04.06.2014 Views

University of Botswana Law Journal - PULP

University of Botswana Law Journal - PULP

University of Botswana Law Journal - PULP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL<br />

The <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> is a peer refereed journal published twice a year. It provides a forum<br />

for scholars and practitioners to reflect on diverse legal issues <strong>of</strong> national, regional and international significance<br />

and <strong>of</strong> local and regional relevance.<br />

PATRON<br />

The Hon. Justice Nganunu, Chief Justice <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong>.<br />

INTERNATIONAL EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARD<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. D. D. N. Nsereko, Judge, International<br />

Criminal Court, The Hague, The Netherlands<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. W. Du Plessis<br />

Faculty <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong>, North-West <strong>University</strong><br />

(Potchefstroom Campus), South Africa.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. T. Maluwa<br />

H. Laddie and Linda P. Montague Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong>,<br />

Dickinson School <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong>, Penn. State <strong>University</strong>,<br />

USA.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. M. Reisman<br />

Myres McDougal Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong>, Yale <strong>Law</strong><br />

School, New Haven, USA.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. K. Frimpong<br />

Ghana Institute <strong>of</strong> Management and Public<br />

Administration, (GIMPA), Accra, Ghana<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. S. Roberts<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong>, London School <strong>of</strong> Economics,<br />

United Kingdom.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. A. McCall Smith<br />

Edinburgh <strong>Law</strong> School, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Edinburgh,<br />

United Kingdom.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. C. Forsyth<br />

Faculty <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong>, Robinson College, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Cambridge, United Kingdom.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. B. Othlogile<br />

Vice Chancellor, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong>.<br />

Dr. A. Molokomme<br />

Attorney-General, <strong>Botswana</strong>.<br />

EDITORIAL BOARD<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Peter Takirambudde<br />

Editor-in-Chief, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong>.<br />

Mrs. E. Macharia-Mokobi<br />

Secretary, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong>.<br />

Dr. K. Solo<br />

<strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong>.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. C. Ngongola<br />

<strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong>.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. J. Kiggundu<br />

<strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong>.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. E. K. Quansah<br />

<strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong>.<br />

Dr. O. B. Tshosa<br />

<strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong>.<br />

Mr. T. Sebego<br />

Vice chairman, <strong>Law</strong> Society <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong><br />

SUBMISSIONS<br />

All correspondence concerning articles and other<br />

submissions should be addressed to:<br />

The Editor-in-Chief<br />

<strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Journal</strong><br />

Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong><br />

<strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong><br />

Private Bag UB 00705 Gaborone<br />

<strong>Botswana</strong><br />

Email submissions: ublj@mopipi.ub.bw<br />

Guidelines on the preparation and submission <strong>of</strong><br />

articles and other contributions can be found on the<br />

inside back cover <strong>of</strong> each issue. More detailed<br />

guidelines will be supplied on request.<br />

SUBSCRIPTIONS<br />

All business correspondence, including orders and remittances relating to subscriptions as well as advertising<br />

should be addressed to the Editor-in-Chief.<br />

SUBSCRIPTION RATES (All rates include postage)<br />

Annual institutional rate<br />

(Africa) P 280 (US $50).<br />

Annual institutional rate<br />

(Europe and America) P 400 (US $80)<br />

Annual individual rate<br />

(Africa) P 100 (US $ 20)<br />

Annual individual rate<br />

(Europe and America) P 200 (US $40)<br />

The mode <strong>of</strong> citation <strong>of</strong> this <strong>Journal</strong> is:<br />

11 UBLJ (2010)<br />

©UBLJ, 2010. All rights reserved. No part <strong>of</strong> this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or<br />

transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning or<br />

otherwise, without the written permission <strong>of</strong> the publisher.<br />

ISSN 1817-2733<br />

THE WORLD BANK<br />

Washington, D.C.


UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL<br />

VOLUME 11 DECEMBER 2010<br />

ARTICLES<br />

Foreign Aid, the Rule <strong>of</strong> Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong>, and Economic Development.........3<br />

in Africa<br />

N.A.Curott<br />

Paradigm Shifts in International Justice and the Duty to Protect: ............19<br />

In Search <strong>of</strong> an Action Principle<br />

P. Glen<br />

The Right to Maternal Health Care: Developing International ................39<br />

Human Rights <strong>Law</strong> to Prevent Maternal Mortality<br />

L. S. Johnson<br />

Between Judicial Enabling and Adversarialism: The Role <strong>of</strong> ..................81<br />

the Judicial Officer in Protecting the Unrepresented Accused<br />

in <strong>Botswana</strong> in a Comparative Perspective<br />

R.J.V. Cole<br />

Competition and Regulation in the Gold Industry:.................................117<br />

An American Perspective<br />

J. Wilkerson<br />

Procurement <strong>Law</strong> in Nigeria: Challenge for Attainment........................131<br />

<strong>of</strong> its Objectives<br />

O.A. Jacob<br />

COMMENTS<br />

Principled Leadership: Finding Common Ground Among.....................153<br />

Divergent Philosophies<br />

V.D. Lopez JD<br />

MTN & Airtel’s African Tryst: The Legal Angle ..................................159<br />

S.V. Adithya Vidyasagar<br />

Limits <strong>of</strong> Fair Dealing with Literary Works in India..............................169<br />

A. Goel


2 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

RECENT LEGAL DEVELOPMENTS<br />

Lesotho - Q. Letsika .....................................177<br />

- L. Kometsi<br />

Zimbabwe - J. Pfumorodze ..............................185


3<br />

ARTICLES<br />

Foreign aid, the rule <strong>of</strong> law, and economic development in<br />

Africa<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

N.A. Curott*<br />

Foreign aid has failed to bring about any significant development results in the<br />

poor countries <strong>of</strong> Africa in over sixty years <strong>of</strong> existence. The failure <strong>of</strong> aid is<br />

due to the fact that development planning faces an insurmountable calculation<br />

problem. Attempting to salvage aid by making it more selective does not<br />

address this problem, and will not make aid effective. Aid by its very nature<br />

causes waste, corruption, politicization, privilege seeking, and statism, all <strong>of</strong><br />

which are detrimental to economic development. Instead <strong>of</strong> relying on aid,<br />

African economies should occupy themselves with creating legal institutions<br />

that are commensurate with the protection <strong>of</strong> private property and the Rule <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Law</strong>, which are foremost among the institutions necessary for sustainable, long<br />

run economic growth.<br />

1. INTRODUCTION<br />

In the sixty years since its inception, foreign aid has failed to bring about any<br />

significant economic development in the poor countries <strong>of</strong> Africa. This fact has<br />

caused many analysts to criticize the internal workings <strong>of</strong> foreign aid<br />

administration in recent years, but they rarely question the actual potential <strong>of</strong><br />

foreign aid to lift poor countries out <strong>of</strong> poverty. Instead, the political<br />

establishment calls for ever more aid: The United Nations recommended in<br />

January <strong>of</strong> 2005 that the total amount <strong>of</strong> aid to Africa should be doubled by<br />

2010, 1 while Official Development Assistance from the U.S. to Africa has<br />

tripled since President Bush took <strong>of</strong>fice in 2001, 2 and it is likely that the new<br />

Millennium Challenge Account will increase cash grants to poor African<br />

countries. British Prime Minister Tony Blair has recently been a leading<br />

champion <strong>of</strong> foreign aid and debt forgiveness, and advocates doubling aid to<br />

Africa. The strategy <strong>of</strong> the IMF and the World Bank for development also<br />

includes increasing the flow <strong>of</strong> aid to developing countries. 3 It is widely<br />

* Mercatus Center at George Mason <strong>University</strong>, 4400 <strong>University</strong> Drive, Fairfax, VA U.S.<br />

ncurott@gmu.edu.<br />

1 UN Millennium Project, Investing in Development: A Practical Plan to Achieve the Millennium<br />

Development Goals (New York: United Nations Development Programme, 2005).<br />

2 International Development Statistics, http://oecd.org.<br />

3 Global Monitoring Report 2006: Millennium Development Goals: Strengthening Mutual Accountability,<br />

Aid, Trade, and Governance (World Bank Publications, 2006).


4 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

believed by policy makers that increasing foreign aid will achieve the<br />

millennium development goal <strong>of</strong> a fifty percent reduction in poverty by 2015.<br />

The widespread advocacy <strong>of</strong> foreign aid is remarkable considering<br />

its failure to produce any sustained development in the past. This study<br />

investigates whether the new round <strong>of</strong> foreign aid spending is likely to be<br />

effective at reducing poverty in Africa, and finds that both economic history<br />

and economic reasoning suggest that it will not. The article then considers<br />

what alternatives exist to foreign aid. Since the protection <strong>of</strong> private property<br />

and the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> are foremost among the institutions necessary for<br />

sustainable, long run economic growth, the article concludes that those<br />

interested in the development <strong>of</strong> African economies should occupy<br />

themselves with creating legal institutions that are commensurate with the<br />

Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong>.<br />

2. THE FAILURE OF FOREIGN AID<br />

Reducing poverty is a noble goal, but past experience shows that merely<br />

increasing foreign aid funding won’t bring about development, and may even<br />

impede it. Foreign aid’s track record is dismal, and economists no longer deny<br />

that Western development aid to Africa has been ineffective. The prevailing<br />

consensus among economists is that previous aid policies have not worked<br />

very well. Approximately $568 billion in foreign aid has been poured into<br />

Africa, 4 with little development to show for it. Countries that were given the<br />

most aid, including Liberia and Somalia, have actually experienced negative<br />

economic growth. 5 Income per capita throughout Africa has completely<br />

stagnated since the inception <strong>of</strong> foreign aid. 6 Thus many analysts have come to<br />

question the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> aid in the first place. 7<br />

Still, the political establishment generally calls for more foreign aid.<br />

They argue that foreign aid is necessary for three reasons – (1) it promotes the<br />

political interests <strong>of</strong> the givers, 8 (2) it is necessary for providing humanitarian<br />

relief in times <strong>of</strong> emergency, and (3) it is necessary for eliminating poverty.<br />

The first two justifications <strong>of</strong> foreign aid, while perhaps relevant, are beyond<br />

4 W. Easterly, Freedom versus Collectivism in Foreign Aid, in J. Gwartney and R. <strong>Law</strong>son, Economic<br />

Freedom <strong>of</strong> the World: 2006 Annual Report 34 (Fraser Institute, 2006).<br />

5 World Bank, World Development Indicators Online, http://www.worldbank.org. In the case <strong>of</strong> Somalia<br />

there is evidence that conditions have actually improved since the complete collapse <strong>of</strong> the national<br />

government in 1991. See B. Powell, R. Ford and A. Nowrasteh, Somalia After State Collapse: Chaos or<br />

Improvement? Independent Review Working Paper Number 64.<br />

6 Ibid.<br />

7 See, for example, J. Morton, The Poverty <strong>of</strong> Nations: The Aid Dilemma at the Heart <strong>of</strong> Africa (British<br />

Academic Press, 1994).<br />

8 A large portion <strong>of</strong> foreign aid has always been earmarked for the advancement <strong>of</strong> Western political<br />

interests, in particular toward stopping the spread <strong>of</strong> communism. See P. T. Bauer, The Development<br />

Frontier: Essays in Applied Economic (Harvard <strong>University</strong> Press, 1991) p. 42. More recently, foreign aid<br />

is being used in an attempt to prevent terrorism. See USAID, Policy Framework for Bilateral Foreign Aid<br />

(2006) for the current US policy on bilateral foreign aid.


FOREIGN AID, THE RULE OF LAW AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN AFRICA 5<br />

the scope <strong>of</strong> this investigation, which deals with the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> foreign<br />

aid in bringing about economic growth and prosperity for those countries<br />

which receive it. 9 The elimination <strong>of</strong> poverty requires the higher levels <strong>of</strong><br />

income that come with economic growth and development, and the best hope<br />

for the impoverished masses in the third world to improve their well being lies<br />

in economic growth. The reason is that economic development is essential to<br />

human welfare.<br />

Although well-being is a subjective concept that cannot itself be<br />

measured, proxies such as income, life expectancy, educational opportunities,<br />

literacy, and nutrition can serve as reasonable estimates. Statistical studies<br />

show that economic development is a very significant factor in determining<br />

many desirable well-being indicators. 10 A productive economy is necessary<br />

for creating an environment in which individuals are capable <strong>of</strong> developing<br />

their faculties and can peacefully pursue meaningful and fulfilling lives. One<br />

should ultimately ask, then, does foreign aid “work?” Is foreign aid capable <strong>of</strong><br />

lifting poor countries up out <strong>of</strong> a cycle <strong>of</strong> poverty, onto a higher plain <strong>of</strong><br />

economic development? Economic reasoning and historical evidence suggest<br />

that the answer to this question is a resounding “no.”<br />

A. Foreign Aid is Not Necessary for Development<br />

The original economic argument for foreign aid was that third world<br />

development would be impossible without it. 11 This line <strong>of</strong> thinking holds that<br />

people in under-developed countries are simply too poor to save any money, so<br />

they never have a pool <strong>of</strong> funds available for creating the capital formation that<br />

is necessary for economic development. According to this view, foreign aid<br />

can help them break out <strong>of</strong> this trap and get on the path to sustainable long-term<br />

economic growth by providing the funds necessary for capital investment.<br />

The facts <strong>of</strong> history, however, strongly refute the notion that poor<br />

countries need foreign aid to break out <strong>of</strong> poverty. For starters, the first<br />

nations to develop, such as England, achieved economic growth and<br />

development without foreign aid. If foreign aid were really necessary for<br />

9 It should be noted, however, that although humanitarian assistance programs are usually defended on the<br />

grounds that they have intrinsic humanitarian value, in the long run they <strong>of</strong>ten create more problems than<br />

they solve. Even a program as seemingly unobjectionable as food aid has had many unintended but<br />

harmful consequences in Africa, including disrupting local markets and putting local producers out <strong>of</strong><br />

business. See J. Bovard, The Continuing Failure <strong>of</strong> Foreign Aid, Cato Policy Analysis No. 65 (1986); D.<br />

Osterfeld, Prosperity Versus Planning (Oxford <strong>University</strong> Press 1992) p. 142. More importantly, even<br />

when successful, humanitarian assistance programs are only temporary alleviations for those in extreme<br />

need. They do nothing to fix the underlying problem, which is the human suffering associated with<br />

extreme poverty.<br />

10 See P. J. Boettke & J. R. Subrick, Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong>, Development and Human Capabilities, 10 Supreme Court<br />

Economic Review 109 (2002).<br />

11 This theory, known as the “vicious cycle <strong>of</strong> poverty,” is still the leading justification for foreign aid today.<br />

Economist Jeffrey Sachs is now its leading proponent; see J. D. Sachs, The End <strong>of</strong> Poverty: How We Can<br />

Make it Happen in Our Lifetime (Penguin Books, 2005). For a refutation <strong>of</strong> this poverty trap theory see P.<br />

T. Bauer, Dissent on Development (Harvard <strong>University</strong> Press, 1972) pp. 31-38.


6 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

development, then no country could have developed to begin with. Then there<br />

are also many recent examples <strong>of</strong> countries, such as South Korea and Taiwan,<br />

which began to develop only after they stopped receiving large-scale<br />

economic aid. 12<br />

Moreover, examination <strong>of</strong> the relevant data also undercuts the theory<br />

that foreign aid is necessary for economic development. Recent studies have<br />

taken to task conventional foreign aid wisdom, as represented by the<br />

“Financing Gap” approach. Developed by World Bank economists, the<br />

“Financing Gap” approach assumes that the amount <strong>of</strong> economic growth a<br />

country experiences is proportional to the level <strong>of</strong> investment. 13 Thus, if poor<br />

countries are not investing enough to achieve a target output, foreign aid could<br />

make up for the shortfall, ensuring enough investment for economic growth.<br />

Experience has failed to validate the assumptions <strong>of</strong> the “Financing Gap”<br />

approach. A number <strong>of</strong> empirical studies show that there is no statistical<br />

correlation between economic growth and <strong>of</strong>ficial levels <strong>of</strong> investment. 14 This<br />

finding implies that foreign aid for investment is not a sufficient condition for<br />

economic growth. Furthermore, in countries where economic growth has<br />

occurred, only six percent had increased the amount <strong>of</strong> investment by the<br />

amount required according to the finance gap models. This casts serious<br />

doubts on any simplistic model relating economic growth to investment. 15<br />

Additionally, dozens <strong>of</strong> econometric studies on the relationship between<br />

foreign aid and economic growth reveal no conclusive evidence that the level<br />

<strong>of</strong> aid is correlated with the amount <strong>of</strong> growth in recipient countries. 16<br />

B. Why Aid is Ineffective and Harms its Recipients<br />

Studies <strong>of</strong> economic data and statistics have resoundingly shown that foreign<br />

aid has not brought about the expected economic growth in recipient countries.<br />

One must now ask, why hasn't foreign aid worked? Indeed, can foreign aid<br />

work, within the constructs <strong>of</strong> economic reasoning? A vast body <strong>of</strong> literature<br />

tells us no, and for the following reasons. First, foreign aid handouts are not<br />

subject to the “market test” <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>it and loss, thus they are wasted rather than<br />

being put to productive use. Second, foreign aid creates “perverse incentives,”<br />

12 M. Krauss, Development without Aid (New Press, 1983) p. 190.<br />

13 See W. Easterly, The Elusive Quest for Growth: Economists’ Adventures and Misadventures in the<br />

Tropics (MIT Press, 2001) pp. 28-37.<br />

14 Ibid., 39-42; M. Blomstom et al., Is Fixed Investment the Key to Economic Growth?, 111 Quarterly<br />

<strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> Economics 269 (1996).<br />

15 See Easterly, note 13 above, p. 40. This isn’t to say that investment in capital isn’t crucial for economic<br />

development. What is important is the right kind <strong>of</strong> investment, which government aid programs lack the<br />

knowledge and incentive to provide. Easterly goes too far in rejecting the importance <strong>of</strong> investment<br />

altogether.<br />

16 A number <strong>of</strong> recent studies have found that aid fails to systematically improve growth rates. See P.<br />

Boone, Politics and the Effectiveness <strong>of</strong> Foreign Aid, 40 European Economic Review 289 (1996); I.<br />

Vasquez, Official Assistance, Economic Freedom, and Policy Change: Is Foreign Aid Like Campagne?,<br />

18 Cato <strong>Journal</strong> 275 (1998); T. Ovaska, The Failure <strong>of</strong> Development Aid, 23 Cato <strong>Journal</strong> 175 (2003).


FOREIGN AID, THE RULE OF LAW AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN AFRICA 7<br />

entirely antithetical to economic growth and development, amongst those who<br />

receive it. Finally, foreign aid, by subsidizing corrupt regimes, empowers<br />

dictators and begets increased corruption and repression <strong>of</strong> the poor masses it<br />

aims to help. Despite its noble intentions, foreign aid is doomed to failure for<br />

these systemic reasons, which shall now be examined in further detail.<br />

Foreign Aid Lacks Market Signals<br />

Under market capitalism, entrepreneurs evaluate possible investment projects<br />

on the basis projected return- “i.e.”, will the investment be pr<strong>of</strong>itable? 17<br />

Entrepreneurs stake their own funds, or borrowed funds for which they are<br />

ultimately liable, on these investments, thus they have strong incentive to “get<br />

it right,” “i.e.” to avoid bad investments that won't pay <strong>of</strong>f. Of course,<br />

entrepreneurs can and do fail in this regard; they frequently lose money in what<br />

turn out to be unpr<strong>of</strong>itable investments and face the prospect <strong>of</strong> going out <strong>of</strong><br />

business. Entrepreneurs who repeatedly fail will ultimately lose their funding,<br />

whether it be their own money, bank credit, or shareholders' equity. In general,<br />

successful entrepreneurs, those who do the best job <strong>of</strong> satisfying consumers<br />

and thereby winning their business, are rewarded with pr<strong>of</strong>its, and<br />

unsuccessful entrepreneurs, who waste resources, are “fired” by the<br />

consumers. In contrast, the bureaucrats and government <strong>of</strong>ficials responsible<br />

for “investing” foreign aid dollars face no such market test, and hence have no<br />

such incentive to make the best investment choices. 18 As long time aid<br />

practitioner Thomas Dichter has noted: “Whereas a large corporation cannot<br />

lose money forever without facing some consequences, the aid industry has<br />

gone on for 60 years with hardly anything to show for the two trillion dollars it<br />

has spent (something it does not really bother to deny), and yet it is still very<br />

much in business.” 19 The primary incentive <strong>of</strong> World Bank bureaucrats is to<br />

spend as much money as possible, not to ensure it is effectively spent.<br />

Consequently, billions <strong>of</strong> dollars have been siphoned into inefficient, and<br />

unproductive, and capital-intensive projects such as the construction <strong>of</strong> damns,<br />

oil refineries, airports, and crop-storage depots. 20 Many <strong>of</strong> these projects are<br />

unsustainable, and have to be abandoned. A 2000 report found that 73 percent<br />

<strong>of</strong> the projects undertaken in Africa that year by the World Bank were not even<br />

17 For a more detailed explanation <strong>of</strong> the entrepreneur’s role in the market economy, see I. Kirzner,<br />

Competition and Entrepreneurship (<strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Chicago Press, 1973).<br />

18 For an explanation <strong>of</strong> the different incentives that private and public decision makers face, see L. V.<br />

Mises, Bureaucracy (Yale <strong>University</strong> Press, 1944).<br />

19 T. Dichter, Time to Stop Fooling Ourselves about Foreign Aid: A Practitioner’s View, Cato Institute<br />

Foreign Policy Briefing No 86 (2005).<br />

20 See D. Osterfeld, note 9 above, p, 150; G. B. N. Ayittey, Aid For Black Elephants: How Foreign<br />

Assistance Has Failed Africa, in D. Bandow & I. Vasquez ed., Perpetuating Poverty (Cato Institute,<br />

1994).


8 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

a success by their own standards. 21 Investments in education and AIDS<br />

prevention have been equally ineffective. 22 No matter how noble the<br />

intentions, nor how vast the pocketbook <strong>of</strong> the foreign aid establishment, it<br />

cannot get around the fact that it lacks the discipline imposed by the pr<strong>of</strong>it and<br />

loss test. In fact, without the information generated by market price signals,<br />

there is no way to make rational choices about where to allocate resources. 23<br />

In the absence <strong>of</strong> property ownership and the competitive process <strong>of</strong> market<br />

exchange, it is impossible to determine the true opportunity cost <strong>of</strong> investment<br />

decisions. Thus it should come as no surprise that the vast majority <strong>of</strong> foreign<br />

aid dollars are wasted. Development planners face a fundamental and<br />

unsolvable economic calculation problem. And since there is no telling<br />

whether foreign-aid funded investments make economic sense, how can<br />

anyone expect foreign aid to yield economic growth?<br />

Foreign Aid Perverts the Incentive Structure <strong>of</strong> Recipients<br />

Not only has the foreign aid establishment largely ignored this “market test”<br />

idea, but they have ignored the broad incentive structure that foreign aid creates<br />

for the government and the people in recipient countries. Foreign aid amounts<br />

to a subsidization <strong>of</strong> poverty in third-world countries, and when you subsidize<br />

something, you get more <strong>of</strong> it. To be a well-qualified candidate for foreign aid<br />

payments, a country must be full <strong>of</strong> impoverished people and show weak or<br />

non-existent economic growth. Yet foreign aid payments do not go into the<br />

hands <strong>of</strong> the impoverished masses, they go into the hands <strong>of</strong> government<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficials, who then decide how the money is spent. Thus government <strong>of</strong>ficials<br />

have little incentive to enact policies amenable to economic growth, and much<br />

incentive to retain the status quo ante <strong>of</strong> grinding poverty, in order to show their<br />

rich Western benefactors that they need ever greater foreign aid handouts. In<br />

addition, foreign aid has enabled many African governments to engage in<br />

policies harmful to growth, such as economic regulations, confiscation <strong>of</strong><br />

property, and suppression <strong>of</strong> trade. 24 Perhaps the most pernicious effect <strong>of</strong><br />

foreign aid is that the money has been used by ruthless and tyrannical dictators<br />

in Africa to suppress their own people. 25 These are long-standing policies and<br />

cannot be attributed to mistakes on the part <strong>of</strong> well-intentioned governments.<br />

They are defects inherent in the aid system itself.<br />

21 International Financial Institution Advisory Commission (Meltzer Commission), Report to the U.S.<br />

Congress and the Department <strong>of</strong> the Treasury (March 8, 2000).<br />

22 See Easterly, note 13 above.<br />

23 The Austrian economist Ludwig von Mises was the first to explain why market prices are necessary for<br />

rational economic calculation. See L. V. Mises, Economic Calculation in the Socialist Commonwealth, in<br />

F. A. Hayek, ed., Collectivist Economic Planning (G. Routledge & Sons, 1935).<br />

24 See Bauer, note 8 above, p. 46.<br />

25 See G. B. N. Ayittey, Africa in Chaos (St. Martin’s Press, 1998); M. Maren, The Road to Hell: The<br />

Ravaging Effects <strong>of</strong> Foreign Aid and International Charity (Free Press, 2002).


FOREIGN AID, THE RULE OF LAW AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN AFRICA 9<br />

Foreign aid also harms it recipients by creating perverse incentives<br />

for ordinary workers. The impoverished masses, in order to have a shot at<br />

participation in the foreign aid bonanza, have strong incentives to align<br />

themselves with the political factions that have control <strong>of</strong> the money. Thus it<br />

comes as no surprise that many poor African countries are characterized by an<br />

unusually high intermingling <strong>of</strong> private and political life. 26 Aid puts more<br />

resources at the disposal <strong>of</strong> the governments, and therefore increases its power<br />

vis-à-vis the rest <strong>of</strong> society. One consequence is that peoples’ affairs tend to<br />

be diverted from economic activity (“i.e.” wealth creation) to politics. 27 This<br />

undermines the productivity <strong>of</strong> an economy because resources are shifted<br />

from productive activity into seeking political favor and privileges. 28<br />

Enormous sums <strong>of</strong> money have also been lost because <strong>of</strong> the<br />

widespread corruption in African governments. 29 And even worse, aid<br />

actually promotes corruption by providing resources that are fought over by<br />

interest groups and factions. 30 If the only downside to aid were that much <strong>of</strong> it<br />

is lost and wasted, perhaps it would still be desirable. After all, some aid is<br />

better than none. But aid has had many deleterious effects in the recipient<br />

countries. The very term “aid” is misleading because it implies that it actually<br />

helps the recipients. In this way it prejudices debate in the favor <strong>of</strong> more aid.<br />

In actuality aid is a government-to-government subsidy, and must be judged<br />

by the overall effects that this subsidy produces. Aid does not go directly to<br />

the impoverished African masses. In the long run it will only help the poor if it<br />

leads to development, which, as we have seen, it has not, and indeed cannot in<br />

the light <strong>of</strong> economic reasoning.<br />

C. The New Debate on Foreign Aid<br />

The combination <strong>of</strong> waste, corruption, and rent seeking all combine to explain<br />

why aid has not contributed to economic growth. The manifest failure <strong>of</strong> aid<br />

programs to achieve their intended goals and the corruption they have<br />

engendered has caused the World Bank to recognize the importance <strong>of</strong> the<br />

26 Bauer long contended that aid increases the size and scope <strong>of</strong> recipient governments, contributes to the<br />

politicization <strong>of</strong> life, and is an anti-market force. See, for example, Bauer, note 8 above. A statistical<br />

examination <strong>of</strong> the relationship between economic freedom and the amount <strong>of</strong> development aid is treated<br />

in B. Powell and M. Ryan, Development Aid and Economic Freedom: Are they Related? Forthcoming,<br />

<strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> Private Enterprise.<br />

27 See W. Baumol, Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive, and Destructive 98 <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> Political<br />

Economy 893 (1990).<br />

28 In economics, the process by which individuals attempt to gain through manipulation <strong>of</strong> the political<br />

environment instead <strong>of</strong> through trade and the production <strong>of</strong> added wealth is called rent seeking. This idea<br />

was first developed in G. Tullock, The Welfare Costs <strong>of</strong> Tariffs, Monopolies, and Theft, 5 Western<br />

Economic <strong>Journal</strong> 224 (1967). The term rent seeking was introduced by A. O. Krueger, The Political<br />

Economy <strong>of</strong> the Rent-Seeking Society, 64 American Economic Review 291 (1974).<br />

29 For a general account <strong>of</strong> corruption in Africa, see J. M. Mbaku, Bureaucratic and Political Corruption in<br />

Africa: The Public Choice Perspective (Krieger Publishing Company, 2000).<br />

30 See J. Svensson, Foreign Aid and Rent-Seeking, 51 <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> International Economics, 437 (2004); A.<br />

Alesina & B. Weder, Do Corrupt Governments Receive Less Foreign Aid?, 92 American Economic<br />

Review 1126 (2002).


10 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

recipient countries’ policies. An influential paper by Burnside and Dollar has<br />

provoked a new debate about the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> aid. 31 It claims that while aid<br />

has not caused a systematic improvement in living standards, it has promoted<br />

economic growth when given to countries with good policies and governance.<br />

These findings are overly optimistic, however, and have been hotly disputed. 32<br />

In the first place, it is difficult to define a standard <strong>of</strong> good policies<br />

and then stick to this standard by withholding money from countries that don’t<br />

meet it. In the past corrupt governments have not received less aid, 33 and this<br />

is unlikely to change because it is not seen to be in the interest <strong>of</strong> donors or<br />

recipients. Donors do not want to withhold aid money from poor countries, so<br />

the standards for disbursement are likely to be ineffectively weak or simply<br />

ignored. Recent history confirms this conclusion. Despite the new rhetoric <strong>of</strong><br />

selectivity, not much has been done to promote real reform or greater<br />

accountability. The attempts by donors to influence the policies <strong>of</strong> recipient<br />

countries have been half-hearted and ineffective. African leaders accept<br />

reform reluctantly, if at all, and trying to impose institutions from the outside<br />

in by tying aid to political performance engenders resentment and hostility<br />

amongst its recipients. For these reasons foreign aid is unlikely to be given<br />

selectively.<br />

More importantly, even if foreign aid were selectively given, it<br />

would still undermine the good policies it was meant to promote because <strong>of</strong><br />

the perverse incentive structure inherent in foreign aid. For the reasons<br />

already stated above, foreign aid causes corruption, privilege seeking, and<br />

crony statism. These effects are counterproductive for countries attempting to<br />

implement good policies and develop the institutions necessary for economic<br />

growth and development. The attempts to fix foreign aid are self-defeating<br />

and will not work in practice.<br />

3. THE RULE OF LAW AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO<br />

FOREIGN AID<br />

Rising out <strong>of</strong> poverty depends in the long run on economic growth. Since<br />

foreign aid has not contributed much toward economic growth, and is not likely<br />

to do so for the reasons explained above, it is necessary to consider the<br />

31 C. Burnside & D. Dollar, Aid, Policies, and Growth, 90 American Economic Review 847 (2000). Other<br />

key papers in the “new economics <strong>of</strong> foreign aid” include: P. Collier & D. Dollar, Aid Allocation and<br />

Poverty Reduction, 46 European Economic Review (2002); P. Collier & D. Dollar, Development<br />

Effectiveness: What Have We Learnt?, 114 Economic <strong>Journal</strong> F244 (2004).<br />

32 Two papers that argue against the findings <strong>of</strong> Burnside and Dollar are W. Easterly, The Cartel <strong>of</strong> Good<br />

Intentions: The Problem <strong>of</strong> Bureaucracy in Foreign Aid, 5 The <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> Policy Reform 223 (2002); and<br />

I. Vasquez, The New Approach to Foreign Aid: Is the Enthusiasm Warranted?, Cato Institute Foreign<br />

Policy Briefing No. 79 (2003). In addition, several recent studies have found that aid is detrimental to<br />

growth even for countries with good policies. See H. J. Brumm, Aid, Policies, and Growth: Bauer was<br />

Right, 23 Cato <strong>Journal</strong> 167 (2003); W. Easterly et al., Aid, Policies, and Growth: Comment, 94 American<br />

Economic Review 774 (2004).<br />

33 A. Alesina & B. Weder, note 30 above.


FOREIGN AID, THE RULE OF LAW AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN AFRICA 11<br />

alternatives. Empirical work has found that differences in social, political, and<br />

cultural institutions across countries are among the most important<br />

determinants <strong>of</strong> differences in economic growth rates. The reason is that<br />

institutions establish the framework for economic activity within a country. 34<br />

As the late economist Mancur Olson explained, economic performance is<br />

determined mostly by the structure <strong>of</strong> incentives that individuals face when<br />

they make choices. National boundaries create different structures <strong>of</strong><br />

incentives, which determine much <strong>of</strong> the difference in wealth between<br />

countries. 35<br />

Good institutions create an environment that promotes<br />

entrepreneurship, inventiveness, economic growth and development. Some <strong>of</strong><br />

the most important <strong>of</strong> these institutions embody what is known as the Rule <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Law</strong>. The consensus among empirical researchers is that the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> is a<br />

key determinant <strong>of</strong> economic growth. 36 Since the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> is a significant<br />

factor in bringing about economic development, understanding what this<br />

entails and how it leads to development is essential for evaluating<br />

development policy.<br />

A. The Meaning <strong>of</strong> the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong><br />

In recent years there has been a resurgence <strong>of</strong> interest in The Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong><br />

among legal scholars, and appeals to the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> have become frequent in<br />

policy analysis. 37 Despite its popularity as a rhetorical device, however,<br />

invocations <strong>of</strong> the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> are typically vague and <strong>of</strong>ten contradict one<br />

another. 38 This is probably due to the fact that important scholars have<br />

disagreed over the precise meaning <strong>of</strong> the phrase “Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong>,” so that several<br />

strands <strong>of</strong> ideas have been subsumed under the same name. 39 Irrespective <strong>of</strong><br />

this theoretical dispute, the aspects <strong>of</strong> the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> that are important for<br />

development are relatively straightforward.<br />

34 For a discussion <strong>of</strong> institutional economics by a Nobel Prize winning economist, see D. North,<br />

Institutions, Institutional Change, and Performance (Cambridge <strong>University</strong> Press, 1990).<br />

35 M. Olson, Jr., Distinguished Lecture on Economics in Government: Big Bills Left on the Sidewalk: Why<br />

Some Nations are Rich and Others are Poor, 10 The <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> Economic Perspectives 3 (1996).<br />

36 R. J. Barro, Determinants <strong>of</strong> Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Empirical Study (MIT Press, 1997); R.<br />

J. Barro, Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong>, Democracy, and Economic Performance, in G. P. O’Driscoll, K. R. Holmes, M.<br />

Kirkpatick, eds, 2000 Index <strong>of</strong> Economic Freedom 31 (Heritage Foundation and Dow Jones & Co.,<br />

2000); S.-i-Martin, I Just Ran Two Million Regressions, Amercian Economic Review, 87 (2) (1997). For<br />

a complete survey <strong>of</strong> studies on the relationship between economic freedom and growth, see N. Berggren,<br />

The Benefits <strong>of</strong> Economic Freedom: A Survey, 8 Independent Review 193.<br />

37 Cf. T. Carothers, The Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> Revival, Foreign Affairs Mar/Apr 1998, Vol. 77 Issue 2 (“One cannot<br />

get through a foreign policy debate these days without someone proposing the rule <strong>of</strong> law as a solution to<br />

the world’s troubles.”).<br />

38 Cf G. P. Fletcher, Basic Concepts in Legal Thought 12 (1996) (“(W)e are never really sure what we mean<br />

by the ‘rule <strong>of</strong> law’.”), cited in R. H. Fallon, Jr., "The Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong>" as a Concept in Constitutional<br />

Discourse, 97 Columbia <strong>Law</strong> Review 1 (1997). In Fallon’s estimation “Invocations <strong>of</strong> the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong><br />

are sufficiently meaningful to deserve attention, but today are typically too vague and conclusory to dispel<br />

lingering puzzlement.”<br />

39 See Fallon, note 38 above, who identifies four separate ideal types that underlie different Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong><br />

based arguments.


12 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

In its simplest form, the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> is expressed eloquently by the<br />

well-known political maxim that a nation should be under the rule <strong>of</strong> laws,<br />

and not men. But this means not merely that the laws <strong>of</strong> the land are followed<br />

or that everything is regulated by law. 40 If the law making authority were free<br />

to make laws arbitrarily dictating to people their actions, this would differ in<br />

no appreciable way from the very “rule <strong>of</strong> men” that the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> is meant<br />

to contrast. Therefore, for the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> to prevail the laws must apply to<br />

everyone, and those who make the law must be subject to the same legal rules<br />

as the rest <strong>of</strong> society. More specifically, the government must be constrained<br />

by fixed rules that are known publicly before their application, and the<br />

discretionary abilities <strong>of</strong> those wielding the coercive apparatus <strong>of</strong> the state<br />

must be curtailed as much as possible. Under the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong>, government<br />

cannot discriminate against individuals on an ad hoc basis. In this way the<br />

individual has a sphere <strong>of</strong> autonomy, circumscribed by the general rules,<br />

within which he may undertake the activities he prefers without fearing that<br />

the government will suppress or hinder his efforts. 41<br />

Under the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> political power can only be exercised on the<br />

basis and within the constraints <strong>of</strong> the law, and various substantive and<br />

procedural institutions exist to protect civic and economic liberties from<br />

arbitrary interventions by authorities. 42 The most important procedural<br />

institutions in a constitutional democracy are the separation <strong>of</strong> powers, an<br />

independent judiciary, and an impartial court system. The judges should be<br />

appointed according to a constitutional procedure and not directly by the<br />

executive authority. In order to be impartial, the judiciary must be<br />

independent from the executive authority and not subject to control or<br />

manipulation. The judiciary must be able to deliberate freely, and even find<br />

against government and its <strong>of</strong>ficials without having to fear reprimands or<br />

violence.<br />

The existence <strong>of</strong> these procedural institutions, however, is not by<br />

itself a guarantee <strong>of</strong> the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong>. Even where they exist, no country does<br />

a perfect job <strong>of</strong> securing the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong>. Critics <strong>of</strong> constitutional democracy<br />

40 See F. A. Hayek, The Road to Serfdom (1944) p. 92 (“Anyone ready to deny this would have to contend<br />

that whether the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> prevails today [1944] in Germany, Italy, or Russia depends on whether the<br />

dictators have obtained their absolute power by constitutional means.”).<br />

41 The political philosopher and Nobel Prize winning economist F. A. Hayek has aptly boiled down these<br />

aspects <strong>of</strong> the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> into three main requirements: first, generality, “i.e.” that government is bound<br />

by explicit legal rules so that minimum discretion is left to the arbitrary decisions <strong>of</strong> the individuals in<br />

charge <strong>of</strong> government; second, formality, “i.e.” that these rules are announced and can be known<br />

beforehand by all members <strong>of</strong> society, leaving the individual free to pursue his own ends within these<br />

parameters without fearing deliberate acts <strong>of</strong> coercion by the government; and last, equality, “i.e.” that<br />

these rules apply equally to all people, such that no one is without the protection <strong>of</strong> the legal system and<br />

no one is above the law. See F. A. Hayek, note 40 above, p. 72-84 (1944); The Constitution <strong>of</strong> Liberty<br />

(1960).<br />

42 See W. Kasper & M. E. Streit, Institutional Economics, 165ff. (Edward Elgar, 1998).


FOREIGN AID, THE RULE OF LAW AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN AFRICA 13<br />

have even argued that the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> under government is impossible. 43<br />

Under this view, only market, or non-politically chosen law that emerges<br />

spontaneously from the actions and decisions <strong>of</strong> free individuals can be<br />

consistent with the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong>. 44 Be this as it may, it is clear that some<br />

governments come much closer to achieving the ideal than others. The degree<br />

to which the legal structure functions properly to secure the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> varies<br />

greatly among countries. 45 These differences have had a great impact on<br />

economic growth rates because the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> is necessary for securing<br />

private property rights and economic predictability.<br />

B. The Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> and Economic Development<br />

Governance under the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> is restricted to formal rules that tell people<br />

beforehand what actions will be taken by government in a certain situation.<br />

These rules allow individuals to plan their affairs with reasonable assurance as<br />

to how the state will use its coercive powers. This predictability makes<br />

economic activity much more effective. In the words <strong>of</strong> Hayek: “If the<br />

individuals are to be able to use their knowledge effectively in making plans,<br />

they must be able to predict actions <strong>of</strong> the state which may affect these<br />

plans.” 46 Successful entrepreneurship in particular requires a stable legal<br />

environment. As economist Peter Boettke has explained, it is “… the rule <strong>of</strong><br />

law [that] provides us with the stability and predictability in economic affairs<br />

required for agents to engage in entrepreneurial action – both in terms <strong>of</strong><br />

exploiting existing opportunities for pr<strong>of</strong>it through arbitrage and the discovery<br />

<strong>of</strong> new pr<strong>of</strong>it opportunities through arbitration.” 47 Since the essence <strong>of</strong><br />

entrepreneurship is alertness to pr<strong>of</strong>it opportunities that satisfy the desires <strong>of</strong><br />

consumers, the more successful entrepreneurship there is the more consumer<br />

desires will be satisfied and the more economic growth there will be. 48<br />

Under the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> the laws must be stated clearly without<br />

reference to particular individuals or groups. The generality and formal nature<br />

<strong>of</strong> the laws prevent discretionary and ad hoc economic policies that inhibit<br />

43 See J. Hasnas, The Myth <strong>of</strong> the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong>, Wisconsin <strong>Law</strong> Review 199 (1995). (“The fact is that there is<br />

no such thing as a government <strong>of</strong> law and not people. The law is an amalgam <strong>of</strong> contradictory rules and<br />

counter-rules expressed in inherently vague language that can yield a legitimate legal argument for any<br />

desired conclusion. For this reason, as long as the law remains a state monopoly, it will always reflect the<br />

political ideology <strong>of</strong> those invested with decision-making power.”)<br />

44 Order under the law without government is discussed in E. Stringham, Market Chosen <strong>Law</strong>, 14 <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

Libertarian Studies 53 (1999). Evidence for the superiority <strong>of</strong> a spontaneously ordered Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong><br />

without political provision is given in B. Benson, The Enterprise <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong>: Justice without the State<br />

(Pacific Research Institute, 1990).<br />

45 The extent <strong>of</strong> the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> is measured in J. Gwartney & R. <strong>Law</strong>son, Economic Freedom <strong>of</strong> the<br />

World: 2006 Annual Report (Fraser Institute, 2006).<br />

46 Hayek, note 40 above at p. 84.<br />

47 Boettke & Subrick, note 10 above.<br />

48 The satisfaction <strong>of</strong> consumer desires is the essence <strong>of</strong> entrepreneurship; see I. Kirzner, note 17 above.


14 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

entrepreneurship and economic growth. Private property rights are protected<br />

in this way from being violated by government <strong>of</strong>ficials or arbitrary laws.<br />

Individuals who are not secure in their property lack the incentive to<br />

undertake investment or engage in entrepreneurship. Individuals and<br />

businesses must be confident that their efforts will not be wasted before they<br />

will engage in commerce, save income, and make long-term plans. The Rule<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> provides a stable system <strong>of</strong> protection within which people can engage<br />

in economic activity and have the incentive to do so. Investors are particularly<br />

concerned about the prevalence <strong>of</strong> law and order, the burdens <strong>of</strong> arbitrary<br />

regulation, and the possibility <strong>of</strong> expropriation. The amount <strong>of</strong> investment in<br />

countries without the security provided by the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> is severely<br />

restricted, limiting the possibility <strong>of</strong> economic expansion.<br />

A well functioning legal system is also a key determinant <strong>of</strong> capital<br />

accumulation. An ever growing capital structure is essential for a vibrant,<br />

growing economy. Hernando De Soto, in his groundbreaking work, “The<br />

Mystery <strong>of</strong> Capital,” argues that the degree <strong>of</strong> capital formation in an<br />

economy depends largely on a country's legal system, specifically, how easy<br />

or difficult is it for a landowner to establish clear, recognized legal title to his<br />

land. 49 For only with clear, legal title, De Soto argues, can small-time<br />

landowners, who comprise a large component <strong>of</strong> every economy, “capitalize”<br />

on their land, their main asset, and become able to acquire the funds and tools<br />

that they need to be more productive and to contribute to further capitalization<br />

<strong>of</strong> the larger economy.<br />

No country can develop without economic freedom and the<br />

protection <strong>of</strong> private property rights. The Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong>, by providing the<br />

framework for protecting private property and individual freedom, creates the<br />

stability and predictability in economic affairs necessary to promote<br />

entrepreneurship, saving and investment, and capital formation. It is<br />

nonsensical to expect that foreign aid will lead to economic development in<br />

Africa without addressing the institutional factors, such as the lack <strong>of</strong> Rule <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Law</strong>, which are responsible for Africa’s failure to develop in the first place.<br />

4. EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE<br />

In our consideration <strong>of</strong> the role that a well functioning legal system plays in<br />

protecting private property rights we have seen that the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> should be<br />

an important determinant <strong>of</strong> economic performance. It is obvious from simple<br />

observation that countries that secure the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> have much more<br />

productive economies than those that do not. This everyday experience is<br />

formalized and confirmed by evidence from the Fraser Institute’s economic<br />

49 H. De Soto, The Mystery <strong>of</strong> Capital, (Basic Books, 2000).


FOREIGN AID, THE RULE OF LAW AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN AFRICA 15<br />

freedom report, Economic Freedom <strong>of</strong> the World. 50 Area 2 <strong>of</strong> the Fraser index,<br />

Legal System & Property Rights, provides an annual estimate <strong>of</strong> the realization<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> principle in 123 countries. Countries are ranked according<br />

to the security property rights, the independence <strong>of</strong> the judiciary, and the<br />

impartiality <strong>of</strong> the court system. The scale ranges from a score <strong>of</strong> one for<br />

countries with no Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> up to a score <strong>of</strong> ten for countries that perfectly<br />

secure the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> for all <strong>of</strong> its citizens.<br />

Chart 1 divides the Fraser index scores for 121 countries in 2004 into<br />

quintiles and compares them with the average level <strong>of</strong> GDP per capita,<br />

measured by the World Bank according to the Atlas method. 51 The countries<br />

in the top quintile <strong>of</strong> the Legal System and Property Rights scores had an<br />

average per capita income <strong>of</strong> $29,122 in 2004, while those in the bottom<br />

quintile averaged only $2561. The chart bellow shows a strong relationship<br />

between the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> and per capita income.<br />

Relation Between Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> and GDP Per-Capita<br />

GDP/CA<br />

35000<br />

30000<br />

25000<br />

20000<br />

15000<br />

10000<br />

5000<br />

0<br />

Top 2nd 3rd 4th Bottom<br />

Legal System and Property Rights Quintiles<br />

This snapshot view <strong>of</strong> the relationship between the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> and<br />

GDP per capita is reinforced by data from the Heritage Foundation’s Index <strong>of</strong><br />

Economic Freedom. 52 The index ranks the security <strong>of</strong> private property on a<br />

score from 1, being the best, to 5, the worst. In a sample <strong>of</strong> 143 countries for<br />

2004, those that had a property score <strong>of</strong> 1 averaged $30,505, while those<br />

countries with a score <strong>of</strong> 5 averaged only $2,953.<br />

50 Gwartney and <strong>Law</strong>son, note 45 above.<br />

51 Income statistics are from the World Bank (2005): GDP per capita 2004, Atlas method and PPP, World<br />

Development Indicators database, World Bank, www.worldbank.org./data/wdi/.<br />

52 The Heritage Foundation & Wall Street <strong>Journal</strong>, Index <strong>of</strong> Economic Freedom: 2006 Annual Report<br />

(Heritage Foundation, 2006).


16 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

Relation Between Property Rights and GDP Per-Capita<br />

GDP Per/C<br />

35000.0<br />

30000.0<br />

25000.0<br />

20000.0<br />

15000.0<br />

10000.0<br />

5000.0<br />

0.0<br />

1 2 3 4 5<br />

Property Score<br />

We can glean from these statistics that there is a strong relationship<br />

between the status <strong>of</strong> a country’s economic development and how well private<br />

property is protected in that country and the extent to which there is Rule <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Law</strong>. But the fact that the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> and development go hand in hand does<br />

not establish which one causes which, or if they aren’t both the result <strong>of</strong><br />

something else entirely. 53 Deduction and economic reasoning, however, tell<br />

us that the security <strong>of</strong> private property and the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> are primary causes<br />

<strong>of</strong> economic growth. Econometric studies that survey the historical evidence<br />

demonstrate and support economic theory, and find that the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> is an<br />

important determinant <strong>of</strong> economic growth. 54<br />

These generalized findings have been reinforced by individual case<br />

studies <strong>of</strong> African countries. Of particular interest is the recent economic<br />

success story <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong>. For many years <strong>Botswana</strong> has been one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

world’s fastest growing economies, with an average economic growth rate <strong>of</strong><br />

7.7 percent. 55 Without much foreign aid, and in the absence <strong>of</strong> a large state,<br />

<strong>Botswana</strong> has gone from being the third poorest nation <strong>of</strong> the world in 1965 to<br />

an upper middle income nation today. In an important new case study,<br />

economist Scott Beaulier has found that the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> and comparatively<br />

free economic institutions are the major explanations for <strong>Botswana</strong>’s greater<br />

success at economic development than other African countries.<br />

53 Existing studies have established the correlation between components <strong>of</strong> economic freedom, including the<br />

protection <strong>of</strong> property rights and the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong>, and economic growth, but they have not fully<br />

established the arrow <strong>of</strong> causation. See J. W. Dawson, Causality in the Freedom-Growth Relationship, 19<br />

European <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> Political Economy 475.<br />

54 See references cited in note 36 above. A recent study decomposing the effects between economic freedom<br />

and growth concludes that the component <strong>of</strong> economic freedom that is significant and has the largest<br />

effect on growth is the Legal Structure and Security <strong>of</strong> Private Ownership. F. Carlson & S. Lundstrom,<br />

Economic Freedom and Growth: Decomposing the Effects, 112 Public Choice 335 (2002).<br />

55 S. Beaulier, Look <strong>Botswana</strong>: No Hands! Why <strong>Botswana</strong> Should Let the Country Steer Itself, in B. Powell<br />

ed., Making Poor Nations Rich: Entrepreneurship and the Process <strong>of</strong> Development (Stanford <strong>University</strong><br />

Press, Forthcoming).


FOREIGN AID, THE RULE OF LAW AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN AFRICA 17<br />

The sum <strong>of</strong> this historical evidence points strongly to the conclusion<br />

that the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> is an essential prerequisite for development to take place<br />

in Africa. Poor African nations must follow the example <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong>, and all<br />

<strong>of</strong> the nations that have achieved development, by establishing the protection<br />

<strong>of</strong> private property rights and the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong>. A well functioning legal<br />

system is a prerequisite for economic development, without which the poor<br />

countries <strong>of</strong> Africa cannot hope to rise out <strong>of</strong> poverty.<br />

5. CONCLUSION<br />

Foreign aid has been completely ineffective at bringing about development in<br />

impoverished nations. A great deal <strong>of</strong> foreign aid money has been wasted on<br />

inefficient and unproductive investments. This waste is not surprising because<br />

those in charge <strong>of</strong> the funds are not subject to the pr<strong>of</strong>it and loss test <strong>of</strong> the<br />

marketplace. Given this fact, it is hard to imagine how future aid programs<br />

might turn out any better. A great deal <strong>of</strong> aid money has also been given to<br />

tyrannical governments that have used it to suppress and violate the rights <strong>of</strong><br />

their own subjects. The grave defects <strong>of</strong> the aid system and the magnitude <strong>of</strong><br />

the harm that it has caused should cause any well meaning individual to<br />

question the logic <strong>of</strong> the political establishment that is calling for the expansion<br />

<strong>of</strong> aid programs and greater foreign aid spending. Attempting to salvage<br />

foreign aid by making it more selective will not fix the problems inherent in<br />

foreign aid or make aid effective in bringing about economic development. Aid<br />

by its very nature causes waste, corruption, politicization, privilege seeking,<br />

and statism, all <strong>of</strong> which are detrimental to economic development.<br />

What countries need for development is an institutional framework<br />

that encourages entrepreneurship, hard work, saving, investment and capital<br />

accumulation. The institution <strong>of</strong> private property creates the incentive for<br />

individuals to carry out productive economic activity. The Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong><br />

establishes a framework in which property rights are respected and enforced.<br />

Economic reasoning therefore suggests that the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> should be an<br />

important determinant <strong>of</strong> economic development. This theory is supported by<br />

historical evidence, which shows a strong relationship between countries that<br />

secure the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> and their rate <strong>of</strong> economic growth. Foreign aid<br />

undermines the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> by engendering corruption and diverting energy<br />

from productive to counterproductive endeavors, and therefore undercuts the<br />

process <strong>of</strong> development that it is meant to bring about.<br />

The poor nations <strong>of</strong> Africa remain undeveloped because they lack an<br />

institutional environment conducive to economic progress. Suboptimal<br />

institutional arrangements have become locked-in, so to speak, and in order to<br />

get on the path to sustainable economic growth they must be replaced with<br />

institutions that inculcate respect for private property and the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong>.


18 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

Reform efforts, however, should be approached with caution. Simply<br />

earmarking foreign aid funds for Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> reform, for example, will<br />

probably have little positive impact because institutions grafted on<br />

exogenously are unlikely to stick. In order to stick, an institutional change<br />

must be rooted in the informal practices and expectations <strong>of</strong> the indigenous<br />

population, and be compatible with their prevailing culture and norms. For<br />

this reason, it is unlikely that aid can provide the appropriate shock to the<br />

indigenous institutional regime to help them break out <strong>of</strong> their current<br />

institutional trajectory. Indeed, most underdeveloped nations in Sub-Saharan<br />

Africa remain mired in poverty despite recent attempts to exogenously<br />

introduce institutional change. For Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> reform to be successful, an<br />

amenable cultural climate is an essential prerequisite. Therefore, recognizing<br />

and articulating the importance <strong>of</strong> the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> is at least an important first<br />

step because attempts to impose institutional reform without widespread<br />

support are premature and likely to fail.<br />

The entire mindset <strong>of</strong> central planning, even for Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> reform,<br />

needs to be dropped. Instead, effort should be spent trying to discover<br />

mechanisms that effectively constrain predatory government and make it<br />

possible for poor nations to get past stakeholder problems. The population and<br />

the political leaders must support and devise mechanisms based on their own<br />

indigenous institutions to coordinate around new rule changes and usher in a<br />

Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> regime. Development planning merely interferes with individual<br />

decision making (individual planning) and the natural evolution <strong>of</strong> market<br />

institutions. Ill-conceived development planning, such as foreign aid,<br />

undermines the foundation that makes development possible.<br />

The answer to poverty is not foreign aid, which does more harm than<br />

good. What is needed instead is an institutional environment that unleashes<br />

the creative energy <strong>of</strong> a society. Economic development depends upon the<br />

attitudes <strong>of</strong> the individual citizens and the conduct <strong>of</strong> their government. When<br />

individuals have freedom, their natural drive to improve their own lives brings<br />

about the process <strong>of</strong> economic development. If the impoverished masses <strong>of</strong><br />

the third world want living standards comparable to the people in the west,<br />

they must adopt the institutions <strong>of</strong> Western civilization that make such wealth<br />

possible. If individuals in developed countries want to help those in poor<br />

countries get out <strong>of</strong> poverty, they must convince them to adopt the necessary<br />

institutions, such as the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong>, and help them devise mechanisms to<br />

secure it.


19<br />

Paradigm shifts in international justice and the duty to<br />

protect; in search <strong>of</strong> an action principle<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

P. Glen*<br />

This article places the emerging “responsibility to protect” within the<br />

historical development <strong>of</strong> international human rights and criminal law, while<br />

also attempting to more fully theorize the responsibility to ensure that it can be<br />

a basis for action in the face <strong>of</strong> a state’s commission <strong>of</strong> atrocities against its<br />

citizens. The main point <strong>of</strong> departure concerns the issue <strong>of</strong> “right authority” at<br />

that point in time when a coercive intervention is justified. Rather than rely<br />

solely on the Security Council in these situations, this article contends that<br />

unilateral and multilateral action must be countenanced by a fully theorized<br />

“responsibility to protect.” Such action is the only likely action to be taken in<br />

many circumstances, on account <strong>of</strong> the self-interest <strong>of</strong> Security Council<br />

members and general apathy towards intervention in the United Nations.<br />

There are solid legal and policy grounds for permitting such interventions and<br />

no compelling arguments to the contrary. Without sanctioning such action, it<br />

is very likely that the responsibility to protect will become just another quaint<br />

theory in international law, irrelevant to on the ground decision-making and<br />

incapable <strong>of</strong> the protection it was created to provide.<br />

1. INTRODUCTION<br />

In his seminal work on the history <strong>of</strong> scientific development, Thomas Kuhn<br />

described the structure <strong>of</strong> that development as revolutionary in nature,<br />

occurring at that point in time “in which an older paradigm is replaced in whole<br />

or in part by an incompatible one.” 1 The impetus for this paradigm shift is<br />

malfunction – “scientific revolutions are inaugurated by a growing sense …<br />

that an existing paradigm has ceased to function adequately in the exploration<br />

<strong>of</strong> an aspect <strong>of</strong> nature to which that paradigm itself had previously led the way<br />

... [T]he sense <strong>of</strong> malfunction that can lead to crisis is prerequisite to<br />

revolution.” 2 Kuhn himself analogized his conception <strong>of</strong> the theory and<br />

operation <strong>of</strong> scientific revolutions to political revolutions, drawing out<br />

parallels in genesis, form and function between the two. The notion <strong>of</strong><br />

revolutionary change, or paradigm shifts, itself provides a useful framework to<br />

judge the evolution, current state, and potential future <strong>of</strong> international human<br />

Associate Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, Georgetown <strong>University</strong> <strong>Law</strong> School, Washington, DC.<br />

1 T.S. Kuhn, The structure <strong>of</strong> scientific revolutions 92 (Chicago: <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Chicago Press, 1996)<br />

(1962).<br />

2 Id.


20 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

rights and criminal law. Although the analogy must necessarily be incomplete,<br />

as is the analogy between scientific and political revolutions, it does go a long<br />

way in explaining how the current system <strong>of</strong> international justice has reached<br />

its present state, and what may need to occur before that system can develop<br />

further.<br />

The central focus <strong>of</strong> the instant article is on the emerging principle <strong>of</strong><br />

the “responsibility to protect,” a principle still in its infancy almost ten years<br />

after its initial iteration. That principle itself is built <strong>of</strong> discrete smaller<br />

principles, which together build the overarching notion <strong>of</strong> a “responsibility to<br />

protect,” but for present purposes, this article is concerned only with the<br />

potential recourse to military or other definitive action in the face <strong>of</strong> a state’s<br />

failure to safeguard its citizens. 3 Using Kuhn as the backdrop, this article<br />

argues that the international justice system finds itself again at the threshold <strong>of</strong><br />

a paradigm shift, one which, whether the community makes the shift or fails<br />

to make the shift, will have far-reaching consequences for international law<br />

and policy in the twenty-first century. In essence, the international<br />

community, confronted with continuing instances <strong>of</strong> genocide, crimes against<br />

humanity, and mass atrocities committed by states against their own<br />

populaces, finds itself desperately in need <strong>of</strong> an “action principle,” a principle<br />

that can motivate and sanction actions by states in the interest <strong>of</strong> populations<br />

generally.<br />

Despite much political rhetoric and posturing on the international<br />

stage, such a principle still escapes policy-makers and those with the will to<br />

act. This is not surprising considering the myriad interests that are <strong>of</strong>ten in<br />

play when members <strong>of</strong> the international community sit down and attempt to<br />

address specific and concrete realities and situations. Further, it should be<br />

noted at the outset that there may never come a time when a true action<br />

principle is embraced and utilized by members <strong>of</strong> the international<br />

community. Nonetheless, to cease striving for such a principle would be an<br />

abdication <strong>of</strong> responsibility by those who have the power to act. As Gareth<br />

Evans has written, “[i]t can only be a matter <strong>of</strong> time before reports emerge<br />

again, from Central Africa, Central or South Asia, the Balkans, or somewhere<br />

else, <strong>of</strong> massacres or mass starvation, rape or ethnic cleansing, occurring or<br />

apprehended.” 4 It would be nice if, for once, the international community<br />

actually had a plan and a course <strong>of</strong> action prepared for such occurrences that<br />

could be implemented and undertaken in time to halt the commission <strong>of</strong><br />

crimes, rather than to simply wait and dispense post hoc “justice” after the<br />

fact. It is to this aim that the instant article is dedicated.<br />

3 The “responsibility to protect” comprises three distinct responsibilities: the responsibility to react, with<br />

which this article is concerned, and the responsibilities to prevent and rebuild each vitally important in<br />

their own right.<br />

4 G. Evans, The Responsibility to Protect: Rethinking Humanitarian Intervention, 98 Am. Soc’y Int’l L.<br />

Proc. 78, 80 (2004).


PARADIGM SHIFTS IN INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE 21<br />

2. REVOLUTIONS IN INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE<br />

Since the Treaty <strong>of</strong> Westphalia established the framework <strong>of</strong> the modern<br />

international order, there have been two major shifts in the world <strong>of</strong><br />

international justice that could be construed, in the Kuhnian sense, as<br />

revolutions. The first occurred in the wake <strong>of</strong> World War Two with the trials<br />

<strong>of</strong> former political and military leaders <strong>of</strong> the defeated German and Japanese<br />

sides. The Nuremburg tribunal explicitly disallowed any defense based on<br />

sovereign immunity, “i.e.”, the position prevailing under the Westphalian<br />

conception <strong>of</strong> the state that a country’s leaders would be immune to<br />

prosecution by other states. 5 Although not entirely without precedent, and<br />

there are few innovations in international law and policy that are truly sui<br />

generis, Nuremburg represented a partial replacement <strong>of</strong> the Westphalian<br />

paradigm with a new paradigm in which state actors could be held accountable<br />

for certain crimes against their populaces. Returning to Kuhn, the paradigm<br />

shift itself is clear, and the fact that the Nuremburg principles only partially<br />

unraveled the sovereignty contemplated by the Treaty <strong>of</strong> Westphalia does not<br />

discount the revolutionary nature <strong>of</strong> this moment. Moreover, the malfunctionas-impetus<br />

is also apparent, although the shift is made post hoc – it is not a<br />

systemic malfunction that necessarily led to the shift away from Westphalia,<br />

but that shift occurred because, had the international community failed to make<br />

the shift, the malfunction would have been manifest. Those who committed the<br />

crimes <strong>of</strong> Nazi Germany could have been freed, and a dangerous precedent<br />

regarding international accountability would have been set.<br />

The basic principle <strong>of</strong> Nuremburg, that a state’s leaders will be held<br />

accountable for atrocities committed against its citizens, remained in the<br />

consciousness <strong>of</strong> international law, despite several years <strong>of</strong> somnolence, and<br />

returned with vigor in the last years <strong>of</strong> the Twentieth Century. In response to<br />

the atrocities committed during the disintegration <strong>of</strong> Yugoslavia and in<br />

Rwanda, the United Nations established ad hoc tribunals for the trial <strong>of</strong> those<br />

responsible. More recently, hybrid tribunals have been established in<br />

Cambodia and Sierra Leone. Yet despite the continuing vibrance <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Nuremburg principle, the international community’s application <strong>of</strong> that<br />

principle was obviously and decidedly ad hoc – although perpetrators would<br />

be brought to justice, such justice remained dependent on the establishment <strong>of</strong><br />

a specific forum for a specific situation.<br />

Thus, the second revolutionary moment occurred at the point when<br />

international justice became institutionalized in the body <strong>of</strong> the International<br />

Criminal Court. This moment fits more neatly into the Kuhn analogy, as a<br />

“malfunction” was at least implicitly present – the cost and time involved with<br />

5 See G. Robertson QC, Ending Impunity: How International Criminal <strong>Law</strong> Can Put Tyrants on Trial, 38<br />

Cornell Int’l L.J. (2005) p. 649, pp. 650-656.


22 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

establishing a tribunal anew for each situation warranting justice – and the<br />

paradigm shift towards an institutionalized forum for administering<br />

international criminal justice at least partially replaced the prior system <strong>of</strong> ad<br />

hoc and national justice. National jurisdictions will continue to have a<br />

significant role to play in the system via the principle <strong>of</strong> complementarity, and<br />

nothing in the Rome Statute itself bars recourse to hybrid or other forms <strong>of</strong> ad<br />

hoc tribunals, yet ins<strong>of</strong>ar as it does present an entirely new and permanent<br />

forum for the administration <strong>of</strong> international criminal justice, the ICC is truly<br />

revolutionary in the Kuhnian sense. From its establishment on, and to the<br />

extent that crimes are committed within its temporal and substantive<br />

jurisdiction, it will be charged with the role <strong>of</strong> investigating violations <strong>of</strong><br />

international criminal and humanitarian law, bringing appropriate charges,<br />

and trying the violators. And it will do all this from a permanent seat, with a<br />

full complement <strong>of</strong> judges, prosecutors, and staff, whose full time job will be<br />

international criminal law.<br />

These first two moments have built <strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong> each other, as the<br />

establishment <strong>of</strong> the ICC is a direct result <strong>of</strong> the continuing vitality <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Nuremburg principles and the international community’s desire to see justice<br />

done when the worst atrocities are committed by state political and military<br />

leaders. So, to, have the cumulative “effects” <strong>of</strong> these preceding moments<br />

given rise to the current point <strong>of</strong> crisis in international criminal and human<br />

rights law, where, for the first time, the international community has begun to<br />

question to what extent the atrocities themselves may be halted prior to or<br />

during their commission, rather than simply punished post factum. To<br />

ultimately answer this question, however, means that one must return to the<br />

surviving aspects <strong>of</strong> Westphalia and rationalize one state’s “meddling” into<br />

the sovereign domain <strong>of</strong> another state, a course <strong>of</strong> action effectively rendered<br />

impermissible by the founding document <strong>of</strong> the current international order,<br />

the United Nations Charter: “Nothing contained in the present Charter shall<br />

authorize the United Nations to intervene in matters which are essentially<br />

within the domestic jurisdiction <strong>of</strong> any state[.]” 6<br />

The “malfunction” here is clear – a state’s sovereignty, as<br />

traditionally conceived under the international system, in essence means that<br />

certain ongoing acts will be isolated from review by the international<br />

community, even if, under prevailing norms <strong>of</strong> international law, the<br />

perpetrators may ultimately be held to account for those atrocities. This<br />

dilemma was noted by former Secretary-General K<strong>of</strong>i Annan over the course<br />

<strong>of</strong> several high-pr<strong>of</strong>ile appearances and speeches from 1999 through 2001. In<br />

his speech to the Fifty-Fourth Session <strong>of</strong> the U.N. General Assembly, Annan<br />

stated that “[s]urely no legal principle – even sovereignty – can ever shield<br />

6 Charter <strong>of</strong> the United Nations, 26 June, 1945, 3 Bevans 1153, article 2.7.


PARADIGM SHIFTS IN INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE 23<br />

crimes against humanity.” 7 In his millennium report issued the following year,<br />

the dilemma was posed in more existential terms: “If humanitarian intervention<br />

is, indeed, an unacceptable assault on sovereignty, how should we respond to<br />

a Rwanda, to a Srebrenica – to gross and systematic violations <strong>of</strong> human rights<br />

that affect every precept <strong>of</strong> our common humanity?” 8 This course <strong>of</strong> thought<br />

culminated at the very moment that the new principle <strong>of</strong> a “responsibility to<br />

protect” became manifest. At his Nobel lecture in 2001, Annan stated<br />

emphatically that the “sovereignty <strong>of</strong> states must no longer be used as a shield<br />

for gross violations <strong>of</strong> human rights.” 9 That same year, the International<br />

Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty issued a report designed to<br />

meet the inherent tension between state sovereignty and the state’s continuing<br />

proclivity to commit atrocities against its own citizens. In the words <strong>of</strong> one<br />

prominent member, to meet these difficulties, the international community had<br />

“to rethink sovereignty in terms <strong>of</strong> its essence being not so much control as<br />

responsibility.” 10 Thus, we find ourselves in the midst <strong>of</strong> the third (potentially)<br />

great, although currently incomplete, revolution in international criminal and<br />

human rights law.<br />

3. THE RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT: FROM<br />

2001 THROUGH THE PRESENT<br />

The “responsibility to protect” was the result <strong>of</strong> the International Commission<br />

on Intervention and State Sovereignty’s 2001 report, The Responsibility to<br />

Protect. 11 This report, in the course <strong>of</strong> rethinking sovereignty-asresponsibility,<br />

premised the resulting conception <strong>of</strong> sovereignty on two basic<br />

principles: “a primary responsibility to protect lies with the state and a<br />

secondary or surrogate responsibility to protect falls to the international<br />

community when the state is unable or unwilling to halt or avert a population<br />

suffering serious harm, whether resulting from internal war, insurgency,<br />

repression or state failure.” 12 This conception <strong>of</strong> state sovereignty envisions a<br />

two-fold conception <strong>of</strong> state responsibility: a state is internally responsible to<br />

its citizens for the welfare <strong>of</strong> those citizens, and externally responsible to the<br />

international community for its internal actions. 13 In essence, then, the<br />

Commission contemplated a “residual responsibility” on the part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

7 Secretary-General presents his Annual Report to General Assembly, U.N. Doc. SG/SM/7136 and GA/<br />

9596 (20 September, 1999).<br />

8 K.A. Annan, We the peoples: The role <strong>of</strong> the United Nations in the 21st century 48 (2000), G.A.<br />

Resolution 2000, U.N. GAOR, 54th Sess., U.N. Doc. a/54/2000 (2000), available at http://www.un.org/<br />

millennium.<br />

9 K. Annan, Nobel Lecture (10 December, 2001).<br />

10 Evans, supra note 4, p. 82.<br />

11 International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty, the Responsibility to Protect (2001).<br />

12 E. McClean, The Responsibility to Protect: The Role <strong>of</strong> International Human Rights <strong>Law</strong>, 13 J. Conflict &<br />

Security L. (2008) pp. 123-127.<br />

13 Id. at 128; C. Stahn, Responsibility to Protect: Political Rhetoric or Emerging Legal Norm?, 101 Am. J.<br />

Int’l L. (2007) p. 99, p. 104.


