University of Botswana Law Journal - PULP
University of Botswana Law Journal - PULP
University of Botswana Law Journal - PULP
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL<br />
The <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> is a peer refereed journal published twice a year. It provides a forum<br />
for scholars and practitioners to reflect on diverse legal issues <strong>of</strong> national, regional and international significance<br />
and <strong>of</strong> local and regional relevance.<br />
PATRON<br />
The Hon. Justice Nganunu, Chief Justice <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong>.<br />
INTERNATIONAL EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARD<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>. D. D. N. Nsereko, Judge, International<br />
Criminal Court, The Hague, The Netherlands<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>. W. Du Plessis<br />
Faculty <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong>, North-West <strong>University</strong><br />
(Potchefstroom Campus), South Africa.<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>. T. Maluwa<br />
H. Laddie and Linda P. Montague Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong>,<br />
Dickinson School <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong>, Penn. State <strong>University</strong>,<br />
USA.<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>. M. Reisman<br />
Myres McDougal Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong>, Yale <strong>Law</strong><br />
School, New Haven, USA.<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>. K. Frimpong<br />
Ghana Institute <strong>of</strong> Management and Public<br />
Administration, (GIMPA), Accra, Ghana<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>. S. Roberts<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong>, London School <strong>of</strong> Economics,<br />
United Kingdom.<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>. A. McCall Smith<br />
Edinburgh <strong>Law</strong> School, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Edinburgh,<br />
United Kingdom.<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>. C. Forsyth<br />
Faculty <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong>, Robinson College, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
Cambridge, United Kingdom.<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>. B. Othlogile<br />
Vice Chancellor, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong>.<br />
Dr. A. Molokomme<br />
Attorney-General, <strong>Botswana</strong>.<br />
EDITORIAL BOARD<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>. Peter Takirambudde<br />
Editor-in-Chief, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong>.<br />
Mrs. E. Macharia-Mokobi<br />
Secretary, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong>.<br />
Dr. K. Solo<br />
<strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong>.<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>. C. Ngongola<br />
<strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong>.<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>. J. Kiggundu<br />
<strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong>.<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>. E. K. Quansah<br />
<strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong>.<br />
Dr. O. B. Tshosa<br />
<strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong>.<br />
Mr. T. Sebego<br />
Vice chairman, <strong>Law</strong> Society <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong><br />
SUBMISSIONS<br />
All correspondence concerning articles and other<br />
submissions should be addressed to:<br />
The Editor-in-Chief<br />
<strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Journal</strong><br />
Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong><br />
<strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong><br />
Private Bag UB 00705 Gaborone<br />
<strong>Botswana</strong><br />
Email submissions: ublj@mopipi.ub.bw<br />
Guidelines on the preparation and submission <strong>of</strong><br />
articles and other contributions can be found on the<br />
inside back cover <strong>of</strong> each issue. More detailed<br />
guidelines will be supplied on request.<br />
SUBSCRIPTIONS<br />
All business correspondence, including orders and remittances relating to subscriptions as well as advertising<br />
should be addressed to the Editor-in-Chief.<br />
SUBSCRIPTION RATES (All rates include postage)<br />
Annual institutional rate<br />
(Africa) P 280 (US $50).<br />
Annual institutional rate<br />
(Europe and America) P 400 (US $80)<br />
Annual individual rate<br />
(Africa) P 100 (US $ 20)<br />
Annual individual rate<br />
(Europe and America) P 200 (US $40)<br />
The mode <strong>of</strong> citation <strong>of</strong> this <strong>Journal</strong> is:<br />
11 UBLJ (2010)<br />
©UBLJ, 2010. All rights reserved. No part <strong>of</strong> this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or<br />
transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning or<br />
otherwise, without the written permission <strong>of</strong> the publisher.<br />
ISSN 1817-2733<br />
THE WORLD BANK<br />
Washington, D.C.
UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL<br />
VOLUME 11 DECEMBER 2010<br />
ARTICLES<br />
Foreign Aid, the Rule <strong>of</strong> Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong>, and Economic Development.........3<br />
in Africa<br />
N.A.Curott<br />
Paradigm Shifts in International Justice and the Duty to Protect: ............19<br />
In Search <strong>of</strong> an Action Principle<br />
P. Glen<br />
The Right to Maternal Health Care: Developing International ................39<br />
Human Rights <strong>Law</strong> to Prevent Maternal Mortality<br />
L. S. Johnson<br />
Between Judicial Enabling and Adversarialism: The Role <strong>of</strong> ..................81<br />
the Judicial Officer in Protecting the Unrepresented Accused<br />
in <strong>Botswana</strong> in a Comparative Perspective<br />
R.J.V. Cole<br />
Competition and Regulation in the Gold Industry:.................................117<br />
An American Perspective<br />
J. Wilkerson<br />
Procurement <strong>Law</strong> in Nigeria: Challenge for Attainment........................131<br />
<strong>of</strong> its Objectives<br />
O.A. Jacob<br />
COMMENTS<br />
Principled Leadership: Finding Common Ground Among.....................153<br />
Divergent Philosophies<br />
V.D. Lopez JD<br />
MTN & Airtel’s African Tryst: The Legal Angle ..................................159<br />
S.V. Adithya Vidyasagar<br />
Limits <strong>of</strong> Fair Dealing with Literary Works in India..............................169<br />
A. Goel
2 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
RECENT LEGAL DEVELOPMENTS<br />
Lesotho - Q. Letsika .....................................177<br />
- L. Kometsi<br />
Zimbabwe - J. Pfumorodze ..............................185
3<br />
ARTICLES<br />
Foreign aid, the rule <strong>of</strong> law, and economic development in<br />
Africa<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
N.A. Curott*<br />
Foreign aid has failed to bring about any significant development results in the<br />
poor countries <strong>of</strong> Africa in over sixty years <strong>of</strong> existence. The failure <strong>of</strong> aid is<br />
due to the fact that development planning faces an insurmountable calculation<br />
problem. Attempting to salvage aid by making it more selective does not<br />
address this problem, and will not make aid effective. Aid by its very nature<br />
causes waste, corruption, politicization, privilege seeking, and statism, all <strong>of</strong><br />
which are detrimental to economic development. Instead <strong>of</strong> relying on aid,<br />
African economies should occupy themselves with creating legal institutions<br />
that are commensurate with the protection <strong>of</strong> private property and the Rule <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Law</strong>, which are foremost among the institutions necessary for sustainable, long<br />
run economic growth.<br />
1. INTRODUCTION<br />
In the sixty years since its inception, foreign aid has failed to bring about any<br />
significant economic development in the poor countries <strong>of</strong> Africa. This fact has<br />
caused many analysts to criticize the internal workings <strong>of</strong> foreign aid<br />
administration in recent years, but they rarely question the actual potential <strong>of</strong><br />
foreign aid to lift poor countries out <strong>of</strong> poverty. Instead, the political<br />
establishment calls for ever more aid: The United Nations recommended in<br />
January <strong>of</strong> 2005 that the total amount <strong>of</strong> aid to Africa should be doubled by<br />
2010, 1 while Official Development Assistance from the U.S. to Africa has<br />
tripled since President Bush took <strong>of</strong>fice in 2001, 2 and it is likely that the new<br />
Millennium Challenge Account will increase cash grants to poor African<br />
countries. British Prime Minister Tony Blair has recently been a leading<br />
champion <strong>of</strong> foreign aid and debt forgiveness, and advocates doubling aid to<br />
Africa. The strategy <strong>of</strong> the IMF and the World Bank for development also<br />
includes increasing the flow <strong>of</strong> aid to developing countries. 3 It is widely<br />
* Mercatus Center at George Mason <strong>University</strong>, 4400 <strong>University</strong> Drive, Fairfax, VA U.S.<br />
ncurott@gmu.edu.<br />
1 UN Millennium Project, Investing in Development: A Practical Plan to Achieve the Millennium<br />
Development Goals (New York: United Nations Development Programme, 2005).<br />
2 International Development Statistics, http://oecd.org.<br />
3 Global Monitoring Report 2006: Millennium Development Goals: Strengthening Mutual Accountability,<br />
Aid, Trade, and Governance (World Bank Publications, 2006).
4 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
believed by policy makers that increasing foreign aid will achieve the<br />
millennium development goal <strong>of</strong> a fifty percent reduction in poverty by 2015.<br />
The widespread advocacy <strong>of</strong> foreign aid is remarkable considering<br />
its failure to produce any sustained development in the past. This study<br />
investigates whether the new round <strong>of</strong> foreign aid spending is likely to be<br />
effective at reducing poverty in Africa, and finds that both economic history<br />
and economic reasoning suggest that it will not. The article then considers<br />
what alternatives exist to foreign aid. Since the protection <strong>of</strong> private property<br />
and the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> are foremost among the institutions necessary for<br />
sustainable, long run economic growth, the article concludes that those<br />
interested in the development <strong>of</strong> African economies should occupy<br />
themselves with creating legal institutions that are commensurate with the<br />
Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong>.<br />
2. THE FAILURE OF FOREIGN AID<br />
Reducing poverty is a noble goal, but past experience shows that merely<br />
increasing foreign aid funding won’t bring about development, and may even<br />
impede it. Foreign aid’s track record is dismal, and economists no longer deny<br />
that Western development aid to Africa has been ineffective. The prevailing<br />
consensus among economists is that previous aid policies have not worked<br />
very well. Approximately $568 billion in foreign aid has been poured into<br />
Africa, 4 with little development to show for it. Countries that were given the<br />
most aid, including Liberia and Somalia, have actually experienced negative<br />
economic growth. 5 Income per capita throughout Africa has completely<br />
stagnated since the inception <strong>of</strong> foreign aid. 6 Thus many analysts have come to<br />
question the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> aid in the first place. 7<br />
Still, the political establishment generally calls for more foreign aid.<br />
They argue that foreign aid is necessary for three reasons – (1) it promotes the<br />
political interests <strong>of</strong> the givers, 8 (2) it is necessary for providing humanitarian<br />
relief in times <strong>of</strong> emergency, and (3) it is necessary for eliminating poverty.<br />
The first two justifications <strong>of</strong> foreign aid, while perhaps relevant, are beyond<br />
4 W. Easterly, Freedom versus Collectivism in Foreign Aid, in J. Gwartney and R. <strong>Law</strong>son, Economic<br />
Freedom <strong>of</strong> the World: 2006 Annual Report 34 (Fraser Institute, 2006).<br />
5 World Bank, World Development Indicators Online, http://www.worldbank.org. In the case <strong>of</strong> Somalia<br />
there is evidence that conditions have actually improved since the complete collapse <strong>of</strong> the national<br />
government in 1991. See B. Powell, R. Ford and A. Nowrasteh, Somalia After State Collapse: Chaos or<br />
Improvement? Independent Review Working Paper Number 64.<br />
6 Ibid.<br />
7 See, for example, J. Morton, The Poverty <strong>of</strong> Nations: The Aid Dilemma at the Heart <strong>of</strong> Africa (British<br />
Academic Press, 1994).<br />
8 A large portion <strong>of</strong> foreign aid has always been earmarked for the advancement <strong>of</strong> Western political<br />
interests, in particular toward stopping the spread <strong>of</strong> communism. See P. T. Bauer, The Development<br />
Frontier: Essays in Applied Economic (Harvard <strong>University</strong> Press, 1991) p. 42. More recently, foreign aid<br />
is being used in an attempt to prevent terrorism. See USAID, Policy Framework for Bilateral Foreign Aid<br />
(2006) for the current US policy on bilateral foreign aid.
FOREIGN AID, THE RULE OF LAW AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN AFRICA 5<br />
the scope <strong>of</strong> this investigation, which deals with the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> foreign<br />
aid in bringing about economic growth and prosperity for those countries<br />
which receive it. 9 The elimination <strong>of</strong> poverty requires the higher levels <strong>of</strong><br />
income that come with economic growth and development, and the best hope<br />
for the impoverished masses in the third world to improve their well being lies<br />
in economic growth. The reason is that economic development is essential to<br />
human welfare.<br />
Although well-being is a subjective concept that cannot itself be<br />
measured, proxies such as income, life expectancy, educational opportunities,<br />
literacy, and nutrition can serve as reasonable estimates. Statistical studies<br />
show that economic development is a very significant factor in determining<br />
many desirable well-being indicators. 10 A productive economy is necessary<br />
for creating an environment in which individuals are capable <strong>of</strong> developing<br />
their faculties and can peacefully pursue meaningful and fulfilling lives. One<br />
should ultimately ask, then, does foreign aid “work?” Is foreign aid capable <strong>of</strong><br />
lifting poor countries up out <strong>of</strong> a cycle <strong>of</strong> poverty, onto a higher plain <strong>of</strong><br />
economic development? Economic reasoning and historical evidence suggest<br />
that the answer to this question is a resounding “no.”<br />
A. Foreign Aid is Not Necessary for Development<br />
The original economic argument for foreign aid was that third world<br />
development would be impossible without it. 11 This line <strong>of</strong> thinking holds that<br />
people in under-developed countries are simply too poor to save any money, so<br />
they never have a pool <strong>of</strong> funds available for creating the capital formation that<br />
is necessary for economic development. According to this view, foreign aid<br />
can help them break out <strong>of</strong> this trap and get on the path to sustainable long-term<br />
economic growth by providing the funds necessary for capital investment.<br />
The facts <strong>of</strong> history, however, strongly refute the notion that poor<br />
countries need foreign aid to break out <strong>of</strong> poverty. For starters, the first<br />
nations to develop, such as England, achieved economic growth and<br />
development without foreign aid. If foreign aid were really necessary for<br />
9 It should be noted, however, that although humanitarian assistance programs are usually defended on the<br />
grounds that they have intrinsic humanitarian value, in the long run they <strong>of</strong>ten create more problems than<br />
they solve. Even a program as seemingly unobjectionable as food aid has had many unintended but<br />
harmful consequences in Africa, including disrupting local markets and putting local producers out <strong>of</strong><br />
business. See J. Bovard, The Continuing Failure <strong>of</strong> Foreign Aid, Cato Policy Analysis No. 65 (1986); D.<br />
Osterfeld, Prosperity Versus Planning (Oxford <strong>University</strong> Press 1992) p. 142. More importantly, even<br />
when successful, humanitarian assistance programs are only temporary alleviations for those in extreme<br />
need. They do nothing to fix the underlying problem, which is the human suffering associated with<br />
extreme poverty.<br />
10 See P. J. Boettke & J. R. Subrick, Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong>, Development and Human Capabilities, 10 Supreme Court<br />
Economic Review 109 (2002).<br />
11 This theory, known as the “vicious cycle <strong>of</strong> poverty,” is still the leading justification for foreign aid today.<br />
Economist Jeffrey Sachs is now its leading proponent; see J. D. Sachs, The End <strong>of</strong> Poverty: How We Can<br />
Make it Happen in Our Lifetime (Penguin Books, 2005). For a refutation <strong>of</strong> this poverty trap theory see P.<br />
T. Bauer, Dissent on Development (Harvard <strong>University</strong> Press, 1972) pp. 31-38.
6 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
development, then no country could have developed to begin with. Then there<br />
are also many recent examples <strong>of</strong> countries, such as South Korea and Taiwan,<br />
which began to develop only after they stopped receiving large-scale<br />
economic aid. 12<br />
Moreover, examination <strong>of</strong> the relevant data also undercuts the theory<br />
that foreign aid is necessary for economic development. Recent studies have<br />
taken to task conventional foreign aid wisdom, as represented by the<br />
“Financing Gap” approach. Developed by World Bank economists, the<br />
“Financing Gap” approach assumes that the amount <strong>of</strong> economic growth a<br />
country experiences is proportional to the level <strong>of</strong> investment. 13 Thus, if poor<br />
countries are not investing enough to achieve a target output, foreign aid could<br />
make up for the shortfall, ensuring enough investment for economic growth.<br />
Experience has failed to validate the assumptions <strong>of</strong> the “Financing Gap”<br />
approach. A number <strong>of</strong> empirical studies show that there is no statistical<br />
correlation between economic growth and <strong>of</strong>ficial levels <strong>of</strong> investment. 14 This<br />
finding implies that foreign aid for investment is not a sufficient condition for<br />
economic growth. Furthermore, in countries where economic growth has<br />
occurred, only six percent had increased the amount <strong>of</strong> investment by the<br />
amount required according to the finance gap models. This casts serious<br />
doubts on any simplistic model relating economic growth to investment. 15<br />
Additionally, dozens <strong>of</strong> econometric studies on the relationship between<br />
foreign aid and economic growth reveal no conclusive evidence that the level<br />
<strong>of</strong> aid is correlated with the amount <strong>of</strong> growth in recipient countries. 16<br />
B. Why Aid is Ineffective and Harms its Recipients<br />
Studies <strong>of</strong> economic data and statistics have resoundingly shown that foreign<br />
aid has not brought about the expected economic growth in recipient countries.<br />
One must now ask, why hasn't foreign aid worked? Indeed, can foreign aid<br />
work, within the constructs <strong>of</strong> economic reasoning? A vast body <strong>of</strong> literature<br />
tells us no, and for the following reasons. First, foreign aid handouts are not<br />
subject to the “market test” <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>it and loss, thus they are wasted rather than<br />
being put to productive use. Second, foreign aid creates “perverse incentives,”<br />
12 M. Krauss, Development without Aid (New Press, 1983) p. 190.<br />
13 See W. Easterly, The Elusive Quest for Growth: Economists’ Adventures and Misadventures in the<br />
Tropics (MIT Press, 2001) pp. 28-37.<br />
14 Ibid., 39-42; M. Blomstom et al., Is Fixed Investment the Key to Economic Growth?, 111 Quarterly<br />
<strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> Economics 269 (1996).<br />
15 See Easterly, note 13 above, p. 40. This isn’t to say that investment in capital isn’t crucial for economic<br />
development. What is important is the right kind <strong>of</strong> investment, which government aid programs lack the<br />
knowledge and incentive to provide. Easterly goes too far in rejecting the importance <strong>of</strong> investment<br />
altogether.<br />
16 A number <strong>of</strong> recent studies have found that aid fails to systematically improve growth rates. See P.<br />
Boone, Politics and the Effectiveness <strong>of</strong> Foreign Aid, 40 European Economic Review 289 (1996); I.<br />
Vasquez, Official Assistance, Economic Freedom, and Policy Change: Is Foreign Aid Like Campagne?,<br />
18 Cato <strong>Journal</strong> 275 (1998); T. Ovaska, The Failure <strong>of</strong> Development Aid, 23 Cato <strong>Journal</strong> 175 (2003).
FOREIGN AID, THE RULE OF LAW AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN AFRICA 7<br />
entirely antithetical to economic growth and development, amongst those who<br />
receive it. Finally, foreign aid, by subsidizing corrupt regimes, empowers<br />
dictators and begets increased corruption and repression <strong>of</strong> the poor masses it<br />
aims to help. Despite its noble intentions, foreign aid is doomed to failure for<br />
these systemic reasons, which shall now be examined in further detail.<br />
Foreign Aid Lacks Market Signals<br />
Under market capitalism, entrepreneurs evaluate possible investment projects<br />
on the basis projected return- “i.e.”, will the investment be pr<strong>of</strong>itable? 17<br />
Entrepreneurs stake their own funds, or borrowed funds for which they are<br />
ultimately liable, on these investments, thus they have strong incentive to “get<br />
it right,” “i.e.” to avoid bad investments that won't pay <strong>of</strong>f. Of course,<br />
entrepreneurs can and do fail in this regard; they frequently lose money in what<br />
turn out to be unpr<strong>of</strong>itable investments and face the prospect <strong>of</strong> going out <strong>of</strong><br />
business. Entrepreneurs who repeatedly fail will ultimately lose their funding,<br />
whether it be their own money, bank credit, or shareholders' equity. In general,<br />
successful entrepreneurs, those who do the best job <strong>of</strong> satisfying consumers<br />
and thereby winning their business, are rewarded with pr<strong>of</strong>its, and<br />
unsuccessful entrepreneurs, who waste resources, are “fired” by the<br />
consumers. In contrast, the bureaucrats and government <strong>of</strong>ficials responsible<br />
for “investing” foreign aid dollars face no such market test, and hence have no<br />
such incentive to make the best investment choices. 18 As long time aid<br />
practitioner Thomas Dichter has noted: “Whereas a large corporation cannot<br />
lose money forever without facing some consequences, the aid industry has<br />
gone on for 60 years with hardly anything to show for the two trillion dollars it<br />
has spent (something it does not really bother to deny), and yet it is still very<br />
much in business.” 19 The primary incentive <strong>of</strong> World Bank bureaucrats is to<br />
spend as much money as possible, not to ensure it is effectively spent.<br />
Consequently, billions <strong>of</strong> dollars have been siphoned into inefficient, and<br />
unproductive, and capital-intensive projects such as the construction <strong>of</strong> damns,<br />
oil refineries, airports, and crop-storage depots. 20 Many <strong>of</strong> these projects are<br />
unsustainable, and have to be abandoned. A 2000 report found that 73 percent<br />
<strong>of</strong> the projects undertaken in Africa that year by the World Bank were not even<br />
17 For a more detailed explanation <strong>of</strong> the entrepreneur’s role in the market economy, see I. Kirzner,<br />
Competition and Entrepreneurship (<strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Chicago Press, 1973).<br />
18 For an explanation <strong>of</strong> the different incentives that private and public decision makers face, see L. V.<br />
Mises, Bureaucracy (Yale <strong>University</strong> Press, 1944).<br />
19 T. Dichter, Time to Stop Fooling Ourselves about Foreign Aid: A Practitioner’s View, Cato Institute<br />
Foreign Policy Briefing No 86 (2005).<br />
20 See D. Osterfeld, note 9 above, p, 150; G. B. N. Ayittey, Aid For Black Elephants: How Foreign<br />
Assistance Has Failed Africa, in D. Bandow & I. Vasquez ed., Perpetuating Poverty (Cato Institute,<br />
1994).
8 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
a success by their own standards. 21 Investments in education and AIDS<br />
prevention have been equally ineffective. 22 No matter how noble the<br />
intentions, nor how vast the pocketbook <strong>of</strong> the foreign aid establishment, it<br />
cannot get around the fact that it lacks the discipline imposed by the pr<strong>of</strong>it and<br />
loss test. In fact, without the information generated by market price signals,<br />
there is no way to make rational choices about where to allocate resources. 23<br />
In the absence <strong>of</strong> property ownership and the competitive process <strong>of</strong> market<br />
exchange, it is impossible to determine the true opportunity cost <strong>of</strong> investment<br />
decisions. Thus it should come as no surprise that the vast majority <strong>of</strong> foreign<br />
aid dollars are wasted. Development planners face a fundamental and<br />
unsolvable economic calculation problem. And since there is no telling<br />
whether foreign-aid funded investments make economic sense, how can<br />
anyone expect foreign aid to yield economic growth?<br />
Foreign Aid Perverts the Incentive Structure <strong>of</strong> Recipients<br />
Not only has the foreign aid establishment largely ignored this “market test”<br />
idea, but they have ignored the broad incentive structure that foreign aid creates<br />
for the government and the people in recipient countries. Foreign aid amounts<br />
to a subsidization <strong>of</strong> poverty in third-world countries, and when you subsidize<br />
something, you get more <strong>of</strong> it. To be a well-qualified candidate for foreign aid<br />
payments, a country must be full <strong>of</strong> impoverished people and show weak or<br />
non-existent economic growth. Yet foreign aid payments do not go into the<br />
hands <strong>of</strong> the impoverished masses, they go into the hands <strong>of</strong> government<br />
<strong>of</strong>ficials, who then decide how the money is spent. Thus government <strong>of</strong>ficials<br />
have little incentive to enact policies amenable to economic growth, and much<br />
incentive to retain the status quo ante <strong>of</strong> grinding poverty, in order to show their<br />
rich Western benefactors that they need ever greater foreign aid handouts. In<br />
addition, foreign aid has enabled many African governments to engage in<br />
policies harmful to growth, such as economic regulations, confiscation <strong>of</strong><br />
property, and suppression <strong>of</strong> trade. 24 Perhaps the most pernicious effect <strong>of</strong><br />
foreign aid is that the money has been used by ruthless and tyrannical dictators<br />
in Africa to suppress their own people. 25 These are long-standing policies and<br />
cannot be attributed to mistakes on the part <strong>of</strong> well-intentioned governments.<br />
They are defects inherent in the aid system itself.<br />
21 International Financial Institution Advisory Commission (Meltzer Commission), Report to the U.S.<br />
Congress and the Department <strong>of</strong> the Treasury (March 8, 2000).<br />
22 See Easterly, note 13 above.<br />
23 The Austrian economist Ludwig von Mises was the first to explain why market prices are necessary for<br />
rational economic calculation. See L. V. Mises, Economic Calculation in the Socialist Commonwealth, in<br />
F. A. Hayek, ed., Collectivist Economic Planning (G. Routledge & Sons, 1935).<br />
24 See Bauer, note 8 above, p. 46.<br />
25 See G. B. N. Ayittey, Africa in Chaos (St. Martin’s Press, 1998); M. Maren, The Road to Hell: The<br />
Ravaging Effects <strong>of</strong> Foreign Aid and International Charity (Free Press, 2002).
FOREIGN AID, THE RULE OF LAW AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN AFRICA 9<br />
Foreign aid also harms it recipients by creating perverse incentives<br />
for ordinary workers. The impoverished masses, in order to have a shot at<br />
participation in the foreign aid bonanza, have strong incentives to align<br />
themselves with the political factions that have control <strong>of</strong> the money. Thus it<br />
comes as no surprise that many poor African countries are characterized by an<br />
unusually high intermingling <strong>of</strong> private and political life. 26 Aid puts more<br />
resources at the disposal <strong>of</strong> the governments, and therefore increases its power<br />
vis-à-vis the rest <strong>of</strong> society. One consequence is that peoples’ affairs tend to<br />
be diverted from economic activity (“i.e.” wealth creation) to politics. 27 This<br />
undermines the productivity <strong>of</strong> an economy because resources are shifted<br />
from productive activity into seeking political favor and privileges. 28<br />
Enormous sums <strong>of</strong> money have also been lost because <strong>of</strong> the<br />
widespread corruption in African governments. 29 And even worse, aid<br />
actually promotes corruption by providing resources that are fought over by<br />
interest groups and factions. 30 If the only downside to aid were that much <strong>of</strong> it<br />
is lost and wasted, perhaps it would still be desirable. After all, some aid is<br />
better than none. But aid has had many deleterious effects in the recipient<br />
countries. The very term “aid” is misleading because it implies that it actually<br />
helps the recipients. In this way it prejudices debate in the favor <strong>of</strong> more aid.<br />
In actuality aid is a government-to-government subsidy, and must be judged<br />
by the overall effects that this subsidy produces. Aid does not go directly to<br />
the impoverished African masses. In the long run it will only help the poor if it<br />
leads to development, which, as we have seen, it has not, and indeed cannot in<br />
the light <strong>of</strong> economic reasoning.<br />
C. The New Debate on Foreign Aid<br />
The combination <strong>of</strong> waste, corruption, and rent seeking all combine to explain<br />
why aid has not contributed to economic growth. The manifest failure <strong>of</strong> aid<br />
programs to achieve their intended goals and the corruption they have<br />
engendered has caused the World Bank to recognize the importance <strong>of</strong> the<br />
26 Bauer long contended that aid increases the size and scope <strong>of</strong> recipient governments, contributes to the<br />
politicization <strong>of</strong> life, and is an anti-market force. See, for example, Bauer, note 8 above. A statistical<br />
examination <strong>of</strong> the relationship between economic freedom and the amount <strong>of</strong> development aid is treated<br />
in B. Powell and M. Ryan, Development Aid and Economic Freedom: Are they Related? Forthcoming,<br />
<strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> Private Enterprise.<br />
27 See W. Baumol, Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive, and Destructive 98 <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> Political<br />
Economy 893 (1990).<br />
28 In economics, the process by which individuals attempt to gain through manipulation <strong>of</strong> the political<br />
environment instead <strong>of</strong> through trade and the production <strong>of</strong> added wealth is called rent seeking. This idea<br />
was first developed in G. Tullock, The Welfare Costs <strong>of</strong> Tariffs, Monopolies, and Theft, 5 Western<br />
Economic <strong>Journal</strong> 224 (1967). The term rent seeking was introduced by A. O. Krueger, The Political<br />
Economy <strong>of</strong> the Rent-Seeking Society, 64 American Economic Review 291 (1974).<br />
29 For a general account <strong>of</strong> corruption in Africa, see J. M. Mbaku, Bureaucratic and Political Corruption in<br />
Africa: The Public Choice Perspective (Krieger Publishing Company, 2000).<br />
30 See J. Svensson, Foreign Aid and Rent-Seeking, 51 <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> International Economics, 437 (2004); A.<br />
Alesina & B. Weder, Do Corrupt Governments Receive Less Foreign Aid?, 92 American Economic<br />
Review 1126 (2002).
10 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
recipient countries’ policies. An influential paper by Burnside and Dollar has<br />
provoked a new debate about the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> aid. 31 It claims that while aid<br />
has not caused a systematic improvement in living standards, it has promoted<br />
economic growth when given to countries with good policies and governance.<br />
These findings are overly optimistic, however, and have been hotly disputed. 32<br />
In the first place, it is difficult to define a standard <strong>of</strong> good policies<br />
and then stick to this standard by withholding money from countries that don’t<br />
meet it. In the past corrupt governments have not received less aid, 33 and this<br />
is unlikely to change because it is not seen to be in the interest <strong>of</strong> donors or<br />
recipients. Donors do not want to withhold aid money from poor countries, so<br />
the standards for disbursement are likely to be ineffectively weak or simply<br />
ignored. Recent history confirms this conclusion. Despite the new rhetoric <strong>of</strong><br />
selectivity, not much has been done to promote real reform or greater<br />
accountability. The attempts by donors to influence the policies <strong>of</strong> recipient<br />
countries have been half-hearted and ineffective. African leaders accept<br />
reform reluctantly, if at all, and trying to impose institutions from the outside<br />
in by tying aid to political performance engenders resentment and hostility<br />
amongst its recipients. For these reasons foreign aid is unlikely to be given<br />
selectively.<br />
More importantly, even if foreign aid were selectively given, it<br />
would still undermine the good policies it was meant to promote because <strong>of</strong><br />
the perverse incentive structure inherent in foreign aid. For the reasons<br />
already stated above, foreign aid causes corruption, privilege seeking, and<br />
crony statism. These effects are counterproductive for countries attempting to<br />
implement good policies and develop the institutions necessary for economic<br />
growth and development. The attempts to fix foreign aid are self-defeating<br />
and will not work in practice.<br />
3. THE RULE OF LAW AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO<br />
FOREIGN AID<br />
Rising out <strong>of</strong> poverty depends in the long run on economic growth. Since<br />
foreign aid has not contributed much toward economic growth, and is not likely<br />
to do so for the reasons explained above, it is necessary to consider the<br />
31 C. Burnside & D. Dollar, Aid, Policies, and Growth, 90 American Economic Review 847 (2000). Other<br />
key papers in the “new economics <strong>of</strong> foreign aid” include: P. Collier & D. Dollar, Aid Allocation and<br />
Poverty Reduction, 46 European Economic Review (2002); P. Collier & D. Dollar, Development<br />
Effectiveness: What Have We Learnt?, 114 Economic <strong>Journal</strong> F244 (2004).<br />
32 Two papers that argue against the findings <strong>of</strong> Burnside and Dollar are W. Easterly, The Cartel <strong>of</strong> Good<br />
Intentions: The Problem <strong>of</strong> Bureaucracy in Foreign Aid, 5 The <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> Policy Reform 223 (2002); and<br />
I. Vasquez, The New Approach to Foreign Aid: Is the Enthusiasm Warranted?, Cato Institute Foreign<br />
Policy Briefing No. 79 (2003). In addition, several recent studies have found that aid is detrimental to<br />
growth even for countries with good policies. See H. J. Brumm, Aid, Policies, and Growth: Bauer was<br />
Right, 23 Cato <strong>Journal</strong> 167 (2003); W. Easterly et al., Aid, Policies, and Growth: Comment, 94 American<br />
Economic Review 774 (2004).<br />
33 A. Alesina & B. Weder, note 30 above.
FOREIGN AID, THE RULE OF LAW AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN AFRICA 11<br />
alternatives. Empirical work has found that differences in social, political, and<br />
cultural institutions across countries are among the most important<br />
determinants <strong>of</strong> differences in economic growth rates. The reason is that<br />
institutions establish the framework for economic activity within a country. 34<br />
As the late economist Mancur Olson explained, economic performance is<br />
determined mostly by the structure <strong>of</strong> incentives that individuals face when<br />
they make choices. National boundaries create different structures <strong>of</strong><br />
incentives, which determine much <strong>of</strong> the difference in wealth between<br />
countries. 35<br />
Good institutions create an environment that promotes<br />
entrepreneurship, inventiveness, economic growth and development. Some <strong>of</strong><br />
the most important <strong>of</strong> these institutions embody what is known as the Rule <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Law</strong>. The consensus among empirical researchers is that the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> is a<br />
key determinant <strong>of</strong> economic growth. 36 Since the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> is a significant<br />
factor in bringing about economic development, understanding what this<br />
entails and how it leads to development is essential for evaluating<br />
development policy.<br />
A. The Meaning <strong>of</strong> the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong><br />
In recent years there has been a resurgence <strong>of</strong> interest in The Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong><br />
among legal scholars, and appeals to the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> have become frequent in<br />
policy analysis. 37 Despite its popularity as a rhetorical device, however,<br />
invocations <strong>of</strong> the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> are typically vague and <strong>of</strong>ten contradict one<br />
another. 38 This is probably due to the fact that important scholars have<br />
disagreed over the precise meaning <strong>of</strong> the phrase “Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong>,” so that several<br />
strands <strong>of</strong> ideas have been subsumed under the same name. 39 Irrespective <strong>of</strong><br />
this theoretical dispute, the aspects <strong>of</strong> the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> that are important for<br />
development are relatively straightforward.<br />
34 For a discussion <strong>of</strong> institutional economics by a Nobel Prize winning economist, see D. North,<br />
Institutions, Institutional Change, and Performance (Cambridge <strong>University</strong> Press, 1990).<br />
35 M. Olson, Jr., Distinguished Lecture on Economics in Government: Big Bills Left on the Sidewalk: Why<br />
Some Nations are Rich and Others are Poor, 10 The <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> Economic Perspectives 3 (1996).<br />
36 R. J. Barro, Determinants <strong>of</strong> Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Empirical Study (MIT Press, 1997); R.<br />
J. Barro, Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong>, Democracy, and Economic Performance, in G. P. O’Driscoll, K. R. Holmes, M.<br />
Kirkpatick, eds, 2000 Index <strong>of</strong> Economic Freedom 31 (Heritage Foundation and Dow Jones & Co.,<br />
2000); S.-i-Martin, I Just Ran Two Million Regressions, Amercian Economic Review, 87 (2) (1997). For<br />
a complete survey <strong>of</strong> studies on the relationship between economic freedom and growth, see N. Berggren,<br />
The Benefits <strong>of</strong> Economic Freedom: A Survey, 8 Independent Review 193.<br />
37 Cf. T. Carothers, The Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> Revival, Foreign Affairs Mar/Apr 1998, Vol. 77 Issue 2 (“One cannot<br />
get through a foreign policy debate these days without someone proposing the rule <strong>of</strong> law as a solution to<br />
the world’s troubles.”).<br />
38 Cf G. P. Fletcher, Basic Concepts in Legal Thought 12 (1996) (“(W)e are never really sure what we mean<br />
by the ‘rule <strong>of</strong> law’.”), cited in R. H. Fallon, Jr., "The Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong>" as a Concept in Constitutional<br />
Discourse, 97 Columbia <strong>Law</strong> Review 1 (1997). In Fallon’s estimation “Invocations <strong>of</strong> the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong><br />
are sufficiently meaningful to deserve attention, but today are typically too vague and conclusory to dispel<br />
lingering puzzlement.”<br />
39 See Fallon, note 38 above, who identifies four separate ideal types that underlie different Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong><br />
based arguments.
12 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
In its simplest form, the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> is expressed eloquently by the<br />
well-known political maxim that a nation should be under the rule <strong>of</strong> laws,<br />
and not men. But this means not merely that the laws <strong>of</strong> the land are followed<br />
or that everything is regulated by law. 40 If the law making authority were free<br />
to make laws arbitrarily dictating to people their actions, this would differ in<br />
no appreciable way from the very “rule <strong>of</strong> men” that the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> is meant<br />
to contrast. Therefore, for the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> to prevail the laws must apply to<br />
everyone, and those who make the law must be subject to the same legal rules<br />
as the rest <strong>of</strong> society. More specifically, the government must be constrained<br />
by fixed rules that are known publicly before their application, and the<br />
discretionary abilities <strong>of</strong> those wielding the coercive apparatus <strong>of</strong> the state<br />
must be curtailed as much as possible. Under the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong>, government<br />
cannot discriminate against individuals on an ad hoc basis. In this way the<br />
individual has a sphere <strong>of</strong> autonomy, circumscribed by the general rules,<br />
within which he may undertake the activities he prefers without fearing that<br />
the government will suppress or hinder his efforts. 41<br />
Under the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> political power can only be exercised on the<br />
basis and within the constraints <strong>of</strong> the law, and various substantive and<br />
procedural institutions exist to protect civic and economic liberties from<br />
arbitrary interventions by authorities. 42 The most important procedural<br />
institutions in a constitutional democracy are the separation <strong>of</strong> powers, an<br />
independent judiciary, and an impartial court system. The judges should be<br />
appointed according to a constitutional procedure and not directly by the<br />
executive authority. In order to be impartial, the judiciary must be<br />
independent from the executive authority and not subject to control or<br />
manipulation. The judiciary must be able to deliberate freely, and even find<br />
against government and its <strong>of</strong>ficials without having to fear reprimands or<br />
violence.<br />
The existence <strong>of</strong> these procedural institutions, however, is not by<br />
itself a guarantee <strong>of</strong> the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong>. Even where they exist, no country does<br />
a perfect job <strong>of</strong> securing the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong>. Critics <strong>of</strong> constitutional democracy<br />
40 See F. A. Hayek, The Road to Serfdom (1944) p. 92 (“Anyone ready to deny this would have to contend<br />
that whether the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> prevails today [1944] in Germany, Italy, or Russia depends on whether the<br />
dictators have obtained their absolute power by constitutional means.”).<br />
41 The political philosopher and Nobel Prize winning economist F. A. Hayek has aptly boiled down these<br />
aspects <strong>of</strong> the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> into three main requirements: first, generality, “i.e.” that government is bound<br />
by explicit legal rules so that minimum discretion is left to the arbitrary decisions <strong>of</strong> the individuals in<br />
charge <strong>of</strong> government; second, formality, “i.e.” that these rules are announced and can be known<br />
beforehand by all members <strong>of</strong> society, leaving the individual free to pursue his own ends within these<br />
parameters without fearing deliberate acts <strong>of</strong> coercion by the government; and last, equality, “i.e.” that<br />
these rules apply equally to all people, such that no one is without the protection <strong>of</strong> the legal system and<br />
no one is above the law. See F. A. Hayek, note 40 above, p. 72-84 (1944); The Constitution <strong>of</strong> Liberty<br />
(1960).<br />
42 See W. Kasper & M. E. Streit, Institutional Economics, 165ff. (Edward Elgar, 1998).
FOREIGN AID, THE RULE OF LAW AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN AFRICA 13<br />
have even argued that the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> under government is impossible. 43<br />
Under this view, only market, or non-politically chosen law that emerges<br />
spontaneously from the actions and decisions <strong>of</strong> free individuals can be<br />
consistent with the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong>. 44 Be this as it may, it is clear that some<br />
governments come much closer to achieving the ideal than others. The degree<br />
to which the legal structure functions properly to secure the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> varies<br />
greatly among countries. 45 These differences have had a great impact on<br />
economic growth rates because the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> is necessary for securing<br />
private property rights and economic predictability.<br />
B. The Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> and Economic Development<br />
Governance under the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> is restricted to formal rules that tell people<br />
beforehand what actions will be taken by government in a certain situation.<br />
These rules allow individuals to plan their affairs with reasonable assurance as<br />
to how the state will use its coercive powers. This predictability makes<br />
economic activity much more effective. In the words <strong>of</strong> Hayek: “If the<br />
individuals are to be able to use their knowledge effectively in making plans,<br />
they must be able to predict actions <strong>of</strong> the state which may affect these<br />
plans.” 46 Successful entrepreneurship in particular requires a stable legal<br />
environment. As economist Peter Boettke has explained, it is “… the rule <strong>of</strong><br />
law [that] provides us with the stability and predictability in economic affairs<br />
required for agents to engage in entrepreneurial action – both in terms <strong>of</strong><br />
exploiting existing opportunities for pr<strong>of</strong>it through arbitrage and the discovery<br />
<strong>of</strong> new pr<strong>of</strong>it opportunities through arbitration.” 47 Since the essence <strong>of</strong><br />
entrepreneurship is alertness to pr<strong>of</strong>it opportunities that satisfy the desires <strong>of</strong><br />
consumers, the more successful entrepreneurship there is the more consumer<br />
desires will be satisfied and the more economic growth there will be. 48<br />
Under the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> the laws must be stated clearly without<br />
reference to particular individuals or groups. The generality and formal nature<br />
<strong>of</strong> the laws prevent discretionary and ad hoc economic policies that inhibit<br />
43 See J. Hasnas, The Myth <strong>of</strong> the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong>, Wisconsin <strong>Law</strong> Review 199 (1995). (“The fact is that there is<br />
no such thing as a government <strong>of</strong> law and not people. The law is an amalgam <strong>of</strong> contradictory rules and<br />
counter-rules expressed in inherently vague language that can yield a legitimate legal argument for any<br />
desired conclusion. For this reason, as long as the law remains a state monopoly, it will always reflect the<br />
political ideology <strong>of</strong> those invested with decision-making power.”)<br />
44 Order under the law without government is discussed in E. Stringham, Market Chosen <strong>Law</strong>, 14 <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
Libertarian Studies 53 (1999). Evidence for the superiority <strong>of</strong> a spontaneously ordered Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong><br />
without political provision is given in B. Benson, The Enterprise <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong>: Justice without the State<br />
(Pacific Research Institute, 1990).<br />
45 The extent <strong>of</strong> the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> is measured in J. Gwartney & R. <strong>Law</strong>son, Economic Freedom <strong>of</strong> the<br />
World: 2006 Annual Report (Fraser Institute, 2006).<br />
46 Hayek, note 40 above at p. 84.<br />
47 Boettke & Subrick, note 10 above.<br />
48 The satisfaction <strong>of</strong> consumer desires is the essence <strong>of</strong> entrepreneurship; see I. Kirzner, note 17 above.
