26.05.2014 Views

entire symposium - Plant Management Network

entire symposium - Plant Management Network

entire symposium - Plant Management Network

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

P a g e | 1<br />

Proceedings of the Meeting<br />

Editors: Jackie K. Burns, James H. Graham, and Tim R. Gottwald<br />

General Editor: Barbara Thompson<br />

Organizing Committee:<br />

Jackie Burns (Chair) – University of Florida/IFAS – jkbu@ufl.edu<br />

Wayne Dixon – FDACS/DPI – dixonw@doacs.state.fl.us<br />

Tim Gottwald – USDA/ARS – Tim.Gottwald@ars.usda.gov<br />

Tim Spann – University of Florida/IFAS – spann@ufl.edu<br />

Jim Graham – University of Florida/IFAS – jhgraham@ufl.edu<br />

Research Program Committee:<br />

Elizabeth Baldwin – USDA/ARS<br />

Renato Bassanezi – Fundecitrus<br />

Bill Dawson – University of Florida/IFAS<br />

Megan Dewdney – University of Florida/IFAS<br />

MaryLou Polek – California Citrus Research Board<br />

Industry Organizing Committee:<br />

Bobby Barben – Citrus Research &<br />

Development Foundation<br />

Dan Gunter – Citrus Research &<br />

Development Foundation<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org<br />

David Hall – USDA/ARS<br />

Mike Irey – U.S. Sugar<br />

John DaGraça – Texas A&M University<br />

Michael Rogers – University of Florida/IFAS<br />

Juliano Ayres – Fundecitrus<br />

Ray Prewett – Texas Citrus Mutual<br />

Mike Sparks – Florida Citrus Mutual<br />

Conference Contacts:<br />

Clark Baxley – Florida Citrus Mutual – clarkb@flcitrusmutual.com<br />

Christen Johnson – University of Florida/IFAS – chris29@ufl.edu<br />

Kevin Metheny – Florida Citrus Mutual – kevinm@flcitrusmutual.com<br />

Jewel Letchworth – Florida Citrus Mutual – jewell@flcitrusmutual.com<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Compilation Copyright © 2011 <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Management</strong> <strong>Network</strong><br />

Orlando, Florida January 2011


P a g e | 2<br />

Sponsors<br />

The Organizing Committee extends its sincere thanks to all who assisted with the conference.<br />

Special appreciation is extended to Clark Baxley, Kevin Metheny, Mike Sparks, and the staff of<br />

Florida Citrus Mutual for providing expert service and outstanding support for the<br />

2 nd International Research Conference on Huanglongbing. We also thank Dr. Earl Taylor and<br />

Dr. Gavin Poole for their logistical and audio-visual contributions during the meeting.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 3<br />

Conference Organizers<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 4<br />

The 2 nd International Research Conference on<br />

Huanglongbing<br />

January 10-14, 2011<br />

Index of Presentations:<br />

No. Presentation and Authors Page<br />

Session 1: Pathogen Genomics, Bioinformatics, Phylogenetics, and Culturing –<br />

John Hartung, Moderator<br />

1.1 Genomic Comparisons of the Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus Chromosome 17<br />

with Other Members of the Rhizobiales – Hartung, J.S., Shao, J.,<br />

Kuykendall, L.D.<br />

1.2 Genetic and Functional Characterization of the znu Operon in the 18<br />

Intracellular Citrus Pathogen, Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus –<br />

Vahling, C.M., Benyon, L.S., Duan, Y.-P.<br />

1.3 Comparison of the Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus Genome with a Draft Ca. 19<br />

L. americanus Genome Reveals Similar Prophage with Likely<br />

Pathogenicity Factors – Zhang, S.J., Wulff, N.A., Flores-Cruz, Z., Zhou,<br />

L.J., Kang, B.-K., Fleites, L.A., Gooch, M.D., Davis, M.J., Duan, Y.-P.,<br />

Gabriel, D.W.<br />

1.4 Analysis of Candidatus Liberibacter americanus Genome – Wulff, N.A., 20<br />

Zhang, S.J., Ayres, A.J., Bové, J.M., Gabriel, D.W.<br />

1.5 Population Genetics Analysis of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus from 21<br />

Multiple Continents – Glynn, J.M., Bai, Y., Chen, C., Duan, Y.-P.,<br />

Civerolo, E.L., Lin, H.<br />

1.6 Phylogenetic Analysis of Asian Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus; Asian 22<br />

Common Strains Are Distributed in Northeast India, Papua New<br />

Guinea, and Timor-Leste – Miyata, S., Kato, H., Tomimura, K., Davis,<br />

R., Smith, M.W., Weinert, M., Iwanami, T.<br />

1.7 Bioinformatic Analysis of Genome Sequence Data for Ca. Liberibacter 23<br />

asiaticus – Lindeberg, M., Saha, S.<br />

1.8 Genetic Diversity of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus Isolates from 24<br />

Paraná State, Brazil – Meneguim, L., Marques, V.V., Murata, M.M.,<br />

Barreto, T.P., Vasquez-Souza, G.V., Villas-Boas, L.A., Paccola-Meirelles,<br />

L.D., Leite, R.P., Jr.<br />

1.9 Analysis of Endophytic Bacterial Diversity from Huanglongbing<br />

Pathogen-Infected Citrus Tissues – Wang, A., Yin, Y., Li, Y., Li, J.,<br />

Xian, J., Wang, Z.<br />

30<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 5<br />

No. Presentation and Authors Page<br />

1.10 Evolving Diversity of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus Revealed by 31<br />

Comparative Analysis of Two Intragenic Tandem Repeat Genes –<br />

Zhou, L.J., Powell, C.A., Hoffman, M., Li, W.B., Fan, G.-C., Liu, B., Duan,<br />

Y.-P.<br />

1.11 In vitro Culture of the Fastidious Bacteria Candidatus Liberibacter 32<br />

asiaticus in Association with Insect Feeder Cells – Fontaine-Bodin, L.,<br />

Fabre, S., Gatineau, F., Dollet, M.<br />

1.12 Preliminary Report of Cultivation of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus 33<br />

from Citrus Tissue with Huanglongbing – Xie, P., Yin, Y., Li, Y., Li, J.,<br />

Wang, Z.<br />

1.13 Characterization of Highly Mosaic Genomic Loci of Candidatus 34<br />

Liberibacter asiaticus in Southern China and Florida – Wang, X.F.,<br />

Zhou, C.Y., Deng, X., Su, H.N., Chen, J.<br />

1.14 Further Evidence That U.S. and Chinese Populations of Candidatus 38<br />

Liberibacter asiaticus are Different – Deng, X., Liu, R., Zhang, P., Chen,<br />

J.<br />

Session 2: Asian Citrus Psyllid Biology and Genomics – David Hall, Moderator<br />

2.1 Phylogeographic and Population Genetic Studies Uncover Two 40<br />

Founding Events in Asian Citrus Psyllid Populations Collected in the<br />

Americas – de León, J.H., Sétamou, M., Gastaminza, G.A., Buenahora, J.,<br />

Cáceres, S., Yamamoto, P.T., Logarzo, G.A., Stañgret, C.R.W.<br />

2.2 Alteration of Microbiome of Bactericera cockerelli and Diaphorina citri 41<br />

Based on Candidatus Liberibacter sp. Infection – Hail, D., Hunter, W.B.,<br />

Bextine, B.R.<br />

2.3 Oral Uptake of dsRNA Increases Mortality in Diet Fed Psyllids – 42<br />

Shatters, R.G., Jr., Powell, C.A., Borovsky, D.<br />

2.4 The Psyllid Feeding Process: Composition and Biosynthetic Inhibition 43<br />

of the Salivary Sheath – Shatters, R.G., Jr.<br />

2.5 A New Method for Short-Term Rearing of Psyllid Adults and Nymphs 44<br />

on Detached Citrus Leaves and Young Terminal Shoots – Ammar,<br />

E.-D., Hall, D.G.<br />

2.6 Comparative Analysis of Asian Citrus Psyllid and Potato Psyllid 45<br />

Antennae – Arras, J., Hunter, W.B., Bextine, B.R.<br />

2.7 The Emerging Psyllid Genome: RNA-Interference and Insect Biology – 46<br />

Hunter, W.B., Bextine, B.R., Shatters, R.G., Jr., Reese, J., Shelby, K.S.,<br />

Hall, D.G.<br />

2.8 Bacterial Population Diversity in Diaphorina citri: Analysis by PCR- 47<br />

DGGE and RFLP Methodology – Wang, Z., Tian, S., Liu, T., Yin, Y.<br />

Session 3: Asian Citrus Psyllid Ecology and Transmission – Lukasz Stelinski, Moderator<br />

3.1 Antennal Responses of Diaphorina citri to Host <strong>Plant</strong> Volatiles<br />

Recorded Using a Coupled Gas Chromatograph Electroantennogram<br />

Detector System – Robbins, P.S., Alessandro, R.T., Lapointe, S.L.<br />

49<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 6<br />

No. Presentation and Authors Page<br />

3.2 Population Dynamics of the Asian Citrus Psyllid and Potential 50<br />

Generations in Northern Sinaloa, Mexico – Cortez-Mondaca, E., López-<br />

Arroyo, J.I., Pérez-Márquez, J., González, V.M.<br />

3.3 Localization of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus in Dissected Organs of 51<br />

Its Psyllid Vector Diaphorina citri Using Fluorescent in situ<br />

Hybridization and Quantitative PCR – Ammar, E.-D., Shatters, R.G., Jr.,<br />

Hall, D.G.<br />

3.4 Interactions of the Asian Citrus Psyllid, Diaphorina citri, with 52<br />

Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus – Pelz-Stelinski, K.S., Rogers, M.E.<br />

3.5 Seasonal Changes in Numbers of Asian Citrus Psyllids Carrying 53<br />

Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus – Ebert, T.A., Brlansky, R.H., Rogers,<br />

M.E.<br />

3.6 Understanding Diaphorina citri-Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus 54<br />

Interactions and D. citri Behavior for Managing Huanglongbing (HLB)<br />

in Florida – Mann, R.S., Pelz-Stelinski, K.S., Rouseff, R.L., Stelinski, L.L.<br />

3.7 Effects of Soil-Applied and Foliar-Applied Insecticides on Asian Citrus 55<br />

Psyllid (Diaphorina citri) Feeding Behavior and Their Possible<br />

Implication for HLB Transmission – Serikawa, R.H., Okuma, D.M.,<br />

Backus, E.A., Rogers, M.E.<br />

3.8 Effect of Insecticides and Mineral Oil on Probing Behavior of 56<br />

Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) in Citrus – de<br />

Miranda, M.P., Felippe, M.R., Garcia, R.B., Yamamoto, P.T., Lopes,<br />

J.R.S.<br />

3.9 A New Detached-Leaf Assay Method to Test the Inoculativity of 57<br />

Psyllids with Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus Associated with<br />

Huanglongbing Disease – Ammar, E.-D., Walter, A., Hall, D.G.<br />

3.10 Preliminary Study of Comparative Acquisition of Candidatus 59<br />

Liberibacter asiaticus and Ca. L. americanus by Diaphorina citri Under<br />

Different Temperatures – Barbosa, J.C., Eckstein, B., Belasque, J., Jr.,<br />

Bergamin Filho, A.<br />

3.11 Host Range of Diaphorina citri Kuwayama and Leuronota fagarae on 60<br />

Citrus and Zanthoxylum spp. – Russell, D.N., Halbert, S.E., Roberts,<br />

P.D.<br />

3.12 Abundance of Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) in Orange 61<br />

Jasmine and Backyard Citrus of Yucatán, Mexico – Lozano-Contreras,<br />

M., Jasso-Argumedo, J., Morales-Koyoc, D., Jasso-Laucirica, T.,<br />

González-Hernández, A., López-Arroyo, J.I.<br />

3.13 Difference of Gender and Effect of Photoperiod on Asian Citrus Psyllid 62<br />

Feeding Behavior – Okuma, D.M., Serikawa, R.H., Rogers, M.E.<br />

3.14 Seasonal Abundance of Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) and 63<br />

Natural Enemies in Citrus Groves of Yucatán, Mexico – Jasso-<br />

Argumedo, J., Lozano-Contreras, M., Barroso-Aké, H., López-Arroyo, J.I.<br />

3.15 Host <strong>Plant</strong>s of Psyllids in South Texas – Thomas, D.B. 64<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 7<br />

No. Presentation and Authors Page<br />

Session 4: Survey, Detection and Diagnosis – John da Graça, Moderator<br />

4.1 Development and Reactivity of Polyclonal Antibodies Based on OMP 67<br />

Sequences of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus – Coletta-Filho, H.D.,<br />

Peroni, L.A., De Souza, A.A., Takita, M.A., Stach-Machado, D.R.<br />

4.2 Development of Single-Chain Antibody Fragments (scFVs) Against 68<br />

Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus by Phage Display – Yuan, Q., Jordan,<br />

R., Brlansky, R.H., Minenkova, O., Hartung, J.S.<br />

4.3 Highly Sensitive Detection by Real-Time PCR Targeting the Multiple 69<br />

Tandem Repeats of Two Prophage Region Genes of the Citrus<br />

Huanglongbing Disease Bacterium, Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus –<br />

Morgan, J.K., Zhou, L.J., Shatters, R.G., Jr., Manjunath, K.L., Duan, Y.-P.<br />

4.4 Comparison of Different Extraction and Assay Protocols in Different 70<br />

Laboratories to Develop a Standardized Assay for Detection of<br />

Huanglongbing-Associated Bacteria from Psyllids – Manjunath, K.L.,<br />

Irey, M.S., Ramadugu, C., Lee, R.F., Levesque, C.S., Brady, B., Polek,<br />

M.L., Lin, H., Civerolo, E.L., Afunian, M., Vidalakis, G.<br />

4.5 Assessment of Various Spectroscopic Techniques for Detection of HLB 71<br />

– Poole, G.H., Hawkins, S.A., Windham, W.R., Heitschmidt, J., Albano,<br />

J.P., Park, B., Lawrence, K.C., Gottwald, T.R.<br />

4.6 Seasonal Variability in HLB Testing Data in <strong>Plant</strong> and Psyllid Samples 72<br />

in Florida – Irey, M.S., Gast, T., Cote, J., Gadea, P., Santiago, O.,<br />

Briefman, L., Graham, J.H.<br />

4.7 Survey to Estimate the Rate of HLB Infection in Florida Citrus Groves 73<br />

– Irey, M.S., Morris, R.A., Estes, M.<br />

4.8 Two Survey Protocols to Detect Newly Introduced HLB and Other 74<br />

Exotic Pathogens and Pests – Gottwald, T.R., Riley, T.D., Irey, M.S.,<br />

Parnell, S.R., Hall, D.G.<br />

4.9 Distribution of Candidatus Liberibacter Americanus and Ca. L. 75<br />

asiaticus in Foliage of Naturally Infected Citrus Trees – Sousa, M.C.,<br />

Lemos, M.V.F., Frare, G.F., Santos, M.A., Lopes, S.A.<br />

4.10 A Perspective on the Activities of Texas HLB Diagnostic Laboratory – 76<br />

Kunta, M., da Graça, J.V., Sétamou, M., Skaria, M.<br />

4.11 Two New Real-Time PCR-Based Surveillance Systems for Candidatus 77<br />

Liberibacter Species Detection – Lin, H., Bai, Y., Civerolo, E.L.<br />

4.12 Detection of Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum in Potato Psyllid 78<br />

Isolated from Sticky Traps – Kwok, K., Levesque, C.S., Manjunath, K.L.,<br />

Irey, M.S., Polek, M.L.<br />

4.13 Detection of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus (Las) on Yellow Sticky 80<br />

Traps by Real-Time PCR – Irey, M.S., Gadea, P., Hall, D.G.<br />

4.14 Validation of the Starch-Iodine Reaction for Field Pre-Diagnosis of<br />

Huanglongbing in Citrus of México – Loredo-Salazar, R.X., Uribe-<br />

Bustamante, A., Rodríguez-Quibrera, C.G., Curtí-Díaz, S.A., Alanís-<br />

Martínez, E.I., Velázquez-Monreal, J.J., López-Arroyo, J.I.<br />

81<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 8<br />

No. Presentation and Authors Page<br />

4.15 Detecting HLB Using NIR Remote Sensing – Gonzalez-Mora, J., Dima, 82<br />

C.S., Irey, M.S., Ehsani, R.<br />

4.16 Isothermal Detection of Huanglongbing in Psyllids and Citrus Tree 83<br />

Samples – Russell, P.F., McGowen, N., Bohannon, R.<br />

4.17 Assessment of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus in the Psyllids, 87<br />

Diaphorina citri Collected from Murraya paniculata in Thailand –<br />

Jantasorn, A., Duan, Y.-P., Hoffman, M., Zhang, S., Puttamuk, T.,<br />

Thaveechai, N.<br />

4.18 Liberibacter Reservoirs in Cities and Villages in the State of São Paulo, 88<br />

Brazil – Lopes, S.A., Frare, G.F., Camargo, L.E.A., Wulff, N.A., Teixeira,<br />

D.C., Bassanezi, R.B., Beattie, G.A.C., Ayres, A.J.<br />

4.19 Pictorial Gallery of Foliar HLB Symptoms on Various Citrus Varieties 89<br />

and Citrus Relatives – Robl, D.J., Riley, T.D., Gomez, H.<br />

Session 5: Economics, Fruit Quality, and Crop Loss – Mike Irey, Moderator<br />

5.1 Evaluation of Chemical Flavor Compounds in Orange Juice from 91<br />

Multiple Harvests of Hamlin and Valencia Fruit from HLB-<br />

Symptomatic Versus Healthy Trees – Baldwin, E., Bai, J., Dea, S.,<br />

Plotto, A., Manthey, J., Rouseff, R.L., Irey, M.S.<br />

5.2 Evaluation of Bitterness Caused by Huanglongbing Disease in Orange 92<br />

Juice – Dea, S., Plotto, A., Manthey, J., Baldwin, E., Irey, M.S.<br />

5.3 Sensory Evaluation of Juice Made with Fruit from Huanglongbing 93<br />

(HLB) Affected Trees – Plotto, A., Valim, F., Rouseff, R.L., Dea, S.,<br />

Manthey, J., Narciso, J., Bai, J., Irey, M.S., Baldwin, E.<br />

5.4 Economic Considerations to Treating HLB with the Standard Protocol 94<br />

or an Enhanced Foliar Nutritional Program – Morris, R.A., Muraro,<br />

R.P.<br />

5.5 When Should a Grower with HLB Stop Removing Trees? – Irey, M.S. 95<br />

5.6 Use of Electronic Sensor Technology to Discriminate between Juices 96<br />

from Huanglongbing Infected and Healthy Orange Trees – Bai, J.,<br />

Dea, S., Plotto, A., Baldwin, E., Irey, M.S.<br />

5.7 A Regional Epidemiological Approach for Yield Loss Estimates Due to 97<br />

Candidatus Liberibacter Under Different Risk Scenarios –<br />

Mora-Aguilera, G., Acevedo, G., López-Arroyo, J.I., Velázquez-Monreal,<br />

J.J., Gómez, R., Robles-González, M.M., Salcedo, D.<br />

Session 6: Epidemiology – Tim Gottwald, Moderator<br />

6.1 Five Years of Experience with Huanglongbing in Florida: Current 99<br />

Assessment; How Did We Get Here? – Halbert, S.E., Manjunath, K.L.,<br />

Ramadugu, C., Lee, R.F.<br />

6.2 Designing Sampling Schemes to Maximize the Probability of Early<br />

Detection of a Huanglongbing Outbreak – Parnell, S.R., Gottwald, T.R.,<br />

van den Bosch, F.<br />

100<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 9<br />

No. Presentation and Authors Page<br />

6.3 Candidatus Liberibacter africanus Subspecies capensis on Calodendrum 101<br />

capense in South Africa – Phahladira, M.N.B., Viljoen, R., Pietersen, G.<br />

6.4 Distribution of Psyllids Positive for Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus in 102<br />

Citrus Groves in Southwest Florida – Halbert, S.E., Manjunath, K.L.,<br />

Ramadugu, C., Mears, P., Lee, R.F.<br />

6.5 Seasonal Prevalence of Citrus Huanglongbing (Candidatus Liberibacter 103<br />

asiaticus) in a Central Florida Sweet Orange Grove – Parkunan, V.,<br />

Wang, N.-Y., Ebert, T.A., Rogers, M.E., Dewdney, M.M.<br />

6.6 A Mathematical Model for Transmission of HLB by Psyllids – Chiyaka, 104<br />

C., Singer, B., Halbert, S.E., van Bruggen, A.H.C.<br />

6.7 Potential Spread of Huanglongbing Through Soil – Nunes da Rocha, U., 105<br />

Dickstein, E.R., van Bruggen, A.H.C.<br />

Session 7: International Citrus Industries, Regulation, and Grower Experiences –<br />

MaryLou Polek, Moderator<br />

7.1 Laws, Huanglongbing <strong>Management</strong>, and the Current Status of the 107<br />

Disease in São Paulo, Brazil – Belasque, J., Jr., Ayres, A.J., Barbosa, J.C.,<br />

Massari, C.A., Bové, J.M.<br />

7.2 Distribution of Citrus Huanglongbing in the Dominican Republic – 108<br />

Matos, L., Hilf, M.E., Cayetano, X., Feliz, A., Puello, H., Méndez, F.,<br />

Borbón, J., Folimonova, S.Y.<br />

7.3 Citrus Huanglongbing in Cuba: Current Situation, <strong>Management</strong>, and 109<br />

Main Research – López, D., Luis, M., Collazo, C., Batista, L., Peña, I.,<br />

González, C., Pérez, J.L., Zamora, V., Borroto, A., Pérez, D., Alonso, E.,<br />

Acosta, I., Llauger, R., Casín, J.C.<br />

7.4 Spreading and Symptoms of Huanglongbing in Mexican Lime Groves 110<br />

in the State of Colima, Mexico – Robles-González, M.M., Velázquez-<br />

Monreal, J.J., Manzanilla Ramirez, M.A., Orozco Santos, M., Flores<br />

Virgen, R., Medina Urrutia, V.M., Carrillo Medrano, S.H.<br />

7.5 The Asian Citrus Psyllid/Huanglongbing Detection, Treatment, and 111<br />

Regulatory Program in California – Galindo, T.<br />

7.6 Detection and Reporting of Asian Citrus Psyllid and Huanglongbing in 112<br />

Commercial Citrus Within California: An Industry Program – Taylor,<br />

B.J., Polek, M.L., Batkin, T.<br />

7.7 Citrus Health Research Forum: A National Research Effort – Polek, 113<br />

M.L., Wisler, G.<br />

7.8 The Identification and Distribution of Citrus Greening Disease in 114<br />

Jamaica – Oberheim, A.P., Brown, S.E., McLaughlin, W.A.<br />

7.9 Fitting a Spatial Analysis Grid for Research on Huanglongbing in<br />

Mexico – Aldama-Aguilera, C., Olvera-Vargas, L.A., Galindo-Mendoza,<br />

M.G.<br />

115<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 10<br />

No. Presentation and Authors Page<br />

Session 8: Host-Pathogen Interactions – Bill Dawson, Moderator<br />

8.1 Examination of Stages of the HLB Disease Development in Citrus Trees 117<br />

– Folimonova, S.Y., Achor, D.S., Hilf, M.E.<br />

8.2 New Defense Response Insights of Sweet Orange Infected with Two 118<br />

Candidatus Liberibacter Species – Mafra, V.S., Martins, P.K., Locali-<br />

Fabris, E.C., Ribeiro-Alves, M., Francisco, C.S., Freitas-Astúa, J., Kishi,<br />

L.T., Machado, M.A.<br />

8.3 Differential Expression of Potential Virulence Genes of Candidatus 119<br />

Liberibacter asiaticus in Infected <strong>Plant</strong>s and Psyllids – Sreedharan, A.,<br />

Wei, S., Wang, N.-Y.<br />

8.4 Metabolome Analysis of Tolerant and Susceptible Citrus Varieties in 120<br />

Response to Infection with Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus –<br />

Albrecht, U., Skogerson, K., Bowman, K.D., Fiehn, O.<br />

8.5 Deep Transcriptome Profiling of Citrus Fruit in Response to 124<br />

Huanglongbing Disease – Martinelli, F., Uratsu, S.L., Albrecht, U.,<br />

Reagan, R.L., Leicht, E., D’Souza, R., Bowman, K.D., Dandekar, A.M.<br />

8.6 Carbohydrate Metabolism and Related Gene Expression Changes in 125<br />

Huanglongbing-Affected Sweet Orange – Chen, C., Fan, J., Yu, Q.,<br />

Brlansky, R.H., Li, Z.-G., Gmitter, F.G., Jr.<br />

8.7 Analysis of Colonization of Citrus Seeds by Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus 126<br />

and Its Possible Role in Seed Transmission – Hilf, M.E.<br />

8.8 Natural Transmission of Huanglongbing Caused by Candidatus 127<br />

Liberibacter americanus and Ca. L. asiaticus and with Two Different<br />

Sources of Inoculum <strong>Plant</strong>s (Citrus sinensis or Murraya exotica) –<br />

Gasparoto, M.C.G., Bassanezi, R.B., Amorim, L., Montesino, L.H.,<br />

Lourenço, S.A., Wulff, N.A., Bergamin Filho, A.<br />

8.9 Callose Predominates over Phloem Protein 2 in Phloem Plugging of 128<br />

Trees Affected with Huanglongbing – Albrigo, L.G., Achor, D.S.<br />

8.10 Influence of Huanglongbing (HLB) on the Composition of Citrus Juices 129<br />

and Mature Leaves – Cancalon, P.F., Bryan, C., Haun, C., Zhang, J.<br />

8.11 Gene Expression in Citrus sinensis Fruit Tissues Harvested from 131<br />

Huanglongbing-Infected Trees – Liao, H.-L., Burns, J.K.<br />

8.12 Expression Profiling of Host Response of Citrus to Candidatus 132<br />

Liberibacter asiaticus Infection – Aritua, V., Wang, N.-Y.<br />

8.13 Arabidopsis Responses to the HLB-Relative Candidatus Liberibacter 133<br />

psyllaurous – Patne, S., Manjunath, K.L., Roose, M.L.<br />

8.14 Comparative Studies of the Endophytic Microbial Community 134<br />

Structures in Huanglongbing-Infected and Non-Infected Citrus <strong>Plant</strong>s –<br />

Zheng X.-F., Liu, B., Ruan, C.-Q., Lin, Y.-Z., Xiao, R.-F., Zhu, Y.-J., Fan,<br />

G.-C., Cai, Z.J., Duan, Y.-P.<br />

8.15 HLB Influences the Diversity, Structure, and Function of the Bacterial<br />

Community Associated with Citrus – Trivedi, P., Wang, N.-Y.<br />

135<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 11<br />

No. Presentation and Authors Page<br />

8.16 Functional Studies of Putative Effectors of Candidatus Liberibacter 136<br />

asiaticus Using Citrus Tristeza Virus Vector – Hajeri, S., Duan, Y.-P.,<br />

Gowda, S.<br />

8.17 First Report of a New Host (Pithecellobium lucidum Benth) of the 137<br />

Citrus Huanglongbing Bacterium, Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus –<br />

Fan, G.-C., Cai, Z.J., Weng, Q.Y., Ke, C., Liu, B., Zhou, L.J., Duan, Y.-P.<br />

8.18 Citrus Seed Grafting: A Simple Technology for Testing Seed 138<br />

Transmission of Citrus Greening/HLB and of Other Pathogenic Agents<br />

– Bar-Joseph, M., Robertson, C., Hilf, M.E., Dawson, W.O.<br />

8.19 Lack of Transmission of HLB by Citrus Seed – Graham, J.H., Johnson, 139<br />

E.G., Bright, D.B., Irey, M.S.<br />

8.20 Visualization of Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus in Immature Citrus Seed 140<br />

Coats by Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization (FISH) of 16S rRNA – Hilf,<br />

M.E.<br />

8.21 Rapid, Sensitive, and Non-Radioactive Tissue-Blot Diagnostic Method 141<br />

for the Detection of Citrus Greening Disease (HLB) – Gowda, S.,<br />

Nageswara Rao, N., Miyata, S., Ghosh, D.K., Irey, M.S., Rogers, M.E.,<br />

Garnsey, S.M.<br />

Session 9: Asian Citrus Psyllid <strong>Management</strong> – Michael Rogers, Moderator<br />

9.1 A Database for Analysis of Diaphorina citri Population Monitoring Data 143<br />

from Commercial Groves – Gast, T., Irey, M.S., Hou, H.<br />

9.2 RNAi Strategy in Citrus Trees to Reduce Hemipteran Pests: Psyllids 148<br />

and Leafhoppers – Hunter, W.B., Glick, E., Bextine, B.R., Paldi, N.<br />

9.3 Application of Insecticidal Sprays to Citrus in Winter Provides 149<br />

Significant Reduction in Asian Citrus Psyllid Diaphorina citri<br />

Populations and Opportunity for Additional Suppression Through<br />

Conservative and Augmentative Biological Control – Qureshi, J.A.,<br />

Stansly, P.A.<br />

9.4 Studies on Imidacloprid and <strong>Management</strong> of ACP in California – 150<br />

Byrne, F., Morse, J.G., Bethke, J.<br />

9.5 Selection and Dosage of Insecticides for the Control of the Asian Citrus 151<br />

Psyllid in the Citrus Groves of Mexico – López-Arroyo, J.I., Díaz-<br />

Zorrilla, U., Hernández-Fuentes, L.M., Cortez-Mondaca, E., Robles-<br />

González, M.M., Villanueva-Jiménez, J.A., Cabrera-Mireles, H., Loera-<br />

Gallardo, J., Jasso-Argumedo, J., Curtí-Díaz, S.A.<br />

9.6 Asian Citrus Psyllid (ACP) Control: Potential Use of Systemic 152<br />

Insecticides in Citrus Bearing Trees – Yamamoto, P.T., de Miranda,<br />

M.P., Felippe, M.R.<br />

9.7 Insecticide Resistance and Susceptibility of Uninfected and Candidatus<br />

Liberibacter asiaticus-Infected Asian Citrus Psyllid in Florida – Tiwari,<br />

S., Rogers, M.E., Stelinski, L.L.<br />

153<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 12<br />

No. Presentation and Authors Page<br />

9.8 Development of Area-Wide Asian Citrus Psyllid <strong>Management</strong> 154<br />

Strategies in Texas – Bartels, D.W., Sétamou, M., Ciomperlik, M.A., da<br />

Graça, J.V.<br />

9.9 Asian Citrus Psyllid <strong>Management</strong> Strategies for California Citrus 155<br />

Growing Regions – Grafton-Cardwell, E.E., Morse J.G., Taylor, B.J.<br />

9.10 Area-Wide <strong>Management</strong> of Asian Citrus Psyllid in Southwest Florida – 156<br />

Stansly, P.A., Arevalo, H.A., Zekri, M., Hamel, R.<br />

9.11 Evaluation of Low Volume Sprayers Used in Citrus Psyllid Control 157<br />

Applications – Hoffmann, C., Fritz, B., Martin, D., Atwood, R., Hurner, T.,<br />

Ledebuhr, M., Tandy, M., Jackson, J.L., Wisler, G., Polek, M.L.<br />

9.12 Identification of Parasitoids and Haplotypes of Tamarixia radiata 158<br />

(Waterston) (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) from Diaphorina citri in<br />

Yucatán, México – González-Hernández, A., Jasso-Argumedo, J., Cruz-<br />

García, R., Lozano-Contreras, M., López-Arroyo, J.I., Villanueva-Segura,<br />

O.K.<br />

9.13 Host Specificity Testing of Tamarixia radiata for the Classical Biological 159<br />

Control of Asian Citrus Psyllid, Diaphorina citri, in California –<br />

Pandey, R.R., Hoddle, M.S.<br />

9.14 Predators in Non-Commercial Citrus and Preliminary Evaluation of 160<br />

Their Potential Against the Asian Citrus Psyllid in Texas –<br />

Pfannenstiel, R.S., Unruh, T.R.<br />

9.15 Suitability of Diaphorina citri, Toxoptera citricida, and Aphis spiraecola 161<br />

as Prey for Hippodamia convergens – Qureshi, J.A., Stansly, P.A.<br />

9.16 Molecular Analysis of Tamarixia radiata from America Uncovers 162<br />

Extensive Haplotype Variation: Multiple Groups? – de León, J.H.,<br />

Gastaminza, G.A., Sétamou, M., Cáceres, S., Kanga, L.H.B., Buenahora, J.,<br />

Parra, J.R., Logarzo, G.A., Stañgret, C.R.W.<br />

9.17 Molecular Characterization of a New Entomopathogenic Fungus Isaria 163<br />

poprawskii: A Potential Biocontrol Agent for Diaphorina citri.<br />

Development of Isaria-Specific Molecular Markers – de León, J.H.,<br />

Cabanillas, H.E., Humber, R.A., Murray, K.D., Moran, P., Jones, W.A.<br />

9.18 RNAi – Evaluating Injection into Citrus Trees and Grapevine to Target 164<br />

Psyllids and Leafhoppers – Hunter, W.B., Stover, E., Glick, E., Bextine,<br />

B.R., Paldi, N.<br />

9.19 Using Novel Photonic Fence Technology to Protect Foundation Block 165<br />

and Nursery Stock from Asian Citrus Psyllid – Johanson, E., Patt, J.,<br />

Mullen, E., Rutschman, P., Pegram, N.<br />

9.20 Development of a Diaphorina citri-Specific Molecular Diagnostic 166<br />

Marker for Gut Content Examinations – de León, J.H., Thomas, D.B.,<br />

Sétamou, M., Hagler, J.R.<br />

9.21 Development of a Pathogen Dispenser to Control Asian Citrus Psyllid<br />

(ACP) in Residential Citrus – Patt, J., Jackson, M., Dunlap, C., Meikle,<br />

W., Adamczyk, J.<br />

167<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 13<br />

No. Presentation and Authors Page<br />

9.22 Producing New Flush at Will in Citrus to Study ACP-<strong>Plant</strong> Interactions 168<br />

– Malik, N.S.A., Brockington, J., Pérez, J.L., Mangan, R.L.<br />

9.23 Thresholds for Vector Control in Young Citrus Treated for Symptoms 169<br />

of HLB with a Nutrient/SAR Package – Monzó, C., Arevalo, H.A.,<br />

Stansly, P.A.<br />

9.24 Experimental Release Rate Analysis of Volatile Compounds from Wax- 170<br />

Based Dispensers – Neuman, R.D., Mills, D.R., Shelton, A.B.<br />

9.25 Vegetation Canopy Airflow Modeling for Airborne Dispersion of 171<br />

DMDS – Shelton, A.B., Neuman, R.D.<br />

9.26 Methods and Systems to Deliver Volatile Compounds for Biological 172<br />

Control Strategies – Neuman, R.D., Shelton, A.B., Zee, R.H.<br />

Session 10: HLB <strong>Management</strong> – Tim Spann, Moderator<br />

10.1 Trunk Injection of Copper Sulfate Pentahydrate (Magna-Bon) Affects 174<br />

Expression of HLB – Graham, J.H., Irey, M.S., Miele, F.<br />

10.2 Chemical Compounds Effective Against the Citrus Huanglongbing 175<br />

Bacterium, Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus In <strong>Plant</strong>a – Zhang, M.-Q.,<br />

Powell, C.A., Zhou, L.J., He, Z., Stover, E., Duan, Y.-P.<br />

10.3 Regional HLB <strong>Management</strong> on the Effectiveness of Local Strategies of 176<br />

Inoculum Reduction and Vector Control – Bassanezi, R.B., Yamamoto,<br />

P.T., Montesino, L.H., Gottwald, T.R., Amorim, L., Bergamin Filho, A.<br />

10.4 The Theory of Managing Huanglongbing with <strong>Plant</strong> Nutrition and Real 177<br />

World Success in Florida – Spann, T.M., Rouse, R.E., Schumann, A.W.<br />

10.5 Nutritional Treatments: Inconsequential Effect on HLB Control and 178<br />

Promote Area-Wide Titer Increase and Disease Spread – Gottwald,<br />

T.R., Irey, M.S., Graham, J.H., Wood, B.<br />

10.6 Nutritional Approaches for <strong>Management</strong> of Huanglongbing (Citrus 179<br />

Greening) in China – Xia, Y., Sequeira, R.<br />

10.7 First Steps Towards Rescuing Las-Infected Citrus Germplasm – 180<br />

McCollum, G., Stover, E.<br />

10.8 Screening Chemical Compounds Against Citrus Huanglongbing Using 181<br />

an Optimized Grafting System from Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus-<br />

Infected Citrus Scions – Zhang, M.-Q., Duan, Y.-P., Powell, C.A.<br />

10.9 Discovery of Antimicrobial Small Molecules Against Candidatus 182<br />

Liberibacter asiaticus by Screening Novel SecA Inhibitors Using<br />

Structure Based Design – Akula, N., Wang, N.-Y.<br />

10.10 The Low Pressure Trunk Injection System: A Technology to Fight 184<br />

Against HLB – Tomas, J.<br />

10.11 Does Systemic Acquired Resistance (SAR) Control HLB Disease 185<br />

Development? – Graham, J.H., Myers, M.E., Irey, M.S., Gottwald, T.R.<br />

10.12 Use of Growth-Priming Agents to Extend the Growth of HLB-Affected<br />

Citrus – He, Z., Zhang, M.-Q., Viana, E., Merlin, T., Duan, Y.-P., Stoffella,<br />

P.J., Liptay, A., Powell, C.A.<br />

186<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 14<br />

No. Presentation and Authors Page<br />

10.13 Evaluation of Foliar Zinc and Manganese for Control of HLB or 187<br />

Associated Symptom Development – Johnson, E.G., Irey, M.S., Gast, T.,<br />

Bright, D.B., Graham, J.H.<br />

10.14 Role of Nutritional and Insecticidal Treatments in Mitigation of HLB: 188<br />

Main Effects and Interactions – Stansly, P.A., Arevalo, H.A., Rouse, R.E.<br />

10.15 Use of Horticultural Practices in Citriculture to Survive Huanglongbing 189<br />

– Stuchi, E.S., Girardi, E.A.<br />

10.16 Critical Control Point (CCP) Analysis to Build a Model System for 191<br />

Measuring Citrus Propagation Risk Mitigations. II. Sampling and<br />

Monitoring – Brown, L.G., Jones, E.M., Hartzog, H.M.<br />

10.17 The Need of an Epidemio-Surveillance <strong>Network</strong> to Prevent 192<br />

Huanglongbing Arrival in the South Mediterranean Basin – Dollet, M.,<br />

Aubert, B., Imbert, E., Gatineau, F.<br />

10.18 Presence of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus in Diaphorina citri 193<br />

Kuwayama Collected from <strong>Plant</strong>s for Sale in Florida – Halbert, S.E.,<br />

Manjunath, K.L., Ramadugu, C., Lee, R.F.<br />

10.19 A Model System for Studying Huanglongbing – Manjunath, K.L., 194<br />

Ramadugu, C., Kund, G., Trumble, J., Lee, R.F.<br />

Session 11: Host Tolerance and Resistance – Fred Gmitter, Moderator<br />

11.1 Incidence of Huanglongbing on Several Sweet Orange Cultivars 196<br />

Budded onto Different Rootstocks at the Citrus Experimental Station<br />

(EECB), Bebedouro, São Paulo, Brazil – Stuchi, E.S., Reiff, E.T.,<br />

Sempionato, O.R., Girardi, E.A., Parolin, L.G., Toledo, D.A.<br />

11.2 Host Preference and Suitability of Native North American Rutaceae for 197<br />

the Development of the Asian Citrus Psyllid, Diaphorina citri<br />

Kuwayama – Sandoval, J.L., II, Sétamou, M., da Graça, J.V.<br />

11.3 Progress Using Transgenic Approaches and Biotechnology-Facilitated 198<br />

Conventional Breeding to Develop Genetic Resistance/Tolerance to<br />

HLB in Commercial Citrus – Grosser, J.W., Dutt, M., Shohael, A.,<br />

Barthe, G.A.<br />

11.4 Promoter Regulation of the β-Glucuronidase (GUS) Gene and 199<br />

Antimicrobial Peptide D4E1 in a Citrus Rootstock – Benyon, L.S.,<br />

Stover, E., Bowman, K., McCollum, G., Niedz, R.<br />

11.5 Responses of Transgenic Hamlin Sweet Orange <strong>Plant</strong>s Expressing the 200<br />

attacin A Gene to Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus Infection – Felipe,<br />

R.T.A., Mourão-Filho, F.A., Pereira, E.V., Jr., Lopes, S.A., Sousa, M.C.,<br />

Mendes, B.M.J.<br />

11.6 Screening Antimicrobial Peptides In-Vitro for Use in Developing<br />

Huanglongbing and Citrus Canker Resistant Transgenic Citrus –<br />

Stover, E., Stange, R., McCollum, G., Jaynes, J.<br />

201<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 15<br />

No. Presentation and Authors Page<br />

11.7 Response of Citrus Transgenic <strong>Plant</strong>s Expressing STX IA Gene to 202<br />

Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus – Marques, V.V., Bagio, T.Z.,<br />

Sugahara, V.H., Vasquez-Souza, G.V., Grange, L., Meneguim, L.,<br />

Kobayashi, A.K., Bespalhok, J., Pereira, L.F.P., Vieira, L.G.E., Leite, R.P.,<br />

Jr.<br />

11.8 Rootstocks and Pruning Effects on Huanglongbing Incidence on Tahiti 204<br />

Limes in Bebedouro, Northern São Paulo State, Brazil – Stuchi, E.S.,<br />

Reiff, E.T., Sempionato, O.R., Cantuarias-Avilés, T., Girardi, E.A., Parolin,<br />

L.G., Toledo, D.A.<br />

11.9 Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus (CLas) Titer in Field HLB-Exposed 205<br />

Commercial Citrus Cultivars – Stover, E., McCollum, G.<br />

11.10 Host Response of Different Citrus Genotypes and Relatives to 206<br />

Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus Infection – Boscariol-Camargo, R.L.,<br />

Cristofani-Yaly, M., Malosso, A., Coletta-Filho, H.D., Machado, M.A.<br />

11.11 Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus (CLas) Titer in Poncirus trifoliata and 207<br />

P. trifoliata Hybrids: Inferences on Components of HLB Resistance –<br />

Stover, E., Shatters, R.G., Jr., McCollum, G., Hall, D.G., Duan, Y.-P.<br />

11.12 The Role of Salicylic Acid and Systemic Acquired Resistance in the 208<br />

Response of Citrus to HLB – Khalaf, A., Febres, V.J., Brlansky, R.H.,<br />

Gmitter, F.G., Jr., Moore, G.A.<br />

11.13 Observations of Citrus × Poncirus Hybrid Tolerance to Infection with 209<br />

Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus – Bowman, K.D., Albrecht, U.<br />

11.14 Performance of a Phage Gene in Transgenic Citrus Resistant to Citrus 210<br />

Greening – Jiang, Y., Perazzo, G., Septer, A., Kress, R., Gabriel, D.W.<br />

11.15 Genome Sequences of Haploid Clementine Mandarin and Diploid Sweet 211<br />

Orange – Gmitter, F.G., Jr.<br />

11.16 Exploring Metabolic Profiles of <strong>Plant</strong> Tissue with Increased or 212<br />

Decreased Susceptibility – Malik, N.S.A., Pérez, J.L., Brockington, J.,<br />

Mangan, R.L.<br />

Take Home Messages: What Can Be Implemented Now or in the Near Future? 213<br />

HLB Pathology Lessons – M. Dewdney / T. Schubert 214<br />

Entomology Lessons – L.L. Stelinski / M. Sétamou 219<br />

Horticulture Lessons – C. Oswalt / E. Stover 229<br />

Addenda<br />

A1 Author Index 235<br />

A2 List of Participants 246<br />

A3 Meeting Agenda 265<br />

A4 Session 9 Addendum – Extended Papers 9.24 & 9.25 280<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 16<br />

Session 1:<br />

Pathogen Genomics,<br />

Bioinformatics,<br />

Phylogenetics, and<br />

Culturing<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 17<br />

1.1 Genomic Comparisons of the Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus Chromosome with Other<br />

Members of the Rhizobiales<br />

Hartung, J.S., Shao, J., Kuykendall, L.D. Molecular <strong>Plant</strong> Pathology Laboratory, United States<br />

Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA<br />

Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus is a member of the Rhizobiales, as are the nitrogen fixing<br />

Sinorhizobium meliloti and Bradyrhizobium japonicum, the plant pathogen Agrobacterium<br />

tumefaciens, and the facultative intracellular mammalian pathogen Bartonella henselae.<br />

Comparisons of chromosomal gene content identified 52 clusters of conserved orthologous genes<br />

found in all five metabolically diverse species. The intracellular pathogens, Ca. Liberibacter<br />

asiaticus and Bartonella henselae, have drastically reduced genomes with low content of guanine<br />

and cytosine. The Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus genome has 319 coding sequences not found on the<br />

chromosomes of the other members of the Rhizobiales from a total of 1136 coding sequences.<br />

Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus has all 100 COGs previously found in all bacteria to support basic<br />

physiological functions, but also has representatives of 10 COGs that have been lost in other<br />

intracellular pathogens (Merhej et al., 2009) including a hemolysin, an ATP dependent Clp<br />

protease, an ABC transport permease, and a flagellar motor component. These COGS, as well as<br />

six proteins uniquely shared by Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus and Bartonella henselae, may<br />

condition host cells for intracellular colonization or facilitate transmission by insects. InvA,<br />

shared with Bartonella henselae and believed to prevent apoptosis of cells infected by Rickettsia<br />

prowazeckii (Gaywee et al., 2002), is also present. Only two chromosomal protein encoding<br />

genes were uniquely shared by Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus and Agrobacterium tumefaciens, the<br />

other plant pathogen in the study. These genes may also be important to the host-pathogen<br />

interaction. Five and twelve chromosomal genes were uniquely shared between Ca. Liberibacter<br />

asiaticus and Sinorhizobium meliloti and Bradyrhizobium japonicum, respectively.<br />

References<br />

Gaywee, J., Xu, W., Radulovic, S., Bessman, M.J., Azad, A.F. 2002. The Rickettsia prowazekii<br />

invasions gene homlog (invA) encodes a nudix hydrolase active on adenosine (5’)-<br />

pentaphospho-(5’)-adenosine. Molecular and Cellular Proteomics 1:179-185.<br />

Merhej, V. et al. 2009. Massive comparative analysis reveals convergent evolution of specialized<br />

bacteria. Biology Direct 4(13).<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 18<br />

1.2 Genetic and Functional Characterization of the znu Operon in the Intracellular Citrus<br />

Pathogen, Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus<br />

Vahling, C.M., Benyon, L.S., Duan, Y.-P. USDA-ARS-USHRL, Fort Pierce, FL, USA<br />

The uptake of zinc by Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus (Las) may act as a virulence mechanism<br />

in its citrus hosts because symptoms of citrus huanglongbing often mimic those with zinc<br />

deficiencies. Annotation of the Las genome has revealed two putative operons, approximately<br />

191 kb apart, each encoding for a high-affinity zinc uptake system. The operons contained either<br />

three or four genes consisting of znuACB or znuACBB, respectively. In this uptake system,<br />

ZnuA is predicted to function as a periplasmic metallochaperone, ZnuB as a membrane<br />

permease, and ZnuC as the ATPase subunit of the ATP-binding cassette transporter. Several<br />

motifs that are characteristic of these proteins, such as the Walker A and B motifs within ZnuC,<br />

have been identified in the Las encoded homologue. Interestingly, neither proteins homologous<br />

to those known to regulate this operon (zur) nor its regulatory elements (Zur box) have been<br />

identified in Las. To understand the role of these two operons in the fastidious Las bacterium,<br />

each individual gene was placed under an inducible promoter, transformed into the Escherichia<br />

coli BW25113 strain with the corresponding gene of interest knocked out, and analyzed in a<br />

complementation assay. Results from the assays have demonstrated that not all of the Las<br />

encoded genes appear to be able to functionally complement the E. coli knock-out strains.<br />

Because of the essential nature of zinc within the cell, this system may be crucial for the<br />

pathogen’s survival. Thus, disruption of this system may provide a possible mechanism for<br />

eliminating the bacterium.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 19<br />

1.3 Comparison of the Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus Genome with a Draft Ca. L. americanus<br />

Genome Reveals Similar Prophage with Likely Pathogenicity Factors<br />

Zhang, S.J. 1 , Wulff, N.A. 2 , Flores-Cruz, Z. 1 , Zhou, L.J. 3 , Kang, B.-K. 4 , Fleites, L.A. 1 , Gooch,<br />

M.D. 5 , Davis, M.J. 6 , Duan, Y.-P. 7 , Gabriel, D.W. 1<br />

1 <strong>Plant</strong> Pathology Dept., University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA<br />

2 Departamento Científico, Fundecitrus, Araraquara, SP, Brazil<br />

3 UF-IFAS Indian River Research and Education Center, Fort Pierce, FL, USA<br />

4 Microbiology and Cell Science Dept., University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA<br />

5 Division of <strong>Plant</strong> Industry, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services,<br />

Gainesville, FL, USA<br />

6 UF-IFAS Citrus Research and Education Center, Lake Alfred, FL, USA<br />

7 U.S. Horticultural Research Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Fort Pierce, FL, USA<br />

Huanglongbing is a lethal disease of citrus caused by psyllid transmitted, phloem limited,<br />

α-Proteobacteria: Ca. L. asiaticus (Las), Ca. L. americanus (Lam), and Ca. L. africanus (Laf).<br />

Genomic sequencing of curated Las strain UF506 revealed two largely homologous, circular<br />

phage genomes, SC1 and SC2, which were found tandemly integrated in the UF506 chromosome<br />

as prophages in all hosts tested. SC1 carried suspected lytic cycle genes, was found in lytic cycle<br />

DNA forms only in planta, and its genes were highly induced only in planta and particularly in<br />

periwinkle. Phage particles associated with Las were found in the phloem of infected periwinkles<br />

by transmission electron microscopy. SC2 appeared to lack lytic cycle genes and replicated as an<br />

excision plasmid in psyllids and in planta. SC2 encoded putative adhesin and peroxidase genes<br />

that had not previously been identified in Las and which may be involved in lysogenic<br />

conversion (pathogenicity). Shotgun sequencing of Lam strain São Paulo is ca. 98% complete,<br />

with a total of 1,203,790 bps of sequence in 355 contigs with average length of 3.4 kb to date.<br />

Lam has a high level of synteny with Las, including 80% of the likely proteins encoded by SC1<br />

and SC2. Overall, DNA sequence similarity is surprisingly low. SC1 encodes one putative<br />

colicin and SC2 encodes a putative colicin immunity protein; neither has been found in Lam,<br />

which is being supplanted by Las as the predominant HLB species in Brazil. It is possible that<br />

Las colicin kills Lam, indicating a potential control strategy.<br />

Acknowledgement<br />

Funding: Florida Citrus Advanced Technology Program and USDA APHIS.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 20<br />

1.4 Analysis of Candidatus Liberibacter americanus Genome<br />

Wulff, N.A. 1 , Zhang, S.J. 2 , Ayres, A.J. 1 , Bové, J.M. 3 , Gabriel, D.W. 2<br />

1 Fundecitrus, Araraquara, SP, Brazil<br />

2 <strong>Plant</strong> Pathology Dept., University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA<br />

3 INRA and U. Bordeaux 2, Villenave d’Ornon, France<br />

Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus (Las), Ca. L. americanus (Lam) and a 16Sr group IX<br />

phytoplasma are individually associated with huanglongbing (HLB) symptoms in Brazil.<br />

Whereas Lam was the prevalent species in 2004 when HLB was first reported (Teixeira et al.,<br />

2005), since 2006 Las has been the dominant species and is now present in larger areas than Lam<br />

(Coletta-Filho et al., 2007; Lopes et al., 2007, 2009a). The reason for this shift might be related<br />

to the fact that Las tolerates higher temperatures and reaches on average 10 times higher titer in<br />

citrus trees than Lam (Lopes et al., 2009a,b), favoring its psyllid transmission from diseased to<br />

healthy trees and spread to areas with wider ranges in temperature. Under favorable conditions<br />

and, despite the lower titers, Lam-infected trees usually express more severe symptoms than<br />

Las-infected trees. A preliminary comparative analysis of Lam and Las genomes has been<br />

carried out in order to possibly define the factors underlying such distinctions. Due to the<br />

inability to continuously grow Liberibacter in culture media, a pulse field strategy was employed<br />

to obtain Lam chromosomal DNA from infected periwinkles (Wulff et al., 2009). The DNA was<br />

amplified with phi29 and subjected to further purification using cesium chloride density gradient<br />

centrifugation in the presence of bisbenzimide. DNA with % GC lower than 50 was collected<br />

and subjected to 454 pyrosequencing. A draft genome of Lam was obtained and the similarities<br />

and differences against Las (Duan et al., 2009) at the structural level, including ribosomal operon<br />

architecture, prophage number, and genome synteny, will be presented.<br />

Acknowledgement<br />

Financial Support: CRDF (Grant #65) and FAPESP (2010/16820-9).<br />

References<br />

Coletta-Filho et al. 2007. Proceedings of the XVII Conference of the International Organization<br />

of Citrus Virologists (IOCV), Adana, Turkey, p. 124.<br />

Duan et al. 2009. Molecular <strong>Plant</strong>-Microbe Interactions 22:1011-1020.<br />

Lopes et al. 2007. Proc. Workshop sobre Epidemiologia de Doenças de <strong>Plant</strong>as. Campos do<br />

Jordão, São Paulo, Brazil, p. 69-76.<br />

Lopes et al. 2009a. Phytopathology 99:301-306.<br />

Lopes et al. 2009b. <strong>Plant</strong> Disease 93:257-262.<br />

Teixeira et al. 2005. Molecular and Cellular Probes 19:173-179.<br />

Wulff et al. 2009. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 59:1984-<br />

1991.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 21<br />

1.5 Population Genetics Analysis of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus from Multiple<br />

Continents<br />

Glynn, J.M. 1 , Bai, Y. 2 , Chen, C. 3 , Duan, Y.-P. 4 , Civerolo, E.L. 1 , Lin, H. 1<br />

1 USDA-ARS-SJVASC-CDPG, Parlier, CA, USA<br />

2 Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanning, Guangxi, China<br />

3 Guangxi Citrus Research Institute, Guilin, China<br />

4 USDA-ARS-HRL-SPPR, Fort Pierce, FL, USA<br />

Huanglongbing (HLB) is currently the most destructive citrus disease in the world and has<br />

caused enormous economic losses in the citrus industry. In the United States (U.S.), HLB is<br />

typically associated with the presence of a fastidious phloem-limited bacterium named<br />

Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus (Las), though other Liberibacter species have also been<br />

associated with HLB. Unfortunately, very little is known regarding the population characteristics<br />

of Las and epidemiology of HLB. The recent release of the Las genome sequence has allowed<br />

for the development of molecular markers to better understand the origins, transmission, and<br />

population dynamics of the HLB-associated bacterium. From a starting pool of more than<br />

100 putative simple sequence repeats (SSRs), we developed a panel of 7 polymorphic molecular<br />

markers for Las. Using this panel of markers, we obtained complete genotypic profiles for nearly<br />

300 Las isolates from the US, China, India, Brazil, Cambodia, Vietnam, Taiwan, Thailand, and<br />

Japan. Analysis of these profiles identified two distinct clonal complexes of Las associated with<br />

HLB and indicates that at least two separate introduction events associated with the occurrence<br />

and distribution of HLB in Florida citrus. The panel of markers we introduce here should be<br />

useful for future population genetic and molecular epidemiologic studies of HLB.<br />

References<br />

Feil, E.J., Li, B.C., Aanensen, D.M., Hanage, W.P., Spratt, B.G. 2004. eBURST: inferring<br />

patterns of evolutionary descent among clusters of related bacterial genotypes from<br />

multilocus sequence typing data. Journal of Bacteriology 186:1518-1530.<br />

Lin, H., Civerolo, E.L., Hu, R., Barros, S., Francis, M., Walker, M.A. 2005. Multilocus simple<br />

sequence repeat markers for differentiating strains and evaluating genetic diversity of<br />

Xylella fastidiosa. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 71:4888-4892.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 22<br />

1.6 Phylogenetic Analysis of Asian Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus; Asian Common<br />

Strains Are Distributed in Northeast India, Papua New Guinea, and Timor-Leste<br />

Miyata, S. 1 , Kato, H. 1 , Tomimura, K. 1 , Davis, R. 2 , Smith, M.W. 3 , Weinert, M. 4 , Iwanami, T. 1<br />

1 Natl Inst Fruit Tree Sci, NARO, Japan<br />

2 NAQS, AQIS, Australia<br />

3 Bundaberg Res St, DEEDI, Australia<br />

4 Cent Trop Agric, DEEDI, Australia<br />

Gram-negative bacterium Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus causes citrus greening disease<br />

(huanglongbing) – with a history of new introduction and spread through several major citrus<br />

producing areas worldwide. Especially in Asia, it was reported since the early 19th century, and<br />

citrus production in many Asian countries is still overwhelmed by this destructive disease. The<br />

Indian isolates of Ca. L. asiaticus had been reported from several areas in India; however, their<br />

16S rDNA sequences were different from other Asian isolates, e.g., Japanese, Taiwanese,<br />

Indonesian, Vietnamese, or Chinese ones. Thus, we investigated the phylogenetic relationships<br />

among these Asian and Northeast Indian isolates. Ca. L. asiaticus was detected by PCR using<br />

primers specific for nusG-rplK genes and 16S rDNA in symptomatic leaves collected from<br />

Northeast India, Papua New Guinea (PNG), and Timor-Leste (East Timor). Phylogenetic<br />

analysis with 16S rDNA sequences and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of omp gene<br />

region was conducted. It was revealed that the Northeast Indian isolates were genetically closer<br />

to Asian common isolates from Japan, Taiwan, and Vietnam than to Indian isolates previously<br />

reported. This suggests that the Asian common strains of Ca. L. asiaticus are distributed also in<br />

Northeast India. Further phylogenetic analyses were also conducted using other genomic regions,<br />

and new results will be presented.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 23<br />

1.7 Bioinformatic Analysis of Genome Sequence Data for Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus<br />

Lindeberg, M., Saha, S. Department of <strong>Plant</strong> Pathology and <strong>Plant</strong>-Microbe Biology, Cornell<br />

University, Ithaca, NY, USA<br />

Availability of genome sequence data for Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus (Las) (Duan et al., 2009),<br />

believed to be the cause of huanglongbing, provides the opportunity to use sequence analysis to<br />

gain insights into mechanisms of adaptation to host and vector. To enable the research<br />

community to easily view the Las genome and its components features, a GBrowse genome<br />

viewer for Las has been installed for use via the CG-HLB Genome Resources Website<br />

(http://www.citrusgreening.org/HLB-GBrowse.html). The genome viewer is searchable by gene<br />

name, locus tag, feature type, or coordinates. Las genome characterization provided within the<br />

viewer includes information on protein functional domains, subcellular locations, and predicted<br />

signal peptide or lipopeptide cleavage sites, indicative of proteins located on the bacterial<br />

surface. Locations of repeat sequences of use for designing primers for strain detection are<br />

provided, as are operon predictions. Features are hyperlinked to outside databases or more<br />

detailed information pages as appropriate, with links to in-depth protein characterizations<br />

generated by the Grishin lab similarly provided. Links to various additional online resources and<br />

genome analysis tools can be found at the Citrus Greening-HLB Genome Resources Website<br />

(http://citrusgreening.org).<br />

Reference<br />

Duan, Y.-P., Zhou, L., Hall, D.G., Li, W., Doddapaneni, H., Lin, H., Liu, L., Vahling, C.M.,<br />

Gabriel, D.W., Williams, K.P., Dickerman, A., Sun, Y., Gottwald, T. 2009. Complete<br />

genome sequence of citrus huanglongbing bacterium Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus<br />

obtained through metagenomics. Molecular <strong>Plant</strong>-Microbe Interactions 22:1011-1020.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 24<br />

1.8 Genetic Diversity of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus Isolates from Paraná State,<br />

Brazil<br />

Meneguim, L. 1 , Marques, V.V. 2 , Murata, M.M. 1,2 , Barreto, T.P. 2 , Vasquez-Souza, G.V. 2 ,<br />

Villas-Boas, L.A. 1 , Paccola-Meirelles, L.D. 1 , Leite, R.P., Jr. 2<br />

1 UEL, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina, Brazil<br />

2 IAPAR, Instituto Agronômico do Paraná, Londrina, Brazil<br />

Huanglongbing (HLB) is one of the most devastating diseases for citrus production around the<br />

world. The disease was first reported in Paraná State in 2006. In Brazil, Candidatus Liberibacter<br />

asiaticus and Candidatus Liberibacter americanus have been associated with HLB. However,<br />

only Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus has been reported in Paraná. In this study, we investigated the<br />

genetic diversity of Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus present in Paraná State by RFLP analyses and<br />

sequencing of the β-operon ribosomal protein genes. For RFLP analyses, DNA fragments were<br />

amplified with the primers HP1/LP1c for omp gene from 40 isolates of the bacterium. PCR<br />

products were digested with the restriction enzymes ApoI, HinfI, and TaqI. The primers A2/J5<br />

were used to amplify a fragment of 703 bp of the β-operon ribosomal protein genes from<br />

21 isolates. The amplified fragments were sequenced and a region of 402 bp was used for<br />

comparisons. In the PCR-RFLP analysis, no genetic diversity was observed among the isolates.<br />

The partial sequences of the β-operon ribosomal Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus protein genes were<br />

identical to each other. When compared with known Ca. Liberibacter spp. sequences, the<br />

homology was higher for Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus (100%) than for Candidatus Liberibacter<br />

africanus (84%) or Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum (80%). These results indicate a low<br />

variability among the isolates Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus present in Paraná State.<br />

Introduction<br />

In Brazil, the disease was first reported in São Paulo State in 2004 (Coletta-Filho et al., 2004). In<br />

Paraná State, the disease was observed for the first time in 2006. Two species of Ca. Liberibacter<br />

have been associated with HLB, Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus and Candidatus Liberibacter<br />

americanus (Coletta-Filho et al., 2004; Teixeira et al., 2005). However, only Ca. Liberibacter<br />

asiaticus has been reported in Paraná. Four years after the first report, the disease is present in<br />

citrus orchards of more than 54 counties of the north and northwest regions of the State of<br />

Paraná.<br />

Assessment of the genetic diversity may provide a framework for understanding the<br />

population structure and dynamics of plant pathogenic bacteria. The omp gene encoding an outer<br />

membrane protein (omp) has been used for studying Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus diversity on the<br />

basis of phenotypic traits (Bastianel et al., 2005).<br />

In this study, we investigated the genetic diversity of Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus present in<br />

Paraná State by restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) analyses using the omp<br />

locus and sequencing of the β-operon ribosomal protein genes.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 25<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Leaf samples were collected from HLB-infected citrus trees in different orchards of Paraná State<br />

(Table 1). DNA was extracted from leaf midribs by using the cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide<br />

(CTAB) method (Murray and Thompson, 1980).<br />

PCR reactions were carried out in a 40 ml reaction mixture containing 1X PCR buffer,<br />

2.5 mM MgCl 2 , 0.2 mM dNTPs, 0.2 mM of each primer, 1 U of Taq DNA polymerase<br />

(Invitrogen), and 2 ml of DNA. Amplification products were evaluated by electrophoresis in 1%<br />

agarose gels and visualized by staining with ethidium bromide.<br />

For RFLP analyses, the <strong>entire</strong> omp gene of Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus from 40 isolates was<br />

amplified with the primers HP1/LP1c (Table 1). PCR products were digested with the restriction<br />

enzymes ApoI, HinfI and TaqI, and the DNA fragments were separated by 2% agarose gel<br />

electrophoresis by using standard procedures.<br />

The primers A2/J5 were used to amplify a fragment of 703 bp of the β-operon ribosomal<br />

protein genes from 21 isolates (Table 1) (Hocquellet et al., 1999).<br />

PCR amplicons were sequenced directly in both orientations by using the BigDye<br />

Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit in a 3130X1 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems,<br />

Inc.) by using the same primers used for PCR. DNA sequences of 402 bp were used for<br />

comparisons with the current GenBank database by using the BLASTn network service available<br />

in the National Center for Biotechnology Information.<br />

Results<br />

Primers HP1 and LP1c were used to amplify the omp gene from 40 isolates (Table 1). The PCR<br />

products (approximate size of 2.4 kb) were digested with three distinct enzymes, ApoI, HinfI, and<br />

TaqI. In the PCR-RFLP analysis, a single profile of restriction was obtained for each restriction<br />

enzyme (Fig. 1). No genetic diversity was observed among the isolates of Ca. Liberibacter<br />

asiaticus used in this study, based on the omp gene.<br />

DNA sequences of 420 bp were used for comparisons among the HLB isolates from Paraná<br />

State and with those of the current GenBank. The partial sequences of the β-operon ribosomal of<br />

Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus protein genes were identical to each other (Fig. 2). The phylogenetic<br />

tree also showed that all isolates were identical independent of their geographical origins<br />

(Fig. 2). When compared with known Ca. Liberibacter spp. sequences, the homology was higher<br />

for Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus (100%) than for Ca. Liberibacter africanus (84%) or<br />

Ca. Liberibacter solanacearum (80%) (Fig. 2).<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 26<br />

Conclusion<br />

These results indicate no variability among the isolates Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus was present in<br />

Paraná State respective to the genes investigated.<br />

References<br />

Bastianel, C., Garnier-Semancik, M., Renaudin, J., Bové, J.M., Eveillard, S. 2005. Diversity of<br />

Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus, based on the omp gene sequence. Applied and<br />

Environmental Microbiology 71:6473-6478.<br />

Coletta-Filho, H.D., Targon, M.L.P.N., Takita, M.A., De Negri, J.D., Pompeu, J., Jr., Amaral,<br />

A.M., Muller, G.W., Machado, M.A. 2004. First report of the causal agent of<br />

huanglongbing (Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus) in Brazil. <strong>Plant</strong> Disease 88:1382.<br />

Hocquellet, A., Toorawa, P., Bové, J.M., Garnier, M. 1999. Detection and identification of the<br />

two Candidatus Liberibacter species associated with citrus huanglongbing by PCR<br />

amplification of ribosomal protein genes of the β operon. Molecular and Cellular Probes<br />

13:373-379.<br />

Murray, M.G., Thompson, W.F. 1980. Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA.<br />

Nucleic Acids Research 8:4321-4325.<br />

Teixeira, D.C., Ayres, A.J., Kitajima, E.W., Tanaka, F.A.O., Danet, J.L., Jagoueix-Eveillard, S.,<br />

Saillard, C., Bové, J.M. 2005. First report of a huanglongbing-like disease of citrus in Sao<br />

Paulo State, Brazil, and association of a new liberibacter species, Candidatus Liberibacter<br />

americanus, with the disease. <strong>Plant</strong> Disease 89:107.<br />

Table 1. Isolates of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus of different regions of Paraná State,<br />

Brazil, used in this study.<br />

Sweet orange<br />

Years of<br />

Isolate Origin<br />

variety<br />

planting<br />

1 Altônia/NW a n.d. b n.d.<br />

2 Altônia/NW n.d. n.d.<br />

3 Paranavaí/NW Pera n.d.<br />

8 Paraíso do Norte/NW n.d. n.d.<br />

10 Paranavaí/NW Pera n.d.<br />

11 Paranavaí/NW Pera n.d.<br />

14 Paranavaí/NW Pera n.d.<br />

16 Alto araná/NW Pera 2002<br />

18 Rolândia/N Iapar 73 1997<br />

36 Rolândia/N Iapar 73 1997<br />

46 Pitangueiras/N Pera n.d.<br />

76 Cambé/N Valência 2003<br />

109 Sabáudia/N Valência n.d.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 27<br />

112 Rolândia/N Iapar 73 1997<br />

114 Rolândia/N Iapar 73 1997<br />

117 Pitangueiras/N Valência n.d.<br />

119 Alto Paraná/NW n.d. n.d.<br />

139 Pitangueiras/N Pera 2002<br />

147 Cambé/N Pera 2003<br />

153 Sabáudia/N Valência 1997<br />

157 Rolândia/N Pera 1997<br />

175 Pitangueiras/N Valência 1996<br />

207 Cambé/N Folha Murcha 2002<br />

232 Bandeirantes/N Pera 2006<br />

233 Sabaudia/N n.d. n.d.<br />

251 Santo Antonio do Paraíso/NW Iapar 73 2004<br />

253 Prado Ferreira/N Pera 2004<br />

258 Sabáudia/N Folha Murcha 1996<br />

259 Sabáudia/N Iapar 73 1996<br />

262 Astorga/N Pera 2005<br />

266 Cambé/N Pera 2004<br />

268 Rolândia/N Pera Rio 2002<br />

274 Rolândia/N Iapar 73 2005<br />

293 Prado Ferreira/N Pera 2007<br />

302 Cornélio Procópio/N Pera 2004<br />

311 Rolândia/N Valência 2003<br />

312 Rolândia/N Pera n.d.<br />

323 Arapongas/N Folha Murcha n.d.<br />

330 Bela Vista do Paraiso/N Pera 2006<br />

350 Rolandia/N n.d. n.d.<br />

a NW, Northwest region; N, North region; b n.d., not determined.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 28<br />

M 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 nd M M 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 M nd<br />

A<br />

B<br />

M 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 nd M<br />

C<br />

C<br />

Fig. 1. ApoI (A), HinfI (B), and TaqI (C) restriction profile analyses of PCR-amplified DNAs<br />

from citrus infected with Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus of different regions of Paraná State, Brazil.<br />

M, 1kb DNA ladder; 1, 10 (Paranavaí); 2, 16 (Alto Paraná); 3, 76 (Cambé); 4, 119 (Alto Paraná);<br />

5, 147 (Cambé); 6, 157 (Rolândia); 7, 175 (Pitangueiras); 8, 207 (Cambé); 9, 232 (Bandeirantes);<br />

10, 233 (Sabáudia); 11, 251 (Santo Antonio do Paraíso); 12, 258 (Sabáudia); 13, 259 (Sabáudia);<br />

nd, not digested.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 29<br />

Fig. 2. Phylogenetic trees based on β-operon ribosomal gene sequence of Ca. Liberibacter spp.,<br />

using MEGA version 2.1. GenBank accession numbers are given in parentheses.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 30<br />

1.9 Analysis of Endophytic Bacterial Diversity from Huanglongbing Pathogen-Infected<br />

Citrus Tissues<br />

Wang, A. 1 , Yin, Y. 1 , Li, Y. 1 , Li, J. 1 , Xian, J. 2 , Wang, Z. 1<br />

1 Bioengineering College, Chongqing University, Chongqing, 400030, Chongqing, China<br />

2 Lucky Team Biotech Development (Hepu) Ltd., Co. Hepu, Beihai, 536128, Guangxi, China<br />

The endophytic bacterial diversity in huanglongbing pathogen-infected and healthy citrus plant<br />

tissues of stem, leave midrib, bark, and roots from Hepu, Guangxi municipality were<br />

investigated to decipher the interactions of the HLB pathogen with companion microbial<br />

populations. Classical morphological, physiological, and chemotaxonomic characteristics<br />

methodology, and 16S rRNA and PCR-RFLP analysis methods were applied. Using traditional<br />

isolation and 16S rDNA amplicon methods, 10 genera of bacteria were identified from<br />

21 culturable bacterial populations. The sequence analyses using the NCBI GenBank database<br />

showed that they belonged to 10 different genera of bacteria. The dominant bacterial population<br />

in healthy citrus belonged to Bacillus sp., Pseudomonas sp., and Kocuria sp.; while in phloem<br />

tissue of infected 10-year-old citrus, Bacillus sp., Pseudomonas sp., Kocuria halotolerans, and<br />

Microbacterium sp. were found. Two 16Sr DNA clone libraries of endophytic bacteria were<br />

constructed and 29 restriction endonuclease types were detected; 10 genera of bacteria and<br />

11 genera of uncultured bacteria were identified. The dominant bacterial population in libraries<br />

belonged to Dyella sp., Pseudomonas sp., Serratia sp., and unculturable bacteria. The density<br />

and species of endophytic bacteria were remarkably different compared to diseased and healthy<br />

trees. By traditional cultivation, 16S rDNA sequencing, and PCR-RFLP analysis, the diversity of<br />

populations and species of endophytic bacteria mainly in citrus phloem tissue were determined to<br />

be different in infected and healthy citrus plants, while some of the functional bacterial isolates<br />

including Microbacterium sp., Curtobacterium sp., etc., were gram-positive bacteria belonging<br />

to the genus Microbacteriaceae, Actinomycetales. They are most likely associated with the<br />

huanglongbing causal agent currently still under investigation.<br />

Acknowledgement<br />

This work was granted by the National Science Foundation of China, in NSFC No. 30971875.<br />

Keywords: Huanglongbing, endophytic bacteria, 16S rDNA, isolation culture, RFLP,<br />

biodiversity<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 31<br />

1.10 Evolving Diversity of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus Revealed by Comparative<br />

Analysis of Two Intragenic Tandem Repeat Genes<br />

Zhou, L.J. 1,2 , Powell, C.A. 1 , Hoffman, M. 2 , Li, W.B. 3 , Fan, G.-C. 4 , Liu, B. 4 , Duan, Y.-P. 2<br />

1 UF-IFAS Indian River Research and Education Center, Fort Pierce, FL, USA<br />

2 USDA-ARS-USHRL, Fort Pierce, FL, USA<br />

3 USDA-APHIS_PPQ_CPHST, Beltsville, MD, USA<br />

4 Citrus Huanglongbing Research Center, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou,<br />

Fujian 350002, China<br />

Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus (Las) is the most prevalent species of citrus huanglongbing<br />

bacteria in the world. Two related and hyper variable genes (hyvI and hyvII) were identified in<br />

prophage regions of the psy62 Las genome. The hyvI contains up to 12 nearly identical tandem<br />

repeats (NITR, 132 bp) and 4 partial repeats, while the hyvII contains up to 2 NITR and 4 partial<br />

repeats, and shares homology with hyvI. Frequent deletions or insertions of these repeats within<br />

the hyvI/II genes were observed, but none of which disrupted the open reading frames.<br />

Sequencing analysis of the hyvI/hyvII genes from 35 Las DNA samples collected globally<br />

revealed sequence conservation within individual repeats but extensive variation regarding repeat<br />

numbers, their rearrangement, and the sequences flanking the repeat region. These differences<br />

are found not only in samples with distinct geographical origins but also from a single origin and<br />

even from a single Las-infected sample. The Florida isolates contain both hyvI and hyvII, while<br />

all other global isolates contain only one of the two. Interclade assignments of the putative<br />

HyvI/II proteins from Florida isolates with other global isolates in the phylogenic trees imply a<br />

strong potential of multiple populations existing in the Las bacteria in the world, and a<br />

multi-source introduction of the Las bacterium into Florida. On the other hand, the high copy<br />

number of these multiple nearly identical repeats provides a significant advantage for developing<br />

more sensitive diagnosis tools.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 32<br />

1.11 In vitro Culture of the Fastidious Bacteria Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus in<br />

Association with Insect Feeder Cells<br />

Fontaine-Bodin, L., Fabre, S., Gatineau, F., Dollet, M. CIRAD-BIOS, Etiology Wilts,<br />

TA A 29/F, Campus International de Baillarguet, 34398 Montpellier cedex 5, France<br />

Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus (LAS) is vectored by psyllids and is able to proliferate inside the<br />

insect. We therefore hypothesize that insect cells could act like feeder cells, providing nutrients<br />

in a continuous way and a favorable environment to the bacteria. Various insect cell lines and<br />

sources of LAS inoculum were tested in an empirical way to select for a suitable cell line and to<br />

establish a protocol for primo-cultures. LAS presence in the inoculated cell cultures was checked<br />

by direct PCR and confirmed by sequencing of the amplicons. Nine different cell lines were<br />

tested from Mamestra, Spodoptera, Drosophila, Aedes, and Diaphorina insects. Mamestra and<br />

Spodoptera cell lines were not suitable for LAS growth. One Aedes and two Drosophila cell<br />

lines sustained Liberibacter survival and growth. Diaphorina cell lines were recently received<br />

and are under investigation regarding their capacity to maintain the bacteria. To reach higher<br />

bacterial concentrations, we analyzed metabolic pathways potentially encoded by the Ca.<br />

Liberibacter genome to define limiting factors and/or growth inhibitors, and we complemented<br />

the primo-cultures with various additives (sugars, vitamins, etc.). A culture of LAS was obtained<br />

with Aedes cells as feeder cells. This culture has been continuously growing for 9 months and<br />

16 successive transfers. We are currently working on axenization of this culture. By adding<br />

selected additives in our LAS/Aedes co-cultures, we increased the yield of LAS (~1.10 7 cells/ml),<br />

and we are currently looking into the best ways to maintain/increase this concentration and to<br />

stock those LAS cultures.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 33<br />

1.12 Preliminary Report of Cultivation of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus from Citrus<br />

Tissue with Huanglongbing<br />

Xie, P., Yin, Y., Li, Y., Li, J., Wang, Z. Genetic Engineering Research Center, Bioengineering<br />

College of Chongqing University, Chongqing, 400030, P. R. China<br />

Huanglongbing (HLB) is an extremely devastating disease of citrus caused by the<br />

phloem-limited bacteria Candidatus Liberibacter spp., which has not been grown in sub-culture<br />

continually. In this paper, we attempted to cultivate Ca. L. asiaticus using media formulations<br />

developed in response to the growth of other bacteria that may appear to be related to the<br />

Liberibacter. A co-cultivation medium named Las-VAE has been designed and used to<br />

successfully cultivate Ca. L. asiaticus in liquid culture consisting of citrus vascular tissue<br />

extracts, growth factors, and auto QS inducers of bacterial population. By supplying known<br />

quantities of endophytes isolated from several citrus varieties and common periwinkle phloem<br />

tissue in China into liquid co-cultivation system with Las in a facultative anaerobic plastic box,<br />

the preliminary results indicated that several endophytic bacteria such as Microbacterium<br />

laevaniformans and Curtobacterium sp. facilitate the growth of the HLB pathogen, which was<br />

detected by SGI-qPCR in culture. Culture solution, positive for Ca. L. asiaticus by a 16S-rDNA<br />

quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assay, indicated that the quantity of pathogen<br />

increased with the maximum about 50 times that of the initial culture mixture.<br />

Acknowledgement<br />

This work was granted by the National Science Foundation of China, in NSFC No. 30971875.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 34<br />

1.13 Characterization of Highly Mosaic Genomic Loci of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus<br />

in Southern China and Florida<br />

Wang, X.F. 1 , Zhou, C.Y. 1* , Deng, X. 2 , Su, H.N. 1 , Chen, J. 3*<br />

1 Citrus Research Institute, Southwest University, Chongqing 400712, China<br />

2 Citrus HLB Research Center, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China<br />

3 San Joaquin Valley Agricultural Sciences Center, USDA-ARS, Parlier, CA, USA<br />

*Corresponding authors<br />

Introduction<br />

Huanglongbing (HLB) is a destructive disease of citrus production worldwide. The disease was<br />

first noted in the Chaoshan area in Guangdong Province of the people’s republic of China in the<br />

late 1800s (Lin, 1956) and is currently distributed in 10 citrus producing provinces in south<br />

China. HLB is now established in Florida of the United States (Halbert, 2005) and poses a great<br />

challenge to the local citrus industry there. In both China and U.S., Candidatus Liberibacter<br />

asiaticus is regarded as the putative pathogen of HLB. Identification and characterization of<br />

unique genomic loci in Ca. L. asiaticus is currently a critical and most practical means to<br />

evaluate this unculturable bacterium (Chen et al., 2010; Kotoh et al., 2011; Tomimura et al.,<br />