24 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

international community, to be activated: (1) when a particular state is clearly<br />

either unwilling or unable to fulfill its responsibility to protect; (2) when a<br />

particular state … is itself the actual perpetrator <strong>of</strong> crimes or atrocities; or (3)<br />

where people living outside a particular state are directly threatened by actions<br />

taking place there. 14<br />

When this residual responsibility is activated, states in the<br />

international community may take coercive measures as against the <strong>of</strong>fending<br />

state, which “may include political, economic, or judicial measures, and in<br />

extreme – but only in extreme – cases, they may also include military<br />

action.” 15 The possibility <strong>of</strong> military action is central to the instant article, but<br />

as Evans noted, that possibility is accompanied by a number <strong>of</strong> difficult<br />

questions: “[W]hat is an extreme case? Where should we draw the line in<br />

determining when military intervention is prima facie defensible? What other<br />

conditions or restraints, if any, should apply in determining whether and how<br />

intervention should proceed? Most difficult <strong>of</strong> all, who makes all these<br />

decisions? Who should have the ultimate authority to determine whether an<br />

intrusion into a sovereign state, involving the use <strong>of</strong> deadly force on a<br />

potentially massive scale, should actually go ahead?” 16 The Commission<br />

established six basic criteria that should govern the question <strong>of</strong> military<br />

intervention:<br />

1. Just cause (the threshold for action) – military intervention should not be<br />

countenanced unless two potential situations are present: “large-scale loss<br />

<strong>of</strong> life, actual or apprehended, with or without genocidal intent, that is the<br />

product either <strong>of</strong> deliberate state action, state neglect or inability to act, or<br />

a failed state situation; or large-scale ‘ethnic-cleansing,’ actual or<br />

apprehended, whether carried out by killing, forced expulsion, acts <strong>of</strong><br />

terror, or rape.” 17 The Commission also noted that situations <strong>of</strong> natural<br />

disasters or catastrophes could also provide the catalyst for military<br />

intervention, “when the state concerned is unwilling or unable to cope or<br />

call for assistance, and significant loss <strong>of</strong> life is occurring or threatened.” 18<br />

2. Right intention – “The primary purpose <strong>of</strong> the intervention, whatever other<br />

motives the intervening states may have, must be to halt or avert human<br />

suffering.” 19<br />

3. Last resort – military intervention must always be an option <strong>of</strong> last resort:<br />

“Every diplomatic and nonmilitary avenue for the prevention or peaceful<br />

resolution <strong>of</strong> the humanitarian crisis must have been explored.” 20 The<br />

Commission hedged against the interminable delay a strict application <strong>of</strong><br />

14 Stahn, supra note 13, p. 104 (citing The responsibility to protect 17).<br />

15 Evans, supra note 4, p. 84.<br />

16 Id.<br />

17 Id. p. 85.<br />

18 Id.<br />

19 Id. pp. 85-86.<br />

20 Id. p. 86.


PARADIGM SHIFTS IN INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE 25<br />

a “last resort” principle could lead to, noting that the requirement that<br />

military intervention must be a recourse <strong>of</strong> last resort “does not necessarily<br />

mean that every such option must literally have been tried and failed; <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

there will simply not be the time for that process to work itself out. What<br />

it does mean is that there must be reasonable grounds for believing that, in<br />

all circumstances, if the measure had been attempted it would not have<br />

succeeded.” 21<br />

4. Proportionality – “The scale, duration, and intensity <strong>of</strong> the planned<br />

military intervention should be the minimum necessary to secure the<br />

humanitarian objectives in question.” 22<br />

5. Reasonable prospects – “Military action can only be justified if it stands a<br />

reasonable chance <strong>of</strong> successfully halting or averting the atrocities or<br />

suffering that triggered the intervention.” 23<br />

6. Right authority – the military intervention must derive its invocation from<br />

an international actor with the legal authority to authorize military<br />

interventions into a sovereign state. 24<br />

The question <strong>of</strong> right authority is central to whether the<br />

“responsibility to protect” will ever become an efficacious principle <strong>of</strong> action.<br />

As Gareth Evans noted in the wake <strong>of</strong> the Commission’s report, “[w]hen it<br />

comes to authorizing military intervention for human protection purposes, the<br />

argument is compelling that the United Nations, in particular the Security<br />

Council, should be the first port <strong>of</strong> call. The difficult question – starkly raised<br />

by Kosovo – is whether it should be the last.” 25 Thus, although the<br />

Commission’s report made clear that the United Nations should be the first<br />

stop in obtaining authorization to intervene for protection purposes, it did not<br />

foreclose the option that states unilaterally, in coalitions, or under the auspices<br />

<strong>of</strong> regional organizations, could intervene if the United Nations failed to take<br />

appropriate action. 26<br />

The issue <strong>of</strong> right authority was next taken up by the United Nations’<br />

High-Level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change, whose mandate<br />

encompassed issues mainly pertaining to institutional reform at the U.N.<br />

Unsurprisingly, then, the focus <strong>of</strong> the eventually issued report centered on the<br />

primacy <strong>of</strong> U.N. authorization, specifically via the Security Council. 27<br />

“Unlike the Commission [], the panel did not envisage that an international<br />

responsibility to protect could be invoked by coalitions <strong>of</strong> the able or willing<br />

21 Id.<br />

22 Id.<br />

23 Id.<br />

24 Id. pp. 86-88.<br />

25 Id. pp. 86-87.<br />

26 The responsibility to protect 54-55; see Stahn, supra note 13, at 104; R. J. Hamilton, The Responsibility to<br />

Protect: From Document to Doctrine—But What <strong>of</strong> Implementation?, 19 Harv. Hum Rts. J. (2006) pp.<br />

289-291.<br />

27 See High-level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change, a More Secure World: Our Shared<br />

Responsibility (2004).


26 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

or regional organizations in the absence <strong>of</strong> Security Council authorization.<br />

The report stressed that the ‘emerging norm’ <strong>of</strong> a ‘collective international<br />

responsibility to protect’ was only ‘exercisable by the Security Council’ and<br />

only if military intervention was at stake.” 28 Again unsurprisingly, this same<br />

tact was presented in Secretary-General Annan’s 2005 report, In Larger<br />

Freedom: Towards Development, Security and Human Rights for All. 29 In this<br />

report, the “[u]se <strong>of</strong> force was described as an ultima ratio measure that, if<br />

taken, ought to be carried out by the Security Council. The notion <strong>of</strong><br />

responsibility to protect was used to constrain, rather than to enable, the use <strong>of</strong><br />

force.” 30 As Carsten Stahn noted, “the general focus <strong>of</strong> the report on the<br />

[Security] Council and the silence <strong>of</strong> the secretary-general on alternative<br />

means <strong>of</strong> carrying out interventions for purposes <strong>of</strong> human protection<br />

indicated a general reluctance to accept military action without the Security<br />

Council’s authorization.” 31<br />

Nonetheless, despite the United Nations own attempts to maintain<br />

not only a focus on the Security Council, but a monopoly <strong>of</strong> decision, gray<br />

area was restored to the “right authority” debate via the 2005 World Summit<br />

Outcome Document, the product <strong>of</strong> the High-Level Plenary Meeting <strong>of</strong> the<br />

60th Session <strong>of</strong> the General Assembly. 32 The relevant provisions <strong>of</strong> that<br />

document are paragraphs 138 and 139, which embody the responsibility to<br />

protect and contemplate the circumstances when the residual responsibility <strong>of</strong><br />

the international community may be activated. Paragraph 138 recognizes that<br />

“Each individual State has the responsibility to protect its populations from<br />

genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity. This<br />

responsibility entails the prevention <strong>of</strong> such crimes, including their<br />

incitement, through appropriate and necessary means.” Turning from the<br />

state’s internal responsibilities, paragraph 139 addresses the external<br />

dimension <strong>of</strong> the state’s responsibility: “The international community,<br />

through the United Nations, also has the responsibility to use appropriate<br />

diplomatic, humanitarian and other peaceful means, in accordance with<br />

Chapter VI and VIII <strong>of</strong> the Charter, to help to protect populations from<br />

genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity.” When<br />

that responsibility comes into play, the international community should be<br />

“prepared to take collective action, in a timely and decisive manner, through<br />

the Security Council, in accordance with the Charter, including Chapter VII,<br />

on a case-by-case basis and in cooperation with relevant regional<br />

organizations as appropriate, should peaceful means be inadequate and<br />

28 Stahn, supra note 13, p. 106.<br />

29 See Report <strong>of</strong> the Secretary General, in Larger Freedom: Towards Development, Security and Human<br />

Rights for All (2005).<br />

30 Stahn, supra note 13, at 107.<br />

31 Id. pp. 107-08.<br />

32 G.A. Res. 60/1 (24, October, 2005).


PARADIGM SHIFTS IN INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE 27<br />

national authorities are manifestly failing to protect their populations from<br />

genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity.” 33<br />

The Outcome Document does not, contrary to the previous iterations<br />

by Annan and the High-Level Panel on Threats, Challenges, and Change,<br />

“firmly state that UN collective security action constitutes the only option for<br />

responding to mass atrocities through the use <strong>of</strong> force ... It leaves the door<br />

open to unilateral response through its ‘case-by-case’ vision <strong>of</strong> collective<br />

security and qualified commitment to act in cooperation with regional<br />

organizations (‘as appropriate’).” 34 Another commentator has posited that<br />

unilateral intervention may be contemplated upon the satisfaction <strong>of</strong> three<br />

conditions: (1) one <strong>of</strong> a narrow set <strong>of</strong> “extreme human rights abuses” is<br />

present; (2) a course <strong>of</strong> international action has been exhausted or is infeasible<br />

(“the agreement implies a hierarchy <strong>of</strong> actors and <strong>of</strong> interventions: Good faith<br />

U.N. action is privileged over unilateralism and peaceful action is privileged<br />

over violent means.”); and (3) the intervention is undertaken solely for<br />

purposes <strong>of</strong> protection. 35<br />

Although the circumstances that may warrant a military intervention<br />

in the face <strong>of</strong> a state’s failure to protect its own citizens are more or less clear,<br />

the course <strong>of</strong> conduct contemplated once those circumstances become<br />

apparent is less so. The four documents explored above diverge in this regard,<br />

with some contemplating potential unilateral or multilateral action outside the<br />

confines <strong>of</strong> the U.N. system if that system itself is unable to take the<br />

appropriate steps, while others view the U.N. as the sole permissible step on<br />

the enforcement side <strong>of</strong> the responsibility to protect. Unfortunately, until this<br />

dilemma is resolved, there is little reason to believe that the responsibility to<br />

protect, no matter how beautifully theorized, will have any relevance in<br />

practice.<br />

4. THE RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT: AN<br />

EARLY FAILURE<br />

Whether in the Congo, Sudan, Burma, or any <strong>of</strong> a range <strong>of</strong> other states, the<br />

responsibility to protect has failed as a principle in motivating a response to a<br />

state’s clear abdication <strong>of</strong> its internal responsibility to protect its citizens. This<br />

failure can be attributed to a number <strong>of</strong> causes, including a lack <strong>of</strong> clear support<br />

for the principle in practice, “i.e.” a lack <strong>of</strong> political will for broad<br />

implementation, an incompletely and potential incorrectly theorized view <strong>of</strong><br />

the “responsibility,” and the pervasiveness at the United Nations and in foreign<br />

delegations <strong>of</strong> a paper culture antithetical to definitive action.<br />

33 Id. at p. 139.<br />

34 Stahn, supra note 13, p. 109.<br />

35 See A. L. Bannon, The Responsibility to Protect: The U.N. World Summit and the Question <strong>of</strong><br />

Unilateralism, 115 YALE L.J. (2006) pp. 1157-1158.


28 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

First, it is far from clear that there is currently, or ever will be,<br />

sufficient political will to make the responsibility to protect a political reality<br />

in those situations where its invocation would be needed. This is a distinct<br />

issue from those circumstances which present a need for invocation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

principle, but where action may be impossible from a logistical or operational<br />

perspective. The failure here is starker, as the international community could<br />

do something, but for failure to adequately mobilize political resources does<br />

not. The situation in Darfur is <strong>of</strong>ten viewed through this prism, as operational<br />

capacity has never been a real concern in planning on the ground aid and<br />

action. Rather, one <strong>of</strong> the many lessons <strong>of</strong> Darfur is that “even if operational<br />

targets can be met, they will not be met without political commitment.” 36 This<br />

situation, a failure <strong>of</strong> political will despite the capacity to act, is not particular<br />

to Darfur, but will infect every circumstance where the responsibility to<br />

protect is invoked, and this is true for a range <strong>of</strong> reasons, from individual<br />

apathy in the populations <strong>of</strong> other states to self-interest on the part <strong>of</strong><br />

governments and international actors. 37 A failure <strong>of</strong> political commitment is<br />

fatal in these situations, as there is nothing outside the very imperative to<br />

action that these situations cry out for that can compel action on the part <strong>of</strong><br />

states or international bodies. Yet unless this situation can be remedied, the<br />

enunciation <strong>of</strong> the “responsibility to protect” may well “merely mark the turn<br />

<strong>of</strong> another century <strong>of</strong> inaction in the face <strong>of</strong> mass human suffering.” 38<br />

Second, it is also not clear that the principle has achieved any sort <strong>of</strong><br />

real consensus regarding its scope and implementation in theory, making any<br />

practical application that much more difficult. Emma McLean has noted that<br />

“the change in language advocated by the ICISS report has done little to forge<br />

consensus or overcome the struggle between sovereignty and human<br />

rights.” 39 Despite paying lip-service to the responsibility to protect, many<br />

states still wish to maintain rigidly classic definitions <strong>of</strong> sovereignty, whether<br />

so they can keep a tight grasp on regions seeking independence, or because<br />

they simply want outside eyes averted from domestic issues. This inevitably<br />

means that the responsibility to protect cannot gain hard legal traction, as it<br />

remains simply a principle, or a s<strong>of</strong>t law ideal, yet to coalesce around a<br />

definitive consensus <strong>of</strong> when and how sovereignty can be “side-stepped” in<br />

favor <strong>of</strong> international action. 40 Although the responsibility to protect itself<br />

should probably never become such a hard principle <strong>of</strong> law, as that would<br />

36 Hamilton, supra note 26, p. 294.<br />

37 See G. Evans, From Humanitarian Intervention to the Responsibility to Protect, 24 Wis. Int’l L.J. (2006)<br />

pp. 703-720.<br />

38 Hamilton, supra note 26, at 297.<br />

39 McLean, supra note 12, p. 134 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).<br />

40 See, “e.g” id. at p. 135 (“At this juncture it is pertinent to recall that the responsibility to protect is not a<br />

legal principle. It is a policy option which the ICISS grounds on four pillars to support the position that a<br />

norm <strong>of</strong> intervention for human protection purposes in extreme cases <strong>of</strong> major harm to civilians is<br />

emerging.”); Stahn, supra note 13, p. 120 (“Responsibility to protect is in many ways still a political<br />

catchword rather than a legal norm.”).


PARADIGM SHIFTS IN INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE 29<br />

implicate the (unwise) establishment <strong>of</strong> a coercive regime for incidences <strong>of</strong><br />

non-action, 41 the foundations <strong>of</strong> the responsibility must rest on such hard legal<br />

“facts.” Such legal facts must include the extent <strong>of</strong> a state’s sovereignty and<br />

when sovereignty can cease to act as a cover for a state’s treatment <strong>of</strong> its own<br />

citizens, the circumstances when militarily coercive action can be resorted to,<br />

and what the nature <strong>of</strong> the military response could be, “i.e.” international,<br />

unilateral, multilateral, regional. Until these definitional and legal issues are<br />

sorted out, the responsibility to protect will remain not only a point <strong>of</strong> s<strong>of</strong>t<br />

law, but, for all intents and purposes, simple and superfluous verbiage.<br />

Finally, despite any number <strong>of</strong> hortatory declarations <strong>of</strong> support,<br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> the principle is inevitably compromised by the fact that its<br />

implementation rests with an organization that largely finds written reports,<br />

reprimands, and censures sufficient to discharge its responsibility without<br />

getting its hands dirty with real action. The United Nations and any number <strong>of</strong><br />

foreign ministries, including the United States Department <strong>of</strong> State, are paper<br />

cultures intricably bound to notions <strong>of</strong> bureaucracy and the interminable delay<br />

inherent therein. Thus, while many trumpet the idea <strong>of</strong> a responsibility to<br />

protect, there is little reason to believe that this responsibility will ever be put<br />

into action, as the individuals with the responsibility to act must go through<br />

any number <strong>of</strong> paper exchanges and reports before action could actually be<br />

countenanced. Indicative <strong>of</strong> this mindset are two recently issued reports, one<br />

by the United Nations, the other by the International Human Rights Clinic <strong>of</strong><br />

Harvard <strong>Law</strong> School. The Harvard report dealt with the issue <strong>of</strong> international<br />

crimes being committed in Burma, and was overseen by veritable<br />

international jurists, among them, Richard Goldstone, Patricia Wald, and Sir<br />

Ge<strong>of</strong>frey Nice. 42 The report noted the consistent course <strong>of</strong> grave violations <strong>of</strong><br />

human rights law undertaken by Burma’s military junta, and the fact that such<br />

violations had been extensively documented by the United Nations over the<br />

preceding decades in a range <strong>of</strong> reports and resolutions. 43 Noting these<br />

reports, however, the report did not question the efficacy <strong>of</strong> the United<br />

Nations, or advocate for actual action. Rather, it recommended recourse<br />

through the United Nations Security Council; specifically, that the U.N.<br />

should pass resolutions condemning the situation, the Security Council should<br />

establish a Commission <strong>of</strong> Inquiry to verify the violations, and then the<br />

Security Council should establish a judicial mechanism or refer the case to the<br />

International Criminal Court to address the violations. 44 It seems an odd<br />

conclusion to recommend further reports as the definitive action, when that<br />

41 See Stahn, supra note 13, p. 117 (“If the responsibility to protect were indeed a primary legal norm <strong>of</strong><br />

international law, it would be logical to assume that such violations should entail some form <strong>of</strong> legal<br />

sanction in case <strong>of</strong> noncompliance. But it is uncertain on what basis and under which rules such violations<br />

could be remedied.”).<br />

42 See International Human Rights Clinic, Harvard <strong>Law</strong> School, Crimes in Burma (May 2009).<br />

43 See id. pp. 3-4, pp. 37-76.<br />

44 Id. p. 77 and pp. 86-90.


30 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

very conclusion was derived from decades <strong>of</strong> reports that have obviously not<br />

impacted the situation in Burma at all.<br />

This same flawed logic and lack <strong>of</strong> self-awareness is even more<br />

present in the Secretary-General’s report on “implementing” the responsibility<br />

to protect. 45 The Secretary-General correctly noted, regarding genocide, that<br />

“[t]oo <strong>of</strong>ten, the international response has been inadequate. Far from being<br />

consigned to history, genocide remains a serious threat. Not just vigilance but<br />

a will to act are as important today as ever.” 46 Nonetheless, any directive to<br />

act is almost immediately undermined in the same paragraph: “To this effect,<br />

my Special Advisor and his <strong>of</strong>fice continue to pursue a strategy <strong>of</strong> enhancing<br />

the United Nations’ understanding <strong>of</strong> genocide and its precursors, <strong>of</strong><br />

strengthening the ways in which existing international law can be used to<br />

prevent genocide and, above all, <strong>of</strong> monitoring and analyzing ongoing<br />

situations <strong>of</strong> concern and advising me and Member States as needed.” 47 This<br />

inaction is manifest even in the monitoring <strong>of</strong> actual, rather than apprehended,<br />

incidents. Regarding the breakdown in the Congo, “[t]hroughout 2008, my<br />

Special Advisor on the Prevention <strong>of</strong> Genocide has followed the situation in<br />

the eastern DRC … with considerable concern ... From his meetings and<br />

observations, my Special Advisor concluded that there is cause for deep<br />

concern regarding the grave human rights and humanitarian situation in<br />

North Kivu, including the risk <strong>of</strong> genocidal violence[.]” 48 The basic thrust <strong>of</strong><br />

this report is the establishment <strong>of</strong> a framework <strong>of</strong> analysis “to determine<br />

whether there may be a risk <strong>of</strong> genocide in a certain situation.” 49<br />

The framework uses eight questions to prompt information<br />

collection and analysis <strong>of</strong> key areas: (1) the existence and<br />

vulnerability <strong>of</strong> national, ethnic, racial or religious group(s); (2)<br />

human rights violations committed against the group(s); (3)<br />

domestic capacity to prevent genocide; (4) the existence <strong>of</strong> armed<br />

opposition actors; (5) the existence <strong>of</strong> any significant political or<br />

economic motivation encouraging political leads to stroke divisions<br />

between groups; (6) whether elements <strong>of</strong> the crime <strong>of</strong> genocide are<br />

already occurring; (7) whether there are moments <strong>of</strong> particular<br />

vulnerability approaching; and (8) whether there is a discernible<br />

intent to commit to destroy a national, ethnic, racial or religious<br />

population group. 50<br />

45 Implementing the Responsibility to Protect—Report <strong>of</strong> the Secretary-General, A/63/677, January 2009,<br />

21 Int’l J. Refugee L. 519 (2009).<br />

46 Id. p. 536.<br />

47 Id.<br />

48 Id. p. 531.<br />

49 Id. at 519-20.<br />

50 Id. at p. 520, pp. 522-24.


PARADIGM SHIFTS IN INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE 31<br />

One can imagine a genocide being completed in the time that the<br />

United Nations will take to answer these questions which, it bears mentioning,<br />

will only “prompt information collection and analysis” even if a risk <strong>of</strong><br />

genocide is apprehended! The kind <strong>of</strong> analysis and assessment noted by the<br />

United Nations, and undertaken by the Harvard clinic, are important and have<br />

a place within the international justice framework. At some point, however,<br />

the proliferation <strong>of</strong> reports cannot help but have a deleterious impact on the<br />

will to act, as seems clearly the case at this stage in the development <strong>of</strong> the<br />

responsibility to protect. Too many actors and policy makers seem content on<br />

writing about why and in what situations the responsibility should be engaged,<br />

rather than in undertaking the necessary steps to ensure implementation on the<br />

ground. Yet, as is obvious, no matter how beautiful the language or theory <strong>of</strong><br />

the responsibility is, if it cannot protect in practice, it is not worth the paper<br />

these reports are written on. As Gareth Evans has written, “[w]e cannot be<br />

content with reports and declaration. We must, as an international community,<br />

be prepared to act. We will not be able to live with ourselves if we do not.” 51<br />

5. TOWARDS A PRINCIPLE OF ACTION<br />

If the responsibility to protect, as currently conceived and implemented, is<br />

flawed and incapable <strong>of</strong> realizing its inherent promise, how can the<br />

international community proceed towards a principle <strong>of</strong> action that can provide<br />

the requisite impetus in a Darfur or Burma? In order to realize such a principle<br />

<strong>of</strong> action, the responsibility to protect simply has to be more tightly and<br />

coherently theorized, specifically in relation to the types <strong>of</strong> overtly coercive<br />

responses it will countenance under its name, “i.e.” how military action may be<br />

undertaken. This may be the most important aspect regarding moving forward,<br />

but all the hard legal “facts” noted in the preceding section must be dealt with<br />

explicitly and comprehensively, which has only occurred to a limited degree<br />

thus far. Specifically, the limitations on a state’s sovereignty must be<br />

addressed, the circumstances warranting an overt and physical response must<br />

be categorized, and the permissible nature <strong>of</strong> that response must be delineated.<br />

As an initial matter, however, the “theory” <strong>of</strong> the international<br />

community’s residual responsibility must be more fully developed. The<br />

“responsibility to protect” asserts that a state has an internal responsibility to<br />

protect its citizens, and an external responsibility to the international<br />

community to assure that it does fulfill its domestic responsibilities. 52 Only<br />

when the state shirks the internal dimension <strong>of</strong> its responsibility may the<br />

international community’s responsibility be engaged. Rather than view the<br />

international community’s “residual” responsibility as derivative <strong>of</strong> the state’s<br />

51 Evans, supra note 4, p. 89.<br />

52 See McClean, supra note 13, at 128; Stahn, supra note 14, p. 104.


32 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

internal responsibility, that responsibility should derive directly from the<br />

corpus <strong>of</strong> international human rights and criminal law, “i.e.” the international<br />

community has a responsibility to enforce a state’s compliance with its<br />

obligations under international law, and when a state fails to fulfill those<br />

mandates, coercive action by the international community is permissible.<br />

Although a state does have an external responsibility to the international<br />

community to ensure its own compliance with its international obligations,<br />

this responsibility is not one which implicates the domestic populace or<br />

should engage any international responsibility. It is a traditional state-to-state<br />

conception <strong>of</strong> responsibility, and recourse for violations in that sense should<br />

be confined to traditional avenues <strong>of</strong> international dispute settlement. Any<br />

responsibility undergirding the international community’s call to action in<br />

“responsibility to protect” situations should be based not on this external<br />

dimension <strong>of</strong> the state’s responsibility, but on the international community’s<br />

duty to ensure compliance with international law.<br />

Regarding limitations on a state’s sovereignty, it is still accepted that<br />

so long as a state complies with its obligations to its citizens, its internal<br />

actions will avoid external scrutiny. There is a growing consensus, however,<br />

that when this responsibility is neglected, any defense to external scrutiny<br />

based on sovereignty is weak, at best. This fact is derived from the legal<br />

obligations undertaken by the state on behalf <strong>of</strong> its citizens, and the<br />

understanding that a state may not commit atrocities against its subject<br />

populace: “If nations have no sovereign right to commit or passively permit<br />

atrocities against their own populations, then they cannot object on<br />

sovereignty grounds to coercive actions halting the commission <strong>of</strong> those<br />

atrocities.” 53 Thus, the issue <strong>of</strong> sovereignty need not be dealt with in a<br />

necessarily expansive manner. It is sufficient, for purposes <strong>of</strong> discerning when<br />

action is warranted, to address solely those grave circumstances where the<br />

state is actively committing atrocities against its populace. In those<br />

circumstances, a state simply does not have any cognizable defense to<br />

intervention, as it is itself committing crimes under international law which<br />

the intervention is designed to stop. Accordingly, this provides the first legal<br />

peg <strong>of</strong> support for a principle <strong>of</strong> action: action can proceed against a state that<br />

is committing crimes against its population in violation <strong>of</strong> international law,<br />

because that state lacks any colorable sovereignty defense.<br />

But what crimes will trigger this “abrogation” <strong>of</strong> sovereignty?<br />

Any inclination towards adventurism on the part <strong>of</strong> the members <strong>of</strong><br />

the international community can be tempered by making clear that a military<br />

intervention will only be triggered by the worst abuses <strong>of</strong> a state. Election<br />

fraud or electoral corruption would be an insufficient basis to justify a military<br />

response, making action unjustified based on the recent elections in Iran and<br />

53 Bannon, supra note 35, p. 1162.


PARADIGM SHIFTS IN INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE 33<br />

the previous disputed elections in Kenya and Zimbabwe. Violations <strong>of</strong> other<br />

human rights, “i.e.” religious freedom, rights <strong>of</strong> association, freedoms <strong>of</strong><br />

speech and the press, are also not actions that should trigger an overt military<br />

response. This is not to say that these rights are not extraordinarily important<br />

or that some other form <strong>of</strong> coercive response should not be contemplated and<br />

implemented – it is solely to recognize that not every violation <strong>of</strong> a right<br />

cognizable under international law can give rise to the most extreme response.<br />

Rather, the ICISS report has basically gotten it right in categorizing those<br />

circumstances where a state’s actions against its citizens will give rise to<br />

colorable grounds for military intervention: where there is “large-scale loss <strong>of</strong><br />

life, actual or apprehended, with or without genocidal intent, that is the<br />

product either <strong>of</strong> deliberate state action, state neglect or inability to act, or a<br />

failed state situation; or large-scale ‘ethnic-cleansing,’ actual or apprehended,<br />

whether carried out by killing, forced expulsion, acts <strong>of</strong> terror, or rape.” 54<br />

Additionally, intervention will be countenanced when a state is unwilling or<br />

unable to take necessary steps to protect its populace in the wake <strong>of</strong> a natural<br />

disaster or catastrophe. 55 Burma’s inexcusable delay and ultimately<br />

ineffectual response to Cyclone Nargis is just such an example.<br />

To this list should be added a state’s commission <strong>of</strong> crimes against<br />

humanity, as defined by the Rome Statute. This would include as a trigger for<br />

a military response a state’s commission <strong>of</strong> enslavement, deportation or<br />

forcible transfers <strong>of</strong> segments <strong>of</strong> the population, torture, persecution, statesponsored<br />

disappearances, and other inhumane acts <strong>of</strong> a similar character. 56<br />

Although these acts are justifiably seen as reprehensible, the criticism may be<br />

leveled that to include crimes against humanity as a trigger for military action<br />

increases exponentially those circumstances where such action could be<br />

justified. The line between persecution and deprivation <strong>of</strong> religious freedoms,<br />

for instance, may be gray, and there are no good reasons for including crimes<br />

against humanity on the one hand, while excluding similarly egregious<br />

violations <strong>of</strong> human rights on the other. In practice, and in correctly applying<br />

the definition <strong>of</strong> crimes against humanity, including this class should not<br />

unduly expand the range <strong>of</strong> circumstances where a military action may be<br />

countenanced, mainly on account <strong>of</strong> the inherent jurisdictional limitation <strong>of</strong><br />

“crimes against humanity.” The acts noted above are not crimes against<br />

humanity when viewed in isolation, or necessarily even when viewed in the<br />

aggregate: rather, to constitute crimes against humanity, a state must be<br />

committing the listed acts, and the state’s commission <strong>of</strong> those acts must be<br />

widespread or systematic, and the attacks must be directed at a civilian<br />

54 Evans, supra note 4, p. 85.<br />

55 Id.<br />

56 Rome Statute <strong>of</strong> the International Criminal Court, art. 5(1) (b), U.N. Doc. 1998, A/CONF. 183/9 (1 July,<br />

2002).


34 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

population. 57 Considering the prevailing international law definitions <strong>of</strong><br />

“widespread” and “systematic,” it is unlikely that including crimes against<br />

humanity as a trigger to action would lead to action in any but the most<br />

egregious circumstances. 58 Thus, once a state’s sovereignty has been pierced<br />

by its commission <strong>of</strong> atrocities against its citizens, military action can be<br />

countenanced if those atrocities constitute genocide or mass killings, or crimes<br />

against humanity, or if the state fails to take reasonable responsive action in the<br />

face <strong>of</strong> a natural disaster or catastrophe to the significant detriment <strong>of</strong> its<br />

population. This is the second legal peg on which any claim <strong>of</strong> military action<br />

must be hung.<br />

This leaves, <strong>of</strong> course, perhaps the most contentious aspect <strong>of</strong> any<br />

principle <strong>of</strong> action – when can action be resorted to and who is charged with<br />

the responsibility <strong>of</strong> acting?<br />

Much <strong>of</strong> the debate over the “responsibility to protect” has taken<br />

place within the context <strong>of</strong> “growing concerns as to the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the<br />

[United Nations], in particular the Security Council, to respond to genocide,<br />

ethnic cleansing and other mass human rights violations.” 59 The United<br />

Nations generally, and the Security Council specifically, proved ineffectual in<br />

the face <strong>of</strong> genocide in Rwanda and ethnic cleansing and forced displacements<br />

<strong>of</strong> persons in Kosovo, and has thus far failed to act with any sort <strong>of</strong> efficacy in<br />

Sudan, Burma or Congo. Yet the fact remains that the United Nations and the<br />

Security Council are the preeminent legal-political institutions under<br />

international law, for better or for worse, and thus, there is a compelling<br />

argument that before any military action can be undertaken, the Security<br />

Council must be consulted. 60 Nonetheless, there are also compelling reasons<br />

for not consulting the Security Council. Its members vested interests may<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten block definitive action in a state where action is sorely needed, such as<br />

in Darfur, where China has substantial oil interests in Sudan and is loathe to<br />

risk those interests on humanitarian grounds. Self-interest leads to two distinct<br />

problems. First, self-interest, if it proceeds through incrementalism, may delay<br />

any action by the Security Council until far past the time when action could<br />

have been efficacious in halting the commission <strong>of</strong> atrocities. Second, if selfinterest<br />

leads to a more definitive refusal <strong>of</strong> action, say through an explicit<br />

veto <strong>of</strong> a contemplated course <strong>of</strong> action, the Security Council’s refusal to act<br />

will inevitably call into question any actions that are ultimately contemplated<br />

or undertaken by a state singularly or in a coalition <strong>of</strong> other like-minded actors<br />

57 Id. at article. 7(1).<br />

58 See, “e.g.” Prosecutor v Rutaganda, Case No. ICTR-96-3-T, Judgment, 69 (6 December, 1999)<br />

(“‘widespread,’ as an element <strong>of</strong> crimes against humanity, was defined in the Akayesu Judgment, as<br />

massive, frequent, large scale action, carried out collectively with considerable seriousness and directed<br />

against a multiplicity <strong>of</strong> victims, whilst ‘systematic’ was defined as thoroughly organised action,<br />

following a regular pattern on the basis <strong>of</strong> a common policy and involving substantial public or private<br />

resources.”).<br />

59 McLean, supra note 13, p. 124.<br />

60 See Evans, supra note 4, pp. 86-87.


PARADIGM SHIFTS IN INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE 35<br />

in the wake <strong>of</strong> the United Nations’ failure to act. Thus, a pall may be cast over<br />

any eventual action. Of course, delay may become manifest even if no selfinterest<br />

problems are present. As noted previously, the United Nations is<br />

largely a paper culture, and so even if the Security Council may be inclined<br />

towards action, no action will be implemented until a significant number <strong>of</strong><br />

rounds <strong>of</strong> investigation, reporting, and debate have taken place. As with the<br />

“analysis <strong>of</strong> genocide” proposed by the Secretary-General in his report on<br />

implementing the responsibility to protect, one can very well image the<br />

completion <strong>of</strong> genocide or crimes against humanity in the time it may take the<br />

Security Council to act.<br />

This article is not the place to argue for comprehensive United<br />

Nations’ reform or for a position that would blatantly ignore that body’s<br />

prerogatives regarding international law and intervention. Nonetheless, it is<br />

clear that some mechanism must be put into place that will assure at least the<br />

possibility <strong>of</strong> a course <strong>of</strong> action in the face <strong>of</strong> United Nations inaction. Thus,<br />

recourse to unilateralism and multilateralism must be countenanced by a fully<br />

theorized responsibility to protect. The main question that needs to be<br />

answered in that context, then, is when can such action be resorted to?<br />

Assuming for purposes <strong>of</strong> this article that the Security Council, or,<br />

more generally, the United Nations, should be the first stop in seeking<br />

sanction for the use <strong>of</strong> military action against a state that has failed in its<br />

responsibility to protect, alternative courses <strong>of</strong> action should be permitted<br />

when it becomes apparent that the Security Council is either unable or<br />

unwilling to act. Thus, there needs to be a requirement <strong>of</strong> exhausting available<br />

U.N. remedies prior to undertaking a unilateral or multilateral response, but<br />

the exhaustion requirement has to be read in a pragmatic, not formal sense. In<br />

line with Gareth Evans, it is not necessary that every potential remedial course<br />

via the Security Council be attempted and fail prior to undertaking alternative<br />

courses <strong>of</strong> action – a state ready to take action need only be certain that all<br />

international courses have been explored and have either failed or further<br />

attempts would be futile. 61 This is a necessarily subjective test – when further<br />

courses <strong>of</strong> action will be deemed futile will obviously depend on the<br />

perspective <strong>of</strong> the state seeking sanction for action, and there is, unfortunately,<br />

no bright-line rule for when, in any given situation, the Security Council has<br />

become “irrelevant.” To require some level <strong>of</strong> exhaustion, however, assures<br />

that the United Nations will be the first stop in seeking sanction to any<br />

military action, which should, in turn, assure that body a place in the debate<br />

about whether coercive military action is justified and provide it with an<br />

opportunity to undertake its obligation to protect subjugated populaces.<br />

If, however, it fails in this obligation, as seems increasingly likely<br />

given its track record over the preceding decades, the responsibility to protect<br />

61 Id. p. 86.


36 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

must be theorized in such a way as to provide explicit legal cover for action on<br />

the part <strong>of</strong> single states, multilateral coalitions, or regional actors. In most<br />

circumstances, these types <strong>of</strong> responses will be all that is available, either<br />

because <strong>of</strong> self-interest on the part <strong>of</strong> Security Council members or the general<br />

apathy at the United Nations towards action. The failure <strong>of</strong> the United Nations<br />

to act, however, should not be an obstacle in the road to others exercising their<br />

responsibility to protect. Nor are there any fatal criticisms to allowing<br />

unilateral or multilateral action in these circumstances. Unilateralism is<br />

almost a non-starter, as there are few, if any countries, with the ability to<br />

intervene unilaterally in the circumstances contemplated by the responsibility<br />

to protect. The United States, perhaps the only country with both the resources<br />

and will to undertake such interventions, is reeling from two current wars and<br />

is unlikely to undertake, unilaterally, any new obligations. In any event, any<br />

eventual action is still constricted by threshold requirements that would have<br />

to be met, even if unilateral or multilateral action is taken outside the confines<br />

<strong>of</strong> Security Council sanction. Permitting such action does not create a “wild<br />

west” type <strong>of</strong> atmosphere where any gunslinger-country can ride to the rescue<br />

<strong>of</strong> an afflicted population. Such intervention can only occur once a state has<br />

failed in its own duty to protect its citizens, and the actions being undertaken<br />

in that state rise to the requisite level <strong>of</strong> severity to warrant forcible<br />

intervention. In short, the responsibility does not grant a carte blanche to<br />

willing states. Additionally, so long as the responsibility is grounded on the<br />

legal pegs noted above, no claim can be made that the intervention itself, even<br />

if it does occur through a “coalition <strong>of</strong> the willing” rather than under the<br />

auspices <strong>of</strong> the U.N. blue hats, is impermissible. Any intervention will occur<br />

only under the legal principles that sovereignty is limited, and that the<br />

<strong>of</strong>fending state’s sovereignty has been pierced by its active commission <strong>of</strong><br />

heinous crimes against its own population. Finally, and also unfortunately,<br />

self-interest, when present, will likely act against the principle <strong>of</strong> intervention,<br />

not in favor <strong>of</strong> action.<br />

The Bush administration’s invasion <strong>of</strong> Iraq has done much to temper<br />

the international community’s desire to intervene in humanitarian situations.<br />

This is unfortunate, not least so because any humanitarian justification for that<br />

invasion was decidedly post hoc and not relevant to the initial decision to<br />

invade. 62 Those with the power to act now cannot be lead astray by the hangover<br />

<strong>of</strong> that “misadventure.” Action outside the Security Council in<br />

responsibility to protect situations must be sanctioned, as in the bulk <strong>of</strong> such<br />

situations that will be the only true action that is likely to occur. This is<br />

embarrassingly apparent from shots <strong>of</strong> U.N. “peacekeepers” standing by in the<br />

midst <strong>of</strong> the Rwandan genocide, to NATO’s lead role in Kosovo after the<br />

Security Council’s inexcusable abdication <strong>of</strong> responsibility, and to the lead<br />

62 P. Wolfowtiz, Realism, Foreign Pol’y, September-October. 2009, pp. 66-72.


PARADIGM SHIFTS IN INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE 37<br />

role <strong>of</strong> African states and regional organizations in Congo and Darfur. If the<br />

responsibility to protect is to attain the status <strong>of</strong> an action principle, then U.N.-<br />

fetishism must be jettisoned in favor <strong>of</strong> a more pragmatic outlook on<br />

international law and policy. Sanctioning the types <strong>of</strong> alternative action<br />

contemplated by this article, and in those circumstances where such action is<br />

warranted, would go a long way in making such an action principle a reality.<br />

6. CONCLUSION<br />

There is a serious malfunction in the current operation <strong>of</strong> international human<br />

rights and criminal law, as states continue to commit mass atrocities against<br />

their own populations. Although the “responsibility to protect” does represent<br />

a partial shift away from the prevailing paradigm, whereby a state is largely<br />

unaccountable during the commission <strong>of</strong> such acts, it has thus far been<br />

ineffectual in marshaling action against <strong>of</strong>fending states. This is so for a<br />

number <strong>of</strong> reasons, but most importantly because implementation <strong>of</strong> a plan <strong>of</strong><br />

action is too dependent on the United Nations and the Security Council. If a<br />

true “action principle” is to be realized in the near future, unilateral and<br />

multilateral action in the face <strong>of</strong> United Nations inaction must be sanctioned by<br />

the international community. The fears surrounding such a move are largely<br />

unfounded and, in any event, the potential gains to be realized far outweigh any<br />

<strong>of</strong> the associated costs. Although some have sought a balancing in these<br />

situations, weighing the harm to the Security Council if action is undertaken<br />

outside its purview against the harm to populations in the face <strong>of</strong> non-action,<br />

there is another dimension to this analysis, namely the harm to the international<br />

system when states are permitted to flaunt international law with impunity in<br />

the commission <strong>of</strong> crimes against their populations. Darfur, Burma, and North<br />

Korea, to name a few, are horrendous situations not only for the human cost<br />

associated with the regimes’ misdeeds, but also because the very existence <strong>of</strong><br />

these regimes seems a repudiation <strong>of</strong> those human rights that have grounded<br />

the international order since the birth <strong>of</strong> the United Nations. Now is finally the<br />

time for action and the time to cease hiding behind reports and other<br />

instruments <strong>of</strong> interminable delay. For if we fail to act now, in light <strong>of</strong> decades<br />

<strong>of</strong> accumulated knowledge, “we will not be able to live with ourselves.” 63<br />

63 Evans, supra note 4, p. 89.


The right to maternal health care: Developing international<br />

human rights law to prevent maternal mortality<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

L. S. Johnson*<br />

The enormous problems <strong>of</strong> maternal and infant mortality in today’s world are<br />

directly linked to inadequate or nonexistent maternal health care for millions<br />

<strong>of</strong> women everywhere. This paper argues that viewing the right to maternal<br />

health care as a human right is an opportunity to discern ways in which both<br />

individuals and states wishing to advocate for maternal health care could use<br />

existing international human rights law to do so. By examining international<br />

human rights law that has developed to establish maternal health care as a<br />

human right since the 1970s, this paper builds a framework within which<br />

policy alternatives, for both states and individuals, to advocate for the right to<br />

maternal health care are elucidated. After clarifying the international<br />

agreements and community policies that currently recognize maternal health<br />

care as a human right, the author projects future trends in international human<br />

rights law regarding the right to maternal health care. Making<br />

recommendations to build a multifaceted human rights approach to reducing<br />

maternal death, the paper emphasizes the critical need for both states and<br />

individuals to act to prevent maternal mortality globally.<br />

1. INTRODUCTION<br />

When my mother started screaming, we went into the room and<br />

started crying. Why was no one helping her to get relief from the<br />

pain? My father said we had to wait until morning and then find a<br />

way to take her to a health care center. Minute by minute, her<br />

screaming became louder and louder. We were all sitting beside her.<br />

Her face was so red. She carried on screaming until she died. No,<br />

she stopped screaming before she died, but she was breathing very<br />

loudly just before she died. After she died, we cried a lot. We cried<br />

for five days because we had lost the dearest person in our life. My<br />

mother died because we didn’t have a doctor in our village and the<br />

bad roads had been blocked by snow. I hate the snow ... it’s so<br />

difficult for me when I see other children, their mothers giving them<br />

money, sweets, or kissing them ... I can’t stop crying. We still<br />

39<br />

<br />

JD, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Iowa, Programme Assistant.


40 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

remember our mother and love her.<br />

-Twelve-year-old Mehdi, Afghanistan, 2007. 1<br />

Every day around the world, 1500 women die from pregnancy- or childbirthrelated<br />

complications. 2 Because many pregnant women do not receive the care<br />

they need before, during and after childbirth, up to 1 million pregnant women<br />

die every year from what are considered “largely avoidable causes.” 3 Lack <strong>of</strong><br />

health care for the mother during pregnancy and childbirth also leads to tragic<br />

rates <strong>of</strong> infant mortality. 4 “Maternal and perinatal deaths (stillbirths and first<br />

week deaths) together add up to 6.3 million lives lost every year.” 5 These<br />

deaths are directly linked to inadequate or nonexistent maternal health care for<br />

millions <strong>of</strong> women everywhere. This paper addresses the problem <strong>of</strong> maternal<br />

mortality, focusing on the cause <strong>of</strong> this problem as the denial <strong>of</strong> maternal health<br />

care to women globally. With the goal <strong>of</strong> presenting a multifaceted human<br />

rights approach to reducing maternal death around the world, I argue that<br />

maternal health care is a human right. Viewing the right to maternal health care<br />

as a human right is an opportunity to advance a woman-centered approach and<br />

to discern policy alternatives for both states and individuals wishing to<br />

advocate for maternal health care to use existing international human rights law<br />

to do so. 6<br />

1 IRIN, Veil <strong>of</strong> Tears: Afghan’s stories <strong>of</strong> loss in childbirth 16 (L. Tunbridge, ed., M. Popalzai, trans., IRIN<br />

2009) (Mehdi and his family live in the Shahristan District in the central province <strong>of</strong> Daykundi,<br />

Afghanistan, hours away from the nearest health facility).<br />

2 World Health Organization, Maternal Mortality, http://www.who.int/making_pregnancy_safer/ topics/<br />

maternal_mortality/en/index.html (last visited 6 February, 2010).<br />

3 MPs issue maternal deaths warning, BBC News (2 March, 2008), available at http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/<br />

health/7270735.stm. Further, for every woman who dies due to a pregnancy- or childbirth-related<br />

complication, it is estimated that 30 more women will become disabled, injured, or ill because <strong>of</strong><br />

pregnancy. Id. See also P. Farmer, Pathologies <strong>of</strong> Power: Health, Human Rights and the New War on the<br />

Poor 44 (2003) (noting that more than half a million women die each year during childbirth, and<br />

according to analyses <strong>of</strong> 1995 statistics, 99.8 percent <strong>of</strong> these deaths occurred in developing countries).<br />

4 Every year across the globe, 3 million babies are stillborn, and nearly 750,000 <strong>of</strong> these die during birth.<br />

World Health Organization, Maternal Mortality, supra note 2. Additionally, more than 1 million infants<br />

die every year because they are born prematurely. March <strong>of</strong> Dimes, March <strong>of</strong> Dimes White Paper on<br />

Preterm Birth: The Global and Regional Toll 3 (March <strong>of</strong> Dimes Foundation 2009).<br />

5 World Health Organization, Maternal Mortality, supra note 2. The World Health Organization also notes:<br />

“Further many women must live with an obstetric fistula because <strong>of</strong> childbirth complications, and many<br />

babies are disabled. This combined toll that mother and babies are paying for inadequate services should<br />

be considered when maternal mortality is being discussed.” Id. Obstetric fistula is a serious medical<br />

condition resulting from prolonged, obstructed labor with inadequate medical care, in which a hole<br />

develops between the rectum and the vagina or between the bladder and the vagina. The powerful awardwinning<br />

documentary A Walk to Beautiful, which tells the stories <strong>of</strong> five Ethiopian women who suffer<br />

from obstetric fistula and who embark on separate journeys in search <strong>of</strong> a cure and a way to reclaim their<br />

lives and dignity, notes that obstetric fistula is almost entirely preventable. A Walk to Beautiful (Engel<br />

Entertainment 2007). See also, A Walk to Beautiful, http://www.walktobeautiful.com/.<br />

6 I hope to respond to the important argument made by B. Sadasivam, a former Program Coordinator at<br />

Women’s Environment and Development, that “reproductive health advocacy can find itself stymied by<br />

an over-reliance on the rights framework to advance its goals.” In noting that human rights language can<br />

“further politicize deeply sensitive issues <strong>of</strong> reproduction and sexuality,” Sadasivam argues for a<br />

“women-centered approach to reproductive health” that focuses on trusting women and granting women<br />

the authority and the ability to make reproductive decisions based on adequate information and services.<br />

B. Sadasivam, The Rights Framework in Reproductive Health Advocacy – A Reappraisal, 8 Hastings<br />

Women’s L.J. p. 313, p. 315 and pp. 337-338 (1997). I agree with Sadasivam’s assertion that “even a<br />

broad-based human rights approach does not go to a crucial aspect <strong>of</strong> the problem: the failure <strong>of</strong> public<br />

health systems in developing countries,” but I attempt to respond to Sadasivam’s concerns and


THE RIGHT TO MATERNAL HEALTH CARE 41<br />

Part 1 begins by identifying the right to maternal health care as part<br />

<strong>of</strong> the right to health. Part 2 clarifies the international community policies<br />

establishing maternal health care as a human right. In Part 3, I build from<br />

existing international community policy to develop a multifaceted human<br />

rights approach to prevent maternal mortality. First I note that while the right<br />

to health includes the right to maternal health care, the right to maternal health<br />

care must be separated from the right to health to ensure that international<br />

human rights law is meeting the specific needs, cultural differences and<br />

particular experiences <strong>of</strong> women. 7 Next, I focus on policy alternatives for<br />

states, using the United States as an example. I then turn to examining how<br />

individuals and non-state actors can use a human rights perspective and frame<br />

strategies within the current international human rights law regime to act to<br />

ensure the right to maternal health care. I conclude by arguing that building<br />

from existing international community policy that establishes maternal health<br />

care as a human right is an opportunity for both states and individuals to act to<br />

prevent maternal mortality globally.<br />

Clarification <strong>of</strong> the Right to Maternal Health Care<br />

I use the term “maternal health care” to refer to prenatal, obstetric, and<br />

postnatal health care that, at minimum, means: (1) having access to a skilled<br />

health care pr<strong>of</strong>essional when needed during pregnancy; (2) having a skilled<br />

health care pr<strong>of</strong>essional present during delivery if desired; (3) the access and<br />

ability to utilize basic emergency obstetric care; 8 and (4) having access to a<br />

skilled health care pr<strong>of</strong>essional as needed for 42 days after the birth <strong>of</strong> a child<br />

or the termination <strong>of</strong> a pregnancy (such as through miscarriage). 9 These four<br />

6 assert that the formal articulations <strong>of</strong> reproductive rights in international law, which are being advanced<br />

through the development <strong>of</strong> customary international law and through individual lawsuits, provide a<br />

foundation from which reproductive health advocacy can advance its goals. Id.<br />

7 This statement borrows language from an essay by E. Brems, who uses the theoretical framework <strong>of</strong><br />

“inclusive universality” to focus on the “adaptation <strong>of</strong> international human rights law to the specific needs<br />

and experiences <strong>of</strong> women.” E. Brems, Protecting the Rights <strong>of</strong> Women, in International Human Rights in<br />

the 21st Century: Protecting the Rights <strong>of</strong> Groups 100 (G. M. Lyons & J. Mayall, eds., 2003), reprinted<br />

(with changes from E. Brems) in Human Rights in the World Community: Issues and Action 120, 123 (R.<br />

P. Claude & B. H. Weston eds., 2006).<br />

8 For the definition <strong>of</strong> “basic” emergency obstetric care that I use, see infra, note 12.<br />

9 Because I use a definition <strong>of</strong> maternal health care that is specifically tailored to preventing maternal<br />

mortality, at a minimum maternal health care must include access to a skilled health care pr<strong>of</strong>essional for<br />

42 days after the termination <strong>of</strong> a pregnancy, whether through birth or through other causes. This is<br />

because the World Health Organization defines maternal death as: “the death <strong>of</strong> a woman while pregnant<br />

or within 42 days <strong>of</strong> termination <strong>of</strong> pregnancy, irrespective <strong>of</strong> the duration and site <strong>of</strong> the pregnancy, from<br />

any cause related to or aggravated by the pregnancy or its management but not from accidental or<br />

incidental causes.” Further, the World Health Organization distinguishes between maternal death (the<br />

cause <strong>of</strong> which is related to or aggravated by the pregnancy itself) and death during pregnancy (the cause<br />

<strong>of</strong> which can be accidental or incidental) in stating: “To facilitate the identification <strong>of</strong> maternal deaths in<br />

circumstances in which cause <strong>of</strong> death attribution is inadequate, a new category has been introduced:<br />

Pregnancy-related death is defined as the death <strong>of</strong> a woman while pregnant or within 42 days <strong>of</strong><br />

termination <strong>of</strong> pregnancy, irrespective <strong>of</strong> the cause <strong>of</strong> death.” World Health Organization, Maternal<br />

Mortality Ratio, http://www.who.int/healthinfo/statistics/indmaternalmortality/en/index.html (last visited<br />

16 March, 2010).


42 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

minimum standards apply universally, from developing societies to the world’s<br />

wealthiest nations. Ideally maternal health care should include more than<br />

having mere access to a skilled healthcare pr<strong>of</strong>essional, and states should be<br />

encouraged to go beyond providing only the four minimum standards I set<br />

forth. Nonetheless, because as many as 2/3 <strong>of</strong> maternal deaths in the world<br />

today are considered to be preventable, even these minimum requirements for<br />

maternal health care would make a tremendous difference in reducing maternal<br />

death globally. 10 The definition <strong>of</strong> maternal health care that I use draws from<br />

the maternal mortality reduction strategy outlined by Human Rights Watch:<br />

There is broad global consensus on three critical maternalmortality-reducing<br />

strategies – skilled attendance at birth, 11 access<br />

to emergency obstetric care, 12 and access to referral systems ...<br />

Available research suggests that access and ability to utilize<br />

emergency obstetric care will have maximum impact on maternal<br />

mortality ... The most skilled attendant cannot save a woman<br />

experiencing life-threatening pregnancy-related complications<br />

unless she is able to reach the appropriate health facility in time. A<br />

strong referral system is not limited to ambulance services. It must<br />

at a minimum provide obstetric first aid in case <strong>of</strong> emergencies and<br />

have easily accessible and affordable around-the-clock health care<br />

and referral facilities that connect both private and public health<br />

facilities. For all three core interventions to successfully reduce and<br />

eliminate preventable maternal mortality and morbidity there has to<br />

be a functional public health system. Hence the global priority that<br />

10 See, “e.g.” Birth and Death (White Ribbon Alliance), available at http://www.whiteribbonalliance.org/<br />

resources.cfm?a0=video&play=BirthandDeath (last visited 4 March, 2010) (a short film highlighting the<br />

tragedy <strong>of</strong> global maternal mortality, which notes that every single minute a woman is lost to the world<br />

because <strong>of</strong> pregnancy/childbirth complications, and that currently one half <strong>of</strong> the world’s women give<br />

birth without a health worker present); Human Rights Watch, No Tally <strong>of</strong> the Anguish (7 October, 2009),<br />

available at http://www.hrw.org/en/node/85773/section/6 and Three-Quarters <strong>of</strong> Indian Maternal Deaths<br />

Preventable, Study Finds, Medical News Today (12 October, 2009), available at http://<br />

www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/167001.php.<br />

11 Human Rights Watch states: “Skilled birth attendance refers to the presence <strong>of</strong> health staff trained in<br />

midwifery at birth. A skilled birth attendant's ability to save a pregnant woman is limited unless she is<br />

supported by a robust health system that includes emergency obstetric care and referral support. Some<br />

experts argue that ‘the skill level <strong>of</strong> the attendant needed at the peripheral level [sub-district including<br />

village level]...depends upon the ready accessibility and acceptance <strong>of</strong> referral care.’” Human Rights<br />

Watch, supra note 10.<br />

12 Human Rights Watch defines basic emergency obstetric care as including: “the ability to conduct assisted<br />

vaginal deliveries, remove placenta and retained products, and manage pregnancy complications by<br />

intravenously introducing or injecting anticonvulsants, oxytocic drugs (drugs that expand the cervix or<br />

vagina to facilitate delivery), and antibiotics. Comprehensive emergency obstetric care includes the<br />

ability to provide life-saving interventions including through surgery (cesarean sections) and blood<br />

transfusions. Quality basic and emergency obstetric care are dependent on factors such as availability <strong>of</strong><br />

adequate health personnel trained in midwifery skills, specialists such as anesthetists, gynecologists, and<br />

surgeons, adequate infrastructure such as blood banks, blood matching ability, sufficient supply <strong>of</strong> drugs,<br />

and good referral systems.” Id.


THE RIGHT TO MATERNAL HEALTH CARE 43<br />

is being given to maternal mortality reduction is increasingly hailed<br />

as an opportunity to improve public health systems. 13<br />

Maternal health and maternal health care are to be distinguished. The<br />

right to maternal health (like the right to health generally) encompasses a<br />

range <strong>of</strong> divergent factors and underlying human rights that must be realized<br />

to fully realize the right to maternal health (such as food, clean water, and<br />

other socio-economic factors). While the underlying conditions that pregnant<br />

women face around the world are a critical part <strong>of</strong> their right to maternal<br />

health, as an attempt to define a set <strong>of</strong> minimum standards and to develop<br />

attainable, enforceable duties on governments to prevent maternal mortality, I<br />

focus only on the duty <strong>of</strong> governments to provide pregnant women with<br />

maternal health care, arguing that duty exists in international human rights<br />

law. 14 Access to abortion, an underlying condition affecting maternal health<br />

generally, <strong>of</strong>ten is included in advocating for maternal health protection. I<br />

purposefully avoid discussion about abortion rights in this paper, even though<br />

many advocates for reproductive rights consider abortion rights to be<br />

reproductive rights. 15 While access to abortion services would reduce<br />

unwanted pregnancies, and therefore have some effect on reducing overall<br />

maternal mortality, I do not discuss abortion issues, choosing instead to<br />

examine ways in which to ensure that women have access to health care<br />

during non-intentionally-terminated pregnancy and childbirth. 16 Because<br />

health care during pregnancy and childbirth is known to prevent maternal<br />

mortality, I present policy options to advocate for improved access to health<br />

care services during pregnancy and childbirth by using international human<br />

rights law.<br />

13 Id.<br />

14 This duty on governments to provide maternal health care could be considered a “positive human right.”<br />

In arguing that the right to health should be conceived as a negative right, B. Jessie Hill, Associate<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essor and Associate Director <strong>of</strong> the Center for Social Justice at Case Western Reserve <strong>University</strong><br />

School <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong>, distinguishes between positive and negative rights: “A positive right is generally<br />

considered to be an entitlement to something – a right to call on the government to provide, at government<br />

expense, a particular public good, such as shelter, education or medical care. Such rights are sometimes<br />

referred to as ‘socio-economic rights,’ and they are recognized as constitutional rights in a number <strong>of</strong><br />

foreign countries. International law and numerous national constitutions, moreover, specifically recognize<br />

a right to health, which is in most instances understood as a positive entitlement to health care. Negative<br />

rights, by contrast, are simply rights to be free <strong>of</strong> governmental interference with one’s decision to do<br />

something; they are ‘negative checks on government, preserving a sphere <strong>of</strong> private immunity.’” B. J.<br />

Hill, Reproductive Rights as Health Care Rights, 18 Colum. J. Gender & L. (2009) p. 501, pp. 502-503.<br />

15 See, “e.g” Center for Reproductive Rights, Our Issues, http://reproductiverights.org/en/our-issues (last<br />

visited 15 April, 2010).<br />

16 For comprehensive discussions on abortion rights as reproductive rights central to protecting women’s<br />

health, see, e.g., Hill, supra note 14.


44 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

Part 1: The Right to Health and The Right to Maternal<br />

Health Care<br />

The human right to health has been recognized in several fundamental human<br />

rights instruments, and numerous international agreements articulate state<br />

responsibility for the right to health. 17 Among the international instruments<br />

recognizing the human right to health are the Universal Declaration <strong>of</strong> Human<br />

Rights, 18 the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural<br />

Rights, 19 the International Convention on the Elimination <strong>of</strong> All Forms <strong>of</strong><br />

Racial Discrimination, 20 the Convention on the Elimination <strong>of</strong> All Forms <strong>of</strong><br />

Discrimination Against Women, 21 and the Convention on the Rights <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Child. 22 “Several regional human rights instruments also recognize the right to<br />

health, such as the European Social Charter <strong>of</strong> 1961 as revised (article 11), the<br />

African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights <strong>of</strong> 1981 (artricle 16) and the<br />

Additional Protocol to the American Convention on Human Rights in the Area<br />

<strong>of</strong> Economic, Social and Cultural Rights <strong>of</strong> 1988 (article 10).” 23 Perhaps the<br />

most widely used and accepted definition <strong>of</strong> “health” in international human<br />

rights law at present is contained in the preamble to the Constitution <strong>of</strong> the<br />

World Health Organization (“WHO”). 24 The WHO Constitution states:<br />

“Health is a state <strong>of</strong> complete physical, mental and social well-being and not<br />

merely the absence <strong>of</strong> disease and infirmity.” 25 Maternal health care falls under<br />

17 B. C. A. Toebes, The Right to Health as a Human Right in International <strong>Law</strong> 4 (1999). Toebes provides a<br />

comprehensive and detailed examination <strong>of</strong> the right to health in her book, from examining the right to<br />

health in international treaties and declarations to discussing the implementation <strong>of</strong> the right to health. As<br />

a thorough discussion <strong>of</strong> the right to health in international law is beyond the scope <strong>of</strong> this paper, this<br />

author recommends Toebes for a complete study <strong>of</strong> the right to health. See also Realizing the Right to<br />

Health (A. Clapham & M. Robinson eds., 2009), the third <strong>of</strong> the Swiss Human Rights books available at<br />

http://www.swisshumanrightsbook.com/SHRB/shrb_03.html.<br />

18 Universal Declaration <strong>of</strong> Human Rights, G.A. Res. 217A, at Article 25(1) (10 December, 1948), available<br />

at http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html, reprinted in Health and Human Rights: Basic International<br />

Documents 1, 3 (S. P. Marks ed., 2006) [hereinafter Universal Declaration].<br />

19 International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, G.A. Res. 2200A, at Article 12 (16<br />

December, 1966), reprinted in Health and Human Rights: Basic International Documents 4, 7 (S. P.<br />

Marks ed., 2006) [hereinafter CESCR].<br />

20 International Convention on the Elimination <strong>of</strong> All Forms <strong>of</strong> Racial Discrimination, G.A. Res. 2106, at<br />

Article 5(e) (iv) (21 December, 1965), reprinted in Health and Human Rights: Basic International<br />

Documents 81, 81 (S. P. Marks ed., 2006).<br />

21 Convention on the Elimination <strong>of</strong> All Forms <strong>of</strong> Discrimination Against Women, G.A. Res. 34/180, at<br />

Article. 11.1(f) and Article. 12 (18 December, 1979), reprinted in Health and Human Rights: Basic<br />

International Documents 81, 81 (S. P. Marks ed., 2006) [hereinafter CEDAW].<br />

22 Convention on the Rights <strong>of</strong> the Child, G.A. Res. 44/25, at Article 24 (20 November, 1989), reprinted in<br />

Health and Human Rights: Basic International Documents 249, 255 (S. P. Marks, ed., 2006) [hereinafter<br />

CRC]. See also A. Eide & W. B. Eide, Article 24: The Right to Health, in A Commentary on the United<br />

Nations Convention on the Rights <strong>of</strong> the Child (A. Alen et al. eds., 2006).<br />

23 UN Econ. & Soc. Council [ECOSOC], The right to the highest attainable standard <strong>of</strong> health: Substantive<br />

Issues Arising in the Implementation <strong>of</strong> the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural<br />

Rights 2, E/C.12/2000/4 (11 August, 2000) (General Comment No. 14) [hereinafter ECOSOC General<br />

Comment].<br />

24 I. L. Feitshans, Is There a Human Right to Reproductive Health? 8 Tex. J. Women & L. 93, 97 (1998) and<br />

Toebes, supra note 17, at 24.<br />

25 Preamble to the Constitution <strong>of</strong> the World Health Organization as adopted by the International Health<br />

Conference (19-22 June, 1946), available at http://www.who.int/governance/eb/constitution/en/<br />

index.html.


THE RIGHT TO MATERNAL HEALTH CARE 45<br />

the right to health as a form <strong>of</strong> health care that individuals are entitled to as part<br />

<strong>of</strong> the overarching right to health. In other words, the right to health<br />

encompasses the right to maternal health care.<br />

The health <strong>of</strong> pregnant women was not specifically recognized as<br />

part <strong>of</strong> the right to health until the 1994 Programme <strong>of</strong> Action <strong>of</strong> the<br />

International Conference on Population and Development (“ICPD”). 26 The<br />

ICPD Programme <strong>of</strong> Action embraced the right to “reproductive health” and<br />

emulated the WHO definition <strong>of</strong> health in stating: “Reproductive health is a<br />

state <strong>of</strong> complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the<br />

absence <strong>of</strong> disease and infirmity in all matters relating to the reproductive<br />

system and its functions and processes.” 27 The ICPD Programme <strong>of</strong> Action<br />

also noted that implicit to any reproductive rights was “the right <strong>of</strong> access to<br />

appropriate health-care services that will enable women to go safely through<br />

pregnancy and childbirth and provide couples with the best chance <strong>of</strong> having a<br />

healthy infant.” 28 The ICPD Programme <strong>of</strong> Action’s “holistic approach” to<br />

reproductive rights was endorsed at the 1995 Beijing Women’s Conference,<br />

which again placed reproductive rights firmly within the right to health<br />

framework. 29<br />

Part 2: Description and Analysis <strong>of</strong> Past Trends in<br />

Establishing the Right to Maternal Health Care<br />

The 1994 ICPD Programme <strong>of</strong> Action encompassed a broad spectrum <strong>of</strong><br />

reproductive health needs, and symbolized a significant departure from early<br />

articulations <strong>of</strong> reproductive rights in international law. 30 Early attempts to<br />

articulate reproductive rights were heavily influenced by the population control<br />

movement, such as the 1968 International Conference on Human Rights and<br />

the 1974 World Population Plan <strong>of</strong> Action, both <strong>of</strong> which recognized<br />

reproductive rights as the right <strong>of</strong> all couples to decide freely and responsibly<br />

the number and spacing <strong>of</strong> their children and the right to have the information,<br />

26 Feitshans, supra note 24, p. 115.<br />

27 United Nations, Programme <strong>of</strong> Action <strong>of</strong> the International Conference on Population and Development<br />

7.2 (1994), UN Doc. A/CONF.171/13 (18 October, 1994), reprinted in Health and Human Rights: Basic<br />

International Documents 223, 225 (S. P. Marks, ed., 2006) [hereinafter ICPD Programme <strong>of</strong> Action].<br />

28 Id. The ICPD also defined reproductive health care as “the constellation <strong>of</strong> methods, techniques and<br />

services that contribute to reproductive health and well-being by preventing and solving reproductive<br />

health problems. It also includes sexual health, the purpose <strong>of</strong> which is the enhancement <strong>of</strong> life and<br />

personal relations, and not merely counseling and care related to reproduction and sexually transmitted<br />

diseases.” Id.<br />

29 Sadasivam, supra note 6, pp. 321-323. In 1995, the UN Fourth World Conference on Women met in<br />

Beijing, and instead <strong>of</strong> attempting to write a treaty issued an extremely detailed “Platform Document”<br />

which reflected the voices and interests <strong>of</strong> the thousands <strong>of</strong> participants. Feitshans, supra note 24, at 107.<br />

The Platform for Action “placed reproductive rights squarely within human rights already recognized in<br />

national laws, international human rights documents and other consensus documents.” Sadasivam, supra<br />

note 6, p. 323. See also, United Nations, Platform <strong>of</strong> Action <strong>of</strong> the Fourth World Conference on Women<br />

(1995), UN Doc. A/CONF.177/20 (17 October, 1995), reprinted in Health and Human Rights: Basic<br />

International Documents 229 (S. P. Marks, ed., 2006) [hereinafter Beijing Platform for Action].<br />

30 Sadasivam, supra note 6, pp. 318-321.


46 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

education and the means to do so – in other words, the right to family planning<br />

services. 31 The rights to decide how many children to have/when to have them<br />

and to receive family planning services, while important, did little to ensure<br />

that women were receiving health care services during pregnancy and birth.<br />

With the focus on the world’s need for fewer births, the early enunciations <strong>of</strong><br />

reproductive rights gave women little autonomy. Thus starting in the 1970s, the<br />

international women’s rights movement worked to clarify the right to<br />

reproductive health, de-linking reproductive rights from population control “to<br />

promote the perspective that women have an unencumbered right to<br />

reproductive health and choice.” 32<br />

In 1979, the Convention on the Elimination <strong>of</strong> All Forms <strong>of</strong><br />

Discrimination Against Women (“CEDAW”) stated: “states parties shall<br />

ensure to women appropriate services in connection with pregnancy,<br />

confinement and the post-natal period, granting free services where necessary,<br />

as well as adequate nutrition during pregnancy and lactation.” 33 In 1994, the<br />

UN ICPD Programme <strong>of</strong> Action explicitly recognized the right <strong>of</strong> women to<br />

go through pregnancy and childbirth safely for the first time in the<br />

international community. 34 The following year at the UN Fourth World<br />

Conference on Women in Beijing (the “Beijing Women’s Conference”), the<br />

1995 Beijing Platform for Action again recognized this right <strong>of</strong> women,<br />

stating that implicit to the right <strong>of</strong> reproductive health is: “the right <strong>of</strong> access<br />

to appropriate health-care services that will enable women to go safely<br />

through pregnancy and childbirth and provide couples with the best chance <strong>of</strong><br />

having a healthy infant.” 35 In 2000, Goal 5 <strong>of</strong> the Millennium Development<br />

Goals 36 was to “Improve Maternal Health” and listed two targets: reducing by<br />

three quarters the maternal mortality ratio and achieving universal access to<br />

reproductive health. 37<br />

In 2009, reaffirming the ICPD Programme <strong>of</strong> Action, the Beijing<br />

Platform for Action, the 2000 Millennium Declaration, the 2005 World<br />

31 Id. p. 318.<br />

32 Id. p. 320. Sadasivam elaborates, writing that feminist scholars “emphasize that this right should be<br />

protected from manipulation by individuals, states or collectives. Women’s rights advocates have also<br />

called for the recognition <strong>of</strong> women’s right to health, including reproductive health, because it is socially<br />

and politically dependent upon the environments women inhabit.” Id.<br />

33 CEDAW, supra note 21, at Art. 12(2).<br />

34 S. Gruskin et al, Using human rights to improve maternal and neonatal health: history, connections and a<br />

proposed practical approach, 86(8) Bull. World Health Org. 2 (2008), available at http://<br />

www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?pid=S0042-96862008000800010&script=sci_arttext&tlng=en.<br />

35 Beijing Platform for Action, supra note 29, at 94.<br />

36 The Millennium Development Goals (“MDGs”) are eight goals drawn from the actions and targets<br />

contained in the Millennium Declaration that was adopted by 189 nations-and signed by 147 heads <strong>of</strong><br />

state and governments during the United Nations Millennium Summit in September 2000. The MDGs<br />

respond to the world's main development challenges. United Nations Development Programme, About<br />

the MDGs: Basics, http://www.undp.org/mdg/basics.shtml (last visited 15 April, 2010).<br />

37 United Nations, Millennium Development Goals, available at http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/ (last<br />

visited 4 March, 2010). Goal 5 is closely linked to Goal 4, which is to “Reduce Child Mortality” and has<br />

as its target reducing by two thirds, between 1990 and 2015, the under-five mortality rate. Id.


