11.05.2014 Views

OAS Journal - University of Oklahoma

OAS Journal - University of Oklahoma

OAS Journal - University of Oklahoma

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

VOLUME 53, NUMBER 1<br />

CONTENTS<br />

Trowel Marks.............................................................................................................................................................2<br />

Chapter Reports .........................................................................................................................................................3<br />

Welcome to the Society..............................................................................................................................................3<br />

Society Spotlight ........................................................................................................................................................4<br />

Book Reviews .............................................................................................................................................................5<br />

Rock Art .....................................................................................................................................................................7<br />

An Old-Fashioned Hoe, Down in Northwestern <strong>Oklahoma</strong>....................................................................................8<br />

The Certain Site Southern Plains Late Archaic Bison Kills..................................................................................16<br />

Rock Art ...................................................................................................................................................................18<br />

<strong>OAS</strong> Spring Dig at the Certain Site on the Flying W Guest Ranch ......................................................................19<br />

A Calf Creek Potpourri............................................................................................................................................20<br />

An Interesting Pottery Sherd from Tulsa County ..................................................................................................28<br />

Corner-tanged Knife................................................................................................................................................31<br />

An Unusual Occurrence <strong>of</strong> Ground Stone Items from Jackson County, <strong>Oklahoma</strong> ...........................................32<br />

Spring 2005 Seminars Set .......................................................................................................................................35<br />

FROM THE EDITORS:<br />

We continue to have a shortage <strong>of</strong> articles for the 2005 <strong>Journal</strong> year.<br />

Whether it’s a major article, an interesting find or a book review (book<br />

reviewers, please send in your reviews!), we have a place for it in the 2005<br />

<strong>Journal</strong>.<br />

© OKLAHOMA ANTHROPOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2005<br />

1<br />

<strong>Oklahoma</strong> Archeology, Vol. 53, No. 1


Trowel Marks<br />

Hello Everyone,<br />

I hope you all had a wonderful Christmas and enjoyed<br />

the holidays. Winter is <strong>of</strong>ficially here now--time to<br />

stay indoors and dream and plan for sunny spring days<br />

and outdoor activities. Committees have been very<br />

busy planning our Spring Conference, Spring Dig, the<br />

Caddo Conference, <strong>Journal</strong> articles, certification<br />

seminars, perhaps even a Fall Dig.<br />

We had an excellent and informative January board<br />

meeting. Lois Albert mentioned there will be several<br />

certification seminars <strong>of</strong>fered throughout this spring<br />

and during the dig. So watch for the dates if you are<br />

needing any <strong>of</strong> these seminars.<br />

The Caddo Conference will be March 17-19 at the<br />

Sam Noble Museum. Papers will be presented on<br />

Thursday and Friday, then on Saturday, the 19th, the<br />

Caddos will have a Powwow dance. Lois Albert is<br />

getting them all set up.<br />

Our <strong>OAS</strong> Spring Conference is Friday, May 6, and<br />

Saturday, May 7, at the Sam Noble Museum. Friday<br />

night is the social time with Don Wyck<strong>of</strong>f's band<br />

playing "Music under the Mammoth." Saturday is the<br />

board meeting, morning speakers, then in the<br />

afternoon we will have our panel <strong>of</strong> speakers<br />

discussing Critical Issues in Archaeology in<br />

<strong>Oklahoma</strong>, with an open discussion afterwards. Our<br />

speakers for the panel will be Pat Gilman, Lewis<br />

Vogele, Robert Brooks, Charles Wallis, Meeks<br />

Etchieson, Bob Blasing, John Hartley, Stephen<br />

Perkins, and KC Kraft. Saturday night is the banquet<br />

dinner, awards, and another guest speaker. I am still<br />

working on the fine details and will let you know<br />

more in the next issue <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Journal</strong> which will come<br />

out before our meeting. But it should be an interesting<br />

and thought provoking conference, and hopefully a lot<br />

<strong>of</strong> issues can be brought out into the open for<br />

discussion and some problems made aware <strong>of</strong>/or<br />

solved.<br />

The Spring Dig will be the Certain Site which is<br />

located 5 miles from Elk City. The dates are May 21-<br />

30. This is a late archaic bison kill site. The site is on<br />

the Flying W Dude Ranch and will have camping<br />

facilities. There is plenty <strong>of</strong> room and also a large<br />

dining hall for gatherings and seminars. Lee Bement<br />

is the archaeologist in charge and says that at this<br />

extensive site several hundred bison skeletons and<br />

many points have been found. More information will<br />

come later, but mark your calendar for these dates.<br />

On the east side <strong>of</strong> Lake Keystone is an area that is<br />

badly eroded and needs attention, as much has already<br />

been found there. But this may be a Fall Dig in the<br />

making.<br />

KC Kraft had a group meet at the Survey Department<br />

to clean up the big trailer, take inventory and repair<br />

equipment. Thanks to all who helped with this.<br />

The Fall Meeting will be at OSU. I will be making a<br />

few trips to Stillwater this summer to work on plans<br />

for the program with Dr. Stephen Perkins. I don't<br />

have any dates as yet. Dr. Perkins spoke about the<br />

Aztec Culture at our Central Chapter one night, so I<br />

know we can make this an interesting day.<br />

Pat Gilman told us that George Bass, who is the father<br />

<strong>of</strong> nautical archaeology, will be speaking March 3-4.<br />

And two visiting Chinese archaeologists will be<br />

speaking sometime in February on their work on the<br />

clay warriors.<br />

Diane Denton has come up with a project idea to<br />

bring in some money for the society. This is a bison<br />

skull necklace charm or pin with a red zigzag in either<br />

silver or gold. Lee Bement said he didn't see any<br />

problems with getting this set up. And this is<br />

exclusively <strong>Oklahoma</strong>n!!!!!<br />

Archaeology Day is also still an idea for next fall. We<br />

think hands on things, outdoor activities, helpful<br />

archaeologists, and lots <strong>of</strong> information will bring in<br />

families....and new members.<br />

The downside news is that membership is down, and<br />

we need articles for the <strong>Journal</strong>.<br />

<strong>OAS</strong> has many exciting things planned for this year. I<br />

hope that with some good publicity, we can entice<br />

many who have wandered away to come back and<br />

reconnect with us, and that we can also get new<br />

individuals interested enough to join us.<br />

Kathy Gibbs, President<br />

2<br />

<strong>Oklahoma</strong> Archeology, Vol. 53, No. 1


Chapter Reports<br />

Byrds Mill (Ada) Chapter<br />

They meet the 2nd Tuesday <strong>of</strong> each month with the<br />

exception <strong>of</strong> June, July, and August. They had a<br />

really good attendance for the November meeting.<br />

They have added one new member. They have good<br />

meetings planned through May, including a field trip<br />

planned to see cave art.<br />

Carl Gilley says that he is willing to go to McAlester<br />

and help them get set up again. He says there are<br />

some interested people there, and he will try to get it<br />

going.<br />

Report filed by Carl Gilley<br />

Tulsa Chapter<br />

The Tulsa chapter meets on the 4th Monday at 7 pm.<br />

at the Aaronson auditorium, downtown public library.<br />

Our Jan. 24th program was, The Osage, speaker<br />

Leonard Maker. On Feb 28th, our speaker will be<br />

Bryan Tapp, Ph.D. geologist, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Tulsa. He<br />

will speak on the evolution <strong>of</strong> the Ouachita<br />

Mountains. Our March 28th speaker is Carol Eames.<br />

Her program is Walking South New Zealand. Carol is<br />

a retired Tulsa zoo educational curator. Our chapter<br />

president, Bill Obrien is going to speak to the Mayes<br />

County genealogical society Monday March the l4th<br />

in Pryor. His program is about the Texas road that<br />

passed between Pryor and Grand Lake.<br />

For an entertaining and enjoyable dinner come join us<br />

at Baxter Interurban, 727 S. Houston, about 5:00 p.m.<br />

before our monthly meeting. You may have the<br />

opportunity to meet our presenter and the conversation<br />

is never boring! Come see for yourself!<br />

Report filed by Charles Surber<br />

Central Chapter<br />

The <strong>Oklahoma</strong> City chapter <strong>of</strong> O.A.S. meets on the<br />

first Thursday <strong>of</strong> each month from 7 to 9 p.m. at the<br />

Garden Center in Will Rogers Park (on the southwest<br />

corner <strong>of</strong> N.W. 36 and I-44).<br />

The December meeting was a potluck dinner and<br />

“dirty Santa” gift exchange at the Staneks’ home.<br />

January’s meeting was cancelled because <strong>of</strong> ice.<br />

The March program (rescheduled from January) will<br />

be Dr. Fred Schneider, a retired anthropology<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essor, who will discuss how corn cultivation by<br />

Native Americans spread rapidly northward in what is<br />

now the U.S.<br />

Report filed by Charles Cheatham<br />

Welcome to the Society<br />

New Members, 12/01/2004 through 02/01/2005<br />

Contributing<br />

Chester L. Shaw, Sheridan, AR<br />

Dovie Warren, Granite<br />

Active<br />

Katherine Dickey, Weatherford<br />

Nicholas Johnson, Norman<br />

Lance L. Larey, Tulsa<br />

Billy Bob Ross, Ada<br />

Stewart J. Smith, OKC<br />

Alexander C. Ward, OKC<br />

Kay Weast, Weatherford<br />

3<br />

<strong>Oklahoma</strong> Archeology, Vol. 53, No. 1


Society Spotlight<br />

Leland C. Bement<br />

Born in Texas during the fifth decade <strong>of</strong> the last<br />

century, I grew up in South Dakota along the Missouri<br />

River. Family outings along the river led to a lifetime<br />

infatuation with prehistoric cultures. Pot sherds make<br />

great skipping stones. After graduating from High<br />

School in El Salvador, I spent the summer<br />

volunteering at a late classic Maya site. My<br />

undergraduate career was accomplished at Fort Lewis<br />

College in Durango, Colorado. From there we (I<br />

picked up a wife and daughter along the way) moved<br />

to Austin, Texas so that I could continue my<br />

education. I received an MA and PhD from the<br />

<strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Texas at Austin. Accompanying my<br />

graduate classes, I worked full time at the Texas<br />

Archaeological Survey (Later called TARL-SP) which<br />

provided a wide variety <strong>of</strong> experience in contract and<br />

research archaeology. My MA thesis included the<br />

Pleistocene animal remains from Bonfire Shelter in<br />

SW Texas. My PhD dissertation was the analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

the human, animal, and artifactual remains from<br />

Bering sinkhole (also in Texas). These sites<br />

awakened an interest in animal bone analysis which<br />

continues today. Oh yes, Jason came along during<br />

that time. Upon completion <strong>of</strong> my PhD I searched for<br />

the perfect job. After turning down <strong>of</strong>fers from<br />

prestigious contract firms I accepted a position with<br />

the <strong>Oklahoma</strong> Archeological Survey. I have just<br />

completed 13 years with the <strong>Oklahoma</strong> Archeological<br />

Survey—the longest I’ve stayed anywhere in my life.<br />

When UT plays OU at the Cotton Bowl, my team<br />

always wins!<br />

Favorite Food: Buffalo<br />

Favorite Animal: Buffalo<br />

Best Discovery: My wife, Terry, (and a painted bison<br />

skull)<br />

Favorite Activity: Do you need to ask?<br />

Hobby: Hunting with Jason.<br />

4<br />

<strong>Oklahoma</strong> Archeology, Vol. 53, No. 1


Sign: Sagittarius<br />

Favorite Color: Blue<br />

Favorite Car: 1951 Chevy pickup<br />

Current Research: I am actively involved in the<br />

excavation and analysis <strong>of</strong> Paleoindian sites in<br />

western <strong>Oklahoma</strong>. Sites <strong>of</strong> particular note are Cooper<br />

and Jake Bluff. Other research interests include<br />

faunal analysis, bison kill sites, hunter-gatherer<br />

studies, and paleo-environmental reconstructions<br />

Book Reviews<br />

The Long Summer: How Climate Changed<br />

Civilization by Brian Fagan (Published by Basic<br />

Books, 2004, 284 pages, $26, ISBN: 0465022812).<br />

Reviewed by Jon Denton<br />

Brian Fagan is an archeologist known to value the<br />

effect <strong>of</strong> climate on history. He does not give in easily<br />

to alarm. That's what makes the last page <strong>of</strong> his latest<br />

book scary stuff.<br />

No doubt climate has had a great impact on human<br />

history. Humans have become adept at adaptation. Yet<br />

great societies have risen and fallen in response to the<br />

capricious pendulum <strong>of</strong> weather. Despite their selfproclaimed<br />

certainty <strong>of</strong> power, the story <strong>of</strong> many<br />

civilizations is written in the dust, says Fagan, an<br />

emeritus anthropologist at the <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

California, Santa Barbara.<br />

"The collapses <strong>of</strong>ten came as a complete surprise to<br />

rulers and elites who believed in royal infallibility and<br />

espoused rigid ideologies <strong>of</strong> power. There is no reason<br />

to assume that we've somehow escaped this shaping<br />

process," he tells us.<br />

"The Long Summer" uses archeology to demonstrate<br />

how it happens. Most <strong>of</strong> mankind's history occurred<br />

during the last 15,000 years, the Holocene. As<br />

temperatures rose, glaciers receded and sea levels<br />

climbed. Human civilization responded to the long<br />

summer with technology, population growth and<br />

government.<br />

As he did in his previous two books linking weather<br />

and climate to human history -- "Floods, Famines, and<br />

Emperors" and "The Little Ice Age" -- Fagan shows us<br />

how climate influences us in positive and negative<br />

ways. He focuses on the rise <strong>of</strong> civilizations in what<br />

are now the Middle East, Europe and the Americas.<br />

A gradually warming earth led to a cattle herding<br />

culture among ancient Egyptians. Rising sea levels<br />

created the Persian Gulf and Fertile Crescent, which<br />

generated the rise <strong>of</strong> Mesopotamia.<br />

Not that all was wet and warm. Humans invented<br />

agricultural techniques in response to colder weather.<br />

That led them to build permanent cities and<br />

communities, follow rulers, devise governments,<br />

assemble armies and declare warfare.<br />

Sometimes it was simply warm or cold, with little<br />

moisture. Droughts in the Middle East spurred the<br />

deliberate cultivation <strong>of</strong> plant foods. A thousand-year<br />

chill, caused by a sudden shutdown <strong>of</strong> the Gulf<br />

Stream, led to the rise <strong>of</strong> a reindeer culture.<br />

The Vikings, suddenly frozen out <strong>of</strong> their excursions<br />

south to Europe and West to America, left discovery<br />

<strong>of</strong> much <strong>of</strong> the New World to the Spanish, Portuguese,<br />