2009). In this study, we report our observation of a mosaic locus of prophage origin in the<br />

genome of Ca. L. asiaticus. PCR analyses using a primer set flanking this genomic locus<br />

revealed eight electrophoretic types (E-types) of Ca. L. asiaticus strains from China and U.S.<br />

Sequence analysis showed that the insertion/deletion events were responsible for the amplicon<br />

variations.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

HLB symptomatic citrus leaves were collected from nine provinces in China and Florida in U.S.<br />

between 2007 and 2010 (Table 1). Primer set Lap5650f /Lap5650r (5’-TCT GTG ATG CCG<br />

TTT GTA GG-3’/5’-CCA AAT CAG CCA GCT CAA AT-3’) flanking the chromosomal region<br />

of CLIBASIA_05640 to CLIBASIA_05650 was selected for further studies. PCR products were<br />

cloned with pGEM T-easy vector and sequenced using BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle<br />

Sequencing Kit in a 3130×1 Genetic Analyzer. Multiple sequence alignments were performed<br />

using the ClustalW (Ver.1.74) program with the default parameters. Manual adjustment was<br />

performed when appropriate. Nine DNA sequences of various Ca. L. asiaticus strains generated<br />

in this study have been deposited in GenBank with accession numbers JF412691 to JF412699.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

A total of 262 HLB samples that were positive with primer set OI1/OI2c and ITSAf/ITSAr were<br />

analyzed (Table 1). PCR amplification with primer set Lap5650f/Lap5650r produced eight<br />

electrophoretic types, designated as E-type A to H. Each E-type was composed of one or more of<br />

five DNA amplicons, designated as P1 to P5 (Fig. 1). In silico analysis identified only a single<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 35<br />

DNA region of 797 bp in the genome of Ca. L. asiaticus strain psy62 that matched E-type C<br />

(Fig. 1, Table 1). E-type C was found in 3 (4.1%) out of the 74 Florida HLB samples. Other<br />

E-types detected in Florida were A, G, and H. E-type G was predominant (82.4%), followed by<br />

E-type A (10.4%) and E-type H (4.1%) (Table 1). Six E-types (A, B, C, D, E, and F) were found<br />

in the 188 samples from China (Fig. 2). E-type A was the most frequent (71.3%), followed by<br />

E-type B (9.7%). It should be noted that of the six E-types in China, five (A, B, C, D, and E)<br />

were found in Yunnan with type B being predominant (Table 1). This is in contrast to the<br />

Guangdong population that has only two E-types (A and F), with type A being predominant.<br />

Different numbers of E-types could suggest that Ca. L. asiaticus population in Yunnan<br />

underwent more vigorous prophage activity than those in Guangdong. The detection of P3 only<br />

in Yunnan further demonstrates that the Ca. L. asiaticus population in Yunnan is more diverse.<br />

Information about population diversity of Ca. L. asiaticus in Yunnan is currently very limited<br />

and deserves more attention in the future.<br />

The sequences of P1, P2, P3, P4, and P5 (Fig. 1) were determined to be 797, 869, 906,<br />

1071, and 1143 bp, respectively. Alignment data showed that the five DNA sequences shared a<br />

common backbone of P1 (Fig. 2). Referenced to P1, the other four sequences were formed due to<br />

insertion events at position 574 and 722 (Fig. 2). P2 (869 bp) had a 72-nt direct repeat at position<br />

574 inside ORF CLIBASIA_05650. P3 (906 bp) had an insertion of a 109 bp fragment at<br />

position 722 within the annotated non-coding region. Similar to P3, P4 (1071 bp) had an<br />

insertion at position 722 but a fragment size of 274 bp. P5 had both the P2 and P4 type<br />

insertions. BLASTn search showed that P1 sequence was identical to that in strain Psy62 (Duan<br />

et al., 2009), and P5 was over 99% similar to those of Ca. L. asiaticus strain UF506<br />

(HQ377374.1), Liberibacter phage SC1 (HQ377372.1), and Liberibacter phage SC2<br />

(HQ377373.1) (Zhang et al., 2011).<br />

In summary, by identifying and analyzing a highly mosaic genomic locus, we found<br />

significant inter- and intra-population variations of Ca. L. asiaticus from South China and<br />

Florida. Our investigation shows that insertion/deletion events contribute to the DNA variations.<br />

Information provided in this study is potentially useful for identification, characterization, and<br />

understanding of the diversity of Ca. L. asiaticus populations in different geographical regions<br />

and various biological traits.<br />

Acknowledgement<br />

Part of this research was partially supported by a California Citrus Research Board grant, MOA’s<br />

Public Benefit Research Foundation of China (201003067-02; 200903004-06) and Program for<br />

Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (PCSIRT, IRT0976).<br />

References<br />

Chen, J., Deng, X., Sun, X., Jones, D., Irey, M., Civerolo, E. 2010. Guangdong and Florida<br />

populations of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus distinguished by a genomic locus with<br />

short tandem repeats. Phytopathology 100:567-572.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 36<br />

Duan, Y., Zhou, L., Hall, D.G., Li, W., Doddapaneni, H., Lin, H., Liu, L., Vahling, C.M.,<br />

Gabriel, D.W., Williams, K.P., Dickerman, A., Sun, Y., Gottwald, T. 2009. Complete<br />

genome sequence of citrus Huanglongbing bacterium, Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus<br />

obtained through metagenomics. Molecular <strong>Plant</strong>-Microbe Interactions 22:1011-1020.<br />

Halbert, S.E. 2005. The discovery of huanglongbing in Florida. Proceedings of the 2 nd<br />

International Citrus Canker and Huanglongbing Research Workshop, Florida Citrus<br />

Mutual, Orlando, H-3.<br />

Kato, H., Subandiyah, S., Tomimura, K., Okuda, M., Su, H.J., Iwanami, T. 2011. Differentiation<br />

of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus isolates by variable number of tandem repeat analysis.<br />

Applied Environmental Microbiology [Epub ahead of print].<br />

Lin, K.-H. 1956. Observations on yellow shoot of citrus. Acta Phytopathology Sin. 2:1-11.<br />

Tomimura, K., Miyata, S., Furuya, N., Kubota, K., Okuda, M., Subandiyah, S., Hung, T.H., Su,<br />

H.J., Iwanami, T. 2009. Evaluation of genetic diversity among Candidatus Liberibacter<br />

asiaticus isolates collected in Southeast Asia. Phytopathology 99:1062-1069.<br />

Zhang, S., Flores-Cruz, Z., Zhou, L., Kang, B.H., Fleites, L., Gooch, M.D., Wulff, N.A., Davis,<br />

M.J., Duan, Y., Gabriel, D.W. 2011. Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus carries an excision plasmid<br />

prophage and a chromosomally integrated prophage that becomes lytic in plant infections.<br />

Molecular <strong>Plant</strong> Microbe Interactions 24:458-468.<br />

Table 1. Frequencies of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus electrophoretic types (E-types) at<br />

different locations in China and U.S.<br />

Location<br />

E-type<br />

A B C D E F G H<br />

Total<br />

China<br />

Yunnan 6 27 6 3 1 - - - 43<br />

Guizhou 3 2 5 - - - - - 10<br />

Sichuan 2 - - - - - - - 2<br />

Guangxi 30 6 - - - - - - 36<br />

Guangdong 65 - - - - 2 - - 67<br />

Fujian 14 - - - - - - - 14<br />

Jiangxi 4 - - - - - - - 4<br />

Hunan 6 2 - - - - - - 8<br />

Zhejiang 4 - - - - - - - 4<br />

Total 134 37 11 3 1 2 - - 188<br />

Frequency 71.3 19.7 5.9 1.6 0.5 1.1 - -<br />

U.S.<br />

Florida 7 - 3 - - - 61 3 74<br />

Frequency 10.4 - 4.1 - - - 82.4 4.1<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 37<br />

Fig. 1. Electrophoretic profiles (E-types) of representative Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus<br />

strains from PCR amplification with primer set Lap5650f/Lap5650r. Lane M on the left contains<br />

molecular markers. Size unique amplicons are designated through P1 to P5.<br />

Fig. 2. Sequence comparison of five types of PCR amplicons (P1 to P5) from primer set<br />

Lap5650f/Lap5650r. Annotation of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus strain Psy62 is used as a<br />

reference and shown in the first row. Nucleotide positions 574 and 722 are marked. The two sites<br />

serve as sequence insert sites responsible for the mosaic phenomenon of the genomic locus.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 38<br />

1.14 Further Evidence That U.S. and Chinese Populations of Candidatus Liberibacter<br />

asiaticus are Different<br />

Deng, X. 1 , Liu, R. 1 , Zhang, P. 1 , Chen, J. 2<br />

1 South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, PRC<br />

2 USDA-ARS-PWA, Parlier, CA, USA<br />

Citrus huanglongbing (HLB) is associated with Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus. Many efforts<br />

to detect genetic variation of Ca. L. asiaticus in conserved genomic loci such as 16s rDNA have<br />

not been successful. We have reported a genomic locus with short tandem repeats could be used<br />

to separate the Ca. L. asiaticus populations of Guangdong of China and Florida of the U.S.<br />

(Phytopathology 100:567-572). We recently found that prophage genes are also good candidates<br />

to differentiate strains of Ca. L. asiaticus. Prophages are important genetic elements of bacterial<br />

genomes and are involved in lateral gene transfer, pathogenicity, environmental adaptations, and<br />

interstrain genetic variability. In this study, the sequence of a phage terminase gene was<br />

identified. Based on the terminase gene sequence, a set of primers was designed and used for<br />

PCR detection of prophage in HLB citrus samples collected from two provinces, Guangdong<br />

with an average altitude of 2,000 m. The<br />

frequency of prophage detection was 15.8% in Guangdong and 97.4% in Yunnan. However, the<br />

prophage gene sequences obtained from 10 Guangdong strains and 8 Yunnan strains shared<br />

100% similarity. It remains unclear what contributed to the prophage variation in the two<br />

regions. Further study showed that the prophage gene could be detected in 99% of Florida strains<br />

of Ca. L. asiaticus. Yet the Florida strains differed from the Chinese strains at 9 single nucleotide<br />

positions.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 39<br />

Session 2:<br />

Asian Citrus Psyllid<br />

Biology and Genomics<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 40<br />

2.1 Phylogeographic and Population Genetic Studies Uncover Two Founding Events in<br />

Asian Citrus Psyllid Populations Collected in the Americas<br />

de León, J.H. 1 , Sétamou, M. 2 , Gastaminza, G.A. 3 , Buenahora, J. 4 , Cáceres, S. 5 , Yamamoto,<br />

P.T. 6 , Logarzo, G.A. 7 , Stañgret, C.R.W. 8<br />

1 USDA, ARS, Weslaco, TX, USA<br />

2 Citrus Center Texas A&M University - Kingsville, Weslaco, TX, USA<br />

3 Estación Experimental Agroindustrial Obispo Colombres (EEAOC), Tucumán, Argentina<br />

4 Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Salto, Uruguay<br />

5 Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Bella Vista, Corrientes, Argentina<br />

6 Escola Superior de Agricultura ‘Luiz de Queiroz’/USP, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil<br />

7 USDA, ARS, SABCL, Buenos Aires, Argentina<br />

8 Private Contractor, Itapúa, Paraguay<br />

A phylogeographic analysis inferred from the partial mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit I<br />

gene (433 bp) was performed with 22 populations (n = 132) of Diaphorina citri collected in the<br />

Americas and one in the Pacific. Eight populations (n = 46) from four countries in South<br />

America, 14 (n = 76) from four countries in North America, and one from Hawaii (n = 10) were<br />

analyzed. Twenty-three haplotypes (hp) were identified that fell into two groups, hp1-8 were<br />

identified in South America (Group 1) and hp 9-23 were identified in North America and Hawaii<br />

(Group 2). Hp1 and 9 were present in the highest frequencies within each population and within<br />

their group, 81-85%. Sharing of haplotypes was not observed between the two groups. An<br />

analysis of molecular variance uncovered significant genetic structure (Φ CT = 0.733; P < 0.001)<br />

between the two groups in the Americas. A neighbor-joining phylogram and two haplotype<br />

networks (Parsimony Splits and Statistical Parsimony) discriminated the two groups, while both<br />

networks identified hp1 and 9 as the ancestral or founding haplotypes within their respective<br />

group. Significantly negative neutrality tests (Tajima’s D and Fu’s Fs), non-significant mismatch<br />

distribution parameters (SSD and HRI), and low genetic diversity levels provided evidence of<br />

demographic expansion within each group in the Americas. The data suggest that two founding<br />

events of D. citri occurred in the Americas, one in South America and one in North America.<br />

Furthermore, North America and Hawaii appear to share a similar source of invasion. These data<br />

are important to the development of biological control programs against D. citri in the Americas.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 41<br />

2.2 Alteration of Microbiome of Bactericera cockerelli and Diaphorina citri Based on<br />

Candidatus Liberibacter sp. Infection<br />

Hail, D. 1 , Hunter, W.B. 2 , Bextine, B.R. 1<br />

1 University of Texas, Tyler, TX, USA<br />

2 USDA, ARS, U.S. Horticultural Research Lab, Fort Pierce, FL, USA<br />

Candidatus Liberibacter species have recently been implicated as causative agents in both Zebra<br />

Chip (ZC) and huanglongbing (HLB), diseases of potatoes and citrus, respectively. ZC and HLB<br />

are limiting factors in the production of these crops and intense research is ongoing on the<br />

vectors, the potato psyllid (Bactericera cockerelli) and the Asian citrus psyllid (Diaphorina<br />

citri). An insect’s microbiome consists of the microbial flora present in the body and may serve<br />

as a possible avenue of biological control. In this study, the microbial flora associated with<br />

B. cockerelli and D. citri were evaluated. A comprehensive study of the microbiome of four life<br />

stages (egg, early instars, 5th instars, and adults) was determined by pyrosequencing of 16S<br />

ribosomal DNA using the bTEFAP methodology. The resulting sequences were compared to a<br />

curated high quality 16S rDNA database derived from NCBI’s GenBank. Some of the bacteria<br />

identified in this report are initial discoveries; species from the genera Wolbachia, Rhizobium,<br />

Gordonia, Mycobacterium, Xanthomonas, and many others were detected; and an assessment of<br />

the microbiome associated with B. cockerelli was established for each life stage. Next, microbial<br />

flora associated with adult B. cockerelli and D. citri (both positive and negative for Candidatus<br />

Liberibacter spp.) were analyzed and compared.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 42<br />

2.3 Oral Uptake of dsRNA Increases Mortality in Diet Fed Psyllids<br />

Shatters, R.G., Jr. 1 , Powell, C.A. 2 , Borovsky, D. 3<br />

1 USDA, ARS, USHRL, Fort Pierce, FL, USA<br />

2 UF-IFAS Indian River Research and Education Center, Fort Pierce, FL, USA<br />

3 FMEL, IFAS, University of Florida, Vero Beach, FL, USA<br />

Recent publications have shown that, in some insects, oral uptake of dsRNA targeting specific<br />

genes within the insect can be toxic through RNAi-induced mechanisms. This observation has<br />

opened a new area of research on the development of highly specific insect control strategies.<br />

Using an artificial diet feeding system, we have shown that feeding psyllid specific dsRNA to<br />

Asian citrus psyllids (Diaphorina citri) can also increase mortality. The dsRNA targeting<br />

specific members of three different psyllid gene families (tubulins, vacuolar ATPases, and gut<br />

cathepsins) was added to the artificial diets, and psyllid mortality was monitored over 6 days.<br />

The dsRNA targeting two specific genes (one Vacuolar ATPase and one cathepsin F) doubled<br />

the mortality that was observed in psyllids feeding either on standard diet or diet supplemented<br />

with dsRNA that was not specific to psyllids. Only dsRNA targeting two out of eight separate<br />

genes from the three studied gene families increased mortality. Preliminary analysis of mRNA<br />

transcripts to genes targeted by the dsRNA indicates a reduction in total intact transcripts in<br />

psyllids feeding on the cognate dsRNA, a finding that supports the induction of an RNAi<br />

mechanism. Research in optimizing diet for feeding trials and dosage responses will be<br />

presented. This is the first report of dsRNA working in psyllids and supports the possibility of<br />

using an RNAi-based strategy to control the Asian citrus psyllid.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 43<br />

2.4 The Psyllid Feeding Process: Composition and Biosynthetic Inhibition of the Salivary<br />

Sheath<br />

Shatters, R.G., Jr. USDA, ARS, USHRL, Fort Pierce, FL, USA<br />

The Asian citrus psyllid (Diaphorina citri) belongs to a group of insects that feed on plant<br />

vascular contents through the use of piercing mouthparts. In the piercing/probing stage of<br />

feeding, these insects secrete liquid saliva that solidifies immediately upon exposure. This saliva<br />

ultimately forms a tube that is presumed to be necessary for establishment of a successful<br />

feeding process. We have used an artificial diet developed to stimulate salivary sheath formation<br />

to study the molecular basis of this feeding process. Salivary sheaths have been successfully<br />

isolated from this diet and used for chemical analysis that indicates a structure composed<br />

primarily of carbohydrates. However, proteins are present within this sheath with 1 or 2 major<br />

protein bands and several less abundant bands when analyzed by SDS-PAGE. Using this diet, we<br />

have also identified EDTA as an inhibitor of salivary sheath formation. The addition of EDTA<br />

also results in changes to the composition of secreted proteins with 3 major protein bands visible<br />

by SDS-PAGE. Protein characterization is currently being conducted by mass spectroscopy and<br />

results will be discussed. This work shows that it is possible to block the psyllids’ ability to<br />

synthesize salivary sheaths during their probing process. The ultimate goal of this work is to<br />

identify salivary sheath formation inhibitors that can be used to block psyllid feeding and<br />

ultimately produce transgenic citrus plants that are innately resistant to the Asian citrus psyllid.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 44<br />

2.5 A New Method for Short-Term Rearing of Psyllid Adults and Nymphs on Detached<br />

Citrus Leaves and Young Terminal Shoots<br />

Ammar, E.-D., Hall, D.G. Subtropical Insects Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Fort Pierce, FL,<br />

USA<br />

Using whole citrus plants for rearing of psyllids for biological studies or for studying vector<br />

relations of huanglongbing disease takes considerable space, time, and other resources. We have<br />

developed a new and simpler method for short-term rearing of the Asian citrus psyllid<br />

Diaphorina citri using detached citrus leaves for psyllid adults and detached young terminal<br />

shoots for young nymphs. The cut petioles of young leaves or terminal shoots are immersed in<br />

water or moistened cotton in small microfuge tubes. Each leaf or terminal shoot is then ‘caged’<br />

in a clear plastic 50 ml (or larger) tube, and the psyllids are added to it. Young D. citri adults and<br />

2 nd to 3 rd -instar nymphs reared on these detached leaves or terminal shoots were observed<br />

feeding and excreting their honey dew regularly, and the adults were observed laying eggs.<br />

Survival of young adults was 89, 80, and 75% after 2, 3, and 4 weeks, respectively, on detached<br />

leaves changed weekly. Survival and adult emergence of young nymphs were significantly<br />

higher in those kept for one week on the youngest fully expanded leaves on detached terminal<br />

shoots (78 and 55%, respectively), compared to those kept for the same period on older detached<br />

leaves (57 and 26%, respectively). We believe that this new short-term rearing method for<br />

psyllids can save time and other resources and enhance various studies on the biology,<br />

management, and pathogen-vector interactions of this and other psyllid species.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 45<br />

2.6 Comparative Analysis of Asian Citrus Psyllid and Potato Psyllid Antennae<br />

Arras, J. 1 , Hunter, W.B. 2 , Bextine, B.R. 1<br />

1 University of Texas, Tyler, TX, USA<br />

2 USDA, ARS, U.S. Horticultural Research Laboratory, Fort Pierce, FL, USA<br />

The comparative investigation of the morphological basis for olfactory reception in the Asian<br />

citrus psyllid (Diaphorina citri) and the potato/tomato psyllid (Bacterocera cockerelli<br />

(Hemiptera: Psyllidae) was performed using scanning electron microscopy to elucidate the<br />

sensory mechanisms being used by these two psyllids in host selection and mating. Different<br />

host plant niches are used by these psyllids. While D. citri is essentially monophagous feeding<br />

only from citrus and its near relatives, B. cockerelli feeds on a wide range of Solanaceous plants.<br />

In this study, two different antennal sensory arrays were identified, with a more complex<br />

arrangement occurring in D. citri over B. cockerelli. The antenna length of D. citri was 0.23 mm<br />

long and contained 10 segments, while B. cockerelli had antenna of 0.60 mm length with<br />

10 segments. In both species, apically on the sensillus terminalis there are two conspicuous<br />

multi-porus single-walled bristles. These were longer in B. cockerelli. Mechano- and<br />

chemosensory hairs appear in low numbers on all segments in both species, with higher number<br />

of sensillae on distal segments. Diaphorina citri coevolved with its citrus host plant in tropical<br />

Asian countries, thus locating the strong aromatic plants was most likely less difficult and<br />

females would be constrained to a specific host plant; B. cockerelli, which has fewer olfactory<br />

sensilla and feeds on a wider host range, may have more sensitivity to specific chemical cues to<br />

locate the opposite gender for mating which could occur on many different host plants.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 46<br />

2.7 The Emerging Psyllid Genome: RNA-Interference and Insect Biology<br />

Hunter, W.B. 1 , Bextine, B.R. 2 , Shatters, R.G., Jr. 1 , Reese, J. 3 , Shelby, K.S. 4 , Hall, D.G. 1<br />

1 USDA, ARS, U.S. Horticultural Research Laboratory, Fort Pierce, FL, USA<br />

2 University of Texas at Tyler, Tyler, TX, USA<br />

3 Reese Consulting, Inc., Alpharetta, GA, USA<br />

4 USDA, ARS, Columbia, MO, USA<br />

Psyllids are major disease vectors of many fruit tree crops, yet their genetics have remained<br />

poorly studied. The first genome draft of the Asian citrus psyllid (ACP), Diaphorina citri<br />

(Hemiptera: Psyllidae), is currently being completed for the research community. Insect<br />

genomics have advanced insect management by examining gene function and biological<br />

pathways. Invasive pests are often subjected to genetic analysis that can identify species more<br />

accurately for classification, thus expediting the proper application of pest management<br />

regulations. ACP is a highly competent vector of the phloem-inhabiting bacterium Candidatus<br />

Liberibacter asiaticus, associated with huanglongbing (HLB) (citrus greening disease). HLB<br />

threatens the U.S. citrus industry due to losses in fruit yield, palatability, and tree death. Research<br />

efforts underway on psyllid genomics are using this information to develop strategies to suppress<br />

ACP populations. Production and mining of ACP genetic libraries identified several genes that<br />

function in psyllid responses to stress such as temperature, insecticides, and disease (i.e., heat<br />

shock proteins, hsp70, hsp90, cytochrome P450’s, Glutathione-S Transferase, Cu-SOD, Toll,<br />

and others). Further applications into functional genomics of ACP are being applied to develop<br />

RNAi, gene disruption methods to more effectively suppress ACP populations and reduce the<br />

spread of HLB in citrus.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 47<br />

2.8 Bacterial Population Diversity in Diaphorina citri: Analysis by PCR-DGGE and RFLP<br />

Methodology<br />

Wang, Z., Tian, S., Liu, T., Yin, Y. (Key Laboratory of Gene Function and Regulation at<br />

Chongqing, Bioengineering College of Chongqing University, Chongqing, P. R. China, 400030)<br />

The internal microflora of insects is a complex micro-ecosystem, in which a large and varied<br />

microbial community inhabits. This community plays important roles for their hosts' growth,<br />

development, digestion, absorption of nutrients, and resistance to colonization by exotic<br />

microbes, and so on. In this paper, we examined the bacterial diversity within citrus psyllids<br />

(Diaphorina citri), which is a vector of Liberibacter sp., using 16S rDNA-based molecular<br />

approaches of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) and restriction fragment length<br />

polymorphism (RFLP). Bacterial taxa belonging to γ-Proteobacteria, β-Proteobacteria, and α-<br />

Proteobacteria of Proteobacteria were obtained by RFLP, including the families<br />

Pseudomonadaceae, Enterobacteriaceae, Xanthomonadaceae, Burkholderiaceae, Rickettsiaceae,<br />

and Rhizobiaceae. Syncytium endosymbiont and secondary symbionts of Diaphorina citri can<br />

also be obtained by RFLP. Four different families belonging to Proteobacteria and two families<br />

belonging to Firmicutes were obtained by DGGE. The result by PCR-DGGE analysis revealed<br />

that the bacterial population of D. citri is affected by the host plant of psyllids and geographic<br />

location, and the host plant has more obvious impact than that of geographic location. However,<br />

the existence of Syncytium endosymbiont in D. citri is not affected by the host plant or<br />

geographic location. Both RFLP and DGGE analysis indicated that the Syncytium endosymbiont<br />

of D. citri is a dominant microflora, and the two methods combination can reveal the microbial<br />

diversity in Diaphorina citri conveniently.<br />

Acknowledgement<br />

This work was granted by the National Science Foundation of China, in NSFC No. 30971875.<br />

Keywords: Diaphorina citri, PCR-DGGE, RFLP, bacterial, microbial diversity<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 48<br />

Session 3:<br />

Asian Citrus Psyllid<br />

Ecology and<br />

Transmission<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 49<br />

3.1 Antennal Responses of Diaphorina citri to Host <strong>Plant</strong> Volatiles Recorded Using a<br />

Coupled Gas Chromatograph Electroantennogram Detector System<br />

Robbins, P.S., Alessandro, R.T., Lapointe, S.L. ARS-USDA, Fort Pierce, FL, USA<br />

Understanding the cues used by the Asian citrus psyllid to locate host plants and/or conspecifics<br />

could yield valuable tools for detection, monitoring, and control of this global pest of citrus.<br />

Some evidence exists from laboratory assays and olfactometer studies that this species responds<br />

to common plant volatiles and possibly to a female-produced sex attractant (Wenninger et al.,<br />

2008, 2009). We recently succeeded in recording antennal responses using a gas<br />

chromatograph-electroantennogram detector (GC-EAD) system to distinguish<br />

electrophysiologically active peaks for subsequent identification and use in behavioral analyses.<br />

Progress in identifying compounds that elicit antennal response and the methods used to measure<br />

antennal responses will be presented along with plans to use GC-EAD to search for potentially<br />

useful semiochemicals.<br />

References<br />

Wenninger, E.J., Stelinski, L.L., Hall, D.G. 2008. Behavioral evidence for a female-produced sex<br />

attractant in Diaphorina citri. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 128:450-459.<br />

Wenninger, E.J., Stelinski, L.L., Hall, D.G. 2009. Roles of olfactory cues, visual cues, and<br />

mating status in orientation of Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) to four<br />

different host plants. Environmental Entomology 38:225-234.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 50<br />

3.2 Population Dynamics of the Asian Citrus Psyllid and Potential Generations in<br />

Northern Sinaloa, Mexico<br />

Cortez-Mondaca, E. 1 , López-Arroyo, J.I. 2 , Pérez-Márquez, J. 1 , González, V.M. 1<br />

1 INIFAP, Centro Regional de Investigaciones del Noreste, Cd. Obregón, Son., México<br />

2 INIFAP, Centro Regional de Investigaciones del Noreste, Río Bravo, Tam., México<br />

cortez.edgardo@inifap.gob.mx<br />

The Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (Hemiptera: Psyllidae), has been present in<br />

northern Sinaloa, Mexico since 2005 or earlier; however, its abundance, population fluctuation,<br />

and the potential number of generations per year in the area were unknown. The objective of this<br />

study was to determine the population dynamics of D. citri in three orchards, with five citrus<br />

species, in northern Sinaloa, Mexico. Weekly samplings of D. citri adults were conducted with<br />

yellow sticky traps. We recorded the different nymphal instars in the citrus shoots of Noor and<br />

Oroval clementines; Fortune and Nova mandarins; Marrs Early and Navelate orange; Star Ruby<br />

grapefruit; and Mexican lime. The calculation of the potential number of generations was<br />

performed with a minimum threshold temperature of 13.5°C and thermal constant for<br />

development from egg to adult of 211 degree-days. The presence of D. citri in the citrus of<br />

northern Sinaloa, Mexico was permanent throughout the year; however, the largest population<br />

increases were recorded from September 2009 to January 2010, as well as during April and May<br />

2010. Mexican lime had the most abundant presence of the insect, whereas the mandarins were<br />

the least preferred (P < 0.001). Based on the degree-days accumulation, it was determined for the<br />

region that there is the potential for the development of 18-19 generations of D. citri during the<br />

year. The results have implications for the management of the pest in the region.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 51<br />

3.3 Localization of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus in Dissected Organs of Its Psyllid<br />

Vector Diaphorina citri Using Fluorescent in situ Hybridization and Quantitative PCR<br />

Ammar, E.-D., Shatters, R.G., Jr., Hall, D.G. Subtropical Insects Research Unit, USHRL,<br />

USDA-ARS, Fort Pierce, FL, USA<br />

Vector interactions of huanglongbing (HLB) disease with its psyllid vectors, particularly at the<br />

organ and cellular levels, are poorly understood. We used fluorescent in situ hybridization<br />

(FISH) and quantitative PCR (Q-PCR) for the localization of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus<br />

(LAS) associated with HLB in its psyllid vector Diaphorina citri. Several FISH protocols have<br />

been tested on hemolymph smears and dissected psyllid organs and on leaf sections from<br />

HLB-infected citrus plants as positive controls. LAS was detected in the hemolymph, filter<br />

chamber, and midgut of D. citri collected from field HLB-infected citrus trees, as well as in the<br />

phloem of infected leaves, but not in healthy control psyllids or leaves. Additionally, Q-PCR<br />

detected LAS in dissected organs of individual D. citri adults collected from HLB-infected citrus<br />

trees. The proportion of infected salivary glands (47%) was significantly lower than those of the<br />

alimentary canal (72%) or other body parts (79%). Interestingly, the relative titer of LAS,<br />

compared to psyllid genomic DNA in each sample, was significantly higher in both the salivary<br />

gland and alimentary canal compared to that in the rest of the insect body. These results provide<br />

the first molecular confirmation of LAS in the hemolymph, alimentary canal, and salivary glands<br />

of D. citri. They also strongly suggest that the salivary glands constitute a major transmission<br />

barrier to LAS in the psyllid vector and that LAS may replicate or accumulate in both the<br />

alimentary canal and salivary glands of D. citri.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 52<br />

3.4 Interactions of the Asian Citrus Psyllid, Diaphorina citri, with Candidatus Liberibacter<br />

asiaticus<br />

Pelz-Stelinski, K.S., Rogers, M.E. Entomology and Nematology Department, UF-IFAS Citrus<br />

Research and Education Center, Lake Alfred, FL, USA<br />

The Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri Kuwayama, which transmits the bacteria Candidatus<br />

Liberibacter asiaticus (Liberibacter), is responsible for the spread of citrus greening disease, or<br />

huanglongbing (HLB), throughout most of the world’s citrus-producing regions. Understanding<br />

the relationship between D. citri and Liberibacter is critical for the development of psyllid and<br />

HLB management programs. As part of a comprehensive study on this vector-pathogen<br />

interaction, we have conducted a series of studies investigating Liberibacter transmission and<br />

psyllid fitness. Acquisition was examined by caging healthy psyllid eggs or adults on infected<br />

sweet orange plants for 1 day to 5 weeks. Similarly, inoculation was examined by enclosing<br />

infected psyllids on healthy plants for 1-24 days. Real-time PCR detection assays with<br />

Liberibacter-specific oligonucleotides were performed on DNA extracts from psyllids and plants<br />

to determine whether the bacterium was present. Our findings indicate that transmission of<br />

Liberibacter by Florida D. citri populations occurs at a lower rate than previously reported for<br />

other populations of D. citri and for the African citrus psyllid, Trioza erytreae (Capoor et al.,<br />

1974; Buitendag and von Broembsen, 1993; Pelz-Stelinski et al., 2010). Acquisition of<br />

Liberibacter was greatest in nymphs reared on infected plants, while a smaller percentage of<br />

psyllids acquired the bacterium during adult feeding. Inoculation experiments indicated that<br />

approximately 10% of citrus plants developed HLB within one year after exposure to a single<br />

infected psyllid. The results of our studies also suggested that transmission of Liberibacter is<br />

mediated by the effect of temperature. Liberibacter infection played an important role in the<br />

fitness of D. citri, resulting in greater reproductive output and decreased survival, and suggesting<br />

that a trade-off may exist between these life-history traits in response to Liberibacter infection.<br />

References<br />

Buitendag, C.H., von Broembsen, L.A. 1993. Living with citrus greening in South Africa. Citrus<br />

Journal 3:29-32.<br />

Capoor, S.P., Rao, D.G., Viswanath, S.M. 1974. Greening disease of citrus in the Deccan Trap<br />

Country and its relationship with the vector, Diaphorina citri Kuwayama. Proceedings of<br />

the Sixth Conference of the International Organization of Citrus Virologists. p. 43-49.<br />

Inoue, H., Ohnishi, J., Ito, T., Tomimura, K., Miyata, S., Iwanami, T., Ashihara, W. 2009.<br />

Enhanced proliferation and efficient transmission of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus by<br />

adult Diaphorina citri after acquisition feeding in the nymphal stage. Annals of Applied<br />

Biology 155:29-36.<br />

Pelz-Stelinski, K.S., Brlansky, R.H., Ebert, T.A., Rogers, M.E. 2010. Transmission parameters<br />

for Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus by the Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri<br />

Kuwayama. Journal of Economic Entomology 103:1531-1541.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 53<br />

3.5 Seasonal Changes in Numbers of Asian Citrus Psyllids Carrying Candidatus<br />

Liberibacter asiaticus<br />

Ebert, T.A., Brlansky, R.H., Rogers, M.E. UF-IFAS Citrus Research and Education Center,<br />

Lake Alfred, FL, USA<br />

In 2008, we began collecting Asian citrus psyllids from five commercial groves in central<br />

Florida. Sampling in Homestead (southern Florida) began in 2009. DNA from over<br />

70,000 psyllids was extracted and tested for Liberibacter using RTQ-PCR methods. Seasonal<br />

variability was very high at all groves. Even at Homestead where all the trees were infected and<br />

there was no psyllid control, the fraction of psyllids carrying Liberibacter could double or<br />

decline by half from one month to the next. Similar variability was observed at all groves. There<br />

was no obvious pattern to this variability. It appears that the fraction of psyllids carrying<br />

Liberibacter was greater in cooler months. However, some psyllids always carried Liberibacter,<br />

and increases in the number of psyllids carrying Liberibacter could happen at any time. The<br />

grove at Arcadia was one of the places where Liberibacter was detected early in the scouting<br />

efforts to document the spread of this bacterium in Florida. The grove at Arcadia has an<br />

aggressive tree removal program and a regular scouting program. Less than 1.4% of the psyllids<br />

at Arcadia carry Liberibacter compared to over 15% at Lake Alfred and over 70% at Homestead.<br />

This may demonstrate the potential effectiveness of aggressive management programs at<br />

reducing the rate at which the disease can spread.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 54<br />

3.6 Understanding Diaphorina citri-Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus Interactions and<br />

D. citri Behavior for Managing Huanglongbing (HLB) in Florida<br />

Mann, R.S., Pelz-Stelinski, K.S., Rouseff, R.L., Stelinski, L.L. UF-IFAS Citrus Research and<br />

Education Center, Lake Alfred, FL, USA<br />

We have been investigating how infection of Asian citrus psyllid (ACP) by Candidatus<br />

Liberibacter asiaticus (Ca. Las) affects the behavioral response of the vector to healthy versus<br />

diseased citrus trees. We have also investigated if Ca. Las is sexually transmitted between adult<br />

psyllids and if female ACP attracts males with a pheromone. Our investigations to date indicate<br />

that HLB-infected citrus plants are more attractive to ACP adults than healthy plants. However,<br />

ACP adults subsequently disperse to healthy plants and make healthy rather than diseased plants<br />

their final settling preference. Forced mating between Ca. Las-infected males and healthy<br />

females showed that Ca. Las is sexually transmitted from Ca. Las-infected male psyllids to<br />

healthy females but not from infected females to healthy males or among psyllids of the same<br />

sex. Females that acquired Ca. Las from males during mating were also able to transmit the<br />

bacteria transovarially. The whole body cuticular extract from female ACP adults was attractive<br />

to male ACP in laboratory and field bioassays suggesting that female ACP produces a<br />

pheromone to attract males. Field bioassays with whole body male and female ACP cuticular<br />

extracts suggested an aggregative function of the pheromone. Our ongoing research efforts<br />

include identification of chemical profiles of healthy and HLB-infected plants to determine the<br />

reasons for differential behavioral preferences for healthy and diseased plants, how sexual<br />

transmission of Ca. Las impacts spread of HLB, and identification of the putative ACP<br />

pheromone to improve management of the ACP and HLB complex in Florida.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 55<br />

3.7 Effects of Soil-Applied and Foliar-Applied Insecticides on Asian Citrus Psyllid<br />

(Diaphorina citri) Feeding Behavior and Their Possible Implication for HLB Transmission<br />

Serikawa, R.H. 1 , Okuma, D.M. 1 , Backus, E.A. 2 , Rogers, M.E. 1<br />

1 UF-IFAS Citrus Research and Education Center, Lake Alfred, FL, USA<br />

2 USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Parlier, CA, USA<br />

Application of insecticides to reduce psyllid (Diaphorina citri Kuwayama) populations is one of<br />

the primary methods used for ‘huanglongbing’ (HLB) management. However, it is unknown<br />

whether insecticide application can disrupt psyllid feeding behaviors associated with pathogen<br />

acquisition and inoculation before insecticide toxicity kills the insect. In this research, Electrical<br />

Penetration Graph (EPG) technology was used to study the feeding behaviors of D. citri and<br />

pathogen acquisition and inoculation in citrus under seven different insecticide treatments:<br />

aldicarb (Temik 15 G), chlorpyrifos (Lorsban 4 E), fenpropathrin (Danitol 2.4 EC), imidacloprid<br />

(Provado 1.6 F and Admire Pro 4.6 F), spinetoram (Delegate WG), and spirotetramat (Movento<br />

240 SC). Each insecticide was evaluated individually during 12 hours of recording. Foliar<br />

insecticides were fresh-applied, and soil-applied insecticides were applied 15 days prior to the<br />

experiments. Individual psyllids were wired and their feeding behavior recorded. Non-sequential<br />

feeding parameters for each treatment were compared using ANOVA. Chlorpyrifos,<br />

fenpropathrin, imidacloprid, and spinetoram provided the best results in disturbing the psyllid<br />

feeding, possibly avoiding pathogen acquisition and inoculation. In contrast, aldicarb and<br />

spirotetramat did not significantly disrupt psyllid feeding, possibly allowing HLB pathogen<br />

acquisition and inoculation. These results provide important information for improvement of<br />

HLB management through insecticide use.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 56<br />

3.8 Effect of Insecticides and Mineral Oil on Probing Behavior of Diaphorina citri<br />

Kuwayama (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) in Citrus<br />

de Miranda, M.P. 1 , Felippe, M.R. 1 , Garcia, R.B. 1 , Yamamoto, P.T. 2 , Lopes, J.R.S. 2<br />

1 Fundecitrus, Araraquara, Brazil<br />

2 ESALQ/Universidade de São Paulo, Piracicaba, Brazil<br />

This research was carried out to study the probing behavior of D. citri in citrus treated with<br />

insecticides and mineral oil using the Electrical Penetration Graph (EPG/DC system) technique.<br />

We used two application methods: spray (foliar application) and drench. Citrus sinensis<br />

seedlings with fully expanded leaves were sprayed with the following products and doses (ml<br />

commercial product/100 L water): Imidacloprid (Provado 200 SC – 20 ml); Dimethoate<br />

(Dimetoato 500 EC – 80 ml); λ-cyhalothrin (Karate Zeon 50 CS – 15 ml); and mineral oil (M.O.)<br />

(Argenfrut-RV – 1.5%). Nursery trees (C. sinensis × C. limonia) were treated by drench with the<br />

following products: Imidacloprid (Confidor 700 WG – 0.5 g c.p./plant) and Thiamethoxam<br />

(Actara 250 WG – 1 g c.p./plant). At least 15 psyllids per treatment were monitored for 6 hours<br />

at 1, 7, 14, and 21 days after application (DAA) for spray treatments and at 15, 35, 50, and 95<br />

DAA for drench applications. Insecticides and M.O. mainly affected the initial phase of probing<br />

(pathway). In the case of insecticides, D. citri was able to perform probes 1 DAA but it was able<br />

to reach the phloem only in the evaluation at 15 DAA. However, on plants treated with M.O.,<br />

around 32% of insects were able to reach the phloem 1 DAA. With systemic insecticides, the<br />

main interference on probing behavior occurred during the phloem phase; phloem sap ingestion,<br />

as measured by duration of waveform E2, is significantly reduced (approximately 91%), and the<br />

insect subsequently withdraws the stylets from the plant and rarely restarts a new probe.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 57<br />

3.9 A New Detached-Leaf Assay Method to Test the Inoculativity of Psyllids with<br />

Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus Associated with Huanglongbing Disease<br />

Ammar, E.-D., Walter, A., Hall, D.G. Subtropical Insects Research Unit, USHRL,<br />

USDA-ARS, Fort Pierce, FL, USA<br />

Nymphs of the Asian citrus psyllid (ACP) Diaphorina citri can acquire Candidatus Liberibacter<br />

asiaticus (LAS) from huanglongbing (HLB)-infected plants, and both nymphs and adults can<br />

transmit HLB to healthy citrus. Normally, however, the proportion of Las-infected ACP<br />

individuals, based on PCR assays, is much higher than the proportion of psyllids that are capable<br />

of inoculating/transmitting HLB to healthy citrus plants (Inoue et al., 2009; Pelz-Stelinski et al.,<br />

2010). To test their inoculativity with Las, psyllids are usually fed singly or in small groups on<br />

citrus seedlings and the latter assayed 3-12 months later by PCR. Here, we have developed a new<br />

‘detached-leaf assay’ method that can potentially speed up Las-inoculativity tests on psyllids<br />

considerably by shortening this period to 2-3 weeks. Young adults of ACP, that had been reared<br />

as nymphs on HLB-infected citrus plants, were tested for inoculativity by caging them singly or<br />

in small groups (5 or 10 adults per leaf) in 50-ml polypropylene tubes on detached healthy<br />

mid-size leaves of sweet orange (Citrus sinensis (L.)) as described by Ammar and Hall (2011).<br />

The tubes were kept at 25ºC and 14-hour light per day. HLB-infected ACP adults were caged on<br />

these detached healthy leaves for 7 days before being transferred to a new healthy test leaf for<br />

another 7 days. One week following the end of the inoculation access feeding period, the midribs<br />

of the assay leaves were processed for quantitative PCR (Q-PCR) using Li primers (targeting the<br />

bacterial 16s gene; Li et al., 2006) as well as the more sensitive LJ900 primers (targeting a phage<br />

of Las; Morgan et al., 2011). At the end of the experiment, all surviving adults were also<br />

processed for Q-PCR using both of these primers.<br />

In two trials in which 10, 5, or 1 infected adult ACP per leaf were fed on detached sweet<br />

orange leaves for 7 days, percentages of Las-positive leaves were 40, 18.8, and 4.4%,<br />

respectively, using Li primers, and 60, 40.6, and 11.1%, respectively, using LJ900 primers. Ct<br />

values using LJ900 primers were much lower than those using Li primers. None of the leaves on<br />

which healthy ACP adults were similarly fed was Las-positive using either primer. Using Li<br />

primers, 2/7 of the positive ACP groups gave positive results in the two consecutive test weeks,<br />

whereas 5/7 gave positive results only in the 1 st or 2 nd week of testing. Adults tested singly,<br />

however, gave positive results only in the 1 st or 2 nd week. Using LJ900 primers, 6/10 ACP<br />

groups gave positive results in both test weeks, whereas 4/10 gave positive results only in the 1 st<br />

or 2 nd week. Also, adults tested singly gave positive results only in weeks 1 or 2. These results<br />

suggest intermittent Las-inoculation by infected ACP individuals. At the end of the above two<br />

trials, percentage of Las-positive psyllid adults was 77.8% using Li primers and 94.4% using<br />

LJ900 primers. The above results on Las-inoculativity of ACP on detached leaves, using the<br />

more conventional and less sensitive Li primers, are largely comparable to those reported for Las<br />

transmission when whole citrus seedlings are used for inoculation, e.g., 4-10% transmission by<br />

individual ACP were recently reported although 40-100% of the psyllids were Las-positive using<br />

PCR (Pelz-Stelinski et al., 2010). Our results suggest that detached citrus leaves can be used to<br />

test Las-inoculativity in single or small groups of ACP, which potentially can speed up this<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 58<br />

process from 3-12 months when using whole citrus seedlings for inoculation, to only 2-3 weeks<br />

when using the detached-leaf method. Using more sensitive primers can increase the usefulness<br />

of this new ‘detached-leaf assay’ method.<br />

References<br />

Ammar, E.-D., Hall, D.G. 2011. A new method for short-term rearing of citrus psyllids and for<br />

collecting their honeydew excretions. Florida Entomologist 94:340-342.<br />

Inoue, H., Ohnishi, J., Ito, T., Tomimura, K., Miyata, S., Iwanami, T., Ashihara, W. 2009.<br />

Enhanced proliferation and efficient transmission of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus by<br />

adult Diaphorina citri after acquisition feeding in the nymphal stage. Annals of Applied<br />

Biology 155:29-36.<br />

Li, W.B., Hartung, J.S., Levy, L. 2006. Quantitative real-time PCR for detection and<br />

identification of Candidatus Liberibacter species associated with citrus huanglongbing.<br />

Journal of Microbiological Methods 66:104-115.<br />

Morgan, J.K., Zhou, L., Li, W., Shatters, R.G., Jr., Manjunath, K.L., Duan, Y.-P. 2011. Highly<br />

sensitive detection by real-time PCR targeting the multiple tandem-repeats of two prophage<br />

region genes of the citrus huanglongbing disease bacterium, Candidatus Liberibacter<br />

asiaticus. Proceedings of the 2 nd International Research Conference on Huanglongbing,<br />

Orlando, FL. January 10-14, 2011.<br />

Pelz-Stelinski, K.S., Brlansky, R.H., Ebert, T.A., Rogers, M.E. 2010. Transmission parameters<br />

for Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus by Asian citrus psyllid (Hemiptera: Psyllidae).<br />

Journal of Economical Entomology 1031531-1031541.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 59<br />

3.10 Preliminary Study of Comparative Acquisition of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus<br />

and Ca. L. americanus by Diaphorina citri Under Different Temperatures<br />

Barbosa, J.C. 1 , Eckstein, B. 1 , Belasque, J., Jr. 2 , Bergamin Filho, A. 1<br />

1 ESALQ/Universidade de São Paulo, Piracicaba, Brazil<br />

2 Fundecitrus, Araraquara, Brazil<br />

In Brazil, huanglongbing (HLB) is associated with two species of bacteria, Candidatus<br />

Liberibacter asiaticus (Las) and Ca. L. americanus (Lam). Both species are vectored by the<br />

psyllid Diaphorina citri Kuwayama. Studies in Brazil have shown an increase of Las-infected<br />

plants when compared to Lam-infected plants. The reason behind that is unknown, but<br />

temperature could be influencing the transmission of Lam and Las by psyllids. The objective of<br />

this study was to verify the influence of temperature in the transmission of Lam and Las by<br />

psyllids. The transmission of Lam and Las by psyllids was analyzed under three conditions of<br />

day/night temperatures (20/22°C, 25/27°C, and 30/32°C) in a 12-hour photoperiod. For each<br />

temperature condition, groups of adult psyllids were caged on branches of Lam- or Las-infected<br />

citrus plants for an acquisition access period of 4 days. Therefore, for each combination of<br />

temperature and bacterium species, 10 psyllids were collected from infected branches and caged<br />

on citrus healthy plants (Citrus limonia Osbeck) for 21 days. After that, insects were collected<br />

and individually analyzed by PCR to assess the acquisition of Lam and Las. In this study, the<br />

acquisition efficiency of Lam by psyllids under 20/22°C was 10%, while acquisitions under<br />

25/27°C and 30/32°C were not verified. The acquisition efficiency of Las under 20/22°C and<br />

25/27°C was 25%, while under 30/32°C was 12.5%. These results are preliminary and further<br />

studies are necessary for a better understanding about the influence of temperature on the<br />

transmission of Ca. Liberibacter spp.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 60<br />

3.11 Host Range of Diaphorina citri Kuwayama and Leuronota fagarae on Citrus and<br />

Zanthoxylum spp.<br />

Russell, D.N. 1 , Halbert, S.E. 1 , Roberts, P.D. 2<br />

1 Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of <strong>Plant</strong> Industry,<br />

Gainesville, FL, USA<br />

2 UF-IFAS Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, Immokalee, FL, USA<br />

Diaphorina citri Kuwayama is one of the vectors of huanglongbing (HLB) pathogens.<br />

Occasional colonies of D. citri have been observed on Zanthoxylum fagara, but D. citri is not<br />

reported to complete development on any species of Zanthoxylum. Leuronota fagarae<br />

Burckhardt, described from South America, showed up in Florida in 2001 on Z. fagara. The<br />

objective of this study was to determine whether D. citri could develop on species of<br />

Zanthoxylum, and whether L. fagarae could develop on citrus or on other species of<br />

Zanthoxylum. We also examined whether adults could feed on the plants long enough to acquire<br />

or transmit the HLB pathogen. Adults were caged on plants and observed each day to determine<br />

viability and presence of nymphs. Results indicate that D. citri produced offspring only on citrus,<br />

and L. fagarae produced offspring only on Z. fagara. Diaphorina citri adults lived longer on<br />

citrus and Zanthoxylum clava-herculis than on Zanthoxylum coriaceum, Zanthoxylum flavum, or<br />

Z. fagara. However, some of the adults on each of these plants lived as long as 5 days. Leuronota<br />

fagarae adults lived 30 days or more on Z. coriaceum, Z. clava-herculis, Murraya paniculata,<br />

and Z. fagara, but average survival on citrus and Z. flavum was only 2-7.5 days. D. citri could<br />

feed on any of these plants long enough to transmit HLB pathogens. Any HLB infection<br />

probably would be a dead end, except possibly in the case of Z. fagara. Susceptibility of<br />

Zanthoxylum to HLB and vector capabilities of L. fagarae are under investigation.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 61<br />

3.12 Abundance of Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) in Orange Jasmine and<br />

Backyard Citrus of Yucatán, Mexico<br />

Lozano-Contreras, M. 1 , Jasso-Argumedo, J. 1 , Morales-Koyoc, D. 1 , Jasso-Laucirica, T. 1 ,<br />

González-Hernández, A. 2 , López-Arroyo, J.I. 3<br />

1 INIFAP, Centro de Investigación Regional del Sureste. Mérida, Yuc., México<br />

2 UANL, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas. San Nicolás de los Garza, N.L., México<br />

3 INIFAP-Centro Regional de Investigaciones del Noreste. Río Bravo, Tam., México<br />

lozano.monica@inifap.gob.mx<br />

Samplings of the Asian citrus psyllid (ACP) and its natural enemies were performed in<br />

52 localities distributed across 42 municipalities in the state of Yucatán, Mexico. Adult<br />

population of ACP in orange jasmine ranged from 0 to 8.56 per tap; meanwhile, in citrus, the<br />

ACP densities ranged from 0 to 1.4 per tap. The range of ACP population densities in young<br />

shoots of orange jasmine was 0-13.4; in citrus, the densities ranged from 0 to 7.2. ACP<br />

infestation in orange jasmine was 72.4%; in backyard citrus, the highest infestation was 34.4%.<br />

The natural enemies attacking D. citri were Olla v. nigrum, Cycloneda sanguinea, Ceraeochrysa<br />

spp., Chrysoperla spp., and Tamarixia radiata. Abundance of natural enemies was<br />

approximately 3:1 higher in natural jasmine than in backyard citrus. In both types of plants, the<br />

most abundant beneficial insect was Cycloneda sanguinea followed by Ceraeochrysa sp., Olla<br />

v-nigrum, and Chrysoperla sp. Parasitism by Tamarixia radiata ranged from 0 to 31% in orange<br />

jasmine and 0 to 4.5% in backyard citrus.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 62<br />

3.13 Difference of Gender and Effect of Photoperiod on Asian Citrus Psyllid Feeding<br />

Behavior<br />

Okuma, D.M., Serikawa, R.H., Rogers, M.E. UF-IFAS Citrus Research and Education Center,<br />

Lake Alfred, FL, USA<br />

The huanglongbing (HLB) pathogen is vectored by the Asian Citrus Psyllid, Diaphorina citri<br />

Kuwayama (Hemiptera: Psyllidae), through its feeding. However, detailed information regarding<br />

gender and photoperiod on the psyllid’s feeding behavior has never been provided. Two<br />

experiments were conducted using an electrical penetration graph (EPG) monitor to provide<br />

detailed examination of psyllid feeding behavior. In both experiments, adult psyllids 5 to 10 days<br />

old were selected and sexed using magnifying lens. Recordings were made for 12 hours using the<br />

abaxial side of a sweet orange young leaf. In the first experiment, the difference in feeding<br />

behaviors between female and male psyllids was examined. In the second experiment, the<br />

influence of photoperiod (light/dark) on psyllid feeding behavior was examined. Non-sequential<br />

feeding parameters were analyzed by ANOVA (PROC GLIMMIX, SAS Institute, 2001). The<br />

results of those studies will be presented and discussed in terms of developing a better<br />

understanding of D. citri feeding behavior, and further development of more efficient methods of<br />

monitoring and management in order to protect citrus from HLB infection.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 63<br />

3.14 Seasonal Abundance of Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) and Natural Enemies<br />

in Citrus Groves of Yucatán, Mexico<br />

Jasso-Argumedo, J. 1 , Lozano-Contreras, M. 1 , Barroso-Aké, H. 1 , López-Arroyo, J.I. 2<br />

1 INIFAP, Centro de Investigación Regional del Sureste. Mérida, Yuc., México<br />

2 INIFAP-Centro Regional de Investigaciones del Noreste. Río Bravo, Tam., México<br />

jasso.juan@inifap.gob.mx<br />

Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (Hemiptera: Psyllidae), the Asian citrus psyllid (ACP), has been<br />

present in the Peninsula of Yucatán, Mexico, since 2002; however, in spite of its distribution in<br />

the area and the occurrence of infective specimens in neighboring countries, the first plant<br />

infected by Ca. Liberibacter spp. was not found until July of 2009 in Tizimín, Yucatán, México.<br />

The objective of this study was to determine the seasonal abundance of D. citri in 14 groves of<br />

Persian lime and sweet orange. In young irrigated orange trees, the abundance of D. citri was<br />

constant throughout the whole year with densities in the range of 0-1.8 adults per tap; pest<br />

infestation ranged from 10 to 30%, though it was detected at a peak of 60%. In mature orange<br />

trees growing with scarce water during the dry season, the highest abundance of ACP was<br />

0.2 adults per tap, the average abundance during the year was 0.02 adults, and pest infestation<br />

ranged from 10 to 30%. In Persian lime groves, the abundance of D. citri ranged from 0 to<br />

1.56 adults per tap, while pest infestation was 21.05% on average per year. The most abundant<br />

beneficial insects were Cycloneda sanguinea followed by Chrysoperla sp. Olla v-nigrum and<br />

Ceraeochrysa sp.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 64<br />

3.15 Host <strong>Plant</strong>s of Psyllids in South Texas<br />

Thomas, D.B. USDA-ARS, Kika de la Garza Subtropical Agriculture Research Center,<br />

Weslaco, TX, USA<br />

South Texas, an important citrus producing center, is home to an array of psyllid species which<br />

now include the Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri Kuwayama. Although psyllids typically<br />

breed on a narrow range of related plant species, the adults will often feed on a wider range of<br />

host plants (Hodkinson, 1974). To date, none of the dozen or so species native to south Texas<br />

have been found to breed on Citrus, but the adults of several species are commonly found in<br />

Citrus groves, especially Leuronota maculata (Crawford), Trioza diospyri (Ashmead),<br />

Heteropsylla texana (Crawford), and H. mimosae (Crawford). In addition to Citrus, L. maculata<br />

is also commonly encountered on torchwood, a rutaceous plant native to Texas. Although the<br />

breeding host for this psyllid is reported to be hackberry (Celtis spp.) (Hodkinson, 1988), a<br />

closely related species, L. fagarae Burkhardt, breeds on Rutaceae (Halbert and Manjunath,<br />

2004). In contrast, the gall and lerp forming hackberry psyllids (4 species) (see Yang and Mitter,<br />

1993) and willow psyllids (2 species) seem to keep to their breeding host plants as adults. This<br />

alternate feeding host behavior is of obvious significance because, aside from the implications<br />

for enhanced survival, such psyllids could spread the HLB bacterium to their regular hosts and<br />

thus create a reservoir of the disease agent in non-crop plants. Likewise, D. citri is often found<br />

on non-rutaceous plants, including hackberry. Given that the hackberry psyllid visits Citrus and<br />

that the citrus psyllid visits hackberry, that ubiquitous tree may be a candidate for screening as an<br />

HLB reservoir. The only non-rutaceous plant on which D. citri has been found breeding in Texas<br />

is the edible fig, Ficus carica (Moraceae). In the summer of 2010, we discovered D. citri nymphs<br />

on a dooryard fig tree. Fig has its own species of psyllid, Homatoma ficus (L.), but both adults<br />

and nymphs of that species are easily distinguished. Our colleague Jesus De Leon confirmed our<br />

identification of the nymphs with a molecular marker (in ref. and abstract this <strong>symposium</strong>). In a<br />

follow-up greenhouse experiment, we reared D. citri through to adults on potted fig plants.<br />

Significantly, the only other record for breeding by D. citri, on a non-rutaceous host plant, was<br />

for the jackfruit Artocarpus, also in the family Moraceae (Shivanker et al., 2000). Although,<br />

Peña et al. (2006) were unable to substantiate jackfruit as a host, the possibility of non-rutaceous<br />

hosts needs to be verified. Movement of D. citri among commercial Citrus and dooryard Citrus<br />

trees may also be of concern for disease management. In both 2009 and 2010, we saw a striking<br />

pattern of host usage in south Texas with spring-time peaks in dooryard populations and<br />

fall/winter peaks in Citrus groves. These peaks were independent of, that is, not driven by<br />

immature phenology that was closely related to the rainfall-flush cycle. Rather it appeared that<br />

there was a migration of adults from dooryards into groves in the summer with a reverse<br />

migration in the winter. Colleagues working with the potato psylla found large numbers of<br />

D. citri in potato fields in the first week of January 2009, whereas the rest of the year they were<br />

no more than incidental. This phenomenon requires more investigation.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 65<br />

References<br />

Halbert, S.E., Manjunath, K.L. 2004. Asian citrus psyllids (Sternorrhyncha: Psyllidae) and<br />

greening disease of Citrus: A literature review and assessment of risk in Florida. Florida<br />

Entomologist 87:330-353.<br />

Hodkinson, I.D. 1974. The biology of the Psylloidea (Hemiptera): a review. Bulletin of<br />

Entomological Research 64:325-339.<br />

Hodkinson, I.D. 1988. The nearctic psylloidea (Insecta: Hemiptera): an annotated checklist.<br />

Journal of Natural History 22:1174-1243.<br />

Peña, J.E., Mannion, C.M., Ulmer, B.J., Halbert, S.E. 2006. Jackfruit, Artocarpus heterophylus,<br />

is not a host of Diaphorina citri (Homoptera: Psyllidae) in Florida. Florida Entomologist<br />

89:412-413.<br />

Shivanker, V.J., Rao, C.N., Singh, S. 2000. Studies on citrus psylla Diaphorina citri Kuwayama:<br />

a review. Agricultural Review (India) 21:199-204.<br />

Yang, M.M., Mitter, C. 1993. Biosystematics of hackberry psyllids (Pachypsylla) and the<br />

evolution of gall and lerp formation in psyllids (Homoptera: Psylloidea): a preliminary<br />

report. In: Price et al. (eds.). The Ecology of Gall Forming Insects. USDA Forest Service,<br />

Washington, DC, p. 172-185.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 66<br />

Session 4:<br />

Survey, Detection and<br />

Diagnosis<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 67<br />

4.1 Development and Reactivity of Polyclonal Antibodies Based on OMP Sequences of<br />

Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus*<br />

Coletta-Filho, H.D. 1 , Peroni, L.A. 2 , De Souza, A.A. 1 , Takita, M.A. 1 , Stach-Machado, D.R. 2<br />

1 Centro de Citricultura Sylvio Moreira, IAC, Cordeiropolis, Brazil<br />

2 UNICAMP, Campinas, Brazil<br />

The use of serological approaches on Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus (Las) research and<br />

diagnosis is limited by the absence of good antibodies as a consequence of uncultured<br />

characteristic of this bacterium. Polyclonal antibody with specific reaction against Las will be<br />

useful for both quick and low-cost diagnosis test, as well as immunomicroscopy studies. Here,<br />

we are showing results of polyclonal antibodies (PAs) produced from nine immunogenic<br />

synthetic peptides whose amino acid sequences were translated from Las - Outer Membrane<br />

Protein genomic sequences and selected based on antigenicity and hydrophilicity by<br />

Antogenicity plot. The antigenic peptides were synthesized by Bio-Synthesis, Inc. (Lewisville,<br />

TX, USA) with size ranging from 10 to 26 amino acids and were endovenously twice inoculated<br />

(total of 500 µg) in white rabbits. Seven days after the last injection, each rabbit was bled<br />

through cardiac puncture, and the serum titer and specificity were determined by indirect<br />

enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) according to Clark et al. (1986). Eight of nine<br />

PAs, tested with dilutions from 1:500 to 1:32,000, resulted in a linear pattern of reactivity at<br />

O.D. of 405 nm, by ELISA, against their antigens (10 µg/ml). So, we tested by ELISA the eight<br />

preselected PAs to react against citrus asiatic-HLB symptomatic leaves. Four of eight PAs<br />

recognized Las in the infected leaves at O.D. ranging from 0.456 to 0.669 (1:2,000 dilution) with<br />

no cross-reaction observed against healthy plants as well as against some bacteria species<br />

potentially present in citrus plants like Xanthomanas citri pathovars, Methylobacterium sp.<br />

(Araujo et al., 2002), and Xylella fastidosa.<br />

Acknowledgement<br />

Research was supported by FCPRAC contract #061.<br />

References<br />

Araujo, W.L., Marcon, J., Maccheroni, W., Jr., van Elsas, J.D., van Vuurde, J.W.L., Azevedo,<br />

J.L. 2002. Diversity of endophytic bacterial populations and their interaction with Xylella<br />

fastidiosa in citrus plants. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 68:4906-4914.<br />

Clark, M.F., Lister, R.M., Bar-Joseph, M. 1986. ELISA techniques, p. 742-766. In: Weissbach,<br />

H., Weissbach, A. (eds.), Methods in Enzymology, vol. 118. Academic Press, New York,<br />

820 p.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 68<br />

4.2 Development of Single-Chain Antibody Fragments (scFVs) Against Candidatus<br />

Liberibacter asiaticus by Phage Display<br />

Yuan, Q. 1 , Jordan, R. 1 , Brlansky, R.H. 2 , Minenkova, O. 3 , Hartung, J.S. 1<br />

1 USDA ARS Molecular <strong>Plant</strong> Pathology Laboratory, Beltsville, MD, USA<br />

2 UF-IFAS Citrus Research and Education Center, Lake Alfred, FL, USA<br />

3 Sigma tau Pharmaceuticals, Rome, Italy<br />

Psyllids collected in Florida were assayed individually for Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus (CaLas) by<br />

q-PCR and extracts that contained >10 8 CaLas/insect were used to immunize mice. mRNA from<br />

spleens of immunized mice was purified and converted into a cDNA library. Antibody gene<br />

repertoires were PCR-amplified using 23 primers for the heavy chain variable region (V H ) and<br />

21 primers for the light chain variable region (V L ). The V H and V L repertoires were joined by<br />

overlap extension PCR and ligated into the phage vector pKM19 (Pavoni et al., 2007). Forty-five<br />

clones were picked at random from the library and tested by PCR. The library contained 1.3 ×<br />

10 7 independent clones with full-length scFV inserts. Biopanning of the phage library with plant<br />

and insect extracts for phage expressing scFV against CaLas was not successful. Therefore,<br />

rabbit polyclonal antiserum raised against purified outer membrane protein (OMP) of CaLas was<br />

prepared. Three rounds of immunocapture were done with CaLas from extracts of psyllids using<br />

Dynabeads coated with sheep anti-rabbit IgG and rabbit anti-OMP serum. In each of 3 cycles of<br />

affinity selection with purified antigen, about 1.0 × 10 12 phage were used for panning with 1.2 ×<br />

10 6 , 3.4 × 10 7 , and 9.2 × 10 7 phage recovered after the first, second, and third cycles,<br />

respectively. ELISA showed that scFVs that bound CaLas were enriched in the panned libraries,<br />

although the development of the ELISA plates was very slow. This could be due to low numbers<br />

of target CaLas even after immunocapture. Polyclonal antisera are currently being raised in<br />

rabbits against purified native pilus protein to substitute for OMP in the immunocapture of<br />

CaLas.<br />

Reference<br />

Pavoni, E., et al. 2007. New display vector reduces biological bias for expression of antibodies in<br />

E. coli. Gene 391:120-129.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 69<br />

4.3 Highly Sensitive Detection by Real-Time PCR Targeting the Multiple Tandem Repeats<br />

of Two Prophage Region Genes of the Citrus Huanglongbing Disease Bacterium,<br />

Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus<br />

Morgan, J.K. 1 , Zhou, L.J. 2 , Shatters, R.G., Jr. 1 , Manjunath, K.L. 3 , Duan, Y.-P. 1<br />

1 USDA-ARS, U.S. Horticultural Research Laboratory, Fort Pierce, FL, USA<br />

2 UF-IFAS Indian River Research and Education Center, Fort Pierce, FL, USA<br />

3 USDA-ARS, National Clonal Germplasm Repository for Citrus and Dates, Riverside, CA, USA<br />

Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus is the prevalent Liberibacter associated with citrus<br />

huanglongbing worldwide. Residing in phloem sieve cells of host plants and vectored by the<br />

Asian citrus psyllid (Diaphorina citri), this fastidious bacterium lives as a pathogen or symbiont.<br />

Uneven distribution and variation in bacterial levels within individual hosts emphasize the need<br />

for sensitive and reliable detection. Here, we have developed real-time PCR using SYBR Green<br />

1 (LJ900fr) and TaqMan ® (LJ900fpr) methods targeting near identical 132 bp multiple tandem<br />

repeats of two Ca. L. asiaticus prophage region genes, hyvI and hyvII. Because the copy number<br />

of these tandem repeats is high (up to 15 combined), targeting these improves detection of Ca. L.<br />

asiaticus relative to the three-copy 16S rDNA-based USDA APHIS real-time PCR standard,<br />

‘HLBaspr’. Relative comparative testing of both LJ900fr and LJ900fpr against HLBaspr<br />

indicated an average reduction in detectable threshold of approximately 9 and 3 cycles from local<br />

and global samples for the LJ900 methods, respectively. Additionally, multi-sample testing of<br />

two variable level Ca. L. asiaticus infected citrus trees (R8T1 and R8T3) indicated Ca. L.<br />

asiaticus positive detection within all samples by both LJ900 methods, whereas HLBaspr<br />

detected ~50% positive from each tree sample. Furthermore, the hyvI/hyvII repeat sequence is<br />

demonstrated within the Ca. L. americanus strain. Both LJ900 methods provide a significant<br />

increase in reliable detection of Ca. L. asiaticus within low and variable level Ca. L. asiaticus<br />

samples, dramatically improving the detection of the bacterium.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 70<br />

4.4 Comparison of Different Extraction and Assay Protocols in Different Laboratories to<br />

Develop a Standardized Assay for Detection of Huanglongbing-Associated Bacteria from<br />

Psyllids<br />

Manjunath, K.L. 1 , Irey, M.S. 2 , Ramadugu, C. 3 , Lee, R.F. 1 , Levesque, C.S. 4 , Brady, B. 4 , Polek,<br />

M.L. 4 , Lin, H. 5 , Civerolo, E.L. 5 , Afunian, M. 3 , Vidalakis, G. 3,6<br />

1 National Clonal Germplasm Repository for Citrus and Dates, USDA-ARS, Riverside, CA, USA<br />

2 U.S. Sugar Corporation, Clewiston, FL, USA<br />

3 University of California, Riverside, CA, USA<br />

4 Citrus Research Board, Riverside, CA, USA<br />

5 San Joaquin Valley Agricultural Sciences Center, USDA-ARS, Parlier, CA, USA<br />

6 Citrus Clonal Protection Program, Riverside, CA, USA<br />

Since the first detection of huanglongbing (HLB) in the Western hemisphere in 2004, the disease<br />

has spread to several countries. Monitoring movement of HLB and early detection, especially in<br />

areas where HLB has not been reported, is largely dependent on testing for HLB-associated<br />

bacteria (Candidatus Liberibacter spp.) in psyllid vectors. Since the HLB-associated pathogen<br />

can be detected in psyllids well before the onset of disease symptoms in plants, the psyllid<br />

testing is now used extensively in many laboratories. Since several methods of psyllid DNA<br />

extractions and qPCR assays are practiced, it would be desirable for reliability,<br />

cost-effectiveness, and accuracy to use methods that give comparable results. Field collected<br />

psyllids exhibit both seasonality and very low levels of infection and hence are not suitable for<br />

developing standardized methods. A greenhouse-maintained psyllid colony monitored for several<br />

months was consistently shown to contain infected psyllids and used for this study. About<br />

1500 single psyllids were tested simultaneously in five laboratories in Florida and California by<br />

employing a number of different extraction methods and tested for the HLB-associated bacteria<br />

by standard quantitative PCR. A total of 16 lab/extraction/qPCR combinations were conducted.<br />

Most of the assays resulted in a narrow range of infection of 6-8%; however, there was a range<br />

of infection rates of 1-10%, indicating the need for further evaluation of the methods used in<br />

different laboratories. The strengths and weaknesses of the different methods and minimum<br />

requirements for conducting a reliable psyllid HLB testing assay are discussed.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 71<br />

4.5 Assessment of Various Spectroscopic Techniques for Detection of HLB<br />

Poole, G.H. 1 , Hawkins, S.A. 2 , Windham, W.R. 2 , Heitschmidt, J. 2 , Albano, J.P. 1 , Park, B. 2 ,<br />

Lawrence, K.C. 2 , Gottwald, T.R. 1<br />

1 USDA-ARS, Fort Pierce, FL, USA<br />

2 USDA-ARS, Athens, GA, USA<br />

Although real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) is an accepted method of determining an<br />

HLB infection in citrus, this technique can be time consuming and expensive. In this study,<br />

several spectral techniques were tested for their ability to rapidly screen leaf samples for HLB. In<br />

the first trial, 179 HLB positive and negative leaf samples were collected from greenhouse- and<br />

farm-grown orange and grapefruit trees. In the second trial, 238 leaves were collected from<br />

greenhouse-grown grapefruit trees which had one of several diseases (HLB, canker, CTV,<br />

CLRV, or CPsV), one of several nutrient deficiencies (copper, iron, magnesium, manganese,<br />

zinc, or “water only”), and control samples. In both trials, the samples were individually<br />

analyzed with hyperspectral imaging (HSI, 400-1000 nm), fourier transform infrared-attenuated<br />

total reflection spectroscopy (FTIR-ATR, 700-1765 cm -1 ), near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy<br />

(NIRS, 450-2500 nm), and real-time PCR. The data from HSI was not promising, with multiple<br />

false positive and negative results in both trials. FTIR-ATR did well in trial 1 with an error rate<br />

under 5%, but had markedly higher false positive issues in trial 2. NIRS also did well in trial 1,<br />

but in trial 2 as with the FTIR-ATR analysis, the predictor models suffered from false positives.<br />

After combining the datasets and removing the visible portion of the spectrum (450-700 nm), the<br />

accuracy of the NIRS improved and was in agreement with the data from the first trial. Overall,<br />

there is a good possibility of using a spectral analysis of leaf tissue as an alternative, rapid, and<br />

inexpensive assay for HLB infection.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 72<br />

4.6 Seasonal Variability in HLB Testing Data in <strong>Plant</strong> and Psyllid Samples in Florida<br />

Irey, M.S. 1 , Gast, T. 2 , Cote, J. 1 , Gadea, P. 1 , Santiago, O. 2 , Briefman, L. 2 , Graham, J.H. 3<br />

1 U.S. Sugar Corporation, Clewiston, FL, USA<br />

2 Southern Gardens Citrus Corporation, Clewiston, FL, USA<br />

3 UF-IFAS Citrus Research and Education Center, Lake Alfred, FL, USA<br />

Southern Gardens Diagnostic Laboratory (SGDL) is a disease testing laboratory that has been<br />

testing grower samples for huanglongbing (HLB) by real-time PCR (qPCR) since October, 2006.<br />

Since its inception, the lab has tested over 165,000 plant samples and over 6,000 individual<br />

psyllid samples. Samples submitted to the laboratory come from growers throughout the state<br />

and are collected and delivered to the laboratory every month of the year. A database is<br />

maintained for all samples, and the data contained within the database has proven to be a<br />

valuable resource to study the seasonal and temporal differences in HLB testing results. Both the<br />

quantity of samples received and the results of the samples that are received can be used to draw<br />

conclusions as to the temporal incidence of symptoms, type of symptoms that test positive for<br />

HLB by qPCR, and to determine the best time of the year to sample for HLB in plants and<br />

psyllids. In plants, most symptomatic samples are received August through January and the<br />

greatest percentage of HLB positive samples is found July through January. During the less<br />

optimum times of year, only blotchy mottle symptoms test positive for HLB, whereas during the<br />

optimum time of the year, many different types of symptoms test positive. With respect to the<br />

testing of psyllids, more psyllids test positive for HLB during the months of October through<br />

May. However, the incidence of psyllids is greatest April through November. So the optimum<br />

time to detect HLB in psyllids may not be during the time of year when the psyllid is the most<br />

prevalent.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 73<br />

4.7 Survey to Estimate the Rate of HLB Infection in Florida Citrus Groves<br />

Irey, M.S. 1 , Morris, R.A. 2 , Estes, M. 3<br />

1 U.S. Sugar Corporation, Clewiston, FL, USA<br />

2 UF-IFAS Citrus Research and Education Center, Lake Alfred, FL, USA<br />

3 FDACS, DPI, Gainesville, FL, USA<br />

The incidence of HLB infection in Florida groves is needed to assess the magnitude of the HLB<br />

problem, assist in tracking disease management efforts, and to enable better forecasts of future<br />

infection rates, fruit production, and prices. In 2008 and 2009, two independent surveys were<br />

conducted to determine infection levels across the state. One survey was a collaborative project<br />

between IFAS, The National Agricultural Statistics Service’s Florida field office (NASS), and<br />

Division of <strong>Plant</strong> Industry (DPI). The second survey was conducted by U.S. Sugar Corporation<br />

(USSC). The IFAS/NASS/DPI surveys were based on survey forms that were mailed to 3,037<br />

Florida growers, whereas the USSC survey was based on GPS-based tree infection data provided<br />

by scouting companies and growers. For 2008, the incidence of HLB was estimated to be 1.6%<br />

and 2.3% for the IFAS/NASS/DPI and the USSC surveys, respectively. The infection rates were<br />

highest in the Southern and Indian River production regions of the state. Due to a relatively low<br />

response rate in 2009, the data from both surveys groups were combined. The combined surveys<br />

showed a statewide HLB infection rate for oranges of 6.4%. The Southern, Indian River, and the<br />

southern portion of the Central Regions had the highest infection rates, while most of the<br />

Central, Western, and Northern regions had infection rates below 1.0%.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 74<br />

4.8 Two Survey Protocols to Detect Newly Introduced HLB and Other Exotic Pathogens<br />

and Pests<br />

Gottwald, T.R. 1 , Riley, T.D. 2 , Irey, M.S. 3 , Parnell, S.R. 4 , Hall, D.G. 1<br />

1 USDA, ARS, U.S. Horticultural Research Laboratory, Fort Pierce, FL, USA<br />

2 USDA, APHIS, <strong>Plant</strong> Protection and Quarantine, Citrus Health Response Program, Orlando,<br />

FL, USA<br />

3 Southern Gardens, U.S. Sugar Corporation, Clewiston, FL, USA<br />

4 Biomathematics and Bioinformatics, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, AL5 2JQ, UK<br />

Detection of initial introductions of exotic pathogens or pests is difficult because they occur in<br />

very low incidence. Optimal probability of eradication/mitigation depends on early detection<br />

prior to subsequent spread. The earlier the detection, the more likely the pathogen can be<br />

eliminated or its buildup can be slowed, lessening disease impact often for multiple years.<br />

Finding point introductions across a broad geographic landscape of mixed commercial and<br />

residential areas requires substantial manpower and fiscal resources. Point introductions often go<br />

undetected for long periods until their incidence exceeds the lower threshold of the sampling<br />

methods deployed. One means of ‘finding a needle in a haystack’ is to utilize epidemiological<br />

characteristics and knowledge of probable pathways of the pathogen/pest to parse the<br />

geographical area into smaller areas that can be prioritized by potential risk of introduction. Two<br />

survey methods for early detection are presented and both can be applied to various hosts,<br />

pathogens, vectors, and insect pests. The first method predicts the most likely locations in a<br />

given geographic area for introduction and is based on U.S. Census and international travel data,<br />

combined with knowledge of the pathosystem’s epidemiology. The method models and<br />

generates a risk index that predicts new introductions and can be deployed in areas where HLB is<br />

not known to exist. The second method sweeps large areas multiple times per year to estimate<br />

HLB incidence and ACP populations, generating a GIS-based risk index map via<br />

spatiotemporally modeling that can be used to target area-wide disease and vector<br />

control/mitigation.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 75<br />

4.9 Distribution of Candidatus Liberibacter Americanus and Ca. L. asiaticus in Foliage of<br />

Naturally Infected Citrus Trees<br />

Sousa, M.C. 1 , Lemos, M.V.F. 2 , Frare G.F. 3 , Santos, M.A. 1 , Lopes, S.A. 1<br />

1 Fundecitrus, Araraquara, Brazil<br />

2 FCAV/Universidade Estadual Paulista, Jaboticabal, Brazil<br />

3 ESALQ/Universidade de São Paulo, Piracicaba, Brazil<br />

Knowledge on Liberibacter distribution and titer within the foliage of a tree canopy may indicate<br />

the potential for that particular tree to act as a source of inoculum. Eight 5-year-old<br />

Valencia/Rangpur lime trees, four naturally infected with Ca. L. americanus (Lam) and four with<br />

Ca. L. asiaticus (Las), and exhibiting leaf mottling at the top of one of three main branches, were<br />

selected in an orchard near Avaré, SP. In total, 219 leaf samples (10 leaves per sample) were<br />

collected from 9 to 12 parts of each symptomatic branch and 9 each from two asymptomatic<br />

branches of each tree. The samples were processed for DNA extraction and analyzed by<br />

conventional (cPCR simplex and cPCR duplex), nested, and SYBR green quantitative PCR<br />

(qPCR). Branch positioning and sampling sites were mapped. Lam was detected in<br />

18 symptomatic and 3 asymptomatic samples and Las in 6 symptomatic and 6 asymptomatic<br />

samples. Good agreement for Liberibacter detection was obtained among all four PCR protocols<br />

tested. Cycle threshold values and bacterial titers (estimated in number of cells per gram of<br />

tissue) averaged, respectively, 30.2 and 2.45 × 10 5 for Lam and 28.1 and 5.2 × 10 6 for Las. The<br />

greater distribution and higher titers observed in Las-infected trees confirms why Las has spread<br />

much faster than Lam in Brazil.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 76<br />

