been expanded to
include the area contiguous with the MROTC east of Tinker to Post Road. As recommended
in the Actions of the Public Services and Infrastructure section of this plan, a study should
be conducted to determine the feasibility of closing Douglas Boulevard to address future
needs for Tinker expansion and security.
The bulk of the Southeast Sector planning area is designated as Rural. These areas
are predominately agriculture, open space and large lot residential uses. Developments in
this area are beyond city sewer and water service for the next 20 years or more. Rural areas
are to remain no to very low intensity development in order to preserve the Sector’s natural
character.
A large area surrounding Lake Draper and the proposed West Elm Creek Reservoir is
designated as Environmental Conservation. This designation limits development to open
space, large lot residential and recreational uses. Development proposals within this area
will be examined on a case-by-case basis to determine environmental impacts and
compatibility.
Interstates 40 and 240 are designated as Major Activity Corridors to S Henney Road.
These corridors support concentrated commercial activities serving customers throughout
the City and region. Commercial Nodes have been designated at the I-40 intersections of S
Choctaw Road, S Anderson Road and S Post Road. Appearance corridors and their design
controls are further explained in the Actions section of Area-wide Development and Design.
DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN 35

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 3
Map 14: Land available for development
DEVELOPMENT STATUS MAP
DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN 37

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 3
Map 15: Proposed Land Use Plan, 2030
PROPOSED LAND USE MAP
Note: This map is general in nature, and is
not intended to depict particular land uses
for specific parcels.
38 DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 3
CONCERNS
Area-wide Development and Design
Future urbanization and development will negatively impact water, sewer, roads and
traffic circulation in transportation corridors, if left unaddressed.
Future development may detract from the character and beauty of the sector if materials,
building siting, screening and general appearance are not considered.
New commercial and industrial development will not provide adequate buffering and
screening against neighboring residential areas and view corridors, which results in a
loss of open space.
There are inconsistencies in road standards between private and public roads,
contributing to uneven road surfaces and increased deterioration on certain streets.
Future residential development should maintain a quality that protects surrounding
housing values and promotes pride of ownership.
There is not a clear understanding of property ownership and the responsibility for
mowing and maintaining rural rights-of way, resulting in high grass growth and an
increased fire danger, which is already at high risk due to the volume of undeveloped and
agricultural land within the Southeast Sector.
Future development may compromise environmentally valued areas, such as Hog Creek
and heavily wooded areas surrounding stream banks.
Rural Areas
Conflicts and compatibility issues have arisen and may continue to arise as agricultural
zoned properties (AA) are rezoned to the higher density single-family rural residential (RA)
district designations.
Allowing residential developments that are perceived as incompatible to develop
adjacent to each other produces incongruent views, discordant character, and a potential
for decreased property values, resulting in degraded quality of the Southeast Sector.
Urban Growth and Industrial Areas
New traffic-generating developments along I-240 and I-40 exits will cause major traffic
problems if left unaddressed.
If not addressed, future development and expansion of Tinker Air Force Base will
generate increased traffic on adjacent roads, and increased interest in residential
development due to the expansion of infrastructure east of the Base.
Environmental Conservation Areas
Environmental Conservation areas under City ownership are being preserved that could
be utilized for environmental benefits, such as wildlife habitat/refuge, wetland banking,
expansion of low-impact trails or other recreational use.
ACTIONS
Area-wide Development and Design
Designate the following section line roads as “Secondary Appearance Corridors”:
Sunnylane Road, Sooner Road, Douglas Boulevard, Post Road, Anderson Road, Choctaw
Road, Peebly Road, Harrah Road, SE 29 th Street , SE 59 th Street, and SE 149 th Street.
Maintain attractive appearance within these corridors by applying special controls on
new development. These appearance controls should include:
DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN 39

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 3
−
−
−
−
−
Limitations on more intense uses;
Increased setbacks as the number of lanes of section line road increases;
Specifying building materials and attractive design treatments for building surfaces
visible from the corridors;
Enhanced landscaping; and
Sign restrictions.
Continue the designation of I-40 and I-240 as “Appearance Corridors”. Maintain an
attractive appearance within these corridors by applying all appearance controls on new
development that are listed for Secondary Appearance Corridors, with additional
consideration for the following:
− Greenbelts;
− Extra setbacks; and
− Height limitations.
Allow commercial development in areas designated as Commercial Nodes on Map 15:
Proposed Land Use Plan 2030 (I-40 at intersections of Choctaw Road, Anderson Road
and Post Road).
Promote parking lot designs that contribute to the attractiveness of the area and
minimize the visual, noise, and air pollution impacts on adjoining properties.
− Treatments could include berms and landscaping along parking lot edges, ample
landscaping placed throughout the interior of the parking area to break up the
expanse of concrete, and locating parking areas behind buildings.
Apply special protective measures to new development proposed for locations adjacent
to existing areas of residential development, view corridors, or open space. These
measures could include:
− Locating larger lots adjacent to existing acreage development;
− Providing greenbelts along the urban-acreage development boundaries;
− Buffering commercial and industrial developments with greenspace; and
− Preserving natural features, including trees and streams.
Provide an appropriate mix and pattern of residential development that
− Promotes a sense of neighborhood and livability;
− Integrates effectively with surrounding development;
− Allows for efficient vehicular and pedestrian access;
− Efficiently utilizes available public services; and
− Maintains property values.
Encourage existing neighborhood associations to acquire adjacent properties along
stream banks as neighborhood-owned private open spaces. Acquisition of land and
construction of trails could be funded through assistance from foundation grants or
establishing neighborhood assessment programs.
Adopt appropriate changes to the Subdivision Regulations to ensure that neighborhood
trails are built in all new developments. When feasible, link neighborhood trails between
neighborhoods and ultimately to the Oklahoma City trails system.
Provide open spaces and preserve natural features including existing trees and
drainageways within new subdivisions. Consider adopting changes to the Zoning
Ordinance and Subdivision Regulations to allow density bonuses for providing open
space.
40 DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 3
Encourage “Conservation” Subdivisions through the use of density bonuses for the
preservation of open space, trees and natural resources.
Adopt changes to the Oklahoma City Code requiring that the smooth side of fencing
should face outward (posts facing inside) on all fences located adjacent to streets.
Provide private and/or public sidewalks, bike paths, and pedestrian trails throughout
residential areas as connections from residential areas to recreational areas, public
spaces, open spaces, and commercial development. Public ownership and maintenance
of these facilities should be subject to the availability of City funds.
Encourage partnerships with non-profit organizations for the maintenance of common
areas and facilities not maintained by a public entity or homeowners association.
Require new developments abutting Hog Creek to incorporate environmental
preservation controls extending 100 feet from the drainage area of the creek basin, and
develop greenbelt access and trails.
Rural Areas
Evaluate residential densities and land uses in rural development proposals using the
following considerations:
− Is the proposed development compatible with the types and intensities of
development in adjoining areas?
− Are police and fire protection and other public services adequate to serve the
proposed development?
− Are the streets and roads adequate to handle the increased traffic volumes
associated with the proposed development? Are there safety /emergency access
considerations associated with the proposed street layout?
− What impact will the proposed development have on the cost of providing City
services including fire and police protection, sewer, waste collection, and streets and
roads?
− Are there any environmental preservation or protection areas that may be impacted
by the proposed development?
− Are there any flight paths in the area that would effect the proposed development?
− Are there other impacts specific to the proposed development?
Require landscape buffering along frontages of rural residential subdivisions to improve
the appearance of adjacent transportation corridors.
Allow limited commercial development within rural areas that is appropriate to the rural
context and is scaled to serve the needs of residents in the vicinity.
As part of the development approval process, subdivision plats should address the
immediate and long-term traffic circulation patterns within the subdivision and at points
of access onto arterial streets.
− Internal circulation shall provide alternatives for traffic to enter or exit the
subdivision.
− Access onto arterial streets shall not impact traffic speed, flow, sight distance or
safety.
− Include provisions for pedestrian and bicycle circulation.
− Consider connections to adjacent subdivisions.
Adopt increased road standards
DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN 41

