Measuring the Electron Beam Energy in a Magnetic Bunch ... - DESY

More documents

Recommendations

Info

7.2.4 The upper-level and lower-level of the HF front end chassis. 7.2.5 Resolution of the 10.4 GHz front-end installed in the tunnel. 7.2.6 Resolution of the 10.4 GHz front-end installed out of the tunnel. 7.2.7 Three days long measurement of the difference between the split signals. 7.2.8 Scanning the gradient of the first accelerating module and measuring the change in the position of the beam with the chicane BPM. 7.2.9 Beam position change corresponding to a small energy change. 7.2.10 Beam arrival-time change corresponding to a small energy change. 7.2.11 Measurements of the beam arrival-time changes resulting from scans of the RF (GUN) and laser phases in the photo-injector. 7.2.12 Fiducializing the mechanical phase shifter potentiometer with the vector modulator. 7.2.13 The curvature of the BC2 BPM measurement results from the problems with the mechanical phase shifter. 7.2.14 Comparison of mixer outputs for 10.4 GHz phase measurement (top) and 1.3 GHz phase measurement (bottom). 7.2.15 1.3 GHz front-end beam position measurement as a function of beam energy. 7.2.16 1.3 GHz front end beam arrival-time measurement as a function of beam energy. 7.3.1 Mach Zehnder Electro Optical Modulator (EOM) used to sample the amplitude of an electrical signal. 7.3.2 Mach Zehnder Electro Optical Modulator (EOM) used to sample the slope of a beam transient pulse. 7.3.3 Measuring the amplitude of the laser pulses with an ADC that is clocked with a signal that is generated by the laser pulses themselves. 7.3.4 Calibrating the arrival-time measurement requires scanning the arrivaltime of the laser pulse about the zero crossing of the beam-transient pulse. 7.4.1 Chicane BPM optical front-end schematic. 7.4.2 Length stabilized fiber link concept. 7.2.3 The layout of the fibers in the top layer of the optical front-end chassis for the chicane BPM. 7.2.4 The side view of the optical front-end chassis. 7.2.5 Effectiveness of active temperature control in the tunnel. 8.2.1 Beam arrival-time measurement with length stabilized fiber. 8.2.2 Balanced optical cross correlator used to measure the difference between the arrival-times of pulses coming from and returning to the MLO. 8.3.1 Schematic of MLO-MO laser-RF lock. 8.3.2 One frequency is filtered out of the frequency comb of pulsed laser signal on photodetector. 8.3.3 Setup for measurement of the mixer’s Kφ and characterization of the spectral noise density and drift contributed by each RF component. 8.3.4 Spectral noise density of signal at the exit of the LNA shown in Fig. 8.3.1. 8.3.5 RF phase measurement drift with temperature control, with and without disturbances (people in room).
8.3.6 RF phase measurement drift without temperature control, without disturbances (people in room). 8.3.7 Out-of-loop measurement drift without temperature control and without disturbances (people in room). 9.1.1 A synchrotron light monitor system with CCD screen. 9.1.2 A picture of the beam as imaged with the synchrotron light camera. 9.2.1 Two Photomultipliers used to measure the beam position in the chicane. 10.1.1 Measurements of energy stability in the chicane taken by the coarse and fine HF front-ends of the chicane BPM plotted with energy setpoint values from the upstream accelerating module. 10.2.1 Correlation between the measurements of the beam position in the chicane taken by the chicane BPM (labeled EBPM) and the photomultiplier tube monitor (PMT). 10.2.2 Fine HF front-ends position measurement and photomultiplier tube position measurement in good agreement. 10.2.3 Fine HF front-ends position measurement and photomultiplier tube position measurement in poor agreement. 10.3.1 Fine HF front-ends position measurement and photomultiplier tube position measurement. 10.4.1 Optical (EOM) front-end position measurement and photomultiplier tube position measurement along with a time of flight measurement involving 2 BAMs and a line showing how the setpoint of the gradient changed. 10.4.2 The beam energy was changed by 0.3 % with the accelerator gradient setpoint and the beam energy measured by the chicane BPM changed by a comparable amount. 10.4.3 Optical (EOM) front-end chicane BPM measurement and photomultiplier tube BPM measurement along with a time-of-flight measurement involving 2 BAMs and a line showing how the setpoint of the gradient predicted an energy change of 0.1%. 10.4.4 The beam-arrival time upstream of the chicane measured with both the transversely mounted stripline BPM installed in the chicane and with a button-type pickup BAM installed upstream of the chicane. 10.4.5 Optical (EOM) front-end position measurement, 10.4 GHz front-end measurement, photomultiplier tube position measurement, time-of-flight measurement involving 2 BAMs and the setpoint of the gradient are plotted together over several hours.
Page 1 and 2: Measuring the Electron Beam Energy