4.10 A Perspective on the Activities of Texas HLB Diagnostic Laboratory<br />

Kunta, M., da Graça, J.V., Sétamou, M., Skaria, M. Texas A&M University-Kingsville, Citrus<br />

Center, Weslaco, TX, USA<br />

The Citrus Center diagnostic laboratory received USDA-APHIS certified status to perform<br />

APHIS PPQ validated diagnostic tests since August 2008. It has the capacity to test<br />

approximately 500 samples a day and extract DNA from 900 psyllids or 400 plants per week.<br />

Thus far, about 25,000 psyllid samples and 8,000 plant samples have been tested. These were<br />

collected by USDA-APHIS, Texas Department of Agriculture, and the Citrus Center's citrus<br />

commodity survey personnel. Samples that produce a Ct value less than 37 in qPCR were sent to<br />

the PPQ molecular diagnostic laboratory (MDL) in Beltsville, MD, for confirmation. Two citrus<br />

samples, from Hidalgo and Harris counties, respectively, showed high borderline Ct values;<br />

however, none produced an amplicon in conventional PCR tests. The results were further<br />

confirmed by MDL and the samples were designated as ‘inconclusive’ since positive<br />

conventional PCR and nucleotide sequencing information are necessary to confirm the presence<br />

of HLB. Moreover, re-samples from these plants showed negative results in qPCR tests.<br />

Forty-four orange jasmine samples yielded Ct values between 33 and 37; some of which were<br />

confirmed by MDL and were also designated as ‘inconclusive.’ We have performed qPCR,<br />

conventional PCR, nested PCR, and PCR coupled with restriction digestion on 440 orange<br />

jasmine leaf samples collected from 55 plants and psyllids in the vicinity of these plants.<br />

Twenty-four samples produced borderline Ct values, but none of them resulted in a conventional<br />

PCR band.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 77<br />

4.11 Two New Real-Time PCR-Based Surveillance Systems for Candidatus Liberibacter<br />

Species Detection<br />

Lin, H. 1 , Bai, Y. 2 , Civerolo, E.L. 1<br />

1 Crop Diseases, Pests and Genetics Unit USDA-ARS, Parlier, CA, USA<br />

2 Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanning, Guangxi, China<br />

We developed two novel surveillance systems for Candidatus Liberibacter (CL) species<br />

detection and identification. The first system is called “single tube dual primer Taq-Man PCR”<br />

(STDP). The procedure involves two sequential rounds of PCR using the CL asiaticus<br />

species-specific outer and inner primer pairs. Different annealing temperatures between inner<br />

and outer pair primers allow both the first and the second rounds of PCR to be performed<br />

sequentially in the same closed tube. The sensitivity of the dual primer system is comparable to<br />

the conventional two-tube nested PCR, but the STDP eliminates the potential risk of cross<br />

contaminations commonly associated with conventional nested PCR. The second system is<br />

fluorescent dye-based real-time PCR. This diagnostic system employs a pair of Liberibacter<br />

universal primers flanking a sequence region homologous to the known CL species; CL asiaticus<br />

(Las), CL africanus (Laf), CL americanus (Lam), and CL solanacearum (Lso). This primer<br />

system is able to quantitatively detect all four Liberibacter species, but sequence variation among<br />

each species amplicon can be distinguished by performing a post PCR high resolution melting<br />

curve analysis (HRMCA). Both systems reported here are robust and cost-effective for reliable<br />

detection, quantitation, and identification of Liberibacter species in plants and insects and<br />

provide high throughput capabilities suitable for large-scale, year-round quarantine screening<br />

and epidemiological studies.<br />

References<br />

Lin, H., Chen, C., Doddapaneni, H., Duan, Y.-P., Civerolo, E.L., Bai, X.J., Zhao, X.L. 2010.<br />

A new diagnostic system for ultra sensitive and specific detection and quantitation of<br />

Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus, the bacterium associated with citrus huanglongbing.<br />

Journal of Microbiological Methods 81:17-25.<br />

Lin, H., Liao, H., Bai, Y., Civerolo, E.L. 2010. A new molecular diagnostic tool for<br />

quantitatively detecting and genotyping Candidatus Liberibacter species. Phytopathology<br />

100:S72.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 78<br />

4.12 Detection of Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum in Potato Psyllid Isolated from<br />

Sticky Traps<br />

Kwok, K. 1 , Levesque, C.S. 1 , Manjunath, K.L. 2 , Irey, M.S. 3 , Polek, M.L. 1<br />

1 Citrus Research Board, Visalia/Riverside, CA, USA<br />

2 USDA, ARS National Germplasm Repository, Riverside, CA, USA<br />

3 U.S. Sugar Corporation, Clewiston, FL, USA<br />

The Citrus Research Board established an Operations Department in response to the 2008<br />

discovery of the Asian Citrus Psyllid (ACP) in California and the threat of huanglongbing (HLB)<br />

disease associated with this vector. The Operations Department is composed of Field, Data<br />

<strong>Management</strong>, and Laboratory Divisions dedicated to ACP trapping throughout the state’s<br />

commercial citrus, diagnostic testing of plant and insect samples using Quantitative Polymerase<br />

Chain Reaction (Q-PCR) to detect Liberibacter asiaticus (Las) DNA (the causative agent of HLB<br />

in Florida), and establishing a website for the dissemination of HLB-related information. In<br />

Florida, it has been determined that Las target DNA is undetectable in DNA extracted from ACP<br />

after 10 days on a sticky trap. Since CRB traps are serviced bimonthly, it is possible that positive<br />

ACP could go undetected if Las DNA is unstable in California’s climatic conditions and we<br />

depend on testing trapped animals for detection. Because we cannot work with the live causative<br />

agents of HLB in California, we have used the potato psyllid Bactericerca cockerelli infected<br />

with Liberibacter solanacearum (Lsol) as a surrogate system. ACP populations in Florida acquire<br />

Las at levels of 30-40%, unlike potato psyllids in California that acquire Lsol to very high levels,<br />

with essentially 100% of the population becoming infected. Based on Q-PCR, the level of<br />

infection in the individual psyllid is also dramatically higher. In two experiments conducted this<br />

spring and summer in Riverside, Lsol DNA was detected in up to 85% of dead psyllids retrieved<br />

after 50 days on traps.<br />

References<br />

Bonani, J.P., Fereres, A., Garzo, E., Miranda, M.P., Appezzato-Da-Gloria, B., Lopes, J.R.S.<br />

2010. Characterization of electrical penetration graphs of the Asian citrus psyllid,<br />

Diaphorina citri, in sweet orange seedlings. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata<br />

134:35-49.<br />

Inoue1, H., Ohnishi, J., Ito, T., Tomimura, K., Miyata, S., Iwanami. T., Ashihara, W. 2009.<br />

Enhanced proliferation and efficient transmission of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus by<br />

adult Diaphorina citri after acquisition feeding in the nymphal stage. Annals of Applied<br />

Biology 155:29-36.<br />

Li, W., Abad, J.A., French-Monar, R.D., Rascoe, J., Wen, A., Gudmestad, N.C., Secor, G.A.,<br />

Lee, I., Duan, Y., Levy, L. 2009. Multiplex real-time PCR for detection, identification and<br />

quantification of Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum in potato plants with zebra chip.<br />

Journal of Microbiological Methods 78:59-65.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 79<br />

Liefting, L.W., Sutherland, P.W., Ward, L.I., Paice, K.L., Weir, B.S., Clover, G.R.R. 2009.<br />

A new Candidatus Liberibacter species associated with diseases of solanaceous crops.<br />

<strong>Plant</strong> Disease 93:208-214.<br />

Secor, G.A., Rivera, V.V., Abad, J.A., Clover, G.R.G., Liefting, L.W. Li, X., De Boer, S.H.<br />

2009. Association of Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum with Zebra Chip Disease of<br />

Potato established by graft and psyllid transmission, electron microscopy, and PCR. <strong>Plant</strong><br />

Disease 93:574-583.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 80<br />

4.13 Detection of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus (Las) on Yellow Sticky Traps by<br />

Real-Time PCR<br />

Irey, M.S. 1 , Gadea, P. 1 , Hall, D.G. 2<br />

1 U.S. Sugar Corporation, Clewiston, FL, USA<br />

2 USDA-ARS, U.S. Horticultural Research Laboratory, Fort Pierce, FL, USA<br />

In many areas of the world, surveys to detect the presence of citrus huanglongbing (HLB) prior<br />

to the discovery of symptomatic plants are carried out by the monitoring of Diaphorina citri<br />

(ACP) on yellow sticky traps followed by testing of the psyllids for HLB-associated bacteria<br />

(Las) by real-time PCR (qPCR). In most areas where psyllids are monitored on yellow sticky<br />

traps, the traps are left in the field for 1-2 weeks after which time the cards are brought to the<br />

laboratory for visual evaluation for the presence of ACP, and then, if present, the psyllids are<br />

removed from the cards or the cards are sent to a diagnostic laboratory for subsequent testing.<br />

The process from beginning to end may take up to a month, depending on the work-flow for the<br />

group conducting the surveys. Since the testing of psyllids is a destructive process with respect to<br />

the insect sample, it is hard to validate that a negative qPCR result is indeed negative because<br />

Las were not present, or instead due to degradation of the bacterial DNA over time on the card.<br />

In order to determine if time on yellow sticky traps affects qPCR results for the HLB-associated<br />

bacteria, Las-infected ACP were placed on yellow sticky traps and tested after defined periods of<br />

time by qPCR. In two separate tests, the incidence of Las-positive ACP declined with increasing<br />

time on the yellow sticky traps, indicating that the testing of ACP obtained from yellow sticky<br />

traps may not be the best method to survey for the presence of Las.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 81<br />

4.14 Validation of the Starch-Iodine Reaction for Field Pre-Diagnosis of Huanglongbing in<br />

Citrus of México<br />

Loredo-Salazar, R.X. 1 , Uribe-Bustamante, A. 1 , Rodríguez-Quibrera, C.G. 1 , Curtí-Díaz, S.A. 1 ,<br />

Alanís-Martínez, E.I. 2 , Velázquez-Monreal, J.J. 3 , López-Arroyo, J.I. 4<br />

1 INIFAP, Centro de Investigación Regional del Golfo Centro, Veracruz, Ver., México<br />

2 SENASICA, Dirección General de Sanidad Vegetal, México, D.F.<br />

3 INIFAP, Centro de Investigación Regional del Pacífico Centro, Guadalajara, Jal., México<br />

4 INIFAP, Centro de Investigación Regional del Noreste, Río Bravo, Tam., México<br />

loredo.reyna@inifap.gob.mx<br />

The objective of this study was to validate the iodine-starch reaction for field diagnostics of<br />

huanglongbing (HLB) in México. We tested the method in HLB-infected Mexican lime plants,<br />

Tahiti lime with Wood Pocket, and with Lethal Yellowing, as well as in healthy Murcott<br />

tangelos. Healthy plants of Mexican and Tahiti limes were used as a control. We compared the<br />

staining of the chlorotic and green tissue of the same leaf. 100 leaves were used for each<br />

symptom or citrus species. Presence of Ca. Liberibacter was confirmed by PCR. It was found<br />

that: 1) The chlorotic tissue of leaves with blotchy mottle, diffuse mottle, and green islands were<br />

positive in 87, 75, and 70% of the tests, respectively; whereas, the green tissue of the same<br />

infected leaves only showed positive results in 15, 52, and 58%, in the same order. The use of<br />

chlorotic tissue of infected leaves in the iodine-starch reaction could yield better results in the<br />

detection of suspected trees infected with HLB. 2) 100% of the healthy leaves of Mexican lime<br />

showed very low or no staining, suggesting that it is unlikely to have a false positive. 3) The<br />

staining of the chlorotic tissue of leaves with Wood Pocket (similar symptoms to those caused by<br />

HLB) was low or absent, ruling out this disorder as a suspected infection by HLB. 4) The Tahiti<br />

lime leaves with lethal yellowing and healthy leaves of Murcott tangelo showed high<br />

concentrations of starch, discarding the method for the field diagnostic in such cases.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 82<br />

4.15 Detecting HLB Using NIR Remote Sensing<br />

Gonzalez-Mora, J. 1 , Dima, C.S. 1 , Irey, M.S. 2 , Ehsani, R. 3<br />

1 National Robotics Engineering Center, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA<br />

2 U.S. Sugar Corporation, Clewiston FL, USA<br />

3 UF-IFAS Citrus Research and Education Center, Lake Alfred, FL, USA<br />

Huanglongbing (HLB or citrus greening) is considered one of the most devastating diseases<br />

affecting citrus crops today. Efficient, accurate, and practical methodologies are necessary for<br />

detecting this disease. Remote sensing techniques have proven to be an effective approach for<br />

detecting stress conditions in many different crops. Compared with traditional wet chemical<br />

diagnosis, remote sensing methods do not require sample preparation and their subsequent<br />

analysis in a laboratory, resulting in fast and nondestructive techniques. In this paper, we discuss<br />

the use of the near-infrared reflectance to detect the huanglongbing disease in citrus trees. We<br />

analyze the spectral responses from an extensive collection of leaf samples to discriminate<br />

infected trees from healthy samples. Experimental results comparing the performance of<br />

different feature extraction and classification techniques are provided using data collected in a<br />

controlled environment and also in field conditions.<br />

References<br />

Gonzalez-Mora, J., Vallespi, C., Dima, C.S., Ehsani, R. 2010. HLB detection using hyperspectral<br />

radiometry. 10 th International Conference on Precision Agriculture, Denver, CO.<br />

Sankaran, S., Ehsani, R., Dima, C. 2010. Development of ground-based sensor system for<br />

automated agricultural vehicle to detect diseases in citrus plantations. 10 th International<br />

Conference on Precision Agriculture, Denver, CO.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 83<br />

4.16 Isothermal Detection of Huanglongbing in Psyllids and Citrus Tree Samples<br />

Russell, P.F., McGowen, N., Bohannon, R. Agdia, Inc., Elkhart, IN, USA<br />

Huanglongbing (HLB) disease is found throughout Asia, in Brazil, Mexico, the USA, and parts<br />

of Africa and has seriously affected citrus production in many regions. Three species of the<br />

causative agent Candidatus Liberibacter, which is vectored by psyllids, have been identified.<br />

These are Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus, Candidatus L. americanus, and Candidatus L.<br />

africanus.<br />

We report here on two methods for detecting HLB using isothermal nucleic acid<br />

amplification. Specific detection and identification of the three species is possible using DNA<br />

purified from infected psyllids and citrus trees as well as using crude extracts prepared from the<br />

same samples. <strong>Plant</strong> samples tested include infected citrus trees from South Africa, Brazil, and<br />

the USA.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Psyllid extracts were kindly provided by Dr. John Hartung. Citrus leaves infected with<br />

L. asiaticus, L. americanus, or L. africanus were provided by Dr. John Hartung, Dr. Barry<br />

Manicom, and Dr. Marcelo Pedreira de Miranda.<br />

Samples were initially processed using the Norgen <strong>Plant</strong>/Fungi DNA Isolation Kit (Catalog<br />

# 26200) to isolate pure DNA for use as comparison controls. Crude extracts were prepared by<br />

excising leaf midribs and grinding the samples at a 1:5 ratio in Extraction Buffer. Neat or diluted<br />

extract was then used in the AmplifyRP ® test. Psyllid DNA extracts were used neat or diluted<br />

serially.<br />

Detection of the target sequence with Agdia’s isothermal AmplifyRP ® test was done<br />

according to the standard protocol, using primers and probes targeted to the region surrounding<br />

the protein chain elongation factor. A single microliter of target sample (purified DNA or crude<br />

extract) is used for each reaction. Two methods for detection are available: 1) the “exo” test uses<br />

real-time fluorometric measurement and is complete after 12-15 minutes, and 2) the “nfo” test is<br />

an endpoint assay utilizing a strip to detect the amplicon and provides results in 30 minutes.<br />

Results<br />

The exo and nfo AmplifyRP ® assays were optimized using either psyllid DNA (L. asiaticus) or<br />

DNA isolated from infected plants (L. africanus and L. americanus). Multiple primer/probe<br />

combinations were tested to achieve the maximum sensitivity and specificity for each assay.<br />

Optimized assays were then tested using extracts prepared from infected plant tissue.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 84<br />

Figure 1, Graph A illustrates the specificity and sensitivity of the L. asiaticus exo test for<br />

diluted crude plant extracts. The test can detect HLB at a dilution of 1:1000 of the initial extract<br />

and evinces no cross-reactivity with either L. americanus or L. africanus.<br />

Graph D compares the detection of L. asiaticus in psyllid DNA extracts that were previously<br />

tested using quantitative PCR. AmplifyRP ® is able to detect HLB in samples with a wide range<br />

of Cq values.<br />

Graphs B and C show the specificity and sensitivity for the L. americanus and L. africanus exo<br />

tests, respectively. The L. americanus assay is sensitive down to a 1:100 dilution of crude plant<br />

extract. It demonstrates no cross-reactivity with either DNA from either L. asiaticus or<br />

L. africanus. The L. africanus assay is not completely specific, as it recognizes L. asiaticus.<br />

However, its sensitivity for L. africanus is 10-fold higher than it is for L. asiaticus.<br />

Figure 2 shows examples detection on strips of the AmplifyRP ® nfo L. asiaticus and<br />

L. americanus tests. Panel A demonstrates the specificity and sensitivity of the L. asiaticus test.<br />

Panel B provides an example of the specificity of the L. americanus test. The AmplifyRP ® nfo<br />

L. africanus test shows a similar cross-reactivity to L. asiaticus as the exo test, with sensitivity to<br />

L. africanus 10-fold greater than for L. asiaticus.<br />

Discussion<br />

Using AmplifyRP ® , we can detect all three HLB varieties with a high degree of sensitivity.<br />

AmplifyRP ® can also identify, either directly or through a process of elimination, those varieties.<br />

A summary of this can be found in Table 1. While more extensive testing needs to be done, we<br />

believe that AmplifyRP ® is a fast and easy method for detection of HLB, either as a primary<br />

screen or for confirmation. The test can be performed using crude plant extracts and produces<br />

results in under 30 minutes total.<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

We would like to thank the following individuals and their labs for help with this project:<br />

Dr. Barry Manicom, ARC-ITSC, for providing plant material infected with L. Africanus;<br />

Dr. John Hartung, USDA-ARS, for providing psyllid DNA extracts containing L. asiaticus and<br />

plant material infected with L. asiaticus, L. americanus, and L. africanus; and Dr. Marcelo<br />

Pedreira de Miranda, FUNDECITRUS-Brazil, for providing plant material infected with<br />

L. africanus.<br />

Reference<br />

Piepenburg, O., Williams, C.H., Stemple, D.L., Armes, N.A. 2006. DNA detection using<br />

recombination proteins. Public Library of Science Biology 4(7): e204. DOI:<br />

10.1371/journal.pbio.004020.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 85<br />

Fig. 1. Graph A illustrates the specificity and sensitivity of the L. asiaticus exo test for diluted<br />

crude plant extracts. Graph D compares the detection of L. asiaticus in psyllid DNA extracts<br />

that were previously tested using quantitative PCR. Graphs B and C show the specificity and<br />

sensitivity for the L. americanus and L. africanus exo tests, respectively.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 86<br />

A<br />

B<br />

Fig. 2. nfo detection of HLB plant samples. Panel A: L. asiaticus test on dilutions of crude<br />

extract. Strips 1-3 Las 1:125, 1:625, 1:3125. Strip 4 Lam neat, strip 5 Laf neat.<br />

Panel B: L. americanus test on 4 ng total plant DNA. Strip 1 Lam, strip 2 Laf, strip 3 Las.<br />

Table 1. Summary of limits of detection for HLB tests.<br />

Psyllid Infected Infected plant<br />

DNA plant total crude extract<br />

Test Cq 19.1-19.8 Cq 25.9-26.6 DNA exo nfo<br />

L. asiaticus 1:1000 1:100 ND 1:1000 1:3000<br />

L. africanus NA NA ND Laf 1:100<br />

Las 1:10<br />

Laf 1:250<br />

Las 1:25<br />

L. americanus NA NA 39 pg Lam 1:100 1:5<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 87<br />

4.17 Assessment of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus in the Psyllids, Diaphorina citri<br />

Collected from Murraya paniculata in Thailand<br />

Jantasorn, A. 1 , Duan Y.-P. 2 , Hoffman, M. 2 , Zhang, S. 3 , Puttamuk, T. 1 , Thaveechai, N. 1<br />

1 Department of <strong>Plant</strong> Pathology, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University, Bangkok,<br />

Thailand, 10900<br />

2 USDA-ARS-USHRL, Fort Pierce, FL, USA<br />

3 UF-IFAS Tropical Research and Education Center, Homestead, FL, USA<br />

Orange jasmine, Murraya paniculata, is a preferred alternative host for the Asian citrus psyllid,<br />

the primary vector of huanglongbing (HLB) citrus greening disease (Gasparoto et al., 2010). We<br />

collected Asian citrus psyllids on the alternative host Murraya paniculata from 10 diverse<br />

geographic regions of Thailand. Total genomic DNA was extracted from individual psyllids and<br />

evaluated for the presence of Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus using real-time PCR (Li et al., 2006).<br />

Additional sampling from citrus psyllids collected from infected citrus trees in Fort Pierce, FL<br />

during the summer of 2010 was included for comparison. Preliminary data show evidence of<br />

high titers of Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus in the U.S. psyllid isolates, while titer levels in Thailand<br />

appear to vary by location. The results show different titer levels among individual psyllid<br />

isolates in each of the provinces of Thailand. Samples from Chantaburi province display average<br />

titer level of HLB pathogen of 21.85 Ct value. Highest titer levels were found in isolates from<br />

Naknon Pathom province and Samut Sakhon with Ct values of 16.12 and 22.52, respectively.<br />

Few HLB studies have been conducted in Thailand and the southeast regions of Asia, where<br />

10 to 15% of tangerine trees are lost each year to HLB disease (Bové, 2006; Roistacher, 1996).<br />

Our work provides a first assessment of the infection frequency of the psyllids from<br />

M. paniculata in Thailand.<br />

References<br />

Bové, J.M. 2006. Huanglongbing: a destructive, newly emerging, century-old disease of citrus.<br />

Journal of <strong>Plant</strong> Pathology 88:7-37.<br />

Gasparoto, M.C.G. et al. 2010. First report of Ca. Liberibacter americanus transmission from<br />

Murraya paniculata to sweet orange by Diaphorina. Journal of <strong>Plant</strong> Pathology 92:546.<br />

Li, W.B., Hartung, J.S., Levy, L. 2006. Quantitative real-time PCR for detection and<br />

identification of Candidatus Liberibacter species associated with citrus huanglongbing.<br />

Journal of Microbiological Methods 66:104-115.<br />

Roistacher, C.N. 1996. The economics of living with citrus diseases: huanglongbing (greening)<br />

in Thailand, p. 279-285. In: Proceedings of the 13th Conference of the International<br />

Organization of Citrus Virologists, IOCV, Riverside, CA.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 88<br />

4.18 Liberibacter Reservoirs in Cities and Villages in the State of São Paulo, Brazil<br />

Lopes, S.A. 1 , Frare, G.F. 2 , Camargo, L.E.A. 2 , Wulff, N.A. 1 , Teixeira, D.C. 1 , Bassanezi, R.B. 1 ,<br />

Beattie, G.A.C. 3 , Ayres, A.J. 1<br />

1 Fundecitrus, Araraquara, Brazil<br />

2 ESALQ/Universidade de São Paulo, Piracicaba, Brazil<br />

3 University of Western Sydney, New South Wales, Australia<br />

All commercial citrus and the orange jasmine (Murraya exotica) are hosts of Candidatus<br />

Liberibacter americanus (Lam) and Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus (Las). Orange jasmine and a<br />

variety of limes, mandarins, and sweet oranges exhibiting yellow shoots are commonly found in<br />

urban areas in Brazil. The incidence of orange jasmine plants infected by Liberibacter and their<br />

potential as source of inoculum were assessed in two surveys. Ten to twenty leaves from each<br />

tree were processed for conventional and qPCR analysis. Liberibacter titers were compared with<br />

those on HLB-positive citrus growing in backyards and commercial orchards. Liberibacters were<br />

detected in 91 of 786 trees distributed in 10 of 76 cities and villages, and in most citrus trees<br />

sampled in the city of Araraquara. The yellow shoots and/or dieback exhibited by the<br />

PCR-positive orange jasmine were indistinguishable from those on PCR-negative trees. Lam was<br />

more common in the 2005-06 (96.6%) survey and Las in the 2009 (84.8%) survey, following the<br />

same trend in citrus from backyards and orchards. Orange jasmine symptoms were milder and<br />

developed less rapidly. Lam and Las titers averaged, respectively, 4.3 and 3.0 log cells/g tissue in<br />

orange jasmine compared to 5.5 and 7.3 in citrus. Since in urban areas those infected trees are<br />

not under any insect- or tree eradication-control program, they may have an important role for<br />

inciting and sustaining HLB epidemics. Also, since orange jasmine is propagated in open areas<br />

and is freely commercialized, asymptomatic trees might be spreading Lam and Las to HLB-free<br />

regions.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 89<br />

4.19 Pictorial Gallery of Foliar HLB Symptoms on Various Citrus Varieties and Citrus<br />

Relatives<br />

Robl, D.J., Riley, T.D, Gomez, H. USDA-APHIS-PPQ-CHRP, FL, USA<br />

Since the disease was first observed in Florida (August 2005), pathologists in the Citrus Health<br />

Response Program (CHRP) have had the opportunity to screen thousands of field samples<br />

collected by CHRP technicians at various locations throughout the state. Standard operating<br />

procedure (SOP) requires that prior to undergoing PCR analysis each sample must first be<br />

screened by a pathologist. Based on foliar symptoms alone, a decision is made as to whether or<br />

not a sample should be forwarded to the lab. Rather than visit each office, CHRP pathologists<br />

have, for the most part, relied on digital photos e-mailed directly to the pathologist. This has<br />

worked surprisingly well, and over the years, we have amassed a large photo archive of<br />

symptomatic leaves. This poster is meant to provide the viewer with a sampling of classical HLB<br />

foliar symptoms on various citrus varieties and some citrus relatives as well.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 90<br />

Session 5:<br />

Economics, Fruit<br />

Quality, and Crop<br />

Loss<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 91<br />

5.1 Evaluation of Chemical Flavor Compounds in Orange Juice from Multiple Harvests of<br />

Hamlin and Valencia Fruit from HLB-Symptomatic Versus Healthy Trees<br />

Baldwin, E. 1 , Bai, J. 1 , Dea, S. 1 , Plotto, A. 1 , Manthey, J. 1 , Rouseff, R.L. 2 , Irey, M.S. 3<br />

1 USDA-ARS, Winter Haven, FL, USA<br />

2 UF-IFAS Citrus Research and Education Center, Lake Alfred, FL, USA<br />

3 U.S. Sugar Corporation, Clewiston, FL, USA<br />

Fruit from HLB-affected trees are reported to be off-flavored. This study looked at flavor<br />

compounds in juice made from fruit harvested from 15+ trees symptomatic for HLB compared to<br />

healthy trees grown in the same area for multiple harvests of Hamlin (December/January 2009)<br />

and Valencia (April/June 2009). Fruit from HLB symptomatic trees were separated into<br />

asymptomatic (normal looking, HLBAS) and symptomatic (small, green, and lopsided, HLBS)<br />

fruit for comparison to healthy (H) fruit prior to juicing using a JBT extractor/pasteurizer. For<br />

Valencia, there were no differences in Brix, but HLB juices tended to have higher titratable<br />

acidity (TA), lower ratio (April), and higher oil (June). For Hamlin, Brix was higher in H juice<br />

(December), TA higher in HLBS (December), ratio lower in HLBS, and oil higher for HLBS<br />

juice (December). Healthy juice tended to have higher levels of sucrose and fructose, whereas<br />

glucose was variable, especially for HLBS juice. HLB juice had higher levels of citric acid<br />

(December Hamlin/April Valencia), but there were no differences for the other two<br />

harvests/cultivars. Malic acid tended to be lower in HLB juices. Limonin and nomilin were<br />

higher in HLB juices, especially HLBS, but were below reported thresholds. Gas<br />

chromatography-olfactometry (GC-O) research did not show differences between H and HLBAS<br />

juice, but observed some volatiles that were found either exclusively or at higher aroma intensity<br />

in either H or HLBS juices. There were more “green”/“fatty” aromas in HLBS, while there were<br />

more “sweet”/“fruity” components in H juices with respect to each other. These results are<br />

similar to those reported for 2007 and 2008 (Baldwin et al., 2010) except that with a larger<br />

sample size (15 trees versus 5-7 trees), there were less significant chemical differences,<br />

especially for HLBAS compared to H juice, due to a reduction in tree-to-tree variation.<br />

Reference<br />

Baldwin, E.A., Plotto, A., Manthey, J., McCollum, G., Bai, J., Irey, M., Cameron, R., Luzio, G.<br />

2010. Effect of Liberibacter infection (Huanglongbing disease) of citrus on orange fruit<br />

physiology and fruit/fruit juice quality: chemical and physical analyses. Journal of<br />

Agricultural and Food Chemistry 58:1247-1262.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 92<br />

5.2 Evaluation of Bitterness Caused by Huanglongbing Disease in Orange Juice<br />

Dea, S. 1 , Plotto, A. 1 , Manthey, J. 1 , Baldwin, E. 1 , Irey, M.S. 2<br />

1 USDA-ARS, Winter Haven, FL, USA<br />

2 U.S. Sugar Corporation, Clewiston, FL, USA<br />

As a preliminary step to understand and characterize what metabolites are responsible for the<br />

bitter off-favor of huanglongbing infected fruit, the thresholds of limonin, nomilin, and their<br />

combination in a sugar and acid matrix, as well as in healthy Valencia orange juice, were<br />

determined by taste panels. Food grade limonin and nomilin were added alone or in combination<br />

to a simple (sucrose and citric acid) or complex (sucrose, glucose, fructose, citric, and malic<br />

acid) matrix, or were added directly into orange juice. Thresholds were determined by taste<br />

panels, composed of 16 to 23 trained panelists, using a three-alternative forced choice (3-AFC)<br />

method (ASTM: E-679). In the simple matrix, the threshold of limonin was lower than nomilin.<br />

The synergetic effect of limonin and nomilin was significant in decreasing their individual<br />

thresholds. Interestingly, the thresholds of limonin and nomilin were lower in orange juice<br />

compared to the thresholds measured in the complex matrix. Our current results show that the<br />

threshold concentrations of limonin and nomilin when added to healthy Valencia orange juice<br />

are higher than the concentrations of those compounds measured in juice made with<br />

symptomatic HLB fruit, which was perceived bitter by a taste panel. Possibly, the lower sugar<br />

and higher acid content of HLB fruit decreased the threshold of those bitter compounds.<br />

Moreover, different concentrations of Valencia and Hamlin HLB-infected juice were blended<br />

into healthy juice to determine the detection and recognition thresholds. Panelists were able to<br />

detect the symptomatic HLB juice at different levels depending on the variety.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 93<br />

5.3 Sensory Evaluation of Juice Made with Fruit from Huanglongbing (HLB) Affected<br />

Trees<br />

Plotto, A. 1 , Valim, F. 2 , Rouseff, R.L. 3 , Dea, S. 1 , Manthey, J. 1 , Narciso, J. 1 , Bai, J. 1 , Irey, M.S. 4 ,<br />

Baldwin, E. 1<br />

1 USDA-ARS, Winter Haven, FL, USA<br />

2 FDOC, Lake Alfred, FL, USA<br />

3 UF-IFAS Citrus Research and Education Center, Lake Alfred, FL, USA<br />

4 U.S. Sugar Corporation, Clewiston, FL, USA<br />

Fruit and juice from trees affected with the huanglongbing (HLB) disease are reportedly having a<br />

bitter or salty taste, but a full description of the flavor of such juice has not been published.<br />

Hamlin and Valencia oranges were harvested from groves where trees were either healthy or<br />

affected with HLB, and included normal looking (non-symptomatic) and symptomatic fruit<br />

(small, green, and lopsided). Fruit was juiced using a JBT 391 extractor and pasteurized under<br />

simulated commercial conditions. A sensory trained panel evaluated the juice using eight aroma,<br />

eight flavor, and six taste and mouth feel descriptors. Samples of each juice were analyzed for<br />

sugars, acids, limonoids, and volatiles. In general, there was no or little difference between juice<br />

from healthy and non-symptomatic HLB fruit. However, for Hamlin and Valencia harvested in<br />

January and April, respectively, orange and fresh (Valencia only) aromas were lower; and<br />

sour/fermented, peppery/musty, and paint aromas were higher in juice from HLB-symptomatic<br />

than healthy fruit. Orange, fruity, and fresh flavors, as well as sweetness, were lower in juice<br />

from HLB-symptomatic fruit; while peel oil, sour/fermented, peppery/musty, and paint flavors,<br />

as well as sourness, saltiness, bitterness, metallic, and tingling attributes were rated higher. There<br />

were little or no differences between samples due to disease status for Valencia harvested in<br />

June. Chemical analyses revealed higher limonin and nomilin in Hamlin and Valencia harvested<br />

in April, and lower Brix/TA ratio in Valencia (April), which may explain some of the differences<br />

in taste.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 94<br />

5.4 Economic Considerations to Treating HLB with the Standard Protocol or an Enhanced<br />

Foliar Nutritional Program<br />

Morris, R.A., Muraro, R.P. Associate Extension Scientist and Economist, Professor of Food<br />

and Resource Economics, UF-IFAS Citrus Research and Education Center, Lake Alfred, FL,<br />

USA<br />

From an economic viewpoint, the main consequences of HLB are increased tree mortality,<br />

reduced yields, and increased costs of production. In 2006, one grower in the Immokalee area<br />

whose grove had a relatively high HLB incidence rejected the proposition that removal of<br />

infected trees was the only management option. Instead of removing infected trees, he began<br />

using an enhanced foliar nutrient management program that included SAR compounds reported<br />

to activate a tree’s disease resistance mechanisms and selected micronutrients (Zn, Mn, Mg, Bo,<br />

and Ca). After implementing the foliar nutrient management program, the visual appearance of<br />

the trees improved and an above average crop has been harvested sequentially for 4 years. Two<br />

types of groves were analyzed; one under the standard management protocol, and the other under<br />

an enhanced foliar nutritional program. The two categories of groves were a mature grove with<br />

15 + -year-old trees and an intermediate age grove with 4- to 10-year-old trees. It was assumed<br />

that resets would not survive to become productive under the enhanced foliar nutritional<br />

program. For the mature grove, the time to switch to the enhanced foliar nutrient program was<br />

when annual infection rates from HLB reached 3.9% at fruit prices of $1.50 per pound solids and<br />

4.4% at fruit prices of $1.25 per pound solids. For the 4- to 10-year-old grove, the annual HLB<br />

infection rates where a foliar nutrient program was preferable were the same.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 95<br />

5.5 When Should a Grower with HLB Stop Removing Trees?<br />

Irey, M.S. U.S. Sugar Corporation, Clewiston, FL, USA<br />

HLB was first found in Florida in late 2005 and is now widely distributed throughout the<br />

commercial citrus growing regions of Florida. Although no hard numbers are available, survey<br />

data indicate that the cumulative incidence of infected trees is in the range of 8-10% statewide.<br />

However, the estimated incidence varies across the state with the highest infection levels<br />

occurring in the south and the east coast. In some areas, infection levels within individual groves<br />

are approaching 100%; while in many other areas of the state, infection levels within individual<br />

groves remain less than 1-2%. When HLB was first discovered, the citrus industry was<br />

reasonably united in the approach that should be taken to manage the disease. The recommended<br />

practices included control of the insect vector, use of disease-free planting material, and the<br />

removal of infected trees to lower the inoculum load. However, as infection levels began to<br />

increase, many growers began looking at alternative treatments, mostly nutritional in nature; and,<br />

the HLB management decision has come down to “Should I continue to remove trees?” or<br />

“Should I switch to a nutritional program?” Unfortunately, the decision is much more complex<br />

than this and many factors, both biologic and economic, affect the decision. Factors which affect<br />

the decision include tree age at the decision point, current infection levels, estimated infection<br />

and production estimates going forward, the time horizon being evaluated, and the cost<br />

differentials between the different alternatives. A spreadsheet-based model has been developed<br />

to help growers evaluate their individual situations. Several scenarios will be presented which<br />

will illustrate when each management would be the most cost effective.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 96<br />

5.6 Use of Electronic Sensor Technology to Discriminate between Juices from<br />

Huanglongbing Infected and Healthy Orange Trees<br />

Bai, J. 1 , Dea, S. 1 , Plotto, A. 1 , Baldwin, E. 1 , Irey, M.S. 2<br />

1 USDA-ARS, Winter Haven, FL, USA<br />

2 U.S. Sugar Corporation, Clewiston, FL, USA<br />

Orange juice squeezed from huanglongbing (HLB) infected fruit may have altered flavor in<br />

comparison with juice from healthy fruit. It would be useful to detect and discriminate these<br />

juices from regular juice in a quality control program. Electronic tongue (e-tongue) and<br />

electronic nose (e-nose) are devices that mimic human sense of taste and olfaction, respectively,<br />

based on sensor arrays and pattern recognition systems. In this study, juices from asymptomatic<br />

(HLBa), symptomatic (HLBs), and healthy Valencia and Hamlin fruit were analyzed using<br />

AlphaMOS e-nose (FOX) and e-tongue (ASTREE) over two harvests per variety. One Hamlin<br />

harvest included fruit from trees grown under the Maury Boyd’s (MB) nutritional and plant<br />

defense spray program. A blended juice series with 50, 25, 12.5, and 6.25% HLBs juice balanced<br />

with the healthy juice, together with 100% HLBs and healthy juices were analyzed to determine<br />

the influence of HLBs on juice quality. Results were compared with sensory evaluation data.<br />

Healthy, HLBa, and HLBs juices were separated from each other by both e-nose and e-tongue<br />

for all varieties and harvest times. Juices from the MB program were well separated from those<br />

without MB application for both HLBa and HLBs; moreover, these juices were closer to healthy<br />

juice than non-MB-HLB juice in discrimination distance. There were clear trends in the principle<br />

component analysis plots when HLBs + healthy blend juice dilution series were analyzed by<br />

e-tongue, but not by e-nose. Discrimination between samples by electronic sensors agreed with<br />

sensory data in most cases.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 97<br />

5.7 A Regional Epidemiological Approach for Yield Loss Estimates Due to Candidatus<br />

Liberibacter Under Different Risk Scenarios<br />

Mora-Aguilera, G. 1 , Acevedo, G. 1 , López-Arroyo, J.I. 2 , Velázquez-Monreal, J.J. 3 , Gómez, R. 3 ,<br />

Robles-González, M.M. 3 , Salcedo, D. 4<br />

1 Colegio de Postgraduados, Instituto de Fitosanidad, Texcoco, Edo. de Méx., México<br />

2 INIFAP, Centro Regional de Investigaciones del Noreste. Río Bravo, Tam., México<br />

3 INIFAP, Centro de Investigación Regional del Pacífico Centro, Guadalajara, Jal., México<br />

4 Consultor Ext. IICA-México morag@colpos.mx<br />

Potential yield loss induced by Candidatus Liberibacter (LB) was conducted in Mexico using a<br />

comparative epidemiological approach as part of a governmental effort to assess the impact of<br />

HLB. Regional yield losses were estimated at 1-, 3-, and 5-year scenarios after the pathogen<br />

entrance in Mexico (Salcedo et al., 2010). The analysis was first focused on transforming<br />

historical spatial data from USA and Brazil to temporal progress at different regional levels<br />

(state, county, and field level) and modeling the resulting process. Clearly, three different<br />

temporal behaviors were found depending on the spatial dimension. Thus, Weibull, a flexible<br />

model, fit well with 0.98-0.99 R 2 values. Published fruit weight reduction data was also analyzed<br />

and weighted by citrus species susceptibility (Bassanezi et al., 2009). In order to use temporal<br />

models for predictive purposes, 23 Mexican estates were categorized on three epidemic risk<br />

categories using a principal component-cluster analysis based on host prevalence, climatic, and<br />

susceptibility indexes developed with the epidemic inductivity criterion. Host and clime<br />

variables, associated to two major components, comprised a 72-84% variance. Risk categories<br />

were associated to different temporal models based on their epidemic rate value, e.g., the highest<br />

risk with highest epidemic rate, to predict the proportion of counties and productive units with<br />

HLB. These proportions were related to scaled weight fruit reduction to estimate yield loss at<br />

state and national level. Multivariate analyses and modeling were performed with SAS ver. 6.10<br />

and yield estimates were done with MS Excel. Yield losses will be presented considering<br />

different citrus species and time and space scenarios.<br />

Acknowledgement<br />

Project supported by SAGARPA-SENASICA PM09-4002 and CONACYT-INIFAP<br />

PM10-4032.<br />

References<br />

Bassanezi, R., Montesino, L., Sanches, E. 2009. Effects of huanglongbing on fruit quality of<br />

sweet orange cultivars in Brazil. European Journal of <strong>Plant</strong> Pathology. DOI<br />

10.1007/s10658-009-9506-3.<br />

Salcedo, D., Hinojosa, R., Mora, G., Covarrubias, I., DePaolis, F., Cintora, C., y Mora, S. 2010.<br />

Evaluación del impacto económico de huanglongbing (HLB) en la cadena citrícola<br />

Mexicana. IICA-México. 132 p.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 98<br />

Session 6:<br />

Epidemiology<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 99<br />

6.1 Five Years of Experience with Huanglongbing in Florida: Current Assessment; How<br />

Did We Get Here?<br />

Halbert, S.E. 1 , Manjunath, K.L. 2 , Ramadugu, C. 3 , Lee, R.F. 2<br />

1 Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of <strong>Plant</strong> Industry,<br />

Gainesville, FL, USA<br />

2 National Clonal Germplasm Repository for Citrus and Dates, USDA-ARS, Riverside, CA, USA<br />

3 Department of Botany and <strong>Plant</strong> Sciences, University of California at Riverside, CA, USA<br />

Huanglongbing (citrus greening, HLB) was discovered in Florida in August 2005. During the<br />

5-year period since its discovery, both citrus acreage and production have declined, but other<br />

factors (natural events, market fluctuations, and development) make it difficult to determine how<br />

much of the loss is due to HLB. Spread of the disease in Florida has been rapid. Data indicate<br />

that the initial population of psyllids was free of Liberibacters. Probably, the insects encountered<br />

the pathogens in Miami-Dade County in 2000. DPI survey data indicate that the disease<br />

expanded its range approximately 36 miles per year, three times faster than estimated for Brazil<br />

(Gottwald, 2007). Spread was due to psyllid flight and movement on bulk citrus fruit and on<br />

plants for sale. Retail sales of citrus and of orange jasmine (Murraya paniculata) played a role in<br />

disease distribution. Florida has developed stringent regulations for propagation of citrus and<br />

related plants. Our data indicate these regulations are successful for production of clean plants<br />

and preventing further spread of HLB through plant sales, especially for trees intended for<br />

commercial groves. Area-wide treatments for psyllid vectors also have been successful, lowering<br />

the numbers of psyllids in production areas. Inoculum control (removing infected plants) has<br />

been more difficult for Florida. Many infected blocks have not been removed because of<br />

financial considerations, leaving large inoculum reservoirs. Some growers have had moderate<br />

success using nutrition-based programs, but it is doubtful if a replanted block could become<br />

productive in a high-inoculum environment. More research is needed for a long-term solution.<br />

Reference<br />

Gottwald, T.R., da Graça, J.V., Bassanezi, R.B. 2007. Citrus huanglongbing: the pathogen and<br />

its impact. Online. <strong>Plant</strong> Health Progress doi: 10.1094/PHP-2007-0906-01-RV.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 100<br />

6.2 Designing Sampling Schemes to Maximize the Probability of Early Detection of a<br />

Huanglongbing Outbreak<br />

Parnell, S.R. 1 , Gottwald, T.R. 2 , van den Bosch, F. 1<br />

1 Centre for Mathematical and Computational Biology, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, UK<br />

2 USDA, ARS, U.S. Horticultural Research Laboratory, Fort Pierce, FL, USA<br />

Detecting an outbreak of huanglongbing (HLB) at low incidence is critical if control efforts are<br />

to be implemented in time to be effective. If detection of an outbreak occurs when epidemic<br />

incidence is already at even a moderate level, then little can be done to control the outbreak.<br />

Advances in diagnostic tools are an important facet in achieving early detection but are not<br />

enough alone. Even the most accurate and reliable diagnostic will not help with early detection if<br />

infected host trees are missed during rounds of monitoring. To achieve this, it is important to get<br />

the sampling design right, i.e., determine how many samples to take and from which blocks and<br />

trees. Here, we use mathematical modeling techniques to determine optimal sampling designs<br />

which maximize the probability of detecting an HLB outbreak while it is still at low incidence.<br />

By stochastically generating epidemics of HLB in specific host distributions, we can simulate<br />

monitoring programmes and determine the probability to detect an outbreak before it reaches a<br />

predetermined incidence. Conversely, using a Bayesian approach, we can also calculate the<br />

incidence an outbreak has reached when detected for the first time. We show how the probability<br />

of early detection declines with reduced sample size and how this varies for different sampling<br />

patterns. The method allows growers and regulators to make informed choices on how much<br />

sampling resource to commit to early detection surveillance based on factors such as the<br />

detection-incidence required and the amount of risk that is acceptable in achieving this.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 101<br />

6.3 Candidatus Liberibacter africanus Subspecies capensis on Calodendrum capense in<br />

South Africa<br />

Phahladira, M.N.B. 1,2 , Viljoen, R. 2 , Pietersen, G. 1,2<br />

1 ARC-<strong>Plant</strong> Protection Research Institute, Division of Microbiology and <strong>Plant</strong> Pathology, Private<br />

Bag X134, Queenswood, Pretoria 0001, South Africa<br />

2 Department of Microbiology and <strong>Plant</strong> Pathology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South<br />

Africa<br />

Determining potential alternate hosts to citrus of Candidatus Liberibacter africanus (Laf)<br />

amongst the indigenous plants of South Africa will help to make control by disease pressure<br />

reduction more efficient. In this study, indigenous plants mainly of the Citrus family (Rutaceae)<br />

were tested to determine if they are natural hosts of the pathogen. Symptomatic and nonsymptomatic<br />

leaf and petiole samples of numerous indigenous Rutaceous species, primarily<br />

Calodendrum capense (Cape Chestnut) were collected from areas near citrus orchards, in<br />

gardens, in natural habitats, or from botanical gardens. The presence of Laf was tested for by<br />

DNA extraction and using a published conventional PCR as well as a multiplex PCR containing<br />

an internal control directed at a plant gene. Except for Cape Chestnut, none of the indigenous<br />

plants yielded Liberibacter specific bands following PCR. A number of Cape Chestnut samples,<br />

however, tested positive for the presence of Liberibacter DNA. Direct DNA sequencing of the<br />

PCR products from a number of these plants confirmed the presence of Ca. L. africanus<br />

subspecies capensis (LafC). A real-time PCR protocol, capable of specific detection of LafC,<br />

was developed. Using this, a total of 263 Cape Chestnut samples, collected from Mpumalanga,<br />

Limpopo, Gauteng, KwaZulu-Natal, Western Cape, and Eastern Cape were tested. LafC was<br />

found present in numerous trees from each region, including the Eastern Cape where Laf is<br />

absent. Analysis of an Eastern Cape site where Cape chestnut trees have grown in close<br />

proximity to citrus groves for more than 15 years suggests that LafC does not spread to citrus<br />

naturally, in spite of the presence of Trioza erytreae in the general area. This is based on the fact<br />

that 43 of 44 Cape chestnut trees were LafC infected, while 273 citrus trees, all within a<br />

maximum of 10 m from any given infected Cape chestnut, were negative.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 102<br />

6.4 Distribution of Psyllids Positive for Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus in Citrus Groves<br />

in Southwest Florida<br />

Halbert, S.E. 1 , Manjunath, K.L. 2 , Ramadugu, C. 3 , Mears, P. 4 , Lee, R.F. 2<br />

1 Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of <strong>Plant</strong> Industry,<br />

Gainesville, FL, USA<br />

2 National Clonal Germplasm Repository for Citrus and Dates, USDA-ARS, Riverside, CA, USA<br />

3 Department of Botany and <strong>Plant</strong> Sciences, University of California at Riverside, CA, USA<br />

4 Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of <strong>Plant</strong> Industry, Citrus<br />

Health Response Program, Immokalee, FL, USA<br />

Florida Citrus Health Response Program inspectors collected psyllid samples from 4 trees at<br />

each of 7 points in 12 grove blocks in SW Florida between January and August 2009. Points<br />

included SE corner, mid-point of the eastern edge, NE corner, NW corner, SW corner, center<br />

point, and a floating point designated by the grower (center of the southern border if grower did<br />

not designate a point). Psyllids were counted and sent to Riverside, CA for real-time PCR<br />

analysis for detection of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus (Las). There was no clear difference<br />

in average numbers of insects in the samples from different points, but psyllids were most likely<br />

to be encountered on the eastern edges of the blocks, particularly the SE corners. Psyllids were<br />

most likely to be positive for Las on the eastern edges of the blocks. Several of the blocks were<br />

in adjacent organic and conventionally managed groves. Map plots showing the locations of<br />

positive psyllid samples indicated that the disease was spreading from the organic grove into the<br />

conventionally managed one.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 103<br />

6.5 Seasonal Prevalence of Citrus Huanglongbing (Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus) in a<br />

Central Florida Sweet Orange Grove<br />

Parkunan, V., Wang, N.-Y., Ebert, T.A., Rogers, M.E., Dewdney, M.M. UF-IFAS Citrus<br />

Research and Education Center, Lake Alfred, FL, USA<br />

Citrus huanglongbing (HLB or greening) is the most serious citrus disease worldwide. The Asian<br />

species of the bacterial causal agent, Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus (Las), is responsible for<br />

HLB in Florida and is transmitted by the Asian citrus psyllid (ACP), Diaphorina citri.<br />

Considerable gaps exist in understanding the disease transmission and epidemiology. Seasonal<br />

trends in Las incidence in ACP and citrus populations have been observed but they are not well<br />

defined. Understanding the seasonal variation of HLB is critical to develop time-bound<br />

management strategies for effective HLB control. An Earlygold grove in Orange county Florida<br />

was selected to examine seasonal prevalence of HLB over a 3-year period. Two hundred trees<br />

were selected from 10 consecutive rows. One leaf/tree was randomly picked every fortnight.<br />

Sample collection began at the end of June 2010 with collections ongoing. For qPCR detection<br />

of Las, the midribs of five random leaves were pooled to obtain 40 samples/date. An estimated<br />

Las prevalence in the branches was generated from the pools with PooledInfRate v3.<br />

Simultaneously, ACPs were collected from the same location to compare the seasonal prevalence<br />

of Las in citrus branches and ACPs. Las prevalence increased (from 0.14, 0.20, and 0.21 to 0.27)<br />

from June to September. The data from ACP are still being processed. Comparing the data from<br />

ACP and citrus trees could provide more information on seasonal variation in Las prevalence in<br />

both the vector and the host, and thereby enhancing our management strategies by identifying the<br />

essential periods for ACP control to prevent HLB transmission.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 104<br />

6.6 A Mathematical Model for Transmission of HLB by Psyllids<br />

Chiyaka, C., Singer, B., Halbert, S.E., van Bruggen, A.H.C. Emerging Pathogens Institute,<br />

University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA<br />

A mathematical model of the transmission dynamics of HLB between its psyllid vector and<br />

citrus host has been developed to understand and assess the mechanisms involved in pathogen<br />

acquisition from and transfer to host plants. Citrus flush is the basic unit. Spread is modeled from<br />

flush to flush within one tree. Using parameters from literature, simulations show dynamics in<br />

vector and host populations as the tree approaches complete infection. Simulation results of flush<br />

infection and HLB symptom development throughout a tree are realistic. There is widespread<br />

discussion about the management strategies that would curb HLB spread. Epidemiological<br />

research indicates that rogueing infected trees would be needed besides psyllid control. Only<br />

symptomatic trees testing positive for Las are removed, while infectious non-symptomatic trees<br />

remain. The model will be used to assess the effectiveness of different control methods such as<br />

rogueing of trees, removal of flush, application of nutrient solutions, use of insecticides, and<br />

different combinations of these strategies. Preliminary results show that the numbers of<br />

asymptomatic infectious flush quickly become greater than symptomatic flush, indicating that<br />

removal of symptomatic tissues may not be effective at controlling HLB. Although vector<br />

activity is essential for initial infection in a tree, it is not necessary for continued infection within<br />

a tree since infection can occur from flush to flush. This makes spraying psyllids less effective<br />

once a tree becomes infected. Migration of psyllids from tree to tree will be added to the model<br />

in the near future.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 105<br />

6.7 Potential Spread of Huanglongbing Through Soil<br />

Nunes da Rocha, U., Dickstein, E.R., van Bruggen, A.H.C. Department of <strong>Plant</strong> Pathology and<br />

Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA<br />

Huanglongbing (HLB) emerged in Florida in 2005 and has spread rapidly throughout the State.<br />

The bacterium associated with this disease (Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus, Las) has not been<br />

isolated consistently and Koch’s postulates have not been fulfilled. Las is a symbiont of the<br />

psyllid Diaphorina citri, which transmits the pathogen to citrus. Other potential avenues of<br />

transmission and spread of Las have not been investigated yet. When HLB-infected trees are<br />

removed, young trees are often planted in the same planting hole. Replant disease is a common<br />

phenomenon for other fruit trees. In 2009-2010, we tested if Las could be transmitted through<br />

soil. One year after planting 120 mandarin seedlings in soil collected underneath HLB-positive<br />

citrus trees from two groves, Las qPCR tests were positive for two symptomatic seedlings.<br />

Asymptomatic trees in soil from HLB-positive groves, in autoclaved soil, and in potting mix<br />

tested negative in Las qPCR tests. These results could mean that nonpathogenic Ca. Liberibacter<br />

species are common in soil and endosphere but test positive with qPCR (and that the symptoms<br />

were nonspecific) or that pathogenic Las is transmitted through soil besides psyllids. The<br />

experiment on soil transmission will be repeated; nematodes, protozoa, and root residues will be<br />

isolated from soil and tested for Las by qPCR. Nematode and protozoa species that test positive<br />

will be used in transmission tests.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 106<br />

Session 7:<br />

International Citrus<br />

Industries,<br />

Regulation, and<br />

Grower Experiences<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 107<br />

7.1 Laws, Huanglongbing <strong>Management</strong>, and the Current Status of the Disease in São<br />

Paulo, Brazil<br />

Belasque, J., Jr. 1 , Ayres, A.J. 1 , Barbosa, J.C. 2 , Massari, C.A. 1 , Bové, J.M. 3<br />

1 Fundecitrus, Araraquara, Brazil<br />

2 FCAV/UNESP, Jaboticabal, Brazil<br />

3 INRA and University Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2, Bordeaux, France<br />

Huanglongbing (HLB) was first reported in São Paulo State (SPS), Brazil, in March 2004.<br />

A survey conducted in SPS in 2010 estimated that 1.87% of the total number of sweet orange<br />

trees in SPS were symptomatic. The main producing areas in SPS (Center and South) presented<br />

the highest HLB incidences (3.5% and 2.0%, respectively). In 2005, the Federal Government<br />

approved the first regulatory legislation, imposing, among others, the mandatory eradication of<br />

all HLB-affected trees. In 2006 and 2008, new regulatory rules were ordered in an effort to<br />

reinforce growers to adopt the recommended practices for HLB management. However, in spite<br />

of the rules, the regulatory agencies were not efficient and only a small number of growers<br />

completely followed the law. New foci were detected in areas hitherto not affected and the<br />

disease increased rapidly in the affected ones. With only about one-third of the citrus acreage<br />

being under effective HLB management, the many non-managed orchards are major handicaps<br />

to statewide successful management. It is estimated that 6 to 8 million trees have been eradicated<br />

in SPS since 2004. The recommended practices for preventive HLB management are based on (i)<br />

inoculum reduction by frequent removal of symptomatic trees, (ii) control of psyllid vector<br />

populations by insecticide treatments, and (iii) use of healthy trees from insect-proof, covered<br />

nurseries in the case of resets. This three-pronged, short-term system is the only one that keeps<br />

most of the orchard trees free of HLB until new HLB-resistant trees become available as a longterm<br />

solution. The current HLB status of SPS citrus farms that have adopted the three-pronged<br />

system during the last 6 years will be presented and discussed.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 108<br />

7.2 Distribution of Citrus Huanglongbing in the Dominican Republic<br />

Matos, L. 1,7 , Hilf, M.E. 2 , Cayetano, X. 1 , Feliz, A. 1,3 , Puello, H. 4 , Méndez, F. 5 , Borbón, J. 6 ,<br />

Folimonova, S.Y. 7<br />

1 IDIAF-CENTA, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic<br />

2 USDA-ARS, Fort Pierce, FL, USA<br />

3 DSV-Ministerio de Agricultura, Dominican Republic<br />

4 Consorcio Citrícola del Este, Hato Mayor, Dominican Republic<br />

5 Consorcio Cítricos Dominicanos, Dominican Republic<br />

6 Facultad Agronomía-UASD, Universidad Autónoma de Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic<br />

7 UF-IFAS Citrus Research and Education Center, Lake Alfred, FL, USA<br />

Huanglongbing (HLB) is globally the most economically important disease of citrus. HLB was<br />

first found in the Dominican Republic in September 2008 in Puerto Plata Province on the north<br />

coast. Symptomatic trees were sampled in three different directions from the first identified point<br />

of infection. HLB was found in the northwest near the Haitian border approximately 70 km<br />

away, toward the east coast and to the south toward the middle of the country. Two positive<br />

samples also were found in Azua Province approximately 300 km south of Puerto Plata. One<br />

year after HLB was found in Puerto Plata, it was found almost simultaneously in the main central<br />

and eastern citrus producing areas. The presence of the bacterium (Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus)<br />

was confirmed in samples by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of sequence of the<br />

outer membrane protein gene. Out of 4,100 samples, 1,115 were positive and the disease is<br />

present in 13 of 32 provinces, including the three major citrus producing areas. The distribution<br />

of HLB indicates that factors other than psyllids could be involved in disease spread. Since the<br />

psyllid and citrus are present throughout the country, HLB is expected to spread to all regions.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 109<br />

7.3 Citrus Huanglongbing in Cuba: Current Situation, <strong>Management</strong>, and Main Research<br />

López, D. 1 , Luis, M. 2 , Collazo, C. 2 , Batista, L. 2 , Peña, I. 2 , González, C. 2 , Pérez, J.L. 2 , Zamora,<br />

V. 2 , Borroto, A. 1 , Pérez, D. 1 , Alonso, E. 3 , Acosta, I. 3 , Llauger, R. 2 , Casín, J.C. 4<br />

1 Empresa de Cítricos Ciego de Ávila, Carretera a Ceballos Km 9 ½, Ceballos, C.P 69230 Ciego<br />

de Ávila, Cuba. E-mail: nelson@ecca.co.cu<br />

2 Instituto de Investigaciones en Fruticultura Tropical, Ave. 7ma # 3005, Playa, C.P 11300,<br />

Ciudad de La Habana, Cuba. E-mail: despacho@iift.cu<br />

3 Empresa de Cítricos Victoria de Girón, Finca San José, Torriente, Matanzas, C.P 44540, Cuba.<br />

E-mail: irina@citrovg.cu<br />

4 Centro Nacional de Sanidad Vegetal, Ayuntamiento No 231, Plaza de la Revolución, C.P<br />

10600, Ciudad de La Habana, Cuba. E-mail: interior@sanidadvegetal.cu<br />

Citrus huanglongbing (HLB) was found in Cuba in 2007 and associated with Ca. L. asiaticus,<br />

whereas its vector, Diaphorina citri Kuwayama, was present from 1999 and has settled<br />

throughout the country. The presence of the pathogen was confirmed by PCR in all citrus<br />

commercial areas and residential sectors from 2007 to 2008. Consequently, a management<br />

program was established including staff training, systematic inspection, and eradication of<br />

symptomatic plants mainly for new plantations, vector monitoring and control using systemic<br />

and contact insecticides and mineral oils, and sowing with certified planting material in blocks<br />

isolated from possible inoculum sources. Furthermore, the national citrus development program<br />

was restructured towards intensive and sustainable citrus growing, which involves the search for<br />

new sources of revenue such as recovery of vegetative carbon from eradicated citrus trees and<br />

short-term production crops interspersed with citrus plantations. To understand disease evolution<br />

and evaluate management efficiency, epidemiologic studies are carried out in blocks of the major<br />

citrus areas in the country. Research related to bacterial diagnosis and characterization, vector<br />

biology and behavior, evolution of disease symptoms, sanitation through in vitro shoot tips<br />

grafting, and the influence of HLB in citrus production is conducted. Nowadays, differences are<br />

observed in HLB behavior from citrus areas with dissimilar epidemiological scenes and<br />

management strategies; nevertheless, the incidence of symptomatic plants in new plantations and<br />

D. citri populations has been reduced in areas with efficient eradication and vector control. These<br />

results indicate that a rigorous and more extensive or regional strategy, which should involve<br />

commercial areas and small producers with state regulations for the residential sector, will<br />

guarantee better results in managing the disease.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 110<br />

7.4 Spreading and Symptoms of Huanglongbing in Mexican Lime Groves in the State of<br />

Colima, Mexico<br />

Robles-González, M.M. 1 , Velázquez-Monreal, J.J. 1 , Manzanilla Ramirez, M.A. 1 , Orozco<br />

Santos, M. 1 , Flores Virgen, R. 2 , Medina Urrutia, V.M. 3 , Carrillo Medrano, S.H. 1<br />

1 INIFAP, Colima, Mexico<br />

2 CESAVECOL, Colima, Mexico<br />

3 Universidad de Guadalajara - CUCBA, Jalisco, Mexico<br />

Colima State, Mexico is the most important producing area of Mexican lime in the world. The<br />

Asian citrus psyllid (ACP), Diaphorina citri Kuwayama, reached Mexico in 2002 and was<br />

reported in Colima State in 2004. Huanglongbing (HLB) was first reported in Yucatan State in<br />

2009 where it was detected in a backyard tree. In Colima State, HLB was reported in 2010.<br />

Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus has been detected in samples from HLB symptomatic Mexican<br />

lime trees and the ACP vector. This is a preliminary study that describes spreading of HLB in the<br />

first grove where it was detected in Colima State and also in the region. The size of the first<br />

grove where HLB was detected was 20 hectares; the total number of trees was 2,909. In April<br />

2010, five trees were detected showing HLB symptoms, being 0.2% of incidence, and this<br />

disease was confirmed by PCR. The accumulated incidence of diseased trees by visual symptoms<br />

were 1.0, 5.5, 15.7, 29.5, and 33.0% for the months of May, June, July, August, and September,<br />

respectively. In Colima State, there are 4,555 groves and 595 groves were sampled from April to<br />

October 2010 and HLB symptomatic trees were found in 21% of these groves. The common<br />

symptom that has been observed in diseased trees is an asymmetric leaf mottling, as well as color<br />

inversion in the fruits, and a yield reduction.<br />

References<br />

Bové, J.M. 2006. Huanglongbing: a destructive, newly-emerging, century-old disease of citrus.<br />

Journal of <strong>Plant</strong> Pathology 88(1):7-37.<br />

Halbert, S.E., Manjunath, K.L. 2004. Asian citrus psyllids (Sternorrhyncha: Psyllidae) and<br />

greening disease of citrus: a literature review and assessment of risk in Florida. Florida<br />

Entomologist 87(3):401-402.<br />

Trujillo-Arriaga, J. 2010. Situación actual, regulación y manejo del HLB en México. 2º Taller<br />

internacional sobre el huanglongbing y el psilido asiático de los cítricos. Mérida, Yucatán,<br />

México.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 111<br />

7.5 The Asian Citrus Psyllid/Huanglongbing Detection, Treatment, and Regulatory<br />

Program in California<br />

Galindo, T. California Dept. of Food and Agriculture, Van Nuys, CA, USA<br />

Asian citrus psyllid (ACP) was first found in California in August 2008. Since then, the<br />

California Department of Food and Agriculture (CDF) has partnered with the United States<br />

Department of Agriculture, the county agricultural commissioners, and the citrus industry to<br />

develop a plan to inhibit the spread of ACP and to survey for huanglongbing (HLB). The ACP<br />

detection system consists of government operated yellow panel traps and visual survey in urban<br />

areas and in areas surrounding commercial citrus, while the citrus industry conducts trapping in<br />

commercial groves. The ACP treatment system consists of foliar sprays of cyfluthrin and soil<br />

applications of imidacloprid around ACP find sites out to a 400 meter radius and is funded<br />

jointly by CDFA and industry. The ACP regulatory system restricts the movement of ACP host<br />

material within and out of designated quarantine areas extending up to 20 miles from find sites in<br />

order to inhibit the artificial spread of ACP. The HLB survey system consists of testing captured<br />

ACP for HLB and of collecting suspect plant samples for testing, and to date no HLB has been<br />

found. In addition, a jointly operated outreach campaign has raised awareness of these pests<br />

throughout the state; and finally, a state task force consisting of experts from California, Florida,<br />

and Texas meets periodically to review operations and to recommend any changes which could<br />

enhance the effectiveness of the program.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 112<br />

7.6 Detection and Reporting of Asian Citrus Psyllid and Huanglongbing in Commercial<br />

Citrus Within California: An Industry Program<br />

Taylor, B.J., Polek, M.L., Batkin, T. Citrus Research Board, Visalia, CA, USA<br />

The California citrus industry, through legislation and assessments, funds the work of field<br />

technicians to detect and report findings of Asian citrus psyllid (ACP) and huanglongbing (HLB)<br />

in areas of commercial citrus production. Through the use of visual observation and trapping<br />

protocols, field technicians place and service yellow sticky panel traps for the detection of adult<br />

ACP and conduct visual observations for the presence of ACP and HLB throughout California.<br />

Field technicians use ruggedized personal digital assistants (PDAs) and wireless technologies to<br />

find, locate, and report findings. Field data and laboratory results are merged into a database,<br />

allowing all samples to be tracked from the field through laboratory analysis. Results are<br />

reported to stakeholders through a web-based graphical information system interface.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 113<br />

7.7 Citrus Health Research Forum: A National Research Effort<br />

Polek, M.L. 1 , Wisler, G. 2<br />

1 California Citrus Research Board, Visalia, CA, USA<br />

2 USDA, ARS, GWCC-BLTSVL, Beltsville, MD, USA<br />

In 2007, the Citrus Health Response Plan (CHRP) was established as a national program and is a<br />

collaborative effort involving growers, federal and state regulatory personnel, and researchers.<br />

The Citrus Health Science and Technology Coordinating Group was formed as part of its<br />

organizational structure in December 2009. The Group’s approach to planning research is<br />

outcome-based, where emphasis is placed on the products of research - to manage or prevent<br />

HLB - even as a project is designed. This differs from evidenced-based research in which<br />

conclusions are drawn as data are analyzed. Three outcomes were identified: (1) how can groves<br />

currently affected by ACP and HLB remain productive, (2) how can the spread of ACP and HLB<br />

be prevented or slowed, and (3) what genetic and horticultural strategies can be pursued to keep<br />

groves free of ACP and HLB. These desired outcomes were used to organize the first Research<br />

Forum in June 2010 in Denver, CO. Participants assembled into three separate groups according<br />

to the outcomes and discussed what is known and what research is being conducted regarding<br />

that subject area. An inventory of research projects conducted within the United States and<br />

poster abstracts from the Denver meeting are available on the USDA APHIS web site:<br />

http://www.aphis.usda.gov/plant_health/cphst/ index.shtml. Notes from each of the outcome<br />

group breakout sessions are available on the USDA ARS web site:<br />

http://www.ars.usda.gov/citrusgreening/.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 114<br />

7.8 The Identification and Distribution of Citrus Greening Disease in Jamaica<br />

Oberheim, A.P., Brown, S.E., McLaughlin, W.A. Department of Basic Medical Sciences,<br />

University of the West Indies, Mona, Kinston 7, Jamaica<br />

Citrus huanglongbing (HLB), also known as citrus greening disease, is a devastating bacterial<br />

disease that affects all varieties of citrus, as well as citrus hybrids. Citrus HLB is caused by the<br />

Candidatus Liberibacter ssp. bacteria, of which there are three known species. These are Ca. L.<br />

asiaticus, Ca. L africanus, and Ca. L. americanus (Deng et al., 2008). Citrus leaf samples were<br />

collected island-wide from several varieties of citrus trees that appeared to be symptomatic. The<br />

symptoms observed were blotchy mottle and asymmetrical yellowing of the leaves, along with<br />

lopsided fruits and poor fruit quality. A total of 167 samples were tested for the presence of<br />

citrus greening using the primer pair OI1 and OI2c, of which 72% were positive. Positive<br />

samples were observed island-wide from all 14 parishes. The bacterium was found to be present<br />

in several species of citrus, including Citrus sinensis (orange), Citrus aurantium (sour orange),<br />

Citrus tangerine (tangerine), Citrus × paradisi (grapefruit), Citrus aurantifolia (West Indian<br />

lime), Citrus latifolia (Bearss lime), Citrus grandis (pommelo), and Citrus jambhiri (rough<br />

lemon). The HLB bacterium was also detected in the hybrids Citrus reticulata × Citrus paradisi<br />

(ugli) and ortanique. The most severe symptoms were observed in limes, and the least severe<br />

symptoms were observed in grapefruits. Select samples were cloned and sequenced, and blast<br />

analysis showed that the sequences were 99% similar to that of Ca L. asiaticus from Florida,<br />

Brazil, and Cuba. The results obtained indicate that the disease is widespread across Jamaica,<br />

and therefore measures such as removal and destruction of infected trees should be employed as<br />

a means of disease control.<br />

Reference<br />

Deng, X., Chen, J., Feng, Z., Shan, Z., Guo, H., Zhu, J, Li, H., Civerolo, E.L. 2008.<br />

Identification and characterization of the huanglongbing bacterium in pummelo from<br />

multiple locations in Guangdong, P. R. China. <strong>Plant</strong> Disease 92:513-518.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 115<br />

7.9 Fitting a Spatial Analysis Grid for Research on Huanglongbing in Mexico<br />

Aldama-Aguilera, C., Olvera-Vargas, L.A., Galindo-Mendoza, M.G. Sistema Nacional de<br />

Vigilancia Epidemiológica Fitosanitaria, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, Sierra<br />

Leona N° 550, Lomas II Sección, S.L.P., Mexico<br />

Since the official report of huanglongbing (HLB) in Mexico in July 2009 to date, the bacterium<br />

has been detected in seven states. At a large spatial scale, HLB occurs in citrus plantings that are<br />

somewhat to highly discontinuous across most regions; many of them are solitary trees in<br />

backyards. This complicates determining the spatial pattern of the disease to draw conclusions<br />

concerning spread. The aim of this study was to generate a methodology for regional research on<br />

making management decisions regarding huanglongbing. Weather records from the National<br />

Weather Service and basic thematic mapping from INEGI were used. The information was<br />

stored and worked into the Geographical Information System ArcGIS 9.3, which, through<br />

multicriteria-operations and processed satellite images, we obtained the physical and climate<br />

conditions and potential risk of the bacterium and its vector, Diaphorina citri. Furthermore, we<br />

employed the MAXENT model (Maximum Entropy) with 19 climatic variables to extrapolate<br />

the autocorrelation sequences between the sites with HLB. A grid with 2381 cells, that covers all<br />

the country, was created; each one of the cells measures 15 minutes of latitude and 20 minutes of<br />

longitude. Thirty grid cells with highest risks were chosen to propose research nodes in areas<br />

with or without HLB in commercial citrus orchards and backyard trees.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 116<br />

Session 8:<br />

Host-Pathogen<br />

Interactions<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 117<br />

8.1 Examination of Stages of the HLB Disease Development in Citrus Trees<br />

Folimonova, S.Y. 1 , Achor, D.S. 1 , Hilf, M.E. 2<br />

1 UF-IFAS Citrus Research and Education Center, Lake Alfred, FL, USA<br />

2 USDA-ARS-USHRL, Fort Pierce, FL, USA<br />

Citrus greening (huanglongbing, HLB) is a destructive disease of citrus, and its presence in the<br />

United States is a major threat to the <strong>entire</strong> citrus industry. The causal agent of HLB in Florida is<br />

thought to be Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus. Understanding the early events in HLB infection<br />

are critical to develop effective methods to combat the disease. In order to characterize the stages<br />

of disease development, we conducted cytopathological studies following the progression of the<br />

infection in greenhouse-grown citrus trees graft-inoculated with Ca. L. asiaticus-containing<br />

material. An increasing degree of microscopic aberrations was observed as the disease symptoms<br />

progressed. The ability to observe the bacterium in the infected tissue also correlated with the<br />

degree of the disease progression. Large numbers of bacterial cells were found in phloem sieve<br />

tubes in tissue samples from pre-symptomatic young flushes. In contrast, we did not observe the<br />

bacteria in highly symptomatic leaf samples. Interestingly, these observations correlated with our<br />

recent findings made upon examination of the seed vascular bundle tissue from young immature<br />

and mature fruits collected from HLB-infected field trees. Large numbers of Ca. L. asiaticus<br />

bacteria were visualized in the sieve elements of the seed coats of the majority of seeds sampled<br />

from immature fruits, while no intact bacterial cells could be detected in these tissues from seeds<br />

of mature fruits. Thus, we can hypothesize that for a short period of time after movement of<br />

Ca. L. asiaticus into a growing part of an infected tree, the majority of the pathogen population is<br />

present as live bacteria. Later, as the symptoms develop and tissues mature, most of the bacteria<br />

become non-viable.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 118<br />

8.2 New Defense Response Insights of Sweet Orange Infected with Two Candidatus<br />

Liberibacter Species<br />

Mafra, V.S. 1 , Martins, P.K. 1 , Locali-Fabris, E.C. 1 , Ribeiro-Alves, M. 2 , Francisco, C.S. 1 ,<br />

Freitas-Astúa, J. 1,3 , Kishi, L.T. 1 , Machado, M.A. 1<br />

1 Centro APTA Citros Sylvio Moreira-IAC, São Paulo, Brazil<br />

2 Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil<br />

3 EMBRAPA Mandioca e Fruticultura Tropical, Bahia, Brazil<br />

Huanglongbing (HLB) is a destructive disease of citrus that is caused in Brazil by two fastidious,<br />

phloem-inhabiting bacteria species: Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus and Candidatus<br />

Liberibacter americanus. HLB affects all known citrus species and relatives with little known<br />

tolerance. Upon recognition of a pathogen, plants often activate a complex series of responses<br />

that lead to the local and systemic induction of a broad spectrum of antimicrobial defenses. In<br />

order to investigate the transcriptional modulation of genes and pathways potentially involved<br />

with defense response of plants infected with Candidatus Liberibacter, we used our microarray<br />

data from sweet orange infected with CaLam and published microarray data from sweet orange<br />

infected with CaLas, and produced a consensus global gene expression profile. To compose the<br />

consensus list of genes and pathways differentially regulated, we used all genes with expression<br />

values two-fold, up- and down-regulated, in infected plants compared with control plants. Only<br />

non-redundant probe sets with Arabidopsis homologues were used. A common subset of<br />

47 probe sets differentially expressed was identified, comprising 30 up-regulated genes,<br />

9 down-regulated in both transcriptome data, and 7 that did not demonstrate the same expression<br />

pattern. Interestingly, we found 7 genes with transmembrane transporter activity; some of them<br />

are induced in response to Zn, Fe, and Cu deficiency, 4 genes involved response to bacteria, and<br />

several genes related to response to oxidative stress, SAR, and flavonoid metabolism. This study<br />

will provide new insights into gene expression modulation in HLB and direct the selection of<br />

potential targets for transformation.<br />

Acknowledgement<br />

Financial support: INCT Citros, FCPRAC (Florida), and Embrapa-Monsanto Agreement.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 119<br />

8.3 Differential Expression of Potential Virulence Genes of Candidatus Liberibacter<br />

asiaticus in Infected <strong>Plant</strong>s and Psyllids<br />

Sreedharan, A., Wei, S., Wang, N.-Y. UF-IFAS Citrus Research and Education Center, Lake<br />

Alfred, FL, USA<br />

Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus is the causal agent of citrus greening or huanglongbing, a<br />

destructive disease of citrus in the United States. Citrus greening is usually transmitted through<br />

grafting or through feeding by the Asian citrus psyllid (Diaphorina citri). In order to identify the<br />

potential virulence genes, real-time quantitative PCR assays using total RNA isolated from<br />

infected plants and psyllids were conducted to test the expression profile of Ca. L. asiaticus.<br />

Gene specific primers were used to check the expression of more than 500 genes in<br />

Ca. L. asiaticus. The genes showing a differential expression of two-fold or more in either the<br />

plant or psyllid were selected and categorized into COG (Clusters of Orthologous Groups of<br />

proteins) functional categories. Selected genes that were overexpressed in planta were further<br />

studied by expression or screened on Nicotiana benthamiana plants for symptom expression,<br />

using transient assays. Interestingly, one orf encoding salicylate hydroxylase (sahA) was<br />

identified in the genome of Las. Salicylate hydroxylase is responsible for salicylic acid (SA)<br />

breakdown. SA is important for basal defense, hypersensitive response, and systemic acquired<br />

resistance. Expression assays indicate SahA is functional and can break down various<br />

salicylate-based substrates. In addition, constructs AS7 and AS13, expressing two hypothetical<br />

proteins, caused symptoms on the plants and will be further characterized using transgenic<br />

expression studies on Duncan grapefruit (Citrus paradisi Macf.). Since the virulence<br />

mechanisms of Ca. L. asiaticus is poorly understood, the results from this study will serve as the<br />

first step in identifying potential virulence genes involved in symptom expression and survival of<br />

this pathogen in planta.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 120<br />

8.4 Metabolome Analysis of Tolerant and Susceptible Citrus Varieties in Response to<br />

Infection with Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus<br />

Albrecht, U. 1 , Skogerson, K. 2 , Bowman, K.D. 1 , Fiehn, O. 2<br />

1 USDA-ARS, Fort Pierce, FL, USA<br />

2 University of California, Davis, CA, USA<br />

Metabolomics is a major branch of functional genomics together with transcriptomics and<br />

proteomics. Analysis of the metabolome, which is most directly associated with the phenotype,<br />

may yield important information about the mechanism of plant-pathogen interactions and may<br />

discover biomarkers valuable for diagnostic use. This study investigated the metabolic profile of<br />

citrus plants in response to infection with Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus, the suspected causal<br />

agent of huanglongbing (HLB) in Florida. Leaf metabolites of infected and non-infected<br />

seedlings of the genotypes US-897 (Citrus reticulata Blanco × Poncirus trifoliata L. Raf.),<br />

tolerant to HLB, and Cleopatra mandarin, susceptible to HLB, were investigated at different<br />

times after graft-inoculation with the pathogen. GC-TOF-MS analysis identified 225 compounds<br />

that were significantly different across the study. PCA analysis resulted in distinct clustering of<br />

the two genotypes independent of infection (Fig. 1). Concentrations of many metabolites differed<br />

significantly in non-infected and infected Cleopatra seedlings, resulting in clear discrimination<br />

after PLS analysis upon progression of the disease (Fig. 2). Leaf symptoms of infected Cleopatra<br />

seedlings included chlorosis and size reduction. In contrast, fewer metabolites appeared to be<br />

significantly affected in US-897 seedlings upon infection, preventing a clear separation of<br />

metabolic profiles (Fig. 2). Most leaves of this genotype did not show any disease symptoms<br />

despite infection. Among the compounds most significantly increased in infected leaves of<br />

