23.05.2014 Views

0.1 Klein-Gordon Equation 0.2 Dirac Equation

0.1 Klein-Gordon Equation 0.2 Dirac Equation

0.1 Klein-Gordon Equation 0.2 Dirac Equation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

0.7 <strong>Dirac</strong> <strong>Equation</strong> as a Field <strong>Equation</strong><br />

Although the <strong>Dirac</strong> equation is somewhat sucessful as a one particle equation,<br />

the idea of a filled sea of negative energy states is bizarre, and is also<br />

not applicable to particles of integral spin that do not satisfy the exclusion<br />

principle. The integral spin particles also do not have a consistent quantum<br />

treatment with positive definite probability density. There were other difficulties<br />

such a the <strong>Klein</strong> paradox. Therefore the <strong>Dirac</strong> equation came to be<br />

regarded as a field equation to be subjected to a form of canonical quantization<br />

just like the scalar and electromagnetic fields. To realize this, we must<br />

have a Lagrangian for the <strong>Dirac</strong> equation. A Lagrangian density that serves<br />

is<br />

L = iψγ µ ∂ µ ψ − mψψ (17)<br />

It is easily verified that the equations of motion arising from this are the<br />

<strong>Dirac</strong> equation and its conjugate:<br />

i∂ µ ψγ µ + mψ = 0<br />

When we come to construct the Hamiltonian, however, there are pathological<br />

elements in the calculation. For example, the momentum conjugate to ψ is<br />

identically zero, and the momentum conjugater to ψ is<br />

Π = ∂L<br />

∂∂ 0 ψ<br />

= iψγ 0<br />

Since the momentum conjugate to ψ is iψ † , a coordinate, we are dealing with<br />

a constrained system. Though there are sophisticated methods to deal with<br />

such constraints, we will follow a simple practical method and consider only<br />

ψ to be a coordinate in the Lagrangian. When we construct the Hamiltonian<br />

as<br />

H = Π∂ 0 ψ − L,<br />

We find that the resulting Hamiltonian does not involve time derivatives,<br />

and that these could not be eliminated anyway as in the previous examples<br />

because the canonical momentum does not contain time derivatives. Despite<br />

these peculiarities, the Hamiltonian density derived above leads to the<br />

Hamiltonian<br />

∫<br />

H = d 3 xψ ( † iγ 0 γ i ∂ i + γ 0 m ) ψ,<br />

12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!