THE RIGHT TO MATERNAL HEALTH CARE 47<br />

Summit Outcome, 38 and the Millennium Development Goals, the UN Human<br />

Rights Council adopted the “Resolution on Preventable Maternal Mortality and<br />

Morbidity and Human Rights” (“Maternal Mortality Resolution”). 39 The<br />

Maternal Mortality Resolution recalled the obligations <strong>of</strong> states parties to the<br />

CEDAW, the Convention on the Rights <strong>of</strong> the Child, the CESCR, and other<br />

international agreements in expressing “grave concern at the unacceptably high<br />

global rate <strong>of</strong> preventable maternal mortality and morbidity.” 40 Specifically,<br />

the Maternal Mortality Resolution recognized that most instances <strong>of</strong> maternal<br />

mortality and morbidity are preventable, and that the rates <strong>of</strong> maternal<br />

mortality and morbidity are a human rights challenge. The Maternal Mortality<br />

Resolution called on all states to:<br />

Renew their political commitment to eliminating preventable<br />

maternal mortality and morbidity at the local, national, regional and<br />

international levels, and to redouble their efforts to ensure the full<br />

and effective implementation <strong>of</strong> their human rights obligations…in<br />

particular the [Millennium Development Goals] on improving<br />

maternal health and promoting gender equality and empowering<br />

women, including through the allocation <strong>of</strong> necessary domestic<br />

resources to health systems. [Further, the Maternal Mortality<br />

Resolution requests] states to give renewed emphasis to maternal<br />

mortality and morbidity initiatives in their development<br />

partnerships and cooperation arrangements, including through<br />

honouring existing commitments and considering new<br />

commitments, and the exchange <strong>of</strong> effective practices and technical<br />

assistance to strengthen national capacities, as well as to integrate a<br />

human rights perspective into such initiatives, addressing the impact<br />

that discrimination against women has on maternal mortality and<br />

morbidity. 41<br />

This “landmark resolution” 42 confirms that the right to maternal<br />

health care is a human right already recognized in international human rights<br />

law. In other words, certain international instruments illustrate that<br />

38 The 2005 World Summit met in September 2005 and brought together more than 170 heads <strong>of</strong> state and<br />

government at the United Nations to make decisions in the areas <strong>of</strong> development, security, human rights<br />

and reform <strong>of</strong> the United Nations. Id. The 2005 World Summit Outcome Document reaffirmed the UN<br />

Millennium Declaration. United Nations, General Assembly Resolution on 2005 World Summit Outcome<br />

(2005) UN Doc. A/RES/60/1 (24 October, 2005) [hereinafter World Summit Outcome].<br />

39 United Nations Human Rights Council, General Assembly Resolution on Preventable Maternal Mortality<br />

and Morbidity and Human Rights (2009), UN Doc. A/HRC/11/L.16/Rev.1 (16 June, 2009) [hereinafter<br />

Maternal Mortality Resolution].<br />

40 Id. p. 3.<br />

41 Id. pp. 3-4.<br />

42 Posting <strong>of</strong> S. Sirkin to Physicians for Human Rights Blog, On Human Rights Day, Commit to End<br />

Maternal Mortality, http://phrblog.org/blog/2009/12/10/on-human-rights-day-commit-to-end-maternalmortality/<br />

(10 December, 2009).


48 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

international community policies recognizing the right to maternal health care<br />

exist, and individuals and states wishing to ensure the right to maternal health<br />

care can build from these existing international community policies in<br />

international human rights law.<br />

To summarize, there are six main international instruments that<br />

address the right to maternal health care: the CEDAW; the ICPD Programme<br />

<strong>of</strong> Action; the Beijing Platform for Action; the Millennium Development<br />

Goals; the World Summit Outcome; and the Maternal Mortality Resolution.<br />

These international instruments both reflect and further establish international<br />

community policy that recognizes the human right to maternal health care.<br />

Each instrument plays a part in establishing a different piece <strong>of</strong> the<br />

multifaceted right to maternal health care.<br />

Clarification <strong>of</strong> International Community Policies<br />

Establishing the Right to Maternal Health Care (Table 1)<br />

Year<br />

International<br />

Instrument<br />

1979 Convention on the<br />

Elimination <strong>of</strong> All Forms<br />

<strong>of</strong> Discrimination Against<br />

Women (CEDAW) a<br />

1994 International Conference<br />

on Population and<br />

Development (ICPD)<br />

Programme <strong>of</strong> Action c<br />

1995 Beijing Platform for<br />

Action d<br />

2000 Millennium Development<br />

Goals e<br />

International<br />

Community Policy<br />

Established by the<br />

Instrument<br />

Women should be ensured<br />

appropriate services in<br />

connection with pregnancy<br />

and the post-natal period. b<br />

Women have the right to go<br />

through pregnancy and<br />

childbirth safely, including<br />

the right <strong>of</strong> access to<br />

appropriate health care<br />

services that enable women<br />

to go safely through<br />

pregnancy and childbirth.<br />

Women have the right to go<br />

through pregnancy and<br />

childbirth safely, including<br />

the right <strong>of</strong> access to<br />

appropriate health care<br />

services that enable women<br />

to go safely through<br />

pregnancy and childbirth.<br />

The right to access<br />

reproductive health should<br />

be universal.


THE RIGHT TO MATERNAL HEALTH CARE 49<br />

2005 World Summit Outcome f States are committed to<br />

achieving universal access<br />

to reproductive health by<br />

2015 as set out in the<br />

Millennium Development<br />

Goals.<br />

2009 Maternal Mortality<br />

Resolution g<br />

The right <strong>of</strong> a woman or<br />

girl to achieve the highest<br />

attainable standard <strong>of</strong><br />

sexual and reproductive<br />

health is a human right.<br />

States have a political<br />

commitment to eliminating<br />

preventable maternal<br />

mortality and to ensure the<br />

full and effective<br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> their<br />

human rights obligations.<br />

a. CEDAW, supra note 21, at Article. 12(2).<br />

b. In monitoring the CEDAW, the Committee on the Elimination <strong>of</strong> Discrimination Against Women further<br />

develops this policy by noting that it is discriminatory for a state party to refuse to legally provide for the<br />

performance <strong>of</strong> certain reproductive health services for women, states parties are obligated to eliminate<br />

barriers to women’s access to appropriate health care, and states are to report on the measures they have<br />

taken to ensure timely access to the range <strong>of</strong> services related to reproductive health in general. United<br />

Nations, Committee on the Elimination <strong>of</strong> Discrimination Against Women, General Recommendation<br />

No. 24: Women and Health Article. 12(1) (1999), reprinted in HEALTH AND HUMAN RIGHTS: BASIC<br />

INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTS 241, 241-244 (S. P. Marks, ed., 2006).<br />

c. ICPD Programme <strong>of</strong> Action, supra note 27.<br />

d. Beijing Platform for Action, supra note 29.<br />

e. Millennium Development Goals, supra note 37.<br />

f. World Summit Outcome, supra note 38, at 57(g).<br />

g. Maternal Mortality Resolution, supra note 39.<br />

The above international community policies ought to be controlling<br />

in developing the right to maternal health care. Indeed, international initiatives<br />

and conferences have developed the above policies to build the human right to<br />

maternal health care since the late 1980s.<br />

Trends in Using Existing International Community Policy to<br />

Build the Right to Maternal Health Care<br />

In 1987, the United Nations Population Fund (“UNFPA”), the World Bank and<br />

WHO sponsored the International Safe Motherhood Conference in Nairobi,<br />

Kenya, initiating the Safe Motherhood Initiative. 43 The 1987 Safe Motherhood<br />

43 Safe motherhood initiative: 20 years and counting, 368 The Lancet 1130 (30 September, 2006), available<br />

at www.thelancet.com. The Safe Motherhood Initiative (“SMI”) was launched “by international agencies<br />

and governments to raise global awareness about the impact <strong>of</strong> maternal mortality and morbidity, and find<br />

solutions. It was co-sponsored by seven agencies, UNFPA, UNDP, UNICEF, WHO, IPPF, the Population<br />

Council and the World Bank.” United Nations Polulation Fund, Safe Motherhood, 10 EVALUATION<br />

FINDINGS 1 (January, 1999) [hereinafter UNFPA Safe Motherhood Evaluation].


50 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

Conference launched “the global campaign to reduce maternal mortality” and<br />

had two key action messages: (1) “any pregnant woman can develop lifethreatening<br />

complications with little or no advance warning, so all women need<br />

access to quality maternal health services that can detect and manage lifethreatening<br />

complications” and (2) the presence <strong>of</strong> a health-worker with<br />

midwifery skills at every childbirth should be ensured. 44 In 1997, the focus <strong>of</strong><br />

the Safe Motherhood Initiative shifted away from encouraging mass-training<br />

programs for traditional birth attendants to prioritizing health-sector<br />

interventions, which were designed to increase women’s access to a<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional medical during pregnancy and childbirth, especially for lifethreatening<br />

complications. 45 The Safe Motherhood Initiative, launched by<br />

international agencies and governments, immediately found support in many<br />

other international coalitions and confederations, such as the International<br />

Confederation <strong>of</strong> Midwives (“ICM”). 46 The ICM, for example, used the Safe<br />

Motherhood Initiative to campaign for health care for pregnant woman to<br />

combat maternal mortality. 47 The “ICM’s clear message in the campaign for<br />

Safe Motherhood, which has been widely agreed [with] by other agencies, is<br />

that care during childbirth from an attendant with midwifery skills is the single<br />

most effective way to reduce maternal death.” 48<br />

The Safe Motherhood Initiative developed along with the<br />

international community policies that continued to be established in<br />

international instruments after 1994. In 2004, WHO published a joint<br />

statement with ICM called “Making Pregnancy Safer,” which again<br />

emphasized the critical role <strong>of</strong> a skilled health care attendant at a birth in<br />

reducing maternal mortality, and comprised WHO’s own then-current drive<br />

toward Safe Motherhood. 49 ICM itself today works with other “pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

federations,” such as the International Federation for Gynecologists and<br />

Obstetricians (“FIGO”), the International Council <strong>of</strong> Nurses (“ICN”) and<br />

partners with the Partnership for Safe Motherhood and New Born Health in<br />

advancing the goals <strong>of</strong> the Safe Motherhood Initiative. 50 United Nations<br />

agencies have also used the Safe Motherhood Initiative as impetus to develop<br />

priorities and programs to combat maternal mortality. As new international<br />

instruments have shaped international community policy, the resulting<br />

projects designed to reduce maternal mortality have also been reshaped. Since<br />

the ICPD Programme <strong>of</strong> Action established in international community policy<br />

the recognition that women have the right to go through pregnancy and<br />

44 Safe motherhood initiative, supra note 50.<br />

45 Id.<br />

46 International Confederation <strong>of</strong> Midwives, The Safe Motherhood Initiative, http://<br />

www.internationalmidwives.org/TheSafeMotherhoodInitiative/tabid/616/Default.aspx (last visited 4<br />

March, 2010).<br />

47 Id.<br />

48 Id.<br />

49 Id.<br />

50 Id.


THE RIGHT TO MATERNAL HEALTH CARE 51<br />

childbirth safely, including the right <strong>of</strong> access to appropriate health care<br />

services during pregnancy and childbirth, United Nations agencies have been<br />

able to approach reducing maternal mortality as a “human rights<br />

imperative.” 51<br />

Drawing from the layers <strong>of</strong> international community policy that have<br />

been established by new international instruments since 1994 (see above<br />

table), United Nations organizations, such as UNFPA, have implemented<br />

strategies to reduce maternal mortality. UNFPA uses a three-pronged strategy<br />

to work toward the Millennium Development Goal <strong>of</strong> reducing maternal death<br />

globally: “(1) All women have access to contraception to avoid unintended<br />

pregnancies; (2) All pregnant women have access to skilled care at the time <strong>of</strong><br />

birth; and (3) All those with complications have timely access to quality<br />

emergency obstetric care.” 52 Using this three-pronged strategy and drawing<br />

from international community policy as enunciated in the Millennium<br />

Development Goals, UNFPA has established the Maternal Health Thematic<br />

Fund to “increase the capacity <strong>of</strong> national health systems to provide a broad<br />

range <strong>of</strong> quality maternal health services, reduce health inequities, and<br />

empower women to exercise their right to maternal health.” 53 UNFPA has<br />

also joined with UNICEF, the World Bank and WHO – the four agencies<br />

collectively are known as “The Health 4” or “H4” – to enhance support to the<br />

sixty countries with the highest maternal mortality rates. 54 UN agencies are<br />

not alone in using a human rights approach to combat maternal mortality.<br />

The International Initiative on Maternal Mortality and Human Rights<br />

(“IIMMHR”), which is a partnership <strong>of</strong> “international, regional, and national<br />

civil society organizations” also seeks to make recognizing the connection<br />

between maternal mortality and human rights a political priority. 55 In<br />

promoting government accountability for the implementation <strong>of</strong> policies to<br />

reduce maternal mortality, IIMMHR lists five “core global commitments that<br />

address maternal mortality,” including the Millennium Development Goals,<br />

the Beijing Platform for Action, the World Summit Outcome and the ICPD<br />

Programme <strong>of</strong> Action among the five. 56 IIMMHR uses international<br />

instruments to establish that international community policy dictates that the<br />

reduction <strong>of</strong> maternal mortality is a human rights imperative. In so doing,<br />

IIMMHR is able to place attainable obligations on governments to eliminate<br />

preventable maternal mortality. Perhaps the most important obligation, at least<br />

the most effective in reducing maternal mortality, is to provide maternal<br />

51 United Nations Population Fund, Safe Motherhood, http://www.unfpa.org/public/mothers/consensus.html<br />

(last visited 4 March, 2010).<br />

52 Id.<br />

53 Id.<br />

54 Id.<br />

55 IIMMHR, About Us, http://righttomaternalhealth.org/about-us/about (last visited 4 March, 2010).<br />

56 International Initiative on Maternal Mortality and Human Rights Brochure, available at http://<br />

righttomaternalhealth.org/about-us/about (last visited 4 March, 2010).


52 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

health care.<br />

Since the late 1980s, the trend has been that international groups, at<br />

times partnered with representatives from state governments, play a back and<br />

forth with the international policies establishing the right to maternal health<br />

care as a human right. International groups (UN agencies, other coalitions,<br />

partnerships, confederations, initiatives and pr<strong>of</strong>essional federations) inform<br />

the development <strong>of</strong> the international instruments, which both codify and<br />

establish international community policy on the right to maternal health care.<br />

At the same time, international community policy informs the work that<br />

international groups are doing. For example, over time, international<br />

conferences have formulated maternal mortality as a human rights issue,<br />

resulting in international instruments now treating the right to maternal health<br />

care as a human right. The 1994 ICPD Conference, the 1995 Beijing<br />

Women’s Conference and the 1997 Tenth Anniversary Safe Motherhood<br />

Consultation 57 all focused on maternal mortality as a social injustice and<br />

helped to redefine preventable maternal mortality in terms <strong>of</strong> being a violation<br />

<strong>of</strong> rights, including the right to maternal health care.<br />

As Bharati Sadasivam, a former Program Coordinator at Women’s<br />

Environment and Development, has noted, the declarations and statements<br />

from such conferences:<br />

Although lacking the binding nature <strong>of</strong> treaty law, [have] undeniable<br />

value in advancing reproductive health goals. First, these<br />

declarations and statements add to the practice <strong>of</strong> customary law.<br />

Although UN conference documents are not legally binding, they<br />

are politically enforceable since they represent a consensus among<br />

all member nations. Second, they shape domestic law by giving<br />

advocates the language to make legal demands, foster a rights<br />

debate and ensure informal obligations on the part <strong>of</strong> state and nonstate<br />

actors. The impact <strong>of</strong> conference statements and declarations<br />

on customary and domestic law is critical given the scant<br />

international and domestic jurisprudence on women’s health and the<br />

absence <strong>of</strong> case law. 58<br />

Adding to this vast body <strong>of</strong> conference declarations and statements<br />

are statements issued by UN organizations, such as in 1999, when the Health 4<br />

issued a joint statement asserting that for women, “human rights include<br />

access to services that will ensure safe pregnancy and childbirth.” 59 This year,<br />

57 In 1997 a thematic evaluation was conducted to assess the “relevance, efficiency, effectiveness and<br />

impact <strong>of</strong> UNFPA-supported Safe Motherhood strategies” under the Safe Motherhood Initiative. UNFPA<br />

Safe Motherhood Evaluation, supra note 50, p. 1.<br />

58 Sadasivam, supra note 6, p. 323.<br />

59 World Health Organization, Reduction <strong>of</strong> Maternal Mortality: A Joint WHO/UNFPA/UNICEF/World<br />

Bank Statement (1999).


THE RIGHT TO MATERNAL HEALTH CARE 53<br />

the UN Commission on the Status <strong>of</strong> Women (“CSW”) plans to undertake a<br />

review <strong>of</strong> the implementation <strong>of</strong> the Beijing Platform for Action at its 54th<br />

session (informally called “Beijing +15”) and with the landmark 2009<br />

Maternal Mortality Resolution so recently adopted by the Human Rights<br />

Council, the CSW session and the conclusions it reaches will likely be shaped<br />

by the international community policy codified in the Maternal Mortality<br />

Resolution. 60 In turn, the member states, the representatives <strong>of</strong> nongovernmental<br />

organizations and the representatives <strong>of</strong> UN entities<br />

participating in the 2010 CSW review <strong>of</strong> the Beijing Platform for Action will<br />

go on to influence future development regarding the right to maternal health<br />

care.<br />

Projection <strong>of</strong> Future Trends in Establishing the Right to<br />

Maternal Health Care<br />

The Maternal Mortality Resolution called on states to integrate a human rights<br />

perspective into initiatives to eliminate preventable maternal mortality and<br />

morbidity. 61 The right to maternal health care has been increasingly recognized<br />

as a human right in international instruments and in international community<br />

policies, as reflected in initiatives, declarations and statements made by UN<br />

agencies and other international (including non-governmental) organizations.<br />

The dialogic relationship between community policy (both international and<br />

domestic) on the one hand, and the codification <strong>of</strong> such policy in international<br />

instruments on the other, is an expansion <strong>of</strong> the relationship between customary<br />

international law and international law in its binding form. The relationship is<br />

both dialogic and cyclical, as illustrated below.<br />

60 This session <strong>of</strong> the UN Commission on the Status <strong>of</strong> Women (“CSW”) will mark the 15 th anniversary <strong>of</strong><br />

the Beijing Fourth World Conference on Women. Therefore the CSW session will embark on a 15-year<br />

review <strong>of</strong> the Beijing Platform for Action and “emphasis will be placed on the sharing <strong>of</strong> experiences and<br />

good practices, with a view to overcoming remaining obstacles and new challenges, including those<br />

related to the Millennium Development Goals.” The CSW session is scheduled for March 1-15, 2010.<br />

United Nations Division for the Advancement <strong>of</strong> Women, Beijing +15, http://www.un.org/womenwatch/<br />

daw/beijing15/index.html (last visited 4 March, 2010).<br />

61 Maternal Mortality Resolution, supra note 39, pp. 3-4.


54 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

What this means for the right to maternal health care is that, starting<br />

in the 1970s with the women’s movement’s work to clarify the right to<br />

reproductive health, significant non-binding declarations, statements and<br />

documents were produced that influenced community policy at all levels,<br />

customary international law, and eventually binding treaties. Once the process<br />

began to move maternal health care from being a social value to a human<br />

right, 62 the wheels were in motion for this interdependent process to occur. As<br />

a result, today the right to maternal health care is recognized in all four<br />

“forms” – in community policy, in customary international law, in<br />

international instruments, and in the international declarations, statements and<br />

conference documents being produced even as this paper is read.<br />

I predict that the development <strong>of</strong> the right to maternal health care will<br />

continue in the future, strengthening maternal health care as an identifiable<br />

right along the lines <strong>of</strong> other civil and political rights currently more<br />

recognized in international human rights law. This prediction is based on the<br />

fact that the importance <strong>of</strong> recognizing maternal health care as a human right<br />

remains at the forefront <strong>of</strong> international discussions about human rights,<br />

women’s issues and health care. There are no fewer than 13 international<br />

62 See infra Part 3.


THE RIGHT TO MATERNAL HEALTH CARE 55<br />

events scheduled for 2010 alone that will bring maternal health care into the<br />

spotlight, at least in some capacity, including the UN Human Rights Council’s<br />

14 th session, in which the Human Rights Council plans to follow up on the<br />

Maternal Mortality Resolution. 63 During the CSW session reviewing the<br />

Beijing Platform for Action, at least one panel discussion will focus on<br />

maternal health care: “Maternal Mortality – rights <strong>of</strong> ‘critical concern’ within<br />

and beyond Beijing” is a panel discussion co-sponsored by the Center for<br />

Economic and Social Rights, Amnesty International, Action Canada for<br />

Population and Development, Center for Reproductive Rights, Human Rights<br />

Watch, International Initiative on Maternal Mortality and Human Rights,<br />

International Planned Parenthood Federation, Ipas, and the Women's Global<br />

Network for Reproductive Rights. 64 These agencies recognize maternal<br />

mortality as “an issue <strong>of</strong> gender justice, as well as social and economic<br />

justice,” and advocate for the right to maternal health (including the right to<br />

maternal health care) as a human right that is “about the human rights <strong>of</strong><br />

women, not only the rights to life and to health, but about failures to meet the<br />

full range <strong>of</strong> economic and social rights that contribute to the underlying<br />

poverty and deprivation that results in maternal mortality.” 65 Amnesty<br />

International, for example, has articulated the right to maternal healthcare in<br />

stating: “Women have the right to not be denied maternal health care, which<br />

should be accessible, affordable, adequate and <strong>of</strong> sufficiently high quality,<br />

taking into account their cultural needs. They have the right to access health<br />

care without discrimination.” 66 As the right to maternal health care continues<br />

to develop in the future, new approaches are needed, both to further develop<br />

international law recognizing maternal health care as a human right, and to<br />

work to ensure the right to maternal health care globally.<br />

Part 3: A Multifaceted Human Rights Approach to Prevent<br />

Maternal Mortality<br />

The DFID Health Resource Centre, which provides technical assistance and<br />

information to the British Government’s Department for International<br />

Development, has noted that: “carefully contextualized rights-based<br />

63 Center for Economic and Social Rights, Dying While Giving Life? Maternal Mortality is a Human Rights<br />

Issue: International Events, http://www.cesr.org/article.php?id=772 (last visited 4 March, 2010)<br />

[hereinafter 2010 International Events].<br />

64 Id. These panel discussions sponsored by NGOs also produce important documents that contribute to<br />

informing the development <strong>of</strong> maternal health care as a right within the human rights framework. For<br />

example, in 2009, at the 11 th Session <strong>of</strong> the UN Human Rights Council, NGOs brought together a panel<br />

<strong>of</strong> international and national experts as a side-event to discuss the need for a human rights perspective in<br />

combating maternal mortality. See Center for Reproductive Rights et al., Combating Maternal Mortality:<br />

Why Bring Human Rights into the Picture? (5 June, 2009).<br />

65 2010 International Events, supra note 70.<br />

66 Amnesty International USA, Right to Maternal Health Care, http://www.amnestyusa.org/violenceagainst-women/stop-violence-against-women-svaw/right-to-maternal-health-care/page.do?id=1351018<br />

(last visited 4 March, 2010).


56 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

approaches can add a critical impetus to existing means <strong>of</strong> reducing maternal<br />

mortality.” 67 Burns Weston has examined child labor as a multidimensional<br />

human rights problem and elaborated a “multifaceted problem-solving/policyimplementing<br />

typology” that outlines human rights strategies for all actors<br />

(from individuals to states) in the international community to work to abolish<br />

child labor. 68 Though this paper will not go as in depth as Weston has in<br />

outlining his typology, I also seek to provide policy alternatives for both<br />

individuals and states to utilize existing international law, and to go beyond<br />

using only the law, to prevent global maternal mortality. As Weston writes in<br />

the child labor context:<br />

Though formal legal institutions and procedures created specifically<br />

to promote and protect human rights are indispensable components<br />

<strong>of</strong> a comprehensive strategy for the abolition <strong>of</strong> child labor, they are<br />

by no means the only components – indeed, not even the most<br />

effective or important in many instances. As previously stated, the<br />

abolition <strong>of</strong> child labor requires broad and deep social change, and<br />

for this is needed far more than the formal legal establishment, even<br />

when dedicated specifically to the promotion and protection <strong>of</strong><br />

human rights. 69<br />

Weston argues that bottom-up or grass roots approaches, approaches<br />

in what he names “extra-legal” realms, are intrinsic to the approaching the<br />

problem <strong>of</strong> child labor. 70 Similarly, solving the problem <strong>of</strong> global maternal<br />

death requires “extra-legal” approaches, and such approaches must be grass<br />

roots or bottom-up to address the local reasons that the human right to<br />

maternal health care is not being recognized.<br />

Maternal death is universal. While the problems <strong>of</strong> maternal and<br />

infant mortality are most acute in developing countries, women in rich and<br />

medically advanced nations like the United States also still face shocking<br />

barriers to receiving adequate services during pregnancy and childbirth. 71<br />

67 K. Hawkins, Developing a Human Rights-Based Approach to Addressing Maternal Mortality: Desk<br />

Review (DFID Health Resource Centre 2005).<br />

68 B. Weston, Child Labor in Human Rights <strong>Law</strong> and Policy Perspective, in Human Rights in Labor and<br />

Employment Relations: International and Domestic Perspectives, chapter 4 at 73-121 (Labor and<br />

Employment Relations Association Series, J. A. Gross & L. Compa eds., 2009).<br />

69 Id. at 104.<br />

70 Id. at 105.<br />

71 Disparities in access to primary health care between populations in the United States based on race and<br />

socioeconomic status are well documented. The 2008 National Health Care Disparities Report mandated<br />

by Congress in 42 U.S.C. 299a1(a)(6) noted that “Americans too <strong>of</strong>ten do not receive the care they need<br />

or they receive care that causes harm.” Agency for Health Care Research and Quality, 2008 National<br />

Health Care Disparities Report 1 (March 2009) available at http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/nhdr08/<br />

nhdr08.pdf. With regard to maternal health care, the 2008 report found that the rate <strong>of</strong> pregnant African-<br />

American women who did not receive prenatal care in the first trimester was 1.6 times higher than the rate<br />

for white American pregnant women; for American Indian and Alaska Native women, the rate <strong>of</strong><br />

pregnant women not receiving prenatal care in the first trimester was 2.1 times higher than white


THE RIGHT TO MATERNAL HEALTH CARE 57<br />

There are many reasons why pregnant women may not receive the care they<br />

need. 72 Even in countries where maternal health care is more readily<br />

available, negative or discriminatory attitudes toward women can prevent<br />

women from accessing the care that is available. 73 To be truly effective, a<br />

human rights strategy to advocate for maternal health care requires advocacy<br />

at all levels, from local organizations to intergovernmental organizations. 74<br />

As illustrated in the above diagram, local realms inform international realms,<br />

and vice versa, and the interactions work to develop international human<br />

rights law. Mobilizing local communities, raising awareness, improving<br />

education and strengthening governmental abilities to provide the minimum<br />

71 American pregnant women; and the rate <strong>of</strong> pregnant Hispanic American women not receiving prenatal<br />

care in the first trimester was 2.0 times higher than non-Hispanic white American pregnant women. Id. at<br />

Table H.1, 9-10. In the United States, race can affect both an individual’s access to care independent <strong>of</strong><br />

socioeconomic status, as well as the medical treatment an individual receives, also regardless <strong>of</strong><br />

socioeconomic status. This is documented in the obstetrical treatment received by African-Americans<br />

versus European-Americans. V. R. Randall, Racist health care: reforming an unjust health care system to<br />

meet the needs <strong>of</strong> African-Americans, in Justice and Health Care: Comparative Perspectives 147, 187 (A.<br />

Grubb & M. J. Mehlman eds., 1995).<br />

72 The World Health Organization (WHO) notes that many pregnant women do not receive care “because<br />

there are no services where they live, they cannot afford the services because they are too expensive or<br />

reaching them is too costly.” Further, some women may decide not to use the services available to them<br />

“because they do not like how care is provided or because the health services are not delivering highquality<br />

care.” Finally, WHO recognizes that cultural beliefs and a women’s “low status in society” can<br />

also prevent a pregnant woman from getting the care she needs. World Health Organization, Maternal<br />

Mortality, supra note 2.<br />

73 For example, in discussing a recent Amnesty International report on maternal death in Burkina Faso<br />

(where 2,000 women die every year from complications during pregnancy and birth), Claudio Cordone,<br />

interim Secretary General <strong>of</strong> Amnesty International stated: “Women in Burkina Faso are trapped in a<br />

vicious cycle <strong>of</strong> discrimination which makes giving birth potentially lethal.” This “cycle <strong>of</strong><br />

discrimination” refers to the fact that “most women in Burkina Faso are subordinate to the men in their<br />

lives with little or no control over key decisions such as when to seek medical care and the timing and<br />

spacing <strong>of</strong> their pregnancies in spite <strong>of</strong> having equal status under Burkinabe law.” Further, women and<br />

girls in Burkina Faso continue to be subjected to early marriages and female genital mutilation. Amnesty<br />

International, Pregnant Women in Burkina Faso Dying Because <strong>of</strong> Discrimination (27 January, 2010),<br />

http://www.amnesty.org/en/news-and-updates/report/pregnant-women-burkina-faso-dying-becausediscrimination-20100127.<br />

In an article examining strategies used by human rights NGOs in their work,<br />

Alicia Ely Yamin, former Director <strong>of</strong> Research and Investigations at Physicians for Human Rights, used<br />

an individual narrative to describe the dire consequences <strong>of</strong> societal discrimination against women in<br />

Peru. In detailing the death <strong>of</strong> a twenty-five year old woman named Elena who was very ill after giving<br />

birth to her third child, Yamin writes: “The young doctor, Elena’s husband and brother-in-law and the<br />

[community health worker] began debating [whether to take Elena many hours away to the district<br />

hospital] in Spanish. Throughout, neither Elena nor her sisters-in-law, who in any case only spoke<br />

Aymara, was ever consulted. Her husband was told that he would at least have to pay for the pick-up<br />

truck’s gas – which could add up to more than the price <strong>of</strong> a cow – and, if Elena died at the hospital, he<br />

would have to pay to have the body brought back too. Her husband and brother-in-law decided not to<br />

move Elena, and she died a few hours later <strong>of</strong> a postpartum hemorrhage.” A. E. Yamin, The Future in the<br />

Mirror: Incorporating Strategies for the Defense and Promotion <strong>of</strong> Economic, Social, and Cultural<br />

Rights into the Mainstream Human Rights Agenda, 27 HUM. RTS. Q. 1200 (2005), reprinted in Health and<br />

Human Rights 85, 86-87 (R. Cook & C. Ngwena eds., 2007).<br />

74 Yamin writes on the importance <strong>of</strong> a human rights perspective in policymaking and advocacy in public<br />

health, and asks what a human rights perspective might add to the individual story <strong>of</strong> Elena, the young<br />

woman who died after childbirth in Peru because <strong>of</strong> her lack <strong>of</strong> access to maternal health care: “a human<br />

rights lens underscores that death from pregnancy-related causes is not ‘natural,’ but rather a product <strong>of</strong><br />

social priorities and policy decisions; it changes why Elena’s death matters from a question <strong>of</strong><br />

productivity lost or personal tragedy to one <strong>of</strong> injustice; it focuses the analysis on different forms <strong>of</strong><br />

discrimination; it forces us to look at the state’s accountability for Elena’s situation; it demands that we<br />

ask why those affected do not participate in the relevant decisions at all levels; it calls for multi-sectoral<br />

strategies, which connect health to infrastructure, education, and the like; and many other possibilities.”<br />

Yamin, supra note 80, at 1202. See also A. E. Yamin, Challenges and Possibilities for Innovative Praxis<br />

in Health and Human Rights: Reflections from Peru, 6 HEALTH & HUM. RTS. 35, 36-40 (2002).


58 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

standards <strong>of</strong> maternal health care are all aspects <strong>of</strong> a comprehensive approach<br />

to ensuring the right to maternal health care. 75 Using a human rights<br />

perspective to approach the global problem <strong>of</strong> maternal mortality will help<br />

achieve the “fundamental shift in thinking and action [that] is required if<br />

progress towards reducing maternal mortality is to be achieved.” 76 Maternal<br />

mortality is caused by acknowledged, documented and universal<br />

determinants. 77 “These determinants are <strong>of</strong>ten mutually reinforcing, and<br />

directly linked to poverty.” 78 Approaching the right to maternal health care as<br />

a human right is a way to comprehensively address the varying but<br />

interrelated determinants <strong>of</strong> maternal mortality, as well as a way to bring a<br />

woman-centered approach into international efforts to eliminate preventable<br />

maternal mortality.<br />

Separating the Right to Maternal Health Care from the<br />

Right to Health<br />

Viewing the right to maternal health care as a human right that stands on its<br />

own, apart from the right to health framework, achieves greater protection for<br />

the right to maternal health care. 79 The right to maternal health care is integral<br />

75 Maha Muna, a representative <strong>of</strong> the United Nations Population Fund described a comprehensive approach<br />

to reducing maternal mortality as part <strong>of</strong> a panel discussion in 2009. “What does it take [to reduce<br />

maternal mortality]? Three focus areas: first <strong>of</strong> all, a recognition that giving birth safely is a human rights<br />

standard and principle which is inexpensive. Limited measures need to be taken to get there: access to<br />

contraceptives, skilled personnel and prompt emergency obstetric care. Secondly, acknowledging the<br />

challenges in addressing rights-holders, which require mobilizing communities, raising awareness as well<br />

as tackling inequality and discrimination. Complications during childbirth are the leading cause <strong>of</strong> death<br />

for women in Africa and for girls 15-19 in developing countries in general. This reflects entrenched<br />

discrimination against women and failure to promote women's rights. Many women are unable to exercise<br />

their rights because <strong>of</strong> their youth, poverty and ethnic background. The link between rights-holders and<br />

duty-bearers is made through civil society. This needs a comprehensive approach that tackles also sexual<br />

violence, early child marriage etc. And finally, we need culturally-sensitive access to health care. We<br />

must bring international norms and standards to the lives <strong>of</strong> women and girls.” M. Muna, Combating<br />

Maternal Mortality: Why Bring Human Rights Into the Picture, Panel Discussion (5 June, 2009),<br />

available at http://righttomaternalhealth.org/resource/HRC-panel-2009.<br />

76 Hawkins et al., supra note 74, p. 2.<br />

77 The DFID Health Resource Centre, which provides technical assistance and information to the British<br />

Government’s Department for International Development, notes that the causes <strong>of</strong> maternal mortality are<br />

well known. The report the DFID issued on addressing maternal mortality lists the actual determinants <strong>of</strong><br />

maternal mortality as:<br />

• Women’s status, starting with lack <strong>of</strong> education, which is linked to early marriage and childbearing;<br />

inability to take decisions regarding health care; low valuation <strong>of</strong> girls and women, particularly in the<br />

peak reproductive years, and poorer access to nutrition<br />

• Family and community beliefs which prevent early identification <strong>of</strong> problems related to pregnancy, or<br />

lack <strong>of</strong> awareness <strong>of</strong> pregnant women’s needs<br />

• Women’s lack <strong>of</strong> access to health care services due to inaccessibility, cost, or perceived poor quality<br />

• Poorly functioning health systems and a lack <strong>of</strong> skilled personnel, supplies, equipment, and adequate<br />

referral systems<br />

• A lack <strong>of</strong> a supportive and protective legal and policy environment, or where it exists poor enforcement<br />

<strong>of</strong> its provisions<br />

Hawkins et al., supra note 74, p. 6.<br />

78 Id.<br />

79 In response to the valuable article by B. J. Hill, which argues that advocates and scholars interested in<br />

achieving greater protection for reproductive rights, specifically abortion, in the United States should look<br />

to the negative right <strong>of</strong> health, I note that Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Hill herself has acknowledged: “the negative right to


THE RIGHT TO MATERNAL HEALTH CARE 59<br />

to reducing maternal mortality – “the greatest unsolved public health issue <strong>of</strong><br />

our time.” 80 Leaving the right to maternal health care as a right encompassed<br />

under the right to health may allow states defining “health” in a certain way to<br />

ignore the specific needs <strong>of</strong> pregnant women. For example, state-run family<br />

planning programs with explicit goals <strong>of</strong> population control (such as in China,<br />

India and Indonesia) have “long-standing records <strong>of</strong> neglect <strong>of</strong> women’s health<br />

needs and coercion.” 81 As part <strong>of</strong> the right to maternal health that states must<br />

protect, the right to maternal health care requires “positive measures to ensure<br />

access to reproductive health care and services for all women.” 82 A woman’s<br />

right to health during pregnancy is relevant to diverse value systems, but the<br />

right to maternal health care should traverse diverse value systems, particularly<br />

when a value system jeopardizes a woman’s right to health care. While cultural<br />

practices should be taken into account in international human rights decisionmaking,<br />

83 allowing cultural practices to shape the right to health can allow the<br />

right to maternal health care to go unrecognized. Failing to recognize the right<br />

to maternal health care is ignoring the most obvious human right – the right to<br />

life. The reality is “that the right to life is violated daily by death in pregnancy<br />

and childbirth, which could have been avoided if women enjoyed better health<br />

and better access to reproductive health services.” 84 The right to maternal<br />

health care is particularly susceptible to manipulation by individuals, societies<br />

and governments. Advocates for the right to maternal health care must fight for<br />

a right that is not only female-specific, but also traditionally and ideologically<br />

a right that is held within the private sphere. 85 Because pregnancy and<br />

79 health will not necessarily expand access to reproductive health care for women who lack it.” Hill, supra<br />

note 14, at 531. As my focus is on combating maternal mortality by expanding access to maternal health<br />

care, I frame the right to maternal health care more as a positive right. For further reading on the shift<br />

from the framing <strong>of</strong> reproductive rights as positive rights to a negative human rights framework, see R. A.<br />

Dempsey & B. M. Meier, Going Negative: How Reproductive Rights Discourse Has Been Altered from a<br />

Positive to a Negative Rights Framework in Support <strong>of</strong> “Women’s Rights,” in Women’s Global Health<br />

and Human Rights 83 (P. Murthy & C. L. Smith eds., 2010).<br />

80 A. Foster-Rosales, Maternal Mortality: The Eye <strong>of</strong> the Storm, in Women’s Global Health and Human<br />

Rights 279 (P. Murthy & C. L. Smith eds., 2010).<br />

81 Id. at 331.<br />

82 S. Maiga, Combating Maternal Mortality: Why Bring Human Rights Into the Picture, Panel Discussion (5<br />

June, 2009), available at http://righttomaternalhealth.org/resource/HRC-panel-2009. Maiga argues that as<br />

part <strong>of</strong> ensuring maternal health, states must also take into account “cultural intricacies and women’s<br />

health and nutritional needs.” Here the reader is reminded that the focus <strong>of</strong> this paper is on the right to<br />

maternal health care, and not the right to maternal health.<br />

83 For an approach – “a methodology <strong>of</strong> respect” – for deciding when cultural differences are to be respected<br />

and when not in international human rights law-making, see B. H. WESTON, The Universality <strong>of</strong> Human<br />

Rights in a Multicultured World, The Future <strong>of</strong> International Human Rights 65 (B. H. Weston & S. P.<br />

Marks, eds., 1999), reprinted (with changes from B. H. Weston) in Human Rights in the World<br />

Community: Issues and Actions 39 (R. P. Claude & B. H. Weston eds., 2006).<br />

84 Sadasivam, supra note 6, at 326. Or as the International Initiative on Maternal Mortality and Human<br />

Rights (“IIMMHR”) notes: “Even though dying <strong>of</strong> an easily preventable cause is a human rights<br />

violation--as much as extrajudicial executions, torture, and arbitrary detentions are--the connection<br />

between maternal mortality and human rights has not been widely recognized. The time is ripe for an<br />

effort that confronts this unacceptable situation.” International Initiative on Maternal Mortality and<br />

Human Rights Brochure, supra note 63.<br />

85 Sadasivam discusses the public/private distinction “central to western liberal theory,” a distinction that<br />

“implies that the private sphere is beyond the reach <strong>of</strong> the state’s legal powers.” Sadasivam notes that is<br />

very difficult to guarantee human rights in the private sphere. Sadasivam, supra note 6, pp. 325-326.


60 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

childbirth traditionally come out <strong>of</strong> a conjugal union, the right to maternal<br />

health care is <strong>of</strong>ten placed within the family, an approach that ignores intrinsic<br />

unequal power relations between the sexes within the family structure. 86<br />

Patriarchal norms, the gender-blind (even gender-biased) nature <strong>of</strong><br />

international law and the public/private ideological construct all inform the<br />

right to health, and therefore operate to make the realization <strong>of</strong> the right to<br />

maternal health care vulnerable to being limited when the right to maternal<br />

health care is placed within the right to health framework.<br />

The right to maternal health care should be recognized as an<br />

independent human right apart from the right to health, demanding <strong>of</strong><br />

enforceable state obligations on its own. For a value to move from being a<br />

respected social value to being considered a human right is a tremendously<br />

important transition, as understanding a right as a human right gives rise to<br />

obligations on the part <strong>of</strong> governments to protect the international human<br />

right. Philip Alston has warned that without an established procedure to<br />

recognize when a value becomes a human right, the international system runs<br />

the risk <strong>of</strong> being overloaded with human rights. 87 Alston argues that any<br />

proposed human right should not only reflect a fundamentally important<br />

social value, but should also be relevant to diverse value systems, and should<br />

be eligible for recognition as an interpretation <strong>of</strong> UN Charter obligations, as a<br />

reflection <strong>of</strong> customary law rules or as a declaratory <strong>of</strong> general principles <strong>of</strong><br />

law. 88 Further, Alston suggests that any proposed human right should be able<br />

to achieve a very high degree <strong>of</strong> international consensus, be compatible with<br />

the general practice <strong>of</strong> states and be specific enough to give rise to identifiable<br />

rights and obligations. 89<br />

Burns Weston has provided five postulates that assist in defining<br />

human rights, writing that despite a lack <strong>of</strong> consensus on these postulates, they<br />

are nonetheless accurate. 90 In considering whether a right is a human right,<br />

Weston’s postulates can guide understanding and provide some sort <strong>of</strong><br />

procedure in recognizing if a right is indeed a human right. In sum, Weston<br />

proposes that human rights: (1) are “understood to represent both individual<br />

and group demands” for “cherished values or capabilities, the most<br />

fundamental <strong>of</strong> which is respect”; (2) are commonly assumed to refer to<br />

“fundamental” as distinct from “nonessential” claims or goods; (3) “refer to a<br />

wide continuum <strong>of</strong> claims ranging from the most justiciable to the most<br />

aspirational”; (4) “are qualified by the limitation that the rights <strong>of</strong> individuals<br />

86 Id. p. 329.<br />

87 P. Alston, Conjuring up New Human Rights: A Proposal for Quality Control, 78 AM. J. INT’L L. pp. 607-<br />

608 (1984), cited in Feitshans, supra note 24, pp. 101-102.<br />

88 Id.<br />

89 Id.<br />

90 See B. H. Weston, Human Rights: Concept and Content, Encyclopaedia Britannica, 15th rev. ed. (2005),<br />

available at http://www.britannica.com/eb/article?tocID=219350, reprinted (with changes from B. H.<br />

Weston) in Human Rights in the World Community: Issues and Actions 17 (R. P. Claude & B. H. Weston<br />

eds., 2006).


THE RIGHT TO MATERNAL HEALTH CARE 61<br />

or groups in particular instances are restricted as much as is necessary to<br />

secure the comparable rights <strong>of</strong> others and the aggregate common interest”;<br />

and (5) “are understood to be quintessentially general or universal in<br />

character.” 91<br />

This independent right to maternal health care meets the standards<br />

set by both Alston and Weston to transition from being a value to being a<br />

fundamental human right with the same international legal status as other<br />

more widely recognized human rights. The right to maternal health care<br />

reflects both individual and group demands for a fundamentally important<br />

social value, as a claim for the fundamental human right <strong>of</strong> life. Just as<br />

pregnancy is universal, the causes <strong>of</strong> maternal and infant mortality are also<br />

universal, and thus maternal health care should be universal. “Given that<br />

maternal mortality is the medical manifestation <strong>of</strong> deep-rooted socioeconomic,<br />

gender and cultural inequities, a human rights framework can be<br />

applied.” 92 Civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights are all<br />

wrapped up in a woman’s right to maternal health care. 93 Finally, the right to<br />

maternal health care is eligible for recognition, as it is a human right at least<br />

already articulated in international human rights law and there is a growing<br />

body <strong>of</strong> customary international law reflecting the consensus that the right to<br />

maternal health care is a human right. While the right to maternal health care<br />

does fall within the right to health framework, and valuable lessons can be<br />

learned from advocacy for the right to health, the right to maternal health care<br />

is a human right that is and must be individually recognized in international<br />

law.<br />

The International <strong>Law</strong> Realm<br />

The right to maternal health care has been articulated in international human<br />

rights law, but further development is needed before state and non-state actors<br />

alike will recognize the right to maternal health care as a human right. To quote<br />

91 Id. pp. 20-21.<br />

92 Foster-Rosales, supra note 87, at 282. Foster-Rosales also lends support to my statement that the causes<br />

<strong>of</strong> maternal and infant mortality are universal in writing: “While most pregnancies and deliveries occur<br />

without serious problems, it is a biological truth that 10-15% <strong>of</strong> pregnant women will develop a<br />

complication. This complication, if not recognized in a timely fashion and managed correctly, may result<br />

in the death <strong>of</strong> the mother.” Id. at 281.<br />

93 For example, the IIMMHR states: “Failure to provide available, accessible, acceptable and quality health<br />

care, including emergency obstetric care, for women during pregnancy and childbirth is a violation <strong>of</strong><br />

women's rights to life, health, equality and non-discrimination. Respect and protection <strong>of</strong> women's rights<br />

to information and decision-making in reproductive health, to freedom from gender-based discrimination<br />

and violence, and to participation in planning and implementing health policies are critical for making<br />

pregnancy and delivery safer for women.” IIMMHR, About Maternal Mortality, http://<br />

righttomaternalhealth.org/about-maternal-mortality (last visited Feb. 22, 2010). Further, IIMMHR lists<br />

separate human rights that can be applied to maternal mortality: “Right to Life; Right to the highest<br />

attainable standard <strong>of</strong> health; Right to equality; Right to freedom from discrimination; Right to decide the<br />

number and spacing <strong>of</strong> children; Right to be free from cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment; Right to<br />

education; Right to information; and Right to enjoy the benefits <strong>of</strong> scientific progress.” International<br />

Initiative on Maternal Mortality and Human Rights Brochure, supra note 63.


62 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

I. L. Feitshans, former legal advisor to the Committee <strong>of</strong> Experts on<br />

Reproductive Health <strong>of</strong> the World Health Organization Collaborative Centre<br />

and Russian Academy <strong>of</strong> Medical Sciences and a Delegate for the Global<br />

Alliance <strong>of</strong> Women's Health to the United Nations Fourth World Conference<br />

on Women:<br />

Without question, there is a vast and vibrant corpus <strong>of</strong> international<br />

human rights law protecting reproductive health rights. A legal<br />

justification does exist to support national, employer-based, or<br />

international collaborative efforts that research, treat, and cure<br />

reproductive health problems. Do we need more law? Are there<br />

gaps in existing rules or the international consensus <strong>of</strong> principles<br />

called “norms” that compel us to study, and codify even further, the<br />

rules protecting health? 94<br />

The answer to the question posed by Feitshans, at least with regard to<br />

the right to maternal health care, is yes. Not only are the rules protecting<br />

maternal health care in need <strong>of</strong> strengthening, but also enforcement<br />

mechanisms and strategies to ensure the right to maternal health care must be<br />

developed. While international consensus that the right to maternal health care<br />

is a human right has developed significantly during the past thirty years, gaps<br />

in existing rules and in international community policy do exist. For example,<br />

<strong>of</strong> the six international instruments discussed in Part 2, on the CEDAW are<br />

binding on states. The other five instruments establishing the right to maternal<br />

health care in international community policy do so through customary<br />

international law and in the “extra-legal” realms, but do not firmly set rules<br />

that states are obligated to provide maternal health care for pregnant women.<br />

In other words, further development is needed. Recognizing the right to<br />

maternal health care as a human right recognizes that women have not only<br />

the authority and the ability to make reproductive decisions, but the right to do<br />

so, as well as the right to be provided with services and adequate information<br />

about those services. 95 To firmly imbed this woman-centered human rights<br />

perspective in approaches to maternal mortality, a stronger international<br />

human rights law regime for the right to maternal health care must be<br />

developed. The right to maternal health care is only one part <strong>of</strong> reducing<br />

maternal mortality, but ensuring maternal health care for all women<br />

recognizes, as Soyata Maiga, Special Rapporteur on the Rights <strong>of</strong> Women in<br />

Africa has stated, that: “The right to survive pregnancy is a fundamental<br />

human right.” 96<br />

94 Feitshans, supra note 24, p. 124.<br />

95 See supra note 6.<br />

96 Maiga, supra note 89.


THE RIGHT TO MATERNAL HEALTH CARE 63<br />

The DFID Health Resource Centre has noted that the “hallmark <strong>of</strong><br />

the rights-based approach” is a dual approach: “strengthening the capacity <strong>of</strong><br />

the rights holder to understand that health care is a right and then helping them<br />

to design a strategy to assert and claim this right while simultaneously<br />

working with the duty bearers to improve their capacity to fulfill their<br />

obligations.” 97 Building a stronger international human rights law regime for<br />

the right to maternal health care must utilize this dual approach. First, as the<br />

right to maternal health care is a human right, taking on a normative value,<br />

governments can and should be held accountable for not meeting their<br />

obligation to provide maternal health care, as states have a duty to ensure the<br />

positive right. Governments can assist each other in improving capacity to<br />

fulfill their obligations, and I argue that the United States should play a role in<br />

leading such capacity building. The United States can do so by ratifying<br />

treaties that recognize the human right to maternal health care and by<br />

contributing to international community policy and customary international<br />

law to further develop the human rights law regime for the right to maternal<br />

health care. Second, non-governmental advocacy groups and individuals can<br />

utilize strategies within and beyond (in Weston’s “extra-legal realms”) the<br />

international legal regime to assert and claim the right to maternal health care.<br />

Policy Alternatives for States<br />

As has already been discussed, for a social value to transition to being a human<br />

right, recognized in international law, is tremendously important, as<br />

recognition in an international instrument places legally binding obligations on<br />

states to take positive steps to guarantee that right to their citizens. In a report<br />

on using human rights to advance maternal health, the World Health<br />

Organization states:<br />

International human rights treaties become legally binding when<br />

governments ratify them. This means that governments must then<br />

ensure that their national laws, policies and practices do not conflict,<br />

and are consistent, with their obligations under international law and<br />

that they respect, protect and fulfill the right to health and other<br />

human rights. When a government ratifies a treaty, it agrees to<br />

submit reports on a periodic basis on the compliance <strong>of</strong> domestic<br />

standards and practices with the human rights enshrined in the<br />

particular treaties. These reports are reviewed by committees that<br />

monitor the application <strong>of</strong> human rights treaties. The committee<br />

97 Hawkins et al., supra note 74, p. 13.


64 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

then issues concluding observations and recommendations, which<br />

should be implemented by the government in question. 98<br />

The Committee on the Elimination <strong>of</strong> Discrimination Against<br />

Women (“CEDAW Committee”) monitors the CEDAW. 99 For the right to<br />

maternal health care, this is extremely significant, as Article 12 <strong>of</strong> the<br />

CEDAW calls upon states to “take all appropriate measures to eliminate<br />

discrimination against women in the field <strong>of</strong> health care in order to ensure<br />

access to health care services, including those related to family planning,<br />

confinement and the post-natal period, granting free services where necessary,<br />

as well as adequate nutrition during pregnancy and lactation.” 100 Article 18 <strong>of</strong><br />

the CEDAW requires states parties to submit to the Secretary-General <strong>of</strong> the<br />

UN for consideration by the CEDAW Committee a report on the legislative,<br />

judicial, administrative or other measures which they have adopted to give<br />

effect to the provisions in the CEDAW; these reports must be submitted every<br />

four years and further whenever the CEDAW Committee so requests. 101<br />

Under the CEDAW, states parties have “different kinds <strong>of</strong> general<br />

legal obligations” to implement to right to maternal health care:<br />

• The obligation to respect rights, which requires states to refrain<br />

from interfering with the enjoyment <strong>of</strong> rights;<br />

• The obligation to protect rights, which requires states actively to<br />

prevent violations <strong>of</strong> human rights by third parties; and<br />

• The obligation to fulfill rights, which requires states to take<br />

appropriate governmental measures toward the full realization <strong>of</strong><br />

rights. 102<br />

These legal obligations, the enforcement <strong>of</strong> which is monitored by<br />

the CEDAW Committee, create legal accountability for states. Such<br />

accountability for protecting the right to maternal health care also comes out<br />

<strong>of</strong> the CESCR. 103 The Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Committee,<br />

which monitors the CESCR, has stated that providing essential obstetric<br />

services “constitutes part <strong>of</strong> a state’s core obligations, which while not<br />

defining a per se violation is a factor in considering whether the government<br />

has demonstrated that the measures it has adopted to provide such services<br />

meet a reasonableness criterion.” 104 Legal accountability can be<br />

98 World Health Organization, Using Human Rights for Maternal and Neonatal Health: A tool for<br />

strengthening laws, policies and standards <strong>of</strong> care, A Report <strong>of</strong> Indonesia Field Test Analysis 5 (2006)<br />

[hereinafter Indonesia Field Test Analysis]. See also Hawkins et al., supra note 74, at 43.<br />

99 Id. at 6.<br />

100 CEDAW, supra note 21, at Article 12, cited in Indonesia Field Test Analysis, supra note 105, p. 18.<br />

101 CEDAW, supra note 21, at Article 18.<br />

102 Hawkins et al., supra note 74, p. 43.<br />

103 CESCR, supra note 19.<br />

104 Yamin, supra note 80, at 1214, citing ECOSOC General Comment, supra note 23, p. 44.


THE RIGHT TO MATERNAL HEALTH CARE 65<br />

supplemented with political accountability, where states act to assist each<br />

other in meeting their obligations. As S. P. Marks has written, accountability<br />

“need not take the form <strong>of</strong> pointing an accusing finger.” 105 Rather, for states<br />

to act to ensure accountability among themselves, Marks continues:<br />

In most situations, the appropriate measures for securing<br />

government accountability consist <strong>of</strong> persuasion, technical<br />

assistance, dialogue, and emulation. While accountability usually<br />

refers to sanctioning an agent <strong>of</strong> the state for violating rules, the<br />

nature <strong>of</strong> the state's obligations relating to the right to health justifies<br />

cooperative means <strong>of</strong> achieving change through weaker forms <strong>of</strong><br />

accountability. The important point is to bring about change, and the<br />

choice between confrontational and cooperative means depends on<br />

circumstances. 106<br />

Governments wishing to advocate for the right to maternal health<br />

care globally should work closely with one another to hold each other<br />

accountable under the CESCR and the CEDAW for the protection <strong>of</strong> the right<br />

to maternal health care.<br />

The ICPD Programme <strong>of</strong> Action and the Beijing Platform for Action,<br />

while both expressing international community policy and adding “content<br />

and meaning” to the articulation <strong>of</strong> the right to maternal health care in<br />

international instruments, are themselves “non-binding consensual policy<br />

documents.” 107 They do not result in legal obligations for states. Nonetheless,<br />

states can hold each other accountable for the rights articulated in the ICPD<br />

Programme <strong>of</strong> Action and Beijing Platform for Action, using the “weaker<br />

forms <strong>of</strong> accountability” suggested by Marks. 108 States can work to develop<br />

the right to maternal health care as a human right recognized in customary<br />

international law by doing so in their own practice. This includes through<br />

domestic legislation, and as evidenced by the work a state does in and through<br />

international organizations. 109<br />

The IIMMHAR has issued a Fact Sheet to the UN Human Rights<br />

Council on the Maternal Mortality Resolution, which includes a list <strong>of</strong><br />

valuable ways in which state governments can take “focused, effective action”<br />

to enhance accountability and advance legal standards on the right to maternal<br />

105 S. P. Marks, The New Partnership <strong>of</strong> Health and Human Rights, 2 HUM. RTS. DIALOGUE 21 (2001),<br />

available at http://www.cceia.org/resources/publications/dialogue/2_06/articles/650.html.<br />

106 Id.<br />

107 Hawkins et al., supra note 74, at 43.<br />

108 See Marks, supra note 112.<br />

109 For an in-depth discussion on the development <strong>of</strong> customary international law, see S. Sahl, Researching<br />

Customary International <strong>Law</strong>, State Practice and the Pronouncements <strong>of</strong> States regarding International<br />

<strong>Law</strong>, Globalex (2007), available at http://www.nyulawglobal.org/globalex/Customary_<br />

International_<strong>Law</strong>.htm#_State_Practice.


66 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

health care. 110<br />

• Develop and implement maternal mortality action plans that adopt<br />

a human rights-centered approach, supported and facilitated by<br />

strong institutional mechanisms and financing.<br />

• Develop effective monitoring and accountability mechanisms at<br />

the facility, community, district, and national levels.<br />

• Ensure that all women, particularly marginalized women, have<br />

access to comprehensive sexual and reproductive health<br />

information and services, without discrimination <strong>of</strong> any kind.<br />

• Establish programs that meet the special sexual and reproductive<br />

health needs <strong>of</strong> adolescents.<br />

• Guarantee that comprehensive primary health services, including<br />

sexual and reproductive health services, are available, accessible,<br />

acceptable, and <strong>of</strong> good quality.<br />

• Collect the data needed to guide implementation and evaluation <strong>of</strong><br />

national action plans and global strategies for addressing maternal<br />

mortality.<br />

• Develop indicators and benchmarks for reducing maternal<br />

mortality.<br />

• Focus on proven, effective interventions, including family<br />

planning, skilled birth attendants, emergency obstetric care,<br />

referral networks, and safe abortion. 111<br />

The DFID Health Resource Centre has noted that to truly reduce<br />

maternal mortality, more systemic change must occur, and such change is<br />

only possible if health policy is dealt with at national levels. 112 The role <strong>of</strong><br />

states is critical to the creation <strong>of</strong> an international community policy<br />

environment that fosters a rights-based approach to maternal health care.<br />

Taking the international community policy expressed by non-binding<br />

international instruments such as the ICPD Programme <strong>of</strong> Action and the<br />

Beijing Platform for Action and implementing that policy at a national level<br />

will help to develop customary international law recognizing the right to<br />

maternal health care as a human right.<br />

The Millennium Development Goals, which call for universal access<br />

to reproductive health to reduce maternal mortality, are not in and <strong>of</strong><br />

themselves legally binding on states. Philip Alston has examined the legal<br />

status <strong>of</strong> the Millennium Development Goals and “particularly the claim that<br />

they reflect customary international law and are thus binding on all<br />

110 IMMHR, Fact sheet: UN Human Rights Council Resolution on Maternal Mortality (December. 2009).<br />

111 Id. p. 2.<br />

112 Hawkins et al., supra note 74, p. 3.


THE RIGHT TO MATERNAL HEALTH CARE 67<br />

governments.” 113 Alston concludes that while at least some <strong>of</strong> the Millennium<br />

Development Goals have met this status and are now recognized in customary<br />

international law, it remains difficult to say that all <strong>of</strong> the Millennium<br />

Development Goals have satisfied the criteria required for a norm to become<br />

part <strong>of</strong> customary law. 114 With regard to Goal 5, which calls for the reduction<br />

<strong>of</strong> maternal mortality through providing universal access to reproductive<br />

health, Alston applies a test to determine if a right articulated in a Millennium<br />

Development Goal has become a part <strong>of</strong> customary international law:<br />

… no right should be excluded which is (i) indispensable to a<br />

meaningful notion <strong>of</strong> human dignity (upon which human rights are<br />

based) and (ii) the satisfaction <strong>of</strong> which is demonstrably within the<br />

reach <strong>of</strong> the government in question assuming reasonable support<br />

from the international community. 115<br />

Alston concludes that Goal 5 meets this test and that it can plausibly<br />

be claimed that Goal 5 (and several <strong>of</strong> the other Millennium Development<br />

Goals that Alston examines) reflects norms <strong>of</strong> customary international law.<br />

Finally, the Maternal Mortality Resolution is generally considered to be nonbinding,<br />

but aids in building customary international law and informing<br />

international community policy. Further, as noted by Sandeep Prasad <strong>of</strong><br />

Action Canada for Population and Development (a human rights advocacy<br />

organization):<br />

… the consensus nature <strong>of</strong> this resolution signals agreement on the<br />

part <strong>of</strong> governments with the various acknowledgments, requests<br />

and calls that the Council makes in it. Moreover, the resolution<br />

reinforces the legally binding obligations that states have already<br />

assumed upon themselves as interpreted by treaty-monitoring<br />

bodies and long-standing commitments that governments have<br />

made. 116<br />

Over time, the Maternal Mortality Resolution could be given weight<br />

as a source <strong>of</strong> international law, but as it has been in existence for less than a<br />

year, at present it seems be only evidence <strong>of</strong> already existing international<br />

113 P. Alston, A Human Rights Perspective on the Millennium Development Goals, Paper prepared as a<br />

contribution to the work <strong>of</strong> the Millennium Project Task Force on Poverty and Economic Development, 3,<br />

available at http://hurilink.org/tools/HRsPerspectives_on_the_MDGs--Alston.pdf (last visited 6 March,<br />

2010).<br />

114 Id. p. 3, p. 20.<br />

115 Id. p. 21.<br />

116 J. Jacobson, UN Human Rights Council Resolution: Maternal Death, Illness Are Human Rights<br />

Violations, RH Reality Check (18 June, 2009), http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2009/06/18/unhuman-rights-council-recognizes-maternal-death-and-illness-human-rights-violations.


68 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

law, and not an obligation-creating instrument on its own. 117 Nonetheless, the<br />

Maternal Mortality Resolution has a valuable role to play in influencing future<br />

trends regarding the development <strong>of</strong> the right to maternal health care in<br />

international law, and states (as well as individuals) wishing to advocate for the<br />

right to maternal health care can utilize the landmark Maternal Mortality<br />

Resolution to lend critical support to the cause.<br />

Summary: Existing Accountability and Policy Alternatives<br />

for States (Table 2)<br />

CEDAW a<br />

Instrument<br />

ICPD Programme <strong>of</strong><br />

Action c<br />

Existing State<br />

Accountability<br />

States parties are under<br />

legal obligation to provide<br />

or further that others<br />

provide family planning<br />

and pregnancy related<br />

services, and are under an<br />

immediate obligation to<br />

ensure that women have<br />

access to pregnancy related<br />

services, if necessary free<br />

<strong>of</strong> charge. b<br />

State accountability only to<br />

the extent that the ICPD<br />

Programme <strong>of</strong> Action is a<br />

reflection <strong>of</strong> customary<br />

international law.<br />

Policy Alternatives for<br />

States<br />

Ratify the CEDAW and the<br />

Optional Protocol.<br />

Support enforcement <strong>of</strong><br />

CEDAW commitments by<br />

the CEDAW Committee.<br />

Hold other states politically<br />

accountable through using:<br />

persuasion, technical<br />

assistance, dialogue, and<br />

emulation.<br />

Hold other states politically<br />

accountable through using:<br />

persuasion, technical<br />

assistance, dialogue, and<br />

emulation.<br />

Develop customary<br />

international law to<br />

recognize the right to<br />

maternal health care<br />

through: practice,<br />

legislation,<br />

pronouncements, and<br />

working with international<br />

organizations.<br />

117 For a discussion <strong>of</strong> General Assembly Resolutions as authoritative sources <strong>of</strong> international law, see G. J.<br />

Kerwin, The Role <strong>of</strong> United Nations General Assembly Resolutions in Determining Principles <strong>of</strong><br />

International <strong>Law</strong> in United States Courts, 4 DUKE L. J. 876 (1983) and M. D. Öberg, The Legal Effects<br />

<strong>of</strong> Resolutions <strong>of</strong> the UN Security Council and General Assembly in the Jurisprudence <strong>of</strong> the ICJ, 16(5)<br />

EUROPEAN J. INT’L L. 879 (2005).


THE RIGHT TO MATERNAL HEALTH CARE 69<br />

Beijing Platform for<br />

Action d<br />

Millennium Development<br />

Goals e<br />

World Summit Outcome h<br />

State accountability only to<br />

the extent that the Beijing<br />

Platform for Action is a<br />

reflection <strong>of</strong> customary<br />

international law.<br />

Goal 5, which asserts that<br />

the right to access<br />

reproductive health should<br />

be universal, is a reflection<br />

<strong>of</strong> norms <strong>of</strong> customary<br />

international law.<br />

Reaffirms accountability<br />

under the Millennium<br />

Development Goals.<br />

Hold other states politically<br />

accountable through using:<br />

persuasion, technical<br />

assistance, dialogue, and<br />

emulation.<br />

Develop customary<br />

international law to<br />

recognize the right to<br />

maternal health care<br />

through: practice,<br />

legislation,<br />

pronouncements, and<br />

working with international<br />

organizations.<br />

Call upon treaty bodies to<br />

take note <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Millennium Development<br />

Goals (“MDG”) to take full<br />

account <strong>of</strong> the MDG<br />

commitments in their<br />

work. f<br />

Submit information to the<br />

MDG Monitor to<br />

demonstrate support for<br />

and a commitment to the<br />

MDGs. g<br />

Hold other states politically<br />

accountable through using:<br />

persuasion, technical<br />

assistance, dialogue, and<br />

emulation.<br />

Develop customary<br />

international law to<br />

recognize the right to<br />

maternal health care<br />

through: practice,<br />

legislation,<br />

pronouncements, and<br />

working with international<br />

organizations.<br />

(see above)


70 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

Maternal Mortality<br />

Resolution i<br />

State accountability to the<br />

extent that the Maternal<br />

Mortality Resolution is a<br />

reflection <strong>of</strong> customary<br />

international law. State<br />

accountability to the extent<br />

that the Maternal Mortality<br />

Resolution is a<br />

reinforcement <strong>of</strong> already<br />

existing legal obligations<br />

under the CEDAW and<br />

other human rights treaties.<br />

Hold other states politically<br />

accountable through using:<br />

persuasion, technical<br />

assistance, dialogue, and<br />

emulation.<br />

Develop customary<br />

international law to<br />

recognize the right to<br />

maternal health care<br />

through: practice,<br />

legislation,<br />

pronouncements, and<br />

working with international<br />

organizations.<br />

a. CEDAW, supra note 21, at Article. 12(2).<br />

b. Id. See also Toebes, supra note 17, at 335.<br />

c. ICPD Programme <strong>of</strong> Action, supra note 27.<br />

d. Beijing Platform for Action, supra note 29.<br />

e. Millennium Development Goals, supra note 37.<br />

f. See Alston, supra note 120, at 57.<br />

g. See MDG MONITOR, http://www.mdgmonitor.org/index.cfm (last visited 6 March, 2010).<br />

h. World Summit Outcome, supra note 38, at 57(g).<br />

i. Maternal Mortality Resolution, supra note 39.<br />

Clarification <strong>of</strong> Policy Alternatives for States: Recommendations<br />

for the United States<br />

The United States is not immune to the tragic problem <strong>of</strong> maternal mortality.<br />

In spite <strong>of</strong> being among the world’s most technologically advanced and<br />

wealthy nations, the United States currently falls behind more than 40 other<br />

countries when it comes to rates <strong>of</strong> maternal death. 118 “More women die in the<br />

U.S. after giving birth than die in countries like Poland, Croatia, Italy and<br />

Canada, to name a few.” This year, the Joint Commission, an independent nonpr<strong>of</strong>it<br />

organization that accredits and certifies health organizations and<br />

programs in the U.S., issued an Alert that warns: “current trends and evidence<br />

suggest that maternal mortality rates may be increasing in the U.S.” 119 Citing<br />

a Center for Disease Control and Prevention study, the Joint Commission notes<br />

that in the U.S. there is a four-fold increased risk <strong>of</strong> pregnancy-related death<br />

for black women, and an increased risk for women who did not receive prenatal<br />

care. For marginalized women in the United States, gaining access to maternal<br />

health care may be as difficult as in some <strong>of</strong> the world’s least developed<br />

countries. The United States should take on a leadership role in recognizing the<br />

right to maternal health care as a human right, not only to assist and protect<br />

118 K. Snow & S. Amos, Maternal Mortality Rates Rising in California, ABC World News (Mar. 4, 2010),<br />

available at http://abcnews.go.com/WN/changing-life-preventing-maternal-mortality/story?id=9914009.<br />

119 The Joint Commission, Preventing Maternal Death, 44 Sentinel Event Alert (26 January, 2010), available<br />

at http://www.jointcommission.org/SentinelEvents/SentinelEventAlert/sea_44.htm.