14 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
entrepreneurship and economic growth. Private property rights are protected<br />
in this way from being violated by government <strong>of</strong>ficials or arbitrary laws.<br />
Individuals who are not secure in their property lack the incentive to<br />
undertake investment or engage in entrepreneurship. Individuals and<br />
businesses must be confident that their efforts will not be wasted before they<br />
will engage in commerce, save income, and make long-term plans. The Rule<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> provides a stable system <strong>of</strong> protection within which people can engage<br />
in economic activity and have the incentive to do so. Investors are particularly<br />
concerned about the prevalence <strong>of</strong> law and order, the burdens <strong>of</strong> arbitrary<br />
regulation, and the possibility <strong>of</strong> expropriation. The amount <strong>of</strong> investment in<br />
countries without the security provided by the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> is severely<br />
restricted, limiting the possibility <strong>of</strong> economic expansion.<br />
A well functioning legal system is also a key determinant <strong>of</strong> capital<br />
accumulation. An ever growing capital structure is essential for a vibrant,<br />
growing economy. Hernando De Soto, in his groundbreaking work, “The<br />
Mystery <strong>of</strong> Capital,” argues that the degree <strong>of</strong> capital formation in an<br />
economy depends largely on a country's legal system, specifically, how easy<br />
or difficult is it for a landowner to establish clear, recognized legal title to his<br />
land. 49 For only with clear, legal title, De Soto argues, can small-time<br />
landowners, who comprise a large component <strong>of</strong> every economy, “capitalize”<br />
on their land, their main asset, and become able to acquire the funds and tools<br />
that they need to be more productive and to contribute to further capitalization<br />
<strong>of</strong> the larger economy.<br />
No country can develop without economic freedom and the<br />
protection <strong>of</strong> private property rights. The Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong>, by providing the<br />
framework for protecting private property and individual freedom, creates the<br />
stability and predictability in economic affairs necessary to promote<br />
entrepreneurship, saving and investment, and capital formation. It is<br />
nonsensical to expect that foreign aid will lead to economic development in<br />
Africa without addressing the institutional factors, such as the lack <strong>of</strong> Rule <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Law</strong>, which are responsible for Africa’s failure to develop in the first place.<br />
4. EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE<br />
In our consideration <strong>of</strong> the role that a well functioning legal system plays in<br />
protecting private property rights we have seen that the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> should be<br />
an important determinant <strong>of</strong> economic performance. It is obvious from simple<br />
observation that countries that secure the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> have much more<br />
productive economies than those that do not. This everyday experience is<br />
formalized and confirmed by evidence from the Fraser Institute’s economic<br />
49 H. De Soto, The Mystery <strong>of</strong> Capital, (Basic Books, 2000).
FOREIGN AID, THE RULE OF LAW AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN AFRICA 15<br />
freedom report, Economic Freedom <strong>of</strong> the World. 50 Area 2 <strong>of</strong> the Fraser index,<br />
Legal System & Property Rights, provides an annual estimate <strong>of</strong> the realization<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> principle in 123 countries. Countries are ranked according<br />
to the security property rights, the independence <strong>of</strong> the judiciary, and the<br />
impartiality <strong>of</strong> the court system. The scale ranges from a score <strong>of</strong> one for<br />
countries with no Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> up to a score <strong>of</strong> ten for countries that perfectly<br />
secure the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> for all <strong>of</strong> its citizens.<br />
Chart 1 divides the Fraser index scores for 121 countries in 2004 into<br />
quintiles and compares them with the average level <strong>of</strong> GDP per capita,<br />
measured by the World Bank according to the Atlas method. 51 The countries<br />
in the top quintile <strong>of</strong> the Legal System and Property Rights scores had an<br />
average per capita income <strong>of</strong> $29,122 in 2004, while those in the bottom<br />
quintile averaged only $2561. The chart bellow shows a strong relationship<br />
between the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> and per capita income.<br />
Relation Between Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> and GDP Per-Capita<br />
GDP/CA<br />
35000<br />
30000<br />
25000<br />
20000<br />
15000<br />
10000<br />
5000<br />
0<br />
Top 2nd 3rd 4th Bottom<br />
Legal System and Property Rights Quintiles<br />
This snapshot view <strong>of</strong> the relationship between the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> and<br />
GDP per capita is reinforced by data from the Heritage Foundation’s Index <strong>of</strong><br />
Economic Freedom. 52 The index ranks the security <strong>of</strong> private property on a<br />
score from 1, being the best, to 5, the worst. In a sample <strong>of</strong> 143 countries for<br />
2004, those that had a property score <strong>of</strong> 1 averaged $30,505, while those<br />
countries with a score <strong>of</strong> 5 averaged only $2,953.<br />
50 Gwartney and <strong>Law</strong>son, note 45 above.<br />
51 Income statistics are from the World Bank (2005): GDP per capita 2004, Atlas method and PPP, World<br />
Development Indicators database, World Bank, www.worldbank.org./data/wdi/.<br />
52 The Heritage Foundation & Wall Street <strong>Journal</strong>, Index <strong>of</strong> Economic Freedom: 2006 Annual Report<br />
(Heritage Foundation, 2006).
16 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
Relation Between Property Rights and GDP Per-Capita<br />
GDP Per/C<br />
35000.0<br />
30000.0<br />
25000.0<br />
20000.0<br />
15000.0<br />
10000.0<br />
5000.0<br />
0.0<br />
1 2 3 4 5<br />
Property Score<br />
We can glean from these statistics that there is a strong relationship<br />
between the status <strong>of</strong> a country’s economic development and how well private<br />
property is protected in that country and the extent to which there is Rule <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Law</strong>. But the fact that the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> and development go hand in hand does<br />
not establish which one causes which, or if they aren’t both the result <strong>of</strong><br />
something else entirely. 53 Deduction and economic reasoning, however, tell<br />
us that the security <strong>of</strong> private property and the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> are primary causes<br />
<strong>of</strong> economic growth. Econometric studies that survey the historical evidence<br />
demonstrate and support economic theory, and find that the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> is an<br />
important determinant <strong>of</strong> economic growth. 54<br />
These generalized findings have been reinforced by individual case<br />
studies <strong>of</strong> African countries. Of particular interest is the recent economic<br />
success story <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong>. For many years <strong>Botswana</strong> has been one <strong>of</strong> the<br />
world’s fastest growing economies, with an average economic growth rate <strong>of</strong><br />
7.7 percent. 55 Without much foreign aid, and in the absence <strong>of</strong> a large state,<br />
<strong>Botswana</strong> has gone from being the third poorest nation <strong>of</strong> the world in 1965 to<br />
an upper middle income nation today. In an important new case study,<br />
economist Scott Beaulier has found that the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> and comparatively<br />
free economic institutions are the major explanations for <strong>Botswana</strong>’s greater<br />
success at economic development than other African countries.<br />
53 Existing studies have established the correlation between components <strong>of</strong> economic freedom, including the<br />
protection <strong>of</strong> property rights and the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong>, and economic growth, but they have not fully<br />
established the arrow <strong>of</strong> causation. See J. W. Dawson, Causality in the Freedom-Growth Relationship, 19<br />
European <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> Political Economy 475.<br />
54 See references cited in note 36 above. A recent study decomposing the effects between economic freedom<br />
and growth concludes that the component <strong>of</strong> economic freedom that is significant and has the largest<br />
effect on growth is the Legal Structure and Security <strong>of</strong> Private Ownership. F. Carlson & S. Lundstrom,<br />
Economic Freedom and Growth: Decomposing the Effects, 112 Public Choice 335 (2002).<br />
55 S. Beaulier, Look <strong>Botswana</strong>: No Hands! Why <strong>Botswana</strong> Should Let the Country Steer Itself, in B. Powell<br />
ed., Making Poor Nations Rich: Entrepreneurship and the Process <strong>of</strong> Development (Stanford <strong>University</strong><br />
Press, Forthcoming).
FOREIGN AID, THE RULE OF LAW AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN AFRICA 17<br />
The sum <strong>of</strong> this historical evidence points strongly to the conclusion<br />
that the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> is an essential prerequisite for development to take place<br />
in Africa. Poor African nations must follow the example <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong>, and all<br />
<strong>of</strong> the nations that have achieved development, by establishing the protection<br />
<strong>of</strong> private property rights and the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong>. A well functioning legal<br />
system is a prerequisite for economic development, without which the poor<br />
countries <strong>of</strong> Africa cannot hope to rise out <strong>of</strong> poverty.<br />
5. CONCLUSION<br />
Foreign aid has been completely ineffective at bringing about development in<br />
impoverished nations. A great deal <strong>of</strong> foreign aid money has been wasted on<br />
inefficient and unproductive investments. This waste is not surprising because<br />
those in charge <strong>of</strong> the funds are not subject to the pr<strong>of</strong>it and loss test <strong>of</strong> the<br />
marketplace. Given this fact, it is hard to imagine how future aid programs<br />
might turn out any better. A great deal <strong>of</strong> aid money has also been given to<br />
tyrannical governments that have used it to suppress and violate the rights <strong>of</strong><br />
their own subjects. The grave defects <strong>of</strong> the aid system and the magnitude <strong>of</strong><br />
the harm that it has caused should cause any well meaning individual to<br />
question the logic <strong>of</strong> the political establishment that is calling for the expansion<br />
<strong>of</strong> aid programs and greater foreign aid spending. Attempting to salvage<br />
foreign aid by making it more selective will not fix the problems inherent in<br />
foreign aid or make aid effective in bringing about economic development. Aid<br />
by its very nature causes waste, corruption, politicization, privilege seeking,<br />
and statism, all <strong>of</strong> which are detrimental to economic development.<br />
What countries need for development is an institutional framework<br />
that encourages entrepreneurship, hard work, saving, investment and capital<br />
accumulation. The institution <strong>of</strong> private property creates the incentive for<br />
individuals to carry out productive economic activity. The Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong><br />
establishes a framework in which property rights are respected and enforced.<br />
Economic reasoning therefore suggests that the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> should be an<br />
important determinant <strong>of</strong> economic development. This theory is supported by<br />
historical evidence, which shows a strong relationship between countries that<br />
secure the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> and their rate <strong>of</strong> economic growth. Foreign aid<br />
undermines the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> by engendering corruption and diverting energy<br />
from productive to counterproductive endeavors, and therefore undercuts the<br />
process <strong>of</strong> development that it is meant to bring about.<br />
The poor nations <strong>of</strong> Africa remain undeveloped because they lack an<br />
institutional environment conducive to economic progress. Suboptimal<br />
institutional arrangements have become locked-in, so to speak, and in order to<br />
get on the path to sustainable economic growth they must be replaced with<br />
institutions that inculcate respect for private property and the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong>.
18 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
Reform efforts, however, should be approached with caution. Simply<br />
earmarking foreign aid funds for Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> reform, for example, will<br />
probably have little positive impact because institutions grafted on<br />
exogenously are unlikely to stick. In order to stick, an institutional change<br />
must be rooted in the informal practices and expectations <strong>of</strong> the indigenous<br />
population, and be compatible with their prevailing culture and norms. For<br />
this reason, it is unlikely that aid can provide the appropriate shock to the<br />
indigenous institutional regime to help them break out <strong>of</strong> their current<br />
institutional trajectory. Indeed, most underdeveloped nations in Sub-Saharan<br />
Africa remain mired in poverty despite recent attempts to exogenously<br />
introduce institutional change. For Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> reform to be successful, an<br />
amenable cultural climate is an essential prerequisite. Therefore, recognizing<br />
and articulating the importance <strong>of</strong> the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> is at least an important first<br />
step because attempts to impose institutional reform without widespread<br />
support are premature and likely to fail.<br />
The entire mindset <strong>of</strong> central planning, even for Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> reform,<br />
needs to be dropped. Instead, effort should be spent trying to discover<br />
mechanisms that effectively constrain predatory government and make it<br />
possible for poor nations to get past stakeholder problems. The population and<br />
the political leaders must support and devise mechanisms based on their own<br />
indigenous institutions to coordinate around new rule changes and usher in a<br />
Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong> regime. Development planning merely interferes with individual<br />
decision making (individual planning) and the natural evolution <strong>of</strong> market<br />
institutions. Ill-conceived development planning, such as foreign aid,<br />
undermines the foundation that makes development possible.<br />
The answer to poverty is not foreign aid, which does more harm than<br />
good. What is needed instead is an institutional environment that unleashes<br />
the creative energy <strong>of</strong> a society. Economic development depends upon the<br />
attitudes <strong>of</strong> the individual citizens and the conduct <strong>of</strong> their government. When<br />
individuals have freedom, their natural drive to improve their own lives brings<br />
about the process <strong>of</strong> economic development. If the impoverished masses <strong>of</strong><br />
the third world want living standards comparable to the people in the west,<br />
they must adopt the institutions <strong>of</strong> Western civilization that make such wealth<br />
possible. If individuals in developed countries want to help those in poor<br />
countries get out <strong>of</strong> poverty, they must convince them to adopt the necessary<br />
institutions, such as the Rule <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong>, and help them devise mechanisms to<br />
secure it.
19<br />
Paradigm shifts in international justice and the duty to<br />
protect; in search <strong>of</strong> an action principle<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
P. Glen*<br />
This article places the emerging “responsibility to protect” within the<br />
historical development <strong>of</strong> international human rights and criminal law, while<br />
also attempting to more fully theorize the responsibility to ensure that it can be<br />
a basis for action in the face <strong>of</strong> a state’s commission <strong>of</strong> atrocities against its<br />
citizens. The main point <strong>of</strong> departure concerns the issue <strong>of</strong> “right authority” at<br />
that point in time when a coercive intervention is justified. Rather than rely<br />
solely on the Security Council in these situations, this article contends that<br />
unilateral and multilateral action must be countenanced by a fully theorized<br />
“responsibility to protect.” Such action is the only likely action to be taken in<br />
many circumstances, on account <strong>of</strong> the self-interest <strong>of</strong> Security Council<br />
members and general apathy towards intervention in the United Nations.<br />
There are solid legal and policy grounds for permitting such interventions and<br />
no compelling arguments to the contrary. Without sanctioning such action, it<br />
is very likely that the responsibility to protect will become just another quaint<br />
theory in international law, irrelevant to on the ground decision-making and<br />
incapable <strong>of</strong> the protection it was created to provide.<br />
1. INTRODUCTION<br />
In his seminal work on the history <strong>of</strong> scientific development, Thomas Kuhn<br />
described the structure <strong>of</strong> that development as revolutionary in nature,<br />
occurring at that point in time “in which an older paradigm is replaced in whole<br />
or in part by an incompatible one.” 1 The impetus for this paradigm shift is<br />
malfunction – “scientific revolutions are inaugurated by a growing sense …<br />
that an existing paradigm has ceased to function adequately in the exploration<br />
<strong>of</strong> an aspect <strong>of</strong> nature to which that paradigm itself had previously led the way<br />
... [T]he sense <strong>of</strong> malfunction that can lead to crisis is prerequisite to<br />
revolution.” 2 Kuhn himself analogized his conception <strong>of</strong> the theory and<br />
operation <strong>of</strong> scientific revolutions to political revolutions, drawing out<br />
parallels in genesis, form and function between the two. The notion <strong>of</strong><br />
revolutionary change, or paradigm shifts, itself provides a useful framework to<br />
judge the evolution, current state, and potential future <strong>of</strong> international human<br />
Associate Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, Georgetown <strong>University</strong> <strong>Law</strong> School, Washington, DC.<br />
1 T.S. Kuhn, The structure <strong>of</strong> scientific revolutions 92 (Chicago: <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Chicago Press, 1996)<br />
(1962).<br />
2 Id.
20 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
rights and criminal law. Although the analogy must necessarily be incomplete,<br />
as is the analogy between scientific and political revolutions, it does go a long<br />
way in explaining how the current system <strong>of</strong> international justice has reached<br />
its present state, and what may need to occur before that system can develop<br />
further.<br />
The central focus <strong>of</strong> the instant article is on the emerging principle <strong>of</strong><br />
the “responsibility to protect,” a principle still in its infancy almost ten years<br />
after its initial iteration. That principle itself is built <strong>of</strong> discrete smaller<br />
principles, which together build the overarching notion <strong>of</strong> a “responsibility to<br />
protect,” but for present purposes, this article is concerned only with the<br />
potential recourse to military or other definitive action in the face <strong>of</strong> a state’s<br />
failure to safeguard its citizens. 3 Using Kuhn as the backdrop, this article<br />
argues that the international justice system finds itself again at the threshold <strong>of</strong><br />
a paradigm shift, one which, whether the community makes the shift or fails<br />
to make the shift, will have far-reaching consequences for international law<br />
and policy in the twenty-first century. In essence, the international<br />
community, confronted with continuing instances <strong>of</strong> genocide, crimes against<br />
humanity, and mass atrocities committed by states against their own<br />
populaces, finds itself desperately in need <strong>of</strong> an “action principle,” a principle<br />
that can motivate and sanction actions by states in the interest <strong>of</strong> populations<br />
generally.<br />
Despite much political rhetoric and posturing on the international<br />
stage, such a principle still escapes policy-makers and those with the will to<br />
act. This is not surprising considering the myriad interests that are <strong>of</strong>ten in<br />
play when members <strong>of</strong> the international community sit down and attempt to<br />
address specific and concrete realities and situations. Further, it should be<br />
noted at the outset that there may never come a time when a true action<br />
principle is embraced and utilized by members <strong>of</strong> the international<br />
community. Nonetheless, to cease striving for such a principle would be an<br />
abdication <strong>of</strong> responsibility by those who have the power to act. As Gareth<br />
Evans has written, “[i]t can only be a matter <strong>of</strong> time before reports emerge<br />
again, from Central Africa, Central or South Asia, the Balkans, or somewhere<br />
else, <strong>of</strong> massacres or mass starvation, rape or ethnic cleansing, occurring or<br />
apprehended.” 4 It would be nice if, for once, the international community<br />
actually had a plan and a course <strong>of</strong> action prepared for such occurrences that<br />
could be implemented and undertaken in time to halt the commission <strong>of</strong><br />
crimes, rather than to simply wait and dispense post hoc “justice” after the<br />
fact. It is to this aim that the instant article is dedicated.<br />
3 The “responsibility to protect” comprises three distinct responsibilities: the responsibility to react, with<br />
which this article is concerned, and the responsibilities to prevent and rebuild each vitally important in<br />
their own right.<br />
4 G. Evans, The Responsibility to Protect: Rethinking Humanitarian Intervention, 98 Am. Soc’y Int’l L.<br />
Proc. 78, 80 (2004).
PARADIGM SHIFTS IN INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE 21<br />
2. REVOLUTIONS IN INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE<br />
Since the Treaty <strong>of</strong> Westphalia established the framework <strong>of</strong> the modern<br />
international order, there have been two major shifts in the world <strong>of</strong><br />
international justice that could be construed, in the Kuhnian sense, as<br />
revolutions. The first occurred in the wake <strong>of</strong> World War Two with the trials<br />
<strong>of</strong> former political and military leaders <strong>of</strong> the defeated German and Japanese<br />
sides. The Nuremburg tribunal explicitly disallowed any defense based on<br />
sovereign immunity, “i.e.”, the position prevailing under the Westphalian<br />
conception <strong>of</strong> the state that a country’s leaders would be immune to<br />
prosecution by other states. 5 Although not entirely without precedent, and<br />
there are few innovations in international law and policy that are truly sui<br />
generis, Nuremburg represented a partial replacement <strong>of</strong> the Westphalian<br />
paradigm with a new paradigm in which state actors could be held accountable<br />
for certain crimes against their populaces. Returning to Kuhn, the paradigm<br />
shift itself is clear, and the fact that the Nuremburg principles only partially<br />
unraveled the sovereignty contemplated by the Treaty <strong>of</strong> Westphalia does not<br />
discount the revolutionary nature <strong>of</strong> this moment. Moreover, the malfunctionas-impetus<br />
is also apparent, although the shift is made post hoc – it is not a<br />
systemic malfunction that necessarily led to the shift away from Westphalia,<br />
but that shift occurred because, had the international community failed to make<br />
the shift, the malfunction would have been manifest. Those who committed the<br />
crimes <strong>of</strong> Nazi Germany could have been freed, and a dangerous precedent<br />
regarding international accountability would have been set.<br />
The basic principle <strong>of</strong> Nuremburg, that a state’s leaders will be held<br />
accountable for atrocities committed against its citizens, remained in the<br />
consciousness <strong>of</strong> international law, despite several years <strong>of</strong> somnolence, and<br />
returned with vigor in the last years <strong>of</strong> the Twentieth Century. In response to<br />
the atrocities committed during the disintegration <strong>of</strong> Yugoslavia and in<br />
Rwanda, the United Nations established ad hoc tribunals for the trial <strong>of</strong> those<br />
responsible. More recently, hybrid tribunals have been established in<br />
Cambodia and Sierra Leone. Yet despite the continuing vibrance <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Nuremburg principle, the international community’s application <strong>of</strong> that<br />
principle was obviously and decidedly ad hoc – although perpetrators would<br />
be brought to justice, such justice remained dependent on the establishment <strong>of</strong><br />
a specific forum for a specific situation.<br />
Thus, the second revolutionary moment occurred at the point when<br />
international justice became institutionalized in the body <strong>of</strong> the International<br />
Criminal Court. This moment fits more neatly into the Kuhn analogy, as a<br />
“malfunction” was at least implicitly present – the cost and time involved with<br />
5 See G. Robertson QC, Ending Impunity: How International Criminal <strong>Law</strong> Can Put Tyrants on Trial, 38<br />
Cornell Int’l L.J. (2005) p. 649, pp. 650-656.
22 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
establishing a tribunal anew for each situation warranting justice – and the<br />
paradigm shift towards an institutionalized forum for administering<br />
international criminal justice at least partially replaced the prior system <strong>of</strong> ad<br />
hoc and national justice. National jurisdictions will continue to have a<br />
significant role to play in the system via the principle <strong>of</strong> complementarity, and<br />
nothing in the Rome Statute itself bars recourse to hybrid or other forms <strong>of</strong> ad<br />
hoc tribunals, yet ins<strong>of</strong>ar as it does present an entirely new and permanent<br />
forum for the administration <strong>of</strong> international criminal justice, the ICC is truly<br />
revolutionary in the Kuhnian sense. From its establishment on, and to the<br />
extent that crimes are committed within its temporal and substantive<br />
jurisdiction, it will be charged with the role <strong>of</strong> investigating violations <strong>of</strong><br />
international criminal and humanitarian law, bringing appropriate charges,<br />
and trying the violators. And it will do all this from a permanent seat, with a<br />
full complement <strong>of</strong> judges, prosecutors, and staff, whose full time job will be<br />
international criminal law.<br />
These first two moments have built <strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong> each other, as the<br />
establishment <strong>of</strong> the ICC is a direct result <strong>of</strong> the continuing vitality <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Nuremburg principles and the international community’s desire to see justice<br />
done when the worst atrocities are committed by state political and military<br />
leaders. So, to, have the cumulative “effects” <strong>of</strong> these preceding moments<br />
given rise to the current point <strong>of</strong> crisis in international criminal and human<br />
rights law, where, for the first time, the international community has begun to<br />
question to what extent the atrocities themselves may be halted prior to or<br />
during their commission, rather than simply punished post factum. To<br />
ultimately answer this question, however, means that one must return to the<br />
surviving aspects <strong>of</strong> Westphalia and rationalize one state’s “meddling” into<br />
the sovereign domain <strong>of</strong> another state, a course <strong>of</strong> action effectively rendered<br />
impermissible by the founding document <strong>of</strong> the current international order,<br />
the United Nations Charter: “Nothing contained in the present Charter shall<br />
authorize the United Nations to intervene in matters which are essentially<br />
within the domestic jurisdiction <strong>of</strong> any state[.]” 6<br />
The “malfunction” here is clear – a state’s sovereignty, as<br />
traditionally conceived under the international system, in essence means that<br />
certain ongoing acts will be isolated from review by the international<br />
community, even if, under prevailing norms <strong>of</strong> international law, the<br />
perpetrators may ultimately be held to account for those atrocities. This<br />
dilemma was noted by former Secretary-General K<strong>of</strong>i Annan over the course<br />
<strong>of</strong> several high-pr<strong>of</strong>ile appearances and speeches from 1999 through 2001. In<br />
his speech to the Fifty-Fourth Session <strong>of</strong> the U.N. General Assembly, Annan<br />
stated that “[s]urely no legal principle – even sovereignty – can ever shield<br />
6 Charter <strong>of</strong> the United Nations, 26 June, 1945, 3 Bevans 1153, article 2.7.
PARADIGM SHIFTS IN INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE 23<br />
crimes against humanity.” 7 In his millennium report issued the following year,<br />
the dilemma was posed in more existential terms: “If humanitarian intervention<br />
is, indeed, an unacceptable assault on sovereignty, how should we respond to<br />
a Rwanda, to a Srebrenica – to gross and systematic violations <strong>of</strong> human rights<br />
that affect every precept <strong>of</strong> our common humanity?” 8 This course <strong>of</strong> thought<br />
culminated at the very moment that the new principle <strong>of</strong> a “responsibility to<br />
protect” became manifest. At his Nobel lecture in 2001, Annan stated<br />
emphatically that the “sovereignty <strong>of</strong> states must no longer be used as a shield<br />
for gross violations <strong>of</strong> human rights.” 9 That same year, the International<br />
Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty issued a report designed to<br />
meet the inherent tension between state sovereignty and the state’s continuing<br />
proclivity to commit atrocities against its own citizens. In the words <strong>of</strong> one<br />
prominent member, to meet these difficulties, the international community had<br />
“to rethink sovereignty in terms <strong>of</strong> its essence being not so much control as<br />
responsibility.” 10 Thus, we find ourselves in the midst <strong>of</strong> the third (potentially)<br />
great, although currently incomplete, revolution in international criminal and<br />
human rights law.<br />
3. THE RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT: FROM<br />
2001 THROUGH THE PRESENT<br />
The “responsibility to protect” was the result <strong>of</strong> the International Commission<br />
on Intervention and State Sovereignty’s 2001 report, The Responsibility to<br />
Protect. 11 This report, in the course <strong>of</strong> rethinking sovereignty-asresponsibility,<br />
premised the resulting conception <strong>of</strong> sovereignty on two basic<br />
principles: “a primary responsibility to protect lies with the state and a<br />
secondary or surrogate responsibility to protect falls to the international<br />
community when the state is unable or unwilling to halt or avert a population<br />
suffering serious harm, whether resulting from internal war, insurgency,<br />
repression or state failure.” 12 This conception <strong>of</strong> state sovereignty envisions a<br />
two-fold conception <strong>of</strong> state responsibility: a state is internally responsible to<br />
its citizens for the welfare <strong>of</strong> those citizens, and externally responsible to the<br />
international community for its internal actions. 13 In essence, then, the<br />
Commission contemplated a “residual responsibility” on the part <strong>of</strong> the<br />
7 Secretary-General presents his Annual Report to General Assembly, U.N. Doc. SG/SM/7136 and GA/<br />
9596 (20 September, 1999).<br />
8 K.A. Annan, We the peoples: The role <strong>of</strong> the United Nations in the 21st century 48 (2000), G.A.<br />
Resolution 2000, U.N. GAOR, 54th Sess., U.N. Doc. a/54/2000 (2000), available at http://www.un.org/<br />
millennium.<br />
9 K. Annan, Nobel Lecture (10 December, 2001).<br />
10 Evans, supra note 4, p. 82.<br />
11 International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty, the Responsibility to Protect (2001).<br />
12 E. McClean, The Responsibility to Protect: The Role <strong>of</strong> International Human Rights <strong>Law</strong>, 13 J. Conflict &<br />
Security L. (2008) pp. 123-127.<br />
13 Id. at 128; C. Stahn, Responsibility to Protect: Political Rhetoric or Emerging Legal Norm?, 101 Am. J.<br />
Int’l L. (2007) p. 99, p. 104.
24 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
international community, to be activated: (1) when a particular state is clearly<br />
either unwilling or unable to fulfill its responsibility to protect; (2) when a<br />
particular state … is itself the actual perpetrator <strong>of</strong> crimes or atrocities; or (3)<br />
where people living outside a particular state are directly threatened by actions<br />
taking place there. 14<br />
When this residual responsibility is activated, states in the<br />
international community may take coercive measures as against the <strong>of</strong>fending<br />
state, which “may include political, economic, or judicial measures, and in<br />
extreme – but only in extreme – cases, they may also include military<br />
action.” 15 The possibility <strong>of</strong> military action is central to the instant article, but<br />
as Evans noted, that possibility is accompanied by a number <strong>of</strong> difficult<br />
questions: “[W]hat is an extreme case? Where should we draw the line in<br />
determining when military intervention is prima facie defensible? What other<br />
conditions or restraints, if any, should apply in determining whether and how<br />
intervention should proceed? Most difficult <strong>of</strong> all, who makes all these<br />
decisions? Who should have the ultimate authority to determine whether an<br />
intrusion into a sovereign state, involving the use <strong>of</strong> deadly force on a<br />
potentially massive scale, should actually go ahead?” 16 The Commission<br />
established six basic criteria that should govern the question <strong>of</strong> military<br />
intervention:<br />
1. Just cause (the threshold for action) – military intervention should not be<br />
countenanced unless two potential situations are present: “large-scale loss<br />
<strong>of</strong> life, actual or apprehended, with or without genocidal intent, that is the<br />
product either <strong>of</strong> deliberate state action, state neglect or inability to act, or<br />
a failed state situation; or large-scale ‘ethnic-cleansing,’ actual or<br />
apprehended, whether carried out by killing, forced expulsion, acts <strong>of</strong><br />
terror, or rape.” 17 The Commission also noted that situations <strong>of</strong> natural<br />
disasters or catastrophes could also provide the catalyst for military<br />
intervention, “when the state concerned is unwilling or unable to cope or<br />
call for assistance, and significant loss <strong>of</strong> life is occurring or threatened.” 18<br />
2. Right intention – “The primary purpose <strong>of</strong> the intervention, whatever other<br />
motives the intervening states may have, must be to halt or avert human<br />
suffering.” 19<br />
3. Last resort – military intervention must always be an option <strong>of</strong> last resort:<br />
“Every diplomatic and nonmilitary avenue for the prevention or peaceful<br />
resolution <strong>of</strong> the humanitarian crisis must have been explored.” 20 The<br />
Commission hedged against the interminable delay a strict application <strong>of</strong><br />
14 Stahn, supra note 13, p. 104 (citing The responsibility to protect 17).<br />
15 Evans, supra note 4, p. 84.<br />
16 Id.<br />
17 Id. p. 85.<br />
18 Id.<br />
19 Id. pp. 85-86.<br />
20 Id. p. 86.
PARADIGM SHIFTS IN INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE 25<br />
a “last resort” principle could lead to, noting that the requirement that<br />
military intervention must be a recourse <strong>of</strong> last resort “does not necessarily<br />
mean that every such option must literally have been tried and failed; <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
there will simply not be the time for that process to work itself out. What<br />
it does mean is that there must be reasonable grounds for believing that, in<br />
all circumstances, if the measure had been attempted it would not have<br />
succeeded.” 21<br />
4. Proportionality – “The scale, duration, and intensity <strong>of</strong> the planned<br />
military intervention should be the minimum necessary to secure the<br />
humanitarian objectives in question.” 22<br />
5. Reasonable prospects – “Military action can only be justified if it stands a<br />
reasonable chance <strong>of</strong> successfully halting or averting the atrocities or<br />
suffering that triggered the intervention.” 23<br />
6. Right authority – the military intervention must derive its invocation from<br />
an international actor with the legal authority to authorize military<br />
interventions into a sovereign state. 24<br />
The question <strong>of</strong> right authority is central to whether the<br />
“responsibility to protect” will ever become an efficacious principle <strong>of</strong> action.<br />
As Gareth Evans noted in the wake <strong>of</strong> the Commission’s report, “[w]hen it<br />
comes to authorizing military intervention for human protection purposes, the<br />
argument is compelling that the United Nations, in particular the Security<br />
Council, should be the first port <strong>of</strong> call. The difficult question – starkly raised<br />
by Kosovo – is whether it should be the last.” 25 Thus, although the<br />
Commission’s report made clear that the United Nations should be the first<br />
stop in obtaining authorization to intervene for protection purposes, it did not<br />
foreclose the option that states unilaterally, in coalitions, or under the auspices<br />
<strong>of</strong> regional organizations, could intervene if the United Nations failed to take<br />
appropriate action. 26<br />
The issue <strong>of</strong> right authority was next taken up by the United Nations’<br />
High-Level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change, whose mandate<br />
encompassed issues mainly pertaining to institutional reform at the U.N.<br />
Unsurprisingly, then, the focus <strong>of</strong> the eventually issued report centered on the<br />
primacy <strong>of</strong> U.N. authorization, specifically via the Security Council. 27<br />
“Unlike the Commission [], the panel did not envisage that an international<br />
responsibility to protect could be invoked by coalitions <strong>of</strong> the able or willing<br />
21 Id.<br />
22 Id.<br />
23 Id.<br />
24 Id. pp. 86-88.<br />
25 Id. pp. 86-87.<br />
26 The responsibility to protect 54-55; see Stahn, supra note 13, at 104; R. J. Hamilton, The Responsibility to<br />
Protect: From Document to Doctrine—But What <strong>of</strong> Implementation?, 19 Harv. Hum Rts. J. (2006) pp.<br />
289-291.<br />
27 See High-level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change, a More Secure World: Our Shared<br />
Responsibility (2004).
26 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
or regional organizations in the absence <strong>of</strong> Security Council authorization.<br />
The report stressed that the ‘emerging norm’ <strong>of</strong> a ‘collective international<br />
responsibility to protect’ was only ‘exercisable by the Security Council’ and<br />
only if military intervention was at stake.” 28 Again unsurprisingly, this same<br />
tact was presented in Secretary-General Annan’s 2005 report, In Larger<br />
Freedom: Towards Development, Security and Human Rights for All. 29 In this<br />
report, the “[u]se <strong>of</strong> force was described as an ultima ratio measure that, if<br />
taken, ought to be carried out by the Security Council. The notion <strong>of</strong><br />
responsibility to protect was used to constrain, rather than to enable, the use <strong>of</strong><br />
force.” 30 As Carsten Stahn noted, “the general focus <strong>of</strong> the report on the<br />
[Security] Council and the silence <strong>of</strong> the secretary-general on alternative<br />
means <strong>of</strong> carrying out interventions for purposes <strong>of</strong> human protection<br />
indicated a general reluctance to accept military action without the Security<br />
Council’s authorization.” 31<br />
Nonetheless, despite the United Nations own attempts to maintain<br />
not only a focus on the Security Council, but a monopoly <strong>of</strong> decision, gray<br />
area was restored to the “right authority” debate via the 2005 World Summit<br />
Outcome Document, the product <strong>of</strong> the High-Level Plenary Meeting <strong>of</strong> the<br />
60th Session <strong>of</strong> the General Assembly. 32 The relevant provisions <strong>of</strong> that<br />
document are paragraphs 138 and 139, which embody the responsibility to<br />
protect and contemplate the circumstances when the residual responsibility <strong>of</strong><br />
the international community may be activated. Paragraph 138 recognizes that<br />
“Each individual State has the responsibility to protect its populations from<br />
genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity. This<br />
responsibility entails the prevention <strong>of</strong> such crimes, including their<br />
incitement, through appropriate and necessary means.” Turning from the<br />
state’s internal responsibilities, paragraph 139 addresses the external<br />
dimension <strong>of</strong> the state’s responsibility: “The international community,<br />
through the United Nations, also has the responsibility to use appropriate<br />
diplomatic, humanitarian and other peaceful means, in accordance with<br />
Chapter VI and VIII <strong>of</strong> the Charter, to help to protect populations from<br />
genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity.” When<br />
that responsibility comes into play, the international community should be<br />
“prepared to take collective action, in a timely and decisive manner, through<br />
the Security Council, in accordance with the Charter, including Chapter VII,<br />
on a case-by-case basis and in cooperation with relevant regional<br />
organizations as appropriate, should peaceful means be inadequate and<br />
28 Stahn, supra note 13, p. 106.<br />
29 See Report <strong>of</strong> the Secretary General, in Larger Freedom: Towards Development, Security and Human<br />
Rights for All (2005).<br />
30 Stahn, supra note 13, at 107.<br />
31 Id. pp. 107-08.<br />
32 G.A. Res. 60/1 (24, October, 2005).
PARADIGM SHIFTS IN INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE 27<br />
national authorities are manifestly failing to protect their populations from<br />
genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity.” 33<br />
The Outcome Document does not, contrary to the previous iterations<br />
by Annan and the High-Level Panel on Threats, Challenges, and Change,<br />
“firmly state that UN collective security action constitutes the only option for<br />
responding to mass atrocities through the use <strong>of</strong> force ... It leaves the door<br />
open to unilateral response through its ‘case-by-case’ vision <strong>of</strong> collective<br />
security and qualified commitment to act in cooperation with regional<br />
organizations (‘as appropriate’).” 34 Another commentator has posited that<br />
unilateral intervention may be contemplated upon the satisfaction <strong>of</strong> three<br />
conditions: (1) one <strong>of</strong> a narrow set <strong>of</strong> “extreme human rights abuses” is<br />
present; (2) a course <strong>of</strong> international action has been exhausted or is infeasible<br />
(“the agreement implies a hierarchy <strong>of</strong> actors and <strong>of</strong> interventions: Good faith<br />
U.N. action is privileged over unilateralism and peaceful action is privileged<br />
over violent means.”); and (3) the intervention is undertaken solely for<br />
purposes <strong>of</strong> protection. 35<br />
Although the circumstances that may warrant a military intervention<br />
in the face <strong>of</strong> a state’s failure to protect its own citizens are more or less clear,<br />
the course <strong>of</strong> conduct contemplated once those circumstances become<br />
apparent is less so. The four documents explored above diverge in this regard,<br />
with some contemplating potential unilateral or multilateral action outside the<br />
confines <strong>of</strong> the U.N. system if that system itself is unable to take the<br />
appropriate steps, while others view the U.N. as the sole permissible step on<br />
the enforcement side <strong>of</strong> the responsibility to protect. Unfortunately, until this<br />
dilemma is resolved, there is little reason to believe that the responsibility to<br />
protect, no matter how beautifully theorized, will have any relevance in<br />
practice.<br />
4. THE RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT: AN<br />
EARLY FAILURE<br />
Whether in the Congo, Sudan, Burma, or any <strong>of</strong> a range <strong>of</strong> other states, the<br />
responsibility to protect has failed as a principle in motivating a response to a<br />
state’s clear abdication <strong>of</strong> its internal responsibility to protect its citizens. This<br />
failure can be attributed to a number <strong>of</strong> causes, including a lack <strong>of</strong> clear support<br />
for the principle in practice, “i.e.” a lack <strong>of</strong> political will for broad<br />
implementation, an incompletely and potential incorrectly theorized view <strong>of</strong><br />
the “responsibility,” and the pervasiveness at the United Nations and in foreign<br />
delegations <strong>of</strong> a paper culture antithetical to definitive action.<br />
33 Id. at p. 139.<br />
34 Stahn, supra note 13, p. 109.<br />
35 See A. L. Bannon, The Responsibility to Protect: The U.N. World Summit and the Question <strong>of</strong><br />
Unilateralism, 115 YALE L.J. (2006) pp. 1157-1158.
28 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
First, it is far from clear that there is currently, or ever will be,<br />
sufficient political will to make the responsibility to protect a political reality<br />
in those situations where its invocation would be needed. This is a distinct<br />
issue from those circumstances which present a need for invocation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
principle, but where action may be impossible from a logistical or operational<br />
perspective. The failure here is starker, as the international community could<br />
do something, but for failure to adequately mobilize political resources does<br />
not. The situation in Darfur is <strong>of</strong>ten viewed through this prism, as operational<br />
capacity has never been a real concern in planning on the ground aid and<br />
action. Rather, one <strong>of</strong> the many lessons <strong>of</strong> Darfur is that “even if operational<br />
targets can be met, they will not be met without political commitment.” 36 This<br />
situation, a failure <strong>of</strong> political will despite the capacity to act, is not particular<br />
to Darfur, but will infect every circumstance where the responsibility to<br />
protect is invoked, and this is true for a range <strong>of</strong> reasons, from individual<br />
apathy in the populations <strong>of</strong> other states to self-interest on the part <strong>of</strong><br />
governments and international actors. 37 A failure <strong>of</strong> political commitment is<br />
fatal in these situations, as there is nothing outside the very imperative to<br />
action that these situations cry out for that can compel action on the part <strong>of</strong><br />
states or international bodies. Yet unless this situation can be remedied, the<br />
enunciation <strong>of</strong> the “responsibility to protect” may well “merely mark the turn<br />
<strong>of</strong> another century <strong>of</strong> inaction in the face <strong>of</strong> mass human suffering.” 38<br />
Second, it is also not clear that the principle has achieved any sort <strong>of</strong><br />
real consensus regarding its scope and implementation in theory, making any<br />
practical application that much more difficult. Emma McLean has noted that<br />
“the change in language advocated by the ICISS report has done little to forge<br />
consensus or overcome the struggle between sovereignty and human<br />
rights.” 39 Despite paying lip-service to the responsibility to protect, many<br />
states still wish to maintain rigidly classic definitions <strong>of</strong> sovereignty, whether<br />
so they can keep a tight grasp on regions seeking independence, or because<br />
they simply want outside eyes averted from domestic issues. This inevitably<br />
means that the responsibility to protect cannot gain hard legal traction, as it<br />
remains simply a principle, or a s<strong>of</strong>t law ideal, yet to coalesce around a<br />
definitive consensus <strong>of</strong> when and how sovereignty can be “side-stepped” in<br />
favor <strong>of</strong> international action. 40 Although the responsibility to protect itself<br />
should probably never become such a hard principle <strong>of</strong> law, as that would<br />
36 Hamilton, supra note 26, p. 294.<br />
37 See G. Evans, From Humanitarian Intervention to the Responsibility to Protect, 24 Wis. Int’l L.J. (2006)<br />
pp. 703-720.<br />
38 Hamilton, supra note 26, at 297.<br />
39 McLean, supra note 12, p. 134 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).<br />
40 See, “e.g” id. at p. 135 (“At this juncture it is pertinent to recall that the responsibility to protect is not a<br />
legal principle. It is a policy option which the ICISS grounds on four pillars to support the position that a<br />
norm <strong>of</strong> intervention for human protection purposes in extreme cases <strong>of</strong> major harm to civilians is<br />
emerging.”); Stahn, supra note 13, p. 120 (“Responsibility to protect is in many ways still a political<br />
catchword rather than a legal norm.”).
