23.05.2014 Views

Notes on Mean Field Theory

Notes on Mean Field Theory

Notes on Mean Field Theory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Mean</strong> <strong>Field</strong> <strong>Theory</strong><br />

In a ferromagnet, interacti<strong>on</strong> between neighboring spins due to a combinati<strong>on</strong><br />

of electrostatic interacti<strong>on</strong>s and the exclusi<strong>on</strong> principle can bring<br />

about a phase transiti<strong>on</strong> between a state with no magnetizati<strong>on</strong> in the absence<br />

of a field and a state which is sp<strong>on</strong>taneously magnetized. In the unmagnetized<br />

state, the paramagnetic state, the average spin is zero and the<br />

existence of elementary magnetic moments associated with the spin is shown<br />

by the fact that the spins can be aligned and the system magnetized by an<br />

external field. In the sp<strong>on</strong>taneously magnetized state, the ferromagnetic<br />

state, no external field is needed to magnetize the material.<br />

A model for the energy of a ferromagnet that gives good qualitative<br />

results and shows the existence of a phase transiti<strong>on</strong> is the following:<br />

E = −mB ∑ σ n − J ∑ nm<br />

σ n σ m , (1)<br />

where B is the external magnetic field, m is the magnetic moment of the<br />

electr<strong>on</strong>, and J represents the interacti<strong>on</strong> between spins. The interacti<strong>on</strong><br />

is of very short range, implying that the sec<strong>on</strong>d sum should be taken over<br />

nearest neighbor pairs of spins, each distinct pair appearing <strong>on</strong>ce. The spin<br />

σ appearing here is actually the z-comp<strong>on</strong>ent of the spin of the electr<strong>on</strong><br />

normalized so that it takes <strong>on</strong> values ±1. The model based <strong>on</strong> Eq.(1) is<br />

called the Ising model, and is a simplified versi<strong>on</strong> of the somewhat more<br />

realistic Heisenberg model in which all three of the comp<strong>on</strong>ents of the spin<br />

appear.<br />

Despite its simplicity, the Ising model is very difficult to solve exactly.<br />

There is, however, an approximati<strong>on</strong>, the mean field theory, which gives<br />

a good qualitative descripti<strong>on</strong> of ferromagnetism. The idea of the mean<br />

field theory is to focus <strong>on</strong> a single spin σ n , and replace the spins σ m of<br />

its neighbors by their averages. We c<strong>on</strong>sider <strong>on</strong>ly the case in which all the<br />

spins have identical surroundings, so that all spins will have the same average<br />

〈σ〉 = s. In this way, we obtain the mean field energy for a single spin<br />

E mf = −mBσ − Jνsσ, (2)<br />

where ν is the number of neighboring spins that interact with σ. From this<br />

energy we find the mean field partiti<strong>on</strong> functi<strong>on</strong><br />

( )<br />

mB + Jνs<br />

Z mf = e (mB+Jνs)/τ + e −(mB+Jνs)/τ = 2 cosh<br />

. (3)<br />

τ<br />

1


Recalling that the first term is the relative probability of σ = +1 and the<br />

sec<strong>on</strong>d is the relative probability of σ = −1, we easily find the average spin<br />

to be<br />

( )<br />

mB + Jνs<br />

s = tanh<br />

. (4)<br />

τ<br />

This equality is a self-c<strong>on</strong>sistency c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong> for the average spin s.<br />

Figure 1:<br />

Soluti<strong>on</strong>s of the mean field equati<strong>on</strong> for (i) τ > Jν, and (ii)τ < Jν.<br />