Cleopatra were several amino acids involved in polyamine- or alkaloid biosynthesis (Fig. 3a).<br />

Among the compounds found in high concentrations in US-897 leaves independent of infection<br />

were some with possible anti-microbial activity (Fig. 3b), which may be associated with<br />

tolerance to HLB observed in this genotype.<br />

References<br />

Albrecht, U., Bowman, K.D. 2011. HortScience 46:16-22.<br />

Fiehn, O., Wohlgemuth, G., Scholz, M., Kind, T., Lee, D.Y., Lu, Y., Moon, S., Nikolau, B.J.<br />

2008. Quality control for plant metabolomics: reporting MSI - compliant studies. The <strong>Plant</strong><br />

Journal 53:691-704.<br />

Sumner, L.W., Mendes, P., Dixon, R.A. 2003. <strong>Plant</strong> metabolomics: large-scale phytochemistry<br />

in the functional genomics era. Phytochemistry 62:817-836.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 121<br />

PC2 (0.3%)<br />

US-897<br />

‘Cleopatra’<br />

PC1 (99.2%)<br />

Fig. 1. Unsupervised PCA analysis of leaf metabolites shows distinct clustering of US-897 and<br />

Cleopatra seedlings independent of infection with Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 122<br />

Cleopatra<br />

Cleopatra<br />

US-897<br />

Fig. 2. PLS analysis of leaf metabolites shows clear separation of non-infected (red) and infected<br />

(green) Cleopatra profiles and overlapping of US-897 profiles 40 weeks after inoculation with<br />

Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 123<br />

a)<br />

9.0E+05<br />

8.0E+05<br />

7.0E+05<br />

6.0E+05<br />

5.0E+05<br />

4.0E+05<br />

3.0E+05<br />

2.0E+05<br />

1.0E+05<br />

32 wai<br />

Ornithine<br />

40 wai<br />

0.0E+00<br />

b)<br />

2.0E+05<br />

1.8E+05<br />

Cleo Ctrl Cleo Inf US-897 Ctrl US-897 Inf Cleo Ctrl Cleo Inf US-897 Ctrl US-897 Inf<br />

Bin 309580<br />

32 wai 40 wai<br />

1.6E+05<br />

1.4E+05<br />

1.2E+05<br />

1.0E+05<br />

8.0E+04<br />

6.0E+04<br />

4.0E+04<br />

2.0E+04<br />

0.0E+00<br />

Cleo Ctrl Cleo Inf US-897 Ctrl US-897 Inf Cleo Ctrl Cleo Inf US-897 Ctrl US-897 Inf<br />

Fig. 3. Metabolites detected in Cleopatra and US-897 leaves infected (Inf) and non-infected<br />

(Ctrl) with Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus 32 and 40 weeks after inoculation (wai).<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 124<br />

8.5 Deep Transcriptome Profiling of Citrus Fruit in Response to Huanglongbing Disease<br />

Martinelli, F. 1 , Uratsu, S.L. 1 , Albrecht, U. 2 , Reagan, R.L. 1 , Leicht, E. 3,4 , D’Souza, R. 3,4 ,<br />

Bowman, K.D. 2 , Dandekar, A.M. 1<br />

1 <strong>Plant</strong> Sciences Department, University of California, Davis, CA, USA<br />

2 U.S. Horticultural Research Laboratory, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research<br />

Service, Fort Pierce, FL, USA<br />

3 Mechanical and Aeronautical Engineering Department, University of California, Davis, CA,<br />

USA<br />

4 Center for Computational Science and Engineering, University of California, Davis, CA, USA<br />

Huanglongbing (HLB) or citrus greening, potentially caused by Candidatus liberibacter species<br />

(CaLs), is considered the most destructive citrus disease worldwide. Current diagnosis requires<br />

PCR detection of the putative bacterial candidate but rarely detects the pathogen during early,<br />

asymptomatic infection stages. In this work, we used an alternative strategy based on the study<br />

of early host responses to infection using next-generation sequencing technologies by mining the<br />

deep mRNA profile at different stages of disease development with pathway and protein-protein<br />

network analysis, followed by quantitative real-time PCR analysis of highly regulated genes. We<br />

identified differentially regulated pathways and constructed networks that provide a vivid insight<br />

into the metabolism of fruit affected by HLB. Data mining revealed that HLB enhanced<br />

transcription of genes involved in the light reactions of photosynthesis and in ATP synthesis. The<br />

resultant oxidative stress was linked with the activation of protein degradation and misfolding.<br />

Transcripts for heat shock proteins were down-regulated at all stages of disease, exaggerating<br />

protein misfolding. HLB strongly affected pathways involved in source-sink communications<br />

such as sucrose and starch metabolism and hormone biosynthesis and signaling. Transcription of<br />

several genes involved in the biosynthesis and signal transduction of cytokinins and gibberellins<br />

was reduced, while that of genes involved in ethylene pathways was up-regulated. CaLs<br />

infection triggers a response via both the salicylic acid and jasmonic acid pathways. Transcripts<br />

of several members of the WRKY family of transcription factors increased greatly in response to<br />

CaLs infection. Significantly differentially expressed transcripts might be used as biomarkers of<br />

CaLs infection to improve early diagnosis at the asymptomatic stage using quantitative real-time<br />

PCR.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 125<br />

8.6 Carbohydrate Metabolism and Related Gene Expression Changes in<br />

Huanglongbing-Affected Sweet Orange<br />

Chen, C. 1 , Fan, J. 1,2 , Yu, Q. 1 , Brlansky, R.H. 1 , Li, Z.-G. 2 , Gmitter, F.G., Jr. 1<br />

1 UF-IFAS Citrus Research and Education Center, Lake Alfred, FL, USA<br />

2 Key Laboratory of Biorheological Science and Technology, Ministry of Education, College of<br />

Bioengineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China<br />

Citrus huanglongbing (HLB) is caused by Candidatus Liberibacter spp., the presumed,<br />

uncultured pathogen. In this study, significant changes in carbohydrate metabolism in<br />

HLB-affected sweet orange (Citrus sinensis L. Osbeck), comparing asymptomatic and<br />

symptomatic tissue to their healthy counterpart, respectively, were observed. In asymptomatic<br />

leaves, sucrose and fructose accumulated significantly (p < 0.05) in both midribs and lobes, and<br />

glucose only in the midribs (greater than 5-fold); whereas, maltose levels were reduced to 64.6%<br />

and 86.8% of the healthy level in the midribs and foliar lobes. In symptomatic leaves, sucrose<br />

and glucose remained at higher levels, while no accumulation of fructose was observed; by<br />

contrast, the maltose content decreased to 49.6% of that in healthy leaves. Starch levels increased<br />

3.1- and 7.9-fold in HLB-infected asymptomatic and symptomatic leaves compared to the<br />

healthy level, respectively. Four-fold increase of the cell wall-bound invertase activity was<br />

detected in both types of infected leaves by the invertase assay. In addition, the starch breakdown<br />

gene expression profile suggested that the transcription of DPE2 and MEX1 were<br />

down-regulated. Together with the reduction of maltose, it is suggested that the impairment of<br />

starch breakdown may contribute to the starch accumulation in infected leaves. The imbalance of<br />

carbohydrate partitioning and its relation to HLB pathogenicity in citrus are discussed.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 126<br />

8.7 Analysis of Colonization of Citrus Seeds by Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus and Its Possible<br />

Role in Seed Transmission<br />

Hilf, M.E. USDA-ARS, Fort Pierce, FL, USA<br />

The huanglongbing disease of citrus is associated with infection by the phloem-colonizing<br />

bacterium Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus. Transmission by the psyllid Diaphorina citri and<br />

transmission by vegetative propagation of infected citrus budwood are experimentally verified<br />

methods of short- and long-distance dispersal of the bacterium. Vertical transmission through<br />

infected seed has not been verified but is a concern as a means of moving the pathogen to areas<br />

in which it currently is not found. To address this question of seed transmission, mature seeds<br />

from fruit from infected Sanguinelli sweet orange and Conner’s grapefruit trees were<br />

apportioned into three populations, with one group destructively sampled with analysis of the<br />

separated seed coats and embryo, one group germinated in soil in the greenhouse, and one group<br />

germinated on agar in vitro after removal of the seed coat for separate analysis. Real-time PCR<br />

analysis of nucleic acid extracts from separated seed coats and embryos detected bacterial DNA<br />

in seed coats from both varieties but not in embryos. Similarly, bacterial DNA was detected in<br />

seed coats from both varieties that were removed prior to germination in vitro on agar. Bacterial<br />

DNA was not detected in seedlings of either variety that germinated in vitro. No bacterial DNA<br />

was detected in seedlings of either variety that germinated from seeds planted in soil in the<br />

greenhouse. The data suggest that the embryo is not infected during development even though<br />

bacteria are present in adjacent tissue.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 127<br />

8.8 Natural Transmission of Huanglongbing Caused by Candidatus Liberibacter<br />

americanus and Ca. L. asiaticus and with Two Different Sources of Inoculum <strong>Plant</strong>s (Citrus<br />

sinensis or Murraya exotica)<br />

Gasparoto, M.C.G. 1 , Bassanezi, R.B. 2* , Amorim, L. 1* , Montesino, L.H. 2 , Lourenço, S.A. 1 ,<br />

Wulff, N.A. 2* , Bergamin Filho, A. 1*<br />

1 ESALQ/USP, Piracicaba, Brazil<br />

2 Fundecitrus, Araraquara, Brazil<br />

Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus and Ca. L. americanus are associated with huanglongbing<br />

(HLB) in Brazil. The objective of this study was to compare the natural transmission of HLB<br />

caused by both Liberibacter species using two different sources of inoculum plants (SIP): Citrus<br />

sinensis or Murraya exotica. The experiment was carried out with different SIP, corresponding<br />

to the following treatments: (i) Sweet orange plants infected by Ca. L. asiaticus or Ca. L.<br />

americanus, (ii) only M. exotica plants infected by Ca. L. americanus, and (iii) only sweet orange<br />

plants infected by Ca. L. americanus. Each treatment was applied in an isolated screenhouse<br />

compartment. The first treatment was repeated. In all compartments, healthy sweet orange plants<br />

(test plants - TP) were located around the SIP. Reared Liberibacter-free Asian citrus psyllids<br />

were monthly confined on the SIP for 7 days and later they were released for free movement and<br />

rearing inside the screenhouse. Leaf samples from TP were periodically collected for<br />

Liberibacter detection by real-time PCR. In the first treatment, 28 months after the beginning of<br />

the experiment, the average incidence of TP infected by Ca. L. asiaticus (11.5%) was higher than<br />

the average incidence of Ca. L. americanus infected TP (0.9%). In the same period, the second<br />

treatment had 7.6% of Ca. L. americanus infected TP, while the third treatment did not have any<br />

infected TP. These results showed that Ca. L. asiaticus is better transmitted by ACP than Ca. L.<br />

americanus and when there is only SIP infected by Ca. L. americanus, the highest transmission is<br />

reached when M. exotica served as SIP.<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

Financial support: Fundecitrus, FAPESP (2007/55013-9) and CRDF (NAS-7).<br />

*Authors granted by CNPq.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 128<br />

8.9 Callose Predominates over Phloem Protein 2 in Phloem Plugging of Trees Affected<br />

with Huanglongbing<br />

Albrigo, L.G., Achor, D.S. UF-IFAS Citrus Research and Education Center, Lake Alfred, FL,<br />

USA. albrigo@ufl.edu<br />

Phloem plugging of citrus trees affected with huanglongbing (HLB) was shown previously to<br />

result from two types of materials in sieve elements, callose, and a lectin of phloem protein 2<br />

(PP2) (Achor et al., 2009). An associated study (Etxeberria et al., 2009) found that diversion of<br />

sugars to starch accumulation left the root system of affected trees lacking carbohydrate reserves<br />

as starch. It was proposed that this plugging and sugar diversion might be responsible for the<br />

decline of HLB-infected trees. This study evaluated plugging in four cultivars (Flame, Valencia,<br />

Hamlin, and Murcott) in field sites, and two cultivars (Duncan and Valencia) in a greenhouse to<br />

determine if one plugging type predominated and was a better candidate for transformation or<br />

some other type of blocking of its production. Field and greenhouse plants affected by HLB were<br />

sampled and leaf tissue prepared for transmission electron microscopy. A total of 22 field and<br />

7 greenhouse trees were sampled to observe leaf phloem plugging types. Callose plugging<br />

predominated in all samples with a range of callose to PP2 of 1.8 to 13. The average ratio was<br />

2.7 for all field samples and 2.4 for greenhouse samples. This data suggests that callose plugging<br />

is more likely to cause phloem dysfunction, but PP2 plugging accounts for over 25% of the<br />

phloem plugs.<br />

References<br />

Achor, D.S., Etxeberria, E., Wang, N., Folimonova, S.Y., Chung, K.R., Albrigo, L.G. 2010.<br />

Sequence of anatomical symptom observations in citrus affected with huanglongbing<br />

disease. <strong>Plant</strong> Pathology Journal 9(2):56-64.<br />

Etxeberria, E., Gonzales, P., Dawson, W., Achor, D.S., Albrigo, L.G. 2009. Accumulation and<br />

distribution of abnormally high levels of starch in HLB-infected Valencia orange trees.<br />

Physiological and Molecular <strong>Plant</strong> Pathology 74:76-83.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 129<br />

8.10 Influence of Huanglongbing (HLB) on the Composition of Citrus Juices and Mature<br />

Leaves<br />

Cancalon, P.F., Bryan, C., Haun, C., Zhang, J. Florida Department of Citrus, Lake Alfred, FL,<br />

USA<br />

In this study, the composition of fruit and mature citrus leaves from Hamlin and Valencia orange<br />

and Marsh grapefruit, collected in an infected Florida grove, was followed over time during the<br />

2009-2010 citrus season in control, symptomatic (exhibiting symptoms), and asymptomatic trees<br />

(HLB infected but not showing symptoms). In most cases, the composition of components from<br />

control and asymptomatic samples were similar.<br />

As a continuation to a previous study (Cancalon et al., 2008), orange juice composition was<br />

further examined. Synephrine, a biological amine characteristic of immature fruit, was found to<br />

be consistently higher in HLB-infected fruit. The synephrine values during the season were<br />

69.38 ± 20.31 mg/l and 38.93 ± 9.57 mg/l for symptomatic and control Hamlin; whereas, the<br />

values were 50.23 ± 20.66 mg/l and 22.99 ± 5.63 mg/l for symptomatic and control Valencia,<br />

respectively. Limonin was also found to be higher in HLB-infected fruit. In symptomatic<br />

Valencia, the limonin concentration was 11.1 ± 9.4 mg/l as compared with 1.7 ± 3.5 mg/l for<br />

control; in Hamlin oranges, the values were 9.8 ± 4.6 mg/l and 1.3 ± 2.3 mg/l, respectively.<br />

Most of the study was devoted to the examination of mature leaves. Glucose, fructose,<br />

sucrose, and maltose concentrations were analyzed once a month during the 2009-2010 season<br />

by HPLC/PAD as reported previously (Cancalon, 1993). In order to determine the origin of the<br />

maltose, α- (EC 3.2.1.1) and β- (EC 3.2.1.2) amylase activities were also measured (Megazyme<br />

assay kits, Wicklow, Ireland).<br />

Because of large sample variations, glucose, fructose, and sucrose levels did not vary<br />

significantly in Hamlin, Valencia, or grapefruit, although a trend toward higher glucose and<br />

fructose was noted in symptomatic grapefruit leaves. Small amounts of maltose, at about two<br />

orders of magnitude less than the other sugars were detected. Maltose concentrations were about<br />

three times higher in symptomatic than in control and asymptomatic leaves. Kaplan and Guy<br />

(2004) postulated that a maltose accumulation may function as a solute stabilizing factor in<br />

response to abiotic stress.<br />

Both α- and β-amylase activities were detected in leaf samples. Only maltose and<br />

α-amylase activity were affected by the disease and were significantly higher in HLB<br />

symptomatic leaves. β-amylase was not found to vary with time or with any type of leaves and<br />

remained fairly low. No significant amounts of maltotriose, an α-amylase byproduct, could be<br />

found. During the season, in both Hamlin and Valencia, levels of maltose and α-amylase activity<br />

varied in a similar manner, indicating a possible link between the enzyme and the product. They<br />

peaked in April then decreased significantly until the end of the study in July. Similar changes<br />

occurred in grapefruit leaves but were less striking. This late decrease in maltose and amylase<br />

levels in the leaves may be a reaction to the removal of fruit from the trees. It should also be<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 130<br />

pointed out that an increase in maltose appears to coincide with the January 2010 freezes, which<br />

raises the possibility that a local climate effect may not be ruled out as influencing part of the<br />

observed changes.<br />

In conclusion, high levels of maltose and α-amylase activity seem to be characteristic of<br />

mature HLB leaves; in this study, the potential relationship with variations in starch levels was<br />

not examined. The study has also revealed the difficulty of conducting research in the field,<br />

where many factors such as temperature, humidity, and other physiological stresses on the trees<br />

cannot be controlled. It is also important to note that both symptomatic and non-symptomatic<br />

groups are not homogeneous and that both fruit and leaves in these groups can have very<br />

different biochemical compositions.<br />

References<br />

Cancalon, P.F. 1993. Oligosaccharides generation in acidic sugar media. Journal of the<br />

Association of Official Analytical Chemists 76:584-590.<br />

Cancalon, P.F., Bryan, C., Haun, C., King, D. 2008. Influence of HLB on the composition of<br />

citrus juices. 59 th Citrus Processors= and Subtropical Technology Conference 59:29-30.<br />

Kaplan, F., Guy, C. 2004. β-amylase induction and the protective role of maltose during<br />

temperature shock. <strong>Plant</strong> Physiology 135:1674-1684.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 131<br />

8.11 Gene Expression in Citrus sinensis Fruit Tissues Harvested from<br />

Huanglongbing-Infected Trees<br />

Liao, H.-L., Burns, J.K. UF-IFAS Citrus Research and Education Center, Lake Alfred, FL,<br />

USA<br />

Global gene expression in HLB-infected fruit tissues was evaluated using an Affymetrix array<br />

containing 30,279 Citrus spp. ESTs. Flavedo (FF), vascular tissue (VT), and juice vesicle (JV)<br />

tissue of symptomatic (SY), asymptomatic (AS), and healthy (H) fruit harvested from sweet<br />

orange Hamlin and Valencia cultivars was investigated. Transcriptional profiles indicated the<br />

number of genes impacted by HLB was highest in FF and VT and least in JV. In Hamlin, over<br />

860 genes were changed in SYVT and SYFF compared with H tissues. In Valencia, fewer genes<br />

were changed in SYVT and SYFF, but approximately 50% additional genes (397 genes) were<br />

changed in SYJV compared with Hamlin. As in SY tissues, ASVT and ASFF were strongly<br />

impacted and had similar gene changes in Valencia. However, only 28 genes were altered in<br />

ASJV compared with HJV. The top five gene groups with high numbers of changes included<br />

transporters, carbohydrate metabolism, genetic information processes, phytohormone<br />

metabolism, and defense responses. Highest titer of the HLB bacterium was found specifically<br />

located in SYVT. Gene changes in SYVT were associated with host-pathogen interaction and<br />

seed abortion, and those in SYJV with fruit size, juice sac maturity and morphology, and juice<br />

quality. Similar to SY fruit, girdled fruit were small and could abscise prematurely.<br />

A comparison of gene expression between HLB-infected and girdled treatments will be<br />

presented to differentiate HLB-mediated gene changes from those related to girdling-related<br />

carbohydrate loss.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 132<br />

8.12 Expression Profiling of Host Response of Citrus to Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus<br />

Infection<br />

Aritua, V., Wang, N.-Y. UF-IFAS Citrus Research and Education Center, Lake Alfred, FL,<br />

USA<br />

Huanglongbing (HLB) disease is currently the most economically damaging disease of citrus<br />

worldwide. Three species of Candidatus Liberibacter; Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus (Las), Ca.<br />

Liberibacter africanus, and Ca. Liberibacter americanus have been associated with the disease.<br />

These phloem-limited fastidious α-proteobacteria are vectored by Asian citrus psyllid<br />

(Diaphorina citri) and African citrus psyllid (Trioza erytreae). Of the three, Las has a worldwide<br />

distribution in citrus including Florida. Typical symptoms of HLB are mottling and chlorosis of<br />

leaves, yellow shoots, and lopsided fruit with green color remaining on the stylar end with<br />

aborted seeds and bitter taste. Many of the symptoms are similar to zinc deficiency and have<br />

been linked to starch accumulation. It was reported that Las infection results in significant<br />

differences in response between different citrus varieties or relatives, although none has been<br />

found to be resistant. Systemic infection studies show uneven distribution patterns of Las<br />

populations among different organs, tissues, and varieties of citrus. These results suggest that<br />

cellular response to Las is genotype dependent and may be tissue specific. Our previous study of<br />

gene expression in leaves showed differential gene expression patterns in leaf tissues of<br />

susceptible sweet orange varieties. In addition, Las infection of citrus is affected by the<br />

environmental conditions. In order to further understand the mechanism of citrus infection by<br />

Las, we are currently assessing citrus genes modulated by Las infection in 1) citrus stems and<br />

roots in the greenhouse and 2) citrus leaves in the citrus grove.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 133<br />

8.13 Arabidopsis Responses to the HLB-Relative Candidatus Liberibacter psyllaurous<br />

Patne, S. 1 , Manjunath, K.L. 2 , Roose, M.L. 1<br />

1 University of California, Riverside, CA, USA<br />

2 USDA-ARS, Riverside, CA, USA<br />

The impact of HLB disease on the citrus industry demands systems for more rapid investigation<br />

of HLB control strategies. To identify HLB targets using a high-throughput chemical genomics<br />

approach, we analyzed Arabidopsis thaliana, a tractable model system, for responses to<br />

Candidatus Liberibacter psyllaurous (CLps). Sequence comparisons indicate Candidatus<br />

Liberibacter asiaticus and Candidatus Liberibacter psyllaurous (pathogen associated with tomato<br />

psyllid yellows disease) are closely related species. Two widely used Arabidopsis ecotypes Col-0<br />

and Ler-1 were tested for Candidatus Liberibacter psyllaurous infection and disease related<br />

symptoms. Quantitative real-time PCR with CLps-specific primers showed that both ecotypes<br />

could be infected by psyllids fed on CLps-infected tomato. A higher percentage of Ler-1 than<br />

Col-0 plants were positive (89% vs. 23%) and Ler-1 plants had lower Ct values. CLps systemic<br />

infection was confirmed by testing leaf, shoot, and inflorescence samples from both ecotypes.<br />

Shoot and inflorescence samples showed Ct values 24-28, indicating a relatively higher titer of<br />

pathogen than in leaves (Ct value 31-33). Interestingly, no infected plants showed disease-related<br />

symptoms. Twenty genetically diverse A. thaliana ecotypes were tested to assess variation in<br />

resistance and disease phenotype. QPCR of leaf samples collected 11 days post-inoculation with<br />

psyllids showed that at least 4 out of 5 plants were CLps positive in ecotypes Fei-0 and Ler-1.<br />

No CLps positive plants showed disease-related symptoms. It is evident that Arabidopsis can be<br />

infected with CLps; however, the asymptomatic phenotype is intriguing and systematic genetic<br />

dissection of this response could identify potential targets useful for plant defense in citrus.<br />

References<br />

Clark, R.M., Schweikert, G., Ossowski, S., Zeller, G., Toomajian, C., Shinn, P., Warthmann, N.,<br />

Hu, T.T., Fu, G., Hinds, D.A., Chen, H., Frazer, K.A., Huson, D.H., Schölkopf, B.,<br />

Nordborg, M., Rätsch, G., Ecker, J.R., Weigel, D. 2007. Common sequence<br />

polymorphisms shaping genetic diversity in Arabidopsis thaliana. Science 317:338-342.<br />

Hansen, A.K., Trumble, J.T., Stouthamer, R., Paine, T.D. 2008. A new huanglongbing species,<br />

Candidatus Liberibacter psyllaurous, found to infect tomato and potato, is vectored by the<br />

psyllid Bactericera cockerelli (Sulc). Applied and Environmental Microbiology<br />

74:5862-5865.<br />

Li, W., Abad, J.A., French-Monar, R.D., Rascoe, J., Wen, A., Gudmestad, N.C., Secor, G.A.,<br />

Lee, I.-M., Duan, Y., Levy, L. 2009. Multiplex real-time PCR for detection, identification<br />

and quantification of Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum in potato plants with zebra<br />

chip. Journal of Microbiological Methods 78:59-65.<br />

Li, W., Hartung, J.S., Levy, L. 2006. Quantitative real-time PCR for detection and identification<br />

of Candidatus Liberibacter species associated with citrus huanglongbing. Journal of<br />

Microbiological Methods 66:104-115.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 134<br />

8.14 Comparative Studies of the Endophytic Microbial Community Structures in<br />

Huanglongbing-Infected and Non-Infected Citrus <strong>Plant</strong>s<br />

Zheng X.-F. 1 , Liu, B. 1* , Ruan, C.-Q. 1 , Lin, Y.-Z. 1 , Xiao, R.-F. 1 , Zhu, Y.-J. 1 , Fan, G.-C. 1 , Cai,<br />

Z.J. 1 , Duan, Y.-P. 2<br />

1 Citrus Huanglongbing Research Center of Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou,<br />

China<br />

2 U.S. Horticultural Research Laboratory USDA-ARS, Fort Pierce, FL, USA<br />

*Corresponding author: Prof. LIU Bo, E-mail: fzliubo@163.com<br />

Endophytes in both huanglongbing (HLB)-infected and non-infected citrus plants were studied<br />

using a phospholipid fatty acid (PLFAs) assay in conjunction with culturing. Forty isolates of<br />

endophytes were obtained from Citrus reticulata Blanco (cv. Hongroumiyou) by culturing on<br />

NA medium. Results from PLFAs assay indicated that the 40 isolates of endophytes belong to<br />

4 genuses, 16 species. The species and quantity of endophytes were significantly different<br />

between HLB-infected and non-infected plants with more endophytes in HLB-infected plants.<br />

The endophyte species such as Bacillus subtilis, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and B. licheniformis<br />

were only found in non-infected plants, while B. laevolacticus, Paenibacillus lentimorbus,<br />

B. atrophaeus, and Microbacterium lacticum were found in HLB-infected plants. PLFA types<br />

and quantity in citrus leaves varied along with different varieties and development of HLB<br />

infection. The varieties Lo Tangerines, Fuju, and Navel Oranges showed PLFAs from the highest<br />

to the least, respectively. Cluster analysis revealed community characteristics of endophytes in<br />

citrus leaves were more relevant to citrus variety than to the development stage of HLB<br />

infection. Several PLFA biomarkers were also identified as potential diagnostic markers;<br />

18:3 w6c (6,9,12), 11:0 and 15:03OH may be used to distinguish HLB-infected from the<br />

non-infected leaves of the Fuju variety, while a19:0, i15:0, 16:12OH, 10ME17:0, and i17:0 may<br />

be used to distinguish asymptomatic from non-infected leaves. Future applications of the PLFA<br />

assay in HLB microbial ecology and diagnostics are also discussed.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 135<br />

8.15 HLB Influences the Diversity, Structure, and Function of the Bacterial Community<br />

Associated with Citrus<br />

Trivedi, P., Wang, N.-Y. UF-IFAS Citrus Research and Education Center, Lake Alfred, FL,<br />

USA<br />

The diversity and stability of plant-associated bacterial communities heavily markedly influence<br />

soil and plant quality and ecosystem sustainability. The goal of this study is to understand how<br />

Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus [Las, known to cause huanglongbing (HLB)] influences the<br />

structure and function of plant associated bacterial community. We have used high density<br />

phylogenetic microarray (Phylochip), clone library sequencing, and taxon specific quantitative<br />

PCR (qPCR) based analysis to provide a detailed census of bacterial communities present in<br />

HLB symptomatic and non-symptomatic citrus (Sagaram et al., 2009; Trivedi et al., 2010). Our<br />

results indicate Las to be the only causal agent of HLB in Florida (Sagaram et al., 2009) and<br />

reveals that HLB significantly restructures the composition of the native microbial community<br />

present either in leaf or roots of citrus (Sagaram et al., 2009; Trivedi et al., 2010). Cultivable<br />

diversity of bacteria associated with citrus was investigated, and several novel strains with the<br />

potential to enhance plant growth and suppress diseases were identified (Trivedi et al., 2011).<br />

qPCR and functional microarray “Geochip” analysis showed that HLB infection has a profound<br />

effect on the abundance of various genes involved in important ecological processes. Overall,<br />

our study shows that HLB influences the community structure and function of plant associated<br />

bacteria and will have serious consequences in productive capacity and sustainability of<br />

agro-ecosystems in the citrus groves.<br />

References<br />

Sagaram, U.S., DeAngelis, K.M., Trivedi, P., Andersen, G.L., Lu, S., Wang, N. 2009. Bacterial<br />

diversity analysis of HLB pathogen-infected citrus using PhyloChips and 16S rDNA clone<br />

library sequencing. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 75(6):1566-1574.<br />

Trivedi, P., Duan, Y., Wang, N. 2010. Huanglongbing, a systemic disease, restructures the<br />

bacterial community associated with citrus roots. Applied and Environmental Microbiology<br />

76(11):3427-3436.<br />

Trivedi, P., Spann, T., Wang, N. 2011. Isolation and characterization of beneficial bacterial<br />

community associated with citrus roots. Applied and Environmental Microbiology<br />

(Submitted).<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 136<br />

8.16 Functional Studies of Putative Effectors of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus Using<br />

Citrus Tristeza Virus Vector<br />

Hajeri, S. 1 , Duan, Y.-P. 2 , Gowda, S. 1<br />

1 UF-IFAS Citrus Research and Education Center, Lake Alfred, FL, USA<br />

2 U. S. Horticultural Research Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Fort Pierce, FL, USA<br />

Citrus huanglongbing (HLB), also known as citrus greening, is one of the most destructive<br />

diseases of citrus worldwide. The causative agent, Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus (CLas), is a<br />

fastidious, gram-negative, phloem-limited, α-proteobacterium. The pathogen is vectored by a<br />

psyllid, Diaphorina citri Kuwayama. Thus, CLas is both an intracellular plant pathogen and an<br />

insect endosymbiont. Because of its intracellular nature, there is a significant reduction in the<br />

genome (1.23 Mb) compared to other members of the family. It is possible that the important<br />

genes responsible for pathogenicity in CLas might be buried in the large amount of hypothetical<br />

conserved ORFs, which constitutes nearly 26% of the genome. Using bioinformatics tools, we<br />

have identified a number of putative effector genes based on the genome sequence of CLas. By<br />

the use of citrus tristeza virus (CTV) vector, we could express putative effectors (pathogenicity<br />

and virulence genes) of the CLas bacterium directly inside the phloem of citrus. At present,<br />

20 different genes encoding putative effector proteins from Las-infected citrus plants were<br />

amplified and cloned behind heterologous beet yellows virus CP subgenomic RNA controller<br />

element engineered between the CPm and CP genes in the CTV vector. The CTV virions<br />

containing different HLB effectors will be used to inoculate citrus plants by bark-flap<br />

inoculation. The resulting systemic spread and expression of the putative effectors throughout<br />

citrus trees will enable us to understand the role of the putative effectors in disease induction.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 137<br />

8.17 First Report of a New Host (Pithecellobium lucidum Benth) of the Citrus<br />

Huanglongbing Bacterium, Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus<br />

Fan, G.-C. 1 , Cai, Z.J. 1 , Weng, Q.Y. 1 , Ke, C. 1 , Liu, B. 1 , Zhou, L.J. 2 , Duan, Y.-P. 2<br />

1 Citrus Huanglongbing Research Center of Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou,<br />

China<br />

2 USDA-ARS, Fort Pierce, FL, USA<br />

Most, if not all, host plants of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus are members of the Rutaceae<br />

family due to the feeding preference of its insect vector, Diaphorina citri (Halbert and<br />

Manjunath, 2004). A shrub of non-Rutaceae plants showing yellow shoots, mimicking the<br />

symptom of citrus huanglongbing (HLB), was observed in October 2008 in a citrus orchard in<br />

Fujian, China, where citrus plants were severely infected by HLB. The tree was identified as<br />

Pithecellobium lucidum Benth. Samples collected from symptomatic and asymptomatic branches<br />

of the tree were subjected to DNA isolation using midrib and CTAB method. Ca. L. asiaticus<br />

was detected by conventional PCR using 16S rDNA-based primer set (CG03F/CG05R) (Zhou<br />

et al., 2007) and nested PCR using β-operon-based primer sets (F1/R1 and F2/R2) (Ding et al.,<br />

2005). Sequence analysis revealed that the PCR amplicons (ca. 800 bp and 400 bp) showed 99%<br />

identity with Las 16S rDNA and 100% identity with Las β-operon, respectively, at the nucleotide<br />

level. In addition, a few Las-like bacterial cells were observed in the sieve cells of infected<br />

samples as seen with electron microscope. This is the first report of P. lucidum as a naturally<br />

infected new host of Ca. L. asiaticus. The results of low Las bacterial titer and that the psyllid<br />

did not propagate in this host plant indicate that the new host is an opportunistic host of HLB.<br />

References<br />

Ding, F., Wang, G., Yi, G., Zhong, Y., Zeng J., Zhou, B. 2005. Infection of wampee and lemon<br />

by the citrus huanglongbing pathogen (Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus) in China. Journal<br />

of <strong>Plant</strong> Pathology 87:207-212.<br />

Halbert, S.E., Manjunath, K.L. 2004. Asian citrus psyllids (Sternorrhyncha: Psyllidae) and<br />

greening disease of citrus: a literature review and assessment of risk in Florida. Florida<br />

Entomologist 87(3):330-353.<br />

Zhou, L.J., Gabriel, D.W., Duan, Y.-P., Halbert, S.E., Dixon, W.N. 2007. First report of dodder<br />

transmission of huanglongbing from naturally infected Murraya paniculata to citrus. <strong>Plant</strong><br />

Disease 91(2):227-227.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 138<br />

8.18 Citrus Seed Grafting: A Simple Technology for Testing Seed Transmission of Citrus<br />

Greening/HLB and of Other Pathogenic Agents<br />

Bar-Joseph*, M., Robertson, C., Hilf, M.E., Dawson, W.O. UF-IFAS Citrus Research and<br />

Education Center, Lake Alfred, FL, USA<br />

*Formerly at the S. Tolkowsky Laboratory, ARO, Volcani Center, Bet Dagan, Israel<br />

Grafting plants is widely practiced for horizontal transmission of systemic pathogens. Vertical<br />

transmission of viruses and bacteria from infected mother plants through gametes to seedling<br />

plants is rare and often completely absent. Indeed it is commonly known that phloem-limited<br />

citrus pathogens such as citrus tristeza virus and Spiroplasma citri will not pass from the mother<br />

plant phloem tissues to citrus embryos and, thus, neither disease is seed transmissible. The recent<br />

reports on possible vertical transmission of the CLas agents from seeds collected from<br />

greening/HLB-infested plants to citrus seedling plants had caused considerable phytosanitary<br />

concern and an immediate halt on the movement of citrus seeds from infested to disease-free<br />

geographic regions. The most common method of testing seed transmissions is by sowing seeds<br />

from infected plants and testing the resulting seedlings for the presence of the infectious agents<br />

by symptom observations and PCR diagnosis. We have recently developed a new seed grafting<br />

technique that allows rapid and economical testing of seed transmission of pathogens. Using this<br />

method, we found neither symptoms nor positive PCR detection of Candidatus Liberibacter<br />

asiaticus (CLas) in Volkamer lemon or Duncan grapefruit seedlings grafted with seeds collected<br />

from Hamlin sweet orange or Conner’s grapefruit showing typical greening/HLB symptoms,<br />

whereas the similar plants side-grafted with greening/HLB-infected tissues comprising of<br />

mid-veins from young and small (


P a g e | 139<br />

8.19 Lack of Transmission of HLB by Citrus Seed<br />

Graham, J.H. 1 , Johnson, E.G. 1 , Bright, D.B. 1 , Irey, M.S. 2<br />

1 UF-IFAS Citrus Research and Education Center, Lake Alfred, FL, USA<br />

2 U.S. Sugar Corporation, Clewiston, FL, USA<br />

In Florida nurseries, rootstock seed trees are located outdoors and only protected from psyllid<br />

transmission of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus (Las) by insecticide applications. In 2008,<br />

a survey detected two Carrizo citrange trees as HLB+. Given the potential risk for seed<br />

transmission and introduction of Las into nurseries by seed from source trees, assays of seedlings<br />

derived from seed extracted from symptomatic fruit were begun in 2006. From 2006 to 2008,<br />

seed were collected from mature Pineapple sweet orange trees in Collier County and in 2009,<br />

from Murcott tangor trees in Hendry County, FL. For Pineapple orange, 415, 723, and<br />

439 seedlings and for Murcott, 332 seedlings were tested at least twice by qPCR using 16S<br />

primers. In 2007, a single Pineapple seedling was suspect HLB+ but upon repeated testing was<br />

negative. From nurseries in 2008, 290 seedlings were recovered from fruit located on<br />

symptomatic branches of two Carrizo trees, and in 2009, 125 seedlings were recovered from two<br />

trees of Swingle citrumelo, 649 from four trees of Kuharske Carrizo, 100 from one tree of<br />

Cleopatra mandarin, and 100 from one tree of Shekwasha mandarin. In 2008, one suspect HLB+<br />

Carrizo seedling was detected, but HLB+ status was not confirmed after repeated testing. In<br />

2009, a single questionable PCR detection for Cleopatra mandarin was obtained. Subsequent<br />

detection occurred in only 75 and 33% of repeated 16S runs from two DNA extractions and the<br />

assay was negative using β-operon primers. Despite the occasional HLB+ test results, no plants<br />

have ever developed HLB symptoms, and repeated testing has never confirmed anything other<br />

than the transient presence of Las in seedlings grown from seed obtained from Las-infected trees.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 140<br />

8.20 Visualization of Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus in Immature Citrus Seed Coats by<br />

Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization (FISH) of 16S rRNA<br />

Hilf, M.E. USDA-ARS, 2001 South Rock Road, Fort Pierce, FL, USA<br />

The huanglongbing disease of citrus is associated with infection by the non-cultivable bacterium<br />

Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus. During the course of a study on seed transmission in sweet orange and<br />

grapefruit, Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus DNA was detected in nucleic acid extracts from seed coats<br />

but not from embryos using real-time and conventional PCR. Low crossover threshold values<br />

(Ct) from real-time PCR assays suggested large numbers of bacteria were present in the intact<br />

seed coats. As PCR does not distinguish if bacterial DNA is derived from live or dead cells and<br />

as this bacterium is non-cultivable, FISH specific for 16S rRNA was applied to thin sections of<br />

immature grapefruit seeds to provide indirect evidence of the presence and the viability of<br />

bacterial cells. Fluorescence is expected from bacterial cells which have a high concentration of<br />

ribosomes so that the copy number of the 16S rRNA is 10,000 to 100,000 per cell, indicating<br />

high levels of protein synthesis and hence viable, metabolically active cells. In August 2010,<br />

immature seeds were collected from fruit from an infected Conner’s grapefruit tree, fixed and<br />

imbedded in paraffin. Intense fluorescence was observed from phloem cells within the vascular<br />

bundle and individual bacterial cells were observed in large numbers. This data suggests that, at<br />

least in immature seeds, large numbers of viable cells are present in the seed coat, but not in the<br />

embryo.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 141<br />

8.21 Rapid, Sensitive, and Non-Radioactive Tissue-Blot Diagnostic Method for the<br />

Detection of Citrus Greening Disease (HLB)<br />

Gowda, S. 1 , Nageswara Rao, N. 1 , Miyata, S. 2 , Ghosh, D.K. 3 , Irey, M.S. 4 , Rogers, M.E. 1 ,<br />

Garnsey, S.M. 1<br />

1 UF-IFAS Citrus Research and Education Center, Lake Alfred, FL, USA<br />

2 National Institute of Fruit Tree Science, NARO, Japan<br />

3 National Research Center for Citrus, ICAR, India<br />

4 U.S. Sugar Corporation, Clewiston, FL, USA<br />

Citrus huanglongbing (HLB), also known as citrus greening, is one of the most devastating<br />

diseases of citrus worldwide. The disease is caused by gram-negative, phloem-limited<br />

α-proteobacterium, Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus, vectored by the Diaphorina citri<br />

Kuwayama. Citrus plants infected by the citrus greening bacterium may not show visible<br />

symptoms sometimes for years following infection, and non-uniform distribution within the tree<br />

makes the detection of the pathogen very difficult. Efficient management of HLB disease<br />

requires rapid and sensitive detection early in the infection followed by eradication of the source<br />

of pathogen and the vector. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based method is most<br />

commonly employed for screening the infected/suspected HLB plants and psyllids. This is time<br />

consuming, cumbersome, and not practical for screening large number of samples in the field. To<br />

overcome this, we have developed a simple, sensitive, non-radioactive, tissue-blot diagnostic<br />

method for early detection and screening of HLB disease. Digoxigenin-labeled molecular PCR<br />

and rioboprobes specific to Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus sequences have been developed<br />

and used for the detection of HLB in plants and psyllids.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 142<br />

Session 9:<br />

Asian Citrus Psyllid<br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 143<br />

9.1 A Database for Analysis of Diaphorina citri Population Monitoring Data from<br />

Commercial Groves<br />

Gast, T. 1 , Irey, M.S. 2 , Hou, H. 2<br />

1 Southern Gardens Citrus, Clewiston, FL, USA<br />

2 U.S. Sugar Corporation, Clewiston, FL, USA<br />

The presence of the Asian Citrus Psyllid, Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (ACP), was first noted in<br />

the commercial orange groves of Southern Gardens Citrus Corporation (SGC) in the summer of<br />

2000. By the summer of 2001, ACP was well established in all areas of this 21,500 acre<br />

operation. Huanglongbing (HLB) or citrus greening disease, caused by the bacterium Candidatus<br />

Liberibacter asiaticus, was first documented at SGC on October 11, 2005. As part of its HLB<br />

management program, SGC began a formal program for monitoring the population of the ACP in<br />

September 2007. In November 2008, protocols for field scouting were revised, and a database<br />

for documentation and analysis of scouting results was developed. In order to determine the most<br />

efficient method of scouting, psyllid population data has been monitored in the field using two<br />

different survey methods, the tap method and monitoring of growth flushes with a hand lens.<br />

Psyllid population trends at two commercial groves have been documented using both methods<br />

for over 2 years. In addition to providing a tool for day to day management decisions, the<br />

database has made it possible to compare the different scouting methodologies, and to correlate<br />

results obtained to subsequent HLB infection levels. Use of this or similar databases will enable<br />

growers to predict future HLB infection levels in commercial citrus groves based on current ACP<br />

population data, along with other factors. This data should also help the Florida citrus industry to<br />

establish action thresholds for ACP populations in commercial groves.<br />

Materials and Methods<br />

Data analyzed in this study was obtained from a large, commercial dataset from observations<br />

made by full-time, experienced HLB and ACP Scouts at SGC’s Dunwody Grove and Devil’s<br />

Garden Grove. A full cycle of ACP population monitoring was completed every 5 to 8 days at<br />

both groves in approximately 2,030 and 2,900 net planted acres, respectively. One stop to make<br />

observations was made for every 9 to 10 acres following one of two predetermined routes; the<br />

routes were customized for every Irrigation Zone, which averaged 120 acres in size. Seven out of<br />

ten stops were made on borders or “edges” of grove blocks. At every stop, 10 flush observations<br />

on 10 separate trees were made, and presence/absence of ACP adults, nymphs, and eggs<br />

recorded. Results were expressed in the database as percentage of flush over the <strong>entire</strong> Irrigation<br />

Zone with adults, nymphs, or eggs. Ten observations were then made utilizing the tap method<br />

pioneered for ACP by David Hall at USDA ARS Horticultural Research Lab in Fort Pierce (Hall<br />

et al., 2006) and Jawwad Qureshi and Phil Stansly at IFAS Southwest Florida Research and<br />

Education Center in Immokalee (Qureshi and Stansly, 2007). Total number of ACP adults in the<br />

Irrigation Zone was recorded, and results were expressed in the database as average number of<br />

psyllids per tap. Ten trees were observed at each stop, and the percentage of trees that had any<br />

amount of new flush was also documented. The percentage of stops in the Irrigation Zone in<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 144<br />

which at least one ACP adult was found using the tap method was also calculated in the<br />

database.<br />

Inspection for HLB was performed on raised platforms travelling at 2 mph, or by walking,<br />

in the case of younger, smaller trees. Diagnosis was made using visual symptoms on leaves and<br />

fruit. All trees flagged as suspect for HLB infection were re-examined by one of two experienced<br />

“Senior Scouts.” A GPS point was recorded for locations of all trees confirmed as being infected<br />

by HLB using a Hammerhead XRT ruggedized computer and GeoAg Treelogger software. GPS<br />

data was processed using ESRI ArcGIS software. Leaf samples for PCR analysis were collected<br />

daily for quality control purposes. PCR analysis was carried out at the Southern Gardens<br />

Diagnostic Laboratory managed by Mike Irey. PCR results indicate that the HLB Scouts were<br />

over 95% successful in their positive visual diagnosis of HLB disease.<br />

The 2009 ACP population data used for correlation and regression analysis in this study<br />

was comprised of over 1,337,000 separate field observations, rolled into yearly averages for each<br />

variable for a given Irrigation Zone. The 2010 HLB inspection data used is a cumulative<br />

percentage for the year, derived from the total number of HLB-infected trees detected in each<br />

Irrigation Zone, compared to the total number of bearing trees in that Zone at the beginning of<br />

the year. It represents two complete cycles of inspection at the two groves studied, including<br />

approximately 33,500 man-hours of work, and inspection of over 1,490,000 trees. Statistical<br />

analysis was performed using the data analysis pack of Microsoft Excel software.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

Regarding correlations between the different ACP scouting methodologies, and the different<br />

variables representing ACP population levels, a very strong correlation was found between<br />

“Psyllids per tap” and “% stops with psyllids,” both generated by the tap method (Table 1). This<br />

indicates that the presence/absence of ACP adults detected by tap sampling could be a useful<br />

way to monitor psyllid populations, as opposed to reporting the number of adults detected,<br />

though we have found that the time needed to count adults detected using this method is<br />

minimal. Very good correlations were also found between the two methodologies, i.e., between<br />

“Psyllids per tap” and “% flush w/ACP adults”, and between “% stops with psyllids” and<br />

“% flush w/ACP adults”. Correlations between “% flush w/ACP nymphs” and the other variables<br />

were also significant, though not as strong.<br />

Scrutiny of all variables representing ACP population levels over time revealed that we had<br />

a lapse in ACP control at the Dunwody Grove in 2009, with significantly higher populations<br />

there than at the Devil’s Garden Grove, especially during the period of April to August or<br />

September (Fig. 1). Because our 2010 commercial HLB inspections were revealing a much<br />

higher HLB incidence rate at Dunwody than Devil’s Garden, we decided to examine the possible<br />

statistical relationships between the data generated by these two scouting programs. The best<br />

correlation with the 2010 HLB infection data that we found was to the 2009 “% flush w/ACP<br />

nymphs” data (Table 1; Fig. 2). Regression analysis shows that the 2009 “% flush w/ACP<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 145<br />

nymphs” would have been a good predictor of the subsequent HLB infection at both groves<br />

(Fig. 3).<br />

Finally, recent economic models have suggested that the threshold for maintaining<br />

economic citrus production under the HLB management model of “inspection and elimination of<br />

infected trees for inoculum reduction” is around 4% to 5% HLB infection per year (Irey, 2011<br />

and Morris, 2011). Considering that the “tap method” is currently the most widely accepted<br />

method for ACP monitoring being used by Florida growers, our data suggests that maintaining<br />

ACP adult populations below 0.05 psyllids per tap can help to achieve that HLB infection<br />

threshold (Fig. 4).<br />

References<br />

Hall, D.G., Hentz, M.G., Clomperlik, M.A. 2006. A comparison of traps and stem tap sampling<br />

for monitoring adult Asian Citrus Psyllid (Hemiptera) in Citrus. Florida Entomologist (June<br />

2007) 90(2):327-334.<br />

Irey, M. 2011. When should a grower with HLB stop removing trees? 2 nd International Research<br />

Conference on Huanglongbing, Session 5: Oral Presentation 5.5.<br />

Morris, R.A. 2011. Economic considerations to treating HLB with the standard protocol or an<br />

enhanced foliar nutritional program. 2 nd International Research Conference on<br />

Huanglongbing, Session 5: Oral Presentation 5.4.<br />

Qureshi, J.A., Stansly, P.A. 2007. Integrated approaches for managing the Asian citrus psyllid<br />

Diaphorina citri (Homoptera: Psyllidae) in Florida. Proceedings of the Florida State<br />

Horticultural Society 120:110-115.<br />

Table 1. Correlations between 2009 ACP populations and 2010 HLB % infection. Four<br />

different variables representing ACP population levels, derived from two ACP scouting<br />

methodologies, were included in the analysis.<br />

HLB %<br />

infection<br />

2010<br />

HLB % infection 2010 1<br />

Psyllids<br />

per tap<br />

2009<br />

% stops<br />

w/psyllids<br />

2009<br />

% flush<br />

w/ACP<br />

adults<br />

2009<br />

% flush<br />

w/ACP<br />

nymphs<br />

2009<br />

Psyllids per tap 2009 0.51308 1<br />

% stops w/psyllids 2009 0.62212 0.97145 1<br />

% flush w/ACP adults 2009 0.49191 0.96870 0.92654 1<br />

% flush w/ACP nymphs 2009 0.76112 0.82578 0.87371 0.83806 1<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 146<br />

Fig. 1. ACP population trends at SGC’s Dunwody Grove and Devil’s Garden Grove. From<br />

December 2008 to September 2009, four variables representing ACP populations are presented.<br />

18.0%<br />

Average % Flush with ACP Nymphs and % HLB Infection 2010, by Irrigation Zone<br />

30.0%<br />

16.0%<br />

14.0%<br />

25.0%<br />

% flush with ACP nymphs<br />

12.0%<br />

10.0%<br />

8.0%<br />

6.0%<br />

20.0%<br />

15.0%<br />

10.0%<br />

% HLB Infection<br />

4.0%<br />

2.0%<br />

5.0%<br />

0.0%<br />

0.0%<br />

201<br />

202<br />

203<br />

204<br />

205<br />

206<br />

207<br />

208<br />

209<br />

210<br />

211<br />

212<br />

213<br />

214<br />

215<br />

216<br />

217<br />

218<br />

219<br />

220<br />

221<br />

222<br />

223<br />

224<br />

225<br />

227<br />

228<br />

229<br />

230<br />

231<br />

232<br />

233<br />

234<br />

235<br />

309<br />

311<br />

312<br />

313<br />

316<br />

317<br />

318<br />

319<br />

320<br />

321<br />

322<br />

323<br />

324<br />

325<br />

326<br />

327<br />

328<br />

329<br />

330<br />

331<br />

332<br />

333<br />

% Flush w/ACP nymphs 2009 % HLB Infection 2010<br />

Fig. 2. Average % flush with ACP nymphs by Irrigation Zone in 2009 compared to % HLB<br />

infection in the same Zone in 2010. Zones 201 to 235 are Devil’s Garden Grove; 309 to 333 are<br />

Dunwody Grove.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 147<br />

30%<br />

% flush w/nymphs 2009 vs. % HLB infection 2010<br />

% HLB for Zone, 2010<br />

25%<br />

20%<br />

15%<br />

10%<br />

R 2 = 0.5886<br />

P-value = 0.00031<br />

5%<br />

0%<br />

0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18%<br />

Average % flush w/nymphs for Zone, 2009<br />

Fig. 3. % HLB infection in 2010 as a function of yearly average of % flush with ACP nymphs<br />

for any given Irrigation Zone at Dunwody and Devil’s Garden Groves.<br />

0.400<br />

Average Psyllids (ACP) per Tap 2009 vs. % HLB Infection 2010<br />

30.0%<br />

Psyllids per Tap<br />

0.350<br />

0.300<br />

0.250<br />

0.200<br />

0.150<br />

0.100<br />

0.050<br />

25.0%<br />

20.0%<br />

15.0%<br />

10.0%<br />

5.0%<br />

% HLB Infection<br />

0.000<br />

201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 309 311 312 313 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333<br />

Psyllids per Tap 2009 % HLB Infection 2010<br />

0.0%<br />

Fig. 4. Average psyllids per tap by Irrigation Zone in 2009 compared to % HLB infection in the<br />

same Zone in 2010. Zones 201 to 235 are Devil’s Garden Grove; 309 to 333 are Dunwody<br />

Grove. HLB infection threshold is red dashed line at 5.0%.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 148<br />

9.2 RNAi Strategy in Citrus Trees to Reduce Hemipteran Pests: Psyllids and Leafhoppers<br />

Hunter, W.B. 1 , Glick, E. 2 , Bextine, B.R. 3 , Paldi, N. 2<br />

1 Subtropical Insect Research Unit, USDA-ARS, USHRL, Fort Pierce, FL, USA<br />

2 Beeologics, Inc., LLC, Miami, FL, USA<br />

3 Department of Biology, University of Texas-Tyler, Tyler, TX, USA<br />

We demonstrate delivery of dsRNA constructs for RNAi to psyllids and leafhoppers through<br />

feeding on artificial diet, cuttings, and whole-plant systems (herbaceous plants, woody<br />

grapevine, and citrus seedlings and trees). Preliminary results indicated increased mortality by<br />

Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri; the potato psyllid, Bactericera cockerelli; and the<br />

glassy-winged sharpshooter, Homalodisca vitripennis, using species-specific dsRNA’s.<br />

Treatments using citrus seedlings showed that dsRNA could be introduced into whole plant<br />

systems. Citrus trees which are ~2.5 m tall are currently being screened for dosage titers, uptake<br />

time, and persistence to calculate a cost/benefit ratio and effectiveness. The citrus trees are<br />

6-year-old producing Mexican Limes, thus permitting examination for presence and/or<br />

persistence of dsRNA constructs in fruit and juice. RNA interference technology (RNAi) has<br />

been used successfully to silence endogenous insect genes through feeding, as shown with<br />

research on honey bee (Hunter et al., 2010). We propose that in the case of citrus pests<br />

(i.e., psyllids), specific psyllid transcripts may provide a natural specific treatment that can be<br />

used to reduce and suppress psyllids. RNAi strategies may one day be used across area-wide<br />

programs to suppress insect pests.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 149<br />

9.3 Application of Insecticidal Sprays to Citrus in Winter Provides Significant Reduction<br />

in Asian Citrus Psyllid Diaphorina citri Populations and Opportunity for Additional<br />

Suppression Through Conservative and Augmentative Biological Control<br />

Qureshi, J.A., Stansly, P.A. UF-IFAS, Department of Entomology and Nematology, Southwest<br />

Florida Research and Education Center, Immokalee, FL, USA, E-mail: jawwadq@ufl.edu<br />

Diaphorina citri is an economically important pest of citrus mainly because it vectors<br />

Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus, causal organism of the Asian “huanglongbing” or citrus<br />

greening disease. Mature citrus trees in Florida are dormant in winter and produce most new<br />

shoots in spring, followed by sporadic growth in summer and fall. Young shoots are required for<br />

oviposition and nymphal development, but adults can survive and overwinter on hardened<br />

leaves. Therefore, foliar sprays of broad-spectrum insecticides applied to mature trees in winter<br />

were evaluated in a commercial citrus orchard as a tactic to reduce pest populations and<br />

insecticide use in spring and summer when beneficial insects are most active. Single sprays<br />

(AI/ha) of chlorpyrifos (2.8 kg) in January 2007 and chlorpyrifos, fenpropathrin (0.34 kg), and<br />

oxamyl (1.12 kg) in January 2008 reduced adult psyllids an average of 10- to 15-fold over<br />

5-6 months compared to untreated trees, respectively, without additional sprays. Spiders,<br />

lacewings, and ladybeetles were equally abundant during the growing season in both treated and<br />

untreated trees both years. This tactic has been adopted area-wide to manage psyllid in Florida<br />

and to establish Citrus Health <strong>Management</strong> Areas to reduce the spread of HLB. For additional<br />

suppression of psyllid, we are mass producing and releasing Tamarixia radiata, an ectoparasitoid<br />

of D. citri that we imported from Pakistan, South China, and North Vietnam in 2008, and an<br />

already established strain imported from Taiwan and South Vietnam in 1999. The repeated<br />

releases of these parasitoids in citrus groves are contributing to overall reduction in psyllid<br />

population.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 150<br />

9.4 Studies on Imidacloprid and <strong>Management</strong> of ACP in California<br />

Byrne, F. 1 , Morse, J.G. 1 , Bethke, J. 2<br />

1 Dept. of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, CA, USA<br />

2 University of California Cooperative Extension, San Diego, CA, USA<br />

ACP was recently detected in California. Thus far, the insect has been confined to backyard<br />

citrus and has not been detected on either nursery or field-grown citrus. HLB has not been<br />

detected in ACP insects sampled from find sites. Soil-applied systemic treatments with the<br />

neonicotinoid imidacloprid have been used for the management of ACP at find sites. In our<br />

research, we are evaluating possible strategies for the use of imidacloprid in commercial citrus.<br />

Key issues related to the use of imidacloprid are application rates and the timing of treatments to<br />

maximize psyllid control. In addition, concerns about the possible impacts of imidacloprid<br />

treatments against honey bees are being addressed. We are conducting extensive studies on the<br />

uptake and persistence of imidacloprid in the most important citrus-growing regions in<br />

California. Following treatments at different timings during a season, we monitor the<br />

concentrations of insecticide in leaf tissue that is most attractive to ACP; and, during the spring<br />

bloom, we test for the presence of imidacloprid residues in nectar sampled from flowers on<br />

treated trees. In addition to our work on field-grown citrus, we are also working with the citrus<br />

nursery industry to develop strategies for optimizing the use of imidacloprid on nursery stock.<br />

Imidacloprid treatments are used by nurseries as part of a quarantine mandate that requires that<br />

nursery stock be treated before it can be moved within the quarantine zone.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 151<br />

9.5 Selection and Dosage of Insecticides for the Control of the Asian Citrus Psyllid in the<br />

Citrus Groves of Mexico<br />

López-Arroyo, J.I. 1 , Díaz-Zorrilla, U. 2 , Hernández-Fuentes, L.M. 3 , Cortez-Mondaca, E. 4 ,<br />

Robles-González, M.M. 3 , Villanueva-Jiménez, J.A. 5 , Cabrera-Mireles, H. 2 , Loera-Gallardo, J. 1 ,<br />

Jasso-Argumedo, J. 6 , Curtí-Díaz, S.A. 6<br />

1 INIFAP, Centro de Investigación Regional del Noreste. Río Bravo, Tam., México<br />

2 INIFAP, Centro de Investigación Regional del Golfo Centro. Veracruz, Ver., México<br />

3 INIFAP, Centro de Investigación Regional del Pacífico Centro. Guadalajara, Jal., México<br />

4 INIFAP, Centro de Investigación Regional del Noroeste. Cd. Obregón, Son., México<br />

5 Colegio de Postgraduados, Campus Veracruz, Ver., México<br />

6 INIFAP, Centro de Investigación Regional del Sureste. Mérida, Yuc., México<br />

lopez.jose@inifap.gob.mx<br />

Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (Hemiptera: Psyllidae), the Asian citrus psyllid (ACP), was found in<br />

México in 2002 and has invaded the whole Mexican citrus industry during the past 6 years.<br />

Traditionally, the insect was controlled only in isolated groves where the direct damage was<br />

significant. Since the detection of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus in Yucatan, México in 2009,<br />

the status of ACP has changed because infective specimens could disseminate the pathogen to<br />

other groves in different areas of México. In order to develop a regional plan for the management<br />

of ACP in México, during the last 2 years, we evaluated more than 40 different insecticides in<br />

trials performed in different ecological areas of the Mexican citrus industry. The products<br />

included organophosphates, pyrethroids, neonicotinoids, mineral oils, botanicals, soaps,<br />

entomopathogenic fungi, etc. We selected the products that caused more than 85% mortality. In<br />

order to avoid the possible development of insecticide resistance in the ACP, we suggest a<br />

program for the use of insecticides for the control of the ACP according to its toxicological<br />

group. The plan includes dosages and timing for insecticide applications in citrus (grapefruit,<br />

mandarin, and orange), Mexican and Persian lime, as well as for young and mature trees. The<br />

program enforces the use of registered insecticides and presents alternative products that yield<br />

good control of the pest at an affordable economical cost. The program will be evaluated during<br />

2011 in the different citrus growing areas of México.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 152<br />

9.6 Asian Citrus Psyllid (ACP) Control: Potential Use of Systemic Insecticides in Citrus<br />

Bearing Trees<br />

Yamamoto, P.T. 1 , de Miranda, M.P. 2 , Felippe, M.R. 2<br />

1 ESALQ/Universidade de São Paulo, Piracicaba, Brazil<br />

2 Fundecitrus, Araraquara, Brazil<br />

Asian citrus psyllid (ACP) is an exotic citrus pest in Brazil that recently became very important<br />

as the vector of Liberibacters associated with citrus huanglongbing (HLB). Experiments were<br />

designed to study the efficacy of systemic insecticides to control ACP in citrus bearing trees and<br />

to determine the factors that influence their efficiencies. We conducted three experiments started<br />

at different times of the year, in which thiamethoxam and imidacloprid were tested at doses of<br />

1.25 g and 3.0-3.5 ml/m of plant height, respectively. In the first experiment, implemented in<br />

September 2009, both insecticides were effective in controlling ACP. Enzyme-linked<br />

immunosorbent assays (ELISA) were used to estimate the concentration of thiamethoxam in the<br />

plant, showing that the insecticide reached 4,000 ppb at 40 days after application in Valencia<br />

sweet orange on Swingle citrumelo. The concentration of thiamethoxam was higher than 400 ppb<br />

(concentration threshold that causes ACP mortality) from 9 to 68 days after application. The<br />

results of the second experiment, implemented in November 2009 in two rootstocks and soil<br />

types, showed lower insecticide efficiency when compared to the first experiment in Swingle<br />

rootstock. In Rangpur lime rootstock, the efficiency was low. The results of the third experiment,<br />

implemented in February 2010, showed that systemic insecticides were not effective in the<br />

control of ACP. The ELISA showed that the concentration of thiamethoxam was lower than<br />

200 ppb (concentration that causes no mortality) in the last two experiments. Factors influencing<br />

the absorption and translocation of systemic insecticides have not been clarified.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 153<br />

9.7 Insecticide Resistance and Susceptibility of Uninfected and Candidatus Liberibacter<br />

asiaticus-Infected Asian Citrus Psyllid in Florida<br />

Tiwari, S., Rogers, M.E., Stelinski, L.L. UF-IFAS Citrus Research and Education Center, Lake<br />

Alfred, FL, USA<br />

A 2-year field study was conducted to evaluate insecticide resistance levels in field populations<br />

of Asian citrus psyllid (ACP), Diaphorina citri Kuwayama. Five geographically discrete<br />

populations of adult ACP displayed a range of susceptibility levels against 12 tested insecticides.<br />

The highest level of resistance for adult ACP, as compared with a susceptible laboratory (LS)<br />

population, was found with imidacloprid with an LD 50 resistance ratio (RR) of 35 in one<br />

population. Likewise, among nymph populations, indications of resistance were observed with<br />

carbaryl (RR = 2.9), chlorpyriphos (RR = 3.2), imidacloprid (RR = 2.3 and 3.8), and spinetoram<br />

(RR = 3.0 and 5.9). Presence of varying levels of insecticide resistance in adult and nymph<br />

populations was potentially explained by elevated levels of three major detoxifying enzymes:<br />

general esterase, glutathione S-transferase, and cytochrome P 450 . These detoxifying enzymes are<br />

known to be up-regulated in insecticide resistant populations. Las infection significantly<br />

increased susceptibility of ACP adults to chlorpyriphos and spinetoram compared with<br />

uninfected counterparts, and infected ACP were more susceptible to insecticides in general than<br />

uninfected ones. Correspondingly, general esterase, glutathione S-transferase, and cytochrome<br />

P 450 enzyme activities were significantly lower in Las-infected than uninfected ACP. Mortality<br />

of both uninfected and Las-infected ACP was higher at 37° than at 20, 22, or 24°C. Across all<br />

temperatures tested, mean percent mortality was higher in Las-infected than uninfected ACP.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 154<br />

9.8 Development of Area-Wide Asian Citrus Psyllid <strong>Management</strong> Strategies in Texas<br />

Bartels, D.W. 1 , Sétamou, M. 2 , Ciomperlik, M.A. 1 , da Graça, J.V. 2<br />

1 USDA-APHIS-PPQ-CPHST, Mission, TX, USA<br />

2 Citrus Center, Texas A&M University-Kingsville, Weslaco, TX, USA<br />

The concept of an area-wide management approach against the Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina<br />

citri, has the potential to significantly lower the risk of huanglongbing (HLB) establishment and<br />

spread. Reducing the vector population has the advantage of not only lowering the risk of HLB<br />

spread but can make disease eradication possible in case of its accidental introduction, given it is<br />

detected early through ongoing survey efforts. In 2009, Texas A&M Kingsville Citrus Center<br />

and CPHST Mission Lab implemented a pilot project covering almost 1,500 acres of citrus to<br />

test area-wide management of ACP and minimize the risk of HLB in the Lower Rio Grande<br />

Valley, TX. Several of our objectives were to implement site-specific treatment regimes for ACP<br />

control in commercial citrus and refine monitoring methods for ACP populations and infestations<br />

pre- and post-treatment, and continue to test the efficacy of different insecticide application<br />

methods comprising aerial and ground application. We have documented that aerial and ground<br />

applications are very effective before spring flush. We saw a 93% reduction in ACP adults. The<br />

timing of this treatment is critical as adults need to be treated before they begin laying eggs on<br />

the spring flush. The most effective season-long treatment option included four foliar<br />

applications and soil-applied aldicarb. In 2010, we expanded the project area to cover 4,600<br />

acres of citrus and focused the main ACP control treatment to two dormant season sprays in<br />

January and November.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 155<br />

9.9 Asian Citrus Psyllid <strong>Management</strong> Strategies for California Citrus Growing Regions<br />

Grafton-Cardwell, E.E. 1 , Morse J.G. 1 , Taylor, B.J. 2<br />

1 University of California, Riverside, CA, USA<br />

2 Citrus Research Board, Visalia CA, USA<br />

Asian citrus psyllid (ACP) was first detected in southern California in October 2008 in the urban<br />

landscape. Since that time, the California Department of Food and Agriculture has conducted an<br />

eradication program utilizing systemic imidacloprid and foliar cyfluthrin wherever psyllids are<br />

detected. This program has helped to keep the psyllid from spreading into commercial citrus<br />

orchards; however, spread and establishment of ACP in commercial citrus is considered<br />

inevitable. The University of California in collaboration with the Citrus Research Board has<br />

conducted grower discussion sessions in five citrus growing regions of California to develop<br />

strategies for managing ACP once it is established in commercial citrus. In the initial phase of<br />

invasion, when ACP densities are low, treatments of a neonicotinoid and a pyrethroid are<br />

planned to potentially eradicate the pest in individual and/or neighboring orchards. When the<br />

psyllid becomes more widespread, then area-wide treatment programs will be necessary. Based<br />

on the Florida and Texas ACP management experience, ACP treatments will be directed at<br />

periods of flush and also at the late fall and early spring overwintering populations. The number<br />

of additional ACP-effective treatments needed in each region will depend on the current<br />

treatment program for other pests. The management program for the five citrus growing regions<br />

of California is discussed.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 156<br />

9.10 Area-Wide <strong>Management</strong> of Asian Citrus Psyllid in Southwest Florida<br />

Stansly, P.A. 1 , Arevalo, H.A. 1 , Zekri, M. 2 , Hamel, R. 3<br />

1 UF-IFAS Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, Immokalee, FL, USA<br />

2 Hendry County Extension Service, LaBelle, FL, USA<br />

3 Gulf Citrus Growers Association, LaBelle, FL, USA<br />

“Dormant” sprays of broad spectrum insecticides have proven to be an effective tool for<br />

suppressing overwintering adult psyllid populations in Florida, reducing their entry populations<br />

in the spring flush and resulting in significant reductions still detectable well into the growing<br />

season. This tactic appears to have the greatest effect when applied area wide. Over 70,000 acres<br />

were sprayed at least once by air and most of the remainder by ground in southwest Florida as a<br />

cooperative effort during the dormant seasons of 2008-09 and 2009-10. Psyllid populations in<br />

late May had still not increased significantly from winter levels in treated orchards, whereas a<br />

17-fold increase was seen in untreated blocks in 2009. Future plans are to expand the program to<br />

include area-wide scouting with the objective of tracking psyllid populations throughout the<br />

region, pinpointing problem areas, and assisting growers in making informed decisions on a<br />

block-by-block basis during the growing season.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 157<br />

9.11 Evaluation of Low Volume Sprayers Used in Citrus Psyllid Control Applications<br />

Hoffmann, C. 1, *, Fritz, B. 1 , Martin, D. 1 , Atwood, R. 2 , Hurner, T. 3 , Ledebuhr, M. 4 , Tandy, M. 5 ,<br />

Jackson, J.L. 6 , Wisler, G. 7 , Polek, M.L. 8<br />

1 USDA-ARS-Areawide Pest <strong>Management</strong> Research Unit-Aerial Application Group, 2771 F&B<br />

Road, College Station, TX, USA<br />

2 University of Florida, IFAS Extension, Tavares, FL, USA<br />

3 University of Florida, IFAS Extension, Sebring, FL, USA<br />

4 Ledebuhr Industries, Williamston, MI, USA<br />

5 Curtis DynaFog, Westfield, IN, USA<br />

6 Florida Citrus Industry Research Coordinating Council, Tavares, FL, USA<br />

7 USDA-ARS, National Programs, Beltsville, MD, USA<br />

8 Citrus Research Board, Riverside, CA, USA<br />

*To whom correspondence should be addressed: E-mail: clint.hoffmann@ars.usda.gov<br />

Citrus greening is a disease that threatens the survival and economic viability of the Florida<br />

Citrus Industry due to the disease’s ability to kill an infected tree. An insect called Asian citrus<br />

psyllid is a carrier of the bacteria that causes citrus greening; therefore, citrus growers are using<br />

several insecticides and sprayers to find the most effective method to control the insect.<br />

A number of studies involving numerous citrus sprayers and active ingredients were conducted<br />

to determine the droplet size generated by the different sprayers and how to adjust the sprayers to<br />

meet a droplet size requirement that is on many insecticide labels. In the sprayer tests, it was<br />

found that reductions in engine speed or increases in flow rate were required to increase droplet<br />

sizes to meet the product label required droplet size. As the equipment tested here represent the<br />

most typical application equipment used in Florida for psyllid control, these results will provide<br />

applicators, growers, and extension agents with general guidelines to ensure that spray systems<br />

are operated in a manner that complies with label restrictions.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 158<br />

9.12 Identification of Parasitoids and Haplotypes of Tamarixia radiata (Waterston)<br />

(Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) from Diaphorina citri in Yucatán, México<br />

González-Hernández, A. 1 , Jasso-Argumedo, J. 2 , Cruz-García, R. 1 , Lozano-Contreras, M. 2 ,<br />

López-Arroyo, J.I. 3 , Villanueva-Segura, O.K. 1<br />

1 UANL, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, San Nicolás de los Garza, N.L., México<br />

2 INIFAP, Centro de Investigación Regional del Sureste, Mérida, Yuc., México<br />

3 INIFAP, Centro de Investigación Regional del Noreste, Río Bravo, Tam., México<br />

agonzale@fcb.uanl.mx.<br />

Recent studies from 2007 to 2010 have shown morphological and genetic variation in Tamarixia<br />

radiata (Waterston), as well as possible cryptic species. The main objective of this work is to<br />

identify the parasitoids associated with Diaphorina citri and to characterize the haplotypes of<br />

T. radiata present in Yucatán, México. During January to July of 2010, 76 samples of immature<br />

D. citri were collected from citrus plants and Murraya sp. from 161 different, sampled localities.<br />

Species identification was done through comparison of amplified sequences and those available<br />

at GeneBank. Phylogeny was rebuilt using the program Mega 4.1. The results showed the<br />

following parasitoids: Tamarixia radiata, Aprostocetus sp., Horismenus sp., Pachyneuron sp.,<br />

and Synopeas sp. Most of the genetic diversity was found in gen COI from the identified<br />

specimens of T. radiata; four different haplotypes were obtained: H1, H2, H3, and H4.<br />

Comparing Haplotypes (H) from the current study and previous works, it was found that H1 is<br />

similar to H2 from Barr et al. (2010) and also similar to H7 from de León and Sétamou (2010).<br />

The H2 is similar to H1 from Barr et al. (2010) and also similar to H2 from de León and<br />

Sétamou (2010). The Haplotypes H3 and H4 are unique from México. The H1 is the most<br />

common; this is similar to the records found in de León and Sétamou (2010) and Barr et al.<br />

(2010). There is only one record of the Haplotype H4. We found one cryptic species that has not<br />

been reported in previous work.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 159<br />

9.13 Host Specificity Testing of Tamarixia radiata for the Classical Biological Control of<br />

Asian Citrus Psyllid, Diaphorina citri, in California<br />

Pandey, R.R., Hoddle, M.S. Department of Entomology, University of California Riverside,<br />

Riverside, CA, USA<br />

Asian citrus psyllid (ACP) vectors phytopathogenic bacteria that cause a lethal disease in citrus<br />

known as huanglongbing. Pest management practices largely rely on the use of insecticides to<br />

control ACP. However, pesticide use is not always possible, especially in the urban settings with<br />

backyard citrus and in commercial organic production systems. Classical biological control of<br />

ACP using host specific parasitoids, in particular Tamarixia radiata (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae),<br />

is one possible strategy for ACP control in areas where pesticide use is undesired. A strain of this<br />

parasitoid from the Punjab of Pakistan is of interest for use in California. Work is in progress to<br />

assess the environmental safety of T. radiata to native Californian psyllids and weed biocontrol<br />

agents. Representative non-target psyllids have been selected based on (A) native plant feeding<br />

psyllids that are phylogenetically related to ACP, (B) native psyllids with higher probability of<br />

occurrence around citrus groves, (C) native pest psyllids, (D) introduced pest psyllids, and (E)<br />

imported biological control agents of weeds. Laboratory-reared, late-instar ACP and non-target<br />

psyllid nymphs were transferred onto Murraya seedlings and respective native host plants grown<br />

in soil media to maintain good health of the test psyllids. The ability of T. radiata ‘Pakistani<br />

strain’ was tested in quarantine under choice and no-choice regimes contained within a caged<br />

arena. Successful completion of host specificity testing will be followed by submission of an<br />

Environment Assessment report for USDA-APHIS, NAPPO, and the CDFA. Demonstration of<br />

acceptable risk to non-target species by T. radiata to these regulatory agencies will likely result<br />

in permission to mass rear and release the Punjab strain of T. radiata in California for classical<br />

biological control of ACP.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 160<br />

9.14 Predators in Non-Commercial Citrus and Preliminary Evaluation of Their Potential<br />

Against the Asian Citrus Psyllid in Texas<br />

Pfannenstiel, R.S. 1 , Unruh, T.R. 2<br />

1 Beneficial Insects Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Weslaco, TX, USA<br />

2 YARL, USDA-ARS, Wapato, WA, USA<br />

Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (ACP) became established in the Lower Rio Grande Valley of<br />

Texas nearly 10 years ago. Although techniques have been developed that provide control in<br />

orchards, there are few tactics that are consistently applied to dooryard trees and abandoned<br />

orchards. In an effort to understand population dynamics of ACP in non-commercial citrus, the<br />

natural enemies present in non-commercial citrus, and their impact on ACP, we began<br />

a long-term sampling and evaluation program in 2010. ACP densities were estimated and natural<br />

enemies collected monthly at four non-commercial citrus sites in 2010. Predators were collected<br />

and reared if possible to confirm identity and stage. Samples of predators were collected and<br />

tested for feeding on ACP using a psyllid specific monoclonal antibody. Additionally, lab tests<br />

were conducted to determine whether predominant predators would attack and feed on adult<br />

ACP under laboratory conditions. Greater than 95% of all predators collected during 2010 were<br />

spiders. The dominant spider taxa consisted of two species of anyphaenid, a philodromid,<br />

a dictynid, and two salticids. Not all spiders will feed on adult ACP.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 161<br />

9.15 Suitability of Diaphorina citri, Toxoptera citricida, and Aphis spiraecola as Prey for<br />

Hippodamia convergens<br />

Qureshi, J.A., Stansly, P.A. UF-IFAS, Department of Entomology and Nematology, Southwest<br />

Florida Research and Education Center, Immokalee, FL, USA, E-mail: jawwadq@ufl.edu<br />

The convergent lady beetle, Hippodamia convergens Guérin-Méneville, is an important predator<br />

of soft-bodied insect pests. Some citrus producers in Florida initiated releases of commercially<br />

available H. convergens beetles in their groves mainly against D. citri. However, detailed<br />

investigations on the performance of H. convergens on diets of D. citri, T. citricida, or<br />

A. spiraecola were lacking. Therefore, our objective was to evaluate preference, survival,<br />

development, and reproduction of H. convergens on these three Homopteran pests of citrus.<br />

Larvae preferred D. citri over T. citricida in two-way choice tests and consumed more D. citri<br />

than T. citricida or A. spiraecola in no-choice tests during the first 6 hours of encounters in test<br />

arenas. Adults preferred T. citricida over A. spiraecola in two-way choice tests but consumed<br />

equal numbers of all three species in no-choice tests. Development times of larvae at 25.5 ±<br />

0.05°C averaged 11.5 ± 0.9 days on A. spiraecola, significantly longer than a cumulative average<br />

of 8.4 ± 0.4 days on other diets that were equally suitable. Larval survival and pupation times did<br />

not differ among diets. Females lived longer than males irrespective of diet, and there were no<br />

statistically significant differences among psyllid and aphid diets for fecundity or fertility of<br />

beetles. Thus, D. citri, T. citricida, and A. spiraecola are all suitable hosts for H. convergens.<br />

However, we do not yet know how these beetles will respond in the Florida citrus environment.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 162<br />

9.16 Molecular Analysis of Tamarixia radiata from America Uncovers Extensive Haplotype<br />

Variation: Multiple Groups?<br />

de León, J.H. 1 , Gastaminza, G.A. 2 , Sétamou, M. 3 , Cáceres, S. 4 , Kanga, L.H.B. 5 , Buenahora, J. 6 ,<br />

Parra, J.R. 7 , Logarzo, G.A. 8 , Stañgret, C.R.W. 9<br />

1 USDA, ARS, Weslaco, TX, USA<br />

2 Estación Experimental Agroindustrial Obispo Colombres (EEAOC), Tucumán, Argentina<br />

3 Citrus Center Texas A&M University-Kingsville, Weslaco, TX, USA<br />

4 Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Bella Vista, Corrientes, Argentina<br />

5 Florida A&M University, Tallahassee, FL, USA<br />

6 Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Salto, Uruguay<br />

7 Escola Superior de Agricultura ‘Luiz de Queiroz’/USP, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil<br />

8 USDA, ARS, SABCL, Buenos Aires, Argentina<br />

9 Private Contractor, Itapúa, Paraguay<br />

A phylogeographic analysis was performed on field-collected populations of Tamarixia radiata<br />

from South (Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, and Uruguay) and North (Florida, Texas, and México)<br />

America along with laboratory strains from Asia (Pakistan, Southern China, and Northern<br />

Vietnam) by sequencing the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 gene (COI) (518-bp).<br />