PARADIGM SHIFTS IN INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE 29<br />
implicate the (unwise) establishment <strong>of</strong> a coercive regime for incidences <strong>of</strong><br />
non-action, 41 the foundations <strong>of</strong> the responsibility must rest on such hard legal<br />
“facts.” Such legal facts must include the extent <strong>of</strong> a state’s sovereignty and<br />
when sovereignty can cease to act as a cover for a state’s treatment <strong>of</strong> its own<br />
citizens, the circumstances when militarily coercive action can be resorted to,<br />
and what the nature <strong>of</strong> the military response could be, “i.e.” international,<br />
unilateral, multilateral, regional. Until these definitional and legal issues are<br />
sorted out, the responsibility to protect will remain not only a point <strong>of</strong> s<strong>of</strong>t<br />
law, but, for all intents and purposes, simple and superfluous verbiage.<br />
Finally, despite any number <strong>of</strong> hortatory declarations <strong>of</strong> support,<br />
implementation <strong>of</strong> the principle is inevitably compromised by the fact that its<br />
implementation rests with an organization that largely finds written reports,<br />
reprimands, and censures sufficient to discharge its responsibility without<br />
getting its hands dirty with real action. The United Nations and any number <strong>of</strong><br />
foreign ministries, including the United States Department <strong>of</strong> State, are paper<br />
cultures intricably bound to notions <strong>of</strong> bureaucracy and the interminable delay<br />
inherent therein. Thus, while many trumpet the idea <strong>of</strong> a responsibility to<br />
protect, there is little reason to believe that this responsibility will ever be put<br />
into action, as the individuals with the responsibility to act must go through<br />
any number <strong>of</strong> paper exchanges and reports before action could actually be<br />
countenanced. Indicative <strong>of</strong> this mindset are two recently issued reports, one<br />
by the United Nations, the other by the International Human Rights Clinic <strong>of</strong><br />
Harvard <strong>Law</strong> School. The Harvard report dealt with the issue <strong>of</strong> international<br />
crimes being committed in Burma, and was overseen by veritable<br />
international jurists, among them, Richard Goldstone, Patricia Wald, and Sir<br />
Ge<strong>of</strong>frey Nice. 42 The report noted the consistent course <strong>of</strong> grave violations <strong>of</strong><br />
human rights law undertaken by Burma’s military junta, and the fact that such<br />
violations had been extensively documented by the United Nations over the<br />
preceding decades in a range <strong>of</strong> reports and resolutions. 43 Noting these<br />
reports, however, the report did not question the efficacy <strong>of</strong> the United<br />
Nations, or advocate for actual action. Rather, it recommended recourse<br />
through the United Nations Security Council; specifically, that the U.N.<br />
should pass resolutions condemning the situation, the Security Council should<br />
establish a Commission <strong>of</strong> Inquiry to verify the violations, and then the<br />
Security Council should establish a judicial mechanism or refer the case to the<br />
International Criminal Court to address the violations. 44 It seems an odd<br />
conclusion to recommend further reports as the definitive action, when that<br />
41 See Stahn, supra note 13, p. 117 (“If the responsibility to protect were indeed a primary legal norm <strong>of</strong><br />
international law, it would be logical to assume that such violations should entail some form <strong>of</strong> legal<br />
sanction in case <strong>of</strong> noncompliance. But it is uncertain on what basis and under which rules such violations<br />
could be remedied.”).<br />
42 See International Human Rights Clinic, Harvard <strong>Law</strong> School, Crimes in Burma (May 2009).<br />
43 See id. pp. 3-4, pp. 37-76.<br />
44 Id. p. 77 and pp. 86-90.
30 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
very conclusion was derived from decades <strong>of</strong> reports that have obviously not<br />
impacted the situation in Burma at all.<br />
This same flawed logic and lack <strong>of</strong> self-awareness is even more<br />
present in the Secretary-General’s report on “implementing” the responsibility<br />
to protect. 45 The Secretary-General correctly noted, regarding genocide, that<br />
“[t]oo <strong>of</strong>ten, the international response has been inadequate. Far from being<br />
consigned to history, genocide remains a serious threat. Not just vigilance but<br />
a will to act are as important today as ever.” 46 Nonetheless, any directive to<br />
act is almost immediately undermined in the same paragraph: “To this effect,<br />
my Special Advisor and his <strong>of</strong>fice continue to pursue a strategy <strong>of</strong> enhancing<br />
the United Nations’ understanding <strong>of</strong> genocide and its precursors, <strong>of</strong><br />
strengthening the ways in which existing international law can be used to<br />
prevent genocide and, above all, <strong>of</strong> monitoring and analyzing ongoing<br />
situations <strong>of</strong> concern and advising me and Member States as needed.” 47 This<br />
inaction is manifest even in the monitoring <strong>of</strong> actual, rather than apprehended,<br />
incidents. Regarding the breakdown in the Congo, “[t]hroughout 2008, my<br />
Special Advisor on the Prevention <strong>of</strong> Genocide has followed the situation in<br />
the eastern DRC … with considerable concern ... From his meetings and<br />
observations, my Special Advisor concluded that there is cause for deep<br />
concern regarding the grave human rights and humanitarian situation in<br />
North Kivu, including the risk <strong>of</strong> genocidal violence[.]” 48 The basic thrust <strong>of</strong><br />
this report is the establishment <strong>of</strong> a framework <strong>of</strong> analysis “to determine<br />
whether there may be a risk <strong>of</strong> genocide in a certain situation.” 49<br />
The framework uses eight questions to prompt information<br />
collection and analysis <strong>of</strong> key areas: (1) the existence and<br />
vulnerability <strong>of</strong> national, ethnic, racial or religious group(s); (2)<br />
human rights violations committed against the group(s); (3)<br />
domestic capacity to prevent genocide; (4) the existence <strong>of</strong> armed<br />
opposition actors; (5) the existence <strong>of</strong> any significant political or<br />
economic motivation encouraging political leads to stroke divisions<br />
between groups; (6) whether elements <strong>of</strong> the crime <strong>of</strong> genocide are<br />
already occurring; (7) whether there are moments <strong>of</strong> particular<br />
vulnerability approaching; and (8) whether there is a discernible<br />
intent to commit to destroy a national, ethnic, racial or religious<br />
population group. 50<br />
45 Implementing the Responsibility to Protect—Report <strong>of</strong> the Secretary-General, A/63/677, January 2009,<br />
21 Int’l J. Refugee L. 519 (2009).<br />
46 Id. p. 536.<br />
47 Id.<br />
48 Id. p. 531.<br />
49 Id. at 519-20.<br />
50 Id. at p. 520, pp. 522-24.
PARADIGM SHIFTS IN INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE 31<br />
One can imagine a genocide being completed in the time that the<br />
United Nations will take to answer these questions which, it bears mentioning,<br />
will only “prompt information collection and analysis” even if a risk <strong>of</strong><br />
genocide is apprehended! The kind <strong>of</strong> analysis and assessment noted by the<br />
United Nations, and undertaken by the Harvard clinic, are important and have<br />
a place within the international justice framework. At some point, however,<br />
the proliferation <strong>of</strong> reports cannot help but have a deleterious impact on the<br />
will to act, as seems clearly the case at this stage in the development <strong>of</strong> the<br />
responsibility to protect. Too many actors and policy makers seem content on<br />
writing about why and in what situations the responsibility should be engaged,<br />
rather than in undertaking the necessary steps to ensure implementation on the<br />
ground. Yet, as is obvious, no matter how beautiful the language or theory <strong>of</strong><br />
the responsibility is, if it cannot protect in practice, it is not worth the paper<br />
these reports are written on. As Gareth Evans has written, “[w]e cannot be<br />
content with reports and declaration. We must, as an international community,<br />
be prepared to act. We will not be able to live with ourselves if we do not.” 51<br />
5. TOWARDS A PRINCIPLE OF ACTION<br />
If the responsibility to protect, as currently conceived and implemented, is<br />
flawed and incapable <strong>of</strong> realizing its inherent promise, how can the<br />
international community proceed towards a principle <strong>of</strong> action that can provide<br />
the requisite impetus in a Darfur or Burma? In order to realize such a principle<br />
<strong>of</strong> action, the responsibility to protect simply has to be more tightly and<br />
coherently theorized, specifically in relation to the types <strong>of</strong> overtly coercive<br />
responses it will countenance under its name, “i.e.” how military action may be<br />
undertaken. This may be the most important aspect regarding moving forward,<br />
but all the hard legal “facts” noted in the preceding section must be dealt with<br />
explicitly and comprehensively, which has only occurred to a limited degree<br />
thus far. Specifically, the limitations on a state’s sovereignty must be<br />
addressed, the circumstances warranting an overt and physical response must<br />
be categorized, and the permissible nature <strong>of</strong> that response must be delineated.<br />
As an initial matter, however, the “theory” <strong>of</strong> the international<br />
community’s residual responsibility must be more fully developed. The<br />
“responsibility to protect” asserts that a state has an internal responsibility to<br />
protect its citizens, and an external responsibility to the international<br />
community to assure that it does fulfill its domestic responsibilities. 52 Only<br />
when the state shirks the internal dimension <strong>of</strong> its responsibility may the<br />
international community’s responsibility be engaged. Rather than view the<br />
international community’s “residual” responsibility as derivative <strong>of</strong> the state’s<br />
51 Evans, supra note 4, p. 89.<br />
52 See McClean, supra note 13, at 128; Stahn, supra note 14, p. 104.
32 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
internal responsibility, that responsibility should derive directly from the<br />
corpus <strong>of</strong> international human rights and criminal law, “i.e.” the international<br />
community has a responsibility to enforce a state’s compliance with its<br />
obligations under international law, and when a state fails to fulfill those<br />
mandates, coercive action by the international community is permissible.<br />
Although a state does have an external responsibility to the international<br />
community to ensure its own compliance with its international obligations,<br />
this responsibility is not one which implicates the domestic populace or<br />
should engage any international responsibility. It is a traditional state-to-state<br />
conception <strong>of</strong> responsibility, and recourse for violations in that sense should<br />
be confined to traditional avenues <strong>of</strong> international dispute settlement. Any<br />
responsibility undergirding the international community’s call to action in<br />
“responsibility to protect” situations should be based not on this external<br />
dimension <strong>of</strong> the state’s responsibility, but on the international community’s<br />
duty to ensure compliance with international law.<br />
Regarding limitations on a state’s sovereignty, it is still accepted that<br />
so long as a state complies with its obligations to its citizens, its internal<br />
actions will avoid external scrutiny. There is a growing consensus, however,<br />
that when this responsibility is neglected, any defense to external scrutiny<br />
based on sovereignty is weak, at best. This fact is derived from the legal<br />
obligations undertaken by the state on behalf <strong>of</strong> its citizens, and the<br />
understanding that a state may not commit atrocities against its subject<br />
populace: “If nations have no sovereign right to commit or passively permit<br />
atrocities against their own populations, then they cannot object on<br />
sovereignty grounds to coercive actions halting the commission <strong>of</strong> those<br />
atrocities.” 53 Thus, the issue <strong>of</strong> sovereignty need not be dealt with in a<br />
necessarily expansive manner. It is sufficient, for purposes <strong>of</strong> discerning when<br />
action is warranted, to address solely those grave circumstances where the<br />
state is actively committing atrocities against its populace. In those<br />
circumstances, a state simply does not have any cognizable defense to<br />
intervention, as it is itself committing crimes under international law which<br />
the intervention is designed to stop. Accordingly, this provides the first legal<br />
peg <strong>of</strong> support for a principle <strong>of</strong> action: action can proceed against a state that<br />
is committing crimes against its population in violation <strong>of</strong> international law,<br />
because that state lacks any colorable sovereignty defense.<br />
But what crimes will trigger this “abrogation” <strong>of</strong> sovereignty?<br />
Any inclination towards adventurism on the part <strong>of</strong> the members <strong>of</strong><br />
the international community can be tempered by making clear that a military<br />
intervention will only be triggered by the worst abuses <strong>of</strong> a state. Election<br />
fraud or electoral corruption would be an insufficient basis to justify a military<br />
response, making action unjustified based on the recent elections in Iran and<br />
53 Bannon, supra note 35, p. 1162.
PARADIGM SHIFTS IN INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE 33<br />
the previous disputed elections in Kenya and Zimbabwe. Violations <strong>of</strong> other<br />
human rights, “i.e.” religious freedom, rights <strong>of</strong> association, freedoms <strong>of</strong><br />
speech and the press, are also not actions that should trigger an overt military<br />
response. This is not to say that these rights are not extraordinarily important<br />
or that some other form <strong>of</strong> coercive response should not be contemplated and<br />
implemented – it is solely to recognize that not every violation <strong>of</strong> a right<br />
cognizable under international law can give rise to the most extreme response.<br />
Rather, the ICISS report has basically gotten it right in categorizing those<br />
circumstances where a state’s actions against its citizens will give rise to<br />
colorable grounds for military intervention: where there is “large-scale loss <strong>of</strong><br />
life, actual or apprehended, with or without genocidal intent, that is the<br />
product either <strong>of</strong> deliberate state action, state neglect or inability to act, or a<br />
failed state situation; or large-scale ‘ethnic-cleansing,’ actual or apprehended,<br />
whether carried out by killing, forced expulsion, acts <strong>of</strong> terror, or rape.” 54<br />
Additionally, intervention will be countenanced when a state is unwilling or<br />
unable to take necessary steps to protect its populace in the wake <strong>of</strong> a natural<br />
disaster or catastrophe. 55 Burma’s inexcusable delay and ultimately<br />
ineffectual response to Cyclone Nargis is just such an example.<br />
To this list should be added a state’s commission <strong>of</strong> crimes against<br />
humanity, as defined by the Rome Statute. This would include as a trigger for<br />
a military response a state’s commission <strong>of</strong> enslavement, deportation or<br />
forcible transfers <strong>of</strong> segments <strong>of</strong> the population, torture, persecution, statesponsored<br />
disappearances, and other inhumane acts <strong>of</strong> a similar character. 56<br />
Although these acts are justifiably seen as reprehensible, the criticism may be<br />
leveled that to include crimes against humanity as a trigger for military action<br />
increases exponentially those circumstances where such action could be<br />
justified. The line between persecution and deprivation <strong>of</strong> religious freedoms,<br />
for instance, may be gray, and there are no good reasons for including crimes<br />
against humanity on the one hand, while excluding similarly egregious<br />
violations <strong>of</strong> human rights on the other. In practice, and in correctly applying<br />
the definition <strong>of</strong> crimes against humanity, including this class should not<br />
unduly expand the range <strong>of</strong> circumstances where a military action may be<br />
countenanced, mainly on account <strong>of</strong> the inherent jurisdictional limitation <strong>of</strong><br />
“crimes against humanity.” The acts noted above are not crimes against<br />
humanity when viewed in isolation, or necessarily even when viewed in the<br />
aggregate: rather, to constitute crimes against humanity, a state must be<br />
committing the listed acts, and the state’s commission <strong>of</strong> those acts must be<br />
widespread or systematic, and the attacks must be directed at a civilian<br />
54 Evans, supra note 4, p. 85.<br />
55 Id.<br />
56 Rome Statute <strong>of</strong> the International Criminal Court, art. 5(1) (b), U.N. Doc. 1998, A/CONF. 183/9 (1 July,<br />
2002).
34 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
population. 57 Considering the prevailing international law definitions <strong>of</strong><br />
“widespread” and “systematic,” it is unlikely that including crimes against<br />
humanity as a trigger to action would lead to action in any but the most<br />
egregious circumstances. 58 Thus, once a state’s sovereignty has been pierced<br />
by its commission <strong>of</strong> atrocities against its citizens, military action can be<br />
countenanced if those atrocities constitute genocide or mass killings, or crimes<br />
against humanity, or if the state fails to take reasonable responsive action in the<br />
face <strong>of</strong> a natural disaster or catastrophe to the significant detriment <strong>of</strong> its<br />
population. This is the second legal peg on which any claim <strong>of</strong> military action<br />
must be hung.<br />
This leaves, <strong>of</strong> course, perhaps the most contentious aspect <strong>of</strong> any<br />
principle <strong>of</strong> action – when can action be resorted to and who is charged with<br />
the responsibility <strong>of</strong> acting?<br />
Much <strong>of</strong> the debate over the “responsibility to protect” has taken<br />
place within the context <strong>of</strong> “growing concerns as to the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the<br />
[United Nations], in particular the Security Council, to respond to genocide,<br />
ethnic cleansing and other mass human rights violations.” 59 The United<br />
Nations generally, and the Security Council specifically, proved ineffectual in<br />
the face <strong>of</strong> genocide in Rwanda and ethnic cleansing and forced displacements<br />
<strong>of</strong> persons in Kosovo, and has thus far failed to act with any sort <strong>of</strong> efficacy in<br />
Sudan, Burma or Congo. Yet the fact remains that the United Nations and the<br />
Security Council are the preeminent legal-political institutions under<br />
international law, for better or for worse, and thus, there is a compelling<br />
argument that before any military action can be undertaken, the Security<br />
Council must be consulted. 60 Nonetheless, there are also compelling reasons<br />
for not consulting the Security Council. Its members vested interests may<br />
<strong>of</strong>ten block definitive action in a state where action is sorely needed, such as<br />
in Darfur, where China has substantial oil interests in Sudan and is loathe to<br />
risk those interests on humanitarian grounds. Self-interest leads to two distinct<br />
problems. First, self-interest, if it proceeds through incrementalism, may delay<br />
any action by the Security Council until far past the time when action could<br />
have been efficacious in halting the commission <strong>of</strong> atrocities. Second, if selfinterest<br />
leads to a more definitive refusal <strong>of</strong> action, say through an explicit<br />
veto <strong>of</strong> a contemplated course <strong>of</strong> action, the Security Council’s refusal to act<br />
will inevitably call into question any actions that are ultimately contemplated<br />
or undertaken by a state singularly or in a coalition <strong>of</strong> other like-minded actors<br />
57 Id. at article. 7(1).<br />
58 See, “e.g.” Prosecutor v Rutaganda, Case No. ICTR-96-3-T, Judgment, 69 (6 December, 1999)<br />
(“‘widespread,’ as an element <strong>of</strong> crimes against humanity, was defined in the Akayesu Judgment, as<br />
massive, frequent, large scale action, carried out collectively with considerable seriousness and directed<br />
against a multiplicity <strong>of</strong> victims, whilst ‘systematic’ was defined as thoroughly organised action,<br />
following a regular pattern on the basis <strong>of</strong> a common policy and involving substantial public or private<br />
resources.”).<br />
59 McLean, supra note 13, p. 124.<br />
60 See Evans, supra note 4, pp. 86-87.
PARADIGM SHIFTS IN INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE 35<br />
in the wake <strong>of</strong> the United Nations’ failure to act. Thus, a pall may be cast over<br />
any eventual action. Of course, delay may become manifest even if no selfinterest<br />
problems are present. As noted previously, the United Nations is<br />
largely a paper culture, and so even if the Security Council may be inclined<br />
towards action, no action will be implemented until a significant number <strong>of</strong><br />
rounds <strong>of</strong> investigation, reporting, and debate have taken place. As with the<br />
“analysis <strong>of</strong> genocide” proposed by the Secretary-General in his report on<br />
implementing the responsibility to protect, one can very well image the<br />
completion <strong>of</strong> genocide or crimes against humanity in the time it may take the<br />
Security Council to act.<br />
This article is not the place to argue for comprehensive United<br />
Nations’ reform or for a position that would blatantly ignore that body’s<br />
prerogatives regarding international law and intervention. Nonetheless, it is<br />
clear that some mechanism must be put into place that will assure at least the<br />
possibility <strong>of</strong> a course <strong>of</strong> action in the face <strong>of</strong> United Nations inaction. Thus,<br />
recourse to unilateralism and multilateralism must be countenanced by a fully<br />
theorized responsibility to protect. The main question that needs to be<br />
answered in that context, then, is when can such action be resorted to?<br />
Assuming for purposes <strong>of</strong> this article that the Security Council, or,<br />
more generally, the United Nations, should be the first stop in seeking<br />
sanction for the use <strong>of</strong> military action against a state that has failed in its<br />
responsibility to protect, alternative courses <strong>of</strong> action should be permitted<br />
when it becomes apparent that the Security Council is either unable or<br />
unwilling to act. Thus, there needs to be a requirement <strong>of</strong> exhausting available<br />
U.N. remedies prior to undertaking a unilateral or multilateral response, but<br />
the exhaustion requirement has to be read in a pragmatic, not formal sense. In<br />
line with Gareth Evans, it is not necessary that every potential remedial course<br />
via the Security Council be attempted and fail prior to undertaking alternative<br />
courses <strong>of</strong> action – a state ready to take action need only be certain that all<br />
international courses have been explored and have either failed or further<br />
attempts would be futile. 61 This is a necessarily subjective test – when further<br />
courses <strong>of</strong> action will be deemed futile will obviously depend on the<br />
perspective <strong>of</strong> the state seeking sanction for action, and there is, unfortunately,<br />
no bright-line rule for when, in any given situation, the Security Council has<br />
become “irrelevant.” To require some level <strong>of</strong> exhaustion, however, assures<br />
that the United Nations will be the first stop in seeking sanction to any<br />
military action, which should, in turn, assure that body a place in the debate<br />
about whether coercive military action is justified and provide it with an<br />
opportunity to undertake its obligation to protect subjugated populaces.<br />
If, however, it fails in this obligation, as seems increasingly likely<br />
given its track record over the preceding decades, the responsibility to protect<br />
61 Id. p. 86.
36 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
must be theorized in such a way as to provide explicit legal cover for action on<br />
the part <strong>of</strong> single states, multilateral coalitions, or regional actors. In most<br />
circumstances, these types <strong>of</strong> responses will be all that is available, either<br />
because <strong>of</strong> self-interest on the part <strong>of</strong> Security Council members or the general<br />
apathy at the United Nations towards action. The failure <strong>of</strong> the United Nations<br />
to act, however, should not be an obstacle in the road to others exercising their<br />
responsibility to protect. Nor are there any fatal criticisms to allowing<br />
unilateral or multilateral action in these circumstances. Unilateralism is<br />
almost a non-starter, as there are few, if any countries, with the ability to<br />
intervene unilaterally in the circumstances contemplated by the responsibility<br />
to protect. The United States, perhaps the only country with both the resources<br />
and will to undertake such interventions, is reeling from two current wars and<br />
is unlikely to undertake, unilaterally, any new obligations. In any event, any<br />
eventual action is still constricted by threshold requirements that would have<br />
to be met, even if unilateral or multilateral action is taken outside the confines<br />
<strong>of</strong> Security Council sanction. Permitting such action does not create a “wild<br />
west” type <strong>of</strong> atmosphere where any gunslinger-country can ride to the rescue<br />
<strong>of</strong> an afflicted population. Such intervention can only occur once a state has<br />
failed in its own duty to protect its citizens, and the actions being undertaken<br />
in that state rise to the requisite level <strong>of</strong> severity to warrant forcible<br />
intervention. In short, the responsibility does not grant a carte blanche to<br />
willing states. Additionally, so long as the responsibility is grounded on the<br />
legal pegs noted above, no claim can be made that the intervention itself, even<br />
if it does occur through a “coalition <strong>of</strong> the willing” rather than under the<br />
auspices <strong>of</strong> the U.N. blue hats, is impermissible. Any intervention will occur<br />
only under the legal principles that sovereignty is limited, and that the<br />
<strong>of</strong>fending state’s sovereignty has been pierced by its active commission <strong>of</strong><br />
heinous crimes against its own population. Finally, and also unfortunately,<br />
self-interest, when present, will likely act against the principle <strong>of</strong> intervention,<br />
not in favor <strong>of</strong> action.<br />
The Bush administration’s invasion <strong>of</strong> Iraq has done much to temper<br />
the international community’s desire to intervene in humanitarian situations.<br />
This is unfortunate, not least so because any humanitarian justification for that<br />
invasion was decidedly post hoc and not relevant to the initial decision to<br />
invade. 62 Those with the power to act now cannot be lead astray by the hangover<br />
<strong>of</strong> that “misadventure.” Action outside the Security Council in<br />
responsibility to protect situations must be sanctioned, as in the bulk <strong>of</strong> such<br />
situations that will be the only true action that is likely to occur. This is<br />
embarrassingly apparent from shots <strong>of</strong> U.N. “peacekeepers” standing by in the<br />
midst <strong>of</strong> the Rwandan genocide, to NATO’s lead role in Kosovo after the<br />
Security Council’s inexcusable abdication <strong>of</strong> responsibility, and to the lead<br />
62 P. Wolfowtiz, Realism, Foreign Pol’y, September-October. 2009, pp. 66-72.
PARADIGM SHIFTS IN INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE 37<br />
role <strong>of</strong> African states and regional organizations in Congo and Darfur. If the<br />
responsibility to protect is to attain the status <strong>of</strong> an action principle, then U.N.-<br />
fetishism must be jettisoned in favor <strong>of</strong> a more pragmatic outlook on<br />
international law and policy. Sanctioning the types <strong>of</strong> alternative action<br />
contemplated by this article, and in those circumstances where such action is<br />
warranted, would go a long way in making such an action principle a reality.<br />
6. CONCLUSION<br />
There is a serious malfunction in the current operation <strong>of</strong> international human<br />
rights and criminal law, as states continue to commit mass atrocities against<br />
their own populations. Although the “responsibility to protect” does represent<br />
a partial shift away from the prevailing paradigm, whereby a state is largely<br />
unaccountable during the commission <strong>of</strong> such acts, it has thus far been<br />
ineffectual in marshaling action against <strong>of</strong>fending states. This is so for a<br />
number <strong>of</strong> reasons, but most importantly because implementation <strong>of</strong> a plan <strong>of</strong><br />
action is too dependent on the United Nations and the Security Council. If a<br />
true “action principle” is to be realized in the near future, unilateral and<br />
multilateral action in the face <strong>of</strong> United Nations inaction must be sanctioned by<br />
the international community. The fears surrounding such a move are largely<br />
unfounded and, in any event, the potential gains to be realized far outweigh any<br />
<strong>of</strong> the associated costs. Although some have sought a balancing in these<br />
situations, weighing the harm to the Security Council if action is undertaken<br />
outside its purview against the harm to populations in the face <strong>of</strong> non-action,<br />
there is another dimension to this analysis, namely the harm to the international<br />
system when states are permitted to flaunt international law with impunity in<br />
the commission <strong>of</strong> crimes against their populations. Darfur, Burma, and North<br />
Korea, to name a few, are horrendous situations not only for the human cost<br />
associated with the regimes’ misdeeds, but also because the very existence <strong>of</strong><br />
these regimes seems a repudiation <strong>of</strong> those human rights that have grounded<br />
the international order since the birth <strong>of</strong> the United Nations. Now is finally the<br />
time for action and the time to cease hiding behind reports and other<br />
instruments <strong>of</strong> interminable delay. For if we fail to act now, in light <strong>of</strong> decades<br />
<strong>of</strong> accumulated knowledge, “we will not be able to live with ourselves.” 63<br />
63 Evans, supra note 4, p. 89.
The right to maternal health care: Developing international<br />
human rights law to prevent maternal mortality<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
L. S. Johnson*<br />
The enormous problems <strong>of</strong> maternal and infant mortality in today’s world are<br />
directly linked to inadequate or nonexistent maternal health care for millions<br />
<strong>of</strong> women everywhere. This paper argues that viewing the right to maternal<br />
health care as a human right is an opportunity to discern ways in which both<br />
individuals and states wishing to advocate for maternal health care could use<br />
existing international human rights law to do so. By examining international<br />
human rights law that has developed to establish maternal health care as a<br />
human right since the 1970s, this paper builds a framework within which<br />
policy alternatives, for both states and individuals, to advocate for the right to<br />
maternal health care are elucidated. After clarifying the international<br />
agreements and community policies that currently recognize maternal health<br />
care as a human right, the author projects future trends in international human<br />
rights law regarding the right to maternal health care. Making<br />
recommendations to build a multifaceted human rights approach to reducing<br />
maternal death, the paper emphasizes the critical need for both states and<br />
individuals to act to prevent maternal mortality globally.<br />
1. INTRODUCTION<br />
When my mother started screaming, we went into the room and<br />
started crying. Why was no one helping her to get relief from the<br />
pain? My father said we had to wait until morning and then find a<br />
way to take her to a health care center. Minute by minute, her<br />
screaming became louder and louder. We were all sitting beside her.<br />
Her face was so red. She carried on screaming until she died. No,<br />
she stopped screaming before she died, but she was breathing very<br />
loudly just before she died. After she died, we cried a lot. We cried<br />
for five days because we had lost the dearest person in our life. My<br />
mother died because we didn’t have a doctor in our village and the<br />
bad roads had been blocked by snow. I hate the snow ... it’s so<br />
difficult for me when I see other children, their mothers giving them<br />
money, sweets, or kissing them ... I can’t stop crying. We still<br />
39<br />
<br />
JD, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Iowa, Programme Assistant.
40 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
remember our mother and love her.<br />
-Twelve-year-old Mehdi, Afghanistan, 2007. 1<br />
Every day around the world, 1500 women die from pregnancy- or childbirthrelated<br />
complications. 2 Because many pregnant women do not receive the care<br />
they need before, during and after childbirth, up to 1 million pregnant women<br />
die every year from what are considered “largely avoidable causes.” 3 Lack <strong>of</strong><br />
health care for the mother during pregnancy and childbirth also leads to tragic<br />
rates <strong>of</strong> infant mortality. 4 “Maternal and perinatal deaths (stillbirths and first<br />
week deaths) together add up to 6.3 million lives lost every year.” 5 These<br />
deaths are directly linked to inadequate or nonexistent maternal health care for<br />
millions <strong>of</strong> women everywhere. This paper addresses the problem <strong>of</strong> maternal<br />
mortality, focusing on the cause <strong>of</strong> this problem as the denial <strong>of</strong> maternal health<br />
care to women globally. With the goal <strong>of</strong> presenting a multifaceted human<br />
rights approach to reducing maternal death around the world, I argue that<br />
maternal health care is a human right. Viewing the right to maternal health care<br />
as a human right is an opportunity to advance a woman-centered approach and<br />
to discern policy alternatives for both states and individuals wishing to<br />
advocate for maternal health care to use existing international human rights law<br />
to do so. 6<br />
1 IRIN, Veil <strong>of</strong> Tears: Afghan’s stories <strong>of</strong> loss in childbirth 16 (L. Tunbridge, ed., M. Popalzai, trans., IRIN<br />
2009) (Mehdi and his family live in the Shahristan District in the central province <strong>of</strong> Daykundi,<br />
Afghanistan, hours away from the nearest health facility).<br />
2 World Health Organization, Maternal Mortality, http://www.who.int/making_pregnancy_safer/ topics/<br />
maternal_mortality/en/index.html (last visited 6 February, 2010).<br />
3 MPs issue maternal deaths warning, BBC News (2 March, 2008), available at http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/<br />
health/7270735.stm. Further, for every woman who dies due to a pregnancy- or childbirth-related<br />
complication, it is estimated that 30 more women will become disabled, injured, or ill because <strong>of</strong><br />
pregnancy. Id. See also P. Farmer, Pathologies <strong>of</strong> Power: Health, Human Rights and the New War on the<br />
Poor 44 (2003) (noting that more than half a million women die each year during childbirth, and<br />
according to analyses <strong>of</strong> 1995 statistics, 99.8 percent <strong>of</strong> these deaths occurred in developing countries).<br />
4 Every year across the globe, 3 million babies are stillborn, and nearly 750,000 <strong>of</strong> these die during birth.<br />
World Health Organization, Maternal Mortality, supra note 2. Additionally, more than 1 million infants<br />
die every year because they are born prematurely. March <strong>of</strong> Dimes, March <strong>of</strong> Dimes White Paper on<br />
Preterm Birth: The Global and Regional Toll 3 (March <strong>of</strong> Dimes Foundation 2009).<br />
5 World Health Organization, Maternal Mortality, supra note 2. The World Health Organization also notes:<br />
“Further many women must live with an obstetric fistula because <strong>of</strong> childbirth complications, and many<br />
babies are disabled. This combined toll that mother and babies are paying for inadequate services should<br />
be considered when maternal mortality is being discussed.” Id. Obstetric fistula is a serious medical<br />
condition resulting from prolonged, obstructed labor with inadequate medical care, in which a hole<br />
develops between the rectum and the vagina or between the bladder and the vagina. The powerful awardwinning<br />
documentary A Walk to Beautiful, which tells the stories <strong>of</strong> five Ethiopian women who suffer<br />
from obstetric fistula and who embark on separate journeys in search <strong>of</strong> a cure and a way to reclaim their<br />
lives and dignity, notes that obstetric fistula is almost entirely preventable. A Walk to Beautiful (Engel<br />
Entertainment 2007). See also, A Walk to Beautiful, http://www.walktobeautiful.com/.<br />
6 I hope to respond to the important argument made by B. Sadasivam, a former Program Coordinator at<br />
Women’s Environment and Development, that “reproductive health advocacy can find itself stymied by<br />
an over-reliance on the rights framework to advance its goals.” In noting that human rights language can<br />
“further politicize deeply sensitive issues <strong>of</strong> reproduction and sexuality,” Sadasivam argues for a<br />
“women-centered approach to reproductive health” that focuses on trusting women and granting women<br />
the authority and the ability to make reproductive decisions based on adequate information and services.<br />
B. Sadasivam, The Rights Framework in Reproductive Health Advocacy – A Reappraisal, 8 Hastings<br />
Women’s L.J. p. 313, p. 315 and pp. 337-338 (1997). I agree with Sadasivam’s assertion that “even a<br />
broad-based human rights approach does not go to a crucial aspect <strong>of</strong> the problem: the failure <strong>of</strong> public<br />
health systems in developing countries,” but I attempt to respond to Sadasivam’s concerns and
THE RIGHT TO MATERNAL HEALTH CARE 41<br />
Part 1 begins by identifying the right to maternal health care as part<br />
<strong>of</strong> the right to health. Part 2 clarifies the international community policies<br />
establishing maternal health care as a human right. In Part 3, I build from<br />
existing international community policy to develop a multifaceted human<br />
rights approach to prevent maternal mortality. First I note that while the right<br />
to health includes the right to maternal health care, the right to maternal health<br />
care must be separated from the right to health to ensure that international<br />
human rights law is meeting the specific needs, cultural differences and<br />
particular experiences <strong>of</strong> women. 7 Next, I focus on policy alternatives for<br />
states, using the United States as an example. I then turn to examining how<br />
individuals and non-state actors can use a human rights perspective and frame<br />
strategies within the current international human rights law regime to act to<br />
ensure the right to maternal health care. I conclude by arguing that building<br />
from existing international community policy that establishes maternal health<br />
care as a human right is an opportunity for both states and individuals to act to<br />
prevent maternal mortality globally.<br />
Clarification <strong>of</strong> the Right to Maternal Health Care<br />
I use the term “maternal health care” to refer to prenatal, obstetric, and<br />
postnatal health care that, at minimum, means: (1) having access to a skilled<br />
health care pr<strong>of</strong>essional when needed during pregnancy; (2) having a skilled<br />
health care pr<strong>of</strong>essional present during delivery if desired; (3) the access and<br />
ability to utilize basic emergency obstetric care; 8 and (4) having access to a<br />
skilled health care pr<strong>of</strong>essional as needed for 42 days after the birth <strong>of</strong> a child<br />
or the termination <strong>of</strong> a pregnancy (such as through miscarriage). 9 These four<br />
6 assert that the formal articulations <strong>of</strong> reproductive rights in international law, which are being advanced<br />
through the development <strong>of</strong> customary international law and through individual lawsuits, provide a<br />
foundation from which reproductive health advocacy can advance its goals. Id.<br />
7 This statement borrows language from an essay by E. Brems, who uses the theoretical framework <strong>of</strong><br />
“inclusive universality” to focus on the “adaptation <strong>of</strong> international human rights law to the specific needs<br />
and experiences <strong>of</strong> women.” E. Brems, Protecting the Rights <strong>of</strong> Women, in International Human Rights in<br />
the 21st Century: Protecting the Rights <strong>of</strong> Groups 100 (G. M. Lyons & J. Mayall, eds., 2003), reprinted<br />
(with changes from E. Brems) in Human Rights in the World Community: Issues and Action 120, 123 (R.<br />
P. Claude & B. H. Weston eds., 2006).<br />
8 For the definition <strong>of</strong> “basic” emergency obstetric care that I use, see infra, note 12.<br />
9 Because I use a definition <strong>of</strong> maternal health care that is specifically tailored to preventing maternal<br />
mortality, at a minimum maternal health care must include access to a skilled health care pr<strong>of</strong>essional for<br />
42 days after the termination <strong>of</strong> a pregnancy, whether through birth or through other causes. This is<br />
because the World Health Organization defines maternal death as: “the death <strong>of</strong> a woman while pregnant<br />
or within 42 days <strong>of</strong> termination <strong>of</strong> pregnancy, irrespective <strong>of</strong> the duration and site <strong>of</strong> the pregnancy, from<br />
any cause related to or aggravated by the pregnancy or its management but not from accidental or<br />
incidental causes.” Further, the World Health Organization distinguishes between maternal death (the<br />
cause <strong>of</strong> which is related to or aggravated by the pregnancy itself) and death during pregnancy (the cause<br />
<strong>of</strong> which can be accidental or incidental) in stating: “To facilitate the identification <strong>of</strong> maternal deaths in<br />
circumstances in which cause <strong>of</strong> death attribution is inadequate, a new category has been introduced:<br />
Pregnancy-related death is defined as the death <strong>of</strong> a woman while pregnant or within 42 days <strong>of</strong><br />
termination <strong>of</strong> pregnancy, irrespective <strong>of</strong> the cause <strong>of</strong> death.” World Health Organization, Maternal<br />
Mortality Ratio, http://www.who.int/healthinfo/statistics/indmaternalmortality/en/index.html (last visited<br />
16 March, 2010).
42 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
minimum standards apply universally, from developing societies to the world’s<br />
wealthiest nations. Ideally maternal health care should include more than<br />
having mere access to a skilled healthcare pr<strong>of</strong>essional, and states should be<br />
encouraged to go beyond providing only the four minimum standards I set<br />
forth. Nonetheless, because as many as 2/3 <strong>of</strong> maternal deaths in the world<br />
today are considered to be preventable, even these minimum requirements for<br />
maternal health care would make a tremendous difference in reducing maternal<br />
death globally. 10 The definition <strong>of</strong> maternal health care that I use draws from<br />
the maternal mortality reduction strategy outlined by Human Rights Watch:<br />
There is broad global consensus on three critical maternalmortality-reducing<br />
strategies – skilled attendance at birth, 11 access<br />
to emergency obstetric care, 12 and access to referral systems ...<br />
Available research suggests that access and ability to utilize<br />
emergency obstetric care will have maximum impact on maternal<br />
mortality ... The most skilled attendant cannot save a woman<br />
experiencing life-threatening pregnancy-related complications<br />
unless she is able to reach the appropriate health facility in time. A<br />
strong referral system is not limited to ambulance services. It must<br />
at a minimum provide obstetric first aid in case <strong>of</strong> emergencies and<br />
have easily accessible and affordable around-the-clock health care<br />
and referral facilities that connect both private and public health<br />
facilities. For all three core interventions to successfully reduce and<br />
eliminate preventable maternal mortality and morbidity there has to<br />
be a functional public health system. Hence the global priority that<br />
10 See, “e.g.” Birth and Death (White Ribbon Alliance), available at http://www.whiteribbonalliance.org/<br />
resources.cfm?a0=video&play=BirthandDeath (last visited 4 March, 2010) (a short film highlighting the<br />
tragedy <strong>of</strong> global maternal mortality, which notes that every single minute a woman is lost to the world<br />
because <strong>of</strong> pregnancy/childbirth complications, and that currently one half <strong>of</strong> the world’s women give<br />
birth without a health worker present); Human Rights Watch, No Tally <strong>of</strong> the Anguish (7 October, 2009),<br />
available at http://www.hrw.org/en/node/85773/section/6 and Three-Quarters <strong>of</strong> Indian Maternal Deaths<br />
Preventable, Study Finds, Medical News Today (12 October, 2009), available at http://<br />
www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/167001.php.<br />
11 Human Rights Watch states: “Skilled birth attendance refers to the presence <strong>of</strong> health staff trained in<br />
midwifery at birth. A skilled birth attendant's ability to save a pregnant woman is limited unless she is<br />
supported by a robust health system that includes emergency obstetric care and referral support. Some<br />
experts argue that ‘the skill level <strong>of</strong> the attendant needed at the peripheral level [sub-district including<br />
village level]...depends upon the ready accessibility and acceptance <strong>of</strong> referral care.’” Human Rights<br />
Watch, supra note 10.<br />
12 Human Rights Watch defines basic emergency obstetric care as including: “the ability to conduct assisted<br />
vaginal deliveries, remove placenta and retained products, and manage pregnancy complications by<br />
intravenously introducing or injecting anticonvulsants, oxytocic drugs (drugs that expand the cervix or<br />
vagina to facilitate delivery), and antibiotics. Comprehensive emergency obstetric care includes the<br />
ability to provide life-saving interventions including through surgery (cesarean sections) and blood<br />
transfusions. Quality basic and emergency obstetric care are dependent on factors such as availability <strong>of</strong><br />
adequate health personnel trained in midwifery skills, specialists such as anesthetists, gynecologists, and<br />
surgeons, adequate infrastructure such as blood banks, blood matching ability, sufficient supply <strong>of</strong> drugs,<br />
and good referral systems.” Id.
THE RIGHT TO MATERNAL HEALTH CARE 43<br />
is being given to maternal mortality reduction is increasingly hailed<br />
as an opportunity to improve public health systems. 13<br />
Maternal health and maternal health care are to be distinguished. The<br />
right to maternal health (like the right to health generally) encompasses a<br />
range <strong>of</strong> divergent factors and underlying human rights that must be realized<br />
to fully realize the right to maternal health (such as food, clean water, and<br />
other socio-economic factors). While the underlying conditions that pregnant<br />
women face around the world are a critical part <strong>of</strong> their right to maternal<br />
health, as an attempt to define a set <strong>of</strong> minimum standards and to develop<br />
attainable, enforceable duties on governments to prevent maternal mortality, I<br />
focus only on the duty <strong>of</strong> governments to provide pregnant women with<br />
maternal health care, arguing that duty exists in international human rights<br />
law. 14 Access to abortion, an underlying condition affecting maternal health<br />
generally, <strong>of</strong>ten is included in advocating for maternal health protection. I<br />
purposefully avoid discussion about abortion rights in this paper, even though<br />
many advocates for reproductive rights consider abortion rights to be<br />
reproductive rights. 15 While access to abortion services would reduce<br />
unwanted pregnancies, and therefore have some effect on reducing overall<br />
maternal mortality, I do not discuss abortion issues, choosing instead to<br />
examine ways in which to ensure that women have access to health care<br />
during non-intentionally-terminated pregnancy and childbirth. 16 Because<br />
health care during pregnancy and childbirth is known to prevent maternal<br />
mortality, I present policy options to advocate for improved access to health<br />
care services during pregnancy and childbirth by using international human<br />
rights law.<br />
13 Id.<br />
14 This duty on governments to provide maternal health care could be considered a “positive human right.”<br />
In arguing that the right to health should be conceived as a negative right, B. Jessie Hill, Associate<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>essor and Associate Director <strong>of</strong> the Center for Social Justice at Case Western Reserve <strong>University</strong><br />
School <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong>, distinguishes between positive and negative rights: “A positive right is generally<br />
considered to be an entitlement to something – a right to call on the government to provide, at government<br />
expense, a particular public good, such as shelter, education or medical care. Such rights are sometimes<br />
referred to as ‘socio-economic rights,’ and they are recognized as constitutional rights in a number <strong>of</strong><br />
foreign countries. International law and numerous national constitutions, moreover, specifically recognize<br />
a right to health, which is in most instances understood as a positive entitlement to health care. Negative<br />
rights, by contrast, are simply rights to be free <strong>of</strong> governmental interference with one’s decision to do<br />
something; they are ‘negative checks on government, preserving a sphere <strong>of</strong> private immunity.’” B. J.<br />
Hill, Reproductive Rights as Health Care Rights, 18 Colum. J. Gender & L. (2009) p. 501, pp. 502-503.<br />
15 See, “e.g” Center for Reproductive Rights, Our Issues, http://reproductiverights.org/en/our-issues (last<br />
visited 15 April, 2010).<br />
16 For comprehensive discussions on abortion rights as reproductive rights central to protecting women’s<br />
health, see, e.g., Hill, supra note 14.