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 3
−
−
Three inches of paving on either ten inches of stabilized subgrade, or six inches of
stabilized aggregate base over six inches of compacted subgrade ; and
Require thickened / reinforced edges or roll-over curbs to maintain edges on internal
roads.
Urban Growth and Industrial Areas
Encourage clustered, mixed use development that decreases residents’ dependence on
automobiles and preserves open space. This would promote decreased air pollution and
reduced costs for street and road improvements.
Allow commercial development within the urban growth area that is appropriate to an
urban context, enhances community appearance, is limited to uses providing
neighborhood services, and is scaled to serve the needs of residents in adjacent areas.
Discourage strip commercial development along section line roads.
Work with Tinker Air Force Base to address traffic, infrastructure and residential
development needs as expansion occurs and endorse future recommendations from the
Joint Land Use Study. The expansion of infrastructure should be in keeping with the
overall Southeast Sector vision.
Limit new development spurred by the extended water service to the MROTC to be
Industrial Office Parks or High Tech Industrial.
Encourage industrial development in the area bounded by I-40 on the north, the
Environmental Conservation boundary on the south, S Douglas Boulevard on the west,
and S Post Road on the east (shown on Map 15: Proposed Land Use Plan 2030).
Developments should not be approved unless water and sewer exists or is extended
concurrently with the proposed development.
Encourage industrial park design, through PUDs, or the creation of a new zoning category
which includes the following elements:
− sensitive design and placement of buildings,
− screening or prohibiting outdoor storage,
− parcel sizes which allow for long term expansion for individual users,
− special landscaping requirements,
− buffering treatments for truck access, loading facilities, and utilities.
Increase distance, screening and landscaping requirements and limit industrial light
pollution adjacent to residential areas, along highways and arterial streets. Industrial
PUDs located along the boundaries of highways and arterial streets adjacent to
residential developments should include special protections, such as, but not limited to
the following:
− Greenbelts;
− Extra setbacks;
− Step-down in use intensities;
− Height limitations;
− Sign restrictions;
− Lighting restrictions; and
− Specification of building materials.
Facilitate high quality industrial development that brings about significant public benefits
including expanded employment opportunities through targeted extension of public
utilities and transportation services. High technology developments may have special
42 DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 3
service needs including fiber optic communications, grade separated highway access,
rail access, proximity to airports, and high volume demand for electric, natural gas, water
and sewer utilities.
Employ Planned Unit Development (PUD) zoning where extra care is warranted to
minimize adverse impacts on surrounding properties. Such impacts may include (but are
not limited to) traffic volumes, noise, dust, fumes, proliferation in the number and size of
signs, and unsightly appearance. Special situations include industrial development
adjoining appearance corridors and industrial development adjoining residential areas.
Environmental Conservation Areas
Actively enforce the actions within the OKC Plan 2000-2020 for existing designations of
Environmental Conservation Areas, and consider expanding these designations along
stream corridors and areas where natural resources exist.
Limit use within designated Environmental Conservation areas to public open space,
recreation, and five-acre tract residential. To protect watersheds from chemical
pollutants, discourage crops as an allowable practice within agricultural parcels.
Evaluate new development on a case-by-case basis to ensure environmental quality and
compatibility of development.
Develop standards within designated Environmental Conservation areas that ensure that
proposed uses do not adversely affect the quality of public water supplies and water
wells on adjoining properties.
Coordinate with the Water Trust in studying the environmental and land use feasibility of
the West Elm Creek Reservoir to define the extent of the Environmental Conservation
boundary. Examine the appropriateness of the Environmental Conservation designation
in the general area of SE 89 th /S Air Depot/SE 119 th /S Sunnylane, to determine if this
area could be utilized for Urban Growth.
DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN 43

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 4
4. PUBLIC SERVICES AND INFRASTRUCTURE
SUMMARY
Increased growth and development in rural areas poses a challenge to the City in
maintaining the efficiency of public services and quality of infrastructure. The Plan Team
already perceives that this balance has been offset within the Southeast Sector. This section
of the plan addresses police and fire services, the transportation network, water, sewer and
solid waste services, parks, open space and schools. The Plan Team identified the concerns
that currently impact them, and that may pose additional strain on the city and community
as increased development occurs.
One of the Plan Team’s major concerns was a delayed emergency response in rural
areas. The Plan Team attributes the transportation network throughout the sector as one of
the contributing factors. This network includes several dead-end section line roads, which
may complicate the most direct and expedient route for emergency response, and which
may limit the accessibility to residents living in certain subdivisions. This is of particular
concern for fire protection, since the majority of the sector does not have access to city
water service, and is susceptible to large grass fires occurring in agricultural areas.
Although the limited access to city water causes certain challenges to fire-fighting,
the Plan Team does not support extending city water or sewer service east past Anderson
Road. The availability of city water and sewer service supports urban densities, which would
open the door to the broad spread development of subdivisions, retail, office and other
support services. The Plan Team does not support expanding the current landfill or sewer
treatment plants for these reasons as well.
The Plan Team feels strongly that the transportation network and other city services
must keep pace as new development is approved within the Sector. Recommendations to
achieve this include: specific Capital Improvements of road widenings, road improvements,
bridges and traffic signals; increased standards of water sources and fire protection for new
developments; improved circulation routes for both vehicular traffic and pedestrian traffic
via an open space and trails network; and the institution of various public education
programs. Other recommendations and strategies addressing current and future needs
related to Public Services and Infrastructure are outlined in the Action statements of this
Chapter.
4.1 POLICE PROTECTION
The Southeast Sector is served by the Oklahoma City Police Department, Santa Fe
patrol division, which covers approximately 300 square miles. The briefing station is located
at 900 S. Santa Fe Avenue. (See location of Briefing Station and Patrol Divisions on Map
16.) Tinker Air Force Base is not within jurisdiction of the Oklahoma City Police Department.
The Oklahoma City Police Department has jurisdiction in criminal and traffic law
enforcement within the incorporated limits of Oklahoma City. County Sheriff’s departments
have criminal and traffic law enforcement jurisdiction in their respective counties. If within a
city’s incorporated limits, County Sheriff’s departments generally defer investigations to the
municipality.
PUBLIC SERVICES AND INFRASTRUCTURE 45

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 4
Map 16: Police Patrol Divisions and Briefing Stations
4.1.1 Police Staffing within the Southeast Sector
Area residents are concerned about the time taken by Police to respond to calls for
service. However, the Police Department has no data to indicate whether or not response
times are longer in the Southeast Sector than in the rest of the city. Response times are
related to staffing levels, the volume of calls for service, and the priority level (seriousness)
of the call. As shown in the table, due to an overlap in shifts, 36 to 40 officers would be on
duty between 9:30pm and 2:00am. Table 12 shows police staffing levels in the Southeast
Sector. Staffing levels vary by shift and by day of the week.
Table 13: Average Number of Officers on Duty, Santa Fe Division
Shift # Shift time Number of officers on duty
Shift 1 7:00am to 5:00pm 18-20
Shift 2 4:00pm to 2:00am 20-22
Shift 3 9:30pm to 7:30am 16-18
4.1.2 Crime Incidents
Map 17 shows the concentration of major crimes by quarter section from 2000 to
2005. Higher density areas in the northwest portion of the sector show a higher
concentration of crime. The concentration of major crime incidents are grouped into four
categories, by number of incidences occurring within a quarter section mile.
46 PUBLIC SERVICES AND INFRASTRUCTURE