English and French.<br />

Today the world is crowded with humans. Millions<br />

depend on a productive few for food and water. A<br />

sudden shift in climate could threaten a civilization<br />

that has become top heavy.<br />

That is the message Fagan's book makes clear. His<br />

book is an important and highly readable account <strong>of</strong><br />

history, measured not by time but climate. It is<br />

recommended for anybody concerned about global<br />

warmth.<br />

Bison Hunting at Cooper Site<br />

Where Lightning Bolts Drew Thundering Herds<br />

By Leland C. Bement with a contribution by Brian J.<br />

Carter (Published by <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oklahoma</strong> Press,<br />

1999, 256 pages, $19.95, ISBN: 0-8061-3053-9)<br />

Reviewed by Seth Hawkins<br />

On the far horizon, a brilliant orange-sun- drifts<br />

slowly below the rim <strong>of</strong> the earth. Beams <strong>of</strong> yellow<br />

5<br />

<strong>Oklahoma</strong> Archeology, Vol. 53, No. 1


pierce the billowing white clouds as they grow ever<br />

larger and darker, an ominous portent <strong>of</strong> a gathering<br />

storm. To the south and west dark curtains <strong>of</strong> rain fall<br />

as jagged shafts <strong>of</strong> light split the western sky. Over the<br />

gently rolling, red sandstone hills, a carpet <strong>of</strong> lush<br />

grasses waves silently in the s<strong>of</strong>t, cool breeze <strong>of</strong> the<br />

advancing twilight. The pungent "sage scent" <strong>of</strong> the<br />

prairie brushes over the landscape as the nighthawk<br />

dips and turns, winging its way through the darkening<br />

valley below. Slicing the broken divides, a sluggish,<br />

meandering river intrepidly makes its way to the south<br />

and east, twisting and tuning at the slightest<br />

obstruction, its murky waters carrying a heavy load <strong>of</strong><br />

tawny brown silt from the high plains and the far<br />

distant mountains beyond. The last golden rays <strong>of</strong><br />

sunlight peek over the distant western hills, reflecting<br />

a deep reddish hue from the broken terrace walls<br />

rising along the northern margins <strong>of</strong> the river's broad,<br />

level plain.<br />

The shadows quickly lengthen among the thick stands<br />

<strong>of</strong> elm and oak that populate the bottoms, while<br />

willow and cottonwood keep a solitary vigil over the<br />

river's dark, moody waters. With the disappearance <strong>of</strong><br />

the sun's warming rays, an icy gale sweeps down <strong>of</strong>f<br />

the high plains, transforming the serene green ribbon<br />

<strong>of</strong> forest into a turbulent cacophony. In the dark<br />

purple twilight <strong>of</strong> the eastern sky, an eerie, cloudshrouded<br />

moon hangs low over the darkening hills,<br />

her half-light giving a surreal cast to the world below.<br />

Overhead, cold, pulsating beacons <strong>of</strong> light pierce the<br />

darkness. The winter stars rise slowly over the eastern<br />

horizon, harbingers <strong>of</strong> a changing season, <strong>of</strong> biting<br />

wind and numbing cold.<br />

In the distance, along the river's mist filled bottoms, a<br />

finger-like promontory protrudes from the upland<br />

divide and forces its way into the serpentine valley.<br />

Like the ocean tide, the thick fog rolls in, lapping at<br />

the steeply eroded flanks <strong>of</strong> the rocky, windswept<br />

prominence. Atop its level expanse, a huge, roaring<br />

fire licks at the smothering darkness, its flame dancing<br />

against a backdrop <strong>of</strong> hide-draped pole shelters,<br />

haphazardly thrown up against the raw wind. A<br />

procession <strong>of</strong> dark silhouettes circles the warming<br />

blaze while other figures sit motionless before the<br />

flame, its golden light revealing bronzed, weathered<br />

faces, etched by wind and sun. Wrapped in hide<br />

blankets against the gathering cold, they dreamily<br />

ponder the mystic movement <strong>of</strong> wood, smoke, and<br />

flame. Other hearths flicker to life throughout the<br />

small encampment, turning back the menacing<br />

encroachment <strong>of</strong> darkness. Off in a distant comer,<br />

several young boys sit huddled together, stones in<br />

hand, greedily shattering the long "morrow bones"<br />

from the day's kill. In another comer <strong>of</strong> camp, a<br />

number <strong>of</strong> women kneel, bison robes pulled close,<br />

punching, sewing, and s<strong>of</strong>tening leather, nursing<br />

babies, and discussing the abundance <strong>of</strong> meat from the<br />

day's successful hunt. While in another corner <strong>of</strong><br />

camp, kinsmen <strong>of</strong> the People gather around a small<br />

blaze tending sharpened sticks skewered with juicy<br />

chunks <strong>of</strong> red meat and inclined over sizzling, red<br />

coals. Young hunters excitedly hover around the<br />

elders, reenacting the events <strong>of</strong> the hunt earlier that<br />

day.<br />

A small group <strong>of</strong> bison slowly sauntered from the<br />

river's banks to graze on the upland pasture. As they<br />

made their way through the breaks, a small hunting<br />

party set the ambush. The small herd filed through a<br />

steep, narrow gorge. The hunters, armed with atlatls<br />

and darts tipped with dark grey and red banded, fluted<br />

points, followed the small herd up the draw, while<br />

others peered cautiously over the chasm's rim. The kill<br />

was fast and efficient. From above, a cloud <strong>of</strong> flint<br />

tipped lances descended on the unsuspecting prey with<br />

lightning speed. Suddenly panicked, the cows and<br />

their young stampeded up the steep-sided gulch.<br />

Thundering forward, the wild-eyed wave <strong>of</strong> brown<br />

bison trampled the bleached bones <strong>of</strong> their kindred<br />

scattered across the canyon floor. Grunting forms,<br />

hooves pounding, the air swirled with suffocating,<br />

powdery, red dust. Pushing, shoving, cows and calves<br />

alike struggled to keep their footing; they came<br />

bearing down on the grim form <strong>of</strong> a power-laden<br />

skull, horned and emblazoned across its brow with the<br />

mystical red zigzag <strong>of</strong> the lightning bolt. Careening<br />

forward, the lead cows came suddenly to the head <strong>of</strong><br />

the draw, turning abruptly only to meet the remainder<br />

<strong>of</strong> the oncoming herd. Amid the chaos <strong>of</strong> colliding<br />

bodies, trampled in the wild confusion, frantic cows<br />

bellowed and men shrieked. Sleek, feathered darts<br />

pierced the choking dust swirling on the hot, dry air <strong>of</strong><br />

that late summer day.<br />

For a time, the People will eat their fill. As in<br />

countless generations past, hunters have survived by<br />

the kill, while the old ones rekindle tales <strong>of</strong> bygone<br />

glories, <strong>of</strong> injuries, death, hunger, and starvation. The<br />

young sit silently on their haunches, listening intently,<br />

but ready to leap to their feet and recount their own<br />

brave deeds. Their shadows dance wildly against the<br />

shelter walls, and the flames from the central fire leap<br />

high into the night sky, reenacting its own ageless<br />

6<br />

<strong>Oklahoma</strong> Archeology, Vol. 53, No. 1


dance. Beyond the wall <strong>of</strong> night, prowling carnivores<br />

make their presence known, warning cries fending <strong>of</strong>f<br />

intruders from the remains <strong>of</strong> the old kill.<br />

Within the confines <strong>of</strong> fire and family, the small band<br />

is safe and warm, and bellies full for another day.<br />

These Folsom-age kills transpired in a side canyon <strong>of</strong><br />

the Beaver River, not far from its -confluence- with –<br />

Wolf Creek and Ft. Supply. The site, its remains<br />

heavily eroded by the shifting course <strong>of</strong> the Beaver<br />

some eight hundred years previous, consisted <strong>of</strong> a<br />

once extensive bone bed created by three separate<br />

hunting episodes. All three kills were made in late<br />

summer or early autumn, after the rutting season, as<br />

was evident from tooth-eruption analysis and the<br />

absence <strong>of</strong> bull remains. Points from the first and<br />

second kills were manufactured from Alibates and a<br />

unique form <strong>of</strong> Edwards chert found along the<br />

northeast rim <strong>of</strong> the plateau. Points from the third<br />

episode were <strong>of</strong> Alibates and Niobrara. By comparing<br />

the degree <strong>of</strong> retooling to the point's length, and then<br />

comparing the Cooper points to those at Elida, Folsom<br />

and Lipscomb, it was hoped that some light could be<br />

shed on the population movements <strong>of</strong> these Folsom<br />

hunters. At Cooper, the skeletons were articulated,<br />

and the butchering concentrated primarily on<br />

retrieving the hump and shoulder meat, choice pieces.<br />

The tongue and brains were not utilized. This is in<br />

contrast to the butchering techniques used at the late<br />

Archaic Certain site west <strong>of</strong> Elk City. These Archaic<br />

hunters removed the long bones, tongues and brains.<br />

In addition, they knew how to set a good table,<br />

feasting on succulent, roasted ribs.<br />

archeologist's search continues and you can be a<br />

participant in this ongoing work. Start by delving into<br />

the mysteries being uncovered, the silent earth<br />

reluctantly revealing only some <strong>of</strong> its secrets as each<br />

layer <strong>of</strong> dark, pungent soil is peeled back like the<br />

pages <strong>of</strong> an ancient text.<br />

From the very beginning Lee tells his readers to<br />

bypass anything that seems overly technical or<br />

mundane. Hey, don't sell yourself short. You paid<br />

good money for this book and you are spending<br />

valuable time reading it. Slog your way through every<br />

printed word; digest every jot and tittle, and don't<br />

snooze through the boring stuff. Become a part <strong>of</strong> this<br />

grand adventure. The face <strong>of</strong> this primal land<br />

continues in a constant state <strong>of</strong> flux, but some things<br />

remain constant. The winds continue to blow; the<br />

heavenly bodies move along their timeless paths<br />

across the sky, and, in the evening calm, ominously<br />

billowing clouds once again climb above the western<br />

horizon, bringing with them their precious gift <strong>of</strong> rain.<br />

Though the People are now gone, their shadows<br />

remain.<br />

Rock Art<br />

By Seth Hawkins<br />

Who were these people? Where did they come from,<br />

and what became <strong>of</strong> them? By what name were they<br />

known? When they looked into the black night, what<br />

did they fear? What stories did the sun, moon, and<br />

stars tell them? What secret knowledge did their<br />

shamans posses? Who did they marry. and by what<br />

rules were they considered kin? What <strong>of</strong> their<br />

distinctive lithic technology? When, where and why<br />

was the fluted Folsom point developed, and when,<br />

why, and with what new technology was it replaced?<br />

We have only a "snapshot" <strong>of</strong> several <strong>of</strong> their kills at<br />

Cooper, but where did they establish their temporary<br />

camps in order to process those kills, to refit, to<br />

recuperate, and celebrate their good fortune? The<br />

7<br />

<strong>Oklahoma</strong> Archeology, Vol. 53, No. 1


An Old-Fashioned Hoe, Down in Northwestern <strong>Oklahoma</strong><br />

Michael W. McKay and Leland C. Bement<br />

The Late Prehistoric period on the southern Plains<br />

(1500-500 years B.P.), particularly in northwestern<br />

<strong>Oklahoma</strong>, is an expression <strong>of</strong> semi-sedentary bison<br />

hunters subsidizing their diet through generalized<br />

gathering <strong>of</strong> wild plants and small game. More<br />

importantly, however, is the evidence <strong>of</strong> burgeoning<br />

horticulture, particularly during the Plains Village<br />

period (1000-500 years B.P.) when subsistence<br />

regimes included farming <strong>of</strong> tropical cultigens such as<br />

beans, squash, and corn. Historical accounts suggest<br />

corn horticulture was the primary component <strong>of</strong><br />

indigenous diets by the time <strong>of</strong> European contact<br />

(Bell, 1984, Brook 1989, 1994; Drass 1998, Lintz<br />

1984, Wedel 1961).<br />

The mixed but stable diet <strong>of</strong> the Late Prehistoric<br />

greatly altered native lifeways. Small-scale farming<br />

allowed villages to support larger numbers <strong>of</strong> people<br />

and this, in turn, necessitated settlement in areas<br />

where more arable land was accessible for farming.<br />

Plains Village period sites, in particular, are notable<br />

for their locations along major drainage systems and<br />

large tributaries. Generally, settlement density<br />

increases during the Plains Village period, and these<br />

settlements occupy steep terraces, high mesas, and<br />

elevated knolls within floodplain settings where<br />

porous, loamy sands are more amenable to hand<br />

cultivation.<br />

Four unique cultural complexes have been generated<br />

for the regions surrounding and including<br />

northwestern <strong>Oklahoma</strong> during the Late Prehistoric<br />

period (Figure 1). To the west, occupying what are<br />

presently the Texas and <strong>Oklahoma</strong> panhandles, is the<br />

Antelope Creek phase <strong>of</strong> the Upper Canark variant.<br />

Aside from geographic positioning along major<br />

stream and riverbeds in the panhandle region, notable<br />

characteristics <strong>of</strong> Antelope Creek sites are an<br />

abundance <strong>of</strong> stone masonry foundation dwellings<br />

with central floor channels and platforms, large<br />

amounts <strong>of</strong> cordmarked ceramics and imported<br />

Puebloan-design ceramics from the southwestern<br />

U.S., and an affinity for Alibates agatized dolomite in<br />

the chipped stone inventory. Alibates was used to<br />

produce a characteristic Antelope Creek phase tool,<br />

the diamond-beveled knife (Brooks 1989, Lintz 1984,<br />

1986).<br />

8<br />

The second regionally associated Late Prehistoric<br />

complex is the Redbed Plains variant. Notable<br />

characteristics <strong>of</strong> the Redbed Plains variant are large<br />

villages located on the floodplains <strong>of</strong> the Washita<br />

River and its major tributaries in west-central<br />

<strong>Oklahoma</strong>. Redbed Plains groups farmed intensively<br />

along these floodplains, utilizing bone resources for<br />

their cultivation toolkit. Additionally, western Redbed<br />

Plains groups share the same affinities for Alibates<br />

agatized dolomite as do Antelope Creek peoples<br />

(Brooks 1987, 1989; Drass 1998).<br />

A third cultural tradition, known as the Zimms<br />

complex, is wedged between the Upper Canark and<br />

Redbed Plains groups. The Zimms complex is as yet<br />

poorly understood, and its definition is based upon an<br />

artifact assemblage that does not quite align with the<br />

cultural traditions on either side. Dating between A.D.<br />

1250 and 1450, Zimms peoples are thought to have<br />

occupied the westernmost reaches <strong>of</strong> the Washita<br />

River in far western <strong>Oklahoma</strong>, but were primarily<br />

located along the Canadian, Cimarron, and Beaver<br />

Rivers <strong>of</strong> northwest <strong>Oklahoma</strong>. Lintz (1986) views the<br />