44 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
Part 1: The Right to Health and The Right to Maternal<br />
Health Care<br />
The human right to health has been recognized in several fundamental human<br />
rights instruments, and numerous international agreements articulate state<br />
responsibility for the right to health. 17 Among the international instruments<br />
recognizing the human right to health are the Universal Declaration <strong>of</strong> Human<br />
Rights, 18 the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural<br />
Rights, 19 the International Convention on the Elimination <strong>of</strong> All Forms <strong>of</strong><br />
Racial Discrimination, 20 the Convention on the Elimination <strong>of</strong> All Forms <strong>of</strong><br />
Discrimination Against Women, 21 and the Convention on the Rights <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Child. 22 “Several regional human rights instruments also recognize the right to<br />
health, such as the European Social Charter <strong>of</strong> 1961 as revised (article 11), the<br />
African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights <strong>of</strong> 1981 (artricle 16) and the<br />
Additional Protocol to the American Convention on Human Rights in the Area<br />
<strong>of</strong> Economic, Social and Cultural Rights <strong>of</strong> 1988 (article 10).” 23 Perhaps the<br />
most widely used and accepted definition <strong>of</strong> “health” in international human<br />
rights law at present is contained in the preamble to the Constitution <strong>of</strong> the<br />
World Health Organization (“WHO”). 24 The WHO Constitution states:<br />
“Health is a state <strong>of</strong> complete physical, mental and social well-being and not<br />
merely the absence <strong>of</strong> disease and infirmity.” 25 Maternal health care falls under<br />
17 B. C. A. Toebes, The Right to Health as a Human Right in International <strong>Law</strong> 4 (1999). Toebes provides a<br />
comprehensive and detailed examination <strong>of</strong> the right to health in her book, from examining the right to<br />
health in international treaties and declarations to discussing the implementation <strong>of</strong> the right to health. As<br />
a thorough discussion <strong>of</strong> the right to health in international law is beyond the scope <strong>of</strong> this paper, this<br />
author recommends Toebes for a complete study <strong>of</strong> the right to health. See also Realizing the Right to<br />
Health (A. Clapham & M. Robinson eds., 2009), the third <strong>of</strong> the Swiss Human Rights books available at<br />
http://www.swisshumanrightsbook.com/SHRB/shrb_03.html.<br />
18 Universal Declaration <strong>of</strong> Human Rights, G.A. Res. 217A, at Article 25(1) (10 December, 1948), available<br />
at http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html, reprinted in Health and Human Rights: Basic International<br />
Documents 1, 3 (S. P. Marks ed., 2006) [hereinafter Universal Declaration].<br />
19 International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, G.A. Res. 2200A, at Article 12 (16<br />
December, 1966), reprinted in Health and Human Rights: Basic International Documents 4, 7 (S. P.<br />
Marks ed., 2006) [hereinafter CESCR].<br />
20 International Convention on the Elimination <strong>of</strong> All Forms <strong>of</strong> Racial Discrimination, G.A. Res. 2106, at<br />
Article 5(e) (iv) (21 December, 1965), reprinted in Health and Human Rights: Basic International<br />
Documents 81, 81 (S. P. Marks ed., 2006).<br />
21 Convention on the Elimination <strong>of</strong> All Forms <strong>of</strong> Discrimination Against Women, G.A. Res. 34/180, at<br />
Article. 11.1(f) and Article. 12 (18 December, 1979), reprinted in Health and Human Rights: Basic<br />
International Documents 81, 81 (S. P. Marks ed., 2006) [hereinafter CEDAW].<br />
22 Convention on the Rights <strong>of</strong> the Child, G.A. Res. 44/25, at Article 24 (20 November, 1989), reprinted in<br />
Health and Human Rights: Basic International Documents 249, 255 (S. P. Marks, ed., 2006) [hereinafter<br />
CRC]. See also A. Eide & W. B. Eide, Article 24: The Right to Health, in A Commentary on the United<br />
Nations Convention on the Rights <strong>of</strong> the Child (A. Alen et al. eds., 2006).<br />
23 UN Econ. & Soc. Council [ECOSOC], The right to the highest attainable standard <strong>of</strong> health: Substantive<br />
Issues Arising in the Implementation <strong>of</strong> the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural<br />
Rights 2, E/C.12/2000/4 (11 August, 2000) (General Comment No. 14) [hereinafter ECOSOC General<br />
Comment].<br />
24 I. L. Feitshans, Is There a Human Right to Reproductive Health? 8 Tex. J. Women & L. 93, 97 (1998) and<br />
Toebes, supra note 17, at 24.<br />
25 Preamble to the Constitution <strong>of</strong> the World Health Organization as adopted by the International Health<br />
Conference (19-22 June, 1946), available at http://www.who.int/governance/eb/constitution/en/<br />
index.html.
THE RIGHT TO MATERNAL HEALTH CARE 45<br />
the right to health as a form <strong>of</strong> health care that individuals are entitled to as part<br />
<strong>of</strong> the overarching right to health. In other words, the right to health<br />
encompasses the right to maternal health care.<br />
The health <strong>of</strong> pregnant women was not specifically recognized as<br />
part <strong>of</strong> the right to health until the 1994 Programme <strong>of</strong> Action <strong>of</strong> the<br />
International Conference on Population and Development (“ICPD”). 26 The<br />
ICPD Programme <strong>of</strong> Action embraced the right to “reproductive health” and<br />
emulated the WHO definition <strong>of</strong> health in stating: “Reproductive health is a<br />
state <strong>of</strong> complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the<br />
absence <strong>of</strong> disease and infirmity in all matters relating to the reproductive<br />
system and its functions and processes.” 27 The ICPD Programme <strong>of</strong> Action<br />
also noted that implicit to any reproductive rights was “the right <strong>of</strong> access to<br />
appropriate health-care services that will enable women to go safely through<br />
pregnancy and childbirth and provide couples with the best chance <strong>of</strong> having a<br />
healthy infant.” 28 The ICPD Programme <strong>of</strong> Action’s “holistic approach” to<br />
reproductive rights was endorsed at the 1995 Beijing Women’s Conference,<br />
which again placed reproductive rights firmly within the right to health<br />
framework. 29<br />
Part 2: Description and Analysis <strong>of</strong> Past Trends in<br />
Establishing the Right to Maternal Health Care<br />
The 1994 ICPD Programme <strong>of</strong> Action encompassed a broad spectrum <strong>of</strong><br />
reproductive health needs, and symbolized a significant departure from early<br />
articulations <strong>of</strong> reproductive rights in international law. 30 Early attempts to<br />
articulate reproductive rights were heavily influenced by the population control<br />
movement, such as the 1968 International Conference on Human Rights and<br />
the 1974 World Population Plan <strong>of</strong> Action, both <strong>of</strong> which recognized<br />
reproductive rights as the right <strong>of</strong> all couples to decide freely and responsibly<br />
the number and spacing <strong>of</strong> their children and the right to have the information,<br />
26 Feitshans, supra note 24, p. 115.<br />
27 United Nations, Programme <strong>of</strong> Action <strong>of</strong> the International Conference on Population and Development<br />
7.2 (1994), UN Doc. A/CONF.171/13 (18 October, 1994), reprinted in Health and Human Rights: Basic<br />
International Documents 223, 225 (S. P. Marks, ed., 2006) [hereinafter ICPD Programme <strong>of</strong> Action].<br />
28 Id. The ICPD also defined reproductive health care as “the constellation <strong>of</strong> methods, techniques and<br />
services that contribute to reproductive health and well-being by preventing and solving reproductive<br />
health problems. It also includes sexual health, the purpose <strong>of</strong> which is the enhancement <strong>of</strong> life and<br />
personal relations, and not merely counseling and care related to reproduction and sexually transmitted<br />
diseases.” Id.<br />
29 Sadasivam, supra note 6, pp. 321-323. In 1995, the UN Fourth World Conference on Women met in<br />
Beijing, and instead <strong>of</strong> attempting to write a treaty issued an extremely detailed “Platform Document”<br />
which reflected the voices and interests <strong>of</strong> the thousands <strong>of</strong> participants. Feitshans, supra note 24, at 107.<br />
The Platform for Action “placed reproductive rights squarely within human rights already recognized in<br />
national laws, international human rights documents and other consensus documents.” Sadasivam, supra<br />
note 6, p. 323. See also, United Nations, Platform <strong>of</strong> Action <strong>of</strong> the Fourth World Conference on Women<br />
(1995), UN Doc. A/CONF.177/20 (17 October, 1995), reprinted in Health and Human Rights: Basic<br />
International Documents 229 (S. P. Marks, ed., 2006) [hereinafter Beijing Platform for Action].<br />
30 Sadasivam, supra note 6, pp. 318-321.
46 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
education and the means to do so – in other words, the right to family planning<br />
services. 31 The rights to decide how many children to have/when to have them<br />
and to receive family planning services, while important, did little to ensure<br />
that women were receiving health care services during pregnancy and birth.<br />
With the focus on the world’s need for fewer births, the early enunciations <strong>of</strong><br />
reproductive rights gave women little autonomy. Thus starting in the 1970s, the<br />
international women’s rights movement worked to clarify the right to<br />
reproductive health, de-linking reproductive rights from population control “to<br />
promote the perspective that women have an unencumbered right to<br />
reproductive health and choice.” 32<br />
In 1979, the Convention on the Elimination <strong>of</strong> All Forms <strong>of</strong><br />
Discrimination Against Women (“CEDAW”) stated: “states parties shall<br />
ensure to women appropriate services in connection with pregnancy,<br />
confinement and the post-natal period, granting free services where necessary,<br />
as well as adequate nutrition during pregnancy and lactation.” 33 In 1994, the<br />
UN ICPD Programme <strong>of</strong> Action explicitly recognized the right <strong>of</strong> women to<br />
go through pregnancy and childbirth safely for the first time in the<br />
international community. 34 The following year at the UN Fourth World<br />
Conference on Women in Beijing (the “Beijing Women’s Conference”), the<br />
1995 Beijing Platform for Action again recognized this right <strong>of</strong> women,<br />
stating that implicit to the right <strong>of</strong> reproductive health is: “the right <strong>of</strong> access<br />
to appropriate health-care services that will enable women to go safely<br />
through pregnancy and childbirth and provide couples with the best chance <strong>of</strong><br />
having a healthy infant.” 35 In 2000, Goal 5 <strong>of</strong> the Millennium Development<br />
Goals 36 was to “Improve Maternal Health” and listed two targets: reducing by<br />
three quarters the maternal mortality ratio and achieving universal access to<br />
reproductive health. 37<br />
In 2009, reaffirming the ICPD Programme <strong>of</strong> Action, the Beijing<br />
Platform for Action, the 2000 Millennium Declaration, the 2005 World<br />
31 Id. p. 318.<br />
32 Id. p. 320. Sadasivam elaborates, writing that feminist scholars “emphasize that this right should be<br />
protected from manipulation by individuals, states or collectives. Women’s rights advocates have also<br />
called for the recognition <strong>of</strong> women’s right to health, including reproductive health, because it is socially<br />
and politically dependent upon the environments women inhabit.” Id.<br />
33 CEDAW, supra note 21, at Art. 12(2).<br />
34 S. Gruskin et al, Using human rights to improve maternal and neonatal health: history, connections and a<br />
proposed practical approach, 86(8) Bull. World Health Org. 2 (2008), available at http://<br />
www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?pid=S0042-96862008000800010&script=sci_arttext&tlng=en.<br />
35 Beijing Platform for Action, supra note 29, at 94.<br />
36 The Millennium Development Goals (“MDGs”) are eight goals drawn from the actions and targets<br />
contained in the Millennium Declaration that was adopted by 189 nations-and signed by 147 heads <strong>of</strong><br />
state and governments during the United Nations Millennium Summit in September 2000. The MDGs<br />
respond to the world's main development challenges. United Nations Development Programme, About<br />
the MDGs: Basics, http://www.undp.org/mdg/basics.shtml (last visited 15 April, 2010).<br />
37 United Nations, Millennium Development Goals, available at http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/ (last<br />
visited 4 March, 2010). Goal 5 is closely linked to Goal 4, which is to “Reduce Child Mortality” and has<br />
as its target reducing by two thirds, between 1990 and 2015, the under-five mortality rate. Id.
THE RIGHT TO MATERNAL HEALTH CARE 47<br />
Summit Outcome, 38 and the Millennium Development Goals, the UN Human<br />
Rights Council adopted the “Resolution on Preventable Maternal Mortality and<br />
Morbidity and Human Rights” (“Maternal Mortality Resolution”). 39 The<br />
Maternal Mortality Resolution recalled the obligations <strong>of</strong> states parties to the<br />
CEDAW, the Convention on the Rights <strong>of</strong> the Child, the CESCR, and other<br />
international agreements in expressing “grave concern at the unacceptably high<br />
global rate <strong>of</strong> preventable maternal mortality and morbidity.” 40 Specifically,<br />
the Maternal Mortality Resolution recognized that most instances <strong>of</strong> maternal<br />
mortality and morbidity are preventable, and that the rates <strong>of</strong> maternal<br />
mortality and morbidity are a human rights challenge. The Maternal Mortality<br />
Resolution called on all states to:<br />
Renew their political commitment to eliminating preventable<br />
maternal mortality and morbidity at the local, national, regional and<br />
international levels, and to redouble their efforts to ensure the full<br />
and effective implementation <strong>of</strong> their human rights obligations…in<br />
particular the [Millennium Development Goals] on improving<br />
maternal health and promoting gender equality and empowering<br />
women, including through the allocation <strong>of</strong> necessary domestic<br />
resources to health systems. [Further, the Maternal Mortality<br />
Resolution requests] states to give renewed emphasis to maternal<br />
mortality and morbidity initiatives in their development<br />
partnerships and cooperation arrangements, including through<br />
honouring existing commitments and considering new<br />
commitments, and the exchange <strong>of</strong> effective practices and technical<br />
assistance to strengthen national capacities, as well as to integrate a<br />
human rights perspective into such initiatives, addressing the impact<br />
that discrimination against women has on maternal mortality and<br />
morbidity. 41<br />
This “landmark resolution” 42 confirms that the right to maternal<br />
health care is a human right already recognized in international human rights<br />
law. In other words, certain international instruments illustrate that<br />
38 The 2005 World Summit met in September 2005 and brought together more than 170 heads <strong>of</strong> state and<br />
government at the United Nations to make decisions in the areas <strong>of</strong> development, security, human rights<br />
and reform <strong>of</strong> the United Nations. Id. The 2005 World Summit Outcome Document reaffirmed the UN<br />
Millennium Declaration. United Nations, General Assembly Resolution on 2005 World Summit Outcome<br />
(2005) UN Doc. A/RES/60/1 (24 October, 2005) [hereinafter World Summit Outcome].<br />
39 United Nations Human Rights Council, General Assembly Resolution on Preventable Maternal Mortality<br />
and Morbidity and Human Rights (2009), UN Doc. A/HRC/11/L.16/Rev.1 (16 June, 2009) [hereinafter<br />
Maternal Mortality Resolution].<br />
40 Id. p. 3.<br />
41 Id. pp. 3-4.<br />
42 Posting <strong>of</strong> S. Sirkin to Physicians for Human Rights Blog, On Human Rights Day, Commit to End<br />
Maternal Mortality, http://phrblog.org/blog/2009/12/10/on-human-rights-day-commit-to-end-maternalmortality/<br />
(10 December, 2009).
48 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
international community policies recognizing the right to maternal health care<br />
exist, and individuals and states wishing to ensure the right to maternal health<br />
care can build from these existing international community policies in<br />
international human rights law.<br />
To summarize, there are six main international instruments that<br />
address the right to maternal health care: the CEDAW; the ICPD Programme<br />
<strong>of</strong> Action; the Beijing Platform for Action; the Millennium Development<br />
Goals; the World Summit Outcome; and the Maternal Mortality Resolution.<br />
These international instruments both reflect and further establish international<br />
community policy that recognizes the human right to maternal health care.<br />
Each instrument plays a part in establishing a different piece <strong>of</strong> the<br />
multifaceted right to maternal health care.<br />
Clarification <strong>of</strong> International Community Policies<br />
Establishing the Right to Maternal Health Care (Table 1)<br />
Year<br />
International<br />
Instrument<br />
1979 Convention on the<br />
Elimination <strong>of</strong> All Forms<br />
<strong>of</strong> Discrimination Against<br />
Women (CEDAW) a<br />
1994 International Conference<br />
on Population and<br />
Development (ICPD)<br />
Programme <strong>of</strong> Action c<br />
1995 Beijing Platform for<br />
Action d<br />
2000 Millennium Development<br />
Goals e<br />
International<br />
Community Policy<br />
Established by the<br />
Instrument<br />
Women should be ensured<br />
appropriate services in<br />
connection with pregnancy<br />
and the post-natal period. b<br />
Women have the right to go<br />
through pregnancy and<br />
childbirth safely, including<br />
the right <strong>of</strong> access to<br />
appropriate health care<br />
services that enable women<br />
to go safely through<br />
pregnancy and childbirth.<br />
Women have the right to go<br />
through pregnancy and<br />
childbirth safely, including<br />
the right <strong>of</strong> access to<br />
appropriate health care<br />
services that enable women<br />
to go safely through<br />
pregnancy and childbirth.<br />
The right to access<br />
reproductive health should<br />
be universal.
THE RIGHT TO MATERNAL HEALTH CARE 49<br />
2005 World Summit Outcome f States are committed to<br />
achieving universal access<br />
to reproductive health by<br />
2015 as set out in the<br />
Millennium Development<br />
Goals.<br />
2009 Maternal Mortality<br />
Resolution g<br />
The right <strong>of</strong> a woman or<br />
girl to achieve the highest<br />
attainable standard <strong>of</strong><br />
sexual and reproductive<br />
health is a human right.<br />
States have a political<br />
commitment to eliminating<br />
preventable maternal<br />
mortality and to ensure the<br />
full and effective<br />
implementation <strong>of</strong> their<br />
human rights obligations.<br />
a. CEDAW, supra note 21, at Article. 12(2).<br />
b. In monitoring the CEDAW, the Committee on the Elimination <strong>of</strong> Discrimination Against Women further<br />
develops this policy by noting that it is discriminatory for a state party to refuse to legally provide for the<br />
performance <strong>of</strong> certain reproductive health services for women, states parties are obligated to eliminate<br />
barriers to women’s access to appropriate health care, and states are to report on the measures they have<br />
taken to ensure timely access to the range <strong>of</strong> services related to reproductive health in general. United<br />
Nations, Committee on the Elimination <strong>of</strong> Discrimination Against Women, General Recommendation<br />
No. 24: Women and Health Article. 12(1) (1999), reprinted in HEALTH AND HUMAN RIGHTS: BASIC<br />
INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTS 241, 241-244 (S. P. Marks, ed., 2006).<br />
c. ICPD Programme <strong>of</strong> Action, supra note 27.<br />
d. Beijing Platform for Action, supra note 29.<br />
e. Millennium Development Goals, supra note 37.<br />
f. World Summit Outcome, supra note 38, at 57(g).<br />
g. Maternal Mortality Resolution, supra note 39.<br />
The above international community policies ought to be controlling<br />
in developing the right to maternal health care. Indeed, international initiatives<br />
and conferences have developed the above policies to build the human right to<br />
maternal health care since the late 1980s.<br />
Trends in Using Existing International Community Policy to<br />
Build the Right to Maternal Health Care<br />
In 1987, the United Nations Population Fund (“UNFPA”), the World Bank and<br />
WHO sponsored the International Safe Motherhood Conference in Nairobi,<br />
Kenya, initiating the Safe Motherhood Initiative. 43 The 1987 Safe Motherhood<br />
43 Safe motherhood initiative: 20 years and counting, 368 The Lancet 1130 (30 September, 2006), available<br />
at www.thelancet.com. The Safe Motherhood Initiative (“SMI”) was launched “by international agencies<br />
and governments to raise global awareness about the impact <strong>of</strong> maternal mortality and morbidity, and find<br />
solutions. It was co-sponsored by seven agencies, UNFPA, UNDP, UNICEF, WHO, IPPF, the Population<br />
Council and the World Bank.” United Nations Polulation Fund, Safe Motherhood, 10 EVALUATION<br />
FINDINGS 1 (January, 1999) [hereinafter UNFPA Safe Motherhood Evaluation].
50 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
Conference launched “the global campaign to reduce maternal mortality” and<br />
had two key action messages: (1) “any pregnant woman can develop lifethreatening<br />
complications with little or no advance warning, so all women need<br />
access to quality maternal health services that can detect and manage lifethreatening<br />
complications” and (2) the presence <strong>of</strong> a health-worker with<br />
midwifery skills at every childbirth should be ensured. 44 In 1997, the focus <strong>of</strong><br />
the Safe Motherhood Initiative shifted away from encouraging mass-training<br />
programs for traditional birth attendants to prioritizing health-sector<br />
interventions, which were designed to increase women’s access to a<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essional medical during pregnancy and childbirth, especially for lifethreatening<br />
complications. 45 The Safe Motherhood Initiative, launched by<br />
international agencies and governments, immediately found support in many<br />
other international coalitions and confederations, such as the International<br />
Confederation <strong>of</strong> Midwives (“ICM”). 46 The ICM, for example, used the Safe<br />
Motherhood Initiative to campaign for health care for pregnant woman to<br />
combat maternal mortality. 47 The “ICM’s clear message in the campaign for<br />
Safe Motherhood, which has been widely agreed [with] by other agencies, is<br />
that care during childbirth from an attendant with midwifery skills is the single<br />
most effective way to reduce maternal death.” 48<br />
The Safe Motherhood Initiative developed along with the<br />
international community policies that continued to be established in<br />
international instruments after 1994. In 2004, WHO published a joint<br />
statement with ICM called “Making Pregnancy Safer,” which again<br />
emphasized the critical role <strong>of</strong> a skilled health care attendant at a birth in<br />
reducing maternal mortality, and comprised WHO’s own then-current drive<br />
toward Safe Motherhood. 49 ICM itself today works with other “pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />
federations,” such as the International Federation for Gynecologists and<br />
Obstetricians (“FIGO”), the International Council <strong>of</strong> Nurses (“ICN”) and<br />
partners with the Partnership for Safe Motherhood and New Born Health in<br />
advancing the goals <strong>of</strong> the Safe Motherhood Initiative. 50 United Nations<br />
agencies have also used the Safe Motherhood Initiative as impetus to develop<br />
priorities and programs to combat maternal mortality. As new international<br />
instruments have shaped international community policy, the resulting<br />
projects designed to reduce maternal mortality have also been reshaped. Since<br />
the ICPD Programme <strong>of</strong> Action established in international community policy<br />
the recognition that women have the right to go through pregnancy and<br />
44 Safe motherhood initiative, supra note 50.<br />
45 Id.<br />
46 International Confederation <strong>of</strong> Midwives, The Safe Motherhood Initiative, http://<br />
www.internationalmidwives.org/TheSafeMotherhoodInitiative/tabid/616/Default.aspx (last visited 4<br />
March, 2010).<br />
47 Id.<br />
48 Id.<br />
49 Id.<br />
50 Id.
THE RIGHT TO MATERNAL HEALTH CARE 51<br />
childbirth safely, including the right <strong>of</strong> access to appropriate health care<br />
services during pregnancy and childbirth, United Nations agencies have been<br />
able to approach reducing maternal mortality as a “human rights<br />
imperative.” 51<br />
Drawing from the layers <strong>of</strong> international community policy that have<br />
been established by new international instruments since 1994 (see above<br />
table), United Nations organizations, such as UNFPA, have implemented<br />
strategies to reduce maternal mortality. UNFPA uses a three-pronged strategy<br />
to work toward the Millennium Development Goal <strong>of</strong> reducing maternal death<br />
globally: “(1) All women have access to contraception to avoid unintended<br />
pregnancies; (2) All pregnant women have access to skilled care at the time <strong>of</strong><br />
birth; and (3) All those with complications have timely access to quality<br />
emergency obstetric care.” 52 Using this three-pronged strategy and drawing<br />
from international community policy as enunciated in the Millennium<br />
Development Goals, UNFPA has established the Maternal Health Thematic<br />
Fund to “increase the capacity <strong>of</strong> national health systems to provide a broad<br />
range <strong>of</strong> quality maternal health services, reduce health inequities, and<br />
empower women to exercise their right to maternal health.” 53 UNFPA has<br />
also joined with UNICEF, the World Bank and WHO – the four agencies<br />
collectively are known as “The Health 4” or “H4” – to enhance support to the<br />
sixty countries with the highest maternal mortality rates. 54 UN agencies are<br />
not alone in using a human rights approach to combat maternal mortality.<br />
The International Initiative on Maternal Mortality and Human Rights<br />
(“IIMMHR”), which is a partnership <strong>of</strong> “international, regional, and national<br />
civil society organizations” also seeks to make recognizing the connection<br />
between maternal mortality and human rights a political priority. 55 In<br />
promoting government accountability for the implementation <strong>of</strong> policies to<br />
reduce maternal mortality, IIMMHR lists five “core global commitments that<br />
address maternal mortality,” including the Millennium Development Goals,<br />
the Beijing Platform for Action, the World Summit Outcome and the ICPD<br />
Programme <strong>of</strong> Action among the five. 56 IIMMHR uses international<br />
instruments to establish that international community policy dictates that the<br />
reduction <strong>of</strong> maternal mortality is a human rights imperative. In so doing,<br />
IIMMHR is able to place attainable obligations on governments to eliminate<br />
preventable maternal mortality. Perhaps the most important obligation, at least<br />
the most effective in reducing maternal mortality, is to provide maternal<br />
51 United Nations Population Fund, Safe Motherhood, http://www.unfpa.org/public/mothers/consensus.html<br />
(last visited 4 March, 2010).<br />
52 Id.<br />
53 Id.<br />
54 Id.<br />
55 IIMMHR, About Us, http://righttomaternalhealth.org/about-us/about (last visited 4 March, 2010).<br />
56 International Initiative on Maternal Mortality and Human Rights Brochure, available at http://<br />
righttomaternalhealth.org/about-us/about (last visited 4 March, 2010).
52 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
health care.<br />
Since the late 1980s, the trend has been that international groups, at<br />
times partnered with representatives from state governments, play a back and<br />
forth with the international policies establishing the right to maternal health<br />
care as a human right. International groups (UN agencies, other coalitions,<br />
partnerships, confederations, initiatives and pr<strong>of</strong>essional federations) inform<br />
the development <strong>of</strong> the international instruments, which both codify and<br />
establish international community policy on the right to maternal health care.<br />
At the same time, international community policy informs the work that<br />
international groups are doing. For example, over time, international<br />
conferences have formulated maternal mortality as a human rights issue,<br />
resulting in international instruments now treating the right to maternal health<br />
care as a human right. The 1994 ICPD Conference, the 1995 Beijing<br />
Women’s Conference and the 1997 Tenth Anniversary Safe Motherhood<br />
Consultation 57 all focused on maternal mortality as a social injustice and<br />
helped to redefine preventable maternal mortality in terms <strong>of</strong> being a violation<br />
<strong>of</strong> rights, including the right to maternal health care.<br />
As Bharati Sadasivam, a former Program Coordinator at Women’s<br />
Environment and Development, has noted, the declarations and statements<br />
from such conferences:<br />
Although lacking the binding nature <strong>of</strong> treaty law, [have] undeniable<br />
value in advancing reproductive health goals. First, these<br />
declarations and statements add to the practice <strong>of</strong> customary law.<br />
Although UN conference documents are not legally binding, they<br />
are politically enforceable since they represent a consensus among<br />
all member nations. Second, they shape domestic law by giving<br />
advocates the language to make legal demands, foster a rights<br />
debate and ensure informal obligations on the part <strong>of</strong> state and nonstate<br />
actors. The impact <strong>of</strong> conference statements and declarations<br />
on customary and domestic law is critical given the scant<br />
international and domestic jurisprudence on women’s health and the<br />
absence <strong>of</strong> case law. 58<br />
Adding to this vast body <strong>of</strong> conference declarations and statements<br />
are statements issued by UN organizations, such as in 1999, when the Health 4<br />
issued a joint statement asserting that for women, “human rights include<br />
access to services that will ensure safe pregnancy and childbirth.” 59 This year,<br />
57 In 1997 a thematic evaluation was conducted to assess the “relevance, efficiency, effectiveness and<br />
impact <strong>of</strong> UNFPA-supported Safe Motherhood strategies” under the Safe Motherhood Initiative. UNFPA<br />
Safe Motherhood Evaluation, supra note 50, p. 1.<br />
58 Sadasivam, supra note 6, p. 323.<br />
59 World Health Organization, Reduction <strong>of</strong> Maternal Mortality: A Joint WHO/UNFPA/UNICEF/World<br />
Bank Statement (1999).
THE RIGHT TO MATERNAL HEALTH CARE 53<br />
the UN Commission on the Status <strong>of</strong> Women (“CSW”) plans to undertake a<br />
review <strong>of</strong> the implementation <strong>of</strong> the Beijing Platform for Action at its 54th<br />
session (informally called “Beijing +15”) and with the landmark 2009<br />
Maternal Mortality Resolution so recently adopted by the Human Rights<br />
Council, the CSW session and the conclusions it reaches will likely be shaped<br />
by the international community policy codified in the Maternal Mortality<br />
Resolution. 60 In turn, the member states, the representatives <strong>of</strong> nongovernmental<br />
organizations and the representatives <strong>of</strong> UN entities<br />
participating in the 2010 CSW review <strong>of</strong> the Beijing Platform for Action will<br />
go on to influence future development regarding the right to maternal health<br />
care.<br />
Projection <strong>of</strong> Future Trends in Establishing the Right to<br />
Maternal Health Care<br />
The Maternal Mortality Resolution called on states to integrate a human rights<br />
perspective into initiatives to eliminate preventable maternal mortality and<br />
morbidity. 61 The right to maternal health care has been increasingly recognized<br />
as a human right in international instruments and in international community<br />
policies, as reflected in initiatives, declarations and statements made by UN<br />
agencies and other international (including non-governmental) organizations.<br />
The dialogic relationship between community policy (both international and<br />
domestic) on the one hand, and the codification <strong>of</strong> such policy in international<br />
instruments on the other, is an expansion <strong>of</strong> the relationship between customary<br />
international law and international law in its binding form. The relationship is<br />
both dialogic and cyclical, as illustrated below.<br />
60 This session <strong>of</strong> the UN Commission on the Status <strong>of</strong> Women (“CSW”) will mark the 15 th anniversary <strong>of</strong><br />
the Beijing Fourth World Conference on Women. Therefore the CSW session will embark on a 15-year<br />
review <strong>of</strong> the Beijing Platform for Action and “emphasis will be placed on the sharing <strong>of</strong> experiences and<br />
good practices, with a view to overcoming remaining obstacles and new challenges, including those<br />
related to the Millennium Development Goals.” The CSW session is scheduled for March 1-15, 2010.<br />
United Nations Division for the Advancement <strong>of</strong> Women, Beijing +15, http://www.un.org/womenwatch/<br />
daw/beijing15/index.html (last visited 4 March, 2010).<br />
61 Maternal Mortality Resolution, supra note 39, pp. 3-4.
54 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
What this means for the right to maternal health care is that, starting<br />
in the 1970s with the women’s movement’s work to clarify the right to<br />
reproductive health, significant non-binding declarations, statements and<br />
documents were produced that influenced community policy at all levels,<br />
customary international law, and eventually binding treaties. Once the process<br />
began to move maternal health care from being a social value to a human<br />
right, 62 the wheels were in motion for this interdependent process to occur. As<br />
a result, today the right to maternal health care is recognized in all four<br />
“forms” – in community policy, in customary international law, in<br />
international instruments, and in the international declarations, statements and<br />
conference documents being produced even as this paper is read.<br />
I predict that the development <strong>of</strong> the right to maternal health care will<br />
continue in the future, strengthening maternal health care as an identifiable<br />
right along the lines <strong>of</strong> other civil and political rights currently more<br />
recognized in international human rights law. This prediction is based on the<br />
fact that the importance <strong>of</strong> recognizing maternal health care as a human right<br />
remains at the forefront <strong>of</strong> international discussions about human rights,<br />
women’s issues and health care. There are no fewer than 13 international<br />
62 See infra Part 3.
THE RIGHT TO MATERNAL HEALTH CARE 55<br />
events scheduled for 2010 alone that will bring maternal health care into the<br />
spotlight, at least in some capacity, including the UN Human Rights Council’s<br />
14 th session, in which the Human Rights Council plans to follow up on the<br />
Maternal Mortality Resolution. 63 During the CSW session reviewing the<br />
Beijing Platform for Action, at least one panel discussion will focus on<br />
maternal health care: “Maternal Mortality – rights <strong>of</strong> ‘critical concern’ within<br />
and beyond Beijing” is a panel discussion co-sponsored by the Center for<br />
Economic and Social Rights, Amnesty International, Action Canada for<br />
Population and Development, Center for Reproductive Rights, Human Rights<br />
Watch, International Initiative on Maternal Mortality and Human Rights,<br />
International Planned Parenthood Federation, Ipas, and the Women's Global<br />
Network for Reproductive Rights. 64 These agencies recognize maternal<br />
mortality as “an issue <strong>of</strong> gender justice, as well as social and economic<br />
justice,” and advocate for the right to maternal health (including the right to<br />
maternal health care) as a human right that is “about the human rights <strong>of</strong><br />
women, not only the rights to life and to health, but about failures to meet the<br />
full range <strong>of</strong> economic and social rights that contribute to the underlying<br />
poverty and deprivation that results in maternal mortality.” 65 Amnesty<br />
International, for example, has articulated the right to maternal healthcare in<br />
stating: “Women have the right to not be denied maternal health care, which<br />
should be accessible, affordable, adequate and <strong>of</strong> sufficiently high quality,<br />
taking into account their cultural needs. They have the right to access health<br />
care without discrimination.” 66 As the right to maternal health care continues<br />
to develop in the future, new approaches are needed, both to further develop<br />
international law recognizing maternal health care as a human right, and to<br />
work to ensure the right to maternal health care globally.<br />
Part 3: A Multifaceted Human Rights Approach to Prevent<br />
Maternal Mortality<br />
The DFID Health Resource Centre, which provides technical assistance and<br />
information to the British Government’s Department for International<br />
Development, has noted that: “carefully contextualized rights-based<br />
63 Center for Economic and Social Rights, Dying While Giving Life? Maternal Mortality is a Human Rights<br />
Issue: International Events, http://www.cesr.org/article.php?id=772 (last visited 4 March, 2010)<br />
[hereinafter 2010 International Events].<br />
64 Id. These panel discussions sponsored by NGOs also produce important documents that contribute to<br />
informing the development <strong>of</strong> maternal health care as a right within the human rights framework. For<br />
example, in 2009, at the 11 th Session <strong>of</strong> the UN Human Rights Council, NGOs brought together a panel<br />
<strong>of</strong> international and national experts as a side-event to discuss the need for a human rights perspective in<br />
combating maternal mortality. See Center for Reproductive Rights et al., Combating Maternal Mortality:<br />
Why Bring Human Rights into the Picture? (5 June, 2009).<br />
65 2010 International Events, supra note 70.<br />
66 Amnesty International USA, Right to Maternal Health Care, http://www.amnestyusa.org/violenceagainst-women/stop-violence-against-women-svaw/right-to-maternal-health-care/page.do?id=1351018<br />
(last visited 4 March, 2010).
56 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
approaches can add a critical impetus to existing means <strong>of</strong> reducing maternal<br />
mortality.” 67 Burns Weston has examined child labor as a multidimensional<br />
human rights problem and elaborated a “multifaceted problem-solving/policyimplementing<br />
typology” that outlines human rights strategies for all actors<br />
(from individuals to states) in the international community to work to abolish<br />
child labor. 68 Though this paper will not go as in depth as Weston has in<br />
outlining his typology, I also seek to provide policy alternatives for both<br />
individuals and states to utilize existing international law, and to go beyond<br />
using only the law, to prevent global maternal mortality. As Weston writes in<br />
the child labor context:<br />
Though formal legal institutions and procedures created specifically<br />
to promote and protect human rights are indispensable components<br />
<strong>of</strong> a comprehensive strategy for the abolition <strong>of</strong> child labor, they are<br />
by no means the only components – indeed, not even the most<br />
effective or important in many instances. As previously stated, the<br />
abolition <strong>of</strong> child labor requires broad and deep social change, and<br />
for this is needed far more than the formal legal establishment, even<br />
when dedicated specifically to the promotion and protection <strong>of</strong><br />
human rights. 69<br />
Weston argues that bottom-up or grass roots approaches, approaches<br />
in what he names “extra-legal” realms, are intrinsic to the approaching the<br />
problem <strong>of</strong> child labor. 70 Similarly, solving the problem <strong>of</strong> global maternal<br />
death requires “extra-legal” approaches, and such approaches must be grass<br />
roots or bottom-up to address the local reasons that the human right to<br />
maternal health care is not being recognized.<br />
Maternal death is universal. While the problems <strong>of</strong> maternal and<br />
infant mortality are most acute in developing countries, women in rich and<br />
medically advanced nations like the United States also still face shocking<br />
barriers to receiving adequate services during pregnancy and childbirth. 71<br />
67 K. Hawkins, Developing a Human Rights-Based Approach to Addressing Maternal Mortality: Desk<br />
Review (DFID Health Resource Centre 2005).<br />
68 B. Weston, Child Labor in Human Rights <strong>Law</strong> and Policy Perspective, in Human Rights in Labor and<br />
Employment Relations: International and Domestic Perspectives, chapter 4 at 73-121 (Labor and<br />
Employment Relations Association Series, J. A. Gross & L. Compa eds., 2009).<br />
69 Id. at 104.<br />
70 Id. at 105.<br />
71 Disparities in access to primary health care between populations in the United States based on race and<br />
socioeconomic status are well documented. The 2008 National Health Care Disparities Report mandated<br />
by Congress in 42 U.S.C. 299a1(a)(6) noted that “Americans too <strong>of</strong>ten do not receive the care they need<br />
or they receive care that causes harm.” Agency for Health Care Research and Quality, 2008 National<br />
Health Care Disparities Report 1 (March 2009) available at http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/nhdr08/<br />
nhdr08.pdf. With regard to maternal health care, the 2008 report found that the rate <strong>of</strong> pregnant African-<br />
American women who did not receive prenatal care in the first trimester was 1.6 times higher than the rate<br />
for white American pregnant women; for American Indian and Alaska Native women, the rate <strong>of</strong><br />
pregnant women not receiving prenatal care in the first trimester was 2.1 times higher than white
THE RIGHT TO MATERNAL HEALTH CARE 57<br />
There are many reasons why pregnant women may not receive the care they<br />
need. 72 Even in countries where maternal health care is more readily<br />
available, negative or discriminatory attitudes toward women can prevent<br />
women from accessing the care that is available. 73 To be truly effective, a<br />
human rights strategy to advocate for maternal health care requires advocacy<br />
at all levels, from local organizations to intergovernmental organizations. 74<br />
As illustrated in the above diagram, local realms inform international realms,<br />
and vice versa, and the interactions work to develop international human<br />
rights law. Mobilizing local communities, raising awareness, improving<br />
education and strengthening governmental abilities to provide the minimum<br />
71 American pregnant women; and the rate <strong>of</strong> pregnant Hispanic American women not receiving prenatal<br />
care in the first trimester was 2.0 times higher than non-Hispanic white American pregnant women. Id. at<br />
Table H.1, 9-10. In the United States, race can affect both an individual’s access to care independent <strong>of</strong><br />
socioeconomic status, as well as the medical treatment an individual receives, also regardless <strong>of</strong><br />
socioeconomic status. This is documented in the obstetrical treatment received by African-Americans<br />
versus European-Americans. V. R. Randall, Racist health care: reforming an unjust health care system to<br />
meet the needs <strong>of</strong> African-Americans, in Justice and Health Care: Comparative Perspectives 147, 187 (A.<br />
Grubb & M. J. Mehlman eds., 1995).<br />
72 The World Health Organization (WHO) notes that many pregnant women do not receive care “because<br />
there are no services where they live, they cannot afford the services because they are too expensive or<br />
reaching them is too costly.” Further, some women may decide not to use the services available to them<br />
“because they do not like how care is provided or because the health services are not delivering highquality<br />
care.” Finally, WHO recognizes that cultural beliefs and a women’s “low status in society” can<br />
also prevent a pregnant woman from getting the care she needs. World Health Organization, Maternal<br />
Mortality, supra note 2.<br />
73 For example, in discussing a recent Amnesty International report on maternal death in Burkina Faso<br />
(where 2,000 women die every year from complications during pregnancy and birth), Claudio Cordone,<br />
interim Secretary General <strong>of</strong> Amnesty International stated: “Women in Burkina Faso are trapped in a<br />
vicious cycle <strong>of</strong> discrimination which makes giving birth potentially lethal.” This “cycle <strong>of</strong><br />
discrimination” refers to the fact that “most women in Burkina Faso are subordinate to the men in their<br />
lives with little or no control over key decisions such as when to seek medical care and the timing and<br />
spacing <strong>of</strong> their pregnancies in spite <strong>of</strong> having equal status under Burkinabe law.” Further, women and<br />
girls in Burkina Faso continue to be subjected to early marriages and female genital mutilation. Amnesty<br />
International, Pregnant Women in Burkina Faso Dying Because <strong>of</strong> Discrimination (27 January, 2010),<br />
http://www.amnesty.org/en/news-and-updates/report/pregnant-women-burkina-faso-dying-becausediscrimination-20100127.<br />
In an article examining strategies used by human rights NGOs in their work,<br />
Alicia Ely Yamin, former Director <strong>of</strong> Research and Investigations at Physicians for Human Rights, used<br />
an individual narrative to describe the dire consequences <strong>of</strong> societal discrimination against women in<br />
Peru. In detailing the death <strong>of</strong> a twenty-five year old woman named Elena who was very ill after giving<br />
birth to her third child, Yamin writes: “The young doctor, Elena’s husband and brother-in-law and the<br />
[community health worker] began debating [whether to take Elena many hours away to the district<br />
hospital] in Spanish. Throughout, neither Elena nor her sisters-in-law, who in any case only spoke<br />
Aymara, was ever consulted. Her husband was told that he would at least have to pay for the pick-up<br />
truck’s gas – which could add up to more than the price <strong>of</strong> a cow – and, if Elena died at the hospital, he<br />
would have to pay to have the body brought back too. Her husband and brother-in-law decided not to<br />
move Elena, and she died a few hours later <strong>of</strong> a postpartum hemorrhage.” A. E. Yamin, The Future in the<br />
Mirror: Incorporating Strategies for the Defense and Promotion <strong>of</strong> Economic, Social, and Cultural<br />
Rights into the Mainstream Human Rights Agenda, 27 HUM. RTS. Q. 1200 (2005), reprinted in Health and<br />
Human Rights 85, 86-87 (R. Cook & C. Ngwena eds., 2007).<br />
74 Yamin writes on the importance <strong>of</strong> a human rights perspective in policymaking and advocacy in public<br />
health, and asks what a human rights perspective might add to the individual story <strong>of</strong> Elena, the young<br />
woman who died after childbirth in Peru because <strong>of</strong> her lack <strong>of</strong> access to maternal health care: “a human<br />
rights lens underscores that death from pregnancy-related causes is not ‘natural,’ but rather a product <strong>of</strong><br />
social priorities and policy decisions; it changes why Elena’s death matters from a question <strong>of</strong><br />
productivity lost or personal tragedy to one <strong>of</strong> injustice; it focuses the analysis on different forms <strong>of</strong><br />
discrimination; it forces us to look at the state’s accountability for Elena’s situation; it demands that we<br />
ask why those affected do not participate in the relevant decisions at all levels; it calls for multi-sectoral<br />
strategies, which connect health to infrastructure, education, and the like; and many other possibilities.”<br />
Yamin, supra note 80, at 1202. See also A. E. Yamin, Challenges and Possibilities for Innovative Praxis<br />
in Health and Human Rights: Reflections from Peru, 6 HEALTH & HUM. RTS. 35, 36-40 (2002).