THE RIGHT TO MATERNAL HEALTH CARE 71<br />

pregnant women in the United States, but also to tackle the atrocious problems<br />

<strong>of</strong> maternal and infant mortality globally.<br />

To elaborate on the policy alternatives for states outlined in Table 2<br />

above, this paper <strong>of</strong>fers recommendations for the United States to advocate<br />

for the right to maternal health care globally. The United States should ratify<br />

the CEDAW and the CEDAW Optional Protocol. Amnesty International<br />

notes:<br />

The United States is among a small minority <strong>of</strong> countries that have<br />

not yet ratified CEDAW, including Iran and Sudan. The United<br />

States has the dubious distinction <strong>of</strong> being the only country in the<br />

Western Hemisphere and the only industrialized democracy that has<br />

not ratified this treaty. The Senate Foreign Relations Committee<br />

voted in July 2002 to recommend ratification <strong>of</strong> CEDAW, but the<br />

Treaty has never come before the full Senate for a vote. 120<br />

Currently, the CEDAW is only eight countries away from universal<br />

ratification (with 186 states parties to the CEDAW as <strong>of</strong> March 2010). 121<br />

Without ratification, the United States is not accountable under the provisions<br />

<strong>of</strong> the CEDAW, including Article 12(2), which ensures maternal health care.<br />

To help develop a stronger international law regime for the right to maternal<br />

health care, the United States should ratify the CEDAW and the Optional<br />

Protocol, and support enforcement <strong>of</strong> CEDAW commitments by the CEDAW<br />

Committee to hold other nations legally and politically accountable for the<br />

right to maternal health care.<br />

The United States needs to hold itself legally accountable under the<br />

CEDAW, and therefore ideally ratification should occur without reservations.<br />

In 2002, the last time the CEDAW came before the Senate Foreign Relations<br />

Committee, ratification was recommended subject to reservations,<br />

understandings and declarations. 122 The understandings included: “The<br />

United States understands that Article 12 permits states parties to determine<br />

which health care services are appropriate in connection with family planning,<br />

pregnancy, confinement and the post-natal period, as well as when the<br />

provision <strong>of</strong> free services is necessary, and does not mandate the provision <strong>of</strong><br />

particular services on a cost-free basis” and that “nothing in this Convention<br />

shall be construed to reflect or create any right to abortion and in no case<br />

120 Amnesty International, Convention on the Elimination <strong>of</strong> All Forms <strong>of</strong> Discrimination Against Women<br />

(CEDAW), http://www.amnestyusa.org/violence-against-women/ratify-the-treaty-for-the-rights-<strong>of</strong>women-cedaw/page.do?id=1108216<br />

(last visited 6 March, 2010).<br />

121 N. Gabr, Chair for Committee on the Elimination <strong>of</strong> Discrimination Against Women, Statement to<br />

Commission on the Status <strong>of</strong> Women Fifty-Fourth Session (1-12 March, 2010), available at http://<br />

www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/beijing15/statements/CEDAW.pdf.<br />

122 Library <strong>of</strong> Congress, Legislative Actions: The Convention on the Elimination <strong>of</strong> All Forms <strong>of</strong><br />

Discrimination Against Women, Treaty No. 96-53 (2002), available at http://www.thomas.gov/home/<br />

treaties/treaties.html.


72 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

should abortion be promoted as a method <strong>of</strong> family planning.” 123 These<br />

understandings are unnecessary to state with ratification, at least because the<br />

“CEDAW does not address the matter <strong>of</strong> abortion and, according to the U.S.<br />

State Department, is ‘abortion neutral.’” 124 Making these understandings part<br />

<strong>of</strong> ratification would also serve to limit the accountability <strong>of</strong> the United States.<br />

Such understandings go against using a rights-based approach to maternal<br />

health care.<br />

A rights-based approach asserts that maternal health care is a human<br />

right and that women, not the state, have the right to determine which health<br />

care services are appropriate to their family planning, pregnancy, confinement<br />

and the post-natal period. To protect this positive human right, the state’s role<br />

is to ensure, as much as possible, maternal health care services so that women<br />

have the ability to make such determinations. The CEDAW specifically states<br />

that these services should be free where necessary because so many women in<br />

the world do not receive maternal health care because they cannot afford it.<br />

This includes women in the United States, and the U.S. government should<br />

not try to limit its responsibility when it comes to providing cost-free maternal<br />

health care to pregnant women in need.<br />

Building from the ICPD Programme <strong>of</strong> Action and the Beijing<br />

Platform for Action to the most recent Maternal Mortality Resolution, the<br />

United States should continue to work to build customary international law<br />

that recognizes maternal health care as a human right. Pronouncements <strong>of</strong><br />

states are “excellent resources for the evidence <strong>of</strong> custom,” 125 and the United<br />

States continues to issue documents in the forms <strong>of</strong> diplomatic papers,<br />

memorandums, briefs, position papers and remarks, many <strong>of</strong> which assert a<br />

rights-based approach to maternal health care. For example, in a very recent<br />

statement by Melanne Verveer, U.S. Ambassador-at-Large for Global<br />

Women’s Issues, at Beijing +15, Ms. Verveer provided detailed evidence that<br />

the U.S. recognizes the right to maternal health care, at least in practice. While<br />

the quote is long, it is valuable to cite in full.<br />

The persistently high global rates <strong>of</strong> maternal and child mortality do<br />

not stem from uncertainty about how to save the lives <strong>of</strong> women and<br />

children. We know that providing proven, evidence-based<br />

interventions – such as skilled birth attendants, access to emergency<br />

obstetric care, pre- and post-natal care, nutrition, and access to<br />

family planning – will improve maternal and child health, as will<br />

strengthening health systems to better respond to the needs <strong>of</strong><br />

women and girls.<br />

123 Id.<br />

124 Amnesty International, supra note 136. For a brief discussion <strong>of</strong> abortion and the right to maternal health<br />

care, see supra Clarification <strong>of</strong> the Right to Maternal Health Care.<br />

125 Sahl, supra note 116.


THE RIGHT TO MATERNAL HEALTH CARE 73<br />

To improve the health <strong>of</strong> women and girls, we also need to address<br />

the myriad economic, cultural, social, and legal barriers that impede<br />

their access to needed health care. The unacceptably high rate <strong>of</strong><br />

maternal mortality is directly linked to persistent gender<br />

inequalities, including gender-based violence, harmful traditional<br />

practices such as early and forced marriage, lack <strong>of</strong> education, lack<br />

<strong>of</strong> economic opportunity, and unequal access to adequate health<br />

services and facilities.<br />

The United States is committed to reducing maternal and child<br />

mortality through its Global Health Initiative, which was announced<br />

by President Obama last year and commits to a strong focus on<br />

maternal and child health.<br />

The U.S. has also demonstrated its commitment to the health <strong>of</strong><br />

women and girls by sponsoring a resolution on “Reducing Maternal<br />

Mortality and Morbidity through the Empowerment <strong>of</strong> Women,”<br />

along with a cross-regional group <strong>of</strong> member states. We welcome<br />

delegations’ support for this initiative. 126<br />

The United States, both through pronouncements and through its<br />

work in international organizations, already is helping to develop customary<br />

international law that recognizes maternal health care as a human right. The<br />

U.S. can go further though, and arguably much <strong>of</strong> the work that the U.S. needs<br />

to do should take place within its borders. By passing legislation that uses a<br />

rights-based approach to ensure maternal health care for women in the United<br />

States, the U.S. would go far in serving as a leader for other nations to emulate<br />

in advocating for the right to maternal health care globally.<br />

Policy Alternatives for Individuals & Advocacy Groups<br />

Individuals also play a critical role in the development <strong>of</strong> the international law<br />

regime protecting the right to maternal health care. Individuals can hold states<br />

accountable for their human rights obligations through bringing action against<br />

governments that fail to meet their legal obligations. These actions take two<br />

main forms: litigation in domestic courts and complaints brought before<br />

international committees responsible for the enforcement <strong>of</strong> treaties, such as<br />

the CEDAW Committee. When the CEDAW was first ratified, advocates for<br />

the right to maternal health care complained that the CEDAW was “hobbled by<br />

126 M. Verveer, Statement by Ambassador Melanne Verveer, U.S. Ambassador-at-Large for Global Women's<br />

Issues, at the Fifty-fourth session <strong>of</strong> the Commission on the Status <strong>of</strong> Women, at United Nations<br />

Headquarters (3 March, 2010), available at http://usun.state.gov/briefing/statements/2010/137772.htm.


74 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

the lack <strong>of</strong> an Optional Protocol, which would authorize it to receive<br />

complaints from individuals, groups and organizations alleging violations.” 127<br />

Today this has changed, and with the ratification <strong>of</strong> the CEDAW Optional<br />

Protocol, individuals are now able to bring complaints against governments<br />

that are parties to the CEDAW Optional Protocol. 128 With 99 states parties to<br />

the CEDAW Optional Protocol as <strong>of</strong> today, this is an extremely valuable<br />

mechanism to enforce the right to maternal health care. 129 The CEDAW<br />

Optional Protocol provides a “communications procedure” through which<br />

individuals, groups and organizations can file complaints in writing about<br />

violations <strong>of</strong> rights. 130 Further, the CEDAW Optional Protocol allows the<br />

CEDAW Committee to conduct inquiries into grave or systematic abuses by<br />

states parties to the Optional Protocol with an “inquiry procedure.” 131<br />

In 2007, the Center for Reproductive Rights, along with the Brazilian<br />

group Advocaci, filed a complaint before the CEDAW Committee on behalf<br />

<strong>of</strong> Alyne da Silva Pimentel against the government <strong>of</strong> Brazil. 132 “Alyne, a 28-<br />

year-old Afro-Brazilian woman, died <strong>of</strong> complications resulting from<br />

pregnancy after her local health center misdiagnosed her symptoms and<br />

delayed providing her with emergency care;” Alyne da Silva Pimentel v Brazil<br />

is the first maternal mortality case to be brought before the CEDAW<br />

Committee. 133 The Center for Reproductive Rights alleged that “by failing to<br />

implement effective policies and programs that address the high rates <strong>of</strong><br />

maternal mortality, Brazil is violating its obligations under national and<br />

international human rights law that guarantee women's rights to life, health<br />

and equality,” and cited both Brazil’s Constitution and international human<br />

rights treaties including CEDAW as creating legal obligations for Brazil to<br />

protect the right to maternal health care. 134 The CEDAW Committee gave the<br />

Brazilian government until August 2008 to render a decision regarding the<br />

case, and the CEDAW Committee planned to analyze the case following the<br />

presentation <strong>of</strong> facts and <strong>of</strong>ficial arguments. 135 As <strong>of</strong> the writing <strong>of</strong> this paper,<br />

127 Sadasivam, supra note 6, p. 334.<br />

128 The General Assembly adopted the Optional Protocol to the CEDAW on October 6, 1999 in resolution<br />

54/4 (A/RES/54/4). See CEDAW Optional Protocol, http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/cedaw/<br />

protocol/sigop.htm (last visited 6 March, 2010).<br />

129 Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination <strong>of</strong> All Forms <strong>of</strong> Discrimination Against Women,<br />

G.A. Res. 54/4, 2131 Treaty Series 83, Status available at http://treaties.un.org/ [hereinafter Optional<br />

Protocol Status].<br />

130 CEDAW Optional Protocol, supra note 144.<br />

131 Id.<br />

132 Center for Reproductive Rights, Alyne de Silva Pimentel v Brazil (10 December, 2008), http://<br />

reproductiverights.org/en/case/alyne-da-silva-pimentel-v-brazil-committee-on-the-elimination-<strong>of</strong>discrimination-against-women.<br />

133 Id.<br />

134 For an English translation <strong>of</strong> the full text <strong>of</strong> the Center for Reproductive Rights petition in the Alyne de<br />

Silva Pimentel case, see Latin American and Caribbean Women’s Health Network, Case <strong>of</strong> maternal<br />

morbidity in Brazil goes before the CEDAW committee, The Free Library by Farlex (2008), http://<br />

www.thefreelibrary.com/Case+<strong>of</strong>+maternal+morbidity+in+Brazil+goes+before+the+CEDAW+<br />

committee.-a0198415431.<br />

135 Id.


THE RIGHT TO MATERNAL HEALTH CARE 75<br />

no decision has been rendered by the CEDAW Committee on the case, but the<br />

Center for Reproductive Rights has requested “that the Brazilian Government<br />

compensate Alyne’s family, including her nine year-old daughter, prioritize<br />

the reduction <strong>of</strong> maternal mortality, including training providers and<br />

establishing and enforcing protocols, and improve care in vulnerable<br />

communities.” 136 If the case is successful, it “will lead to recognition <strong>of</strong><br />

government accountability for preventing maternal deaths and state<br />

obligations to promote women’s health.” 137<br />

Individuals, or organizations advocating on behalf <strong>of</strong> individuals, can<br />

also bring litigation on domestic courts to ensure a government’s legal<br />

obligation to provide maternal health care. The Center for Reproductive<br />

Rights has utilized this approach in India, supporting several public interest<br />

lawsuits seeking better implementation <strong>of</strong> India’s National Rural Health<br />

Mission, which aims to reduce maternal mortality, improve service delivery<br />

and to increase equity and access to maternal health care. 138 In April 2009, the<br />

Center for Reproductive Rights filed a memorandum <strong>of</strong> support for Kalyani<br />

Meena in Kalyani Meena v Union <strong>of</strong> India & Others (2008), a case developed<br />

in collaboration with the Human Rights <strong>Law</strong> Network <strong>of</strong> India to “address the<br />

overwhelming number <strong>of</strong> preventable deaths <strong>of</strong> women who die either in<br />

Pregnancy or childbirth in the north Indian state.” 139 The Kalyani Meena case<br />

is before the Jharkhand High Court in India. 140 In May 2009, the Center for<br />

Reproductive Rights prepared a “friend-<strong>of</strong>-the-court” brief in support <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Centre for Health and Resource Management v The State <strong>of</strong> Bihar & Others<br />

(2008), a maternal mortality case highlighting the impact <strong>of</strong> India’s failed<br />

national and local public health policies and the lack <strong>of</strong> access to maternal<br />

health care in Bihar. 141 These are only two cases in a comprehensive strategy<br />

being employed by Indian NGOs and international advocacy groups like the<br />

Center for Reproductive Rights to promote the use <strong>of</strong> litigation in India to<br />

protect women’s reproductive rights, including the right to maternal health<br />

care.<br />

136 L. Cabal & J. M. Todd-Gher, Reframing the Right to Health: Legal Advocacy to Advance Women’s<br />

Reproductive Rights, in REALIZING THE RIGHT TO HEALTH 120, 132 (A. Clapham & M. Robinson eds.,<br />

2009).<br />

137 Id.<br />

138 S. Majumdar, <strong>Law</strong>suits Used to Shrink India’s Maternal Deaths, REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH (24 September,<br />

2009), available at http://www.womensenews.org/story/reproductive-health/090924/lawsuits-usedshrink-indias-maternal-deaths.<br />

139 Center for Reproductive Rights, Kalyani Meena v Union <strong>of</strong> India & Others (2 September, 2009),<br />

available at http://reproductiverights.org/en/case/kalyani-meena-v-union-<strong>of</strong>-india-ors.<br />

140 Id.<br />

141 Center for Reproductive Rights, Centre for Health and Resource Management v The State <strong>of</strong> Bihar &<br />

Others (14 August, 2009), available at http://reproductiverights.org/en/case/centre-for-health-andresource-management-v-the-state-<strong>of</strong>-bihar-others.


76 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

The “Extra-Legal” Realm<br />

Such innovative and far-reaching strategies are critical to the development <strong>of</strong><br />

the international human rights regime recognizing the right to maternal health<br />

care. “The vision <strong>of</strong> a rights-based approach to reducing maternal mortality has<br />

been around for 15 years and more; what is needed are diverse, wide-scale<br />

actions to put it into practice.” 142 International advocacy groups are vital in<br />

developing such approaches to protecting the right to maternal health care.<br />

Grassroots and other initiatives that focus on maternal mortality as a human<br />

rights issue raise awareness, promote education, and encourage women to<br />

advocate for their right to maternal health care. As Weston emphasized in his<br />

article on child labor, 143 these alternative strategies are important, as there are<br />

“significant limitations to relying upon court-centric strategies.” 144 Non-state<br />

actors not only can work to hold individual governments accountable using<br />

court-centric strategies, but also can go further in advocating for resources<br />

from foreign sources to finance maternal health care and can forge alliances<br />

with international social movements. 145 Public interest, resulting in public<br />

action with respect to the right to maternal health care fosters the recognition<br />

<strong>of</strong> the right to maternal health care in international community policy.<br />

Individuals and advocacy groups can raise awareness through a wide variety <strong>of</strong><br />

means; one successful tool for human rights advocacy has been the individual<br />

narrative. 146 Video is a powerful way to reach diverse, widespread audiences,<br />

and human rights organizations have utilized video to tell personal narratives<br />

and highlight the human rights tragedy <strong>of</strong> maternal mortality. 147 Individuals<br />

and Advocacy Groups can work to organize and encourage public and state<br />

action and so build from existing international human rights law that already<br />

establishes maternal health care as a positive human right to act to prevent<br />

maternal mortality globally.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

On average, a woman somewhere in the world dies in childbirth every<br />

minute. 148 In the time that it has taken to read this paper, over 40 women have<br />

died, and most due to preventable circumstances. Maternal mortality in today’s<br />

142 R. Okello & T. Gyuse, Maternal Mortality, A Human Rights Catastrophe, GLOBAL POLICY FORUM (30<br />

June, 2009), available at http://www.globalpolicy.org/component/content/article/211-development/<br />

47913-maternal-mortality-a-human-rights-catastrophe.html.<br />

143 Weston, supra note 75.<br />

144 Yamin, supra note 80, at 1220.<br />

145 Id. pp. 1228-1235 pp. 1239-1242.<br />

146 Id. at 1204.<br />

147 See, “e.g.”, J. Rincon, Videos on how maternal mortality affects communities, Conversations for a Better<br />

World (28 October, 2009), available at http://www.conversationsforabetterworld.com/2009/10/videoson-how-maternal-mortality-affects-communities/.<br />

148 Okello & Gyuse, supra note 158.


THE RIGHT TO MATERNAL HEALTH CARE 77<br />

world is a human rights catastrophe. Recognizing the right to maternal health<br />

care as a human right is a way to prevent maternal mortality globally. The right<br />

to maternal health care already exists in international law. This paper has<br />

attempted to elucidate ways in which both states and individuals wishing to<br />

advocate for maternal health care could use existing international human rights<br />

law to further develop the legal regime for the right to maternal health care, and<br />

use a human rights-based approach to eliminate preventable maternal<br />

mortality. I have focused on the right to maternal health care, separating the<br />

right to maternal health care from the right to health and from the right to<br />

maternal health generally. While realizing the right to maternal health care will<br />

advance the right to maternal health, my narrower focus has been on the right<br />

to health care during pregnancy and childbirth. Because health care during<br />

pregnancy and childbirth is known to prevent maternal mortality, I have<br />

attempted to determine policy alternatives to advocate for improved access to<br />

health care services during pregnancy and childbirth by using international<br />

human rights law. I used the United States as an example to demonstrate that<br />

states, particularly wealthy and powerful states like the U.S., have the ability<br />

to affect change beyond their borders. Recognizing that the right to maternal<br />

health care is a human right recognizes that women have the right to determine<br />

which health care services are appropriate to their family planning, pregnancy,<br />

confinement and the post-natal period, and asserts that states have an<br />

affirmative duty to protect this positive human right by providing women with<br />

maternal health care services. States and individuals can and should work<br />

together to develop international human rights law to prevent maternal<br />

mortality.<br />

Recognizing the right to maternal health care as a human right places<br />

an affirmative duty on states to provide maternal health care to pregnant<br />

women. Countries without the internal capacity to provide maternal health<br />

care may argue against such an affirmative duty, especially if a country<br />

doesn’t have the ability to meet such a duty. Nonetheless, such aspirational<br />

duties are frequently codified in international law in the human rights context.<br />

The Millennium Development Goals, “which range from halving extreme<br />

poverty to halting the spread <strong>of</strong> HIV/AIDS and providing universal primary<br />

education, all by the target date <strong>of</strong> 2015,” 149 are all aspirational goals that<br />

place duties on states. The codification <strong>of</strong> the Millennium Development Goals<br />

provides a “blueprint” agreement for all <strong>of</strong> the world’s countries and the<br />

world’s leading developmental institutions to work to meet the needs <strong>of</strong> the<br />

world’s poorest. 150 For states that aren’t able to meet the Millennium<br />

Development Goals on their own, the international community feels<br />

149 United Nations, Millennium Development Goals: Background, http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/<br />

bkgd.shtml (last visited 17 April, 2010).<br />

150 Id.


78 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

compelled to assist them because <strong>of</strong> their commitments to the MDGs.<br />

Calling attention to the issue <strong>of</strong> maternal death as a human rights<br />

issue gives impetus to international efforts to help states meet their duty to<br />

provide pregnant women with maternal health care. A recent example<br />

illustrates this point. In April 2010, the British medical journal Lancet<br />

published a paper that found the number <strong>of</strong> women who die in pregnancy or<br />

childbirth had dropped by more than 35% over 28 years. 151 Lancet’s editor,<br />

Dr. Richard Horton, wrote in an accompanying comment “that he was<br />

pressured to delay publishing the report because <strong>of</strong> the potential damage to<br />

maternal advocacy campaigns.” 152 While the Lancet article found that<br />

maternal deaths had fallen to about 343,000 in 2008, another report issued<br />

only days later by a global alliance hosted by the World Health Organization<br />

“claimed progress in maternal health was at a standstill” and that up to<br />

500,000 women still die in childbirth every year. 153 The WHO alliance<br />

findings did not explain where their data came from, but in the same report<br />

U.N. <strong>of</strong>ficials claimed they needed $20 billion every year to “save women and<br />

children in developing countries.” 154 Paradoxically, good news can be bad<br />

news when it comes to motivating states to address human rights issues; “the<br />

more people who are dying, the more money U.N. <strong>of</strong>ficials can raise, making<br />

some experts not keen to announce success or acknowledge that a problem is<br />

not as bad as they once thought.” 155 Advocates are concerned that progress in<br />

reducing maternal mortality – progress in meeting the duty to provide<br />

maternal health care – “will detract from the urgency <strong>of</strong> their cause.” 156<br />

The Lancet study cited a number <strong>of</strong> reasons for the improvement,<br />

including “the increasing ability <strong>of</strong> ‘skilled attendants’ – people with some<br />

medical training – to help women give birth.” 157 Dr. Horton argued that the<br />

study’s finding would not conflict with advocacy goals, stating in a telephone<br />

interview with the New York Times:<br />

People who have spent many years committed to the issue <strong>of</strong><br />

maternal health were understandably worried that these figures<br />

could divert attention from an issue that they care passionately<br />

about. But my feeling is that they are misguided in their view that it<br />

151 M. Cheng, Politics <strong>of</strong> aid seen in clash over maternal deaths, ASSOCIATED PRESS (14 April, 2010),<br />

available at http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5j-phKb8xCQcxd8xanFFF<br />

7f1IN3oAD9F2R4H00.<br />

152 Id.<br />

153 Id.<br />

154 Id.<br />

155 Id.<br />

156 D. Grady, Maternal Deaths Decline Sharply Across the Globe, NY TIMES (13 April, 2010), available at<br />

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/14/health/14births.html.<br />

157 Id.


THE RIGHT TO MATERNAL HEALTH CARE 79<br />

would be damaging. My view is that actually these numbers help<br />

their cause, not hinder it. 158<br />

Dr. Horton argued that the new data should encourage the world’s<br />

politicians to spend more on “pregnancy-related health matters,” as the data<br />

dispels the belief that statistics have been stuck on one place for decades,<br />

instead showing that money allocated to women’s health is actually<br />

accomplishing something. 159 The debate over the publication <strong>of</strong> the Lancet<br />

article not only demonstrates how critical international cooperation is in<br />

capacity building (as advocates for maternal health care argue, there is a dire<br />

need for international aid to help states meet their duty to provide maternal<br />

health care), but also shows that the right to maternal health care continues to<br />

be defined as a human right in the international context. A report issued<br />

concurrently with the Lancet article by the Partnership for Maternal, Newborn<br />

and Child Health, specified the improvements that are saving the lives <strong>of</strong><br />

women around the world and causing the numbers <strong>of</strong> maternal death to<br />

decrease:<br />

For instance, India pays women to get prenatal care and skilled care<br />

for delivery. Nepal provides home visits for family planning.<br />

Malawi is training nonphysicians to perform emergency Caesarean<br />

sections. Brazil has set up a health system that provides free primary<br />

care and skilled attendance at birth for all. 160<br />

Whether or not the Lancet findings will reduce state commitments to<br />

capacity building for providing maternal health care, the findings do also<br />

show that recognizing the right to maternal health care as a human right is<br />

working in preventing maternal mortality around the world.<br />

I agree with Sadasivam’s assertion that “even a broad-based human<br />

rights approach does not go to a crucial aspect <strong>of</strong> the problem: the failure <strong>of</strong><br />

public health systems in developing countries,” but I have attempted to assert<br />

that the formal articulations <strong>of</strong> the right to maternal health care international<br />

law, which are being advanced through the development <strong>of</strong> customary<br />

international law and through individual lawsuits, provide a foundation from<br />

which advocates for maternal health care can advance their goals. 161<br />

Asserting that the right to maternal health care is a human right is a way to<br />

develop policy alternatives, both in the international law and “extra-legal”<br />

realms. As Alicia Yamin, former Director <strong>of</strong> Research and Investigations at<br />

Physicians for Human Rights, has stated:<br />

158 Id.<br />

159 Id.<br />

160 Id.<br />

161 See supra note 6.


80 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

Applying the label human rights is in no way a magical panacea or<br />

guarantee <strong>of</strong> effectiveness with respect to any issue, as the gross<br />

breach between discourse and practice in even the narrow area <strong>of</strong><br />

torture attests. Yet, the nongovernmental human rights movement<br />

has already amply demonstrated that it can take issues that were<br />

previously not considered to be human rights issues, such as<br />

landmines, and not only make them so, but also create normative<br />

instruments and standards and mobilize public and state action with<br />

respect to them. 162<br />

Weston writes on the need for a strategy with a “multitude <strong>of</strong><br />

mechanisms and techniques” at all levels, “from the most local to the most<br />

global,” engaging all elements <strong>of</strong> society and proceeding with imagination<br />

and energy to succeed in the abolition <strong>of</strong> child labor. 163 Such a multifaceted<br />

strategy is necessary to ensure maternal health care for pregnant women, and<br />

thereby prevent maternal mortality. I have presented policy alternatives for<br />

states and individuals to advance international law to strengthen the right to<br />

maternal health care as a human right, and I have briefly examined strategies<br />

in the “extra-legal” realm (such as education and video advocacy) to work to<br />

further develop the right to maternal health care. Continued work is needed.<br />

Providing maternal health care is working to reduce maternal mortality, as<br />

evidenced by the Lancet study, and continuing to advocate for the right to<br />

maternal health care as a human right will continue to prevent maternal<br />

mortality in the future.<br />

162 Yamin, supra note 80, at 1244.<br />

163 Weston, supra note 75, at 109.


Between judicial enabling and adversarialism: The role <strong>of</strong><br />

the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer in protecting the unrepresented accused in<br />

<strong>Botswana</strong> in a comparative perspective<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

R.J.V. Cole*<br />

The role <strong>of</strong> the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer in <strong>Botswana</strong>’s adversarial system has evolved<br />

over the decades. Traditionally, the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer in the adversarial system<br />

plays a neutral role while the parties present their cases. The semblance <strong>of</strong><br />

neutrality compels the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer to remain passive and refrain from<br />

interfering with the process. Over the years, the courts have recognised that the<br />

unrepresented accused cannot get a fair trial as she is unaware <strong>of</strong> the rules <strong>of</strong><br />

procedure and evidence. This being the case, the unrepresented accused<br />

cannot effectively participate in the proceedings. Consequently, the courts<br />

have over the years stated that judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers have a duty to assist<br />

unrepresented accused persons. This position was recently given added<br />

impetus by the Court <strong>of</strong> Appeal. This article discusses the duty <strong>of</strong> the judicial<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficer to the unrepresented accused and its implications for <strong>Botswana</strong>’s<br />

adversarial system. In so doing, comparative analysis is made with Australia,<br />

South Africa and to some extent Namibia, which share similar (adversarial<br />

common law) systems with <strong>Botswana</strong>.<br />

1. INTRODUCTION<br />

The Court <strong>of</strong> Appeal recently in the case <strong>of</strong> Nieklas Willem v The State, 1<br />

reiterated the duty <strong>of</strong> judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers to advise unrepresented accused persons<br />

<strong>of</strong> their procedural rights. In so doing, the Court was not venturing into pristine<br />

environment. What is symbolic about this judgment, however, is that the Court<br />

urged the relevant authorities to come out with a check list for the guidance <strong>of</strong><br />

judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers, indicating that it continues to be inundated with appeals<br />

relating to omissions by judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers to advise unrepresented accused <strong>of</strong><br />

their procedural rights. The Court noted that this leads to a waste <strong>of</strong> valuable<br />

time in dealing with such irregularities and the concomitant enquiry into<br />

whether miscarriage <strong>of</strong> justice has occurred.<br />

It is interesting to note that the Court did not itself take the<br />

opportunity to make a comprehensive (if not exhaustive) list <strong>of</strong> instances<br />

81<br />

Lecturer, Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong>, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong>, LLB (Hons) (FBC-USL), LLM (UNISA), LLD<br />

(Stell).<br />

1 Court <strong>of</strong> Appeal Case No. CLCLB-092-2009, delivered on the 28 January, 2010 (unreported).


82 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

wherein judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers have a duty to assist the unrepresented accused. This<br />

<strong>of</strong> course was an opportunity missed. A missed opportunity because cases<br />

dealing with judicial advice generally refer to specific rights and are mostly<br />

dealt with by the High Court. Nieklas on the other hand provided an<br />

opportunity for a comprehensive guide to be provided in a single case by no<br />

less than the highest court <strong>of</strong> the land. The rippling effect <strong>of</strong> this case, however,<br />

is that the direction <strong>of</strong> the Court requiring a checklist has received initial<br />

response by the authorities. Under the direction <strong>of</strong> the Chief Justice, the<br />

Registrar and Master <strong>of</strong> the High Court circulated a circular 2 to judicial<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficers, listing instances where judicial guidance should be given to<br />

unrepresented accused persons. The list places a duty on judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers to;<br />

“(a) Advise an unrepresented accused person at the onset <strong>of</strong> the<br />

constitutional right to legal representation at [her] own expense,<br />

(b) Advise an unrepresented accused person <strong>of</strong> the right or purpose<br />

(meaning) <strong>of</strong> cross- examination,<br />

(c) Advise an unrepresented accused person <strong>of</strong> any special statutory<br />

defences available to him/her,<br />

(d) Advise an unrepresented accused person <strong>of</strong> the right to address<br />

the Court at the close <strong>of</strong> the trial or in mitigation and<br />

(e) Advise an unrepresented accused person about exceptional<br />

extenuating circumstances in the case <strong>of</strong> compulsory sentences.”<br />

This document is by no means a Judicial Circular and was only<br />

intended as a temporary stopgap measure, awaiting the formulation <strong>of</strong> a<br />

comprehensive judicial guide or checklist. Indeed, the compilation <strong>of</strong> a<br />

standard checklist for judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers is impending. While the Registrar’s<br />

Circular is not law and while the Court <strong>of</strong> Appeal itself abdicated from setting<br />

a comprehensive guide, the Court ignited a chain <strong>of</strong> events which demand an<br />

excursion into the judicial duties in relation to the unrepresented accused.<br />

The purpose <strong>of</strong> this article is two-fold. First, it seeks to discuss the<br />

duty <strong>of</strong> the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer in relation to the unrepresented accused. In so<br />

doing, it catalogues and discusses the areas covered by the Registrar’s<br />

Circular as well as other possible areas. It may be seen, admittedly, as a<br />

precocious endeavour at setting the groundwork for what is to be expected in<br />

the final instruction to judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers. Second, it is envisaged that the<br />

direction given by the Court in Nieklas will consequently reinforce the<br />

participation <strong>of</strong> judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers in criminal trials. This article, therefore,<br />

discusses the implications <strong>of</strong> this for <strong>Botswana</strong>’s adversarial system. The<br />

second part <strong>of</strong> the article discusses the role <strong>of</strong> a judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer in the<br />

adversarial process. The discussion views her role against the inquisitorial<br />

2 Registrar’s Circular No. 1 <strong>of</strong> 2010.


UNREPRESENTED ACCUSED IN BOTSWANA 83<br />

backdrop. The third part highlights the plight <strong>of</strong> the unrepresented accused.<br />

The fourth part seeks to conceptualise the role <strong>of</strong> judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers in <strong>of</strong>fering<br />

assistance to the unrepresented accused. The case law <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong><br />

jurisdictions form the basis <strong>of</strong> the discussion. Also, comparative analysis is<br />

made between <strong>Botswana</strong>, Australia, South Africa and to some extent<br />

Namibia. This creates an opportunity to benchmark <strong>Botswana</strong> against other<br />

jurisdictions influenced by the common law adversarial tradition and measure<br />

<strong>Botswana</strong>’s fair trial credentials. The fifth part discusses the judicial enabling<br />

role <strong>of</strong> the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer and specific areas where judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers are<br />

required to give assistance to the unrepresented accused. The sixth part<br />

highlights the implications <strong>of</strong> judicial enabling. Part seven, the conclusion,<br />

underscores the fact that judicial enabling is fuelled by the demand <strong>of</strong> a fair<br />

trial which in turn has brought significant change to the landscape <strong>of</strong> the<br />

criminal process.<br />

2. THE ROLE OF THE JUDICIAL OFFICER<br />

Two principal procedural models have evolved worldwide, the adversarial and<br />

inquisitorial models. The role <strong>of</strong> judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers is to some extent determined<br />

by a cleavage <strong>of</strong> dichotomy setting apart these two models. The role <strong>of</strong> the<br />

judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer is for practical purposes, determined by the model within which<br />

she operates. While the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer mainly remains alo<strong>of</strong> in the classical<br />

adversarial system, she takes control <strong>of</strong> proceedings in the inquisitorial<br />

tradition.<br />

2.1 The judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer and the adversarial system<br />

Judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers ascertain facts – barring the jury system – and apply the law<br />

to those facts in order to resolve disputes placed before them. But the mode <strong>of</strong><br />

fact-finding is tailored to a large extent, on the procedural model wherein the<br />

judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer operates. In <strong>Botswana</strong>, a judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer presiding over a<br />

criminal matter is governed by the Anglo-American adversarial tradition. The<br />

classical feature <strong>of</strong> this arrangement dictates that the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer is<br />

disengaged from the contest and allows the parties to present their case. 3 This<br />

3 R.M. Hayden and J.K. Anderson, “On The Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Procedural Systems in Laboratory Experiments:<br />

A Critique <strong>of</strong> Thibaut and Walker,” 3 (1/2) <strong>Law</strong> and Human Behaviour (1979), p. 21 at 22; E. Allan Lind,<br />

J. Thibaut and L. Walker, “Discovery and Presentation <strong>of</strong> Evidence in Adversary and Nonadversary<br />

Proceedings,” 71(6) Michigan <strong>Law</strong> Review (1973), p. 1129 at 1143; A.S. Goldstein, “Reflections on Two<br />

Models: Inquisitorial Themes in American Criminal Procedure,” 26(5) Stanford <strong>Law</strong> Review (1974), p.<br />

1009 at 1016; J. Thibault, L. Walker and E. Allan Lind, “Adversary Presentation and Bias in Legal


84 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

restrained posture symbolises an impartial and disinterested umpire. 4 Since it<br />

is the responsibility <strong>of</strong> the parties to present their evidence, the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer<br />

serves as a gatekeeper and ensures that the rules <strong>of</strong> evidence and procedure are<br />

observed. The judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer guides the process by way <strong>of</strong> procedural and<br />

evidential rules. Questions relating to the admissibility <strong>of</strong> evidence are<br />

primarily raised by the parties and determined by the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer. This<br />

means that pro<strong>of</strong> lies with the parties. If the accused is unrepresented she has<br />

to face a trained prosecutor. The chances <strong>of</strong> success <strong>of</strong> an unrepresented<br />

accused facing a trained prosecutor are likely to be compromised. The<br />

difficulty with having a passive judge is that the discharge <strong>of</strong> procedural and<br />

evidential responsibility lies with the parties and this puts the unrepresented<br />

accused in an unfavourable position. 5 Since each party “owns” its evidence in<br />

the adversarial contest, the parties may be selective in the presentation <strong>of</strong> their<br />

evidence, keeping away vital evidence that is damaging to their case and are<br />

openly bias in their conduct <strong>of</strong> the case. 6 Adversarial lawyers contend that<br />

cross-examination is a vital tool in unearthing the truth. Perhaps this should<br />

complement the “passivity” <strong>of</strong> the adversarial judge. The parties dig in<br />

themselves primarily through cross-examination. Cross-examination is the<br />

principal mechanism for unearthing the truth. 7 On the other hand, a digging-in<br />

judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer as is the case with the inquisitorial investigating judge will<br />

certainly have significant powers that allow her to unearth the truth. After all,<br />

she is able to summon evidence and witnesses without the possibility <strong>of</strong> being<br />

accused <strong>of</strong> descending into the arena. Inquisitorial lawyers for their part,<br />

contend that cross-examination only serves to discredit a truthful but<br />

vulnerable or intimidated witness. 8 This, according to them, is a veritable<br />

3 R.M. Hayden and J.K. Anderson, “On The Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Procedural Systems in Laboratory Experiments:<br />

A Critique <strong>of</strong> Thibaut and Walker,” 3 (1/2) <strong>Law</strong> and Human Behaviour (1979), p. 21 at 22; E. Allan Lind,<br />

J. Thibaut and L. Walker, “Discovery and Presentation <strong>of</strong> Evidence in Adversary and Nonadversary<br />

Proceedings,” 71(6) Michigan <strong>Law</strong> Review (1973), p. 1129 at 1143; A.S. Goldstein, “Reflections on Two<br />

Models: Inquisitorial Themes in American Criminal Procedure,” 26(5) Stanford <strong>Law</strong> Review (1974), p.<br />

1009 at 1016; J. Thibault, L. Walker and E. Allan Lind, “Adversary Presentation and Bias in Legal<br />

Decisionmaking,” 86(2) Harvard <strong>Law</strong> Review (1972), p. 386 at 388; A. Lind, J. Thibaut and L. Walker,<br />

“A Cross-Cultural Comparison <strong>of</strong> the Effect <strong>of</strong> Adversary and Inquisitorial Processes on Bias in Legal<br />

Decisionmaking,” 62(2) Virginia <strong>Law</strong> Review (1976), p. 271 at 273; J. Thibaut, L. Walker, S. La Tour and<br />

P. Houlden, “Procedural Justice as Fairness,” 26(6) Stanford <strong>Law</strong> Review (1974), p. 1271 at 1275; J.H.<br />

Langbein, The Origins <strong>of</strong> Adversary Criminal Trial, Oxford, Oxford <strong>University</strong> Press (2005), p. 311; M.<br />

Damaska, “Evidentiary Barriers to Conviction and Two Models <strong>of</strong> Criminal Procedure: A Comparative<br />

Study,” 121 <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania <strong>Law</strong> Review (1973), p. 506 at 510.<br />

4 Thibault, Walker and Allan Lind, op.cit. at p. 390; M. Damaska, The Faces <strong>of</strong> Justice and State Authority:<br />

A Comparative Approach to the Legal Process, New Haven/London, Yale <strong>University</strong> Press (1986), p. 3.<br />

5 Allan Lind, Thiabaut and Walker, op.cit. at p. 1143.<br />

6 Thibaut, Walker, La Tour and Houlden, op.cit. at p. 1275; J. McEwan, Evidence and the Adversarial<br />

Process (The Modern <strong>Law</strong>), 2 nd ed., Oxford, Hart Publishing (1998), p. 3; G. Brouwer, “Inquisitorial and<br />

Adversary Procedures – A Comparative Analysis,” 55 Australian <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> (1981), p. 207.<br />

7 C. Roodt, “Fact Finding, Fairness and Judicial Participation in Criminal Proceedings,” 44(2) Codicillus<br />

(2003), p. 68 at 69.<br />

8 See generally L. Ellison, The Adversarial Process and the Vulnerable Witness, Oxford, Oxford<br />

<strong>University</strong> Press (2001); K. Quinn, “Justice for Vulnerable and Intimidated Witnesses in Adversarial<br />

Proceedings?,” 66(1) Modern <strong>Law</strong> Review (2003), p. 139; see also E. Slater, “The Judicial Process and the<br />

Ascertainment <strong>of</strong> Fact,” 24(6) Modern <strong>Law</strong> Review 1961), p. 721 at 722.


UNREPRESENTED ACCUSED IN BOTSWANA 85<br />

weakness in the adversarial contest. But the main obstacle facing the judicial<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficer in <strong>Botswana</strong>’s adversarial system is orality. The principal mode <strong>of</strong><br />

ascertaining the truth is by oral evidence. Since witnesses are called to support<br />

a particular side, the tendency <strong>of</strong> witness loyalty and bias cannot be ruled out.<br />

Ultimately, the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer is left to depend on what counsel, the witnesses<br />

and exclusionary rules allow to be filtered into the system. Clearly, the judicial<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficer relies on the parties to unearth the truth. This in itself is a barrier to<br />

unearthing the truth, a situation that is not made any easier when the accused is<br />

unrepresented.<br />

The unrepresented accused is not equipped to participate fully in the<br />

adversarial trial. Because <strong>of</strong> this, the unrepresented accused suffers substantial<br />

disadvantage. Classical adversarial adherence is, therefore, unsustainable and<br />

the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer cannot bury her head in the sand in ostrich-like fashion,<br />

while the unrepresented accused suffers injustice. This will make a mockery<br />

<strong>of</strong> the whole process, especially as the State has the distinct advantage <strong>of</strong><br />

investigating powers and permanent prosecutorial staff and <strong>of</strong>fices. The State<br />

investigates, scoops up vital documents and interviews all possible witnesses,<br />

which the accused is usually unable and not permitted to do. That a trained<br />

prosecutor then marshals the evidence in the face <strong>of</strong> an unassisted accused<br />

does carry undertones <strong>of</strong> medieval inquisitions. The adversarial system,<br />

therefore, can only operate fully if the accused is assisted through procedural<br />

and evidential hurdles.<br />

2.2 The judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer and the inquisitorial system<br />

In the continental inquisitorial system, the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer is traditionally an<br />

investigating judge. She controls the investigations and dominates the trial. 9<br />

The prosecutor, therefore, is not an active player and the imbalance that is<br />

synonymous with the adversarial process is removed. An investigating judge<br />

or juge d’instruction plays a dominant role as early as the pre-trial stage in that<br />

it is she who investigates the crime and collects the evidence. 10 She generally<br />

interrogates the accused and witnesses, confronts them with each other, orders<br />

for searches and seizures and commissions experts to assist in the<br />

investigations. 11 In the adversarial contest, these would be seen as very wide<br />

powers and in any event, functions that normally fall within the purview <strong>of</strong> the<br />

police. In the inquisitorial system, the results <strong>of</strong> the investigations, statements<br />

9 Hayden and Anderson, op.cit. at p. 22; Thibault, Walker and Allan Lind, op.cit. at p. 388; Lind, Thibaut<br />

and Walker, op.cit. at p. 276; Goldstein, op.cit. at p. 1019; J.A. Andrews and M. Hirst, Andrews & Hirst<br />

on Criminal Evidence, 3 rd ed., London, Sweet & Maxwell (1997), p. 1.<br />

10 M. Ploscowe, “Development <strong>of</strong> Inquisitorial and Accusatorial Elements in French Procedure,” 23(3)<br />

<strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> Criminal <strong>Law</strong> and Criminology (1932), p. 372 at 373; Goldstein, op.cit. at p. 1019.<br />

11 Ploscowe, op.cit. at p. 373; Thibault, Walker and Allan Lind, op.cit. at p. 388; Lind, Thibaut and Walker,<br />

at p. 276.


86 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

<strong>of</strong> witnesses and the accused’s statement are compiled into a dossier. 12 The<br />

evidence is thus developed for both sides by the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer. 13 To this<br />

extent, there is relative balance between the prosecution and the accused.<br />

3. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE<br />

UNREPRESENTED ACCUSED<br />

3.1 The circumstances <strong>of</strong> the accused during the<br />

investigation<br />

The accused is at her most vulnerable during the investigation process. The<br />

overwhelming shock that the potential loss <strong>of</strong> liberty inflicts on the individual<br />

is immeasurable. This is particularly aggravating in the case <strong>of</strong> first <strong>of</strong>fenders.<br />

The accused is basically at the mercy <strong>of</strong> the police and has little or no access to<br />

the outside world, should the police decide to incarcerate her during<br />

investigations. As is typical <strong>of</strong> adversarial systems, in <strong>Botswana</strong>, investigations<br />

are conducted solely by the police. Neither the judiciary nor the accused are<br />

involved. In fact, the accused is an object <strong>of</strong> the investigations. Witnesses and<br />

exhibits are basically seized by the police and the accused is not given access<br />

to the proceeds <strong>of</strong> the investigations as and when they yield results. Though it<br />

is said that the accused is not compelled to answer to questions put to her by<br />

the police, adverse inference may be drawn from refusal by the accused to<br />

answer incriminating questions. 14<br />

3.1.1 Lack <strong>of</strong> legal representation<br />

The right to legal representation is guaranteed by section 10(2)(d) <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Constitution. 15 However, it is doubtful whether this provision extends to pretrial<br />

investigations. 16 Unfortunately, case law on the right to legal<br />

representation is limited to the trial <strong>of</strong> the proceedings. In actual fact, no legal<br />

sanctions attach for deprivation <strong>of</strong> the accused <strong>of</strong> access to legal representation<br />

at the pre-trial stage. Consequently, the accused’s rights are severely curtailed<br />

at this stage. Since, judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers are not involved at this stage, the accused<br />

12 Ploscowe, op.cit, at p. 376; Lind, Thibaut and Walker, op.cit. at p. 276; Goldstein, op.cit. at p. 1019.<br />

13 Thibaut, Walker and Allan Lind, op.cit. at p. 388.<br />

14 Attorney-General v Moagi [1981] B.L.R. 1 (CA).<br />

15 The section provides: “Every person who is charged with a criminal <strong>of</strong>fence shall be permitted to defend<br />

himself before the court in person or, at his own expense, by a legal representative <strong>of</strong> his own choice.”<br />

(emphasis added).<br />

16 See D.D. Ntanda Nsereko, “Legal Representation in <strong>Botswana</strong>,” Israel Yearbook on Human Rights<br />

(1988), p. 211; B. Molatlhegi, “The Right to Legal Representation in Criminal Proceedings in <strong>Botswana</strong>:<br />

More than a Court-Room Right for the Knowlegeable Suspect?,” 13(3) South African <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> Human<br />

Rights (1997), p. 458; B. Molatlhegi, “Undefended Accused Persons, The Courts and Procedural Justice<br />

in <strong>Botswana</strong>,” 4(2) East African <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> Peace and Human Rights (1998), p. 185 at 187.


UNREPRESENTED ACCUSED IN BOTSWANA 87<br />

is left at the mercy and devices <strong>of</strong> the police. 17 In the absence <strong>of</strong> judicial and<br />

constitutional pre-trial legal representation guarantees, the police <strong>of</strong>ten operate<br />

on the premise that access to counsel at this stage is granted as a matter <strong>of</strong><br />

courtesy. 18<br />

3.1.2 Confessions<br />

The accused is usually an object <strong>of</strong> the investigations. More <strong>of</strong>ten than not, the<br />

bulk <strong>of</strong> the State’s case will emanate from information they obtain from the<br />

accused. The monotony <strong>of</strong> the evidence <strong>of</strong> investigating <strong>of</strong>ficers narrating what<br />

the accused told them or what the accused pointed out is all too familiar.<br />

Though the law requires that confessions made to the police should<br />

be confirmed in writing by a judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer as a requirement for admissibility<br />

in court, 19 this is not a sufficient safeguard for ensuring that confessions are<br />

obtained freely and voluntarily. Sometimes, suspects are made to appear<br />

before judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers to make confessions through threats. 20 It must be<br />

noted also, that while judicial confirmation is required as a condition for the<br />

admissibility <strong>of</strong> confessions, this does not apply in relation to admissions.<br />

Evidentially, therefore, confessions can be admitted under the guise <strong>of</strong><br />

admissions. This is because the distinction between confessions and<br />

admissions are a matter <strong>of</strong> definitional technicality. 21 A Confession is defined<br />

17 Molatlhegi reiterates that the presence <strong>of</strong> a legal representative during interrogations will go a long way in<br />

protecting suspects against possible police abuse. See B Molatlhegi, op.cit. at p. 187.<br />

18 See Molatlhegi, op.cit. at p. 460; Ntanda Nsereko, op.cit. at p. 213.<br />

19 Section 228(1)(ii) <strong>of</strong> the Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act provides that confessions made to police<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficers are inadmissible as evidence in court unless they are confirmed in writing in the presence <strong>of</strong> a<br />

judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer; in the case <strong>of</strong> Kgaodi v The State [1996] B.L.R. 23(CA) at p. 28C-F Amissah JP<br />

rationalised the section thus: “The provision prohibits the admission in evidence <strong>of</strong> confessions made to<br />

police <strong>of</strong>ficers simpliciter. It does not matter whether the confession to the police <strong>of</strong>ficer is voluntary or<br />

not. The object <strong>of</strong> the prohibition is obviously to avoid arguments at trial over whether confessions to<br />

police <strong>of</strong>ficers were freely made, without inducement, physical or otherwise. As is well known,<br />

allegations are <strong>of</strong>ten made <strong>of</strong> police <strong>of</strong>ficers torturing or beating up suspects and accused persons or using<br />

other unlawful means in order to obtain statements which advance the investigation or prosecution <strong>of</strong> the<br />

cases. Some <strong>of</strong> these allegations have been found to be true by the courts although the majority <strong>of</strong> them<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten turn out to be unfounded. True or not, it is in the interest <strong>of</strong> justice that these charges, or<br />

opportunities for them to be made, should be minimised, if not altogether eliminated. The prohibition<br />

discourages the police from using force or other forms <strong>of</strong> inducement in extracting confessions to bolster<br />

up their cases, because if the court would not admit any confessions obtained by them at all, there should<br />

be no need for them to use unlawful methods to obtain them. But in order not to exclude genuine<br />

confessions made by accused persons even if made to police <strong>of</strong>ficers altogether, the law permits the<br />

admission <strong>of</strong> such confessions if ‘confirmed and reduced to writing in the presence <strong>of</strong> a magistrate or any<br />

justice who is not a member <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Botswana</strong> Police Force.’”; Ntanda Nsereko, op.cit. at p. 213;<br />

Molatlhegi, op.cit. at p. 460.<br />

20 In the case <strong>of</strong> S v Baalakani Moloise [1977] B.L.R. 28 the accused was taken before a District<br />

Commissioner to make a statement. The reason given by the accused for making the statement was – “I<br />

was asked to go to make [sic] statement before the D.C. by the C.I.D. Police.”; in State v Ramatswidi<br />

[2005] 1 B.L.R. 452 the accused alleged that he had spent two days in police cells and was told by the<br />

investigating <strong>of</strong>ficer that he would only be released if he made a confession to a judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer.<br />

21 Corduff J stated in State v Moithoke [1981] B.L.R. 219 at p. 223: “This is a very restricted and artificial<br />

definition and the only purpose it serves is to free a greater number <strong>of</strong> statements from the effects <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Second Proviso [That is, S 228(1)(ii) <strong>of</strong> the Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act], which requires that<br />

confessions made to police <strong>of</strong>ficers are inadmissible unless they are confirmed in writing in the presence<br />

<strong>of</strong> a magistrate or any justice.”


88 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

as an unequivocal admission <strong>of</strong> guilt, the equivalence <strong>of</strong> a guilty plea in a<br />

court <strong>of</strong> law. 22 Therefore, for a statement <strong>of</strong> the accused to amount to a<br />

confession, it must amount to an admission <strong>of</strong> all the elements <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fence.<br />

In addition it must negative all defences. Admissions on the other hand, relate<br />

to the acceptance <strong>of</strong> certain facts as true. 23 In this regard, several pieces <strong>of</strong><br />

self-incriminatory statements are admissible without judicial endorsement<br />

merely because the statements do not amount to admissions <strong>of</strong> all the elements<br />

<strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fence and do not negative possible defences. Consequently,<br />

admissions may possibly be admitted without proper legal safeguards, merely<br />

because they do not satisfy the classical definition <strong>of</strong> a confession in<br />

<strong>Botswana</strong>. These same admissions when pieced together, may lead to an<br />

inference <strong>of</strong> the accused’s guilt. The overly narrow definition <strong>of</strong> a confession<br />

therefore means that an accused may in actual fact be recruited to incriminate<br />

herself under circumstances that are far from being voluntary, and such selfincriminating<br />

statements are admissible in court as admissions. 24 The<br />

artificial distinction between confessions and admissions means that<br />

admissions which implicate the accused are admissible in evidence whether or<br />

not they are confirmed in writing by a judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer. This is so because<br />

statements that do not amount to an unequivocal admission <strong>of</strong> guilt <strong>of</strong> all the<br />

elements <strong>of</strong> an <strong>of</strong>fence, do not amount to a confession. 25 They are admissible<br />

in the absence <strong>of</strong> judicial confirmation. The prosecution’s case can, therefore,<br />

be built from bits and pieces <strong>of</strong> admissions. All such admissions are<br />

admissible without the judicial supervision provided for by section 228(1)(ii).<br />

This effectively allows the admitting into evidence <strong>of</strong> confessions through the<br />

back door, under the guise that they are admissions. When once the pre-trial<br />

process is tainted with unfairness, the trial proper is at the risk <strong>of</strong> being unfair<br />

also.<br />

22 Mohalenyane v The State [1984] B.L.R. 291; R v Becker 1929 AD 167; see also State v Miclas Habane<br />

[1971] 2 B.L.R. 66; Martlouw v The State [1993] B.L.R. 306; Moseki v The State [1995] B.L.R. 690;<br />

State v Khama [2000] 1 B.L.R. 209; State v Ramatswidi op.cit. note 20 supra.<br />

23 Desai and Another v The State [1985] B.L.R. 582.<br />

24 Murray J stated in State v Mosarwa and Mapitsi High Court, Criminal Trial No. 37 <strong>of</strong> 1985 (Unreported),<br />

that a better definition <strong>of</strong> a confession would be: “An admission made at any time by a person accused <strong>of</strong><br />

an <strong>of</strong>fence, stating or suggesting the inference that he committed that <strong>of</strong>fence.”; Corduff J stated in State v<br />

Moithoke op.cit. note 21 at p. 223 supra: “This is a very restricted and artificial definition and the only<br />

purpose it serves is to free a greater number <strong>of</strong> statements from the effects <strong>of</strong> the Second Proviso [That is,<br />

S 228(1)(ii) <strong>of</strong> the Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act], which requires that confessions made to police<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficers are inadmissible unless they are confirmed in writing in the presence <strong>of</strong> a magistrate or any<br />

justice.”<br />

25 Desai and Another v The State op.cit. note 23 supra; Mohalenyane v The State op.cit. note 22 supra; R v<br />

Becker 1929 AD 167; State v Miclas Habane op.cit. note 22 supra; Martlouw v The State op.cit note 22<br />

supra; Moseki v The State op.cit. note 22 supra; State v Khama op.cit. note 22 supra; State v Ramatswidi<br />

op.cit. note 20 supra; Mashabile v The State [1984] B.L.R. 96 (CA).


UNREPRESENTED ACCUSED IN BOTSWANA 89<br />

3.2 The circumstances <strong>of</strong> the accused at trial<br />

When we read our law books and discover that up until eighteenth century<br />

Europe, accused persons were not allowed to defend themselves nor have legal<br />

representation; and that torture was part <strong>of</strong> the criminal process, 26 we react<br />

with shock and disdain. Barring the medieval sanction <strong>of</strong> torture, the plight <strong>of</strong><br />

the present-day unrepresented accused raises stark similarities. The State<br />

conducts investigations, collects all relevant documents and interviews<br />

possible witnesses. The accused usually cannot do this. The evidence is<br />

presented in court by a trained prosecutor and the unrepresented accused is<br />

clueless as to the intricacies <strong>of</strong> the process. The majestic and subliminal<br />

solemnity <strong>of</strong> the courtroom, more than ever leaves the unrepresented accused<br />

awestruck and in great trepidation. 27<br />

In the adversarial trial, while the accused is presumed innocent, she<br />

stands the risk <strong>of</strong> conviction if she is unable to make a full answer to the prima<br />

facie case <strong>of</strong> the prosecution. 28 Effective defence only comes with active<br />

participation by the accused at the trial. This includes the ability to object to<br />

prosecution evidence, the opportunity to cross-examine prosecution<br />

witnesses, to call and examine witnesses <strong>of</strong> her own and to make final<br />

submissions. 29 It is obvious that the ability <strong>of</strong> the unrepresented accused to<br />

participate at her trial is patently compromised due to the intimidating<br />

atmosphere in the court room and her lack <strong>of</strong> legal knowledge. This has legal<br />

implications and patently renders the trial unfair. It need not be emphasised<br />

that the consequences <strong>of</strong> conviction can be severe. They include incurring a<br />

criminal record which can lead to denial <strong>of</strong> social privileges, civic rights, and<br />

even imprisonment. Public conscience therefore cannot permit a system<br />

wherein the accused cannot make use <strong>of</strong> the legal safeguards open to her, but<br />

faces the risk <strong>of</strong> losing her liberty. In this regard, judicial enabling plays a<br />

crucial protecting role in respect <strong>of</strong> the unrepresented accused. The role <strong>of</strong> the<br />

judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer, therefore, in guiding the unrepresented accused through the<br />

legal hurdles <strong>of</strong> the adversarial system cannot be understated.<br />

26 Ploscowe, op.cit. at p. 376.<br />

27 E. Slater, “The Judicial Process and the Ascertainment <strong>of</strong> Fact,” 24(6) Modern <strong>Law</strong> Review (1961), p. 721<br />

at 721-722.<br />

28 Attorney-General v Moagi op.cit. note 14 supra.<br />

29 B. Mckillop, “The Position <strong>of</strong> Accused Persons under the Common <strong>Law</strong> System in Australia (More<br />

Particularly in New South Wales) and the Civil <strong>Law</strong> System in France,” 26(2) <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> New South<br />

Wales <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> (2003), p. 515 at 527; J. Jackson, “The Effect <strong>of</strong> Human Rights on Criminal<br />

Evidentiary Processes: Towards Convergence, Divergence or Realignment?,” 68(5) Modern <strong>Law</strong> Review<br />

(2005), p. 737 at 751; S. Trechsel, Human Rights in Criminal Proceedings, New York, Oxford <strong>University</strong><br />

Press (2005), p. 89; Mbisana v Attorney-General and Another [1999] 1 B.L.R. 189; State v Segana Ntibi<br />

[1968-1970] B.L.R. 330; Motshwane and Others v The State [2002] 2 B.L.R. 368.


90 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

4. JUDICIAL ENABLING<br />

4.1 Judicial enabling in <strong>Botswana</strong><br />

Recognition <strong>of</strong> the plight <strong>of</strong> the unrepresented accused and the demand for<br />

judicial assistance is well settled in <strong>Botswana</strong> case law. This stems from the<br />

duty on the court to ensure that the accused gets a fair trial. 30 Thus in the case<br />

<strong>of</strong> Mmopi and Another v The State 31 Murray J had this to say:<br />

“When a person is on trial for a serious <strong>of</strong>fence and does not have<br />

the advantage <strong>of</strong> legal representation I consider that it is essential<br />

that the magistrate should <strong>of</strong>fer advice by way <strong>of</strong> explaining court<br />

procedure to such a person. An unrepresented accused is under a<br />

severe disadvantage. If he is given no assistance on matters <strong>of</strong><br />

procedure that one would not necessarily expect to be known to an<br />

unrepresented accused person injustice could easily result.” 32<br />

Similarly, in Tshukudu v The State 33 Dibotelo J (as he then was)<br />

noted that:<br />

“After the foregoing exchanges between the appellant and the<br />

magistrate the trial duly proceeded and as I have already stated the<br />

appellant was convicted at the end <strong>of</strong> the trial in which the learned<br />

magistrate merely stated at the close <strong>of</strong> the prosecution case that the<br />

appellant's rights had been explained to him without recording what<br />

he told the appellant by way <strong>of</strong> explanation <strong>of</strong> his rights or what<br />

those rights were. In my view it is <strong>of</strong>ten not enough for a trial court,<br />

especially where an accused is not represented by counsel, merely to<br />

record that it had fully explained to the accused his rights without<br />

briefly recording on the record what those rights were and any such<br />

omission may be fatal to a conviction.” 34<br />

In State v Matlhogonolo Masole, 35 O'Brien Quinn CJ wrote:<br />

“Where a single charge or a single count charges two or more<br />

<strong>of</strong>fences that charge or count is bad for duplicity. But it is for the<br />

30 Lesetedi and Another v The State [2001] 1 B.L.R. 393; Gare v The State [2001] 1 B.L.R. 143 (CA);<br />

Morobatseng and Others v The State [2003] 1 B.L.R. 466.<br />

31 [1986] B.L.R. 8.<br />

32 Ibid at p. 10F-H.<br />

33 [2000] 1 B.L.R. 400.<br />

34 Ibid at p. 402F-H; see also Obonetse Ngakaemang v Regina [1964-1967] B.L.R. 131; Walter Madisa v<br />

Regina [1964-1967] B.L.R.157; State v David Rantabana and Another [1981] B.L.R. 255; Tsie v The<br />

State [1999] 2 B.L.R. 305.<br />

35 [1982] B.L.R. 202.


UNREPRESENTED ACCUSED IN BOTSWANA 91<br />

accused to raise that point before his plea is taken or, as soon as the<br />

evidence discloses duplicity in the charge or count, in cases where<br />

duplicity is not immediately apparent. However, where, as is the<br />

usual position here, an accused is not legally represented, the<br />

Magistrate or Judge trying the case should examine the charge or<br />

count and if he considers it to be defective on grounds <strong>of</strong> duplicity<br />

or for any other reason it is his duty to raise the point and, if<br />

necessary, have the charge or count amended or withdraw or to<br />

refuse to accept it at all.” 36<br />

4.2 Judicial enabling in Australia<br />

In the case <strong>of</strong> Dietrich v the queen, 37 the High Court <strong>of</strong> Australia noted the<br />

inherent unfairness characteristic <strong>of</strong> trials wherein accused persons are<br />

unrepresented. The Court recognised the fact that lack <strong>of</strong> legal representation<br />

places the accused at a disadvantage. The Court reiterated that a proper defence<br />

<strong>of</strong> the accused requires a proper knowledge <strong>of</strong> the rules <strong>of</strong> evidence and<br />

procedure. Highlighting the legal complexities faced by the unrepresented<br />

accused and the need for pr<strong>of</strong>essional guide, the Court had this to say:<br />

“Skill is required in both the examination in chief and the crossexamination<br />

<strong>of</strong> witnesses if the evidence is to emerge in the best<br />

light for the defence. The evidence to be called on behalf <strong>of</strong> the<br />

accused, if any, must be marshalled so as to avoid raising issues<br />

which will be damaging to the case for the Defence. A decision<br />

must be made whether the accused is to give evidence on oath, is to<br />

make an unsworn statement or is to remain mute. Competence in<br />

dealing with these matters depends to a large extent upon training<br />

and experience. And, as Murphy J pointed out in McInnes, an<br />

accused in person cannot effectively put some arguments that<br />

36 Ibid at pp. 204-205; In Rabonko v The State [2006] 2 B.L.R. 166 Lesetedi J noted at p. 168C-D: “An<br />

accused person has in terms <strong>of</strong> s 10(1) <strong>of</strong> the Constitution an entitlement to a fair trial. In my view, a fair<br />

trial cannot be realised where an accused person does not understand the import <strong>of</strong> the criminal<br />

proceedings which he is facing nor have a rudimentary idea as to how not only to present his case but to<br />

conduct his defence by way <strong>of</strong> putting the essential elements <strong>of</strong> his defence to the prosecution witnesses.<br />

That there is a duty upon a presiding judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer to assist an accused person who is unrepresented and<br />

seems not to understand the court procedures, in the conduct <strong>of</strong> his defence has been expressed in a<br />

number <strong>of</strong> cases.”; Lord Weir JA also remarked in Gare v The State op.cit. note 30 supra at pp. 148G-<br />

149A that: “In any trial where the accused person defends himself, either because he chooses to do so or<br />

because he cannot afford a legal representative, an onerous responsibility lies on the judge to ensure that<br />

he receives a fair trial. There will be cases where the accused may be able to conduct his case with skill<br />

and there will be cases in which the issues at the trial will be obvious to the meanest intelligence. In such<br />

cases it will probably be unnecessary for the judge to intervene. On the other hand there will be cases<br />

where the issues are not straightforward. In such situation the judge will have to be vigilant to ensure that<br />

the defence case does not go by default because <strong>of</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> skill or comprehension on the part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

accused. No hard and fast rules can be laid down as to when or to what extent a court should intervene on<br />

behalf <strong>of</strong> accused persons. Each case depends upon its own circumstances.”<br />

37 (1992) 177 CLR 292; see also R v Zorad (1990) NSWLR 91 at 95.


92 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

Counsel can, such as an argument that, although on the evidence the<br />

accused is probably guilty, he is not guilty beyond reasonable<br />

doubt.”<br />

Similarly, in Mc Innis v R, 38 Murphy J remarked quite pointedly that:<br />

“The notion that an unrepresented accused can defend himself<br />

adequately goes against experience in all but the rarest cases. Even<br />

an experienced lawyer would be regarded as foolish to represent<br />

himself if accused <strong>of</strong> a serious crime.” 39<br />

Judicial enabling is a settled practice especially in magistrates’<br />

courts. In this regard, judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers would ask the unrepresented accused<br />

pertinent questions and also give her an opportunity to speak. The judicial<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficer would outline the relevant aspects <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fence, point out possible<br />

mitigating factors to the accused and also provide general guidance on<br />

evidential matters. 40<br />

The Criminal Trial Bench Book 41 specifically provides for judicial<br />

enabling. In this regard, judicial advice should be given to the unrepresented<br />

accused at the commencement <strong>of</strong> the trial, and where appropriate, as the trial<br />

proceeds. The judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer is thus under a duty to outline various<br />

procedural options, modes <strong>of</strong> objection, the order <strong>of</strong> evidence, the right to<br />

make submissions, the manner <strong>of</strong> leading evidence-in-chief, and the right to<br />

cross-examination. 42<br />

4.3 Judicial enabling in South Africa<br />

Judicial enabling is underscored by sections 35(3)(f) and (g) <strong>of</strong> the South<br />

African Constitution. These provisions are set within the context <strong>of</strong> the right to<br />

a fair trial. Section 35(3)(f) which caters for the right to legal representation,<br />

demands that the accused be informed <strong>of</strong> the right. Section 35(3)(g) is to the<br />

effect that where it is necessary to provide the accused with legal aid, she<br />

should be informed <strong>of</strong> this entitlement. The courts have stated that the duty to<br />

point out the right to legal representation to the accused lies with the judicial<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficer. 43 Though the constitutional provisions relating to judicial enabling are<br />

38 (1979) 143 CLR 575.<br />

39 Ibid at p. 589.<br />

40 C. Craigie, “Unrepresented Litigants: The Criminal Justice Perspective,” (2005), available at (last visited 5 October 2010); see also McPherson v R (1981) 147 CLR 512; R v<br />

Gidley (1994) 3 NSWLR 168.<br />

41 Cited in Craigie, Ibid.<br />

42 Ibid.<br />

43 S v Pienaar 2000 (2) SACR 143 (NC); S v Radebe 1988 (1) SA 191 (T); S v Mabaso 1990 (3) SA 185<br />

(A).