Zimms complex as part <strong>of</strong> the Upper Canark variant<br />

since the three Zimms-related sites have dwellings<br />

with floor channels and platforms. Alternately, Drass<br />

and Moore (1987) have suggested that the Zimms<br />

complex is intrusive to western <strong>Oklahoma</strong> as Zimms<br />

sites lack the signature masonry foundations <strong>of</strong> Upper<br />

Canark dwellings, and unlike either Antelope Creek or<br />

the Redbed Plains groups, Zimms sites possess very<br />

limited numbers <strong>of</strong> bone horticultural implements and<br />

over 90% <strong>of</strong> the ceramic assemblage is plain, smoothsurfaced<br />

pottery (Brooks 1994; Drass and Moore<br />

1987; Drass et. al. 1987; Moore 1988; McKay et. al.<br />

2004).<br />

A fourth cultural complex lies to the north,<br />

geographically situated in what are presently<br />

Comanche, Clark, and Meade counties at the<br />

southwestern border <strong>of</strong> Kansas. The Wilmore complex<br />

was defined by Kansas State Historical Society<br />

archaeologists during a 1984 survey <strong>of</strong> four sites<br />

located on the upland hills above the breaks <strong>of</strong> major<br />

tributaries on the northern rim <strong>of</strong> the Cimarron River<br />

drainage (Bevitt 1994). Like the Zimms complex, the<br />

Wilmore complex is as yet poorly understood, being<br />

defined only by surface survey and limited<br />

<strong>Oklahoma</strong> Archeology, Vol. 53, No. 1


Figure 1: Late Prehistoric cultural complexes and relevant site locations.<br />

excavation. Collectively, the Wilmore complex sites<br />

fit within the Plains Village tradition. The settlement<br />

pattern consists <strong>of</strong> small, dispersed individual<br />

habitations or small farming hamlets positioned along<br />

perennial, spring-fed streams. Dwellings generally<br />

have semi-subterranean floors; ceramics are<br />

characterized by decorated rim, smoothed cordmarked<br />

vessels; and chipped stone tools consist <strong>of</strong> Washita<br />

and Fresno arrow points, drills, perforaters??, gravers,<br />

and diamond-beveled or ovate knives. Horticultural<br />

tools are primarily <strong>of</strong> bison and deer bone. Bison<br />

scapula hoes are uniquely prepared through the<br />

removal <strong>of</strong> the glenoid head in addition to other blade<br />

reduction procedures such as removal <strong>of</strong> the scapular<br />

spine and beveling <strong>of</strong> the blade edge. Along with a<br />

large number <strong>of</strong> bison scapula hoes, there are many<br />

bison tibia digging stick tips, bison ulna picks, and a<br />

quantity <strong>of</strong> deer mandible sickles.<br />

Most Late Prehistoric artifact assemblages from<br />

northwestern <strong>Oklahoma</strong> and its surrounding regions<br />

produce quantities <strong>of</strong> fragmented and well-used bone<br />

9<br />

cultivation implements like bison and deer scapula<br />

hoes and tibia digging-stick tips. Rarely are there any<br />

chipped stone horticultural tools included in southern<br />

Plains assemblages. However, a recent find from the<br />

Smith #2 site (34HP138) in southeast Harper County<br />

(McKay et. al. 2004), as well as four other chipped<br />

stone hoes now document the use <strong>of</strong> stone hoes by<br />

Late Prehistoric groups. The five implements come<br />

from distinct but closely associated topographical<br />

settings and therefore, provide an opportunity for<br />

comparative analysis <strong>of</strong> variation in Late Prehistoric<br />

traditions <strong>of</strong> the northwestern <strong>Oklahoma</strong> region.<br />

Let’s Talk About the Hoe Collection<br />

The Lonker Site (34BV4)<br />

A fragment <strong>of</strong> a metamorphosed quartzite hoe was<br />

recovered during site mitigation from a badly<br />

disturbed, 110 x 90 x 25 cm refuse pit (Feature 5, see<br />

Figure 2), which held very little cultural material in<br />

total (Brooks 1994). Radiometric dating <strong>of</strong> associated<br />

<strong>Oklahoma</strong> Archeology, Vol. 53, No. 1


Figure 2. Topographic view <strong>of</strong> the Lonker Site (34BV4) and the location <strong>of</strong> relevant features (based on Brooks<br />

1994:Figure 3).<br />

pit Features 3 and 4 produced calibrated dates <strong>of</strong> 715<br />

± 50 years B.P. (Beta-4716) and 750 ± 40 years B.P.<br />

(Beta-4717) respectively, indicating an occupation <strong>of</strong><br />

the Lonker site circa A.D. 1260-1290. This time frame<br />

places the Lonker site in the middle <strong>of</strong> the southern<br />

Plains Village period, making site occupants<br />

contemporaneous with the early Upper Canark<br />

tradition (Brooks 1994, Lintz 1984, 1986).<br />

The hoe fragment’s definition was based upon its high<br />

degree <strong>of</strong> dorsal polish and a large number <strong>of</strong> linear<br />

striations (Brooks 1994). Unfortunately, the fragment<br />

is so small that striation direction is indeterminate. No<br />

dimensions were recorded for the hoe fragment nor<br />

was there discussion <strong>of</strong> material quality or color.<br />

Smith #2 Site (34HP138)<br />

A very large, elongated rectangular, bifacially<br />

knapped stone hoe was removed from the floor <strong>of</strong> a<br />

1m x 1m storage-turned-refuse pit at The Smith #2<br />

site. This site is positioned atop the ridge <strong>of</strong> a high,<br />

10<br />

upland knoll located at the edge <strong>of</strong> the southern breaks<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Cimarron River drainage in southeastern Harper<br />

County (McKay et. al. 2004). Radiometric dating <strong>of</strong><br />

carbonized corn from the pit feature indicates site<br />

occupation circa A.D. 1400-1450 (Beta-195762 and<br />

Beta-189107) associating the site with the southern<br />

Plains Village period. Based upon the large quantity<br />

<strong>of</strong> associated surface artifacts and the presence <strong>of</strong> two<br />

burned post molds and a large storage pit, the site was<br />

most likely a small farming hamlet. The quantity <strong>of</strong><br />

burned corn kernels and cob pieces removed during<br />

excavation <strong>of</strong> the pit feature suggests small-scale<br />

farming occurred either atop the knoll, or within the<br />

small playa zones encircling the knoll. The presence<br />

<strong>of</strong> Kansas pipestone as well as large quantities <strong>of</strong> Flint<br />

Hills chert in the artifact assemblage suggests that the<br />

Smith #2 occupants were involved in long distance<br />

exchange, or were non-local peoples that had<br />

imported non-local resources upon arrival. Such was<br />

the case with the chipped stone hoe.<br />

Measuring 24 x 8 x 4.3 cm, the hoe was manufactured<br />

<strong>Oklahoma</strong> Archeology, Vol. 53, No. 1


Figure 3. Chipped stone hoes from northwestern <strong>Oklahoma</strong>. (a.) Siltstone hoe from Smith #2 site (34HP138); (b.)<br />

Day Creek chert hoe from Harper County; (c.) Florence B hoe from Texas County (IF 0-193).<br />

from a high-quality, chocolate-brown siltstone (Figure<br />

3a), similar in color but texturally different from some<br />

<strong>of</strong> the ferruginous Dakota quartzite found in local<br />

beds <strong>of</strong> Ogallala outwash gravels. The source <strong>of</strong> the<br />

siltstone material is unknown. Though amenable to<br />

knapping, the siltstone core is <strong>of</strong> a texture similar in<br />

coarseness to metaquartzite, making reduction<br />

thinning possible but difficult. The hoe, thus, has a<br />

high central ridge and faces that are somewhat<br />

convex. The convexity <strong>of</strong> both faces is equal; one face<br />

is not more flattened than the opposite. A small patch<br />

<strong>of</strong> cortex remains on the ridge <strong>of</strong> one face. The<br />

11<br />

<strong>Oklahoma</strong> Archeology, Vol. 53, No. 1


implement is <strong>of</strong> considerable length, yet there is no<br />

curvature to the tool when viewed in pr<strong>of</strong>ile.<br />

Therefore, it is thought that the hoe was manufactured<br />

from a tabular cobble or lensatic fragment <strong>of</strong> siltstone.<br />

The siltstone hoe is bifacially flaked by alternately<br />

removing a number <strong>of</strong> very large flakes from both<br />

sides and from each end. This knapping technique<br />

produced lateral edges that are straight and only<br />

slightly sinuous. One end <strong>of</strong> the stone is slightly<br />

broader than the other, and this wider end is the only<br />

point on the tool from which any small flakes have<br />

been bifacially removed, giving that end a serrated<br />

appearance. It is assumed that this broader, serrated<br />

end would have been the bit end. Neither end <strong>of</strong> the<br />

tool exhibits blunting/dulling nor polish. In fact, the<br />

only region where edge grinding appears to have been<br />

applied is along the lateral margins <strong>of</strong> both edges<br />

beginning at midline and moving distally 5 cm.<br />

Smoothing and slight polish across the midpoint <strong>of</strong> the<br />

implement suggests hafting <strong>of</strong> the tool.<br />

Due to its interment within the pit feature, one side <strong>of</strong><br />

the hoe has been heavily calcined, leaving behind a<br />

patina which obscures any possible use-wear<br />

signatures that may be present. Other than edge<br />

grinding and slight polish, no notching or other<br />

indications <strong>of</strong> hafting technique are present. The lack<br />

<strong>of</strong> end or blade polish, striations, or blunting indicates<br />

that the tool had been deposited unused or with<br />

minimal use for storage and later retrieval.<br />

Sleeping Bear Creek Isolated Find, Harper County<br />

A large, elongated oval chert hoe was discovered atop<br />

an upland terrace overlooking Sleeping Bear Creek<br />

near the southern breaks <strong>of</strong> the Cimarron River<br />

drainage system in Harper County (Figure 3b).<br />

Obtained by a collector in the 1930’s, the exact<br />

provenience for this tool is uncertain. However, the<br />

general setting for this find is less than 8 kilometers (5<br />

miles) north <strong>of</strong> the Smith #2 site. Based upon its<br />

outward gray-mottled appearance and luminescence<br />

signature, the hoe was manufacture from Day Creek<br />

chert, a local lithic resource found atop the<br />

Cimarron/Beaver River divide in present-day Harper<br />

County. In fact, Day Creek chert sources are located<br />

only 3.2 kilometers north <strong>of</strong> the Smith #2 site<br />

discussed previously, and within 4.8 kilometers<br />

southeast <strong>of</strong> the zone where the Harper County<br />

Isolated Find was thought to have been discovered<br />

(see Figure 1).<br />

Judging by the convexity <strong>of</strong> the tool when viewed in<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>ile, as well as the residual knapping platform on<br />

the poll end <strong>of</strong> the tool, the hoe was produced from a<br />

very large flake core. The flake core was bifacially<br />

flaked for thinning, leaving behind no cortex and<br />

producing a tool with a length <strong>of</strong> 17.6 cm, and an<br />

average thickness <strong>of</strong> 2.8 cm. The width <strong>of</strong> the tool’s<br />

bit end is 9.4 cm, while the poll measures 7.4 cm<br />

across. Because <strong>of</strong> large, deep flake scars, the lateral<br />

edges appear quite sinuous. Edge grinding is apparent<br />

around the tools lateral periphery. The hoe has an<br />

hourglass shape due to deep hafting notches placed<br />

immediately distal <strong>of</strong> midline. The hoe is 6.6 cm wide<br />

at the notches, and the notches have an average length<br />

<strong>of</strong> 3.6 cm and an average depth <strong>of</strong> 0.6 cm. The lateral<br />

edges <strong>of</strong> the notches are more heavily ground and<br />

blunted than the rest <strong>of</strong> the lateral periphery.<br />

The implement has a 2 cm wide, cream-colored vein,<br />

centrally located on the ventral face that courses the<br />

tool’s entire length. The cream-colored inclusion or<br />

defect is likely the reason this particular flake was<br />

chosen to produce a digging implement, rather than<br />

another tool form. Day Creek chert is <strong>of</strong>ten riddled<br />

with defects such as large phenocrystic vesicles, or<br />

veins <strong>of</strong> differing chert textures. In fact, the mixing <strong>of</strong><br />

cream-, blue- and gray-colored material is common.<br />

The fact that the cream-colored portion <strong>of</strong> the flake<br />

has not been altered to a pink or rose color indicates<br />

that the flake core was probably not heat-treated. The<br />

cream-colored vein is not visible on the dorsal face.<br />

Use-related polish is apparent on both tool faces, but<br />

more prominent on the dorsal side <strong>of</strong> the flake<br />

implement. Polish on the dorsal side extends to within<br />

2 cm <strong>of</strong> the poll end <strong>of</strong> the tool. The bit is heavily<br />

battered and crushed. Flake scars on the dorsal side <strong>of</strong><br />

the flake’s bit end are partially obliterated from usewear.<br />

Striations are not observed on either the dorsal<br />

or ventral surfaces, probably due to the hardness <strong>of</strong><br />

Day Creek chert.<br />

Texas County Isolated Find 0-193 (part <strong>of</strong> the Ralph<br />

White Collection at the Sam Noble <strong>Oklahoma</strong> Museum<br />

<strong>of</strong> Natural History)<br />

As discussed by Lintz and White (1980), a teardropshaped<br />

stone hoe was discovered in a blowout along<br />

G<strong>of</strong>f Creek in what is now Texas County, <strong>Oklahoma</strong>.<br />