58 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
standards <strong>of</strong> maternal health care are all aspects <strong>of</strong> a comprehensive approach<br />
to ensuring the right to maternal health care. 75 Using a human rights<br />
perspective to approach the global problem <strong>of</strong> maternal mortality will help<br />
achieve the “fundamental shift in thinking and action [that] is required if<br />
progress towards reducing maternal mortality is to be achieved.” 76 Maternal<br />
mortality is caused by acknowledged, documented and universal<br />
determinants. 77 “These determinants are <strong>of</strong>ten mutually reinforcing, and<br />
directly linked to poverty.” 78 Approaching the right to maternal health care as<br />
a human right is a way to comprehensively address the varying but<br />
interrelated determinants <strong>of</strong> maternal mortality, as well as a way to bring a<br />
woman-centered approach into international efforts to eliminate preventable<br />
maternal mortality.<br />
Separating the Right to Maternal Health Care from the<br />
Right to Health<br />
Viewing the right to maternal health care as a human right that stands on its<br />
own, apart from the right to health framework, achieves greater protection for<br />
the right to maternal health care. 79 The right to maternal health care is integral<br />
75 Maha Muna, a representative <strong>of</strong> the United Nations Population Fund described a comprehensive approach<br />
to reducing maternal mortality as part <strong>of</strong> a panel discussion in 2009. “What does it take [to reduce<br />
maternal mortality]? Three focus areas: first <strong>of</strong> all, a recognition that giving birth safely is a human rights<br />
standard and principle which is inexpensive. Limited measures need to be taken to get there: access to<br />
contraceptives, skilled personnel and prompt emergency obstetric care. Secondly, acknowledging the<br />
challenges in addressing rights-holders, which require mobilizing communities, raising awareness as well<br />
as tackling inequality and discrimination. Complications during childbirth are the leading cause <strong>of</strong> death<br />
for women in Africa and for girls 15-19 in developing countries in general. This reflects entrenched<br />
discrimination against women and failure to promote women's rights. Many women are unable to exercise<br />
their rights because <strong>of</strong> their youth, poverty and ethnic background. The link between rights-holders and<br />
duty-bearers is made through civil society. This needs a comprehensive approach that tackles also sexual<br />
violence, early child marriage etc. And finally, we need culturally-sensitive access to health care. We<br />
must bring international norms and standards to the lives <strong>of</strong> women and girls.” M. Muna, Combating<br />
Maternal Mortality: Why Bring Human Rights Into the Picture, Panel Discussion (5 June, 2009),<br />
available at http://righttomaternalhealth.org/resource/HRC-panel-2009.<br />
76 Hawkins et al., supra note 74, p. 2.<br />
77 The DFID Health Resource Centre, which provides technical assistance and information to the British<br />
Government’s Department for International Development, notes that the causes <strong>of</strong> maternal mortality are<br />
well known. The report the DFID issued on addressing maternal mortality lists the actual determinants <strong>of</strong><br />
maternal mortality as:<br />
• Women’s status, starting with lack <strong>of</strong> education, which is linked to early marriage and childbearing;<br />
inability to take decisions regarding health care; low valuation <strong>of</strong> girls and women, particularly in the<br />
peak reproductive years, and poorer access to nutrition<br />
• Family and community beliefs which prevent early identification <strong>of</strong> problems related to pregnancy, or<br />
lack <strong>of</strong> awareness <strong>of</strong> pregnant women’s needs<br />
• Women’s lack <strong>of</strong> access to health care services due to inaccessibility, cost, or perceived poor quality<br />
• Poorly functioning health systems and a lack <strong>of</strong> skilled personnel, supplies, equipment, and adequate<br />
referral systems<br />
• A lack <strong>of</strong> a supportive and protective legal and policy environment, or where it exists poor enforcement<br />
<strong>of</strong> its provisions<br />
Hawkins et al., supra note 74, p. 6.<br />
78 Id.<br />
79 In response to the valuable article by B. J. Hill, which argues that advocates and scholars interested in<br />
achieving greater protection for reproductive rights, specifically abortion, in the United States should look<br />
to the negative right <strong>of</strong> health, I note that Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Hill herself has acknowledged: “the negative right to
THE RIGHT TO MATERNAL HEALTH CARE 59<br />
to reducing maternal mortality – “the greatest unsolved public health issue <strong>of</strong><br />
our time.” 80 Leaving the right to maternal health care as a right encompassed<br />
under the right to health may allow states defining “health” in a certain way to<br />
ignore the specific needs <strong>of</strong> pregnant women. For example, state-run family<br />
planning programs with explicit goals <strong>of</strong> population control (such as in China,<br />
India and Indonesia) have “long-standing records <strong>of</strong> neglect <strong>of</strong> women’s health<br />
needs and coercion.” 81 As part <strong>of</strong> the right to maternal health that states must<br />
protect, the right to maternal health care requires “positive measures to ensure<br />
access to reproductive health care and services for all women.” 82 A woman’s<br />
right to health during pregnancy is relevant to diverse value systems, but the<br />
right to maternal health care should traverse diverse value systems, particularly<br />
when a value system jeopardizes a woman’s right to health care. While cultural<br />
practices should be taken into account in international human rights decisionmaking,<br />
83 allowing cultural practices to shape the right to health can allow the<br />
right to maternal health care to go unrecognized. Failing to recognize the right<br />
to maternal health care is ignoring the most obvious human right – the right to<br />
life. The reality is “that the right to life is violated daily by death in pregnancy<br />
and childbirth, which could have been avoided if women enjoyed better health<br />
and better access to reproductive health services.” 84 The right to maternal<br />
health care is particularly susceptible to manipulation by individuals, societies<br />
and governments. Advocates for the right to maternal health care must fight for<br />
a right that is not only female-specific, but also traditionally and ideologically<br />
a right that is held within the private sphere. 85 Because pregnancy and<br />
79 health will not necessarily expand access to reproductive health care for women who lack it.” Hill, supra<br />
note 14, at 531. As my focus is on combating maternal mortality by expanding access to maternal health<br />
care, I frame the right to maternal health care more as a positive right. For further reading on the shift<br />
from the framing <strong>of</strong> reproductive rights as positive rights to a negative human rights framework, see R. A.<br />
Dempsey & B. M. Meier, Going Negative: How Reproductive Rights Discourse Has Been Altered from a<br />
Positive to a Negative Rights Framework in Support <strong>of</strong> “Women’s Rights,” in Women’s Global Health<br />
and Human Rights 83 (P. Murthy & C. L. Smith eds., 2010).<br />
80 A. Foster-Rosales, Maternal Mortality: The Eye <strong>of</strong> the Storm, in Women’s Global Health and Human<br />
Rights 279 (P. Murthy & C. L. Smith eds., 2010).<br />
81 Id. at 331.<br />
82 S. Maiga, Combating Maternal Mortality: Why Bring Human Rights Into the Picture, Panel Discussion (5<br />
June, 2009), available at http://righttomaternalhealth.org/resource/HRC-panel-2009. Maiga argues that as<br />
part <strong>of</strong> ensuring maternal health, states must also take into account “cultural intricacies and women’s<br />
health and nutritional needs.” Here the reader is reminded that the focus <strong>of</strong> this paper is on the right to<br />
maternal health care, and not the right to maternal health.<br />
83 For an approach – “a methodology <strong>of</strong> respect” – for deciding when cultural differences are to be respected<br />
and when not in international human rights law-making, see B. H. WESTON, The Universality <strong>of</strong> Human<br />
Rights in a Multicultured World, The Future <strong>of</strong> International Human Rights 65 (B. H. Weston & S. P.<br />
Marks, eds., 1999), reprinted (with changes from B. H. Weston) in Human Rights in the World<br />
Community: Issues and Actions 39 (R. P. Claude & B. H. Weston eds., 2006).<br />
84 Sadasivam, supra note 6, at 326. Or as the International Initiative on Maternal Mortality and Human<br />
Rights (“IIMMHR”) notes: “Even though dying <strong>of</strong> an easily preventable cause is a human rights<br />
violation--as much as extrajudicial executions, torture, and arbitrary detentions are--the connection<br />
between maternal mortality and human rights has not been widely recognized. The time is ripe for an<br />
effort that confronts this unacceptable situation.” International Initiative on Maternal Mortality and<br />
Human Rights Brochure, supra note 63.<br />
85 Sadasivam discusses the public/private distinction “central to western liberal theory,” a distinction that<br />
“implies that the private sphere is beyond the reach <strong>of</strong> the state’s legal powers.” Sadasivam notes that is<br />
very difficult to guarantee human rights in the private sphere. Sadasivam, supra note 6, pp. 325-326.
60 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
childbirth traditionally come out <strong>of</strong> a conjugal union, the right to maternal<br />
health care is <strong>of</strong>ten placed within the family, an approach that ignores intrinsic<br />
unequal power relations between the sexes within the family structure. 86<br />
Patriarchal norms, the gender-blind (even gender-biased) nature <strong>of</strong><br />
international law and the public/private ideological construct all inform the<br />
right to health, and therefore operate to make the realization <strong>of</strong> the right to<br />
maternal health care vulnerable to being limited when the right to maternal<br />
health care is placed within the right to health framework.<br />
The right to maternal health care should be recognized as an<br />
independent human right apart from the right to health, demanding <strong>of</strong><br />
enforceable state obligations on its own. For a value to move from being a<br />
respected social value to being considered a human right is a tremendously<br />
important transition, as understanding a right as a human right gives rise to<br />
obligations on the part <strong>of</strong> governments to protect the international human<br />
right. Philip Alston has warned that without an established procedure to<br />
recognize when a value becomes a human right, the international system runs<br />
the risk <strong>of</strong> being overloaded with human rights. 87 Alston argues that any<br />
proposed human right should not only reflect a fundamentally important<br />
social value, but should also be relevant to diverse value systems, and should<br />
be eligible for recognition as an interpretation <strong>of</strong> UN Charter obligations, as a<br />
reflection <strong>of</strong> customary law rules or as a declaratory <strong>of</strong> general principles <strong>of</strong><br />
law. 88 Further, Alston suggests that any proposed human right should be able<br />
to achieve a very high degree <strong>of</strong> international consensus, be compatible with<br />
the general practice <strong>of</strong> states and be specific enough to give rise to identifiable<br />
rights and obligations. 89<br />
Burns Weston has provided five postulates that assist in defining<br />
human rights, writing that despite a lack <strong>of</strong> consensus on these postulates, they<br />
are nonetheless accurate. 90 In considering whether a right is a human right,<br />
Weston’s postulates can guide understanding and provide some sort <strong>of</strong><br />
procedure in recognizing if a right is indeed a human right. In sum, Weston<br />
proposes that human rights: (1) are “understood to represent both individual<br />
and group demands” for “cherished values or capabilities, the most<br />
fundamental <strong>of</strong> which is respect”; (2) are commonly assumed to refer to<br />
“fundamental” as distinct from “nonessential” claims or goods; (3) “refer to a<br />
wide continuum <strong>of</strong> claims ranging from the most justiciable to the most<br />
aspirational”; (4) “are qualified by the limitation that the rights <strong>of</strong> individuals<br />
86 Id. p. 329.<br />
87 P. Alston, Conjuring up New Human Rights: A Proposal for Quality Control, 78 AM. J. INT’L L. pp. 607-<br />
608 (1984), cited in Feitshans, supra note 24, pp. 101-102.<br />
88 Id.<br />
89 Id.<br />
90 See B. H. Weston, Human Rights: Concept and Content, Encyclopaedia Britannica, 15th rev. ed. (2005),<br />
available at http://www.britannica.com/eb/article?tocID=219350, reprinted (with changes from B. H.<br />
Weston) in Human Rights in the World Community: Issues and Actions 17 (R. P. Claude & B. H. Weston<br />
eds., 2006).
THE RIGHT TO MATERNAL HEALTH CARE 61<br />
or groups in particular instances are restricted as much as is necessary to<br />
secure the comparable rights <strong>of</strong> others and the aggregate common interest”;<br />
and (5) “are understood to be quintessentially general or universal in<br />
character.” 91<br />
This independent right to maternal health care meets the standards<br />
set by both Alston and Weston to transition from being a value to being a<br />
fundamental human right with the same international legal status as other<br />
more widely recognized human rights. The right to maternal health care<br />
reflects both individual and group demands for a fundamentally important<br />
social value, as a claim for the fundamental human right <strong>of</strong> life. Just as<br />
pregnancy is universal, the causes <strong>of</strong> maternal and infant mortality are also<br />
universal, and thus maternal health care should be universal. “Given that<br />
maternal mortality is the medical manifestation <strong>of</strong> deep-rooted socioeconomic,<br />
gender and cultural inequities, a human rights framework can be<br />
applied.” 92 Civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights are all<br />
wrapped up in a woman’s right to maternal health care. 93 Finally, the right to<br />
maternal health care is eligible for recognition, as it is a human right at least<br />
already articulated in international human rights law and there is a growing<br />
body <strong>of</strong> customary international law reflecting the consensus that the right to<br />
maternal health care is a human right. While the right to maternal health care<br />
does fall within the right to health framework, and valuable lessons can be<br />
learned from advocacy for the right to health, the right to maternal health care<br />
is a human right that is and must be individually recognized in international<br />
law.<br />
The International <strong>Law</strong> Realm<br />
The right to maternal health care has been articulated in international human<br />
rights law, but further development is needed before state and non-state actors<br />
alike will recognize the right to maternal health care as a human right. To quote<br />
91 Id. pp. 20-21.<br />
92 Foster-Rosales, supra note 87, at 282. Foster-Rosales also lends support to my statement that the causes<br />
<strong>of</strong> maternal and infant mortality are universal in writing: “While most pregnancies and deliveries occur<br />
without serious problems, it is a biological truth that 10-15% <strong>of</strong> pregnant women will develop a<br />
complication. This complication, if not recognized in a timely fashion and managed correctly, may result<br />
in the death <strong>of</strong> the mother.” Id. at 281.<br />
93 For example, the IIMMHR states: “Failure to provide available, accessible, acceptable and quality health<br />
care, including emergency obstetric care, for women during pregnancy and childbirth is a violation <strong>of</strong><br />
women's rights to life, health, equality and non-discrimination. Respect and protection <strong>of</strong> women's rights<br />
to information and decision-making in reproductive health, to freedom from gender-based discrimination<br />
and violence, and to participation in planning and implementing health policies are critical for making<br />
pregnancy and delivery safer for women.” IIMMHR, About Maternal Mortality, http://<br />
righttomaternalhealth.org/about-maternal-mortality (last visited Feb. 22, 2010). Further, IIMMHR lists<br />
separate human rights that can be applied to maternal mortality: “Right to Life; Right to the highest<br />
attainable standard <strong>of</strong> health; Right to equality; Right to freedom from discrimination; Right to decide the<br />
number and spacing <strong>of</strong> children; Right to be free from cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment; Right to<br />
education; Right to information; and Right to enjoy the benefits <strong>of</strong> scientific progress.” International<br />
Initiative on Maternal Mortality and Human Rights Brochure, supra note 63.
62 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
I. L. Feitshans, former legal advisor to the Committee <strong>of</strong> Experts on<br />
Reproductive Health <strong>of</strong> the World Health Organization Collaborative Centre<br />
and Russian Academy <strong>of</strong> Medical Sciences and a Delegate for the Global<br />
Alliance <strong>of</strong> Women's Health to the United Nations Fourth World Conference<br />
on Women:<br />
Without question, there is a vast and vibrant corpus <strong>of</strong> international<br />
human rights law protecting reproductive health rights. A legal<br />
justification does exist to support national, employer-based, or<br />
international collaborative efforts that research, treat, and cure<br />
reproductive health problems. Do we need more law? Are there<br />
gaps in existing rules or the international consensus <strong>of</strong> principles<br />
called “norms” that compel us to study, and codify even further, the<br />
rules protecting health? 94<br />
The answer to the question posed by Feitshans, at least with regard to<br />
the right to maternal health care, is yes. Not only are the rules protecting<br />
maternal health care in need <strong>of</strong> strengthening, but also enforcement<br />
mechanisms and strategies to ensure the right to maternal health care must be<br />
developed. While international consensus that the right to maternal health care<br />
is a human right has developed significantly during the past thirty years, gaps<br />
in existing rules and in international community policy do exist. For example,<br />
<strong>of</strong> the six international instruments discussed in Part 2, on the CEDAW are<br />
binding on states. The other five instruments establishing the right to maternal<br />
health care in international community policy do so through customary<br />
international law and in the “extra-legal” realms, but do not firmly set rules<br />
that states are obligated to provide maternal health care for pregnant women.<br />
In other words, further development is needed. Recognizing the right to<br />
maternal health care as a human right recognizes that women have not only<br />
the authority and the ability to make reproductive decisions, but the right to do<br />
so, as well as the right to be provided with services and adequate information<br />
about those services. 95 To firmly imbed this woman-centered human rights<br />
perspective in approaches to maternal mortality, a stronger international<br />
human rights law regime for the right to maternal health care must be<br />
developed. The right to maternal health care is only one part <strong>of</strong> reducing<br />
maternal mortality, but ensuring maternal health care for all women<br />
recognizes, as Soyata Maiga, Special Rapporteur on the Rights <strong>of</strong> Women in<br />
Africa has stated, that: “The right to survive pregnancy is a fundamental<br />
human right.” 96<br />
94 Feitshans, supra note 24, p. 124.<br />
95 See supra note 6.<br />
96 Maiga, supra note 89.
THE RIGHT TO MATERNAL HEALTH CARE 63<br />
The DFID Health Resource Centre has noted that the “hallmark <strong>of</strong><br />
the rights-based approach” is a dual approach: “strengthening the capacity <strong>of</strong><br />
the rights holder to understand that health care is a right and then helping them<br />
to design a strategy to assert and claim this right while simultaneously<br />
working with the duty bearers to improve their capacity to fulfill their<br />
obligations.” 97 Building a stronger international human rights law regime for<br />
the right to maternal health care must utilize this dual approach. First, as the<br />
right to maternal health care is a human right, taking on a normative value,<br />
governments can and should be held accountable for not meeting their<br />
obligation to provide maternal health care, as states have a duty to ensure the<br />
positive right. Governments can assist each other in improving capacity to<br />
fulfill their obligations, and I argue that the United States should play a role in<br />
leading such capacity building. The United States can do so by ratifying<br />
treaties that recognize the human right to maternal health care and by<br />
contributing to international community policy and customary international<br />
law to further develop the human rights law regime for the right to maternal<br />
health care. Second, non-governmental advocacy groups and individuals can<br />
utilize strategies within and beyond (in Weston’s “extra-legal realms”) the<br />
international legal regime to assert and claim the right to maternal health care.<br />
Policy Alternatives for States<br />
As has already been discussed, for a social value to transition to being a human<br />
right, recognized in international law, is tremendously important, as<br />
recognition in an international instrument places legally binding obligations on<br />
states to take positive steps to guarantee that right to their citizens. In a report<br />
on using human rights to advance maternal health, the World Health<br />
Organization states:<br />
International human rights treaties become legally binding when<br />
governments ratify them. This means that governments must then<br />
ensure that their national laws, policies and practices do not conflict,<br />
and are consistent, with their obligations under international law and<br />
that they respect, protect and fulfill the right to health and other<br />
human rights. When a government ratifies a treaty, it agrees to<br />
submit reports on a periodic basis on the compliance <strong>of</strong> domestic<br />
standards and practices with the human rights enshrined in the<br />
particular treaties. These reports are reviewed by committees that<br />
monitor the application <strong>of</strong> human rights treaties. The committee<br />
97 Hawkins et al., supra note 74, p. 13.
64 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
then issues concluding observations and recommendations, which<br />
should be implemented by the government in question. 98<br />
The Committee on the Elimination <strong>of</strong> Discrimination Against<br />
Women (“CEDAW Committee”) monitors the CEDAW. 99 For the right to<br />
maternal health care, this is extremely significant, as Article 12 <strong>of</strong> the<br />
CEDAW calls upon states to “take all appropriate measures to eliminate<br />
discrimination against women in the field <strong>of</strong> health care in order to ensure<br />
access to health care services, including those related to family planning,<br />
confinement and the post-natal period, granting free services where necessary,<br />
as well as adequate nutrition during pregnancy and lactation.” 100 Article 18 <strong>of</strong><br />
the CEDAW requires states parties to submit to the Secretary-General <strong>of</strong> the<br />
UN for consideration by the CEDAW Committee a report on the legislative,<br />
judicial, administrative or other measures which they have adopted to give<br />
effect to the provisions in the CEDAW; these reports must be submitted every<br />
four years and further whenever the CEDAW Committee so requests. 101<br />
Under the CEDAW, states parties have “different kinds <strong>of</strong> general<br />
legal obligations” to implement to right to maternal health care:<br />
• The obligation to respect rights, which requires states to refrain<br />
from interfering with the enjoyment <strong>of</strong> rights;<br />
• The obligation to protect rights, which requires states actively to<br />
prevent violations <strong>of</strong> human rights by third parties; and<br />
• The obligation to fulfill rights, which requires states to take<br />
appropriate governmental measures toward the full realization <strong>of</strong><br />
rights. 102<br />
These legal obligations, the enforcement <strong>of</strong> which is monitored by<br />
the CEDAW Committee, create legal accountability for states. Such<br />
accountability for protecting the right to maternal health care also comes out<br />
<strong>of</strong> the CESCR. 103 The Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Committee,<br />
which monitors the CESCR, has stated that providing essential obstetric<br />
services “constitutes part <strong>of</strong> a state’s core obligations, which while not<br />
defining a per se violation is a factor in considering whether the government<br />
has demonstrated that the measures it has adopted to provide such services<br />
meet a reasonableness criterion.” 104 Legal accountability can be<br />
98 World Health Organization, Using Human Rights for Maternal and Neonatal Health: A tool for<br />
strengthening laws, policies and standards <strong>of</strong> care, A Report <strong>of</strong> Indonesia Field Test Analysis 5 (2006)<br />
[hereinafter Indonesia Field Test Analysis]. See also Hawkins et al., supra note 74, at 43.<br />
99 Id. at 6.<br />
100 CEDAW, supra note 21, at Article 12, cited in Indonesia Field Test Analysis, supra note 105, p. 18.<br />
101 CEDAW, supra note 21, at Article 18.<br />
102 Hawkins et al., supra note 74, p. 43.<br />
103 CESCR, supra note 19.<br />
104 Yamin, supra note 80, at 1214, citing ECOSOC General Comment, supra note 23, p. 44.
THE RIGHT TO MATERNAL HEALTH CARE 65<br />
supplemented with political accountability, where states act to assist each<br />
other in meeting their obligations. As S. P. Marks has written, accountability<br />
“need not take the form <strong>of</strong> pointing an accusing finger.” 105 Rather, for states<br />
to act to ensure accountability among themselves, Marks continues:<br />
In most situations, the appropriate measures for securing<br />
government accountability consist <strong>of</strong> persuasion, technical<br />
assistance, dialogue, and emulation. While accountability usually<br />
refers to sanctioning an agent <strong>of</strong> the state for violating rules, the<br />
nature <strong>of</strong> the state's obligations relating to the right to health justifies<br />
cooperative means <strong>of</strong> achieving change through weaker forms <strong>of</strong><br />
accountability. The important point is to bring about change, and the<br />
choice between confrontational and cooperative means depends on<br />
circumstances. 106<br />
Governments wishing to advocate for the right to maternal health<br />
care globally should work closely with one another to hold each other<br />
accountable under the CESCR and the CEDAW for the protection <strong>of</strong> the right<br />
to maternal health care.<br />
The ICPD Programme <strong>of</strong> Action and the Beijing Platform for Action,<br />
while both expressing international community policy and adding “content<br />
and meaning” to the articulation <strong>of</strong> the right to maternal health care in<br />
international instruments, are themselves “non-binding consensual policy<br />
documents.” 107 They do not result in legal obligations for states. Nonetheless,<br />
states can hold each other accountable for the rights articulated in the ICPD<br />
Programme <strong>of</strong> Action and Beijing Platform for Action, using the “weaker<br />
forms <strong>of</strong> accountability” suggested by Marks. 108 States can work to develop<br />
the right to maternal health care as a human right recognized in customary<br />
international law by doing so in their own practice. This includes through<br />
domestic legislation, and as evidenced by the work a state does in and through<br />
international organizations. 109<br />
The IIMMHAR has issued a Fact Sheet to the UN Human Rights<br />
Council on the Maternal Mortality Resolution, which includes a list <strong>of</strong><br />
valuable ways in which state governments can take “focused, effective action”<br />
to enhance accountability and advance legal standards on the right to maternal<br />
105 S. P. Marks, The New Partnership <strong>of</strong> Health and Human Rights, 2 HUM. RTS. DIALOGUE 21 (2001),<br />
available at http://www.cceia.org/resources/publications/dialogue/2_06/articles/650.html.<br />
106 Id.<br />
107 Hawkins et al., supra note 74, at 43.<br />
108 See Marks, supra note 112.<br />
109 For an in-depth discussion on the development <strong>of</strong> customary international law, see S. Sahl, Researching<br />
Customary International <strong>Law</strong>, State Practice and the Pronouncements <strong>of</strong> States regarding International<br />
<strong>Law</strong>, Globalex (2007), available at http://www.nyulawglobal.org/globalex/Customary_<br />
International_<strong>Law</strong>.htm#_State_Practice.
66 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
health care. 110<br />
• Develop and implement maternal mortality action plans that adopt<br />
a human rights-centered approach, supported and facilitated by<br />
strong institutional mechanisms and financing.<br />
• Develop effective monitoring and accountability mechanisms at<br />
the facility, community, district, and national levels.<br />
• Ensure that all women, particularly marginalized women, have<br />
access to comprehensive sexual and reproductive health<br />
information and services, without discrimination <strong>of</strong> any kind.<br />
• Establish programs that meet the special sexual and reproductive<br />
health needs <strong>of</strong> adolescents.<br />
• Guarantee that comprehensive primary health services, including<br />
sexual and reproductive health services, are available, accessible,<br />
acceptable, and <strong>of</strong> good quality.<br />
• Collect the data needed to guide implementation and evaluation <strong>of</strong><br />
national action plans and global strategies for addressing maternal<br />
mortality.<br />
• Develop indicators and benchmarks for reducing maternal<br />
mortality.<br />
• Focus on proven, effective interventions, including family<br />
planning, skilled birth attendants, emergency obstetric care,<br />
referral networks, and safe abortion. 111<br />
The DFID Health Resource Centre has noted that to truly reduce<br />
maternal mortality, more systemic change must occur, and such change is<br />
only possible if health policy is dealt with at national levels. 112 The role <strong>of</strong><br />
states is critical to the creation <strong>of</strong> an international community policy<br />
environment that fosters a rights-based approach to maternal health care.<br />
Taking the international community policy expressed by non-binding<br />
international instruments such as the ICPD Programme <strong>of</strong> Action and the<br />
Beijing Platform for Action and implementing that policy at a national level<br />
will help to develop customary international law recognizing the right to<br />
maternal health care as a human right.<br />
The Millennium Development Goals, which call for universal access<br />
to reproductive health to reduce maternal mortality, are not in and <strong>of</strong><br />
themselves legally binding on states. Philip Alston has examined the legal<br />
status <strong>of</strong> the Millennium Development Goals and “particularly the claim that<br />
they reflect customary international law and are thus binding on all<br />
110 IMMHR, Fact sheet: UN Human Rights Council Resolution on Maternal Mortality (December. 2009).<br />
111 Id. p. 2.<br />
112 Hawkins et al., supra note 74, p. 3.
THE RIGHT TO MATERNAL HEALTH CARE 67<br />
governments.” 113 Alston concludes that while at least some <strong>of</strong> the Millennium<br />
Development Goals have met this status and are now recognized in customary<br />
international law, it remains difficult to say that all <strong>of</strong> the Millennium<br />
Development Goals have satisfied the criteria required for a norm to become<br />
part <strong>of</strong> customary law. 114 With regard to Goal 5, which calls for the reduction<br />
<strong>of</strong> maternal mortality through providing universal access to reproductive<br />
health, Alston applies a test to determine if a right articulated in a Millennium<br />
Development Goal has become a part <strong>of</strong> customary international law:<br />
… no right should be excluded which is (i) indispensable to a<br />
meaningful notion <strong>of</strong> human dignity (upon which human rights are<br />
based) and (ii) the satisfaction <strong>of</strong> which is demonstrably within the<br />
reach <strong>of</strong> the government in question assuming reasonable support<br />
from the international community. 115<br />
Alston concludes that Goal 5 meets this test and that it can plausibly<br />
be claimed that Goal 5 (and several <strong>of</strong> the other Millennium Development<br />
Goals that Alston examines) reflects norms <strong>of</strong> customary international law.<br />
Finally, the Maternal Mortality Resolution is generally considered to be nonbinding,<br />
but aids in building customary international law and informing<br />
international community policy. Further, as noted by Sandeep Prasad <strong>of</strong><br />
Action Canada for Population and Development (a human rights advocacy<br />
organization):<br />
… the consensus nature <strong>of</strong> this resolution signals agreement on the<br />
part <strong>of</strong> governments with the various acknowledgments, requests<br />
and calls that the Council makes in it. Moreover, the resolution<br />
reinforces the legally binding obligations that states have already<br />
assumed upon themselves as interpreted by treaty-monitoring<br />
bodies and long-standing commitments that governments have<br />
made. 116<br />
Over time, the Maternal Mortality Resolution could be given weight<br />
as a source <strong>of</strong> international law, but as it has been in existence for less than a<br />
year, at present it seems be only evidence <strong>of</strong> already existing international<br />
113 P. Alston, A Human Rights Perspective on the Millennium Development Goals, Paper prepared as a<br />
contribution to the work <strong>of</strong> the Millennium Project Task Force on Poverty and Economic Development, 3,<br />
available at http://hurilink.org/tools/HRsPerspectives_on_the_MDGs--Alston.pdf (last visited 6 March,<br />
2010).<br />
114 Id. p. 3, p. 20.<br />
115 Id. p. 21.<br />
116 J. Jacobson, UN Human Rights Council Resolution: Maternal Death, Illness Are Human Rights<br />
Violations, RH Reality Check (18 June, 2009), http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2009/06/18/unhuman-rights-council-recognizes-maternal-death-and-illness-human-rights-violations.
68 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
law, and not an obligation-creating instrument on its own. 117 Nonetheless, the<br />
Maternal Mortality Resolution has a valuable role to play in influencing future<br />
trends regarding the development <strong>of</strong> the right to maternal health care in<br />
international law, and states (as well as individuals) wishing to advocate for the<br />
right to maternal health care can utilize the landmark Maternal Mortality<br />
Resolution to lend critical support to the cause.<br />
Summary: Existing Accountability and Policy Alternatives<br />
for States (Table 2)<br />
CEDAW a<br />
Instrument<br />
ICPD Programme <strong>of</strong><br />
Action c<br />
Existing State<br />
Accountability<br />
States parties are under<br />
legal obligation to provide<br />
or further that others<br />
provide family planning<br />
and pregnancy related<br />
services, and are under an<br />
immediate obligation to<br />
ensure that women have<br />
access to pregnancy related<br />
services, if necessary free<br />
<strong>of</strong> charge. b<br />
State accountability only to<br />
the extent that the ICPD<br />
Programme <strong>of</strong> Action is a<br />
reflection <strong>of</strong> customary<br />
international law.<br />
Policy Alternatives for<br />
States<br />
Ratify the CEDAW and the<br />
Optional Protocol.<br />
Support enforcement <strong>of</strong><br />
CEDAW commitments by<br />
the CEDAW Committee.<br />
Hold other states politically<br />
accountable through using:<br />
persuasion, technical<br />
assistance, dialogue, and<br />
emulation.<br />
Hold other states politically<br />
accountable through using:<br />
persuasion, technical<br />
assistance, dialogue, and<br />
emulation.<br />
Develop customary<br />
international law to<br />
recognize the right to<br />
maternal health care<br />
through: practice,<br />
legislation,<br />
pronouncements, and<br />
working with international<br />
organizations.<br />
117 For a discussion <strong>of</strong> General Assembly Resolutions as authoritative sources <strong>of</strong> international law, see G. J.<br />
Kerwin, The Role <strong>of</strong> United Nations General Assembly Resolutions in Determining Principles <strong>of</strong><br />
International <strong>Law</strong> in United States Courts, 4 DUKE L. J. 876 (1983) and M. D. Öberg, The Legal Effects<br />
<strong>of</strong> Resolutions <strong>of</strong> the UN Security Council and General Assembly in the Jurisprudence <strong>of</strong> the ICJ, 16(5)<br />
EUROPEAN J. INT’L L. 879 (2005).
THE RIGHT TO MATERNAL HEALTH CARE 69<br />
Beijing Platform for<br />
Action d<br />
Millennium Development<br />
Goals e<br />
World Summit Outcome h<br />
State accountability only to<br />
the extent that the Beijing<br />
Platform for Action is a<br />
reflection <strong>of</strong> customary<br />
international law.<br />
Goal 5, which asserts that<br />
the right to access<br />
reproductive health should<br />
be universal, is a reflection<br />
<strong>of</strong> norms <strong>of</strong> customary<br />
international law.<br />
Reaffirms accountability<br />
under the Millennium<br />
Development Goals.<br />
Hold other states politically<br />
accountable through using:<br />
persuasion, technical<br />
assistance, dialogue, and<br />
emulation.<br />
Develop customary<br />
international law to<br />
recognize the right to<br />
maternal health care<br />
through: practice,<br />
legislation,<br />
pronouncements, and<br />
working with international<br />
organizations.<br />
Call upon treaty bodies to<br />
take note <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Millennium Development<br />
Goals (“MDG”) to take full<br />
account <strong>of</strong> the MDG<br />
commitments in their<br />
work. f<br />
Submit information to the<br />
MDG Monitor to<br />
demonstrate support for<br />
and a commitment to the<br />
MDGs. g<br />
Hold other states politically<br />
accountable through using:<br />
persuasion, technical<br />
assistance, dialogue, and<br />
emulation.<br />
Develop customary<br />
international law to<br />
recognize the right to<br />
maternal health care<br />
through: practice,<br />
legislation,<br />
pronouncements, and<br />
working with international<br />
organizations.<br />
(see above)
70 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
Maternal Mortality<br />
Resolution i<br />
State accountability to the<br />
extent that the Maternal<br />
Mortality Resolution is a<br />
reflection <strong>of</strong> customary<br />
international law. State<br />
accountability to the extent<br />
that the Maternal Mortality<br />
Resolution is a<br />
reinforcement <strong>of</strong> already<br />
existing legal obligations<br />
under the CEDAW and<br />
other human rights treaties.<br />
Hold other states politically<br />
accountable through using:<br />
persuasion, technical<br />
assistance, dialogue, and<br />
emulation.<br />
Develop customary<br />
international law to<br />
recognize the right to<br />
maternal health care<br />
through: practice,<br />
legislation,<br />
pronouncements, and<br />
working with international<br />
organizations.<br />
a. CEDAW, supra note 21, at Article. 12(2).<br />
b. Id. See also Toebes, supra note 17, at 335.<br />
c. ICPD Programme <strong>of</strong> Action, supra note 27.<br />
d. Beijing Platform for Action, supra note 29.<br />
e. Millennium Development Goals, supra note 37.<br />
f. See Alston, supra note 120, at 57.<br />
g. See MDG MONITOR, http://www.mdgmonitor.org/index.cfm (last visited 6 March, 2010).<br />
h. World Summit Outcome, supra note 38, at 57(g).<br />
i. Maternal Mortality Resolution, supra note 39.<br />
Clarification <strong>of</strong> Policy Alternatives for States: Recommendations<br />
for the United States<br />
The United States is not immune to the tragic problem <strong>of</strong> maternal mortality.<br />
In spite <strong>of</strong> being among the world’s most technologically advanced and<br />
wealthy nations, the United States currently falls behind more than 40 other<br />
countries when it comes to rates <strong>of</strong> maternal death. 118 “More women die in the<br />
U.S. after giving birth than die in countries like Poland, Croatia, Italy and<br />
Canada, to name a few.” This year, the Joint Commission, an independent nonpr<strong>of</strong>it<br />
organization that accredits and certifies health organizations and<br />
programs in the U.S., issued an Alert that warns: “current trends and evidence<br />
suggest that maternal mortality rates may be increasing in the U.S.” 119 Citing<br />
a Center for Disease Control and Prevention study, the Joint Commission notes<br />
that in the U.S. there is a four-fold increased risk <strong>of</strong> pregnancy-related death<br />
for black women, and an increased risk for women who did not receive prenatal<br />
care. For marginalized women in the United States, gaining access to maternal<br />
health care may be as difficult as in some <strong>of</strong> the world’s least developed<br />
countries. The United States should take on a leadership role in recognizing the<br />
right to maternal health care as a human right, not only to assist and protect<br />
118 K. Snow & S. Amos, Maternal Mortality Rates Rising in California, ABC World News (Mar. 4, 2010),<br />
available at http://abcnews.go.com/WN/changing-life-preventing-maternal-mortality/story?id=9914009.<br />
119 The Joint Commission, Preventing Maternal Death, 44 Sentinel Event Alert (26 January, 2010), available<br />
at http://www.jointcommission.org/SentinelEvents/SentinelEventAlert/sea_44.htm.
THE RIGHT TO MATERNAL HEALTH CARE 71<br />
pregnant women in the United States, but also to tackle the atrocious problems<br />
<strong>of</strong> maternal and infant mortality globally.<br />
To elaborate on the policy alternatives for states outlined in Table 2<br />
above, this paper <strong>of</strong>fers recommendations for the United States to advocate<br />
for the right to maternal health care globally. The United States should ratify<br />
the CEDAW and the CEDAW Optional Protocol. Amnesty International<br />
notes:<br />
The United States is among a small minority <strong>of</strong> countries that have<br />
not yet ratified CEDAW, including Iran and Sudan. The United<br />
States has the dubious distinction <strong>of</strong> being the only country in the<br />
Western Hemisphere and the only industrialized democracy that has<br />
not ratified this treaty. The Senate Foreign Relations Committee<br />
voted in July 2002 to recommend ratification <strong>of</strong> CEDAW, but the<br />
Treaty has never come before the full Senate for a vote. 120<br />
Currently, the CEDAW is only eight countries away from universal<br />
ratification (with 186 states parties to the CEDAW as <strong>of</strong> March 2010). 121<br />
Without ratification, the United States is not accountable under the provisions<br />
<strong>of</strong> the CEDAW, including Article 12(2), which ensures maternal health care.<br />
To help develop a stronger international law regime for the right to maternal<br />
health care, the United States should ratify the CEDAW and the Optional<br />
Protocol, and support enforcement <strong>of</strong> CEDAW commitments by the CEDAW<br />
Committee to hold other nations legally and politically accountable for the<br />
right to maternal health care.<br />
The United States needs to hold itself legally accountable under the<br />
CEDAW, and therefore ideally ratification should occur without reservations.<br />
In 2002, the last time the CEDAW came before the Senate Foreign Relations<br />
Committee, ratification was recommended subject to reservations,<br />
understandings and declarations. 122 The understandings included: “The<br />
United States understands that Article 12 permits states parties to determine<br />
which health care services are appropriate in connection with family planning,<br />
pregnancy, confinement and the post-natal period, as well as when the<br />
provision <strong>of</strong> free services is necessary, and does not mandate the provision <strong>of</strong><br />
particular services on a cost-free basis” and that “nothing in this Convention<br />
shall be construed to reflect or create any right to abortion and in no case<br />
120 Amnesty International, Convention on the Elimination <strong>of</strong> All Forms <strong>of</strong> Discrimination Against Women<br />
(CEDAW), http://www.amnestyusa.org/violence-against-women/ratify-the-treaty-for-the-rights-<strong>of</strong>women-cedaw/page.do?id=1108216<br />
(last visited 6 March, 2010).<br />
121 N. Gabr, Chair for Committee on the Elimination <strong>of</strong> Discrimination Against Women, Statement to<br />
Commission on the Status <strong>of</strong> Women Fifty-Fourth Session (1-12 March, 2010), available at http://<br />
www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/beijing15/statements/CEDAW.pdf.<br />
122 Library <strong>of</strong> Congress, Legislative Actions: The Convention on the Elimination <strong>of</strong> All Forms <strong>of</strong><br />
Discrimination Against Women, Treaty No. 96-53 (2002), available at http://www.thomas.gov/home/<br />
treaties/treaties.html.
72 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
should abortion be promoted as a method <strong>of</strong> family planning.” 123 These<br />
understandings are unnecessary to state with ratification, at least because the<br />
“CEDAW does not address the matter <strong>of</strong> abortion and, according to the U.S.<br />
State Department, is ‘abortion neutral.’” 124 Making these understandings part<br />
<strong>of</strong> ratification would also serve to limit the accountability <strong>of</strong> the United States.<br />
Such understandings go against using a rights-based approach to maternal<br />
health care.<br />
A rights-based approach asserts that maternal health care is a human<br />
right and that women, not the state, have the right to determine which health<br />
care services are appropriate to their family planning, pregnancy, confinement<br />
and the post-natal period. To protect this positive human right, the state’s role<br />
is to ensure, as much as possible, maternal health care services so that women<br />
have the ability to make such determinations. The CEDAW specifically states<br />
that these services should be free where necessary because so many women in<br />
the world do not receive maternal health care because they cannot afford it.<br />
This includes women in the United States, and the U.S. government should<br />
not try to limit its responsibility when it comes to providing cost-free maternal<br />
health care to pregnant women in need.<br />
Building from the ICPD Programme <strong>of</strong> Action and the Beijing<br />
Platform for Action to the most recent Maternal Mortality Resolution, the<br />
United States should continue to work to build customary international law<br />
that recognizes maternal health care as a human right. Pronouncements <strong>of</strong><br />
states are “excellent resources for the evidence <strong>of</strong> custom,” 125 and the United<br />
States continues to issue documents in the forms <strong>of</strong> diplomatic papers,<br />
memorandums, briefs, position papers and remarks, many <strong>of</strong> which assert a<br />
rights-based approach to maternal health care. For example, in a very recent<br />
statement by Melanne Verveer, U.S. Ambassador-at-Large for Global<br />
Women’s Issues, at Beijing +15, Ms. Verveer provided detailed evidence that<br />
the U.S. recognizes the right to maternal health care, at least in practice. While<br />
the quote is long, it is valuable to cite in full.<br />
The persistently high global rates <strong>of</strong> maternal and child mortality do<br />
not stem from uncertainty about how to save the lives <strong>of</strong> women and<br />
children. We know that providing proven, evidence-based<br />
interventions – such as skilled birth attendants, access to emergency<br />
obstetric care, pre- and post-natal care, nutrition, and access to<br />
family planning – will improve maternal and child health, as will<br />
strengthening health systems to better respond to the needs <strong>of</strong><br />
women and girls.<br />
123 Id.<br />
124 Amnesty International, supra note 136. For a brief discussion <strong>of</strong> abortion and the right to maternal health<br />
care, see supra Clarification <strong>of</strong> the Right to Maternal Health Care.<br />
125 Sahl, supra note 116.
THE RIGHT TO MATERNAL HEALTH CARE 73<br />
To improve the health <strong>of</strong> women and girls, we also need to address<br />
the myriad economic, cultural, social, and legal barriers that impede<br />
their access to needed health care. The unacceptably high rate <strong>of</strong><br />
maternal mortality is directly linked to persistent gender<br />
inequalities, including gender-based violence, harmful traditional<br />
practices such as early and forced marriage, lack <strong>of</strong> education, lack<br />
<strong>of</strong> economic opportunity, and unequal access to adequate health<br />
services and facilities.<br />
The United States is committed to reducing maternal and child<br />
mortality through its Global Health Initiative, which was announced<br />
by President Obama last year and commits to a strong focus on<br />
maternal and child health.<br />
The U.S. has also demonstrated its commitment to the health <strong>of</strong><br />
women and girls by sponsoring a resolution on “Reducing Maternal<br />
Mortality and Morbidity through the Empowerment <strong>of</strong> Women,”<br />
along with a cross-regional group <strong>of</strong> member states. We welcome<br />
delegations’ support for this initiative. 126<br />
The United States, both through pronouncements and through its<br />
work in international organizations, already is helping to develop customary<br />
international law that recognizes maternal health care as a human right. The<br />
U.S. can go further though, and arguably much <strong>of</strong> the work that the U.S. needs<br />
to do should take place within its borders. By passing legislation that uses a<br />
rights-based approach to ensure maternal health care for women in the United<br />
States, the U.S. would go far in serving as a leader for other nations to emulate<br />
in advocating for the right to maternal health care globally.<br />
Policy Alternatives for Individuals & Advocacy Groups<br />
Individuals also play a critical role in the development <strong>of</strong> the international law<br />
regime protecting the right to maternal health care. Individuals can hold states<br />
accountable for their human rights obligations through bringing action against<br />
governments that fail to meet their legal obligations. These actions take two<br />
main forms: litigation in domestic courts and complaints brought before<br />
international committees responsible for the enforcement <strong>of</strong> treaties, such as<br />
the CEDAW Committee. When the CEDAW was first ratified, advocates for<br />
the right to maternal health care complained that the CEDAW was “hobbled by<br />
126 M. Verveer, Statement by Ambassador Melanne Verveer, U.S. Ambassador-at-Large for Global Women's<br />
Issues, at the Fifty-fourth session <strong>of</strong> the Commission on the Status <strong>of</strong> Women, at United Nations<br />
Headquarters (3 March, 2010), available at http://usun.state.gov/briefing/statements/2010/137772.htm.