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 4
Map 17: Concentration of Major Crimes by quarter section, 2000 - 2005
As shown in Table 14, major crime rates (number of incidents per 100,000 persons)
in the Southeast Sector for the year 2005 are lower than the citywide rates for Oklahoma
City. When compared with Oklahoma City, the Southeast Sector has low crime rates for
robbery, weapons offenses, and narcotics. For the year 2005 the Southeast Sector had no
homicides. Though larceny, burglary and auto theft are the three highest major crime rates
in the Southeast Sector, there is a less than fifty percent chance of these crimes to occur.
Table 14: Major Crime Incidence by Crime Category, 2005
July 1, 2005
Crime Category
Southeast Sector
Population 30,999
Number of
Incidents
Yearly Rate
per 100,000
persons
INDEX
SE Sector Rate/
City Rate
City of Oklahoma City
Population 531,600
Number of
Incidents
Yearly Rate per
100,000
persons
Total, all types 1,171 3,777.5 0.34 58,696 11,041.4
− Homicide 0 0 0.00 58 10.9
− Rape 7 22.6 0.32 380 71.5
− Robbery 13 41.9 0.19 1,192 224.2
− Assault 132 425.8 0.29 7,16 1,470.3
− Burglary 276 890.4 0.54 8,813 1,657.8
− Larceny 496 1,600.1 0.30 27,902 5,248.7
− Auto Theft 175 564.5 0.57 5,282 993.6
− Weapons Offenses 6 19.4 0.17 614 115.5
− Vandalism 30 96.8 0.24 2,117 398.2
− Sex Offenses 14 45.2 0.40 602 113.2
− Narcotics 22 71.0 0.10 3,920 737.4
Source: Crime incidence date maintained by Oklahoma City Police Department. Population estimates
from Oklahoma City Planning Department. Crime rate and indices are based on crime incidents for which
location can be determined.
PUBLIC SERVICES AND INFRASTRUCTURE 47

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 4
4.2 FIRE PROTECTION AND EMERGENCY SERVICES
4.2.1 Fire Stations within the Southeast Sector
The Fire Department is conducting a fire station location study, which should be
complete by mid-summer 2006. It will examine near-term fire station needs in Oklahoma
City, and will evaluate the development trends to recommend locations and timing for
constructing new fire stations, and closing or transferring existing stations within certain
areas.
All of the Southeast Sector is serviced by Oklahoma City Fire District 603, which has
three fire stations within the sector’s boundaries at the following locations:
Station No. 13, 6901 SE 74th
Station No. 28, 7101 S. Anderson Road
Station No. 36, SE 104th & Peebly Rd
Map 18: Fire Stations and Fire District Location Map
4.2.2 Emergency Medical Response
Eighty percent of all Oklahoma City Fire Department responses are to emergency
medical services calls. The Fire Department currently has 20 Advance Life Support (ALS)
engine companies in service, and has plans to add more in the near future. These engine
companies carry paramedics and manual defibrillators on them and are placed in areas
where a need has been determined by past emergency responses.
Emergency Medical Services Authority (EMSA) is the exclusive emergency medical
service provider for more than 1.1 million people in Central and Northeast Oklahoma. EMSA
was established in Tulsa in 1977. The service area was expanded to include Bixby, Jenks,
and Sand Springs, and then into Oklahoma City and Edmond in 1990. EMSA now has two
48 PUBLIC SERVICES AND INFRASTRUCTURE

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 4
divisions; the eastern division, supporting Tulsa as its major city, and the western division
centered on Oklahoma City.
In Tulsa, Oklahoma City and Edmond, EMSA must respond to 90 percent of all priority
one calls (life threatening emergencies) within 9 minutes and to 90 percent of all priority
two calls (non-life threatening emergencies) in less than 13 minutes.
EMSA’s average response time* last year to calls in the Western Division (Yukon,
Bethany, Mustang, The Village, Warr Acres, Nichols Hills Piedmont and Oklahoma City)
was 6 minutes, 46 seconds.
* Average response time is measured from the moment a dispatcher answers a call to the time
an ambulance arrives on scene. Includes all priority one and two calls.
4.2.3 Fire Control and Prevention Measures
The Fire Department is also analyzing the most effective control measures for fire
prevention. For rural areas with no access to city water, the fire department recommends
residential sprinklers.
Options For Rural Development
– Provide OKC Public Water Supply with hydrants
– Provide Other Public Water Supply with hydrants
– Residential Sprinklers
– 15,000 gal. Storage Tank*
– Water from a NFPA 1142 (was 1231) approved source*
*These options will supply a limited amount of water at the following rates:
– Structures 3,600 s.f. 1,500 gallons per minute for 30 minutes
4.2.4 Additional Fire Protection Requirements
If the projected emergency response time exceeds the Oklahoma City Service
Standard (3 ½ minutes for urban developments or five minutes for rural), the City currently
applies additional development requirements as set forth in Table 15.
PUBLIC SERVICES AND INFRASTRUCTURE 49

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 4
Table 15: Additional Fire Protection Requirements
Type of development Size of residential lots Fire Protection Requirements
Urban development Less than one acre If fire response time exceeds 3 ½ minutes:
− fire retardant roofing
Acreage development One to two acres If fire response time exceeds 5 minutes:
− fire retardant roofing
− 60 foot separation between structures
− alternative water supply source
Large lot development Larger than two acres If fire response time exceeds 5 minutes:
− fire retardant roofing
− 60 foot separation between structures
4.2.5 Public Safety Capital Sales Tax
The City is in the process of implementing improvements funded through the Public
Safety Capital Sales Tax. As a part of this, new storm sirens were installed and a new stateof-the-art
911 and dispatch facility completed with a new computer-aided dispatch system.
A major upgrade of new 800 mega-hertz digital communications systems is underway, which
includes new hand-held radios. Additionally, new radios and new mobile data computers will
be installed within each fire rig by the end of the year. These computers will enable vehicle
locators and Geographic Information System (GIS) mapping technology to assist firefighters
in the field. This mapping technology will enable firefighters to more easily locate specific
buildings hydrants, and roads. Currently, companies in outlying areas update maps for
streets, private roads, hydrants and buildings regularly.
4.3 TRANSPORTATION
4.3.1 Current Conditions
Two interstate highways, I-240 and I-40, provide east-west access through the
Southeast Sector as part of the federal interstate highway system. The planning, design and
construction of these thoroughfares is managed by the Oklahoma Department of
Transportation (ODOT). Section line roads provide local access within the Southeast Sector.
Map 19 shows existing traffic signals and the number of lanes for section line roads in the
Southeast Sector.
There are several section line roads that are not connected due to natural barriers,
such as streams and steep terrain. With a limited number of continuous section line roads
providing connectivity to the interstate, these routes serve as the main transportation routes
to residents and businesses within the outlying areas. The Plan Team expressed that
circulation within this partially disconnected network can be problematic for the infrequent
traveler, and can impact emergency response time.
Poor street condition is readily noticeable and is the most common complaint of rural
residents. Heavy farming equipment, tractors, trucks and sport utility vehicles are common
vehicle types to travel on rural streets. However, rural section line roads are not always built
to urban road standards. Repairs and overlays are common on rural roads that were built to
50 PUBLIC SERVICES AND INFRASTRUCTURE