Similar to the topographical setting <strong>of</strong> Smith #2, the<br />

G<strong>of</strong>f Creek blowout was positioned within the gently<br />

rolling sand hills <strong>of</strong> the Beaver River’s northern<br />

breaks. Compared to the Smith #2 stone hoe, TXIF 0-<br />

12<br />

<strong>Oklahoma</strong> Archeology, Vol. 53, No. 1


193 is much shorter, narrower, and thinner, measuring<br />

18 x 5 x 2.2 cm (Figure 3c).<br />

Based upon its original beige color, fragmented<br />

diatomaceous inclusions, and red color transformation<br />

caused by heat-treatment, it is thought that the chert<br />

resource used to produce TXIF 0-193 is a form <strong>of</strong><br />

Florence B chert, found in the Flint Hills region <strong>of</strong><br />

Kansas and extreme north-central <strong>Oklahoma</strong><br />

(<strong>Oklahoma</strong> Archaeological Survey comparative<br />

collection: Florence chert #3). The chert cobble<br />

appears to have been heat-treated prior to knapping,<br />

making the material more brittle, texturally uniform,<br />

and amenable to controlled flake removal. There is no<br />

curvature <strong>of</strong> the tool when viewed in pr<strong>of</strong>ile,<br />

suggesting the tool was manufactured from a tabular<br />

or lensatic cobble <strong>of</strong> chert, rather than from a large<br />

flake core. The lateral edges are straight, having been<br />

bifacially flaked. This has left not only a somewhat<br />

rounded central ridge grading into convex faces, but<br />

lateral edges that are minimally sinuous. Both faces<br />

are equal in convexity.<br />

The tool is teardrop-shaped. The wide end, thought to<br />

be the tool’s bit based upon the presence <strong>of</strong> heavy<br />

polish and linear striations, measures 2.2 cm across,<br />

while the opposite end measures 1.9 cm. The only<br />

cortex noted on the tool is a small platform <strong>of</strong><br />

patinated material located adjacent to the poll or<br />

narrower end <strong>of</strong> the tool. The entire periphery <strong>of</strong> the<br />

tool appears to have been ground and blunted. The bit<br />

end has been crushed and rounded from continual<br />

battering. Either hafting or use polish is evident across<br />

the entire tool surface; however, one face has far more<br />

polish and linear striations, particularly near the bit<br />

end (see Lintz and White 1980:4, Figure 1). In fact,<br />

the polish is so extensive that it practically obliterates<br />

flake scars on the bit end. Because <strong>of</strong> the intensity <strong>of</strong><br />

use-wear on one side versus the opposite, the<br />

implement is thought to be a hoe, rather than an adze<br />

or axe that would be expected to have equal wear on<br />

both sides.<br />

The Booth Site (14CM406)<br />

Radiocarbon dating suggests that the Booth site was<br />

occupied between A.D. 1307 and 1638. During its<br />

occupation, a number <strong>of</strong> pit features and dwelling<br />

structures had been constructed. A fragment <strong>of</strong> an<br />

elongated, leaf-shaped biface (see Bevitt 1994:84,<br />

Figure 23) manufactured from Dakota quartzite was<br />

recovered from one <strong>of</strong> these pit features during<br />

excavation. Feature 247 is a circular, straight-walled,<br />

flat-floor pit that appeared to have been truncated by a<br />

later semi-subterranean house structure (Feature 101).<br />

Feature 247 contained dense collections <strong>of</strong> mussel<br />

shell and bone fragments interspersed with ceramic<br />

and lithic artifacts, including the biface fragment. All<br />

materials were suspended in a dark, gray-brown soil<br />

matrix. The biface fragment was later matched with<br />

fragments from a donated surface collection. The<br />

complete implement exhibits extensive use-related<br />

abrasion on both ends and quite extensive abrasion<br />

along the central ridges <strong>of</strong> each face. No mention is<br />

made <strong>of</strong> residual hafting signatures, retained cortex, or<br />

the type <strong>of</strong> core (tabular or flake) from which the tool<br />

was produced. The lateral margins <strong>of</strong> the tool were<br />

heavily rounded from use, and a number <strong>of</strong> flake scars<br />

were nearly obliterated. Numerous striations were<br />

noted running parallel with the long axis <strong>of</strong> the tool<br />

and due to these characteristics the tool is considered<br />

to be a digging implement.<br />

Discussion<br />

There is a distance <strong>of</strong> more than 48.3 kilometers (30<br />

miles) between the Booth site in Comanche County,<br />

Kansas, and the Harper County finds and greater than<br />

64.3 kilometers (40 miles) between the Lonker site<br />

and the Harper County finds. There is an even greater<br />

distance between Lonker and the G<strong>of</strong>f Creek stone<br />

hoe further west in Texas County, yet all <strong>of</strong> these sites<br />

where chipped stone hoes have been recovered can<br />

still be considered regionally associated making it<br />

plausible that Late Prehistoric groups producing these<br />

rare hoes were culturally related.<br />

Contextual dates have been established on three <strong>of</strong> the<br />

chipped stone hoes - A.D. 1260-1290 for the Lonker<br />

site hoe fragment, A.D. 1400-1450 for the Smith #2<br />

siltstone hoe, and A.D. 1307-1638 for the Booth site<br />

hoe. All dates fall within the Plains Village period.<br />

The five chipped stone hoes in this collection were<br />

found on upland terraces adjacent to breaks feeding<br />

large tributaries <strong>of</strong> major river systems. This fact,<br />

coupled with the nature <strong>of</strong> Late Prehistoric lifestyles<br />

and the intensification <strong>of</strong> farming, leads to the<br />

assumption that the two isolated chipped stone hoes<br />

might also fit into the Plains Village temporal setting.<br />

While geographic and temporal similarities within the<br />

chipped stone hoe collection can be used to relate the<br />

regional groups producing chipped stone hoes,<br />

diagnostic features <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> the hoes produces quite<br />

a different picture. Each <strong>of</strong> the five hoes is quite<br />

unique, having been manufactured from distinct lithic<br />

13<br />

<strong>Oklahoma</strong> Archeology, Vol. 53, No. 1


materials. Two <strong>of</strong> these lithic resources are not found<br />

locally. Both <strong>of</strong> the tools produced from non-local<br />

resources are manufactured from tabular cores, while<br />

the Day Creek chert hoe, made from a local resource,<br />

is produced from a large flake. Attributes <strong>of</strong> the parent<br />

cores for the Lonker and Booth site cores remain<br />

indeterminate.<br />

It appears that chipped stone hoes were heavily<br />

curated with a large quantity <strong>of</strong> labor invested in their<br />

production, use, and maintenance. All five implements<br />

were produced through bifacial flake reduction<br />

methods, removing the majority <strong>of</strong> the cortex from the<br />

core. The two implements manufactured from nonlocal<br />

resources were knapped in such a way as to<br />

leave straight, minimally sinuous lateral edges, while<br />

lateral edges that were quite sinuous were left on the<br />

Day Creek chert hoe. Additionally, only the Florence<br />

B hoe from Texas County appears to have been heattreated<br />

prior to manufacture.<br />

None <strong>of</strong> the complete stone hoes match in plan view.<br />

Each has a different morphology: teardrop,<br />

rectangular, leaf-shaped, and hourglass. However, all<br />

three are knapped such that a central ridge remains on<br />

both faces, and both faces on each tool are equally<br />

convex. Only the Day Creek chert hoe is notched for<br />

hafting. Slight grinding modifications are found on the<br />

lateral edges <strong>of</strong> the Smith #2, Booth, and Texas<br />

County hoes, but hafting polish can not be identified<br />

or distinguished from use-related polish.<br />

Due to the variability <strong>of</strong> resources used to<br />

manufacture the five chipped stone hoes, there is no<br />

consistent pattern in the use-wear signatures. The<br />

siltstone hoe from Smith #2 had been stored unused<br />

and therefore possessed little to no use-wear. In<br />

contrast, the Day Creek chert hoe from Harper County<br />

is heavily polished by the abrasion <strong>of</strong> silicates as the<br />

implement continually entered and pulled the sandyloam<br />

soils. The Lonker and Booth site hoe fragments<br />

and the Florence B chert hoe from Texas County all<br />

exhibit the same heavy polish as the Day Creek chert<br />

hoe. However, either because they were manufactured<br />

from s<strong>of</strong>ter lithic material than Day Creek chert or<br />

because they were used to perform different<br />

cultivating tasks than the Day Creek chert hoe, there<br />

are numerous linear striations present on their blade<br />

faces that are not apparent on the Day Creek chert<br />

hoe.<br />

The Florence B chert hoe exhibits greater polish and<br />

more striations on one side versus the other; however,<br />

it is unknown whether hoe blades were rotated and<br />

rehafted prehistorically, a technique that would have<br />

exposed each face to alternating intensities <strong>of</strong> wear<br />

during their use-life. In a study concerning wear<br />

patterns on bison scapula hoes from a number <strong>of</strong><br />

Redbed Plains variant sites, Davis (1965) notes a usewear<br />

study performed on chipped stone hoes by<br />

Sergei Semenov (1964). Semenov states that the most<br />

prominent indicator <strong>of</strong> a tool being used as a hoe is the<br />

wear distribution across each face. Due to hafting and<br />

the angle <strong>of</strong> use, polish and linear striations will<br />

predominate on the outside face <strong>of</strong> a hoe blade.<br />

The stone hoes from Smith #2 and the Booth site<br />

broaden Late Prehistoric horticultural tool<br />

assemblages that already included bison scapula hoes<br />

and tibia digging stick tips. The presence <strong>of</strong> both stone<br />

and bone implements suggests the need for a digging<br />

implement that is stronger than bone. The upland<br />

setting <strong>of</strong> these finds provides contexts where stone<br />

implements are more desirable than bone. At Smith<br />

#2, the storage pit was dug into dune clay that would<br />

have been impervious to bone tools. In fact, because<br />

<strong>of</strong> the soil density, archaeologists had trouble cutting a<br />

clean pr<strong>of</strong>ile across the feature’s face using modern<br />

steel shovels. In this regard, the modern definition <strong>of</strong><br />

these stone implements might be closer to the<br />

description <strong>of</strong> a “mattock”, rather than a “hoe”.<br />

Finally, the setting from which all five chipped stone<br />

implements were recovered is intriguing. All five sites<br />

are located in the upland hills bordering breaks that<br />

are nearly a mile (1.6 kilometers) from the sandchoked<br />

channels <strong>of</strong> braided stream systems. Most <strong>of</strong><br />

the nearby streambeds tend to flow ephemerally,<br />

usually carrying only run<strong>of</strong>f precipitation.<br />

As discussed by Lintz and White (1980:5),<br />

horticulture in this upland dune setting is more akin to<br />

wild plant harvesting. Quoting ethnographic records,<br />

Lintz and White state that digging implements like<br />

chipped stone hoes were likely used to extract tubers<br />

and roots such “…as Indian turnip (Psoralea<br />

esculenta and hypogea), bush morning glory (Ipomoea<br />

ieptophylla), and Jerusalem artichoke (Helianhus<br />

tuberosus) (that) were important dietary supplements,<br />

while wild plum roots (Prunus spp.), and yucca<br />

(Yucca spp.) had medicinal uses.” The quantity <strong>of</strong><br />

charred corn apparent in the Smith #2 storage pit<br />

indicates that upland farmers were participating in<br />

intensive cultivation <strong>of</strong> tropical cultigens, though<br />

charred blue-funnel lily corms in the pit fill<br />

substantiates at least the subsidizing <strong>of</strong> farming with<br />

14<br />

<strong>Oklahoma</strong> Archeology, Vol. 53, No. 1


wild plant gathering including some subsurface plant<br />

parts. Extraction <strong>of</strong> the corms and probably other<br />

resources may, in fact, have necessitated the<br />

production and use <strong>of</strong> chipped stone implements<br />

(McKay et. al. 2004).<br />

References<br />

Bell, Robert E.<br />

1984 Prehistory <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oklahoma</strong>. Academic Press,<br />

Orlando.<br />

Brooks, Robert L.<br />

1987 The Arthur Site: Settlement and Subsistence<br />

Structure at a Washita River Phase Village.<br />

<strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oklahoma</strong>, <strong>Oklahoma</strong> Archaeological<br />

Survey, Studies in <strong>Oklahoma</strong>’s Past 15, Norman.<br />

1989 The Village Farming Societies. In From<br />

Clovis to Comanchero: Archaeological Overview <strong>of</strong><br />

the Southern Great Plains edited by J. L. H<strong>of</strong>man, R.<br />

L. Brooks, J.S. Hays, D.W. Owsley, R.L. Jantz, M.K.<br />

Marks, and M.H. Manhein pp. 71-90. Arkansas<br />

Archaeological Survey, Research Series No. 35,<br />

Fayetteville.<br />

1994 Variability in Southern Plains Village Cultural<br />

Complexes: Archaeological Investigations at the<br />

Lonker Site in the <strong>Oklahoma</strong> Panhandle. Bulletin <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>Oklahoma</strong> Anthropological Society Bulletin 43:1-<br />

27.<br />

Davis, Michael K.<br />

1965 A Study <strong>of</strong> Wear on Washita River Focus<br />

Buffalo Scapula Tools. Bulletin <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Oklahoma</strong><br />

Anthropological Society 13:153-159.<br />

Drass, Richard R.<br />

1998 The Southern Plains Villagers. In<br />

Archaeology on the Great Plains edited by W.<br />

Raymond Wood, pp. 415-455. <strong>University</strong> Press <strong>of</strong><br />

Kansas, Lawrence.<br />

Drass, Richard R. and Michael C. Moore<br />

1987 The Linville II Site (34RM92) and Plains<br />

Village Manifestations in the Mixed Grass Prairie.<br />

Plains Anthropologist 32:118:404-418.<br />

Drass, Richard R., Timothy G. Baugh, and Peggy<br />

Flynn<br />

1987 The Heerwald Site and Early Plains Village<br />

Adaptations in the Southern Plains. North American<br />

Archaeologist 8(2):151-190.<br />

Lintz, Christopher<br />

1984 The Plains Villagers: Antelope Creek. In<br />

Prehistory <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oklahoma</strong> edited by Robert E. Bell, pp.<br />

325-346. Academic Press, New York.<br />

1986 Architecture and Community Variability<br />

within the Antelope Creek Phase <strong>of</strong> the Texas<br />

Panhandle, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oklahoma</strong>, <strong>Oklahoma</strong><br />

Archaeological Survey, Studies in <strong>Oklahoma</strong>’s Past<br />

14. Norman.<br />

Lintz, Christopher and Bill White<br />

1980 A Chipped Stone Digging Implement from<br />

the <strong>Oklahoma</strong> Panhandle. <strong>Oklahoma</strong> Anthropological<br />

Society Newsletter 28:3.<br />

McKay, Michael W., Leland C. Bement, and Richard<br />

R. Drass<br />

2004 Testing Results <strong>of</strong> Four Late Holocene Sites<br />

Harper County, <strong>Oklahoma</strong>. <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oklahoma</strong>,<br />

<strong>Oklahoma</strong> Archaeological Survey, Resource Survey<br />

Report No. 49. Norman.<br />

Moore, Michael C.<br />

1988 Additional Evidence for the Zimms Complex?<br />

A Re-evaluation <strong>of</strong> the Lamb-Miller Site, 34RM25,<br />

Roger Mills County, <strong>Oklahoma</strong>. Bulletin <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Oklahoma</strong> Anthropological Society 37:136-150.<br />

Semenov, Sergei A. (M. W. Thompson, translation)<br />

1964 Prehistoric Technology: An Experimental<br />

Study <strong>of</strong> the Oldest Tools and Artifacts from Traces <strong>of</strong><br />

Manufacture and Wear. Cory, Adams, and MacKay,<br />

London.<br />

Wedel, Waldo R.<br />

1961 Prehistoric Man on the Great Plains.<br />

<strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oklahoma</strong>. Press, Norman.<br />