74 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
the lack <strong>of</strong> an Optional Protocol, which would authorize it to receive<br />
complaints from individuals, groups and organizations alleging violations.” 127<br />
Today this has changed, and with the ratification <strong>of</strong> the CEDAW Optional<br />
Protocol, individuals are now able to bring complaints against governments<br />
that are parties to the CEDAW Optional Protocol. 128 With 99 states parties to<br />
the CEDAW Optional Protocol as <strong>of</strong> today, this is an extremely valuable<br />
mechanism to enforce the right to maternal health care. 129 The CEDAW<br />
Optional Protocol provides a “communications procedure” through which<br />
individuals, groups and organizations can file complaints in writing about<br />
violations <strong>of</strong> rights. 130 Further, the CEDAW Optional Protocol allows the<br />
CEDAW Committee to conduct inquiries into grave or systematic abuses by<br />
states parties to the Optional Protocol with an “inquiry procedure.” 131<br />
In 2007, the Center for Reproductive Rights, along with the Brazilian<br />
group Advocaci, filed a complaint before the CEDAW Committee on behalf<br />
<strong>of</strong> Alyne da Silva Pimentel against the government <strong>of</strong> Brazil. 132 “Alyne, a 28-<br />
year-old Afro-Brazilian woman, died <strong>of</strong> complications resulting from<br />
pregnancy after her local health center misdiagnosed her symptoms and<br />
delayed providing her with emergency care;” Alyne da Silva Pimentel v Brazil<br />
is the first maternal mortality case to be brought before the CEDAW<br />
Committee. 133 The Center for Reproductive Rights alleged that “by failing to<br />
implement effective policies and programs that address the high rates <strong>of</strong><br />
maternal mortality, Brazil is violating its obligations under national and<br />
international human rights law that guarantee women's rights to life, health<br />
and equality,” and cited both Brazil’s Constitution and international human<br />
rights treaties including CEDAW as creating legal obligations for Brazil to<br />
protect the right to maternal health care. 134 The CEDAW Committee gave the<br />
Brazilian government until August 2008 to render a decision regarding the<br />
case, and the CEDAW Committee planned to analyze the case following the<br />
presentation <strong>of</strong> facts and <strong>of</strong>ficial arguments. 135 As <strong>of</strong> the writing <strong>of</strong> this paper,<br />
127 Sadasivam, supra note 6, p. 334.<br />
128 The General Assembly adopted the Optional Protocol to the CEDAW on October 6, 1999 in resolution<br />
54/4 (A/RES/54/4). See CEDAW Optional Protocol, http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/cedaw/<br />
protocol/sigop.htm (last visited 6 March, 2010).<br />
129 Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Elimination <strong>of</strong> All Forms <strong>of</strong> Discrimination Against Women,<br />
G.A. Res. 54/4, 2131 Treaty Series 83, Status available at http://treaties.un.org/ [hereinafter Optional<br />
Protocol Status].<br />
130 CEDAW Optional Protocol, supra note 144.<br />
131 Id.<br />
132 Center for Reproductive Rights, Alyne de Silva Pimentel v Brazil (10 December, 2008), http://<br />
reproductiverights.org/en/case/alyne-da-silva-pimentel-v-brazil-committee-on-the-elimination-<strong>of</strong>discrimination-against-women.<br />
133 Id.<br />
134 For an English translation <strong>of</strong> the full text <strong>of</strong> the Center for Reproductive Rights petition in the Alyne de<br />
Silva Pimentel case, see Latin American and Caribbean Women’s Health Network, Case <strong>of</strong> maternal<br />
morbidity in Brazil goes before the CEDAW committee, The Free Library by Farlex (2008), http://<br />
www.thefreelibrary.com/Case+<strong>of</strong>+maternal+morbidity+in+Brazil+goes+before+the+CEDAW+<br />
committee.-a0198415431.<br />
135 Id.
THE RIGHT TO MATERNAL HEALTH CARE 75<br />
no decision has been rendered by the CEDAW Committee on the case, but the<br />
Center for Reproductive Rights has requested “that the Brazilian Government<br />
compensate Alyne’s family, including her nine year-old daughter, prioritize<br />
the reduction <strong>of</strong> maternal mortality, including training providers and<br />
establishing and enforcing protocols, and improve care in vulnerable<br />
communities.” 136 If the case is successful, it “will lead to recognition <strong>of</strong><br />
government accountability for preventing maternal deaths and state<br />
obligations to promote women’s health.” 137<br />
Individuals, or organizations advocating on behalf <strong>of</strong> individuals, can<br />
also bring litigation on domestic courts to ensure a government’s legal<br />
obligation to provide maternal health care. The Center for Reproductive<br />
Rights has utilized this approach in India, supporting several public interest<br />
lawsuits seeking better implementation <strong>of</strong> India’s National Rural Health<br />
Mission, which aims to reduce maternal mortality, improve service delivery<br />
and to increase equity and access to maternal health care. 138 In April 2009, the<br />
Center for Reproductive Rights filed a memorandum <strong>of</strong> support for Kalyani<br />
Meena in Kalyani Meena v Union <strong>of</strong> India & Others (2008), a case developed<br />
in collaboration with the Human Rights <strong>Law</strong> Network <strong>of</strong> India to “address the<br />
overwhelming number <strong>of</strong> preventable deaths <strong>of</strong> women who die either in<br />
Pregnancy or childbirth in the north Indian state.” 139 The Kalyani Meena case<br />
is before the Jharkhand High Court in India. 140 In May 2009, the Center for<br />
Reproductive Rights prepared a “friend-<strong>of</strong>-the-court” brief in support <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Centre for Health and Resource Management v The State <strong>of</strong> Bihar & Others<br />
(2008), a maternal mortality case highlighting the impact <strong>of</strong> India’s failed<br />
national and local public health policies and the lack <strong>of</strong> access to maternal<br />
health care in Bihar. 141 These are only two cases in a comprehensive strategy<br />
being employed by Indian NGOs and international advocacy groups like the<br />
Center for Reproductive Rights to promote the use <strong>of</strong> litigation in India to<br />
protect women’s reproductive rights, including the right to maternal health<br />
care.<br />
136 L. Cabal & J. M. Todd-Gher, Reframing the Right to Health: Legal Advocacy to Advance Women’s<br />
Reproductive Rights, in REALIZING THE RIGHT TO HEALTH 120, 132 (A. Clapham & M. Robinson eds.,<br />
2009).<br />
137 Id.<br />
138 S. Majumdar, <strong>Law</strong>suits Used to Shrink India’s Maternal Deaths, REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH (24 September,<br />
2009), available at http://www.womensenews.org/story/reproductive-health/090924/lawsuits-usedshrink-indias-maternal-deaths.<br />
139 Center for Reproductive Rights, Kalyani Meena v Union <strong>of</strong> India & Others (2 September, 2009),<br />
available at http://reproductiverights.org/en/case/kalyani-meena-v-union-<strong>of</strong>-india-ors.<br />
140 Id.<br />
141 Center for Reproductive Rights, Centre for Health and Resource Management v The State <strong>of</strong> Bihar &<br />
Others (14 August, 2009), available at http://reproductiverights.org/en/case/centre-for-health-andresource-management-v-the-state-<strong>of</strong>-bihar-others.
76 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
The “Extra-Legal” Realm<br />
Such innovative and far-reaching strategies are critical to the development <strong>of</strong><br />
the international human rights regime recognizing the right to maternal health<br />
care. “The vision <strong>of</strong> a rights-based approach to reducing maternal mortality has<br />
been around for 15 years and more; what is needed are diverse, wide-scale<br />
actions to put it into practice.” 142 International advocacy groups are vital in<br />
developing such approaches to protecting the right to maternal health care.<br />
Grassroots and other initiatives that focus on maternal mortality as a human<br />
rights issue raise awareness, promote education, and encourage women to<br />
advocate for their right to maternal health care. As Weston emphasized in his<br />
article on child labor, 143 these alternative strategies are important, as there are<br />
“significant limitations to relying upon court-centric strategies.” 144 Non-state<br />
actors not only can work to hold individual governments accountable using<br />
court-centric strategies, but also can go further in advocating for resources<br />
from foreign sources to finance maternal health care and can forge alliances<br />
with international social movements. 145 Public interest, resulting in public<br />
action with respect to the right to maternal health care fosters the recognition<br />
<strong>of</strong> the right to maternal health care in international community policy.<br />
Individuals and advocacy groups can raise awareness through a wide variety <strong>of</strong><br />
means; one successful tool for human rights advocacy has been the individual<br />
narrative. 146 Video is a powerful way to reach diverse, widespread audiences,<br />
and human rights organizations have utilized video to tell personal narratives<br />
and highlight the human rights tragedy <strong>of</strong> maternal mortality. 147 Individuals<br />
and Advocacy Groups can work to organize and encourage public and state<br />
action and so build from existing international human rights law that already<br />
establishes maternal health care as a positive human right to act to prevent<br />
maternal mortality globally.<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
On average, a woman somewhere in the world dies in childbirth every<br />
minute. 148 In the time that it has taken to read this paper, over 40 women have<br />
died, and most due to preventable circumstances. Maternal mortality in today’s<br />
142 R. Okello & T. Gyuse, Maternal Mortality, A Human Rights Catastrophe, GLOBAL POLICY FORUM (30<br />
June, 2009), available at http://www.globalpolicy.org/component/content/article/211-development/<br />
47913-maternal-mortality-a-human-rights-catastrophe.html.<br />
143 Weston, supra note 75.<br />
144 Yamin, supra note 80, at 1220.<br />
145 Id. pp. 1228-1235 pp. 1239-1242.<br />
146 Id. at 1204.<br />
147 See, “e.g.”, J. Rincon, Videos on how maternal mortality affects communities, Conversations for a Better<br />
World (28 October, 2009), available at http://www.conversationsforabetterworld.com/2009/10/videoson-how-maternal-mortality-affects-communities/.<br />
148 Okello & Gyuse, supra note 158.
THE RIGHT TO MATERNAL HEALTH CARE 77<br />
world is a human rights catastrophe. Recognizing the right to maternal health<br />
care as a human right is a way to prevent maternal mortality globally. The right<br />
to maternal health care already exists in international law. This paper has<br />
attempted to elucidate ways in which both states and individuals wishing to<br />
advocate for maternal health care could use existing international human rights<br />
law to further develop the legal regime for the right to maternal health care, and<br />
use a human rights-based approach to eliminate preventable maternal<br />
mortality. I have focused on the right to maternal health care, separating the<br />
right to maternal health care from the right to health and from the right to<br />
maternal health generally. While realizing the right to maternal health care will<br />
advance the right to maternal health, my narrower focus has been on the right<br />
to health care during pregnancy and childbirth. Because health care during<br />
pregnancy and childbirth is known to prevent maternal mortality, I have<br />
attempted to determine policy alternatives to advocate for improved access to<br />
health care services during pregnancy and childbirth by using international<br />
human rights law. I used the United States as an example to demonstrate that<br />
states, particularly wealthy and powerful states like the U.S., have the ability<br />
to affect change beyond their borders. Recognizing that the right to maternal<br />
health care is a human right recognizes that women have the right to determine<br />
which health care services are appropriate to their family planning, pregnancy,<br />
confinement and the post-natal period, and asserts that states have an<br />
affirmative duty to protect this positive human right by providing women with<br />
maternal health care services. States and individuals can and should work<br />
together to develop international human rights law to prevent maternal<br />
mortality.<br />
Recognizing the right to maternal health care as a human right places<br />
an affirmative duty on states to provide maternal health care to pregnant<br />
women. Countries without the internal capacity to provide maternal health<br />
care may argue against such an affirmative duty, especially if a country<br />
doesn’t have the ability to meet such a duty. Nonetheless, such aspirational<br />
duties are frequently codified in international law in the human rights context.<br />
The Millennium Development Goals, “which range from halving extreme<br />
poverty to halting the spread <strong>of</strong> HIV/AIDS and providing universal primary<br />
education, all by the target date <strong>of</strong> 2015,” 149 are all aspirational goals that<br />
place duties on states. The codification <strong>of</strong> the Millennium Development Goals<br />
provides a “blueprint” agreement for all <strong>of</strong> the world’s countries and the<br />
world’s leading developmental institutions to work to meet the needs <strong>of</strong> the<br />
world’s poorest. 150 For states that aren’t able to meet the Millennium<br />
Development Goals on their own, the international community feels<br />
149 United Nations, Millennium Development Goals: Background, http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/<br />
bkgd.shtml (last visited 17 April, 2010).<br />
150 Id.
78 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
compelled to assist them because <strong>of</strong> their commitments to the MDGs.<br />
Calling attention to the issue <strong>of</strong> maternal death as a human rights<br />
issue gives impetus to international efforts to help states meet their duty to<br />
provide pregnant women with maternal health care. A recent example<br />
illustrates this point. In April 2010, the British medical journal Lancet<br />
published a paper that found the number <strong>of</strong> women who die in pregnancy or<br />
childbirth had dropped by more than 35% over 28 years. 151 Lancet’s editor,<br />
Dr. Richard Horton, wrote in an accompanying comment “that he was<br />
pressured to delay publishing the report because <strong>of</strong> the potential damage to<br />
maternal advocacy campaigns.” 152 While the Lancet article found that<br />
maternal deaths had fallen to about 343,000 in 2008, another report issued<br />
only days later by a global alliance hosted by the World Health Organization<br />
“claimed progress in maternal health was at a standstill” and that up to<br />
500,000 women still die in childbirth every year. 153 The WHO alliance<br />
findings did not explain where their data came from, but in the same report<br />
U.N. <strong>of</strong>ficials claimed they needed $20 billion every year to “save women and<br />
children in developing countries.” 154 Paradoxically, good news can be bad<br />
news when it comes to motivating states to address human rights issues; “the<br />
more people who are dying, the more money U.N. <strong>of</strong>ficials can raise, making<br />
some experts not keen to announce success or acknowledge that a problem is<br />
not as bad as they once thought.” 155 Advocates are concerned that progress in<br />
reducing maternal mortality – progress in meeting the duty to provide<br />
maternal health care – “will detract from the urgency <strong>of</strong> their cause.” 156<br />
The Lancet study cited a number <strong>of</strong> reasons for the improvement,<br />
including “the increasing ability <strong>of</strong> ‘skilled attendants’ – people with some<br />
medical training – to help women give birth.” 157 Dr. Horton argued that the<br />
study’s finding would not conflict with advocacy goals, stating in a telephone<br />
interview with the New York Times:<br />
People who have spent many years committed to the issue <strong>of</strong><br />
maternal health were understandably worried that these figures<br />
could divert attention from an issue that they care passionately<br />
about. But my feeling is that they are misguided in their view that it<br />
151 M. Cheng, Politics <strong>of</strong> aid seen in clash over maternal deaths, ASSOCIATED PRESS (14 April, 2010),<br />
available at http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5j-phKb8xCQcxd8xanFFF<br />
7f1IN3oAD9F2R4H00.<br />
152 Id.<br />
153 Id.<br />
154 Id.<br />
155 Id.<br />
156 D. Grady, Maternal Deaths Decline Sharply Across the Globe, NY TIMES (13 April, 2010), available at<br />
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/14/health/14births.html.<br />
157 Id.
THE RIGHT TO MATERNAL HEALTH CARE 79<br />
would be damaging. My view is that actually these numbers help<br />
their cause, not hinder it. 158<br />
Dr. Horton argued that the new data should encourage the world’s<br />
politicians to spend more on “pregnancy-related health matters,” as the data<br />
dispels the belief that statistics have been stuck on one place for decades,<br />
instead showing that money allocated to women’s health is actually<br />
accomplishing something. 159 The debate over the publication <strong>of</strong> the Lancet<br />
article not only demonstrates how critical international cooperation is in<br />
capacity building (as advocates for maternal health care argue, there is a dire<br />
need for international aid to help states meet their duty to provide maternal<br />
health care), but also shows that the right to maternal health care continues to<br />
be defined as a human right in the international context. A report issued<br />
concurrently with the Lancet article by the Partnership for Maternal, Newborn<br />
and Child Health, specified the improvements that are saving the lives <strong>of</strong><br />
women around the world and causing the numbers <strong>of</strong> maternal death to<br />
decrease:<br />
For instance, India pays women to get prenatal care and skilled care<br />
for delivery. Nepal provides home visits for family planning.<br />
Malawi is training nonphysicians to perform emergency Caesarean<br />
sections. Brazil has set up a health system that provides free primary<br />
care and skilled attendance at birth for all. 160<br />
Whether or not the Lancet findings will reduce state commitments to<br />
capacity building for providing maternal health care, the findings do also<br />
show that recognizing the right to maternal health care as a human right is<br />
working in preventing maternal mortality around the world.<br />
I agree with Sadasivam’s assertion that “even a broad-based human<br />
rights approach does not go to a crucial aspect <strong>of</strong> the problem: the failure <strong>of</strong><br />
public health systems in developing countries,” but I have attempted to assert<br />
that the formal articulations <strong>of</strong> the right to maternal health care international<br />
law, which are being advanced through the development <strong>of</strong> customary<br />
international law and through individual lawsuits, provide a foundation from<br />
which advocates for maternal health care can advance their goals. 161<br />
Asserting that the right to maternal health care is a human right is a way to<br />
develop policy alternatives, both in the international law and “extra-legal”<br />
realms. As Alicia Yamin, former Director <strong>of</strong> Research and Investigations at<br />
Physicians for Human Rights, has stated:<br />
158 Id.<br />
159 Id.<br />
160 Id.<br />
161 See supra note 6.
80 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
Applying the label human rights is in no way a magical panacea or<br />
guarantee <strong>of</strong> effectiveness with respect to any issue, as the gross<br />
breach between discourse and practice in even the narrow area <strong>of</strong><br />
torture attests. Yet, the nongovernmental human rights movement<br />
has already amply demonstrated that it can take issues that were<br />
previously not considered to be human rights issues, such as<br />
landmines, and not only make them so, but also create normative<br />
instruments and standards and mobilize public and state action with<br />
respect to them. 162<br />
Weston writes on the need for a strategy with a “multitude <strong>of</strong><br />
mechanisms and techniques” at all levels, “from the most local to the most<br />
global,” engaging all elements <strong>of</strong> society and proceeding with imagination<br />
and energy to succeed in the abolition <strong>of</strong> child labor. 163 Such a multifaceted<br />
strategy is necessary to ensure maternal health care for pregnant women, and<br />
thereby prevent maternal mortality. I have presented policy alternatives for<br />
states and individuals to advance international law to strengthen the right to<br />
maternal health care as a human right, and I have briefly examined strategies<br />
in the “extra-legal” realm (such as education and video advocacy) to work to<br />
further develop the right to maternal health care. Continued work is needed.<br />
Providing maternal health care is working to reduce maternal mortality, as<br />
evidenced by the Lancet study, and continuing to advocate for the right to<br />
maternal health care as a human right will continue to prevent maternal<br />
mortality in the future.<br />
162 Yamin, supra note 80, at 1244.<br />
163 Weston, supra note 75, at 109.
Between judicial enabling and adversarialism: The role <strong>of</strong><br />
the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer in protecting the unrepresented accused in<br />
<strong>Botswana</strong> in a comparative perspective<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
R.J.V. Cole*<br />
The role <strong>of</strong> the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer in <strong>Botswana</strong>’s adversarial system has evolved<br />
over the decades. Traditionally, the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer in the adversarial system<br />
plays a neutral role while the parties present their cases. The semblance <strong>of</strong><br />
neutrality compels the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer to remain passive and refrain from<br />
interfering with the process. Over the years, the courts have recognised that the<br />
unrepresented accused cannot get a fair trial as she is unaware <strong>of</strong> the rules <strong>of</strong><br />
procedure and evidence. This being the case, the unrepresented accused<br />
cannot effectively participate in the proceedings. Consequently, the courts<br />
have over the years stated that judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers have a duty to assist<br />
unrepresented accused persons. This position was recently given added<br />
impetus by the Court <strong>of</strong> Appeal. This article discusses the duty <strong>of</strong> the judicial<br />
<strong>of</strong>ficer to the unrepresented accused and its implications for <strong>Botswana</strong>’s<br />
adversarial system. In so doing, comparative analysis is made with Australia,<br />
South Africa and to some extent Namibia, which share similar (adversarial<br />
common law) systems with <strong>Botswana</strong>.<br />
1. INTRODUCTION<br />
The Court <strong>of</strong> Appeal recently in the case <strong>of</strong> Nieklas Willem v The State, 1<br />
reiterated the duty <strong>of</strong> judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers to advise unrepresented accused persons<br />
<strong>of</strong> their procedural rights. In so doing, the Court was not venturing into pristine<br />
environment. What is symbolic about this judgment, however, is that the Court<br />
urged the relevant authorities to come out with a check list for the guidance <strong>of</strong><br />
judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers, indicating that it continues to be inundated with appeals<br />
relating to omissions by judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers to advise unrepresented accused <strong>of</strong><br />
their procedural rights. The Court noted that this leads to a waste <strong>of</strong> valuable<br />
time in dealing with such irregularities and the concomitant enquiry into<br />
whether miscarriage <strong>of</strong> justice has occurred.<br />
It is interesting to note that the Court did not itself take the<br />
opportunity to make a comprehensive (if not exhaustive) list <strong>of</strong> instances<br />
81<br />
Lecturer, Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong>, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong>, LLB (Hons) (FBC-USL), LLM (UNISA), LLD<br />
(Stell).<br />
1 Court <strong>of</strong> Appeal Case No. CLCLB-092-2009, delivered on the 28 January, 2010 (unreported).
82 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
wherein judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers have a duty to assist the unrepresented accused. This<br />
<strong>of</strong> course was an opportunity missed. A missed opportunity because cases<br />
dealing with judicial advice generally refer to specific rights and are mostly<br />
dealt with by the High Court. Nieklas on the other hand provided an<br />
opportunity for a comprehensive guide to be provided in a single case by no<br />
less than the highest court <strong>of</strong> the land. The rippling effect <strong>of</strong> this case, however,<br />
is that the direction <strong>of</strong> the Court requiring a checklist has received initial<br />
response by the authorities. Under the direction <strong>of</strong> the Chief Justice, the<br />
Registrar and Master <strong>of</strong> the High Court circulated a circular 2 to judicial<br />
<strong>of</strong>ficers, listing instances where judicial guidance should be given to<br />
unrepresented accused persons. The list places a duty on judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers to;<br />
“(a) Advise an unrepresented accused person at the onset <strong>of</strong> the<br />
constitutional right to legal representation at [her] own expense,<br />
(b) Advise an unrepresented accused person <strong>of</strong> the right or purpose<br />
(meaning) <strong>of</strong> cross- examination,<br />
(c) Advise an unrepresented accused person <strong>of</strong> any special statutory<br />
defences available to him/her,<br />
(d) Advise an unrepresented accused person <strong>of</strong> the right to address<br />
the Court at the close <strong>of</strong> the trial or in mitigation and<br />
(e) Advise an unrepresented accused person about exceptional<br />
extenuating circumstances in the case <strong>of</strong> compulsory sentences.”<br />
This document is by no means a Judicial Circular and was only<br />
intended as a temporary stopgap measure, awaiting the formulation <strong>of</strong> a<br />
comprehensive judicial guide or checklist. Indeed, the compilation <strong>of</strong> a<br />
standard checklist for judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers is impending. While the Registrar’s<br />
Circular is not law and while the Court <strong>of</strong> Appeal itself abdicated from setting<br />
a comprehensive guide, the Court ignited a chain <strong>of</strong> events which demand an<br />
excursion into the judicial duties in relation to the unrepresented accused.<br />
The purpose <strong>of</strong> this article is two-fold. First, it seeks to discuss the<br />
duty <strong>of</strong> the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer in relation to the unrepresented accused. In so<br />
doing, it catalogues and discusses the areas covered by the Registrar’s<br />
Circular as well as other possible areas. It may be seen, admittedly, as a<br />
precocious endeavour at setting the groundwork for what is to be expected in<br />
the final instruction to judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers. Second, it is envisaged that the<br />
direction given by the Court in Nieklas will consequently reinforce the<br />
participation <strong>of</strong> judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers in criminal trials. This article, therefore,<br />
discusses the implications <strong>of</strong> this for <strong>Botswana</strong>’s adversarial system. The<br />
second part <strong>of</strong> the article discusses the role <strong>of</strong> a judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer in the<br />
adversarial process. The discussion views her role against the inquisitorial<br />
2 Registrar’s Circular No. 1 <strong>of</strong> 2010.
UNREPRESENTED ACCUSED IN BOTSWANA 83<br />
backdrop. The third part highlights the plight <strong>of</strong> the unrepresented accused.<br />
The fourth part seeks to conceptualise the role <strong>of</strong> judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers in <strong>of</strong>fering<br />
assistance to the unrepresented accused. The case law <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong><br />
jurisdictions form the basis <strong>of</strong> the discussion. Also, comparative analysis is<br />
made between <strong>Botswana</strong>, Australia, South Africa and to some extent<br />
Namibia. This creates an opportunity to benchmark <strong>Botswana</strong> against other<br />
jurisdictions influenced by the common law adversarial tradition and measure<br />
<strong>Botswana</strong>’s fair trial credentials. The fifth part discusses the judicial enabling<br />
role <strong>of</strong> the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer and specific areas where judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers are<br />
required to give assistance to the unrepresented accused. The sixth part<br />
highlights the implications <strong>of</strong> judicial enabling. Part seven, the conclusion,<br />
underscores the fact that judicial enabling is fuelled by the demand <strong>of</strong> a fair<br />
trial which in turn has brought significant change to the landscape <strong>of</strong> the<br />
criminal process.<br />
2. THE ROLE OF THE JUDICIAL OFFICER<br />
Two principal procedural models have evolved worldwide, the adversarial and<br />
inquisitorial models. The role <strong>of</strong> judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers is to some extent determined<br />
by a cleavage <strong>of</strong> dichotomy setting apart these two models. The role <strong>of</strong> the<br />
judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer is for practical purposes, determined by the model within which<br />
she operates. While the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer mainly remains alo<strong>of</strong> in the classical<br />
adversarial system, she takes control <strong>of</strong> proceedings in the inquisitorial<br />
tradition.<br />
2.1 The judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer and the adversarial system<br />
Judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers ascertain facts – barring the jury system – and apply the law<br />
to those facts in order to resolve disputes placed before them. But the mode <strong>of</strong><br />
fact-finding is tailored to a large extent, on the procedural model wherein the<br />
judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer operates. In <strong>Botswana</strong>, a judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer presiding over a<br />
criminal matter is governed by the Anglo-American adversarial tradition. The<br />
classical feature <strong>of</strong> this arrangement dictates that the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer is<br />
disengaged from the contest and allows the parties to present their case. 3 This<br />
3 R.M. Hayden and J.K. Anderson, “On The Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Procedural Systems in Laboratory Experiments:<br />
A Critique <strong>of</strong> Thibaut and Walker,” 3 (1/2) <strong>Law</strong> and Human Behaviour (1979), p. 21 at 22; E. Allan Lind,<br />
J. Thibaut and L. Walker, “Discovery and Presentation <strong>of</strong> Evidence in Adversary and Nonadversary<br />
Proceedings,” 71(6) Michigan <strong>Law</strong> Review (1973), p. 1129 at 1143; A.S. Goldstein, “Reflections on Two<br />
Models: Inquisitorial Themes in American Criminal Procedure,” 26(5) Stanford <strong>Law</strong> Review (1974), p.<br />
1009 at 1016; J. Thibault, L. Walker and E. Allan Lind, “Adversary Presentation and Bias in Legal
84 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
restrained posture symbolises an impartial and disinterested umpire. 4 Since it<br />
is the responsibility <strong>of</strong> the parties to present their evidence, the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer<br />
serves as a gatekeeper and ensures that the rules <strong>of</strong> evidence and procedure are<br />
observed. The judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer guides the process by way <strong>of</strong> procedural and<br />
evidential rules. Questions relating to the admissibility <strong>of</strong> evidence are<br />
primarily raised by the parties and determined by the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer. This<br />
means that pro<strong>of</strong> lies with the parties. If the accused is unrepresented she has<br />
to face a trained prosecutor. The chances <strong>of</strong> success <strong>of</strong> an unrepresented<br />
accused facing a trained prosecutor are likely to be compromised. The<br />
difficulty with having a passive judge is that the discharge <strong>of</strong> procedural and<br />
evidential responsibility lies with the parties and this puts the unrepresented<br />
accused in an unfavourable position. 5 Since each party “owns” its evidence in<br />
the adversarial contest, the parties may be selective in the presentation <strong>of</strong> their<br />
evidence, keeping away vital evidence that is damaging to their case and are<br />
openly bias in their conduct <strong>of</strong> the case. 6 Adversarial lawyers contend that<br />
cross-examination is a vital tool in unearthing the truth. Perhaps this should<br />
complement the “passivity” <strong>of</strong> the adversarial judge. The parties dig in<br />
themselves primarily through cross-examination. Cross-examination is the<br />
principal mechanism for unearthing the truth. 7 On the other hand, a digging-in<br />
judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer as is the case with the inquisitorial investigating judge will<br />
certainly have significant powers that allow her to unearth the truth. After all,<br />
she is able to summon evidence and witnesses without the possibility <strong>of</strong> being<br />
accused <strong>of</strong> descending into the arena. Inquisitorial lawyers for their part,<br />
contend that cross-examination only serves to discredit a truthful but<br />
vulnerable or intimidated witness. 8 This, according to them, is a veritable<br />
3 R.M. Hayden and J.K. Anderson, “On The Evaluation <strong>of</strong> Procedural Systems in Laboratory Experiments:<br />
A Critique <strong>of</strong> Thibaut and Walker,” 3 (1/2) <strong>Law</strong> and Human Behaviour (1979), p. 21 at 22; E. Allan Lind,<br />
J. Thibaut and L. Walker, “Discovery and Presentation <strong>of</strong> Evidence in Adversary and Nonadversary<br />
Proceedings,” 71(6) Michigan <strong>Law</strong> Review (1973), p. 1129 at 1143; A.S. Goldstein, “Reflections on Two<br />
Models: Inquisitorial Themes in American Criminal Procedure,” 26(5) Stanford <strong>Law</strong> Review (1974), p.<br />
1009 at 1016; J. Thibault, L. Walker and E. Allan Lind, “Adversary Presentation and Bias in Legal<br />
Decisionmaking,” 86(2) Harvard <strong>Law</strong> Review (1972), p. 386 at 388; A. Lind, J. Thibaut and L. Walker,<br />
“A Cross-Cultural Comparison <strong>of</strong> the Effect <strong>of</strong> Adversary and Inquisitorial Processes on Bias in Legal<br />
Decisionmaking,” 62(2) Virginia <strong>Law</strong> Review (1976), p. 271 at 273; J. Thibaut, L. Walker, S. La Tour and<br />
P. Houlden, “Procedural Justice as Fairness,” 26(6) Stanford <strong>Law</strong> Review (1974), p. 1271 at 1275; J.H.<br />
Langbein, The Origins <strong>of</strong> Adversary Criminal Trial, Oxford, Oxford <strong>University</strong> Press (2005), p. 311; M.<br />
Damaska, “Evidentiary Barriers to Conviction and Two Models <strong>of</strong> Criminal Procedure: A Comparative<br />
Study,” 121 <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania <strong>Law</strong> Review (1973), p. 506 at 510.<br />
4 Thibault, Walker and Allan Lind, op.cit. at p. 390; M. Damaska, The Faces <strong>of</strong> Justice and State Authority:<br />
A Comparative Approach to the Legal Process, New Haven/London, Yale <strong>University</strong> Press (1986), p. 3.<br />
5 Allan Lind, Thiabaut and Walker, op.cit. at p. 1143.<br />
6 Thibaut, Walker, La Tour and Houlden, op.cit. at p. 1275; J. McEwan, Evidence and the Adversarial<br />
Process (The Modern <strong>Law</strong>), 2 nd ed., Oxford, Hart Publishing (1998), p. 3; G. Brouwer, “Inquisitorial and<br />
Adversary Procedures – A Comparative Analysis,” 55 Australian <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> (1981), p. 207.<br />
7 C. Roodt, “Fact Finding, Fairness and Judicial Participation in Criminal Proceedings,” 44(2) Codicillus<br />
(2003), p. 68 at 69.<br />
8 See generally L. Ellison, The Adversarial Process and the Vulnerable Witness, Oxford, Oxford<br />
<strong>University</strong> Press (2001); K. Quinn, “Justice for Vulnerable and Intimidated Witnesses in Adversarial<br />
Proceedings?,” 66(1) Modern <strong>Law</strong> Review (2003), p. 139; see also E. Slater, “The Judicial Process and the<br />
Ascertainment <strong>of</strong> Fact,” 24(6) Modern <strong>Law</strong> Review 1961), p. 721 at 722.
UNREPRESENTED ACCUSED IN BOTSWANA 85<br />
weakness in the adversarial contest. But the main obstacle facing the judicial<br />
<strong>of</strong>ficer in <strong>Botswana</strong>’s adversarial system is orality. The principal mode <strong>of</strong><br />
ascertaining the truth is by oral evidence. Since witnesses are called to support<br />
a particular side, the tendency <strong>of</strong> witness loyalty and bias cannot be ruled out.<br />
Ultimately, the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer is left to depend on what counsel, the witnesses<br />
and exclusionary rules allow to be filtered into the system. Clearly, the judicial<br />
<strong>of</strong>ficer relies on the parties to unearth the truth. This in itself is a barrier to<br />
unearthing the truth, a situation that is not made any easier when the accused is<br />
unrepresented.<br />
The unrepresented accused is not equipped to participate fully in the<br />
adversarial trial. Because <strong>of</strong> this, the unrepresented accused suffers substantial<br />
disadvantage. Classical adversarial adherence is, therefore, unsustainable and<br />
the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer cannot bury her head in the sand in ostrich-like fashion,<br />
while the unrepresented accused suffers injustice. This will make a mockery<br />
<strong>of</strong> the whole process, especially as the State has the distinct advantage <strong>of</strong><br />
investigating powers and permanent prosecutorial staff and <strong>of</strong>fices. The State<br />
investigates, scoops up vital documents and interviews all possible witnesses,<br />
which the accused is usually unable and not permitted to do. That a trained<br />
prosecutor then marshals the evidence in the face <strong>of</strong> an unassisted accused<br />
does carry undertones <strong>of</strong> medieval inquisitions. The adversarial system,<br />
therefore, can only operate fully if the accused is assisted through procedural<br />
and evidential hurdles.<br />
2.2 The judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer and the inquisitorial system<br />
In the continental inquisitorial system, the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer is traditionally an<br />
investigating judge. She controls the investigations and dominates the trial. 9<br />
The prosecutor, therefore, is not an active player and the imbalance that is<br />
synonymous with the adversarial process is removed. An investigating judge<br />
or juge d’instruction plays a dominant role as early as the pre-trial stage in that<br />
it is she who investigates the crime and collects the evidence. 10 She generally<br />
interrogates the accused and witnesses, confronts them with each other, orders<br />
for searches and seizures and commissions experts to assist in the<br />
investigations. 11 In the adversarial contest, these would be seen as very wide<br />
powers and in any event, functions that normally fall within the purview <strong>of</strong> the<br />
police. In the inquisitorial system, the results <strong>of</strong> the investigations, statements<br />
9 Hayden and Anderson, op.cit. at p. 22; Thibault, Walker and Allan Lind, op.cit. at p. 388; Lind, Thibaut<br />
and Walker, op.cit. at p. 276; Goldstein, op.cit. at p. 1019; J.A. Andrews and M. Hirst, Andrews & Hirst<br />
on Criminal Evidence, 3 rd ed., London, Sweet & Maxwell (1997), p. 1.<br />
10 M. Ploscowe, “Development <strong>of</strong> Inquisitorial and Accusatorial Elements in French Procedure,” 23(3)<br />
<strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> Criminal <strong>Law</strong> and Criminology (1932), p. 372 at 373; Goldstein, op.cit. at p. 1019.<br />
11 Ploscowe, op.cit. at p. 373; Thibault, Walker and Allan Lind, op.cit. at p. 388; Lind, Thibaut and Walker,<br />
at p. 276.
86 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
<strong>of</strong> witnesses and the accused’s statement are compiled into a dossier. 12 The<br />
evidence is thus developed for both sides by the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer. 13 To this<br />
extent, there is relative balance between the prosecution and the accused.<br />
3. THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE<br />
UNREPRESENTED ACCUSED<br />
3.1 The circumstances <strong>of</strong> the accused during the<br />
investigation<br />
The accused is at her most vulnerable during the investigation process. The<br />
overwhelming shock that the potential loss <strong>of</strong> liberty inflicts on the individual<br />
is immeasurable. This is particularly aggravating in the case <strong>of</strong> first <strong>of</strong>fenders.<br />
The accused is basically at the mercy <strong>of</strong> the police and has little or no access to<br />
the outside world, should the police decide to incarcerate her during<br />
investigations. As is typical <strong>of</strong> adversarial systems, in <strong>Botswana</strong>, investigations<br />
are conducted solely by the police. Neither the judiciary nor the accused are<br />
involved. In fact, the accused is an object <strong>of</strong> the investigations. Witnesses and<br />
exhibits are basically seized by the police and the accused is not given access<br />
to the proceeds <strong>of</strong> the investigations as and when they yield results. Though it<br />
is said that the accused is not compelled to answer to questions put to her by<br />
the police, adverse inference may be drawn from refusal by the accused to<br />
answer incriminating questions. 14<br />
3.1.1 Lack <strong>of</strong> legal representation<br />
The right to legal representation is guaranteed by section 10(2)(d) <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Constitution. 15 However, it is doubtful whether this provision extends to pretrial<br />
investigations. 16 Unfortunately, case law on the right to legal<br />
representation is limited to the trial <strong>of</strong> the proceedings. In actual fact, no legal<br />
sanctions attach for deprivation <strong>of</strong> the accused <strong>of</strong> access to legal representation<br />
at the pre-trial stage. Consequently, the accused’s rights are severely curtailed<br />
at this stage. Since, judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers are not involved at this stage, the accused<br />
12 Ploscowe, op.cit, at p. 376; Lind, Thibaut and Walker, op.cit. at p. 276; Goldstein, op.cit. at p. 1019.<br />
13 Thibaut, Walker and Allan Lind, op.cit. at p. 388.<br />
14 Attorney-General v Moagi [1981] B.L.R. 1 (CA).<br />
15 The section provides: “Every person who is charged with a criminal <strong>of</strong>fence shall be permitted to defend<br />
himself before the court in person or, at his own expense, by a legal representative <strong>of</strong> his own choice.”<br />
(emphasis added).<br />
16 See D.D. Ntanda Nsereko, “Legal Representation in <strong>Botswana</strong>,” Israel Yearbook on Human Rights<br />
(1988), p. 211; B. Molatlhegi, “The Right to Legal Representation in Criminal Proceedings in <strong>Botswana</strong>:<br />
More than a Court-Room Right for the Knowlegeable Suspect?,” 13(3) South African <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> Human<br />
Rights (1997), p. 458; B. Molatlhegi, “Undefended Accused Persons, The Courts and Procedural Justice<br />
in <strong>Botswana</strong>,” 4(2) East African <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> Peace and Human Rights (1998), p. 185 at 187.
UNREPRESENTED ACCUSED IN BOTSWANA 87<br />
is left at the mercy and devices <strong>of</strong> the police. 17 In the absence <strong>of</strong> judicial and<br />
constitutional pre-trial legal representation guarantees, the police <strong>of</strong>ten operate<br />
on the premise that access to counsel at this stage is granted as a matter <strong>of</strong><br />
courtesy. 18<br />
3.1.2 Confessions<br />
The accused is usually an object <strong>of</strong> the investigations. More <strong>of</strong>ten than not, the<br />
bulk <strong>of</strong> the State’s case will emanate from information they obtain from the<br />
accused. The monotony <strong>of</strong> the evidence <strong>of</strong> investigating <strong>of</strong>ficers narrating what<br />
the accused told them or what the accused pointed out is all too familiar.<br />
Though the law requires that confessions made to the police should<br />
be confirmed in writing by a judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer as a requirement for admissibility<br />
in court, 19 this is not a sufficient safeguard for ensuring that confessions are<br />
obtained freely and voluntarily. Sometimes, suspects are made to appear<br />
before judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers to make confessions through threats. 20 It must be<br />
noted also, that while judicial confirmation is required as a condition for the<br />
admissibility <strong>of</strong> confessions, this does not apply in relation to admissions.<br />
Evidentially, therefore, confessions can be admitted under the guise <strong>of</strong><br />
admissions. This is because the distinction between confessions and<br />
admissions are a matter <strong>of</strong> definitional technicality. 21 A Confession is defined<br />
17 Molatlhegi reiterates that the presence <strong>of</strong> a legal representative during interrogations will go a long way in<br />
protecting suspects against possible police abuse. See B Molatlhegi, op.cit. at p. 187.<br />
18 See Molatlhegi, op.cit. at p. 460; Ntanda Nsereko, op.cit. at p. 213.<br />
19 Section 228(1)(ii) <strong>of</strong> the Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act provides that confessions made to police<br />
<strong>of</strong>ficers are inadmissible as evidence in court unless they are confirmed in writing in the presence <strong>of</strong> a<br />
judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer; in the case <strong>of</strong> Kgaodi v The State [1996] B.L.R. 23(CA) at p. 28C-F Amissah JP<br />
rationalised the section thus: “The provision prohibits the admission in evidence <strong>of</strong> confessions made to<br />
police <strong>of</strong>ficers simpliciter. It does not matter whether the confession to the police <strong>of</strong>ficer is voluntary or<br />
not. The object <strong>of</strong> the prohibition is obviously to avoid arguments at trial over whether confessions to<br />
police <strong>of</strong>ficers were freely made, without inducement, physical or otherwise. As is well known,<br />
allegations are <strong>of</strong>ten made <strong>of</strong> police <strong>of</strong>ficers torturing or beating up suspects and accused persons or using<br />
other unlawful means in order to obtain statements which advance the investigation or prosecution <strong>of</strong> the<br />
cases. Some <strong>of</strong> these allegations have been found to be true by the courts although the majority <strong>of</strong> them<br />
<strong>of</strong>ten turn out to be unfounded. True or not, it is in the interest <strong>of</strong> justice that these charges, or<br />
opportunities for them to be made, should be minimised, if not altogether eliminated. The prohibition<br />
discourages the police from using force or other forms <strong>of</strong> inducement in extracting confessions to bolster<br />
up their cases, because if the court would not admit any confessions obtained by them at all, there should<br />
be no need for them to use unlawful methods to obtain them. But in order not to exclude genuine<br />
confessions made by accused persons even if made to police <strong>of</strong>ficers altogether, the law permits the<br />
admission <strong>of</strong> such confessions if ‘confirmed and reduced to writing in the presence <strong>of</strong> a magistrate or any<br />
justice who is not a member <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Botswana</strong> Police Force.’”; Ntanda Nsereko, op.cit. at p. 213;<br />
Molatlhegi, op.cit. at p. 460.<br />
20 In the case <strong>of</strong> S v Baalakani Moloise [1977] B.L.R. 28 the accused was taken before a District<br />
Commissioner to make a statement. The reason given by the accused for making the statement was – “I<br />
was asked to go to make [sic] statement before the D.C. by the C.I.D. Police.”; in State v Ramatswidi<br />
[2005] 1 B.L.R. 452 the accused alleged that he had spent two days in police cells and was told by the<br />
investigating <strong>of</strong>ficer that he would only be released if he made a confession to a judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer.<br />
21 Corduff J stated in State v Moithoke [1981] B.L.R. 219 at p. 223: “This is a very restricted and artificial<br />
definition and the only purpose it serves is to free a greater number <strong>of</strong> statements from the effects <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Second Proviso [That is, S 228(1)(ii) <strong>of</strong> the Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act], which requires that<br />
confessions made to police <strong>of</strong>ficers are inadmissible unless they are confirmed in writing in the presence<br />
<strong>of</strong> a magistrate or any justice.”
