23.05.2014 Views

0.1 Klein-Gordon Equation 0.2 Dirac Equation

0.1 Klein-Gordon Equation 0.2 Dirac Equation

0.1 Klein-Gordon Equation 0.2 Dirac Equation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

0.7 <strong>Dirac</strong> <strong>Equation</strong> as a Field <strong>Equation</strong><br />

Although the <strong>Dirac</strong> equation is somewhat sucessful as a one particle equation,<br />

the idea of a filled sea of negative energy states is bizarre, and is also<br />

not applicable to particles of integral spin that do not satisfy the exclusion<br />

principle. The integral spin particles also do not have a consistent quantum<br />

treatment with positive definite probability density. There were other difficulties<br />

such a the <strong>Klein</strong> paradox. Therefore the <strong>Dirac</strong> equation came to be<br />

regarded as a field equation to be subjected to a form of canonical quantization<br />

just like the scalar and electromagnetic fields. To realize this, we must<br />

have a Lagrangian for the <strong>Dirac</strong> equation. A Lagrangian density that serves<br />

is<br />

L = iψγ µ ∂ µ ψ − mψψ (17)<br />

It is easily verified that the equations of motion arising from this are the<br />

<strong>Dirac</strong> equation and its conjugate:<br />

i∂ µ ψγ µ + mψ = 0<br />

When we come to construct the Hamiltonian, however, there are pathological<br />

elements in the calculation. For example, the momentum conjugate to ψ is<br />

identically zero, and the momentum conjugater to ψ is<br />

Π = ∂L<br />

∂∂ 0 ψ<br />

= iψγ 0<br />

Since the momentum conjugate to ψ is iψ † , a coordinate, we are dealing with<br />

a constrained system. Though there are sophisticated methods to deal with<br />

such constraints, we will follow a simple practical method and consider only<br />

ψ to be a coordinate in the Lagrangian. When we construct the Hamiltonian<br />

as<br />

H = Π∂ 0 ψ − L,<br />

We find that the resulting Hamiltonian does not involve time derivatives,<br />

and that these could not be eliminated anyway as in the previous examples<br />

because the canonical momentum does not contain time derivatives. Despite<br />

these peculiarities, the Hamiltonian density derived above leads to the<br />

Hamiltonian<br />

∫<br />

H = d 3 xψ ( † iγ 0 γ i ∂ i + γ 0 m ) ψ,<br />

12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!