UNREPRESENTED ACCUSED IN BOTSWANA 93<br />

limited to the right to legal representation, a number <strong>of</strong> cases impose a general<br />

duty on judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers to assist unrepresented accused persons.<br />

A general rule providing that judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers assist unrepresented<br />

accused persons is established in South African case law. 44 In this regard,<br />

judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers have a general duty to ensure that unrepresented accused fully<br />

understand their rights, otherwise, the trial may be rendered unfair. 45 This<br />

duty is said to have a close connection with the judicial oath to uphold the<br />

Constitution as well as the constitutional demand to promote the objects <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Bill <strong>of</strong> Rights, in the development <strong>of</strong> the common law. 46 Consequently,<br />

judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers have a duty, among others, to alert unrepresented accused <strong>of</strong><br />

unfavourable presumptions, 47 the right to testify and the effect <strong>of</strong> failure to do<br />

so 48 and the purpose <strong>of</strong> cross-examination. 49<br />

It is clear that judicial enabling is embedded in modern adversarial<br />

systems. In this regard, the gulf between adversarialism and inquisitorialism is<br />

bridged. Judicial guidance to the unrepresented accused is central to the right<br />

to a fair trial. The application <strong>of</strong> judicial enabling by the courts <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong><br />

puts their jurisprudence at par with those <strong>of</strong> other reputable legal systems.<br />

This element <strong>of</strong> collegiality is an important yardstick and a positive measure<br />

<strong>of</strong> the commitment <strong>of</strong> the courts <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong> to fair trials.<br />

4.4 In search <strong>of</strong> definition<br />

At the heart <strong>of</strong> the above cases which have embraced judicial enabling, is the<br />

recognition <strong>of</strong> the plight <strong>of</strong> the unrepresented accused in the criminal process<br />

and the corresponding need for judicial intervention. The judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer has<br />

become a third factor participant in criminal proceedings, the first and second<br />

factors being the prosecution and the accused respectively. As a third factor<br />

participant, the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer exercises her duty in ensuring that the trial is<br />

fair. Judicial enabling can therefore, be referred to as a process wherein a<br />

judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer engages in a “hand-holding” process, guiding the unrepresented<br />

accused through the trial process by informing her <strong>of</strong> the procedures. Judicial<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficers have become more visible participants in criminal adversarial<br />

proceedings. 50 Effectively, the demand for fairness has resulted in a tripartite<br />

44 S v May 2005 (2) SACR 331 (SCA). See also S v Ndlovu 2002 (2) SACR 325 (SCA); S v Mambo 1999<br />

(2) SACR 421 (W); S v Manale 2000 (2) SACR 666 (NCD).<br />

45 S v Radebe op.cit. note 43 supra.<br />

46 Section 39(2) <strong>of</strong> the South African Constitution; see P.J. Schwikkard, “Does the Merging <strong>of</strong> Inquisitorial<br />

and Adversarial Procedures Impact on Fair Trial Rights,” available at http://www.isrcl.org/Papers/<br />

Schwikkard> (last visited 6 October 2010).<br />

47 S v Lango 1962 (1) SA 107 (N).<br />

48 S v Makhubo 1990 (2) SACR 320 (O).<br />

49 S v Lekhetho 2002 (2) SACR 13 (O); S v Mashaba 2004 (1) SACR 214 (T).<br />

50 Steytler notes: “The court is obliged to inform the accused <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> his procedural rights and duties and<br />

to assist him in exercising some <strong>of</strong> those where he clearly experiences difficulty in doing so.” N.C.<br />

Steytler, The Undefended Accused on Trial, Cape Town, Juta & Co (1988), p. 222; J. McEwan, Evidence<br />

and the Adversarial Process (The Modern <strong>Law</strong>), 2 nd ed., Oxford, Hart Publishing (1998), p. 2.


94 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

system <strong>of</strong> pro<strong>of</strong>, as the alo<strong>of</strong>ness <strong>of</strong> the adversarial judge is displaced by a more<br />

visible arbiter. No doubt, judicial enabling imposes a positive duty in assisting<br />

the unrepresented accused in presenting her defence.<br />

Essentially, failure to advise an accused <strong>of</strong> her right to crossexamination,<br />

to make closing submissions, to give evidence and to call<br />

witnesses among others, will vitiate the proceedings if the accused has<br />

suffered prejudice. Several <strong>of</strong> the cases that have insisted on judicial enabling<br />

have married their reasoning with a prerequisite that the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer plays<br />

a role in assisting the unrepresented accused to present her case. It has been<br />

firmly stated that this represents an essential element <strong>of</strong> the right to a fair<br />

trial. 51 It is clear, therefore, that the expansion <strong>of</strong> the judicial role is founded<br />

on the fair trial imperative.<br />

5. INCIDENCE OF JUDICIAL ENABLING<br />

5.1 Areas covered by the Circular<br />

It is now settled that procedural rights should be explained to the unrepresented<br />

accused. A number <strong>of</strong> the areas that require judicial advice were noted in the<br />

Circular and will now be considered.<br />

5.1.1 The duty to advise the unrepresented accused <strong>of</strong> the<br />

right to legal representation<br />

While it is settled that judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers should intervene and advise accused<br />

persons <strong>of</strong> their procedural rights, judicial approach tends to indicate that no<br />

legal consequence follows in the event <strong>of</strong> failure to do so, where the accused<br />

has suffered no prejudice. 52 There is no constitutional mandate on the judicial<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficer to advise the unrepresented accused <strong>of</strong> her right to legal representation,<br />

nor have the courts interpreted the duty as such. Therefore, while a legal duty<br />

rests on judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers to advise an unrepresented accused <strong>of</strong> her right to legal<br />

representation, this duty is watered-down by the absence <strong>of</strong> constitutional<br />

backing. In the case <strong>of</strong> Moroka v the state 53 the appellant was not informed <strong>of</strong><br />

the right to legal representation during the trial. Counsel for the appellant<br />

argued on appeal that this was irregular and should vitiate the proceedings. The<br />

Court noted that there was a common law right <strong>of</strong> an accused to access legal<br />

advice and legal representation. The Court stated that that right has been<br />

enshrined in section 10 <strong>of</strong> the Constitution. In relation to the issue whether a<br />

51 Gare v The State op.cit. note 30 supra; State v Sethunya [1986] B.L.R.483; State v Bareki [1979-1980]<br />

B.L.R. 35.<br />

52 State v Matlhogonolo Masole [1982] 1 B.L.R. 202.<br />

53 [2001] 1 B.L.R. 134 (CA).


UNREPRESENTED ACCUSED IN BOTSWANA 95<br />

judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer had a duty to advise an accused <strong>of</strong> her right to legal<br />

representation, the Court held that the duty was not mandatory or peremptory.<br />

The Court stated that it is rather a salutary practice which should be followed<br />

in every case. 54 In the Court’s view, whether failure to advise the accused will<br />

vitiate the proceedings will depend on whether there has been a failure <strong>of</strong><br />

justice. The Court found that there was no failure <strong>of</strong> justice.<br />

The Court relied on section 13(3) <strong>of</strong> the Court <strong>of</strong> Appeal Act 55 which<br />

provides that notwithstanding the fact that a point raised on appeal might be<br />

decided in favour <strong>of</strong> the appellant, the court may dismiss the appeal where<br />

there has been no substantial miscarriage <strong>of</strong> justice. The Court stated that the<br />

question whether an irregularity has resulted in a failure <strong>of</strong> justice will depend<br />

upon “whether the Court hearing the appeal considers, on the evidence (and<br />

credibility findings if any) unaffected by the irregularity or defect, that there is<br />

pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> guilt beyond reasonable doubt. If it does so consider, there was no<br />

resultant failure <strong>of</strong> justice.” 56<br />

This decision is most unfortunate. The fact remains that the evidence<br />

against an accused may appear overwhelming and there may seem to be pro<strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> guilt beyond reasonable doubt, simply because the accused did not have<br />

legal representation. This is because the unrepresented accused might not be<br />

able to test the credibility <strong>of</strong> the evidence and the witnesses as a trained<br />

lawyer would. Often, where a lawyer appears halfway through a trial where a<br />

conviction seemed inevitable, the lawyer would materially turn around the<br />

events in favour <strong>of</strong> the accused as material discrepancies and weaknesses in<br />

the evidence <strong>of</strong> the prosecution would be unearthed. Therefore, the<br />

“overwhelming evidence test” that courts so <strong>of</strong>ten use to override material<br />

irregularities is not safe-pro<strong>of</strong>.<br />

The right to legal representation is a fundamental right, perhaps the<br />

most important, since with effective legal representation the accused’s other<br />

procedural rights will ultimately be protected. It is the right <strong>of</strong> all rights. One<br />

would think, therefore, that the bearer <strong>of</strong> such an important right should be<br />

informed <strong>of</strong> it. Unfortunately, the Court did not regard the duty to inform the<br />

accused <strong>of</strong> her right to legal representation as a right in itself. It would appear<br />

that the duty was rather regarded as a procedural step, breach <strong>of</strong> which will<br />

merely lead to a simple irregularity. In a criminal trial, the accused has a<br />

constitutional right to legal representation. A right is meaningless to the bearer<br />

if she is unaware <strong>of</strong> it. While recognising the duty <strong>of</strong> judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers to<br />

inform accused persons <strong>of</strong> the right to legal representation, the Court ruled on<br />

54 Similar decisions were reached in Rakgole v The State [2008] 1 B.L.R. 139 (CA); Phologolo v The State<br />

[2007] 1 B.L.R. 61; Masango v The State [2001] 2 B.L.R. 616; Ramogotho v Director <strong>of</strong> Public<br />

Prosecutions [2007] 1 B.L.R. 334 (CA); Chanda v The State [2007] 1 B.L.R. 400 (CA); Bojang v The<br />

State [1994] B.L.R. 146; Leow v The State [1995] B.L.R. 564.<br />

55 Cap 04:01.<br />

56 Moroka v The State op.cit. note 53 supra at p. 140D-E. Citing section 13(3) <strong>of</strong> the Court <strong>of</strong> Appeal Act.


96 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

the basis <strong>of</strong> the evidence, that there was no failure <strong>of</strong> justice even though the<br />

Court could not tell how the prosecution’s evidence would have fared under<br />

the microscopic cross-examination <strong>of</strong> a lawyer.<br />

In contradistinction with <strong>Botswana</strong>, a somewhat reinforced<br />

commitment to legal representation finds expression in South African<br />

jurisprudence. The tone <strong>of</strong> the case law lays emphasis on the duty to inform<br />

the accused <strong>of</strong> the right to legal representation. The philosophical undertone<br />

<strong>of</strong> this duty is informed by the reasoning that a right is <strong>of</strong> no use to a person if<br />

she is not aware <strong>of</strong> it. 57 But more importantly, the duty to inform an accused<br />

<strong>of</strong> her right to legal representation is supported by the constitutional<br />

imperative. Section 35(3)(f) <strong>of</strong> the South African Constitution provides that<br />

an accused must be informed <strong>of</strong> the right to choose and to be represented by a<br />

legal practitioner <strong>of</strong> her choice. The accused must be informed that she has a<br />

right to communicate with her legal representative and if this is not possible,<br />

she should be provided with an interpreter. 58 A failure on the part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer to inform the accused <strong>of</strong> this right may result in a complete<br />

failure <strong>of</strong> justice. 59 It has unfortunately been held, however, that the accused<br />

will suffer no prejudice where, having regard to the evidence, the accused<br />

would have been convicted anyway. 60<br />

The South African courts have also held that the courts have a duty to<br />

encourage the accused to obtain legal representation in respect <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fences that<br />

attract severe penalties such as life imprisonment. 61 South Africa, unlike<br />

<strong>Botswana</strong>, has a public funded legal aid system. The courts have therefore<br />

decided that the accused should be informed <strong>of</strong> her right to legal aid if she is<br />

too poor to hire a lawyer. 62 This position is informed by the fact that merely<br />

informing the accused <strong>of</strong> her right to legal representation is insignificant if she<br />

cannot afford a lawyer. 63 The South African system thus ensures a deeper<br />

commitment to ensuring that accused persons are made aware <strong>of</strong> their right to<br />

legal representation.<br />

5.1.2 The duty to advise the unrepresented accused <strong>of</strong> the<br />

purpose <strong>of</strong> cross-examination<br />

The right <strong>of</strong> an accused to cross-examine the witnesses <strong>of</strong> the prosecution is<br />

engraved in section 10(2)(e) <strong>of</strong> the Constitution <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong>. Cross-<br />

57 P.M. Bekker, T. Geldenhuys, J.J. Joubert, J.P. Swanepoel, S.S. Terblanche and S.E. Van der Merwe<br />

Criminal Procedure Handbook, 9 th ed., Claremont, Juta & Co (2009), p. 80.<br />

58 S v Pienaar op.cit. note 43 supra.<br />

59 S v Radebe op.cit. note 43 supra; S v Mabaso op.cit. note 43 supra.<br />

60 Hlantlala v Dyantyi 1999 (2) SACR 541 (SCA); S v Rudman and Another; S v Mthwana 1992 (1) SACR<br />

70 (A); S v Mthwana 1989 (4) SA 361 (N).<br />

61 S v Mbambo 1999 (2) SACR 421 (W); see also S v Nkondo 2000 (1) SACR 358 (W); S v Manale 2000 (2)<br />

SACR 666 (NC).<br />

62 S v Davids; Dladla 1989 (4) SA 172 (N); S v Mthwana op.cit. note 60 supra.<br />

63 Bekker, Geldenhuys, Joubert, Swanepoel, Terblanche and Van der Merwe, op.cit. at p. 80.


UNREPRESENTED ACCUSED IN BOTSWANA 97<br />

examination is one <strong>of</strong> the fundamental pillars <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Botswana</strong> procedural<br />

system. 64 It is essential to the element <strong>of</strong> confrontation on which the<br />

adversarial tradition rests. 65 The accused’s right to cross-examination is<br />

closely related to her right to be present during the trial. An accused can only<br />

confront her adversary if she is present and has heard the evidence. 66<br />

The right to cross- examination is a fundamental right, breach <strong>of</strong><br />

which amounts to a serious irregularity. Cross-examination puts the veracity<br />

and credibility <strong>of</strong> a witness’s evidence to the test, while also allowing the<br />

accused to put her version <strong>of</strong> the events to the witness. In Kebadireng, after a<br />

witness had testified, the trial magistrate granted the prosecutor’s request to<br />

“withdraw” the evidence <strong>of</strong> the witness. On review, the Court held that once a<br />

witness had testified, she should be cross-examined. Therefore, the accused<br />

was denied the right to cross-examine the witness. The Court held that, there<br />

were no legal consequences where the evidence against an accused is<br />

overwhelming despite a breach <strong>of</strong> the right to cross-examine. 67 The Court<br />

noted also that there was sufficient evidence from other witnesses to convict<br />

the accused and that the accused was permitted to cross-examine those<br />

witnesses, although it is not clear whether the trial magistrate relied on the<br />

evidence <strong>of</strong> the witness who was not cross-examined.<br />

In State v Tsatsi piet and another, 68 both accused persons elected to<br />

give evidence on oath. The prosecutor cross-examined each accused but the<br />

accused were not permitted to cross-examine each other. The Court laid<br />

emphasis on the constitutional guarantee <strong>of</strong> the right to cross-examination,<br />

stating that the right extends to the evidence <strong>of</strong> co-accused persons and their<br />

witnesses. The Court did not state whether the evidence <strong>of</strong> each accused<br />

implicated the other. The Court noted the possibility that a witness may have<br />

evidence which might assist the accused in her defence. The accused should<br />

therefore not be prevented from putting questions to such a witness. The<br />

Court, it appeared, found it necessary to consider whether it could still convict<br />

on the basis <strong>of</strong> other evidence. In the Court’s view, there was a total<br />

miscarriage <strong>of</strong> justice and the irregularity in failing to give the accused an<br />

opportunity to cross-examine was <strong>of</strong> such a nature that the accused were<br />

prejudiced.<br />

The case <strong>of</strong> Rabonko 69 illustrates the manifest injustice that may<br />

64 State v Kebadireng [1984] B.L.R. 167.<br />

65 R. Ellert, Nato “Fair Trial” Safeguards: Precursor to an International Bill <strong>of</strong> Procedural Rights, The<br />

Hague, M. Nijh<strong>of</strong>f (1963), p. 30; As Cassim notes, “Cross-examination is regarded as an example <strong>of</strong><br />

confronting one’s adversary. Thus, the right to challenge evidence may well include the right to<br />

confrontation.” F. Cassim, “The Rights <strong>of</strong> Child Witnesses Versus the Accused’s Right to Confrontation:<br />

A Comparative Perspective,” 36(1) Comparative and International <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> Southern Africa<br />

(2003), p. 65 at 66.<br />

66 State v Etang Thai and Another [1971-1973] B.L.R. 25.<br />

67 State v Kebadireng op.cit. note 64 supra.<br />

68 [1971] 2 B.L.R 59.<br />

69 Op.cit. note 36 supra.


98 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

occur where an accused who clearly does not understand the legal process is<br />

left to her own devices. In this case, the accused was charged with the <strong>of</strong>fence<br />

<strong>of</strong> attempted rape. After the complainant had testified, the accused asked her<br />

only one question which was: “did I rape you?” When called upon to present<br />

his defence, the accused merely stated that he will rely on the medical report.<br />

The report indicated that there was no evidence <strong>of</strong> penetration. The Court<br />

noted that the accused’s purported cross-examination and defence showed that<br />

he was under the misapprehension that he was facing a charge <strong>of</strong> rape and not<br />

attempted rape. The Court opined that the trial magistrate should have<br />

explained what the real charge was and explained the object and purpose <strong>of</strong><br />

cross-examination to the accused. The Court noted that a trial cannot be fair if<br />

the accused is unable to defend himself by putting essential elements <strong>of</strong> his<br />

defence to the prosecution witnesses.<br />

In Motswedi and Another v The State, 70 the Court emphasised on the<br />

duty <strong>of</strong> judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers to ensure that accused persons are afforded an<br />

opportunity to cross-examine a co-accused. This can be broadly translated as a<br />

duty to advise the accused <strong>of</strong> her right <strong>of</strong> cross-examination. The duty is not<br />

limited to merely indicating to the accused that she has a right to crossexamine.<br />

The full purpose <strong>of</strong> cross-examination should be explained such that<br />

the accused is able to exercise the right as best as she can. 71 However, while<br />

noting the fundamental importance <strong>of</strong> the right to cross-examination, the<br />

Court noted that having regard to the accused’s confession, no prejudice had<br />

occurred.<br />

In what can be described as an exemplary example <strong>of</strong> the judicial<br />

enabling process, the Court in Mponda v The State 72 digressed on the<br />

approach to be employed in explaining the accused’s right <strong>of</strong> crossexamination.<br />

The Court noted that not only should the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer explain<br />

that the accused is entitled to cross-examination, she should also explain what<br />

is expected <strong>of</strong> cross-examination. The Court suggested that:<br />

“It might be prudent, and I say this by way <strong>of</strong> suggestion only, for a<br />

magistrate to say to an unrepresented accused, who appears to him<br />

to need assistance, that, if he disputes material allegations made by<br />

the witness, that he, the magistrate, will help him. The magistrate<br />

might properly <strong>of</strong>fer to turn the version that the accused may<br />

subsequently wish to lay before the court in the course <strong>of</strong> his case<br />

into questions <strong>of</strong> the witness. Such <strong>of</strong>fer might be made if the<br />

accused (a) should state that he feels he is unable to effectively<br />

question the witness himself; (b) should wish the magistrate to put<br />

70 [1984] B.L.R. 223.<br />

71 Ntwayame v The State [2008] 1 B.L.R. 167 (CA); Rabonko v The State op.cit. note 36 supra.<br />

72 [1986] B.L.R. 286.


UNREPRESENTED ACCUSED IN BOTSWANA 99<br />

questions upon his behalf; and, (c) tells the magistrate the gist <strong>of</strong> his<br />

case where it conflicts with the evidence that the witness about to be<br />

cross-examined has given. It should be stressed by the magistrate to<br />

the accused that he is free to take his own course and is under no<br />

obligation to accept the advice <strong>of</strong> the magistrate. It is <strong>of</strong> course<br />

important that the magistrate should fully record the nature <strong>of</strong> the<br />

exchange between himself and the accused if he considers, in the<br />

exercise <strong>of</strong> his discretion, that it is appropriate for him, by way <strong>of</strong><br />

helping the accused to present his case, to take the course I have<br />

outlined as in certain circumstances being desirable.” 73<br />

The Court suggested that the position taken in the South African<br />

cases <strong>of</strong> S v Sebatana 74 and S v Dipholo 75 be followed. In those cases, it was<br />

emphasised that the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer should assist the unrepresented accused in<br />

her cross-examination by asking her if she agrees to the material allegations<br />

made against her in the evidence <strong>of</strong> the witnesses. In this way, matters in<br />

dispute will be brought to light.<br />

Mponda recognises that judicial assistance to the unrepresented<br />

accused during cross-examination is part <strong>of</strong> the general duty <strong>of</strong> the judicial<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficer in assisting the accused to present her defence. No doubt, the<br />

phenomenon <strong>of</strong> a more visible judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer playing a more dynamic role in<br />

ensuring fair treatment <strong>of</strong> the unrepresented accused is recognisable. On the<br />

basis <strong>of</strong> Kebadireng, Motswedi and Rabonko however, failure to exercise this<br />

duty will bear no consequences if the accused is not prejudiced.<br />

73 Ibid at p. 291A-D. In Rabonko v The State [2007] 1 B.L.R. 31 at p. 32E-G, Lesetedi J had this to say: “A<br />

judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer trying a case in which an unrepresented accused seems to be at sea and unable to either<br />

cross-examine or appreciate what the purpose and import <strong>of</strong> cross-examination is in my view does have a<br />

duty to advise an accused person as to the purpose <strong>of</strong> cross-examination. For to know <strong>of</strong> the existence <strong>of</strong> a<br />

right and not to know how to exercise it is <strong>of</strong> cold comfort to the beneficiary <strong>of</strong> the right. A judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer<br />

must however be careful to not descend into the arena and carry out the cross-examination on behalf <strong>of</strong> an<br />

accused person. A failure by a judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer to advise an unrepresented accused person not only <strong>of</strong> the<br />

right to cross-examination but also its object, may result in a failure <strong>of</strong> justice where an accused person<br />

seems to have no idea <strong>of</strong> either the existence <strong>of</strong> the right or how to exercise it.”; in State v Ncube [2008] 1<br />

B.L.R. 64 at p. 68D-F, Newman J noted that: “In my view, it is proper practice for a trial magistrate to<br />

advise an unrepresented accused, at the commencement <strong>of</strong> the state’s case or, at the latest, after the first<br />

prosecution witness has testified in-chief, <strong>of</strong> his right to ask relevant questions <strong>of</strong> each prosecution<br />

witness, which need not be limited to matters raised in-chief, and which are aimed at: (a) casting doubt on<br />

the accuracy <strong>of</strong> the evidence given by the witness in-chief; (b) extracting from the witness evidence<br />

supporting the accused’s version <strong>of</strong> the facts in issue; and (c) in appropriate circumstances, discrediting<br />

the witness’s reliability as a witness.”; evidence <strong>of</strong> judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers generally assisting unrepresented<br />

accused and assisting them to cross-examine witnesses, has been traced to the eighteenth century. See<br />

J.H. Langbein, The Origins <strong>of</strong> Adversary Criminal Trial, Oxford, Oxford <strong>University</strong> Press (2003), pp.<br />

314-321.<br />

74 1983 (1) SA 809.<br />

75 1983 (4) SA 757.


100 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

5.1.3 The duty to advise the unrepresented accused <strong>of</strong><br />

special and statutory defences<br />

It is well established that judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers are under a duty to inform accused<br />

persons <strong>of</strong> statutory and other defences that may be open to them. In <strong>Botswana</strong>,<br />

this issue has mainly been determined in sexual related <strong>of</strong>fences. Thus in the<br />

case <strong>of</strong> State v Bareki 76 it was held that on a charge <strong>of</strong> rape, where the<br />

complainant is alleged to have been under the age <strong>of</strong> sixteen years, if the<br />

accused is undefended he must be alerted <strong>of</strong> the defence provided by section<br />

147(5) <strong>of</strong> the Penal Code. This section provides a defence in respect <strong>of</strong> persons<br />

charged with having unlawful carnal knowledge <strong>of</strong> a girl under the age <strong>of</strong><br />

sixteen. 77 The section provides the accused with a defence if the accused can<br />

show that he had reasonable cause to believe, and did believe that the victim<br />

had attained the age <strong>of</strong> sixteen years. 78 The Court apparently noted that the<br />

accused should be alerted <strong>of</strong> the defence, since having regard to the evidence,<br />

he stood the risk <strong>of</strong> being convicted <strong>of</strong> defilement if the victim was in fact<br />

below the age <strong>of</strong> sixteen years.<br />

In Gare v The State, 79 the appellant was convicted by a magistrate's<br />

court on a charge <strong>of</strong> having had carnal knowledge <strong>of</strong> a girl <strong>of</strong> less than sixteen<br />

years <strong>of</strong> age in contravention <strong>of</strong> section 147 <strong>of</strong> the Penal Code. The appellant<br />

admitted that he had sexual intercourse with the complainant. He was not<br />

represented at the trial and the inept manner in which he conducted his case<br />

would seem to suggest that he had little understanding <strong>of</strong> the issues and was<br />

almost certainly unaware <strong>of</strong> the special defence set out in section 147(5) <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Penal Code. The evidence <strong>of</strong> the prosecution established that the complainant<br />

was fifteen years old. The accused did not address the issue <strong>of</strong> age. The<br />

complainant testified that she told the accused that she was fifteen years old<br />

and he did not dispute this in cross-examination. He admitted to having sexual<br />

intercourse with the complainant, stating that she was his girl friend. While it<br />

was clear that the complainant told the accused that she already had a boy<br />

friend, the appellant did not cross-examine the complainant on her physical<br />

development. In fact, this issue did not appear on the record. The accused did<br />

not avail himself <strong>of</strong> the special defence set out in section 147(5) <strong>of</strong> the Penal<br />

Code. Zietsman JA 80 held that in view <strong>of</strong> the obvious ineptness with which<br />

76 Op.cit. note 51 supra; see also Ramabe v The State [2002] 1 B.L.R. 523; Galebonwe v The State [2002] 1<br />

B.L.R. 46 (CA); Matlakadibe v The State [2004] 1 B.L.R. 44 (CA); Tsunke v The State [2004] 2 B.L.R.<br />

155; Mfwazala v The State [2007] 3 B.L.R. 476; Gaosenkwe v The State [2001] 1 B.L.R. 324; Sefo v The<br />

State [2007] 2 B.L.R. 562.<br />

77 This <strong>of</strong>fence is akin to statutory rape.<br />

78 The section reads: “It shall be a sufficient defence to any charge under this section if it appears to the<br />

court before whom the charge is brought that the person so charged had reasonable cause to believe and<br />

did in fact believe that the person was <strong>of</strong> or above the age <strong>of</strong> 16 years or was such charged person’s<br />

spouse.”<br />

79 Op.cit. note 30 supra.<br />

80 Aguda ag JP dissenting.


UNREPRESENTED ACCUSED IN BOTSWANA 101<br />

the accused conducted his defence, and his probable ignorance <strong>of</strong> the special<br />

defence, the court should have provided him with an explanation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

special defence. 81 The Court noted that the accused was entitled to a fair trial<br />

in terms <strong>of</strong> section 10 <strong>of</strong> the Constitution and that the magistrate was under a<br />

duty to explain the existence and meaning <strong>of</strong> this defence to him. In the<br />

circumstances, the conviction was quashed.<br />

5.1.4 The duty to advise the unrepresented accused <strong>of</strong> the<br />

right to address the court at the close <strong>of</strong> the trial and<br />

in mitigation<br />

Section 181 <strong>of</strong> the Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act provides for the<br />

prosecution and accused to address the court after all the evidence has been led.<br />

The duty <strong>of</strong> the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer to make an unrepresented accused aware <strong>of</strong> this<br />

was declared in Walter Madisa v The State. 82 This case, as with other cases<br />

involving breaches <strong>of</strong> procedural rights, indicated that failure <strong>of</strong> an accused to<br />

address the court was inconsequential where no prejudice occurred. 83 The<br />

case, however, amply demonstrates a factual situation where a procedural<br />

mishap would result in prejudice. In this case, the appellant was convicted <strong>of</strong><br />

assault occasioning actual bodily harm upon an allegation <strong>of</strong> a woman with<br />

whom he was cohabiting, that he had kicked her on her private parts, resulting<br />

in bleeding. The appellant and the complainant had three children together. The<br />

complainant in fact testified that she only became aware that she was six<br />

months pregnant as a result <strong>of</strong> a medical examination conducted after the<br />

81 Lord Wier JA who concurred with Zietsman JA noted at p. 149A-F: “In the present case, the appellant<br />

faced a serious charge, that <strong>of</strong> unlawful carnal knowledge <strong>of</strong> a female under the age <strong>of</strong> 16 years. The<br />

Penal Code provided him with the defence that if it appeared to the court that he had reasonable cause to<br />

believe and did in fact believe that the complainant was 16 years or over he would be acquitted. At the<br />

start <strong>of</strong> the trial the charge was read over to the appellant and he said that he understood it. The special<br />

defence was not. I do not go so far as to say that there was any requirement to read out the terms <strong>of</strong> the<br />

statutory defence at the start <strong>of</strong> the proceedings although my own inclination, particularly in the case <strong>of</strong> an<br />

unrepresented and illiterate accused, would have been to do so. Moreover if, as the trial progressed it<br />

became clear to the court from questions put in cross-examination that this accused clearly understood the<br />

issue and the nature <strong>of</strong> any defence open to him, there would have been no need for the court to intervene<br />

with assistance. But in this case, studying the record <strong>of</strong> proceedings, it appears to me that the appellant<br />

had no idea what was the true issue. Indeed from such questions as he asked, it seems that he was under<br />

the impression that he was facing a charge <strong>of</strong> rape and that what he was seeking to establish was a defence<br />

<strong>of</strong> consent. Be that as it may, at no stage as the trial proceeded did it become apparent that the appellant<br />

had any idea that the statutory defence existed or was open to him. This should have become obvious to<br />

the magistrate after the appellant's very brief cross-examination <strong>of</strong> the first witness, who was the<br />

complainant. The complainant stated that the appellant had asked her age and she told him that she was 15<br />

years old. There was no cross-examination <strong>of</strong> this vital piece <strong>of</strong> evidence and, in my view, the magistrate<br />

ought to have intervened there and then to draw the appellant's attention to the special defence and ask<br />

him if he wished to ask the complainant any questions on the matter. Moreover when the appellant came<br />

to give evidence himself, he said noting that could have had any bearing on the special defence and by<br />

refraining from intervening, the magistrate let the opportunity pass for this possible defence to be put<br />

forward.”<br />

82 Op.cit. note 34 supra.<br />

83 See Chiwaura v The State [1985] B.L.R. 201; Moima v The State [1982] 1 B.L.R. 112; Moraeng v The<br />

State [2007] 1 B.L.R. 657; Masango v The State [2001] 2 B.L.R. 616; Moletsane v The State [1995]<br />

B.L.R. 83; Moletsane v The State [1996] B.L.R. 73 (CA); Makwapeng v The State [1999] 1 B.L.R. 48<br />

(CA).


102 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

assault. At the close <strong>of</strong> the evidence, the trial magistrate stood the matter down<br />

at lunch time, indicating that the matter will proceed after lunch. When the<br />

matter resumed, the magistrate by inadvertence, proceeded to deliver judgment<br />

and sentence without inviting the parties to make submissions. The Court noted<br />

that since the complainant had been pregnant several times before, regard being<br />

had to her evidence that she only realised that she was six months pregnant<br />

during the medical examination, counsel for the accused might have wanted to<br />

address the court on her credibility. Though the Court could not speculate what<br />

counsel could have said, it concluded that the accused was prejudiced under the<br />

circumstances. In any event, closing addresses are crucial to the criminal<br />

process as they allow the accused to call the court’s attention to salient matters<br />

in an endeavour to influence the court in finding in its favour.<br />

Another process wherein an accused endeavours to influence the<br />

decision <strong>of</strong> the court in its favour is through mitigation. When once convicted,<br />

the accused would implore the court to pass the lenient most possible<br />

sentence. In this regard, the accused should be given an opportunity to address<br />

the court. The accused would normally bring mitigating factors to the<br />

attention <strong>of</strong> the court. That the accused addresses the court in mitigation is <strong>of</strong><br />

paramount importance as the information presented assists the court in<br />

arriving at an appropriate sentence. 84<br />

It is an established rule <strong>of</strong> law that a convicted accused has a right to<br />

be heard and lead evidence in mitigation. 85 In Ofetotse v The State, 86 the<br />

Court noted that despite the absence <strong>of</strong> any statutory provision relating to<br />

mitigation, this is a well established rule <strong>of</strong> practice in the courts <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong><br />

and must always be followed. The Court noted that failure to accord the<br />

accused an opportunity to mitigate amounts to an irregularity and the sentence<br />

cannot stand. 87 The courts have held that to remedy, the irregularity, the<br />

matter should be remitted to the trial court to hear evidence in mitigation and<br />

then pass sentence. However, in order to avoid the delays that this route is<br />

bound to create, the appellate courts have in practise, imposed sentence<br />

themselves, after consideration <strong>of</strong> the conditions under which the <strong>of</strong>fence was<br />

committed or allowing the parties to file documents relating to mitigation. 88<br />

In the case <strong>of</strong> Gaotlhobogwe v The State, 89 the Court noted that an<br />

assessment <strong>of</strong> the proper sentence to be passed is as important as any other<br />

stage <strong>of</strong> the criminal process. In this regard, to prevent or discourage a<br />

convicted person from addressing the court or giving evidence in mitigation<br />

will amount to a serious irregularity. Without specifically stating the duty <strong>of</strong><br />

84 State v Rahii [1981] B.L.R. 252.<br />

85 Seakwa and Others v The State [1984] B.L.R. 226; Masupatsele v The State [1987] B.L.R. 96.<br />

86 [1989] B.L.R. 314 (CA).<br />

87 Seakwa and Others v The State op.cit note 85 supra; Ofetotse v The State op.cit. note 86 supra.<br />

88 Seakwa and Others v The State op.cit note 85 supra; Ofetotse v The State op.cit. note 86 supra.<br />

89 [1992] B.L.R. 286 (CA).


UNREPRESENTED ACCUSED IN BOTSWANA 103<br />

the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer to inform the accused <strong>of</strong> her right to mitigate, the Court<br />

cited extensively from the South African case <strong>of</strong> R v Chinyani, 90 where it was<br />

noted that the most desirable practice was to ask the defence after conviction,<br />

whether it desires to say anything in relation to conviction. It has been<br />

contended that section 274 <strong>of</strong> the South African Criminal Procedure Act 91<br />

obliges the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer to allow the accused an opportunity to lead<br />

evidence and address the court in mitigation. 92<br />

It must be noted that in Gaotlhobogwe, the accused was represented<br />

by counsel. One must speculate that had the facts been different, the Court<br />

would have stated the duty to call upon the accused to mitigate as it has so<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten done with other procedural rights. The facts are that after conviction,<br />

counsel instructed the accused to go into the witness box as he intended to<br />

lead evidence in mitigation. The judge retorted that he may not go into the<br />

box. This reaction was apparently provoked by the fact that counsel did not<br />

seek leave <strong>of</strong> the court and further that previous convictions were not yet put<br />

to the accused. Though counsel did not further indicate that he intended to put<br />

the accused in the box, he proceeded to address the court in mitigation from<br />

the bar. Also, when asked by the Court during the appeal proceedings, what<br />

his client would have said in mitigation, counsel’s reply did not reveal<br />

anything substantial that would have persuaded the trial court to pass a<br />

different sentence. In fact, it was on this basis that the Court came to the<br />

conclusion that the accused was not prejudiced.<br />

The duty <strong>of</strong> the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer in relation to the unrepresented<br />

accused has been highlighted. The Court in Kelebile v The State, 93 noted that<br />

the issue <strong>of</strong> mitigation is not a ritual that lacks real content. In passing<br />

sentence, justice can only be done if the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer is aware <strong>of</strong> the<br />

personal background and personal circumstances <strong>of</strong> the accused. These issues<br />

are important factors in weighing aggravating and mitigating factors. The<br />

Court was <strong>of</strong> the view therefore that a judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer has a duty to probe the<br />

accused so as to elicit all the factors relevant to passing sentence. The Court<br />

stated that there are differences in the psychology and customs <strong>of</strong> people.<br />

Difference in circumstances and conditions cover a broad spectrum <strong>of</strong><br />

subjective and objective considerations. Sentencing should therefore be made<br />

within the social context <strong>of</strong> the accused’s situation. Therefore, even where the<br />

accused states that she has nothing to say in mitigation, the court has a duty to<br />

probe the accused.<br />

90 1956 (1) P.H. H65.<br />

91 Act 51 <strong>of</strong> 1977.<br />

92 Bekker, Geldenhuys, Joubert, Swanepoel, Terblanche and Van der Merwe, op.cit. at p. 292. Section 274<br />

reads:<br />

“(1) A court may, before passing sentence, receive such evidence as it thinks fit in order to inform itself as<br />

to the proper sentence to be passed.<br />

(2) The accused may address the court on any evidence received under subsection (1), as well as on the<br />

matter <strong>of</strong> the sentence, and thereafter the prosecution may likewise address the court.”<br />

93 [1983] B.L.R. 92.


104 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

5.1.5 The duty to advise the unrepresented accused about<br />

exceptional extenuating circumstances in the case <strong>of</strong><br />

compulsory sentences<br />

In its bid to curb certain socially undesirable acts, Parliament has intervened to<br />

enact minimum sentences in respect <strong>of</strong> certain <strong>of</strong>fences. In this regard, statute<br />

provides for compulsory minimum sentences which judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers are bound<br />

to follow. There are a number <strong>of</strong> such legislations in <strong>Botswana</strong>. Whether the<br />

intention <strong>of</strong> Parliament is to stamp out such crimes by deterring would-be<br />

<strong>of</strong>fenders with stiff penalties, to incapacitate <strong>of</strong>fenders in respect <strong>of</strong> certain<br />

crimes that the society considers being serious or prevalent, or to ensure that<br />

the measure <strong>of</strong> retribution is proportionate to the crime committed is a matter<br />

for conjecture. What is clear, however, is that the taking away <strong>of</strong> judicial<br />

discretion in sentencing has led to obnoxious consequences wherein accused<br />

have sometimes received severe sentences for trivial conduct, merely because<br />

the crime they committed carry statutory minimum sentences even though the<br />

gravity <strong>of</strong> their conduct did not deserve such sentences. Cases where judicial<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficers apply mandatory sentences which are disproportionate to the conduct<br />

<strong>of</strong> the accused usually attract public outcry. It is interesting to note that similar<br />

sentiments have been echoed in Parliament as well, even though they are the<br />

creators <strong>of</strong> such provisions. 94<br />

The legislature found a solution to the problem caused by minimum<br />

sentences, by legislating an escape clause which permits judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers to<br />

circumvent statutory minimum sentences “where there are exceptional<br />

extenuating circumstances which would render the imposition <strong>of</strong> the statutory<br />

minimum period <strong>of</strong> imprisonment totally inappropriate ...”. 95 While it is clear<br />

that judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers should consider exceptional extenuating circumstances<br />

before imposing sentence in respect <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fences carrying minimum<br />

sentences, 96 there is no authority that the unrepresented accused should be<br />

94 In the words <strong>of</strong> Dibotelo J (as he then was) in the case <strong>of</strong> Matomela and Another v The State [2000] 1<br />

B.L.R. 396 at p. 399D-G, “In my view, the <strong>of</strong>ten resorted to practice <strong>of</strong> enacting mandatory minimum<br />

sentences for certain types <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fences constitutes a threat to the independence <strong>of</strong> the courts as envisaged<br />

by the Constitution and the practice by the legislature <strong>of</strong> arrogating to itself the functions reserved for the<br />

judiciary by the Constitution is clearly undesirable and should be discouraged or discontinued as it erodes<br />

the discretionary powers <strong>of</strong> the courts in sentencing <strong>of</strong>fenders. It is ironic and sad and I <strong>of</strong>ten observe with<br />

detached amusement that whenever there is a public outcry arising from what the public perceives as<br />

injustices meted out by the courts when they impose mandatory minimum sentences which have been<br />

prescribed by the legislature, some members <strong>of</strong> the legislature also blame the courts in such situations<br />

instead <strong>of</strong> owning up and shouldering the blame. There is a real danger in my view that the <strong>of</strong>ten resorted<br />

to practice <strong>of</strong> prescribing mandatory minimum sentences may in the near future bring very unhealthy<br />

conflict between the legislature and the judiciary.”<br />

95 Section 2 Penal Code (Amendment) Act 39 <strong>of</strong> 2004, incorporated into the Penal Code as section 27(4).<br />

For a consideration <strong>of</strong> what amounts to exceptional extenuating circumstances, see State v Fu and Others<br />

[2006] 1 B.L.R. 486; Serumola v Director <strong>of</strong> Public Prosecutions [2007] 1 B.L.R. 434 (CA); Keboseke v<br />

The State; Seleka v The State [2008] 1 B.L.R. 327 (CA); Tlhowe v The State [2008] 1 B.L.R. 356 (CA);<br />

Seme and Another v The State [2006] 1 B.L.R. 35; State v Basutli and Another [2007] 3 B.L.R. 409; State<br />

v Moyo [2007] 1 B.L.R. 737; Seakgatleng v The State [2006] 2 B.L.R. 301; Piet v The State [2007] 2<br />

B.L.R. 460; State v Anis [2007] 2 B.L.R. 346.<br />

96 State v Khumo and Another [2007] 3 B.L.R. 844.


UNREPRESENTED ACCUSED IN BOTSWANA 105<br />

invited to address the court or lead evidence on the matter. However, there is<br />

evidence that suggests that judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers may well be following the practice<br />

<strong>of</strong> inviting accused to address them on exceptional extenuating<br />

circumstances. 97<br />

Perhaps, a word on extenuating circumstances is in order at this<br />

stage. The question <strong>of</strong> extenuating circumstances usually arises in respect <strong>of</strong><br />

sentencing in murder cases. The Penal Code 98 provides for the death penalty<br />

except where there are extenuating circumstances. 99 In other words, the court<br />

should impose the death sentence for the <strong>of</strong>fence <strong>of</strong> murder except it finds<br />

extenuating circumstances. In relation to extenuating circumstances, the<br />

accused should be permitted to lead evidence and address the court if she so<br />

desires. However, the courts are bound to look for extenuating circumstances<br />

from the evidence led during trial. 100 The analogy <strong>of</strong> extenuating<br />

circumstances in respect <strong>of</strong> section 203(2) <strong>of</strong> the Penal Code <strong>of</strong>fers little<br />

assistance to the exceptional extenuating circumstances debate since accused<br />

persons are always represented in cases <strong>of</strong> murder and defence attorney would<br />

usually indicate that she intends to lead evidence or address the court on<br />

extenuating circumstances. Also, it has been held that the accused has no onus<br />

to prove extenuating circumstances, nor does the State have an onus to<br />

disprove it. 101 What seems clear is that the court should consider extenuating<br />

circumstances on the basis <strong>of</strong> the trial evidence, and should also permit the<br />

defence to lead evidence or address the court on same if it so desires.<br />

Consequently, there is no onus on the court to invite the defence to raise<br />

extenuating circumstances.<br />

5.2 Other possible areas<br />

5.2.1 The duty to explain the unrepresented accused’s<br />

rights and options at the close <strong>of</strong> the prosecution’s<br />

case<br />

Section 180(4) <strong>of</strong> the Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act provides that at the<br />

close <strong>of</strong> the prosecution’s case, the court is required to ask the accused if she<br />

intends to adduce evidence in her defence. It follows that, at the close <strong>of</strong> the<br />

97 In State v Moyo op.cit. note 95 supra, the accused was convicted <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fence <strong>of</strong> robbery. Before<br />

passing sentence under section 292(2) <strong>of</strong> the Penal Code which provides for a minimum prison term <strong>of</strong> 10<br />

years, the records show that the accused was invited to address the Court on exceptional extenuating<br />

circumstances. In passing sentence Chinhengo J noted at p. 740B-C, “I asked the accused if there were<br />

any exceptional extenuating circumstances which would constrain or require me to impose a sentence<br />

other than the minimum mandatory sentence and he was unable to point out to any.”<br />

98 Cap 08:01.<br />

99 Section 203(2) <strong>of</strong> the Penal Code.<br />

100 Tsae v The State [2003] 2 B.L.R. 55 (CA); Losang v The State (Practice Direction) [1985] B.L.R. 281.<br />

101 Tsae v The State op.cit. note 100 supra; Kelaletswe and Others v The State [1995] B.L.R. 100 (CA);<br />

Ntesang v The State [1995] B.L.R. 151 (CA).


106 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

case <strong>of</strong> the prosecution, the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer has a duty to explain to the accused<br />

her rights and options, should the accused be found to have a case to answer.<br />

This involves a whole corpus <strong>of</strong> rights relating to the conduct <strong>of</strong> the defence.<br />

They include the right to give evidence, the right to make an unsworn<br />

statement, the right to remain silent and the right to call witnesses. 102 These<br />

rights and their implications should be explained in full.<br />

The courts have exemplified the process to be followed in explaining<br />

the rights <strong>of</strong> the accused at the close <strong>of</strong> the prosecution’s case. In Mmopi and<br />

Another v The State, 103 the Court noted that an unrepresented accused is<br />

under severe disadvantage and that if the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer fails to explain<br />

matters <strong>of</strong> procedure to her, injustice could easily result. The Court further<br />

noted that the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer should explain to the accused that she will be<br />

afforded an opportunity to state her side <strong>of</strong> the case. She should point out to<br />

the accused person what the issues were and invite her to tell her story. The<br />

Court also held that should the accused person thereafter remain mute, the<br />

judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer should carefully note on the record what she has said to the<br />

accused person, read it over to her and invite the accused to comment on what<br />

she has recorded. 104 The courts are unanimous in their conclusion that failure<br />

to comply with section 180(4) is fatal to a conviction. 105<br />

5.2.2 The duty to explain unfavourable presumptions to the<br />

unrepresented accused<br />

While the prosecution usually has the onus <strong>of</strong> proving its case against the<br />

accused, Parliament sometimes legislates presumptions that relieve the State <strong>of</strong><br />

its onus in respect <strong>of</strong> some elements <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fence. These presumptions<br />

normally conclude a state <strong>of</strong> affairs unfavourable to the accused, on the basis<br />

<strong>of</strong> a basic fact, leaving it to the accused to disprove the concluded state <strong>of</strong><br />

affairs. Usually, the State will only have to prove a single basic element from<br />

which the guilt <strong>of</strong> the accused may be inferred, unless she proves the contrary.<br />

Such reverse onuses are unfavourable to the accused and places her at the risk<br />

<strong>of</strong> conviction merely because the prosecution has proved the basic fact. 106<br />

Several legislations in <strong>Botswana</strong> contain such provisions. However, there is a<br />

dearth <strong>of</strong> authority on the duty <strong>of</strong> the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer in relation to an accused<br />

who is faced with an unfavourable presumption.<br />

102 State v Molatlhegi [1997] B.L.R. 911; State v David Rantabana and Another [1981] B.L.R. 255.<br />

103 [1986] B.L.R. 8; it was noted in Tsae v The State op.cit. note 100 supra that the court is not obliged to<br />

advise the accused directly when she is represented as this can be left to counsel. Obviously, the court will<br />

have to verify from counsel whether she has explained the accused’s rights and make a note <strong>of</strong> this in her<br />

records.<br />

104 It was also held in Tsie v The State [1999] 2 B.L.R. 305 that the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer should make notes <strong>of</strong> his<br />

advice to the accused and record the answers <strong>of</strong> the accused.<br />

105 Mhaladi v The State [1990] B.L.R. 168; State v Molatlhegi op.cit. note 102 supra; State v David<br />

Rantabana and Another op.cit. note 102 supra; Obonetse Ngakaemang v Regina op.cit. note 34 supra.


UNREPRESENTED ACCUSED IN BOTSWANA 107<br />

In the case <strong>of</strong> Mosanana v The State, 107 the appellant had been<br />

charged under the Stock Theft Act 108 on two counts <strong>of</strong> receiving stolen stock<br />

which she either knew or had reason to believe had been stolen. The appellant<br />

was acquitted on the substantive counts but convicted on lesser charges <strong>of</strong><br />

receiving stock without having reasonable cause for believing at the time <strong>of</strong><br />

acquisition that such stock was the property <strong>of</strong> the person from whom it was<br />

received. The evidence showed that the appellant was given the cattle by a<br />

debtor, in satisfaction <strong>of</strong> a debt owed by the latter to the former. At the time,<br />

the appellant was sick and in bed, but asked one Opelo to check the cattle. As<br />

a result <strong>of</strong> the appellant’s conversation with Opelo, she was satisfied that the<br />

cattle belonged to the debtor. While the cattle were unbranded, Opelo testified<br />

that other cattle <strong>of</strong> that age in <strong>Botswana</strong> are not usually branded. In reaching a<br />

decision, the magistrate relied on section 4 <strong>of</strong> the Stock Theft Act which<br />

provided that:<br />

“A person who in any manner, otherwise than at a public sale,<br />

acquires or receives into his possession from any other person stolen<br />

stock or stolen produce without having reasonable cause, pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

which shall be on such first-mentioned person, for believing at the<br />

time <strong>of</strong> such acquisition or receipt that such stock or produce was<br />

the property <strong>of</strong> the person from whom he received it or that such<br />

person was duly authorised by the owner there<strong>of</strong> to deal with it or<br />

dispose <strong>of</strong> it, shall be deemed to be guilty <strong>of</strong> an <strong>of</strong>fence.”<br />

The magistrate found that the appellant did not prove that she had<br />

reasonable cause for believing that the cattle belonged to the debtor. The<br />

Court, on appeal, disagreed with this finding. The Court stated that the<br />

appellant did show that she had reasonable cause for believing that the cattle<br />

belonged to the debtor. The Court stated that the appellant did ask Opelo to<br />

check the cattle and that the latter found nothing amiss. It was also the<br />

evidence <strong>of</strong> Opelo that he found nothing unusual with unbranded cattle. Over<br />

and above this, the Court stated the duty <strong>of</strong> judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers where an<br />

106 For some articles on reverse onus clauses, see R.J.V. Cole, “Determining the Constitutionality <strong>of</strong> Reverse<br />

Onus Clauses in <strong>Botswana</strong>,” 16(2) African <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> International and Comparative <strong>Law</strong> (2008), p. 236;<br />

A. Ashworth, “Article 6 and the Fairness <strong>of</strong> Trials,” Criminal <strong>Law</strong> Review (1999), p. 261; A. Ashworth,<br />

“Four Threats to the Presumption <strong>of</strong> Innocence,” 123(1) South African <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> (2006), p. 63; A.A.S.<br />

Zuckerman, “No Third Exception to the Woolmington Rule,” 103 <strong>Law</strong> Quarterly Review (1987), p. 170;<br />

C.R.M. Dlamini, “Presumptions in the South African <strong>Law</strong> <strong>of</strong> Evidence III,” 65(1) Tydskrif vir<br />

Hedendaagse Romeins-Hollandse Reg (2002), p. 147; F. Egonda-Ntende, “Presumption <strong>of</strong> Innocence and<br />

the Reverse Onus Clause: Does the 1995 Uganda Constitution Establish A New Standard?,” 9(2) East<br />

African <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> Peace and Human Rights (2003), p. 194; P. Roberts, “Taking the Burden <strong>of</strong> Pro<strong>of</strong><br />

Seriously,” Criminal <strong>Law</strong> Review (1995), p. 783; K. Govender, “Determining the Constitutionality <strong>of</strong><br />

Presumptions,” 8 South African <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> Criminal Justice (1995), p. 205; C.R. Nesson, “Reasonable<br />

Doubt and Permissive Inferences: The Value <strong>of</strong> Complexity,” 92(6) Harvard <strong>Law</strong> Review (1979), p.<br />

1187.<br />

107 [1985] B.L.R. 29.<br />

108 Cap 09:01, 1973. Now replaced by the Stock Theft Act Cap 09:01, Act 21 <strong>of</strong> 1996.


108 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

unfavourable onus is placed on an accused. The Court noted that in such a<br />

case, the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer should “explain to the accused in clear terms that to<br />

escape conviction he has to prove certain matters and he should fully explain<br />

what these matters are. In other words, the accused should be given fair notice<br />

<strong>of</strong> any issues not stated in or apparent from the substantive charge.” 109 In the<br />

Court’s view, failure to inform the accused may prejudice her in the conduct<br />

<strong>of</strong> her defence. In the circumstances, the Court felt compelled to set aside the<br />

conviction.<br />

The dearth <strong>of</strong> authorities in this area presents a perfect opportunity to<br />

engage in some comparative analysis. The Namibian case <strong>of</strong> S v Kau and<br />

Others 110 presents a crystal exemplification <strong>of</strong> the duty <strong>of</strong> the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer<br />

in bringing the purport and effect <strong>of</strong> an unfavourable presumption to the<br />

attention <strong>of</strong> the unrepresented accused. In that case, sixteen appellants all<br />

illiterate, were charged and convicted <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fence <strong>of</strong> wrongfully and<br />

illegally hunting specially protected game. The legislation proscribing this<br />

conduct provided that no person other than the lawful holder <strong>of</strong> a licence shall<br />

hunt specially protected game. 111 On appeal, the appellants argued among<br />

other things, that the trial magistrate erred in failing to explain the existence<br />

and implications <strong>of</strong> the presumption created by section 85(2) <strong>of</strong> the Nature<br />

Conservation Ordinance. 112 The section imposed an onus on the appellants<br />

(then accused) to prove that they had a licence to hunt. The Supreme Court<br />

held that the appellants being illiterate were not expected to know <strong>of</strong> the<br />

provision merely by its mention on the charge sheet. The appellants, therefore,<br />

required a proper explanation <strong>of</strong> the import <strong>of</strong> the provision. In the Court’s<br />

view, only a lawyer or magistrate could make such an explanation. The Court<br />

held that as the accused were unrepresented, the magistrate had a duty to<br />

explain the provision and the shifting <strong>of</strong> the onus. Failure to explain the<br />

presumption was held to amount to an irregularity, thereby rendering the trial<br />

unfair. The Court proceeded to set aside the conviction.<br />

The South African Courts have also in a number <strong>of</strong> cases ruled that<br />

judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers have a duty to explain unfavourable presumptions to the<br />

unrepresented accused. In S v Cross, 113 an accused had failed to pay his<br />

monthly instalments in respect <strong>of</strong> a maintenance order. When once the<br />

prosecution had proved failure to pay, an onus fell upon him to establish<br />

109 Mosanana v The State op.cit. note 107 supra at p. 31.<br />

110 [1993] NASC 2; 1995 NR 1. Obtained from: (last visited 1 September 2010).<br />

Cyclostyled copy on file with the author.<br />

111 Section 26(1) <strong>of</strong> the Nature Conservation Ordinance 4 <strong>of</strong> 1975 as amended.<br />

112 The section provides as follows:<br />

“Whenever any person performs an act and he would commit or have committed an <strong>of</strong>fence by<br />

performing that act if he had not been the holder <strong>of</strong> a licence, registration permit, exemption, document,<br />

written permission or written or other authority or power (herein in this section called the necessary<br />

authority) to perform such act, he shall, if charged with the commission <strong>of</strong> such <strong>of</strong>fence, be deemed not to<br />

have been the holder <strong>of</strong> the necessary authority, unless the contrary is proved.”<br />

113 1971 (2) 356 (R,AD); S v Lango op.cit. note 47 supra; S v Kekwana 1978 (2) SA 172 (NKA); S v Brown<br />

1984 (3) SA 399 (KPA); S v Khumalo 1979 (4) SA 480 (TPD).


UNREPRESENTED ACCUSED IN BOTSWANA 109<br />

inadequate means to pay. The trial magistrate did not explain this onus to the<br />

accused. The accused in his evidence, made a vague attempt to explain his<br />

finances. The Court, on appeal, noted that it was clear that the accused was<br />

unaware <strong>of</strong> the necessity <strong>of</strong> producing concrete facts and figures in order to<br />

establish his assertion that he was unable to pay during the period in question.<br />

The Court, therefore, laid down a rule <strong>of</strong> practice that where an unrepresented<br />

accused is charged with the <strong>of</strong>fence <strong>of</strong> failure to pay maintenance, the judicial<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficer should explain the onus resting on the accused. The Court stated that<br />

the accused should be informed that it is insufficient to make a bald statement<br />

on oath asserting inability to pay but that all the relevant facts and figures and<br />

documentary evidence available should be produced in order that the court<br />

may properly adjudicate on the matter.<br />

The Court’s rationale in Kau was that the appellants being<br />

unrepresented, had no way <strong>of</strong> knowing about the import and effect <strong>of</strong> the<br />

presumption if the magistrate did not explain it to them. Of significance is the<br />

Court’s view that it is unwise to assume that the magistrate’s failure to warn<br />

the appellants <strong>of</strong> the presumption did not result in prejudice because the<br />

magistrate did not rely on the presumption. The Court noted that the<br />

prosecution did not lead evidence to prove that the appellants did not have the<br />

relevant permit and must have therefore relied on the presumption to prove the<br />

appellants’ guilt. While the Court held that the failure to inform the appellants<br />

<strong>of</strong> the presumption rendered the trial unfair, it also took into consideration the<br />

fact that the trial court also failed to inform the appellants <strong>of</strong> other rights to<br />

which they were entitled. 114 This case, therefore, reinforces the general duty<br />

<strong>of</strong> the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer to bring the attention <strong>of</strong> the accused to her procedural<br />

rights.<br />

Cross underscores the judicial enabling duty <strong>of</strong> the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer. It<br />

can be seen that the Court’s reasoning was based on the fact that the judicial<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficer should give the unrepresented accused sufficient and detailed<br />

information <strong>of</strong> what is required for her to put up a proper rebuttal. The<br />

accused carries the risk <strong>of</strong> non-persuasion and it is therefore vitally important<br />

that this is brought to her attention. It will amount to “trickery” to convict an<br />

accused with the aid <strong>of</strong> a statutory presumption which effectively excuses the<br />

prosecution from proving an element <strong>of</strong> an <strong>of</strong>fence because that element is<br />

proved by virtue <strong>of</strong> the presumption, while at the same time demanding that<br />

the accused disproves the presumed facts, if the accused is unaware <strong>of</strong> the<br />

onus or evidential burden placed on her.<br />

114 Failure to ask the appellants to what extent they admit or deny issues raised in their plea and that they are<br />

not obliged to answer questions; failure to advice the appellants <strong>of</strong> their right to legal representation;<br />

failure to advise the appellants <strong>of</strong> their right to cross-examination.


110 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

5.2.3 The duty to advise the unrepresented accused <strong>of</strong> the<br />

possible conviction <strong>of</strong> a lesser <strong>of</strong>fence<br />

There are occasions where the prosecution fails to establish the <strong>of</strong>fence with<br />

which the accused is charged because they have not established one or more<br />

elements constituting the <strong>of</strong>fence. However, it might still be possible to convict<br />

the accused <strong>of</strong> a lesser <strong>of</strong>fence on the basis <strong>of</strong> the evidence adduced. 115 For<br />

example, a person may be convicted <strong>of</strong> an attempt to commit an <strong>of</strong>fence for<br />

which she was charged where the evidence establishes attempt but fails to<br />

establish the substantive <strong>of</strong>fence. 116 Also, a person charged with defilement<br />

may end up with a conviction for indecent assault. 117 Where it is apparent to<br />

the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer that the accused might be convicted <strong>of</strong> a lesser <strong>of</strong>fence, she<br />

must advise the accused <strong>of</strong> this possibility.<br />

In the case <strong>of</strong> State v Bareki 118 the Court held that on a charge <strong>of</strong><br />

rape, where the accused is unrepresented, he must be informed <strong>of</strong> the fact that<br />

a conviction <strong>of</strong> defilement is a competent verdict, where it is alleged that the<br />

victim is under the age <strong>of</strong> sixteen years. In this regard, the accused must be<br />

given an opportunity <strong>of</strong> addressing the additional issues such as the age <strong>of</strong> the<br />

victim. 119 The Court noted that section 10(2)(b) <strong>of</strong> the Constitution <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Botswana</strong> provides that an accused be informed <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fence for which he is<br />

charged. In the Court’s view, therefore, a judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer has a duty to inform<br />

an unrepresented accused <strong>of</strong> the possibility <strong>of</strong> conviction <strong>of</strong> an alternative<br />

<strong>of</strong>fence. Since the particulars <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fence had made no reference to the age<br />

<strong>of</strong> the victim, the accused could not have adverted his mind to the issue <strong>of</strong> age<br />

or its relevance.<br />

In the case <strong>of</strong> Chalaomane v The State, 120 the appellant had been<br />

charged with the <strong>of</strong>fence <strong>of</strong> shop-breaking and theft. The only evidence<br />

proved against the appellant was that he was in possession <strong>of</strong> goods stolen<br />

from the shop in question. The trial court did not warn him <strong>of</strong> a possible<br />

conviction <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fence <strong>of</strong> receiving stolen property and proceeded to<br />

convict him <strong>of</strong> that <strong>of</strong>fence. The Court noted that the trial court should have<br />

warned the appellant <strong>of</strong> the risk <strong>of</strong> conviction on the alternative <strong>of</strong>fence <strong>of</strong><br />

receiving stolen property as stipulated by section 194 <strong>of</strong> the Criminal<br />

Procedure and Evidence Act. 121 The Court noted, however, that the evidence<br />

115 Section 187 <strong>of</strong> the Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act Cap 08:02. See generally sections 187 to 197 <strong>of</strong><br />

the Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act.<br />

116 Section 188 <strong>of</strong> the Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act.<br />

117 Section 193 <strong>of</strong> the Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act; Segametsi v The State [1986] B.L.R. 441.<br />

118 Op.cit. note 51 supra.<br />

119 Ibid.<br />

120 [1986] B.L.R. 261 (CA).<br />

121 Section 194 <strong>of</strong> the Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act provides: “When a person is charged with any<br />

<strong>of</strong>fence mentioned in sections 300 to 305 <strong>of</strong> the Penal Code (relating to burglary, house-breaking and<br />

similar <strong>of</strong>fences) and the court is <strong>of</strong> the opinion that he is not guilty <strong>of</strong> that <strong>of</strong>fence but that he is guilty <strong>of</strong><br />

any other <strong>of</strong>fence mentioned in those sections or in sections 317 to 320 <strong>of</strong> the Penal Code, he may be<br />

convicted <strong>of</strong> that other <strong>of</strong>fence although he was not charged with it.”


UNREPRESENTED ACCUSED IN BOTSWANA 111<br />

related solely and entirely to possession <strong>of</strong> stolen goods. As this was the sole<br />

issue, the appellant had an opportunity <strong>of</strong> defending himself in relation to<br />

possession and did so on the basis <strong>of</strong> an alibi and denial <strong>of</strong> possession. The<br />

defence was rejected. Therefore, according to the Court, the appellant was not<br />

prejudiced in any way. The Court held that there was no substantial<br />

miscarriage <strong>of</strong> justice, and dismissed the appeal.<br />

In Bareki, the Court aligned its argument with the constitutional right<br />

<strong>of</strong> the accused to be informed <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fence with which she is charged.<br />

According to the Court, where it is possible that an accused may be convicted<br />

<strong>of</strong> an <strong>of</strong>fence with which she was not charged, the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer has a duty to<br />

inform the accused accordingly and she must be afforded an opportunity to<br />

defend herself on any additional issues that the situation may present. The<br />

procedural question that arises is, at what stage the warning should be made.<br />

Should it be made as soon as the possibility <strong>of</strong> a lesser charge is clear or<br />

apparent. The problem here is that at the time the issue <strong>of</strong> a possible<br />

alternative verdict registers itself, the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer may not be sure whether<br />

she would convict the accused <strong>of</strong> the substantive or lesser <strong>of</strong>fence. The<br />

question <strong>of</strong> whether the accused will be convicted <strong>of</strong> the substantive or lesser<br />

<strong>of</strong>fence would depend on what finding <strong>of</strong> fact the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer will make at<br />

the end <strong>of</strong> the day, having regard to the evidence. In other words, it would<br />

depend on which side the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer believes. Again, the possibility <strong>of</strong> an<br />

acquittal would not be entirely ruled out. Even, and assuming that the<br />

possibility <strong>of</strong> a conviction for a lesser <strong>of</strong>fence loomed at the time the State<br />

closed its case, the evidence <strong>of</strong> the defence might tilt the ground in favour <strong>of</strong><br />

an acquittal. It should be said therefore, that the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer should fulfil<br />

this duty as soon as it becomes apparent that an alternative verdict is possible.<br />

Though Chalaomane and Bareki do not give directions as to how the court<br />

should exercise its duty, the case <strong>of</strong> State v Sethunya 122 is <strong>of</strong> valuable<br />

assistance. Relying on the constitutional right <strong>of</strong> the accused to be informed <strong>of</strong><br />

the charges against her, the Court noted that the duty arises “as soon as the<br />

possibility <strong>of</strong> a conviction <strong>of</strong> another <strong>of</strong>fence enters the mind <strong>of</strong> the trial<br />

judge.” 123 In a master stroke, the Court set out the duty and its procedural<br />

implications when it noted:<br />

“The judge should remember that the accused comes to contest the<br />

charge in the indictment. He may be put at a disadvantage by<br />

finding during the trial that he has to meet an allegation that he<br />

committed another <strong>of</strong>fence. The accused must be protected in such<br />

circumstances and an adjournment should be granted in exceptional<br />

circumstances. There is no fixed time in a trial when a warning<br />

122 [1986] B.L.R. 483.<br />

123 Ibid at p. 485H.


112 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

should be given to the accused but obviously the sooner it is given<br />

the better. It may well be that the alternative <strong>of</strong>fence does not arise<br />

in the judge's mind until the accused has given evidence or even<br />

when his witnesses have given evidence, if that be the case, the trial<br />

judge should give his warning then or anytime before he delivers his<br />

judgment but the warning must be given before judgment is<br />

delivered and the accused must be allowed to recall State witnesses<br />

if he so wishes, to give further evidence and if necessary to recall or<br />

call further witnesses.” 124<br />

This ensures that the accused is given an opportunity to defend<br />

herself fully, and to attend to any additional issues that the possible new<br />

charge may present. It is founded on the constitutional requirement that an<br />

accused should not be convicted unless she has been informed <strong>of</strong> the charges<br />

she is facing. 125 The effect <strong>of</strong> informing the accused <strong>of</strong> the possible lesser<br />

<strong>of</strong>fence is that the trial is re-set and the accused is able to recall the witnesses<br />

so as to cross-examine them on the basis <strong>of</strong> the new charge.<br />

5.2.4 Analysing the trend <strong>of</strong> the case law<br />

The cases discussed above illustrate that the courts have consistently reminded<br />

judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers <strong>of</strong> the judicial enabling process. This forms part <strong>of</strong> the selfcorrection<br />

element in the system. Courts continue to remind themselves <strong>of</strong> the<br />

rules that bind them as well as making corrections from within. In Nieklas, the<br />

Court <strong>of</strong> Appeal went a stage further by directing that the message be<br />

disseminated directly to judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers via a checklist. This should create an<br />

ever-present reminder to judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers <strong>of</strong> the judicial enabling process.<br />

While noting that failure to advise the accused results in procedural failure, the<br />

courts rely significantly on the prejudice clause. Effectively, this takes other<br />

124 Ibid at p. 486A-C. In the case <strong>of</strong> State v Fihlani [1987] B.L.R.225 the Court noted at pp. 226H-227C that:<br />

“The essential principle which emerges is that as soon as the possibility <strong>of</strong> a conviction <strong>of</strong> another <strong>of</strong>fence<br />

enters the mind <strong>of</strong> the trial judge he must always ensure that that course will involve no risk <strong>of</strong> injustice to<br />

the accused and that he has had the opportunity <strong>of</strong> fully meeting that alternative in the course <strong>of</strong> his<br />

defence. The judge should remember that the accused comes to contest the charge in the indictment. He<br />

may be put at a disadvantage by finding during the trial that he has to meet an allegation that he<br />

committed another <strong>of</strong>fence. The accused must be protected in such circumstances and an adjournment<br />

should be granted in exceptional circumstances. There is no fixed time in a trial when a warning should be<br />

given to the accused but obviously the sooner it is given the better. It may well be that the alternative<br />

<strong>of</strong>fence does not arise in the judge's mind until the accused has given evidence or even when his witnesses<br />

have given evidence, if that be the case, the trial judge should give his warning then or anytime before he<br />

delivers his judgment but the warning must be given before judgment is delivered and the accused must<br />

be allowed to recall State witnesses if he so wishes, to give further evidence and if necessary to recall or<br />

call further witnesses.”<br />

125 Ibid; Moeti v The State [1998] B.L.R. 55. In Dick v The State [2007] 2 B.L.R. 592, the Court noted that<br />

although it was proper for a judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer to warn an accused if he was contemplating convicting him on<br />

a substituted charge, the failure to warn him did not always result in a failure <strong>of</strong> justice. For example,<br />

injustice would not result where the evidence led related to the accused's possession <strong>of</strong> stolen property<br />

and his explanation or lack <strong>of</strong> explanation for such possession, had been fully contested at the trial.


UNREPRESENTED ACCUSED IN BOTSWANA 113<br />

interests into consideration. As noted in Makwapeng v The State, if failure by<br />

the court to advise the accused would by itself result in vitiation <strong>of</strong> the trial,<br />

even where there is overwhelming evidence to convict, this will affect the<br />

credibility <strong>of</strong> the judiciary. In addition, one must say that victims <strong>of</strong> crime and<br />

the wider societal interests would not be served if those that are obviously<br />

guilty were allowed to escape on the basis <strong>of</strong> mere technicalities.<br />

However, the application <strong>of</strong> the prejudice rule to the failure to advise<br />

an accused <strong>of</strong> her right to legal representation is a source <strong>of</strong> discomfiture. To<br />

say that the conviction should stand because the evidence is overwhelming, is<br />

to some extent, out <strong>of</strong> place in the adversarial context. The evidence may be<br />

overwhelming because it was not subject to challenge from an expert in the art<br />

<strong>of</strong> cross-examination. <strong>Law</strong>yers sometimes take over cases midstream from<br />

self-actors who would be faring badly in defending themselves due to their<br />

lack <strong>of</strong> legal knowledge. In such cases, due to their legal skills, the lawyers<br />

would be able to turn around the fortunes <strong>of</strong> an accused, where a conviction<br />

had previously seemed imminent. One can therefore never conjecture what<br />

effect legal representation could have had on the process. The crossexamination<br />

might have been different, and the lawyer could have produced<br />

evidence or witnesses that the accused was aware <strong>of</strong> but did not appreciate<br />

their value and so did not present such evidence or call such witnesses to<br />

testify. 126 There are issues that only a lawyer could unearth due to her legal<br />

skills. 127 Therefore, the evidence against the accused may very well be<br />

overwhelming, not because she is guilty, but because she did not have<br />

adequate representation. In this regard, failure to advise an accused <strong>of</strong> her<br />

right to legal representation is not a mere technical matter that can be<br />

overlooked. Such failure by itself, should render the trial unfair except where<br />

it is shown that the accused was aware <strong>of</strong> the right.<br />

6. THE IMPLICATIONS OF JUDICIAL ENABLING<br />

ON THE ADVERSARIAL PROCESS<br />

Effectively, judicial enabling mimics the inquisitorial system to some extent.<br />

The judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer is a more active participant. To some extent, it can be said<br />

that she “investigates” the accused’s case. Clearly, for the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer to be<br />

able to assist the accused in cross-examination as suggested in Mponda,<br />

126 In Kau v The State and Others op.cit. note 110 supra at p. 23 <strong>of</strong> the cyclostyled copy, the Namibian<br />

Supreme Court stated that “…it cannot be said, in the absence <strong>of</strong> representation on their behalf, that all the<br />

evidence which should have been placed before court was in fact placed before the court or that State<br />

witnesses were properly cross-examined and tested or that the cases <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> the appellants were<br />

properly presented.”<br />

127 As Jansen JA noted in S v Shabancru 1976 (3) SA 555 (A) at p. 558F: “The case against the appellant on<br />

the merits certainly appears to be formidable and to have fully justified the conviction. But, on the other<br />

hand, it is impossible to say what effect a properly conducted defence could have had on the ultimate<br />

result.”