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 4
the minimum thickness, and contain no curb to reinforce the street edge. The Plan Team
feels strongly that all new roads, whether public or private, should meet the highest
construction standards.
Map 19: Major Streets and Traffic Signals
Map 20 shows bond issued Capital Improvement Projects between 1995 and 2000
for the Southeast Sector.
Map 20: Capital Improvements Projects, 1995-2000
PUBLIC SERVICES AND INFRASTRUCTURE 51

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 4
4.3.2 Assessment of Transportation Needs
The Plan Team requests the following transportation studies be conducted::
Oklahoma Department of Transportation (ODOT)
− Number and proximity of the multiple access points along I-40 between S Anderson
Rd to S Choctaw Road, and
− Traffic flow and access to ramps and interchanges along I-40 and I-240.
City of Oklahoma City, City of Midwest City and Tinker AFB
− Impacts from gate reconfigurations and security requirements east of Tinker, and
− Closure of Douglas and alternative transportation configurations.
If an Eastern Outer Loop or interstate bypass is developed in the future, the Plan
Team does not support that such a transportation corridor be located within the Southeast
Sector. The Plan Team is concerned that additional development would occur as
improvements increasing traffic capacity are made to serve a future interstate bypass.
The highest traffic volumes for north-south section line roads are along Sooner,
Anderson, Choctaw, Peebly and Harrah Roads. The highest traffic volumes on east-west
section line roads are along SE 149th, SE 59th, SE 44th and SE 29th Streets. The
Oklahoma City Public Works Department determines a possible need to widen a two-lane
street to four lanes when a two-lane road segment reaches a threshold of 7,000 or more
vehicle trips per day. Maps 21 and 22 show average daily trips (ADT) for section line roads
within the Southeast Sector for the year 2004.
52 PUBLIC SERVICES AND INFRASTRUCTURE

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 4
Map 21: Traffic Volumes, Bryant Avenue to Hiwasse Road, 2004
PUBLIC SERVICES AND INFRASTRUCTURE 53

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 4
Map 22: Traffic Volumes, Henney Road to Harrah Road, 2004
4.4 WATER SUPPLY
The City of Oklahoma City provides municipal water for residential and business use
and for fire protection in the far northwestern portion of the Southeast Sector. Groundwater
wells supply water for those areas not served by the Oklahoma City water system. Extension
of city water mains serving the recently approved Maintenance Repair Overhaul and
Technology Center (MROTC) development at Douglas and SE 59 th Street may provide
options for water service to potential new developments west of Post Road and north of SE
74 th Street.
The Plan Team supports further extension of city water into the area bounded by I-40
on the north, I-240 on the south, Post on the east, and Douglas on the west. The Plan Team
54 PUBLIC SERVICES AND INFRASTRUCTURE

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 4
would like development within this area to be limited to industrial development, such as
high-tech industrial parks, only if city water and sewer is available.
Map 23: Water Mains
4.5 SANITARY SEWER
The City of Oklahoma City provides wastewater treatment for homes and businesses
in the far northwestern portion of the Southeast Sector. Wastewater from the northwestern
portion of the sector flows to the North Canadian Wastewater Treatment Plant. The North
Canadian Wastewater Treatment Plant has a daily average flow of 50 million gallons per day
(mgd), with a peak treatment capacity of 120 mgd.
Sewer service is not available in the eastern portion of the sector. Septic tanks and
lagoons provide wastewater treatment in these areas. The extension of sewer for the MROTC
development will also provide services into an expanded area that the Plan Team promotes
for high-tech industrial development (see area designated as Industrial between South
Douglas Boulevard and South Post Road, and Interstates 40 and 240 on Map 15: Proposed
Land Use Plan, 2030).
PUBLIC SERVICES AND INFRASTRUCTURE 55

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 4
Map 24: Sanitary Sewer
4.6 SOLID WASTE
Waste Management, Inc provides solid waste collection services for residential
customers in the Southeast Sector with some supplemental service provided by the City of
Oklahoma City. Waste management on Tinker Air Force Base is contracted by Sea Coast
Disposal, and uses the landfill at SW 59 th Street. The landfill at 7540 SW 59th Street is
owned and operated by Allied Waste Industries.
In August of 2005, Allied Waste reported that the capacity of the Southeast Landfill
will be reached in 22.7 years. Since capacity is expected to be met near the extent of the
planning period, the Plan Team does not support expanding the existing landfill or approving
additional landfill sites to be located within the sector. The Plan Team requested that the
Planning Department conduct a study to determine recreational redevelopment
opportunities for the landfill site upon its closing.
56 PUBLIC SERVICES AND INFRASTRUCTURE

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 4
Map 25: Solid Waste Collection and Landfill Location
Solid Waste Services
for Residential
Customers
Urban area:
Weekly for cart
collection,
supplemental
bags and
recycling;
monthly for
bulky collection
Rural area:
Weekly cart
collection;
monthly bulk
collection
4.7 PARKS, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE
Map 26: Parks and Recreational Facilities
There are two small public parks
within the Southeast Sector, including a
children’s park (classified as a
metropolitan park) that was constructed
near Lake Draper as part of the 2000
Bond Issue; and one open space area
located at Sooner Road and SE 59th
Street.
Mackleman Park, classified as a
neighborhood park, lies just outside the
sector at SE 59th Street and Mackleman
Drive. Tinker Air Force Base has Charles
B Hall Tuskegee Air Park, which is open
to the public during daylight hours. The
air base has plans for future trails to
connect the Air Park with regional trails.
The Plan Team believes Lake
Stanley Draper has ample space and
encourages it to be developed with park
amenities serving residents and visitors
of the Southeast Sector.
PUBLIC SERVICES AND INFRASTRUCTURE 57

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 4
Map 27: Southeast Sector Area Trails
Three trails, as a part of the Oklahoma City Trails Master Plan are planned within the
Southeast Sector, Draper Lake Trail, 104 St Trail and Tinker-Draper Trail. The Tinker-Draper
trail has funding. Map 27 shows the location of Oklahoma City trails along with Choctaw
and Norman’s bike trails. Opportunities exist to link Oklahoma City’s trail system with
adjacent communities.
4.8 SCHOOLS
The MAPS for Kids program is a joint effort by the City of Oklahoma City and area
schools to improve educational facilities. This program funds school capital projects through
a special, dedicated sales tax. There are nine school districts within the Southeast Sector,
shown in Table 16 and Map 28.
Table 16: School Enrollment by District
School District Enrollment (as of 10/05)
Choctaw-Nicoma Park Schools 4,787
Harrah Public Schools 2,321
Little Axe Public Schools 1,271
58 PUBLIC SERVICES AND INFRASTRUCTURE

