15.05.2014 Views

Joe Justice: Managing a Collaborative Multi-National Team in Real ...

Joe Justice: Managing a Collaborative Multi-National Team in Real ...

Joe Justice: Managing a Collaborative Multi-National Team in Real ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

62:15 Q: To help fund WikiSpeed, where can e get a T-shirt with the Gorilla high fiv<strong>in</strong>g the shark. A: ….<br />

64:30 Q: What is your longer term vision for the care manufacturers. Do you see this scal<strong>in</strong>g up to a larger car<br />

manufacturer. Would it then turn <strong>in</strong>to a for-profit car operation. A: …Were not aga<strong>in</strong>st profit but that’s not what we do<br />

…….we want to make a difference for the environment … more customer relevant, more environmentally susta<strong>in</strong>able,<br />

and lower overall cost of ownership, we’ve done the right th<strong>in</strong>g. We see all of our current competitors as future<br />

partners.<br />

69:43 Q: I’ve been coach<strong>in</strong>g, so fac<strong>in</strong>g the pa<strong>in</strong> of transformation, and view this work as disruptive. What do you see<br />

of current manufactures succeed<strong>in</strong>g with this <strong>in</strong>stead of new disruptive manufacturers grow<strong>in</strong>g up around them and<br />

eat<strong>in</strong>g their lunch? A: That’s Steve Denn<strong>in</strong>g’s po<strong>in</strong>t exactly, if I followed you. He’s say<strong>in</strong>g it’s very pa<strong>in</strong>ful for an<br />

exist<strong>in</strong>g organization to change methods, and so what seems to be happen<strong>in</strong>g, and what has historically happened, <strong>in</strong><br />

the pace of bus<strong>in</strong>ess turnover that’s accelerat<strong>in</strong>g, is that some other company comes up, is radically disruptive, takes<br />

over the space, and then they become the complacent one. Then they’re raided and disrupted, and they’re raided and<br />

disrupted. My guess at what the answer is, what I’ve observed and have some evidence of what the answer might be,<br />

is that companies need to be good at change. Not be good at agile, not be good at scrum, not be good at l<strong>in</strong>e<br />

manufactur<strong>in</strong>g, not be good at lean, although all those th<strong>in</strong>gs do help them change quickly; but the actual good is not<br />

to figure out how to be an awesome scrum master. The actual good is to figure out how to make your team do<br />

someth<strong>in</strong>g different next week that’s better than what you’re do<strong>in</strong>g now. That’s what all these practices are all about.<br />

We all know this. But sometimes it’s easy to get dogmatic, and we know when that happens, the excitement starts to<br />

leave the team. The other part of that is, if there’s anyth<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Team</strong> WikiSpeed is do<strong>in</strong>g that’s actually new – because<br />

everyth<strong>in</strong>g we’re do<strong>in</strong>g is common across the agile space, it’s just the agile space is still boom<strong>in</strong>g, it’s still fly<strong>in</strong>g open<br />

and expand<strong>in</strong>g – is focus<strong>in</strong>g on moral as a multiplier for velocity. That’s not very common yet. I’ve heard a few<br />

sessions about it [here at the conference], and I didn’t come up with it either. But we apply that very seriously, and<br />

we apply that paired with reduced cost to make change. I bet that that’s what might serve these companies, be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

good at hav<strong>in</strong>g highly motivated teams that are mak<strong>in</strong>g changes quickly. They may be able to stay on top of their<br />

markets. But that doesn’t address how to conv<strong>in</strong>ce or encourage or support an exist<strong>in</strong>g company try to make change.<br />

