foreword - City of Pickering

More documents

Recommendations

Info

FIGURE 3 Traffic Calming Review Checklist DATE: _______________________ STREET: ______________________________________ MINIMUM CRITERIA Facility Type Local Collector Type ‘C’ Arterial Length of Facility Greater than 300 metres Number of Lanes Maximum of 2 Local Road 85 th Percentile Speed ______ km/h Exceeds 55 km/h AND/OR Infiltrating Traffic _________ v/d of _________ v/d Exceeds 30% Collector Road/Type ‘C’ Arterial 85 th Percentile Speed ______ km/h Exceeds 57 km/h AND/OR Infiltrating Traffic _________ v/d of _________ v/d Exceeds 30% Note: The Traffic Calming request will be denied if any of the above criteria is not satisfied. SECONDARY CRITERIA POINTS Transit Route Yes (0 Points) No (1 Point) ______ Emergency Route Yes (0) No (1) ______ Collision Experience Less than 3/year (0) More than 3/year (1) ______ Pedestrian Generators Yes (5) No (0) ______ Residential frontage < 60% (0) > 60% (1) + (1)/10% ______ Service Function Traffic (0) Land Use (1) Combination (.5) ______ Traffic Volumes _________ v/d > Capacity (1) < Capacity (0) ______ Roadway Grade < 5% (1) < 10% (.5) > 10% (0) ______ Posted Speed Limit 40 km/h (0) 50 km/h (0) 60 km/h (0) ______ Point Assessment Total Points _____ Low Priority 0-5 Medium Priority 6-10 High Priority 11+ Note: Point system is not a warrant but rather a mechanism for reporting and discussion. Traffic Calming Request Status Approved for further review Request Denied
FIGURE 4 Traffic Calming Support Form Dear Resident: Please be advised that traffic calming measures have been requested for installation by the neighbours on your street. Traffic calming measures are generally defined as the installation of mainly physical measures to reduce the negative effects of motor vehicle use, alter driver behaviour and improve conditions for non-motorized street users. Traffic calming can result in reduced vehicle speeds, lower traffic volumes, reduced collision severity and frequency, improve neighbourhood livability and help to reduce the negative effects of motorized vehicles on the environment. Traffic calming measures, however, may also account for minimal delays to emergency response times, damages to vehicles and equipment and cause discomfort to victims requiring emergency attention. It should also be noted that during the winter season, snow removal operations may be somewhat delayed due to the additional time required to complete the snow-clearing operations. City staff have conducted technical traffic studies which indicate that traffic calming measures may be suitable for installation on your street. The Safer Streets Traffic Calming Review Committee has considered the minimum criteria and has granted approval to proceed with this initiative. A 70% support rate is required from the residents on your street in order for this project to proceed further. Please complete this form by printing your name, address, telephone number and indicating whether you support or oppose the installation of traffic calming measures on your street. Please ensure that the form has been signed and dated, with one signature per household, by a person 18 years of age or older. Thank-you for your co-operation and participation. We will advise you of the outcome of this investigation and also provide you with the details of any future meetings. SUPPORT OPPOSE RESIDENT’S NAME: _____________________ ADDRESS: _________________________ TELEPHONE NUMBER: __________________ SIGNATURE: _____________________________ DATE: _____________________________
Page 2 and 3:
FOREWORD Traffic concerns have grow
Page 4 and 5:
City of Pickering January 2003 Safe
Page 6 and 7:
Page 8 and 9:
Page 10 and 11:
Page 12 and 13:
Page 14 and 15:
Page 16 and 17:
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51: APPENDIX A NEIGHBOURHOOD QUESTIONNA
Page 52 and 53: ROUGEMOUNT DRIVE TRAFFIC CALMING QU
Page 54 and 55: DALEWOOD DRIVE & BROOKRIDGE GATE TR
Page 56 and 57: THE HAMLET OF CHERRYWOOD TRAFFIC CA
Page 58 and 59: THE HAMLET OF WHITEVALE TRAFFIC CAL
Page 60 and 61: THE HAMLET OF GREENWOOD TRAFFIC CAL
Page 62 and 63: GLENDALE DRIVE TRAFFIC CALMING QUES
Page 71 and 72: APPENDIX C REFERENCES
Page 74 and 75: City of Pickering January 2003 Neig
Page 76: City of Pickering January 2003 Neig
Page 79 and 80: City of Pickering January 2003 40 K
Page 81 and 82: City of Pickering January 2003 40 K
Page 83: FIGURE 2 40 km/h Reduced Speed Eval
Page 86 and 87: City of Pickering January 2003 All-
Page 88 and 89: City of Pickering January 2003 All-
Page 90 and 91: FIGURE 1 ALL-WAY STOP SIGN INVESTIG
Page 92: FIGURE 3 All-Way Stop Warrant (Arte
Page 95 and 96: City of Pickering January 2003 Traf
Page 97 and 98: City of Pickering January 2003 Traf
Page 99: FIGURE 2 Traffic Calming Request Fo
Page 104: City of Pickering January 2003 Comm
show all

foreword - City of Pickering

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?