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 4
School District Enrollment (as of 10/05)
McLoud Public Schools 1,787
Midwest City – Del City Schools 14,552
Moore Public Schools 20,028
Norman Public Schools 13,128
Oklahoma City Public Schools 40,322
Robin Hill Public School 172
Map 28: School Districts, Types, and Location
CONCERNS
Police Protection
Area residents perceive there to be a lengthy police response time and low police
presence within rural areas of the Southeast Sector.
Jurisdictional boundaries for police service are unclear to rural residents.
Future growth will increase the demand for emergency services, and stretch already thin
resources as evident by its few police stations and police patrols within the sector.
Inadequate lighting and low densities (resulting in fewer ‘eyes’ watching the area)
creates a hospitable environment for crime incidents.
Fire Protection and Emergency Services
There are inadequate fire protection standards for rural properties.
Emergency and fire response time exceeds standards desired by rural residents.
PUBLIC SERVICES AND INFRASTRUCTURE 59

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 4
Residents perceive there to be jurisdictional issues impeding emergency responses.
Transportation
The transportation network within the Southeast Sector does not keep pace with
development. Many subdivisions exit onto major arterials causing traffic congestion in
the surrounding areas.
The limited number of continuous section line roads results in traffic congestion on the
streets that are connected to the rest of the City and to the interstates.
There are very few alternative transportation options, such as bike trails, bus service, and
park and ride facilities within the Southeast Sector.
The interstate interchanges have inadequate capacity and signalization at high traffic
points, such as on I-40 from Air Depot Boulevard to the east.
Water, Sewer and Solid Waste
Growth is limited by the extent of City water lines, which only serve as far east as Douglas
Boulevard. However, increased growth within this area will cause the demand for water in
surrounding areas.
Extending City water and sewer services for the Maintenance Repair Overhaul and
Technology Center (MROTC) development at Tinker AFB may open new opportunities for
development in the immediate area.
The lack of City water in rural areas impacts fire-fighting capabilities.
The location of a new sewage treatment plant and/or the expansion of sewer services
eastward would increase development capacity in rural areas.
There are currently no plans for addressing the landfill when its capacity is reached.
Continued population growth outside of the Southeast Sector contributes to the landfill.
The City’s large trash pick-up and burn guidelines don’t differentiate between urban and
rural areas, although rural residents require different types of service than urban
residents. Many rural residents are not aware of the City’s large trash pick-up policies or
burn guidelines.
The City has increased trash collection rates, and yet provides fewer services to rural
customers, such as no curbside recycling or collection of yard debris.
Parks, Recreation and Open Space
The lack of parks, open spaces, trails, and meeting places within the Southeast Sector
impact the area’s ability to build a sense of community and enhance neighborhood
livability and housing values.
A Motor Racetrack is not supported as a land use or activity within the Southeast Sector.
Schools
There are growing safety concerns caused by traffic problems and inadequate streets
around schools in the sector.
Continued population growth paired with limited capacities of schools within the
Southeast Sector will cause increased traffic and pedestrian conflicts around school
properties and a greater demand on school districts.
60 PUBLIC SERVICES AND INFRASTRUCTURE

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 4
ACTIONS
Police Protection
Evaluate crime incidence levels, response times, and projected growth on a continuing
basis to determine if additional public safety measures or resources are needed. When
evaluations of service levels confirm that a problem exists, increasing the number of
officers assigned to the Southeast Sector and implementing staggered, random patrols,
if feasible, will be the initial strategy for addressing these concerns.
The Police Department should engage in community education programs and the City of
Oklahoma City should distribute publications clarifying police jurisdictions for residents
within the Southeast Sector.
Establish criteria for new development, redevelopment, and subdivision approval based
on Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) standards.
Require lighting at subdivision entrances and major street intersections and encourage
lighting on private roads to deter crime.
Promote cooperative neighborhood crime prevention strategies involving area residents,
businesses, Sheriff’s Department and Oklahoma City Police Department. Possible
approaches include:
− Neighborhood crime watch;
− Neighborhood patrols by residents and property owners;
− Police take-home vehicles; and
− Supplemental patrols by private security firms.
Fire Protection and Emergency Services
Offer “trade-offs” or other incentives to encourage developers to provide supplemental
water sources (tanks, ponds, swimming pools) and/or sprinklers in residential units.
Trade-offs could include density bonuses.
Require larger tank standards for fire protection as follows:
− Structures < 3,600 sq. ft. require a minimum 30,000 gallon tank
− Structures > 3,600 sq. ft. require a minimum 45,000 gallon tank
Install public well-water towers at strategic locations within rural areas with no access to
city water to serve fire tank truck needs. These towers should be located within a
reasonable distance to subdivisions.
Ensure that Fire Department Capital Safety upgrades for radios and mobile data
computers are available for vehicles within the field in the outermost areas first.
The Oklahoma City Fire Department should engage in community education programs
and distribute publications addressing fire suppression, prevention techniques, and
jurisdictional issues to residents and businesses within the Southeast Sector.
Transportation
Increase capacity of Post Road from SE 29 th Street to I-240 to accommodate high tech
industrial development and North/South access in the area.
Work with the county and state to address future transportation plans for the Tinker Air
Force Base expansion area.
PUBLIC SERVICES AND INFRASTRUCTURE 61

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 4
Partner with ODOT to address capacity issues of I-40 at Air Depot Boulevard eastward,
and consider improvements in ramps, overpasses and interchanges along I-40 and I-240
to better handle traffic flow and improve access to section line roads.
Prioritize Capital Improvements for repairs, and widening for the following roads:
− North/South:
▪ Sooner Road from SE 29th Street to SE 149th Street
▪ Anderson Road from SE 29th Street to SE 104th Street
▪ Choctaw Road from SE 29th Street to SE 149th Street
▪ Peebly Road from SE 44th Street to SE 149th Street
▪ Harrah Road from SE 29th Street to SE 164th Street
− East/West:
▪ SE 29th Street from Sooner Road to Choctaw Road
▪ SE 149th Street from Sunnylane Road to Pottawatomie Road, taking into account
location of West Elm Creek Reservoir intake area
Prioritize Capital Improvements for signalization at the following intersections:
− SE 82nd Street and Sooner Road
− SE 71st Street and Choctaw Road
Consider ways to promote greater utilization of transportation options other than
automobiles, such as a park and ride service that provides an express transit service,
and extending bus service into the Southeast Sector.
Water, Sewer and Solid Waste
Preserve the rural character of the Southeast Sector by not extending City water and
sewer services east of Anderson Road and south of I-240, nor allowing a new sewage
treatment plant to be located within the sector.
The Oklahoma City Fire Department and City Manager’s Office should examine the
feasibility and cost of installing public well-water towers at strategic locations within rural
areas with no access to city water to aid fire fighting.
The City Planning Department should work with the community and landfill property
owners to develop a plan to utilize the landfill for passive recreation when its capacity is
reached and the landfill is closed and capped.
Promote and pursue solid waste disposal alternatives such as: composting facilities,
recycling programs, incinerators, and conversion of trash to energy. Consider selling
methane gas emitted from trash decomposition as an alternative fuel source for
industries surrounding the landfill.
Prohibit a new landfill from being developed within the Southeast Sector.
Increase the frequency of large trash pick ups in rural areas when burn bans are in
effect, and increase the allotted volume of yard debris for curb side pick ups. The City
should also include educational inserts in city service bills to rural residents regarding
bulk and yard waste pick up services and times.
Parks, Recreation and Open Space
Develop Lake Draper as a regional park with various amenities for active and passive
recreation, adequate lighting and connections from neighborhoods.
Require open spaces, park areas, recreational facilities, trails, and public meeting places
to be included into area developments, where feasible. Encourage developers of new
62 PUBLIC SERVICES AND INFRASTRUCTURE