15<br />

<strong>Oklahoma</strong> Archeology, Vol. 53, No. 1


The Certain Site Southern Plains Late Archaic Bison Kills<br />

Leland C. Bement and Kent J. Buehler<br />

Abstract<br />

Testing <strong>of</strong> a bison bone deposit at the base <strong>of</strong> a 25m<br />

sandstone cliff at the Certain site, 34BK46, western<br />

<strong>Oklahoma</strong>, yielded resharpening flakes and a<br />

butchering tool. These artifacts, plus the density <strong>of</strong><br />

bison remains suggest this cliff was used as a bison<br />

jump. Bone from this deposit was radiocarbon dated<br />

to 2200 ybp, some 300-400 years older than the bones<br />

in the arroyo kills for which the site is best known. In<br />

addition, we found another bison bonebed two meters<br />

deeper than the first. Although little excavation has<br />

been accomplished in this lower bonebed, we did<br />

recover a chert chip suggesting it too is the result <strong>of</strong> a<br />

bison jump. The two deposits at the base <strong>of</strong> the cliff<br />

make the Certain site the second confirmed bison<br />

jump on the southern Plains. The geomorphological<br />

history <strong>of</strong> the canyon provides the mechanism leading<br />

to the abandoning <strong>of</strong> the jump technique for the arroyo<br />

trap technique. Evidence <strong>of</strong> a shift in environmental<br />

conditions from xeric to mesic ushered in the<br />

Woodland horticulturalists.<br />

Introduction<br />

Bison hunters on the North American plains employed<br />

communal kill techniques including arroyo traps, sand<br />

dune traps, pounds, surrounds, and jumps. Examples<br />

<strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> these techniques are found in the<br />

archeological record on the northern plains (Frison<br />

1991). The same can not be said for the southern<br />

plains, where the majority <strong>of</strong> kills occurred in arroyo<br />

or sand dune traps. Bonfire Shelter (Dibble and<br />

Lorrain 1968; Bement 1986), in southwest Texas, has<br />

been the southern plains’ only example <strong>of</strong> a bison<br />

jump. Recent work at the Certain bison kill site,<br />

34BK46, in western <strong>Oklahoma</strong> yielded evidence for a<br />

second bison jump on the southern plains. Drawing on<br />

information provided by geomorphology, taphonomy,<br />

and archaeology, the Certain site jump may contain<br />

more than one jump episode.<br />

The Certain site is best known for its extensive arroyo<br />

trap kills located in several gullies along a 300m<br />

stretch <strong>of</strong> a spring fed tributary <strong>of</strong> Sandstone Creek<br />

(Bement and Buehler 1994; Buehler 1997). The<br />

arroyo kills date between 1800 and 1600 years ago.<br />

Large corner-notched dart points, hammerstones, and<br />

16<br />

resharpening flakes comprise the cultural material<br />

from these kills. Butchering and processing features<br />

accompany the kills, but, as yet, no formal camp site<br />

has been found.<br />

While the arroyo traps are located in short gullies on<br />

the north side <strong>of</strong> the canyon, the 25m high sandstone<br />

cliff is on the south side. At the base <strong>of</strong> this cliff, and<br />

on the downstream edge, are the bone deposits<br />

attributed to the jump (Figure 1, Area H). The bone<br />

deposit uncovered in 1997 dates 400 years older (2200<br />

bp) than the age <strong>of</strong> the arroyo kills. A second, lower<br />

bone deposit discovered during the 1998 excavation<br />

may extend the use <strong>of</strong> this site back further in time.<br />

Investigation <strong>of</strong> the upper bone deposit and the<br />

erosional surface bone in a 2x2m area yielded four<br />

resharpening flakes, one flake butchering tool, and the<br />

partial remains <strong>of</strong> at least seven individuals (based on<br />

the number <strong>of</strong> right mandibular diastema). The lower<br />

bone deposit was briefly exposed in a 50x50cm unit<br />

and contained portions <strong>of</strong> at least three bison (based<br />

on humerii) and a single chert chip. The lithics<br />

provide the cultural link to the bison remains. The<br />

context <strong>of</strong> the bones at the bottom <strong>of</strong> a 20+ m cliff<br />

<strong>of</strong>fers the interpretation that this is a jump site.<br />

Evidence <strong>of</strong> in situ Context<br />

Our argument that the bonebeds at the bottom <strong>of</strong> the<br />

cliff are in situ, primary deposits is found in the soil<br />

development, articulation <strong>of</strong> skeletal elements,<br />

taphonomy, and presence <strong>of</strong> gray sediments resulting<br />

from the microbial breakdown <strong>of</strong> organics left from<br />

the butchering <strong>of</strong> the animals. A pr<strong>of</strong>ile trench was cut<br />

along the downstream edge <strong>of</strong> the bone-bearing<br />

deposits. A description <strong>of</strong> the deposits in this trench<br />

(by Brian Carter, OSU) indicates roughly horizontal<br />

rather than vertical stratigraphy resulting from the<br />

erosion <strong>of</strong> sediments and then the collapse <strong>of</strong> more<br />

recent overburden to bury the exposed older deposit.<br />

The basic sequence is one <strong>of</strong> vertical bedrock face<br />

with vertically stratified sediment remnants set against<br />

it, then buried under colluvial materials from the top<br />

<strong>of</strong> the pr<strong>of</strong>ile. The vertically stratified deposits are red<br />

silty sands with occasional small sandstone pebbles.<br />

Overlying colluvial material consists <strong>of</strong> mottled red<br />

and brown sandy loams with pockets <strong>of</strong> organic<br />

solum.<br />

<strong>Oklahoma</strong> Archeology, Vol. 53, No. 1


Figure 1. Bison arroyo traps and jump, Area H, at the Certain site.<br />

Geomorphic History <strong>of</strong> the Canyon<br />

The surface and near-surface geology <strong>of</strong> this portion<br />

<strong>of</strong> western <strong>Oklahoma</strong> are dominated by late<br />

Pleistocene to Holocene age sand dunes; Ogallala<br />

formation sands and gravels; and redbed sandstones <strong>of</strong><br />

Permian age. In the vicinity <strong>of</strong> the Certain site, the<br />

Ogallala deposits are merely deflated remnants<br />

composed primarily <strong>of</strong> gravels on hill tops or<br />

reworked into the drainage bottoms. Permian age<br />

sandstones outcrop in all drainages and most<br />

interfluvs.<br />

The canyon is cut into the Permian age sandstone and<br />

has undergone numerous cut and fill sequences--some<br />

<strong>of</strong> which we can date. By the time the gullies were<br />

employed, the main canyon had filled to within 3<br />

meters <strong>of</strong> the canyon rim, rendering the cliff to a 3 m<br />

drop and burying the cliff base deposits under 17 m <strong>of</strong><br />

fill.<br />

The gullies and canyon continued to fill during and<br />

after the use <strong>of</strong> the arroyo traps. During the early 20th<br />

century, it was possible to drive a tractor from one<br />

bank <strong>of</strong> the canyon to the other. Now, due to extreme<br />

17<br />

erosion, the 25 m deep canyon is once again being<br />

flushed <strong>of</strong> deposits.<br />

Sustained research into the documentation and dating<br />

<strong>of</strong> soil formation events in the canyon systems <strong>of</strong><br />

western <strong>Oklahoma</strong> by Pete Thurmond and Don<br />

Wyck<strong>of</strong>f has yielded evidence for cyclical xeric and<br />

mesic intervals averaging 400 years duration during<br />

the late Holocene. The period <strong>of</strong> arroyo use at Certain<br />

falls within one <strong>of</strong> the xeric periods. The cliff use<br />

predates the series documented by Thurmond and<br />

Wyck<strong>of</strong>f, but falls within a xeric period documented<br />

by others in the region (Ferring 1986; Hall 1982).<br />

Preliminary carbon isotopic analysis <strong>of</strong> bone from the<br />

various kill and processing events corroborates the use<br />

<strong>of</strong> the kill site during xeric periods.<br />

The sequence <strong>of</strong> site use has been reconstructed as<br />

follows. The cliff jump dates to around 2280 yrs. BP<br />

and carbon isotope analysis indicates these animals<br />

subsisted on a diet composed <strong>of</strong> 98% C4 xeric adapted<br />

grasses. The first <strong>of</strong> the arroyo traps (Trench C) dates<br />

to roughly 1760 yrs BP and these animals had a diet<br />

composed <strong>of</strong> nearly 95% C4 grasses. Trench A<br />

animals were killed around 1680 BP. By this time the<br />

<strong>Oklahoma</strong> Archeology, Vol. 53, No. 1


diet sees an increase in the C3 grass component <strong>of</strong> the<br />

diet although C4 grasses still dominate at 80%. The<br />

last arroyo kill for which we have data (Trench G)<br />

occurred around 1570 BP by which time the animals’<br />

diet consisted <strong>of</strong> only 61% C4 grasses. The nearly<br />

40% drop in C4 composition in the diet over a period<br />

<strong>of</strong> 200 years <strong>of</strong> arroyo kills indicates the grasslands in<br />

this area were shifting from a short grass prairie to a<br />

mixed grass prairie, suggesting an increase in<br />

precipitation. Immediately following Trench G<br />

utilization is the onslaught <strong>of</strong> the mesic episode <strong>of</strong> the<br />

interval defined by Thurmond and Wyck<strong>of</strong>f.<br />

The significance <strong>of</strong> the mesic episode is seen in the<br />

regional influx <strong>of</strong> incipient horticulturalists <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Woodland period. Because bison remains are rare at<br />

Woodland sites it is possible that concomitant with the<br />

influx <strong>of</strong> horticulturalists is the withdrawal <strong>of</strong> the<br />

bison range from this area <strong>of</strong> the plains. The<br />

environmental conditions conducive to horticulture<br />

may have been marginal for bison habitat. The<br />

possible displacement <strong>of</strong> the Late Archaic huntergatherers<br />

by Woodland horticulturalists may have<br />

been driven more by a shift in the environment and its<br />

affect on bison range conditions rather than in<br />

intercultural conflict or assimilation.<br />

In conclusion, the excavation at the Certain site has<br />

documented a bison jump that predates the use <strong>of</strong> the<br />

arroyo traps at the site. The shift from the jump<br />

technique to arroyo trap was prompted by the filling<br />

<strong>of</strong> the canyon with sediment, rendering the cliff<br />

ineffective while opening access to the side arroyos.<br />

By the time <strong>of</strong> the final use <strong>of</strong> the arroyo traps, the<br />

environment had become more moist and the bison<br />

range may have withdrawn to the west at the very<br />

time the Woodland horticulturalists, following the<br />

westward expansion <strong>of</strong> mesic conditions, moved into<br />

the region.<br />

References Cited<br />

Bement, Leland C.<br />

1986 Excavation <strong>of</strong> the Late Pleistocene Deposits<br />

<strong>of</strong> Bonfire Shelter, Val Verde County, Texas. Texas<br />

Archeological Survey Archeology Series 1. The<br />

<strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Texas at Austin.<br />

Bement, Leland C. and Kent J. Buehler<br />

1994 Preliminary Results from the Certain Site: A<br />

Late Archaic Bison Kill in Western <strong>Oklahoma</strong>. Plains<br />

Anthropologist 39(148):173-183.<br />

Buehler, Kent J.<br />

1997 Where’s the Cliff?: Late Archaic Bison Kills<br />

in the Southern Plains. In Southern Plains Bison<br />

Procurement and Utilization From Paleoindian to<br />

Historic, edited by Leland C. Bement and Kent J.<br />

Buehler, pp. 135-143, Plains Anthropologist Memoir<br />

29.<br />

Dibble, David S. and Dessamae Lorrain<br />

1968 Bonfire Shelter: A Stratified Bison Kill Site,<br />

Val Verde County, Texas. Miscellaneous Paper 1.<br />

Austin: <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Texas, Texas Memorial<br />

Museum.<br />

Ferring, C. Reid<br />

1986 Late Holocene Cultural Ecology in the<br />

Southern Plains: Perspectives from Delaware Canyon,<br />

<strong>Oklahoma</strong>. Plains Anthropologist Memoir 21:55-82.<br />

Frison, George C.<br />

1991 Prehistoric Hunters <strong>of</strong> the High Plains.<br />

Second Edition. Academic Press, New York.<br />

Hall, Stephen A.<br />

1982 Late Holocene Paleoecology <strong>of</strong> the Southern<br />

Plains. Quaternary Research 17:391-407.<br />

Rock Art<br />

By Seth Hawkins<br />

18<br />

<strong>Oklahoma</strong> Archeology, Vol. 53, No. 1


<strong>OAS</strong> Spring Dig at the Certain Site on the Flying W Guest Ranch<br />

May 21-30, 2005<br />

The Flying W contains the largest bison kill site known for <strong>Oklahoma</strong>. Known by archaeologists as the Certain<br />

site, 34BK46, this site has the remains <strong>of</strong> an estimated 800 bison concentrated in five gullies. Additional animals<br />

are found at the base <strong>of</strong> a 30-foot high sandstone cliff. Between 500 B.C. and A.D. 300 spear-wielding hunters<br />

repeatedly killed bison at this site. The earliest kill technique was to drive a small bison herd over the sandstone<br />

cliff. The fall killed most <strong>of</strong> the animals while others staggered around until hunters dispatched them with spears.<br />

By A.D. 100, the canyon filled with sandy deposits, burying the cliff. This temporarily halted use <strong>of</strong> the site,<br />

however, by A.D. 200 steep-walled gullies (known as arroyos) began cutting into the deposits. Five arroyos<br />

eroded into the northern wall <strong>of</strong> the canyon. Bison attracted to the lush vegetation and water on the grassy canyon<br />

floor were rounded up and diverted into these arroyos where hunters lurked on the gully rims ready for the<br />

slaughter. The average size kill probably contained 20 to 30 animals, including bulls, cows, and calves. Following<br />

each kill event, the hunters turned butchers and skinned, disarticulated, and deboned the animals. Some cooking<br />

<strong>of</strong> the meat occurred while the remaining animals were being butchered.<br />

Archaeologists working since 1992 have uncovered portions <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> these kill deposits. Found among the<br />

bison bones are the spear points used to dispatch the animals. In addition, small flakes removed to sharpen dulled<br />

knife edges are scattered around the bones. Small fire hearths containing burned bone fragments identify areas<br />

where the hunters dined and rested during the butchering process.<br />

Archaeologists Lee Bement and Kent Buehler with the <strong>Oklahoma</strong> Archeological Survey, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oklahoma</strong>,<br />

have established a research station near the site and continue its exploration and excavation. The ongoing work at<br />

this site provides an exciting opportunity for the guests at the Flying W. Each guest that takes in the trail ride will<br />

visit the excavations. Also, materials from the excavation are on display at the museum.<br />

The Guest Ranch has camping hookups as well as primitive camping areas. Spring dig participants will be<br />

excavating in the bison bone deposits in the side gullies as well as at the foot <strong>of</strong> the cliff. More information will be<br />

contained in the next <strong>Journal</strong>.<br />

19<br />

<strong>Oklahoma</strong> Archeology, Vol. 53, No. 1


A Calf Creek Potpourri<br />

Don G. Wyck<strong>of</strong>f<br />

Since the publication <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Oklahoma</strong><br />

Anthropological Society’s Bulletins #40 and #42, a<br />

sustained interest in Calf Creek materials has resulted<br />

in inquiries and reports <strong>of</strong> distinctive artifacts from<br />

widely scattered places. Because they typically are<br />

single objects from diverse locations, it seems most<br />

appropriate to compile and briefly describe some <strong>of</strong><br />

these artifacts here. Figure 1 is a map <strong>of</strong> the Central<br />

and Southern Plains with the find spots marked for the<br />

items described below.<br />

The continuing accumulation <strong>of</strong> radiocarbon dates for<br />

Calf Creek materials, especially those from<br />

<strong>Oklahoma</strong>’s Kubik site (Neal 2002), supports the<br />

conclusion that these artifacts are tied to a middle<br />

Holocene hunter-gatherer lifeway <strong>of</strong> some 5000 years<br />

ago. Such timing puts these artifacts and sites where<br />

they are found in good contexts near the end <strong>of</strong> the<br />

several millennial long, warm, dry spell known at the<br />

Altithermal. Given the sporadic occurrence <strong>of</strong> Calf<br />

Creek projectiles/knives with bison remains (Figure 2;<br />

Spivey et al. 1994), it may be that the widespread<br />

finds <strong>of</strong> Calf Creek tools (e.g., Wyck<strong>of</strong>f and Shockey<br />