C<strong>on</strong>sider this c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong> in the absence of an external field. The equati<strong>on</strong><br />

s = tanh Jνs/τ can be solved graphically by plotting the left hand side and<br />

the right hand side <strong>on</strong> the same graph as functi<strong>on</strong>s of s. Where the plots<br />

intersect, there is a soluti<strong>on</strong>. There are two possibilities: (i) if Jν/τ < 1,<br />

there is there is a single soluti<strong>on</strong> s = 0, and (ii) if Jν/τ > 1, there are three<br />

soluti<strong>on</strong>s, s = 0, ±s 1 (τ). See Figure (). Since the two states with n<strong>on</strong>-zero s<br />

have the same free energy, they are the stable states because the state with<br />

s = 0 has a higher free energy. The mean field free energy can be calculated<br />

from the standard equati<strong>on</strong> F = −τ log Z, giving<br />

F mf = −Nτ log(2 cosh Jν/τ) (5)<br />

if there a total of N spins. Thus the theory predicts that at high temperature<br />

τ > Jν, the average spin, and hence the total magnetizati<strong>on</strong> M = Nms, is<br />

2


zero, while at low temperature τ < Jν there is a magnetizati<strong>on</strong> of magnitude<br />

Nms 1 (τ), which can be in either directi<strong>on</strong>. The transiti<strong>on</strong> takes place at a<br />

critical temperature τ c = Jν. This is the paramagnetic-ferromagnetic phase<br />

transiti<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Magnetizati<strong>on</strong> near τ c . We can find the magnetizati<strong>on</strong> as a functi<strong>on</strong><br />

of the temperature near the critical temperature from the self c<strong>on</strong>sistency<br />

equati<strong>on</strong>, which can be written s = tanh(τ c s/τ), by expanding the hyperbolic<br />

tangent to third order in s. The resulting equati<strong>on</strong> is<br />

τ 3 c<br />

s = τ c<br />

τ s − 1 3 τ 3 s3 . (6)<br />

Solving this for s, we obtain the magnetizati<strong>on</strong><br />

√<br />

M = Nms ≈ Nm 3 τ c − τ<br />

, (7)<br />

τ c<br />

correct to first order in the temperature difference τ c − τ. Thus the magnetizati<strong>on</strong><br />

increases very rapidly below the critical temperature, having a<br />

behavior something like the <strong>on</strong>e shown in Figure ().<br />

Figure 2:<br />

Magnetizati<strong>on</strong> as a functi<strong>on</strong> of temperature<br />

Susceptibility above τ c . Just above the critical temperature, there is<br />

no sp<strong>on</strong>taneous magnetizati<strong>on</strong>, but we can see the effect of an external field<br />

3


y expanding the full equati<strong>on</strong> s = tanh(mB + Jνs)/τ assuming that both<br />

s and B are small. The result is<br />

M = Nms = Nm2<br />

τ − τ c<br />

B (8)<br />

The coefficient of B is a quantity called the magnetic susceptibility. Its<br />

divergence at the critical temperature is a sign that the system is <strong>on</strong> the<br />

verge of being ordered: a very small magnetic field will produce a large<br />

magnetizati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Energy and heat capacity. The energy U of the system is best obtained<br />

directly from Eq. (1), since the standard method of obtaining it from<br />

Z mf would overcount the interacti<strong>on</strong> terms. If the number of spins is N,<br />

the number of nearest neighbor pairs is Nν/2. Therefore, Eq. (1) gives<br />

The heat capacity is<br />

U = −NmBs − 1 2 NνJs 2 . (9)<br />

C = ∂U<br />

∂τ<br />

= −NmB<br />

ds<br />

dτ −1 2 NνJ ds2<br />

dτ . (10)<br />

Since the derivatives of s and s 2 with respect to τ are both negative, as<br />

indicated in Figure (), the heat capacity is positive. When the external field<br />

B is absent, C is zero above the critical temperature where s = 0. Eq. (10)<br />

shows that C is disc<strong>on</strong>tinuous at τ c , since ds/dτ is negative and finite at<br />

this point (see Eq. (7). The disc<strong>on</strong>tinuity of C at the critical temperature is<br />

characteristic of this type of phase transiti<strong>on</strong> and shows that the two phases<br />

have different physical properties.<br />

4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!