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 4
housing areas to provide connectivity to private parks and/or trail systems within their
developments and public points of interest.
Encourage City partners and developers to construct trail systems in Floodplains along
area creeks, and look for opportunities to link with surrounding trail systems and
recreational opportunities, such as linking Lake Draper with Lake Thunderbird in Norman
via Douglas Boulevard, and North Deer Creek via SE 104 th Street, Peebly Road and SE
59 th Street.
Utilize any existing unused rights-of-way on section line roads for the installation of
dedicated bike lanes and trails, and install dedicated bike lanes on low traffic four- to
five-lane arterials, such as SE 59 th Street, Air Depot Boulevard, and SE 74 th Street.
Schools
Prioritize improvements, widenings and repairs on streets around school properties
within the Southeast Sector.
Oklahoma City MAPS should work proactively with the Planning Department in the
expansion of school facilities or construction of additional facilities to keep pace with the
anticipated growth in school-age population.
School Districts with schools in the Southeast Sector should work with the City’s Traffic
Department to develop solutions to traffic and circulation problems associated with
student drop-off and pick-up.
PUBLIC SERVICES AND INFRASTRUCTURE 63

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 5
5. COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
SUMMARY
Communication between neighbors on acreage developments isn’t as easily
accomplished as those living in the higher density neighborhoods. This, in combination with
the unavailability of internet service, poses challenges to rural residents in gaining
knowledge of what is happening in their community. In order to improve community
awareness, decrease crime, and improve property maintenance, the Plan Team
recommends that all new subdivisions be required to instate neighborhood or homeowner’s
associations.
The Plan Team is concerned that rural residents are not adequately informed about
proposals for development. They state that the current system of notification is not
appropriate for reaching all of the residents in rural areas who would be potentially impacted
by development proposals. The Plan Team recommends adjusting the notification process
for Rural areas and instating additional notification methods for rural residents.
5.1 NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS
Neighborhood associations are the primary means by which residents and business
interests can work together to achieve common planning goals. Neighborhood associations
also provide a means for communication among area residents, business interests, and City
officials and staff. As shown in Map 29, there are currently nine active neighborhood
associations within the Southeast Sector. Neighborhood associations listed as inactive were
at one time active associations; there are six such inactive associations within the Southeast
Sector.
Map 29: Neighborhood Associations
COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT 65

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 5
5.2 PUBLIC NOTIFICATIONS
Pending verification as to legality, the Plan Team requests that boundaries and
extent for public notification are increased to capture more property owners within sparsely
populated rural areas. The following summarizes the current requirements for public
notification of City Council and Planning Commission hearings, as set forth in the City’s
zoning code.
5.2.1 Rezoning
Notice of City Council and Planning Commission hearing shall be given at least 20
days prior to such hearing by mailing written notice to all owners of property within a 300-
foot radius of the exterior boundary of the subject property, said radius to be extended by
increments of 100 linear feet until the list of property owners includes not less than 15
individual property owners of separate parcels or until a maximum radius of 1,000 feet has
been reached.
5.2.2 Plat Approval
Notice shall be mailed to the owners of land immediately adjoining the platted land,
as their names appear upon the plats in the County Clerk's office and their addresses
appear in the City Directory or on the tax records of the County in which the property is
located.
CONCERNS
The lack of active, well-organized, neighborhood and business associations and crime
watches leads to a weak sense of community and promotes vulnerable areas for crimes
to occur.
Current notification standards are not adequate in rural areas of the city with low
population densities. Some area residents and businesses are not informed of zoning
cases for nearby properties to be heard by the City’s Planning Commission.
ACTIONS
Improve existing, develop new, and reform inactive neighborhood associations and crime
watches. Enlist help from capacity-building organizations and/or neighborhood resource
non-profits (such as Council of Neighborhoods and Neighborhood Alliance) to strengthen
existing Neighborhood Associations and develop new ones.
Target high crime neighborhoods for the formation of Neighborhood Associations and
crime watches.
Institute a “Light the Night” program, which encourages businesses and residents to
leave outdoor lights turned on throughout the night.
Change the notification process for Planning Commission cases in areas of the city
defined in The OKC Plan, 2000-2020 as “Rural” according to the following:
− When rezoning properties from AA Agricultural to any higher density residential use
unit, notice of City Council and Planning Commission hearing shall be given at least
20 days prior to such hearing by mailing written notice to all owners of property
within 300 linear feet of the exterior boundary of the subject property. The
notification area is to be extended by increments of 100 linear feet until the list of
property owners includes not less than 25 individual, unique property owners of
66 COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 5
separate parcels or until a maximum notification area of ¼ mile from the exterior
boundary of subject property has been reached.
− When rezoning properties from AA Agricultural to any commercial or higher intensity
use other than residential, notice of City Council and Planning Commission hearing
shall be given at least 20 days prior to such hearing by mailing written notice to all
owners of property within 300 linear feet of the exterior boundary of the subject
property. The notification area is to be extended by increments of 100 linear feet
until the list of property owners includes not less than 25 individual, unique property
owners of separate parcels or until a maximum notification area of ½ mile from
exterior boundary of subject property has been reached.
Require that all rezoning applicants:
− Acquire notification list through certified abstracts;
− Post signs on the subject property stating the proposed zoning change, hearing date
and time; and
− Supply a map demarcating the notification area surrounding the subject property and
the notified properties.
Maintain a current Planning Commission docket on the City’s website with tools to search
or sort the cases by sector or area.
Partner with non-profit organizations (such as Neighborhood Alliance) to establish a
voluntary email notification of Planning Commission and City Council items pertaining to
the area.
COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT 67

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 6
6. PLAN IMPLEMENTATION
Implementation is the process of making a plan’s recommended actions come to life.
The Southeast Sector Plan’s Actions are summarized and divided as either One-time Plan
Actions or Ongoing Plan Actions. For each Action, the chapter and subheading from which it
was taken in the Plan is listed in parenthesis.
6.1 ONE-TIME PLAN ACTIONS
Plan Actions in this section are divided into two categories: Zoning Code and
Subdivision Regulations; and Recommended Capital Improvements Projects. They involve
specific one-time actions necessary to carry out Plan goals.
6.1.1 Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Regulations
Plan Actions listed in this section either require changes to the City’s Zoning Code,
Subdivision Regulations.
Coordinated by: Oklahoma City Planning Department
Also involving: Development professionals
Review/Approval by: Planning Commission and City Council
Actions:
– Require groundwater analysis and remediation measures within R-A zoning district.
(Chapter 2: Water Quality and Water Resources)
– Restrict crop production within the Environmental Conservation designation. (Chapter
2: Water Quality and Water Resources)
– Develop tree, water and open space preservation overlays and establish remediation
measures. (Chapter 2: Preservation of Trees and Open Space)
– Establish a design overlay for the Lake Draper PUD. (Chapter 2: Lake Stanley Draper)
– Require increased road standards for repairs and new construction.(Chapter 3: Rural)
– Require rural subdivision plats to address internal circulation and access onto
arterial streets. (Chapter 3: Rural)
– Require all new developments to construct neighborhood trails and preserve open
spaces and natural features. Consider allowing density bonuses for providing open
space. (Chapter 3: Area-wide Development and Design)
– Require that the smooth side of fencing faces outward (posts facing inside) on all
fences located adjacent to streets. (Chapter 3: Area-wide Development and Design)
– Require landscape buffering along frontages of rural residential subdivisions
adjacent to transportation corridors. (Chapter 3: Rural Areas)
– Create new zoning category for industrial park design. Encourage sensitive design
controls and special boundary protections through PUDs (Chapter 3: Urban Growth
and Industrial Areas)
– Require lighting at all subdivision entrances and major street intersections and
encourage lighting on private roads to deter crime. (Chapter 4: Police Protection)
PLAN IMPLEMENTATION 69