Two colonies of the same strain from Pakistan were analyzed that were maintained at two<br />

different locations (Pak-1 and Pak-2). Our ongoing goal is to determine whether T. radiata could<br />

exist as a cryptic species complex or to determine whether groups can be uncovered and<br />

distinguished. Extensive haplotype (hp) variation was uncovered with a total of 52 haplotypes<br />

out of 91 individuals, indicating that 57% of individuals carried a different haplotype. Four<br />

haplotypes were shared among countries and continents: hp2 in Florida, China, and Vietnam;<br />

hp8 in Texas, México, Argentina, Brazil, and Pak-2; hp16 in Brazil and Pak-1; and hp21 in<br />

Uruguay and Pak-1. Interestingly, no sharing of haplotypes was seen between the Pak-1 and<br />

Pak-2 stains. A NeighborNet phylogenetic network clustered the haplotypes into four groups:<br />

Group 1 (Florida, China, and Vietnam), Group 2 (Uruguay and Pak-1), Group 3 (Argentina,<br />

Brazil, Uruguay, Pak-1, and Vietnam), and Group 4 (Texas, México, Brazil, Paraguay, and<br />

Pak-2). Each of these haplotypes was positioned at a specific node in the network, implicitly<br />

suggesting that each may be an ancestral haplotype. Similar results were seen with a 95%<br />

confidence statistical parsimony network. Are these groups reproductively compatible? Accurate<br />

identifications are crucial to the success of biological control programs.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 163<br />

9.17 Molecular Characterization of a New Entomopathogenic Fungus Isaria poprawskii:<br />

A Potential Biocontrol Agent for Diaphorina citri. Development of Isaria-Specific<br />

Molecular Markers<br />

de León, J.H. 1 , Cabanillas, H.E. 1 , Humber, R.A. 2 , Murray, K.D. 1 , Moran, P. 1 , Jones, W.A. 3<br />

1 USDA, ARS, Weslaco, TX, USA<br />

2 USDA, ARS, Ithaca, NY, USA<br />

3 USDA, ARS, Stoneville, MS, USA<br />

We genetically characterized Isaria poprawskii sp. nov., a new entomopathogenic fungal species<br />

similar to Isaria javanica (= Paecilomyces javanicus). Biological, ecological, and morphological<br />

data will be presented elsewhere. The fungus was discovered during natural epizootics on the<br />

sweet potato whitefly (Bemisia argentifolii) in the Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas (LRGV),<br />

USA. Phylogenetic analyses of I. poprawskii inferred from β-tubulin (TUB2) sequence data was<br />

performed along with standard Isaria TUB2 sequences obtained from GenBank. Fifteen<br />

previously un-sequenced fungal isolates, eight of which were field collected from the LRGV,<br />

were also included in the analyses. I. poprawskii was shown to be closely related to I. javanica<br />

ex-type; however, it formed its own unique clade, thus confirming its status as a new fungal<br />

species. In addition, our analyses confirmed that I. poprawskii could be recovered from the fields<br />

of the LRGV. The results showed that both I. javanica and I. poprawskii are present in the<br />

LRGV in sympatry. Polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism<br />

(PCR-RFLP) diagnostic assays reliably distinguished isolates belonging to the I. javanica and<br />

I. poprawskii clades. Inter-simple sequence repeat-polymerase chain reaction (ISSR-PCR) DNA<br />

fingerprinting also distinguished the ex-type isolates of I. javanica and I. poprawskii. PCR-RFLP<br />

assays were also developed toward I. fumosorosea and I. tenuipes, and the four assays were<br />

tested for their utility on important isolates presently being used in biocontrol programs against<br />

Diaphorina citri. These assays, along with the phylogenetic data, uncovered 11 misidentified<br />

fungal isolates. Correct identifications are critical to biological control programs.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 164<br />

9.18 RNAi - Evaluating Injection into Citrus Trees and Grapevine to Target Psyllids and<br />

Leafhoppers<br />

Hunter, W.B. 1 , Stover, E. 1 , Glick, E. 2 , Bextine, B.R. 3 , Paldi, N. 2<br />

1 USDA-ARS, U.S. Horticultural Research Lab, Fort Pierce, FL, USA<br />

2 Beeologics, Inc., LLC, Miami, FL, USA<br />

3 Department of Biology, University of Texas-Tyler, Tyler, TX, USA<br />

Methods to deliver effective dosages of dsRNA constructs into woody crops, i.e., citrus trees and<br />

grapevine, to induce RNA interference (RNAi) effects on targeted insect pests were evaluated.<br />

RNAi has been demonstrated to work in psyllids and leafhoppers. Citrus trees and grapevines<br />

grown in glasshouses or on an ARS research farm were treated with dsRNA, and the leaves were<br />

evaluated for presence and persistence over a 1- to 4-week period. Preliminary results showed<br />

that persistence could be extended by weekly delivery of dsRNA, or by an increase in<br />

concentration of a single treatment, which has also been shown in other applications of RNAi fed<br />

to insects (Hunter et al., 2010). While these results are promising, more research is needed to<br />

determine concentration levels needed within plants to trigger effective RNAi in feeding insects;<br />

to determine the influences of plant size; and seasonal effects.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 165<br />

9.19 Using Novel Photonic Fence Technology to Protect Foundation Block and Nursery<br />

Stock from Asian Citrus Psyllid<br />

Johanson, E. 1 , Patt, J. 2 , Mullen, E. 1 , Rutschman, P. 1 , Pegram, N. 1<br />

1 Intellectual Ventures Lab, Bellevue, WA, USA<br />

2 USDA-ARS, Weslaco, TX, USA<br />

Photonic Fence Technology (PFT) uses a combination of real-time image processing, optics, and<br />

lasers to detect, identify, track, and kill specified insects that enter the detection area. Originally<br />

developed to combat malaria, the system has been tested on Asian citrus psyllids (ACP). PFT<br />

identifies the genus and gender of an insect based on the target’s wingbeat frequency and is able<br />

to identify and kill insects at a range exceeding 30 m by applying a brief but lethal burst of<br />

photonic energy via a directed focused laser beam. The <strong>entire</strong> system can be built from relatively<br />

inexpensive components common in consumer electronics, including safeguards to disarm the<br />

system if a human enters the detection area. Recent testing shows that PFT also has the<br />

capability to detect, identify, and kill Asian citrus psyllids (ACP). Specifically, photonic<br />

exposure testing shows that ACP can be identified and eliminated at a distance of 7 m using a<br />

15 millisecond dose of 10 mJ of photonic energy. Next steps include optimizing this technology<br />

specifically to protect foundation block and nursery stock from ACP. As PFT can be adapted to<br />

perform non-lethal analysis of insect flight movements, future work will include research on the<br />

system’s capabilities in monitoring ACP presence in trucks, shipping containers, and outdoor<br />

citrus plantings. Initial test results indicate that PFT could become a cost-effective ACP<br />

management and research tool.<br />

References<br />

Bové, J.M. 2006. Huanglongbing: a destructive, newly-emerging, century-old disease of citrus.<br />

Journal of <strong>Plant</strong> Pathology 88:7-37.<br />

Hall, D.G., Hentz, G., Ciomperlik, M. 2007. A comparison of traps and stem tap sampling for<br />

monitoring adult Asian citrus psyllid (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) in citrus. Florida Entomologist<br />

90:327-334.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 166<br />

9.20 Development of a Diaphorina citri-Specific Molecular Diagnostic Marker for Gut<br />

Content Examinations<br />

de León, J.H. 1 , Thomas, D.B. 1 , Sétamou, M. 2 , Hagler, J.R. 3<br />

1 USDA, ARS, Weslaco, TX, USA<br />

2 Citrus Center Texas A&M University-Kingsville, Weslaco, TX, USA<br />

3 USDA, ARS, Maricopa, AZ, USA<br />

The goal of the study was to develop a Diaphorina citri-specific molecular diagnostic marker to<br />

aid in identifying key predators to enhance biological control efforts (e.g., Tamarixia radiata,<br />

Isaria fungal isolates). Field studies in citrus orchards revealed that various species of lady<br />

beetles (Coccinellidae) were the most common and most important predators of D. citri in Texas<br />

(M. Sétamou, unpubl. data). The mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit I gene (COI) was<br />

sequenced, and a specific COI marker was developed that generated a DNA fragment of 183-bp.<br />

The marker detected all life stages (eggs, larvae, and adults) of D. citri. Sensitivity assays<br />

showed the detection limit of the marker to be about 5 pg. The COI marker has been tested in<br />

specificity assays against 41 species of arthropods; including 10 species of Psyllidae, 10 species<br />

of Coccinellidae, 10 species of spiders, 3 species of green lacewings (Chrysopidae), 4 species of<br />

sharpshooters (Cicadellidae), an earwig (Forficulidae), and a ground beetle (Carabidae). The<br />

specificity tests demonstrated that the COI marker is highly specific toward D. citri, as<br />

cross-reactivity was not detected with any other species tested to date. The specificity of the COI<br />

molecular marker is critical; for example, out of the 10 Psyllidae identified in Texas, 5 are<br />

commonly found on traps in Texas citrus. Ash grey and convergent lady beetles tested positive<br />

after feeding on D. citri nymphs, demonstrating the utility of the marker for use in gut content<br />

analyses. The marker could aid in developing a conservation biological control program.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 167<br />

9.21 Development of a Pathogen Dispenser to Control Asian Citrus Psyllid (ACP) in<br />

Residential Citrus<br />

Patt, J. 1 , Jackson, M. 2 , Dunlap, C. 2 , Meikle, W. 1 , Adamczyk, J. 1<br />

1 USDA-ARS, Weslaco, TX, USA<br />

2 USDA-ARS, Peoria, IL, USA<br />

ACP dwelling in residential areas may stymie the effectiveness of area-wide management<br />

programs aimed at containing the spread of HLB in commercial citrus. We are developing an<br />

auto-disseminator (dispenser) of spores of the fungal pathogen Isaria fumosorosea (strain 3581).<br />

The tube-shaped dispenser, designed to be hung from backyard trees, has several features to<br />

optimize spore transfer to ACP. It is bright yellow and has pleats to provide multiple edges on<br />

which ACP can perch and crawl. The spore carrier, a powder made from pulverized cotton burrs,<br />

can support both blastospores and conidia, and can be dusted on the dispenser surface. In<br />

efficacy tests, free-flying psyllids, released from a cage in a greenhouse, were exposed to an<br />

array of 8 spore dispensers and 32 potted orange trees. A proportion of the psyllids settled on the<br />

trees after visiting the dispensers. The trees were inspected for 6 days following release and the<br />

number of psyllids on each tree recorded. Dead psyllids were returned to the lab where they were<br />

surface sterilized, placed in sterile humid chambers, and incubated at 26° ± 1°C. After 7 days, all<br />

remaining psyllids were collected and tested for infection. A mean of 56% (±8.2% SEM)<br />

(n = 3 tests) of the psyllids recovered from the trees developed mycosis, indicating the<br />

plausibility of using an auto-disseminator to infect ACP. Further tests will determine whether<br />

horizontal and secondary infections occur from ACP infected by the auto-disseminator. The<br />

possibility of using scent attractants is being explored.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 168<br />

9.22 Producing New Flush at Will in Citrus to Study ACP-<strong>Plant</strong> Interactions<br />

Malik, N.S.A., Brockington, J., Pérez, J.L., Mangan, R.L. USDA-ARS, Kika de la Garza<br />

Subtropical Agricultural Research Center, Weslaco, TX, USA<br />

Asian citrus psyllids (ACP) produce their nymphs only on new citrus leaves from where they<br />

multiply and possibly transmit the pathogen Candidatus Liberibacter that causes the ‘greening<br />

disease’. Research efforts to understand and control the lethal ‘greening disease’ require a<br />

constant supply of new flush to use in various studies. We have therefore tested various<br />

environmental and surgical treatments that could produce abundance of new flush in citrus plants<br />

throughout the year. Our results have shown that through environmental manipulations (i.e., by<br />

changing day and night temperatures, and length of induction period), we can not only produce<br />

new flush at will, but we could also control if the new flush will be vegetative or flowering.<br />

Thus, the technique may be useful for studies even on other insect interactions where insects may<br />

be more attracted to flowers versus vegetative shoots. The technique is also useful for nurseries<br />

to induce branching to enhance market value of the potted trees. In addition to environmental<br />

manipulations, we have also found that surgical removal of leaves prior to subjecting the plants<br />

to induction conditions greatly enhance the production of flush in different citrus cultivars. These<br />

results and the design of an inexpensive walk-in type growth chamber ($6K vs. $100K of<br />

commercial growth chamber) for such studies will be presented.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 169<br />

9.23 Thresholds for Vector Control in Young Citrus Treated for Symptoms of HLB with a<br />

Nutrient/SAR Package<br />

Monzó, C., Arevalo, H.A, Stansly, P.A. UF-IFAS Southwest Florida Research and Education<br />

Center, Immokalee, FL, USA<br />

Control of Diaphorina citri management is one of the basic components of HLB management,<br />

even for infected trees (Arevalo and Stansly, unpubl.). Foliar applications of micronutrients are a<br />

complementary strategy being used by many Florida growers to extend the productive life of<br />

infected trees. Therefore, establishment of economic thresholds for psyllid control, under<br />

different price scenarios, could optimize returns on investment when a nutrient/SAR package is<br />

being applied, even if HLB incidence is high. To accomplish this objective, two 3-year field<br />

experiments are being conducted in commercial orange blocks with high incidence of<br />

symptomatic trees. Experimental design is RCB with four replicates and four treatments: (1) No<br />

insecticide, (2) calendar applications, (3) nominal threshold of 0.2 psyllids/stem tap, and<br />

(4) nominal threshold of 0.7 psyllids/stem tap. Psyllid populations are being monitored biweekly<br />

by tap sampling and flushing observations. Impacts of insecticides on natural enemies are being<br />

evaluated by tap samples, flush observations, and suction samples. Economic thresholds will be<br />

calculated using the following parameters: treatment costs, fruit price, insecticide efficacy, and<br />

yield loss. Yield loss will be co-related with the cumulative number of ACP/tap obtained in each<br />

of the treatments, as well as the incidence of HLB and the average bacterial titer as estimated by<br />

Q-PCR. Differences in cumulative ACP/tap among treatments have become evident 4 months<br />

after initiating experiments, with more psyllids in treatments (1) and (4) (294.3 ± 100.3 and<br />

633.8 ± 331.3 cumulative ACP/tap, respectively) than in treatments (2) and (3) (58.6 ± 33.6 and<br />

212.5 ± 97.6 cumulative ACP/tap, respectively).<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 170<br />

9.24 Experimental Release Rate Analysis of Volatile Compounds from Wax-Based<br />

Dispensers<br />

Neuman, R.D., Mills, D.R., Shelton, A.B. Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA<br />

An engineering evaluation was performed to evaluate deployment strategies for dimethyl<br />

disulfide (DMDS) as an effective ACP repellent. An experimental apparatus was set up to<br />

investigate the release of volatile substances from wax-based dispenser under well-defined<br />

conditions of geometry, surface area, air flow, and temperature. The advantage is that the release<br />

rate can be modeled as a convective mass transfer process taking place in laminar boundary layer<br />

flow parallel to a flat surface. Therefore, the gas-phase mass-transfer coefficient and, hence, the<br />

release rate per unit surface area can be predicted. Release rate measurements of emulsified<br />

paraffin wax, with and without DMDS, show three regimes of mass loss: (a) an initial rapid loss<br />

linear with time, (b) a transition region, and (c) a much smaller rate of loss decreasing with time.<br />

Significantly, the statistically measured value of 0.87 g/h for the release rate in the constant rate<br />

period is found to be in excellent agreement with the theoretical calculations (0.85 g/h) of the<br />

mass loss of water from blank formulations. In contrast, the release rate is 0.63 g/h for<br />

wax-DMDS (10% w/w) formulations, a value significantly lower than that predicted (1.85 g/h).<br />

The release rate in wax-DMDS formulations appears to be affected by both chemical and<br />

structural effects, whereas the release rate in blank wax formulations appears to be only affected<br />

by structural effects. The release rate profiles indicate serious challenges in the deployment of<br />

DMDS using current wax-based formulations. Thus, for the delivery of DMDS and related<br />

substances, alternative deployment strategies should be developed and evaluated.<br />

See Addendum A4 for Extended Paper 9.24 – Page 281 - 286<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 171<br />

9.25 Vegetation Canopy Airflow Modeling for Airborne Dispersion of DMDS<br />

Shelton, A.B., Neuman, R.D. Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA<br />

A computational fluid dynamics model of airflow in and around vegetation is used to examine<br />

the airborne dispersion of dimethyl disulfide (DMDS) vapor within a citrus orchard under<br />

a narrowly scoped set of conditions. The basic airflow is governed by the Reynolds-averaged<br />

Navier-Stokes formulation where closure for the unresolved turbulence scales is provided by<br />

a traditional two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence model. The vegetation is represented in a<br />

virtual manner through source terms that model the drag and turbulence length scale<br />

modification imparted by leaves and branches on the air. Dimethyl disulfide is treated as a<br />

passive scalar concentration field whose transport and distribution depend on intrinsic diffusivity<br />

and advection by the prevailing airflow. Numerical solution of the flow model, including the<br />

vegetation source terms and passive scalar evolution, is accomplished in a commercial<br />

computational fluid dynamics code. The simulations provide the steady state plume geometry of<br />

dimethyl disulfide for specified release rate and point, hedge geometry, and ambient winds.<br />

Results show that for 2.5 m/s winds at 10 m, a ground point release rate of 0.2 g/day provides<br />

good coverage at a concentration of at least 1 ppb with a relatively small local region in excess of<br />

the human olfactory threshold concentration of 10 ppb.<br />

See Addendum A4 for Extended Paper 9.25 – Page 287 - 292<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 172<br />

9.26 Methods and Systems to Deliver Volatile Compounds for Biological Control Strategies<br />

Neuman, R.D., Shelton, A.B., Zee, R.H. Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA<br />

There is great interest in natural volatile compounds having known benefits and their usage in<br />

the fight against the ubiquitous huanglongbing (HLB) disease. However, the methods, devices,<br />

and systems associated with the prior art of delivering volatile compounds are not able to meet<br />

the requisite demands of field applications. In this paper, we disclose a breakthrough in the art of<br />

controlled delivery of volatile compounds that meet the design requirements for a wide variety of<br />

applications and methods. The approach employed is the development of vapor delivery systems<br />

that utilize passive flow control nozzles uniquely designed to deliver volatile compounds in<br />

either open local environments or open field environments. Indeed, the methods and vapor<br />

delivery systems described provide (a) continuous, consistent, and sustainable rate of delivery<br />

over <strong>entire</strong> growing seasons, (b) controlled rate of delivery at strategic field locations which<br />

yields effective concentrations in open environments per application requirements,<br />

(c) fine-tuning of the rate of delivery to a predetermined rate for specific applications, (d) the<br />

means to utilize volatile compounds having vapor pressures that range over several orders of<br />

magnitude, and (e) deployment of advanced biocontrol configurations such as combinations of<br />

repellents, attractants, and immune enhancement promoters. The invention has many advantages,<br />

one of which is the flexibility it offers in the design and engineering of vapor delivery systems<br />

for biocontrol strategies. Among the benefits of biological control, especially when large-scale<br />

application systems are implemented, will be reduced usage of various pesticides with significant<br />

reduction in pesticide residues in crop products.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 173<br />

Session 10:<br />

HLB <strong>Management</strong><br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 174<br />

10.1 Trunk Injection of Copper Sulfate Pentahydrate (Magna-Bon) Affects Expression of<br />

HLB<br />

Graham, J.H. 1 , Irey, M.S. 2 , Miele, F. 3<br />

1 UF-IFAS Citrus Research and Education Center, Lake Alfred, FL, USA<br />

2 U.S. Sugar Corporation, Clewiston, FL, USA<br />

3 Magna-Bon, Okeechobee, FL, USA<br />

HLB is caused by a phloem-limited bacterium that is unlikely to be directly contacted by<br />

bactericides such as copper (Cu) formulations applied to the plant surface. The objective was to<br />

evaluate trunk injections of soluble Cu in Magna-Bon (M-B). The trial was located in a south<br />

Florida grove of 5-year-old Hamlin orange trees that were healthy (PCR-), asymptomatic (PCR+<br />

without symptoms), and PCR+ with mild decline. Six treatments of 24 trees consisted of<br />

non-treated check (NTC); 1 M-B injection @ 8,000 ppm; 1 M-B injection @ 1,000 ppm; 2 M-B<br />

injections @ 1,000 ppm; 6 M-B injections @ 1,000 ppm; or 6 M-B injections @ 500 ppm. Trunk<br />

injections of 3-5 ml per tree were made at 1- or 3-month intervals, depending on treatment. Trees<br />

were assayed by PCR to estimate bacterial infection and HLB canopy symptoms were visually<br />

assessed before and at 5 months after injections began in April 2009. All M-B treatments<br />

produced changes in canopy ratings that reflected positive response compared to no change for<br />

the NTC trees. Ct values for the NTC trees indicated positive HLB status, whereas Ct’s for M-B<br />

treated trees were significantly higher and indicated negative or threshold bacterial infection.<br />

High leaf Cu in all treatments indicated overspray of the trees with Cu bactericide. Alternatively,<br />

a bioassay for systemic copper activity was conducted with expanding fall flush by<br />

injection-infiltration of detached leaves with Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri (Xcc). Canker<br />

lesions were reduced in leaves of M-B treated versus NTC trees, confirming Cu from M-B is<br />

systemic in the tree.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 175<br />

10.2 Chemical Compounds Effective Against the Citrus Huanglongbing Bacterium,<br />

Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus In <strong>Plant</strong>a<br />

Zhang, M.-Q. 1 , Powell, C.A. 1 , Zhou, L.J. 1 , He, Z. 1 , Stover, E. 2 , Duan, Y.-P. 2<br />

1 UF-IFAS Indian River Research and Education Center, Fort Pierce, FL, USA<br />

2 USDA-ARS-USHRL, Fort Pierce, FL, USA, Yongping.duan@ars.usda.gov<br />

Citrus huanglongbing (HLB) is one of the most destructive diseases of citrus worldwide and is<br />

threatening the survival of the Florida citrus industry. Currently, there is no established cure for<br />

this century-old and emerging disease. As a possible control strategy for citrus HLB, therapeutic<br />

compounds were screened using a propagation test system with Las-infected periwinkle and<br />

citrus plants. The results demonstrated that the combination of penicillin and streptomycin (PS)<br />

was effective in eliminating or suppressing the Las bacterium and provided a therapeutically<br />

effective level of control for a much longer period of time than when administering either<br />

antibiotic separately. When treated with the PS, Las-infected periwinkle cuttings achieved 70%<br />

rooting versus less than 50% with other treatments. The Las bacterial titer in the infected<br />

periwinkle plants, as measured by quantitative real-time PCR, decreased significantly following<br />

root-soaking or foliar-spraying with PS. Application of the PS via trunk injection or root soaking<br />

also eliminated or suppressed the Las bacterium in the HLB-affected citrus plants. This may<br />

provide a useful tool for the management of citrus HLB and other Liberibacter-associated<br />

diseases.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 176<br />

10.3 Regional HLB <strong>Management</strong> on the Effectiveness of Local Strategies of Inoculum<br />

Reduction and Vector Control<br />

Bassanezi, R.B. 1 *, Yamamoto, P.T. 3 *, Montesino, L.H. 1 , Gottwald, T.R. 2 , Amorim, L. 3 *,<br />

Bergamin Filho, A. 3 *<br />

1 Fundecitrus, Araraquara, Brazil<br />

2 USDA/ARS, Fort Pierce, FL, USA<br />

3 ESALQ/USP, Piracicaba, Brazil<br />

The effectiveness of local strategies of inoculum reduction and vector control on HLB progress<br />

were studied in São Paulo (E1-Oct/05; E2-May/06). Regional HLB management was present for<br />

E1 and absent for E2. Local inoculum reduction levels for E1 were every 4, 8, and 16 weeks, and<br />

for E2, every 2, 4, 12, and 26 weeks. Local vector control levels for E1 were no control, program<br />

A (PA), and program B (PB), and for E2, no control and program C (PC). Psyllid control was<br />

done with two 56-day-interval applications of systemic insecticides during the rainy season, and<br />

in the rest of the year, with contact insecticide sprays every 28 days for PA, and every 14 days<br />

for PB and PC. The beginning of the HLB epidemic was delayed 10 months by regional HLB<br />

management but wasn’t affected by different local strategies in both experiments. After 60 and<br />

53 months, the HLB incidence and progress rate weren’t affected by different frequencies of<br />

local inoculum reduction in both experiments, and were different only in plots with and without<br />

local vector control in E2. Regional HLB management reduced the HLB incidence (90% less for<br />

E1) and progress rate (75% less for E1) in both plots with and without vector control. These<br />

reductions were explained by smaller psyllid population and lower frequency of infective psyllid<br />

in E1 than in E2.<br />

Acknowledgements<br />

Financial support: Fundecitrus, FAPESP (2005/00718-2 and 2007/55013-9), CNPq<br />

(578049/2008-2), and CRDF (NAS-8). *Authors granted by CNPq.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 177<br />

10.4 The Theory of Managing Huanglongbing with <strong>Plant</strong> Nutrition and Real World<br />

Success in Florida<br />

Spann, T.M. 1 , Rouse, R.E. 2 , Schumann, A.W. 1<br />

1 UF-IFAS Citrus Research and Education Center, Lake Alfred, FL, USA<br />

2 UF-IFAS Southwest Florida Research and Education Center, Immokalee, FL, USA<br />

Huanglongbing (HLB) is regarded as the most devastating disease of citrus worldwide. Countries<br />

infected with HLB either no longer produce citrus commercially or have had to relocate their<br />

industries to different geographic regions to avoid the disease. Because citrus is such an<br />

important part of the Florida economy, and the state is surrounded by water, neither of these<br />

strategies were viable options. Thus, efforts have been ongoing to find ways to maintain the<br />

health and productivity of existing mature trees in Florida until a long-term cure is developed.<br />

Our data, as well as the data of other researchers, shows that HLB-infected trees are consistently<br />

deficient in Ca, Mg, Mn, Zn, and B; and, in a grove setting, these nutrient deficient trees are<br />

more likely to be HLB-infected than the nutrient sufficient trees. It is not yet known whether<br />

these deficiencies are a result of decreased nutrient uptake or if the nutrients are being bound<br />

within the plant making them unavailable. These findings are important because mineral<br />

nutrients function as inhibitors, activators, and regulators of plant and pathogen physiological<br />

processes. For example, Ca and B are important nutrients for the development, maintenance, and<br />

integrity of cell walls. <strong>Plant</strong>s deficient in Ca and B have higher levels of free sugars and amino<br />

acids in the apoplast and phloem sap – compounds needed by many pathogens and insect pests.<br />

Mg is important for protein synthesis through its role in the aggregation of ribosome subunits.<br />

Under Mg deficiency, protein synthesis stops and free amino acid content increases.<br />

A commercial citrus grove in Florida has been maintaining HLB-infected trees for nearly 5 years<br />

through an aggressive foliar nutrition and psyllid control program. These results have been<br />

replicated in three other locations within the state for 2 years. Overall tree health, yield, and fruit<br />

quality of HLB-infected trees under this management program will be discussed.<br />

Acknowledgement<br />

Financial support: McKinnon Corporation, CRDF.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 178<br />

10.5 Nutritional Treatments: Inconsequential Effect on HLB Control and Promote<br />

Area-Wide Titer Increase and Disease Spread<br />

Gottwald, T.R. 1 , Irey, M.S. 2 , Graham, J.H. 3 , Wood, B. 4<br />

1 USDA, ARS, U.S. Horticultural Research Laboratory, Fort Pierce, FL, USA<br />

2 Southern Gardens, U.S. Sugar Corporation, Clewiston, FL, USA<br />

3 UF-IFAS Citrus Research and Education Center, Lake Alfred, FL, USA<br />

4 USDA, ARS, SE Fruit and Nut Research Lab, Byron, GA, USA<br />

The use of nutritional applications to control or offset the deleterious effects of huanglongbing<br />

(HLB) has been a topic of considerable discussion and debate. However, most reports are<br />

anecdotal and without sufficient statistical rigor. Even so, Florida producers are using this<br />

unproven method without validation in lieu of conventional control methods. The formulation<br />

for the nutritional program (NP) has varied considerably, but most often consists of foliar<br />

applications of wettable-powder micronutrients, phosphite, and methyl salicylate. A trial<br />

consisting of a randomized complete block design with three blocks and four replicate<br />

trees/block was repeated in 2009 and 2010. All trees were PCR+ for Las at the onset of the trial<br />

but showing only mild symptoms. This stage of infection was chosen based on claims that the<br />

NP maintains health and productivity of HLB-infected trees for a number of years, thereby<br />

extending the grove’s commercial viability. Combinations of components were compared with a<br />

control consisting of a standard insecticide program for psyllids. Additional treatments consisted<br />

of phosphite with Mn-carbonate, Mn-metalosate, Cu-metalosate, or Zn-metalosate, and injection<br />

treatments using soluble copper or silver mixed with a polymer. There was no significant<br />

difference in titer dynamics, yield (number fruit per tree, kg fruit/tree, proportion of fruit<br />

dropped), or quality (Brix, acid, brix:acid ratio), compared to the control. The NP did not sustain<br />

tree health, yield, or fruit quality. In addition, there is a major concern that because nutritional<br />

supplements have no effect on Las titer, their use will promote area-wide inoculum buildup and<br />

spread.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 179<br />

10.6 Nutritional Approaches for <strong>Management</strong> of Huanglongbing (Citrus Greening) in<br />

China<br />

Xia, Y. 1 , Sequeira, R. 2<br />

1 North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA<br />

2 USDA/APHIS, Raleigh, NC, USA<br />

The use of supplemental nutrition including micronutrients as a part of huanglongbing (HLB)<br />

management program is being adopted by a growing number of citrus growers in Florida. The<br />

expectation is that by adding additional nutrition, especially the micronutrients, the productive<br />

life of infected trees can be extended, perhaps indefinitely. Although the approach is recent in the<br />

United States, as is HLB itself, nutrient management has been practiced in China for many years.<br />

Our review of 60+ years’ history of research and field practice in China reveals no consistent<br />

evidence to support the notion that nutrient management can maintain productivity of<br />

HLB-infested trees over the long term. However, it appeared that increased nutrition, together<br />

with other cultural practices such as irrigation, may be able to prolong grove productivity for<br />

variable periods of time in certain cases. In general, under a good nutritional program plus<br />

optimal irrigation, mature (10 years or older) sweet oranges can sustain productivity for another<br />

3-5 years with symptoms; pomelos can last significantly longer. Citrus plants grown from seeds<br />

or high layering also appeared to perform well under a nutritional program. However, fruit<br />

quality from these severely infected plants was generally unsatisfactory, depending on severity<br />

of the disease. Currently, there is no wide-spread use of supplemental nutrition for HLB<br />

management as a single strategy in China. However, micronutrients are commonly used in<br />

commercial production to optimize plant nutritional status.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 180<br />

10.7 First Steps Towards Rescuing Las-Infected Citrus Germplasm<br />

McCollum, G., Stover, E. USDA, ARS, USHRL, Fort Pierce, FL, USA<br />

Huanglongbing (HLB) disease is having a significant impact on the USDA citrus breeding<br />

program as it has shown up in a number of trees that exist only in a virtually irreplaceable<br />

germplasm collection. It is critical that we rescue Las-budwood from elite germplasm that is<br />

Las+. We reasoned that by selecting budwood that tests Las-, albeit from Las+ trees, we would<br />

produce some propagations free of Las. At least three, and as many as six, branches from each of<br />

seven trees were tested for Las using standard qPCR methods. A total of 90 propagations (3 from<br />

each branch) were produced. Initially, 63% of the branches were Las+. Of all the propagations,<br />

89% survived, with no apparent difference in survival between propagations made from Las+ or<br />

Las- branches. Among all propagations, 29% were Las+. Among propagations made from<br />

branches that were Las+, 55% (18/47) tested Las+, whereas among the propagations made from<br />

Las- branches, 12% (3/25) were Las+, with two of these propagations originating from the same<br />

original branch. Average Ct value for Las+ propagations from Las+ branches was 27.9 compared<br />

to 36.0 for the Las+ propagations from Las- branches. So far, our data support the notion that<br />

testing for Las prior to propagation is an important first step in the process of rescuing Las-tissue<br />

from Las+ trees. Propagated trees will continue to be monitored for the appearance of HLB<br />

symptoms and further development of Las as determined by qPCR, to determine whether uneven<br />

Las distribution and selected propagation from Las+ trees will permit rescue of critical<br />

germplasm.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 181<br />

10.8 Screening Chemical Compounds Against Citrus Huanglongbing Using an Optimized<br />

Grafting System from Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus-Infected Citrus Scions<br />

Zhang, M.-Q. 1 , Duan, Y.-P. 2 , Powell, C.A. 1<br />

1 UF-IFAS Indian River Research and Education Center, Fort Pierce, FL, USA capowell@ufl.edu<br />

2 USDA-ARS, U.S. Horticultural Laboratory, Fort Pierce, FL, USA<br />

Citrus huanglongbing (HLB) is a phloem-limited disease caused by a fastidious bacterium called<br />

Candidatus Liberibacter (Las). Greenhouse experiments were conducted to optimize a citrus<br />

system to screen chemicals for their effects on Las. The results showed that the citrus cutting<br />

regeneration system was not as good for screening molecules as compared to our optimized<br />

regeneration systems from periwinkle. Citrus lemon cuttings with HLB symptoms were used as<br />

scions and grafted onto Las-free grapefruit. Beginning 4 months after graft inoculation, the new<br />

branches had typical HLB symptoms of blotchy mottle in scions, and the rootstock had vein<br />

corking and yellow shoots. More than 90% of HLB-affected lemon scions survived and 80% of<br />

the inoculated rootstocks were infected with a Ct value of 29.7 ± 3.35 six months after grafting.<br />

HLB-affected lemon branches were sampled and soaked in PS (penicillin and streptomycin),<br />

MDL (metronidazole), and DBNPA (2,2-dibromo-3-nitrilopropionamide) solutions overnight,<br />

cut into two or three buds for scions, and then grafted onto the Las-free grapefruit. More than<br />

95% of the scions treated with PS survived and grew better than untreated controls; all new<br />

leaves from the scions tested negative for Las by PCR. When the HLB-affected scions were<br />

treated with MDL and DBNPA, less than 70% of the scions survived. Also, more than 50% of<br />

the new branches were infected by the HLB bacteria, with Ct values of 24.3 ± 2.74 for MDL and<br />

30.7 ± 1.32 for DBNPA, respectively. Other chemicals, such as kasumin, are currently being<br />

tested using this system.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 182<br />

10.9 Discovery of Antimicrobial Small Molecules Against Candidatus Liberibacter<br />

asiaticus by Screening Novel SecA Inhibitors Using Structure Based Design<br />

Akula, N., Wang, N.-Y. UF-IFAS Citrus Research and Education Center, Lake Alfred, FL,<br />

USA<br />

Protein secretion in bacteria is a critical and complex process. SecA is the protein translocase<br />

ATPase subunit and a superfamily 2 RNA helicase, involved in pre-protein translocation across<br />

and integration into the cellular membrane in bacteria (Hartl et al., 1990; Lill et al., 1990;<br />

Ulbrandt et al., 1992). Identification of small molecule inhibitors that interfere with the function<br />

of SecA could lead to potential antimicrobial agents. In order to find novel inhibitory structures,<br />

we used various computational techniques such as pharmacophore design, virtual screening, and<br />

molecular docking methods (Friesner et al., 2004). Based on virtual screening and docking, we<br />

identified ~4500 structures from millions of commercially available database (Irwin and<br />

Shoichet, 2005) structures. Those structures were again docked with extra-precession by using a<br />

glide (Friesner et al., 2006) program. We chose the top 2% of structures based on the scoring<br />

functions, physicochemical properties, and our chemical intuition. Further, these structures were<br />

energy minimized by molecular minimization studies, and we evaluated their binding energies to<br />

pick the best 20 structures. The selected compounds were used to perform biological activity<br />

studies against SecA. Among these 20 compounds, 3 were active below 10 µm. The highly<br />

active structures will be utilized to design a potential inhibitor compound against SecA. All<br />

molecular modeling studies were performed on HP ProLiant Linux system using Schrodinger<br />

Suite Programs (2010). An ATPase assay kit and purified SecA enzyme was used for biological<br />

testing.<br />

References<br />

Friesner, R.A., Banks, J.L., Murphy, R.B., Halgren, T.A., Klicic, J.J., Mainz, D.T., Repasky,<br />

M.P., Knoll, E.H., Shelley, M., Perry, J.K., Shaw, D.E., Francis, P., Shenkin, P.S. 2004.<br />

Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment<br />

of docking accuracy. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 47:1739-1749.<br />

Friesner, R.A., Murphy, R.B., Repasky, M.P., Frye, L.L., Greenwood, J.R., Halgren, T.A.,<br />

Sanschagrin, P.C., Mainz, D.T. 2006. Extra precision glide: docking and scoring<br />

incorporating a model of hydrophobic enclosure for protein-ligand complexes. Journal of<br />

Medicinal Chemistry 49:6177-6196.<br />

Hartl, F.U., Lecker, S., Schiebel, E., Hendrick, J.P., Wickner, W. 1990. The binding cascade of<br />

SecB to SecA to SecY/E mediates preprotein targeting to the E. coli plasma membrane.<br />

Cell 63:269-279.<br />

Irwin, J.J., Shoichet, B.K. 2005. ZINC - a free database of commercially available compounds<br />

for virtual screening. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 45:177-182.<br />

Lill, R., Dowhan, W., Wickner, W. 1990. The ATPase activity of SecA is regulated by acidic<br />

phospholipids, SecY, and the leader and mature domains of precursor proteins. Cell<br />

60:271-280.<br />

Schrodinger Suite Programs. 2010. Schrodinger LLC, New York.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 183<br />

Ulbrandt, N.D., London, E., Oliver, D.B. 1992. Deep penetration of a portion of Escherichia coli<br />

SecA protein into model membranes is promoted by anionic phospholipids and by partial<br />

unfolding, Journal of Biological Chemistry 267:15184-15192.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 184<br />

10.10 The Low Pressure Trunk Injection System: A Technology to Fight Against HLB<br />

Tomas, J. Agricultural Integrated Solutions USA Corporation, 6506 SW 113 Court, Miami, FL,<br />

USA<br />

This system is a technology that has been used to control Phytophthora and Verticillium dahliae<br />

in Oil Palms and Avocado trees, to successfully control Red Palm Weevil at the Mediterranean<br />

Region, to eliminate the Thaumetopea pityocampa, and to control Witches Broom in lime trees.<br />

This injection is a very clean method, fast to apply, which respects environment. The method<br />

consists of a plastic injector that is introduced in the trunk using a drilling machine and a<br />

pressured injection capsule that is made with an elastic tube containing the solution. When we<br />

connect both elements, the pressure made by the elastic capsule (under 100 kPa) introduces the<br />

solution to the tree through the injector. The solution will be absorbed by the tree and enhanced<br />

by its evapotranspiration. This allows the product to get distributed in every part of the tree<br />

through the vascular system. This system guarantees that the delivery pressure will not damage<br />

the tree vascular system. We apply the dose in low concentrations to avoid tissue damage, and<br />

this allows even distribution in the tree tissues. This system got the Second Award at the Geneva<br />

International Inventions Summit, and we are convinced it can be used to reduce and eventually<br />

eradicate Diaphorina population at citrus plantations to avoid HLB disease transmission.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 185<br />

10.11 Does Systemic Acquired Resistance (SAR) Control HLB Disease Development?<br />

Graham, J.H. 1 , Myers, M.E. 1 , Irey, M.S. 2 , Gottwald, T.R. 3<br />

1 UF-IFAS Citrus Research and Education Center, Lake Alfred, FL, USA<br />

2 U.S. Sugar Corporation, Clewiston, FL, USA<br />

3 USDA-ARS, Fort Pierce, FL, USA<br />

The objective is to evaluate soil-applied neo-nicotinoids and other SAR inducers on HLB disease<br />

progress in newly planted citrus trees subjected to psyllid-mediated infection or<br />

graft-inoculation. One-year-old Hamlin trees were planted in May 2009 and treated as follows:<br />

1) non-treated check (UTC), 2) foliar insecticide to control psyllids, 3) soil-applied<br />

imidacloprid/thiamethoxam (IMID/THIA) to induce SAR, 4) soil-applied IMID/THIA plus foliar<br />

insecticides, 5) graft-inoculated UTC, and 6) graft-inoculated with IMID/THIA. There were<br />

50 trees per treatment (5 blocks of 10 trees). In 2009, the effect of SAR inducers on HLB<br />

infection progress was inconclusive, perhaps attributable to the interaction of IMID/THIA with<br />

psyllid control that may have an uncontrolled effect on psyllid transmission. In 2010, the SAR<br />

inducer acibenzolar-S-methyl (ASM, Actigard 50 WP), which does not control psyllids, was<br />

substituted in treatments 3, 4, and 6. At 17 months after treatments began, 65 trees were PCR+<br />

(22%) in the trial. Higher number of PCR+ occurred in the UTC (14), the UTC with graft<br />

inoculation (13), and the IMID/THIA/ASM with graft-inoculation (18). Lower number of PCR+<br />

trees occurred without graft inoculation in treatments with SAR inducers (6), foliar insecticides<br />

(8), and foliar insecticide plus SAR inducers (6). At this time, the effect of SAR on HLB disease<br />

progress is minimal, which indicates a lack of promise for use of SAR inducers in HLB<br />

management.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 186<br />

10.12 Use of Growth-Priming Agents to Extend the Growth of HLB-Affected Citrus<br />

He, Z. 1 , Zhang, M.-Q. 1 , Viana, E. 1 , Merlin, T. 2 , Duan, Y.-P. 2 , Stoffella, P.J. 1 , Liptay, A. 3 ,<br />

Powell, C.A. 1<br />

1 UF-IFAS Indian River Research and Education Center, Fort Pierce, FL, USA zhe@ufl.edu<br />

2 USDA-ARS, U.S. Horticultural Laboratory, Fort Pierce, FL, USA<br />

3 Stoller USA, Inc., Houston, TX, USA<br />

Citrus greening disease, also called huanglongbing (HLB), associated with a fastidious,<br />

phloem-limited bacterium (Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus-Las), is posing a major threat to<br />

the citrus industry due to its rapid spread and greatly reduced marketable yields. HLB-affected<br />

trees characteristically suffer from a damaged root system and nutritional disorder because of<br />

interrupted transport of photoassimilates from shoot to the root, and mineral nutrients/water from<br />

root to the shoot. In this study, greenhouse experiments were conducted to examine the effects of<br />

growth-priming agents [including root growth enhancer, trace element combination (Zn, Cu, and<br />

Mn), plant growth regulators, and sugar transporter alone or in combination] on the root growth,<br />

leaf chlorophyll, and leaf starch of HLB-affected citrus seedlings and periwinkle plants. The<br />

experiments were a factorial design with six replicates, and the growth-priming agents were<br />

biweekly applied by soil application in liquid. Visual observation of the root systems of citrus<br />

seedlings was conducted in 2 months, and the measurements of leaf chlorophyll and starch<br />

concentrations were performed in 3 months after the treatments. Periwinkle plants were<br />

harvested in 4 months, and biomass yields of root and shoot were recorded and root parameters<br />

(length, surface area, and diameter) were determined. When applied alone, root growth enhancer<br />

was most effective in promoting plant growth followed by trace element combination, as<br />

indicated by a significant increase in shoot and root biomass, particularly root length and surface<br />

area, as compared with the control. <strong>Plant</strong>s that received root growth enhancer had higher contents<br />

of leaf chlorophyll. Sugar-transporter was efficient in reducing soluble starch in the leaves of<br />

Las-infected periwinkle. The combination of root growth enhancer or plant growth regulators<br />

with sugar-transporter significantly reduced leaf soluble starch and increased leaf chlorophyll<br />

contents of HLB-affected citrus. Observable recovery of root growth of the HLB-affected citrus<br />

occurred in 2 months after the treatments. These results indicate that the growth-priming agents,<br />

when applied in proper combinations, may be useful for extending the growth and production of<br />

HLB-affected citrus.<br />

Keywords: Citrus greening disease, leaf starch content, plant growth-priming agents, root<br />

restoration<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 187<br />

10.13 Evaluation of Foliar, Zinc, and Manganese for Control of HLB or Associated<br />

Symptom Development<br />

Johnson, E.G. 1 , Irey, M.S. 2 , Gast, T. 2 , Bright, D.B. 1 , Graham, J.H. 1<br />

1 UF-IFAS Citrus Research and Education Center, Lake Alfred, FL, USA<br />

2 U.S. Sugar Corporation, Clewiston, FL, USA<br />

Florida growers have reported that supplementary foliar nutrient applications maintain<br />

productivity of HLB-infected trees. However, efficacy and sustainability of the nutritional<br />

approach for HLB disease management has not been validated. The main cause of visible HLB<br />

symptoms, yield reduction, and tree decline appears to be disruption of phloem tissue, which<br />

blocks the flow of photosynthate and nutrients from source to sink tissue. If supplemental<br />

nutrition is a sustainable approach, it is expected that foliar nutrients will reduce or eliminate<br />

damage and plugging in citrus phloem tissue caused by the bacterium and possibly reduce spread<br />

or replication of the bacterium in infected trees. A greenhouse study is underway to evaluate a<br />

mixture of foliar nutrients representative of that used by Florida growers for HLB management.<br />

Infected and non-infected Hamlin trees under different combinations of nutritional treatments are<br />

being monitored for bacterial titer in phloem tissue and development of disease symptoms,<br />

including phloem cell morphological changes: plugging, necrosis, and starch accumulation.<br />

Initial results show no difference in the infection rate or bacterial populations in leaf midribs.<br />

Multiple microscopy techniques including TEM, light, and fluorescence microscopy with<br />

callose-specific dyes are being used to monitor phloem plugging and necrosis as the infection<br />

progresses. A complimentary field trial is evaluating bacterial titer, yield, and tree health in a<br />

south Florida Hamlin grove with a mixture of healthy, asymptomatic (PCR+), and HLB<br />

symptomatic trees.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 188<br />

10.14 Role of Nutritional and Insecticidal Treatments in Mitigation of HLB: Main Effects<br />

and Interactions<br />

Stansly, P.A., Arevalo, H.A., Rouse, R.E. UF-IFAS Southwest Florida Research and Education<br />

Center, Immokalee FL, USA<br />

Insecticidal control of the psyllid vector is widely considered the foundation of HLB<br />

management, while foliar applications of micronutrients are being touted as an effective method<br />

of mitigating impacts of the disease on tree health and production. Although the combination of<br />

these two practices is having salutatory effects in a number of Florida citrus groves, the<br />

individual contributions of the two main components are not known. We report preliminary<br />

results from a replicated factorial experiment with four treatments (nutritionals, insecticides,<br />

nutritionals + insecticides, and control) initiated in February 2008 on a 12-acre block of Valencia<br />

orange planted in 2002. The nutritional mix was applied three times a year corresponding to<br />

major flushes. Insecticides were applied in winter and then when psyllid density exceeded a<br />

predetermined threshold, maintaining a ratio of adult psyllids in treated to untreated trees of<br />

approximately 1:12. PCR positive trees increased from 29% in November 2008 to 95% in May<br />

2010 with significantly lower Ct values in insecticide-treated plots. Significantly positive effects<br />

on production were seen from insecticides, with highest yield from trees receiving both nutrients<br />

and insecticides. Preliminary results would thus indicate that the main effect of these programs is<br />

coming from the insecticidal component with an auxiliary role provided by corrective nutritional<br />

treatments.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 189<br />

10.15 Use of Horticultural Practices in Citriculture to Survive Huanglongbing<br />

Stuchi, E.S. 1,2 , Girardi, E.A. 1<br />

1 Embrapa Cassava & Fruits, Cruz das Almas, Brazil<br />

2 Citrus Experimental Station, Bebedouro, Brazil<br />

Huanglongbing (HLB) was first reported in Brazil in 2004 and had caused severe losses in the<br />

main producing regions, threatening the sustainability of the whole citrus chain. Current control<br />

strategies are based on the use of healthy nursery trees, inspection and systematic eradication of<br />

symptomatic plants, and chemical control of the insect vector. Research is being carried out to<br />

achieve HLB resistance, including genetic engineering. Horticultural practices for immediate use<br />

in citriculture can be evaluated to mitigate HLB effects. The following practices are discussed:<br />

selection of naturally occurring tolerant materials, new regions for citrus production in Brazil,<br />

unusual concepts for screened nursery trees’ production, use of repellent and attractive plants,<br />

low-input production systems, use of resistance elicitors, protected cultivation, intercropping,<br />

and ultra high density (UHD) plantings. Alternative production systems of screened nursery trees<br />

include seed-derived trees of scion varieties, intensive production systems, and the use of larger<br />

nursery trees. The main objective of UHD practice is to anticipate fruit bearing in order to get<br />

high yields until the tenth harvest. The use of UHD plantings depends on the availability of<br />

small-sized scion varieties, dwarfing rootstocks, viroid inoculation, and conditioning of nursery<br />

trees before planting. HLB threat limits the feasibility of current citriculture practices and<br />

demonstrates the need to join different strategies for confronting this disease: genetic advances,<br />

pathogen and vector control, and improved horticultural practices. No isolated strategy will<br />

provide a satisfactory solution.<br />

References<br />

Bar-Joseph, M. 2009. Rational management of emerging citrus greening/HLB infections - an<br />

open item for discussion with IOCV. Newsletter of the International Organization of Citrus<br />

Virologists, p. 9-14, October 2009.<br />

Bassanezi, R.B., Montesino, L.H., Stuchi, E.S. 2009. Effects of huanglongbing on fruit quality of<br />

sweet orange cultivars in Brazil. European Journal of <strong>Plant</strong> Pathology 125:565-572.<br />

Belasque J., Jr., Bassanezi, R.B., Yamamoto, P.T., Ayres, A.J., Tachibana, A., Violante, A.R.,<br />

Tank, A., Jr., Di Giorgi, F., Tersi, F.E.A., Menezes, G.M., Dragone, J., Jank, R.H., Jr.,<br />

Bové, J.M. 2010. Lessons from huanglongbing management in São Paulo State, Brazil.<br />

Journal of <strong>Plant</strong> Pathology 92:285-302.<br />

Bové, J.M. 2006. Huanglongbing: a destructive, newly-emerging, century-old disease of citrus.<br />

Journal of <strong>Plant</strong> Pathology 88:7-37.<br />

Folimonova, S.Y., Robertson, C.J., Garnsey, C.S., Gowda, S., Dawson, W.O. 2009. Examination<br />

of the responses of different genotypes of citrus to huanglongbing (citrus greening) under<br />

different conditions. Phytopathology 99:1346-1354.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 190<br />

Gmitter, F. 2009. Surveying for naturally occurring HLB field resistance. In: Citrus Greening<br />

Symposium 2009. Bartow, FL, USA: UF/IFAS Extension.<br />

http://citrusagents.ifas.ufl.edu/events/Citrus_Greening_Symposium_2009/Videos/CitrusGr<br />

eeningSymposium2009.htm (accessed on 01.10.2010)<br />

Gottwald, T.R., Irey, M., Bergamin-Filho, A., Bassanezi, R.B., Gilligan, C.A. 2008. A stochastic<br />

spatiotemporal analysis of the contribution of primary versus secondary spread of HLB. In:<br />

Gottwald, T.R., Dixon, W., Graham, J., Berger, P. (eds.). Proceedings of the International<br />

Research Conference on Huanglongbing, Orlando, Florida: USDA and University of<br />

Florida, p. 247-252.<br />

Rabe, E., Warrington, J., Toua, J. 1996. Spacing densities: an economic perspective. Proceedings<br />

of the International Society of Citriculture 2:825-831.<br />

Roka, F.M., Rouse, R.E., Muraro, R.P. 1997. Southwest Florida citrus yield by tree age in high<br />

density planting. Proceedings of the Florida State Horticultural Society 110:82-86.<br />

Roka, F., Muraro, R., Morris, A., Spyke, P., Morgan, K., Schumann, A., Castle, W.S., Stover, E.<br />

2010. Citrus production systems to survive greening - economic thresholds. Proceedings of<br />

the Florida State Horticultural Society 122:122-126.<br />

Stuchi, E.S., Donadio, L.C., Sempionato, O.R. 2003. Performance of Tahiti lime on Poncirus<br />

trifoliata var. monstrosa Flying Dragon in four densities. Fruits 58:13-17.<br />

Van Den Berg, M.A. 1994. Synopsis of strategies to reduce populations of citrus psylla, Trioza<br />

erytreae and the spread of greening. Fruits 49:229-234.<br />

Zaka, S.M., Zeng, X.N., Holford, P., Beattie, G.A.C. 2009. Repellent effect of guava leaf<br />

volatiles on settlement of adults of citrus psylla, Diaphorina citri Kuwayama, on citrus.<br />

Insect Science 17:39-45.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 191<br />

10.16 Critical Control Point (CCP) Analysis to Build a Model System for Measuring<br />

Citrus Propagation Risk Mitigations. II. Sampling and Monitoring<br />

Brown, L.G., Jones, E.M., Hartzog, H.M. USDA APHIS PPQ Center for <strong>Plant</strong> Health Science<br />

and Technology, Raleigh, NC, USA<br />

The level of sampling required for the detection and monitoring of regulated plant pests is a<br />

policy decision that considers, among other things, the pest risk. Pest risk analysis includes the<br />

evaluation of options to reduce, eliminate, or manage the risk at some level that often involves<br />

sampling at one or more points of mitigation in system approaches. To identify independent<br />

procedures for monitoring and control, a Critical Control Point system analysis is used to<br />

identify the hazards and points where mitigation measures can be applied in a defined system.<br />

Control points are monitored to detect the minimum proportion of the infestation that the<br />

regulator uses for detection in a designated sample population of citrus plants. The USDA Citrus<br />

Health Recovery Program - Regulatory Working Group (CHRP-RWG) requested a sampling and<br />

testing plan that would detect a prevalence of Ca. L. asiaticus (Las) infected plants in a facility<br />

producing citrus nursery stock (CNS). The Working Group suggested a sampling and testing<br />

method to detect a 1% prevalence of Las in CNS produced under a systems approach.<br />

Convention states that there should be no less than a 95% probability of detecting a population of<br />

plants with 1% prevalence of Las. After the detection level is decided, a sample number can be<br />

calculated. A complete citrus budwood program risk model was recently proposed by Brown<br />

(2008). The authors have refined the model to better illustrate risk and the monitoring of control<br />

points. Criteria for acceptance or rejection based on failure for each independent procedure are<br />

suggested. These criteria can be used to monitor the system by incorporating a risk level and<br />

stating the desired level of confidence. A table with sample size and the estimated cost of<br />

sampling and testing CNS is presented.<br />

Reference<br />

Brown, L.G. 2008. A model system for measuring citrus propagation risk mitigation based on<br />

Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) methods. Phytopathology 98:S27.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 192<br />

10.17 The Need of an Epidemio-Surveillance <strong>Network</strong> to Prevent Huanglongbing Arrival<br />

in the South Mediterranean Basin<br />

Dollet, M. 1 , Aubert, B. 2 , Imbert, E. 3 , Gatineau, F. 1<br />

1 CIRAD, Department of Biological Systems, Research Unit 29 “Etiology Wilts” TA A-29/F,<br />

34398 Montpellier Cedex 5, France<br />

2 ADAC, CIRAD Consultant, Montpellier, France<br />

3 Department PERSYST; CIRAD, Campus International de Baillarguet, 34398 Montpellier<br />

Cedex 5, France<br />

Huanglongbing (HLB) originated in the 1900s in Asia where it is transmitted by the psyllid<br />

Diaphorina citri. In South Africa another form of HLB, transmitted by Trioza erytreae was<br />

described in the 1960s. The “African” and “Asian” forms may occasionally occur in the same<br />

area (Peninsula Arabia), where both species of the psyllids vectors are present, and each psyllid<br />

can carry both forms of the bacteria associated with HLB – Ca. L. asiaticus and Ca. L africanus.<br />

In the 2000s, the arrival of HLB on the American continent boosted research on HLB. HLB has<br />

also caused severe damage in East Africa, mainly Kenya and Tanzania. Recently, Ca. L asiaticus<br />

was identified in Ethiopia (Saponari et al., 2010). On the west side, in Cameroon, symptoms of<br />

HLB were described and T. eythreae was present. This psyllid also invaded Madeira and the<br />

Canary Islands 10 years ago. The Mediterranean Basin produces around 18 million tons of citrus<br />

yearly. Because of the importance of movements, trade, tourism, and pilgrims, Citrus production<br />

is in danger. The threat could come from the East (Saudi Arabia, Iran, and Yemen), the South<br />

(Ethiopia and Somalia), and the West (Cameroon and Canarias). CIRAD, in collaboration with<br />

Embrapa - Brazil, Cameroon and partners in Morocco, Tunisia, Egypt, and Turkey, will start<br />

actions for a prevention strategy. A training course on symptoms, psyllids identification, and<br />

molecular diagnosis is scheduled in early 2011 and will be the foundation of an<br />

epidemio-surveillance network in the South Mediterranean Basin.<br />

Reference<br />

Saponari, M., De Bac, G., Breithaupt, J., Loconsole, G., Yokomi, R.K., Catalano, L. 2010. First<br />

report of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus associated with huanglongbing in sweet orange<br />

in Ethiopia. <strong>Plant</strong> Disease 94:482.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 193<br />

10.18 Presence of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus in Diaphorina citri Kuwayama<br />

Collected from <strong>Plant</strong>s for Sale in Florida<br />

Halbert, S.E. 1 , Manjunath, K.L. 2 , Ramadugu, C. 3 , Lee, R.F. 2<br />

1 Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of <strong>Plant</strong> Industry,<br />

Gainesville, FL, USA<br />

2 National Clonal Germplasm Repository for Citrus and Dates, USDA-ARS, Riverside, CA, USA<br />

3 Department of Botany and <strong>Plant</strong> Sciences, University of California at Riverside, CA, USA<br />

Huanglongbing (HLB or greening) is a devastating disease of citrus reported from Florida in<br />

2005. The disease has spread to all citrus growing counties in the state. Best management<br />

strategies for HLB include use of clean planting material, elimination of inoculum, and excellent<br />

psyllid vector control. In this study, 1,186 samples of Asian citrus psyllids, Diaphorina citri<br />

Kuwayama, were collected from plants for sale (citrus and its relatives) in Florida over a period<br />

of 4 years and tested for the presence of HLB-associated Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus (Las)<br />

by real-time PCR. Samples came from 44 of Florida’s 67 counties. Overall, about 9.7% of the<br />

1,186 tested D. citri samples collected from plants for sale were positive for Las. Among the<br />

psyllid samples tested, about 9% of the samples collected from citrus, 10% of the samples<br />

collected from Murraya paniculata, and a single sample from Bergera koenigii were positive for<br />

Las. Murraya paniculata is a preferred host of D. citri and is used widely as an ornamental plant.<br />

In 2008, Florida State regulations began requiring mandatory screened enclosures for<br />

propagation of citrus and related plants (including M. paniculata). After the new regulations<br />

came into effect, the number of psyllid finds in venues that propagate citrus (citrus propagating<br />

nurseries and budwood facilities) dropped substantially, indicating the efficacy of the new rules.<br />

Propagation and sale of M. paniculata in Florida ceased when it became necessary (and<br />

uneconomical) to grow the popular ornamental plant under stringent containment.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 194<br />

10.19 A Model System for Studying Huanglongbing<br />

Manjunath, K.L. 1 , Ramadugu, C. 2 , Kund, G. 3 , Trumble, J. 3 , Lee, R.F. 1<br />

1 National Clonal Germplasm Repository for Citrus and Dates, USDA-ARS, Riverside, CA, USA<br />

2 Dept. of Botany and <strong>Plant</strong> Sciences, University of California at Riverside, CA, USA<br />

3 Dept. of Entomology, University of California at Riverside, CA, USA<br />

Since its first report from the Western hemisphere in 2004, citrus greening disease<br />

(huanglongbing, HLB) has caused severe damage to industries of Brazil and Florida. Both the<br />

vector and the disease have quickly spread into other citrus growing countries. Prolonged<br />

latency, lower titer of the bacteria in plants, seasonality of infection in vectors, slow disease<br />

progression in citrus, and several other factors make it a challenging system to conduct research<br />

and to develop better disease management strategies. In the present study, biological and<br />

molecular characterization of a bacterium (Candidatus Liberibacter psyllaurous), closely related<br />

to HLB associated bacteria, that causes “psyllid yellows” symptoms in tomato was used as a<br />

model system for research on various aspects related to management of HLB. The genome of<br />

Ca. L. psyllaurous was compared with that of Ca. L. asiaticus employing various techniques.<br />

The disease was successfully graft transmitted to healthy tomato plants. Symptom expression in<br />

tomatoes was shown to be temperature dependent. Symptom suppression was achieved at higher<br />

temperatures when plants were maintained at 36°C/30°C (16 h/8 h), but was not affected at 25°C<br />

or at 8°C. Results of effects of antibiotic therapy on mitigation of disease will be discussed. Host<br />

range studies using both graft and insect transmission of several members of Solanaceae revealed<br />

both resistant and susceptible plants. The suitability of this model system to screen a large<br />

number of chemicals, antibiotics, and transgenes for potential control of citrus HLB will be<br />

discussed.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 195<br />

Session 11:<br />

Host Tolerance and<br />

Resistance<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 196<br />

11.1 Incidence of Huanglongbing on Several Sweet Orange Cultivars Budded onto<br />

Different Rootstocks at the Citrus Experimental Station (EECB), Bebedouro, São Paulo,<br />

Brazil<br />

Stuchi, E.S. 1,2 , Reiff, E.T. 2 , Sempionato, O.R. 2 , Girardi, E.A. 1 , Parolin, L.G. 2 , Toledo, D.A. 2<br />

1 Embrapa Cassava & Fruits, Cruz das Almas, Brazil<br />

2 Citrus Experimental Station, Bebedouro, Brazil<br />

Huanglongbing (HLB), caused by Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus and Ca. L. americanus and<br />

vectored by Diaphorina citri Kuwayama, was first reported in 2004 in Brazil and it is currently<br />

widespread in São Paulo State (Belasque et al., 2010). The EECB, in partnership with Embrapa<br />

Cassava & Fruits, conducts a citrus improvement program aimed to select scion and rootstock<br />

Citrus cultivars mainly focused on the resistance or tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses. In<br />

2006, the first HLB-infected tree was reported at the EECB, and since then, a program of<br />

inspection and removal of symptomatic trees has been applied, recording disease incidence data.<br />

About 200 sweet orange scion/rootstock combinations are under evaluation in trees from 4 to<br />

20 years of age. Main commercial rootstocks such as Rangpur lime, Swingle citrumelo, and<br />

Sunki and Cleopatra mandarins are considered, as well as some hybrids, mandarins,<br />

miscellaneous genotypes obtained from germplasm banks, and some introduced materials. Sweet<br />

orange cultivars and clones primarily correspond to new budlines obtained from germplasm<br />

banks and several old budlines from regional selections that were sanitized by shoot tip grafting<br />

(STG) and inoculated with the PIAC CTV strain for cross protection. Sweet orange scions<br />

introduced from different countries and regions of the world are also under evaluation. The<br />

effects of plant age, rootstock cultivar, scion maturation period, budline type, different clones of<br />

a given cultivar, plant localization relative to the plot borders, and the interaction of all these<br />

factors on HLB incidence will be discussed.<br />

Reference<br />

Belasque J., Bassanezi, R.B., Yamamoto, P.T., Ayres, A.J., Tachibana, A., Violante, A.R., Tank,<br />

A., Di Giorgi, F., Tersi, F.E.A., Menezes, G.M., Dragone, J., Jank, R.H., Bové, J.M. 2010.<br />

Lessons from huanglongbing management in São Paulo State, Brazil. Journal of <strong>Plant</strong><br />

Pathology 92:285-302.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 197<br />

11.2 Host Preference and Suitability of Native North American Rutaceae for the<br />

Development of the Asian Citrus Psyllid, Diaphorina citri Kuwayama<br />

Sandoval, J.L., II, Sétamou, M., da Graça, J.V. Texas A&M University-Kingsville, Citrus<br />

Center, Weslaco, TX, USA<br />

The Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri Kuwayama, a vector of citrus huanglongbing<br />

(greening disease), is now present in all citrus producing states in the USA and Mexico. It can<br />

reproduce on several plant species in the Rutaceae family; orange jasmine (Murraya spp.) and<br />

curry leaf (Bergera koenigii) are amongst its favored hosts. There are several indigenous<br />

Rutaceae species in North America and some (e.g., Choisya spp.) are popular ornamentals.<br />

A study was therefore initiated to determine the suitability of some of these plants for the<br />

development of the psyllid using no-choice and choice experiments. D. citri was found to<br />

successfully colonize and reproduce on Choisya ternatea, C. arizonica, and Helietta baretata in<br />

no-choice tests, but reverted back to its preferred hosts, orange jasmine and curry leaf, in choice<br />

tests. On some of the other plant species (Amyris madrensis, A. texana, and Zanthoxylum<br />

fagara), adult psyllids laid eggs that hatched, but no nymphal development was recorded beyond<br />

the first instar. No reproduction occurred on Esenbeckia berlandieri, Ptelea trifoliate, or<br />

Casimiroa edulis, although adult psyllids were able to survive on these species for several days.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 198<br />

11.3 Progress Using Transgenic Approaches and Biotechnology-Facilitated Conventional<br />

Breeding to Develop Genetic Resistance/Tolerance to HLB in Commercial Citrus<br />

Grosser, J.W., Dutt, M., Shohael, A., Barthe, G.A. UF-IFAS Citrus Research and Education<br />

Center, Lake Alfred, FL, USA<br />

A primary strategy of our program to produce HLB-resistant citrus is genetic engineering to<br />

incorporate bacterial resistance genes not found in citrus. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are<br />

part of the innate immune response and can be found among all classes of life, including humans.<br />

These peptides are usually small proteins and have an ability to associate with membranes.<br />

Antimicrobial peptides are also characterized by their broad spectrum antibiotic property.<br />

Incorporation of one or more genes encoding for antimicrobial peptides into the citrus genome<br />

via genetic engineering could potentially result in development of cultivars resistant to HLB<br />

without otherwise altering varietal integrity. We have made significant progress moving several<br />

AMP genes into commercial citrus cultivars, mostly grapefruits and sweet oranges, using<br />

standard Agrobacterium-mediated citrus transformation and an alternative protoplast/GFP citrus<br />

transformation developed previously in our laboratory. A second strategy being employed is to<br />

incorporate genes that may turn on systemic acquired resistance (SAR). We have also tested and<br />

identified several phloem-limited promoters that function efficiently in citrus. Genetically<br />

modified plants containing antimicrobial genes or SAR-induction genes driven by a<br />

phloem-specific Arabidopsis sucrose synthase promoter have also been produced. The targeting<br />

of antimicrobial gene expression using phloem specific promoters is expected to minimize the<br />

expression of the foreign transproteins in subsequent fruit and juice products. Hundreds of<br />

transgenic plants from independent transformation events have already been regenerated and<br />

propagated, and greenhouse and field testing (at two sites in heavy HLB-pressure areas) of these<br />

transgenic plants is underway. Our goal is to identify the most effective yet safe transgene(s)<br />

against HLB and then transform it (them) into selected high-quality sweet orange cultivars with a<br />

sequential range of maturity dates. We are also testing complex hybrid rootstock candidates to<br />

determine their affect on HLB disease establishment and severity in grafted sweet orange scions.<br />

A preliminary experiment showed that complex ‘tetrazyg’ rootstocks infer variable tolerance<br />

when grafted with HLB-infected sweet orange scion. ‘Tetrazygs’ are allotetraploid hybrids<br />

obtained from crosses of somatic hybrids created by protoplast fusion. The working hypothesis is<br />

that the identification of a rootstock that can prevent HLB bacterium replication and has a higher<br />

efficiency of pumping specific nutrients affected by the HLB disease complex could mitigate the<br />

development and spread of the disease when challenged in the field.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 199<br />

11.4 Promoter Regulation of the β-Glucuronidase (GUS) Gene and Antimicrobial Peptide<br />

D4E1 in a Citrus Rootstock<br />

Benyon, L.S., Stover, E., Bowman, K.D., McCollum, G., Niedz, R. U.S. Horticultural Research<br />

Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Fort Pierce, FL, USA<br />

Because agrochemicals and conventional breeding for disease resistance have not been sufficient<br />

in controlling huanglongbing (HLB), alternative strategies for sustaining citrus crops have<br />

attracted attention. Since no HLB resistance has been identified within cultivated citrus,<br />

transgenic solutions to the disease have become a focus of breeding programs. Among these<br />

solutions, use of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) to enhance plant resistance is at the forefront.<br />

Virtually all organisms possess an innate immune response involving AMPs that can counter a<br />

microbial infection. At the USHRL, we have chosen to use synthetic or plant AMPs over those<br />

of animal origin. The first of the AMPs selected was D4E1, a 17 amino acid synthetic AMP<br />

which forms a β sheet (Lucca et al., 1998) and is active against Agrobacterium tumefaciens in<br />

poplar (Mentag et al., 2003). It is a highly active AMP with a minimum inhibitory concentration<br />

(MIC) less than 1 μM (Stover et al., 2008). We constructed a binary vector (pUSHRL) with an<br />

expression cassette containing either the β-glucuronidase (GUS) reporter gene or the D4E1 AMP<br />

under the control of several promoters in the trifoliate rootstock US-802. Because Candidatus<br />

Liberibacter, the gram-negative bacterium associated with HLB, infects only the phloem tissue<br />

of the plants, it may be desirable to express potential transgenes specifically in the phloem or<br />

companion cells. Thus, we opted to provide seven different promoters for our two genes. The<br />

promoters included: 2x35S from the cauliflower mosaic virus, WDV from wheat dwarf<br />

geminivirus, PR-1 the pathogenesis-related protein gene 1 promoter from tobacco, AtSS the<br />

sucrose-H+ symporter gene promoter from Arabidopsis, SSyn the sucrose synthase promoter<br />

from citrus, PP2 the phloem protein 2-like gene promoter from citrus, and 409S a truncated<br />

polyubiquitin promoter from potato. The promoter activities include constitutive (2x35S; 409S),<br />

inducible (PR-1), phloem-specific (AtSS, SSyn, and WDV), and Affymetrix citrus microchip<br />

HLB up-regulated (PP2). Seedlings are being screened for transformation efficiency, localization<br />

of expression, and level of transgene expression.<br />

References<br />

Lucca, A.J., de Bland, J.M., Grimm, C., Jacks, T.J., Cary, J.W., Jaynes, J.M., Cleveland, T.E.,<br />

Walsh, T.J. 1998. Fungicidal properties, sterol binding, and proteolytic resistance of the<br />

synthetic peptide D4E1. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 44:514-520.<br />

Mentag, R., Luckevich, M., Morency, M.J., Seguin, A. 2003. Bacterial disease resistance of<br />

transgenic hybrid poplar expressing the synthetic antimicrobial peptide D4E1. Tree<br />

Physiology 23:405-411.<br />

Stover, E., Bowman, K., McCollum, G., Niedz, R. 2008. Developing transgenic solutions for<br />

HLB resistant citrus at the US Horticultural Research Laboratory. Proceedings of the<br />

International Research Conference on Huanglongbing, p. 374.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 200<br />

11.5 Responses of Transgenic Hamlin Sweet Orange <strong>Plant</strong>s Expressing the attacin A Gene<br />

to Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus Infection<br />

Felipe, R.T.A. 1 , Mourão-Filho, F.A. 1 , Pereira, E.V., Jr. 1 , Lopes, S.A. 2 , Sousa, M.C. 2 , Mendes,<br />

B.M.J. 3<br />

1 ESALQ/Universidade de São Paulo, Piracicaba, Brazil<br />

2 Fundecitrus, Araraquara, Brazil<br />

3 CENA/Universidade de São Paulo, Piracicaba, Brazil<br />

Genes that code for antimicrobial peptides have been used in an attempt to produce transgenic<br />

plants against bacterial pathogens. Herein, we show the responses of Hamlin sweet orange<br />

cultivar transformed with attacin A gene (attA), in 12 independent transformation events, against<br />

Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus infection. Four plants of each event were inoculated, by stem<br />

grafting, with HLB-positive budsticks, and evaluated for symptom expression and bacterial titers<br />

(Log 10 Liberibacter copies per gram of leaf tissue), using SYBR green qPCR, 8 months after<br />

inoculation. Four non-transformed inoculated plants were used as positive controls. HLB leaf<br />

symptom severities and average bacterial titers of most plants did not differ from that found on<br />

the control. However, plants of two transformation events (8 and 11) showed lower symptom<br />

severities and lower bacterial titers. Current work might indicate if symptom and bacterial titers<br />

correlate with attA expression levels. Details of this study will be presented and the perspectives<br />

in HLB control with the use of transgenic plants are discussed.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 201<br />

11.6 Screening Antimicrobial Peptides In-Vitro for Use in Developing Huanglongbing and<br />

Citrus Canker Resistant Transgenic Citrus<br />

Stover, E. 1 , Stange, R. 1 , McCollum, G. 1 , Jaynes, J. 2<br />

1 USDA-ARS-USHRL, Fort Pierce, FL, USA<br />

2 Integrative Biosciences Program, Tuskegee University, Tuskegee, AL, USA<br />

Huanglongbing (HLB) and Asiatic citrus canker (ACC) seriously threaten sustainability of the<br />

Florida citrus industry. No HLB resistance has been identified within cultivated citrus, so<br />

development of resistant transgenic citrus is a high priority. With the HLB pathosystem largely<br />

unknown, broad-spectrum antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are the current focus. In vitro<br />

assessment of minimum inhibitory concentration was conducted using Sinorhizobium meliloti<br />

and Agrobacterium tumefaciens as α-proteobacteria surrogates for Liberibacter (causal agent of<br />

HLB). Xanthomonas citri (causing ACC) was included in these analyses in the hope that HLB<br />

and ACC resistance can be achieved with the same AMP transgene, using non-tissue-specific<br />

promoters. Nineteen AMPs were initially tested from diverse sources. The most active AMPs<br />

included Tachyplesin 1 from horseshoe crab, SMAP-29 from sheep, and the synthetic D4E1.<br />

These AMPs inhibited growth of all three test bacterial species at 1 µM or less. A further<br />

24 synthetic AMPs were designed based on initial results, and 11 of these showed effectiveness<br />

at 1 µM or less across all three test bacteria. Most AMPs were comparable in effectiveness<br />

across the three bacterial species, but some species × AMP interactions were observed.<br />

Hemolytic activity was assessed by exposure of porcine erythrocytes to a range of AMP<br />

concentrations. Hemolysis from most AMPs at 10 µM was not significantly different from water,<br />

while melittin (from bee venom) was highly hemolytic. AMPs which are not of animal origin,<br />

that suppress bacterial growth at 1 µM or less, and show negligible hemolysis are the focus for<br />

further work developing transgenic citrus resistant to HLB and ACC.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 202<br />

11.7 Response of Citrus Transgenic <strong>Plant</strong>s Expressing STX IA Gene to Candidatus<br />

Liberibacter asiaticus<br />

Marques, V.V. 1,2 , Bagio, T.Z. 3 , Sugahara, V.H. 1 , Vasquez-Souza, G.V. 1,2 , Grange, L. 4 ,<br />

Meneguim, L. 3 , Kobayashi, A.K. 5 , Bespalhok, J. 4 , Pereira, L.F.P. 5 , Vieira, L.G.E. 1 , Leite, R.P.,<br />

Jr. 1<br />

1 IAPAR/Instituto Agronômico do Paraná, PR, Brazil<br />

2 FAPEAGRO/Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e ao Agronegócio, Londrina, PR, Brazil<br />

3 UEL/Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Londrina, PR, Brazil<br />

4 UFPR/Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, PR, Brasil<br />

5 EMBRAPA/Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária, Brasília, DF, Brazil<br />

Huanglongbing (HLB) is a major threat for citrus production around the world. However, no<br />

resistance to this disease has been found in species of the genus Citrus or in plants of closely<br />

related genera. The development of transgenic plants for disease resistance in economically<br />

important cultivars of citrus may represent a unique and efficient strategy for control of HLB.<br />

<strong>Plant</strong> transformation with antibacterial peptides has been used to enhance pathogen resistance in<br />

different plants. Sarcotoxin IA (STX IA) is an antibacterial peptide that is secreted by a meat-fly<br />

Sarcophaga peregrina and belongs to the peptide group that interacts with bacterial cellular<br />

membrane causing an electrochemical potential loss. In this study, we evaluated transgenic sweet<br />

orange events transformed with the STX IA gene in regard to the HLB disease. Experiments were<br />

conducted at the Instituto Agronômico do Paraná – IAPAR, Londrina, PR, Brazil, under<br />

greenhouse conditions, by using five independent events of sweet orange cv. Pera (STX-3,<br />

STX-5, STX-11, STX12, and STX-13) transformed with the vector pST10 containing the STX IA<br />

gene under control of CaMV 35S promoter and the signal peptide from tobacco PR1a<br />

(Bespalhok et al., 2001). For each transformation event, five plants at the same developmental<br />

stage were inoculated by two different methods. By grafting inoculation, segments 2 to 4 cm<br />

long of Ca. L. asiaticus-infected citrus plants were grafted in the test plants. By insect<br />

inoculation, 20 psyllids (Diaphorina citri) were transferred from donor plants to each test plant.<br />

The insects were kept in a net cage on the plant for 2 weeks. After killing the psyllids by<br />

insecticide spray, the plants were maintained under greenhouse conditions for further observation<br />

of symptom development. Non-transformed plants of the same cultivar of sweet orange were<br />

used as control. The plants were examined regularly for HLB symptom development and<br />

evaluated by PCR for HLB bacterium presence 6 and 13 months after inoculation. Leaf DNA<br />

was extracted from 500 mg of central leaf veins according to the CTAB protocol of Murray and<br />

Thompson (1980). PCR was performed by using rplA2/rplJ5 primers to identify Ca. L. asiaticus<br />

(Teixeira et al., 2005). In both methods of inoculation, the plants showed symptoms of the<br />

disease approximately 10 months after inoculation. Disease incidence ranged from 20% to 100%<br />

among the transgenic and control plants (Fig. 1). The results show an improvement in resistance<br />

to HLB of three transgenic events, STX-3, STX-5, and STX-11 (Fig. 1). However, the<br />

concentration of the HLB bacterium was not determined in the different tested plants.<br />

Nevertheless, the variation in symptom expression indicates increased HLB resistance in some<br />

transgenic events.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 203<br />

Acknowledgement<br />

This work has been supported by the Fundo de Defesa da Citricultura (FUNDECITRUS),<br />

Araraquara, SP, Brazil.<br />

References<br />

Bespalhok Filho, J.C., Kobayashi, A.K., Pereira, L.F.P., Vieira, L.G.E. 2001. Laranja<br />

transgênica. Biotecnologia, Ciência e Desenvolvimento 23:62-66.<br />

Bové, J.M. 2006. Huanglongbing: a destructive, newly-emerging, century-old disease of citrus.<br />

Journal of <strong>Plant</strong> Pathology 88:7-37.<br />

da Graça, J.V., Korsten, L. 2004. Citrus huanglongbing: review, present status and future<br />

strategies. In: S.A.M.H. Naqui (ed.). Diseases of Fruits and Vegetables. Kluwer Academic,<br />

The Netherlands, p. 229-245.<br />

Okada, M., Natori, S. 1983. Purification and characterization of an antibacterial protein from<br />

hemolinph of Sarcophaga peregrine (flesh-fly) larvae. Biochemical Journal 211:727-734.<br />