88 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
as an unequivocal admission <strong>of</strong> guilt, the equivalence <strong>of</strong> a guilty plea in a<br />
court <strong>of</strong> law. 22 Therefore, for a statement <strong>of</strong> the accused to amount to a<br />
confession, it must amount to an admission <strong>of</strong> all the elements <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fence.<br />
In addition it must negative all defences. Admissions on the other hand, relate<br />
to the acceptance <strong>of</strong> certain facts as true. 23 In this regard, several pieces <strong>of</strong><br />
self-incriminatory statements are admissible without judicial endorsement<br />
merely because the statements do not amount to admissions <strong>of</strong> all the elements<br />
<strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fence and do not negative possible defences. Consequently,<br />
admissions may possibly be admitted without proper legal safeguards, merely<br />
because they do not satisfy the classical definition <strong>of</strong> a confession in<br />
<strong>Botswana</strong>. These same admissions when pieced together, may lead to an<br />
inference <strong>of</strong> the accused’s guilt. The overly narrow definition <strong>of</strong> a confession<br />
therefore means that an accused may in actual fact be recruited to incriminate<br />
herself under circumstances that are far from being voluntary, and such selfincriminating<br />
statements are admissible in court as admissions. 24 The<br />
artificial distinction between confessions and admissions means that<br />
admissions which implicate the accused are admissible in evidence whether or<br />
not they are confirmed in writing by a judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer. This is so because<br />
statements that do not amount to an unequivocal admission <strong>of</strong> guilt <strong>of</strong> all the<br />
elements <strong>of</strong> an <strong>of</strong>fence, do not amount to a confession. 25 They are admissible<br />
in the absence <strong>of</strong> judicial confirmation. The prosecution’s case can, therefore,<br />
be built from bits and pieces <strong>of</strong> admissions. All such admissions are<br />
admissible without the judicial supervision provided for by section 228(1)(ii).<br />
This effectively allows the admitting into evidence <strong>of</strong> confessions through the<br />
back door, under the guise that they are admissions. When once the pre-trial<br />
process is tainted with unfairness, the trial proper is at the risk <strong>of</strong> being unfair<br />
also.<br />
22 Mohalenyane v The State [1984] B.L.R. 291; R v Becker 1929 AD 167; see also State v Miclas Habane<br />
[1971] 2 B.L.R. 66; Martlouw v The State [1993] B.L.R. 306; Moseki v The State [1995] B.L.R. 690;<br />
State v Khama [2000] 1 B.L.R. 209; State v Ramatswidi op.cit. note 20 supra.<br />
23 Desai and Another v The State [1985] B.L.R. 582.<br />
24 Murray J stated in State v Mosarwa and Mapitsi High Court, Criminal Trial No. 37 <strong>of</strong> 1985 (Unreported),<br />
that a better definition <strong>of</strong> a confession would be: “An admission made at any time by a person accused <strong>of</strong><br />
an <strong>of</strong>fence, stating or suggesting the inference that he committed that <strong>of</strong>fence.”; Corduff J stated in State v<br />
Moithoke op.cit. note 21 at p. 223 supra: “This is a very restricted and artificial definition and the only<br />
purpose it serves is to free a greater number <strong>of</strong> statements from the effects <strong>of</strong> the Second Proviso [That is,<br />
S 228(1)(ii) <strong>of</strong> the Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act], which requires that confessions made to police<br />
<strong>of</strong>ficers are inadmissible unless they are confirmed in writing in the presence <strong>of</strong> a magistrate or any<br />
justice.”<br />
25 Desai and Another v The State op.cit. note 23 supra; Mohalenyane v The State op.cit. note 22 supra; R v<br />
Becker 1929 AD 167; State v Miclas Habane op.cit. note 22 supra; Martlouw v The State op.cit note 22<br />
supra; Moseki v The State op.cit. note 22 supra; State v Khama op.cit. note 22 supra; State v Ramatswidi<br />
op.cit. note 20 supra; Mashabile v The State [1984] B.L.R. 96 (CA).
UNREPRESENTED ACCUSED IN BOTSWANA 89<br />
3.2 The circumstances <strong>of</strong> the accused at trial<br />
When we read our law books and discover that up until eighteenth century<br />
Europe, accused persons were not allowed to defend themselves nor have legal<br />
representation; and that torture was part <strong>of</strong> the criminal process, 26 we react<br />
with shock and disdain. Barring the medieval sanction <strong>of</strong> torture, the plight <strong>of</strong><br />
the present-day unrepresented accused raises stark similarities. The State<br />
conducts investigations, collects all relevant documents and interviews<br />
possible witnesses. The accused usually cannot do this. The evidence is<br />
presented in court by a trained prosecutor and the unrepresented accused is<br />
clueless as to the intricacies <strong>of</strong> the process. The majestic and subliminal<br />
solemnity <strong>of</strong> the courtroom, more than ever leaves the unrepresented accused<br />
awestruck and in great trepidation. 27<br />
In the adversarial trial, while the accused is presumed innocent, she<br />
stands the risk <strong>of</strong> conviction if she is unable to make a full answer to the prima<br />
facie case <strong>of</strong> the prosecution. 28 Effective defence only comes with active<br />
participation by the accused at the trial. This includes the ability to object to<br />
prosecution evidence, the opportunity to cross-examine prosecution<br />
witnesses, to call and examine witnesses <strong>of</strong> her own and to make final<br />
submissions. 29 It is obvious that the ability <strong>of</strong> the unrepresented accused to<br />
participate at her trial is patently compromised due to the intimidating<br />
atmosphere in the court room and her lack <strong>of</strong> legal knowledge. This has legal<br />
implications and patently renders the trial unfair. It need not be emphasised<br />
that the consequences <strong>of</strong> conviction can be severe. They include incurring a<br />
criminal record which can lead to denial <strong>of</strong> social privileges, civic rights, and<br />
even imprisonment. Public conscience therefore cannot permit a system<br />
wherein the accused cannot make use <strong>of</strong> the legal safeguards open to her, but<br />
faces the risk <strong>of</strong> losing her liberty. In this regard, judicial enabling plays a<br />
crucial protecting role in respect <strong>of</strong> the unrepresented accused. The role <strong>of</strong> the<br />
judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer, therefore, in guiding the unrepresented accused through the<br />
legal hurdles <strong>of</strong> the adversarial system cannot be understated.<br />
26 Ploscowe, op.cit. at p. 376.<br />
27 E. Slater, “The Judicial Process and the Ascertainment <strong>of</strong> Fact,” 24(6) Modern <strong>Law</strong> Review (1961), p. 721<br />
at 721-722.<br />
28 Attorney-General v Moagi op.cit. note 14 supra.<br />
29 B. Mckillop, “The Position <strong>of</strong> Accused Persons under the Common <strong>Law</strong> System in Australia (More<br />
Particularly in New South Wales) and the Civil <strong>Law</strong> System in France,” 26(2) <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> New South<br />
Wales <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> (2003), p. 515 at 527; J. Jackson, “The Effect <strong>of</strong> Human Rights on Criminal<br />
Evidentiary Processes: Towards Convergence, Divergence or Realignment?,” 68(5) Modern <strong>Law</strong> Review<br />
(2005), p. 737 at 751; S. Trechsel, Human Rights in Criminal Proceedings, New York, Oxford <strong>University</strong><br />
Press (2005), p. 89; Mbisana v Attorney-General and Another [1999] 1 B.L.R. 189; State v Segana Ntibi<br />
[1968-1970] B.L.R. 330; Motshwane and Others v The State [2002] 2 B.L.R. 368.
90 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
4. JUDICIAL ENABLING<br />
4.1 Judicial enabling in <strong>Botswana</strong><br />
Recognition <strong>of</strong> the plight <strong>of</strong> the unrepresented accused and the demand for<br />
judicial assistance is well settled in <strong>Botswana</strong> case law. This stems from the<br />
duty on the court to ensure that the accused gets a fair trial. 30 Thus in the case<br />
<strong>of</strong> Mmopi and Another v The State 31 Murray J had this to say:<br />
“When a person is on trial for a serious <strong>of</strong>fence and does not have<br />
the advantage <strong>of</strong> legal representation I consider that it is essential<br />
that the magistrate should <strong>of</strong>fer advice by way <strong>of</strong> explaining court<br />
procedure to such a person. An unrepresented accused is under a<br />
severe disadvantage. If he is given no assistance on matters <strong>of</strong><br />
procedure that one would not necessarily expect to be known to an<br />
unrepresented accused person injustice could easily result.” 32<br />
Similarly, in Tshukudu v The State 33 Dibotelo J (as he then was)<br />
noted that:<br />
“After the foregoing exchanges between the appellant and the<br />
magistrate the trial duly proceeded and as I have already stated the<br />
appellant was convicted at the end <strong>of</strong> the trial in which the learned<br />
magistrate merely stated at the close <strong>of</strong> the prosecution case that the<br />
appellant's rights had been explained to him without recording what<br />
he told the appellant by way <strong>of</strong> explanation <strong>of</strong> his rights or what<br />
those rights were. In my view it is <strong>of</strong>ten not enough for a trial court,<br />
especially where an accused is not represented by counsel, merely to<br />
record that it had fully explained to the accused his rights without<br />
briefly recording on the record what those rights were and any such<br />
omission may be fatal to a conviction.” 34<br />
In State v Matlhogonolo Masole, 35 O'Brien Quinn CJ wrote:<br />
“Where a single charge or a single count charges two or more<br />
<strong>of</strong>fences that charge or count is bad for duplicity. But it is for the<br />
30 Lesetedi and Another v The State [2001] 1 B.L.R. 393; Gare v The State [2001] 1 B.L.R. 143 (CA);<br />
Morobatseng and Others v The State [2003] 1 B.L.R. 466.<br />
31 [1986] B.L.R. 8.<br />
32 Ibid at p. 10F-H.<br />
33 [2000] 1 B.L.R. 400.<br />
34 Ibid at p. 402F-H; see also Obonetse Ngakaemang v Regina [1964-1967] B.L.R. 131; Walter Madisa v<br />
Regina [1964-1967] B.L.R.157; State v David Rantabana and Another [1981] B.L.R. 255; Tsie v The<br />
State [1999] 2 B.L.R. 305.<br />
35 [1982] B.L.R. 202.
UNREPRESENTED ACCUSED IN BOTSWANA 91<br />
accused to raise that point before his plea is taken or, as soon as the<br />
evidence discloses duplicity in the charge or count, in cases where<br />
duplicity is not immediately apparent. However, where, as is the<br />
usual position here, an accused is not legally represented, the<br />
Magistrate or Judge trying the case should examine the charge or<br />
count and if he considers it to be defective on grounds <strong>of</strong> duplicity<br />
or for any other reason it is his duty to raise the point and, if<br />
necessary, have the charge or count amended or withdraw or to<br />
refuse to accept it at all.” 36<br />
4.2 Judicial enabling in Australia<br />
In the case <strong>of</strong> Dietrich v the queen, 37 the High Court <strong>of</strong> Australia noted the<br />
inherent unfairness characteristic <strong>of</strong> trials wherein accused persons are<br />
unrepresented. The Court recognised the fact that lack <strong>of</strong> legal representation<br />
places the accused at a disadvantage. The Court reiterated that a proper defence<br />
<strong>of</strong> the accused requires a proper knowledge <strong>of</strong> the rules <strong>of</strong> evidence and<br />
procedure. Highlighting the legal complexities faced by the unrepresented<br />
accused and the need for pr<strong>of</strong>essional guide, the Court had this to say:<br />
“Skill is required in both the examination in chief and the crossexamination<br />
<strong>of</strong> witnesses if the evidence is to emerge in the best<br />
light for the defence. The evidence to be called on behalf <strong>of</strong> the<br />
accused, if any, must be marshalled so as to avoid raising issues<br />
which will be damaging to the case for the Defence. A decision<br />
must be made whether the accused is to give evidence on oath, is to<br />
make an unsworn statement or is to remain mute. Competence in<br />
dealing with these matters depends to a large extent upon training<br />
and experience. And, as Murphy J pointed out in McInnes, an<br />
accused in person cannot effectively put some arguments that<br />
36 Ibid at pp. 204-205; In Rabonko v The State [2006] 2 B.L.R. 166 Lesetedi J noted at p. 168C-D: “An<br />
accused person has in terms <strong>of</strong> s 10(1) <strong>of</strong> the Constitution an entitlement to a fair trial. In my view, a fair<br />
trial cannot be realised where an accused person does not understand the import <strong>of</strong> the criminal<br />
proceedings which he is facing nor have a rudimentary idea as to how not only to present his case but to<br />
conduct his defence by way <strong>of</strong> putting the essential elements <strong>of</strong> his defence to the prosecution witnesses.<br />
That there is a duty upon a presiding judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer to assist an accused person who is unrepresented and<br />
seems not to understand the court procedures, in the conduct <strong>of</strong> his defence has been expressed in a<br />
number <strong>of</strong> cases.”; Lord Weir JA also remarked in Gare v The State op.cit. note 30 supra at pp. 148G-<br />
149A that: “In any trial where the accused person defends himself, either because he chooses to do so or<br />
because he cannot afford a legal representative, an onerous responsibility lies on the judge to ensure that<br />
he receives a fair trial. There will be cases where the accused may be able to conduct his case with skill<br />
and there will be cases in which the issues at the trial will be obvious to the meanest intelligence. In such<br />
cases it will probably be unnecessary for the judge to intervene. On the other hand there will be cases<br />
where the issues are not straightforward. In such situation the judge will have to be vigilant to ensure that<br />
the defence case does not go by default because <strong>of</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> skill or comprehension on the part <strong>of</strong> the<br />
accused. No hard and fast rules can be laid down as to when or to what extent a court should intervene on<br />
behalf <strong>of</strong> accused persons. Each case depends upon its own circumstances.”<br />
37 (1992) 177 CLR 292; see also R v Zorad (1990) NSWLR 91 at 95.
92 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
Counsel can, such as an argument that, although on the evidence the<br />
accused is probably guilty, he is not guilty beyond reasonable<br />
doubt.”<br />
Similarly, in Mc Innis v R, 38 Murphy J remarked quite pointedly that:<br />
“The notion that an unrepresented accused can defend himself<br />
adequately goes against experience in all but the rarest cases. Even<br />
an experienced lawyer would be regarded as foolish to represent<br />
himself if accused <strong>of</strong> a serious crime.” 39<br />
Judicial enabling is a settled practice especially in magistrates’<br />
courts. In this regard, judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers would ask the unrepresented accused<br />
pertinent questions and also give her an opportunity to speak. The judicial<br />
<strong>of</strong>ficer would outline the relevant aspects <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fence, point out possible<br />
mitigating factors to the accused and also provide general guidance on<br />
evidential matters. 40<br />
The Criminal Trial Bench Book 41 specifically provides for judicial<br />
enabling. In this regard, judicial advice should be given to the unrepresented<br />
accused at the commencement <strong>of</strong> the trial, and where appropriate, as the trial<br />
proceeds. The judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer is thus under a duty to outline various<br />
procedural options, modes <strong>of</strong> objection, the order <strong>of</strong> evidence, the right to<br />
make submissions, the manner <strong>of</strong> leading evidence-in-chief, and the right to<br />
cross-examination. 42<br />
4.3 Judicial enabling in South Africa<br />
Judicial enabling is underscored by sections 35(3)(f) and (g) <strong>of</strong> the South<br />
African Constitution. These provisions are set within the context <strong>of</strong> the right to<br />
a fair trial. Section 35(3)(f) which caters for the right to legal representation,<br />
demands that the accused be informed <strong>of</strong> the right. Section 35(3)(g) is to the<br />
effect that where it is necessary to provide the accused with legal aid, she<br />
should be informed <strong>of</strong> this entitlement. The courts have stated that the duty to<br />
point out the right to legal representation to the accused lies with the judicial<br />
<strong>of</strong>ficer. 43 Though the constitutional provisions relating to judicial enabling are<br />
38 (1979) 143 CLR 575.<br />
39 Ibid at p. 589.<br />
40 C. Craigie, “Unrepresented Litigants: The Criminal Justice Perspective,” (2005), available at (last visited 5 October 2010); see also McPherson v R (1981) 147 CLR 512; R v<br />
Gidley (1994) 3 NSWLR 168.<br />
41 Cited in Craigie, Ibid.<br />
42 Ibid.<br />
43 S v Pienaar 2000 (2) SACR 143 (NC); S v Radebe 1988 (1) SA 191 (T); S v Mabaso 1990 (3) SA 185<br />
(A).
UNREPRESENTED ACCUSED IN BOTSWANA 93<br />
limited to the right to legal representation, a number <strong>of</strong> cases impose a general<br />
duty on judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers to assist unrepresented accused persons.<br />
A general rule providing that judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers assist unrepresented<br />
accused persons is established in South African case law. 44 In this regard,<br />
judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers have a general duty to ensure that unrepresented accused fully<br />
understand their rights, otherwise, the trial may be rendered unfair. 45 This<br />
duty is said to have a close connection with the judicial oath to uphold the<br />
Constitution as well as the constitutional demand to promote the objects <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Bill <strong>of</strong> Rights, in the development <strong>of</strong> the common law. 46 Consequently,<br />
judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers have a duty, among others, to alert unrepresented accused <strong>of</strong><br />
unfavourable presumptions, 47 the right to testify and the effect <strong>of</strong> failure to do<br />
so 48 and the purpose <strong>of</strong> cross-examination. 49<br />
It is clear that judicial enabling is embedded in modern adversarial<br />
systems. In this regard, the gulf between adversarialism and inquisitorialism is<br />
bridged. Judicial guidance to the unrepresented accused is central to the right<br />
to a fair trial. The application <strong>of</strong> judicial enabling by the courts <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong><br />
puts their jurisprudence at par with those <strong>of</strong> other reputable legal systems.<br />
This element <strong>of</strong> collegiality is an important yardstick and a positive measure<br />
<strong>of</strong> the commitment <strong>of</strong> the courts <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong> to fair trials.<br />
4.4 In search <strong>of</strong> definition<br />
At the heart <strong>of</strong> the above cases which have embraced judicial enabling, is the<br />
recognition <strong>of</strong> the plight <strong>of</strong> the unrepresented accused in the criminal process<br />
and the corresponding need for judicial intervention. The judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer has<br />
become a third factor participant in criminal proceedings, the first and second<br />
factors being the prosecution and the accused respectively. As a third factor<br />
participant, the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer exercises her duty in ensuring that the trial is<br />
fair. Judicial enabling can therefore, be referred to as a process wherein a<br />
judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer engages in a “hand-holding” process, guiding the unrepresented<br />
accused through the trial process by informing her <strong>of</strong> the procedures. Judicial<br />
<strong>of</strong>ficers have become more visible participants in criminal adversarial<br />
proceedings. 50 Effectively, the demand for fairness has resulted in a tripartite<br />
44 S v May 2005 (2) SACR 331 (SCA). See also S v Ndlovu 2002 (2) SACR 325 (SCA); S v Mambo 1999<br />
(2) SACR 421 (W); S v Manale 2000 (2) SACR 666 (NCD).<br />
45 S v Radebe op.cit. note 43 supra.<br />
46 Section 39(2) <strong>of</strong> the South African Constitution; see P.J. Schwikkard, “Does the Merging <strong>of</strong> Inquisitorial<br />
and Adversarial Procedures Impact on Fair Trial Rights,” available at http://www.isrcl.org/Papers/<br />
Schwikkard> (last visited 6 October 2010).<br />
47 S v Lango 1962 (1) SA 107 (N).<br />
48 S v Makhubo 1990 (2) SACR 320 (O).<br />
49 S v Lekhetho 2002 (2) SACR 13 (O); S v Mashaba 2004 (1) SACR 214 (T).<br />
50 Steytler notes: “The court is obliged to inform the accused <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> his procedural rights and duties and<br />
to assist him in exercising some <strong>of</strong> those where he clearly experiences difficulty in doing so.” N.C.<br />
Steytler, The Undefended Accused on Trial, Cape Town, Juta & Co (1988), p. 222; J. McEwan, Evidence<br />
and the Adversarial Process (The Modern <strong>Law</strong>), 2 nd ed., Oxford, Hart Publishing (1998), p. 2.
94 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
system <strong>of</strong> pro<strong>of</strong>, as the alo<strong>of</strong>ness <strong>of</strong> the adversarial judge is displaced by a more<br />
visible arbiter. No doubt, judicial enabling imposes a positive duty in assisting<br />
the unrepresented accused in presenting her defence.<br />
Essentially, failure to advise an accused <strong>of</strong> her right to crossexamination,<br />
to make closing submissions, to give evidence and to call<br />
witnesses among others, will vitiate the proceedings if the accused has<br />
suffered prejudice. Several <strong>of</strong> the cases that have insisted on judicial enabling<br />
have married their reasoning with a prerequisite that the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer plays<br />
a role in assisting the unrepresented accused to present her case. It has been<br />
firmly stated that this represents an essential element <strong>of</strong> the right to a fair<br />
trial. 51 It is clear, therefore, that the expansion <strong>of</strong> the judicial role is founded<br />
on the fair trial imperative.<br />
5. INCIDENCE OF JUDICIAL ENABLING<br />
5.1 Areas covered by the Circular<br />
It is now settled that procedural rights should be explained to the unrepresented<br />
accused. A number <strong>of</strong> the areas that require judicial advice were noted in the<br />
Circular and will now be considered.<br />
5.1.1 The duty to advise the unrepresented accused <strong>of</strong> the<br />
right to legal representation<br />
While it is settled that judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers should intervene and advise accused<br />
persons <strong>of</strong> their procedural rights, judicial approach tends to indicate that no<br />
legal consequence follows in the event <strong>of</strong> failure to do so, where the accused<br />
has suffered no prejudice. 52 There is no constitutional mandate on the judicial<br />
<strong>of</strong>ficer to advise the unrepresented accused <strong>of</strong> her right to legal representation,<br />
nor have the courts interpreted the duty as such. Therefore, while a legal duty<br />
rests on judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers to advise an unrepresented accused <strong>of</strong> her right to legal<br />
representation, this duty is watered-down by the absence <strong>of</strong> constitutional<br />
backing. In the case <strong>of</strong> Moroka v the state 53 the appellant was not informed <strong>of</strong><br />
the right to legal representation during the trial. Counsel for the appellant<br />
argued on appeal that this was irregular and should vitiate the proceedings. The<br />
Court noted that there was a common law right <strong>of</strong> an accused to access legal<br />
advice and legal representation. The Court stated that that right has been<br />
enshrined in section 10 <strong>of</strong> the Constitution. In relation to the issue whether a<br />
51 Gare v The State op.cit. note 30 supra; State v Sethunya [1986] B.L.R.483; State v Bareki [1979-1980]<br />
B.L.R. 35.<br />
52 State v Matlhogonolo Masole [1982] 1 B.L.R. 202.<br />
53 [2001] 1 B.L.R. 134 (CA).
UNREPRESENTED ACCUSED IN BOTSWANA 95<br />
judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer had a duty to advise an accused <strong>of</strong> her right to legal<br />
representation, the Court held that the duty was not mandatory or peremptory.<br />
The Court stated that it is rather a salutary practice which should be followed<br />
in every case. 54 In the Court’s view, whether failure to advise the accused will<br />
vitiate the proceedings will depend on whether there has been a failure <strong>of</strong><br />
justice. The Court found that there was no failure <strong>of</strong> justice.<br />
The Court relied on section 13(3) <strong>of</strong> the Court <strong>of</strong> Appeal Act 55 which<br />
provides that notwithstanding the fact that a point raised on appeal might be<br />
decided in favour <strong>of</strong> the appellant, the court may dismiss the appeal where<br />
there has been no substantial miscarriage <strong>of</strong> justice. The Court stated that the<br />
question whether an irregularity has resulted in a failure <strong>of</strong> justice will depend<br />
upon “whether the Court hearing the appeal considers, on the evidence (and<br />
credibility findings if any) unaffected by the irregularity or defect, that there is<br />
pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> guilt beyond reasonable doubt. If it does so consider, there was no<br />
resultant failure <strong>of</strong> justice.” 56<br />
This decision is most unfortunate. The fact remains that the evidence<br />
against an accused may appear overwhelming and there may seem to be pro<strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>of</strong> guilt beyond reasonable doubt, simply because the accused did not have<br />
legal representation. This is because the unrepresented accused might not be<br />
able to test the credibility <strong>of</strong> the evidence and the witnesses as a trained<br />
lawyer would. Often, where a lawyer appears halfway through a trial where a<br />
conviction seemed inevitable, the lawyer would materially turn around the<br />
events in favour <strong>of</strong> the accused as material discrepancies and weaknesses in<br />
the evidence <strong>of</strong> the prosecution would be unearthed. Therefore, the<br />
“overwhelming evidence test” that courts so <strong>of</strong>ten use to override material<br />
irregularities is not safe-pro<strong>of</strong>.<br />
The right to legal representation is a fundamental right, perhaps the<br />
most important, since with effective legal representation the accused’s other<br />
procedural rights will ultimately be protected. It is the right <strong>of</strong> all rights. One<br />
would think, therefore, that the bearer <strong>of</strong> such an important right should be<br />
informed <strong>of</strong> it. Unfortunately, the Court did not regard the duty to inform the<br />
accused <strong>of</strong> her right to legal representation as a right in itself. It would appear<br />
that the duty was rather regarded as a procedural step, breach <strong>of</strong> which will<br />
merely lead to a simple irregularity. In a criminal trial, the accused has a<br />
constitutional right to legal representation. A right is meaningless to the bearer<br />
if she is unaware <strong>of</strong> it. While recognising the duty <strong>of</strong> judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers to<br />
inform accused persons <strong>of</strong> the right to legal representation, the Court ruled on<br />
54 Similar decisions were reached in Rakgole v The State [2008] 1 B.L.R. 139 (CA); Phologolo v The State<br />
[2007] 1 B.L.R. 61; Masango v The State [2001] 2 B.L.R. 616; Ramogotho v Director <strong>of</strong> Public<br />
Prosecutions [2007] 1 B.L.R. 334 (CA); Chanda v The State [2007] 1 B.L.R. 400 (CA); Bojang v The<br />
State [1994] B.L.R. 146; Leow v The State [1995] B.L.R. 564.<br />
55 Cap 04:01.<br />
56 Moroka v The State op.cit. note 53 supra at p. 140D-E. Citing section 13(3) <strong>of</strong> the Court <strong>of</strong> Appeal Act.
96 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
the basis <strong>of</strong> the evidence, that there was no failure <strong>of</strong> justice even though the<br />
Court could not tell how the prosecution’s evidence would have fared under<br />
the microscopic cross-examination <strong>of</strong> a lawyer.<br />
In contradistinction with <strong>Botswana</strong>, a somewhat reinforced<br />
commitment to legal representation finds expression in South African<br />
jurisprudence. The tone <strong>of</strong> the case law lays emphasis on the duty to inform<br />
the accused <strong>of</strong> the right to legal representation. The philosophical undertone<br />
<strong>of</strong> this duty is informed by the reasoning that a right is <strong>of</strong> no use to a person if<br />
she is not aware <strong>of</strong> it. 57 But more importantly, the duty to inform an accused<br />
<strong>of</strong> her right to legal representation is supported by the constitutional<br />
imperative. Section 35(3)(f) <strong>of</strong> the South African Constitution provides that<br />
an accused must be informed <strong>of</strong> the right to choose and to be represented by a<br />
legal practitioner <strong>of</strong> her choice. The accused must be informed that she has a<br />
right to communicate with her legal representative and if this is not possible,<br />
she should be provided with an interpreter. 58 A failure on the part <strong>of</strong> the<br />
judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer to inform the accused <strong>of</strong> this right may result in a complete<br />
failure <strong>of</strong> justice. 59 It has unfortunately been held, however, that the accused<br />
will suffer no prejudice where, having regard to the evidence, the accused<br />
would have been convicted anyway. 60<br />
The South African courts have also held that the courts have a duty to<br />
encourage the accused to obtain legal representation in respect <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fences that<br />
attract severe penalties such as life imprisonment. 61 South Africa, unlike<br />
<strong>Botswana</strong>, has a public funded legal aid system. The courts have therefore<br />
decided that the accused should be informed <strong>of</strong> her right to legal aid if she is<br />
too poor to hire a lawyer. 62 This position is informed by the fact that merely<br />
informing the accused <strong>of</strong> her right to legal representation is insignificant if she<br />
cannot afford a lawyer. 63 The South African system thus ensures a deeper<br />
commitment to ensuring that accused persons are made aware <strong>of</strong> their right to<br />
legal representation.<br />
5.1.2 The duty to advise the unrepresented accused <strong>of</strong> the<br />
purpose <strong>of</strong> cross-examination<br />
The right <strong>of</strong> an accused to cross-examine the witnesses <strong>of</strong> the prosecution is<br />
engraved in section 10(2)(e) <strong>of</strong> the Constitution <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong>. Cross-<br />
57 P.M. Bekker, T. Geldenhuys, J.J. Joubert, J.P. Swanepoel, S.S. Terblanche and S.E. Van der Merwe<br />
Criminal Procedure Handbook, 9 th ed., Claremont, Juta & Co (2009), p. 80.<br />
58 S v Pienaar op.cit. note 43 supra.<br />
59 S v Radebe op.cit. note 43 supra; S v Mabaso op.cit. note 43 supra.<br />
60 Hlantlala v Dyantyi 1999 (2) SACR 541 (SCA); S v Rudman and Another; S v Mthwana 1992 (1) SACR<br />
70 (A); S v Mthwana 1989 (4) SA 361 (N).<br />
61 S v Mbambo 1999 (2) SACR 421 (W); see also S v Nkondo 2000 (1) SACR 358 (W); S v Manale 2000 (2)<br />
SACR 666 (NC).<br />
62 S v Davids; Dladla 1989 (4) SA 172 (N); S v Mthwana op.cit. note 60 supra.<br />
63 Bekker, Geldenhuys, Joubert, Swanepoel, Terblanche and Van der Merwe, op.cit. at p. 80.
UNREPRESENTED ACCUSED IN BOTSWANA 97<br />
examination is one <strong>of</strong> the fundamental pillars <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Botswana</strong> procedural<br />
system. 64 It is essential to the element <strong>of</strong> confrontation on which the<br />
adversarial tradition rests. 65 The accused’s right to cross-examination is<br />
closely related to her right to be present during the trial. An accused can only<br />
confront her adversary if she is present and has heard the evidence. 66<br />
The right to cross- examination is a fundamental right, breach <strong>of</strong><br />
which amounts to a serious irregularity. Cross-examination puts the veracity<br />
and credibility <strong>of</strong> a witness’s evidence to the test, while also allowing the<br />
accused to put her version <strong>of</strong> the events to the witness. In Kebadireng, after a<br />
witness had testified, the trial magistrate granted the prosecutor’s request to<br />
“withdraw” the evidence <strong>of</strong> the witness. On review, the Court held that once a<br />
witness had testified, she should be cross-examined. Therefore, the accused<br />
was denied the right to cross-examine the witness. The Court held that, there<br />
were no legal consequences where the evidence against an accused is<br />
overwhelming despite a breach <strong>of</strong> the right to cross-examine. 67 The Court<br />
noted also that there was sufficient evidence from other witnesses to convict<br />
the accused and that the accused was permitted to cross-examine those<br />
witnesses, although it is not clear whether the trial magistrate relied on the<br />
evidence <strong>of</strong> the witness who was not cross-examined.<br />
In State v Tsatsi piet and another, 68 both accused persons elected to<br />
give evidence on oath. The prosecutor cross-examined each accused but the<br />
accused were not permitted to cross-examine each other. The Court laid<br />
emphasis on the constitutional guarantee <strong>of</strong> the right to cross-examination,<br />
stating that the right extends to the evidence <strong>of</strong> co-accused persons and their<br />
witnesses. The Court did not state whether the evidence <strong>of</strong> each accused<br />
implicated the other. The Court noted the possibility that a witness may have<br />
evidence which might assist the accused in her defence. The accused should<br />
therefore not be prevented from putting questions to such a witness. The<br />
Court, it appeared, found it necessary to consider whether it could still convict<br />
on the basis <strong>of</strong> other evidence. In the Court’s view, there was a total<br />
miscarriage <strong>of</strong> justice and the irregularity in failing to give the accused an<br />
opportunity to cross-examine was <strong>of</strong> such a nature that the accused were<br />
prejudiced.<br />
The case <strong>of</strong> Rabonko 69 illustrates the manifest injustice that may<br />
64 State v Kebadireng [1984] B.L.R. 167.<br />
65 R. Ellert, Nato “Fair Trial” Safeguards: Precursor to an International Bill <strong>of</strong> Procedural Rights, The<br />
Hague, M. Nijh<strong>of</strong>f (1963), p. 30; As Cassim notes, “Cross-examination is regarded as an example <strong>of</strong><br />
confronting one’s adversary. Thus, the right to challenge evidence may well include the right to<br />
confrontation.” F. Cassim, “The Rights <strong>of</strong> Child Witnesses Versus the Accused’s Right to Confrontation:<br />
A Comparative Perspective,” 36(1) Comparative and International <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> Southern Africa<br />
(2003), p. 65 at 66.<br />
66 State v Etang Thai and Another [1971-1973] B.L.R. 25.<br />
67 State v Kebadireng op.cit. note 64 supra.<br />
68 [1971] 2 B.L.R 59.<br />
69 Op.cit. note 36 supra.
98 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
occur where an accused who clearly does not understand the legal process is<br />
left to her own devices. In this case, the accused was charged with the <strong>of</strong>fence<br />
<strong>of</strong> attempted rape. After the complainant had testified, the accused asked her<br />
only one question which was: “did I rape you?” When called upon to present<br />
his defence, the accused merely stated that he will rely on the medical report.<br />
The report indicated that there was no evidence <strong>of</strong> penetration. The Court<br />
noted that the accused’s purported cross-examination and defence showed that<br />
he was under the misapprehension that he was facing a charge <strong>of</strong> rape and not<br />
attempted rape. The Court opined that the trial magistrate should have<br />
explained what the real charge was and explained the object and purpose <strong>of</strong><br />
cross-examination to the accused. The Court noted that a trial cannot be fair if<br />
the accused is unable to defend himself by putting essential elements <strong>of</strong> his<br />
defence to the prosecution witnesses.<br />
In Motswedi and Another v The State, 70 the Court emphasised on the<br />
duty <strong>of</strong> judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers to ensure that accused persons are afforded an<br />
opportunity to cross-examine a co-accused. This can be broadly translated as a<br />
duty to advise the accused <strong>of</strong> her right <strong>of</strong> cross-examination. The duty is not<br />
limited to merely indicating to the accused that she has a right to crossexamine.<br />
The full purpose <strong>of</strong> cross-examination should be explained such that<br />
the accused is able to exercise the right as best as she can. 71 However, while<br />
noting the fundamental importance <strong>of</strong> the right to cross-examination, the<br />
Court noted that having regard to the accused’s confession, no prejudice had<br />
occurred.<br />
In what can be described as an exemplary example <strong>of</strong> the judicial<br />
enabling process, the Court in Mponda v The State 72 digressed on the<br />
approach to be employed in explaining the accused’s right <strong>of</strong> crossexamination.<br />
The Court noted that not only should the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer explain<br />
that the accused is entitled to cross-examination, she should also explain what<br />
is expected <strong>of</strong> cross-examination. The Court suggested that:<br />
“It might be prudent, and I say this by way <strong>of</strong> suggestion only, for a<br />
magistrate to say to an unrepresented accused, who appears to him<br />
to need assistance, that, if he disputes material allegations made by<br />
the witness, that he, the magistrate, will help him. The magistrate<br />
might properly <strong>of</strong>fer to turn the version that the accused may<br />
subsequently wish to lay before the court in the course <strong>of</strong> his case<br />
into questions <strong>of</strong> the witness. Such <strong>of</strong>fer might be made if the<br />
accused (a) should state that he feels he is unable to effectively<br />
question the witness himself; (b) should wish the magistrate to put<br />
70 [1984] B.L.R. 223.<br />
71 Ntwayame v The State [2008] 1 B.L.R. 167 (CA); Rabonko v The State op.cit. note 36 supra.<br />
72 [1986] B.L.R. 286.
UNREPRESENTED ACCUSED IN BOTSWANA 99<br />
questions upon his behalf; and, (c) tells the magistrate the gist <strong>of</strong> his<br />
case where it conflicts with the evidence that the witness about to be<br />
cross-examined has given. It should be stressed by the magistrate to<br />
the accused that he is free to take his own course and is under no<br />
obligation to accept the advice <strong>of</strong> the magistrate. It is <strong>of</strong> course<br />
important that the magistrate should fully record the nature <strong>of</strong> the<br />
exchange between himself and the accused if he considers, in the<br />
exercise <strong>of</strong> his discretion, that it is appropriate for him, by way <strong>of</strong><br />
helping the accused to present his case, to take the course I have<br />
outlined as in certain circumstances being desirable.” 73<br />
The Court suggested that the position taken in the South African<br />
cases <strong>of</strong> S v Sebatana 74 and S v Dipholo 75 be followed. In those cases, it was<br />
emphasised that the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer should assist the unrepresented accused in<br />
her cross-examination by asking her if she agrees to the material allegations<br />
made against her in the evidence <strong>of</strong> the witnesses. In this way, matters in<br />
dispute will be brought to light.<br />
Mponda recognises that judicial assistance to the unrepresented<br />
accused during cross-examination is part <strong>of</strong> the general duty <strong>of</strong> the judicial<br />
<strong>of</strong>ficer in assisting the accused to present her defence. No doubt, the<br />
phenomenon <strong>of</strong> a more visible judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer playing a more dynamic role in<br />
ensuring fair treatment <strong>of</strong> the unrepresented accused is recognisable. On the<br />
basis <strong>of</strong> Kebadireng, Motswedi and Rabonko however, failure to exercise this<br />
duty will bear no consequences if the accused is not prejudiced.<br />
73 Ibid at p. 291A-D. In Rabonko v The State [2007] 1 B.L.R. 31 at p. 32E-G, Lesetedi J had this to say: “A<br />
judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer trying a case in which an unrepresented accused seems to be at sea and unable to either<br />
cross-examine or appreciate what the purpose and import <strong>of</strong> cross-examination is in my view does have a<br />
duty to advise an accused person as to the purpose <strong>of</strong> cross-examination. For to know <strong>of</strong> the existence <strong>of</strong> a<br />
right and not to know how to exercise it is <strong>of</strong> cold comfort to the beneficiary <strong>of</strong> the right. A judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer<br />
must however be careful to not descend into the arena and carry out the cross-examination on behalf <strong>of</strong> an<br />
accused person. A failure by a judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer to advise an unrepresented accused person not only <strong>of</strong> the<br />
right to cross-examination but also its object, may result in a failure <strong>of</strong> justice where an accused person<br />
seems to have no idea <strong>of</strong> either the existence <strong>of</strong> the right or how to exercise it.”; in State v Ncube [2008] 1<br />
B.L.R. 64 at p. 68D-F, Newman J noted that: “In my view, it is proper practice for a trial magistrate to<br />
advise an unrepresented accused, at the commencement <strong>of</strong> the state’s case or, at the latest, after the first<br />
prosecution witness has testified in-chief, <strong>of</strong> his right to ask relevant questions <strong>of</strong> each prosecution<br />
witness, which need not be limited to matters raised in-chief, and which are aimed at: (a) casting doubt on<br />
the accuracy <strong>of</strong> the evidence given by the witness in-chief; (b) extracting from the witness evidence<br />
supporting the accused’s version <strong>of</strong> the facts in issue; and (c) in appropriate circumstances, discrediting<br />
the witness’s reliability as a witness.”; evidence <strong>of</strong> judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers generally assisting unrepresented<br />
accused and assisting them to cross-examine witnesses, has been traced to the eighteenth century. See<br />
J.H. Langbein, The Origins <strong>of</strong> Adversary Criminal Trial, Oxford, Oxford <strong>University</strong> Press (2003), pp.<br />
314-321.<br />
74 1983 (1) SA 809.<br />
75 1983 (4) SA 757.