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 6
– Establish criteria for new development, redevelopment, and subdivisions to conform
with CPTED standards. (Chapter 4: Police Protection)
– Require larger tank standards for fire protection in rural residential developments as
outlined in the plan. (Chapter 4: Fire Protection and Emergency Services)
– Change the notification process for Planning Commission cases in rural areas of the
city. (Chapter 5: Community Involvement)
6.1.2 Recommended Capital Improvements Projects (CIP)
Plan Team members recommended Capital Improvements Projects by first, second
and third priority. Map 30 shows project locations for the Recommended Capital
Improvements Projects. There are several recommended improvements for section line
roads that extend into adjacent municipalities or county jurisdictions. Oklahoma City’s Public
Works department should collaborate with adjacent municipalities and county officials on
the implementation of these improvements.
Coordinated by: Oklahoma City Planning Department
Also involving: Public Works, Traffic Design and Engineering and Traffic Management
divisions, Oklahoma Department of Transportation, Oklahoma City Water Trust
Review/Approval by: Planning Commission and City Council
Actions: Recommend prioritization of projects as follows:
First Priority
– Signalize at SE 82nd Street and Sooner Road
– Repair, widen and/or signalize Sooner Road from SE 29th Street to SE 149th Street
– Partner with ODOT for interchange improvements, adequate acceleration and
deceleration lanes and overpasses along I-40 and I-240 to improve access to section
line roads
– Signalize SE 71st Street and Choctaw Road
– Repair, widen and/or signalize Choctaw Road from SE 29th Street to SE 149th Street
– Repair, widen and/or signalize Anderson Road from SE 29th Street to SE 104th
Street
– Connect and pave Henney Road from SE 89th Street to SE 74th Street to provide
another point of access for the several subdivisions in the area
Second Priority
– Repair, widen and/or signalize Post Road from SE 29th Street to I-240
– Repair, widen and/or signalize Peebly Road from SE 44th Street to SE 149th Street
– Repair, widen and/or signalize Harrah Road from SE 29th Street to SE 164th Street
– Repair, widen and/or signalize SE 29th Street from Sooner Road to Choctaw Road
– Repair, widen and/or signalize SE 149th Street from Sunnylane Road to
Pottawatomie Road (taking into account proposed location of West Elm Creek
Reservoir)
– Pave and light existing Park and Ride facilities at Choctaw Road and I-40
70 PLAN IMPLEMENTATION

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 6
Third Priority
– Install public well-water towers at strategic locations within rural areas with no access
to city water to serve fire tank truck needs
– Construct trail systems in Floodplains along area creeks, and look for opportunities to
link with surrounding communities trail systems and recreational opportunities, such
as linking Lake Draper Trail with Lake Thunderbird in Norman via Douglas Boulevard,
and North Deer Creek via SE 104th Street, Peebly Road and SE 59th Street
– Develop Lake Draper as a regional park with various amenities for active and passive
recreation, adequate lighting and connections from neighborhoods
– Target low traffic 4 to 5 lane arterials such as SE 59th Street / Air Depot Boulevard /
SE 74th Street for installation of dedicated bike lanes
– Utilize existing, unused ROW on section line roads for dedicated bike lanes/trails
Map 30: Recommended Capital Improvement Projects (CIP)
Location not specified:
- Public well-water towers
- Low traffic arterial bike lanes
- ROW bike lanes/trails
6.2 ONGOING PLAN ACTIONS
The Plan Actions outlined in this section are meant to be carried out throughout the
planning period. They serve as a guide for development to occur within the Southeast
Sector Plan’s overall vision.
6.2.1 Environment
Coordinated by: Oklahoma City Planning Department
Also involving: Development professionals, Oklahoma Water Resources Board, Oklahoma
City Water Trust
Review/Approval by: Planning Commission, City Council
Actions:
PLAN IMPLEMENTATION 71

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 6
– Promote the actions set forth in The OKC Plan, 2000-2020 to preserve and protect
water quality. (Chapter 2: Water Quality and Quantity)
– Encourage private and/or public preservation of neighborhood open space. (Chapter
2: Preservation of Trees and Open Space)
– Restrict commercial and industrial development around Lake Draper. (Chapter 2:
Lake Stanley Draper)
– Limit residential development around Lake Draper to low densities with septic
service. (Chapter 2: Lake Stanley Draper)
– Require the preservation of significant trees around Lake Draper. (Chapter 2: Lake
Stanley Draper)
– Encourage revegetation and continued monitoring around Lake Draper. (Chapter 2:
Lake Stanley Draper)
– Require new developments abutting Hog Creek to establish easements for and
greenbelts and trails. (Chapter 3: Area-wide Development and Design)
– Expand Environmental Conservation designations along stream corridors and areas
where natural resources exist. (Chapter 3: Environmental Conservation)
– Evaluate new development proposals within the Environmental Conservation area on
a case-by-case basis to ensure environmental quality and compatibility of
development. (Chapter 3: Environmental Conservation)
– Develop standards for new development to protect quality of public water supplies
and water wells within Environmental Conservation areas. (Chapter 3: Environmental
Conservation)
– Initiate a study to assess the environmental and land use feasibility of West Elm
Creek Reservoir, and define the extent of Environmental Conservation boundary in
the general area of SE 89th/S Air Depot/SE 119th/S Sunnylane. (Chapter 3:
Environmental Conservation)
6.2.2 Land Use and Development Standards
Coordinated by: Oklahoma City Planning Department
Also involving: Development professionals
Review/Approval by: Planning Commission, City Council
Actions:
– Identify, preserve and maintain community and historic assets. Explore the use of
easements through the Farmland Protection program to preserve historic farms.
(Chapter 2: Environmental Effects of Development)
– Protect the natural areas around Tinker from encroachment. (Chapter 2:
Environmental Effects of Development)
– Designate “Secondary Appearance Corridors” to section line roads, and “Appearance
Corridors” along I-40 and I-240 as shown in Map 15: Proposed Land Use Plan, 2030.
(Chapter 3: Area-wide Development and Design)
– Promote parking lot designs that contribute to the attractiveness and minimize
negative impacts on adjoining properties. (Chapter 3: Area-wide Development and
Design)
72 PLAN IMPLEMENTATION