Teixeira, D.C., Danet, J.L., Eveillard, S., Martins, E.C., Jesus, W.C., Jr., Yamamoto, P.T., Lopes,<br />

S.A., Bassanezi, R.B., Ayres, A.J., Saillard, C., Bové, J.M. 2005. Citrus huanglongbing in<br />

São Paulo state, Brazil: PCR detection of the Candidatus Liberibacter species associated<br />

with the disease. Molecular and Cellular Probes 19:173-179.<br />

Fig. 1. Frequency of HLB-diseased plants of transgenic events and non-transformed control<br />

plants 6 months after inoculation with Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus. Based on PCR results by using<br />

the rplA2/rplJ5 primers 6 months after inoculation.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 204<br />

11.8 Rootstocks and Pruning Effects on Huanglongbing Incidence on Tahiti Limes in<br />

Bebedouro, Northern São Paulo State, Brazil<br />

Stuchi, E.S. 1,2 , Reiff, E.T. 2 , Sempionato, O.R. 2 , Cantuarias-Avilés, T. 2 , Girardi, E,A. 1 , Parolin,<br />

L.G. 2 , Toledo, D.A. 2<br />

1 Embrapa Cassava & Fruits, Cruz das Almas, Brazil<br />

2 Citrus Experimental Station, Bebedouro, Brazil<br />

In 2004, huanglongbing (HLB), caused by Candidatus liberibacter asiaticus and<br />

Ca. L. americanus and vectored by Diaphorina citri Kuwayama, was first reported in São Paulo<br />

State, Brazil. Tahiti (Persian) lime is an important regional fruit crop, but HLB symptoms are not<br />

so clearly expressed as in sweet oranges. In 2001, an experiment was planted in Bebedouro,<br />

Northern São Paulo State, aimed to characterize the following 12 rootstocks (treatments) for<br />

Tahiti lime: two Rangpur limes (FCAV and Limeira), three trifoliate oranges (Rubidoux, FCAV,<br />

and Flying Dragon (FD)), Swingle citrumelo, Sunki, and Sun Chu Sha Kat mandarins, Orlando<br />

tangelo, Carrizo citrange, and the hybrids Changsha × English Small (HRS 801) and Rangpur<br />

lime × Swingle citrumelo (HRS 827). Except on FD, all the other rootstocks induced high vigor<br />

to Tahiti lime canopies. In May 2009, after a first 7-year evaluation cycle (Cantuarias-Avilés,<br />

2009), trees were pruned to a 3 m height. Most of the trees showed HLB-like symptoms in<br />

October 2009, and on December 2009, they were sampled for Ca. Liberibacter spp. detection by<br />

PCR. All the suspected trees were positive. Until December 2009, the average cumulative<br />

incidence (CI) of HLB in the plots was 72.1%, with CI values varying from 10 to 100%. For<br />

most of the rootstocks, CI values were equal or higher than 60%, while the trees budded onto the<br />

FD rootstock showed the lower HLB incidence (10%). Pruning may be an extremely hazardous<br />

practice in areas under high HLB pressure if a careful vector control program is not applied.<br />

Acknowledgement<br />

Financial Support: FAPESP.<br />

Reference<br />

Cantuarias-Aviles, T. 2009. Avaliação horticultural da laranjeira ‘Folha Murcha’, tangerineira<br />

‘Satsuma’ e limeira ácida ‘Tahiti’ sobre doze porta-enxertos. Universidade de São Paulo<br />

Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiroz”, Piracicaba/SP, Brazil, 129 p.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 205<br />

11.9 Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus (CLas) Titer in Field HLB-Exposed Commercial<br />

Citrus Cultivars<br />

Stover, E., McCollum, G. USDA-ARS-USHRL, Fort Pierce, FL, USA<br />

There are reports that some citrus scion cultivars are slower to develop huanglongbing (HLB;<br />

e.g., Lange et al., 1985; Shokrollah et al., 2009). To evaluate this in Florida, eight groves with<br />

four or more diverse cultivars planted in close proximity were surveyed. Twenty trees of each<br />

cultivar in each grove were randomly selected to avoid bias and edge effects, and an HLB<br />

diagnostic leaf sample was collected from each. CLas 16S rDNA primers (Li et al., 2006) were<br />

used in qPCR, all standardized to 3 ng nucleic acid/reaction. No cultivar was low in CLas titer in<br />

all groves. Across all groves, 22% of the 760 trees tested had a Ct value 5.8 CLas<br />

genomes/sample). In two groves, there was little HLB. Data on the six groves with high<br />

incidence of HLB were subjected to ANOVA, using CT values. Minneola, Sweet Orange, and<br />

Murcott displayed the greatest CLas titer, averaging 304, 236, and 168 CLas/sample. In the<br />

lowest titer group, Temple, Fallglo, grapefruit, and Sunburst displayed the lowest titers, at 9, 13,<br />

40, and 107, respectively. Minneola and Temple differed 30-fold in CLas titer and were<br />

compared adjoining each other in all the same groves. Assessment of Las/HLB in replicated<br />

cultivar trials and breeding populations exposed to high disease pressure and controlled psyllid<br />

challenges have all been initiated. Since Temple, Sunburst, Fallglo, and their parents are widely<br />

used in our breeding program, we hope to identify diverse scion types with greater HLB<br />

resistance for near-term deployment.<br />

References<br />

Lange, J.H. de, Vincent, A.P., Nel, M. 1985. Breeding for resistance to greening disease in<br />

citrus. Citrus and Subtropical Fruit Journal 614:6-9.<br />

Li, W., Hartung, J.S., Levy, L. 2006. Quantitative real-time PCR for detection and identification<br />

of Candidatus Liberibacter species associated with citrus huanglongbing. Journal of<br />

Microbiological Methods 66:104-115.<br />

Shokrollah, H., Abdullah, T.L., Sijam, K., Abdullah, S.N.A., Abdullah, N.A.P. 2009. Differential<br />

reaction of citrus species in Malaysia to huanglongbing (HLB) disease using grafting<br />

method. American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4:32-38.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 206<br />

11.10 Host Response of Different Citrus Genotypes and Relatives to Candidatus<br />

Liberibacter asiaticus Infection<br />

Boscariol-Camargo, R.L., Cristofani-Yaly, M., Malosso, A., Coletta-Filho, H.D., Machado,<br />

M.A. Centro APTA Citros Sylvio Moreira – IAC, Cordeirópolis/SP, Brazil<br />

Citrus huanglongbing (HLB) or greening, reported in São Paulo State in 2004, is considered the<br />

main disease of the crop worldwide and has caused significant damage. In Brazil, the disease is<br />

caused by two species of the bacteria Candidatus Liberibacter, and disease control is<br />

accomplished by eradicating infected plants and insecticidal spraying, but there is a demand for<br />

alternative strategies with lower economic and environmental costs. Considering that much of<br />

the germplasm of citrus in Brazil had not yet been evaluated for susceptibility or resistance to the<br />

HLB bacterium, this study aimed to evaluate the multiplication of bacteria and the development<br />

of symptoms in species and varieties of citrus and related genera. Five replicates of each plant<br />

were inoculated with infected Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus buds and evaluated for disease<br />

symptoms and presence of bacteria during 12 months. Grafted plants with healthy budwood were<br />

used as negative control. Evaluation was carried out every 2 months using Real Time<br />

Quantitative PCR with TaqMan probes. After infection with infected buds, the bacteria could be<br />

detected in all genotypes, although with variation in the amount of bacteria over time. Genotypes<br />

such as Atalantia, Poncirus trifoliata, and Citrus limettioides Tanaka (Persian lime) showed a<br />

reduction in the bacteria multiplication rate, indicating some degree of tolerance. Actually, there<br />

was no relationship between the titer of the bacteria in the tissues, presence, and intensity of<br />

symptoms.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 207<br />

11.11 Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus (CLas) Titer in Poncirus trifoliata and P. trifoliata<br />

Hybrids: Inferences on Components of HLB Resistance<br />

Stover, E., Shatters, R.G., Jr., McCollum, G., Hall, D.G., Duan, Y.-P. USDA-ARS-USHRL,<br />

Fort Pierce, FL, USA<br />

Poncirus trifoliata hybrids field grown at USHRL on Sun Chu Sha rootstock were tested for<br />

CLas 16S rDNA and Citrus dehydrin by qPCR, assessing random quadrant samples, a diagnostic<br />

“worst” sample, and rootstock suckers (November 2009). Resulting data were expressed as<br />

abundance of CLas relative to Citrus dehydrin. The two P. trifoliata had non-detectable or low<br />

CLas abundance, as did two citranges, except that citrange diagnostic samples and rootstock<br />

samples had very high CLas (20-24 CLas rDNA/Citrus dehydrin). Variability was observed in<br />

relative CLas abundance among the 10 citranges tested with most showing high abundance in<br />

quadrants (20 CLas/citrus gene), and all showed high CLas in rootstock suckers. The data<br />

suggest that Poncirus and some Poncirus hybrids suppress CLas even when grafted onto a<br />

high-titer source. Data suggest that in some citranges, CLas increases in small populations of<br />

leaves with the possibility that leaves undergoing senescence may permit proliferation as host<br />

defenses decline. Using only most-symptomatic diagnostic samples may obscure important<br />

differences in CLas proliferation. Theoretically, slower development of HLB/CLas could be due<br />

to alteration in several components: attractiveness of trees to ACP, CLas establishment at ACP<br />

feeding, CLas proliferation following ACP inoculation, systemic movement of CLas with<br />

subsequent further proliferation, and development of plant responses observed as HLB<br />

symptoms. Reduction or slowing of any of these steps may slow disease development and spread<br />

but with different implications in management and commercial significance. Careful<br />

consideration needs to be given to the value and implications of such resistance or tolerance.<br />

References<br />

Folimonova, S.Y., Robertson, C.J., Garnsey, S.M., Gowda, S., Dawson, W.O. 2009.<br />

Examination of the responses of different genotypes of citrus to huanglongbing (citrus<br />

greening) under different conditions. Phytopathology 99:1346-1354.<br />

Li, W., Hartung, J. S., Levy, L. 2006. Quantitative real-time PCR for detection and identification<br />

of Candidatus Liberibacter species associated with citrus huanglongbing. Journal of<br />

Microbiological Methods 66:104-115.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 208<br />

11.12 The Role of Salicylic Acid and Systemic Acquired Resistance in the Response of<br />

Citrus to HLB<br />

Khalaf, A. 1 , Febres, V.J. 1 , Brlansky, R.H. 2 , Gmitter, F.G., Jr. 2 , Moore, G.A. 1<br />

1 UF-IFAS Horticultural Sciences, Gainesville, FL, USA<br />

2 UF-IFAS Citrus Research and Education Center, Lake Alfred, FL, USA<br />

To study the mechanisms of induced resistance in citrus, we designed microarray experiments to<br />

compare the response of citrus types to exogenous application of salicylic acid (SA) and<br />

infection with Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus, the etiological agent of huanglongbing (HLB).<br />

SA has been shown to induce the expression of genes associated with plant defense and the<br />

establishment of systemic acquired resistance (SAR). Our custom Agilent Citrus GeneChip<br />

(4x44K format) was used in these experiments to compare treated and untreated grapefruit<br />

(Citrus paradisi) plants. Functional expression analysis of the microarray data confirmed<br />

up-regulation of some genes previously associated with SA/SAR (pathogenesis-related proteins,<br />

LRR, lipid metabolic processes, etc.) in treated but not untreated plants. We also evaluated gene<br />

expression responses of sweet orange (C. sinensis) and rough lemon (C. jambhiri) to HLB. In our<br />

greenhouse observations, sweet orange developed yellow blotchy mottle symptoms earlier than<br />

rough lemon. <strong>Plant</strong>s were also tested by PCR for the presence of HLB and only positive plants<br />

were further used in the functional gene expression analyses. More than half of the genes<br />

significantly induced by SA were also induced in rough lemon but not sweet orange 27 weeks<br />

after inoculation with HLB. These results indicate that HLB induced a response that overlapped<br />

in that part of SA. This information could be exploited to improve disease management strategies<br />

in the field.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 209<br />

11.13 Observations of Citrus × Poncirus Hybrid Tolerance to Infection with Candidatus<br />

Liberibacter asiaticus<br />

Bowman, K.D., Albrecht, U. USDA-ARS, Fort Pierce, FL, USA<br />

This study used greenhouse inoculation tests and field trials to investigate the apparent tolerance<br />

of some Citrus × Poncirus hybrids to infection with Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus (Las). The<br />

citrus rootstock US-897 (Citrus reticulata Blanco × Poncirus trifoliata L. Raf.) was observed to<br />

be tolerant to HLB in field plantings. Where US-897 trees were naturally exposed to high<br />

populations of Asian citrus pysllid, Diaphorina citri (ACP), infected with Las, they did not<br />

exhibit distinct symptoms typical for HLB disease. Greenhouse tests were completed to compare<br />

the response of US-897 seedlings inoculated with Las to those of susceptible genotypes.<br />

Although ACP-exposed field trees and Las-inoculated greenhouse trees of US-897 became<br />

PCR-positive for the pathogen, they did not develop leaf symptoms nor develop faint leaf<br />

symptoms only much longer after inoculation. In addition, growth of US-897 plants was<br />

unaffected or only slightly affected by Las infection. Other hybrids of P. trifoliata with Citrus<br />

spp. were also observed to exhibit some tolerance to Las infection, including US-802 (Citrus<br />

grandis × P. trifoliata). Some variability was observed in the tolerance reaction of different<br />

Poncirus hybrids to Las infection. Preliminary greenhouse and field studies with susceptible<br />

scions grafted on US-897 and some other Poncirus hybrids suggest that these rootstocks may<br />

provide some delay in HLB disease progression or moderation of symptom expression, but that<br />

all trees, regardless of rootstock, eventually decline from the disease. Studies are underway now<br />

to examine the effect of the Poncirus-type tolerance in a scion and to determine its physiological<br />

basis.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 210<br />

11.14 Performance of a Phage Gene in Transgenic Citrus Resistant to Citrus Greening<br />

Jiang, Y. 1 , Perazzo, G. 1 , Septer, A. 1 , Kress, R. 2 , Gabriel, D.W. 1,3<br />

1 Integrated <strong>Plant</strong> Genetics, Inc, Alachua, FL, USA<br />

2 Southern Gardens Citrus, Clewiston, FL, USA<br />

3 UF-IFAS <strong>Plant</strong> Pathology Department, Gainesville, FL, USA<br />

Huanglongbing (HLB), also known as citrus greening, is a lethal disease of citrus caused by<br />

several species of Candidatus Liberibacter, a psyllid transmitted, phloem-limited,<br />

α-proteobacteria. One of these species, Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus (Las), is widespread in Florida<br />

citrus. Additional species of Liberibacter have emerged as new infectious agents of tomato and<br />

potato. There are no practical chemical controls for Liberibacter. A gene was isolated from phage<br />

Xp15 of Xanthomonas campestris pv. pelargonii that encodes a protein, BC, that is not directly<br />

lethal to bacteria but affects ability to resist natural plant anti-microbial compounds, including<br />

phytoalexins. More than 40 transgenic citrus lines (cv. Carrizo, Pineapple sweet orange, and<br />

Duncan grapefruit) expressing BC were generated and half were clonally propagated. Expression<br />

of BC did not obviously affect the morphology or development of transgenic citrus trees, many<br />

of which are over 3 years old. Western blot analyses showed that BC can be stably expressed in<br />

citrus. For challenge inoculations, Las was introduced by grafting Las-infected grapefruit as<br />

scions onto BC expressing transgenic and control lines as rootstock. Las-infected, grafted scions<br />

transmitted Las to previously uninfected rootstock, including some transgenic BC lines, based on<br />

positive nested PCR tests of rootstock shoots. However, after removal of the infected scions, all<br />

transgenic lines expressing BC became Las negative within 1-2 months, and remained so after<br />

9 months of testing to date, i.e., the BC expressing lines appeared to be self-curing.<br />

Non-transgenic and/or silenced citrus lines that became positive remained positive. Las was also<br />

introduced into tobacco by use of infected dodder; all transgenic tobacco plants tested that<br />

expressed BC remained Las-negative after dodder challenge. Transgenic citrus plants expressing<br />

BC are in field trials conducted by Southern Gardens Citrus.<br />

Acknowledgement<br />

Financial Support: Southern Gardens Citrus and USDA-APHIS.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 211<br />

11.15 Genome Sequences of Haploid Clementine Mandarin and Diploid Sweet Orange<br />

Gmitter, F.G., Jr. UF-IFAS Citrus Research and Education Center, Lake Alfred, FL, USA<br />

The International Citrus Genome Consortium (ICGC) is releasing a preliminary annotated<br />

genome assembly from a Clementine mandarin haploid plant, sequenced using Sanger<br />

technology. Sequencing, assembly, and annotation were performed by Genoscope (France),<br />

USDOE-JGI and HudsonAlpha (USA), and IGA (Italy) with contributions from Lifesequencing<br />

(Spain). Brazil, France, Italy, Spain, and the USA (i.e., the Florida citrus industry) provided<br />

financial support for the project. The assembly represents 6.3x coverage. Preliminary annotation<br />

is underway (November 2010) to be completed before January 2011. Additional steps to refine<br />

and improve the sequence, including haploid BAC end sequencing, a high-density linkage map,<br />

and additional sequencing, will be described; a chromosome-based assembly should be complete<br />

by late summer 2011. Additionally, an annotated assembly of the heterozygous diploid sweet<br />

orange is being released by a collaboration of UF, Roche/454 Life Sciences, USDOE-JGI, and<br />

Georgia Tech University. This genome was assembled from shotgun reads using 454 FLX and<br />

FLX Titanium platforms (14x coverage), 3 kb and 8 kb insert paired end library FLX reads<br />

(9 and 6.7x coverage, respectively), plus an additional 1.2x Sanger coverage produced previously<br />

at JGI. The genome currently represents ~320Mb, anchored to more than 12,500 scaffolds;<br />

however, more than 50% of the sequence is within only 256 scaffolds. Annotation integrated<br />

EST information with ab initio GeneMark models, predicting 25,376 protein coding loci and<br />

more than 46,000 transcripts. Future perspectives on citrus genome sequencing will be discussed,<br />

as well as the potential applications of these genome sequences to the efforts to provide<br />

long-term genetic solutions to HLB.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 212<br />

11.16 Exploring Metabolic Profiles of <strong>Plant</strong> Tissue with Increased or Decreased<br />

Susceptibility<br />

Malik, N.S.A., Pérez, J.L., Brockington, J., Mangan, R.L. USDA-ARS, Kika de la Garza<br />

Subtropical Agricultural Research Center, Weslaco, TX, USA<br />

Studies were initiated to investigate any links between metabolic profiles of the citrus leaves and<br />

the extent of ACP infestation. Exploratory studies were therefore conducted to investigate<br />

differences in metabolic profiles between young and mature leaves. Initially, profile of<br />

polyphenols in young and susceptible leaves versus mature and not susceptible leaves showed<br />

that with the age of grapefruit (Rio Red) leaves there occurs a drastic decline in flavonoids. For<br />

example, the levels of flavonoid naringin declined by 90%, while there were substantial losses in<br />

apigenin and Flavonid-1 (identity yet to be determined), when young leaves matured. In addition,<br />

our initial studies indicated that sour orange plants first subjected to low temperature (5 ± 1°C)<br />

for 5-6 days attracted more psyllids than the control plants, i.e., plants that are continuously kept<br />

under warm temperature (26 ± 1°C). Polyphenol profiles of leaves exposed to low temperature<br />

showed specific difference from the polyphenol profiles of control plants. In addition, we<br />

compared the changes in leaf polyphenols resulting from psyllid infestation (psyllid stress) to<br />

changes resulting from water stress. These studies provided interesting insight to metabolic<br />

changes in satsuma leaves in response to different stresses. For example, two flavonoids appear<br />

only in leaves infected with ACP, i.e., they are absent in normal and water stressed leaves. In<br />

addition, caffeic acid levels increased nearly 100% in water stressed leaves but declined nearly<br />

80% in leaves infested with psyllids. The samples will now be analyzed for free amino acids,<br />

polyamine, sugars, and pigments.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 213<br />

Take-Home Messages:<br />

What Can Be Implemented<br />

Now or in the Near Future?<br />

2011 International HLB Meeting<br />

Orlando, Florida January 2011<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 214<br />

HLB Pathology<br />

Take-Home Messages<br />

Megan Dewdney<br />

and<br />

Timothy Schubert<br />

Grower Day Summary:<br />

HLB Pathology Lessons<br />

2011 International HLB Meeting<br />

Orlando, FL<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 215<br />

What Can Be Implemented Shortly?<br />

Ca. Liberibacter spp. Lessons<br />

Considerations for Sampling<br />

• Uneven distribution of Ca. Liberibacter spp. makes diagnosis very challenging<br />

‣ Because you can’t find it, doesn’t mean it’s not there<br />

‣ Insufficient sampling or wrong tissue<br />

• Need to think about HLB as affecting a population rather than individual plants for<br />

management<br />

‣ Population examples: grove, block, etc.<br />

Fruit of New Technologies<br />

• New technologies allowed advancements not possible 10 years ago<br />

• Indications of at least 2 Florida Las strains<br />

‣ Separate introductions? Present in Florida potentially for many years based on genetic<br />

diversity<br />

‣ Disease appearance late 2005 due to psyllid arrival 1998 and long latent period<br />

• 4 main strains worldwide<br />

‣ Brazilian, USA, China, and India (most different)<br />

Distinguishing Strains with Sequencing<br />

• Should more than a small portion of the ribosome be used to<br />

differentiate between strains?<br />

‣ Probably yes but which ones ─ still being debated<br />

‣ Is there a biological/phenological/epidemiological significance?<br />

Culturing the Liberibacter spp.<br />

• Progress with insect cell lines<br />

Michael Rogers<br />

• Used several insect cell lines in a co-culture<br />

‣ D. citri cell lines recently received<br />

‣ In mosquito and fruit fly cell lines able to transfer between 18-20 times<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 216<br />

New Detection Methods<br />

• Antibodies specific for Las to develop cheaper and faster methods of detection in the<br />

field<br />

‣ Dot blots<br />

‣ ELISA perhaps to be used in a dip stick test<br />

• Could be very useful for new experimental protocols<br />

‣ Immunocapture<br />

‣ Gold labeling ─ Is that really Las?<br />

• Spectroscopic techniques<br />

‣ Needs more work because can’t tell diseases apart in the field<br />

PCR – New and Improved?!?<br />

• A new way to test for 4 Ca. Liberibacter spp.<br />

‣ A better tool for regulatory agencies? PPQ? DPI?<br />

• A more sensitive/reliable technique for diagnostic qPCR<br />

‣ Based on a prophage (bacterial virus) which may not always be there<br />

‣ Not quantitative ─ only a yes/no answer<br />

• Developing strips for PCR<br />

‣ Isothermal DNA detection<br />

‣ Constant temperatures for 20 minutes<br />

Are Liberibacters the microscopic equivalent of a 1960’s Rock and Roll Band?<br />

Trash the hotel room and leave quickly<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 217<br />

• Asymptomatic new flush has the highest Las titers in the plant under controlled<br />

conditions<br />

‣ First 3-6 months<br />

• Symptoms then commence but the bacterial titer drops<br />

‣ Under electron microscopy, bacteria are degrading or absent<br />

• Under natural inoculation of young trees, titer found in symptomatic tissue at higher<br />

levels than asymptomatic tissues<br />

‣ Recently symptomatic trees ─ is the syndrome from a natural inoculation process<br />

different from artificial?<br />

Early Physiological Changes<br />

• First microscopic symptom is swelling between cells<br />

• Callose deposits in phloem<br />

‣ Phloem collapse complete by 9 months with surrounding cells full of starch<br />

• At 6-9 months, first symptoms are observed<br />

Seasonality of Liberibacter<br />

• U.S. Sugar (Southern Gardens) Diagnostic Lab samples<br />

‣ Best diagnostic accuracy is from August to October<br />

‣ August to January/February, all typical symptoms are suitable to identify a positive<br />

‣ Worst time to send in samples is in June and July<br />

‣ Only blotchy mottle will come back positive year-round<br />

• Experimental evidence confirms these trends in the field<br />

Las Shuts Down Part of Defense<br />

• Common plant defense pathway is short-circuited by Las<br />

‣ The bacteria has an enzyme that is capable of degrading salicylic acid (SA)<br />

‣ Looking for an inhibitor of this enzyme<br />

• Is this why applying salicylic acid-containing products has had mixed results?<br />

Revisiting Seed Transmission<br />

• Some debate over seed transmission (still!)<br />

• Bacteria can be found in seed coat<br />

‣ Especially the phloem of developing seed<br />

‣ Embryos all tested negative<br />

• Numbers diminish over time<br />

‣ Could detect sometimes but did not distinguish between live and dead bacteria<br />

‣ Seedlings all tested negative after 1 year<br />

• Conclusion: no seed transmission<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 218<br />

Interesting Facts About Ca. Liberibacter spp. Some day useful?<br />

Garnier and Bové, 1984<br />

‘Omics ─ What on Earth Are They?<br />

• Genomics ─ What genetic information is present in an organism?<br />

‣ Sequencing starts the process<br />

• Transcriptomics ─ What genes are being used?<br />

‣ Up regulated ─ identifies what genes are in use more<br />

frequently than normal (as defined by research)<br />

‣ Down regulated ─ identifies what genes are less active<br />

than normal<br />

• Proteomics ─ What proteins (structural and enzymes) are<br />

being made?<br />

• Metabolomics ─ What are the final gene products?<br />

So What?<br />

• These are excellent techniques for developing ideas for new research projects<br />

• Need to be followed up by experiments that prove the hypotheses<br />

• Sorting through the data<br />

• Allowed for great strides in host pathogen relations in Xylella fastidiosa<br />

Ca. Liberibacter Genomes Small<br />

• Smaller than other closely related bacteria<br />

• Some genes for flagellum present but never seen in plant or insect ─ Does it work?<br />

• Carries genes that cause disease in other organisms, especially animals like insects<br />

• Contains virus sequences that are harmful when bacteria are stressed<br />

‣ Can we use this to kill Liberibacter in the plant?<br />

• Bacteria take form of tangled knots within cells<br />

Ca. Liberibacter americanus<br />

• Ca. L. americanus genome is close to complete allowing<br />

for the discovery of common disease causing elements<br />

‣ Now almost out-competed by Ca. L. asiaticus in Brazil<br />

‣ L. americanus does not contain the prophage<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 219<br />

Entomology<br />

Take-Home Messages<br />

Lukasz Stelinski (FL) and<br />

Mamoudou Setamou (TX)<br />

Grower Day Summary:<br />

Entomology Lessons<br />

2011 International HLB Meeting<br />

Orlando, FL<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 220<br />

Session 2: Asian Citrus Psyllid<br />

Biology and Genomics<br />

2.1: de León et al.<br />

• Reported evidence for separate ACP invasions in North and South America apparently<br />

resulting from ACP that came from different countries in Asia<br />

• Little gene flow was evident between these two groups ─ so they have remained separate<br />

• Suggested that any biological control agent would likely need to originate from the<br />

source country of the founding ACP population<br />

2.2: Bextine et al.<br />

• Compared the microbial diversity in potato psyllid and ACP. The greatest bacterial<br />

diversity occurred in eggs<br />

• When both psyllid species were infected with Liberibacter, there was another bacterial<br />

species present which is not there when Liberibacter was absent<br />

• The species of bacteria associated with Liberibacter infections was unique for each<br />

psyllid and are potential targets for psyllid control<br />

2.3: Borovsky et al.<br />

• Development of RNAi for ACP control<br />

• Demonstrated the efficacy of an artificial feeding system<br />

• Used three double stranded RNAs to target three specific ACP genes and showed<br />

increased ACP mortality<br />

• By using all three types simultaneously, mortality was greatest<br />

2.5: Ammar et al.<br />

• Using a detached citrus leaf placed in a polypropylene tube allowed more rapid<br />

assessments (2-3 weeks) of Las inoculation by infected ACP compared to whole plant<br />

assays (3-12 months)<br />

2 .6: Bextine et al.<br />

• Antennae of ACP and potato psyllid are slightly different. Suggested ACP might be<br />

better at finding host plants, while potato psyllid might be better at finding mates<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 221<br />

Session 2: Asian Citrus Psyllid<br />

Biology and Genomics (Posters)<br />

2.7: Hunter et al.<br />

• Production and mining of ACP genetic libraries identified several genes which function<br />

in psyllid responses to stress such as temperature, insecticides, and disease<br />

• Knowledge of ACP functional genomics will be used to develop RNAi gene disruption<br />

methods for ACP suppression<br />

Session 3: Asian Citrus Psyllid<br />

Ecology and Transmission<br />

3.1: Robbins et al.<br />

• Made a recent research advancement in recording ACP antennal signals with a device<br />

that is coupled to a gas chromatograph. These recordings allow us to precisely narrow<br />

down which chemicals psyllids are able to smell for mixtures of chemicals that are<br />

injected onto the chromatograph<br />

• Establishing this method should speed up the process of identifying attractants for ACP ─<br />

both host plant volatile and potential pheromone components<br />

• Seven compounds of interest identified that are being pursued<br />

3.2: Lopez-Arroyo et al.<br />

• Discussed ACP distribution in Northern Sinaloa, Mexico<br />

• Populations of ACP greatest on Mexican Lime > Orange > Grapefruit<br />

• Seasonal population abundance greatest September to February<br />

• 18 generations of ACP/year<br />

3.3: Ammar et al.<br />

• ACP salivary glands had the fewest Las bacteria compared with the alimentary canal and<br />

other body parts<br />

• Authors suggest that salivary glands are the major barrier to Las infection and<br />

transmission ─ perhaps a target site to exploit<br />

3.4: Pelz-Stelinski et al.<br />

• Acquisition greatest during nymphal development and at 25°C<br />

• Low efficiency of Las inoculation by Florida ACP (5%)<br />

• Las decreases over lifespan of ACP<br />

• Las alters ACP fitness: increased egg laying, faster development time, shorter lifespan<br />

• Increased egg laying by infected ACP suggest that Las is well-adapted to psyllids and<br />

may contribute to disease spread<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 222<br />

3.5: Ebert et al.<br />

• Seasonal changes in numbers of ACP carrying the HLB-causing pathogen<br />

• The more aggressive the management, the lower the incidence of HLB infection<br />

• Infection can vary from 2-3% to 40% or more and appears to be correlated with how<br />

aggressively psyllids are managed and whether management is done in coordinated<br />

fashion<br />

• October/November/December ─ period of greatest threat from infected ACP in Florida<br />

3.6: Mann et al.<br />

• ACP initially more attracted to HLB-infected plants, but subsequently they choose<br />

healthy plants as their final location for long-term setting<br />

• This may be a mechanism for rapid disease spread<br />

• Chemical and nutritional factors may underlie this behavior, which are being identified to<br />

prevent this movement from diseased to healthy plants<br />

• Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus is transferred at a low rate 3-5% from males to females<br />

during mating<br />

3.7: Serikawa et al:<br />

• Measured feeding behavior of ACP on plants treated with systemic and foliar insecticides<br />

• Chlorpyrifos, fenpropathrin, imidacloprid, and spinetoram were best in disturbing ACP<br />

feeding and thus may be best in preventing acquisition/inoculation<br />

• Aldicarb and spirotetramat did not disrupt ACP feeding, which may possibly allow<br />

pathogen inoculation prior to death<br />

3.8: Miranda et al.<br />

• Also measured effect of insecticides on ACP feeding<br />

• Systemically applied imidacloprid and thiamethoxam reduced psyllid probing and killed<br />

ACP fast<br />

• Effect can be very long lasting; upwards of 95 days<br />

• Contact insecticides (Dimethoate, λ-cyhalothrin) can initially prevent feeding on older<br />

leaves, but protection of young shoots was much worse. Also effect was not as long<br />

lasting as with systemic insecticides. In some cases, ACP could probe on newly treated<br />

shoots or within a few days<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 223<br />

Session 3: Asian Citrus Psyllid<br />

Ecology and Transmission (Posters)<br />

3.10: Barbosa et al.<br />

• Las acquired more efficiently than Lam by ACP<br />

3.11: Halbert et al.<br />

• Do ACP use other host plants?<br />

• ACP produced offspring on citrus, but not on Zanthoxylum species (in the citrus or rue<br />

family)<br />

• ACP adults lived longer on citrus and Z. clava-herculis than on other Zanthoxylum<br />

species<br />

• ACP might be able to transmit Las to Zanthoxylum species, although development of<br />

HLB may only be possible in Z. fagara<br />

3.12: Jasso-Arumedo et al.<br />

• In Mexico, infestations of ACP were greater on orange jasmine than in backyard citrus<br />

• Abundance of natural enemies was approximately 3:1 higher in natural jasmine than in<br />

backyard citrus<br />

• Cycloneda sanguinea was the most abundant; beneficial in both plants<br />

• T. radiata was more abundant in orange jasmine than in backyard citrus<br />

3.14: Jasso-Argumedo et al.<br />

• Infestation of young trees in Mexican orange groves was constant throughout the year<br />

(10-30%); lower infestations occurred in mature orange trees<br />

• The average annual infestation of Persian lime trees was 21%<br />

3.15: Thomas et al.<br />

• In Texas, ACP adults have been found on hackberry, mesquite, potato, acacia, and<br />

torchwood<br />

• ACP adults and nymphs have been found on common fig<br />

• Alternate ACP hosts may serve as reservoirs for Las<br />

• Other psyllid species utilizing these hosts may by potential vectors of Las<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 224<br />

Session 9: Asian Citrus Psyllid <strong>Management</strong><br />

Moderator: Michael Rogers<br />

7 Oral presentations<br />

19 posters<br />

Geographic areas of studies presented:<br />

• U.S. (CA, FL, TX, and AL)<br />

• Mexico<br />

• Brazil<br />

Topics covered in Oral Presentations:<br />

1. Database for ACP population in commercial groves<br />

2. Efficacy evaluation of dormant sprays for ACP for psyllid control and conservation of<br />

natural enemies<br />

3. Testing of insecticides for ACP control (type, rates, application methods)<br />

4. New strategies for ACP control (RNA interference)<br />

5. Studies on imidacloprid for ACP management<br />

6. Insecticide resistance and susceptibility of uninfected and CLas infected ACP<br />

9.1: Gast et al. (FL)<br />

• U.S. Sugar has a “monster” plant and has strong interest in continuing the supply of fruit<br />

to the plant<br />

• Second location where HLB was detected in FL (Oct 2005). Initially, no ACP control on<br />

mature groves, but currently aggressive ACP control and grove scouting for both ACP<br />

and HLB<br />

• Monitoring program is expensive (4 scouts for ACP and 15 HLB inspectors), but required<br />

• Two ACP scouting methods (tap sampling for adult and visual inspections of flush shoots<br />

for all life stages)<br />

• Comprehensive database developed: good correlation between HLB infection rate and<br />

% sampling sites with psyllids and flush shoots with ACP nymphs<br />

• Factors that affect HLB infection: young trees, neighbor not doing anything, and strong<br />

border effects<br />

• To keep HLB infection


P a g e | 225<br />

• Technology, environmentally friendly. Working w/APHIS and EPA for regulatory issues,<br />

and w/companies for commercialization<br />

• Psyllid genome mapped and ready for release (in 3-4 months)<br />

9.3: Qureshi and Stansly (FL)<br />

• Demonstrated the importance of winter dormant sprays for ACP control<br />

• 1 or 2 winter dormant sprays effective for providing excellent ACP control for up to<br />

4-5 months<br />

• Winter dormant sprays (Jan 15) also allow judicial use of beneficials (minimal to nil<br />

effects on natural enemies)<br />

• For effective psyllid control, make at least one winter spray, then during the season spray<br />

before each flush cycle based on psyllid counts (similar recommendation made by Bartels<br />

et al. from TX, poster 9.8)<br />

• Tamarixia main parasitoid in FL, but parasitism rate is moderate (20%). Inoculative and<br />

augmentative releases improve this parasitism rate, up to 50% in some locations<br />

9.4: Byrne et al. (CA)<br />

• Evaluate the efficacy of imidacloprid in three settings (backyard citrus, nursery and<br />

commercial groves)<br />

• CA is in ACP eradication mode, once a find made eradication efforts are immediately<br />

implemented at the sites and vicinity<br />

• Treatment consists of foliar application of a pyrethroid (e.g., cyfluthrin) and a soil<br />

application of neonicotinoid (imidacloprid)<br />

• Negative correlation between leaf tissue content of imidacloprid and trunk diameter. As<br />

the tree ages, lower imidacloprid titer in leaf tissue; thus needs for higher application<br />

rates!<br />

• Nursery stock regulation: requirement to treat nursery plants with both a systemic and a<br />

foliar insecticide in order to move plants. This treatment is performed under supervision<br />

• In commercial citrus both foliar sprays and imidacloprid applied; takes time to reach<br />

lethal dose in plant (200-250 ppb)<br />

9.5: Lopez-Arroyo et al. (Mexico)<br />

• ACP detected in 2002 and by 2008 has spread almost everywhere (even in states with no<br />

commercial citrus)<br />

• Infective ACP (i.e., carrying CLas) found in July 2009. ACP did not catch stakeholder<br />

attention until this detection<br />

• 40 insecticides from various classes tested for their efficacy in ACP control and<br />

non-target impacts on indicator beneficials<br />

• Based on their test results, 12 insecticides (each from a different class) were selected and<br />

recommended for use (once per year to avoid resistance buildup)<br />

• Augmentative releases of Tamarixia is also highly recommended because of the excellent<br />

host finding ability of Tamarixia that is found where its host is present<br />

• A pilot program on AWM of ACP will start soon (or under way)<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 226<br />

9.6: Yamamoto et al. (Brazil)<br />

• Introduced the 3 strategies that are important for HLB management (elimination of<br />

sources of inoculum, ACP control, and healthy nursery trees), but stressed the importance<br />

of ACP control as a key element<br />

• Both foliar and soil applied insecticides can be used for ACP control, but because soil<br />

systemic insecticides are compatible with BC, emphasis is placed on them<br />

• Their studies on imidacloprid showed excellent control on non-bearing trees, but<br />

inconsistent results with bearing trees<br />

• To elucidate the inconsistency observed, field trials were performed to evaluate the<br />

impact of application rate and volume, phosphate, soil type, and rootstock on<br />

imidacloprid efficacy<br />

• Good control obtained in Sept in contrast to Nov application<br />

• Poor control when neonic titer 400 ppb<br />

9.7: Tiwari et al. (FL)<br />

• Studied insecticide resistance in field-collected ACP populations in FL using different<br />

methods (diagnosis dose method, leaf disc)<br />

• 12 insecticides were tested, and resistance has been documented in 4 of them<br />

(chlorpyrifos, imidacloprid, thimaethoxam, and fenpropathrin) at various levels<br />

(resistance ratio for imidacloprid is up to 35 in some locations), thus requiring that a<br />

resistance management program must be implemented<br />

• This resistance seems to be regulated by enzymatic activity, with general esterase playing<br />

a major role<br />

• They also observed that CLas infected ACP (w/lower general esterase activity) were<br />

more susceptible to insecticides than their non-infective counterparts, which is somehow<br />

good news<br />

• Various resistance levels across the state: resistance monitoring, pesticide rotation<br />

Session 9: Asian Citrus Psyllid <strong>Management</strong> (Posters)<br />

Topics covered in Posters:<br />

1. Area-wide management of ACP (TX, CA, and FL: 9.8, 9.9, and 9.10)<br />

• ACP better managed on AW basis than local levels<br />

• Importance of winter dormant spray application is demonstrated and two dormant (Nov<br />

and Jan) are recommended in TX, one in FL<br />

• Spray prior to onset of new flush<br />

• Aerial application of broad spectrum insecticide as effective as ground airblast sprays<br />

• In CA, eradication mode and any finds immediately trigger spray application of find sites<br />

and neighboring sites<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 227<br />

2. Low Volume Spray Technology (FL: 9.11)<br />

• LV is effective technology for ACP control<br />

• Minimum droplet size (DV0.5) of 90 microns is required to meet requirement<br />

• Engine speed reduction for both airblast type sprayers and air-assisted sprayers, and<br />

increased flow rate for air-assisted sprayers can increase droplet size to meet the<br />

requirement<br />

• LV8-V2, LV8, London Fog 18-20 Citrus sprayer are all examples of machines in which<br />

droplet size increase is obtained by adjusting engine from full throttle to lower rpm<br />

3. Molecular analysis of Tamarixia and Development of Diaphorina specific marker<br />

(TX, Mexico: 9.12, 9.16, 9.17, 9.20)<br />

• Morphological and genetic variations observed within Tamarixia. 4 groups of Tamarixia<br />

observed in N and S America. It is possible that cryptic sp. exists<br />

• Highly specific markers developed to determine whether predators have consumed ACP<br />

• This tool will assist in understanding which natural enemies consume ACP and play a<br />

role in its control<br />

4. Host specificity testing of Tamarixia (CA, 9.13)<br />

• Before releasing Tamarixia, host range testing must be performed<br />

• Three indigenous psyllids to CA (acacia psyllid, prosopis psyllid, Rhus psyllid) were not<br />

accepted as hosts by Tamarixia<br />

• Completing such tests with additional psyllids can facilitate the release of Tamarixia into<br />

new areas such as CA and TX<br />

5. Evaluation of ACP predators (FL, TX: 9.14 and 9.15)<br />

• Spiders were observed as the most abundant predators in non-commercial citrus in TX;<br />

however, most of these spiders first attack and then reject ACP preys<br />

• Convergent ladybeetle is an important predator for soft-bodied insect such as ACP,<br />

brown citrus aphid and green aphid. Its larvae prefer psyllid nymph over BCA<br />

• Because these 3 preys are equally suitable for convergent LB, they offer avenue for the<br />

persistence and better efficacy of this natural enemy<br />

6. Novel approaches for ACP management (9.17, 9.18, 9.19, 9.21, 9.24, 9.25, and 9.26)<br />

• New fungus sp (Isaria poprawski) w/potential of ACP control has been genetically<br />

characterized<br />

• RNAi technology (previously described)<br />

• Photonic fence technology can identify and zapped ACP by delivering levels of photonic<br />

energy. PFT used in mosquito control. Preliminary test done in TX and could be useful in<br />

small areas citrus production<br />

• An auto-dissemination system developed that will permit ACP to naturally disperse<br />

spores of pathogenic fungi. System can be used in urban area<br />

• Use of DMDS (for ACP control): studies conducted on release profile and release method<br />

of this compound<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 228<br />

7. Other topics (9.22, 9.23)<br />

• <strong>Plant</strong> growing environment has been modified (change of day and night T, length of<br />

induction period) to allow continuous new flush production in citrus plants. Can be used<br />

to support BC programs for n.e. rearing and also in nurseries to induce branching<br />

• Field trial under way to determine the best ACP control timing. Calendar sprays are<br />

compared to spray programs triggered by threshold. All spray timing significantly<br />

reduces ACP pop within 6 months, but impact on yield not yet quantified. This study will<br />

assist grower in knowing when to spray<br />

Session 9: Asian Citrus Psyllid <strong>Management</strong><br />

Key Points<br />

• ACP control is of paramount importance<br />

• Better achieved when done in an AW basis<br />

• Winter dormant sprays are a MUST!<br />

• Aerial, ground airblast, and LV spray are effective tools<br />

• Important to preserve natural enemies as they contribute to ACP control<br />

• Resistance development is a real problem; monitor and manage resistance<br />

• New control methods are being developed<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 229<br />

Horticulture<br />

Take-Home Messages<br />

Ed Stover<br />

Grower Day Summary:<br />

Horticulture Lessons<br />

2011 International HLB Meeting<br />

Orlando, FL<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 230<br />

3 full days<br />

400 participants from 20 countries<br />

75 oral presentations<br />

96 posters<br />

(20 pages of notes)<br />

Urgency of HLB as a threat to citrus production and the engine of substantial grower<br />

investment has fully engaged numerous researchers to find solutions<br />

• In 2 years of this effort, there are SOME new ideas or mature recommendations ready for<br />

implementation<br />

• Tools and knowledge are being assembled for much greater future progress and I assume<br />

growers want a glimpse<br />

• In this meeting, researchers shared ideas and data and many came away with a piece of<br />

the puzzle that will plug in to advance their efforts or established collaborations that will<br />

accelerate progress<br />

• MANY of these “aha” moments occur over dinner or during breaks, and so these<br />

summaries can only tell a part of the story<br />

Urgency of need to save existing trees has compelled strong interest in developing<br />

therapeutics to lessen effect of HLB<br />

• Nutritional treatments are controversial, seem to provide a benefit in some situations ─<br />

great talk by Irey to suggest threshold of 4-5% tree loss per year as transition point from<br />

Scouting/Roguing to Nutritional Life Support for infected trees<br />

• Antibiotic treatments Zhang et al. (UF-IRREC and ARS) have provided marked benefits<br />

in pilot studies in the greenhouse and initial field studies....may face tough sledding for<br />

deregulation and likely require cheaper delivery (sprays rather than injections) for<br />

commercial delivery<br />

• Jim Graham, Irey, and Miele ─ Injection of Cu compounds (Magna-Bon) reported to<br />

reduce CLas<br />

More therapeutics to save existing trees:<br />

• Ping Duan (ARS ─ Ft. Pierce) reported that in initial field trials, a form of therapy,<br />

appears to have eliminated HLB symptoms .... Stay tuned<br />

• RNAi for psyllid control (Falk/Hunter/Borovsky et al.) ─ Biopesticide today/transgenic<br />

tomorrow?<br />

• Bill Dawson ─ CREC ─ provided update on the CTV expression vector. Best greatly<br />

suppress HLB and have developed variants that can infect CTV+ trees and likely will<br />

protect 80% of trees for 10+ years. BIG regulatory hurdles, but in field trials<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 231<br />

• Dean Gabriel UF ─ Gainesville <strong>Plant</strong> Path, reported discovery that a virus embedded in<br />

the CLas DNA may provide seeds of CLas destruction. Signal that causes the virus to<br />

replicate would kill CLas cells. Possible therapeutic, transgenic?<br />

New Understanding of HLB/citrus biology with relevance to citrus industry?<br />

• The question as to whether HLB can be seed transmitted continues to compel new work<br />

• Two studies reported that seed from HLB infected highly symptomatic fruit did not result<br />

in plants with HLB. One study reported CLas transmitted often, but likely not causing<br />

HLB<br />

• In a study reported by Mark Hilf, USDA/ARS, Ft. Pierce, he showed that CLas is often<br />

present in vascular bundles of seed coats which may explain the reports of early PCR+<br />

seedlings<br />

In our breeding program, we remove seed coats before planting seeds from infected fruit ─<br />

Citrus Breeding Programs throughout U.S. and the world are squarely focused on HLB<br />

• Developing tools that will open up cutting edge technologies that make this “a golden age<br />

for biology.” Steve Lindow noted that “HLB is a tough nut to crack, and you are lucky<br />

you didn’t get it even a few years ago”<br />

• Exploring genes related to resistance/susceptibility<br />

• Assessing resistance in conventional breeding/ scions/rootstocks<br />

• Developing transgenics<br />

Loading the tool box!<br />

• Tremendous progress in genomics of host, pathogen, and vector ─ FINALLY we will<br />

have the full wiring diagram to fix “what’s broken”<br />

• Citrus: Gmitter (CREC ─ leading international consortium) Full genome (DNA<br />

sequence) of Haploid Clementine and Ridge Pineapple Orange genome will provide<br />

RNAi targets, etc.<br />

• Liberibacter: Gabriel and Wulff (Brazil) CLam and CLas comparison; Hong Lin (ARS ─<br />

Parlier) strains of CLas; Duan; Hartung.... Understanding differences reveals weaknesses<br />

to exploit<br />

• Antibodies to CLas!!!! Like shining a spotlight at night<br />

Exploring resistance and susceptibility genes<br />

• Identifying genes that may confer resistance, better understanding of HLB biology and<br />

gene expression in resistant and susceptible Citrus. Targets for action!<br />

• Understanding of Citrus defense systems and HLB, e.g., some SA response to HLB<br />

(Moore ─ UF Gainesville); but shuts down some SAR systems (Dandekar ─ UCD); turns<br />

up JA (Machado ─ Brazil); produces antimicrobials (Albrecht and Bowman)<br />

• Identified CLas “virulence” genes that cause plant disease response (Wang ─ CREC)<br />

• Better understanding of HLB source/sink metabolism, etc., for therapeutics or transgenics<br />

(Chen et al. ─ CREC; He et al. ─ IRREC)<br />

• Understanding of phloem plugging (Albrigo ─ CREC)<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 232<br />

Existing Resistance? Not ready for prime time....<br />

• No strong HLB resistance has been identified in cultivated Citrus scion varieties<br />

• But evidence that there are differences in susceptibility, seemingly even between sweet<br />

oranges, which may have economic value (Stuchi et al. ─ Brazil)<br />

• Some specialty types (e.g., ‘Temple’) with much lower CLas than sweet orange (Stover<br />

et al.)<br />

• Evidence that some rootstocks may enhance HLB tolerance of scions (Grosser; Stuchi)<br />

Transgenics<br />

• Exploring antimicrobial peptides and other transgenes that will enhance plant resistance<br />

(many labs reported)<br />

• Comparing promoters that direct where genes are “turned on” (ARS ─ Ft Pierce; CREC)<br />

• Tomato and LSol as a model system for testing transgenics (Manjunath and Lee ─ ARS<br />

─ Riverside)<br />

• Improved methods for resistance screening of transgenics (Grosser ─ CREC)<br />

• Many transgenics being tested by many labs<br />

• Most advanced is GE citrus with virus gene that kills bacteria, looks excellent in GH, and<br />

now in field trials (Jiang et al., Gabriel lab ─ UF)<br />

Take home?<br />

• If knowledge is power........<br />

• Our knowledge of HLB, Liberibacter, ACP, and their interaction with Citrus has<br />

expanded many-fold over the last 2 years<br />

• The assembled understanding is reaching a critical mass that will soon reveal outstanding<br />

tools for living with HLB<br />

• And a series of ever better solutions will emerge over the coming years<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 233<br />

Chris Oswalt - UF/IFAS - Polk County<br />

Bartow, FL<br />

Specific Topics<br />

• Statewide Disease Levels<br />

• Tree Removal<br />

• Fruit Quality<br />

• Novel Alternative Treatments<br />

• Regional HLB <strong>Management</strong><br />

• Foliar Nutrition<br />

Statewide Disease Levels<br />

• In 2008 HLB disease level 1.6 to 2.3%<br />

• In 2009 low response combined number at 6.4% for oranges only<br />

• Survey (2009) adjusted to HLB infection at 8% statewide for all varieties (2X increase<br />

per year)<br />

• It is estimated today that HLB disease level is approximately18%<br />

• Highest levels in south and east<br />

• Central, northern, and western 1% (2009)<br />

Tree Removal<br />

• Factors include: tree age, infection levels, estimated future infection rates and production,<br />

time horizon, and costs of treatments (nutritional)<br />

• Average annual infection rate exceeds 4-5%<br />

• Dependent on production costs and fruit prices (along with a number of other<br />

assumptions)<br />

• Will be implementing a foliar nutritional program<br />

• At $1.50/pound annual HLB infection rates >3.9%<br />

• At $1.25/pound annual HLB infection rates >4.4%<br />

HLB Symptomatic Fruit Quality<br />

• Dependent on harvest date<br />

• Brix ─ lower to no change<br />

• Generally higher in acid<br />

• Generally lower ratios<br />

• Higher levels (below thresholds) of Limonin and Nomilin<br />

• A 25% blend is detectable by panelists<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 234<br />

Novel Alternative Treatments<br />

• Trunk injection of Magna-Bon (copper sulfate pentahydrate)<br />

• Positive response in appearance<br />

• Resulted in higher ct values with treatment (lower HLB)<br />

• Magna-Bon systemic in tree<br />

• Penicillin and streptomycin trunk injection<br />

• Reduced HLB levels in treated citrus<br />

Regional HLB <strong>Management</strong><br />

• Brazilian study (regional vs. local) on inoculum reduction and vector control<br />

• Regional management resulted in delayed epidemic of HLB by 10 months<br />

• Reduced HLB incidence by 90%<br />

• Reduced HLB progression by 75%<br />

• Attributed to smaller ACP populations and lower frequency of HLB infected ACP<br />

Foliar Nutrition Programs<br />

• HLB infected trees are deficient in Ca, Mg, Mn, Zn, and B compared to healthy citrus<br />

trees<br />

• These mineral nutrients are important for many plant functions<br />

• Program started early at first HLB detection<br />

• Tree health, fruit quality, and yields (above area average) maintained for 5 years in grove<br />

• Maintained aggressive psyllid control throughout<br />

• Today grove close to 100% HLB infected<br />

• Tree death attributed to blight not HLB<br />

• This is not a replicated statistically valid experiment ─ a real world observation<br />

• Has been repeated with similar success<br />

• One statistical study<br />

• Trees with mild symptoms HLB +<br />

• Study compared to an ACP control program<br />

• Multiple combinations of nutritional materials including reportedly successful<br />

combinations<br />

• No treatment was statistically better than control<br />

• Treatments had no effect on tree HLB levels<br />

• Provides for the continued buildup of HLB inoculum<br />

• Enhanced nutritional programs along with good grove management has been shown to<br />

increase productivity<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 235<br />

A1. Author Index<br />

Author’s Name<br />

Page number(s)<br />

Acevedo, G. 97<br />

Achor, D.S. 117, 128<br />

Acosta, I. 109<br />

Adamczyk, J. 167<br />

Afunian, M. 70<br />

Akula, N. 182<br />

Alanís-Martínez, E.I. 81<br />

Albano, J.P. 71<br />

Albrecht, U. 120, 124, 209<br />

Albrigo, L.G. 128<br />

Aldama-Aguilera, C. 115<br />

Alessandro, R.T. 49<br />

Alonso, E. 109<br />

Ammar, E.-D. 44, 51, 57<br />

Amorim, L. 127, 176<br />

Arevalo, H.A. 156, 169, 188<br />

Aritua, V. 132<br />

Arras, J. 45<br />

Atwood, R. 157<br />

Aubert, B. 192<br />

Ayres, A.J. 20, 88, 107<br />

Backus, E.A. 55<br />

Bagio, T.Z. 202<br />

Bai, J. 91, 93, 96<br />

Bai, Y. 21, 77<br />

Baldwin, E. 91, 92, 93, 96<br />

Barbosa, J.C. 59, 107<br />

Bar-Joseph, M. 138<br />

Barreto, T.P. 24<br />

Barroso-Aké, H. 63<br />

Bartels, D.W. 154<br />

Barthe, G.A. 198<br />

Bassanezi, R.B. 88, 127, 176<br />

Batista, L. 109<br />

Batkin, T. 112<br />

Beattie, G.A.C. 88<br />

Belasque, J., Jr. 59, 107<br />

Benyon, L.S. 18, 199<br />

Bergamin Filho, A. 59, 127, 176<br />

Bespalhok, J. 202<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 236<br />

A1. Author Index<br />

Author’s Name<br />

Page number(s)<br />

Bethke, J. 150<br />

Bextine, B.R. 41,45, 46, 148, 164<br />

Bohannon, R. 83<br />

Borbón, J. 108<br />

Borovsky, D. 42<br />

Borroto, A. 109<br />

Boscariol-Camargo, R.L. 206<br />

Bové, J.M. 20, 107<br />

Bowman, K.D. 120, 124, 199, 209<br />

Brady, B. 70<br />

Briefman, L. 72<br />

Bright, D.B. 139, 187<br />

Brlansky, R.H. 53, 68, 125, 208<br />

Brockington, J. 168, 212<br />

Brown, L.G. 191<br />

Brown, S.E. 114<br />

Bryan, C. 129<br />

Buenahora, J. 40, 162<br />

Burns, J.K. 130<br />

Byrne, F. 150<br />

Cabanillas, H.E. 163<br />

Cabrera-Mireles, H. 151<br />

Cáceres, S. 40, 162<br />

Cai, Z.J. 134, 137<br />

Camargo, L.E.A. 88<br />

Cancalon, P.F. 129<br />

Cantuarias-Avilés, T. 204<br />

Carrillo Medrano, S.H. 110<br />

Casín, J.C. 109<br />

Cayetano, X. 108<br />

Chen, C. (China) 21<br />

Chen, C. (CREC) 125<br />

Chen, J. 34, 38<br />

Chiyaka, C. 104<br />

Ciomperlik, M.A. 154<br />

Civerolo, E.L. 21, 70, 77<br />

Coletta-Filho, H.D. 67, 206<br />

Collazo, C. 109<br />

Cortez-Mondaca, E. 50, 151<br />

Cote, J. 72<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 237<br />

A1. Author Index<br />

Author’s Name<br />

Page number(s)<br />

Cristofani-Yaly, M. 206<br />

Cruz-García, R. 158<br />

Curtí-Díaz, S.A. 81, 151<br />

D’Souza, R. 124<br />

da Graça, J.V. 76, 154, 197<br />

Dandekar, A.M. 124<br />

Davis, M.J. 19<br />

Davis, R. 22<br />

Dawson, W.O. 138<br />

de León, J.H. 40, 162, 163, 166<br />

de Miranda, M.P. 56, 152<br />

De Souza, A.A. 67<br />

Dea, S. 91, 92, 93, 96<br />

Deng, X. 34, 38<br />

Dewdney, M.M. 103, 214<br />

Díaz-Zorrilla, U. 151<br />

Dickstein, E.R. 105<br />

Dima, C.S. 82<br />

Dollet, M. 32, 192<br />

Duan, Y.-P. 18, 19, 21, 31, 29, 87, 134, 136, 137, 175, 181, 186, 207<br />

Dunlap, C. 167<br />

Dutt, M. 198<br />

Ebert, T.A. 53, 103<br />

Eckstein, B. 59<br />

Ehsani, R. 82<br />

Estes, M. 73<br />

Fabre, S. 32<br />

Fan, G.-C. 31, 134, 137<br />

Fan, J. 125<br />

Febres, V.J. 208<br />

Felipe, R.T.A. 200<br />

Felippe, M.R. 56, 152<br />

Feliz, A. 108<br />

Fiehn, O. 120<br />

Fleites, L.A. 19<br />

Flores Virgen, R. 110<br />

Flores-Cruz, Z. 19<br />

Folimonova, S.Y. 108, 117<br />

Fontaine-Bodin, L. 32<br />

Francisco, C.S. 118<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 238<br />

A1. Author Index<br />

Author’s Name<br />

Page number(s)<br />

Frare, G.F. 75, 88<br />

Freitas-Astúa, J. 118<br />

Fritz, B. 157<br />

Gabriel, D.W. 19, 20, 210<br />

Gadea, P. 72, 180<br />

Galindo, T. 111<br />

Galindo-Mendoza, M.G. 115<br />

Garcia, R.B. 56<br />

Garnsey, S.M. 141<br />

Gasparoto, M.C.G. 127<br />

Gast, T. 72, 143, 187<br />

Gastaminza, G.A. 40, 162<br />

Gatineau, F. 32, 192<br />

Ghosh, D.K. 141<br />

Girardi, E.A. 189, 196, 204<br />

Glick, E. 148, 164<br />

Glynn, J.M. 21<br />

Gmitter, F.G., Jr. 125, 208, 211<br />

Gomez, H. 89<br />

Gómez, R. 97<br />

González, V.M. 50<br />

González, C. 109<br />

González-Hernández, A. 61, 158<br />

Gonzalez-Mora, J. 82<br />

Gooch, M.D. 19<br />

Gottwald, T.R. 73, 74, 100, 176, 178, 185<br />

Gowda, S. 136, 141<br />

Grafton-Cardwell, E.E. 155<br />

Graham, J.H. 72, 139, 174, 178, 185, 187<br />

Grange, L. 202<br />

Grosser, J.W. 198<br />

Hagler, J.R. 166<br />

Hail, D. 41<br />

Hajeri, S. 136<br />

Halbert, S.E. 60, 101, 102, 104, 193<br />

Hall, D.G. 44, 46, 51, 57, 74, 80, 207<br />

Hamel, R. 156<br />

Hartung, J.S. 17, 68<br />

Hartzog, H.M. 191<br />

Haun, C. 129<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 239<br />

A1. Author Index<br />

Author’s Name<br />

Page number(s)<br />

Hawkins, S.A. 71<br />

He, Z. 175, 186<br />

Heitschmidt, J. 71<br />

Hernández-Fuentes, L.M. 151<br />

Hilf, M.E. 108, 117, 126, 138, 140<br />

Hoddle, M.S. 159<br />

Hoffman, M. 31, 87<br />

Hoffmann, C. 157<br />

Hou, H. 143<br />

Humber, R.A. 163<br />

Hunter, W.B. 41, 45, 46, 148, 164<br />

Hurner, T. 157<br />

Imbert, E. 192<br />

Irey, M.S. 70, 72, 73, 74, 78, 80, 82, 91, 92, 93, 95, 96, 139, 141,<br />

Iwanami, T. 22<br />

Jackson, J.L. 157<br />

Jackson, M. 167<br />

Jantasorn, A. 87<br />

Jasso-Argumedo, J. 61, 63, 151, 158<br />

Jasso-Laucirica, T. 61<br />

Jaynes, J. 201<br />

Jiang, Y. 210<br />

Johanson, E. 165<br />

Johnson, E.G. 139, 187<br />

Jones, E.M. 191<br />

Jones, W.A. 163<br />

Jordan, R. 68<br />

Kang, B.-K. 19<br />

Kanga, L.H.B. 162<br />

Kato, H. 22<br />

Ke, C. 137<br />

Khalaf, A. 208<br />

Kishi, L.T. 118<br />

Kobayashi, A.K. 202<br />

Kress, R. 210<br />

Kund, G. 194<br />

Kunta, M. 76<br />

Kuykendall, L.D. 17<br />

Kwok, K. 78<br />

Lapointe, S.L. 49<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 240<br />

A1. Author Index<br />

Author’s Name<br />

Page number(s)<br />

Lawrence, K.C. 71<br />

Ledebuhr, M. 157<br />

Lee, R.F. 70, 99, 102, 193, 194<br />

Leicht, E. 124<br />

Leite, R.P., Jr. 24, 202<br />

Lemos, M.V.F. 75<br />

Levesque, C.S. 70, 78<br />

Li, J. 30, 33<br />

Li, W.B. 31<br />

Li, Y. 30, 33<br />

Li, Z.-G. 125<br />

Liao, H.-L. 131<br />

Lin, H. 21, 70, 77<br />

Lin, Y.-Z. 134<br />

Lindeberg, M. 23<br />

Liptay, A. 186<br />

Liu, B. 31, 134, 137<br />

Liu, R. 38<br />

Liu, T. 47<br />

Llauger, R. 109<br />

Locali-Fabris, E.C. 118<br />

Loera-Gallardo, J. 181<br />

Logarzo, G.A. 40, 162<br />

Lopes, J.R.S. 56<br />

Lopes, S.A. 75, 88, 200<br />

López, D. 109<br />

López-Arroyo, J.I. 50, 61, 63, 81, 97, 151, 156<br />

Loredo-Salazar, R.X. 81<br />

Lourenço, S.A. 127<br />

Lozano-Contreras, M. 61, 64, 158<br />

Luis, M. 109<br />

Machado, M.A. 118, 206<br />

Mafra, V.S. 118<br />

Malik, N.S.A. 168, 212<br />

Malosso, A. 206<br />

Mangan, R.L. 168, 212<br />

Manjunath, K.L. 69, 70, 78, 99, 102, 133, 193, 194<br />

Mann, R.S. 54<br />

Manthey, J. 91, 92, 93<br />

Manzanilla Ramirez, M.A. 110<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 241<br />

A1. Author Index<br />

Author’s Name<br />

Page number(s)<br />

Marques, V.V. 24, 202<br />

Martin, D. 157<br />

Martinelli, F. 124<br />

Martins, P.K. 118<br />

Massari, C.A. 107<br />

Matos, L. 108<br />

McCollum, G. 180, 199, 201, 205, 207<br />

McGowen, N. 83<br />

McLaughlin, W.A. 114<br />

Mears, P. 102<br />

Medina Urrutia, V.M. 110<br />

Meikle, W. 167<br />

Mendes, B.M.J. 200<br />

Méndez, F. 108<br />

Meneguim, L. 24, 202<br />

Merlin, T. 186<br />

Miele, F. 174<br />

Mills, D.R. 170, 281<br />

Minenkova, O. 68<br />

Miyata, S. 22, 141<br />

Montesino, L.H. 127, 176<br />

Monzó, C. 169<br />

Moore, G.A. 208<br />

Mora-Aguilera, G. 97<br />

Morales-Koyoc, D. 61<br />

Moran, P. 163<br />

Morgan, J.K. 69<br />

Morris, R.A. 73, 94<br />

Morse, J.G. 150, 155<br />

Mourão-Filho, F.A. 200<br />

Mullen, E. 165<br />

Muraro, R.P. 94<br />

Murata, M.M. 24<br />

Murray, K.D. 163<br />

Myers, M.E. 185<br />

Nageswara Rao, N. 141<br />

Narciso, J. 93<br />

Neuman, R.D. 170, 171, 172, 281, 287<br />

Niedz, R. 199<br />

Nunes da Rocha, U. 105<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 242<br />

A1. Author Index<br />

Author’s Name<br />

Page number(s)<br />

Oberheim, A.P. 114<br />

Okuma, D.M. 55, 62<br />

Olvera-Vargas, L.A. 115<br />

Orozco Santos, M. 110<br />

Paccola-Meirelles, L.D. 24<br />

Paldi, N. 148, 164<br />

Pandey, R.R. 159<br />

Park, B. 71<br />

Parkunan, V. 103<br />

Parnell, S.R. 74, 100<br />

Parolin, L.G. 196, 204<br />

Parra, J.R. 162<br />

Patne, S. 133<br />

Patt, J. 165, 167<br />

Pegram, N. 165<br />

Pelz-Stelinski, K.S. 52, 54<br />

Peña, I. 109<br />

Perazzo, G. 210<br />

Pereira, E.V., Jr. 200<br />

Pereira, L.F.P. 202<br />

Pérez, D. 109<br />

Pérez, J.L. 109, 168, 212<br />

Pérez-Márquez, J. 50<br />

Peroni, L.A. 67<br />

Pfannenstiel, R.S. 160<br />

Phahladira, M.N.B. 101<br />

Pietersen, G. 101<br />

Plotto, A. 91, 92, 93, 96<br />

Polek, M.L. 70, 78, 112, 113, 157<br />

Poole, G.H. 71<br />

Powell, C.A. 31, 42, 175, 181, 186<br />

Puello, H. 108<br />

Puttamuk, T. 87<br />

Qureshi, J.A. 149, 161<br />

Ramadugu, C. 70, 99, 102, 193, 194<br />

Reagan, R.L. 124<br />

Reese, J. 46<br />

Reiff, E.T. 196, 204<br />

Ribeiro-Alves, M. 118<br />

Riley, T.D. 74, 89<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 243<br />

A1. Author Index<br />

Author’s Name<br />

Page number(s)<br />

Robbins, P.S. 49<br />

Roberts, P.D. 60<br />

Robertson, C. 138<br />

Robl, D.J. 89<br />

Robles-González, M.M. 97, 110, 151<br />

Rodríguez-Quibrera, C.G. 81<br />

Rogers, M.E. 52, 53, 55, 62, 103, 141, 153<br />

Roose, M.L. 133<br />

Rouse, R.E. 177, 188<br />

Rouseff, R.L. 54, 91, 93<br />

Ruan, C.-Q. 134<br />

Russell, D.N. 60<br />

Russell, P.F. 83<br />

Rutschman, P. 165<br />

Saha, S. 23<br />

Salcedo, D. 97<br />

Sandoval, J.L., II 197<br />

Santiago, O. 72<br />

Santos, M.A. 75<br />

Schumann, A.W. 177<br />

Sempionato, O.R. 196, 204<br />

Septer, A. 210<br />

Sequeira, R. 179<br />

Serikawa, R.H. 55, 62<br />

Sétamou, M. 40, 76, 154, 162, 166, 197<br />

Shao, J. 17<br />

Shatters, R.G., Jr. 42, 43, 46, 51, 69, 207<br />

Shelby, K.S. 46<br />

Shelton, A.B. 170, 171, 172, 281, 287<br />

Shohael, A. 198<br />

Singer, B. 104<br />

Skaria, M. 76<br />

Skogerson, K. 120<br />

Smith, M.W. 22<br />

Sousa, M.C. 75, 200<br />

Spann, T.M. 177<br />

Sreedharan, A. 119<br />

Stach-Machado, D.R. 67<br />

Stange, R. 201<br />

Stañgret, C.R.W. 40, 162<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 244<br />

A1. Author Index<br />

Author’s Name<br />

Page number(s)<br />

Stansly, P.A. 149, 156, 161, 169, 188<br />

Stelinski, L.L. 54, 153<br />

Stoffella, P.J. 186<br />

Stover, E. 164, 175, 180, 199, 201, 205, 207<br />

Stuchi, E.S. 189, 196, 204<br />

Su, H.N. 34<br />

Sugahara, V.H. 202<br />

Takita, M.A. 67<br />

Tandy, M. 157<br />

Taylor, B.J. 112, 155<br />

Teixeira, D.C. 88<br />

Thaveechai, N. 87<br />

Thomas, D.B. 64, 166<br />

Tian, S. 47<br />

Tiwari, S. 153<br />

Toledo, D.A. 196, 204<br />

Tomas, J. 184<br />

Tomimura, K. 22<br />

Trivedi, P. 135<br />

Trumble, J. 194<br />

Unruh, T.R. 160<br />

Uratsu, S.L. 124<br />

Uribe-Bustamante, A. 81<br />

Vahling, C.M. 18<br />

Valim, F. 93<br />

van Bruggen, A.H.C. 104, 105<br />

van den Bosch, F. 100<br />

Vasquez-Souza, G.V. 24, 202<br />

Velázquez-Monreal, J.J. 81, 97, 110<br />

Viana, E. 186<br />

Vidalakis, G. 70<br />

Vieira, L.G.E. 202<br />

Viljoen, R. 101<br />

Villanueva-Jiménez, J.A. 151<br />

Villanueva-Segura, O.K. 158<br />

Villas-Boas, L.A. 24<br />

Walter, A. 57<br />

Wang, A. 30<br />

Wang, N.-Y. 103, 119, 132, 135, 182<br />

Wang, X.F. 34<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 245<br />

A1. Author Index<br />

Author’s Name<br />

Page number(s)<br />

Wang, Z. 30, 33, 47<br />

Wei, S. 119<br />

Weinert, M. 22<br />

Weng, Q.Y. 127<br />

Windham, W.R. 71<br />

Wisler, G. 113, 157<br />

Wood, B. 178<br />

Wulff, N.A. 19, 20, 88, 127<br />

Xia, Y. 179<br />

Xian, J. 30<br />

Xiao, R.-F. 134<br />

Xie, P. 33<br />

Yamamoto, P.T. 40, 56, 152, 176<br />

Yin, Y. 30, 33, 47<br />

Yu, Q. 125<br />

Yuan, Q. 68<br />

Zamora, V. 109<br />

Zee, R.H. 172<br />

Zekri, M. 156<br />

Zhang, J. 129<br />

Zhang, M.-Q. 175, 181, 186<br />

Zhang, P. 38<br />

Zhang, S. 87<br />

Zhang, S.J. 19, 20<br />

Zheng X.-F. 134<br />

Zhou, C.Y. 34<br />

Zhou, L.J. 19, 31, 69, 137, 175<br />

Zhu, Y.-J. 134<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 246<br />

A2. List of Registered Participants (those registered at the time of the meeting are included)<br />

Full Name Affiliation Address City State ZIP Country Email<br />

Ms. Diann Achor UF/IFAS CREC 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850 USA dsar@ufl.edu<br />

Mr. Bob Adair Florida Rsrch Ctr for Ag<br />

7055 33rd Street Vero Beach FL 32966 USA bob@flaresearch.com<br />

Sustainability<br />

Dr. Ute Albrecht USDA ARS 2001 S Rock Rd Fort Pierce FL 34945-3030 USA ute.albrecht@ars.usda.gov<br />

Dr. Gene Albrigo UF/IFAS CREC 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850 USA albrigo@ufl.edu;<br />

albrigo@crec.ifas.ufl.edu<br />

Dr. Cristobal Aldama Universidad Autonoma de San Luis Sierra Leona 550, Col San Luis,<br />

78250 Mexico cristobal.aldama@uaslp.mx<br />

Potosi - SINAVEF<br />

Lomas II Seccion<br />

Potosi<br />

Mr. Eduardo Almada USDA APHIS IS Carr Reynosa-Matamoros Reynosa, Tam 88501 Mexico eduardo.almada@aphis.usda.gov<br />

KM79 Brecha 102<br />

Mr. Allen Altman Altman*Allen 12445 US Highway 301 Dade City FL 33525 USA allenpcfb@aol.com;<br />

allen.altman@ffbic.com<br />

Mr. Fernando Agricultural Integrated Solutions USA 6505 SW 113th Ave Miami FL 33173 USA fadelavega@gmail.com<br />

Alvarez<br />

Mr. Ricardo Alvarez Comite Estatal de Sanidad Vegetal de Carr. Victoria Monterrey Guemez,<br />

87230 Mexico rialra@yahoo.com<br />

Ramos<br />

Tamaulipas<br />

Km 22<br />

Tamaulipas<br />

Dr. El-Desouky USDA ARS USHRL 2001 S Rock Rd Fort Pierce FL 34945 USA Eldesouky.Ammar@ars.usda.gov<br />

Ammar<br />

Dr. Lilian Amorim University of Sao Paulo - ESALQ Av. Pádua Dias 11 Piracicaba,<br />

13418-900 Brazil liamorim@esalq.usp.br<br />

Sao Paulo<br />

Ms. Vickie Anthony Citrus Solutions, LLC PO Box 1341 Zolfo Springs FL 33890-1341 USA<br />

Dr. Doug Archer University of Florida/IFAS PO Box 110200 Gainesville FL 32611-0200 USA dlarcher@ufl.edu<br />

Dr. Calvin Arnold USDA ARS USHRL 2001 S Rock Rd Fort Pierce FL 34945 USA Calvin.Arnold@ars.usda.gov<br />

Ms. Marina Arouca UF/IFAS CREC 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850 USA marinarouc@yahoo.com.br<br />

Mr. Hugo Arredondo COMITE ESTATAL DE SANIDAD EMILIANO ZAPATA 482, Tecoman,<br />

28110 Mexico hugo.arredondo@senasica.gob.mx<br />

VEGETAL DE COLIMA<br />

COL. TEPEYAC<br />

Colima<br />

Mr. Ryan Atwood University of Florida Extension 1951 Woodlea Rd Tavares FL 32778 USA ryan@keyplex.com<br />

Mr. Juliano Ayres Fundecitrus Av. Dr. Adhemar Pereira de Arraraquara,<br />

14807-040 Brazil ayres@fundecitrus.com.br<br />

Barros 201<br />

Sao Paulo<br />

Dr. Murat Azik Florida Department of Citrus 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850 USA mazik@citrus.state.fl.us<br />

Dr. Jinhe Bai USDA ARS Citrus & Subtropical 600 Avenue S, NW Winter Haven FL 33881 USA jinhe.bai@ars.usda.gov<br />

Products Lab<br />

Dr. Elizabeth USDA ARS Citrus & Subtropical 600 Avenue S, NW Winter Haven FL 33881 USA liz.baldwin@ars.usda.gov<br />

Baldwin<br />

Products Lab<br />

Mr. Botond Balogh Nichino America, Inc. 6913 Monarch Park Dr Apollo Beach FL 33572 USA bbalogh@nichino.net<br />

Mr. Bobby Barben Barben Fruit Company, Inc. 21 E Pine St Avon Park FL 33825-3946 USA rhb@barbenfruit.com<br />

Mr. John Barben Barben Fruit Company, Inc. 21 E Pine St Avon Park FL 33825-3946 USA jpb@barbenfruit.com<br />

Mr. Bill Barber Lykes Citrus <strong>Management</strong> PO Box 1690 Tampa FL 33601-1690 USA bill.barber@lykes.com<br />

Mr. Júlio Barbosa University of Sao Paulo - ESALQ Av. Pádua Dias 11 Piracicaba,<br />

Sao Paulo<br />

Mr. Juan Barcelo Consorcio Citricola del Este Carratera Hato Mayor<br />

Sabana de la Mar Km 1<br />

Hato Mayor 25000 Dominican<br />

Republic<br />

13418-900 Brazil juliobarbosao@gmail.com<br />

jbarcelos@citricola.com;<br />

citricola@citricola.com<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 247<br />

Full Name Affiliation Address City State ZIP Country Email<br />

Mr. Joe Barcinas Foothill Agricultural Research, Inc 550 W Foothill Parkway Corona CA 92882 USA farinc@att.net<br />

Mr. Shahar Bar- ANI 3006 Longhorn Ave Austin TX 78758 USA sbar-cohav@appliednanotech.net<br />

Cohav<br />

Ms. Michele Barefoot New Zealand Institute for <strong>Plant</strong> & 430 F St Ste F Davis CA 95616 USA michele.barefoot@plantandfood.co<br />

Food Research<br />

.nz<br />

Dr. Moshe Bar- S. Tolkowsky Laboratory ARO, The Volcani Center Rehovot 76211 Israel mbjoseph@gmail.com<br />

Joseph<br />

Bet Dagan<br />

Mr. Alfred Barrett Jamaica Citrus Protection Agency P.O. 108 Bog Walk Saint<br />

55555 Jamaica jcpa@anbell.net;<br />

Catherine<br />

barrettalfred@hotmail.com<br />

Mr. Giovane Barroti Citrus Consultants Group - GCONCI Rua Carlos Gomes, 144 - Cordeiropolis,<br />

13490000 Brazil gbarroti@uol.com.br<br />

Centro - CP 39<br />

Sao Paulo<br />

Dr. David Bartels USDA APHIS PPQ CPHST Moore Air Base #6414 22675 Edinburg TX 78541 USA david.w.bartels@aphis.usda.gov<br />

N Moorfield Rd<br />

Dr. Renato Bassanezi Fundecitrus Av. Dr. Adhemar Pereira de Arraraquara,<br />

14807-040 Brazil rbbassanezi@fundecitrus.com.br<br />

Barros 201<br />

Sao Paulo<br />

Ms. Shirley<br />

California Citrus Mutual 512 N Kaweah Ave Exeter CA 93221-1200 USA shirleyb@cacitrusmutual.com<br />

Batchman<br />

Mr. Ted Batkin California Citrus Research Board PO Box 230 Visalia CA 93279-0230 USA ted@citrusresearch.org<br />

Mr. Clark Baxley Florida Citrus Mutual 25942 Risen Star Dr Wesley FL 33544 USA clarkbaxley@juno.com<br />

Chapel<br />

Dr. Jose Belasque Fundecitrus<br />

Av. Dr. Adhemar Pereira de Arraraquara,<br />

14807-040 Brazil belasque@fundecitrus.com.br<br />

Junior<br />

Barros 201<br />

Sao Paulo<br />

Mr. John Bell Bayer CropScience LP PO Box 12014 Research NC 27709-2014 USA john.bell@bayercropscience.com<br />

Triangle Park<br />

Mr. Jose Bellotte Louis Dreyfuss Commodities Rod.Armando Salles Bebedouro,<br />

14707900 Brazil jose.bellotte@ldcom.com<br />

Oliveira, Km 396<br />

Sao Paulo<br />

Dr. Lesley Benyon USDA ARS USHRL 2001 S Rock Rd Fort Pierce FL 34945 USA lesley.benyon@ars.usda.gov<br />