Page 3 and 4: Abstract Within this thesis, work w
Page 5 and 6: 9 Synchrotron Light Monitors 9.1 Pr
Page 7 and 8: List of Figures 1.0.1 Magnetic bunc
Page 9: 5.5.10 Dependence of the slope of p
Page 13 and 14: where α is the bending angle intro
Page 15 and 16: R 16 ( eBl / 2) d ⎛ ⎞ 1 eff 2 p
Page 17 and 18: 2 Free-electron Lasers The facility
Page 19 and 20: arrival-time and energy prior to a
Page 21 and 22: electrons travel faster than low-en
Page 23 and 24: efore bunch compressor energy chirp
Page 25 and 26: corresponds to terms that are linea
Page 27 and 28: spread will be larger and the trans
Page 29 and 30: (a) (b) Figure 2.3.4 Single chicane
Page 31 and 32: 3 Beam Arrival-time Stabilization A
Page 33 and 34: changes in the amplitude of the kly
Page 35 and 36: The problem of cavity field measure
Page 37 and 38: creates a single point-of-failure s
Page 39 and 40: accelerator section and it was firs
Page 41 and 42: ACC1 ~Gun 3rd ACC2 ACC3ACC4 ACC7 Ac
Page 43 and 44: • The lack of a normal-conducting
Page 45 and 46: ( ) E − E ⎛ E − E ⎜ ⎝ 0 0
Page 47 and 48: 3.7 Second Accelerator Section Jitt
Page 49 and 50: 4 Beam Shape in the Bunch Compresso
Page 51 and 52: There has been some debate over the
Page 53 and 54: V T = V cos( k ⋅ z + = V T 0 rf
Page 55 and 56: Upstream of the first accelerator s
Page 57 and 58: Positive bump 5 8 deg off-crest in
Page 59 and 60: E (MeV) 4.75 4.74 4.73 4.72 4.71 4.
Page 61 and 62:
leads one to suspect that as in the
Page 63 and 64:
vacuum feedthroughs, the buttons we
Page 65 and 66:
J image − ⎡ ⎛ ⎞ ⎤ = ⎢ +
Page 67 and 68:
sensitivity of 8 and 20 mm diameter
Page 69 and 70:
1 v phase = . (5.1.21) LC Finally,
Page 71 and 72:
some locations. Nevertheless, it is
Page 73 and 74:
BPM BAM More power at lower frequen
Page 75 and 76:
arrival-time monitor with and witho
Page 77 and 78:
5.2 Cavity BPM Cavity BPMs (Fig. 5.
Page 79 and 80:
t=0 Z 0 t=L/c Z 0 2L Figure 5.3.1 L
Page 81 and 82:
0.2 nC beam charge and can handle b
Page 83 and 84:
T1-T2=T3 X=T3*c T1 T2 Figure 5.5.2
Page 85 and 86:
None of the designs suffered from a
Page 87 and 88:
pickup functions appropriately over
Page 89 and 90:
35 Measured BPM Vertical amplitude
Page 91 and 92:
2.5 Beam position 2 position (cm) 1
Page 93 and 94:
L( x0 , t) U 0 ( t) = λ( x0 , t) (
Page 95 and 96:
1 x beam = ) xdtdx Q ∫∫λ ( x,
Page 97 and 98:
0 BPM beam width dependence arrival
Page 99 and 100:
100 Vertical y position sensitiviy
Page 101 and 102:
Such an x-y tilt was measured with
Page 103 and 104:
10 5 head x [mm] 0 tail -5 -5 -4 -3
Page 105 and 106:
3.5 x 10-3 Horizontal Charge Distri
Page 107 and 108:
The problem that could arise due to
Page 109 and 110:
around their zero-crossings in orde
Page 111 and 112:
v i ( i i i t) = A sin(2π f t + θ
Page 113 and 114:
strengths of the peaks seen in Fig.
Page 115 and 116:
algorithm required to select the ph
Page 117 and 118:
Downmixers for EBPM BPM-L BPM-R BPM
Page 119 and 120:
While this option was not built and
Page 121 and 122:
A Peltier element acts as a heat pu
Page 123 and 124:
For the measurement shown in Fig. 7
Page 125 and 126:
2 1.5 1 BC2 x position (mm) 0.5 0 -
Page 127 and 128:
0 BC2 arrival time (ps) 1.5 1 0.5 0
Page 129 and 130:
eality check BC2 PMT EBPM and PMT p
Page 131 and 132:
EBPM and PM positions (mm) 6 5 4 3
Page 133 and 134:
If a limiter or nothing at all is u
Page 135 and 136:
Depending on the arrival-time of th
Page 137 and 138:
20mW to BAM FARADAY 8m 80/20 60mW W
Page 139 and 140:
can be placed anywhere prior to the
Page 141 and 142:
Insulation Peltier element on metal
Page 143 and 144:
using the RF limiter. This might be
Page 145 and 146:
compared. The length of the cable c
Page 147 and 148:
eplaced with fiber. The advantage o
Page 149 and 150:
Photodetector Photodetector Two las
Page 151 and 152:
RF-Lock Box for FLASH MLO Synchroni
Page 153 and 154:
In Fig. 8.3.4, the spectral noise d
Page 155 and 156:
Mixer Output (fs) 40 20 0 -20 MLO R
Page 157 and 158:
For a frame of reference concerning
Page 159 and 160:
(Fig. 9.1.2). This method proved to
Page 161 and 162:
N λ ∞ ∫ ω / ω Δω 9 3 ( ω)
Page 163 and 164:
Finally, we can use this, together
Page 165 and 166:
The highest energy resolution (ΔE/
Page 167 and 168:
Good agreement between the RF chica
Page 169 and 170:
10.3 Out-of-loop Vector Sum The out
Page 171 and 172:
out. This was done in two ways: by
Page 173 and 174:
1.8 1.6 stripline button 1.4 Upstre
Page 175 and 176:
10 Conclusion and Outlook Six disti
Page 177 and 178:
Appendix A The derivation of Eqs. 3
Page 179 and 180:
Solving Eq. 8 for E 1 ’ provides
Page 181 and 182:
Higher order terms and the 3 rd -ha
Page 183 and 184:
∂t ∂V 2 2 ⋅ ΔV 2 1 = T1 '( E
Page 185 and 186:
References [1] P. Castro. “Beam t
Page 187 and 188:
[28] H. Schlarb et al., “Beam bas
Page 189 and 190:
[55] C. Gerth, personal communicati
show all

Measuring the Electron Beam Energy in a Magnetic Bunch ... - DESY

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?