There’s the thought that you have to give someone at least five compliments before you can ask them to change. It<br />

might be f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g out what’s really good about the companies we’re <strong>in</strong> before we f<strong>in</strong>d out what we might want to<br />

disrupt, and disrupt it very gently, and with support. And come at it, I amag<strong>in</strong>e, from a lov<strong>in</strong>g angle at what the<br />

company’s already good at, and a lov<strong>in</strong>g angle for the people <strong>in</strong> the bus<strong>in</strong>ess and what they’re already do<strong>in</strong>g, and help<br />

them do it better – to be higher morale, and to be able to make changes quickly. Then maybe we will see all<br />

companies be<strong>in</strong>g cont<strong>in</strong>ually disruptive. And we’ll all benefit from hav<strong>in</strong>g a radically different, maybe, pace of new<br />

product development that is customer focused. Did that talk to your question at all or did I go sideways and talk <strong>in</strong> a<br />

rant?<br />

72:42 Q quy responds: No, actually that was really good. But I th<strong>in</strong>k when you were talk<strong>in</strong>g there about, um, some<br />

people th<strong>in</strong>k I’m a nice guy. I’ve got them fooled. When you’re look<strong>in</strong>g at try<strong>in</strong>g to transform them, it seems to take<br />

an awful long time. So they th<strong>in</strong>k “I’m go<strong>in</strong>g to get this coach <strong>in</strong>, and oh by the way I want you to take these hundred<br />

teams and get them agile before the end of the year.” I just k<strong>in</strong>d of start to shiver and shake when I hear them talk<br />

that way, because it’s a lot of talk<strong>in</strong>g, help<strong>in</strong>g. When they feel like you’re there to help, then you get the ability to<br />

<strong>in</strong>fluence them. And that, to me, takes a long time to be able to build that up. That’s my fear, of them not actually<br />

transform<strong>in</strong>g. Then it takes a 2x4 to the head and that’s a lot more pa<strong>in</strong>ful for them then a nice transformation.<br />

73:39 A: I used to feel that level of resistance at the clients I’d go to <strong>in</strong> my day job. I don’t any more. That example<br />

at Tait radio – they were already do<strong>in</strong>g some strong practices that they had found by work<strong>in</strong>g with Mary and Tom<br />

Poppendieck, and Henrick [Kniberg] . Then when Tim Meyer and I were able to come <strong>in</strong>, we were able to set up a<br />

team on day one. We were able to have visible, radical progress <strong>in</strong> that team. The team was, and Tim and I were able<br />

to support it (we didn’t build those radios, we’re not radio eng<strong>in</strong>eers) <strong>in</strong> five days. We’re beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g to see the pace of<br />

adoption, the pace of culture change, go through the roof too. What I see as a – I will get on my high horse for a just<br />

a m<strong>in</strong>ute – is I see people come <strong>in</strong> and talk about organizational change as if it’s this road map <strong>in</strong> this cycle. What?<br />

We’re agile.<br />

[excitedly] I run <strong>in</strong>to a client and say “You have permission to do what you need to do. They do, right? [said<br />

sideways, to management presumably]. Okay – and you won’t be fired for at least one week. Now we’re go<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

do someth<strong>in</strong>g really different and here’s the practices that support it. See that Q ball, just for this week, we’re<br />

go<strong>in</strong>g to move it aga<strong>in</strong>st the wall, okay? Please take these th<strong>in</strong>gs over here . Who has the clearest vision of what<br />

we’re do<strong>in</strong>g? Who can imag<strong>in</strong>e a day <strong>in</strong> the life of the customer,a nd what they’re do<strong>in</strong>g that day when they’re<br />

us<strong>in</strong>g your product or service, and what they ate for breakfast, and how it relates to the rest of the t<strong>in</strong>gs they do<br />

that day? Who is that? It’s your tester?! Oh wow, imag<strong>in</strong>e that, it’s not even someone from market<strong>in</strong>g but they<br />

really do. Do they? They do. Let’s talk about how to vote as a team. You’re now this th<strong>in</strong>g called the product<br />

owner. Who’s go<strong>in</strong>g to run get everybody screwdrivers and lemonade? Okay, for today at least you’re the scrum<br />

master. Do you have a background <strong>in</strong> team psychology? No. Well maybe go to a coach<strong>in</strong>g cl<strong>in</strong>ic next week.<br />

Week one we have results. That starts to have people from other teams come <strong>in</strong> and look, say<strong>in</strong>g “what’s go<strong>in</strong>g<br />

on.” And we have an all hands session say<strong>in</strong>g everyth<strong>in</strong>g you gave this team once a year, you’re no go<strong>in</strong>g to give<br />

them a little piece of it once a week, and everyth<strong>in</strong>g you used to get from this team once a year, once a quarter,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!