1994, 1995) correlate with ameliorating climatic<br />

conditions, improved grasslands, and an uninhabited<br />

landscape suitable for wide ranging bands <strong>of</strong> huntergatherers.<br />

Monahans Area, Southwest Texas<br />

While teaching the <strong>Oklahoma</strong> Prehistory class here at<br />

O.U. a couple <strong>of</strong> years ago, one <strong>of</strong> the students<br />

brought a spectacular example <strong>of</strong> a Calf Creek point<br />

(Figure 3) in for my examination. This student was<br />

from the Midland-Odessa, Texas, area and said he had<br />

found the piece while hunting in the sand dunes near<br />

Monahans, Texas (Figure 1).<br />

to many examples <strong>of</strong> this style <strong>of</strong> spearpoint/knife.<br />

The material is a pale brown (Munsell 10YR 7/3)<br />

chert with a very lustrous shine. Most likely it is a<br />

heat-treated variety <strong>of</strong> Edwards chert, but when first<br />

shown to me its color and the presence <strong>of</strong> a few<br />

fusilinid-like inclusions caused me to think it might be<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Florence flint from north central <strong>Oklahoma</strong>.<br />

This point style is called Andice or Bell in Texas<br />

(Turner and Hester 1985), but the style was formally<br />

recognized and published as the Calf Creek type<br />

(Dickson 1968; Perino 1968) in Arkansas and<br />

<strong>Oklahoma</strong> before Bell and Andice were formally<br />

published as types in Texas. Calf Creek points are<br />

reported (Parker and Mitchell 1979) from a site near a<br />

playa on the Texas part <strong>of</strong> the Southern High Plains.<br />

From the library resources available to me, the<br />

occurrence <strong>of</strong> this style in southwestern Texas is not<br />

readily apparent. Nevertheless, the specimen<br />

illustrated and documented here attests to some kind<br />

<strong>of</strong> Calf Creek people’s presence in that area.<br />

McIntosh County, <strong>Oklahoma</strong><br />

Two artifacts, and possibly a third, recently found at<br />

site 34MI136 in McIntosh County <strong>of</strong> eastern<br />

<strong>Oklahoma</strong> are believed representative <strong>of</strong> Calf Creek<br />

implements. Site 34MI136 has a Calf Creek collection<br />

that was extensively described (Duncan and Wyck<strong>of</strong>f<br />

1994) in the Society’s first volume on this distinctive<br />

material culture. This site was minimally cored and<br />

tested in 1995 with the cooperation <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Army<br />

Corps <strong>of</strong> Engineers, Tulsa District. Though the<br />

findings were limited, well heat-treated resharpening<br />

flakes, like one would expect from the Calf Creek<br />

tools found there, were recovered some 60 cm deep in<br />

the aeolian sand that blankets this old river terrace.<br />

This Texas find is 7.8 cm in overall length, 5.0 cm in<br />

maximum width (across blade), 2.6 cm in stem length,<br />

1.8 cm in width at the stem’s base, and 0.58 cm in<br />

maximum thickness. The specimen is complete except<br />

for one barb broken <strong>of</strong>f just below the notch<br />

termination. A noticeable juncture along the lower<br />

part <strong>of</strong> the remaining barb implicates the blade was<br />

probably more convex sided but has been resharpened<br />

several times. The nearly parallel sided stem was<br />

bifacially thinned from the base, giving it the<br />

distinctive wedge-like longitudinal section so common<br />

20<br />

The new finds include a nearly complete Calf Creek<br />

point (Figure 4), an extensively reworked Calf Creek<br />

point (Figure 5), and a flake knife (Figure 6).<br />

Inclusion <strong>of</strong> this latter in this article is somewhat<br />

speculative (due to its undiagnostic character), but the<br />

specimen is <strong>of</strong> the same brown Woodford chert as the<br />

nearly complete point reported here. The nearly<br />

complete Calf Creek point lacks only its stem (Figure<br />

4), but even in this broken condition the specimen<br />

constitutes an exceptional example <strong>of</strong> the flaking<br />

mastery associated with Calf Creek finished<br />

<strong>Oklahoma</strong> Archeology, Vol. 53, No. 1


Figure 1. Locations <strong>of</strong> the various Calf Creek finds discussed in this brief report.<br />

21<br />

<strong>Oklahoma</strong> Archeology, Vol. 53, No. 1


Figure 2. The Tulsa County find <strong>of</strong> a Calf Creek spearpoint in a juvenile bison skull. Scale is in centimeters.<br />

Photo courtesy <strong>of</strong> Mike Callahan, Sam Noble <strong>Oklahoma</strong> Museum <strong>of</strong> Natural History.<br />

Figure 3. The Calf Creek biface found in the Monahans area <strong>of</strong> southwest Texas.<br />

22<br />

<strong>Oklahoma</strong> Archeology, Vol. 53, No. 1


Figure 4. A Calf Creek biface from site 34Mi136. Material is Woodford chert. Scale is in centimeters.<br />

Figure 5. Extensively resharpened Calf Creek biface from 34Mi136. Material is Ogallala quartzite. Scale is in<br />

centimeters.<br />

23<br />

<strong>Oklahoma</strong> Archeology, Vol. 53, No. 1


Figure 6. Flake tool <strong>of</strong> Woodford chert from site 34Mi136. Scale is in centimeters.<br />

bifaces. This specimen measures 7.8 cm in overall<br />

length (without the stem), 5.33 cm in maximum width<br />

(across lower part <strong>of</strong> blade), and 7.2 mm in maximum<br />

thickness. The barbs are 1.53 and 1.42 cm long; both<br />

display fine serrations along their edges. In fact, the<br />

entire length <strong>of</strong> both convex blade edges are finely<br />

serrated due to fine (2.2 to 3.3 mm wide and some 5<br />

mm long), continuous, usually bifacial, flake scars<br />

along most <strong>of</strong> the blade edges. The specimen is<br />

missing perhaps 3 mm <strong>of</strong> the tip due to a bend break,<br />

and, as noted, the stem is largely missing (3.9 mm<br />

remains) due, again, to a bend break. This exquisitely<br />

flaked biface is made from a dark grayish brown<br />

(2.5Y 4/2) chert; it retains a bit <strong>of</strong> tan cortex on one<br />

face <strong>of</strong> one barb. This chert appears to be the<br />

Woodford material like that found in the western<br />

Ouachita Mountains (Banks 1990).<br />

Because it is <strong>of</strong> the same material, a flake tool is also<br />

illustrated and described here, even though there is no<br />

way to assure it is <strong>of</strong> Calf Creek origin. Roughly<br />

diamond shaped (Figure 6) this flake tool measures<br />

4.54 cm long, 3.51 cm in maximum width, and .65 cm<br />

in maximum thickness. It is bifacially flaked with<br />

continuous, short (2 to 5 mm) flake scars along a 3.63<br />

cm long edge; the bifacial flaking forms an edge angle<br />

<strong>of</strong> 72 degrees. No abrasions or wear are evident on the<br />

edge or the ridges <strong>of</strong> the flake scars using a 20X hand<br />

lens. It may be that this bifacial flaking was a means<br />

to dull the edge for holding so that the opposite edge<br />

was the actual tool area. This opposite edge exhibits<br />

minute bifacial scalar scars and is very slightly dulled.<br />

24<br />

The third specimen from 34MI136 is a stem-blade<br />

section from a Calf Creek point (Figure 5). It is made<br />

from a slightly glossy pink (heated?) Ogallala<br />

quartzite. This artifact is 3.32 cm long, 2.09 cm wide<br />

across its incomplete blade, 1.83 cm in stem length,<br />

1.8 cm wide across the base, and 7.1 mm in maximum<br />

thickness. The blade remnant has an <strong>of</strong>f-center tip,<br />

fine serrations on a beveled (due to retouching) edge,<br />

and missing corner due to a bend break. Clearly, the<br />

piece has been heavily used and resharpened.<br />

As noted above, these artifacts come from a McIntosh<br />

County site where a collection <strong>of</strong> Calf Creek<br />

diagnostics has already been reported (Duncan and<br />

Wyck<strong>of</strong>f 1994). The finds reported here do increase<br />

the evidence that Ouachita Mountains material was<br />

favored by Calf Creek campers at 34MI136. The<br />

Ogallala quartzite piece reported here is the first Calf<br />

Creek artifact <strong>of</strong> that material to be reported for the<br />

site. While Ogallala quartzite is usually perceived as<br />

being distributed mainly in western <strong>Oklahoma</strong><br />

(Powell 1995; Thurmond and Wyck<strong>of</strong>f 1999), this<br />

material is being washed into eastern <strong>Oklahoma</strong> by<br />

rivers such as the Canadian. So, it is possible the<br />

34MI136 example was made and used locally rather<br />

than brought here from the west.<br />

Hoyt Locality, <strong>Oklahoma</strong><br />

Known as the Hoyt Locality, the Canadian River<br />

below Eufaula Dam has yielded an astounding number<br />

and array <strong>of</strong> Paleoindian and Archaic artifacts and<br />

Pleistocene and Holocene fossils. A monograph<br />

<strong>Oklahoma</strong> Archeology, Vol. 53, No. 1


documenting many <strong>of</strong> these objects is being compiled<br />

for publication by the Sam Noble <strong>Oklahoma</strong> Museum<br />

<strong>of</strong> Natural History. The fossils and artifacts typically<br />

are found on gravel bars where time and water flow<br />

have sorted them according to size. Calf Creek<br />

diagnostics have been noted (Wyck<strong>of</strong>f 1995:Figure 8)<br />

to be among the interesting artifacts recovered at this<br />

location. Reported here is a rather unique artifact<br />

associated with the Calf Creek horizon. It was found<br />

by John and Ann C<strong>of</strong>fman and donated to the Sam<br />

Noble <strong>Oklahoma</strong> Museum <strong>of</strong> Natural History before<br />

they retired and moved to Colorado.<br />

The artifact in question is an example <strong>of</strong> what has<br />

been called Calf Creek “practice pieces” (Figure 7).<br />

Basically, this is a large flake with a notch chipped<br />

into it. The flake is probably a s<strong>of</strong>t-hammer biface<br />

thinning flake <strong>of</strong> heat-treated Keokuk chert from the<br />

Ozarks. This lustrous, olive yellow (2.5Y 6/6) flake<br />

has a cortex platform and measures 5.1 cm long, 3.8<br />

cm wide, and 5.2 mm in maximum thickness.<br />

Originally, its distal termination was a slight hinge,<br />

and into this end a 2.12 cm long notch has been<br />

bifacially flaked. No signs <strong>of</strong> use are obvious, but,<br />

given its being found in the river, abrasion by silt and<br />

sand may have scoured away any clues to its function.<br />

Elsewhere, practice pieces have yet to disclose their<br />

use for a particular purpose (Neal 1994; Wyck<strong>of</strong>f et<br />

al. 1994), and it may be that objects such as this one<br />

were simply the result <strong>of</strong> practicing making the deep<br />

notches common to Calf Creek projectile points.<br />

Practice pieces such as this one occur sporadically at<br />

Calf Creek sites in central <strong>Oklahoma</strong>, but the example<br />

reported here is one <strong>of</strong> the few known to have been<br />

found in eastern <strong>Oklahoma</strong>.<br />

R.S. Kerr Lake, Haskell County<br />

Calf Creek artifacts continue to erode from a Haskell<br />

County site reported (Neal et al. 1994) in the eastern<br />

<strong>Oklahoma</strong> compilation <strong>of</strong> Calf Creek materials. This<br />

site is on Corps <strong>of</strong> Engineers property at R.S. Kerr<br />

Lake, and though the site has been reported to the<br />

Corps <strong>of</strong> Engineers archaeologists no plans have been<br />

made to assess or protect the site to date. Most<br />

recently, a burned rock feature has begun to erode out,<br />

and several <strong>of</strong> the artifacts reported at this time are<br />

believed associated with it.<br />

Ten Calf Creek bifaces are briefly reported here<br />

(Figure 8). Not illustrated but also recently found at<br />

the site are several Cossatot bifaces and a large T-<br />

shaped drill. The 10 specimens illustrated here are<br />

stems or stem-blade sections from broken or heavily<br />

used (resharpened) Calf Creek projectiles/knives. Two<br />

are <strong>of</strong> novaculite while three others are <strong>of</strong> Woodford<br />

chert; both <strong>of</strong> these materials are common to the<br />

Ouachita Mountains south <strong>of</strong> the site. The remaining<br />

five specimens are <strong>of</strong> lustrous (heat treated) cherts<br />

from the Ozarks north <strong>of</strong> the site. So, the raw<br />

materials <strong>of</strong> the Calf Creek diagnostic tools attest to<br />

the site’s occupants having ties to both physiographic<br />

regions. Two <strong>of</strong> the illustrated pieces are quite small<br />

(2.1 to 2.8 cm in maximum length) and both exhibit<br />

basal notching chipped into flakes that otherwise<br />

exhibit limited bifacial flaking. These almost<br />

miniature examples may be the products <strong>of</strong> very<br />

young knappers. The remaining specimens are either<br />

stems or are stems with segments <strong>of</strong> short, stubby<br />

blades. The two specimens with the largest blades<br />

have blade edges with fine serrations.<br />

This site has yielded many stems from Calf Creek and<br />

Cossatot spearpoints or knives, and the finds reported<br />

here add to the impression that the site was a notable<br />

base camp where hunting tools were being<br />

refurbished.<br />

Enterprise, Kansas<br />

Finally, a single artifact found by the late Bill<br />

Lambert, who resided at Enterprise, Kansas (Figure 1)<br />

merits mention here. Bill found this spearpoint/knife<br />

in the Kansas River there at Enterprise a couple <strong>of</strong><br />

years ago. He kindly let me photograph it, so the<br />

available information is based on that brief<br />

examination and documentation.<br />

The specimen consists <strong>of</strong> a stem-blade section (Figure<br />

9). It is made from a white flint that is lustrous. Some<br />

<strong>of</strong> its shiny appearance may be due to river polishing,<br />

but I do believe the flint had also been heat treated.<br />

The stem is parallel sided and long (2.3 cm) like those<br />

on Calf Creek bifaces. The base, however, has a<br />

distinctive notch in it, and this is not common to Calf<br />

Creek points. The notch more resembles those seen on<br />

Cossatot points, which, in <strong>Oklahoma</strong>, <strong>of</strong>ten co-occur<br />

with Calf Creek. In many respects, the stem looks like<br />

those on Pedernales points (Turner and Hester 1985).<br />

The blade is asymmetrically triangular and includes a<br />

remnant where a barb had been. Overall, the piece<br />

shares attributes <strong>of</strong> Calf Creek, except for the notched<br />

base.<br />

25<br />

<strong>Oklahoma</strong> Archeology, Vol. 53, No. 1


Figure 7. Calf Creek practice piece found in Canadian River at Hoyt Locality.<br />

