- Page 1 and 2: Measuring the Electron Beam Energy
- Page 3 and 4: Abstract Within this thesis, work w
- Page 5 and 6: 9 Synchrotron Light Monitors 9.1 Pr
- Page 7 and 8: List of Figures 1.0.1 Magnetic bunc
- Page 9 and 10: 5.5.10 Dependence of the slope of p
- Page 11 and 12: 8.3.6 RF phase measurement drift wi
- Page 13 and 14: where α is the bending angle intro
- Page 15 and 16: R 16 ( eBl / 2) d ⎛ ⎞ 1 eff 2 p
- Page 17 and 18: 2 Free-electron Lasers The facility
- Page 19 and 20: arrival-time and energy prior to a
- Page 21 and 22: electrons travel faster than low-en
- Page 23 and 24: efore bunch compressor energy chirp
- Page 25 and 26: corresponds to terms that are linea
- Page 27 and 28: spread will be larger and the trans
- Page 29 and 30: (a) (b) Figure 2.3.4 Single chicane
- Page 31 and 32: 3 Beam Arrival-time Stabilization A
- Page 33 and 34: changes in the amplitude of the kly
- Page 35 and 36: The problem of cavity field measure
- Page 37 and 38: creates a single point-of-failure s
- Page 39 and 40: accelerator section and it was firs
- Page 41 and 42: ACC1 ~Gun 3rd ACC2 ACC3ACC4 ACC7 Ac
- Page 43 and 44: • The lack of a normal-conducting
- Page 45 and 46: ( ) E − E ⎛ E − E ⎜ ⎝ 0 0
- Page 47: 3.7 Second Accelerator Section Jitt
- Page 51 and 52: There has been some debate over the
- Page 53 and 54: V T = V cos( k ⋅ z + = V T 0 rf
- Page 55 and 56: Upstream of the first accelerator s
- Page 57 and 58: Positive bump 5 8 deg off-crest in
- Page 59 and 60: E (MeV) 4.75 4.74 4.73 4.72 4.71 4.
- Page 61 and 62: leads one to suspect that as in the
- Page 63 and 64: vacuum feedthroughs, the buttons we
- Page 65 and 66: J image − ⎡ ⎛ ⎞ ⎤ = ⎢ +
- Page 67 and 68: sensitivity of 8 and 20 mm diameter
- Page 69 and 70: 1 v phase = . (5.1.21) LC Finally,
- Page 71 and 72: some locations. Nevertheless, it is
- Page 73 and 74: BPM BAM More power at lower frequen
- Page 75 and 76: arrival-time monitor with and witho
- Page 77 and 78: 5.2 Cavity BPM Cavity BPMs (Fig. 5.
- Page 79 and 80: t=0 Z 0 t=L/c Z 0 2L Figure 5.3.1 L
- Page 81 and 82: 0.2 nC beam charge and can handle b
- Page 83 and 84: T1-T2=T3 X=T3*c T1 T2 Figure 5.5.2
- Page 85 and 86: None of the designs suffered from a
- Page 87 and 88: pickup functions appropriately over
- Page 89 and 90: 35 Measured BPM Vertical amplitude
- Page 91 and 92: 2.5 Beam position 2 position (cm) 1
- Page 93 and 94: L( x0 , t) U 0 ( t) = λ( x0 , t) (
- Page 95 and 96: 1 x beam = ) xdtdx Q ∫∫λ ( x,
- Page 97 and 98: 0 BPM beam width dependence arrival
- Page 99 and 100:
100 Vertical y position sensitiviy
- Page 101 and 102:
Such an x-y tilt was measured with
- Page 103 and 104:
10 5 head x [mm] 0 tail -5 -5 -4 -3
- Page 105 and 106:
3.5 x 10-3 Horizontal Charge Distri
- Page 107 and 108:
The problem that could arise due to
- Page 109 and 110:
around their zero-crossings in orde
- Page 111 and 112:
v i ( i i i t) = A sin(2π f t + θ
- Page 113 and 114:
strengths of the peaks seen in Fig.
- Page 115 and 116:
algorithm required to select the ph
- Page 117 and 118:
Downmixers for EBPM BPM-L BPM-R BPM
- Page 119 and 120:
While this option was not built and
- Page 121 and 122:
A Peltier element acts as a heat pu
- Page 123 and 124:
For the measurement shown in Fig. 7
- Page 125 and 126:
2 1.5 1 BC2 x position (mm) 0.5 0 -
- Page 127 and 128:
0 BC2 arrival time (ps) 1.5 1 0.5 0
- Page 129 and 130:
eality check BC2 PMT EBPM and PMT p
- Page 131 and 132:
EBPM and PM positions (mm) 6 5 4 3
- Page 133 and 134:
If a limiter or nothing at all is u
- Page 135 and 136:
Depending on the arrival-time of th
- Page 137 and 138:
20mW to BAM FARADAY 8m 80/20 60mW W
- Page 139 and 140:
can be placed anywhere prior to the
- Page 141 and 142:
Insulation Peltier element on metal
- Page 143 and 144:
using the RF limiter. This might be
- Page 145 and 146:
compared. The length of the cable c
- Page 147 and 148:
eplaced with fiber. The advantage o
- Page 149 and 150:
Photodetector Photodetector Two las
- Page 151 and 152:
RF-Lock Box for FLASH MLO Synchroni
- Page 153 and 154:
In Fig. 8.3.4, the spectral noise d
- Page 155 and 156:
Mixer Output (fs) 40 20 0 -20 MLO R
- Page 157 and 158:
For a frame of reference concerning
- Page 159 and 160:
(Fig. 9.1.2). This method proved to
- Page 161 and 162:
N λ ∞ ∫ ω / ω Δω 9 3 ( ω)
- Page 163 and 164:
Finally, we can use this, together
- Page 165 and 166:
The highest energy resolution (ΔE/
- Page 167 and 168:
Good agreement between the RF chica
- Page 169 and 170:
10.3 Out-of-loop Vector Sum The out
- Page 171 and 172:
out. This was done in two ways: by
- Page 173 and 174:
1.8 1.6 stripline button 1.4 Upstre
- Page 175 and 176:
10 Conclusion and Outlook Six disti
- Page 177 and 178:
Appendix A The derivation of Eqs. 3
- Page 179 and 180:
Solving Eq. 8 for E 1 ’ provides
- Page 181 and 182:
Higher order terms and the 3 rd -ha
- Page 183 and 184:
∂t ∂V 2 2 ⋅ ΔV 2 1 = T1 '( E
- Page 185 and 186:
References [1] P. Castro. “Beam t
- Page 187 and 188:
[28] H. Schlarb et al., “Beam bas
- Page 189 and 190:
[55] C. Gerth, personal communicati