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 6
– Apply special protective measures to new development adjacent to existing
residential development, view corridors, or open space. (Chapter 3: Area-wide
Development and Design)
– Allow commercial development around the intersections where Commercial Nodes
are identified as shown on Map 15: Proposed Land Use Plan, 2030. (Chapter 3: Areawide
Development and Design)
– Encourage clustered, mixed use development through density bonus incentives.
(Chapter 3: Area wide Development and Design)
– Evaluate residential densities and land uses in rural development proposals using
the considerations outlined in this plan. (Chapter 3: Rural Areas)
– Allow limited commercial development within rural areas that is appropriate in
context and scale to the rural vicinity. (Chapter 3: Rural Areas)
– Encourage PUD zoning where extra care is warranted to minimize adverse impacts on
surrounding properties. (Chapter 3: Urban Growth and Industrial Areas)
– Encourage development within the specialized Urban Growth designation to be
complementary in design and intensity with adjacent developments. (Chapter 3:
Urban Growth and Industrial Areas)
– Apply special design controls for commercial development within the urban growth
area. (Chapter 3: Urban Growth and Industrial Areas)
– Discourage strip commercial development along section line roads. (Chapter 3:
Urban Growth and Industrial Areas)
– Work with Tinker Air Force Base to address traffic, infrastructure and residential
development needs as expansion occurs and endorse future recommendations from
the Joint Land Use Study. (Chapter 3:Urban Growth and Industrial Areas)
6.2.3 Parks and Recreation
Coordinated by: Oklahoma City Planning Department
Also involving: Oklahoma City Water Trust, development professionals
Review/Approval by: Planning Commission, City Council
Actions:
– Confine off road vehicles to the Crosstimbers Motorized Off Road Vehicle Facility, and
prohibit the further expansion of the facility. (Chapter 2: Lake Stanley Draper)
– Develop Lake Draper as a Regional Park and preserve the natural character of the
lake to the maximum extent possible. (Chapter 2: Lake Stanley Draper)
– Develop the West Elm Creek area with appropriate interim uses that benefit the
public as outlined in the plan. (Chapter 2: West Elm Creek)
– Require public amenities to be included into area developments, where feasible.
(Chapter 4: Parks and Recreation)
– Encourage connectivity within new residential subdivisions to private parks, trail
systems and public points of interest. (Chapter 4: Parks and Recreation)
6.2.4 Public Services
Coordinated by: Oklahoma City Planning Department
Also involving: Oklahoma City Police and Fire departments, development professionals
PLAN IMPLEMENTATION 73

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 6
Review/Approval by: Planning Commission, City Council
Actions:
– Evaluate crime stats and projected growth on a continuing basis to determine if
additional resources or implementation strategies are needed. (Chapter 4: Police
Protection)
– Engage in community education programs and distribute publications clarifying
police jurisdictions for residents within the Southeast Sector. (Chapter 4: Police
Protection)
– Promote cooperative neighborhood crime prevention strategies involving area
residents, businesses, Sheriff’s Department and Oklahoma City Police Department.
(Chapter 4: Police Protection)
– Offer incentives for supplemental water sources (tanks, ponds, swimming pools
and/or sprinklers) in residential units. (Chapter 4: Fire Protection and Emergency
Services)
– Ensure that Fire Department Capital Safety upgrades for radios and mobile data
computers are available for vehicles within the field in the outermost areas first.
(Chapter 4: Fire Protection and Emergency Services)
– Engage in community education programs on fire suppression, prevention
techniques, and jurisdictional issues with residents and businesses within the
Southeast Sector. (Chapter 4: Fire Protection and Emergency Services)
– Discourage extending City water and sewer services east of Anderson Road and
south of I-240, or developing a new sewage treatment plant within the sector.
(Chapter 4: Water, Sewer and Solid Waste)
– Develop a plan to utilize the existing landfill as a passive recreation when its capacity
is reached and the landfill is closed and capped. (Chapter 4: Water, Sewer and Solid
Waste)
– Promote and pursue solid waste disposal alternatives. Consider selling methane gas
emitted from trash decomposition as an alternative fuel source for industries
surrounding the landfill. (Chapter 4: Water, Sewer and Solid Waste)
– Prohibit a new landfill from being developed within the Southeast Sector. (Chapter 4:
Water, Sewer and Solid Waste)
– Increase the frequency of large trash pick ups in rural areas when burn bans are in
effect, and increase the allotted volume of yard debris for curb side pick ups.
(Chapter 4: Water, Sewer and Solid Waste)
– Include educational inserts in city service bills regarding bulk and yard waste pick up
services and times to rural residents. (Chapter 4: Water, Sewer and Solid Waste)
6.2.5 Schools
Coordinated by: Oklahoma City Planning Department
Also involving: Oklahoma City Public School officials, Oklahoma City School District,
Public Works Traffic and Engineering and Traffic Management divisions
Review/Approval by: Planning Commission, City Council
Actions:
74 PLAN IMPLEMENTATION

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 6
– Oklahoma City MAPS should work proactively with the Planning Department in the
expansion of school facilities or construction of additional facilities to keep pace with
the anticipated growth in school-age population. (Chapter 4: Schools)
– Prioritize improvements, widenings and repairs on streets around schools. (Chapter
4: Schools)
– School Districts with schools in the Southeast Sector should work with the City’s
Traffic Department to develop solutions to traffic and circulation problems. (Chapter
4: Schools)
6.2.6 Community Involvement
Coordinated by: Oklahoma City Planning Department
Also involving: Council of Neighborhoods, Neighborhood Alliance, area property owners
Actions:
– Improve existing, develop new, and reform inactive neighborhood associations and
crime watches. (Chapter 5: Community Involvement)
– Form Neighborhood Associations and crime watches within targeted high crime
neighborhoods. (Chapter 5: Community Involvement)
– Maintain a current Planning Commission docket on the City’s website with tools to
search or sort the cases by sector or area. (Chapter 5: Community Involvement)
– Partner with non-profit organizations (such as Neighborhood Alliance) to establish a
voluntary email notification of Planning Commission and City Council items pertaining
to the area. (Chapter 5: Community Involvement)
– Institute a “Light the Night” program, which encourages businesses and residents to
leave outdoor lights turned on throughout the night. (Chapter 5: Community
Involvement)
PLAN IMPLEMENTATION 75

Southeast Sector Plan
CHAPTER 7
7. APPENDIX
7.1 REFERENCES
Oklahoma Conservation Commission. 2000. The Oklahoma Wetlands Reference Guide (James
Henley and Mark S. Harrison, authors). Oklahoma Conservation Commission, Oklahoma
City, Oklahoma.
Oklahoma Climatological Survey. http://www.ocs.ou.edu.
US Fish and Wildlife Service. http://www.fws.gov.
Association of Central Oklahoma Governments (ACOG).
http://www.acogok.org/Programs_and_Services/Water_Resources/Ground_Water.asp
USGS Groundwater Atlas of the United States. http://capp.water.usgs.gov/gwa/ch_e/Etext9.html#cenok
Oklahoma Water Resources Board. http://www.owrb.state.ok.us/
Oklahoma Archeological Survey. http://www.ou.edu/cas/archsur/home.htm
American Memory, Library of Congress. http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/index.html
7.2 RESOURCES
Association of Central Oklahoma
Governments
21 E Main Street, Suite 100
Oklahoma City, OK 73104-2405
405-234-2264
405-234-2200 (fax)
acog@acogok.org
http://www.acogok.org/
Oklahoma Archeological Survey
111 E Chesapeake
Norman, OK 73019-5111
405-325-7211
archsurvey@ou.edu
http://www.ou.edu/cas/archsur/hom
e.htm
Oklahoma Department of
Environmental Quality
707 N Robinson
Oklahoma City, OK 73102
405-702-1000
405-702-1001 (fax)
http://www.deq.state.ok.us/
1-800-522-0206 24-Hour Emergency
Response & Environmental
Complaints Hotline
Oklahoma Department of Transportation
200 N. E. 21st Street
Oklahoma City, OK 73105
405-522-8000
odotinfo@odot.org
http://www.okladot.state.ok.us/
Oklahoma Historic Preservation Office
2401 North Laird Avenue
Oklahoma City, OK 73105
405-521-6249
405-522-0816 (fax)
http://www.okhistory.org/
Oklahoma Water Resources Board
3800 North Classen Blvd.
Oklahoma City, OK 73118
405-530-8800
405-530-8900 (fax)
http://www.owrb.state.ok.us/
APPENDIX 77