Dr. Armando University of Sao Paulo - ESALQ Av. Pádua Dias 11 Piracicaba,<br />

13418-900 Brazil abergami@esalq.usp.br<br />

Bergamin Filho<br />

Sao Paulo<br />

Dr. Philip Berger USDA APHIS PPQ CPHST 1730 Varsity Drive Ste 400 Raleigh NC 27606 USA philip.h.berger@aphis.usda.gov<br />

Dr. Blake Bextine University of Texas at Tyler 3900 University Blvd Tyler TX 75799 USA bbextine@uttyler.edu<br />

Ms. Kathie Blyskal Sunkist Growers, Inc. 10509 Business Dr Unit B Fontana CA 92337 USA kblyskal@sunkistgrowers.com<br />

Dr. Robert Bohannon Agdia, Inc. 30380 County Rd 6 Elkhart IN 46514 USA bob@agdia.com<br />

Dr. Dov Borovsky University of Florida FMEL 200 9th St SE Vero Beach FL 32962 USA dobo@ufl.edu<br />

Mr. Daniel Botts Florida Fruit & Vegetable Association PO Box 948153 Maitland FL 32794-8153 USA daniel.botts@ffva.com<br />

Mr. Doug Bournique Indian River Citrus League PO Box 690007 Vero Beach FL 32969-0007 USA info@ircitrusleague.org<br />

Mr. Lawrence Bowie Trade Winds Citrus Limited Bog Walk Saint<br />

55555 Jamaica leon.stewart@tradewindscitrus.co<br />

Catherine<br />

m<br />

Dr. Kim Bowman USDA ARS 2001 S Rock Rd Fort Pierce FL 34945 USA kim.bowman@ars.usda.gov<br />

Mr. Maury Boyd Boyd*Maurice PO Box 979 Oakland FL 34760-0979 USA mboyd.mcorp@mpinet.net<br />

Mr. Dennis<br />

Haines City Citrus Growers<br />

PO Box 337 Haines City FL 33845-0337 USA dennisb@gate.net<br />

Broadaway<br />

Association<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 248<br />

Full Name Affiliation Address City State ZIP Country Email<br />

Mr. Jim Brockington USDA ARS 2413 E Highway 83 Weslaco TX 78596 USA jim.brockington@ars.usda.gov<br />

Mr. Andrew Brown California Citrus Mutual 512 N Kaweah Ave Exeter CA 93221-1200 USA<br />

Dr. H. Donovan TicoFrut S.A. Cerro Cortez, San Carlos Aguas Zarcas,<br />

3535456 Costa Rica dbrown@ticofrut.com<br />

Brown<br />

Alajuela<br />

Dr. Lawrence Brown USDA APHIS PPQ CPHST PERAL 1730 Varsity Dr Ste 300 Raleigh NC 27606 USA lawrence.g.brown@aphis.usda.gov<br />

Dr. Sherline Brown University of the West Indies Mona Kingston 7 Kingston Jamaica sherline.brown02@uwimona.edu.j<br />

m<br />

Dr. Harold Browning UF/IFAS CREC 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850 USA hwbr@crec.ifas.ufl.edu<br />

Mr. Dan Brunetti KeyPlex 1155 Louisiana Ave Ste 207 Winter Park FL 32789 USA dbrunetti@keyplex.com<br />

Dr. Marco T.<br />

Texas AgriLife Research 2415 E Highway 83 Weslaco TX 78596 USA marcobn@me.com<br />

Buenrostro-Nava<br />

Dr. Richard Buker Helena Chemical Company 2405 N 71st St Tampa FL 33619-2952 USA bukerr@helenachemical.com<br />

Mr. Leon Bunce USDA APHIS PPQ 920 Main Campus Dr Ste Raleigh NC 27606 USA leon.k.bunce@aphis.usda.gov<br />

200<br />

Mr. Bill Burchenal Cee Bee's Grove, Inc. 16907 Boy Scout Rd Odessa FL 33556-2101 USA bill@ceebeescitrus.com<br />

Dr. Jackie Burns UF/IFAS CREC 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850 USA jkbu@ufl.edu<br />

Dr. Frank Byrne University of California, Riverside Department of Entomology Riverside CA 92521 USA frank.byrne@ucr.edu<br />

Mr. Zijian Cai<br />

Fujian Academy of Agricultural<br />

Sciences<br />

Research Center for High<br />

Technology of Ag Sciences<br />

Wusi Road 251, Room 1309<br />

Fuzhou,<br />

Fujian<br />

350003 PR China<br />

Mr. Justin Cain Chemical Dynamics, Inc. PO Box 486 <strong>Plant</strong> City FL 33564-0486 USA JCain03@msn.com<br />

Dr. Hernán Camacho TicoFrut, S.A. Muelle de San Carlos Ciudad,<br />

3000 Costa Rica hcamachov@hotmail.com<br />

Quesada<br />

Dr. Paul Cancalon Florida Department of Citrus 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850 USA pcancalo@citrus.state.fl.us<br />

Dr. Kitty Cardwell USDA/NIFA 800 9th St SW Washington DC 20024 USA kcardwell@nifa.usda.gov<br />

Mr. Eduardo Carlos IAPAR - Instituto Agronomico do Rod. Celso Garcia Cid, km Londrina, PR 86001-970 Brazil efcarlos@iapar.br<br />

Parana<br />

375<br />

Mr. Doug Carman California Citrus Mutual 512 N Kaweah Ave Exeter CA 93221-1200 USA<br />

Mr. Mike Carrere Lykes Citrus <strong>Management</strong> PO Box 1690 Tampa FL 33601-1690 USA mike.carrere@lykes.com<br />

Mr. Stan Carter McArthur Farms, Inc. 1550 NE 208th St Okeechobee FL 34972-7295 USA stanjcfl@aol.com<br />

Mr. Steve Caruso Florida's Natural Growers/Citrus PO Box 1111 Lake Wales FL 33859-1111 USA steve.caruso@citrusworld.com<br />

World<br />

Dr. Bill Castle UF/IFAS CREC 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850 USA bcastle@ufl.edu<br />

Mr. Wiley Cauthen McKinnon Corporation PO Box 979 Oakland FL 34760-0979 USA<br />

Mr. Peter Chaires New Varieties Development & PO Box 1113 Lakeland FL 33802 USA pchaires@flcitruspackers.org<br />

<strong>Management</strong> Corporation<br />

Ms. Holly<br />

Pest & Disease <strong>Management</strong>, LLC PO Box 1208 Avon Park FL 33826-1208 USA HLChamberlain@embarqmail.com<br />

Chamberlain<br />

Dr. Chunxian Chen UF/IFAS CREC 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850 USA cxchen@ufl.edu<br />

Dr. Jianchi Chen USDA ARS 9611 S Riverbend Ave Parlier CA 93648 USA Jianchi.chen@ars.usda.gov<br />

Mr. Wilson Roberto Citrus Consultants Group - GCONCI Rua Carlos Gomes, 144 - Cordeiropolis,<br />

13490000 Brazil wrchignolli@linkway.com.br<br />

Chignolli<br />

Centro - CP 39<br />

Sao Paulo<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 249<br />

Full Name Affiliation Address City State ZIP Country Email<br />

Dr. Matthew<br />

USDA APHIS PPQ CPHST Moore Air Base #6414 22675 Edinburg TX 78541 USA matt.a.ciomperlik@aphis.usda.gov<br />

Ciomperlik<br />

N Moorfield Rd<br />

Dr. Edwin Civerolo USDA ARS San Joaquin Valley Ag 9611 S Riverbend Ave Parlier CA 93648 USA edwin.civerolo@ars.usda.gov<br />

Sciences<br />

Dr. Paul Clayson UF/IFAS CREC 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850 USA drpaulsmc@gmail.com<br />

Mr. James F. A Elizabeth Alexander PO Box 524 Bartow FL 33831-0524 USA jfclements@gmail.com<br />

Clements<br />

Mr. Rex Clonts Clonts Groves, Inc. PO Box 622916 Oviedo FL 32762-2916 USA wrclonts@yahoo.com<br />

Mr. Andy Coker California Citrus Mutual 512 N Kaweah Ave Exeter CA 93221-1200 USA<br />

Dr. Helvecio Coletta- Centro de Citricultura/IAC Rod Anhanguera, Km 158 Cordeiropolis,<br />

13490-970 Brazil helvecio@centrodecitricultura.br<br />

Filho<br />

Sao Paulo<br />

Mr. Jim Conrad DuPont Crop Protection 3680 Winding Lake Cir Orlando FL 32835 USA jim.conrad-1@usa.dupont.com<br />

Mr. Vic Corkins Central California Tristeza<br />

22847 Road 140 Tulare CA 93274-9367 USA jbarnier@cctea.org<br />

Eradication Agency<br />

Mr. Aaron Corkum Cutrale Citrus Juices USA, Inc. 602 McKean St. Auburndale FL 33823-4070 USA acorkum@cutrale.com<br />

Mr. Reinaldo Citrus Consultants Group - GCONCI Rua Carlos Gomes, 144 - Cordeiropolis,<br />

13490000 Brazil corte@gconci.com.br<br />

Donizeti Corte<br />

Centro - CP 39<br />

Sao Paulo<br />

Mr. James Cranney California Citrus Quality Council 210 Magnolia Ave Ste 3 Auburn CA 95603 USA jcranney@calcitrusquality.org<br />

Dr. André Creste Eduardo de Paula Machado e Outros Fazenda Sao Jose, Caixa Rio Clara, Sao<br />

13500970 Brazil acreste@uol.com.br<br />

Postal 31<br />

Paulo<br />

Dr. John daGraca Texas A&M University - Kingsville, 312 N International Blvd Weslaco TX 78596 USA jdagraca@ag.tamu.edu<br />

Citrus Center<br />

Mr. Tad Dallas USDA ARS USHRL 2001 S Rock Rd Fort Pierce FL 34945-3030 USA tad.dallas@ars.usda.gov<br />

Dr. Abhaya Dandekar University of California - Davis One Shields Ave Davis CA 95616 USA amdandekar@ucdavis.edu<br />

Mr. Craig Davis UF/IFAS CREC 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850 USA<br />

Dr. William Dawson UF/IFAS CREC 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850 USA wodtmv@crec.ifas.ufl.edu<br />

Dr. Leonardo De La Auburn University<br />

209 Rouse Life Sciences Auburn AL 36849 USA lzd0005@auburn.edu<br />

Fuente<br />

Building<br />

Dr. Jesse de Leon USDA ARS 2413 East Highway 83 Weslaco TX 78596 USA jesus.deleon@ars.usda.gov<br />

Mr. Arlindo de Salvo Improcrop do Brasil Ltda Curio 312 B Capela Velha Araucaria,<br />

83705552 Brazil arlindoconsulton@gmail.com<br />

Parana<br />

Dr. Sharon Dea USDA ARS Citrus & Subtropical 600 Avenue S, NW Winter Haven FL 33881 USA sharon.dea@ars.usda.gov<br />

Products Lab<br />

Mr. Juan Delgado TicoFrut S.A. 18-4433, Aguas Zarcas San Carlos,<br />

18-4433 Costa Rica jdelgado@ticofrut.com<br />

Alajuela<br />

Dr. Christian Agdia, Inc. 30380 County Rd 6 Elkhart IN 46514 USA christian@agdia.com<br />

Delgado Palomino<br />

Dr. Xiaoling Deng South China Agricultural University Wushan Rd 483 Guangzhou,<br />

510642 PR China xldeng@scau.edu.cn<br />

Guangdong<br />

Dr. Ziniu Deng Hunan Agricultural University Furong Qu Changsha,<br />

410128 PR China deng7009@163.com<br />

Hunan<br />

Mr. Mike Dennison Cee Bee's Grove, Inc. 16907 Boy Scout Rd Odessa FL 33556-2101 USA<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 250<br />

Full Name Affiliation Address City State ZIP Country Email<br />

Dr. Megan Dewdney UF/IFAS CREC 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850 USA mmdewdney@crec.ifas.ufl.edu<br />

Mr. Fabio Di Giorgi Louis Dreyfuss Commodities Rod.Armando Salles Bebedouro,<br />

14707900 Brazil fabio.di.giorgi@ldcom.com<br />

Oliveira, Km 396<br />

Sao Paulo<br />

Mr. Todd Dicks L Dicks, Inc. PO Box 1809 Dundee FL 33838-1809 USA<br />

Dr. Fang Ding Huazhong Agricultural University No 1 Shizishan St Wuhan 430070 PR China dingfang2008@gmail.com<br />

Dr. Wayne Dixon Florida Dept. of Agriculture & 1911 SW 34th St Gainesville FL 32608 USA Wayne.Dixon@freshfromflorida.c<br />

Consumer Services<br />

om<br />

Dr. Michel Dollet CIRAD Campus de Baillarquet TA Montpelier 34398 France michel.dollet@cirad.fr<br />

A-29/F<br />

Dr. Hamed Doostdar KeyPlex 1155 Louisiana Ave Ste 207 Winter Park FL 32789 USA hdoostdar@keyplex.com<br />

Mr. Aedan Dowling Tropicana Products, Inc. PO Box 338 Bradenton FL 34206-0338 USA aedan.dowling@pepsico.com<br />

Mr. Randy Driggers USDA ARS USHRL 2001 S Rock Rd Fort Pierce FL 34945 USA randy.driggers@ars.usda.gov<br />

Mr. Yoel Drishpoun Mehadrin Tnuport Export 1 Power Center Beerot<br />

60905 Israel yoeld@mtex.co.il<br />

Yitzhak<br />

Dr. Yong-Ping Duan USDA ARS USHRL 2001 S Rock Rd Fort Pierce FL 34945 USA yongping.duan@ars.usda.gov<br />

Dr. Joan Dusky UF/IFAS Extension Administration PO Box 110210 Gainesville FL 32611 USA jadu@ufl.edu<br />

Dr. Timothy Ebert UF/IFAS CREC 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850 USA tebert@ufl.edu<br />

Mr. Mike Edenfield Bayer CropScience LP 11097 Ledgement Ln Windermere FL 34786 USA mike.edenfield@bayercropscience.<br />

com<br />

Mr. Choaa El Mohtar UF/IFAS CREC 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850 USA mohtarc@crec.ifas.ufl.edu<br />

Mr. Jim Ellis<br />

FDACS - Division of Fruit &<br />

PO Box 1072 Winter Haven FL 33882-1072 USA James.Ellis@freshfromflorida.com<br />

Vegetables<br />

Mr. Gary England University of Florida 7620 State Road 471 Ste 2 Bushnell FL 33513 USA gke@ifas.ufl.edu<br />

Mrs. Kate English Pavese Law Firm PO Drawer 1507 Fort Myers FL 33902 USA kre@paveselaw.com<br />

Mr. Bret Erickson Texas Citrus Mutual 901 Business Park Dr Ste Mission TX 78572 USA<br />

400<br />

Dr. Akif Eskalen University of California, Riverside Dept of <strong>Plant</strong> Pathology & Riverside CA 92521 USA akif.eskalen@ucr.edu<br />

Microbiology 900 University<br />

Ave, Fawcett Lab #232<br />

Mr. Mark Estes FDACS 3027 Lake Alfred Rd Winter Haven FL 33881-1438 USA mark.estes@freshfromflorida.com<br />

Miss Jennie Fagen University of Florida PO Box 110700 Gainesville FL 32611 USA jenn1eruth@ufl.edu<br />

Mr. Mauro Fagotti Citrus Consultants Group - GCONCI Rua Carlos Gomes, 144 - Cordeiropolis,<br />

13490000 Brazil fagotti@gconci.com.br<br />

Centro - CP 39<br />

Sao Paulo<br />

Dr. Bryce Falk University of California, Davis Dept. of <strong>Plant</strong> Pathology 1 Davis CA 95616-5270 USA bwfalk@ucdavis.edu<br />

Shields AVE<br />

Dr. Guocheng Fan Fujian Academy of Agricultural Research Center for High Fuzhou,<br />

350003 PR China<br />

Sciences<br />

Technology of Ag Sciences Fujian<br />

Wusi Road 251, Room 1309<br />

Mr. Steve Farr Ben Hill Griffin, Inc. PO Box 127 Frostproof FL 33843-0127 USA sfarr@bhgriffin.com<br />

Dr. Vicente Febres University of Florida 1301 Fifield Hall Gainesville FL 32611 USA vjf@ufl.edu<br />

Miss Rafaella Felipe University of Sao Paulo - ESALQ Avenida Padua Dias, 9 Piracicaba,<br />

13416-145 Brazil raffynha@yahoo.com.br<br />

Sao Paulo<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 251<br />

Full Name Affiliation Address City State ZIP Country Email<br />

Dr. Latanya Fisher University of Florida 1301 Fifield Hall Gainesville FL 32611 USA lfisher@ufl.edu<br />

Mrs. Lidia Flores Comite Estatal de Sanidad Vegetal de Hacienda las Toronjas #140 Montemorelos<br />

67500 Mexico lidiaf2004@yahoo.com.mx<br />

Nuevo Leon<br />

, Nuevo Leon<br />

Mr. John Floyd Floyd & Associates, Inc. 10548 Singletary Rd Dade City FL 33525-1568 USA floydcitrus@yahoo.com<br />

Dr. Svetlana<br />

UF/IFAS CREC 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850 USA svetlana@ufl.edu;<br />

Folimonova<br />

sveta@crec.ifas.ufl.edu<br />

Dr. Lisa Fontaine- CIRAD<br />

Campus de Baillarquet TA Montpelier 34398 France lisa.fontaine_bodin@cirad.fr<br />

Bodin<br />

A-29/F<br />

Miss Ana Aurora COMITE ESTATAL DE SANIDAD PEDRO VILLEGAS 51 HERMOSILL<br />

83000 MEXICO aurorafontes@gmail.com<br />

Fontes Puebla VEGETAL DE SONORA<br />

COL. DEL RAZO<br />

O, SONORA<br />

Mr. Dick Fort Fort*Richard Jr 500 5th St NE Fort Meade FL 33841-2612 USA rafort@embarqmail.com<br />

Dr. Juliana Freitas- Embrapa/Centro de Citricultura Rod. Anhanguera km 158 Cordeiropolis,<br />

13490-970 Brazil juliana@cnpmf.embrapa.br<br />

Astua<br />

Sylvio Moreira<br />

Sao Paulo<br />

Mr. Joe Froehlich Froehlich*Joseph J. 9 Cheshire Rd Bethpage NY 11714 USA jjfro0609@msn.com<br />

Mr. Jack Frost Wedgworth's, Inc. PO Box 2076 Belle Glade FL 33430 USA jack@wedgworth.com<br />

Mr. Satoshi Fusayasu <strong>Plant</strong> Protection Station, Naze Branch 1-1 Nazenagahama-cho Amami City,<br />

894-0036 Japan fusayasus@pps.maff.go.jp<br />

Kagoshima<br />

Dr. Stephen Futch University of Florida Extension 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850 USA shf@ufl.edu<br />

Dr. Dean Gabriel University of Florida - <strong>Plant</strong><br />

PO Box 110680 Gainesville FL 32611-0680 USA dgabr@ufl.edu;<br />

Pathology Dept.<br />

gabriel@ipgenetics.com<br />

Ms. Paula Gadea United States Sugar Corporation 111 Ponce de Leon Ave Clewiston FL 33440 USA pgadea@ussugar.com<br />

Mr. Dan Galbraith California Citrus Mutual 512 N Kaweah Ave Exeter CA 93221-1200 USA dgalbraith@limoneira.com<br />

Mrs. Celestina California Department of Food & 13915 Saticoy St Van Nuys CA 91402 USA tgalindo@cdfa.ca.gov<br />

Galindo<br />

Agriculture<br />

Dr. Steve Garnsey UF/IFAS CREC 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850 USA steve.garnsey@gmail.com<br />

Mr. Timothy Gast Southern Gardens Citrus 1820 County Road 833 Clewiston FL 33440 USA tgast@southerngardens.com<br />

Mr. Tim Gaver Saint Lucie County Extension Service 8400 Picos Rd Ste 101 Fort Pierce FL 34945-3045 USA tgaver.49@ufl.edu<br />

Mr. Jeff Geuder USDA Florida Ag Statistics PO Box 530105 Orlando FL 32853-0105 USA jeff_geuder@nass.usda.gov; nassfl@nass.usda.gov<br />

Mr. Frank Giles Florida Grower Magazine/Meister 1555 Howell Branch Rd Ste Winter Park FL 32789 USA frgiles@meistermedia.com;<br />

Media<br />

C-204<br />

fgiles@meistermedia.com<br />

Mr. James Giles ProPak Software, LLC 150 3rd St SW 2nd Floor Winter Haven FL 33880 USA jamesg@propaksoftware.com<br />

Mr. Luiz Girotto Fischer S/A - Comercio Industria e Sao Lourenco St #81 Matao, Sao<br />

15990-200 Brazil salves@terralagro.com.br<br />

Agricultura<br />

Paulo<br />

Dr. Fred Gmitter UF/IFAS CREC 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850 USA fgg@crec.ifas.ufl.edu<br />

Mr. Pat Gomes USDA APHIS PPQ 920 Main Campus Dr Ste Raleigh NC 27606-5213 USA patrick.j.gomes@aphis.usda.gov<br />

200<br />

Mrs. Hilda Gomez USDA APHIS PPQ CHRP 1700 NW 66th Ave Ste 112 <strong>Plant</strong>ation FL 33313 USA hilda.gomez@aphis.usda.gov<br />

Mr. Exau Vicente Comite Estatal de Sanidad Vegetal de Col. Centro. Tuxtla Gutierrez Chiapas 29000 Mexico<br />

Gonzalez<br />

Chiapas<br />

Calle 7 Poniente Norte #151<br />

Mr. Pedro Gonzalez UF/IFAS CREC 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850 USA pcgo@crec.ifas.ufl.edu<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 252<br />

Full Name Affiliation Address City State ZIP Country Email<br />

Dr. Jose Gonzalez- NREC, Carnegie Mellon University 10 40th St Pittsburgh PA 15201 USA jgmora@nrec.ri.cmu.edu<br />

Mora<br />

Mr. Jim Gorden California Citrus Research Board PO Box 230 Visalia CA 93279-0230 USA jim@gordenag.com<br />

Dr. Tim Gottwald USDA ARS USHRL 2001 S Rock Rd Fort Pierce FL 34945 USA tim.gottwald@ars.usda.gov<br />

Dr. Luiz Goulart University of California Davis MMI Dept., GBSF Ste 5503 Davis CA 95616 USA<br />

Rm 5521<br />

Dr. Siddarame Gowda UF/IFAS CREC 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850 USA gowda@ufl.edu<br />

Ms. Cheryl Graffam UF/IFAS CREC 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850 USA<br />

Dr. Elizabeth<br />

University of California, Riverside Department of Entomology Riverside CA 92521 USA bethgc@uckac.edu<br />

Grafton-Cardwell<br />

Dr. James Graham UF/IFAS CREC 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850 USA jhg@crec.ifas.ufl.edu;<br />

jhgraham@ufl.edu<br />

Dr. Dennis Gross Texas A&M University Department of <strong>Plant</strong><br />

College TX 77843-2132 USA d-gross@tamu.edu<br />

Pathology & Microbiology Station<br />

2132 TAMU<br />

Dr. Jude Grosser UF/IFAS CREC 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850 USA jgrosser@ufl.edu<br />

Mr. Gus Gunderson California Citrus Mutual 512 N Kaweah Ave Exeter CA 93221-1200 USA<br />

Dr. Dan Gunter Citrus Research and Development 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850-2299 USA dgunter@sunorchard.com<br />

Foundation, Inc.<br />

Dr. Goutam Gupta Los Alamos National Labs Mail Stop M888, TA-43, Los Alamos NM 87545 USA gxg@lanl.gov<br />

HRL<br />

Mr. Francisco Belize Agricultural Health Authority Belmopan 35467 Belize frankpest@yahoo.com<br />

Gutierrez<br />

Dr. Kevin Hackett USDA ARS 5601 Sunnyside Ave Beltsville MD 20705 USA Kevin.Hackett@ars.usda.gov<br />

Dr. Subhas Hajeri UF/IFAS CREC 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850 USA hajeriss@ufl.edu<br />

Dr. Susan Halbert FDACS - Division of <strong>Plant</strong> Industry PO Box 147100 Gainesville FL 32614 USA Susan.Halbert@freshfromflorida.c<br />

om<br />

Dr. David Hall USDA ARS 2001 S Rock Rd Fort Pierce FL 34945 USA david.hall@ars.usda.gov<br />

Mr. Ron Hamel Gulf Citrus Growers Association, Inc. PO Box 1319 LaBelle FL 33975-1319 USA gulfcitruscapron@embarqmail.com<br />

Mr. Tom Hammond Hammond Groves PO Box 643278 Vero Beach FL 32964 USA tomshammond@aol.com<br />

Mr. Craig Hampton Tropicana Products, Inc. 1001 13th Ave E Bradenton FL 34208 USA craig.hampton@pepsico.com<br />

Mr. Michael Harowitz ProSource One 4094 Paul Buchman Hwy <strong>Plant</strong> City FL 33565 USA maharowitz@landolakes.com<br />

Dr. Scott Harper UF/IFAS CREC 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850 USA sjharper@ufl.edu<br />

Mr. Bert J. Harris B J Harris & Son, Inc. 514 Lake Mirror Dr Lake Placid FL 33852-5966 USA bande@htn.net<br />

Mr. Gregg Hartt S Y Hartt & Son, Inc. PO Box 1429 Avon Park FL 33826-1429 USA theorangedoctor@htn.net<br />

Dr. John Hartung USDA ARS Molecular <strong>Plant</strong><br />

10300 Baltimore Ave Beltsville MD 20705-2350 USA john.hartung@ars.usda.gov<br />

Pathology Lab<br />

Mr. Louis Haverlock Lou Ross Citrus, Inc. PO Box 567 Balm FL 33503-0567 USA rosslou2@aol.com<br />

Dr. Zhenli He University of Florida 2199 S Rock Rd Fort Pierce FL 34945-3138 USA zhe@ufl.edu<br />

Mr. Paul Heller Texas Citrus Mutual 901 Business Park Dr Ste Mission TX 78572 USA martha@valleyag.org<br />

400<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 253<br />

Full Name Affiliation Address City State ZIP Country Email<br />

Mrs. Megan<br />

USDA APHIS PPQ CPHST 1730 Varsity Drive Ste 400 Raleigh NC 27606 USA megan.w.henderson@aphis.usda.g<br />

Henderson<br />

ov<br />

Dr. Katherine University of Florida - SFREC 2685 State Road 29 N Immokalee FL 34142 USA jinxkat@ufl.edu<br />

Hendricks<br />

Dr. Jorge Hernandez SAGARPA Karina 116 Celaya, Gto. 38050 Mexico j.hernandezbaeza@yahoo.com.mx<br />

Dr. Mark Hilf USDA ARS USHRL 2001 S Rock Rd Fort Pierce FL 34945 USA mark.hilf@ars.usda.gov<br />

Mr. Nick Hill California Citrus Mutual 512 N Kaweah Ave Exeter CA 93221-1200 USA ccm@cacitrusmutual.com<br />

Dr. Nguyen Van Hoa Southern Horticultural Research 203, My Tho Tien Giang 860000 Viet Nam hoavn2003@gmail.com<br />

Institute<br />

Ms. Joanne Hodge USDA ARS USHRL 2001 S Rock Rd Fort Pierce FL 34945-3030 USA<br />

Dr. Greg Hodges FDACS - Division of <strong>Plant</strong> Industry 1911 SW 34th St Gainesville FL 32608 USA Greg.Hodges@freshfromflorida.co<br />

m<br />

Dr. Michele Hoffman USDA ARS USHRL 2991 S Rock Rd Fort Pierce FL 34945 USA michele.hoffman@ars.usda.gov<br />

Dr. Charla<br />

USDA APHIS PPQ CPHST 1730 Varsity Drive Ste 400 Raleigh NC 27606 USA Charla.Hollingsworth@aphis.usda.<br />

Hollingsworth<br />

gov<br />

Mr. Kieth<br />

Chemical Containers, Inc. PO Box 1307 Lake Wales FL 33859-1307 USA kiethh@embarqmail.com<br />

Hollingsworth<br />

Mr. Curt Holmes California Citrus Mutual 512 N Kaweah Ave Exeter CA 93221-1200 USA<br />

Mr. David Freeman Graves Brothers Company<br />

2770 Indian River Blvd Ste Vero Beach FL 32960-4230 USA<br />

Howard<br />

201<br />

Dr. Jiahuai Hu UF/IFAS CREC 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850 USA hjh@ufl.edu<br />

Dr. John Hu University of Hawaii 3190 Maile Way Honolulu HI 96822 USA johnhu@hawaii.edu<br />

Dr. Wayne Hunter USDA ARS 2001 S Rock Rd Fort Pierce FL 34945 USA wayne.hunter@ars.usda.gov<br />

Mrs. Sandy Hurner Hurner*G Tim 3604 Golfview Rd Sebring FL 35875-5028 USA<br />

Mr. Tim Hurner University of Florida Extension 4509 George Blvd Sebring FL 33875 USA plowboy@ufl.edu<br />

Mr. Thiago Iost Promotora Citricola del Golfo SA de Constitucion 405 Pte Monterrey,<br />

64000 Mexico thiago.iost@citrofrut.com.mx<br />

CV<br />

Colonia Centro<br />

NL<br />

Mr. Michael Irey United States Sugar Corporation 111 Ponce de Leon Ave Clewiston FL 33440 USA msirey@ussugar.com;<br />

mirey@ussugar.com<br />

Mr. Ed Ishida Bayer CropScience LP 1773 Powell Dr. Ventura CA 93004 USA Ed.Ishida@bayercropscience.com<br />

Mr. John Jackson FCIRCC 36545 E Eldorado Lake Dr Eustis FL 32736 USA jackson7@ufl.edu<br />

Mr. Arom Jantasorn University of Florida 2199 S Rock Rd Fort Pierce FL 34945 USA am_pam@hotmail.com<br />

Dr. Juan Jasso INIFAP Calle 6, No. 398 Av Correra Merida,<br />

97130 Mexico jasso.juan@inifap.gob.mx<br />

Racho<br />

Yucatan<br />

Mr. Tom Jerkins Blue Goose Growers, LLC 16050 W Orange Ave Fort Pierce FL 34945 USA tjerkins@bluegoosegrowers.com<br />

Dr. Yingnan Jiang Integrated <strong>Plant</strong> Genetics, Inc. 13420 Progress Blvd Ste 100 Alachua FL 32615 USA jiang@ipgenetics.com<br />

Mr. 3ric Johanson Intellectual Ventures Laboratory 1600 132nd Ave NE Ste 100 Bellevue WA 98134 USA 3ricj@intven.com<br />

Ms. Christen Johnson UF/IFAS CREC 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850 USA cajohnson295@gmail.com<br />

Dr. Evan Johnson UF/IFAS CREC 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850 USA egjohnson@ufl.edu<br />

Mr. Jason Johnson FDACS - Citrus Nursery Inspection 3397 US 27 S Avon Park FL 33825 USA Jason.Johnson@freshfromflorida.c<br />

om<br />

Dr. Moneen Jones University of Florida - SFREC 2685 State Road 29 N Immokalee FL 34142 USA mmjones2@ufl.edu<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 254<br />

Full Name Affiliation Address City State ZIP Country Email<br />

Dr. Joseph Joyce University of Florida/IFAS PO Box 110180 Gainesville FL 32611-0180 USA jcj@ifas.ufl.edu<br />

Mr. Marvin Kahn Kahn Grove Service Company PO Box 3346 Sebring FL 33871-3346 USA mkahn@kahngrove.com<br />

Mr. David Karp University of California, Riverside 9050 Lloyd Pl Los Angeles CA 90069 USA dkarp@ucr.edu<br />

Dr. Manjunath USDA ARS Citrus Germplasm 1060 Martin Luther King Riverside CA 92507 USA manjunath.keremane@ars.usda.go<br />

Keremane<br />

Repository<br />

Blvd<br />

v<br />

Dr. Abeer Khalaf University of Florida 1301 Fifield Hall Gainesville FL 32611 USA abeera@ufl.edu<br />

Dr. Nabil Killiny UF/IFAS CREC 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850 USA nabilkilliny@ufl.edu<br />

Dr. Dan King Florida Department of Citrus 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850 USA dking@citrus.state.fl.us<br />

Mr. Richard Kinney Florida Citrus Packers PO Box 1113 Lakeland FL 33802-1113 USA rkinney@flcitruspackers.org<br />

Mr. Thomas<br />

Cooperative Producers, Inc. PO Box 3147 Immokalee FL 34143 USA tfkirschner@yahoo.com;<br />

Kirschner<br />

kirschnertfk@yahoo.com<br />

Mr. Maris Klavins Bayer CropScience LP 2 T.W. Alexander Dr Research NC 27709 USA maris.klavins@bayer.com<br />

Triangle Park<br />

Mr. Ben Krupski Lennon Grove Service, Inc. 2701 Dean Ridge Rd Orlando FL 32825-8724 USA lgscitrus@aol.com<br />

Dr. Stephen Lapointe USDA ARS 2001 S Rock Rd Fort Pierce FL 34945 USA stephen.lapointe@ars.usda.gov<br />

Mr. Bruno Laureano Comite Estatal de Sanidad Vegetal Calle Nogal Lote 11, Mz2 Chilpancingo,<br />

39090 Mexico bruno_laureano@yahoo.com.mx<br />

Ahuelican<br />

del Guerrero<br />

Jacarandas 2a Seccion Guerrero<br />

Dr. Richard Lee USDA ARS Citrus Germplasm 1060 Martin Luther King Riverside CA 92507 USA richard.lee@ars.usda.gov<br />

Repository<br />

Blvd<br />

Dr. Rui Leite<br />

IAPAR - Instituto Agronomico do Rod. Celso Garcia Cid, km Londrina, PR 86001-970 Brazil ruileite@iapar.br<br />

Parana<br />

375<br />

Mr. Bill Lennon Lennon Grove Service, Inc. 2701 Dean Ridge Rd Orlando FL 32825-8724 USA lgscitrus@aol.com<br />

Mrs. Jewel<br />

Florida Citrus Mutual PO Box 89 Lakeland FL 33802 USA jewell@flcitrusmutual.com<br />

Letchworth<br />

Dr. Cynthia LeVesque California Citrus Research Board PO Box 230 Visalia CA 93279-0230 USA cynthia@citrusresearch.org<br />

Dr. Laurene Levy USDA APHIS PPQ CPHST BARC-East, Bldg-580 Beltsville MD 20705 USA laurene.levy@aphis.usda.gov<br />

Mr. Wayne Lewis Lewis & Associates, Inc. PO Box 16518 Tampa FL 33687 USA wlewis@la-fl.com<br />

Dr. Wenbin Li USDA APHIS PPQ Building 580, Powder Mill Beltsville MD 20708 USA wenbin.li@aphis.usda.gov<br />

Rd<br />

Dr. Hui-Ling Liao University of Florida/IFAS 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850 USA bigface@ufl.edu<br />

Dr. Lia Liefting MAF Biosecurity New Zealand PO Box 2095 Auckland 1140 New lia.liefting@maf.govt.nz<br />

Zealand<br />

Mr. Rene Lima Citrovita Agropecuaria Ltda Estrada Municipal, s/n, km Itapetininga,<br />

18203-000 Brazil rene.lima@citrovita.com.br<br />

01 ditrito Recha<br />

Sao Paulo<br />

Dr. Hong Lin USDA ARS 9611 S Riverbend Ave Parlier CA 93648 USA hong.lin@ars.usda.gov<br />

Dr. Magdalen Cornell University<br />

Department of <strong>Plant</strong> Ithaca NY 14853 USA ML16@cornell.edu<br />

Lindeberg<br />

Pathology<br />

Dr. Steven Lindow University of California, Berkeley <strong>Plant</strong> & Microbial Biology Berkeley CA 94720 USA icelab@berkeley.edu<br />

Department 111 Koshland<br />

Hall<br />

Mr. Horacio Lomba Consorcio Citricos Dominicanos S.A. Carretera Duarte Km 46 Villa<br />

Altagracia<br />

10112 Dominican<br />

Republic<br />

hlomba@gruporica.com<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 255<br />

Full Name Affiliation Address City State ZIP Country Email<br />

Mr. Martin Loosli Louis Dreyfuss Commodities Rod.Armando Salles Bebedouro,<br />

14707900 Brazil martin.loosli@ldcom.com<br />

Oliveira, Km 396<br />

Sao Paulo<br />

Dr. Silvio Lopes Fundecitrus Av. Joao Luis Gentil Araraquara,<br />

14805-289 Brazil slopes@fundecitrus.com.br<br />

Fernandes 243<br />

San Paulo<br />

Mr. Abel Lopez SENASICA SAGARPA INSURGENTES SUR 489 CUAUHTEM<br />

06100 MEXICO abel.lopez@senasica.gob.mx<br />

Buenfil<br />

PISO 16<br />

OC, MEXICO<br />

Dr. Jose Lopez- INIFAP Campo Experimental General<br />

64700 Mexico jila64@yahoo.com;<br />

Arroyo<br />

Teran,Nuevo<br />

lopez.jose@inifap.gob.mx<br />

Leon<br />

Dr. Eliezer Louzada Texas A&M University - Kingsville, 312 N International Blvd Weslaco TX 78596 USA elouzada@ag.tamu.edu<br />

Citrus Center<br />

Mr. David Lowe USDA APHIS PPQ CHRP 1700 NW 66 Ave Ste 112 <strong>Plant</strong>ation FL 33313 USA david.lowe@aphis.usda.gov<br />

Dr. Monica Lozano INIFAP Calle 6, No. 398 Av Correra Merida,<br />

97130 Mexico lozano.monica@inifap.gob.mx<br />

Racho<br />

Yucatan<br />

Mr. Fred Lozo Florida Phosphorus, Inc. 6 Abaco Rd Key Largo FL 33470 USA flaphosphorus@comcast.net<br />

Mr. Charlie Lucas Consolidated Citrus LP 63 Barn Rd Venus FL 33960 USA clucas@cclpcitrus.com<br />

Mr. Eduardo Antonio Citrus Consultants Group - GCONCI Rua Carlos Gomes, 144 - Cordeiropolis,<br />

13490000 Brazil ealucato@uol.com.br<br />

Lucato<br />

Centro - CP 39<br />

Sao Paulo<br />

Ms. Magally Luque- CDFA 3180 Cridge St Riverside CA 92507 USA mlwilliams@cdfa.ca.gov<br />

Williams<br />

Dr. Marcos Machado Centro de Citricultura Sylvio Moreira Caixa Postal 04<br />

Cordeiropolis,<br />

13493970 Brazil marcos@centrodecitricultura.br<br />

- IA<br />

SP<br />

Mr. David Machlitt Consulting Entomology Services 12142 River Grove St Moorpark CA 93021 USA machlitt@gmail.com<br />

Dr. Agenor Mafra- ISCA Technologies, Inc. 1230 W Spring St Riverside CA 92507 USA president@iscatech.com<br />

Neto<br />

Dr. Robert Mangan USDA ARS 2413 E Highway 83 Weslaco TX 78596 USA robert.mangan@ars.usda.gov<br />

Dr. Rajinder Mann UF/IFAS CREC 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850 USA mannrs@crec.ifas.ufl.edu<br />

Dr. John Manthey USDA ARS CPRL 600 Avenue S. NW Winter Haven FL 33881 USA John.Manthey@ars.usda.gov<br />

Mrs. Veronica Coordinator, Belize MIle 9 SCK Valley SCK District Belize vema600@yahoo.com<br />

Manzanero Majil<br />

Dr. Viviani Marques Agronomic Institute of Parana Celso Garcia Cid km 375 Londrina,<br />

86001-970 Brazil viviani@iapar.br<br />

Parana<br />

Mr. Jesus Marquez CESAVENY Primero de Diciembre No 36 San Leonel,<br />

63830 Mexico coordinacioncitricos@cesavenay.o<br />

Norte<br />

Nayarit<br />

rg.mx<br />

Mr. Larry Marsh Florida Citrus <strong>Management</strong>, Inc. PO Box 1347 LaBelle FL 33975 USA larrym3041@aol.com<br />

Mr. Julio Martich Consorcio Citricos Dominicanos S.A. Carretera Duarte Km 46 Villa<br />

10112 Dominican juliomartich@codetel.net.do<br />

Altagracia<br />

Republic<br />

Dr. Jose Luis<br />

Citricola Del Yaqui, S.A. de C.V. Allende 615 PTE Local 3 CD. Obregon,<br />

85000 Mexico jlmarca@hotmail.com<br />

Martinez<br />

Altos<br />

Son<br />

Mr. Eloy Martinez COMITE ESTATAL DE SANIDAD PROL. MIGUEL HIDALGO SAN PEDRO<br />

72160 MEXICO eema_59@hotmail.com<br />

Aguilar<br />

VEGETAL DE PUEBLA<br />

No. 2107<br />

CHOLULA,P<br />

UEBLA<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 256<br />

Full Name Affiliation Address City State ZIP Country Email<br />

Mr. Perry Mason Mason Groves PO Box 286 Lake Placid FL 33862-0286 USA masongroves@embarqmail.com<br />

Dr. Philip Mason USDA APHIS PPQ 2150 Centre Ave Bldg B Fort Collins CO 80526 USA phillip.a.mason@aphis.usda.gov<br />

Mr. Luis Matos UF/IFAS CREC 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850 USA luismatos@crec.ifas.ufl.edu<br />

Dr. Takayuki<br />

Yokohama <strong>Plant</strong> Protection Station 1-16-10, Shinyamashita, Yokohama,<br />

231-0801 Japan matsuurat@pps.maff.go.jp<br />

Matsuura<br />

Naka-ku<br />

Kanagawa<br />

Dr. Richard Mayer KeyPlex 1155 Louisiana Ave Ste 207 Winter Park FL 32789 USA rtmayer@Keyplex.com<br />

Mr. Steve Mayo Mayo Grove <strong>Management</strong> 6601 North Blvd Fort Pierce FL 34951-5202 USA Stephen.Mayo@ars.usda.gov<br />

Mr. Peter McClure Central Florida Grove Service, Inc. 5325 Summerlin Rd Port Saint FL 34987 USA pmcclure@evansprop.com<br />

Lucie<br />

Dr. Greg McCollum USDA ARS USHRL 2001 S Rock Rd Fort Pierce FL 34945 USA greg.mccollum@ars.usda.gov<br />

Mr. Donald<br />

Dixie Farms, LLC 5 Hill Ave Orlando FL 32801 USA<br />

McCosham<br />

Mr. George McEwan California Citrus Mutual 512 N Kaweah Ave Exeter CA 93221-1200 USA<br />

Dr. Alistair McKay Sunkist Growers, Inc. 1756 Eastman Ave #112 Ventura CA 93003 USA amckay@sunkistgrowers.com<br />

Mr. Marty McKenna McKenna & Associates Citrus, Inc. 2551 Lakeview Dr Sebring FL 33870-2759 USA mck80@earthlink.net;<br />

donna@mckennabros.com<br />

Mr. Pat McKenna McKenna Brothers, Inc. 70 Mammoth Grove Road Lake Wales FL 33898 USA pat@mckennabros.com<br />

Mr. Ben McLean McLean Ag Chemical, Inc. PO Box 1044 Minneola FL 34755 USA benmclean@aol.com<br />

Mr. Mark McLean Citrus Marketing Services 3335 US Highway 27 S Sebring FL 33870-5441 USA markvmclean@gmail.com<br />

Mr. Ryan McLean Citrus Marketing Services 3335 US Highway 27 S Sebring FL 33870-5441 USA<br />

Dr. Camilo Lazaro Citrus Consultants Group - GCONCI Rua Carlos Gomes, 144 - Cordeiropolis,<br />

13490000 Brazil clmedina@conplantferti.com.br<br />

Medina<br />

Centro - CP 39<br />

Sao Paulo<br />

Mr. Mauricio Lemos Citrus Consultants Group - GCONCI Rua Carlos Gomes, 144 - Cordeiropolis,<br />

13490000 Brazil mauricio.mendes@agrafnp.com.br<br />

Mendes da Silva<br />

Centro - CP 39<br />

Sao Paulo<br />

Dr. Ana Maria IAPAR - Instituto Agronomico do Rod. Celso Garcia Cid, km Londrina, PR 86001-970 Brazil meneguim@iapar.br<br />

Meneguim<br />

Parana<br />

375<br />

Ms. Tatiana Merlin Sao Paulo State University 1780 Dr Jose Barbosa de Botucatu, Sao<br />

18610307 Brazil trpdalmeida@hotmail.com<br />

Barros<br />

Paulo<br />

Mr. John Merritt Consolidated Citrus LP 63 Barn Rd Venus FL 33960 USA jmerritt@cclpcitrus.com<br />

Mr. Paul Metheney Central California Tristeza<br />

22847 Road 140 Tulare CA 93274-9367 USA pmetheney@cctea.org<br />

Eradication Agency<br />

Mr. Kevin Metheny Florida Citrus Mutual PO Box 89 Lakeland FL 33802 USA kevinm@flcitrusmutual.com<br />

Mr. Manuel Meza USDA APHIS IS Carr Reynosa-Matamoros Reynosa, Tam 88501 Mexico manuel.meza@aphis.usda.gov<br />

KM79 Brecha 102<br />

Mr. Frank Miele Magna - Bon 2421 SW 127 Ave Davie FL 33325 USA mielemgt@yahoo.com<br />

Dr. Marcelo Miranda Fundecitrus Av. Dr. Adhemar Pereira de Araraquara,<br />

14807040 Brazil mpmiranda@fundecitrus.com.br<br />

Barros 201<br />

Sao Paulo<br />

Dr. Shin-ichi Miyata National Institute of Fruit Tree Fujimoto 2-1<br />

Tsukuba,<br />

305-8605 Japan smiyata@ufl.edu;<br />

Science<br />

Ibaraki<br />

smiyata@affrc.go.jp<br />

Mr. Michael Monroe Sun Ag, Inc. 7735 County Road 512 Fellsmere FL 32948-7802 USA mmonroe@sunaginc.com<br />

Mr. Rick Montney ProPak Software, LLC 150 3rd St SW 2nd Floor Winter Haven FL 33880 USA rickm@propaksoftware.com<br />

Dr. Cesar Monzo University of Florida - SFREC 2685 State Road 29 N Immokalee FL 34142 USA cmonzo@ufl.edu<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 257<br />

Full Name Affiliation Address City State ZIP Country Email<br />

Mr. Gene Mooney Ben Hill Griffin, Inc. PO Box 127 Frostproof FL 33843-0127 USA gmooney@bhgriffin.com<br />

Dr. Gloria Moore University of Florida 1301 Fifield Hall Gainesville FL 32611 USA gamoore@ufl.edu<br />

Ms. Pamela Moreno USDA APHIS IS Carr Reynosa-Matamoros Reynosa, Tam 88501 Mexico pamelamoreno0207@hotmail.com<br />

KM79 Brecha 102<br />

Dr. Kent Morgan USDA ARS USHRL 2001 S Rock Rd Fort Pierce FL 34945 USA kent.morgan@ars.usda.gov<br />

Mr. Robert A. Morris UF/IFAS CREC 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850 USA ramorris@ufl.edu<br />

Dr. Joseph Morse University of California, Riverside Department of Entomology Riverside CA 92521 USA joseph.morse@ucr.edu<br />

3401 Watkins Dr<br />

Mr. Matt Moye Citrus Solutions, LLC PO Box 1341 Zolfo Springs FL 33890-1341 USA moyeboy2@hotmail.com<br />

Ms. Emma Mullen Intellectual Ventures Laboratory 1600 132nd Ave NE Ste 100 Bellevue WA 98134 USA emullen@intven.com<br />

Mr. Ronald P. UF/IFAS CREC 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850 USA rpm@crec.ifas.ufl.edu<br />

Muraro<br />

Mr. Michael Murphy Cooperative Producers, Inc. PO Box 3147 Immokalee FL 34143 USA msmurf1fl@yahoo.com<br />

Mr. Monty Myers University of Florida - IRREC 2199 S Rock Rd Fort Pierce FL 34945 USA montyemyers@crec.ifas.ufl.edu<br />

Mr. Dan Myhaver EnviroLogix, Inc. 530 Riverside Industrial Portland ME 04039 USA dan.myhaver@envirologix.com<br />

Pkwy<br />

Ms. Cheryl Nagle Tropicana 1001 13th Ave E Bradenton FL 34208 USA cheryl.nagle@pepsico.com<br />

Dr. Jan Narciso USDA ARS Citrus & Subtropical 600 Avenue S, NW Winter Haven FL 33881 USA jan.narciso@ars.usda.gov<br />

Products Lab<br />

Mr. Ernie Neff Southeast AgNet/Citrus Industry 302 S Massachusetts Ave Lakeland FL 33801 USA ernie@southeastagnet.com<br />

Mag.<br />

Ste 114<br />

Dr. Ronald Neuman Auburn University Department of Chemical Auburn AL 36849 USA neumard@auburn.edu<br />

Engineering<br />

Mr. Jerry Newlin Orange - Co, LP 12010 NE Hwy 70 Arcadia FL 34266-4267 USA jnewlin@orangecofla.com<br />

Dr. Ru Nguyen FDACS - Division of <strong>Plant</strong> Industry PO Box 147100 Gainesville FL 32614-7100 USA ru.nguyen@freshfromflorida.com<br />

Mr. James Nickel California Citrus Mutual 512 N Kaweah Ave Exeter CA 93221-1200 USA<br />

Mrs. Cheryl Noble Asset Protection Partners of Central PO Box 160398<br />

Altamonte FL 32716 USA cnoble@sihle.com<br />

Fla<br />

Springs<br />

Mr. Antonio Novelo Comite Estatal de Sanidad Vegetal de Col. Cd. Industrial Calle 19 Merida,<br />

Mexico nnovelo4@hotmail.com;<br />

Cocom<br />

Yucatan<br />

No. 443 X 26 Y 28<br />

Yucatan<br />

psv@yct.sagarpa.gob.mx<br />

Dr. Ulisses Nunes da University of Florida - <strong>Plant</strong><br />

1453 Fifield Hall Gainesville FL 32611 USA u.nunesdarocha@ufl.edu<br />

Rocha<br />

Pathology<br />

Mr. Gerald O'Connor KeyPlex 1155 Louisiana Ave Ste 207 Winter Park FL 32789 USA goc@keyplex.com<br />

Miss Daniela Okuma University of Florida 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850 USA dmokuma@ufl.edu<br />

Mr. Donny Oleniczak Bayer CropScience LP 203 Winghurst Blvd Orlando FL 32828 USA<br />

Mr. Chris Oswalt University of Florida Extension 1702 Highway 17-98 S Bartow FL 33830 USA wcoswalt@ufl.edu<br />

Mr. Paulo Paiva Louis Dreyfuss Commodities Rod.Armando Salles Bebedouro,<br />

14707900 Brazil paulo.paiva@ldcom.com<br />

Oliveira, Km 396<br />

Sao Paulo<br />

Dr. Raju Pandey University of California, Riverside Department of Entomology Riverside CA 92521 USA pandeyr@ucr.edu<br />

900 University Ave<br />

Dr. Venkatesan UF/IFAS CREC 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850 USA venki@ufl.edu<br />

Parkunan<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 258<br />

Full Name Affiliation Address City State ZIP Country Email<br />

Dr. Stephen Parnell Rothamsted Research West Common Harpenden,<br />

AL5 2JQ United stephen.parnell@bbsrc.ac.uk<br />

Hertfordshire<br />

Kingdom<br />

Dr. Larry Parsons UF/IFAS CREC 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850 USA lparsons@ufl.edu<br />

Mr. Minesh Patel Dixie Farms, LLC 5 Hill Ave Orlando FL 32801 USA min@beaconlandscaping.com<br />

Mrs. Sai Patne University of California, Riverside 900 University Ave Riverside CA 92521 USA spatn001@ucr.edu<br />

Dr. Joseph Patt USDA ARS 2413 E Highway 83 Weslaco TX 78596 USA Joseph.Patt@ars.usda.gov<br />

Ms. Cristina Paul USDA ARS MPPL Citrus Quarantine Unit Bldg Beltsville MD 20705 USA cristina.paul@ars.usda.gov<br />

004 Rm 118<br />

Mr. James Paul Gulf Coast Citrus PO Box 7369 Naples FL 34101-7369 USA<br />

Mr. Jay Pearson Sinensis, Inc. PO Box 2275 Winter Haven FL 33883-2275 USA jay@ejpearsonjr.com<br />

Mr. Nathan Pegram Intellectual Ventures Laboratory 1600 132nd Ave NE Ste 100 Bellevue WA 98005 USA npegram@intven.com<br />

Mr. Doug Peltzer California Citrus Mutual 512 N Kaweah Ave Exeter CA 93221-1200 USA<br />

Mr. Tim Peltzer California Citrus Mutual 512 N Kaweah Ave Exeter CA 93221-1200 USA<br />

Dr. Kirsten Pelz- UF/IFAS CREC 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850 USA pelzstelinski@ufl.edu<br />

Stelinski<br />

Mr. Ezequiel Perez Consorcio Citricola del Este Carratera Hato Mayor Hato Mayor 25000 Dominican eperez@citricola.com<br />

Sabana de la Mar Km 1<br />

Republic<br />

Mr. Federico Perez Comite Estatal de Sanidad Vegetal de Circunvalacion Agustin Guadalajara,<br />

44150 Mexico psv@jal.sagarpa.gob.mx<br />

Mejia<br />

Jalisco, A.C.<br />

Yanez No. 2175, Col Barrera Jalisco<br />

Ms. Edith Pettis Pettis Groves PO Box 2539 Wauchula FL 33873 USA epettis06@hotmail.com<br />

Dr. Robert<br />

USDA ARS 2413 E Highway 83 Weslaco TX 78596 USA Bob.Pfannenstiel@ars.usda.gov<br />

Pfannenstiel<br />

Mr. Steve Pfleger Tropicana Products, Inc. PO Box 338 Bradenton FL 34206-0338 USA<br />

Mr. J. Don Phillips Certi-Fine Fruit Company, Inc. 125 Terra Mango Loop Ste Orlando FL 32835 USA cff@cfl.rr.com<br />

A<br />

Mr. Floyd Philmon Philmon*Floyd 13456 Happy Hill Rd Dade City FL 33525-8125 USA<br />

Mr. Mark Philmon Philmon*Mark A 18034 Clay Hill Rd Dade City FL 33523-6441 USA<br />

Mr. Francisco Pierri Citrus Consultants Group - GCONCI Rua Carlos Gomes, 144 - Cordeiropolis,<br />

13490000 Brazil fpn14@terra.com.br<br />

Neto<br />

Centro - CP 39<br />

Sao Paulo<br />

Dr. Gerhard Pietersen ARC - <strong>Plant</strong> Protection Research Private Bag X134 Pretoria 0121 South Africa gerhard.pietersen@up.ac.za<br />

Institute<br />

Mr. Andy Pike Sun Ray Farms 2400 Old State Road 8 Lake Placid FL 33852-9591 USA<br />

Mr. Ernesto Luiz Citrus Consultants Group - GCONCI Rua Carlos Gomes, 144 - Cordeiropolis,<br />

13490000 Brazil elpa@btu.flash.tv.br<br />

Pires de Almeida<br />

Centro - CP 39<br />

Sao Paulo<br />

Mr. Shane Platt Farm Credit PO Box 8009 Lakeland FL 33802-8009 USA splatt@farmcreditcfl.com<br />

Dr. Anne Plotto USDA ARS Citrus & Subtropical 600 Avenue S, NW Winter Haven FL 33881 USA Anne.Plotto@ars.usda.gov<br />

Products Lab<br />

Dr. MaryLou Polek California Citrus Research Board PO Box 230 Visalia CA 93279-0230 USA marylou@citrusresearch.org<br />

Dr. Gavin Poole USDA ARS USHRL 2001 S Rock Rd Fort Pierce FL 34945 USA gavin.poole@ars.usda.gov<br />

Dr. Elena Postnikova USDA 1301 Ditto Ave Fort Detrick MD 21702 USA elena.postnikova@ars.usda.gov<br />

Dr. Charles Powell University of Florida 2199 S Rock Rd Fort Pierce FL 34945-3138 USA CApowell@ufl.edu<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 259<br />

Full Name Affiliation Address City State ZIP Country Email<br />

Mr. Ray Prewett Texas Citrus Mutual 901 Business Park Dr Ste Mission TX 78572 USA ray@valleyag.org<br />

400<br />

Mr. Pickens Price Price Groves PO Box 1165 Dade City FL 33526-1165 USA pricedevco@embarqmail.com<br />

Dr. Humberto Puello Consorcio Citricola del Este Carratera Hato Mayor Hato Mayor 25000 Dominican chpuello@yahoo.com;<br />

Sabana de la Mar Km 1<br />

Republic hpuello@citricola.com<br />

Dr. Jawwad Qureshi University of Florida/IFAS SWFREC 2685 State Road 29 N Immokalee FL 34142 USA jawwadq@ufl.edu<br />

Mrs. Jacqueline SA San Miguel Lavalle 4001 San Miguel,<br />

4000 Argentina jramallo@sa-sanmiguel.com<br />

Ramallo<br />

Tucuman<br />

Mr. Brian Randolph IMG Citrus, Inc. 2600 45th St Vero Beach FL 32967-1384 USA brianr@imgcitrus.com;<br />

brian.randolph@imgcitrus.com<br />

Mr. Enrique Rangel USDA APHIS IS Carr Reynosa-Matamoros Reynosa, Tam 88501 Mexico enrique.rangel@aphis.usda.gov<br />

KM79 Brecha 102<br />

Dr. Jose Reyes UF/IFAS CREC 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850 USA jireyes@ufl.edu<br />

Mr. Taw Richardson AgroSource, Inc. PO Box 1341 Mountainside NJ 07092-0341 USA taw.richardson@agrosource.net<br />

Mr. Steve Riffle Tropicana Products, Inc. PO Box 338 Bradenton FL 34206-0338 USA<br />

Mr. Timothy Riley USDA APHIS PPQ 10806 Palmbay Dr. Orlando FL 32824 USA timothy.riley@aphis.usda.gov<br />

Dr. Mark Ritenour UF - Indian River REC 2199 S Rock Rd Fort Pierce FL 34945 USA ritenour@ufl.edu<br />

Dr. Paul Robbins USDA ARS 2001 S Rock Rd Fort Pierce FL 34945-3030 USA paul.robbins@ars.usda.gov<br />

Mr. David Roberts California Citrus Mutual 512 N Kaweah Ave Exeter CA 93221-1200 USA ccm@cacitrusmutual.com<br />

Dr. Pamela Roberts UF/IFAS Southwest Fla. Research & 2686 SR 29 N Immokalee FL 34142 USA pdr@ufl.edu<br />

Education Center<br />

Mr. Thomas Roberts Integrated Consulting Entomology 120 Stanislaus Ave Ventura CA 93004 USA troberts@dock.net<br />

Ms. Cecile Robertson UF/IFAS CREC 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850 USA<br />

Mr. Daniel Robl USDA 1833 57th St Sarasota FL 34243 USA daniel.robl@aphis.usda.gov<br />

Dr. Pedro Robles SENASICA<br />

Guillermo Perez Valenzuela Col. Del<br />

04100 Mexico pedro.robles@senasica.gob.mx<br />

Garcia<br />

127<br />

Carmen,Coyo<br />

acan<br />

Mr. Hamilton Rocha Citrus Consultants Group - GCONCI Rua Carlos Gomes, 144 - Cordeiropolis,<br />

13490000 Brazil c.dalfre@uol.com.br<br />

Centro - CP 39<br />

Sao Paulo<br />

Dr. Mario Rocha- Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Cd. Universitaria<br />

Monterrey,<br />

66450 Mexico mrocha@fcb.uanl.mx;<br />

Peña<br />

Leon<br />

Nuevo Leon<br />

mario.rochape@uanl.edu.mx<br />

Mr. Jason Rogers J. B. Rogers Citrus, Inc. 9149 Lake Lynn Dr. Sebring FL 33876 USA agrogers5@gmail.com<br />

Dr. Michael Rogers UF/IFAS CREC 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850 USA mrgrs@ufl.edu<br />

Dr. Steve Rogers Citrus Research and Development 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850-2299 USA steve@stever.com<br />

Foundation, Inc.<br />

Dr. Mikeal Roose University of California, Riverside Department of Botany & Riverside CA 92521-0001 USA mikeal.roose@ucr.edu<br />

<strong>Plant</strong> Sciences<br />

Mr. Sidney Marcos Citrus Consultants Group - GCONCI Rua Carlos Gomes, 144 - Cordeiropolis,<br />

13490000 Brazil s.mrosa@uol.com.br<br />

Rosa<br />

Centro - CP 39<br />

Sao Paulo<br />

Mr. Richard Rosario University of Florida PO Box 110700 Gainesville FL 32611 USA richardrosariopa@ufl.edu<br />

Mr. David Roth California Citrus Mutual 512 N Kaweah Ave Exeter CA 93221-1200 USA<br />

Dr. Robert Rouse University of Florida 2686 State Rd 29 N Immokalee FL 34142-9514 USA rrouse@ufl.edu<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 260<br />

Full Name Affiliation Address City State ZIP Country Email<br />

Dr. Chuanqing Ruan Fujian Academy of Agricultural Research Center for High Fuzhou,<br />

350003 PR China ruanchuanqing@163.com<br />

Sciences<br />

Technology of Ag Sciences Fujian<br />

Wusi Road 251, Room 1309<br />

Mr. Phillip Rucks Phillip Rucks Citrus Nursery, Inc. PO Box 1318 Frostproof FL 33843 USA rucksnursery@aol.com<br />

Mr. Nick Russakis Russakis Groves 8801 Indrio Rd Fort Pierce FL 34951-1615 USA jimgrussakis@aol.com<br />

Mr. Paul Russell Agdia, Inc. 30380 County Rd 6 Elkhart IN 46514 USA prussell@agdia.com<br />

Mr. Phillip<br />

Intellectual Ventures Laboratory 1600 132nd Ave NE Ste 100 Bellevue WA 98005 USA prutschman@intven.com<br />

Rutschman<br />

Mr. Earl Rutz California Citrus Research Board PO Box 230 Visalia CA 93279-0230 USA earlrutz1@mac.com<br />

Dr. Surya Saha Cornell University 334 <strong>Plant</strong> Science Ithaca NY 14850 USA ss2489@cornell.edu<br />

Dr. Bacilio Salas USDA APHIS Moore Air base Bldg-6414 Edinburg TX 78541 USA bacilio.salas@aphis.usda.gov<br />

22675 N Moorefield Rd<br />

Mr. Antonio Celso Citrus Consultants Group - GCONCI Rua Carlos Gomes, 144 - Cordeiropolis,<br />

13490000 Brazil acsanches@terra.com.br<br />

Sanches<br />

Centro - CP 39<br />

Sao Paulo<br />

Mr. Sergio Sanchez USDA APHIS IS Carr Reynosa-Matamoros Reynosa, Tam 88501 Mexico sergio.sanchez@aphis.usda.gov<br />

Mr. Hector Sanchez<br />

Anguiano<br />

SENASICA<br />

KM79 Brecha 102<br />

Guillermo Perez Valenzuela<br />

127<br />

Col. Del<br />

Carmen,Coyo<br />

acan<br />

04100 Mexico hector.sanchez@senasica.gob.mx<br />

Bebedouro,<br />

14711-114 Brazil mrsantos@jfcitrus.com.br<br />

Sao Paulo<br />

Orlando FL 32826 USA ssantra@mail.ucf.edu<br />

Mr. Francisco Santos JF Citrus Agropecuaria Ltda Rua Cel. Candido Procopio<br />

De Oliveira, 353<br />

Dr. Swadeshmukul NanoScience Technology Center, 12424 Research Parkway Ste<br />

Santra<br />

UCF<br />

400<br />

Mr. Greg Sapp Sapp*Greg PO Box 1783 Lake Placid FL 33862-1783 USA sappbros@embarqmail.com<br />

Mr. Dyson Schneider California Citrus Mutual 512 N Kaweah Ave Exeter CA 93221-1200 USA<br />

Mr. Keith Schorsch Intellectual Ventures Laboratory 1600 132nd Ave NE Ste 100 Bellevue WA 98005 USA nsmith@intven.com<br />

Dr. Tim Schubert Florida Department of Ag &<br />

1911 SW 34th St Gainesville FL 32614 USA Tim.Schubert@freshfromflorida.co<br />

Consumer Services<br />

m<br />

Ms. Rhonda<br />

UF/IFAS CREC 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850 USA rschuman@ufl.edu<br />

Schumann<br />

Mr. Don Seaver USDA APHIS PPQ CPHST 1730 Varisty Dr Raleigh NC 27606 USA donald.m.seaver@aphis.usda.gov<br />

Miss Rosana<br />

University of Florida 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850 USA rserikawa@ufl.edu<br />

Serikawa<br />

Dr. Mamoudou Texas A&M University - Kingsville, 312 N International Blvd Weslaco TX 78596 USA msetamou@ag.tamu.edu<br />

Setamou<br />

Citrus Center<br />

Mr. Kevin Severns California Citrus Mutual 512 N Kaweah Ave Exeter CA 93221-1200 USA<br />

Mr. Randy Sexton Sexton Grove Service 4325 17th St SW Vero Beach FL 32968-5912 USA sextongrov@aol.com<br />

Mr. Jonathan Shao USDA ARS Molecular <strong>Plant</strong><br />

10300 Baltimore Ave Beltsville MD 20705-2350 USA jonathan.shao@ars.usda.gov<br />

Pathology Lab<br />

Dr. Robert Shatters USDA ARS USHRL 2001 S Rock Rd Fort Pierce FL 34945 USA robert.shatters@ars.usda.gov<br />

Mrs. Shannon Shepp FDACS - Division of Fruit &<br />

PO Box 1072 Winter Haven FL 33882-1072 USA Shannon.Shepp@freshfromflorida.<br />

Vegetables<br />

com<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 261<br />

Full Name Affiliation Address City State ZIP Country Email<br />

Mr. Joby Sherrod Duda PO Box 788 LaBelle FL 33975 USA joby.sherrod@duda.com<br />

Mr. Turksen Shilts UF/IFAS CREC 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850 USA<br />

Mr. Jose Javier Agricultural Integrated Solutions 6505 SW 113th Ct Miami FL 33173 USA jtomas@aiscosolutions.com<br />

Siguenza<br />

USA<br />

Mr. Flavio Silva JF Citrus Agropecuaria Ltda Rua Cel. Candido Procopio Bebedouro,<br />

14711-114 Brazil jugsalvo@gmail.com<br />

De Oliveira, 353<br />

Sao Paulo<br />

Mr. Wayne Simmons Simmons*Wayne H 1600 Hwy 29 S LaBelle FL 33935 USA whs58@yahoo.com<br />

Mr. Rocco Simonetta PepsiCo 617 W Main St Barrington IL 60010 USA rocco.simonetta@pepsico.com<br />

Mr. Oscar Augusto Citrus Consultants Group - GCONCI Rua Carlos Gomes, 144 - Cordeiropolis,<br />

13490000 Brazil oscar.simonetti@yahoo.com.br<br />

Simonetti<br />

Centro - CP 39<br />

Sao Paulo<br />

Dr. Trevor Smith FDACS - Division of <strong>Plant</strong> Industry PO Box 147100 Gainesville FL 32614-7100 USA trevor.smith@freshfromflorida.co<br />

m<br />

Mr. James Snively Southern Gardens Citrus 1820 County Road 833 Clewiston FL 33440 USA jsnively@southerngardens.com<br />

Mr. Armando Solorio Comite Estatal de Sanidad Vegetal de Circunvalacion Agustin Guadalajara,<br />

44150 Mexico sagarpa_jalisco@yahoo.com.mx<br />

Hernandez<br />

Jalisco, A.C.<br />

Yanez No. 2175, Col Barrera Jalisco<br />

Mr. Carl Sons Sons*Carl 32 Bass St Haines City FL 33844-9612 USA<br />

Dr. Timothy Spann UF/IFAS CREC 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850 USA spann@ufl.edu<br />

Mr. Mike Sparks Florida Citrus Mutual PO Box 89 Lakeland FL 33802 USA mikes@flcitrusmutual.com<br />

Mr. Bob Stambaugh Cooperative Ventures LLC PO Box 9498 Winter Haven FL 33883-9498 USA bobstambaugh@winterhavenlaw.c<br />

om<br />

Dr. Richard Stange USDA ARS USHRL 2001 S Rock Rd Fort Pierce FL 34945 USA<br />

Dr. Philip Stansly University of Florida 2685 State Road 29 N Immokalee FL 34142 USA pstansly@ufl.edu<br />

Mrs. Beatriz Stein Estacion Experimental Agroindustrial Avda William Cross 3150 Las Talitas,<br />

4101 Argentina bstein@sinectis.com.br<br />

Obispo Col.<br />

Tucuman<br />

Dr. Lukasz Stelinski UF/IFAS CREC 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850 USA stelinski@ufl.edu<br />

Ms. Denise<br />

Rabo AgriFinance, Inc.<br />

6704 Professional Parkway Sarasota FL 34240 USA denise.stembridge@raboag.com<br />

Stembridge<br />

W<br />

Dr. Neusa Stenzel IAPAR - Instituto Agronomico do Rod. Celso Garcia Cid, km Londrina, PR 86001-970 Brazil nstenzel@iapar.br<br />

Parana<br />

375<br />

Mr. Mike Stewart Consolidated Citrus LP 63 Barn Rd Venus FL 33960 USA mstewart@cclpcitrus.com<br />

Mr. Thomas Stopyra The Packers of Indian River, Ltd. PO Box 12969 Fort Pierce FL 34979-2969 USA tstopyra@packerscitrus.com<br />

Mrs. Vera Stopyra Gresham Enterprises LLC 4 Bogey Dr Winter Haven FL 33881 USA<br />

Mr. Matt Story Story*Mathew PO Box 1221 Lake Wales FL 33859-1221 USA matt@storycompanies.com<br />

Mr. Paul Story California Citrus Mutual 512 N Kaweah Ave Exeter CA 93221-1200 USA<br />

Mr. Vic Story Story Groves, Inc. PO Box 857 Babson Park FL 33827-0857 USA vic@storycompanies.com;<br />

storycitrus@aol.com<br />

Dr. Ed Stover USDA ARS USHRL 2001 S Rock Rd Fort Pierce FL 34945 USA ed.stover@ars.usda.gov<br />

Mr. John Strang Gapway Grove Corporation PO Box 1364 Auburndale FL 33823-1364 USA john@gapwaygroves.com<br />

Mr. Frank Strazzulla Citrosuco North America, Inc. 5937 Highway 60 E Lake Wales FL 33898 USA fstrazzulla@citrosuco.com<br />

Dr. Eduardo Stuchi Embrapa Cassava & Tropical Fruits PO Box 74 Bebedouro,<br />

14700-970 Brazil stuchi@estacaoexperimental.com.b<br />

SP<br />

r<br />

Mr. Keith Sullivan Consolidated Citrus LP 63 Barn Rd Venus FL 33960 USA ksullivan@cclpcitrus.com<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 262<br />

Full Name Affiliation Address City State ZIP Country Email<br />

Dr. Xiaoan Sun FDACS - Division of <strong>Plant</strong> Industry PO Box 147100 Gainesville FL 32614-7100 USA Xiaoan.Sun@freshfromflorida.com<br />

Dr. Jim Syvertsen UF/IFAS CREC 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850 USA jmsn@ufl.edu<br />

Dr. Alexandre Fischer S/A - Comercio Industria e Sao Lourenco St #81 Matao, Sao<br />

15990-200 Brazil atachibana@citrosuco.com.br<br />

Tachibana<br />

Agricultura<br />

Paulo<br />

Mr. Brian Taylor California Citrus Research Board PO Box 230 Visalia CA 93279-0230 USA brian@citrusresearch.org<br />

Mr. David Taylor Trade Winds Citrus Limited Bog Walk Saint<br />

5555 Jamaica leon.stewart@tradewindscitrus.com<br />

Catherine<br />

Dr. Earl Taylor USDA ARS USHRL 2001 S Rock Rd Fort Pierce FL 34945-3030 USA earl.taylor@ars.usda.gov<br />

Mr. John Taylor Syngenta Crop Protection 110 Dory Rd N North Palm FL 33408 USA john.taylor@syngenta.com<br />

Beach<br />

Miss Stephanie Shea University of Florida - SFREC 2685 State Road 29 N Immokalee FL 34142 USA ssteems@ufl.edu<br />

Teems<br />

Mr. Bruce Templeton Templeton*Bruce 3948 Templeton Rd Lake Wales FL 33853-8891 USA arcoco@yahoo.com<br />

Mr. Jose Eduardo Citrus Consultants Group - GCONCI Rua Carlos Gomes, 144 - Cordeiropolis,<br />

13490000 Brazil jeteofilo@vivax.com.br<br />

Teofilo<br />

Centro - CP 39<br />

Sao Paulo<br />

Mr. Len Therrien USDA ARS USHRL 2001 S Rock Rd Fort Pierce FL 34945-3030 USA leonard.therrien@ars.usda.gov<br />

Dr. Donald Thomas USDA ARS 2413 East Highway 83 Weslaco TX 78596 USA donald.thomas@ars.usda.gov<br />

Dr. Lavern Timmer University of Florida 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850 USA lwtimmer@ufl.edu;<br />

lwt@crec.ifas.ufl.edu<br />

Dr. Siddharth Tiwari University of Florida 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850 USA stiwari@ufl.edu<br />

Mr. Jose Tomas Agricultural Integrated Solutions 6505 SW 113th Ct Miami FL 33173 USA jtomas@aiscosolutions.com<br />

USA<br />

Mr. Gilberto Tozatti Citrus Consultants Group - GCONCI Rua Carlos Gomes, 144 - Cordeiropolis,<br />

13490000 Brazil tozatti@gconci.com.br;<br />

Centro - CP 39<br />

Sao Paulo<br />

gilberto.tozatti@hotmail.com<br />

Mr. Chris Troesch Simpson Fruit Company 445 Limit Ave Mount Dora FL 32757-2999 USA<br />

Mr. Alex Truszkowski DuPont Crop Protection 3680 Winding Lake Cir Orlando FL 32835 USA alex.t.truszkowski@usa.dupont.co<br />

m<br />

Dr. Thomas Turpen Citrus Research and Development 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850-2299 USA tom.turpen@innovationmatters.co<br />

Foundation, Inc.<br />

m<br />

Mr. John Updike Updike Jr.*John PO Box 231 Lake Wales FL 33859-0231 USA jupdike@alcoma.net<br />

Dr. Filomena Valim Florida Department of Citrus 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850 USA fvalim@citrus.state.fl.us<br />

Dr. Ariena H.C. van Emerging Pathogens Institute and 1453 Fifield Hall Gainesville FL 32611 USA ahcvanbruggen@ufl.edu<br />

Bruggen<br />

<strong>Plant</strong> Pathology<br />

Dr. Frank van den Rothamsted Research West Common Harpenden,<br />

AL5 2JQ United frank.vandenbosch@bbsrc.ac.uk<br />

Bosch<br />

Hertfordshire<br />

Kingdom<br />

Ms. April Vega UF/IFAS CREC 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850 USA aprilv26@ufl.edu<br />

Dr. Jose Velazquez INIFAP Km. 35 Carretera Colima Tecoman,<br />

28100 Mexico jvelazquezmon@yahoo.com.mx<br />

Manzanillo<br />

Colima<br />

Dr. Georgios<br />

University of California, Riverside Department of <strong>Plant</strong> Riverside CA 92521 USA vidalg@ucr.edu<br />

Vidalakis<br />

Pathology & Microbiology<br />

Mr. Ricardo Violante Cutrale Citrus Juices 602 McKean St Auburndale FL 33823 USA violante@cutrale.com.br<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 263<br />

Full Name Affiliation Address City State ZIP Country Email<br />

Ms. Ashley Voss USDA ARS USHRL 2001 S Rock Rd Fort Pierce FL 34945-3030 USA ford.ashley@gmail.com;<br />

Ashley.Voss@ars.usda.gov<br />

Ms. Callie Walker Pavese Law Firm PO Drawer 1507 Fort Myers FL 33902 USA cwalker@oldecypressbank.com<br />

Dr. Abigail Walter USDA ARS USHRL 2001 S Rock Rd Fort Pierce FL 34945-3030 USA abigail.walter@ars.usda.gov<br />

Mr. Nan-Yi Wang UF/IFAS CREC 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850 USA nywang@ufl.edu<br />

Dr. Nian Wang UF/IFAS CREC 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850 USA nianwang@ufl.edu<br />

Mr. Xuefeng Wang USDA ARS 9611 S Riverbend Ave Parlier CA 93648 USA<br />

Mr. Malcolm C Watters*Malcolm C 2220 County Road 17 N Lake Placid FL 33852 USA malwatters@htn.net<br />

Watters<br />

Mr. Tripp Watters Watters*Malcolm C 2220 County Road 17 N Lake Placid FL 33852 USA<br />

Mr. Jed Weeks Crop Production Services, Inc. 2100 Moores Ln Mulberry FL 33860 USA jed.weeks@cpsagu.com<br />

Dr. Shawron<br />

Orange - Co, LP 12010 NE Hwy 70 Arcadia FL 34266-4267 USA sweingarten@orangecofla.com<br />

Weingarten<br />

Mr. David Wheeler Wheeler Farms, Inc. PO Box 2715 Lake Placid FL 33862-2715 USA wheelerfarms@earthlink.net<br />

Mr. Mitch Willis PepsiCo 1001 13th Ave E Bradenton FL 34208 USA mitch.willis@pepsico.com<br />

Dr. Gail Wisler USDA ARS 5601 Sunnyside Ave Beltsville MD 20705 USA Gail.Wisler@ARS.USDA.GOV<br />

Dr. Glenn Wright University of Arizona - Yuma 6425 W 8th St Yuma AZ 85364 USA gwright@ag.arizona.edu<br />

Agriculture Center<br />

Dr. Nelson A. Wulff Fundecitrus Av. Dr. Adhemar Pereira de Arraraquara,<br />

14807-040 Brazil nelsonwulff@fundecitrus.com.br<br />

Barros 201<br />

Sao Paulo<br />

Dr. Yulu Xia North Carolina State University 1730 Varsity Dr Ste 110 Raleigh NC 27606 USA yulu_xia@ncsu.edu<br />

Miss Pan Xie<br />

Chongqing University,<br />

Genetic Engineering<br />

Chongqing 400044 PR China xpdd840605@163.com<br />

Bioengineering College<br />

Research Center No. 174<br />

Shazhengjie Dist.<br />

Dr. Pedro Yamamoto University of Sao Paulo - ESALQ Av. Padua Dias, 11 Piracicaba,<br />

13418900 Mexico pedro.yamamoto@usp.br<br />

Sao Paulo<br />

Dr. Gal Yarden Beeologics 11800 SW 77th Ave Miami FL 33156 USA gal@beeologics.com<br />

Miss Jamie Yates UF/IFAS CREC 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850 USA jdyates@ufl.edu<br />

Dr. Raymond Yokomi USDA ARS 9611 S Riverbend Ave Parlier CA 93648 USA ray.yokomi@ars.usda.gov<br />

Ms. Cassie Young UF/IFAS IRREC 2199 S Rock Rd Fort Pierce FL 34945 USA<br />

Dr. Qibin Yu UF/IFAS CREC 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850 USA qibin@crec.ifas.ufl.edu;<br />

qibin@ufl.edu<br />

Dr. Qing Yuan USDA ARS Molecular <strong>Plant</strong><br />

10300 Baltimore Ave Beltsville MD 20705-2350 USA qing.yuan@ars.usda.gov<br />

Pathology Lab<br />

Mr. Kazuyoshi Yuasa Japan International Cooperation 16th Floor, Daeha Business Hanoi 100000 Viet Nam Kazuyoshi.Yuasa@gmail.com<br />