Figure 8. Series <strong>of</strong> Calf Creek bifaces from site at R.S. Kerr Lake in Haskell County. Scale is in centimeters.<br />

26<br />

<strong>Oklahoma</strong> Archeology, Vol. 53, No. 1


Figure 9. Spearpoint found in Kansas River at Enterprise, Kansas.<br />

Enterprise, Kansas, is not too far from the C<strong>of</strong>fey site<br />

(Schmits 1978) where a buried Archaic camp yielded<br />

a few bifaces reminiscent <strong>of</strong> the Calf Creek style.<br />

Moreover, the dates for the C<strong>of</strong>fey site are around<br />

5100 years ago, and that would be contemporaneous<br />

with the Kubik site results for Calf Creek. While the<br />

Enterprise find doesn’t particularly prove anything, it<br />

is another northern Kansas artifact that implicates at<br />

least some stylistic ties to Calf Creek.<br />

Conclusions<br />

Again, this compilation was meant to document a<br />

continued interest in the Calf Creek complex. While<br />

single artifacts don’t individually tell us much, they<br />

can help flesh out perspectives on the presence and<br />

movements <strong>of</strong> people using rather unique styles <strong>of</strong><br />

tools.<br />

Often, as the case with the Enterprise find, such<br />

artifacts pose more questions than answers. But that is<br />

how knowledge comes…looking at things and asking<br />

questions.<br />

References Cited<br />

Banks, L.D.<br />

1990 From Mountain Peaks to Alligator Stomachs:<br />

A Review <strong>of</strong> Lithic Sources in the Trans-Mississippi<br />

South, the Southern Plains, and Adjacent Southwest.<br />

<strong>Oklahoma</strong> Anthropological Society, Memoir 4.<br />

Dickson, D.R.<br />

1968 Two Provisional Point Types. The Arkansas<br />

Amateur 7(6):5-7.<br />

Duncan, M. and D.G. Wyck<strong>of</strong>f<br />

1994 The McKellips Site: An Analysis <strong>of</strong> the Calf<br />

27<br />

Creek Component. Bulletin <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Oklahoma</strong><br />

Anthropological Society 40:257-275.<br />

Neal, L.<br />

1994 A Calf Creek Component from the Lamar<br />

Site, 34Br8, Bryan County. Bulletin <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Oklahoma</strong><br />

Anthropological Society 40:139-179.<br />

2002 Activities at the Kubik Site, 2002. <strong>Oklahoma</strong><br />

Archeology, <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Oklahoma</strong><br />

Anthropological Society 50(3):5-7.<br />

Neal, L., D. Morgan, B. Ross, and D.G. Wyck<strong>of</strong>f<br />

1994 The Red Clay and Island Locations in Haskell<br />

County: Eastern <strong>Oklahoma</strong> Manifestations <strong>of</strong> the Calf<br />

Creek Horizon. Bulletin <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Oklahoma</strong><br />

Anthropological Society 40:277-305.<br />

Parker, W. and J. Mitchell<br />

1979 Notes on Some Bell Points from a Site in<br />

Crosby County, Texas. La Tierra 6(2):26-27.<br />

Perino, G.<br />

1968 Guide to the Identification <strong>of</strong> Certain<br />

American Indian Projectile Points. <strong>Oklahoma</strong><br />

Anthropological Society, Special Bulletin 3.<br />

Powell, V.<br />

1995 Bifaces <strong>of</strong> the Calf Creek Horizon: A<br />

Collection from Cedar Canyon, <strong>Oklahoma</strong>. Bulletin <strong>of</strong><br />

the <strong>Oklahoma</strong> Anthropological Society 42:145-165.<br />

Schmits, L.J.<br />

1978 The C<strong>of</strong>fey Site: Environment and Cultural<br />

Adaptation at a Prairie Plains Archaic Site. Mid-<br />

Continent <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> Archaeology 3(1):69-185.<br />

Spivey, T., F. Freese, and D.G. Wyck<strong>of</strong>f<br />

1994 The Frazier Site: A Calf Creek-Bison<br />

<strong>Oklahoma</strong> Archeology, Vol. 53, No. 1


Association in the Southern Osage Plains, South-<br />

Central <strong>Oklahoma</strong>. Bulletin <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Oklahoma</strong><br />

Anthropological Society 40:131-137.<br />

Thurmond, J.P. and D.G. Wyck<strong>of</strong>f.<br />

1999 The Calf Creek Horizon in Northwestern<br />

<strong>Oklahoma</strong>. Plains Anthropologist 44(169):231-250.<br />

Turner, E.S. and T.R. Hester<br />

1985. A Field Guide to Stone Artifacts <strong>of</strong> Texas<br />

Indians. Texas Monthly Press, Austin.<br />

Wyck<strong>of</strong>f, D.G.<br />

1995 A Summary <strong>of</strong> the Calf Creek Horizon in<br />

<strong>Oklahoma</strong>. Bulletin <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Oklahoma</strong> Anthropological<br />

Society 42:179-210.<br />

Wyck<strong>of</strong>f, D.G., W.L. Neal, and M. Duncan<br />

1994 The Primrose Site, 34Mr65, Murray County,<br />

<strong>Oklahoma</strong>. Bulletin <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Oklahoma</strong> Anthropological<br />

Society 40:11-67.<br />

Wyck<strong>of</strong>f, D.G. and D. Shockey (editors)<br />

1994 Bulletin <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Oklahoma</strong> Anthropological<br />

Society 40.<br />

1995 Bulletin <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Oklahoma</strong> Anthropological<br />

Society 42.<br />

An Interesting Pottery Sherd from Tulsa County<br />

Don G. Wyck<strong>of</strong>f and Charles Rippy<br />

For almost 15 years we have been recording fossils<br />

and artifacts found in the Arkansas River in Tulsa<br />

County (Wyck<strong>of</strong>f and Rippy 1998). Most <strong>of</strong> the fossil<br />

finds were made between Keystone Dam and the town<br />

<strong>of</strong> Sand Springs. Recently, the junior author retired<br />

from the Tulsa Zoological Park. With his leaving, it<br />

was necessary to move the study collection from the<br />

zoo to the Sam Noble <strong>Oklahoma</strong> Museum <strong>of</strong> Natural<br />

History (SNOMNH). There, the fossils and artifacts<br />

will be studied further and information on them<br />

compiled into a book documenting evidence for late<br />

Pleistocene and Holocene ecological settings and<br />

prehistoric people. The collection was moved in<br />

August <strong>of</strong> 2004. Once at Norman it was sorted by<br />

material with the paleontological objects going to Dr.<br />

Nick Czaplewski who will continue analyzing them<br />

for eventual publication. The artifacts, <strong>of</strong> course, went<br />

to the Department <strong>of</strong> Archaeology at SNOMNH.<br />

While organizing these by material, an interesting<br />

pottery sherd came to our attention. Pottery isn’t<br />

abundant in the river finds, and this particular sherd<br />

merited at least a brief note.<br />

This sherd (Figure 1) measures 10.0 cm in length,<br />

6.74 cm in maximum width, and 0.45 to 0.88 cm in<br />

thickness. Its exterior surface (Figure 1a) is<br />

predominantly pale brown (Munsell 10YR 6/3),<br />

whereas its interior surface (Figure 1b) and core are<br />

mainly gray (10YR 5/1). The sherd is from the<br />

shoulder area <strong>of</strong> a medium size jar. It is broken along<br />

the juncture where the rim would begin, so the rimshoulder<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>ile (Figure 1c) is very incomplete. A<br />

1.55 cm hole at the rim-shoulder juncture has smooth<br />

sides and is evidence <strong>of</strong> a former loop handle, one that<br />

was never welded well to either the vessel wall or the<br />

interior surface. The interior surface and several<br />

recent breaks on the wall show that the sherd is<br />

tempered with coarse, rather large, platy fragments <strong>of</strong><br />

mussel shell. Finally, the exterior surface is<br />

distinguished by a series <strong>of</strong> trailed lines, some as<br />

chevrons (apex up) and filled with roughly parallel<br />

lines, others as diagonal lines extending down from<br />

the rim-shoulder area and from the place where the<br />

loop handle was attached.<br />

In eastern <strong>Oklahoma</strong>, archaeologists have long<br />

recognized that crushed mussel shell used as a<br />

tempering material was a relatively late technological<br />

adaptation (Baerreis 1960; Freeman and Buck 1960;<br />

Orr 1946). If the numerous <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Wisconsin<br />

radiocarbon dates for mounds, villages, and<br />

rockshelters along Grand River in Delaware County<br />

are correct, then shell temper became a common<br />

addition to potters’ clays around 1000 years ago<br />

(Purrington 1970; Wyck<strong>of</strong>f 1980). Further south, in<br />

the Spiro area along the Arkansas River, shell<br />

tempered pottery certainly was being made by 700<br />

years ago (Brown 1996), and it dominates pottery<br />

assemblages used by 500 years ago (Rohrbaugh 1982;<br />

Wyck<strong>of</strong>f 1980). For the Tulsa area, late prehistoric<br />

occupations are little known and documented (Brooks<br />

and Stokes 2000), but the protohistoric (A.D. 1720s)<br />

28<br />

<strong>Oklahoma</strong> Archeology, Vol. 53, No. 1


Figure 1 a) View <strong>of</strong> exterior surface <strong>of</strong> trailed pottery sherd from Arkansas River in Tulsa County, b) view <strong>of</strong><br />

interior surface, c) longitudinal section <strong>of</strong> the sherd.<br />

Wichita site known as Lasley Vore yielded mostly<br />

shell tempered pottery (Odell 1998). Notably, the<br />

Lasley Vore site is only some 10 miles or so down the<br />

29<br />

Arkansas River from where this sherd was reportedly<br />

found. Upstream, shell tempered pottery is prevalent<br />

at the A.D. 1700s Wichita sites known as Deer Creek<br />

<strong>Oklahoma</strong> Archeology, Vol. 53, No. 1


and Bryson-Paddock in Kay County (Hartley and<br />

Miller 1977; Sudbury 1976), and a few shell tempered<br />

vessels are reported for the earlier, culturally unusual<br />

Uncas site (Galm 1979; Vehik and Flynn 1982).<br />

Several attributes <strong>of</strong> the sherd reported here seem to<br />

correlate best with pottery at the Uncas site. In<br />

particular, the combination <strong>of</strong> the trailed (broadly<br />

incised) chevron and in-filling lines, the implicated<br />

loop (as opposed to a flattened strap) handle, and the<br />

shell temper are characteristics reported for one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

decorated shell-tempered wares at Uncas (Galm’s Lot<br />

K, “Coon Creek Incised” and Vehik-Flynn’s Lot A,<br />

“Coon Creek Incised”; Galm 1979, Vehik and Flynn<br />

1982). Also, this Uncas ware is reportedly a paddle<br />

and anvil product, and the Tulsa County sherd does<br />

not exhibit any breaks along welded coils so it appears<br />

to be paddle and anvil produced. Incised shell<br />

tempered pottery is reported for the protohistoric and<br />

historic Wichita sites (Hartley and Miller 1977; Odell<br />

1998; Sudbury 1976), including the nearby Lasley<br />

Vore hamlet, but the Wichita pottery typically has<br />

strap (not loop) handles and chevron designs that are<br />

incised (not trailed) in far more symmetrical and<br />

precise ways than manifest on this Tulsa County<br />

sherd.<br />

In conclusion, an unusual sherd from the Arkansas<br />

River in Tulsa County implicates a bit <strong>of</strong> prehistory<br />

and cultural affiliation not well known for the locality.<br />

Given that it was found in the river bed, we have no<br />

idea <strong>of</strong> whether it washed from a nearby camp, was<br />

lost over a canoe, or how it got there. The very sandy<br />

banks <strong>of</strong> the Arkansas River below Keystone dam<br />

have not exposed any buried camp sites <strong>of</strong> which we<br />

are aware. But those <strong>of</strong> you watching the river should<br />

keep your eyes peeled.<br />

References Cited<br />

Baerreis, D.A.<br />

1960 Shell Tempered Pottery in Northeastern<br />

<strong>Oklahoma</strong>. Bulletin <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Oklahoma</strong> Anthropological<br />

Society 8:1-2.<br />

Brooks, R.L. and R.J. Stokes<br />

2000 Archaeological Investigations at Graystone<br />

Estates #1(34Tu129), Tulsa County, <strong>Oklahoma</strong>.<br />

Bulletin <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Oklahoma</strong> Anthropological Society<br />

49:43-61.<br />

Brown, J.A.<br />

1996 The Spiro Ceremonial Center, The<br />

Archaeology <strong>of</strong> Arkansas Valley Caddoan Culture in<br />

Eastern <strong>Oklahoma</strong>, Vol. 2. <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Michigan,<br />

Museum <strong>of</strong> Anthropology, Memoirs 29. Ann Arbor<br />

Freeman, J.E. and A.D. Buck<br />

1960 Woodward Plain and Neosho Punctate, Two<br />

Shell Tempered Pottery Types <strong>of</strong> Northeastern<br />

<strong>Oklahoma</strong>. Bulletin <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Oklahoma</strong> Anthropological<br />

Society 8:3-16.<br />

Galm, J.R.<br />

1979 The Uncas Site: A Late Prehistoric<br />

Manifestation in the Southern Plains. <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Oklahoma</strong>, Archaeological Research and Management<br />

Center, Research Series 5.<br />

Hartley, J.D. and A.F. Miller<br />

1977 Archaeological Investigations at the Bryson-<br />

Paddock Site, An Early Contact Period Site on the<br />

Southern Plains. <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oklahoma</strong> Research<br />

Institute, <strong>Oklahoma</strong> River Basin Surveys Project,<br />

Archaeological Site Report 32. Norman.<br />

Odell, G.H.<br />

1998 The Protohistoric Period in Eastern<br />

<strong>Oklahoma</strong>: Evidence from the Lasley Vore Site.<br />

Bulletin <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Oklahoma</strong> Anthropological Society<br />

47:83-118.<br />

2002 La Harpe’s Post, A Tale <strong>of</strong> French-Wichita<br />

Contact on the Eastern Plains. <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Alabama<br />

Press, Tuscaloosa.<br />

Orr, K.G.<br />

1946 The Archaeological Situation at Spiro,<br />

<strong>Oklahoma</strong>: A Preliminary Report. American Antiquity<br />

11(4):228-256.<br />

Purrington, B.L.<br />

1970 The Prehistory <strong>of</strong> Delaware County,<br />

<strong>Oklahoma</strong>: Cultural Continuity and Change on the<br />

Western Ozark Periphery. Ph.D. dissertation,<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Anthropology, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Wisconsin, Madison.<br />

