29.05.2014 Views

liv poz mag.qxd - Positive Living BC

liv poz mag.qxd - Positive Living BC

liv poz mag.qxd - Positive Living BC

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The bottom line<br />

Is rectal mucus a source of HIV transmission?<br />

by Chuck Osborne<br />

rectal mucus a source of HIV transmission? There have<br />

Isbeen few studies conducted on rectal secretions and HIV<br />

plasma load, but the limited data does point to the probability<br />

that rectal mucus has a higher concentration of HIV than<br />

other bodily fluids such as blood or semen.<br />

Rectal mucus is a natural-forming substance that occurs when<br />

the bowels contract to allow smooth passage of stool. In most people,<br />

this only happens in small amounts. Most rectal mucus discharges<br />

are benign, but there are many conditions that can cause abnormal<br />

or excessive discharge. Amongst these could be hemorrhoids, anal<br />

fissures, prolapses, and warts. Crohn’s disease, colitis, rectal ulcers,<br />

anal tuberculosis, or any number of sexually transmitted infections<br />

(STIs), as well as some AIDS-defining illnesses, could also be responsible.<br />

It’s also normal that rectal mucus can consist of a litany of<br />

fluids, the most evident being blood.<br />

The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention do not<br />

specifically list rectal mucus as a source of HIV transmission,<br />

and very few other agencies mention this fluid by name; however,<br />

the general reference to vaginal or anal fluids presumably<br />

includes anal mucus.<br />

The US Centers for Disease<br />

Control and Prevention do not<br />

specifically list rectal<br />

mucus as a source of HIV<br />

transmission, and very few<br />

other agencies mention this<br />

fluid by name.<br />

Nevertheless, scientists have been aware that rectal fluids<br />

can be a source of infection since Dennis Osmond’s report<br />

from the University of California, San Francisco, in 1998.<br />

There appear to be only two studies of note that have<br />

attempted to measure levels of viral load in rectal mucus.<br />

The first, conducted in 2000 by investigators at the Center for<br />

AIDS & STD at the University of Washington in Seattle, found<br />

only one man out of 54 participants with blood plasma viral<br />

loads below 50 copies/mL who had detectable HIV virus in<br />

rectal secretions. The other study, conducted in 2004 by<br />

Zuckerman et al, again at the University of Washington,<br />

compared viral loads in the blood, semen, and mucosal lining<br />

of the rectum in 64 gay men in the US and Peru. Viral loads<br />

tended to be higher in rectal mucus.<br />

Bodily fluids and their risk factor<br />

in HIV transmission<br />

HIV is not present in:<br />

• Urine<br />

• Feces<br />

• Vomit<br />

• Sweat<br />

HIV is present in negligible (non-infectious) quantities in:<br />

• Sa<strong>liv</strong>a (only detected in a very small number of people)<br />

• Tears<br />

• Blister fluid<br />

HIV is present in sufficient (infectious) quantities in:<br />

• Rectal lubricating secretions (in very high concentrations)<br />

• Blood and blood products<br />

• Semen and pre-ejaculate (pre-cum)<br />

• Vaginal/cervical secretions or juices<br />

• Breast milk<br />

Zuckerman’s study fails to note that of 63 patients, only 27<br />

were on antiretroviral therapy and only 18 had undetectable<br />

viral loads. The study also doesn’t address how long the viral load<br />

was non-detectable before biopsy, or the type of antiretrovirals<br />

participants were taking.<br />

We know from many other studies that some people can have<br />

undetectable viral load in their blood but detectable viral loads in<br />

either genital secretions or sperm. Scientists believe that this may<br />

be more likely to happen in people who have STIs or even<br />

asymptomatic herpes (that is, herpes with no visible symptoms).<br />

The bottom line is that when engaging in anal sex, it’s<br />

always wise to use precautions. 5<br />

Chuck Osborne is a volunteer with <strong>BC</strong>PWA’s<br />

Prevention and Treatment Information Programs.<br />

8 <strong>liv</strong>ing5 MayqJune 2010

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!