114 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

Sebatana and Dipholo, she would have to inquire from the accused what her<br />

defence is and what aspects <strong>of</strong> the testimony she should like to dispute. The<br />

same approach applies if the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer were to assist the accused in<br />

stating her defence or plea in mitigation. This, however, does not mean that the<br />

judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer crosses the well over to the inquisitorial camp as pro<strong>of</strong><br />

primarily rests with the parties. The State investigates its case and initiates<br />

proceedings and the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer merely comes to the aid <strong>of</strong> the accused to<br />

ensure that the trial is fair. This underlying reasoning <strong>of</strong> judicial enabling and<br />

judicial advice is clear from the cases advocating this approach. 128<br />

Practical lessons can be learnt from judicial enabling. The two<br />

principal procedural systems can no longer exist in purist isolation <strong>of</strong> each<br />

other. This lends credence to the argument that the inter-marriage between the<br />

adversarial and inquisitorial systems is an inevitable necessity. Consequently,<br />

devout discipleship and extreme reverence to idealist models should water<br />

down. Realistically, none <strong>of</strong> these models can remain purist and an inevitable<br />

intermix has occurred over the years with each system borrowing from the<br />

other. 129 Scholars have time and again debunked the stereotype <strong>of</strong> confining<br />

procedural systems in polarised continuums. 130 As criminal justice systems<br />

undergo the inevitable process <strong>of</strong> reform, the line <strong>of</strong> distinction between the<br />

models becomes increasingly blurred. 131 Due to the fair trial imperative, one<br />

can say that the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer in <strong>Botswana</strong>, is not expected to maintain the<br />

classic adversarial posture.<br />

Judicial enabling inevitably results in a distortion in rules <strong>of</strong><br />

procedure and potentially, the order <strong>of</strong> proceedings. With time, what might<br />

have previously seemed a distortion <strong>of</strong> the rules, have developed into<br />

normative rules <strong>of</strong> their own. In 1984, the Court stated in Seakwa and Others<br />

v The State 132 that it might be necessary to suspend the rules <strong>of</strong> procedure to<br />

allow the unrepresented and illiterate accused to articulate herself. However,<br />

judicial enabling has come a long way since 1984. What seemed a deviation<br />

from the rules then, has solidified into normative significance. So while<br />

judicial enabling is bound to affect the rules <strong>of</strong> procedure, it has attained a<br />

128 Rabonko v The State op.cit. note 36 supra; State v Bareki op.cit. note 51 supra; State v Sethunya op.cit.<br />

note 51 supra.<br />

129 Thibault, Walker and Allan Lind, op.cit. at p. 388; Goldstein, op.cit. at p. 1025. While accepting that<br />

reforms are desirable, Damaska warns that, “The transplantation <strong>of</strong> factfinding arrangements between<br />

common law and civil law systems would give rise to serious strains in the recipient justice system. The<br />

interaction between the contemplated transplant and the new environment must be carefully studied, and<br />

the question must always be considered whether the recipient culture is prepared – or can be readied – to<br />

live with the wider effects <strong>of</strong> contemplated reform.”: M. Damaska, “The Uncertain Fate <strong>of</strong> Evidentiary<br />

Transplants: Anglo-American and Continental Experiments,” 45(4) American <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> Comparative<br />

<strong>Law</strong> (1997), p. 839 at 851-852; see also H.T. Edwards, “Comments on Damaska’s Of Evidentiary<br />

Transplants,” 45(4) American <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> Comparative <strong>Law</strong> (1997), p. 853 at 859.<br />

130 See P.J. Schwikkard, Possibilities <strong>of</strong> Convergence (2008), Deventer, Kluwer; Thibault, Walker and Allan<br />

Lind, op.cit. at p. 388.<br />

131 As Hayden and Anderson comment, it seems doubtful that a pure adversarial system exists in the United<br />

States or that pure inquisitorial systems exist in Europe. See Hayden and Anderson, at pp. 22-23.<br />

132 Op.cit. note 85 supra.


UNREPRESENTED ACCUSED IN BOTSWANA 115<br />

state <strong>of</strong> normative certainty.<br />

7. CONCLUSION<br />

It is irrefutable that judicial enabling has precipitated a metamorphosis <strong>of</strong> the<br />

adversarial system in <strong>Botswana</strong>. One might be tempted to say that having<br />

regard to the case law, judicial enabling gave birth to a new progeny which is<br />

inconsistent with puritan adversarialim: “the over-speaking judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer”. In<br />

this regard and accepting that the pure adversarial breed is no longer<br />

sustainable in <strong>Botswana</strong>, the active participation <strong>of</strong> the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer can now<br />

be referred to as part <strong>of</strong> the process. Thus the unpalatable tag, “the overspeaking<br />

judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer”, becomes a thing <strong>of</strong> the past. Criminal trials can now<br />

be described as a tripartite dialogue involving the disputants and the judicial<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficer. The judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer elicits evidence especially from the accused, with<br />

the aim <strong>of</strong> assisting her through the process. In assisting the accused, obviously<br />

the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer will raise questions which are geared towards arriving at the<br />

truth, a trait consistent with the inquisitorial investigative judge. Essentially,<br />

we recognise a new strain <strong>of</strong> adversarialism or perhaps, one may say that the<br />

line between the adversarial and inquisitorial dichotomy now suffers from a<br />

blur. This is representative <strong>of</strong> the bridging <strong>of</strong> the cleavage between the<br />

adversarial and inquisitorial models.<br />

It is clear that the underlying factor for the more visible judicial<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficer is the need for a fair trial. It appears politically (or “judicially<br />

incorrect”) incorrect in modern democracies, to conduct trials without the<br />

participation <strong>of</strong> the accused. The present judicial ideology <strong>of</strong> fair trial involves<br />

judicial enabling which takes the form <strong>of</strong> a hand-holding process. Judicial<br />

enabling is clearly a by-product <strong>of</strong> the fair trial imperative. This has inevitably<br />

resulted in a welcome dilution <strong>of</strong> adversarialim at the altar <strong>of</strong> fair trial rights.


117<br />

Competition and Regulation in the Gold Industry:<br />

An American Perspective<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

J. Wilkerson*<br />

When taken from a domestic viewpoint, the primary gold market appears to be<br />

noncompetitive and marred by concentration. However, when seen at the<br />

global scale, it is clear that the primary gold market is competitive and diluted.<br />

Further, even if the primary market were noncompetitive and concentrated at<br />

the global level, that market probably could not readily affect the price <strong>of</strong> gold.<br />

Regardless <strong>of</strong> competitiveness, gold mines in the United States and elsewhere<br />

are subject to environmental and safety regulations that increase the cost <strong>of</strong><br />

production; Regulations are stringently enforced in the United States as<br />

compared to competitor countries, potentially creating a competitive<br />

disadvantage for US primary producers.<br />

1. INTRODUCTION<br />

Gold markets have been regulated for at least five thousand years—since the<br />

first dynastic ruler <strong>of</strong> Egypt, Menes, declared that the value <strong>of</strong> gold would be<br />

two and a half times that <strong>of</strong> silver. 1 The market has arisen in different areas at<br />

different times, with distinct civilizations discovering, exploiting, and coveting<br />

gold from the days <strong>of</strong> their earliest records.<br />

America has been no exception, and the United States has been a<br />

major consumer <strong>of</strong> gold since its inception. The U.S. has also produced gold,<br />

beginning in 1799 when the young son <strong>of</strong> Hessian-turned-farmer John Reed<br />

found a seventeen-pound nugget while bow fishing on his father’s North<br />

Carolina land. 2 This discovery led to the creation <strong>of</strong> placer associations and<br />

mining cohorts in the Colonies – Appalachian organizations that dominated<br />

gold production in the United States until January 1848, when California Gold<br />

Rush started at the American River. 3<br />

Once mining came to California in earnest, it spread throughout the<br />

American West, from Alaska to New Mexico and Oregon to Colorado.<br />

Wherever there were mountains and streams, there were miners and gold<br />

pans. Solo miners and small teams did their best to gather the easy pickings<br />

from streams and veins, but “[b]y the early twentieth century, the best highgrade<br />

deposits <strong>of</strong> precious metals were either exhausted or being worked<br />

<br />

Editor, Comparative <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> and J.D./M.P.P (Candidate), The College <strong>of</strong> William & Mary.<br />

1 O. E. Young, Jr., The Southern Gold Rush, 1828–1836, 48 J. <strong>of</strong> South Hist. 373, 375 (1982).<br />

2 Id. at 373.<br />

3


118 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

out,” 4 and mining became more capital-intensive. The need for capital moved<br />

mining away from a collection <strong>of</strong> individual miners to the formation <strong>of</strong><br />

companies. Luckily, this time <strong>of</strong> needed capital struck during the Second<br />

Industrial Revolution, a period that saw the harnessing <strong>of</strong> hydraulic, electrical,<br />

steam, and internal combustion power. These new technologies allowed<br />

mining companies to dig deeper than ever, to dredge stream beds, to<br />

communicate with far-flung operations, and to transport capital to mines and<br />

ore away from them.<br />

Consequently, technological innovation has been the key to gold<br />

mining in the last 100 years. From cutting mountainsides with pressurized<br />

water, to blasting tunnels with TNT, and – most importantly – to extracting<br />

gold from hard rock through the cyanidation and active-carbonation<br />

processes, new technologies have led to enormous startup costs and, therefore,<br />

huge mining conglomerates looking to exploit economies <strong>of</strong> scale. The<br />

benefits <strong>of</strong> scope economies have also arisen: since mining one mineral can<br />

lead to discovery <strong>of</strong> another, and the equipment and know-how used to dig<br />

one mineral can be used to dig another, mines <strong>of</strong>ten employ their expertise<br />

and equipment to gather gold while mining something else – or vice versa. 5<br />

Technological necessity has made size the watchword <strong>of</strong> modern<br />

economically-sustainable gold mining. Enormous haul trucks, excavators,<br />

underground facilities, open pits, and mills are getting bigger every year to<br />

make up for decreases in ore grade. Today, a mine can stay operable even at<br />

grades <strong>of</strong> one-hundredth <strong>of</strong> an ounce per ton <strong>of</strong> ore, but the capital costs that<br />

allow for such operations are astronomical: up to two billion dollars per mine<br />

for startup costs alone. 6 It is true that entry into the gold primary market is<br />

relatively easy if a high-grade deposit can be extracted with minimal effort<br />

(e.g, artisanal sluice mining in Alaska), but such deposits are increasingly<br />

scarce and <strong>of</strong>ten run dry after a short extraction period. In other words, these<br />

deposits are too small, too easily depleted, and too scattered to support longterm,<br />

large-scale operations. 7 Indeed, the average ore grade <strong>of</strong> large<br />

operations is 3 grams per ton, which leads to a cost per ounce <strong>of</strong> gold <strong>of</strong><br />

between $300 and $400 at well-capitalized firms. Experts agree that as time<br />

marches on, ore grade will generally decrease and cost <strong>of</strong> production will<br />

increase on an exponential curve. 8 Indeed, there is a very high long-run<br />

4 M. Malone, The Collapse <strong>of</strong> Western Metal Mining: An Historical Epitaph 55 Pacific Hist. Rev. 455, 458<br />

(1986).<br />

5 The Bingham Canyon Mine in Utah, for example, is a Kennecott Copper mine that supplements its copper<br />

production by finding gold in the process. As shown in Table 1, Kennecott copper is one <strong>of</strong> the top four<br />

gold producers in the United States, due almost entirely to its Bingham Canyon Mine, which produces<br />

12,300 kg <strong>of</strong> gold per year (the seventh largest gold-producing mine in the U.S.).<br />

6 J.H. Morris, Going for the Gold: The History <strong>of</strong> Newmont Mining Corporation (Univ. <strong>of</strong> Al. Press 2010).<br />

7 Datamonitor, Ref. Code 0199-2063, Industry Pr<strong>of</strong>ile: Global Gold 14 (2010).<br />

8 J. Muller & H.E. Frimmel, Numerical Analysis <strong>of</strong> Historic Gold Production Cycles and Implications for<br />

Future Sub-Cycles, 4 Open Geology J. 30–31 (2010).


COMPETITION AND REGULATION IN THE GOLD INDUSTRY 119<br />

minimum efficient scale at modern mines that is going to get higher. 9 This will<br />

force small firms to either bow out as soon as their high-grade ore is gone, or<br />

accept a takeover bid by a better-capitalized firm.<br />

2. PRODUCT MARKET IS BOTH DOMESTIC AND<br />

GLOBAL<br />

The relevant product in this analysis is primary gold, meaning gold extracted<br />

from the ground in order to be sold. This is in contrast with secondary gold,<br />

which is produced by recycling scrap – a method that took hold in the mid-<br />

1960s and has resulted in secondary production rivaling the size <strong>of</strong> primary<br />

output. 10 Although my concentration is on the primary market, the secondary<br />

market produces a significant amount <strong>of</strong> world supply (or, more appropriately,<br />

its re-supply). The gold produced in the secondary market is indistinguishable<br />

from that produced in the primary market. Thus, I cannot altogether ignore the<br />

secondary market – or gold sold on the market by central banks and others – in<br />

the following discussion. Most gold mining companies are not involved in the<br />

refining processes directly. Instead, gold mines take the refining process to<br />

about 80–90% purity on-site, forming the gold into doré bars and sending them<br />

to external refineries that take the bars to 99.6–99.99% pure bullion. 11 In<br />

addition to this break in vertical integration, I assume that gold mining<br />

companies are not involved in recycling.<br />

Geographically, the market has both domestic and global aspects.<br />

Although gold is bought and sold globally, making concentration and<br />

competition analyses tempting from the world-level, its production is<br />

intimately connected to countries’ land. Thus, individual countries have a<br />

stake in how their gold is mined and how mining affects their economy. From<br />

a regulatory standpoint, many statutes (such as the General Mining Act <strong>of</strong><br />

1872) and the common law are generally applicable to all gold mining<br />

9 It must be noted that large mining corporations appear to be waiting to enter some countries for political<br />

and governmental-efficiency reasons rather than ore grade. These countries’ rich resources are currently<br />

exploited by small-scale firms. China is the poster-child <strong>of</strong> such countries, in which one state-supported<br />

producer mines about 20% <strong>of</strong> all reserves, while innumerable small firms make up the difference. See<br />

generally, L. Tole & G. Koop, Do Environmental Regulations Affect the Location Decisions <strong>of</strong><br />

Multinational Gold Mining Firms? (12 August, 2008) (unpublished manuscript on file with the<br />

<strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Strathclyde).<br />

10 United States Geological Survey, 2007 Minerals Yearbook: Gold 31.9 (2008).<br />

11 J. Marsden & I. House, The Chemistry <strong>of</strong> Gold Extraction 449 (2 nd Ed., Society for Mining Metallurgy &<br />

Exploration 2006). There is a good possibility that gold mines will begin vertical integration with<br />

dedicated refineries (“i.e.”, refineries that take the gold to maximum purity), especially as gold in<br />

circulation (and therefore available for recycling) increases and the gold in the ground decreases. A move<br />

on the large scale would lead to more <strong>of</strong> a possibility that firms could exercise market power. One South<br />

African gold mining company, Harmony, has already integrated, and takes its gold from ore to 99.99%<br />

purity on its own. See R. Short & B. Radebe, Gold in South Africa (2008), available at http://<br />

www.goldinsouthafrica.co.za.It must also be noted that at least some dedicated refineries are owned by a<br />

conglomerate <strong>of</strong> nearby gold mines. Id.


120 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

operations in the U.S. 12 Thus, since both perspectives can be valuable in<br />

creating policy that affects primary production, I examine both the United<br />

States and global mining industries.<br />

3. THE DOMESTIC PRIMARY MARKET APPEARS<br />

HIGHLY CONCENTRATED<br />

Technology, capital, and large firms seem necessary to keep up with demand.<br />

Since gold is sold on a global market both as an investment and as an input,<br />

each gold-producing country (unless centrally-planned) is both an exporter and<br />

an importer <strong>of</strong> gold. The United States was, from 1900 to the early 1960s,<br />

generally a net importer <strong>of</strong> gold. Since then, the U.S. has been, almost without<br />

exception, a net exporter. 13 In 1971, Richard Nixon deregulated the gold<br />

market by removing the United States from the gold standard. This move led<br />

to an immediate jump in prices, which further led, in the 1980s, to a production<br />

level more than four times that <strong>of</strong> 1971. United States production continued to<br />

grow throughout the 1980s and 1990s, peaking at 366 metric tons in 1998 and<br />

then tapering <strong>of</strong>f as prices began falling. Production has steadily fallen since<br />

2001 despite rising prices, and in 2008 the United States primary producers<br />

generated only 233 tons <strong>of</strong> gold. Notably, the 2008 price <strong>of</strong> gold was the<br />

highest it had been since 1987, but the American production level was the<br />

lowest it had been since 1988. 14<br />

Today, gold is produced at only about fifty-five mines in the United<br />

States, with 78% <strong>of</strong> all gold production coming from the state <strong>of</strong> Nevada. 15<br />

Thirteen gold producers owning thirty mines make up over 99% <strong>of</strong> total U.S.<br />

gold production (see Table 1). Among these producers, Barrick Gold<br />

Corporation has the largest market share, at 37.8%, followed by Newmont<br />

Mining Corporation, at 29.5%. As shown in Table 1, the market is highly<br />

concentrated, with an HHI <strong>of</strong> 2521.06 and the top four firms holding more<br />

than 85% <strong>of</strong> the market. Barrick and Newmont have for years been major<br />

players in American gold mining (although they were accompanied by other<br />

similar-sized firms until the early 2000s) 16 and show no signs <strong>of</strong> slowing.<br />

12 It should be pointed out, however, that U.S. courts are not shy about finding jurisdiction over companies<br />

that affect American interests – even when the case has more effects in foreign jurisdictions. See<br />

Consolidated Gold Fields PLC v Anglo American Corp., 698 F. Supp 487 (S.D.N.Y. 1988) aff’d in part,<br />

rev’d in part, sub nom. Consolidated Gold Fields PLC v Minorco, S.A., 871 F.2d 252 (1989) (finding<br />

personal and subject matter jurisdiction over Luxembourg (Minorco) corporation and its hostile takeover<br />

bid for a British (Consolidated Gold Fields – plaintiff) corporation, because the merger would have<br />

created a 32% market share for the new company and because the new company would have minority<br />

control over some American mines).<br />

13 United States Geological Survey, Gold Statistics (2009), available at http://minerals.usgs.gov/ds/2005/<br />

140/gold.pdf.<br />

14 Id.<br />

15 United States Geological Survey, supra note 10, at 31.1<br />

16 M. Callahan, To Hedge or Not to Hedge ... That Is the Question: Empirical Evidence from the North<br />

American Gold Mining Industry 1996-2000, 11 Financial Markets, Institutions and Instruments 271<br />

(2002).


COMPETITION AND REGULATION IN THE GOLD INDUSTRY 121<br />

Indeed, it could be argued that the primary gold market in the United States is<br />

likely subject to collusion among the top producers: Barrick and Newmont<br />

would have a majority market share if taken together. However, this argument<br />

would overlook the global market in which these companies play. Prices are<br />

set at a global scale; thus, while it is true that the top producers could leverage<br />

market power if they were only competing domestically, I now turn to the<br />

competitive landscape at the global level to see this seemingly bleak picture in<br />

a larger context.<br />

Company<br />

Gold Production<br />

(kg)<br />

% Mkt Share (% Mkt Share)<br />

Barrick 90611 37.8 1428.84<br />

Newmont 70788 29.5 870.25<br />

Kinross 28800 12 144<br />

Kennecott 15372 6.4 40.96<br />

Creek 8770 3.7 13.69<br />

Teck 8080 3.4 11.56<br />

Goldcorp 4380 1.8 3.24<br />

Yukon 3790 1.6 2.56<br />

Quadra 3360 1.4 1.96<br />

Wharf 1800 1 1<br />

Coeur d’Alene 1570 1 1<br />

Jipangu 1360 1 1<br />

Apollo 1040 1 1<br />

239.721 HHI: 2521.06<br />

4. GLOBAL SUPPLY AND DEMAND FOR<br />

GOLDPREVENT PRIMARY PRODUCERS FROM<br />

EXERCISING PRICING POWER<br />

The global market is much less concentrated than the domestic scene. The<br />

global primary gold market produced 2,380,000 kilograms <strong>of</strong> gold in 2007 (a<br />

number that stayed relatively constant through 2009), meaning that United


122 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

States gold production consisted <strong>of</strong> only 10% <strong>of</strong> the global market. 17 On a<br />

global level, Barrick is the largest producer with a 10.2% market share –<br />

meaning that Barrick alone produces as much as all U.S. mines combined – but<br />

its market share is far from overbearing. Newmont is the second-largest<br />

producer, at 8.9%. 18 AngloGold Ashanti and Gold Fields follow, at 6.0% and<br />

4.7%, respectively. In other words, at the global level, the four-firm<br />

concentration ratio is only 29.8% – hardly a number that should raise<br />

regulatory red flags. Thus, given that American gold production is merely a<br />

facet in the larger market – within which every producer in the world competes<br />

– the fact that domestic gold production is focused in the hands <strong>of</strong> a few is<br />

meaningless from a price-fixing standpoint; the closest to market power that<br />

domestic firms could come, would be to hold vast deposits and mine them only<br />

when prices are high.<br />

There have been recent murmurings <strong>of</strong> a Barrick-Newmont merger,<br />

and most industry commentators predict that the two will enjoy “operational<br />

synergies” – if not merger itself – within the next few years. 19 Barrick, a<br />

Toronto-based company, has 26 operations scattered among the U.S.,<br />

Australia, Canada, Peru, Chile, Argentina, and Tanzania. 20 Newmont, a<br />

Denver-based company, has gold operations in the U.S., Australia, Canada,<br />

Peru, Indonesia, Ghana, New Zealand, and Mexico. Thus, in the U.S.,<br />

Australia, Canada, and Peru, these two companies could share resources and<br />

operations and possibly benefit from a merger. The merger <strong>of</strong> these two<br />

industry leaders could—if the agreement were to leave all mines operational –<br />

lead to a single firm with almost 20% market share. Such a merger <strong>of</strong> the<br />

industry’s top two firms might look suspect at first glance, but would not<br />

likely have an appreciable effect on the market because the price and quantity<br />

<strong>of</strong> gold on the global market is out <strong>of</strong> all primary producers’ hands – not just<br />

Barrick’s and Newmont’s. Indeed, the inability <strong>of</strong> primary producers to affect<br />

price, and their hedging against price fluctuations, is well-documented. 21<br />

A. Beyond Primary Production<br />

Supply to the global market comes from primary producers, secondary<br />

producers, central banks, and anyone else who has gold and wants to sell it. The<br />

price <strong>of</strong> gold is fixed twice daily by the London Bullion Exchange, 22 and this<br />

price is used as the benchmark for transactions in gold and gold derivatives all<br />

17 Datamonitor, supra note 7, at 10.<br />

18 Id. at 12.<br />

19 See, “e.g.”, D. Kasich, Newmont, Barrick Contemplate Operational Synergies, not Merger,<br />

MINEWEB.COM, http://www.mineweb.com/mineweb/view/mineweb/en/page34?oid=80653&sn=Detail.<br />

20 DATAMONITOR, supra note 7, at 20.<br />

21 See, “e.g”, M. Callahan, supra note 16 (detailing the hedging practices, such as long-term contracts, <strong>of</strong><br />

primary producers in North America).<br />

22 See the London Gold Fix home page, http://www.goldfixing.com/home.htm.


COMPETITION AND REGULATION IN THE GOLD INDUSTRY 123<br />

around the world. If primary producers such as Barrick and Newmont were the<br />

only players in the market, their joint action could affect the price fixed by the<br />

Exchange. However, secondary producers add millions <strong>of</strong> kilograms <strong>of</strong> gold to<br />

the market every year (over 1.2 million in 2008 and increasing at a rate <strong>of</strong> more<br />

than 25% per year). 23 In other words, the size <strong>of</strong> primary producers would<br />

probably have to be unforeseeably enormous (or they would have to organize<br />

a widespread cartel) before they could begin controlling prices on the global<br />

market.<br />

Central banks, such as the United States Federal Reserve (<strong>of</strong> which<br />

most is held at the New York Branch), hold approximately 19% <strong>of</strong> all <strong>of</strong> the<br />

gold ever mined, or 31,350,000 kg. They primarily use these reserves to<br />

guarantee their currency, but countries buy and sell gold for various reasons –<br />

transactions that are controlled by international quantity agreements. A recent<br />

accusation against central banks is that they are using such firms as HSBC,<br />

Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan Chase, and Deutsche Bank to manipulate gold<br />

prices in order to make their currencies look more favorable. 24 Whatever their<br />

reasons for the purchase and sale <strong>of</strong> gold, central banks – especially those <strong>of</strong><br />

the United States (8,133,500 kg), Germany (3,407,600 kg), Italy (2,451,800<br />

kg), and France (2,435,400 kg) 25 – in conjunction with the huge and growing<br />

secondary market, pull market power away from primary producers. Indeed,<br />

annual global primary gold production is less than one-third the size <strong>of</strong><br />

America’s gold reserve alone; additionally, secondary production is growing<br />

and, in the U.S., is only 10% smaller than primary production. 26 Most<br />

importantly, since gold is priced daily by an external authority, anyone<br />

attempting to raise prices can be instantaneously detected and flushed by<br />

others dumping more on the market as prices rise. Consequently, primary gold<br />

producers do not currently have the ability to appreciably affect the price <strong>of</strong><br />

gold on the global market, even though they collectively supply about 50% <strong>of</strong><br />

the gold.<br />

Supply will continue to increase as long as mining companies are<br />

able to cost-effectively detect it and remove it from the earth, but the market<br />

will probably remain relatively stable for at least the next few years as gold<br />

companies plan for expansion. 27 There are no good estimates <strong>of</strong> the amount <strong>of</strong><br />

gold left in the earth, because finding new deposits requires a great deal <strong>of</strong><br />

time and mines generally seek known reserves for only five to ten-year<br />

production increments.However, there are approximately 128,000,000 kg <strong>of</strong><br />

23 Gold Fields Mineral Survey, 2009 Annual Gold Survey: Overview 2 (2009).<br />

24 See, “e.g.”, J. Turk, A Short History <strong>of</strong> the Gold Cartel, GATA.org, http://www.gata.org/node/7402; M.<br />

Gray, Metals Are in the Pits: Trader Blows Whistle on Gold & Silver Price Manipulation, New York<br />

Post, 11 April, 2010, available at http://www.nypost.com/p/news/business/metal_are_in_<br />

the_pits_2arTlGNbMK7mb1uJeVHb0O.<br />

25 World Gold Council, World Official Gold Holdings (2010), available at http://www.gold.org/<br />

deliver.php? file=/value/stats/statistics/archive/pdf/World_Official_Gold_Holdings_Mar_2010.pdf.<br />

26 United States Geological Survey, 2010 Mineral Commodity Summaries: Gold 66 (2010).<br />

27 United States Geological Survey, supra note 10, at 31.7.


124 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

known gold deposits, which representa miniscule <strong>of</strong> the gold in the top four<br />

kilometers <strong>of</strong> the earth’s crust (the currently-mined range). 28 Thus, it is safe to<br />

assume that, as long as economic pr<strong>of</strong>its do not fall below zero due to<br />

increased extraction costs, gold mines will be producing for centuries to come.<br />

Demand for gold is fueled by end-markets, including jewelry<br />

manufacturing (68% <strong>of</strong> demand); electronics, medical, and other industries<br />

(14%); and institutional investing (19%). 29 Given that gold has so many<br />

favorable elemental properties, such as its malleability, ductility, noncorrosiveness,<br />

reflectivity, and conductibility, there are no good substitutes<br />

for it in many applications. Gold has become a necessity in the high-tech<br />

industries. In jewelry manufacturing, gold has for millennia been the metal <strong>of</strong><br />

choice, even in the face <strong>of</strong> substitutes such as platinum, silver, zinc, and<br />

copper. As an investment, gold is strong and growing stronger, with<br />

recession-afflicted investors looking to grow their savings by planting them in<br />

nonperishable metals. Overall, demand is not very elastic but varies by<br />

application, with areas such as dentistry seeing more elasticity due to recent<br />

viable substitutes. 30 Given that overall demand for gold is relatively inelastic<br />

and that gold is increasingly used as a financial investment by governments<br />

and individuals alike, demand is not likely to decrease anytime soon. Further,<br />

in our technological age that increasingly requires gold for the production <strong>of</strong><br />

electronics for the private sector, the military, and personal consumption, it is<br />

likely that demand for gold will rise as time goes by.<br />

5. REGULATIONS IN THE UNITED STATES<br />

Countries are concerned with more than the competitiveness <strong>of</strong> the global<br />

market when they impede mergers or break up mining conglomerates. They are<br />

concerned with the gold in their own soil, and the possibility that a single firm<br />

or cartel will acquire rights to all <strong>of</strong> that gold and then mine it – or fail to mine<br />

it while waiting for higher prices – in a manner that hurts the national economy<br />

or kills jobs. It is conceivable, therefore, that nations look not to the global<br />

market but rather to domestic concerns when deciding how to regulate primary<br />

producers. Such motivations arguably led to the Second Circuit’s antitrust<br />

decision in Consolidated Gold Fields v Minorco. 31<br />

28 H. E. Frimmel, Earth’s Continental Crustal Gold Endowment, 267 Earth and Planetary Science Letters<br />

45, 48 (2008).<br />

29 Datamonitor, supra note 7, at 13.<br />

30 Id. at 14-15.<br />

31 J. B. Berman, Consolidated Gold Fields, PLC v Minorco, S.A.: The Growing Over-Extension <strong>of</strong> United<br />

States Antitrust <strong>Law</strong> 6 Am. U. J. Int’l L. & Pol’y 399 (1991).


COMPETITION AND REGULATION IN THE GOLD INDUSTRY 125<br />

A. Antitrust<br />

No discussion <strong>of</strong> market concentration and competitiveness in the American<br />

primary gold industry could be complete without a hard look at Consolidated<br />

Gold Fields. 32 In that antitrust case involving the potential joining <strong>of</strong> the<br />

world’s two largest firms, the relevant industry was determined to be primary<br />

producers only – and only those primary producers in the non-Communist<br />

world – even though the court recognized that 1) gold was a fungible product<br />

that was traded between Communist and non-Communist areas and 2) gold<br />

was being recycled and resupplied by the secondary market. The court held<br />

that, since Minorco (a member <strong>of</strong> the once-powerful Oppenheimer-controlled<br />

gold mines) would have a 32.3% market share in the narrowly-defined market<br />

if it were allowed to join with Consolidated, the hostile takeover bid violated<br />

the Clayton Act and had to be enjoined until the merits <strong>of</strong> the case could again<br />

be heard. On remand, the injunction stood. 33 Consolidated Gold Fields proves<br />

that determining the relevant market for gold mining antitrust cases is <strong>of</strong><br />

paramount importance, and that courts might take a narrow view <strong>of</strong> that market<br />

to protect domestic interests by finding mergers or takeovers illegal. However,<br />

since Consolidated Gold Fields, no U.S. court has found a violation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Sherman or Clayton Acts in the gold mining industry. This is unsurprising for<br />

three reasons: first, the Soviet bloc collapsed, expanding the market; second,<br />

the market definition began including secondary producers and other sellers,<br />

such as central banks; finally, no gold conglomerate since Oppenheimer has<br />

come close to such a large share <strong>of</strong> the global market.<br />

B. Environmental Regulation<br />

Consolidated Gold Fields is the only American gold mining antitrust case in<br />

the last 20 years, 34 and mines are not subject to direct economic regulation.<br />

Thus, the bulk <strong>of</strong> regulatory issues facing mining companies are environmental<br />

and safety concerns. Of the two, environmental regulations – imposed both by<br />

the federal government and by states – have by far the greatest impact on<br />

32 Supra note 12.<br />

33 Consolidated Gold Fields, PLC v Anglo American Corp. <strong>of</strong> South Africa Ltd., 713 F.Supp. 1457<br />

(S.D.N.Y. 1989).<br />

34 Although the United States has not been much concerned with anti-competitiveness issues in gold mining,<br />

other countries have. For example, South Africa blocked a merger in 2000 and has been stalling another<br />

since 2009. See SA Government Stops Gold Merger, Mining <strong>Journal</strong>, 22 September, 2000; M. Creamer,<br />

South African Government S<strong>of</strong>tens Stance on Zstrata-Anglo Merger, Requests Detail,<br />

MiningWeekly.com, 13 July, 2009. The South African government was concerned in these cases that<br />

intra-country competition and job creation would be stifled. This argument is based on the possibility that<br />

a single company or cartel can gain control <strong>of</strong> all <strong>of</strong> the gold resources in a nation in order to decrease<br />

production and raise prices. We have already seen that raising prices would be impossible – even for the<br />

gold-rich nation <strong>of</strong> South Africa – and therefore the mines would have little incentive to decrease<br />

production. The worst that could happen to South African workers would probably be the increase <strong>of</strong><br />

capital efficiency through a merger, meaning less <strong>of</strong> a reliance on labor and, therefore, lay<strong>of</strong>fs.


126 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

American mines, especially in light <strong>of</strong> the comparative cost advantage that U.S.<br />

regulation gives to mining operations in less-regulated countries. 35<br />

Environmental regulations can be strong enough to force gold companies to<br />

avoid exploration in certain areas, to delay operational startup, or even to go<br />

bankrupt. However, mining companies tend to establish operations in those<br />

countries that have the most stable and smoothly functioning governments –<br />

which also tend to be those countries with somewhat strict environmental<br />

laws. 36 The trade<strong>of</strong>f between effective government-business relations and<br />

exacting environmental laws seems to weigh in favor <strong>of</strong> government-business<br />

relations. Thus, major players in the mining industry are subject to<br />

environmental regulation almost everywhere they go.<br />

In the U.S., whenever a mining company (or anyone else who wants<br />

to mine) finds gold on federal lands through exploration, it can apply for a<br />

mineral patent with the Secretary <strong>of</strong> the Interior. 37 If on Bureau <strong>of</strong> Land<br />

Management-managed land (as opposed to National Park Service, Fish and<br />

Wildlife Service, or Forest Service-managed land, where processes are more<br />

stringent), the process <strong>of</strong> obtaining a patent is quite simple: after receiving the<br />

application, the BLM determines whether gold can be cost-effectively<br />

extracted from the land. If it can, then the mine pays a nominal fee for the<br />

property rights, and the BLM approves the patent, which the Secretary then<br />

reviews and either issues or contests for failing to meet statutory<br />

requirements. 38<br />

Once a firm has control <strong>of</strong> the land, it can begin mining operations –<br />

but not before it clears environmental hurdles. 39 The most important<br />

environmental laws in this arena are the Clean Air Act, the Resource<br />

Conservation and Recovery Act, the Clean Water Act, and the Comprehensive<br />

35 Environmental regulations in many other gold-rich countries, such as Peru, Indonesia, and South Africa,<br />

are not as stringent or as strictly enforced as those in the United States. Thus, environmental regulations –<br />

just like America’s necessarily higher wages and benefits – put mines in the U.S. at a comparative<br />

disadvantage to operations in many other countries. See,”e.g” A. Kumah, Sustainability and gold mining<br />

in the developing world 14 J. <strong>of</strong> Cleaner Production 315 (2005); J. L. Sznopek & T. G. Goonan, U.S.<br />

Geological Survey Circular 1197, The Materials Flow <strong>of</strong> Mercury in the Economies <strong>of</strong> the United States<br />

and the World (2000); J. S. Ogola, et al., Impact <strong>of</strong> Gold mining on the Environment and Human Health:<br />

A Case Study in the Migori Gold Belt, Kenya 24 Environmental Geochemistry and Health 141 (2002).<br />

36 Tole & Koop, supra note 9.<br />

37 Most <strong>of</strong> this section flows from provisions found in the Mining <strong>Law</strong> <strong>of</strong> 1872, 30 USC §§22-42 (2006).<br />

This law was passed during a time <strong>of</strong> little environmental foresight and incentivized expansion in the<br />

West.<br />

38 Mining <strong>Law</strong> – Approval <strong>of</strong> a Patent – A Command Performance 30 LAND & WATER L. REV. 109 (1995).<br />

For example, in 1994, Barrick obtained 1800 acres <strong>of</strong> land in northern Nevada from the BLM at the price<br />

<strong>of</strong> $5 per acre (a total <strong>of</strong> $9,000). There were an estimated 30,000,000 ounces <strong>of</strong> readily-extractable gold<br />

at the site – a value <strong>of</strong> $30 billion. Secretary <strong>of</strong> the Interior Babbitt, deploring Barrick’s ability to get<br />

astronomically valuable land for a pittance, attempted to halt the patent but lost in court because Barrick<br />

had fulfilled all statutory requirements <strong>of</strong> the 1872 Mining <strong>Law</strong> and its amendments.<br />

39 The National Environmental Policy Act <strong>of</strong> 1969, 42 U.S.C. § 4321 et seq. (2006), requires that the federal<br />

agencies study a project’s probable environmental impacts before giving the approval necessary for the<br />

project to begin. The agencies issue Environmental Impact Statements before making permitting<br />

decisions if the proposed activity will “significantly affect the quality <strong>of</strong> the human environment.” 42<br />

U.S.C.A. § 4332(2) (C).


COMPETITION AND REGULATION IN THE GOLD INDUSTRY 127<br />

Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act. 40 Under these and<br />

other laws, the mine is required to obtain permits for air quality, water quality,<br />

underground injection, water supply systems, solid and hazardous waste,<br />

wildlife and vegetation protection, surface disturbance, reclamation permits<br />

and bonding, use <strong>of</strong> toxic chemicals, exploration on Indian lands, and dredge<br />

discharge. 41 After receiving the required permits, the mine then must both<br />

comply with them and issue regular updates on contamination levels, surface<br />

disturbances, water discharge quality, etc. The Environmental Protection<br />

Agency and Department <strong>of</strong> Justice (or states, which also issue environmental<br />

regulations) 42 can use administrative, civil, and criminal sanctions to stiffly<br />

penalize a company that does not comply with its permits.<br />

The EPA and DOJ have been stepping up environmental<br />

enforcement for the past decade, and mining companies consequently focus<br />

enormous resources on compliance – resources that add to the cost per ounce<br />

<strong>of</strong> production. 43 However, these resources are – if the enforcement actions are<br />

large enough to eviscerate economic benefits <strong>of</strong> noncompliance – less than<br />

what the companies would pay if caught violating the law. Whether the<br />

enforcement actions are large enough to remove economic benefits <strong>of</strong><br />

noncompliance is unclear, but it is very clear that mines are in many instances<br />

not required to pay the full monetary effect <strong>of</strong> their actions; the EPA <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

strikes a deal with companies rather than driving them into bankruptcy. 44<br />

C. Safety Regulations<br />

In addition to environmental regulation, the Federal Mine Safety and Health<br />

Act <strong>of</strong> 1977 45 imposes regulations handed down by the Department <strong>of</strong> Labor’s<br />

Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA). This agency issues<br />

regulations on everything from personal protective devices to fire suppression<br />

systems, from airborne silica dust to sound levels, and mines are subject to<br />

40 5 R. T. Connery, et al, American <strong>Law</strong> <strong>of</strong> Mining §165.03 (2d. Ed. 2008).<br />

41 Id. at §166.1. For a lucid discussion <strong>of</strong> hard rock bonding practices, see K. Wernstedt & R. Hersch,<br />

Abandoned Hardrock Mines in the United States: Escape from a Regulatory Impasse? 1 WM. & MARY<br />

POL’Y REV. 1 (forthcoming 2010).<br />

42 Many states, such as Nevada and Colorado, enact broad-based, comprehensive environmental regulations<br />

that apply to mines on all private and public lands. Thus, mining companies cannot escape environmental<br />

regulations just because they purchase their property from a private landowner.<br />

43 Id. at §165.03.<br />

44 See Wernstedt & Hersch, supra note 42, at 9. It is difficult to tell whether this relationship is marked by<br />

capture or by normative concerns, but companies’ long-term viability probably plays a role. A famous<br />

EPA/mine case is ASARCO, which closed down many <strong>of</strong> its regional plants after receiving enormous<br />

fines, but it usually found a way to strike a deal with the EPA so as to stay solvent. For example, in 2003<br />

ASARCO and the EPA set up a joint, $100 million trust fund to clean up all <strong>of</strong> ASARCO’s past misdeeds<br />

at Superfund sites, even though the task was valued much higher. It wasn’t until 2009, in a Chapter 11<br />

settlement, that the EPA stopped playing pat-a-cake with ASARCO and demanded $1.79 billion to clean<br />

up the company’s mess.<br />

45 30 USC §§ 801 et seq. (2006).


128 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

unannounced inspections. MSHA can impose large fines and can even halt<br />

operation <strong>of</strong> a mine if safety concerns are not adequately met. Like<br />

environmental regulations, safety regulations are more stringently enforced in<br />

the U.S. than in many other gold-producing countries, creating a comparative<br />

advantage for those countries.<br />

6. COMPETITIVENESS<br />

The gold mining industry is both rivalrous at the large scale and subject to easy<br />

entry at the small scale. Large multinational conglomerates are constantly<br />

jockeying for control <strong>of</strong> the most underground deposits. They also fight to<br />

lower their costs per ounce and therefore increase their pr<strong>of</strong>its, something that<br />

is done both by improving technology and operational efficiency as well as by<br />

discovering or taking over rich ore deposits.<br />

At the small scale, anyone who wants to stake a claim can do so,<br />

assuming the Department <strong>of</strong> the Interior is convinced that the applicant can<br />

extract gold at a pr<strong>of</strong>it; further, everyone who extracts gold from the ground<br />

can sell it at the same daily-fixed price as large firms, although large firms<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten hedge. From this perspective, the market is subject to infinite<br />

competition. 46 However, large conglomerates are hardly worried about tiny<br />

startups; they are reasonably confident that they are already sitting on the most<br />

lucrative ore deposits in the free world, and are equally confident that they can<br />

buy the smaller operations if need be. Practically, even a small modern mining<br />

operation will require permitting, extraction, electricity, transportation, labor,<br />

milling/leaching, legal, and communications costs – unless the operation is a<br />

tiny artisanal outfit. Even shutting down a mine is costly, given the costs <strong>of</strong><br />

environmental cleanup and reclamation, long-term labor agreements, and<br />

dismantling/transporting mills and other capital. However, since gold is<br />

fungible, any production – even at artisanal outfits – competes with largescale<br />

production.<br />

Even given free entry and a fungible product, “rivalry” is probably a<br />

better term than “competition” to describe the interaction among the world’s<br />

top mining companies. 47 Each company is trying to expand, which means that<br />

they must either find previously unknown ore deposits or take over other<br />

companies’ deposits. In order to get into a position to swallow smaller fish,<br />

gold companies scramble to expand their in-ground reserves and make their<br />

operations more efficient. However, much <strong>of</strong> this rivalry is dispersed due to<br />

many large companies’ expansion into other minerals. For instance, Newmont<br />

Gold, like Kennecott, has recently begun mining copper. This diversification<br />

(along with the likely attendant economies <strong>of</strong> scope) lessens the degree to<br />

46 Datamonitor, supra note 7, at 13–15.<br />

47 Datamonitor, supra note 7, at 15.


COMPETITION AND REGULATION IN THE GOLD INDUSTRY 129<br />

which existing companies can compare balance sheets and makes merger or<br />

takeover more complicated.<br />

Overall, gold mines produce a single, indistinguishable good, cannot<br />

affect the price <strong>of</strong> that good, and are subject to the relatively easy entry <strong>of</strong><br />

competitors. Thus, the industry is, at the small scale at least, competitive.<br />

7. CONCLUSION<br />

The gold mining industry is dominated by relatively few large players with<br />

global market shares <strong>of</strong> at least 1%. However, only one mining company,<br />

Barrick, has a market share over 10%. Even if the global market were more<br />

concentrated, gold mining companies would not likely be able to control the<br />

global gold prices. Further, although entry is relatively free, long-run minimum<br />

efficient scale is high enough to allow in only well-capitalized firms, while<br />

small firms either quit or sell out. Large firms deal with each other as rivals,<br />

with each attempting to control the most and best-concentrated ore deposits,<br />

but even this rivalry is being diffused as companies expand into other mineral<br />

markets. Finally, the impact <strong>of</strong> regulations – including the impact <strong>of</strong><br />

comparative cost disadvantages for U.S. mines – comes mainly from<br />

environmental and safety strictures, but countries may have an idiosyncratic<br />

incentives to protect domestic interests through antitrust.


Procurement law in Nigeria: Challenge for attainment <strong>of</strong> its<br />

objectives<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

O. A. Jacob*<br />

131<br />

On the 4th <strong>of</strong> June 2007, the then President <strong>of</strong> Nigeria, Alhaji Umaru Musa<br />

Yar’Adua signed into law the Public Procurement Act (PPA) which is the first<br />

Nigeria procurement law in the.<br />

The purpose <strong>of</strong> the Act is to ensure transparency, competitiveness, value for<br />

money and pr<strong>of</strong>essionalism in the public sector procurement system. Many<br />

believed that the new law would curb corruption and abuse <strong>of</strong> power in the<br />

award and execution <strong>of</strong> contracts a tool in the hands <strong>of</strong> government<br />

functionaries and politicians to loot the public treasury. This article examines<br />

the objectives, coverage, and compliance strategy and efficacy effectiveness <strong>of</strong><br />

the new law. The author concludes that full implementation <strong>of</strong> the law remains<br />

an elusive objective despite a measure <strong>of</strong> impact. He identifies the factors<br />

contributing to the partial implementation <strong>of</strong> the Act are examined and makes<br />

remedial recommendations.<br />

1. INTRODUCTION<br />

Nigeria gained independence from the British Government in 1960. Between<br />

1960 and 2007, she has passed through Military and Civilian governments. The<br />

military governments rule with decrees while the civilian governments govern<br />

by the constitution and the laws made by the legislature. Both [military or<br />

civilian governments] engage in business transaction <strong>of</strong> which the greater part<br />

is the award <strong>of</strong> contracts. Before 2007, there was no statutory provision that<br />

directly regulate the award <strong>of</strong> public contracts in Nigeria and the result is that<br />

the award <strong>of</strong> contract becomes an avenue by which the government<br />

functionaries reward their friends and cronies and by which they too amass<br />

wealth. Most <strong>of</strong> the rich business men that we have in Nigeria today make their<br />

money through contracts that are awarded to them in the past by the<br />

governments, whether military or civilian government it is the same.<br />

Disgusted by the depth <strong>of</strong> corruption in the procurement system and<br />

its effects on the economy, the Federal Government commissioned the World<br />

Bank in 1999 in collaboration with some Private Sector Specialists to review<br />

the country’s public sector procurement structure, including the existing legal<br />

<br />

LL.B [Unilag Nigeria] BL, LL.M [Oau Nigeria] MA [U. I Nigeria], LL.M [Pretoria South Africa], CILS<br />

[American <strong>University</strong> Washington DC USA] Lecturer Faculty <strong>of</strong> law <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Ibadan. Presently, a<br />

visiting scholar, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Wisconsin Madison USA. E-mails: Permanent osunfolak@yahoo.com<br />

temporary: aosuntogun@wisc.edu


132 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

framework, organizational responsibilities and capabilities, and present<br />

procedures and practices, including how these may differ from the formal rules<br />

and procedures. The World Bank report was damning, it notes that: 1<br />

“About 50% <strong>of</strong> projects in Nigeria are dead even before they<br />

commence ... the projects are designed to fail because the objective<br />

is not to implement them, but to use them as vehicles for looting <strong>of</strong><br />

the public treasury ... Instead <strong>of</strong> adding value, they become<br />

economic drain pipes.”<br />

It was rightly observed that the government functionaries were involved in the<br />

awards <strong>of</strong> public contracts and a new legal regime that will eschew that<br />

abnormality was advocated by the report:<br />

“Members <strong>of</strong> the Federal Tender Board are Ministers who due to<br />

their political role shall not and cannot be expected to deal with<br />

details in procurement procedures. It is therefore considered that the<br />

Federal Tender Board does not add value to the procurement<br />

process. High level politicians such as Governors, Ministers and<br />

Commissioners should use their valuable time for major policy and<br />

strategic issues rather than approving contract awards. Elected<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficials are responsible for allocation <strong>of</strong> resources but the<br />

mechanics <strong>of</strong> spending these resources should follow laid down<br />

procurement regulations and procedures.” 2<br />

Rather than enacting a statutory legislation to regulate public contracts, the<br />

government took a step to check the abuse in the system by establishing the<br />

Budget Monitoring and Price Intelligence Unit (BMPIU) in the Presidency<br />

with an objective among others to ensure that merit and due diligence are<br />

adhered to in the award and execution <strong>of</strong> contracts, procurement <strong>of</strong> products<br />

and services. 3<br />

However on the 4th <strong>of</strong> June 2007, the then president <strong>of</strong> Nigeria<br />

President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua signed into law the Public Procurement Act<br />

(PPA) which is the first procurement law in the history <strong>of</strong> Nigeria. The<br />

purpose <strong>of</strong> the Act is to ensure transparency, competitiveness, value for<br />

money and pr<strong>of</strong>essionalism in the public sector procurement system. 4 The Act<br />

1 See Nigeria: Country Procurement Assessment Report Volume 1 and 2 - http://www-wds.worldbank.org/<br />

external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2001/06/08/000094946_01053004 [site visited on 2<br />

September, 2010].<br />

2 Id.<br />

3 The Budget Monitoring and Price Intelligence Unit (BMPIU) serves as a “vanguard <strong>of</strong> ensuring fiscal<br />

transparency, strict compliance with Federal Government guidelines on Due Process Certification as it<br />

concerns budgeting for and procurement <strong>of</strong> facilities/services/contracts at appropriate costs(Ezekwesili,<br />

2005.<br />

4 Section 4[1] <strong>of</strong> the Act.


PROCUREMENT LAW IN NIGERIA 133<br />

provides for the establishment <strong>of</strong> the National Council on Public Procurement<br />

(NCPP) and the Bureau <strong>of</strong> Public Procurement (BPP) as regulatory authorities<br />

responsible for oversight, management and monitoring <strong>of</strong> public procurement<br />

practices and system. Though the new legal regime takes effect immediately<br />

as it should, we observe lack <strong>of</strong> total commitment on the path <strong>of</strong> the federal<br />

government to fully comply with the regulations enshrined in the Act. The<br />

problem lies with the issue <strong>of</strong> government involvement, whether they<br />

[government functionaries] should disengage from procurement process or<br />

not is an underlying question the government is not comfortable with. The<br />

argument <strong>of</strong> the government functionaries is that they must be involved in the<br />

procurement process in order to safeguard public resources 5 but the report <strong>of</strong><br />

the World Bank nullified this argument:<br />

“Politicians in Nigeria would argue that it is their responsibility to<br />

safeguard public resources by ensuring that corruption is minimised<br />

in the procurement process. However, what is most critical is to<br />

build legitimacy in the procurement process through appropriate<br />

legislation and regulations and not direct involvement in the<br />

procurement process. This legitimacy is very important for both<br />

civil servants and the politicians because they, in the end, need to be<br />

able to work in a system where the public has faith in what is going<br />

on and where they can account for their dispositions.”<br />

As <strong>of</strong> today, the greatest challenge for the enforcement <strong>of</strong><br />

procurement law in Nigeria is the involvement <strong>of</strong> the government<br />

functionaries in the procurement process and this is possible because the<br />

government has not fully implemented the provisions <strong>of</strong> the Act. Should the<br />

government who initiated the enactment <strong>of</strong> the Act fail to fully implement it?<br />

That lackadaisical move on the part <strong>of</strong> the government is worrisome but not<br />

unpredictable. A clue to the reason behind their conduct could be deduced<br />

from the history <strong>of</strong> the PPA itself. It takes the government almost seven years<br />

to enact this law.<br />

This writer finds out that partial implementation or dragging <strong>of</strong> feet<br />

in enacting the law is actuated by the desire <strong>of</strong> the political class in the<br />

government not to lose the means to award contracts to their cronies. This<br />

article discusses the challenge for the attainment <strong>of</strong> the l<strong>of</strong>ty objectives <strong>of</strong> the<br />

PPA. It observes with chagrin that three years since the Act has taken effect,<br />

the Federal Government has not fully implemented it. The implications <strong>of</strong> that<br />

partial implementation <strong>of</strong> the Act are examined and recommendations <strong>of</strong>fered.<br />

This article is divided in to eight parts. The first part is an<br />

introduction while the second part examines the statutory objectives <strong>of</strong> the<br />

5 See World Bank report volume 2 page 39 supra note1.


134 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

Act. In part three, the mechanism for attainment <strong>of</strong> its statutory objectives is<br />

examined and the scope <strong>of</strong> the application <strong>of</strong> the Act is dealt with in the next<br />

part. The impact and the amendment <strong>of</strong> the Act are briefly discussed in the<br />

subsequent parts five and six. The challenge for the enforcement <strong>of</strong> the Act is<br />

considered in part seven and conclusion is in part eight.<br />

2. THE OBJECTIVES OF THE PPA<br />

We cannot overemphasize the importance <strong>of</strong> objectives to a statutory provision<br />

since objective its self is the harbinger that occasion its enactment. It is the<br />

purpose which sets the mission which a particular statue intends to achieve and<br />

does not only prescribe the yardstick for its assessment but also provide a<br />

mechanism for its interpretation. 6<br />

The Canadian courts captured the importance <strong>of</strong> objectives in<br />

interpreting a statute in the Driedger principle: “… the words <strong>of</strong> an Act are to<br />

be read in their entire context, in their grammatical and ordinary sense<br />

harmoniously with the scheme <strong>of</strong> the Act, the object <strong>of</strong> the Act, and the<br />

intention <strong>of</strong> Parliament.” See Ruth Sullivan, Sullivan and Driedger on the<br />

Construction <strong>of</strong> Statutes 4th ed. (Vancouver: Butteworths, 2002) at 1.<br />

As a result, statute ought not to be drafted without having a particular<br />

purpose in mind, just as a house should not be built without having a<br />

particular plan as pattern for engineers to follow. 7 There is a presumption that<br />

every enacted statute has a purpose and that purpose must be discovered either<br />

in the preamble to the statue or in the entire statue. Therefore in this section<br />

we will consider the purpose <strong>of</strong> the PPA by looking in to its objectives in the<br />

Act.<br />

Section 3[1] <strong>of</strong> the PPA establishes a regulatory body known as the<br />

6 There are many rules <strong>of</strong> interpretation from the literal rule to golden rule and the mischief rule etc. The<br />

common thread however is that most <strong>of</strong> the rules consider the objects <strong>of</strong> the Act in interpreting a statute.<br />

Even where there has been uncertainty, ambiguity or absurdity in the words used in such way that it is<br />

difficult for the judge to fathom the meaning <strong>of</strong> the statute and its objects, the courts under the common<br />

law will still consider what is the purpose <strong>of</strong> the Act and not what ought to be the intention <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Parliament or the Judge. In Duport Steels Ltd v SIRS 1980 House <strong>of</strong> Lord Scarman said:<br />

‘In the field <strong>of</strong> statute law the judge must be obedient to the will <strong>of</strong> Parliament ... Parliament makes ... the<br />

law: the judge’s duty is to interpret and to apply the law, not to change it to meet the judge’s idea <strong>of</strong> what<br />

justice requires ... Unpalatable statute law may not be disregarded or rejected, merely because it is<br />

unpalatable.’<br />

‘If Parliament says one thing but means another, it is not, under the historic principles <strong>of</strong> the common<br />

law, for the courts to correct it ... We are to be governed not by Parliament’s intentions but by<br />

Parliament’s enactments’<br />

But even if the court intends to use the purposive approach as advocated by Lord Denning the relevant<br />

point here is still the purpose <strong>of</strong> the parliament. In Magor and St Mellons v Newport Borough Council<br />

Lord Denning said:<br />

‘We do not sit here to pull the language <strong>of</strong> Parliament to pieces and make nonsense <strong>of</strong> it. We sit here to<br />

find out the intention <strong>of</strong> Parliament and carry it out’.<br />

7 But see Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Steven L. Schooner Desiderata: Objectives for a System <strong>of</strong> Government Contract <strong>Law</strong><br />

11 Public Procurement <strong>Law</strong> Review 103 [2002] He asked a question and answered it himself: ‘What does<br />

your government hope to achieve through its government procurement law? It is possible to draft and<br />

enact a new law without answering the question, and experience demonstrates that this is <strong>of</strong>ten the case’.


PROCUREMENT LAW IN NIGERIA 135<br />

Bureau <strong>of</strong> Public procurement [BPP]. The body becomes an agency with<br />

corporate personality. 8 The objectives <strong>of</strong> the PPA as a statute are not directly<br />

stated in the Act but could be gathered from the statutory function <strong>of</strong> the BPP.<br />

In a section <strong>of</strong> the law 9 titled the objectives <strong>of</strong> the Bureau the Act mentioned<br />

four objectives <strong>of</strong> the Bureau which are first to harmonize the existing<br />

government policies and practices on public procurement and to ensure<br />

probity, accountability and transparency in the Procurement process. The<br />

Second is to establish pricing standards and benchmarks while the third is to<br />

ensure the application <strong>of</strong> fair, competitive, transparent value-for money<br />

standards and practices for the procurement and disposal <strong>of</strong> public assets and<br />

services. The fourth is the attainment <strong>of</strong> transparency, competitiveness, cost<br />

effectiveness and pr<strong>of</strong>essionalism in the public sector procurement system.<br />

It seems the <strong>of</strong>ficial website <strong>of</strong> the BPP at its home page is<br />

conspicuously enumerating the objectives <strong>of</strong> the PPA in a simplified form<br />

when it displayed four core issues as its objectives 10 which are economy<br />

efficiency, competition [provision <strong>of</strong> a level playing ground for all strata <strong>of</strong><br />

bidders], value for money and transparency.<br />

To avoid ambiguity as to what the PPA intends to archive and to<br />

provide guidance and direction to all parties in the contract <strong>of</strong> procurement,<br />

the Federal Government <strong>of</strong> Nigeria publishes Procurement Procedures<br />

Manual for Public procurement in Nigeria, 11 The Manual reiterates the issue<br />

<strong>of</strong> the objectives <strong>of</strong> the PPA when it mentions and explains six principal<br />

hallmarks <strong>of</strong> a pr<strong>of</strong>icient public procurement system.<br />

The first to be mentioned is the Economy which it explains<br />

graphically as the best value for money. It explains the meaning <strong>of</strong> value<br />

explicitly when it states:<br />

“For complex purchases, value may imply more than just price, for<br />

example, since quality issues also need to be addressed. Moreover,<br />

lowest initial price may not equate to lowest cost over the operating<br />

life <strong>of</strong> the item procured. But the basic point is the same: the<br />

ultimate purpose <strong>of</strong> sound procurement is to obtain maximum value<br />

for money.” 12<br />

The third is fairness which it describes as a process <strong>of</strong> being non<br />

8 In Nigeria a company must be registered with Corporate Affairs Commission [CAC] before it can be a<br />

corporate body but section 2 <strong>of</strong> the Act invests the agency with the power <strong>of</strong> a corporate entity without<br />

registration with CAC. Section 2 provides that the body shall be a body corporate with perpetual<br />

succession and a common seal and may sue and be sued in its corporate name and can also acquire, hold<br />

or dispose <strong>of</strong> any property whether movable or immovable for the purpose <strong>of</strong> carrying out any <strong>of</strong> its<br />

functions under this Act.<br />

9 Section 4 <strong>of</strong> the PPA.<br />

10 See the <strong>of</strong>ficial website <strong>of</strong> BPP supra note 10 [assessed on 16 August,2010]<br />

11 It can be downloaded from the <strong>of</strong>ficial website <strong>of</strong> the BPP [assessed on 16 August, 2010.]<br />

12 Id.


136 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

partisan in the sense that all interested contractors, suppliers and consultants<br />

must be given a level playing field on which to compete and thereby, directly<br />

expands the purchaser’s options and opportunities. The fourth is transparency<br />

which according to the manual means that the procurement rules must be<br />

accessible and unambiguous. The fifth is that <strong>of</strong> accountability and ethical<br />

standards which it explains in form <strong>of</strong> exhortation and obligation:<br />

“Good procurement holds its practitioners responsible for enforcing<br />

and obeying the rules. It makes them subject to challenge and to<br />

sanction, if appropriate, for neglecting or bending those rules.<br />

Accountability is at once a key inducement to individual and<br />

institutional probity, a key deterrent to collusion and corruption and<br />

a key prerequisite for procurement credibility. A sound procurement<br />

system is one that combines all the above elements. The desired<br />

impact is to inspire the confidence and willingness-to-compete <strong>of</strong><br />

well-qualified vendors. This directly and concretely benefits the<br />

purchasing entity and its constituents, responsive contractors and<br />

suppliers, and donor agencies providing project finance.” 13<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the objectives <strong>of</strong> domestic legislation <strong>of</strong> public procurements<br />

by the national governments in their various states is the use <strong>of</strong> public<br />

procurement as a tool to promote their social and industrial policies. This<br />

particular objective has become a universal trend throughout the globe that<br />

Sue Arrowsmith rightly observed its significance as important objective that<br />

could not be ignored:<br />

“Another important aspect <strong>of</strong> procurement procedure in many states<br />

is the use <strong>of</strong> the economic muscle provided by government<br />

procurement to support wider industrial, social or other policies<br />

which are not directly connected with the procurement itself. Thus,<br />

so far as industrial policy is concerned, in order to boost domestic<br />

industry and employment, general preferences have sometimes been<br />

given to national industry in awarding procurement contracts, either<br />

by reserving particular contracts for domestic products or suppliers<br />

only although more commonly by operating a preference <strong>of</strong> bids<br />

meeting specified domestic content requirements, in terms <strong>of</strong> use <strong>of</strong><br />

domestic products or labor in the contract, or for firms which are<br />

deemed “national’’ firms in term <strong>of</strong> their location or ownership.” 14<br />

13 Id.<br />

14 See S. Arrowsmith, National and International Perspectives on the Regulation <strong>of</strong> Public Procurement:<br />

Harmony or Conflict? In Public Procurement: Global Revolution [S. Arrowsmith & A. Davies eds, 1998]<br />

Kluwer <strong>Law</strong> International . See also Geroski, P.A [1990]. Procurement policy as a tool <strong>of</strong> Industrial<br />

policy, International Review <strong>of</strong> Applied Economics, 4 [2]; 182-198.