Agency<br />

Center, 360 Kim Ma<br />

Dr. Cecilia Zapata UF/IFAS CREC 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850 USA ceciliaz@ufl.edu<br />

Mr. Jorge Zatarain COMITE ESTATAL VEGETAL DE PROL. MIGUEL HIDALGO SAN PEDRO<br />

72160 MEXICO zatarainestolano@hotmail.com<br />

Estalano<br />

SANIDAD DE PUEBLA<br />

No. 2107<br />

CHOLULA,P<br />

UEBLA<br />

Dr. Mongi Zekri University of Florida Extension PO Box 68 LaBelle FL 33975 USA maz@ufl.edu<br />

Dr. Jiuxu Zhang Florida Department of Citrus 700 Experiment Station Rd Lake Alfred FL 33850 USA jzhang@citrus.state.fl.us<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 264<br />

Full Name Affiliation Address City State ZIP Country Email<br />

Dr. Muqing Zhang UF/IFAS IRREC 2199 S Rock Rd Fort Pierce FL 34945 USA mqzhang@ufl.edu<br />

Dr. Shujian Zhang University of Florida <strong>Plant</strong> Pathology Department Gainesville FL 32611 USA sjzhang@ufl.edu<br />

1453 Fifield Hall<br />

Dr. Lijuan Zhou USDA ARS USHRL 2001 S Rock Rd Fort Pierce FL 34945 USA lijuan.zhou@ars.usda.gov<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 265<br />

A3. Meeting Agenda<br />

2 nd International Research Conference on<br />

Huanglongbing<br />

January 10-14, 2011<br />

Agenda<br />

Day 1: Monday, 10 January 2011<br />

7:00 am – 9:00 pm Registration (Foyer)<br />

7:00 – 8:00 am Continental Breakfast (tour attendees only) (Foyer)<br />

8:15 am – 4:30 pm Preconference Tour (by reservation only, tour sold out) (Departs from Foyer)<br />

7:00 – 9:00 pm Welcome Reception (Boca Foyer and Boca Patio)<br />

Day 2: Tuesday, 11 January 2011<br />

7:30 am – 5:00 pm Registration (Foyer)<br />

7:30 – 8:30 am Continental Breakfast (Foyer)<br />

8:30 – 9:15 am Welcome (Caribbean Ballroom IV and V)<br />

Introduction – Mike Sparks, Jim Graham<br />

Mission, Goals, and Objectives – Wayne Dixon<br />

Rules of the House – Jackie Burns<br />

9:15 – 10:15 am Opening Keynote Address (Caribbean Ballroom IV and V)<br />

HLB – A Clear and Present Danger: An Epidemiological Perspective – Tim<br />

Gottwald<br />

10:15 – 10:30 am Break (Foyer)<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 266<br />

10:30 am – 12:00 pm Session 1 (Caribbean Ballroom IV and V)<br />

Pathogen Genomics, Bioinformatics, Phylogenetics, and Culturing – John<br />

Hartung, Moderator<br />

Oral Presentations<br />

10:30 1.1 Genomic Comparisons of the Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus Chromosome with<br />

Other Members of the Rhizobiales – Hartung, J.S., Shao, J., Kuykendall, L.D.<br />

10:45 1.2 Genetic and Functional Characterization of the znu Operon in the<br />

Intracellular Citrus Pathogen, Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus – Vahling,<br />

C.M., Benyon, L.S., Duan, Y.-P.<br />

11:00 1.3 Comparison of the Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus Genome with a Draft Ca. L.<br />

americanus Genome Reveals Similar Prophage with Likely Pathogenicity<br />

Factors – Zhang, S.J., Wulff, N.A., Flores-Cruz, Z., Zhou, L.J., Kang, B.-K.,<br />

Fleites, L.A., Gooch, M.D., Davis, M.J., Duan, Y.-P., Gabriel, D.W.<br />

11:15 1.4 Analysis of Candidatus Liberibacter americanus Genome – Wulff, N.A., Zhang,<br />

S., Ayres, A.J., Bové, J.M., Gabriel, D.W.<br />

11:30 1.5 Population Genetics Analysis of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus from<br />

Multiple Continents – Glynn, J.M., Bai, Y., Chen, C., Duan, Y.-P., Civerolo, E.L.,<br />

Lin, H.<br />

11:45 1.6 Phylogenetic Analysis of Asian Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus; Asian<br />

Common Strains Are Distributed in Northeast India, Papua New Guinea, and<br />

Timor-Leste – Miyata, S., Kato, H., Tomimura, K., Davis, R., Smith, M.W.,<br />

Weinert, M., Iwanami, T.<br />

Posters<br />

1.7 Bioinformatic Analysis of Genome Sequence Data for Ca. Liberibacter<br />

asiaticus – Lindeberg, M., Saha, S.<br />

1.8 Genetic Diversity of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus Isolates from Paraná<br />

State, Brazil – Meneguim, L., Marques, V.V., Murata, M.M., Barreto, T.P.,<br />

Vasquez-Souza, G., Villas-Boas, L.A., Paccola-Meirelles, L.D., Leite, R.P., Jr.<br />

1.9 Analysis of Endophytic Bacterial Diversity from Huanglongbing Pathogen-<br />

Infected Citrus Tissues – Wang, A., Yin, Y., Li, Y., Li, J., Xian, J., Wang, Z.<br />

1.10 Evolving Diversity of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus Revealed by<br />

Comparative Analysis of Two Intragenic Tandem Repeat Genes – Zhou, L.J.,<br />

Powell, C.A., Hoffman, M., Li, W.B., Fan, G.-C., Liu, B., Duan, Y.-P.<br />

1.11 In vitro Culture of the Fastidious Bacteria Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus<br />

in Association with Insect Feeder Cells – Fontaine-Bodin, L., Fabre, S.,<br />

Gatineau, F., Dollet, M.<br />

1.12 Preliminary Report of Cultivation of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus from<br />

Citrus Tissue with Huanglongbing – Xie, P., Yin, Y., Li, Y., Li, J., Wang, Z.<br />

1.13 Characterization of Highly Mosaic Genomic Loci of Candidatus Liberibacter<br />

asiaticus in Southern China and Florida – Wang, X.F., Zhou, C.Y., Deng, X.,<br />

Su, H.N., Chen, J.<br />

1.14 Further Evidence That U.S. and Chinese Populations of Candidatus<br />

Liberibacter asiaticus are Different – Deng, X., Liu, R., Zhang, P., Chen, J.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 267<br />

12:00 – 1:30 pm Lunch and Keynote Lecture 1 (Caribbean Ballroom VI and VII)<br />

RNAi Strategies for Insect Vectors of <strong>Plant</strong> Pathogens – Bryce Falk<br />

1:30 – 2:30 pm Session 2 (Caribbean Ballroom IV and V)<br />

Asian Citrus Psyllid Biology and Genomics – David Hall, Moderator<br />

Oral Presentations<br />

1:30 2.1 Phylogeographic and Population Genetic Studies Uncover Two Founding<br />

Events in Asian Citrus Psyllid Populations Collected in the Americas – de<br />

León, J.H., Sétamou, M., Gastaminza, G.A., Buenahora, J., Cáceres, S.,<br />

Yamamoto, P.T., Logarzo, G.A., Stañgret, C.R.W.<br />

1:45 2.2 Alteration of Microbiome of Bactericera cockerelli and Diaphorina citri Based<br />

on Candidatus Liberibacter sp. Infection – Hail, D., Hunter, W., Bextine, B.<br />

2:00 2.3 Oral Uptake of dsRNA Increases Mortality in Diet Fed Psyllids – Shatters,<br />

R.G., Jr., Powell, C.A., Borovsky, D.<br />

2:15 2.4 The Psyllid Feeding Process: Composition and Biosynthetic Inhibition of the<br />

Salivary Sheath – Shatters, R.G., Jr.<br />

Posters<br />

2.5 A New Method for Short-Term Rearing of Psyllid Adults and Nymphs on<br />

Detached Citrus Leaves and Young Terminal Shoots – Ammar, E.-D., Hall,<br />

D.G.<br />

2.6 Comparative Analysis of Asian Citrus Psyllid and Potato Psyllid Antennae<br />

– Arras, J., Hunter, W., Bextine, B.<br />

2.7 The Emerging Psyllid Genome: RNA-Interference and Insect Biology –<br />

Hunter, W.B., Bextine, B.R., Shatters, R.G., Reese, J., Shelby, K.S., Hall, D.G.<br />

2.8 Bacterial Population Diversity in Diaphorina citri: Analysis by PCR-DGGE<br />

and RFLP Methodology – Wang, Z., Tian, S., Liu, T., Yin, Y.<br />

2:30 – 2:45 pm Break (Foyer)<br />

2:45 – 4:45 pm Session 3 (Caribbean Ballroom IV and V)<br />

Asian Citrus Psyllid Ecology and Transmission – Lukasz Stelinski,<br />

Moderator<br />

Oral Presentations<br />

2:45 3.1 Antennal Responses of Diaphorina citri to Host <strong>Plant</strong> Volatiles Recorded<br />

Using a Coupled Gas Chromatograph Electroantennogram Detector<br />

System – Robbins, P.S., Alessandro, R.T., Lapointe, S.L.<br />

3:00 3.2 Population Dynamics of the Asian Citrus Psyllid and Potential<br />

Generations in Northern Sinaloa, Mexico – Cortez-Mondaca, E., López-<br />

Arroyo, J.I., Pérez-Márquez, J., González, V.M.<br />

3:15 3.3 Localization of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus in Dissected Organs of<br />

Its Psyllid Vector Diaphorina citri Using Fluorescent in situ Hybridization<br />

and Quantitative PCR – Ammar, E.-D., Shatters, R.G., Hall, D.G.<br />

3:30 3.4 Interactions of the Asian Citrus Psyllid, Diaphorina citri, with Candidatus<br />

Liberibacter asiaticus – Pelz-Stelinski, K.S., Rogers, M.E.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 268<br />

3:45 3.5 Seasonal Changes in Numbers of Asian Citrus Psyllids Carrying<br />

Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus – Ebert, T.A., Brlansky, R.H., Rogers,<br />

M.E.<br />

4:00 3.6 standing Diaphorina citri-Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus Interactions<br />

and D. citri Behavior for Managing Huanglongbing (HLB) in Florida –<br />

Mann, R.S., Pelz-Stelinski, K.S., Rouseff, R.L., Stelinski, L.L.<br />

4:15 3.7 Effects of Soil-Applied and Foliar-Applied Insecticides on Asian Citrus<br />

Psyllid (Diaphorina citri) Feeding Behavior and Their Possible Implication<br />

for HLB Transmission – Serikawa, R.H., Okuma, D.M., Backus, E.A., Rogers,<br />

M.E.<br />

4:30 3.8 Effect of Insecticides and Mineral Oil on Probing Behavior of Diaphorina<br />

citri Kuwayama (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) in Citrus – de Miranda, M.P.,<br />

Felippe, M.R., Garcia, R.B., Yamamoto, P.T., Lopes, J.R.S.<br />

Posters<br />

3.9 A New Detached-Leaf Assay Method to Test the Inoculativity of Psyllids<br />

with Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus Associated with Huanglongbing<br />

Disease – Ammar, E.-D., Walter, A., Hall, D.G.<br />

3.10 Preliminary Study of Comparative Acquisition of Candidatus Liberibacter<br />

asiaticus and Ca. L. americanus by Diaphorina citri Under Different<br />

Temperatures – Barbosa, J.C., Eckstein, B., Belasque, J., Jr., Bergamin<br />

Filho, A.<br />

3.11 Host Range of Diaphorina citri Kuwayama and Leuronota fagarae on<br />

Citrus and Zanthoxylum spp. – Russell, D.N., Halbert, S.E., Roberts, P.D.<br />

3.12 Abundance of Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) in Orange Jasmine<br />

and Backyard Citrus of Yucatán, Mexico – Lozano-Contreras, M., Jasso-<br />

Argumedo, J., Morales-Koyoc, D., Jasso-Laucirica, T., González-Hernández,<br />

A., López-Arroyo, J.I.<br />

3.13 Difference of Gender and Effect of Photoperiod on Asian Citrus Psyllid<br />

Feeding Behavior – Okuma, D.M., Serikawa, R.H., Rogers, M.E.<br />

3.14 Seasonal Abundance of Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Psyllidae) and<br />

Natural Enemies in Citrus Groves of Yucatán, Mexico – Jasso-Argumedo,<br />

J., Lozano-Contreras, M., Barroso-Aké, H., López-Arroyo, J.I.<br />

3.15 Host <strong>Plant</strong>s of Psyllids in South Texas – Thomas, D.B.<br />

4:45 – 6:00 pm Poster Session 1 (Caribbean Ballroom III)<br />

7:00 – 8:15 pm Conference Dinner (Caribbean Ballroom VI and VII)<br />

Day 3: Wednesday, 12 January 2011<br />

7:00 am – 5:00 pm Registration (Foyer)<br />

7:00 – 8:00 am Continental Breakfast (Foyer)<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 269<br />

8:00 – 10:15 am Session 4 (Caribbean Ballroom IV and V)<br />

Survey, Detection and Diagnosis – John da Graça, Moderator<br />

Oral Presentations<br />

8:00 4.1 Development and Reactivity of Polyclonal Antibodies Based on OMP<br />

Sequences of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus – Coletta-Filho, H.D.,<br />

Peroni, L.A., De Souza, A.A., Takita, M.A., Stach-Machado, D.R.<br />

8:15 4.2 Development of Single-Chain Antibody Fragments (scFVs) Against<br />

Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus by Phage Display – Yuan, Q., Jordan, R.,<br />

Brlansky, R., Minenkova, O., Hartung, J.<br />

8:30 4.3 Highly Sensitive Detection by Real-Time PCR Targeting the Multiple<br />

Tandem Repeats of Two Prophage Region Genes of the Citrus<br />

Huanglongbing Disease Bacterium, Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus –<br />

Morgan, J.K., Zhou, L., Shatters, R.G., Jr., Manjunath, K., Duan, Y.-P.<br />

8:45 4.4 Comparison of Different Extraction and Assay Protocols in Different<br />

Laboratories to Develop a Standardized Assay for Detection of<br />

Huanglongbing-Associated Bacteria from Psyllids – Manjunath, K., Irey,<br />

M., Ramadugu, C., Lee, R.F., Levesque, C., Brady, B., Polek, M., Lin, H.,<br />

Civerolo, E., Afunian, M., Vidalakis, G.<br />

9:00 4.5 Assessment of Various Spectroscopic Techniques for Detection of HLB –<br />

Poole, G.H., Hawkins, S.A., Windham, W.R., Heitschmidt, J., Albano, J.P.,<br />

Park, B., Lawrence, K.C., Gottwald, T.R.<br />

9:15 4.6 Seasonal Variability in HLB Testing Data in <strong>Plant</strong> and Psyllid Samples in<br />

Florida – Irey, M., Gast, T., Cote, J., Gadea, P., Santiago, O., Briefman, L.,<br />

Graham, J.<br />

9:30 4.7 Survey to Estimate the Rate of HLB Infection in Florida Citrus Groves –<br />

Irey, M., Morris, R.A., Estes, M.<br />

9:45 4.8 Two Survey Protocols to Detect Newly Introduced HLB and Other Exotic<br />

Pathogens and Pests – Gottwald, T., Riley, T., Irey, M., Parnell, S., Hall, D.<br />

10:00 4.9 Distribution of Candidatus Liberibacter Americanus and Ca. L. asiaticus<br />

in Foliage of Naturally Infected Citrus Trees – Sousa, M.C., Lemos, M.V.F.,<br />

Frare, G.F., Santos, M.A., Lopes, S.A.<br />

Posters<br />

4.10 A Perspective on the Activities of Texas HLB Diagnostic Laboratory –<br />

Kunta, M., da Graça, J.V., Sétamou, M., Skaria, M.<br />

4.11 Two New Real-Time PCR-Based Surveillance Systems for Candidatus<br />

Liberibacter Species Detection – Lin, H., Bai, Y., Civerolo, E.L.<br />

4.12 Detection of Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum in Potato Psyllid<br />

Isolated from Sticky Traps – Kwok, K., Levesque, C.S., Manjunath, K., Irey,<br />

M., Polek, M.<br />

4.13 Detection of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus (Las) on Yellow Sticky<br />

Traps by Real-Time PCR – Irey, M., Gadea, P., Hall, D.<br />

4.14 Validation of the Starch-Iodine Reaction for Field Pre-Diagnosis of<br />

Huanglongbing in Citrus of México – Loredo-Salazar, R.X., Uribe-<br />

Bustamante, A., Rodríguez-Quibrera, C.G., Curtí-Díaz, S.A., Alanís-Martínez,<br />

E.I., Velázquez-Monreal, J.J., López-Arroyo, J.I.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 270<br />

4.15 Detecting HLB Using NIR Remote Sensing – Gonzalez-Mora, J., Dima,<br />

C.S., Irey, M., Ehsani, R.<br />

4.16 Isothermal Detection of Huanglongbing in Psyllids and Citrus Tree<br />

Samples – Russell, P.F., McGowen, N., Bohannon, R.<br />

4.17 Assessment of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus in the Psyllids,<br />

Diaphorina citri Collected from Murraya paniculata in Thailand –<br />

Jantasorn, A., Duan, Y.-P., Hoffman, M., Zhang, S., Puttamuk, T., Thaveechai,<br />

N.<br />

4.18 Liberibacter Reservoirs in Cities and Villages in the State of São Paulo,<br />

Brazil – Lopes, S.A., Frare, G.F., Camargo, L.E.A., Wulff, N.A., Teixeira, D.C.,<br />

Bassanezi, R.B., Beattie, G.A.C., Ayres, A.J.<br />

4.19 Pictorial Gallery of Foliar HLB Symptoms on Various Citrus Varieties and<br />

Citrus Relatives – Robl, D.J., Riley, T.D., Gomez, H.<br />

10:15 – 10:30 am Break (Foyer)<br />

10:30 – 11:45 pm Session 5 (Caribbean Ballroom IV and V)<br />

Economics, Fruit Quality, and Crop Loss – Mike Irey, Moderator<br />

Oral Presentations<br />

10:30 5.1 Evaluation of Chemical Flavor Compounds in Orange Juice from Multiple<br />

Harvests of Hamlin and Valencia Fruit from HLB-Symptomatic Versus<br />

Healthy Trees – Baldwin, E., Bai, J., Dea, S., Plotto, A., Manthey, J., Rouseff,<br />

R., Irey, M.<br />

10:45 5.2 Evaluation of Bitterness Caused by Huanglongbing Disease in Orange<br />

Juice – Dea, S., Plotto, A., Manthey, J., Baldwin, E., Irey, M.<br />

11:00 5.3 Sensory Evaluation of Juice Made with Fruit from Huanglongbing (HLB)<br />

Affected Trees – Plotto, A., Valim, F., Rouseff, R., Dea, S., Manthey, J.,<br />

Narciso, J., Bai, J., Irey, M., Baldwin, E.<br />

11:15 5.4 Economic Considerations to Treating HLB with the Standard Protocol or<br />

an Enhanced Foliar Nutritional Program – Morris, R.A., Muraro, R.P.<br />

11:30 5.5 When Should a Grower with HLB Stop Removing Trees? – Irey, M.<br />

Posters<br />

5.6 Use of Electronic Sensor Technology to Discriminate between Juices<br />

from Huanglongbing Infected and Healthy Orange Trees – Bai, J., Dea, S.,<br />

Plotto, A., Baldwin, E., Irey, M.<br />

5.7 A Regional Epidemiological Approach for Yield Loss Estimates Due to<br />

Candidatus Liberibacter Under Different Risk Scenarios – Mora-Aguilera,<br />

G., Acevedo, G., López-Arroyo, J.I., Velazquez, J., Gómez, R., Robles, M.,<br />

Salcedo, D.<br />

12:00 – 1:30 pm Lunch and Keynote Lecture 2 (Caribbean Ballroom VI and VII)<br />

Lessons from Zebra Chip: Prospects for HLB <strong>Management</strong> –<br />

Dennis Gross<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 271<br />

1:30 – 2:15 pm Session 6 (Caribbean Ballroom IV and V)<br />

Epidemiology – Tim Gottwald, Moderator<br />

Oral Presentations<br />

1:30 6.1 Five Years of Experience with Huanglongbing in Florida: Current<br />

Assessment; How Did We Get Here? – Halbert, S.E., Manjunath, K.,<br />

Ramadugu, C., Lee, R.F.<br />

1:45 6.2 Designing Sampling Schemes to Maximize the Probability of Early<br />

Detection of a Huanglongbing Outbreak – Parnell, S.R., Gottwald, T.R., van<br />

den Bosch, F.<br />

2:00 6.3 Candidatus Liberibacter africanus Subspecies capensis on Calodendrum<br />

capense in South Africa – Phahladira, M.N.B., Viljoen, R., Pietersen, G.<br />

Posters<br />

6.4 Distribution of Psyllids Positive for Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus in<br />

Citrus Groves in Southwest Florida – Halbert, S.E., Manjunath, K.,<br />

Ramadugu, C., Mears, P., Lee, R.F.<br />

6.5 Seasonal Prevalence of Citrus Huanglongbing (Candidatus Liberibacter<br />

asiaticus) in a Central Florida Sweet Orange Grove – Parkunan, V., Wang,<br />

N.-Y., Ebert, T.A., Rogers, M.E., Dewdney, M.M.<br />

6.6 A Mathematical Model for Transmission of HLB by Psyllids – Chiyaka, C.,<br />

Singer, B., Halbert, S., van Bruggen, A.H.C.<br />

6.7 Potential Spread of Huanglongbing Through Soil – Nunes da Rocha, U.,<br />

Dickstein, E.R., van Bruggen, A.H.C.<br />

2:15 – 4:15 pm Session 7 (Caribbean Ballroom IV and V)<br />

International Citrus Industries, Regulation, and Grower Experiences –<br />

MaryLou Polek, Moderator<br />

Oral Presentations<br />

2:15 7.1 Laws, Huanglongbing <strong>Management</strong>, and the Current Status of the Disease<br />

in São Paulo, Brazil – Belasque, J., Jr., Ayres, A.J., Barbosa, J.C., Massari,<br />

C.A., Bové, J.M.<br />

2:30 7.2 Distribution of Citrus Huanglongbing in the Dominican Republic – Matos,<br />

L., Hilf, M.E., Cayetano, X., Feliz, A., Puello, H., Méndez, F., Borbón, J.,<br />

Folimonova, S.Y.<br />

2:45 – 3:00 pm Break (Foyer)<br />

3:00 7.3 Citrus Huanglongbing in Cuba: Current Situation, <strong>Management</strong>, and Main<br />

Research – López, D., Luis, M., Collazo, C., Batista, L., Peña, I., González, C.,<br />

Pérez, L., Zamora, V., Borroto, A., Pérez, D., Alonso, E., Acosta, I., Llauger, R.,<br />

Casín, J.C.<br />

3:15 7.4 Spreading and Symptoms of Huanglongbing in Mexican Lime Groves in<br />

the State of Colima, Mexico – Robles Gonzalez, M.M., Velázquez Monreal,<br />

J.J., Manzanilla Ramirez, M.A., Orozco Santos, M., Flores Virgen, R., Medina<br />

Urrutia, V.M., Carrillo Medrano, S.H.<br />

3:30 7.5 The Asian Citrus Psyllid/Huanglongbing Detection, Treatment, and<br />

Regulatory Program in California – Galindo, T.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 272<br />

3:45 7.6 Detection and Reporting of Asian Citrus Psyllid and Huanglongbing in<br />

Commercial Citrus Within California: An Industry Program – Taylor, B.J.,<br />

Polek, M.L., Batkin, T.<br />

4:00 7.7 Citrus Health Research Forum: A National Research Effort – Polek, M.,<br />

Wisler, G.<br />

Posters<br />

7.8 The Identification and Distribution of Citrus Greening Disease in Jamaica<br />

– Oberheim, A.P., Brown, S.E., McLaughlin, W.A.<br />

7.9 Fitting a Spatial Analysis Grid for Research on Huanglongbing in Mexico<br />

– Aldama-Aguilera, C., Olvera-Vargas, L.A., Galindo-Mendoza, M.G.<br />

4:15 – 5:30 pm Poster Session 2 (Caribbean Ballroom III)<br />

6:00 pm Dinner on your own<br />

Day 4: Thursday, 13 January 2011<br />

7:00 am – 5:00 pm Registration (Foyer)<br />

7:00 – 8:00 am Continental Breakfast (Foyer)<br />

8:00 – 10:00 am Session 8 (Caribbean Ballroom IV and V)<br />

Host-Pathogen Interactions – Bill Dawson, Moderator<br />

Oral Presentations<br />

8:00 8.1 Examination of Stages of the HLB Disease Development in Citrus Trees –<br />

Folimonova, S.Y., Achor, D.S., Hilf, M.E.<br />

8:15 8.2 New Defense Response Insights of Sweet Orange Infected with Two<br />

Candidatus Liberibacter Species – Mafra, V.S., Martins, P.K., Locali-Fabris,<br />

E.C., Ribeiro-Alves, M., Francisco, C.S., Freitas-Astúa, J., Kishi, L.T.,<br />

Machado, M.A.<br />

8:30 8.3 Differential Expression of Potential Virulence Genes of Candidatus<br />

Liberibacter asiaticus in Infected <strong>Plant</strong>s and Psyllids – Sreedharan, A.,<br />

Wei, S., Wang, N.<br />

8:45 8.4 Metabolome Analysis of Tolerant and Susceptible Citrus Varieties in<br />

Response to Infection with Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus – Albrecht,<br />

U., Skogerson, K., Bowman, K.D., Fiehn, O.<br />

9:00 8.5 Deep Transcriptome Profiling of Citrus Fruit in Response to<br />

Huanglongbing Disease – Martinelli, F., Uratsu, S.L., Albrecht, U., Reagan,<br />

R.L., Leicht, E., D’Souza, R., Bowman, K.D., Dandekar, A.M.<br />

9:15 8.6 Carbohydrate Metabolism and Related Gene Expression Changes in<br />

Huanglongbing-Affected Sweet Orange – Chen, C., Fan, J., Yu, Q.,<br />

Brlansky, R., Li, Z.-G., Gmitter, F., Jr.<br />

9:30 8.7 Analysis of Colonization of Citrus Seeds by Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus and<br />

Its Possible Role in Seed Transmission – Hilf, M.E.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 273<br />

9:45 8.8 Natural Transmission of Huanglongbing Caused by Candidatus<br />

Liberibacter americanus and Ca. L. asiaticus and with Two Different<br />

Sources of Inoculum <strong>Plant</strong>s (Citrus sinensis or Murraya exotica) –<br />

Gasparoto, M.C.G., Bassanezi, R.B., Amorim, L., Montesino, L.H., Lourenço,<br />

S.A., Wulff, N.A., Bergamin Filho, A.<br />

Posters<br />

8.9 Callose Predominates over Phloem Protein 2 in Phloem Plugging of Trees<br />

Affected with Huanglongbing – Albrigo, L.G., Achor, D.S.<br />

8.10 Influence of Huanglongbing (HLB) on the Composition of Citrus Juices<br />

and Mature Leaves – Cancalon, P.F., Bryan, C., Haun, C., Zhang, J.<br />

8.11 Gene Expression in Citrus sinensis Fruit Tissues Harvested from<br />

Huanglongbing-Infected Trees – Liao, H.-L., Burns, J.K.<br />

8.12 Expression Profiling of Host Response of Citrus to Candidatus<br />

Liberibacter asiaticus Infection – Aritua, V., Wang, N.<br />

8.13 Arabidopsis Responses to the HLB-Relative Candidatus Liberibacter<br />

psyllaurous – Patne, S., Manjunath, K.L., Roose, M.L.<br />

8.14 Comparative Studies of the Endophytic Microbial Community Structures<br />

in Huanglongbing-Infected and Non-Infected Citrus <strong>Plant</strong>s – Zheng X.-F.,<br />

Liu, B., Ruan, C.-Q., Lin, Y.-Z., Xiao, R.-F., Zhu, Y.-J., Fan, G.-C., Cai, Z.J.,<br />

Duan, Y.-P.<br />

8.15 HLB Influences the Diversity, Structure, and Function of the Bacterial<br />

Community Associated with Citrus – Trivedi, P., Wang, N.<br />

8.16 Functional Studies of Putative Effectors of Candidatus Liberibacter<br />

asiaticus Using Citrus Tristeza Virus Vector – Hajeri, S., Duan, Y.-P.,<br />

Gowda, S.<br />

8.17 First Report of a New Host (Pithecellobium lucidum Benth) of the Citrus<br />

Huanglongbing Bacterium, Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus – Fan, G.-C.,<br />

Cai, Z.J., Weng, Q.Y., Ke, C., Liu, B., Zhou, L.J., Duan, Y.-P.<br />

8.18 Citrus Seed Grafting: A Simple Technology for Testing Seed<br />

Transmission of Citrus Greening/HLB and of Other Pathogenic Agents –<br />

Bar-Joseph, M., Robertson, C., Hilf, M., Dawson, W.O.<br />

8.19 Lack of Transmission of HLB by Citrus Seed – Graham, J.H., Johnson,<br />

E.G., Bright, D.B., Irey, M.S.<br />

8.20 Visualization of Ca. Liberibacter asiaticus in Immature Citrus Seed Coats<br />

by Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization (FISH) of 16S rRNA – Hilf, M.E.<br />

8.21 Rapid, Sensitive, and Non-Radioactive Tissue-Blot Diagnostic Method for<br />

the Detection of Citrus Greening Disease (HLB) – Gowda, S., Nageswara<br />

Rao, N., Miyata, S., Ghosh, D.K., Irey, M.S., Rogers, M.E., Garnsey, S.M.<br />

10:00 – 10:15 am Break (Foyer)<br />

10:15 – 12:00 pm Session 9 (Caribbean Ballroom IV and V)<br />

Asian Citrus Psyllid <strong>Management</strong> – Michael Rogers, Moderator<br />

Oral Presentations<br />

10:15 9.1 A Database for Analysis of Diaphorina citri Population Monitoring Data<br />

from Commercial Groves – Gast, T., Irey, M., Hou, H.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 274<br />

10:30 9.2 RNAi Strategy in Citrus Trees to Reduce Hemipteran Pests: Psyllids and<br />

Leafhoppers – Hunter, W., Glick, E., Bextine, B.R., Paldi, N.<br />

10:45 9.3 Application of Insecticidal Sprays to Citrus in Winter Provides Significant<br />

Reduction in Asian Citrus Psyllid Diaphorina citri Populations and<br />

Opportunity for Additional Suppression Through Conservative and<br />

Augmentative Biological Control – Qureshi, J.A., Stansly, P.A.<br />

11:00 9.4 Studies on Imidacloprid and <strong>Management</strong> of ACP in California – Byrne, F.,<br />

Morse, J., Bethke, J.<br />

11:15 9.5 Selection and Dosage of Insecticides for the Control of the Asian Citrus<br />

Psyllid in the Citrus Groves of Mexico – López-Arroyo, J.I., Díaz-Zorrilla,<br />

U., Hernández-Fuentes, L.M., Cortez-Mondaca, E., Robles-González, M.M.,<br />

Villanueva-Jiménez, J.A., Cabrera-Mireles, H., Loera-Gallardo, J., Jasso-<br />

Argumedo, J., Curti-Díaz, S.<br />

11:30 9.6 Asian Citrus Psyllid (ACP) Control: Potential Use of Systemic Insecticides<br />

in Citrus Bearing Trees – Yamamoto, P.T., Miranda, M.P., Felippe, M.R.<br />

11:45 9.7 Insecticide Resistance and Susceptibility of Uninfected and Candidatus<br />

Liberibacter asiaticus-Infected Asian Citrus Psyllid in Florida – Tiwari, S.,<br />

Rogers, M.E., Stelinski, L.L.<br />

Posters<br />

9.8 Development of Area-Wide Asian Citrus Psyllid <strong>Management</strong> Strategies in<br />

Texas – Bartels, D.W., Sétamou, M., Ciomperlik, M.A., da Graça, J.V.<br />

9.9 Citrus Psyllid <strong>Management</strong> Strategies for California Citrus Growing<br />

Regions – Grafton-Cardwell, E.E., Morse J.G., Taylor, B.J.<br />

9.10 Area-Wide <strong>Management</strong> of Asian Citrus Psyllid in Southwest Florida –<br />

Stansly, P.A., Arevalo, H.A., Zekri, M., Hamel, R.<br />

9.11 Evaluation of Low Volume Sprayers Used in Citrus Psyllid Control<br />

Applications – Hoffmann, C., Fritz, B., Martin, D., Atwood, R., Hurner, T.,<br />

Ledebuhr, M., Tandy, M., Jackson, J.L., Wisler, G., Polek, M.<br />

9.12 Identification of Parasitoids and Haplotypes of Tamarixia radiata<br />

(Waterston) (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) from Diaphorina citri in Yucatán,<br />

México – González-Hernández, A., Jasso-Argumedo, J., Cruz-García, R.,<br />

Lozano-Contreras, M., López-Arroyo, J.I., Villanueva-Segura, O.K.<br />

9.13 Host Specificity Testing of Tamarixia radiata for the Classical Biological<br />

Control of Asian Citrus Psyllid, Diaphorina citri, in California – Pandey,<br />

R.R., Hoddle, M.S.<br />

9.14 Predators in Non-Commercial Citrus and Preliminary Evaluation of Their<br />

Potential Against the Asian Citrus Psyllid in Texas – Pfannenstiel, R.S.,<br />

Unruh, T.R.<br />

9.15 Suitability of Diaphorina citri, Toxoptera citricida, and Aphis spiraecola as<br />

Prey for Hippodamia convergens – Qureshi, J.A., Stansly, P.A.<br />

9.16 Molecular Analysis of Tamarixia radiata from America Uncovers Extensive<br />

Haplotype Variation: Multiple Groups? – de León, J.H., Gastaminza, G.A.,<br />

Sétamou, M., Cáceres, S., Kanga, L.H.B., Buenahora, J., Parra, J.R., Logarzo,<br />

G.A., Stañgret, C.R.W.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 275<br />

9.17 Molecular Characterization of a New Entomopathogenic Fungus Isaria<br />

poprawskii: A Potential Biocontrol Agent for Diaphorina citri.<br />

Development of Isaria-Specific Molecular Markers – de León, J.H.,<br />

Cabanillas, H.E., Humber, R.A., Murray, K.D., Moran, P., Jones, W.A.<br />

9.18 RNAi – Evaluating Injection into Citrus Trees and Grapevine to Target<br />

Psyllids and Leafhoppers – Hunter, W., Stover, E., Glick, E., Bextine, B.R.,<br />

Paldi, N.<br />

9.19 Using Novel Photonic Fence Technology to Protect Foundation Block and<br />

Nursery Stock from Asian Citrus Psyllid – Johanson, E., Patt, J., Mullen, E.,<br />

Rutschman, P., Pegram, N.<br />

9.20 Development of a Diaphorina citri-Specific Molecular Diagnostic Marker<br />

for Gut Content Examinations – de León, J.H., Thomas, D., Sétamou, M.,<br />

Hagler, J.R.<br />

9.21 Development of a Pathogen Dispenser to Control Asian Citrus Psyllid<br />

(ACP) in Residential Citrus – Patt, J., Jackson, M., Dunlap, C., Meikle, W.,<br />

Adamczyk, J.<br />

9.22 Producing New Flush at Will in Citrus to Study ACP-<strong>Plant</strong> Interactions –<br />

Malik, N.S.A., Brockington, J., Perez, J.L., Mangan, R.L.<br />

9.23 Thresholds for Vector Control in Young Citrus Treated for Symptoms of<br />

HLB with a Nutrient/SAR Package – Monzó, C., Arevalo, H.A., Stansly, P.A.<br />

9.24 Experimental Release Rate Analysis of Volatile Compounds from Wax-<br />

Based Dispensers – Neuman, R.D., Shelton, A.B., Mills, D.R.<br />

9.25 Vegetation Canopy Airflow Modeling for Airborne Dispersion of DMDS –<br />

Shelton, A.B., Neuman, R.D.<br />

9.26 Methods and Systems to Deliver Volatile Compounds for Biological<br />

Control Strategies – Neuman, R.D., Shelton, A.B., Zee, R.H.<br />

12:00 – 1:30 pm Lunch and Keynote Lecture 3 (Caribbean Ballroom VI and VII)<br />

Viral Vectors and Prospects for HLB Control – Bill Dawson<br />

1:30 – 3:00 pm Session 10 (Caribbean Ballroom IV and V)<br />

HLB <strong>Management</strong> – Tim Spann, Moderator<br />

Oral Presentations<br />

1:30 10.1 Trunk Injection of Copper Sulfate Pentahydrate (Magna-Bon) Affects<br />

Expression of HLB – Graham, J.H., Irey, M.S., Miele, F.<br />

1:45 10.2 Chemical Compounds Effective Against the Citrus Huanglongbing<br />

Bacterium, Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus In <strong>Plant</strong>a – Zhang, M., Powell,<br />

C.A., Zhou, L., He, Z., Stover, E., Duan, Y.-P.<br />

2:00 10.3 Regional HLB <strong>Management</strong> on the Effectiveness of Local Strategies of<br />

Inoculum Reduction and Vector Control – Bassanezi, R.B., Yamamoto,<br />

P.T., Montesino, L.H., Gottwald, T.R., Amorim, L., Bergamin Filho, A.<br />

2:15 10.4 The Theory of Managing Huanglongbing with <strong>Plant</strong> Nutrition and Real<br />

World Success in Florida – Spann, T.M., Rouse, R.E., Schumann, A.W.<br />

2:30 10.5 Nutritional Treatments: Inconsequential Effect on HLB Control and<br />

Promote Area-Wide Titer Increase and Disease Spread – Gottwald, T., Irey,<br />

M., Graham, J., Wood, B.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 276<br />

2:45 10.6 Nutritional Approaches for <strong>Management</strong> of Huanglongbing (Citrus<br />

Greening) in China – Xia, Y., Sequeira, R.<br />

Posters<br />

10.7 First Steps Towards Rescuing Las-Infected Citrus Germplasm –<br />

McCollum, G., Stover, E.<br />

10.8 Screening Chemical Compounds Against Citrus Huanglongbing Using an<br />

Optimized Grafting System from Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus-<br />

Infected Citrus Scions – Zhang, M.-Q., Duan, Y.-P., Powell, C.A.<br />

10.9 Discovery of Antimicrobial Small Molecules Against Candidatus<br />

Liberibacter asiaticus by Screening Novel SecA Inhibitors Using Structure<br />

Based Design – Akula, N., Wang, N.<br />

10.10 The Low Pressure Trunk Injection System: A Technology to Fight Against<br />

HLB – Tomas, J.<br />

10.11 Does Systemic Acquired Resistance (SAR) Control HLB Disease<br />

Development? – Graham, J.H., Myers, M.E., Irey, M.S., Gottwald, T.R.<br />

10.12 Use of Growth-Priming Agents to Extend the Growth of HLB-Affected<br />

Citrus – He, Z., Zhang, M.-Q., Viana, E., Merlin, T., Duan, Y.-P., Stoffella, P.J.,<br />

Liptay, A., Powell, C.A.<br />

10.13 Evaluation of Foliar, Zinc, and Manganese for Control of HLB or<br />

Associated Symptom Development – Johnson, E.G., Irey, M.S., Gast, T.,<br />

Bright, D.B., Graham, J.H.<br />

10.14 Role of Nutritional and Insecticidal Treatments in Mitigation of HLB: Main<br />

Effects and Interactions – Stansly, P.A., Arevalo, H.A., Rouse, R.E.<br />

10.15 Use of Horticultural Practices in Citriculture to Survive Huanglongbing –<br />

Stuchi, E.S., Girardi, E.A.<br />

10.16 Critical Control Point (CCP) Analysis to Build a Model System for<br />

Measuring Citrus Propagation Risk Mitigations. II. Sampling and<br />

Monitoring – Brown, L.G., Jones, E.M., Hartzog, H.M.<br />

10.17 The Need of an Epidemio-Surveillance <strong>Network</strong> to Prevent Huanglongbing<br />

Arrival in the South Mediterranean Basin – Dollet, M., Aubert, B., Imbert, E.,<br />

Gatineau, F.<br />

10.18 Presence of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus in Diaphorina citri<br />

Kuwayama Collected from <strong>Plant</strong>s for Sale in Florida – Halbert, S.E.,<br />

Manjunath, K., Ramadugu, C., Lee, R.F.<br />

10.19 A Model System for Studying Huanglongbing – Manjunath, K., Ramadugu,<br />

C., Kund, G., Trumble, J., Lee, R.F.<br />

3:00 – 3:15 pm Break (Foyer)<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 277<br />

3:15 – 5:00 pm Session 11 (Caribbean Ballroom IV and V)<br />

Host Tolerance and Resistance – Fred Gmitter, Moderator<br />

Oral Presentations<br />

3:15 11.1 Incidence of Huanglongbing on Several Sweet Orange Cultivars Budded<br />

onto Different Rootstocks at the Citrus Experimental Station (EECB),<br />

Bebedouro, São Paulo, Brazil – Stuchi, E.S., Reiff, E.T., Sempionato, O.R.,<br />

Girardi, E.A., Parolin, L.G., Toledo, D.A.<br />

3:30 11.2 Host Preference and Suitability of Native North American Rutaceae for the<br />

Development of the Asian Citrus Psyllid, Diaphorina citri Kuwayama –<br />

Sandoval, J.L., II, Sétamou, M., da Graça, J.V.<br />

3:45 11.3 Progress Using Transgenic Approaches and Biotechnology-Facilitated<br />

Conventional Breeding to Develop Genetic Resistance/Tolerance to HLB<br />

in Commercial Citrus – Grosser, J.W., Dutt, M., Shohael, A., Barthe, G.A.<br />

4:00 11.4 Promoter Regulation of the β-Glucoronidase (GUS) Gene and<br />

Antimicrobial Peptide D4E1 in a Citrus Rootstock – Benyon, L.S., Stover,<br />

E., Bowman, K., McCollum, G., Niedz, R.<br />

4:15 11.5 Responses of Transgenic Hamlin Sweet Orange <strong>Plant</strong>s Expressing the<br />

attacin A Gene to Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus Infection – Felipe,<br />

R.T.A., Mourão-Filho, F.A., Pereira, E.V., Jr., Lopes, S.A., Sousa, M.C.,<br />

Mendes, B.M.J.<br />

4:30 11.6 Screening Antimicrobial Peptides In-Vitro for Use in Developing<br />

Huanglongbing and Citrus Canker Resistant Transgenic Citrus – Stover,<br />

E., Stange, R., McCollum, G., Jaynes, J.<br />

4:45 11.7 Response of Citrus Transgenic <strong>Plant</strong>s Expressing STX IA Gene to<br />

Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus – Marques, V.V., Bagio, T.Z., Sugahara,<br />

V.H., Vasquez, G.V., Grange, L., Meneguim, L., Kobayashi, A.K., Bespalhok,<br />

J., Pereira, L.F.P., Vieira, L.G.E., Leite, R.P., Jr.<br />

Posters<br />

11.8 Rootstocks and Pruning Effects on Huanglongbing Incidence on Tahiti<br />

Limes in Bebedouro, Northern São Paulo State, Brazil – Stuchi, E.S., Reiff,<br />

E.T., Sempionato, O.R., Cantuarias-Avilés, T., Girardi, E.A., Parolin, L.G.,<br />

Toledo, D.A.<br />

11.9 Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus (CLas) Titer in Field HLB-Exposed<br />

Commercial Citrus Cultivars – Stover, E., McCollum, G.<br />

11.10 Host Response of Different Citrus Genotypes and Relatives to Candidatus<br />

Liberibacter asiaticus Infection – Boscariol-Camargo, R.L., Cristofani-Yaly,<br />

M., Malosso, A., Coletta-Filho, H.D., Machado, M.A.<br />

11.11 Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus (CLas) Titer in Poncirus trifoliata and P.<br />

trifoliata Hybrids: Inferences on Components of HLB Resistance – Stover,<br />

E., Shatters, R.G., Jr., McCollum, G., Hall, D., Duan, Y.-P.<br />

11.12 The Role of Salicylic Acid and Systemic Acquired Resistance in the<br />

Response of Citrus to HLB – Khalaf, A., Febres, V.J., Brlansky, R.H.,<br />

Gmitter, F.G., Moore, G.A.<br />

11.13 Observations of Citrus × Poncirus Hybrid Tolerance to Infection with<br />

Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus – Bowman, K.D., Albrecht, U.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 278<br />

11.14 Performance of a Phage Gene in Transgenic Citrus Resistant to Citrus<br />

Greening – Jiang, Y., Perazzo, G., Septer, A., Kress, R., Gabriel, D.W.<br />

11.15 Genome Sequences of Haploid Clementine Mandarin and Diploid Sweet<br />

Orange – Gmitter, F.G., Jr.<br />

11.16 Exploring Metabolic Profiles of <strong>Plant</strong> Tissue with Increased or Decreased<br />

Susceptibility – Malik, N.S.A., Perez, J.L., Brockington, J., Mangan, R.L.<br />

5:00 – 6:15 pm Poster Session 3 (Caribbean Ballroom III)<br />

7:00 – 8:15 pm Conference Banquet and (Caribbean Ballroom VI and VII)<br />

Keynote Lecture 4<br />

Understanding the Lifestyle of <strong>Plant</strong> Pathogens: Towards Successful<br />

<strong>Management</strong> of Vectored <strong>Plant</strong> Diseases – Steven Lindow<br />

8:15 – 9:30 pm Entertainment (Caribbean Ballroom VI and VII)<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 279<br />

Day 5: Friday, 14 January 2011 – Grower Day<br />

7:00 am – noon Registration (Foyer)<br />

7:00 – 8:00 am Continental Breakfast (Foyer)<br />

8:00 am – 12:45 pm Session 12 (Caribbean Ballroom IV and V)<br />

Grower Day – Megan Dewdney, Moderator<br />

8:00 – 9:30 am Take Home Messages: What Can Be Implemented Now or in the Near Future?<br />

8:00 HLB Pathology Lessons – M. Dewdney / T. Schubert<br />

8:30 Entomology Lessons – L.L. Stelinski / M. Sétamou<br />

9:00 Horticulture Lessons – C. Oswalt / E. Stover<br />

9:30 – 11:15 am Managing HLB in Florida and Brazil<br />

9:30 The Florida Experience – M. Irey<br />

10:00 The Brazil Experience – R. Bassanezi<br />

10:30 – 10:45 am Break (Foyer)<br />

10:45 Citrus Health <strong>Management</strong> Areas – M.E. Rogers<br />

11:15 – 12:15 pm WORKSHOP: Nutrition and Tree Health – T.M. Spann / J.H. Graham / Y. Xia<br />

12:15 – 12:45 pm Grower/Industry Responses – Jerry Newlin / Bobby Barben / Others<br />

12:45 – 2:15 pm Lunch and Keynote Lecture 5 (Caribbean Ballroom VI and VII)<br />

Sustaining Productivity in an Endemic HLB Environment – J. Ayres<br />

2:15 – 5:00 pm CHRP HLB Research Coordinating Group Meeting – G. Wisler, M.L. Polek<br />

(Boca Room II, III, and IV)<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 280<br />

A4. Session 9 Addendum<br />

Asian Citrus Psyllid<br />

<strong>Management</strong><br />

Extended Papers<br />

9.24 & 9.25<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 281<br />

9.24 Experimental Release Rate Analysis of Volatile Compounds from Wax-Based<br />

Dispensers<br />

Neuman, R.D., 1 Mills, D.R., 1 Shelton, A.B. 2<br />

1 Department of Chemical Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA<br />

2 Department of Aerospace Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA<br />

While long-term efforts against the citrus disease Huanglongbing focus on the bacteria<br />

responsible and plant resistance, a short-term tool for mitigation of the problem appears to be<br />

exploitation of dimethyl disulfide as a vector repellent. An experimental apparatus is set up to<br />

investigate the release of volatile substances from a wax-based dispenser under well-defined<br />

conditions of geometry, air flow, temperature, and surface area. The release rate is modeled as a<br />

convective mass transfer process taking place in laminar boundary layer flow parallel to a flat<br />

surface. The gas-phase mass-transfer coefficient and, hence, the release rate per unit surface area<br />

is predicted.<br />

Introduction<br />

The goal of this research project is an engineering evaluation of deployment strategies for<br />

dimethyl disulfide (DMDS) as an effective repellent of the Asian citrus psyllid in Florida orange<br />

groves. This study, per the research project deliverables, was to focus on wax-based dispensers.<br />

In particular, a flowable emulsified paraffin wax (SPLAT) manufactured and developed by ISCA<br />

Technologies was selected as a candidate DMDS dispenser because of its prior success in the<br />

delivery of a variety of semiochemicals for insect pest management. In addition, the rheological<br />

properties of SPLAT make it suitable for mechanical delivery using spray or drip applicator<br />

systems. Notwithstanding, the release rate of semiochemicals from SPLAT can be studied under<br />

controlled conditions using a model system of well-defined physical geometry, namely, a flat<br />

surface that permits improved experimental measurements that will advance the fundamental<br />

understanding of the release mechanism of semiochemicals from wax-based dispensers.<br />

Apparatus and Procedure<br />

A laboratory facility set up to investigate the release rate of DMDS was modified for the DMDS<br />

release experiments. The existing drying tray was replaced by a Lucite plate machined with a<br />

rectangle-shape well (25.4 mm wide × 76.2 mm long × 6.35 mm deep) designed to contain the<br />

emulsified paraffin wax dispenser. The tray was placed on a support that extends through the<br />

tunnel floor to an Ohaus electronic balance. Mass data were acquired through an RS-232 serial<br />

connection, and the data were logged using a VBA macro in MS Excel.<br />

The experimental procedures were as follows: prior to starting a release rate experiment,<br />

the fan speed and electrical heaters were adjusted to provide a bulk air velocity of about 1.4 m/s<br />

(or 3 mph) above the dispensing tray and a bulk air temperature of 43°C, respectively. The<br />

selected air velocity is representative of the average air velocity in Central Florida over a<br />

one-year period. Although the selected air temperature is somewhat higher than the summer<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 282<br />

temperatures in Central Florida, it represents a temperature that permits release rate<br />

measurements over long experimental time periods with reasonable accuracy. Twenty-four hours<br />

at minimum were allowed for apparatus stabilization. An experimental methodology was<br />

developed for spreading the SPLAT formulation with or without dimethyl disulfide in the tray<br />

well and smoothing it flush with the plate surface. The tray with the SPLAT-DMDS sample was<br />

immediately placed in the experimental apparatus, and mass data were collected as a function of<br />

time.<br />

The performance of SPLAT-DMDS formulations was initially evaluated by applying 1-g<br />

drip samples from a syringe onto roughened plastic strips hanging in crepe myrtle trees (to<br />

simulate drip applications in citrus groves for reference). The SPLAT-DMDS formulation<br />

consisted of ca. 39.6% solids (wax, soy oil, surfactant, antioxidant, etc.), 50.4% H 2 O, and 10.0%<br />

DMDS. Figure 1 shows the typical characteristics of the release rate as a function of time. Three<br />

regimes of mass loss are clearly evident: (a) an initial rapid loss, (b) a transition region, and (c)<br />

an approximate small linear decrease over time. After 6 hours of exposure to the elements, there<br />

was a mass loss of 33%; and after 24 hours, the mass loss was about 44%. In a little over 2 days,<br />

50% of the mass was lost in the simulated field experiment. It is important to recognize that the<br />

mass loss represents a combined loss of water (and other unknown volatiles or degradation<br />

products from the original proprietary SPLAT formulation) and DMDS, and as such, the actual<br />

loss of DMDS is difficult to resolve by gravimetric measurements alone. The lower horizontal<br />

line in Fig. 1 represents the best estimate of the dry solids in the proprietary SPLAT formulation.<br />

Results and Discussion<br />

Figure 2 shows the typical release rate behavior for the model (flat surface) system of a<br />

SPLAT-DMDS (10% w/w) formulation under controlled laboratory conditions of fixed airflow<br />

(ca. 1.4 m/s) and temperature (43°C) in the experimental apparatus. As before, there are three<br />

regimes of mass loss: (a) an initial rapid loss that appears to be linear with time, (b) a transition<br />

region, and (c) a much smaller rate of decrease over time. It is significant that the two release<br />

rate profiles are very similar for the small drip sample and the relatively large flat model system.<br />

The release rate of DMDS, which is the negative of the slope of the mass versus time curve,<br />

varies by about two orders of magnitude.<br />

An advantage of the experimental approach employed in this study is that the release rate<br />

can be modeled as a convective mass transfer process taking place in laminar boundary layer<br />

flow parallel to a flat surface. Therefore, the gas-phase mass-transfer coefficient and, hence, the<br />

mass transfer flux (or release rate per unit surface area) can be predicted for DMDS as well as for<br />

H 2 O under controlled conditions (such as air velocity, temperature, surface area, etc.) and<br />

compared with the experimental release rate data for SPLAT-DMDS formulations.<br />

The molecular diffusivity of DMDS in air and the vapor pressure of DMDS were evaluated<br />

using data provided in Table C-1 and Table C-2 of USEPA (1994). The molecular diffusivity<br />

(D AB ) of DMDS in air corrected for temperature (D AB is proportional to T 1.75 ) is estimated to be<br />

0.919 × 10 -5 m 2 /s at 43°C. For comparison, a diffusivity value of 1.02 × 10 -5 m 2 /s was calculated<br />

using the semi-empirical method of Fuller et al. (1966). The local convective (gas-phase)<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 283<br />

mass-transfer coefficient k c was evaluated for the case of laminar flow of fluid past a flat plate<br />

using the standard correlation equation for the Sherwood number in boundary-layer flow. The<br />

average value of k c over the SPLAT-DMDS surface of 3-inch length was determined to be 5.01<br />

× 10 -3 m/s. The mass transfer flux N A /A can be found as follows:<br />

N A /A = k c (C Ai − C AG )<br />

where N A is the mass transfer rate, A is the surface area of the solid (SPLAT), k c is the<br />

gas-phase convective mass transfer coefficient, C Ai is the concentration of the semiochemical<br />

(DMDS) in the fluid (air phase) just adjacent to the surface of the solid, and C AG is the<br />

concentration in the bulk air.<br />

The mass transfer flux and the rate of evaporative loss from a free surface of DMDS were<br />

calculated to be 1.65 g/s ⋅ m 2 and 11.3 g/h for the model system employed in this study. For<br />

these calculations, it was assumed that DMDS exists as a free liquid surface at the solid-air<br />

interface, and C Ai was evaluated by assuming that the DMDS-air mixture behaves as an ideal gas<br />

and that local equilibrium exists at the solid-air interface. Furthermore, the vapor pressure of<br />

DMDS was evaluated to be 9.20 kPa at 43°C using the Antoine equation coefficients of USEPA<br />

(1994). In a similar manner, under the conditions of the experimental measurements (ca. 10%<br />

relative humidity), the mass transfer flux, and the rate of evaporative loss from a free surface of<br />

H 2 O were estimated to be 0.269 g/s ⋅ m 2 and 1.85 g/h.<br />

It is possible to estimate with certain assumptions the combined release rate of DMDS and<br />

H 2 O from SPLAT-DMDS formulations in the initial rapid loss regime. SPLAT is a complex<br />

fluid (emulsified paraffin wax) with unique microstructure and, most certainly, is not<br />

homogeneous in the traditional sense. To a first approximation, the SPLAT-DMDS formulation<br />

can be thought of as a three-component system consisting of DMDS, H 2 O, and a hypothetical<br />

SPLAT (water-free) molecule with a weight-averaged molecular mass (418 Da) of the major<br />

constituents of the blank SPLAT formulation presumed to be 30% paraffin wax, 4% soy oil, 10%<br />

Span 60, and 5% vitamin E. Additionally, it can be assumed that domains of DMDS and H 2 O<br />

coexist at the surface of emulsified paraffin wax in admixture with added DMDS in the same<br />

ratio as that in the bulk phase. If so, and assuming that the surface area ratio is proportional to the<br />

volume ratio, the combined release rate of DMDS and H 2 O can be estimated to be 1.85 g/h for<br />

the SPLAT-DMDS formulation, whereas the release rate of H 2 O in the blank SPLAT<br />

formulation is estimated to be 0.85 g/h.<br />

In this initial study, a well-defined physical geometry (i.e., flat surface) was utilized for a<br />

simple experimental model of a wax-based (SPLAT) dispenser. As noted earlier, the mass loss or<br />

release rate was measured as a function of time for a SPLAT-DMDS (10% w/w) formulation<br />

(see Fig. 2). In addition, release rate-time curves were obtained for the same SPLAT-DMDS<br />

formulation, but for a sample of one-half the thickness, and for the blank (or control) SPLAT<br />

formulation. The release rate-time curves are not shown for the latter two cases because they are<br />

similar in features to that of Fig. 2. However, the details of the release rate-time curves are<br />

analyzed and discussed herein in order to shed new insight into the mechanism of the release of<br />

DMDS (and related volatile substances) from flowable wax-based dispensers.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 284<br />

First, the release rate of H 2 O from the blank SPLAT formulation (whose surface is<br />

estimated to consist of 46% water) was examined under the same experimental conditions as<br />

those employed for the SPLAT-DMDS (10% w/w) formulation. Once again, three regimes of<br />

mass loss are evident in the release rate-time curve. In the initial rapid loss regime, the mass<br />

versus time curve is found to be linear, and thus the release rate is constant. The constant rate<br />

was statistically measured to be 0.87 g/h. Significantly, this value for the release rate is found to<br />

be in excellent agreement with the theoretical calculations (0.85 g/h) of the mass loss of water<br />

from the blank SPLAT formulation. The constant rate period lasts for about 60 min under the<br />

experimental conditions employed in this study.<br />

A simple model which is consistent with these findings can explain the release of H 2 O<br />

from flowable wax-based dispensers based on SPLAT technology. The surface of a blank<br />

SPLAT formulation is assumed to consist of water domains and (water-free) SPLAT domains. In<br />

the constant release-rate regime, the water evaporates from the surface of the water domains.<br />

This water behaves as if the hydrocarbon components of SPLAT were not present. The rate of<br />

evaporation (or release rate) under the given conditions is independent of the (water-free)<br />

SPLAT and is essentially the same as the rate of evaporation from a free liquid surface. The<br />

constant rate period continues as long as water is supplied to the surface of the SPLAT<br />

formulation as fast as it is evaporated. Then at some point the release rate is no longer constant,<br />

and it continues to decrease with time. Initially, it may be that the wetted surface area decreases<br />

until the surface is completely dry and/or the evaporation slowly recedes into the interior of the<br />

SPLAT formulation with diffusion likely controlling the transport of water. The actual<br />

mechanisms involved in the movement of water in the SPLAT formulation are likely quite<br />

complicated. Shrinkage of the SPLAT formulation is observed to occur, and shrinkage further<br />

complicates the mechanism of the release of water (as well as other volatile substances such as<br />

DMDS).<br />

Second, the effect of added DMDS on the mass loss from SPLAT formulations was<br />

examined. From the results illustrated in Fig. 2, the mass loss is initially linear with time<br />

(constant rate period), and the release rate in the constant rate period was statistically measured<br />

to be 0.63 g/h for SPLAT-DMDS (10% w/w) formulations. Furthermore, the constant rate<br />

period lasts for about 150 min. Importantly, this release rate in the initial rapid loss regime is less<br />

than that for the blank SPLAT formulation. Also, it is significantly lower than that of the<br />

theoretical calculations (1.85 g/h) for the combined mass loss of both water and DMDS from<br />

the SPLAT-DMDS formulation. In marked contrast, the results are in much better agreement<br />

with the theoretical calculations (0.86 g/h) that assume the mass loss results from only water. In<br />

the case of SPLAT-DMDS formulations, chemical (interaction) effects appear to strongly<br />

influence the mass loss in the constant rate period as opposed to the former case of the blank<br />

SPLAT formulation. DMDS is essentially insoluble in water, whereas it is completely soluble in<br />

many organic solvents. Although the release of DMDS is detected during the experimental<br />

measurements, it is likely that DMDS preferentially partitions into the (water-free)<br />

hydrocarbonaceous SPLAT domains. Therefore, the combined release rate of DMDS and water<br />

in SPLAT-DMDS formulations appears to be affected by both chemical and structural effects,<br />

whereas the release rate of water in blank SPLAT formulations appears to be only affected by<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 285<br />

structural effects. Clearly, much remains to be learned about the mechanisms of the release of<br />

volatile substances in flowable wax-based dispensers.<br />

Third, the effect of sample thickness on the mass loss from SPLAT-DMDS formulations<br />

was also examined. A release rate-time curve was obtained for the same SPLAT-DMDS (10%<br />

w/w) formulation, but for a sample of one-half the thickness (0.317 mm). Again, the release rate<br />

initially was linear with time. Significantly, the rate of mass loss in the constant rate period was<br />

statistically measured to be 0.64 g/h, a value essentially the same as the release rate (0.63 g/h)<br />

for the thicker SPLAT-DMDS formulation. Clearly, the thickness of the SPLAT-DMDS<br />

formulation does not significantly influence the mass loss in the constant rate period of<br />

volatilization. Indeed, this behavior is what is to be expected on the basis of the simple model;<br />

that is, the release rate is independent of the thickness of the SPLAT formulation in the constant<br />

rate regime. However, the time for a specific mass loss is directly proportional to the thickness<br />

(or diameter of sphere) of the formulation sample. Also, the experimental measurements confirm<br />

that the time duration of the constant rate period is not as long in samples of smaller thickness.<br />

Conclusions<br />

An experimental apparatus was set up to investigate the release of volatile substances such as<br />

DMDS from a flowable wax-based dispenser under controlled and well-defined conditions of<br />

physical geometry, air flow, temperature, surface area, etc. A simple model that reasonably<br />

explains the release rate behavior observed in SPLAT formulations without and with added<br />

DMDS is proposed. Although high-quality mass loss measurements were obtained, it is difficult<br />

to resolve unambiguously the actual DMDS loss. Future studies should simultaneously measure<br />

the sulfur content to obtain an improved understanding of the coupled mass transfer processes<br />

involved in wax-based dispensers. The experimental apparatus can be improved by equipping it<br />

with multi-channel tray wells for chemical analysis sampling, on-line analytical sensors,<br />

feedback control for improved temperature stability, and redesigned support/balance for refined<br />

mass measurements.<br />

References<br />

Fuller, E., Schettler, P., Giddings, J. 1966. A new method for prediction of binary gas-phase<br />

diffusion coefficients. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 58:19-27.<br />

USEPA. 1994. Air Emissions Models for Waste and Wastewater, Technical Report<br />

EPA-453/R-94-080A (Environmental Protection Agency).<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 286<br />

Fig. 1. Release rate-time curve for simulated field test of SPLAT-DMDS formulation.<br />

Fig. 2. Release rate-time curve for model system of SPLAT-DMDS formulation.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 287<br />

9.25 Vegetation Canopy Airflow Modeling for Airborne Dispersion of DMDS<br />

Shelton, A.B., Neuman, R.D.<br />

1 Department of Aerospace Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA<br />

2 Department of Chemical Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA<br />

While long-term efforts against the citrus disease Huanglongbing focus on the bacteria<br />

responsible and plant resistance, a short-term tool for mitigation of the problem appears to be<br />

exploitation of dimethyl disulfide as a vector repellent. A computational fluid dynamics model of<br />

airflow in and around vegetation is used to examine the airborne dispersion of dimethyl disulfide<br />

vapor within a citrus orchard under a narrowly-scoped set of conditions.<br />

Introduction<br />

Spray, deposition, and volatilization of pesticides or repellents in agricultural fields and orchards<br />

are highly dependent upon the local meteorological conditions. Since both mean advection and<br />

turbulent diffusion have a direct effect on the overall dispersion of the active ingredients, the<br />

complex aerodynamic interactions between plants and atmosphere can strongly affect local air<br />

quality and efficacy of the application. The scope of the current work is the post-volatilization<br />

airborne dispersion of dimethyl disulfide (DMDS) within a citrus orchard as a potential repellent<br />

for the Asian citrus psyllid. The objective is to mathematically model and numerically simulate<br />

the aerodynamic effects induced by citrus vegetation canopy drag on the local wind and<br />

turbulence fields in and around a typical orchard configuration. Since the roughness layer of<br />

canopy flow is quite different from typical turbulent boundary layer flow, this detail requires<br />

special attention. The various vegetation elements (e.g., branches, stems, leaves, fruits, seeds,<br />

etc.) impart drag on the flow with a corresponding increase in wake turbulence at length scales<br />

smaller than the background shear-generated turbulence. However, instead of a simple<br />

superposition of the small-scale turbulent fluctuations from vegetation element wakes onto the<br />

standard boundary layer fluctuations, large and intermittent coherent structures dominate canopy<br />

turbulence (Finnigan, 2000). The result is a bypass of the classical energy dissipation cascade for<br />

wall-bounded flows.<br />

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is capable of describing these flow details by<br />

numerically solving the physical conservation laws of mass, momentum, and energy. However,<br />

the foremost challenge to computing resources is the wide range of spatial and temporal scales<br />

involved in turbulent flows. To further complicate matters, the scales of interest are much<br />

typically larger than the individual vegetation elements responsible for the dominant flow<br />

characteristics. A fully resolved, three-dimensional, unsteady solution is simply impractical for<br />

analysis of realistic flowfields; therefore, the mathematical model must represent the<br />

phenomenology described above in some average sense. The Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes<br />

(RANS) formulation involves time averaging of the governing equations, requiring modeling of<br />

the overall effect of the <strong>entire</strong> turbulent energy spectrum on the mean flow. Furthermore, the<br />

<strong>entire</strong> vegetation canopy is viewed as porous body with through flow (Finnigan et al., 2009;<br />

Katul et al., 2004; Shaw and Patton, 2003). Due to a combination of economy and accuracy, the<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 288<br />

RANS porous body approach is playing an increasing role in a wide range of vegetation<br />

aerodynamic analyses including agricultural spray drift and deposition (Da Silva, 2006), forest<br />

windthrow (Frank and Ruck, 2008), air quality windbreak (shelterbelt) (Rosenfeld et al., 2010),<br />

and street canyon plantings (Gromke et al., 2008). The current work utilizes a RANS k − ω<br />

formulation (Sogachev, 2009; Sogachev and Panferov, 2006) that includes vegetation effects<br />

implemented through source terms in the momentum and turbulence model closure equations.<br />

Airflow Mathematical Model<br />

Basic Turbulence Formulation<br />

The standard way of coping with wide-ranging scales is to apply an averaging process to the<br />

flowfield and postulate a strategy for the closure problem of unresolved (small scales) effects<br />

upon the mean (extensive details may be found in Pope (2000)). In the approach taken here, the<br />

<strong>entire</strong> effect of turbulent motion on the mean flow is reduced to a contribution to an effective<br />

viscosity μ + μ t . On dimensional grounds, the eddy viscosity may be written μ t = ρk⁄ ω,<br />

where k is the turbulent kinetic energy and ω is the specific dissipation rate. The flowfield<br />

solution requires solving the turbulence closure model equations in addition to the classical<br />

conservation laws. The rate of change of mean momentum, mean volatile concentration,<br />

turbulent kinetic energy, and specific dissipation rate are<br />

ρ D Dt u j =<br />

∂<br />

T u<br />

∂x ij + S u j , ρ D<br />

i Dt φ = ∂<br />

T φ<br />

∂x i<br />

+ S φ<br />

i<br />

ρ D Dt k = ∂<br />

T k<br />

∂x i + P − D + S k , ρ D<br />

i Dt ω = ∂<br />

T ω ω<br />

∂x i + C ω1<br />

i k P − C ω<br />

ω2 D + Sω<br />

k<br />

The transport terms are<br />

T ij = − p̂ + 2 3 ρk δ ij + (μ + μ t ) ∂u i<br />

∂x j<br />

+ ∂u j<br />

∂x i<br />

<br />

T i φ = μ Sc + μ t<br />

σ φ<br />

∂φ<br />

∂x i<br />

, T i k = μ + μ t<br />

σ κ<br />

∂k<br />

∂x i<br />

, T i ω = μ + μ t<br />

σ ω<br />

∂ω<br />

∂x i<br />

where the pressure includes the hydrostatic contribution p̂ = p + ρgz. The shear production<br />

and viscous dissipation appearing in the turbulence closure are<br />

P = μ t<br />

∂u i<br />

∂x j<br />

∂u i<br />

∂x j<br />

+ ∂u j<br />

∂x i<br />

, D = C μ ρkω<br />

The purpose of the additional source terms S (·) in the transport equations is to provide modeling<br />

flexibility. In the present application, S φ allows definition of the release rate and release<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 289<br />

points(s) of volatile material into the air environment, while S j u , S k , and S ω serve to mimic the<br />

important subscale effects of vegetation on the flow.<br />

The standard Wilcox k − ω model (Wilcox, 1998) uses the following model constants and<br />

turbulent Prandtl/Schmidt numbers: C μ = 9⁄ 100, C ω1 = 13⁄ 25, C ω2 = 100⁄ 125, σ k = σ ω = 2,<br />

and σ φ = 9⁄ 10. The molecular Schmidt number is Sc = μ/ρD φ , where the diffusivity D φ is a<br />

material property of the passive scaler.<br />

Vegetation Effects<br />

Since the details of individual vegetation elements are beyond the resolution requirements of a<br />

reasonable simulation, the vegetation crown is considered a porous body with through flow. This<br />

approach treats the effects of the unresolved vegetation on the flow as a local volume-averaged<br />

body force term due to aerodynamic drag. The conventional parameterization of the body force<br />

is<br />

f j = −ρC D Au j u j (no summation).<br />

Given a particular vegetation type and canopy configuration, the fundamental challenge is to<br />

determine an appropriate value of the drag index C D A, where C D is the form drag coefficient and<br />

A is an appropriate frontal area per unit volume. Traditionally, A is taken as the leaf area<br />

density (LAD), defined as the total one-sided surface area of leaves per unit volume of canopy.<br />

In the context of vegetation canopy flow, the terms P and D represent “free-air” turbulent<br />

kinetic energy production and dissipation, respectively. Due to interaction of the vegetation with<br />

the flow, the production is enhanced by the rate at which the mean flow does work against drag,<br />

while the dissipation is enhanced by the rate at which turbulent fluctuations do work against drag<br />

(Finnigan, 2000). Production and dissipation of turbulent kinetic energy due to the unresolved<br />

vegetation thus take the form<br />

P v = β p ρc d<br />

a(u i u i ) 3⁄ 2 , D v = β d ρc d a(u i u i ) 1⁄ 2 k<br />

where β p and β d are additional turbulence model constants. The baseline form of the source<br />

terms for vegetation canopy / boundary layer flow are<br />

S j u = f j , S k = P v − D v , S ω = α p<br />

ω<br />

k Pv − α d<br />

ω<br />

k Dv<br />

Analytically-derived model constants are summarized in Sogachev and Panferov (2006) as<br />

β p = 1, β d = 4, and α p = α d = 1⁄ 2.<br />

The implementation of vegetation contributions to the turbulence model equations as<br />

described above is common in practice (Da Silva, 2006; Endalew et al., 2009). However, the<br />

essential link between turbulent kinetic energy and total dissipation is broken since the<br />

conservation equation for ω is reduced to the role of an additional contribution of dissipation D<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 290<br />

compared to D v . A modification of the vegetation element drag formulation (Sogachev and<br />

Panferov, 2006) relies on two assumptions. First, the additional dissipation observed within a<br />

vegetation canopy compared to open regions is due to the slower decay of dissipation rather than<br />

increased production of dissipation. Second, at the scale of the vegetation elements, the<br />

production of turbulent kinetic energy is almost instantly balanced by its dissipation into heat.<br />

The recommended form (Sogachev, 2009) for vegetation canopy flow is<br />

S j u = f j , S k = 0, S ω = −(C ω1 − C ω2 )D v ω k<br />

where the dissipation model constant is β d = 12C μ .<br />

Numerical Solution<br />

In the scope of the present work, the mean wind is steady and unidirectional and the flow is in<br />

equilibrium with the present ground conditions. The left/right and back/front boundaries of the<br />

simulation domain are periodic pairs. The flow is driven from the sky above by prescribed values<br />

of ambient quantities and from buoyancy below by differing surface temperatures corresponding<br />

to shade and full sun. The ceiling is placed at an altitude above ground level of 10H, where H =<br />

4.6 m is the height of the hedge. The hedge width (shade) and hedge gap (full sun) spacings are<br />

assumed as W = H and G = H/2, respectively.<br />

The computational mesh is comprised of Cartesian control volumes. Since the mesh<br />

spacing implies the averaging volume of the vegetation body force on the airflow, care must be<br />

taken to ensure that the mesh spacing is large enough to eliminate details of the vegetation<br />

elements, but remain small enough to accurately resolve the characteristic variations of the<br />

airflow and scalar concentration. For elevations z < 2H near the vegetation canopy, the mesh<br />

has a uniform spacing of Δx = Δy = Δz = 0.1 m. For elevations z > 2H, the mesh is<br />

stretched in the vertical direction at a geometric rate of 1.1.<br />

Using the commercially available software STAR-CCM+, the equations of motion are<br />

discretized with a density-based finite volume formulation and solved with an iterative implicit<br />

scheme. The various vegetation drag source terms are implemented through user-defined field<br />

functions. The implementation here does not consider variation in the drag force density within<br />

the canopy (i.e., from trunk to crown). A drag coefficient of C D = 0.3 is typical for vegetation<br />

and accounts for element deformation and sheltering. For citrus, the leaf area density is A =<br />

6.5 m −1 (Farooq and Salyani, 2004).<br />

While air is modeled as a perfect gas with constant transport properties, DMDS is modeled<br />

as a passive scalar having a constant diffusivity into air of D = 0.0834 cm 2 /s (USEPA, 1994).<br />

The Schmidt number is Sc = 1.92. A volumetric source prescribes the release point and rate of<br />

DMDS into the air environment as<br />

φ<br />

s release<br />

= ṁ φ release<br />

V<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 291<br />

where V is the local mesh cell volume. The release is assumed to have a concentration of pure<br />

DMDS (φ release = 1 g/g) at a rate of ṁ = 0.2 g/d. Since the airflow itself is periodic across<br />

the simulation domain, a volumetric sink prescribes absorption of DMDS in a region located<br />

near the outflow boundary as<br />

φ<br />

s absorb<br />

= − ρφ τ<br />

V1<br />

3<br />

, τ = ⁄<br />

(u i u i ) 1⁄<br />

2<br />

to prevent recirculation of the passive scalar. The absorption timescale τ is simply the advection<br />

time across a mesh cell.<br />

The boundary condition for winds aloft is based on a log-layer atmospheric boundary layer<br />

u = u ∗<br />

κ log z − d 0<br />

<br />

where the von Karman constant is κ = 0.41 and the roughness and displacement heights are<br />

assumed as z 0 ⁄ H = 0.01 and d 0 ⁄ H = 0.7, respectively. For equilibrium flow, dissipation of<br />

kinetic energy equals its production, D k = p k , resulting in<br />

k = u ∗ 2<br />

, ω =<br />

C μ<br />

z 0<br />

u3<br />

∗<br />

C μ κ(z−d 0 )k<br />

Given a target altitude z 1 and corresponding wind speed u(z 1 ), the friction velocity u ∗ may be<br />

computed to yield κ(z) and ω(z). The Florida Automated Weather <strong>Network</strong> (FAWN) records a<br />

host of ambient field conditions, including temperature and wind data at an altitude of z 1 =<br />

10 m above ground level. Typical ambient values of wind speed and temperature are assumed as<br />

u(z 1 ) = 2.5 m/s and T a = 303 K. Furthermore, it is assumed that the full-shade ground surface<br />

temperature is ambient T a , while the full-sun ground surface temperature is T s = 323 K.<br />

Results<br />

Numerical solution of the flow model described above provides the steady state concentration<br />

field of DMDS. Figure 1 shows the plume geometry resulting from airflow oblique to the<br />

hedgerows by a series of isosurfaces. Selected isosurface levels are by decades, with the highest<br />

concentration value of 10 ppb likely to be in excess of the human olfactory threshold (MSDS,<br />

2011). Solutions were also computed for airflow parallel and perpendicular to the hedgerows but<br />

are unlikely scenarios in practice and not shown here. All cases show that with increasing<br />

distance from the point source, the plume spreads and the maximum concentration decreases,<br />

both at a rapid rate consistent with the high diffusivity of DMDS into air. Furthermore, the right<br />

image shows that DMDS concentration in excess of the 10 ppb barrier is confined to a relatively<br />

small volume as a vertical column having a diameter of ca. H/10. Coverage of 0.1 ppb is<br />

obtained in a region that is 1H to 2H wide for a distance of 5H downwind. Proposed future work<br />

includes multiple point sources with an optimization algorithm to drive the source location and<br />

release rate for desired coverage and concentration.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org


P a g e | 292<br />

References<br />

Da Silva, A. 2006. A Lagrangian model for spray behaviour within vine canopies. Aerosol<br />

Science 37:658-674.<br />

Endalew, A., Hertog, M., Gebreslasie Gebrehiwot, M., Balemans, M., Ramon, H., Nicolaï, B.,<br />

Verboven, P. 2009. Modelling airflow within model plant canopies using an integrated<br />

approach. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 66:9-24.<br />

Farooq, M., Salyani, M. 2004. Modeling of spray penetration and deposition on citrus tree<br />

canopies. Transactions of the ASAE 47:619-627.<br />

Finnigan, J. 2000. Turbulence in plant canopies. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 32:519-571.<br />

Finnigan, J., Shaw, R., Patton, E. 2009. Turbulence structure above a vegetation canopy. Journal<br />

of Fluid Mechanics 637:387-424.<br />

Frank, C., Ruck, B. 2008. Numerical study of the airflow over forest clearings. Forestry 81:259-<br />

277.<br />

Gromke, C. Buccolieri, R., Di Sabatino, S., Ruck, B. 2008. Dispersion study in a street canyon<br />

with tree planting by means of wind tunnel and numerical investigations—evaluation of<br />

CFD data with experimental data. Atmospheric Environment 42:8640-8650.<br />

Katul, G., Mahrt, L., Poggi, D., Sanz, C. 2004. One- and two-equation models for canopy<br />

turbulence. Boundary Layer Meteorology 113:81-109.<br />

MSDS. 2011. Dimethyl disulfide. Material Safety Data Sheet. Product code: 000719. Version<br />

1.5. Issued on: 08/25/2011. Arkema Inc., King of Prussia, Pennsylvania.<br />

Pope, S. 2000. Turbulent Flows. Cambridge University Press.<br />

Rosenfeld, M., Marom, G., Bitan, A. 2010. Numerical simulation of the airflow across trees in a<br />

wind-break. Boundary Layer Meteorology 135:89-107.<br />

Shaw, R., Patton, E. 2003. Canopy element influences on resolved- and subgrid-scale energy<br />

within a large-eddy simulation. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 115:5-17.<br />

Sogachev, A. 2009. A note on two-equation closure modelling of canopy flow. Boundary Layer<br />

Meteorology 130:423-435.<br />

Sogachev, A., Panferov, O. 2006. Modification of two-equation models to account for plant drag.<br />

Boundary Layer Meteorology 121:229-266.<br />

USEPA. 1994. Air Emissions Models for Waste and Wastewater. Technical Report EPA-453/R-<br />

94-080A. Environmental Protection Agency.<br />

Wilcox, D. 1998. Turbulence Modeling for CFD. DCW Industries.<br />

Fig. 1. Perspective view of DMDS plume with flow from front-right to back-left, oblique to<br />

hedge. The light grey isosurfaces indicate the plume boundary encapsulating concentrations of at<br />

least 0.1 ppb (left), 1 ppb (middle), and 10 ppb (right) for a point release at a rate of 0.2 g/d.<br />

IRCHLB Proceedings Jan 2011: www.plantmanagementnetwork.org

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!