31.05.2014 Views

From the Editor - Prison Legal News

From the Editor - Prison Legal News

From the Editor - Prison Legal News

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Cost Shifting (cont.)<br />

community. 51 What <strong>the</strong>se figures mean is<br />

that one in every 136 U.S. residents was in<br />

prison or jail. 52 There were 1,446,269 people<br />

in prison, and 747,529 people in jail, 53 figures<br />

representing a 1.7 percent growth in prison<br />

and a 4.7 percent growth in jail populations. 54<br />

Over 4.1 million people were on probation,<br />

and 784,408 people were on parole. 55 By<br />

yearend 2005 both <strong>the</strong> probation and parole<br />

populations had grown, 0.5 percent and 1.6<br />

percent respectively. 56 Fifty- five percent of<br />

those on probation are white, 30 percent are<br />

African-American, and 13 percent are Latina.<br />

57 Parole data show whites comprised 41<br />

percent, African-Americans, 40 percent, and<br />

Latinos, 18 percent of adults on parole. 58<br />

Along with <strong>the</strong> burgeoning population of<br />

people in jails and prisons or on probation<br />

or parole, <strong>the</strong> cost of <strong>the</strong> criminal justice<br />

system has grown, leading policymakers and<br />

legislators scrambling to find new sources of<br />

revenue without jeopardizing <strong>the</strong>ir political<br />

futures by raising taxes.<br />

Jail Fees are Common, and Costly<br />

In 2005 <strong>the</strong> U.S. Department of Justice,<br />

National Institute of Corrections<br />

surveyed state jails across <strong>the</strong> country “[t]<br />

o explore <strong>the</strong> extent to which local jails<br />

are charging fees to jail inmates,” “[t]o<br />

learn <strong>the</strong> actual amounts of <strong>the</strong> fees that<br />

are being charged and <strong>the</strong> revenues that<br />

are being generated,” and “[t]o learn jail<br />

managers’ views on <strong>the</strong> effectiveness of<br />

charging fees.” 59 This 2005 survey does not<br />

reflect a representative national sample,<br />

however it does provide “substantial<br />

information on jails’ current practices<br />

related to charging inmates for programs<br />

and services.” 60<br />

The report classifies jail fees as ei<strong>the</strong>r a<br />

“‘program fee’ . . . charged to jail inmates<br />

Hot Sexy Pics!<br />

1000S OF HOT! HOT! HOT!<br />

BLACK, EUROPEAN AND SPANISH<br />

GIRLS IN BIKINIS, THONGS,<br />

SHORTS AND MINIS!<br />

$3.00 for info $5.00 for a catalog<br />

$10.00 for a catalog and 8x10<br />

autographed picture. Full New Book<br />

Stamps accepted for payment.<br />

New & Highly Advertised site!<br />

www.writesomeoneinprison.com<br />

Nubian Princess Ent.<br />

POB 37<br />

Timmonsville, SC 29161<br />

April 2008<br />

who are participating in a program that<br />

is not a basic element of jail operations,<br />

or who are receiving a program-related<br />

service”; 61 or, alternatively, as non-program<br />

fees assessed in relation to everyday facility<br />

operations and services. 62 The purposes of<br />

non-program fees are to offset administrative<br />

costs, <strong>the</strong> costs of housing prisoners,<br />

costs of providing routine services (like<br />

phone service and hair cuts), <strong>the</strong> expense of<br />

medical services, and to deter <strong>the</strong> frivolous<br />

use of medical services. 63 Ninety percent of<br />

<strong>the</strong> jails that responded were charging jail inmate<br />

fees, 64 with <strong>the</strong> most common charges<br />

being in <strong>the</strong> “non-program” fee category for<br />

health-related services, like prescriptions (59<br />

percent of respondents) and physician visits<br />

(59 percent of respondents), and participation<br />

in work release programs (58 percent<br />

of respondents). These findings corroborate<br />

those of a 1997 NIC study of <strong>the</strong> largest jails<br />

nationwide that found “charging of inmate<br />

fees is both prevalent and increasing among<br />

<strong>the</strong> agencies surveyed,” with <strong>the</strong> most common<br />

charges imposed for medical care and<br />

participation in work release programs, and<br />

<strong>the</strong> most revenues generated by telephone<br />

services, work release programs, and home<br />

detention. 65<br />

The table below summarizes <strong>the</strong><br />

prevalence of jail fees and was created by<br />

6<br />

<strong>the</strong> 2005 NIC Jail Fees Report of 2004<br />

jail revenues. The NIC report captured<br />

program and non-program categories, as<br />

well as <strong>the</strong> number of agencies assessing<br />

<strong>the</strong> fee and <strong>the</strong> total annual revenues received<br />

from all survey respondents.<br />

State jail officials regularly collect fees<br />

from prisoners by deducting <strong>the</strong> fees from<br />

funds – often deposited by family members<br />

– in prisoner accounts and by taking<br />

cash directly from <strong>the</strong>m upon arrest. In a<br />

2006 lawsuit challenging collection practices<br />

in Kenton and Campbell counties<br />

in Kentucky, a federal court upheld <strong>the</strong><br />

jails’ right to deduct money directly from<br />

commissary accounts of jail prisoners. 66<br />

Kenton County Attorney Garry Edmondson<br />

called <strong>the</strong> decision “an important<br />

victory for all counties,” concluding “[t]<br />

he order recognizes that inmates, not <strong>the</strong><br />

taxpayers, should bear <strong>the</strong> costs of <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

67 68<br />

own incarceration.”<br />

Dean v. Lehman, 69 a 2001 case decided<br />

by <strong>the</strong> Washington State Supreme<br />

Court, also addressed <strong>the</strong> legality of automatic<br />

deduction of funds from inmate<br />

accounts. RCW 72.09.480(2), a 1995 state<br />

statute, “authoriz[ed] specified deductions<br />

from any outside funds sent to DOC<br />

inmates.” 70<br />

Husbands and wives depositing funds<br />

Fee category Number of Agencies revenues<br />

A<br />

assessing this fee<br />

Medical care 121 $1,506,000<br />

(Including several sub-categories of<br />

services; see pp. 18-27 for details)<br />

Telephone use 87 4,465,000<br />

Per diem 77 7,213,000<br />

(Including comprehensive per diem<br />

fees plus separate food- and housingspecific<br />

fees)<br />

Booking 73 4,346,000<br />

Photocopying 69 137,000<br />

Barber/hair care 52 31,000<br />

Bonding 33 631,000<br />

Escort 31 28,000<br />

Notary service 20 303<br />

Laundry 12 136,000<br />

Check processing 5 6,000<br />

Detoxification on intake 2 25,000<br />

Source: Barbara Krauth & Karin Stayton, U.S. Dept’ of Justice, Nat’l Inst. of Corr., Fees Paid by Jail<br />

Inmates: Fee Categories, Revenues, and Management Perspectives in a Sample of U.S. Jails, 17 (Connie<br />

Clem, ed., 2005)<br />

<strong>Prison</strong> <strong>Legal</strong> <strong>News</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!