PROCUREMENT LAW IN NIGERIA 137<br />

To further that universal but domestic objective 15 the PPA provides<br />

that in international bidding, 16 a margin <strong>of</strong> preference may be given to<br />

domestic bidders or suppliers over the foreign bidders. This preference is<br />

exercisable during the process <strong>of</strong> evaluation <strong>of</strong> tenders when a procuring<br />

entity is comparing tenders from domestic bidders with the foreign bidders or<br />

even from the domestic suppliers if some <strong>of</strong> them are <strong>of</strong>fering goods<br />

manufactured locally and others are <strong>of</strong>fering goods manufacture abroad. 17<br />

The purpose is to develop the economy and thereby ensuring dividends <strong>of</strong><br />

democracy to the citizens. One <strong>of</strong> the ways by which the citizens can benefit<br />

from dividends <strong>of</strong> democracy is for the government to encourage development<br />

<strong>of</strong> local contractors and manufacturers. 18<br />

Despite the tendency to prefer local contractors and manufacturers in<br />

certain circumstances enumerated above, the overall goal <strong>of</strong> the government is<br />

to give all qualified bidders an equal opportunity. Therefore, the Act insists<br />

that everything should be done in a transparent manner. Existence <strong>of</strong><br />

preferences must be stated in the bidding documents. 19 In my own analysis,<br />

this will ensure three things; the foreign bidders will have notice <strong>of</strong> those<br />

preferences against them and can prepare on how to swim against the tide, the<br />

local bidders too will have notice <strong>of</strong> eligibility for the preferences and that will<br />

ensure preparation too on how to meet the qualification. At the end, the<br />

existence <strong>of</strong> preferences is not a guarantee that local bidders will win the bid.<br />

The overall goal <strong>of</strong> the PPA is to inculcate all the objectives in to the<br />

procurement process. It envisages that a sound procurement system must not<br />

take one objective and reject the other if confidence and willingness to<br />

compete must be integrated in to the system. Therefore the Manual 20 gives the<br />

picture <strong>of</strong> what the Act intends to avoid by embracing all the objectives<br />

without exclusion <strong>of</strong> any:<br />

“Conversely, a procurement system that fails to take the above<br />

elements [objectives] stimulates hesitation to compete, submission<br />

<strong>of</strong> inflated tenders containing a risk premium, or submission <strong>of</strong><br />

deflated tenders followed by delayed or defective performance.<br />

Other direct results include collusion in bribery by frustrated or<br />

unscrupulous vendors and purchasing entities, bad value for those<br />

15 There has been a minimal restriction on the use <strong>of</strong> domestic regulation to further industrial goal as a result<br />

<strong>of</strong> free trade phenomenon, that the word universal may be subject to criticism therefore this issue shall be<br />

further discussed in the next section.<br />

16 International Competitive bidding is defined by the Act as a solicitation <strong>of</strong> bids from both domestic and<br />

foreign contractors and suppliers.<br />

17 Section 34 [1] and [3] <strong>of</strong> the PPA.<br />

18 The Manual supra note 24 reiterates that it is the policy <strong>of</strong> the government to encourage the development<br />

<strong>of</strong> local contractors and manufacturers page 4.<br />

19 Section 34[2] <strong>of</strong> the PPA provides that where a procuring entity intends to allow domestic preferences,<br />

the bidding documents shall clearly indicate any preference to be granted to domestic suppliers and<br />

contractors and the information required to establish the eligibility <strong>of</strong> a bid for such preference.<br />

20 Id.


138 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

entities and their constituents, and betrayal and abuse <strong>of</strong> the public<br />

trust for personal gain.” 21<br />

3. THE MECHANISM FOR ACCOMPLISHMENT<br />

Compliance strategy or mechanism is the most important aspect <strong>of</strong> law<br />

making. If rules that are made are not complied with, the effect is the same as<br />

if they are not made at all in the first instance. Therefore what should be the<br />

thinking <strong>of</strong> the law makers and those who are drafting the law is how to ensure<br />

compliance? In most cases regulatory agencies are established by the enabling<br />

statutes to ensure compliance. And that is the case with the PPA. The first thing<br />

the Act 22 does is to establish a managerial and administrative architecture for<br />

public procurement in Nigeria and this for the purpose <strong>of</strong> ensuring compliance<br />

<strong>of</strong> the rules made.<br />

In section one <strong>of</strong> part one 23 the Act establishes the National Council<br />

on Public Procurement [NCPP] and in section3 <strong>of</strong> part 2 24 it establishes the<br />

Bureau <strong>of</strong> Public Procurement (BPP) both as regulatory authorities<br />

responsible for the monitoring and oversight <strong>of</strong> public procurement in<br />

Nigeria. While the BBP really performs regulatory and administrative<br />

functions, the NCPP exerts control over the administration <strong>of</strong> BPP to ensure<br />

that the objectives <strong>of</strong> the Act are not defeated. It gives directives for<br />

implementation to the BPP to ensure that it does not derail from the<br />

fundamental principles for procurement. It approves contract thresholds and<br />

policies on public procurement to ensure and maintain sound procurement<br />

process. 25 Though the president appoints the Director General <strong>of</strong> the BPP who<br />

is the chief executive and accounting <strong>of</strong>ficer 26 the recommendation for the<br />

appointment must come from the NCPP who must also approve it before the<br />

appointment can be valid. 27<br />

The BPP serves as the secretariat for the NCPP 28 and performs a<br />

plethora <strong>of</strong> administrative functions that are too numerous to chronicle in this<br />

article. In a nutshell, it oversees and regulates public procurement so as to<br />

archive economic value for money, it develops the legal frame work for public<br />

procurement by undertaking research and survey and sets and monitors<br />

standards for public procurement.BPP is the organ that implements rules,<br />

policies and principles <strong>of</strong> Public procurement in Nigeria and has enforcement<br />

power to ensure compliance with its rules. The issue <strong>of</strong> a ‘Certificate <strong>of</strong> no<br />

21 Id.<br />

22 The PPA supra note 10.<br />

23 Id section 1[1].<br />

24 Id section3 [1].<br />

25 Id section 2.<br />

26 Id section7[1] [2].<br />

27 Id section2[b].<br />

28 Id section6[2].


PROCUREMENT LAW IN NIGERIA 139<br />

Objection’ by the BPP is a condition precedent before a contracting entity<br />

could award a contract 29 and if a contract is awarded without this important<br />

document, the contract is null and void and no money can be disbursed to<br />

service such contract. 30<br />

The principal method <strong>of</strong> procurement is by open competitive bidding<br />

known as a Sealed Bidding, a process by which a procuring entity, based on<br />

previously defined criteria, effects public procurements by <strong>of</strong>fering to every<br />

interested bidder, equal simultaneous information and opportunity to <strong>of</strong>fer the<br />

goods and works needed. 31 Whether international 32 or national, it commences<br />

with invitation to bid which shall be advertised in at least two national<br />

newspapers. Additional advertisement in an internationally recognized<br />

publication is required for international competitive bidding. 33<br />

All bids by the contractors under open competitive bidding must<br />

comply with special special requirements that might be prescribed by the<br />

procuring entity .It should be in writing and sign by an <strong>of</strong>ficial authorized to<br />

bind the bidder to a contract and placed in a sealed envelope. 34 All bids<br />

received before the deadline shall be deposited in a secured ‘tamper-pro<strong>of</strong> bid<br />

box’ while those received after the deadline are returned to the bidders 35 . The<br />

bids shall be opened in public in the full glare <strong>of</strong> the bidders, their<br />

representatives and members <strong>of</strong> the public after they must have been allowed<br />

to examine the bids and ascertain that their bids have not been tampered<br />

with 36 . After the bids have been opened, award must be made to the<br />

responsible bidder who submitted the lowest responsible bid with regard to<br />

work specification and standard 37 .<br />

The second type <strong>of</strong> procurement process is special and restricted<br />

methods <strong>of</strong> procurement and this is statutorily divided into different methods.<br />

The first is Two-Stage Tendering Process generally known as ‘two-step sealed<br />

bidding’ which could be used by contracting entity in certain circumstances. 38<br />

29 Id. Section 6[1] [b] gives the power to BPP to issue certificate <strong>of</strong> ‘No objection for contract Award’ for all<br />

contract to be awarded by the Federal Government <strong>of</strong> Nigeria and any <strong>of</strong> its agencies and parastatals.<br />

30 Id section16[2].<br />

31 Id Section 16[1][c]S24[2] <strong>of</strong> the PPA.<br />

32 Id Section 25[1] it is international if the solicitation <strong>of</strong> bids is from domestic and foreign contractors but if<br />

all are domestic contractors it is national.<br />

33 If it is international, it can be advertised in any <strong>of</strong>ficial websites <strong>of</strong> the procuring entity and that <strong>of</strong> the<br />

BPP, as well as the procurement journal. If it is national, it shall be advertised on the notice board <strong>of</strong> the<br />

procuring entity and any <strong>of</strong>ficial websites <strong>of</strong> the procuring entity .See Section 25 Id.<br />

34 Id Section 27[1].<br />

35 Id.<br />

36 Id Sections 16 , 17 24 and 31.<br />

37 Id Sections 29 and 30.<br />

38 Id Section 39 [2] ‘where it is not feasible for the procuring entity to formulate detailed specifications for<br />

the goods or works or, in the case <strong>of</strong> services, to identify their characteristics and where it seeks tenders,<br />

proposals or <strong>of</strong>fers on various means <strong>of</strong> meeting its needs in order to obtain the most satisfactory solution<br />

to its procurement needs; where the character <strong>of</strong> the goods or works arc subject to rapid technological<br />

advances; where the procuring entity seeks to enter into a contract for research, experiment, study or<br />

development, except where the contract includes the production <strong>of</strong> goods in sufficient quantities to<br />

establish their commercial viability or to recover research and development costs, where the procuring<br />

entity applies this Act to procurement concerned with national security and determines that the selected


140 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

The first step requires the contracting entity to request for submission<br />

<strong>of</strong> tenders and if necessary solicits technical proposals. No tender price is<br />

involved at this stage because the purpose <strong>of</strong> the step is to find out whether the<br />

supplies or services received are adequate and acceptable. Those suppliers or<br />

contractors whose tenders have not been rejected shall be called upon by the<br />

contracting entity to submit final tenders with prices on a single act <strong>of</strong><br />

specification and the awards shall be made from the second stage tenders after<br />

the tenders have been compared with one another and properly evaluated. 39<br />

As an exception ,a procuring entity may result to restricted tendering<br />

and invites only specified contractors to submit tenders if it has obtained the<br />

approval <strong>of</strong> BPP. Restricted tendering could only be used if it could be proved<br />

that it is economical that a limited number <strong>of</strong> suppliers or contractors should<br />

supply the goods or works required and that the time and cost required<br />

examining and evaluating a large number <strong>of</strong> tenders is disproportionate to the<br />

value <strong>of</strong> the goods, works or services to be procured. 40<br />

All contractors or suppliers who can provide the goods or services<br />

must be invited to tender their bids without discrimination and if there is no<br />

time for evaluation and examination <strong>of</strong> tenders, then the contracting entity<br />

shall select in a non-discriminatory manner the number <strong>of</strong> suppliers or<br />

contractors to ensure effective competition. A notice <strong>of</strong> the selected tendering<br />

proceedings must be published in the procurement journal. 41<br />

As for solicitation for negotiated contracts, PPA requires the<br />

contracting entity to request for quotations from at least three separate<br />

contractors. The requests must be made in writing and should contain<br />

information as to whether any factors other than the charges for the goods,<br />

works or services themselves, such as any applicable transportation and<br />

insurance charges, customs duties and taxes are to be included in the price and<br />

the procurement shall be awarded to the qualified contractor or supplier that<br />

gives the lowest priced responsive quotation. 42<br />

A procuring entity may procure goods or works or services from a<br />

single individual as long as it satisfies the conditions for such direct<br />

procurement but must justify its decision for single source procurement and<br />

those justifiable reasons for determination should be recorded in the record <strong>of</strong><br />

procurement proceedings. The reasons must be compatible with the<br />

provisions <strong>of</strong> the PPA 43 which may be as a result <strong>of</strong> the fact that the goods,<br />

38 method is the most appropriate method <strong>of</strong> procurement; or where the tender proceedings have been<br />

utilized but were not successful or the tenders were rejected by the procuring entity under an open<br />

competitive bid procedure and the procuring entity considers that engaging in new tendering proceedings<br />

will not result in a procurement contract’.<br />

39 Id, Section 39[4] [a] [b] and [5]. See also W.Noel Keyes Government Contracts 2 nd edition West<br />

Publishing Company Minnessoata USA p.135.<br />

40 Id section 40.<br />

41 Id.<br />

42 Id.Section 41<br />

43 Id. Section 42.


PROCUREMENT LAW IN NIGERIA 141<br />

works or services are only available from one source or that supervening<br />

events or catastrophic circumstances make the need for them so expedient that<br />

a recourse in to other methods <strong>of</strong> procurement apart from direct procurement<br />

will be unrealistic. On the grounds <strong>of</strong> either reasonableness <strong>of</strong> the price,<br />

unsuitability <strong>of</strong> alternatives to the goods or services in question or national<br />

security the method can still be adopted.<br />

In the same way, procuring entity may engage in direct contracting<br />

<strong>of</strong> goods, works and services during emergency situations when the country is<br />

either seriously threatened by or actually confronted with a disaster,<br />

catastrophe, war, insurrection or Act <strong>of</strong> God or when the condition or quality<br />

<strong>of</strong> goods, equipment, building or publicly owned capital goods may seriously<br />

deteriorate unless corrective or remedial action is urgently and necessarily<br />

taken to maintain them in their actual value or usefulness or when a public<br />

project may be seriously delayed for want <strong>of</strong> an item <strong>of</strong> a minor value that<br />

ought to be procured. 44 Though immediately after the cessation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

situation which led to the emergency procurement, the procuring entity must<br />

give a detailed report <strong>of</strong> procurement made to the BPP for verification and if<br />

necessary the BPP will issue a Certificate <strong>of</strong> No Objection. 45<br />

4. SCOPE, COVERAGE AND APPLICATION<br />

Nigeria is a Federal Republic with a federal system <strong>of</strong> government. It consists<br />

<strong>of</strong> thirty six states and a federal capital territory in Abuja. Power is divided<br />

between the states and the federal government. The legislative power <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Federal Republic <strong>of</strong> Nigeria is vested by the Constitution in the National<br />

Assembly <strong>of</strong> the federation which consists <strong>of</strong> the Senate and the House <strong>of</strong><br />

Representatives. 46 The National Assembly has constitutional power to make<br />

law for the whole <strong>of</strong> the federation in any matter included in the exclusive<br />

legislative list 47 The power to make law in any <strong>of</strong> the states <strong>of</strong> the federation is<br />

vested in the House <strong>of</strong> Assembly <strong>of</strong> each state 48 The House <strong>of</strong> Assembly has<br />

power to make law in any matter not included in the Exclusive list. 49 Both the<br />

states and the national assembly’s can make laws in any matter that fall within<br />

the concurrent list with a proviso that if there is inconsistency between the law<br />

made by the federal legislature and the one made by the states, the law made<br />

44 Id. Section 43.<br />

45 Id.<br />

46 See Section 4[1] <strong>of</strong> the 1999 Constitution.<br />

47 The states could not legislate on any matter in the excusive list. Some <strong>of</strong> the matters are Aviation matters,<br />

Bankruptcy and Insolvency, Census, Copyright, Defence, Creation <strong>of</strong> states, Citizenship etc.<br />

48 See section 4 [6] and [7] <strong>of</strong> the 1999 Constitution.<br />

49 Id. Section 4[7] <strong>of</strong> the Constitution, this is called Residual power <strong>of</strong> the states to make laws in the area <strong>of</strong><br />

chieftaincy matters etc.


142 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

by the national Assembly shall prevail and the state law shall be void to the<br />

extent <strong>of</strong> its inconsistency. 50<br />

Government contract falls within the concurrent list which means<br />

both the states and the federal governments can legislate on it and that is the<br />

constitutional limitation in the application <strong>of</strong> the PPA. It was enacted by the<br />

National Assembly and its coverage does not go beyond the federal<br />

government expenditure. It regulates public contracts at the federal level by<br />

the national government. 51<br />

Another limitation though statutory is self imposed by the PPA itself:<br />

Subsection 2 <strong>of</strong> section 15 provides that the PPA shall not apply to the<br />

procurement <strong>of</strong> special goods; works and services involving national defense<br />

or national security. However the limitation is not an absolute one, since it can<br />

be avoided if the express approval <strong>of</strong> the President has been first sought and<br />

obtained. The PPA gives an inference that it is applicable in some<br />

circumstances to every nook and crannies <strong>of</strong> Nigeria without a territorial<br />

barrier beyond the jurisdiction at federal level when it provides that it applies<br />

to all entities in Nigeria which derive at least 35% <strong>of</strong> the funds appropriated or<br />

proposed to be appropriated for any type <strong>of</strong> procurement from the federation<br />

share <strong>of</strong> consolidated Revenue fund. 52<br />

Section 162 (3) <strong>of</strong> the Constitution 53 makes provision, for<br />

distribution <strong>of</strong> money in the Federation Account, between the Federal<br />

government, the States and the local government Councils in each state.<br />

Section 80 54 defines Consolidated Revenue Fund as:<br />

“All revenues or other moneys raised or received by the Federation<br />

(not being revenues or other moneys payable under this Constitution<br />

or any Act <strong>of</strong> the National Assembly into any other public fund <strong>of</strong><br />

the Federation established for a specific purpose) shall be paid into<br />

and form one Consolidated Revenue Fund <strong>of</strong> the Federation.”<br />

The fact is that money in the Consolidated Revenue Fund should be<br />

shared between the three tiers <strong>of</strong> governments in Nigeria. The question for<br />

consideration is whether they can be regarded as entities and whether they are<br />

subject to section 15[1] [b] <strong>of</strong> the PPA. If they are, the PPA will apply to them<br />

as far as the usage <strong>of</strong> that fund is concerned; if they are not it will not apply.<br />

50 Id. Section 4 <strong>of</strong> the 1999 Constitution.<br />

51 This limitation is from the constitution as well as from the statute. Section15[1] <strong>of</strong> the Act provides that it<br />

shall apply to all procurement <strong>of</strong> goods, works and services carried out by the Federal Government <strong>of</strong><br />

Nigeria and all procurement entities.<br />

52 See section 15[1][b] note that the Act is still new and all <strong>of</strong> its provisions have not been tested in courts.<br />

However if there is conflict between any <strong>of</strong> its provision and that <strong>of</strong> the constitution , the provision <strong>of</strong> the<br />

constitution will prevail and that provision in the Act shall be void to the extent <strong>of</strong> its inconsistency se<br />

section 1[3] <strong>of</strong> 1999 constitution.<br />

53 Id.<br />

54 Id.


PROCUREMENT LAW IN NIGERIA 143<br />

Whatever might be our conjecture, the actual fact is that PPA applies to<br />

federal government and its ministries and agents wherever they might be<br />

located but does not apply to states and states must enact their own<br />

procurement law.<br />

5. THE IMPACT OF THE ACT<br />

The federal Government <strong>of</strong> Nigeria initiated public procurement reform in<br />

2001and the law was passed in 2007.The Act has been in existence for three<br />

years and that is a short time to examine the effect <strong>of</strong> a new law in the life <strong>of</strong> a<br />

nation. Nevertheless it is our opinion that the effort <strong>of</strong> the government to enact<br />

this law has not been in vain for the past three years that we cannot have<br />

something significant to say about its impact. Therefore this section examines<br />

briefly the impact <strong>of</strong> PPA in the polity.<br />

The first impact itself is the establishment <strong>of</strong> procurement law for the<br />

first time in the history <strong>of</strong> Nigeria to govern public contract. This will go a<br />

long way to save government money and to ensure transparency in<br />

procurement method. The rules and regulations enshrined will serve as a<br />

yardstick to bring culprits to judgment and there is tendency that sound<br />

procurement system will prevail.<br />

A commentator in Nigeria 55 lamented how many people particularly<br />

statesmen have escaped punishment for <strong>of</strong>fences <strong>of</strong> corruption in the abuse <strong>of</strong><br />

public procurement because <strong>of</strong> the absence <strong>of</strong> law in that area when he wrote:<br />

“Last year Patricia Etteh was forced to resign as Speaker <strong>of</strong> the<br />

House <strong>of</strong> Representatives 56 in the light <strong>of</strong> evidence that she<br />

irregularly spent 628 million Naira on the refurbishment <strong>of</strong> her<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficial residence and diverted much <strong>of</strong> this money into illicit<br />

payments. Etteh is a prime example <strong>of</strong> someone who could be<br />

prosecuted under the terms <strong>of</strong> the new Bureau <strong>of</strong> Public<br />

Procurement Act. And if she were convicted, the disgraced<br />

politician could find herself serving a prison sentence <strong>of</strong> up to 10<br />

years.” 57<br />

Another report from Nigeria encapsulates the degenerated state <strong>of</strong><br />

55 V. Nwanma- Beware, That Business Proposal Could Procure a Jail Term for You Nigerian Budget<br />

Monitoring Project le: ///C:/Documents and Settings/osua1/Desktop/BEWARE 1.htm [assessed on the 30<br />

<strong>of</strong> August 2010.]<br />

56 Nigeria has two houses <strong>of</strong> parliament at the federal level. The upper house is called House <strong>of</strong> Senate while<br />

the second one is called House <strong>of</strong> Representatives. The upper house is headed by the president <strong>of</strong> Senate<br />

while the second house is headed by a Speaker.<br />

57 What the commentator was saying indirectly was that the failure <strong>of</strong> the government to prosecute Patricia<br />

Etteh the former Speaker <strong>of</strong> the House <strong>of</strong> Representatives was the absence <strong>of</strong> a procurement law in<br />

Nigeria. While that may not be the sole reason for non prosecution <strong>of</strong> Etteh and many public figures that<br />

have mismanaged government money through public contracts, it could be a contributing factor.


144 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

corruption in the award and performance <strong>of</strong> contract from both private and<br />

public sector <strong>of</strong> the economy when a man called Shuabu Attanda was arrested<br />

in Lagos for being in possession <strong>of</strong> a bag containing 70 dead babies. 58<br />

According to the report, the man was trying to dump the corpses when he was<br />

apprehended. Police report later confirmed that the man in question was<br />

neither a ritualist nor a child trafficker as was originally suspected. 59<br />

On interrogation, the man confessed that he was a contractor to a<br />

prominent hospital in Lagos. He explained further that his services were<br />

engaged through a contract to dispose <strong>of</strong>f corpses <strong>of</strong> dead babies by the<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Morbid Anatomy <strong>of</strong> the hospital. 60 He disclosed that part <strong>of</strong><br />

the terms <strong>of</strong> the contract for disposing <strong>of</strong>f the corpses was to give the dead<br />

bodies’ decent burial at a cemetery. 61 The man confessed that he was forced<br />

into dumping the corpses <strong>of</strong> the dead babies anywhere, anyhow because he<br />

could no longer afford to pay the cemetery charges even when it was included<br />

in the total cost <strong>of</strong> the contract because the funds had been exhausted after<br />

“greasing the palms” <strong>of</strong> key <strong>of</strong>ficials <strong>of</strong> the hospital who facilitated the award<br />

<strong>of</strong> the contract. 62 The writer observed correctly that the experience <strong>of</strong> that<br />

unfortunate contractor underlines the long chain <strong>of</strong> corruption in public<br />

procurement at all levels <strong>of</strong> government in Nigeria and that that issue is one <strong>of</strong><br />

the numerous challenges which an agency like the Bureau <strong>of</strong> Public<br />

Procurement is expected to deal with on daily basis at the Federal level. 63<br />

Therefore the enactment <strong>of</strong> a direct statutory provision will<br />

ameliorate this problems if not totally curb it. It is noteworthy that the Act<br />

prescribes harsh sanctions for those who violate its rules. Most <strong>of</strong> the<br />

sanctions are imprisonments without an option <strong>of</strong> fine. A natural person who<br />

is not a public <strong>of</strong>ficer can be imprisoned for not less than five years but not<br />

exceeding ten years without an option <strong>of</strong> fine 64 while a public <strong>of</strong>ficer who<br />

contravenes any provision <strong>of</strong> the Act is subject to the same years <strong>of</strong><br />

imprisonment in addition with summary dismissal from government<br />

services. 65 Even a corporate entity cannot escape sanction if it contravenes the<br />

provisions <strong>of</strong> the Act as it may be liable for disbarment from all public<br />

procurement for a period not less than five years and a fine equivalent to 25%<br />

<strong>of</strong> the value <strong>of</strong> the procurement in issue. 66 It is not likely that those measures<br />

specifically aimed at ensuring the integrity <strong>of</strong> procuring entities may fail, if<br />

effective sanctions in the Act are enforced.<br />

58 See J. E. Nigeria; Procurement Reform – A case for BPP in the states Vanguard Nigerian Newspaper on 9<br />

August 2010.<br />

59 Id.<br />

60 Id.<br />

61 Id.<br />

62 Id.<br />

63 Id.<br />

64 Section 58[1] <strong>of</strong> PPA.<br />

65 Id.Section 58[5].<br />

66 Id Section 58.


PROCUREMENT LAW IN NIGERIA 145<br />

Another impact is that <strong>of</strong> sensitization <strong>of</strong> the citizenry on the objects,<br />

values and components <strong>of</strong> the Act so that it can be acceptable to all. This<br />

aspect has generated an incredible result in Nigeria. Conferences and<br />

workshops were embarked upon by the civil societies and the BPP to create<br />

awareness among the people about the benefits <strong>of</strong> transparency in public<br />

procurement. The result is that <strong>of</strong> public acclamation <strong>of</strong> the Act, people have<br />

accepted the Act and are clamoring for enactment <strong>of</strong> same law at the state and<br />

local level. As a result most states have enacted their own procurement laws to<br />

satisfy the aspiration <strong>of</strong> their people 67 and other states are taking steps to<br />

follow suit. The benefit <strong>of</strong> this impact is that people are now playing a<br />

watchdog role on procurement issue.<br />

The last impact is that <strong>of</strong> prudent management <strong>of</strong> government<br />

resources and money. The Director-General <strong>of</strong> the Bureau for Public<br />

Procurement, BPP, Engr. Emeka Ezeh, is <strong>of</strong> the opinion that more than $590<br />

million (N88.5bn) has been saved the nation through the activities <strong>of</strong> the BPP<br />

in the short time <strong>of</strong> its existence. 68 According to him, the Public Procurement<br />

Act <strong>of</strong> 2007 has served as “a clarion call to probity, accountability, adherence<br />

to methods in the disbursement <strong>of</strong> a commonwealth and the production <strong>of</strong><br />

evidence in the application <strong>of</strong> the wealth.” As a result, “cost <strong>of</strong> contracts are<br />

no longer unreasonably expensive; they are projected in context and vetted<br />

with due rigour.” 69<br />

6. AMENDMENT TO THE ACT<br />

An amendment was made to some provisions <strong>of</strong> the PPA by the Senate in 2009.<br />

The first is on the percentage <strong>of</strong> mobilization to be paid to contractors handling<br />

Federal Government projects in the country. In the Public Procurement Act<br />

(Amendment) Bill passed by the Senate, the Senate specifically amended<br />

Section 35 <strong>of</strong> the Procurement Act which provided for payment <strong>of</strong> mobilization<br />

fee <strong>of</strong> not more that 15 per cent <strong>of</strong> the contract sum. 70 The amended Bill allows<br />

for the negotiation <strong>of</strong> mobilization fees to be prescribed in the bid document<br />

for approval by the tenders boards; whereas, the original Act exclusively vested<br />

such power in the Bureau <strong>of</strong> Public Procurement. 71<br />

The Senate also used the amendment to break the monopoly<br />

currently enjoyed by the Executive to give approval for procurements by other<br />

arms <strong>of</strong> government.<br />

Under the regime <strong>of</strong> approval that the new amendment seeks to<br />

67 Twelve states have enacted their own procurement law in Nigeria.<br />

68 Oscarline Onwuemenyi Due process saved Nigeria N88.5Bbn in two years 12 August 2010 Vanguard<br />

Newspaper.<br />

69 Id.<br />

70 See report <strong>of</strong> the Amendment by the National newspapers Senate amends Public procurement Act This<br />

day 7th <strong>of</strong> October 2009.<br />

71 Id.


146 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

introduce, other arms <strong>of</strong> government – Legislature and Judiciary – have been<br />

given powers to govern their procurement in line with the provisions <strong>of</strong> their<br />

respective budgets. By virtue <strong>of</strong> the amended Section 16, power <strong>of</strong> approval<br />

has been devolved to the Body <strong>of</strong> Principal Officers <strong>of</strong> the National Assembly<br />

in the case <strong>of</strong> procurements in the Federal Legislature and the Judiciary<br />

Tenders Board in the case <strong>of</strong> procurements in the Judiciary.<br />

According to the Chairman <strong>of</strong> the Senate Committee on Finance,<br />

Senator Ahmed Makarfi, who presented the report <strong>of</strong> the committee on the<br />

amendment Bill, the purpose <strong>of</strong> the amendment to section 16 was to ensure<br />

the independence <strong>of</strong> the other arms <strong>of</strong> government. 72<br />

Section 22 was also amended to provide that the decision <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Tenders Board shall be communicated to both the Minister and the<br />

Accounting Officers <strong>of</strong> the entities making the procurements in the<br />

Legislature and the Judiciary. In the original Act, the decision was<br />

communicated to only the minister. 73<br />

The Senate, which subjected the Bill to clause-by-clause<br />

consideration, also deleted the section which vested the Chairmanship <strong>of</strong> the<br />

National Council on Public Procurement (NCPP) on the Minister <strong>of</strong> Finance<br />

and provided that the Chairman shall be appointed by the President.<br />

Another amendment to the Bill was the inclusion <strong>of</strong> the Nigerian<br />

Union <strong>of</strong> <strong>Journal</strong>ists (NUJ) as against the media under composition <strong>of</strong><br />

membership <strong>of</strong> the NCPP. 74<br />

7. CHALLENGE BEFORE THE NEW LEGAL<br />

REGIME<br />

The enactment <strong>of</strong> PPA is a great opportunity for Nigeria to develop as a nation<br />

because national resources will be allocated on just and transparent manner to<br />

satisfy the needs <strong>of</strong> the people and the move towards government<br />

accountability will be guaranteed as the people have a role to monitor the use<br />

<strong>of</strong> their resources. However the greatest challenge to the Act is the reluctance<br />

on the path <strong>of</strong> the government to embrace in totality the full implementation <strong>of</strong><br />

the Act. Public contract is seen as a tool to reward political loyalists and to<br />

amass wealth.<br />

The full implementation <strong>of</strong> the Act will take that supposed tool <strong>of</strong><br />

reward away from those in governments hence the lackadaisical attitude by<br />

the government to fully implement the law. Since 2007, 75 the government has<br />

failed to do the first thing that the Act prescribes to be done to lay a strong<br />

72 Id.<br />

73 Id.<br />

74 Id.<br />

75 The Act was passed in 2007.


PROCUREMENT LAW IN NIGERIA 147<br />

foundation for its implementation. Section 1 <strong>of</strong> subsection 1 76 establishes the<br />

National Council on Public Procurement with mandate so sacrosanct to be<br />

jettisoned. It has mandate to approve and amend the monetary and prior review<br />

thresholds for the application <strong>of</strong> the provisions <strong>of</strong> the Act by procuring<br />

entities. 77 It is the highest authority in the hierarchical structure <strong>of</strong> the<br />

procurement institutions in Nigeria and without its establishment, its statutory<br />

role to control and monitor procurement procedure will be lost. Apart from the<br />

enviable status and function <strong>of</strong> the NCPP, the likely feature <strong>of</strong> the Council<br />

which is a good quality for success is the composition <strong>of</strong> its members. 78<br />

While there may be tendency on the path <strong>of</strong> the government to<br />

influence some <strong>of</strong> the members, there is likelihood that it may be difficult to<br />

influence majority <strong>of</strong> them. As a result, it will be difficult for the government<br />

to influence award <strong>of</strong> contract to their surrogates. The realization <strong>of</strong> that<br />

consequence on the path <strong>of</strong> the government might create reluctance on their<br />

path to full implementation <strong>of</strong> the Act. Presently, it is the Federal Executive<br />

Council [FEC] that approves public contracts in Nigeria a duty that is<br />

statutorily assigned to NCPP as the approving authority. The continued<br />

approval <strong>of</strong> contracts by the Federal Executive Council violates the Public<br />

Procurement Act as FEC is not the approving authority recognized by the Act<br />

and this has led to more violation <strong>of</strong> the Act.<br />

The general pabulum is that birds <strong>of</strong> the same feather flocks together,<br />

the failure <strong>of</strong> the Government to constitute NCCP which should be the<br />

foundational step for entrenchment <strong>of</strong> new procurement regime in Nigeria has<br />

led to other violation, the appointment <strong>of</strong> the Director General <strong>of</strong> the BPP by<br />

the president without an input from the yet to be constituted NCCP as the Act<br />

provided is a flagrant disobedience to the provision <strong>of</strong> the Act. 79<br />

The outcome <strong>of</strong> such a precarious footing could be predicted. Abuse<br />

<strong>of</strong> procurement is likely to be the order <strong>of</strong> the day and that could be one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

contributing factors to recent abuse in the awards <strong>of</strong> high pr<strong>of</strong>ile contracts in<br />

Nigeria. The award <strong>of</strong> a N8.2 billion contract for the upgrading <strong>of</strong> NTA<br />

broadcast equipment generated a lot <strong>of</strong> controversy until it was probed by the<br />

Senate to affirm its consistency with due process <strong>of</strong> procurement law. Certain<br />

revelations from the probe suggest the fact that a lot <strong>of</strong> discrepancies occurred<br />

during the award. An independent reporter explained the inconsistencies <strong>of</strong><br />

76 Id.<br />

77 Id Section 2[A].<br />

78 Some <strong>of</strong> the members are Minister <strong>of</strong> Finance, Attorney-General and Minister <strong>of</strong> Justice, The Secretary to<br />

the Government <strong>of</strong> the federation, Economic Adviser to the president who by their political position<br />

might likely be influenced by the president but the list <strong>of</strong> members include representatives <strong>of</strong> the civil<br />

society and other pr<strong>of</strong>essional bodies like Nigeria Bar Association, Nigeria Society <strong>of</strong> Engineers, Nigeria<br />

Institute <strong>of</strong> Purchasing and Supply Management, Nigeria Association <strong>of</strong> Chambers <strong>of</strong> Commerce,<br />

Industry, Mines and Agriculture etc who are likely to be independent. In fact some <strong>of</strong> the pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

bodies like Nigerian Bar Association have been in the forefront <strong>of</strong> democracy campaign.<br />

79 The Act provides in section 7[1] that the Director General shall be appointed by the President, on the<br />

recommendation <strong>of</strong> the NCCP after competitive selections.


148 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

the award with the procurement law when he wrote: 80<br />

“During the Public Hearing conducted by the Senate Committee,<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>. Akunyili had stated categorically that the contract was not<br />

awarded by her; rather she only received three names <strong>of</strong> contractors<br />

forwarded to her by the NTA (Director General?) which she also<br />

forwarded to the President/Federal Executive Council (FEC) for<br />

approval. Further she claimed at that time (2009) that the planning<br />

<strong>of</strong> the contract started about two years ago (that is 2007) before her<br />

appointment as Minister, though concluded under administration,<br />

and that she is ignorant <strong>of</strong> the technicalities involved in the<br />

procurement processes and therefore failed to participate in<br />

the award <strong>of</strong> the contract…the first capital error <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>. Akunyili is<br />

that in procurement implementation under Section 19 and 22(5) <strong>of</strong><br />

the Public Procurement Act , no one contract is awarded to three<br />

contractors at the same time by the Tenders Board with the approval<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Chief Accounting Officer. It is on record that while<br />

responding to the above charges before the Senate Committee, the<br />

Director General <strong>of</strong> the BPP, Engr. Emeka Ezeh admitted on the<br />

floor <strong>of</strong> the Senate, before the nation’s media crew <strong>of</strong> print and<br />

electronic that the President sent the details <strong>of</strong> the three contractors<br />

to him for audit/review. Therefore in this chain <strong>of</strong> contract award<br />

process, the bus stop was now at Engr. Ezeh’s door step. According<br />

to Ezeh, on analyzing the contract documents he found out there<br />

were errors, which included that the project (contract) was not<br />

appropriated for, neither was it advertised for prospective bidders as<br />

required by law in Section 24 <strong>of</strong> the PPA.”<br />

The independent reporter condemns the role <strong>of</strong> the Director General<br />

in the whole saga when he further wrote: 81<br />

“The Bureau under Engr. Ezeh did not only become an independent<br />

statutory player (referee) but also a major party in bid Technical<br />

and Financial Evaluation (TFE) in the contract award, a<br />

responsibility strictly reserved for procuring entities . In essence, he<br />

is now acting as a procuring entity instead <strong>of</strong> an independent umpire<br />

that should adjudicate on the matter when and if there is a dispute …<br />

By selecting one <strong>of</strong> the contractors forwarded to Engr. Ezeh, which<br />

he described as ‘Damage Control’, knowing that the award failed<br />

80 See M. B. Attah Independent Report: The unresolved N8.14 Billion NTA Contract Award Saga http://<br />

www.nigerianinquirer.com/2010/07/30/independent-report-the-unresolved-?8-4-billion-nta-cont<br />

[assessed on 31 August 2010.<br />

81 Id.


PROCUREMENT LAW IN NIGERIA 149<br />

due process makes him a major party in the [bad] procurement<br />

dispute.”<br />

Another indictment for BPP came in respect with Abuja Airport<br />

Second Runway Contract for the construction <strong>of</strong> a four –kilometer second<br />

runway at the Nnamadi Azikiwe International Airport Abuja. The House <strong>of</strong><br />

Representatives Committee on Aviation after conducting a public hearing on<br />

the contract gave a damning verdict accusing BPP <strong>of</strong> manipulating the cost<br />

and bidding process <strong>of</strong> the award in violation <strong>of</strong> procurement procedures. 82 A<br />

newspaper Editorial in Nigeria captures the discrepancies graphically when it<br />

comments:<br />

“Many issues were uncovered during the public hearing. The ‘No<br />

Objection Certificate’ issued for the project was not only falsely<br />

issued by the Bureau <strong>of</strong> Public Procurement but deliberately and<br />

wrongly issue in conspiracy with the Managing Director <strong>of</strong> Federal<br />

Airport Authority <strong>of</strong> Nigeria [FAAN] and other <strong>of</strong>ficers <strong>of</strong> FAAN to<br />

inflate contract and defraud the federal government <strong>of</strong> Nigeria. The<br />

proceedings, processes and decisions for the award <strong>of</strong> the contract<br />

were not made accessible to the public, which would have allowed<br />

for observation, monitoring ,review ,comment and possible whistle<br />

blowing to ensure transparency.” 83<br />

The Minister <strong>of</strong> Transport Alhaji Isa Ibrahim Bio was also indicted in<br />

the award <strong>of</strong> contract for the modernization <strong>of</strong> the Jebba-Kano railway line to<br />

Costain West Africa Construction Company at the sum <strong>of</strong> N12.2billion. The<br />

staff <strong>of</strong> the Railway who made the allegation recounts how the contract was<br />

inflated through spurious procedures contrary to procurement rules. They<br />

assert: 84<br />

“By right, the board supposes to deliberate and agree on any railway<br />

contract before it recommend to the Federal Executive Council<br />

(FEC) through the Minister for approval. But unfortunately, the<br />

meeting <strong>of</strong> the board was summoned on 29 December, 2009 by<br />

10am to deliberate on the contract for the rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> the Jebba<br />

82 House Aviation Committee Chairman, Bethel Amadi, issued a statement where he specifically mentioned<br />

the sections <strong>of</strong> the law breached. He said: ‘There were obvious breaches <strong>of</strong> various Sections <strong>of</strong> the Public<br />

Procurement Act, especially 16(17), (18), (19), (20); 24(3), 31(2), (3a, b and c), and 33, indicating the<br />

potential breach <strong>of</strong> due process in the award <strong>of</strong> the contract’ See http://news2.onlinenigeria.com/news/<br />

general/25770-Reps-Tackle-Presidency-Over-Runway-Contract.htm [assessed on 1 September 2010.See<br />

also Abuja's Airport Runway <strong>of</strong> Controversy Daily Trust 14 April 2010.<br />

83 See News star Newspaper 31 May –1 June Editorial Pr<strong>of</strong>ligacy in Public procurement page 14.<br />

84 S. Abubakar, Nigeria: How N2Billion Railway project was awarded at N24 Billion Daily Trust 26<br />

January 2010. Can be down loaded at http://allafrica.com/stories/201001270550.html[assessed on 1<br />

September 2010].


150 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

to Kano railway line that was to be awarded to Costain West Africa<br />

that same day by 4pm.<br />

It has already been decided and invitations were already distributed<br />

invited people to witness the signing <strong>of</strong> the contract by 4pm that day<br />

before we were asked to come for a meeting by 10am the same day<br />

to agree on what has already been decided. There was no record<br />

anywhere indicating that Costain West Africa ever handled any<br />

railway project in the past. In any case, the board suppose to meet,<br />

deliberate and agree on who should be recommended for the<br />

contract and not for us to adopt the decisions <strong>of</strong> the minister.”<br />

The minister retorted back in defense: 85<br />

“We want to make sure Nigerians enjoy railway services. The<br />

challenges are enormous, people call us names. We are not <strong>of</strong><br />

particular interest to a particular contractor, to a particular sector, to<br />

a particular group, but what is <strong>of</strong> particular interest to this<br />

administration is delivery. If you are able to deliver or you have the<br />

ability to deliver, we would work together.”<br />

The fact that emanates from all these controversies is the<br />

involvement <strong>of</strong> the government in the award <strong>of</strong> contracts in Nigeria contrary<br />

to the procurement law. Governments are not procuring entities; they are not<br />

tender boards and should also not be the approving authority for public<br />

contracts. The present trend is misnomer and should be rescinded. Another<br />

pathetic fact is that <strong>of</strong> the integrity <strong>of</strong> the procurement <strong>of</strong>ficers. That is a great<br />

setback to the new legal regime but the root cause is still the failure <strong>of</strong> the<br />

government to fully implement the procurement law. Although there is<br />

adequate sanction 86 for the procurement <strong>of</strong>ficers who misbehave in the Act to<br />

make them suffer for their misdemeanor, if government is involved, they may<br />

escape punishment. In addition, section 57[1] 87 provides that the Bureau with<br />

the approval <strong>of</strong> the NCPC shall stipulate a code <strong>of</strong> conduct for all public<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficers. The problem is that the NCPC has not been constituted. Final<br />

implementation <strong>of</strong> the procurement law is the panacea to the ills <strong>of</strong> the<br />

procurement system in Nigeria.<br />

85 Id.<br />

86 See section 57 <strong>of</strong> the Act [PPA].<br />

87 Id.


PROCUREMENT LAW IN NIGERIA 151<br />

8. CONCLUSION<br />

We have examined the procurement law in Nigeria, the policies and the<br />

objectives <strong>of</strong> the law at the domestic level are sound. The regulations fashions<br />

along UN Commission on International Trade <strong>Law</strong> [UNICITRAL] Model are<br />

capable <strong>of</strong> attaining the desired objectives if well implemented and that is<br />

where the problem lies. There is great concern on the involvement <strong>of</strong> the<br />

government in the procuring process, concern on the integrity <strong>of</strong> the<br />

procurement <strong>of</strong>ficers and the lack <strong>of</strong> political will by the government to fully<br />

implement the law. We observed to our chagrin, partial implementation <strong>of</strong> law<br />

by the government. What could be responsible? The power to award contract<br />

is a prestigious one which the government does not want to lose and we pr<strong>of</strong>ess<br />

that to be the reason why the federal government in Nigeria has not constituted<br />

the right body to approve contract. Till today the Federal Executive Council is<br />

responsible for approval <strong>of</strong> contracts while the ministers and other government<br />

functionaries play a greater role in procuring contracts. The resultant effect <strong>of</strong><br />

that lip service has been explained in this article which is an orgy <strong>of</strong> violation<br />

<strong>of</strong> procurement law. We, therefore call on the federal Government <strong>of</strong> Nigeria<br />

to take all necessary steps to inaugurate the NCPP according to the<br />

procurement law. On the issue <strong>of</strong> the integrity <strong>of</strong> the procurement <strong>of</strong>ficers,<br />

those who are found to be corrupt or whose names have been discredited<br />

should face the wrath <strong>of</strong> law and qualified pr<strong>of</strong>essionals <strong>of</strong> impeccable<br />

character should be appointed. Another aspect is the scope <strong>of</strong> the application<br />

<strong>of</strong> the PPA, until similar law applies in all the states and local levels, the gain<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Act shall be short-lived. Though the broad exception in the areas <strong>of</strong><br />

defense and security may be universal 88 it can constitute an avenue for<br />

compromise and corruption in Nigeria in view <strong>of</strong> the controversy surrounding<br />

the use <strong>of</strong> security vote by the executive governors in the states. There should<br />

be an amendment to check the excesses <strong>of</strong> the executives in that area.<br />

88 Almost all the procurement law <strong>of</strong> every country has this exception.


153<br />

COMMENTS<br />

Principled leadership: Finding common ground among<br />

divergent philosophies*<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

V. D. Lopez**<br />

This opinion piece tentatively explores the interrelationship among the various<br />

competing ethical philosophies and the political systems they inform and notes<br />

some <strong>of</strong> the qualities shared by effective principled leaders that transcend<br />

irreconcilable philosophical differences and foster fair decision making<br />

regardless <strong>of</strong> the school <strong>of</strong> ethics from which a leader's personal ethics are<br />

derived.<br />

1. INTRODUCTION<br />

The quest to discover ethical truths has led Western philosophers down some<br />

very different paths throughout the past three millennia. Even a cursory<br />

examination <strong>of</strong> the field quickly reveals irresolvable tensions among<br />

irreconcilable points <strong>of</strong> view. Unfortunately, the discussion <strong>of</strong> ethical standards<br />

and the societal, political and moral norms they inform <strong>of</strong>ten occurs without an<br />

attempt to define terms or provide context for meaningful debate. A brief<br />

overview <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> the leading divergent philosophies is a good starting point<br />

to any meaningful discussion on ethics, its impact on public policy and its role<br />

in the making <strong>of</strong> a principled leader.<br />

2. A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF SOME TRADITIONAL<br />

SCHOOLS OF ETHICS<br />

Ethical Absolutism<br />

Ethical absolutism is an ethical philosophy with many diverse branches all tied<br />

in to the central idea that there are certain universal standards by which to<br />

measure morality. Under this broad branch <strong>of</strong> ethics, concepts such as good and<br />

evil and right and wrong have a separate existence that can be discovered and<br />

* This opinion piece is based in part on an essay by the author on principled leadership that was posted to<br />

leaderethics.com in 2005.<br />

** Associate Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> Legal Studies in Business, H<strong>of</strong>stra <strong>University</strong>, Frank G. Zarb School <strong>of</strong> Business,<br />

Hempstead, New York. The author gratefully acknowledges the support <strong>of</strong> a summer research grant from<br />

the Zarb School <strong>of</strong> Business that facilitated research, writing, and revision <strong>of</strong> several articles and this<br />

opinion piece.


154 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

understood by human beings through philosophical inquiry. Proponents <strong>of</strong> this<br />

broad branch <strong>of</strong> ethics represent a very wide variety <strong>of</strong> schools <strong>of</strong> thoughts that<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten include diametrically opposed world views and political philosophies.<br />

Plato, St. Thomas Aquinas and Karl Marx all believed in ethical absolutism,<br />

despite the fact that the overall philosophy and world view <strong>of</strong> each man was<br />

quite different.<br />

Religious Fundamentalism<br />

Religious fundamentalism is an <strong>of</strong>fshoot <strong>of</strong> ethical fundamentalism. As a<br />

theory <strong>of</strong> ethics, it is based on the existence <strong>of</strong> certain immutable truths. Unlike<br />

ethical absolutism, however, which requires that these values be discovered<br />

through philosophical inquiry and introspection, ethical norms under religious<br />

fundamentalism can only be found by studying the lives and writings <strong>of</strong><br />

prophets or by consulting Holy Scriptures. Under this philosophy, living a<br />

moral life depends upon strict adherence to the religious principles and moral<br />

code dictated by one’s religion.<br />

Utilitarianism<br />

Utilitarianism has as its ethical base the assignment <strong>of</strong> value to actions based<br />

upon their outcome. Under utilitarianism, the ultimate good is defined as<br />

actions intended to bring about the greatest happiness (or greatest good) for the<br />

greatest number <strong>of</strong> individuals in any society. Thus, moral action for a<br />

utilitarian requires the constant evaluation <strong>of</strong> actions based upon their intended<br />

result. Actions that bring about the greatest good to the greatest number are<br />

ethical, or good, while actions that fall short <strong>of</strong> that goal are unethical, or<br />

wrong. To put it another way, utilitarianism does not recognize an intrinsic<br />

value to actions, but rather assigns a positive or negative moral judgment to<br />

actions only in view <strong>of</strong> their result. The most notable proponents <strong>of</strong> this<br />

philosophy are the British philosophers Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) and<br />

John Stuart Mill (1806-1873).<br />

Ethical Relativism<br />

Like utilitarianism, ethical relativism denies the existence <strong>of</strong> absolute moral<br />

values, and holds that moral judgments cannot be made in a vacuum. Unlike<br />

utilitarianism, however, the yardstick by which to measure the morality <strong>of</strong> an<br />

act is not the common good, but rather the circumstances surrounding the<br />

person committing an act at the time that an act is committed. It is a precept <strong>of</strong><br />

this philosophy that a person's actions cannot be judged other than by placing<br />

oneself in the same situation that the actor faced in committing the act in


PRINCIPLED LEADERSHIP 155<br />

question. So that stealing to feed one's hungry child, for example, is not<br />

necessarily wrong. On a societal level, ethical relativism acknowledges that<br />

there are differences between cultures and that what is considered wrong or<br />

even hateful in one culture may be acceptable in another, depending on its<br />

particular circumstances. Human sacrifice, cannibalism, infanticide and ethnic<br />

cleansing are all arguably justifiable for some cultures. Notable proponents <strong>of</strong><br />

relativistic theories include W.G. Sumner (1849-1910) in the U.S. and E.A.<br />

Westermarck (1862-1939) in the U.K.<br />

Deontology<br />

Deontology is a duty-based ethical theory whose principal proponent is the<br />

German philosopher Immanuel Kant (1724-1804). For Kant, an act's morality<br />

is dependent upon the actor's motive, and the only unconditionally good motive<br />

is doing one’s duty. For Kant, the concept <strong>of</strong> duty finds its expression in<br />

categorical imperatives, a set <strong>of</strong> rules <strong>of</strong> behavior derived from practical reason<br />

and tested through a filter <strong>of</strong> universal application. A basic categorical<br />

imperative arrived at practical reasoning, such as you should not steal, is valid<br />

if you can justify the whole world living up to the rule. In other words, moral<br />

behavior can be defined as acting in accordance with rules that you would be<br />

willing to impose on the whole world as a valid code <strong>of</strong> conduct. A person acts<br />

morally whenever she follows a categorical imperative out <strong>of</strong> a sense <strong>of</strong> duty.<br />

Merely engaging in right action <strong>of</strong> itself is not moral; refraining from stealing<br />

because one feels the obligation not to steal is moral conduct, but refraining<br />

from stealing out <strong>of</strong> fear <strong>of</strong> getting caught would not rise to the level <strong>of</strong> moral<br />

conduct.<br />

3. ETHICS AND PUBLIC POLICY<br />

The political implications that flow from even a very superficial overview <strong>of</strong><br />

differing ethical systems should not be ignored. Whether by design or by<br />

default, the ethical values held by political leaders and lawmakers invariably<br />

become a part <strong>of</strong> the political system. We need not look far to see examples <strong>of</strong><br />

the influence <strong>of</strong> ethical systems on public policy and on the politics <strong>of</strong> nations.<br />

The influence <strong>of</strong> religious fundamentalism can readily be seen today in a<br />

number <strong>of</strong> countries, particularly in the Middle East, where militant religious<br />

fundamentalists are engaged in armed struggles to overthrow what they believe<br />

to be immoral secular governments that are instilling in their people false moral<br />

values. If one believes that the only true source <strong>of</strong> morality is religion, it is<br />

logical to believe that theocracy is not only the best, but perhaps the only moral<br />

form <strong>of</strong> government. Ethical absolutism is also readily observable in its secular<br />

form in past and present non-religious totalitarian Marxist, communist and


156 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

fascist regimes. Taken to their logical conclusion, absolutist ideals can not only<br />

be used to justify totalitarianism, they require it; if there are certain knowable,<br />

immutable truths that are valid for all time, then only truly moral form <strong>of</strong><br />

government is one that educates and indoctrinates its people to recognize and<br />

conform to the moral conduct that those truths dictate.<br />

If totalitarian regimes are based on ethical absolutism or religious<br />

fundamentalism, it is clear that democratic governments lean towards nonfundamentalist<br />

ethical principles. The assumption that a variety <strong>of</strong> plausible<br />

views can exist on even essential ethical principles is central to a democratic<br />

form <strong>of</strong> government. The principle <strong>of</strong> majority rule almost inevitably leads to<br />

the adoption <strong>of</strong> some form <strong>of</strong> moral relativism as the guiding ethical principle,<br />

especially in societies with highly diverse social, ethnic and religious cultures<br />

and large numbers <strong>of</strong> unassimilated immigrant populations. The very notion<br />

that right and wrong is subject to a vote institutionalizes ethical relativism in<br />

all democracies; issues such as the death penalty, abortion, and pornography,<br />

and governmental efforts to regulate these areas, illustrate with the strong<br />

emotions and endless debate they elicit our relativistic ethics. Individuals in<br />

democratic societies are free to reject ethical relativism, and many do. They<br />

can also lobby their government to change existing laws, arguing for the<br />

adoption <strong>of</strong> their point <strong>of</strong> view. But a democratic system that completely<br />

abandons ethical relativism in favor <strong>of</strong> ethical absolutism, whether <strong>of</strong> the<br />

secular or religious variety, cannot remain a democracy for long.<br />

The obvious problem we face when trying to impose an ethical<br />

system is in deciding which system to use. While it can be argued that<br />

governments should not legislate morality, all governments in fact do so to<br />

some extent. Criminal law is largely based on prohibiting and punishing<br />

antisocial behavior; as such, criminal law inevitably reflects society's ethical<br />

standards and attempts to discourage behavior that society deems immoral.<br />

Ultimately, questions <strong>of</strong> ethics come down to personal belief. Depending on<br />

the philosophical system applied, nearly any moral point <strong>of</strong> view is<br />

defensible; unfortunately, one person's ethical conduct is frequently another's<br />

mortal sin. In a political context, ethical debate <strong>of</strong>ten hinges on irreconcilable<br />

differences. On the abortion issue, for example, the pro choice and pro-life<br />

groups have philosophical differences that cannot be reconciled. The same is<br />

true <strong>of</strong> people on opposite sides <strong>of</strong> the perpetual debate on the death penalty,<br />

gun control, legalization <strong>of</strong> drugs, animal research, gay marriage, and<br />

innumerable other issues. Very <strong>of</strong>ten, groups on either side <strong>of</strong> a political<br />

controversy believe themselves to be morally right, and, by definition, believe<br />

that those who hold opposing points <strong>of</strong> view are morally wrong (hence,<br />

immoral). The strength <strong>of</strong> a democracy is in its ability to incorporate differing<br />

points <strong>of</strong> view and to obtain a functional compromise on most issues. Some<br />

issues, however, leave no room for compromise, and it is here that the battle


PRINCIPLED LEADERSHIP 157<br />

for the hearts, minds – and votes – <strong>of</strong> citizens is fought. Regardless <strong>of</strong> what<br />

group wins and what opinion manages to weave itself into the fabric <strong>of</strong> the<br />

law, issues <strong>of</strong> ethics cannot be resolved by majority rule for most people, and<br />

spirited debates continue, sometimes escalating into violence and death in too<br />

many countries around the globe.<br />

4. CHARACTERISTICS OF PRINCIPALED<br />

LEADERS<br />

Fortunately, honest, honorable men and women worthy <strong>of</strong> the respect and<br />

loyalty <strong>of</strong> those they are entrusted to lead can create and promote an ethical<br />

business environment regardless <strong>of</strong> whether their personal ethics are grounded<br />

in the teleology or deontology traditions. I prefer the term principled leadership<br />

to that <strong>of</strong> ethical leadership to denote such individuals precisely because there<br />

is less ambiguity in the former than in the latter term. For me at least, the<br />

qualities that make for a principled leader are easily enumerated, and the<br />

environment that such individuals need in order to thrive and flourish is equally<br />

easily identified. These leaders do not need to consult best practices manuals<br />

or other flavor-<strong>of</strong>-the-month derivative “new” pathway to success. Their<br />

guiding principles are simple, timeless, and work without mystery or magic.<br />

They simply share the following characteristics:<br />

1. They put the interests <strong>of</strong> the institution they serve above their own self<br />

interest;<br />

2. They understand that character is defined by the small acts they perform<br />

when nobody is looking;<br />

3. They recognize that respect must be earned and nurtured over time but can<br />

be lost in an instant;<br />

4. They promote their people, not themselves;<br />

5. They take responsibility for their personal failures and for the failures <strong>of</strong><br />

the group they lead;<br />

6. They share credit for their successes with those who made them possible;<br />

7. They are consistent and predictable in their decision making and in<br />

exercising their discretion;<br />

8. They strive to do what is right rather than what is expedient, regardless <strong>of</strong><br />

the consequences to themselves;<br />

9. They do not fear making unpopular decisions or clearly communicating<br />

their rationale for making such decisions;<br />

10. They only serve institutions that do not require them to compromise their<br />

principles.<br />

Principled leaders make an enormous impact on the organizations they serve at<br />

all levels, and are <strong>of</strong>ten most appreciated after they retire or move on, their<br />

contributions and impact most poignant and palpable in their absence.


158 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

5. CONCLUSION<br />

While we may forever debate the relative worth or practical value <strong>of</strong> the<br />

various schools <strong>of</strong> ethics, there can be no doubt that there are countless<br />

principled leaders whose personal ethics reflect each <strong>of</strong> these divergent views.<br />

Consistency, fairness, conscientiousness, reasonableness, supportiveness and<br />

predictability are among the qualities that earn good leaders the respect and<br />

trust <strong>of</strong> those they are entrusted to lead and are universal virtues in themselves.<br />

Women and men <strong>of</strong> good conscience can arrive at good decisions for the<br />

organizations they lead from a wide range <strong>of</strong> perspectives. And while their<br />

personal ethics will inform their views on issues, it is these other qualities that<br />

will ultimately determine whether they are principled leaders. Strict adherence<br />

to a given ethical philosophy will not guarantee principled leadership, and may<br />

well hinder it. Leaders with an absolutist philosophy (religious <strong>of</strong> secular) can<br />

be inflexible, overly judgmental, and unable to empathize or effectively<br />

interact with those who do not share their views. Likewise, leaders who strictly<br />

follow ethical relativism may face difficulty in setting clear standards,<br />

enforcing rules and providing a predictable, stable administration. And,<br />

clearly, a truly nihilistic individual who acknowledges no valid guiding<br />

principles beyond the attainment <strong>of</strong> goals dictated by their self-interest will<br />

never be a principled leader.<br />

Examining the essential sources <strong>of</strong> our different ethical belief<br />

systems can enhance understanding, allow us to find common ground and<br />

work together towards achieving a common purpose. The personal ethical<br />

values <strong>of</strong> a leader, and the ethical philosophy upon which these are grounded,<br />

may be important elements <strong>of</strong> principled leadership. But an individual’s value<br />

system is not the best yardstick by which to measure principled leadership.<br />

Ultimately, we must judge our leaders by the observable virtues we can glean<br />

from their actions and recognize that good, honorable, effective principled<br />

leaders may hold value systems very different from our own.


159<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

MTN & Airtel’s African tryst: The legal angle<br />

S.V. Adithya Vidyasagar*<br />

Bharti Airtel and MTN have been two telecommunication companies that enjoy<br />

a dominant position in India and South Africa respectively. When an alliance<br />

was first proposed between these to companies, everyone in both the countries<br />

went into frenzy as to how the combined entity would be formed, its structure<br />

and the potential benefits this combined entity would provide to its subscribers<br />

and shareholders. When the deal didn’t get through; infact it fell through twice,<br />

it was as if a match made in heavens was not being allowed to be. The primary<br />

logic which perhaps formed the basis <strong>of</strong> this deal’s failure was that these two<br />

companies were seen in their home territories as prized possessions and their<br />

respective governments were not willing to let them relinquish their national<br />

identities. Keeping this basic premise in mind, this article tries to dwell deep<br />

into the legal issues involved in this deal and how they were instrumental in the<br />

failure <strong>of</strong> this deal. The three primary legal issues involved in this deal were:<br />

(i) Dual Listing <strong>of</strong> the combined entity (ii) FDI regime in India (iii) India’s<br />

Takeover Code. All these issues are discussed in detail in Chapter 3 <strong>of</strong> this<br />

article. Since the deal never actually materialized, the deal structure and the<br />

full monetary aspects <strong>of</strong> the deal were never disclosed. Hence secondary<br />

sources <strong>of</strong> information like leading newspapers, journals etc were utilized to<br />

base this article. The complex legal issues involved in this deal have been<br />

analyzed in a simplified manner for the benefit <strong>of</strong> the general public and to<br />

allow for everyone to appreciate the size and importance <strong>of</strong> the deal. The main<br />

aim <strong>of</strong> this article is to allow for the general public to understand the legal<br />

issues which didn’t allow the deal to go through.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Bharti Airtel and MTN have been two telecommunication companies that<br />

enjoy a dominant position in India and South Africa respectively. When an<br />

alliance was first proposed between these two companies, everyone in both the<br />

countries went into frenzy as to how the combined entity would be formed, its<br />

structure and the potential benefits this combined entity would provide to its<br />

subscribers and shareholders.<br />

When the deal didn’t get through; in fact it fell through twice, it was<br />

as if a match made in heavens was not being allowed to be. The primary logic<br />

<br />

Company Secretary <strong>of</strong> the Institute <strong>of</strong> Company Secretaries <strong>of</strong> India (ICSI); B.Com LL.B (Hons.)<br />

candidate at Gujarat National <strong>Law</strong> <strong>University</strong>, India (Class <strong>of</strong> 2006 - 2011).


160 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

which perhaps formed the basis <strong>of</strong> this deal’s failure was that these two<br />

companies were seen in their home territories as prized possessions and their<br />

respective governments were not willing to let them relinquish their national<br />

identities. Keeping this basic premise in mind, this article tries to dwell deep<br />

into the legal issues involved in this deal and how they were instrumental in the<br />

failure <strong>of</strong> this deal.<br />

The three primary legal issues involved in this deal were: (i) Dual<br />

Listing <strong>of</strong> the combined entity (ii) FDI regime in India (iii) India’s Takeover<br />

Code. All these issues are discussed in detail in Chapter 3 <strong>of</strong> this article. Since<br />

the deal never actually materialized, the deal structure and the full monetary<br />

aspects <strong>of</strong> the deal were never disclosed. Hence secondary sources <strong>of</strong><br />

information like leading newspapers, journals etc were utilized to base this<br />

article.<br />

The complex legal issues involved in this deal have been analyzed in<br />

a simplified manner for the benefit <strong>of</strong> the general public and to allow for<br />

everyone to appreciate the size and importance <strong>of</strong> the deal. The main aim <strong>of</strong><br />

this article is to allow for the general public to understand the legal issues<br />

which didn’t allow the deal to go through.<br />

PROLOGUE<br />

Bharti Airtel Ltd is an India based multinational mobile telecommunications<br />

company. It is the largest cellular service provider in India and makes up for<br />

about 23 per cent <strong>of</strong> the India’s mobile market. 1 The telecom company is led<br />

by India’s telecom czar, Mr. Sunil Mittal who effectively holds a controlling<br />

stake in Bharti Airtel through Bharti Telecom. Bharti Airtel has been keen to<br />

position itself as a transnational corporation with its non-India operations like<br />

Airtel Lanka, Airtel Kenya etc.<br />

The MTN Group is a South Africa based multinational mobile<br />

telecommunications company, operating in many African and Middle Eastern<br />

countries. It has presence in nearly 20 countries in Africa and Middle East.<br />

Bharti Airtel and MTN conducted exclusive negotiations twice, 2 in<br />

just one year to create a transnational alliance which in future could lead to a<br />

full blown merger however both times the negotiations fell through. 3 The<br />

talks attracted the attention <strong>of</strong> the Governments <strong>of</strong> both the countries who kept<br />

a close eye on every move made by these two corporations. With all this<br />

public, industry and media frenzy over a deal which could have easily<br />

1 ‘Subscriber Figures for April 2010’, Cellular Operator Association <strong>of</strong> India, URL: http://coai.com/<br />

Sub%20Figs/GSM%202010/all%20india%20GSM%20cell%20sub%20figures%20-%20Apr%27%2010.<br />

xls (Last visited on 13 May, 2010).<br />

2 The first round began on 5 May, 2008 and the second round on 25 May, 2009.<br />

3 A. Sharma and E. Bellman, ‘Bharti, MTN Disconnect Deal Worth $24 Billion’, The Wall Street <strong>Journal</strong>,<br />

URL: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125431578653952371.html (Last visited on 20 April, 2010).


AIRTEL’S AFRICAN TRYST 161<br />

positioned the combined entity as a leading telecommunications company<br />

worldwide, the deal fell through.<br />

This article tries to understand in simple terms the reasons for<br />

pursuing this deal and the reasons for its fallout from a legal angle. The<br />

various Indian laws applicable to this deal and the reasons for South African<br />

government’s unwillingness to approve a proposed deal structure would be<br />

analyzed. The main thrust <strong>of</strong> this paper is to bring to the fore the importance<br />

<strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> these corporations in their home countries and how each country<br />

was unwilling to let go <strong>of</strong> its home corporation’s national identity.<br />

THE NUMBERS OF THE DEAL<br />

The two companies pegged the transaction size at around USD 23 billion.<br />

Bharti Airtel was to pay around USD 13.1 billion for a 49% stake, with USD 7<br />

billion in cash and USD 6.1 billion in equity. MTN, on the other hand, was to<br />

pay around USD 9.6 billion for its 25% stake in Bharti Airtel (the remaining<br />

11% to be held directly by MTN shareholders). Since MTN was paying USD<br />

2.9 billion in cash as part payment for its stake, the net cash outflow for Bharti<br />

Airtel was estimated at USD 4.1 billion (i.e., the USD 7 billion that Bharti<br />

Airtel was required to pay less the USD 2.9 billion it was supposed to get from<br />

MTN). 4 The transaction could have created the third biggest phone firm (by<br />

subscribers) in the world behind China Mobile and Vodafone Group Plc. A<br />

combined Bharti Airtel-MTN would have more than USD 20 billion in<br />

revenue and over 200 million customers easily allowing it benefits <strong>of</strong> scale. 5<br />

THE SYNERGIES FROM THE DEAL<br />

The two companies would have surely benefited from their respective<br />

technical and services experience. Bharti Airtel had already demonstrated how<br />

managed services (outsourcing key network and IT installations) can be<br />

utilized to handle growing markets such as India. Bharti Airtel operates in a<br />

market where average tariffs per minute on mobile phone calls are less than Re<br />

1 per minute (USD 0.02 per minute), but it still makes a lot <strong>of</strong> money. It cuts<br />

cost by outsourcing network construction and management in a model that is<br />

close to pay per use. It has also outsourced IT, a move considered radical by<br />

even US and European telecom giants. India’s IT firms built their business by<br />

convincing customers elsewhere that their work could get done at lower cost<br />

4 A. R. Khan, ‘Bharti-MTN deal: short-term worries, but long-term gains’, Live Mint, 25 May, 2009, URL:<br />

http://www.livemint.com/2009/05/25231630/BhartiMTN-deal-shortterm-wo.html (Last visited on 26<br />

March, 2010).<br />

5 A. Sharma, ‘Bharti, MTN Near Compromise’, The Wall Street <strong>Journal</strong>, 28 September, 2009, URL: http://<br />

online.wsj.com/article/SB125407120709044251.html (Last visited on 23 March, 2010).


162 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

here. Bharti Airtel operates on a low cost model and was convinced the model<br />

can work in other parts <strong>of</strong> the world or at least in Africa. 6<br />

MTN on the other hand has extensive mobile broadband (3G)<br />

portfolio and has implemented mobile number portability (MNP). With India,<br />

on the verge <strong>of</strong> implementing MNP and 3G looking to pick up steam, the<br />

combined entity would certainly have gained an upper hand. Further, Africa<br />

and large parts <strong>of</strong> West Asia have high customer billings also known as<br />

average revenue per user (ARPU) in the industry running up to USD 18 a<br />

month in countries such as Syria and South Africa which present a revenue<br />

expansion opportunity for Bharti Airtel, which like most Indian players rarely<br />

has ARPU rates <strong>of</strong> more than USD 7. Also, the opportunity for growth in<br />

Africa and India is a positive for both sides. Both Africa and have around 40%<br />

penetrations allowing for a lot <strong>of</strong> opportunity. 7<br />

THE FAILURE OF THE DEAL<br />

After months <strong>of</strong> due diligence and talks between Bharti Airtel and MTN, after<br />

countering a host <strong>of</strong> issues, the deal couldn’t go through because <strong>of</strong> the<br />

‘structural issues’ as stated by the South African government. 8 The deal was<br />

primarily influenced by the following major factors:<br />

1.Dual Listing <strong>of</strong> the combined entity<br />

2.FDI regime in India<br />

3.Indian Takeover Code<br />

Dual listing as per standing South African laws is allowed. 9 However<br />

India currently does not allow dual listing at its stock exchanges. This<br />

presented an unforeseen legal challenge for the structuring <strong>of</strong> the deal<br />

especially given the restrictive Indian laws. Further the FDI regime in India<br />

was changed in early 2009 especially as regards the telecom sector which<br />

further complicated matters. The death bell for the deal was perhaps the<br />

complete U-turn done by the Indian market regulator – SEBI from its earlier<br />

guidance provided to the deal makers and the subsequent amendment <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Takeover Code. All these issues combined with the South African<br />

Government’s unwillingness to let go <strong>of</strong> MTN’s South African identity jointly<br />

failed the deal and are discussed at length in the next chapter.<br />

6 A. Anyimadu, ‘The Economist on MTN’, The Economist, 10 May, 2008 (U.S. Edition).<br />

7 A. Mukherjee, ‘Airwave Sandwich’, Outlook India, 2 June, 2008, URL: http://www.outlookindia.com/<br />

article.aspx?237548 (Last visited on 12 May, 2010).<br />

8 ‘Bharti, MTN call <strong>of</strong>f merger talks’, Bloomberg UTV, 30 September, 2009, URL: http://<br />

www.bloombergutv.com/industry-news/telecom-industry-news/33330/bharti--mtn-call-<strong>of</strong>f-mergertalks.html<br />

(Last visited on 17 April, 2010).<br />

9 For instance Investec is a dual listed company with Investec Plc (listed in London) and Investec Limited<br />

(listed in Johannesburg). Also Mondi Group Plc is listed on the London Stock Exchange and the<br />

Johannesburg Stock Exchange.


AIRTEL’S AFRICAN TRYST 163<br />

THE LAW VIS-À-VIS THE PROPOSED DEAL<br />

The legal setup <strong>of</strong> both the countries presented a unique challenge for this<br />

strategic alliance. Both these companies were market leaders in developing<br />

economies which led to each <strong>of</strong> these companies being seen in their home<br />

territories as prized possessions and their respective governments were not<br />

willing to let them relinquish their national identities.<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the novel suggestions put forth to overcome this national<br />

identity issue was to allow for the combined entity to be dual listed at<br />

Johannesburg and Mumbai. Dual listing is a listing process by which a<br />

company would be allowed to be listed and traded on the stock exchanges <strong>of</strong><br />

two countries. Put simply, it is a process that allows a company to be listed on<br />

the stock exchanges <strong>of</strong> two different countries. The company’s shares, which<br />

enjoy voting rights, can be traded on both the bourses. When two companies<br />

in two countries enter into an equity alliance without an outright merger, dual<br />

listing means continued listing <strong>of</strong> the firms in both the countries. The key<br />

point is that the shareholders can buy and sell shares <strong>of</strong> both the companies on<br />

bourses in the two countries.<br />

In a conventional merger or acquisition, the merging companies<br />

become a single legal entity; with one business buying (for cash or stock) the<br />

outstanding shares <strong>of</strong> the other. However, when a dual listed company is<br />

created, the two companies continue to exist, and to have separate bodies <strong>of</strong><br />

shareholders, but they agree to share all the risks and rewards <strong>of</strong> the<br />

ownership <strong>of</strong> all their operating businesses in a fixed proportion, laid out in a<br />

contract called an ‘equalization agreement’. 10<br />

We will now focus at the legal hurdles in the Indian laws as regards<br />

this dual structure. India currently does not allow dual listing. This is because<br />

there is no full capital account convertibility (CAC) in India. CAC is normally<br />

understood as the freedom to convert local financial assets into foreign<br />

financial assets and vice versa at market determined rates <strong>of</strong> exchange. India<br />

introduced full capital account convertibility first for NRIs in early 2002, 11<br />

and with the decisions in January 2004 it has substantially begun the process<br />

<strong>of</strong> introducing full convertibility for the benefit <strong>of</strong> foreigners. 12 However this<br />

process is still not complete. India is slowly moving in this direction at a slow<br />

and calibrated pace.<br />

Now let us look at the Bharti Airtel-MTN deal from the dual listing<br />

viewpoint. At the 2009 G-20 Summit, a South African minister requested<br />

10 See generally L. Rosenthal and C. Young, ‘The seemingly anomalous price behaviour <strong>of</strong> Royal Dutch/<br />

Shell and Unilever N.V./PLC’, <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> Financial Economics (1990) 26, 123-141.<br />

11 T. G. Arun and J. D. Turner, ‘Financial Sector Reforms: The Indian Experience’, The World Economy,<br />

(2002) 25(3), 429-445.<br />

12 ‘Full convertibility: Caution still the watchword’, The Hindu, 9 February, 2004, URL: http://<br />

www.hindu.com/2004/02/09/stories/2004020900050200.htm (Last visited on 5 May, 2010).


164 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

Indian Finance Minister Mr. Pranab Mukherjee to allow dual listing <strong>of</strong> Bharti<br />

Airtel in India and South Africa. 13 This single move clearly lays down the<br />

importance attached to the deal from South African viewpoint. The Indian<br />

position on CAC is based upon in-depth analysis <strong>of</strong> volume <strong>of</strong> reserves and<br />

reserve management system. The Government <strong>of</strong> India was not willing to<br />

change its policy change on full convertibility <strong>of</strong> rupee at the time <strong>of</strong> the<br />

deal. 14 Even though the case <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong>f exemption in case <strong>of</strong> this deal was<br />

contemplated but it was not thought feasible to due the RBI’s perception <strong>of</strong><br />

the Indian rupee and the fiscal debt position. Hence such an exemption could<br />

not be made possible thereby totally eliminating the dual listing scenario<br />

which the South African government was heavily banking upon to approve<br />

the deal.<br />

On top <strong>of</strong> that the Independent Communications Authority <strong>of</strong> South<br />

Africa also asserted that the proposed deal would require their approval and<br />

may face public hearings before such approval is granted. This new hurdle<br />

was because MTN was a South African company with a footprint in Africa<br />

and the South African government was interested that it should remain<br />

African. 15 This made the passage <strong>of</strong> the deal even more burdensome so much<br />

so on the eve <strong>of</strong> failure <strong>of</strong> Bharti Airtel-MTN, investors rejoiced as shares in<br />

MTN jumped as much as 5.98 percent on the Johannesburg bourse while<br />

Bharti Airtel shares gained as much as 11.58 percent in Mumbai. 16<br />

Another major hurdle was the complex FDI regime applicable to<br />

telecom sector in India. FDI is brought into India by two means. The first is<br />

the approval route, whereby prior approval from the Foreign Investment<br />

Promotion Board (FIPB) is required before making any investment. The<br />

second is the automatic route, whereby no approval from the FIPB is required,<br />

provided that the intended investment fulfils the applicable criteria.<br />

Thereafter, the Reserve Bank <strong>of</strong> India is to be informed within 30 days <strong>of</strong><br />

inward remittance and the necessary documents be filed with the Reserve<br />

Bank <strong>of</strong> India within 30 days <strong>of</strong> shares being issued to foreign investors.<br />

On 13 February, 2009 radical changes were made to the FDI norms<br />

in anticipation <strong>of</strong> increased foreign investment. The Department <strong>of</strong> Industrial<br />

Policy and Promotion issued Press Notes February 2009 and March 2009 and<br />

issued further clarifications on 25 February, 2009 through Press Note April<br />

2009, which expanded upon and modified the various previous policies and<br />

13 P. Sinha, ‘Dual listing to hit Bharti-MTN’, 16 September, 2009, URL: http://times<strong>of</strong>india.indiatimes.com/<br />

biz/india-business/Dual-listing-to-hit-Bharti-MTN/articleshow/5016156.cms (Last visited on 1 June,<br />

2010).<br />

14 ‘Bharti-MTN deal: Dual listing not possible now’, Business Standard, 24 September, 2009, URL: http://<br />

www.business-standard.com/india/news/bharti-mtn-deal-dual-listing-not-possible-now-says-sharma/<br />

74264/on (Last visited on 31 May, 2010).<br />

15 W. Roelf, M. Bosch and D. Cowell, ‘MTN, Bharti deal needs S. Africa govt clearance’, 14 September,<br />

2009, URL: http://in.reuters.com/article/idINLE70811520090914 (Last visited on 4 June, 2010).<br />

16 S. Chaudhry and D. Tripathy, ‘Failure <strong>of</strong> Bharti/MTN talks pleases investors’, 1 October, 2009, URL:<br />

http://in.reuters.com/article/idINIndia-42846420091001 (Last visited on 27 May, 2010).


