Assessment of Instructional Technology - Purdue College of ...
Assessment of Instructional Technology - Purdue College of ...
Assessment of Instructional Technology - Purdue College of ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Final Report <strong>of</strong> the Task Force to Assess <strong>Instructional</strong>/Educational <strong>Technology</strong><br />
EInstruction<br />
Appendix III: Summary <strong>of</strong> survey details relevant to EInstruction and Respondus<br />
Faculty Survey:<br />
Clickers <strong>of</strong>fer a way for students to respond anonymously to questions in class and have the<br />
results displayed instantaneously. The majority <strong>of</strong> the faculty (63%) were familiar with the use <strong>of</strong><br />
clickers in the classroom. Of those who had no prior knowledge <strong>of</strong> them, 45% thought they<br />
would be useful and 55% did not. Of the faculty who already knew about clickers, 13% had<br />
actually used them in the classroom and 87% had not. Of those who had prior knowledge <strong>of</strong><br />
them and had used them, 75% thought they were useful for instructional activities and 25% did<br />
not. Of those who had prior knowledge <strong>of</strong> them but had never used them, 73% thought they<br />
would be useful and 27% did not. The "bottom line" seems to be that three-quarters <strong>of</strong> the<br />
faculty members who already knew about clickers thought they would be useful, but 55% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
faculty members who had no prior knowledge <strong>of</strong> them thought they would be <strong>of</strong> no value after<br />
reading a short description <strong>of</strong> them.<br />
Student Survey:<br />
The opinions <strong>of</strong> the students about clickers were more negative than those <strong>of</strong> the faculty. The<br />
majority <strong>of</strong> the students (70%) were familiar with the use <strong>of</strong> clickers in the classroom. Of the<br />
students who were already familiar with them but had not used them in class, 39% thought they<br />
would facilitate learning and 61% thought they would not. Of the students who were already<br />
familiar with them and had actually used them in class, 23% thought they facilitated learning and<br />
77% thought they did not. So the trend seems to be that as more students actually use clickers,<br />
fewer <strong>of</strong> them think they actually have value. This is in line with the fact that <strong>of</strong> the students who<br />
had no prior knowledge <strong>of</strong> clickers and had never used them, 60% thought they would facilitate<br />
learning after reading a short description <strong>of</strong> them.<br />
EInstruction: Necessary Investments<br />
The main expense involved with use <strong>of</strong> clickers is that each student must purchase one for $20.<br />
There is no expense to the instructor. We currently have the technology to implement clickers<br />
and the decision to use or not to use them is up to the instructor(s) involved in teaching the<br />
class. No future investment is necessary except for the students.<br />
Respondus<br />
Faculty Survey:<br />
Respondus is a tool for writing examinations <strong>of</strong>fline in Windows without viewing the underlying<br />
HTML, and then uploading them directly in Blackboard. Only 10% <strong>of</strong> the faculty were familiar<br />
with Respondus. Of those, 60% had actually used Respondus and all <strong>of</strong> them thought it was<br />
useful. Of the faculty who were familiar with Respondus but had not actually used it, 60%<br />
thought it would be useful and 40% did not. Of the faculty members who had no prior knowledge<br />
<strong>of</strong> Respondus (90%), 43% thought it would be useful after reading a short description <strong>of</strong> it, and<br />
57% thought it would not be useful. The "bottom line" with Respondus is that it is necessary if<br />
examinations cannot be given in the classroom, but it is far from ideal because exam security<br />
cannot be guaranteed. No further investment is required for use <strong>of</strong> this tool.<br />
Page 8