Rohrbaugh, C.L.<br />

1982 Spiro and Fort C<strong>of</strong>fee Phases: Changing<br />

Cultural Complexes <strong>of</strong> the Caddoan Area. Ph.D.<br />

dissertation, Department <strong>of</strong> Anthropology, <strong>University</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> Wisconsin, Madison.<br />

Sudbury, B.<br />

1976 Ka-3, The Deer Creek Site, An Eighteenth<br />

Century French Contact Site. Bulletin <strong>of</strong> the<br />

30<br />

<strong>Oklahoma</strong> Archeology, Vol. 53, No. 1


<strong>Oklahoma</strong> Anthropological Society 24:1-135.<br />

Vehik, S.C. and P. Flynn<br />

1982 Archaeological Excavations at the Early<br />

Plains Village Uncas Site (34Ka-172). Bulletin <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>Oklahoma</strong> Anthropological Society 31:5-70.<br />

Wyck<strong>of</strong>f, D.G.<br />

1980 Caddoan Adaptive Strategies in the Arkansas<br />

Basin, Eastern <strong>Oklahoma</strong>. Ph.D. dissertation,<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Anthropology, Washington State<br />

<strong>University</strong>, Pullman.<br />

Wyck<strong>of</strong>f, D.G. and C. Rippy<br />

1998 Late Pleistocene-Early Holocene People and<br />

Animals in Tulsa County: Some Preliminary Insights.<br />

Bulletin <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Oklahoma</strong> Anthropological Society<br />

47:5-37.<br />

Corner-tanged Knife<br />

Richard Drass<br />

The corner-tanged knife in the photograph was found by Robert Wickham in Osage County, <strong>Oklahoma</strong>. The knife<br />

is made <strong>of</strong> Foraker chert. The three dart point fragments pictured with the knife were found in the same area.<br />

These points are all made <strong>of</strong> Florence A chert. The points suggest a Late Archaic or Woodland period occupation.<br />

31<br />

<strong>Oklahoma</strong> Archeology, Vol. 53, No. 1


An Unusual Occurrence <strong>of</strong> Ground Stone Items from Jackson County,<br />

<strong>Oklahoma</strong><br />

Robert L. Brooks<br />

Introduction<br />

In November 1990, Elmer Craft, an avocational<br />

archaeologist and long time Society member who<br />

lived in southwest <strong>Oklahoma</strong>, passed away. Elmer had<br />

visited many <strong>of</strong> the significant archaeological sites in<br />

the southwestern part <strong>of</strong> the state, sharing what<br />

information he had found concerning the prehistoric<br />

occupants <strong>of</strong> the region. In 1993, his wife donated<br />

much <strong>of</strong> his collection from these sites to the<br />

Archeological Survey. This article represents the<br />

beginnings <strong>of</strong> an effort to document the extensive<br />

material collection <strong>of</strong> Mr. Craft. Here, the focus is on<br />

three sites in Jackson County that contained an<br />

unusual association <strong>of</strong> ground stone items. While<br />

other materials are present at these sites, two<br />

categories <strong>of</strong> ground stone, celts and Waco net<br />

sinkers, are discussed.<br />

These items are from the Hensley (34JK5), Edwards<br />

(34JK6), and 34JK7 sites located in southwestern<br />

Jackson County (Figure 1). The Hensley Site is<br />

located on the slope <strong>of</strong> a high terrace approximately<br />

50 meters west <strong>of</strong> the Salt Fork <strong>of</strong> the Red River. The<br />

nearby Edwards Site is situated on three small knolls<br />

on a terrace about 75 meters west <strong>of</strong> the Salt Fork <strong>of</strong><br />

the Red River. The remaining site, 34JK7, is located<br />

on a high terrace overlooking the Red River proper<br />

with the river about 400 meters south <strong>of</strong> the site. All<br />

three sites are documented as containing late<br />

prehistoric materials: chipped stone including scrapers<br />

and Fresno arrow points, manos and metates,<br />

ceramics, and animal bone and shell. Additionally,<br />

34JK7 is also reported to have yielded obsidian arrow<br />

points and a Clovis spear point.<br />

Of concern here are the presence <strong>of</strong> ground stone celts<br />

and Waco net sinkers in Elmer Craft’s collection. In<br />

fact, a celt and net sinkers are the sole items from the<br />

Hensley and Edwards’ sites in the collection. There is<br />

a modest collection <strong>of</strong> chipped stone from 34JK7.<br />

Ground Stone Celts<br />

The ground stone celts are comparable to those from<br />

Plains Village sites in western <strong>Oklahoma</strong>, especially<br />

those <strong>of</strong> the Turkey Creek phase in west-central parts<br />

<strong>of</strong> the state (Drass 1997). They are uniformly made <strong>of</strong><br />

an igneous material (diorite) and were manufactured<br />

by a process <strong>of</strong> pecking to shape with final shaping<br />

and finishing derived from grinding and polishing<br />

using an abrasive material. They all show clear<br />

evidence <strong>of</strong> use.<br />

34JK5 (Figure 2)<br />

Length: 76 mm. Width at Poll: 15.6 mm. Width at<br />

Midlength: 42.7 mm.<br />

Width at Bit: 31.9 mm. Thickness: 24.8 mm. Weight:<br />

128.8 grams.<br />

This celt displays edge blunting and some pitting on<br />

the bit with striations present perpendicular to the bit’s<br />

long axis. The poll end has a few chips removed.<br />

34JK6 (Figure 2)<br />

Length: fragmented. Width at Poll: N/A. Width at<br />

Midlength: N/A.<br />

Width at Bit: 42.1 mm. Thickness: 23.9 mm. Weight:<br />

136.8 grams.<br />

The celt has been fragmented by what appears to be a<br />

blow to the poll end that sheared-<strong>of</strong>f a portion <strong>of</strong> the<br />

celt. The bit is moderately blunted and striations<br />

appear at a 75-80 degree angle to the long axis <strong>of</strong> the<br />

bit. This may represent some attempt at reuse after<br />

breakage.<br />

34JK7 (Figure 2)<br />

Length: 103.2 mm. Width at Poll: 18.1 mm.<br />

Width at Midlength: 44.9 mm.<br />

Width at Bit: 41.2 mm. Thickness: 36.8 mm.<br />

Weight: 279.5 grams.<br />

The celt is finely polished with some blunting <strong>of</strong> the<br />

bit edge. Striations are obscured by polishing. Poll end<br />

exhibits pecking and battering (?) but no evidence <strong>of</strong><br />

shattering. The extreme polish is suggestive <strong>of</strong> a<br />

different material being worked or that the celt had a<br />

longer use life than the others.<br />

The three celts appear to have been used to work<br />

wood although the nature <strong>of</strong> the wood may have<br />

varied. The battering on the poll end <strong>of</strong> the celts also<br />

hints that they were used like wedges where they were<br />

hammered to split the wood. Certainly, the<br />

fragmentation <strong>of</strong> the celt from 34JK6 is suggestive <strong>of</strong><br />

this approach.<br />

32<br />

<strong>Oklahoma</strong> Archeology, Vol. 53, No. 1


33<br />

<strong>Oklahoma</strong> Archeology, Vol. 53, No. 1


34<br />

<strong>Oklahoma</strong> Archeology, Vol. 53, No. 1


Waco Net Sinkers<br />

Unlike the celts, the netsinkers varied in the material<br />

used in their manufacture. This probably suggests that<br />

composition <strong>of</strong> the rock (hardness, brittleness or lack<br />

there<strong>of</strong>, and ease in shaping) were <strong>of</strong> less<br />

consideration in stone selection. The net sinkers were<br />

pecked to shape although with the exception <strong>of</strong> the<br />

grooved areas, there is only minimal grinding or<br />

polishing present. The sinkers are basically oblong in<br />

shape with a shallow groove extending along the<br />

midsection <strong>of</strong> the long axis <strong>of</strong> the object.<br />

34JK5 (Figure 2)<br />

Length: 49.3 mm. Width at Midpoint: 42.4 mm.<br />

Shallow U-shaped Groove: 9.7 mm in width. Groove<br />

Length: 128 mm. Weight: 110.1 grams. Material is a<br />

dense quartzite.<br />

34JK6 (Figure 2)<br />

Length: 50.8 mm. Width at Midpoint: 46.4 mm.<br />

Shallow U-shaped Groove: 7.9 mm in width. Groove<br />

Length: 154 mm. Weight: 125.1 grams. Material is<br />

granitic?<br />

34JK7 (Figure 2)<br />

Length: 52.8. Width at Midpoint: 48.1 mm. Shallow<br />

U-shaped Groove: 8.5 mm in width. Groove Length:<br />

158 mm. Weight: 146.2 grams. Material is a<br />

cemented quartz/quartzite.<br />

The Waco Sinker was initially described by Frank<br />

Watt (1938). They have been most frequently<br />

encountered in the central Texas area and have been<br />

previously identified with an early Archaic/Paleo-<br />

Indian cultural affiliation. Their function is rather<br />

ambiguous. Waco Sinkers, despite their attribution,<br />

have been variously described as net weights, bola<br />

stones, and atlatl weights. As all <strong>of</strong> those collected by<br />

Elmer Craft came from sites that represent essentially<br />

late prehistoric Plains Village occupations, it is<br />

doubtful that they are restricted to early<br />

Archaic/Paleo-Indian times. Functionally, use as a<br />

bola stone or net weight is more probable than as a<br />

weight for an atlatl where the shape <strong>of</strong> the item would<br />

not be very feasible.<br />

Concluding Comments<br />

In this paper, the intent is not to argue that there is<br />

some functional association between the celt and the<br />

Waco Sinkers. It is likely that the association <strong>of</strong> these<br />

pieces reflects the collecting interest <strong>of</strong> Elmer Craft<br />

when he was visiting prehistoric sites. If a relationship<br />

exists with these items, it must be realized through<br />

discovery in an excavation context. Elmer Craft’s<br />

visitation to these sites in Jackson County, though, has<br />

added some new insights on southwestern <strong>Oklahoma</strong><br />

prehistory. The Waco Sinkers, while reported for<br />

<strong>Oklahoma</strong>, are not documented for the more studied<br />

Plains Village cultures (e.g., Washita River and<br />

Turkey Creek phases). Thus, does the presence <strong>of</strong><br />

Waco Sinkers at Plains Village sites in Jackson<br />

County point to distinctions in material assemblages<br />

in the region? Or, are these items from earlier<br />

occupations at these sites? With the exception <strong>of</strong> the<br />

one Clovis-like item from 34JK7, there is little<br />

evidence to suggest multiple components at these<br />

sites, and the Waco Sinkers are interpreted as part <strong>of</strong><br />

the Plains Village assemblage.<br />

References Cited<br />

Drass, Richard R.<br />

1997 Culture Change on the Eastern Margins <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Southern Plains. <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oklahoma</strong>, <strong>Oklahoma</strong><br />

Archeological Survey, Studies in <strong>Oklahoma</strong>’s Past 19<br />

and <strong>Oklahoma</strong> Anthropological Society Memoir 7.<br />

Watt, Frank<br />

1938 The Waco Sinker. Central Texas Archaeology<br />

4: 21-70.<br />

Spring 2005 Seminars Set<br />

Lois E. Albert<br />

Chair, Certification Council<br />

Thanks to Bob Brooks’ efforts, we now have a place for the General Survey Techniques (S2) seminar. However,<br />

because <strong>of</strong> other commitments (such as Caddo Conference) during this spring, we couldn’t find a weekend for it.<br />

We have permission from The Nature Conservancy to survey two <strong>of</strong> their preserves, one in western <strong>Oklahoma</strong><br />

and one in the northeastern part <strong>of</strong> the state. I plan to visit the one in the northeast soon to see what the area is<br />

like. Because <strong>of</strong> the heavy vegetation, the ticks, and the poison ivy, we’ll have to wait until late fall before we can<br />

schedule a survey here. Don’t give up, we will get this seminar scheduled at a time that will work yet!<br />

35<br />

<strong>Oklahoma</strong> Archeology, Vol. 53, No. 1


Several seminars are on the list for spring. The first <strong>of</strong> these is Report Writing (S12) to be taught by Richard Drass<br />

on February 26. The next up is Organic Remains: Floral Remains (S9A) with Dr. Paul Minnis on April 9,<br />

followed by Maps and Mapping (S5) on April 23. The latter will be taught by Lois Albert, Richard Drass, and<br />

others to be announced later. If tentative plans for the Spring Dig work out, General Survey Techniques (S3) will<br />

be <strong>of</strong>fered on the first Saturday <strong>of</strong> the dig, May 21, with possibly other seminars the next weekend, which will be<br />

Memorial Day.<br />

ENROLLMENT FORM FOR CERTIFICATION PROGRAM SEMINARS<br />

_____ S12 Report Writing. Saturday, February 26, 2005, 9:00 a.m. - 4:00 + p.m.. <strong>Oklahoma</strong> Archeological Survey<br />

Conference Room. Instructor: Richard Drass.<br />

_____ S9A Organic Remains: Floral Remains. Saturday, April 9, 2005, 9:00 a.m. - 4:00 + p.m. Small Lab, Basement<br />

<strong>of</strong> Dale Hall, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oklahoma</strong> campus. Instructor: Dr. Paul Minnis, Department <strong>of</strong> Anthropology.<br />

_____ S5 Maps and Mapping. Saturday, April 23, 2005, 9:00 a.m. - 4:00 + p.m. <strong>Oklahoma</strong> Archeological Survey<br />

Conference Room. Instructors: Lois Albert, Richard Drass, and others tba.<br />

_____ S3 General Excavation Techniques. Saturday, May 21, 2005 (tentative), 8:30 a.m. - ? Spring Dig site.<br />

Instructor: Lois Albert.<br />

Please include $2.00 per seminar as an enrollment fee (make checks payable to OU/Archeological Survey). In seminars with<br />

limited enrollment, preference will be given to members who are in the Certification Program. Some seminars may have an<br />

additional fee for reading or study materials; this is usually a nominal amount.<br />

Indicate: ___ I am a current <strong>OAS</strong> member. ___ I am enrolled in the Certification Program.<br />

Name: ____________________________________________________________________<br />

Address: ____________________________________________________________________<br />

City/State/Zip: ________________________________________________________________<br />

Telephone: (____) _______________ (W), (____) _______________ (H)<br />

email address:<br />

Send this completed form with your payment (check/money order - make check to OU/<strong>Oklahoma</strong> Archeological Survey)<br />

to:<br />

Lois Albert, Certification Council Chair<br />

<strong>Oklahoma</strong> Archeological Survey<br />

The <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oklahoma</strong><br />

111 E. Chesapeake<br />

Norman OK 73019-5111<br />

Telephone: (405) 325-7207; FAX (405) 325-7604<br />

e-mail: lealbert@ou.edu<br />

36<br />

<strong>Oklahoma</strong> Archeology, Vol. 53, No. 1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!