AIRTEL’S AFRICAN TRYST 165<br />

the method <strong>of</strong> calculating direct and indirect foreign investment.<br />

Press Note February 2009 laid down criteria as to how and when will<br />

a company will be considered to be ‘owned’ and ‘controlled’ by an Indian. It<br />

also clearly differentiated between direct and indirect investment. 17 Press<br />

Note March 2009 further provided that for the assessment <strong>of</strong> FDI, foreign<br />

investment will now include investment by foreign institutional investors,<br />

non-resident Indians, American depositary receipts, global depositary<br />

receipts, foreign currency convertible bonds, convertible preference shares<br />

and convertible currency debentures. These were earlier regulated separately.<br />

It further made it mandatory to procure FIPB approval where the control or<br />

ownership <strong>of</strong> an existing Indian company is transferred by resident Indians<br />

and companies to a non-resident entity as a consequence <strong>of</strong> a transfer <strong>of</strong> shares<br />

through a merger or amalgamation. 18<br />

Press Note April 2009 elucidated the new guidelines for downstream<br />

investment by Indian companies and, specifically, operating companies (i.e.,<br />

those companies undertaking operations in various economic sectors and<br />

activities), investing companies (i.e., those companies holding only<br />

investments in other Indian companies, directly or indirectly) and operatingcum-investing<br />

companies, which were owned or controlled by non-resident<br />

entities. 19 On an overall reading <strong>of</strong> these guidelines it became clear that the<br />

Bharti Airtel-MTN deal was made further complex as these new regulations<br />

changed the definitions <strong>of</strong> important terms like company owned and<br />

controlled by Indians, calculation <strong>of</strong> direct investment, indirect investment,<br />

downstream investment etc. It was apparent that retaining ownership and<br />

control with Indian companies and Indian residents was <strong>of</strong> paramount<br />

importance for the Government <strong>of</strong> India. Thus the deal was again requiring to<br />

be restructured to ensure that the transaction structure minimized the need for<br />

government intervention and approvals.<br />

The last bump was SEBI’s Takeover Code 20 and its recent<br />

amendment. The amended code now mandated that an open <strong>of</strong>fer be made<br />

even if American Depository Receipts (ADRs) and Global Depository<br />

Receipts (GDRs) with voting rights cross the prescribed threshold. Earlier a<br />

stake acquisition <strong>of</strong> more than 15 per cent triggered the open <strong>of</strong>fer<br />

requirement. Depository receipts were however not considered part <strong>of</strong> this<br />

requirement until they were converted into Indian shares but with overseas<br />

investors increasingly seeking voting rights, SEBI decided to amend the<br />

17 Press Note No 2 (2009 Series), Government <strong>of</strong> India, URL: http://siadipp.nic.in/policy/changes/<br />

pn2_2009.pdf (Last visited on 1 June, 2010).<br />

18 Press Note No 3 (2009 Series), Government <strong>of</strong> India, URL: http://siadipp.nic.in/policy/changes/<br />

pn3_2009.pdf (Last visited on 2 June, 2010).<br />

19 Press Note No 4 (2009 Series), Government <strong>of</strong> India, URL: http://siadipp.nic.in/policy/changes/<br />

pn4_2009.pdf (Last visited on 4 June, 2010).<br />

20 SEBI (Substantial Acquisition <strong>of</strong> Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997.


166 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

norms. 21 This was a complete ‘U’-turn by SEBI from its earlier position. In<br />

July 2009 SEBI had through an ‘informal guidance’ exempted MTN from<br />

making an open <strong>of</strong>fer to Bharti Airtel shareholders. At that time, SEBI had<br />

said an open <strong>of</strong>fer would be triggered only once the GDRs issued to MTN and<br />

its shareholders by Bharti Airtel were converted into local shares with voting<br />

rights. 22 This informal guidance was one <strong>of</strong> the main pillars on which the deal<br />

was being structured. This informal guidance seemed to suggest that SEBI<br />

was in favour <strong>of</strong> the deal and necessary exemptions would be granted. In fact<br />

the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) even dismissed a Bharti Airtel<br />

shareholder’s appeal against the informal guidance <strong>of</strong> SEBI on open <strong>of</strong>fer<br />

pertaining to the proposed Bharti Airtel-MTN deal. 23<br />

This new amendment virtually changed the dynamics <strong>of</strong> the deal.<br />

The amendment meant that the South African company would have to pay<br />

around USD 6.6 billion (approx) as it had to buy an additional 20% stake in<br />

Bharti Airtel while making an open <strong>of</strong>fer to Indian shareholders. 24 This<br />

change again changed the mechanics <strong>of</strong> the deal. This additional <strong>of</strong>fer<br />

requirement made the deal less valuable to Bharti Airtel as it would mean<br />

further dilution <strong>of</strong> its stake in favour <strong>of</strong> MTN and more cash outflow for<br />

MTN. This position was unacceptable to both the parties.<br />

THE AFTERMATH<br />

The USD 23 billion deal for the merger <strong>of</strong> Bharti Airtel and MTN fell through<br />

finally on 30 September, 2009. All the issues discussed above seem to have<br />

been the deal-breaker during the tough negotiations which lasted well over a<br />

year. While announcing the calling <strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong> the talks, Bharti Airtel expressed the<br />

hope that the South African government will review its position in the future<br />

and allow both companies an opportunity to re-engage. 25<br />

Both the companies since then have worked on their separate<br />

strategies to achieve their respective objectives. Bharti Airtel in January 2010<br />

announced a deal to acquire 70% stake in Bangladesh based Warid Telecom.<br />

21 A. Bahl, ‘Sebi amends takeover code: may affect Bharti-MTN’, Live Mint, 23 September 2009, URL:<br />

http://www.livemint.com/2009/09/23003600/Sebi-amends-takeover-code-may.html (Last visited on 2<br />

June, 2010).<br />

22 ‘Takeover Code change to impact Bharti-MTN deal’, Business Standard, 23 September, 2009, URL:<br />

http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/takeover-code-change-to-impact-bharti-mtn-deal/21/29/<br />

370971/ (Last visited on 17 May, 2010).<br />

23 R. R. Prasad, ‘SAT dismisses appeal <strong>of</strong> Bharti Airtel shareholder on open <strong>of</strong>fer’, The Hindu Business<br />

Line, 29 August, 2009, URL: http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/2009/08/29/stories/<br />

2009082950711000.htm (Last visited on 25 May, 2010).<br />

24 A. Datta and A. Laskar, ‘Govt backs Bharti-MTN deal, FM says’, Live Mint, 23 September 2009, URL:<br />

http://www.livemint.com/2009/09/23233726/Govt-backs-BhartiMTN-deal-FM.html (Last visited on 3<br />

June, 2010).<br />

25 ‘Bharti calls <strong>of</strong>f $23-bn telecom deal with MTN’, Rediff Business, 30 September, 2009, URL: http://<br />

business.rediff.com/report/2009/sep/30/tech-bharti-mtn-deal-called-<strong>of</strong>f.htm (Last visited on 20 April,<br />

2010).


AIRTEL’S AFRICAN TRYST 167<br />

This is the largest investment in Bangladesh by an Indian company. 26 Bharti<br />

Airtel also created a foreign expansion unit to continue its ambitious<br />

expansion program. 27 Later Kuwait based telecom company Zain, accepted a<br />

USD 10.7 billion <strong>of</strong>fer from Bharti Airtel for Zain’s African assets. Zain’s<br />

Africa assets include around 70 million customers. Zain’s reach is spread<br />

across Africa and the Middle East. 28<br />

On the other hand MTN could reopen merger negotiations with<br />

Reliance Communications. The current proposal to MTN is similar to the one<br />

in 2008 when Reliance Communications had proposed to merge with MTN by<br />

swapping Anil Ambani’s 67% equity holding in the Indian cellular company<br />

with MTN shares. If the deal eventually fructifies, Reliance Communications<br />

will become a subsidiary <strong>of</strong> MTN while Anil Ambani could end up with a 20-<br />

25% holding in MTN, making him its single-largest shareholder. 29 This<br />

would help Anil Ambani circumvent the South African stock exchange<br />

regulations as if an <strong>of</strong>fer is for 35% <strong>of</strong> a company it triggers the rules whereby<br />

that buyer <strong>of</strong> the South African company must extend the <strong>of</strong>fer to other<br />

shareholders. 30<br />

It does seem that both the companies have moved on from the failed<br />

deal but certainly this deal’s exceptional potential because <strong>of</strong> the market<br />

penetration opportunities available in the African markets and the low cost<br />

model running experience <strong>of</strong> Bharti Airtel cannot be ignored. However due to<br />

the multitude <strong>of</strong> legal issues involved in both the countries coupled with the<br />

need to protect the national identity <strong>of</strong> the two corporates involved in their<br />

respective home territories, led to the downfall <strong>of</strong> an alliance which could<br />

have easily been called as a ‘match made in heavens’.<br />

26 N. Mookerji, ‘Bharti seals Warid Telecom deal’, DNA India, 13 January, 2010, URL: http://<br />

www.dnaindia.com/money/report_bharti-seals-warid-telecom-deal_1334087 (Last visited on 4 May,<br />

2010).<br />

27 ‘Bharti Airtel creates unit for foreign expansion’, The Economic Times, 13 January, 2010, URL: http://<br />

economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/news-by-industry/telecom/Bharti-Airtel-creates-unit-for-foreignexpansion/articleshow/5440449.cms<br />

(Last visited on 22 April, 2010).<br />

28 A. N. Ghaswalla, ‘Zain accepts Bharti <strong>of</strong>fer’, The Times <strong>of</strong> India, 15 February, 2010, URL: http://<br />

times<strong>of</strong>india.indiatimes.com/biz/india-business/Zain-accepts-Bharti-<strong>of</strong>fer/articleshow/5574130.cms<br />

(Last visited on 19 April, 2010).<br />

29 ‘MTN to reopen merger lines with Anil Ambani’, The Economic Times, 1 June, 2010, URL: http://<br />

economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/news-by-industry/telecom/MTN-to-reopen-merger-lines-with-Anil-<br />

Ambani/articleshow/5996604.cms (Last visited on 2 June, 2010).<br />

30 ‘Reliance-MTN Deal Offers an Opportunity for Private Equity’, The Wall Street <strong>Journal</strong>, 24 June, 2008,<br />

URL: http://blogs.wsj.com/deals/2008/06/24/reliance-mtn-deal-<strong>of</strong>fers-an-opportunity-for-private-equity/<br />

(Last visited on 27 May, 2010).


169<br />

Limits <strong>of</strong> fair dealing with literary works in India<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

A. Goel*<br />

In this essay, I seek to briefly juxtapose the fair dealing and fair use defences<br />

to copyright infringement and argue that under the Indian Copyright Act,<br />

1957, the narrower exception <strong>of</strong> fair dealing is envisaged and not <strong>of</strong> fair use.<br />

1. INTRODUCTION<br />

Copyright protection in India is granted to original literary, dramatic, musical<br />

and artistic works; cinematograph films and sound recording. 1 For our present<br />

purposes, literary works are important. Although there is no definition <strong>of</strong> what<br />

constitutes a “literary work” under the Copyright Act, the classic definition <strong>of</strong><br />

Peterson J. is generally regarded as a good one, which is that “literary work”<br />

refers to written or printed matter. 2 To bring the Act in line with the TRIPS<br />

obligations, 3 the Parliament amended the Act to bring computer programmes,<br />

tables and compilations including computer databases within the scope <strong>of</strong><br />

“literary works”. 4<br />

Once a copyright is granted, the holder is given certain exclusive<br />

rights like those <strong>of</strong> reproduction, performance, translation and adaption. 5 Any<br />

exercise <strong>of</strong> these exclusive rights by a person not granted a licence 6<br />

constitutes infringement. 7 However, the statute provides certain exceptions, to<br />

which the defendant may take recourse in an infringement suit brought against<br />

him. 8 These exceptions have been incorporated in order to protect the right to<br />

freedom <strong>of</strong> expression guaranteed under the Constitution <strong>of</strong> India. 9 One <strong>of</strong><br />

these many defences is “fair dealing” 10 against claims <strong>of</strong> infringement <strong>of</strong><br />

copyrighted material.<br />

B.A. LL.B. (Hons.), National <strong>Law</strong> School <strong>of</strong> India <strong>University</strong>, Bangalore; Advocate, Punjab and Haryana<br />

High Court, Chandigarh.<br />

1 Section 13, Indian Copyright Act, 1957 (“Copyright Act”).<br />

2 <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> London Press v <strong>University</strong> Tutorial Press Ltd., (1916) 2 Ch. 601, approved by Satsang v<br />

Mukhopadhyay, AIR 1972 Cal 533.<br />

3 Article 10, TRIPS (Marrakesh Agreement), 1994.<br />

4 Section 2(o), Copyright Act.<br />

5 Section 14, Copyright Act.<br />

6 Licence is granted under Section 30, Copyright Act.<br />

7 Section 51, Copyright Act. In RG Anand v Delux Films, AIR 1978 SC 1613, the Court held that an exact<br />

copy <strong>of</strong> the original is not necessary, but there is infringement even if there are resemblances with the<br />

original in large measures. The test for infringement laid down by the Court is this: to see if the reader,<br />

spectator or viewer after having read or seen both the works is clearly <strong>of</strong> the opinion and gets the<br />

unmistakable impression that the subsequent work appears to be a copy <strong>of</strong> the original.<br />

8 Section 52, Copyright Act.<br />

9 Article 19(1) (a), Constitution <strong>of</strong> India. See: Wiley Eastern Ltd. v Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Management, (1996)<br />

PTR 46 (Del).<br />

10 Section 52(1) (a) and 52(1) (b), Copyright Act.


170 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

The raison d’être for such an exception is that an infringing use<br />

which by allowing will cause greater public benefit than by denying it, must<br />

be allowed. 11 Such an exception therefore is included so as to allow members<br />

<strong>of</strong> the public to use copyrighted work fairly without the requirement <strong>of</strong> a<br />

consent or licence from the copyright-holder. In very broad terms, therefore,<br />

the exception seeks to allow fair use <strong>of</strong> copyrighted material because curbing<br />

it would mean impinging on the fundamental right to freedom <strong>of</strong> speech and<br />

expression. In other words, this exception is to balance two competing<br />

interests – on the one hand, the monopoly <strong>of</strong> authors which acts as an<br />

incentive to create, and on the other, that such a monopoly must not come in<br />

the way <strong>of</strong> creative ability <strong>of</strong> others or the right <strong>of</strong> the public to build upon<br />

previous works. 12<br />

2. “FAIR USE” AND “FAIR DEALING” COMPARED<br />

As already stated, fair dealing <strong>of</strong> copyrighted work does not amount to an<br />

infringement under the Copyright Act. Although it has been generally assumed<br />

that fair dealing is roughly equivalent to its American counterpart <strong>of</strong> fair use,<br />

the latter has a wider scope in that it is not restricted to specific purposes. 13<br />

According to Section 107 <strong>of</strong> the US Copyright Act, 1976, there are four factors<br />

for determining ‘fair use’, viz., (i) purpose and character <strong>of</strong> work; (ii) nature <strong>of</strong><br />

copyrighted work; (iii) amount and substantiality <strong>of</strong> the portion used; (iv)<br />

effect on market value <strong>of</strong> the original. 14 On the other hand, fair dealing is<br />

restricted to only the purposes allowed in the Act, viz., ‘private use including<br />

research’; criticism and review; and reporting current events.<br />

The American concept <strong>of</strong> fair use has been contested on the ground<br />

that it is not in line with the TRIPS requirement 15 confining the limitations or<br />

exceptions to the Berne three-step test, 16 which is that reproduction is<br />

permissible only in certain special cases and that it must not conflict with the<br />

normal exploitation <strong>of</strong> the work and must not unreasonably prejudice the<br />

legitimate interests <strong>of</strong> the copyright-holder. Now, the charge leveled against<br />

11 Newby, T.G., “What’s Fair Here is Not Fair Everywhere: Does the American Fair Use Doctrine Violate<br />

International Copyright <strong>Law</strong>?” 51 Stan. L. Rev. 1633 (1999). See also: Sony Corporation v Universal<br />

Studios, 464 US 417, 479-480 (1984). There are jurists who have justified the fair use doctrine in a<br />

Lockean framework. See: Damstedt, B.J., “Limiting Locke: A Natural <strong>Law</strong> Justification for the Fair Use<br />

Doctrine”, 112 Yale L.J. 1179 (2003). Some authors also argue that fair use doctrine does not in any way<br />

protect freedom <strong>of</strong> speech, see: Lockridge, W., “The Myth <strong>of</strong> Copyright’s Fair Use Doctrine As a<br />

Protector <strong>of</strong> Free Speech”, 24 Santa Clara Computer & High Tech. L.J. 31 (2007).<br />

12 Kartar Singh v Ladha Singh, AIR 1934 Lah 777; Eastern Book Co. v Navin Desai, AIR 2001 Del 185.<br />

13 Griffiths, J., “Preserving Judicial Freedom <strong>of</strong> Movement–Interpreting Fair Dealing in Copyright <strong>Law</strong>”,<br />

[2000] IPQ 164. See also: Copinger and Skone, J., Copyright, Volume I (Sweet & Maxwell, London: 15 th<br />

edition, 2005) 481.<br />

14 For a good analysis <strong>of</strong> American law on fair use, see: Fisher III, W.W., “Reconstructing the Fair Use<br />

Doctrine”, 101 Harv. L. Rev. 1659 (1988).<br />

15 Article 13, TRIPS (Marrakesh Agreement), 1994.<br />

16 Article 9(2), Berne Convention for the Protection <strong>of</strong> Literary and Artistic Works. See: Heide, T., “The<br />

Berne Three-Step Test and the Proposed Copyright Directive”, 21(3) EIPR 105 (1999).


LITERARY WORKS IN INDIA 171<br />

Section 107 is that it does not satisfy the first (specific cases) and the third<br />

(unreasonably prejudicing the author’s legitimate interests) requirements <strong>of</strong><br />

the three-step test due to its open-ended guideline nature. 17 The reason for not<br />

enumerating the purposes for which copyrighted work may be fairly used is<br />

that in view <strong>of</strong> rapid technological advancement, Courts must be free to adapt<br />

the doctrine on a case-by-case basis. 18<br />

Different from this is the fair dealing concept, which was inserted in<br />

the UK legislation in 1956 and retained in 1988, 19 and permits fair dealing for<br />

three purposes, viz., research or private study; criticism or review; and<br />

reporting current events. The concept <strong>of</strong> what is ‘fair’ in fair dealing is<br />

difficult to define. Though it is recognised that it is a question <strong>of</strong> degree, it<br />

depends on various factors, like the quantity and proportion <strong>of</strong> original work<br />

used and the use made <strong>of</strong> them. 20 Similar principles to assess ‘fairness’ have<br />

been followed in India. 21<br />

Additional fetters have been placed on fair dealing in the UK, to<br />

bring it in line with the TRIPS requirements – the Act was amended to further<br />

limit the fair dealing for research or private study in two ways – that it must be<br />

for a non-commercial purpose, and that it must be accompanied by sufficient<br />

acknowledgment. 22<br />

The Indian Act is also based on the fair dealing concept, as opposed<br />

to the American fair use approach, as it limits the purposes for which fair<br />

dealing is allowed. Therefore, in the present circumstance when the law on<br />

fair dealing has not been subject to much judicial examination, it is advisable<br />

to prefer the UK approach to the US approach in understanding the Indian<br />

position.<br />

Having examined the scope <strong>of</strong> the fair dealing provisions in the<br />

Indian Act generally, I will now divide the cases existing under two heads:<br />

first, for the purposes <strong>of</strong> ‘private use, including research’, criticism or<br />

review’ 23 and second, for reporting current events. 24 It is noteworthy that both<br />

Section 52(1)(a) and Section 52(1)(b) exclude computer programmes, despite<br />

the fact that computer programmes are literary works. This is because they<br />

have a different set <strong>of</strong> fair dealing provisions in the Act. In the case <strong>of</strong><br />

computer programmes, fair dealing in the form <strong>of</strong> reverse engineering or<br />

temporary backup is recognised as non-infringing for limited purposes as<br />

17 Ricketson, S., “WIPO Study on Limitations and Exceptions <strong>of</strong> Copyright and Related Rights in the<br />

Digital Environment”, 5 April, 2003, WIPO Doc. SCCR/9/7, p. 67-69.<br />

18 Lewis Galoob Toys v Nintendo, Inc., 964 F.2d 965. See also: Weinreb, L.L., “Fair’s Fair: A Comment on<br />

the Fair Use Doctrine”, 103 Harv. L. Rev. 1137 (1990).<br />

19 Section 29, 30, Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988 (“CDPA”).<br />

20 Hubbard v Vosper, [1972] 2 WLR 394 [per Lord Denning, MR].<br />

21 S.K. Dutt v <strong>Law</strong> Book Co., AIR 1954 All 570; Civic Chandran v Ammini Amma, (1996) PTC (16) 670<br />

(Ker).<br />

22 Section 29, CDPA, amended by Section 9, Copyright and Related Rights Regulations, 2003.<br />

23 Section 52(1) (a), Copyright Act.<br />

24 Section 52(1) (b), Copyright Act.


172 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

analysis, inter-operability, and protection against loss and for non-commercial<br />

personal use. 25 All these provisions rely on the same basic principle behind<br />

fair dealing, which is that fair dealing must be permitted for non-economic<br />

purposes <strong>of</strong> study and analysis, but if they affect the copyright-holder’s<br />

market adversely, they must not be allowed.<br />

3. FAIR DEALING FOR “PRIVATE USE,<br />

INCLUDING RESEARCH”, “CRITICISM OR<br />

REVIEW”<br />

Section 52(1)(a) provides for fair dealing for these purposes. In Blackwood v<br />

Parasuraman, 26 the High Court set forth the basic principles for determining<br />

what constitutes “private use”. In that case, the defendant had published guides<br />

for two <strong>of</strong> plaintiff’s books. Fair dealing for the purpose <strong>of</strong> private study was<br />

claimed, but was rejected by the Court. The Court held that private study only<br />

covers the student copying the book for his own use, and not circulation <strong>of</strong><br />

copies among other students. In other words, “private study” has been given a<br />

restricted meaning. However, problems creep up if one notices the change in<br />

wording from “private study” in the erstwhile legislation to “private use” in the<br />

present one, which may mean to include almost any use with the copyrighted<br />

material as long as it is fair. In such a circumstance, one can give a more<br />

plausible meaning to the fair dealing exception here – by limiting the scope <strong>of</strong><br />

“fair” in fair dealing to include only those actions which have no intention to<br />

compete with the original and which do not have any improper or oblique<br />

motives.<br />

An important departure can be witnessed from the UK Act, because<br />

<strong>of</strong> the 2003 Amendment there inserting the non-commercial purpose and<br />

sufficient acknowledgment requirements as aforementioned, and no such<br />

corresponding riders existing in the Indian legislation. However, the concept<br />

<strong>of</strong> fairness itself as has been understood implies that the nature <strong>of</strong> the fair<br />

dealing must be such so as not to affect the pecuniary interests <strong>of</strong> the<br />

copyright-holder by competing with him. The reason why perhaps such a<br />

requirement does not exist in the Indian Act is because it is still <strong>of</strong> foremost<br />

significance to encourage research and study, and regardless <strong>of</strong> whether such<br />

research is carried out by commercial organisations for commercial purposes,<br />

it must be encouraged. It might suffice to say here that India is not ready to<br />

restrict research and study to only non-commercial uses and the scales must<br />

25 Section 52(1) (aa) to (ad), Copyright Act. For the position in US, see: Rice, D.A., “Sega And Beyond: A<br />

Beacon For Fair Use Analysis ... At Least As Far As It Goes”, 19 Dayton L.Rev. 1131 (1994). See also:<br />

Asarch, C.D., “Is Turn About Fair Play? Copyright <strong>Law</strong> and the Fair Use <strong>of</strong> Computer S<strong>of</strong>tware Loaded<br />

into RAM” 95Mich. L. Rev. 654 (1996). In UK, Section 28A, 29(4A) and 50BA, CDPA, inserted by the<br />

2003 Amendment permit making temporary copies <strong>of</strong> computer programmes and observing, testing and<br />

studying computer programmes.<br />

26 AIR 1959 Mad 410.


LITERARY WORKS IN INDIA 173<br />

tilt against the copyright-holder in this respect.<br />

In Syndicate <strong>of</strong> Press <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Cambridge v Kasturi Lal, 27 the<br />

defendant published three guide books with substantial reproduction from the<br />

plaintiff’s books. The Court held that this was an infringement, not falling<br />

within any <strong>of</strong> the exceptions, 28 because Section 52(1) (h) allows reproduction<br />

for the purpose <strong>of</strong> answering questions to be answered in an examination, and<br />

not questions and answers as a whole.<br />

The exception <strong>of</strong> fair dealing for the purposes <strong>of</strong> criticism or review<br />

came for consideration in Civic Chandran v Ammini Amma, 29 where the<br />

Court held that even if the copying is substantial, it is excepted from<br />

infringement if it is for the purpose <strong>of</strong> criticism. Criticism or review may<br />

relate not only to the literary style, but also to the doctrine, philosophy, ideas<br />

or events described by the author.<br />

The situation in the English case <strong>of</strong> Sillitoe v McGraw-Hill Book<br />

Co. 30 may fall within the purview <strong>of</strong> fair dealing in India, although it was held<br />

not excepted there. In that case, the plaintiff had written three stories, and the<br />

defendant had published three booklets in the nature <strong>of</strong> notes, reproducing up<br />

to ten per cent <strong>of</strong> the original work. The Court held that despite the existence<br />

<strong>of</strong> a disclaimer that the notes are not a substitute for the text, the notes did not<br />

amount to fair dealing. Indian Courts have upheld similar fair dealing claims<br />

in Forster v Parasuram 31 and Ramaiah v Lakshmaiah, 32 where publishing<br />

guide books, even for a pr<strong>of</strong>it-making purpose have been held to be falling<br />

within the fair dealing exception. Be that as it may, it is humbly submitted that<br />

these cases are not correctly decided because the element <strong>of</strong> ‘fairness’ as<br />

described above has not been paid due consideration, since these guides<br />

clearly hamper the sale <strong>of</strong> the original works and compete with them, despite<br />

their educational motive.<br />

Parodies also fall within the purview <strong>of</strong> criticism, and constitute fair<br />

dealing. 33 Parodies are a humorous form <strong>of</strong> social commentary, and while<br />

deciding whether a particular work constitutes a valid parody, it must be<br />

established that only that much work is to be copied as would be necessary to<br />

remind the reader, listener or viewer <strong>of</strong> the original work. 34<br />

27 (2006) PTC (32) 487 (Del).<br />

28 s.52, Copyright Act.<br />

29 (1996) PTC (16) 670 (Ker).<br />

30 (1983) FSR 545 (ChD).<br />

31 AIR 1954 Mad 331.<br />

32 (1989) PTC (9) 137 (AP).<br />

33 Campbell v Acuff-Rose Music, 114 S. Ct. 1164. For the normative aspects, see: Posner, R.A., “When is<br />

Parody Fair Use?”, 21 J. Legal Stud. 67 (1992).<br />

34 Woody Allen v National Video, (1985) 610 F Supp 1612.


174 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

4. FAIR DEALING FOR REPORTING CURRENT<br />

EVENTS<br />

Fair dealing with copyrighted material for the purpose <strong>of</strong> reporting current<br />

events in print or broadcast media also accepts the infringer. 35 However,<br />

compilation <strong>of</strong> addresses or speeches is not a fair dealing. 36 In Civic Chandran<br />

v Ammini Amma, the Court laid down that the reproduction <strong>of</strong> the whole work<br />

or a substantial portion <strong>of</strong> it as such will not normally be permitted and only<br />

extracts or quotations from the work. Also, the quantity <strong>of</strong> extracts permissible<br />

will vary from case-to-case. Fair dealing for reporting current events is<br />

permitted because <strong>of</strong> the right to know, held to be a part <strong>of</strong> the right to freedom<br />

<strong>of</strong> speech and expression. 37 In UK, the scope <strong>of</strong> this exception came for<br />

consideration recently in Ashdown v Telegraph Group, 38 where a newspaper<br />

had published extracts <strong>of</strong> a confidential diary minute <strong>of</strong> a political meeting. The<br />

Court rejected the contention that this fell within the fair dealing exception,<br />

because <strong>of</strong> the extent <strong>of</strong> reproduction made for the defendants’ commercial<br />

interests. Having said that, it is submitted that right to privacy 39 and the right<br />

to know must be balanced in such a manner that neither the public is left<br />

unaware, nor is the citizen whose privacy has been impinged upon, is left<br />

without legal recourse.<br />

5. CONCLUSION<br />

While examining the limits <strong>of</strong> fair dealing exceptions in Indian law, the basic<br />

rule <strong>of</strong> statutory interpretation that “exceptions must be construed strictly and<br />

strongly against the party trying to take the benefit” must be regarded. As I<br />

have shown above, fair dealing as a defence is nothing but an exception carved<br />

out from the general rule <strong>of</strong> infringement <strong>of</strong> a copyrighted work. This<br />

exception is to ensure that giving a monopoly to the author <strong>of</strong> the work must<br />

be balanced with the public interest <strong>of</strong> allowing taking on from there and<br />

developing the work through research and study, as also with the right to know<br />

by allowing dealing for the purpose <strong>of</strong> reporting current events. However, these<br />

exceptions must be limited to the purposes permitted in the Act, and such acts<br />

must be construed giving due regard to the rights bestowed on the copyrightholder<br />

under Section 14, instead <strong>of</strong> a broad reading leaving room for judicial<br />

creativity as it exists in American Copyright law. Such a strict reading is<br />

evident from Blackwood v Parasuraman, 40 where the Court held that if the<br />

35 Section 52(1) (b), Copyright Act.<br />

36 Explanation to Section 52(1) (b), Copyright Act.<br />

37 Reliance Petrochemicals v Indian Express Newspapers, (1988) 4 SCC 592.<br />

38 [2001] EWCA Civ. 1142.<br />

39 Also held to be a fundamental right within Article 21, Constitution <strong>of</strong> India. See: Gobind v State <strong>of</strong> M.P.,<br />

(1975) 2 SCC 148.<br />

40 AIR 1959 Mad 410.


LITERARY WORKS IN INDIA 175<br />

purpose <strong>of</strong> reproduction is not one <strong>of</strong> those enumerated in the statute, the<br />

question <strong>of</strong> fair dealing would not arise.<br />

Further, since the defendant claims these defences, the burden <strong>of</strong><br />

pro<strong>of</strong> must lie on him to prove that his infringing acts were fair dealing for the<br />

purposes permitted under the Act. This burden <strong>of</strong> pro<strong>of</strong> is a heavy one and<br />

courts have held that the fair dealing must fall within the four corners <strong>of</strong> the<br />

statutory provisions. The statutory provisions are based on these general<br />

principles that fair dealing is acceptable as a defence only if the reproduction<br />

is reasonable, “i.e.” it does not prejudice the potential sale <strong>of</strong> the original<br />

work; if the purposes for which the reproduction has been done are among<br />

those mentioned in the statute; there is not a substantial extent <strong>of</strong> copying or<br />

appropriation <strong>of</strong> the research <strong>of</strong> the original.<br />

In conclusion, I submit that fair dealing with a strict interpretation <strong>of</strong><br />

the purposes enumerated in the Act must be permissible, and the American<br />

fair use approach must not be favoured. It must always be remembered that<br />

freedom <strong>of</strong> speech and expression does not necessarily involve the<br />

appropriation <strong>of</strong> another’s work.


177<br />

RECENT LEGAL DEVELOPMENTS<br />

LESOTHO<br />

Q. Letsika*<br />

L. Kometsi**<br />

1. ACTS OF PARLIAMENT<br />

1.1 LAND ACT NO. 42 OF 2010<br />

The preamble <strong>of</strong> the Act sets out the main objectives <strong>of</strong> the Act as being to<br />

provide for the grant <strong>of</strong> titles to land and conversion <strong>of</strong> titles to land, the better<br />

securing <strong>of</strong> titles to land and its administration. Section 4 provides that all land<br />

is vested in the Basotho nation. Section 6 sets out qualifications <strong>of</strong> persons<br />

entitled to hold title to land. These include foreign enterprises for investment<br />

purposes but Basotho must hold at least 20% interest in such an enterprise,<br />

companies and partnerships wholly owned by Basotho and societies in their<br />

different forms, international organisations for which Lesotho enjoys similar<br />

reciprocity for purposes relevant to their activities and citizens <strong>of</strong> Lesotho.<br />

Section 9 introduces a new form <strong>of</strong> title to land, namely sectional titles. The<br />

right to sectional titles are enjoyed in a unit within a complex or building<br />

without necessarily exclusively holding title to land on which the complex or<br />

building is attached. Section 10 creates the presumption <strong>of</strong> joint titles in as far<br />

as marriages in community <strong>of</strong> property are concerned.<br />

The Act provides for the institutional framework for administration<br />

<strong>of</strong> land. Section 11 establishes the <strong>of</strong>fice <strong>of</strong> the commissioner <strong>of</strong> lands. The<br />

functions <strong>of</strong> the commissioner include the administration <strong>of</strong> land by keeping<br />

accurate information and records, resolution <strong>of</strong> disputes relating to land,<br />

levying <strong>of</strong> taxes on land and granting <strong>of</strong> consent to transactions relating to<br />

land (Section 12).<br />

In terms <strong>of</strong> section 14 allocation and revocation <strong>of</strong> land in the rural<br />

areas are made by local councils in consultation with the chief both <strong>of</strong> whom<br />

must have jurisdiction in the area. If the land allocated is to be used for<br />

commercial or industrial purposes the local council is obliged to refer the<br />

application for a grant <strong>of</strong> title to the District Council first. A person allocated<br />

residential and agricultural land in a rural area is entitled to apply for a lease in<br />

respect <strong>of</strong> that land (Sections 16 and 18). The commissioner <strong>of</strong> lands is<br />

entitled to refuse to grant a lease if the land is not used in accordance with an<br />

approved development scheme. If the refusal to grant a lease is based on the<br />

* B.A., LL.B (Lesotho), LL.M. (Natal) Senior Lecturer, Faculty <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong>, National <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Lesotho.<br />

** B.A., LL.B (Lesotho), LL.M (Manchester) Lecturer, Faculty <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong>, National <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Lesotho.


178 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

complaint that the allottee breached the conditions <strong>of</strong> the allocation, s/he is<br />

entitled to remedy the breach failing which the allocation could be revoked. In<br />

the event <strong>of</strong> revocation the allottee is entitled to challenge it by way <strong>of</strong> review<br />

proceedings. Allocations relating to land in the urban areas follows almost the<br />

same procedure except that in the event that the allocating authority has to deal<br />

with commercial and industrial grants it must include a representative from the<br />

ministry <strong>of</strong> trade and industry (Section 25). If land is available for title the<br />

minister is obliged to publicise this fact in the gazette and the commissioner <strong>of</strong><br />

lands must publicise this fact in at least one <strong>of</strong> the newspapers circulating in the<br />

country and invite applications for grant <strong>of</strong> title (Sections 26 and 27). A person<br />

affected by the notice is entitled to object to the grant <strong>of</strong> title by challenging<br />

such notice before a district land court within one month from the date <strong>of</strong><br />

publication (Section 28). Titles in the urban areas are held through a leasehold<br />

system (Section 30). A lease can only be terminated if the lessee is in breach <strong>of</strong><br />

its terms and has failed to comply with a notice from the commissioner calling<br />

upon her/him to remedy the breach within a reasonable specified period <strong>of</strong> time<br />

(Section 37). Upon the expiry <strong>of</strong> the period <strong>of</strong> the lease the lessee is entitled to<br />

the first option for a new lease over the land (Section 38). A lessee may<br />

extinguish his/her rights to land by surrendering the lease or through<br />

abandonment <strong>of</strong> land (Sections 39 and 43).<br />

The Act authorises the government to expropriate land for public<br />

purposes or in the public interest. The minister is entitled to set aside and<br />

declare in a gazette land required for public purposes after consultation with<br />

the allocating authority (Section 48). The Act sets out circumstances that are<br />

considered to be in the public interest or for which land may be acquired for<br />

public purposes (Section 50 and 51). The state is obliged to compensate title<br />

holders if their land is expropriated and the Act sets out the scheme <strong>of</strong><br />

principles which the state must uphold in expropriating land (Sections 52 to<br />

60).<br />

Finally, the Act provides for the scheme <strong>of</strong> regularisation. The<br />

commissioner <strong>of</strong> lands after consultation with the chief and residents <strong>of</strong> the<br />

area selected for regularisation must prepare a scheme <strong>of</strong> regularisation in<br />

accordance with the regulations and in conjunction with an allocating<br />

authority in whose jurisdiction the proposed scheme is to take place (Section<br />

61). Upon approval <strong>of</strong> the scheme the minister declares the area to which it<br />

applies in a gazette and thereafter the commissioner assumes responsibility for<br />

implementing the scheme (Sections 61, 62 and 63).<br />

1.2 EDUCATION ACT NO. 20 OF 2010<br />

The main purpose <strong>of</strong> this Act is to make provision for free and compulsory<br />

primary education (Section 3). Parents are obliged to enrol children aged six up


RECENT LEGAL DEVELOPMENTS – LESOTHO 179<br />

to an age determined by the minister in independent or public schools. They are<br />

obliged to provide learners with full opportunity and guidance to complete<br />

primary education (Section 4 (b)). Attendance at schools is compulsory and<br />

learners are obliged to attend their school every day. Learners can only be<br />

absent if parents provide reasons acceptable to a principal or if a school where<br />

the learner attends gives notice to a parent that the learner has been excused<br />

from attending classes on the grounds that the learner is suffering from an<br />

infectious or contagious disease (Section 6). Where a learner fails to attend<br />

school regularly the parent <strong>of</strong> such learner becomes liable to a criminal<br />

conviction, which may attract community service, fine or custodial sentence<br />

(Section 6(5)). All schools must be registered in accordance with the provisions<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Act (Section 7). The Act establishes an inspectorate <strong>of</strong> schools whose<br />

main function is to supervise schools. The inspectorate inspects the work <strong>of</strong><br />

each school annually, monitors effectiveness <strong>of</strong> tests and examinations,<br />

appraises performance <strong>of</strong> principals <strong>of</strong> schools and performs other functions as<br />

the minister may prescribe (Section 18).<br />

The management <strong>of</strong> schools is undertaken by school principals<br />

(Section 20). In terms <strong>of</strong> section 21 schools are governed by the school<br />

boards. The Act also establishes the Education Advisory Council whose role<br />

is to advise the minister about school curriculum, terms and conditions <strong>of</strong><br />

service for teachers, funding <strong>of</strong> schools and quality assessment (Sections 28<br />

and 29). The Teaching Service Commission is another institution established<br />

by the Act (Section 41). Its main functions are to appoint, promote, demote,<br />

transfer and remove from <strong>of</strong>fice teachers whose salaries are paid by the<br />

government (Section 42). Part X <strong>of</strong> the Act provides for the appointment,<br />

promotion, demotion, transfer or removal from <strong>of</strong>fice <strong>of</strong> teachers other than<br />

those teachers whose salary is paid by the government. Any disputes <strong>of</strong><br />

interest arising in relation to the application <strong>of</strong> the Act must be conciliated by<br />

the Conciliation Board (Section 59). Disputes <strong>of</strong> rights are resolved through<br />

arbitration (Section 68). The Act establishes the Teaching Service Tribunal,<br />

which deals with appeals instituted by a teacher, a trade union or employer<br />

arising from a grievance and disciplinary action.<br />

1.3 WATER AND SEWAGE COMPANY<br />

(PROPRIETARY) LIMITED (ESTABLISHMENT<br />

AND VESTING) ACT NO. 54 OF 2010<br />

The purpose <strong>of</strong> the Act is to establish a government-owned company to be<br />

known as Water and Sewerage (Proprietary) Limited (Section 3). After<br />

incorporation <strong>of</strong> this company all the assets, liabilities, rights and obligations<br />

<strong>of</strong> the existing parastatal known as Water and Sewerage Authority vest in the


180 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

new company (Section 4). All employees <strong>of</strong> the parastatal will be transferred<br />

to the new company (Section 5).<br />

1.4 LAND ADMINISTRATION AUTHORITY ACT NO.<br />

43 OF 2010<br />

This Act establishes the Land Administration Authority as a body corporate<br />

with perpetual succession and common seal capable <strong>of</strong> suing and being sued in<br />

its own name (Section 4). The main function <strong>of</strong> the authority is to act as the<br />

government’s agency responsible for land administration. In discharging its<br />

functions it operates under the general supervision <strong>of</strong> the minister responsible<br />

for land affairs (Section 5). The authority is governed by a board <strong>of</strong> directors<br />

(Section 6). The director general administers and is responsible for the daily<br />

operations <strong>of</strong> the authority (Section 9). The board is responsible for appointing<br />

such number and grades <strong>of</strong> heads <strong>of</strong> departments <strong>of</strong> the authority as the board<br />

may deem necessary for the efficient and effective discharge <strong>of</strong> its functions.<br />

The appointments are made on the recommendation <strong>of</strong> the director general. All<br />

other <strong>of</strong>ficers and staff <strong>of</strong> the authority are appointed by the director general<br />

(Section 21). In terms <strong>of</strong> section 27 <strong>of</strong> the Act all property which immediately<br />

before the commencement <strong>of</strong> the Act was vested in the government for use in<br />

land administration will vest in the authority upon the commencement <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Act.<br />

2. JUDICIAL DECISIONS<br />

2.1 CONTEMPT OF COURT<br />

Lerotholi Polytechnic and Another v Blandinah Lisene Court <strong>of</strong> Appeal Civil<br />

Case No. 25 <strong>of</strong> 2009 (delivered on 11 June 2010) (unreported).<br />

Mrs Lisene (the respondent) was dismissed from her employment as<br />

a lecturer on the 12 March, 2007 following a disciplinary hearing at which she<br />

was found guilty <strong>of</strong> gross misconduct. She referred a claim <strong>of</strong> unfair dismissal<br />

to the Directorate <strong>of</strong> Dispute Prevention and Resolution (DDPR) for<br />

arbitration. The DDPR dismissed the claim and found in favour <strong>of</strong> the<br />

employer. Immediately after this the employer engaged the services <strong>of</strong><br />

another lecturer to replace the respondent. Being dissatisfied with the DDPR’s<br />

award the respondent approached the Labour Court for an order reviewing and<br />

setting aside the award. She was successful in this regard. The Labour Court<br />

ordered reinstatement <strong>of</strong> the respondent and directed the employer to pay her<br />

salary from the date <strong>of</strong> the purported dismissal. The employer appealed the<br />

decision <strong>of</strong> the Labour Court. The Labour Appeal Court dismissed the appeal<br />

and confirmed the decision <strong>of</strong> the Labour Court.


RECENT LEGAL DEVELOPMENTS – LESOTHO 181<br />

The respondent presented herself at work the following day after<br />

judgment was granted in her favour. The employer, being in a dilemma since<br />

it had already replaced her position after the DDPR’s award, requested her to<br />

stay at home until the question <strong>of</strong> what she could do was resolved. She was<br />

also told that in the meantime arrangements would be made for the payment <strong>of</strong><br />

her salary together with arrear salary. The respondent was paid her back-pay<br />

together with salary during the months she spent at home. Subsequent to this<br />

she launched contempt <strong>of</strong> court proceedings against the employer in the<br />

Labour Appeal Court alleging that instead <strong>of</strong> reinstating her, the employer<br />

wanted to retrench her. The Labour Appeal Court held that the employer was<br />

in contempt because it failed to allow the respondent to resume her teaching<br />

responsibilities. The employer appealed this decision.<br />

The Court <strong>of</strong> Appeal set aside the decision <strong>of</strong> the Labour Appeal<br />

Court on the ground that the respondent failed to prove beyond reasonable<br />

doubt that employer’s non-compliance with the reinstatement order was wilful<br />

and mala fide. It held that the employer was in a dilemma after the<br />

reinstatement order, but that the employer did not sit back when faced with<br />

this situation. The appeal was therefore allowed.<br />

2.2 SUCCESSION TO CHIEFTAINSHIP<br />

Neko Tsepo Qefate Nkuebe v Minister <strong>of</strong> Local Government and Three Others<br />

Court <strong>of</strong> Appeal Civil Case No. 41 <strong>of</strong> 2009 (delivered on 23 April 2010)<br />

(Unreported)<br />

This matter concerned a contest for the <strong>of</strong>fice <strong>of</strong> principal chief <strong>of</strong><br />

Quthing and Sebapala after the demise <strong>of</strong> the incumbent Chief Qefate<br />

Nkuebe. The appellant (applicant in the court a quo) is the third son born <strong>of</strong><br />

the late Chieftainess Mahlabathe Nkuebe while the marriage between herself<br />

and the chief was still subsistent. The family had nominated the fourth<br />

Respondent (his eldest brother) as successor to the <strong>of</strong>fice <strong>of</strong> the chief. The<br />

appellant applied to the High Court to stay the process leading to the final<br />

succession to the principal chieftainship <strong>of</strong> Quthing and Sebapala pending<br />

finalization <strong>of</strong> the matter. His basis was that he was the only legitimate son<br />

and successor <strong>of</strong> the late chief. The appellant wanted an order, which would<br />

subject him and the fourth respondent to a DNA test in order to bring this<br />

matter to finality. This application was dismissed by the High Court.<br />

On appeal the main issue was who was entitled to succeed to the<br />

<strong>of</strong>fice <strong>of</strong> the chief. This question was decided on the basis <strong>of</strong> section 10 <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Chieftainship Act No. 22 <strong>of</strong> 1968, which is to the effect that, the first born<br />

legitimate son <strong>of</strong> the only marriage should succeed. The court noted that under<br />

customary law, the fourth respondent would be regarded as the deceased’s<br />

legitimate son because he was so accepted through customary rites. The


182 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

contention by the appellant was that the ultimate test contemplated by section<br />

10 <strong>of</strong> the Chieftainship Act was not to be found under customary law but<br />

under common law.<br />

Applying the South African case <strong>of</strong> Surmon v Surmon 1926 AD 47,<br />

the court opined that the fact that the fourth respondent was born during the<br />

subsistence <strong>of</strong> the marriage between the deceased and his wife gave rise to a<br />

rebuttable presumption <strong>of</strong> legitimacy. The onus <strong>of</strong> rebutting such a<br />

presumption lied with the appellant as he was the one challenging the<br />

legitimacy. On the basis <strong>of</strong> the common law as well as customary law<br />

principles the court dismissed the appeal with costs.<br />

2.3 CRIMINAL LAW – FRAUD<br />

The Crown v Motsotuoa Bernard Ntaote Court <strong>of</strong> Appeal Criminal Case No.<br />

13 <strong>of</strong> 2009 (delivered on the 23 rd April 2010) (unreported)<br />

A deputy commissioner <strong>of</strong> the Lesotho Mounted Police Service<br />

(LMPS) was indicted in the High Court on two counts <strong>of</strong> fraud in that he<br />

misrepresented to the treasury, in respect <strong>of</strong> two separate international<br />

journeys. First, he had represented that he was entitled to subsistence<br />

allowance at the full daily rate. Second, that, inter alia, the minister had<br />

authorized payment to him accordingly. It was alleged that he made all these<br />

representations knowing that they were false and thereby induced the treasury<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficials to pay him the full rate, while he was entitled to one quarter <strong>of</strong> the<br />

rate. The court a quo returned the verdict <strong>of</strong> not guilty, hence the appeal by the<br />

Crown.<br />

On the first count the respondent had submitted claims in respect <strong>of</strong><br />

himself and the team with which he was going to the Republic <strong>of</strong> South<br />

Africa. He subsequently discovered that he was going to be paid on a quarter<br />

rate. He then approached the financial controller and demanded payment at<br />

the full rate. He argued that he qualified for the full rate and he would bring<br />

documentation to prove that he was so qualified. He continued to press the<br />

financial controller for the full rate and the financial controller duly relented.<br />

In respect <strong>of</strong> the second count an allowance <strong>of</strong> a quarter rate had been<br />

authorized for the respondent as well as two other persons accompanying him.<br />

Again respondent was said to have gone to the treasury to persuade them to<br />

change the payment from a quarter rate into a full rate and this was done.<br />

The respondent denied any wrong doing. The court held that, the<br />

Crown failed to establish that the respondent was in no circumstance entitled<br />

to the payment in full rate on the one count. Therefore that the first<br />

misrepresentation that he was entitled to the full allowance was not proved.<br />

The Court convicted him on the other count on the ground that the respondent<br />

misrepresented to the treasury that the full amount was authorized by the


RECENT LEGAL DEVELOPMENTS – LESOTHO 183<br />

minister. The appeal therefore succeeded in part. The matter was remitted to<br />

the High Court sentencing.<br />

2.4 DELICT – INJURIA (INVASION OF PRIVACY)<br />

Francina Malefu Letsieloa v Ernest Lethoko Khobethi and Others Court <strong>of</strong><br />

Appeal Civil Case No.10 <strong>of</strong> 2009 (delivered on 23 April 2010) (unreported)<br />

The appellant instituted maintenance proceedings in South Africa on<br />

behalf <strong>of</strong> her children and herself. This matter did not proceed and was<br />

removed from the roll on the basis that the appellant was a Lesotho national.<br />

The appellant then claimed damages arising out <strong>of</strong> the first respondent’s<br />

disclosure <strong>of</strong> confidential information concerning the appellant to a court in<br />

South Africa. The appellant alleged that the disclosure was given in breach <strong>of</strong><br />

the first respondent’s oath <strong>of</strong> secrecy made in terms <strong>of</strong> regulation 106 <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Public Service Regulations <strong>of</strong> 2005 and that as a result her claim for<br />

maintenance in the said court had been removed from the roll. The appellant<br />

further alleged that first respondent sent information in the form <strong>of</strong> a letter and<br />

copies <strong>of</strong> pay-slips to an address in South Africa. The appellant contended that<br />

the consequence <strong>of</strong> the first respondent’s action damaged her personality,<br />

invaded her right to privacy, dignity and reputation. She therefore claimed<br />

damages totaling R65 000.00.<br />

The court held that the right to privacy does not depend on plaintiff’s<br />

wishes, but rather that the boundary <strong>of</strong> the individual’s right or its<br />

infringement remains an objective question. It then held that the information<br />

communicated by first respondent to the South African court and the<br />

appellant’s husband were neither <strong>of</strong>fensive nor disparaging. The Court<br />

concluded that the information was factually correct and was transmitted to a<br />

judicial institution <strong>of</strong> a neighbouring state. The documents dealt with matters<br />

that were germane and, indeed, essential to the determination <strong>of</strong> the issue with<br />

which that court was concerned. Had the first respondent not disclosed those<br />

facts, the appellant would have been obliged to do so herself in the<br />

proceedings which she had instituted. The court held therefore that neither<br />

was there injuria because there was no infringement <strong>of</strong> the appellant’s rights.<br />

The appeal was therefore dismissed with costs.


185<br />

1. INTRODUCTION<br />

ZIMBABWE<br />

J. Pfumorodze*<br />

This paper seeks to discuss the recent legal developments in Zimbabwe in the<br />

context <strong>of</strong> the Global Political Agreement, (GPA), an interparty agreement for<br />

a power sharing government, and the Constitutional Amendment Number 19.<br />

Its main focus is on the Constitutional Commissions four independent<br />

commissions which were established by the Constitutional Amendment No 19.<br />

These commissions are the Human Rights Commission; the Zimbabwe Media<br />

Commission; the Zimbabwe Electoral Commission and the Zimbabwe anti-<br />

Corruption Commission. Concerning these commissions, the main areas <strong>of</strong><br />

coverage are: establishment and composition <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> these commissions;<br />

their functions and powers and what has been done to operationalise these<br />

independent commissions.<br />

2. BRIEF BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT<br />

Since the year 2000 the political and economic situation in Zimbabwe has been<br />

deteriorating very rapidly. Whilst the then Zimbabwe African National Union<br />

(Patriotic Front) (ZANU PF) government blamed west imposed “sections” for<br />

this bad economic situation, the then opposition Movement for Democratic<br />

Change (MDC) blamed poor governance as the source <strong>of</strong> Zimbabwe’s<br />

economic and political situation. This debate still rages on up to this day. By<br />

the end <strong>of</strong> 2008, the political situation was very tense and the economic<br />

situation was simply unbearable. This was exacerbated by the pre and post<br />

2008 elections violence which left many dead, injured or houses destroyed. It<br />

is in this context that the international community, especially the Southern<br />

Africa Development Community (SADC), facilitated the GPA which paved<br />

way for power sharing government and constitutional Amendment No 19. The<br />

former paved way for the making <strong>of</strong> the new constitution whilst the latter<br />

included important constitutional commissions. The focus <strong>of</strong> this update is on<br />

the four constitutional commissions only.<br />

3. THE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION<br />

The Constitutional Amendment No.19 provides for the Zimbabwe Human<br />

Rights Commission (section 100R). This commission is consisted <strong>of</strong> a<br />

* LLB.S (UZ); LL.M (Cume Laude) (UWC&Amsterdam); Lecturer, Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong>, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Botswana</strong>. Email: jimpfumo@gmail.com


186 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

chairperson and eight other members, at least four <strong>of</strong> whom shall be women.<br />

This ensures gender balance and is in line with the Zimbabwe’s Gender Policy.<br />

The functions <strong>of</strong> this commission include promotion <strong>of</strong> awareness and respect<br />

for human rights and freedoms; promoting the department <strong>of</strong> human rights and<br />

freedoms; monitoring and assessing the observance <strong>of</strong> human rights in<br />

Zimbabwe; investigating allegations <strong>of</strong> human rights violations and assisting<br />

in the preparation <strong>of</strong> state reports to regional and international bodies<br />

concerning human rights treaties conventions and agreements to which<br />

Zimbabwe is a party.<br />

In order to execute its mandate, the Commission is vested with<br />

certain powers. These include the power to take over and continue any<br />

investigation that has been instituted by the Public Protector, where it<br />

determines that the dominant question in issue involved a matter pertinent to<br />

its functions. Furthermore, the Parliament can make law which confess the<br />

Commission with power to conduct investigations on its own initiative or on<br />

receipt <strong>of</strong> complainants; to visit and inspect prisons, detention centres, and<br />

refugee campus to assess the conditions it inmates are kept there conditions to<br />

the appropriate minister. It has also the power to visit and inspect psychiatric<br />

hospitals and rehabilitation centres and make recommendations to the<br />

responsible minister. The Commission has the power to secure or provide<br />

appropriate redress for violations <strong>of</strong> human rights and for injustice.<br />

Members <strong>of</strong> the Human Rights Commission were sworn in on 31<br />

March 2010. The Zimbabwe Human Rights Bill is being drafted by the<br />

Ministry <strong>of</strong> Justice and Legal Affairs. This Bill seeks to provide for the<br />

operationalisation <strong>of</strong> the Zimbabwe Human Rights Commission. It is also<br />

anticipated that the Commission should have the power to comment on Bills<br />

that may in one way or the other violate the human rights principles contained<br />

in the Constitution or international treaties to the Zimbabwe is a party. This is<br />

dome in consultation with the Parliamentary Legal Committee. The principles<br />

<strong>of</strong> the proposed bill were approved on the 6 July, 2010 and drafting<br />

instructions have been sent to the Attorney General’s Office.<br />

4. THE ZIMBABWE MEDIA COMMISSION<br />

The Zimbabwe Media Commission (ZMC) succeeded the Media and<br />

Information Commission (MIC) which was set up by the Access to Information<br />

and Protection <strong>of</strong> Privacy Act (AIPPA) in 2002. The provisions for this<br />

Commission were incorporated into sections 100N to 100Q <strong>of</strong> the Constitution.<br />

This Commission is composed <strong>of</strong> a “chairperson and eight other members<br />

appointed by the President from a list <strong>of</strong> not fewer than we nominees submitted<br />

by the Committee on Standing Rules and orders. For one to be appointed as a


RECENT LEGAL DEVELOPMENTS – ZIMBABWE 187<br />

commissioner, he or she must have knowledge and experience in the press,<br />

print or electronic media or broadcasting.<br />

The main functions <strong>of</strong> the Commission are to uphold and develop<br />

freedom <strong>of</strong> the press, to promote and enforce good practice and ethics in the<br />

press, print and electronic media, and broadcasting; to ensure that the people<br />

<strong>of</strong> Zimbabwe have equitable and wide access to information. It also to ensure<br />

the equitable use and development <strong>of</strong> all indigenous languages spoken in<br />

Zimbabwe.<br />

Section 100Q <strong>of</strong> the Constitution <strong>of</strong> Zimbabwe provides that for the<br />

powers <strong>of</strong> the ZMC it provides that an Act <strong>of</strong> Parliament may confer powers<br />

on the ZMC including the power to conduct investigations and inquires into<br />

any conduct or circumstance that appears to threaten the freedom <strong>of</strong> the<br />

media. In addition, it has also the power to take disciplinary action against<br />

journalists and other persons employed in the media industry, who are found<br />

to have breached any law or any code <strong>of</strong> conduct applicable to them.<br />

Members <strong>of</strong> the ZMC were sworn in by the President on 31 March<br />

2010. It is note worthy that it was not necessary to pass another Act <strong>of</strong><br />

Parliament before the ZMC is set up. AIPPA, as amended in January 2008,<br />

already contains ample provision enabling the Commission to carry out<br />

functions conferred on it by the constitution and the additional functions<br />

conferred on it by AIPPA. This commission is already operational.<br />

5. ZIMBABWE ELECTORAL COMMISSION<br />

This Commission is established in terms <strong>of</strong> section 100B to 100J <strong>of</strong> the<br />

constitution. It is consisted <strong>of</strong> a chairperson and eight other people appointed<br />

by the President. The chairperson is appointed by the President after<br />

consultation with the Judicial Service Commission and the Committee on<br />

standing rules and orders. The chairperson must be a judge or former judge <strong>of</strong><br />

the Supreme Court or the High Court, or a person qualified for appointment as<br />

such a judge. Eight other members are appointed by the President from a list <strong>of</strong><br />

not fewer than twelve nominees submitted by the Committee on Standing<br />

Rules and Orders. Of these eight at least four members must be women. This<br />

ensures gender balance. For one to be appointable to this Commission he or she<br />

must have integrity and experience and competence in the conduct <strong>of</strong> affairs in<br />

the public or private sector. Members <strong>of</strong> the Commission are appointed for a<br />

term <strong>of</strong> six years and their appointment may be renowned for one further term<br />

only. Members <strong>of</strong> Parliament, public <strong>of</strong>ficers and employees <strong>of</strong> statutory<br />

bodies and local government are disqualified for appointment to the Zimbabwe<br />

Electoral Commission. Furthermore, members <strong>of</strong> the Commission must not be<br />

members <strong>of</strong> the political party. The constitution also provides for the removal<br />

<strong>of</strong> a member from <strong>of</strong>fice. The chairperson is removed from <strong>of</strong>fice by the


188 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />

President, with the approval <strong>of</strong> both the Judicial Service Commission and the<br />

Committee on Standing Rules and Orders. Other members are removed with<br />

the approval <strong>of</strong> the Commission and the Committee on Standing Rules and<br />

Orders. The grounds for removal from <strong>of</strong>fice include inability to exercise the<br />

functions <strong>of</strong> member’s <strong>of</strong>fice due to physical or mental incapacity; misconduct;<br />

incompetence and or if one becomes disqualified for appointment to the<br />

Commission.<br />

The Commission’s functions include preparation for, conduct and<br />

supervision <strong>of</strong> elections to the <strong>of</strong>fice <strong>of</strong> the President and Parliament; to the<br />

governing bodies <strong>of</strong> local authorities and referendums. It also compiles<br />

voters’ rolls and registers, designs, prints and distributes ballot boxes; and<br />

delimitation <strong>of</strong> constituencies and wards. Currently, the Bill which seeks to<br />

operationalise the Commission is being drafted by the Attorney General’s<br />

Office.<br />

6. ZIMBABWE ANTI-CORRUPTION COMMISSION<br />

Sections 100K to 100M provide for the establishment and composition <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Zimbabwe Anti-Corruption Commission, its functions and powers. This<br />

Commission should consist <strong>of</strong> at least four and no more than nine members<br />

appointed by the President in consultation with the Committee on Standing<br />

Rules and Orders. Members should be persons <strong>of</strong> integrity chosen for their<br />

knowledge <strong>of</strong> and experience in administration or the prosecution or<br />

investigation <strong>of</strong> crime.<br />

The functions <strong>of</strong> this Commission include combating corruption,<br />

theft, misappropriation, abuse <strong>of</strong> power and other inappropriate conduct <strong>of</strong><br />

affairs in both the public and private sectors. It also makes recommendations<br />

to the government and to organisations in the private sector on measures to<br />

enhance integrity and accountability and prevent corruption.<br />

The Constitution further provides that Parliament should enact<br />

legislation which confers powers on the Anti-Corruption Commission. These<br />

powers include conducting investigations and inquiries, and to secure<br />

prosecution <strong>of</strong> persons concerning corruption, theft, misappropriation, abuse<br />

<strong>of</strong> power and other improprieties.<br />

7. CONCLUSION<br />

The four independent commissions discussed above are no doubt a welcome<br />

development. Some <strong>of</strong> them are now operational whilst some are awaiting<br />

legislation which operationalise them. At this stage, it is premature to judge the<br />

effectiveness <strong>of</strong> these Commissions especially that Zimbabwe is still in


RECENT LEGAL DEVELOPMENTS – ZIMBABWE 189<br />

transition. What can be said is that the power sharing government has worked<br />

positively in coming up with these independent constitution commissions.


UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL<br />

LIBRARY RECOMMENDATION FORM<br />

Dear Librarian/Library/Library Acquisition Committee,<br />

I would like to recommend a subscription to the<br />

<strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Journal</strong><br />

Name:....................................................................................................<br />

...............................................................................................................<br />

Position:................................................................................................<br />

Department:...........................................................................................<br />

Signature:..............................................................................................


UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL<br />

ORDER FORM<br />

Please enter my annual subscription to the <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Journal</strong>,<br />

2 issues ISSN 1817-2733<br />

SUBSCRIPTION TYPE<br />

(Please tick type that applies)<br />

Annual institutional rate (Africa) P280 (US$ 50)<br />

Annual institutional rate (Europe and America) P400 (US$ 80)<br />

Annual individual rate (Africa) P100 (US$ 20)<br />

Annual individual rate (Europe and America) P200 (US$ 40)<br />

(All rates include postage)<br />

METHOD OF PAYMENT<br />

Cheque enclosed (<strong>Botswana</strong> Bank - include P15 for charges)<br />

Foreign Cheques (By special arrangements)<br />

Name/Organisation:...........................................................................................<br />

Mailing Address:...............................................................................................<br />

...........................................................................................................................<br />

Postal Code:.......................................................................................................<br />

Telephone:.........................................................................................................<br />

Fax:....................................................................................................................<br />

E-mail:...............................................................................................................<br />

Address all cheques to: <strong>Botswana</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Journal</strong><br />

All business correspondence, including order and remittances relating to<br />

subscriptions as well as advertising should be addressed to:<br />

The Editor-in-Chief<br />

<strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Journal</strong><br />

Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong><br />

<strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong><br />

Private Bag UB 00705, Gaborone<br />

<strong>Botswana</strong>


GUIDELINES FOR THE SUBMISSION OF ARTICLES AND OTHER SUBMISSIONS<br />

1. Contributions in the form <strong>of</strong> articles, notes, comments or reviews, should be word-processed, doublespaced<br />

and should be provided in electronic form, either by email or in hard copy to:<br />

The Editor-in- Chief<br />

<strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Journal</strong><br />

Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong><br />

<strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong><br />

Private Bag UB 00705 Gaborone<br />

<strong>Botswana</strong><br />

Email:ublj@mopipi.ub.bw<br />

2. One hard copy, double-spaced and printed on A4/letter paper (using one side <strong>of</strong> the paper only) may<br />

accompany an electronic version. A hard copy should be supplied in addition to the electronic version<br />

wherever a contribution contains graphs, tables, or any other significant formatting.<br />

3. In the case <strong>of</strong> articles, an abstract <strong>of</strong> not more than 300 words should be submitted with the contribution.<br />

4. Articles and other submissions are sent to three independent referees. To enable the refereeing procedure<br />

to be anonymous and impartial, the name(s) and institution(s) <strong>of</strong> the author(s) should not be included at the<br />

head <strong>of</strong> the article, but should be typed on a separate sheet and submitted with it. This sheet should also<br />

indicate the address, telephone number, fax number, email address, academic qualifications, institutional<br />

affiliations (where appropriate), and any other identifying material.<br />

5. All submissions should be original pieces that are written in a clear and straightforward style.<br />

6. The titles <strong>of</strong> submissions should be brief, attractive and accurate in describing what the paper is about.<br />

Headings and sub-headings within the text should be short and clear: avoid too many levels <strong>of</strong> subheadings.<br />

7. English spelling is recommended. The Oxford English Dictionary is the standard.<br />

• For punctuations, double quotes should be used for primary quotations and single quotes within quotes.<br />

• Number the pages consecutively only from the top right hand, excluding the cover page.<br />

• For dates, use 30 July, 2003, not 30th July or July 30 etc<br />

• In general, use the following:<br />

• 1995-1996 (not 1995-96)<br />

• 20th century<br />

• pp.24—250, not 24-25 0, Pp.240-250, p.240 et seq. etc<br />

• use “e.g” and “i.e”, instead <strong>of</strong> eg and ie<br />

• use Section and Article not S., Sec., Sect. or Art.<br />

• Latin and other foreign language words should be in italics.<br />

8. Authors are asked to pay particular attention to the accuracy and presentation <strong>of</strong> direct quotations.<br />

9. Footnotes should be numbered consecutively in Arabic numerals after the punctuation mark.<br />

10. The standard British method <strong>of</strong> citation should be followed.<br />

• Books should be cited as follows:<br />

Author (initial and name), title (in italics), place <strong>of</strong> publication, name <strong>of</strong> publisher, date <strong>of</strong><br />

publication and page numbers with p. or pp. e.g.K. Frimpong, Criminal <strong>Law</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong>:<br />

Cases and Materials, 3rd ed., Gaborone, Associated Printers (2000), pp. 50 – 57<br />

• All the words in the book title, except minor form-words such as “by”, “an”, “a”, “the” etc, should have<br />

capital initials.<br />

• Articles should be cited as follows:<br />

Author (initial and name), title (in double quotes NOT underlined), number <strong>of</strong> volume, title <strong>of</strong> serial<br />

publication (in italics), year <strong>of</strong> volume (in brackets), page number (s)<br />

e.g. C. M. Fombad, “Compensation <strong>of</strong> Victims <strong>of</strong> Motor Vehicle Accidents in <strong>Botswana</strong>:<br />

An Appraisal <strong>of</strong> the MVA Fund Act Scheme,” 43 J.A.L (1999), pp. 151 – 183.<br />

• (Please note that where a journal, as in the above example has its own or standard mode <strong>of</strong> citation, this<br />

must be employed, otherwise, the full title <strong>of</strong> the journal in italics must be provided.<br />

• However, the titles <strong>of</strong> law reports and legislation should be printed in plain text, NOT italics).<br />

• As regards cases, the mode <strong>of</strong> citation <strong>of</strong>ficially adopted by the report itself should be followed. In the<br />

absence <strong>of</strong> this, the usual English style should be employed wherever appropriate. This is generally in<br />

the order: date, volume no., if any, initials <strong>of</strong> report, page.<br />

e.g. [2001] 2 All E.R. 740 at 800.<br />

• The names <strong>of</strong> the cases except the “v”, should be in italics, for example: Tebogo v Tebogo.<br />

11. Articles and other submissions are considered on the understanding that they are not being considered<br />

concurrently by any other journal. Regretfully, disks and hardcopies cannot be returned.<br />

12. Articles and other submissions are accepted on the understanding that exclusive copyright is assigned to<br />

the UBLJ. Nevertheless, authors remain free to use the material contained in the paper in other works.<br />

13. It is the responsibility <strong>of</strong> authors to ensure that the material subm•tted does not infringe copyright or is<br />

defamatory, obscene or otherwise unlawful or litigious.<br />

14. The Editorial Board do not hold themselves responsible for any views expressed by contributors.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!