100 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
5.1.3 The duty to advise the unrepresented accused <strong>of</strong><br />
special and statutory defences<br />
It is well established that judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers are under a duty to inform accused<br />
persons <strong>of</strong> statutory and other defences that may be open to them. In <strong>Botswana</strong>,<br />
this issue has mainly been determined in sexual related <strong>of</strong>fences. Thus in the<br />
case <strong>of</strong> State v Bareki 76 it was held that on a charge <strong>of</strong> rape, where the<br />
complainant is alleged to have been under the age <strong>of</strong> sixteen years, if the<br />
accused is undefended he must be alerted <strong>of</strong> the defence provided by section<br />
147(5) <strong>of</strong> the Penal Code. This section provides a defence in respect <strong>of</strong> persons<br />
charged with having unlawful carnal knowledge <strong>of</strong> a girl under the age <strong>of</strong><br />
sixteen. 77 The section provides the accused with a defence if the accused can<br />
show that he had reasonable cause to believe, and did believe that the victim<br />
had attained the age <strong>of</strong> sixteen years. 78 The Court apparently noted that the<br />
accused should be alerted <strong>of</strong> the defence, since having regard to the evidence,<br />
he stood the risk <strong>of</strong> being convicted <strong>of</strong> defilement if the victim was in fact<br />
below the age <strong>of</strong> sixteen years.<br />
In Gare v The State, 79 the appellant was convicted by a magistrate's<br />
court on a charge <strong>of</strong> having had carnal knowledge <strong>of</strong> a girl <strong>of</strong> less than sixteen<br />
years <strong>of</strong> age in contravention <strong>of</strong> section 147 <strong>of</strong> the Penal Code. The appellant<br />
admitted that he had sexual intercourse with the complainant. He was not<br />
represented at the trial and the inept manner in which he conducted his case<br />
would seem to suggest that he had little understanding <strong>of</strong> the issues and was<br />
almost certainly unaware <strong>of</strong> the special defence set out in section 147(5) <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Penal Code. The evidence <strong>of</strong> the prosecution established that the complainant<br />
was fifteen years old. The accused did not address the issue <strong>of</strong> age. The<br />
complainant testified that she told the accused that she was fifteen years old<br />
and he did not dispute this in cross-examination. He admitted to having sexual<br />
intercourse with the complainant, stating that she was his girl friend. While it<br />
was clear that the complainant told the accused that she already had a boy<br />
friend, the appellant did not cross-examine the complainant on her physical<br />
development. In fact, this issue did not appear on the record. The accused did<br />
not avail himself <strong>of</strong> the special defence set out in section 147(5) <strong>of</strong> the Penal<br />
Code. Zietsman JA 80 held that in view <strong>of</strong> the obvious ineptness with which<br />
76 Op.cit. note 51 supra; see also Ramabe v The State [2002] 1 B.L.R. 523; Galebonwe v The State [2002] 1<br />
B.L.R. 46 (CA); Matlakadibe v The State [2004] 1 B.L.R. 44 (CA); Tsunke v The State [2004] 2 B.L.R.<br />
155; Mfwazala v The State [2007] 3 B.L.R. 476; Gaosenkwe v The State [2001] 1 B.L.R. 324; Sefo v The<br />
State [2007] 2 B.L.R. 562.<br />
77 This <strong>of</strong>fence is akin to statutory rape.<br />
78 The section reads: “It shall be a sufficient defence to any charge under this section if it appears to the<br />
court before whom the charge is brought that the person so charged had reasonable cause to believe and<br />
did in fact believe that the person was <strong>of</strong> or above the age <strong>of</strong> 16 years or was such charged person’s<br />
spouse.”<br />
79 Op.cit. note 30 supra.<br />
80 Aguda ag JP dissenting.
UNREPRESENTED ACCUSED IN BOTSWANA 101<br />
the accused conducted his defence, and his probable ignorance <strong>of</strong> the special<br />
defence, the court should have provided him with an explanation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
special defence. 81 The Court noted that the accused was entitled to a fair trial<br />
in terms <strong>of</strong> section 10 <strong>of</strong> the Constitution and that the magistrate was under a<br />
duty to explain the existence and meaning <strong>of</strong> this defence to him. In the<br />
circumstances, the conviction was quashed.<br />
5.1.4 The duty to advise the unrepresented accused <strong>of</strong> the<br />
right to address the court at the close <strong>of</strong> the trial and<br />
in mitigation<br />
Section 181 <strong>of</strong> the Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act provides for the<br />
prosecution and accused to address the court after all the evidence has been led.<br />
The duty <strong>of</strong> the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer to make an unrepresented accused aware <strong>of</strong> this<br />
was declared in Walter Madisa v The State. 82 This case, as with other cases<br />
involving breaches <strong>of</strong> procedural rights, indicated that failure <strong>of</strong> an accused to<br />
address the court was inconsequential where no prejudice occurred. 83 The<br />
case, however, amply demonstrates a factual situation where a procedural<br />
mishap would result in prejudice. In this case, the appellant was convicted <strong>of</strong><br />
assault occasioning actual bodily harm upon an allegation <strong>of</strong> a woman with<br />
whom he was cohabiting, that he had kicked her on her private parts, resulting<br />
in bleeding. The appellant and the complainant had three children together. The<br />
complainant in fact testified that she only became aware that she was six<br />
months pregnant as a result <strong>of</strong> a medical examination conducted after the<br />
81 Lord Wier JA who concurred with Zietsman JA noted at p. 149A-F: “In the present case, the appellant<br />
faced a serious charge, that <strong>of</strong> unlawful carnal knowledge <strong>of</strong> a female under the age <strong>of</strong> 16 years. The<br />
Penal Code provided him with the defence that if it appeared to the court that he had reasonable cause to<br />
believe and did in fact believe that the complainant was 16 years or over he would be acquitted. At the<br />
start <strong>of</strong> the trial the charge was read over to the appellant and he said that he understood it. The special<br />
defence was not. I do not go so far as to say that there was any requirement to read out the terms <strong>of</strong> the<br />
statutory defence at the start <strong>of</strong> the proceedings although my own inclination, particularly in the case <strong>of</strong> an<br />
unrepresented and illiterate accused, would have been to do so. Moreover if, as the trial progressed it<br />
became clear to the court from questions put in cross-examination that this accused clearly understood the<br />
issue and the nature <strong>of</strong> any defence open to him, there would have been no need for the court to intervene<br />
with assistance. But in this case, studying the record <strong>of</strong> proceedings, it appears to me that the appellant<br />
had no idea what was the true issue. Indeed from such questions as he asked, it seems that he was under<br />
the impression that he was facing a charge <strong>of</strong> rape and that what he was seeking to establish was a defence<br />
<strong>of</strong> consent. Be that as it may, at no stage as the trial proceeded did it become apparent that the appellant<br />
had any idea that the statutory defence existed or was open to him. This should have become obvious to<br />
the magistrate after the appellant's very brief cross-examination <strong>of</strong> the first witness, who was the<br />
complainant. The complainant stated that the appellant had asked her age and she told him that she was 15<br />
years old. There was no cross-examination <strong>of</strong> this vital piece <strong>of</strong> evidence and, in my view, the magistrate<br />
ought to have intervened there and then to draw the appellant's attention to the special defence and ask<br />
him if he wished to ask the complainant any questions on the matter. Moreover when the appellant came<br />
to give evidence himself, he said noting that could have had any bearing on the special defence and by<br />
refraining from intervening, the magistrate let the opportunity pass for this possible defence to be put<br />
forward.”<br />
82 Op.cit. note 34 supra.<br />
83 See Chiwaura v The State [1985] B.L.R. 201; Moima v The State [1982] 1 B.L.R. 112; Moraeng v The<br />
State [2007] 1 B.L.R. 657; Masango v The State [2001] 2 B.L.R. 616; Moletsane v The State [1995]<br />
B.L.R. 83; Moletsane v The State [1996] B.L.R. 73 (CA); Makwapeng v The State [1999] 1 B.L.R. 48<br />
(CA).
102 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
assault. At the close <strong>of</strong> the evidence, the trial magistrate stood the matter down<br />
at lunch time, indicating that the matter will proceed after lunch. When the<br />
matter resumed, the magistrate by inadvertence, proceeded to deliver judgment<br />
and sentence without inviting the parties to make submissions. The Court noted<br />
that since the complainant had been pregnant several times before, regard being<br />
had to her evidence that she only realised that she was six months pregnant<br />
during the medical examination, counsel for the accused might have wanted to<br />
address the court on her credibility. Though the Court could not speculate what<br />
counsel could have said, it concluded that the accused was prejudiced under the<br />
circumstances. In any event, closing addresses are crucial to the criminal<br />
process as they allow the accused to call the court’s attention to salient matters<br />
in an endeavour to influence the court in finding in its favour.<br />
Another process wherein an accused endeavours to influence the<br />
decision <strong>of</strong> the court in its favour is through mitigation. When once convicted,<br />
the accused would implore the court to pass the lenient most possible<br />
sentence. In this regard, the accused should be given an opportunity to address<br />
the court. The accused would normally bring mitigating factors to the<br />
attention <strong>of</strong> the court. That the accused addresses the court in mitigation is <strong>of</strong><br />
paramount importance as the information presented assists the court in<br />
arriving at an appropriate sentence. 84<br />
It is an established rule <strong>of</strong> law that a convicted accused has a right to<br />
be heard and lead evidence in mitigation. 85 In Ofetotse v The State, 86 the<br />
Court noted that despite the absence <strong>of</strong> any statutory provision relating to<br />
mitigation, this is a well established rule <strong>of</strong> practice in the courts <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong><br />
and must always be followed. The Court noted that failure to accord the<br />
accused an opportunity to mitigate amounts to an irregularity and the sentence<br />
cannot stand. 87 The courts have held that to remedy, the irregularity, the<br />
matter should be remitted to the trial court to hear evidence in mitigation and<br />
then pass sentence. However, in order to avoid the delays that this route is<br />
bound to create, the appellate courts have in practise, imposed sentence<br />
themselves, after consideration <strong>of</strong> the conditions under which the <strong>of</strong>fence was<br />
committed or allowing the parties to file documents relating to mitigation. 88<br />
In the case <strong>of</strong> Gaotlhobogwe v The State, 89 the Court noted that an<br />
assessment <strong>of</strong> the proper sentence to be passed is as important as any other<br />
stage <strong>of</strong> the criminal process. In this regard, to prevent or discourage a<br />
convicted person from addressing the court or giving evidence in mitigation<br />
will amount to a serious irregularity. Without specifically stating the duty <strong>of</strong><br />
84 State v Rahii [1981] B.L.R. 252.<br />
85 Seakwa and Others v The State [1984] B.L.R. 226; Masupatsele v The State [1987] B.L.R. 96.<br />
86 [1989] B.L.R. 314 (CA).<br />
87 Seakwa and Others v The State op.cit note 85 supra; Ofetotse v The State op.cit. note 86 supra.<br />
88 Seakwa and Others v The State op.cit note 85 supra; Ofetotse v The State op.cit. note 86 supra.<br />
89 [1992] B.L.R. 286 (CA).
UNREPRESENTED ACCUSED IN BOTSWANA 103<br />
the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer to inform the accused <strong>of</strong> her right to mitigate, the Court<br />
cited extensively from the South African case <strong>of</strong> R v Chinyani, 90 where it was<br />
noted that the most desirable practice was to ask the defence after conviction,<br />
whether it desires to say anything in relation to conviction. It has been<br />
contended that section 274 <strong>of</strong> the South African Criminal Procedure Act 91<br />
obliges the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer to allow the accused an opportunity to lead<br />
evidence and address the court in mitigation. 92<br />
It must be noted that in Gaotlhobogwe, the accused was represented<br />
by counsel. One must speculate that had the facts been different, the Court<br />
would have stated the duty to call upon the accused to mitigate as it has so<br />
<strong>of</strong>ten done with other procedural rights. The facts are that after conviction,<br />
counsel instructed the accused to go into the witness box as he intended to<br />
lead evidence in mitigation. The judge retorted that he may not go into the<br />
box. This reaction was apparently provoked by the fact that counsel did not<br />
seek leave <strong>of</strong> the court and further that previous convictions were not yet put<br />
to the accused. Though counsel did not further indicate that he intended to put<br />
the accused in the box, he proceeded to address the court in mitigation from<br />
the bar. Also, when asked by the Court during the appeal proceedings, what<br />
his client would have said in mitigation, counsel’s reply did not reveal<br />
anything substantial that would have persuaded the trial court to pass a<br />
different sentence. In fact, it was on this basis that the Court came to the<br />
conclusion that the accused was not prejudiced.<br />
The duty <strong>of</strong> the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer in relation to the unrepresented<br />
accused has been highlighted. The Court in Kelebile v The State, 93 noted that<br />
the issue <strong>of</strong> mitigation is not a ritual that lacks real content. In passing<br />
sentence, justice can only be done if the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer is aware <strong>of</strong> the<br />
personal background and personal circumstances <strong>of</strong> the accused. These issues<br />
are important factors in weighing aggravating and mitigating factors. The<br />
Court was <strong>of</strong> the view therefore that a judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer has a duty to probe the<br />
accused so as to elicit all the factors relevant to passing sentence. The Court<br />
stated that there are differences in the psychology and customs <strong>of</strong> people.<br />
Difference in circumstances and conditions cover a broad spectrum <strong>of</strong><br />
subjective and objective considerations. Sentencing should therefore be made<br />
within the social context <strong>of</strong> the accused’s situation. Therefore, even where the<br />
accused states that she has nothing to say in mitigation, the court has a duty to<br />
probe the accused.<br />
90 1956 (1) P.H. H65.<br />
91 Act 51 <strong>of</strong> 1977.<br />
92 Bekker, Geldenhuys, Joubert, Swanepoel, Terblanche and Van der Merwe, op.cit. at p. 292. Section 274<br />
reads:<br />
“(1) A court may, before passing sentence, receive such evidence as it thinks fit in order to inform itself as<br />
to the proper sentence to be passed.<br />
(2) The accused may address the court on any evidence received under subsection (1), as well as on the<br />
matter <strong>of</strong> the sentence, and thereafter the prosecution may likewise address the court.”<br />
93 [1983] B.L.R. 92.
104 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
5.1.5 The duty to advise the unrepresented accused about<br />
exceptional extenuating circumstances in the case <strong>of</strong><br />
compulsory sentences<br />
In its bid to curb certain socially undesirable acts, Parliament has intervened to<br />
enact minimum sentences in respect <strong>of</strong> certain <strong>of</strong>fences. In this regard, statute<br />
provides for compulsory minimum sentences which judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers are bound<br />
to follow. There are a number <strong>of</strong> such legislations in <strong>Botswana</strong>. Whether the<br />
intention <strong>of</strong> Parliament is to stamp out such crimes by deterring would-be<br />
<strong>of</strong>fenders with stiff penalties, to incapacitate <strong>of</strong>fenders in respect <strong>of</strong> certain<br />
crimes that the society considers being serious or prevalent, or to ensure that<br />
the measure <strong>of</strong> retribution is proportionate to the crime committed is a matter<br />
for conjecture. What is clear, however, is that the taking away <strong>of</strong> judicial<br />
discretion in sentencing has led to obnoxious consequences wherein accused<br />
have sometimes received severe sentences for trivial conduct, merely because<br />
the crime they committed carry statutory minimum sentences even though the<br />
gravity <strong>of</strong> their conduct did not deserve such sentences. Cases where judicial<br />
<strong>of</strong>ficers apply mandatory sentences which are disproportionate to the conduct<br />
<strong>of</strong> the accused usually attract public outcry. It is interesting to note that similar<br />
sentiments have been echoed in Parliament as well, even though they are the<br />
creators <strong>of</strong> such provisions. 94<br />
The legislature found a solution to the problem caused by minimum<br />
sentences, by legislating an escape clause which permits judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers to<br />
circumvent statutory minimum sentences “where there are exceptional<br />
extenuating circumstances which would render the imposition <strong>of</strong> the statutory<br />
minimum period <strong>of</strong> imprisonment totally inappropriate ...”. 95 While it is clear<br />
that judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers should consider exceptional extenuating circumstances<br />
before imposing sentence in respect <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fences carrying minimum<br />
sentences, 96 there is no authority that the unrepresented accused should be<br />
94 In the words <strong>of</strong> Dibotelo J (as he then was) in the case <strong>of</strong> Matomela and Another v The State [2000] 1<br />
B.L.R. 396 at p. 399D-G, “In my view, the <strong>of</strong>ten resorted to practice <strong>of</strong> enacting mandatory minimum<br />
sentences for certain types <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fences constitutes a threat to the independence <strong>of</strong> the courts as envisaged<br />
by the Constitution and the practice by the legislature <strong>of</strong> arrogating to itself the functions reserved for the<br />
judiciary by the Constitution is clearly undesirable and should be discouraged or discontinued as it erodes<br />
the discretionary powers <strong>of</strong> the courts in sentencing <strong>of</strong>fenders. It is ironic and sad and I <strong>of</strong>ten observe with<br />
detached amusement that whenever there is a public outcry arising from what the public perceives as<br />
injustices meted out by the courts when they impose mandatory minimum sentences which have been<br />
prescribed by the legislature, some members <strong>of</strong> the legislature also blame the courts in such situations<br />
instead <strong>of</strong> owning up and shouldering the blame. There is a real danger in my view that the <strong>of</strong>ten resorted<br />
to practice <strong>of</strong> prescribing mandatory minimum sentences may in the near future bring very unhealthy<br />
conflict between the legislature and the judiciary.”<br />
95 Section 2 Penal Code (Amendment) Act 39 <strong>of</strong> 2004, incorporated into the Penal Code as section 27(4).<br />
For a consideration <strong>of</strong> what amounts to exceptional extenuating circumstances, see State v Fu and Others<br />
[2006] 1 B.L.R. 486; Serumola v Director <strong>of</strong> Public Prosecutions [2007] 1 B.L.R. 434 (CA); Keboseke v<br />
The State; Seleka v The State [2008] 1 B.L.R. 327 (CA); Tlhowe v The State [2008] 1 B.L.R. 356 (CA);<br />
Seme and Another v The State [2006] 1 B.L.R. 35; State v Basutli and Another [2007] 3 B.L.R. 409; State<br />
v Moyo [2007] 1 B.L.R. 737; Seakgatleng v The State [2006] 2 B.L.R. 301; Piet v The State [2007] 2<br />
B.L.R. 460; State v Anis [2007] 2 B.L.R. 346.<br />
96 State v Khumo and Another [2007] 3 B.L.R. 844.
UNREPRESENTED ACCUSED IN BOTSWANA 105<br />
invited to address the court or lead evidence on the matter. However, there is<br />
evidence that suggests that judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers may well be following the practice<br />
<strong>of</strong> inviting accused to address them on exceptional extenuating<br />
circumstances. 97<br />
Perhaps, a word on extenuating circumstances is in order at this<br />
stage. The question <strong>of</strong> extenuating circumstances usually arises in respect <strong>of</strong><br />
sentencing in murder cases. The Penal Code 98 provides for the death penalty<br />
except where there are extenuating circumstances. 99 In other words, the court<br />
should impose the death sentence for the <strong>of</strong>fence <strong>of</strong> murder except it finds<br />
extenuating circumstances. In relation to extenuating circumstances, the<br />
accused should be permitted to lead evidence and address the court if she so<br />
desires. However, the courts are bound to look for extenuating circumstances<br />
from the evidence led during trial. 100 The analogy <strong>of</strong> extenuating<br />
circumstances in respect <strong>of</strong> section 203(2) <strong>of</strong> the Penal Code <strong>of</strong>fers little<br />
assistance to the exceptional extenuating circumstances debate since accused<br />
persons are always represented in cases <strong>of</strong> murder and defence attorney would<br />
usually indicate that she intends to lead evidence or address the court on<br />
extenuating circumstances. Also, it has been held that the accused has no onus<br />
to prove extenuating circumstances, nor does the State have an onus to<br />
disprove it. 101 What seems clear is that the court should consider extenuating<br />
circumstances on the basis <strong>of</strong> the trial evidence, and should also permit the<br />
defence to lead evidence or address the court on same if it so desires.<br />
Consequently, there is no onus on the court to invite the defence to raise<br />
extenuating circumstances.<br />
5.2 Other possible areas<br />
5.2.1 The duty to explain the unrepresented accused’s<br />
rights and options at the close <strong>of</strong> the prosecution’s<br />
case<br />
Section 180(4) <strong>of</strong> the Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act provides that at the<br />
close <strong>of</strong> the prosecution’s case, the court is required to ask the accused if she<br />
intends to adduce evidence in her defence. It follows that, at the close <strong>of</strong> the<br />
97 In State v Moyo op.cit. note 95 supra, the accused was convicted <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fence <strong>of</strong> robbery. Before<br />
passing sentence under section 292(2) <strong>of</strong> the Penal Code which provides for a minimum prison term <strong>of</strong> 10<br />
years, the records show that the accused was invited to address the Court on exceptional extenuating<br />
circumstances. In passing sentence Chinhengo J noted at p. 740B-C, “I asked the accused if there were<br />
any exceptional extenuating circumstances which would constrain or require me to impose a sentence<br />
other than the minimum mandatory sentence and he was unable to point out to any.”<br />
98 Cap 08:01.<br />
99 Section 203(2) <strong>of</strong> the Penal Code.<br />
100 Tsae v The State [2003] 2 B.L.R. 55 (CA); Losang v The State (Practice Direction) [1985] B.L.R. 281.<br />
101 Tsae v The State op.cit. note 100 supra; Kelaletswe and Others v The State [1995] B.L.R. 100 (CA);<br />
Ntesang v The State [1995] B.L.R. 151 (CA).
106 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
case <strong>of</strong> the prosecution, the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer has a duty to explain to the accused<br />
her rights and options, should the accused be found to have a case to answer.<br />
This involves a whole corpus <strong>of</strong> rights relating to the conduct <strong>of</strong> the defence.<br />
They include the right to give evidence, the right to make an unsworn<br />
statement, the right to remain silent and the right to call witnesses. 102 These<br />
rights and their implications should be explained in full.<br />
The courts have exemplified the process to be followed in explaining<br />
the rights <strong>of</strong> the accused at the close <strong>of</strong> the prosecution’s case. In Mmopi and<br />
Another v The State, 103 the Court noted that an unrepresented accused is<br />
under severe disadvantage and that if the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer fails to explain<br />
matters <strong>of</strong> procedure to her, injustice could easily result. The Court further<br />
noted that the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer should explain to the accused that she will be<br />
afforded an opportunity to state her side <strong>of</strong> the case. She should point out to<br />
the accused person what the issues were and invite her to tell her story. The<br />
Court also held that should the accused person thereafter remain mute, the<br />
judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer should carefully note on the record what she has said to the<br />
accused person, read it over to her and invite the accused to comment on what<br />
she has recorded. 104 The courts are unanimous in their conclusion that failure<br />
to comply with section 180(4) is fatal to a conviction. 105<br />
5.2.2 The duty to explain unfavourable presumptions to the<br />
unrepresented accused<br />
While the prosecution usually has the onus <strong>of</strong> proving its case against the<br />
accused, Parliament sometimes legislates presumptions that relieve the State <strong>of</strong><br />
its onus in respect <strong>of</strong> some elements <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fence. These presumptions<br />
normally conclude a state <strong>of</strong> affairs unfavourable to the accused, on the basis<br />
<strong>of</strong> a basic fact, leaving it to the accused to disprove the concluded state <strong>of</strong><br />
affairs. Usually, the State will only have to prove a single basic element from<br />
which the guilt <strong>of</strong> the accused may be inferred, unless she proves the contrary.<br />
Such reverse onuses are unfavourable to the accused and places her at the risk<br />
<strong>of</strong> conviction merely because the prosecution has proved the basic fact. 106<br />
Several legislations in <strong>Botswana</strong> contain such provisions. However, there is a<br />
dearth <strong>of</strong> authority on the duty <strong>of</strong> the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer in relation to an accused<br />
who is faced with an unfavourable presumption.<br />
102 State v Molatlhegi [1997] B.L.R. 911; State v David Rantabana and Another [1981] B.L.R. 255.<br />
103 [1986] B.L.R. 8; it was noted in Tsae v The State op.cit. note 100 supra that the court is not obliged to<br />
advise the accused directly when she is represented as this can be left to counsel. Obviously, the court will<br />
have to verify from counsel whether she has explained the accused’s rights and make a note <strong>of</strong> this in her<br />
records.<br />
104 It was also held in Tsie v The State [1999] 2 B.L.R. 305 that the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer should make notes <strong>of</strong> his<br />
advice to the accused and record the answers <strong>of</strong> the accused.<br />
105 Mhaladi v The State [1990] B.L.R. 168; State v Molatlhegi op.cit. note 102 supra; State v David<br />
Rantabana and Another op.cit. note 102 supra; Obonetse Ngakaemang v Regina op.cit. note 34 supra.
UNREPRESENTED ACCUSED IN BOTSWANA 107<br />
In the case <strong>of</strong> Mosanana v The State, 107 the appellant had been<br />
charged under the Stock Theft Act 108 on two counts <strong>of</strong> receiving stolen stock<br />
which she either knew or had reason to believe had been stolen. The appellant<br />
was acquitted on the substantive counts but convicted on lesser charges <strong>of</strong><br />
receiving stock without having reasonable cause for believing at the time <strong>of</strong><br />
acquisition that such stock was the property <strong>of</strong> the person from whom it was<br />
received. The evidence showed that the appellant was given the cattle by a<br />
debtor, in satisfaction <strong>of</strong> a debt owed by the latter to the former. At the time,<br />
the appellant was sick and in bed, but asked one Opelo to check the cattle. As<br />
a result <strong>of</strong> the appellant’s conversation with Opelo, she was satisfied that the<br />
cattle belonged to the debtor. While the cattle were unbranded, Opelo testified<br />
that other cattle <strong>of</strong> that age in <strong>Botswana</strong> are not usually branded. In reaching a<br />
decision, the magistrate relied on section 4 <strong>of</strong> the Stock Theft Act which<br />
provided that:<br />
“A person who in any manner, otherwise than at a public sale,<br />
acquires or receives into his possession from any other person stolen<br />
stock or stolen produce without having reasonable cause, pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
which shall be on such first-mentioned person, for believing at the<br />
time <strong>of</strong> such acquisition or receipt that such stock or produce was<br />
the property <strong>of</strong> the person from whom he received it or that such<br />
person was duly authorised by the owner there<strong>of</strong> to deal with it or<br />
dispose <strong>of</strong> it, shall be deemed to be guilty <strong>of</strong> an <strong>of</strong>fence.”<br />
The magistrate found that the appellant did not prove that she had<br />
reasonable cause for believing that the cattle belonged to the debtor. The<br />
Court, on appeal, disagreed with this finding. The Court stated that the<br />
appellant did show that she had reasonable cause for believing that the cattle<br />
belonged to the debtor. The Court stated that the appellant did ask Opelo to<br />
check the cattle and that the latter found nothing amiss. It was also the<br />
evidence <strong>of</strong> Opelo that he found nothing unusual with unbranded cattle. Over<br />
and above this, the Court stated the duty <strong>of</strong> judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers where an<br />
106 For some articles on reverse onus clauses, see R.J.V. Cole, “Determining the Constitutionality <strong>of</strong> Reverse<br />
Onus Clauses in <strong>Botswana</strong>,” 16(2) African <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> International and Comparative <strong>Law</strong> (2008), p. 236;<br />
A. Ashworth, “Article 6 and the Fairness <strong>of</strong> Trials,” Criminal <strong>Law</strong> Review (1999), p. 261; A. Ashworth,<br />
“Four Threats to the Presumption <strong>of</strong> Innocence,” 123(1) South African <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> (2006), p. 63; A.A.S.<br />
Zuckerman, “No Third Exception to the Woolmington Rule,” 103 <strong>Law</strong> Quarterly Review (1987), p. 170;<br />
C.R.M. Dlamini, “Presumptions in the South African <strong>Law</strong> <strong>of</strong> Evidence III,” 65(1) Tydskrif vir<br />
Hedendaagse Romeins-Hollandse Reg (2002), p. 147; F. Egonda-Ntende, “Presumption <strong>of</strong> Innocence and<br />
the Reverse Onus Clause: Does the 1995 Uganda Constitution Establish A New Standard?,” 9(2) East<br />
African <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> Peace and Human Rights (2003), p. 194; P. Roberts, “Taking the Burden <strong>of</strong> Pro<strong>of</strong><br />
Seriously,” Criminal <strong>Law</strong> Review (1995), p. 783; K. Govender, “Determining the Constitutionality <strong>of</strong><br />
Presumptions,” 8 South African <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> Criminal Justice (1995), p. 205; C.R. Nesson, “Reasonable<br />
Doubt and Permissive Inferences: The Value <strong>of</strong> Complexity,” 92(6) Harvard <strong>Law</strong> Review (1979), p.<br />
1187.<br />
107 [1985] B.L.R. 29.<br />
108 Cap 09:01, 1973. Now replaced by the Stock Theft Act Cap 09:01, Act 21 <strong>of</strong> 1996.
108 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
unfavourable onus is placed on an accused. The Court noted that in such a<br />
case, the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer should “explain to the accused in clear terms that to<br />
escape conviction he has to prove certain matters and he should fully explain<br />
what these matters are. In other words, the accused should be given fair notice<br />
<strong>of</strong> any issues not stated in or apparent from the substantive charge.” 109 In the<br />
Court’s view, failure to inform the accused may prejudice her in the conduct<br />
<strong>of</strong> her defence. In the circumstances, the Court felt compelled to set aside the<br />
conviction.<br />
The dearth <strong>of</strong> authorities in this area presents a perfect opportunity to<br />
engage in some comparative analysis. The Namibian case <strong>of</strong> S v Kau and<br />
Others 110 presents a crystal exemplification <strong>of</strong> the duty <strong>of</strong> the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer<br />
in bringing the purport and effect <strong>of</strong> an unfavourable presumption to the<br />
attention <strong>of</strong> the unrepresented accused. In that case, sixteen appellants all<br />
illiterate, were charged and convicted <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fence <strong>of</strong> wrongfully and<br />
illegally hunting specially protected game. The legislation proscribing this<br />
conduct provided that no person other than the lawful holder <strong>of</strong> a licence shall<br />
hunt specially protected game. 111 On appeal, the appellants argued among<br />
other things, that the trial magistrate erred in failing to explain the existence<br />
and implications <strong>of</strong> the presumption created by section 85(2) <strong>of</strong> the Nature<br />
Conservation Ordinance. 112 The section imposed an onus on the appellants<br />
(then accused) to prove that they had a licence to hunt. The Supreme Court<br />
held that the appellants being illiterate were not expected to know <strong>of</strong> the<br />
provision merely by its mention on the charge sheet. The appellants, therefore,<br />
required a proper explanation <strong>of</strong> the import <strong>of</strong> the provision. In the Court’s<br />
view, only a lawyer or magistrate could make such an explanation. The Court<br />
held that as the accused were unrepresented, the magistrate had a duty to<br />
explain the provision and the shifting <strong>of</strong> the onus. Failure to explain the<br />
presumption was held to amount to an irregularity, thereby rendering the trial<br />
unfair. The Court proceeded to set aside the conviction.<br />
The South African Courts have also in a number <strong>of</strong> cases ruled that<br />
judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers have a duty to explain unfavourable presumptions to the<br />
unrepresented accused. In S v Cross, 113 an accused had failed to pay his<br />
monthly instalments in respect <strong>of</strong> a maintenance order. When once the<br />
prosecution had proved failure to pay, an onus fell upon him to establish<br />
109 Mosanana v The State op.cit. note 107 supra at p. 31.<br />
110 [1993] NASC 2; 1995 NR 1. Obtained from: (last visited 1 September 2010).<br />
Cyclostyled copy on file with the author.<br />
111 Section 26(1) <strong>of</strong> the Nature Conservation Ordinance 4 <strong>of</strong> 1975 as amended.<br />
112 The section provides as follows:<br />
“Whenever any person performs an act and he would commit or have committed an <strong>of</strong>fence by<br />
performing that act if he had not been the holder <strong>of</strong> a licence, registration permit, exemption, document,<br />
written permission or written or other authority or power (herein in this section called the necessary<br />
authority) to perform such act, he shall, if charged with the commission <strong>of</strong> such <strong>of</strong>fence, be deemed not to<br />
have been the holder <strong>of</strong> the necessary authority, unless the contrary is proved.”<br />
113 1971 (2) 356 (R,AD); S v Lango op.cit. note 47 supra; S v Kekwana 1978 (2) SA 172 (NKA); S v Brown<br />
1984 (3) SA 399 (KPA); S v Khumalo 1979 (4) SA 480 (TPD).
UNREPRESENTED ACCUSED IN BOTSWANA 109<br />
inadequate means to pay. The trial magistrate did not explain this onus to the<br />
accused. The accused in his evidence, made a vague attempt to explain his<br />
finances. The Court, on appeal, noted that it was clear that the accused was<br />
unaware <strong>of</strong> the necessity <strong>of</strong> producing concrete facts and figures in order to<br />
establish his assertion that he was unable to pay during the period in question.<br />
The Court, therefore, laid down a rule <strong>of</strong> practice that where an unrepresented<br />
accused is charged with the <strong>of</strong>fence <strong>of</strong> failure to pay maintenance, the judicial<br />
<strong>of</strong>ficer should explain the onus resting on the accused. The Court stated that<br />
the accused should be informed that it is insufficient to make a bald statement<br />
on oath asserting inability to pay but that all the relevant facts and figures and<br />
documentary evidence available should be produced in order that the court<br />
may properly adjudicate on the matter.<br />
The Court’s rationale in Kau was that the appellants being<br />
unrepresented, had no way <strong>of</strong> knowing about the import and effect <strong>of</strong> the<br />
presumption if the magistrate did not explain it to them. Of significance is the<br />
Court’s view that it is unwise to assume that the magistrate’s failure to warn<br />
the appellants <strong>of</strong> the presumption did not result in prejudice because the<br />
magistrate did not rely on the presumption. The Court noted that the<br />
prosecution did not lead evidence to prove that the appellants did not have the<br />
relevant permit and must have therefore relied on the presumption to prove the<br />
appellants’ guilt. While the Court held that the failure to inform the appellants<br />
<strong>of</strong> the presumption rendered the trial unfair, it also took into consideration the<br />
fact that the trial court also failed to inform the appellants <strong>of</strong> other rights to<br />
which they were entitled. 114 This case, therefore, reinforces the general duty<br />
<strong>of</strong> the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer to bring the attention <strong>of</strong> the accused to her procedural<br />
rights.<br />
Cross underscores the judicial enabling duty <strong>of</strong> the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer. It<br />
can be seen that the Court’s reasoning was based on the fact that the judicial<br />
<strong>of</strong>ficer should give the unrepresented accused sufficient and detailed<br />
information <strong>of</strong> what is required for her to put up a proper rebuttal. The<br />
accused carries the risk <strong>of</strong> non-persuasion and it is therefore vitally important<br />
that this is brought to her attention. It will amount to “trickery” to convict an<br />
accused with the aid <strong>of</strong> a statutory presumption which effectively excuses the<br />
prosecution from proving an element <strong>of</strong> an <strong>of</strong>fence because that element is<br />
proved by virtue <strong>of</strong> the presumption, while at the same time demanding that<br />
the accused disproves the presumed facts, if the accused is unaware <strong>of</strong> the<br />
onus or evidential burden placed on her.<br />
114 Failure to ask the appellants to what extent they admit or deny issues raised in their plea and that they are<br />
not obliged to answer questions; failure to advice the appellants <strong>of</strong> their right to legal representation;<br />
failure to advise the appellants <strong>of</strong> their right to cross-examination.
110 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
5.2.3 The duty to advise the unrepresented accused <strong>of</strong> the<br />
possible conviction <strong>of</strong> a lesser <strong>of</strong>fence<br />
There are occasions where the prosecution fails to establish the <strong>of</strong>fence with<br />
which the accused is charged because they have not established one or more<br />
elements constituting the <strong>of</strong>fence. However, it might still be possible to convict<br />
the accused <strong>of</strong> a lesser <strong>of</strong>fence on the basis <strong>of</strong> the evidence adduced. 115 For<br />
example, a person may be convicted <strong>of</strong> an attempt to commit an <strong>of</strong>fence for<br />
which she was charged where the evidence establishes attempt but fails to<br />
establish the substantive <strong>of</strong>fence. 116 Also, a person charged with defilement<br />
may end up with a conviction for indecent assault. 117 Where it is apparent to<br />
the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer that the accused might be convicted <strong>of</strong> a lesser <strong>of</strong>fence, she<br />
must advise the accused <strong>of</strong> this possibility.<br />
In the case <strong>of</strong> State v Bareki 118 the Court held that on a charge <strong>of</strong><br />
rape, where the accused is unrepresented, he must be informed <strong>of</strong> the fact that<br />
a conviction <strong>of</strong> defilement is a competent verdict, where it is alleged that the<br />
victim is under the age <strong>of</strong> sixteen years. In this regard, the accused must be<br />
given an opportunity <strong>of</strong> addressing the additional issues such as the age <strong>of</strong> the<br />
victim. 119 The Court noted that section 10(2)(b) <strong>of</strong> the Constitution <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Botswana</strong> provides that an accused be informed <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fence for which he is<br />
charged. In the Court’s view, therefore, a judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer has a duty to inform<br />
an unrepresented accused <strong>of</strong> the possibility <strong>of</strong> conviction <strong>of</strong> an alternative<br />
<strong>of</strong>fence. Since the particulars <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fence had made no reference to the age<br />
<strong>of</strong> the victim, the accused could not have adverted his mind to the issue <strong>of</strong> age<br />
or its relevance.<br />
In the case <strong>of</strong> Chalaomane v The State, 120 the appellant had been<br />
charged with the <strong>of</strong>fence <strong>of</strong> shop-breaking and theft. The only evidence<br />
proved against the appellant was that he was in possession <strong>of</strong> goods stolen<br />
from the shop in question. The trial court did not warn him <strong>of</strong> a possible<br />
conviction <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fence <strong>of</strong> receiving stolen property and proceeded to<br />
convict him <strong>of</strong> that <strong>of</strong>fence. The Court noted that the trial court should have<br />
warned the appellant <strong>of</strong> the risk <strong>of</strong> conviction on the alternative <strong>of</strong>fence <strong>of</strong><br />
receiving stolen property as stipulated by section 194 <strong>of</strong> the Criminal<br />
Procedure and Evidence Act. 121 The Court noted, however, that the evidence<br />
115 Section 187 <strong>of</strong> the Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act Cap 08:02. See generally sections 187 to 197 <strong>of</strong><br />
the Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act.<br />
116 Section 188 <strong>of</strong> the Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act.<br />
117 Section 193 <strong>of</strong> the Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act; Segametsi v The State [1986] B.L.R. 441.<br />
118 Op.cit. note 51 supra.<br />
119 Ibid.<br />
120 [1986] B.L.R. 261 (CA).<br />
121 Section 194 <strong>of</strong> the Criminal Procedure and Evidence Act provides: “When a person is charged with any<br />
<strong>of</strong>fence mentioned in sections 300 to 305 <strong>of</strong> the Penal Code (relating to burglary, house-breaking and<br />
similar <strong>of</strong>fences) and the court is <strong>of</strong> the opinion that he is not guilty <strong>of</strong> that <strong>of</strong>fence but that he is guilty <strong>of</strong><br />
any other <strong>of</strong>fence mentioned in those sections or in sections 317 to 320 <strong>of</strong> the Penal Code, he may be<br />
convicted <strong>of</strong> that other <strong>of</strong>fence although he was not charged with it.”
UNREPRESENTED ACCUSED IN BOTSWANA 111<br />
related solely and entirely to possession <strong>of</strong> stolen goods. As this was the sole<br />
issue, the appellant had an opportunity <strong>of</strong> defending himself in relation to<br />
possession and did so on the basis <strong>of</strong> an alibi and denial <strong>of</strong> possession. The<br />
defence was rejected. Therefore, according to the Court, the appellant was not<br />
prejudiced in any way. The Court held that there was no substantial<br />
miscarriage <strong>of</strong> justice, and dismissed the appeal.<br />
In Bareki, the Court aligned its argument with the constitutional right<br />
<strong>of</strong> the accused to be informed <strong>of</strong> the <strong>of</strong>fence with which she is charged.<br />
According to the Court, where it is possible that an accused may be convicted<br />
<strong>of</strong> an <strong>of</strong>fence with which she was not charged, the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer has a duty to<br />
inform the accused accordingly and she must be afforded an opportunity to<br />
defend herself on any additional issues that the situation may present. The<br />
procedural question that arises is, at what stage the warning should be made.<br />
Should it be made as soon as the possibility <strong>of</strong> a lesser charge is clear or<br />
apparent. The problem here is that at the time the issue <strong>of</strong> a possible<br />
alternative verdict registers itself, the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer may not be sure whether<br />
she would convict the accused <strong>of</strong> the substantive or lesser <strong>of</strong>fence. The<br />
question <strong>of</strong> whether the accused will be convicted <strong>of</strong> the substantive or lesser<br />
<strong>of</strong>fence would depend on what finding <strong>of</strong> fact the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer will make at<br />
the end <strong>of</strong> the day, having regard to the evidence. In other words, it would<br />
depend on which side the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer believes. Again, the possibility <strong>of</strong> an<br />
acquittal would not be entirely ruled out. Even, and assuming that the<br />
possibility <strong>of</strong> a conviction for a lesser <strong>of</strong>fence loomed at the time the State<br />
closed its case, the evidence <strong>of</strong> the defence might tilt the ground in favour <strong>of</strong><br />
an acquittal. It should be said therefore, that the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer should fulfil<br />
this duty as soon as it becomes apparent that an alternative verdict is possible.<br />
Though Chalaomane and Bareki do not give directions as to how the court<br />
should exercise its duty, the case <strong>of</strong> State v Sethunya 122 is <strong>of</strong> valuable<br />
assistance. Relying on the constitutional right <strong>of</strong> the accused to be informed <strong>of</strong><br />
the charges against her, the Court noted that the duty arises “as soon as the<br />
possibility <strong>of</strong> a conviction <strong>of</strong> another <strong>of</strong>fence enters the mind <strong>of</strong> the trial<br />
judge.” 123 In a master stroke, the Court set out the duty and its procedural<br />
implications when it noted:<br />
“The judge should remember that the accused comes to contest the<br />
charge in the indictment. He may be put at a disadvantage by<br />
finding during the trial that he has to meet an allegation that he<br />
committed another <strong>of</strong>fence. The accused must be protected in such<br />
circumstances and an adjournment should be granted in exceptional<br />
circumstances. There is no fixed time in a trial when a warning<br />
122 [1986] B.L.R. 483.<br />
123 Ibid at p. 485H.
112 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
should be given to the accused but obviously the sooner it is given<br />
the better. It may well be that the alternative <strong>of</strong>fence does not arise<br />
in the judge's mind until the accused has given evidence or even<br />
when his witnesses have given evidence, if that be the case, the trial<br />
judge should give his warning then or anytime before he delivers his<br />
judgment but the warning must be given before judgment is<br />
delivered and the accused must be allowed to recall State witnesses<br />
if he so wishes, to give further evidence and if necessary to recall or<br />
call further witnesses.” 124<br />
This ensures that the accused is given an opportunity to defend<br />
herself fully, and to attend to any additional issues that the possible new<br />
charge may present. It is founded on the constitutional requirement that an<br />
accused should not be convicted unless she has been informed <strong>of</strong> the charges<br />
she is facing. 125 The effect <strong>of</strong> informing the accused <strong>of</strong> the possible lesser<br />
<strong>of</strong>fence is that the trial is re-set and the accused is able to recall the witnesses<br />
so as to cross-examine them on the basis <strong>of</strong> the new charge.<br />
5.2.4 Analysing the trend <strong>of</strong> the case law<br />
The cases discussed above illustrate that the courts have consistently reminded<br />
judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers <strong>of</strong> the judicial enabling process. This forms part <strong>of</strong> the selfcorrection<br />
element in the system. Courts continue to remind themselves <strong>of</strong> the<br />
rules that bind them as well as making corrections from within. In Nieklas, the<br />
Court <strong>of</strong> Appeal went a stage further by directing that the message be<br />
disseminated directly to judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers via a checklist. This should create an<br />
ever-present reminder to judicial <strong>of</strong>ficers <strong>of</strong> the judicial enabling process.<br />
While noting that failure to advise the accused results in procedural failure, the<br />
courts rely significantly on the prejudice clause. Effectively, this takes other<br />
124 Ibid at p. 486A-C. In the case <strong>of</strong> State v Fihlani [1987] B.L.R.225 the Court noted at pp. 226H-227C that:<br />
“The essential principle which emerges is that as soon as the possibility <strong>of</strong> a conviction <strong>of</strong> another <strong>of</strong>fence<br />
enters the mind <strong>of</strong> the trial judge he must always ensure that that course will involve no risk <strong>of</strong> injustice to<br />
the accused and that he has had the opportunity <strong>of</strong> fully meeting that alternative in the course <strong>of</strong> his<br />
defence. The judge should remember that the accused comes to contest the charge in the indictment. He<br />
may be put at a disadvantage by finding during the trial that he has to meet an allegation that he<br />
committed another <strong>of</strong>fence. The accused must be protected in such circumstances and an adjournment<br />
should be granted in exceptional circumstances. There is no fixed time in a trial when a warning should be<br />
given to the accused but obviously the sooner it is given the better. It may well be that the alternative<br />
<strong>of</strong>fence does not arise in the judge's mind until the accused has given evidence or even when his witnesses<br />
have given evidence, if that be the case, the trial judge should give his warning then or anytime before he<br />
delivers his judgment but the warning must be given before judgment is delivered and the accused must<br />
be allowed to recall State witnesses if he so wishes, to give further evidence and if necessary to recall or<br />
call further witnesses.”<br />
125 Ibid; Moeti v The State [1998] B.L.R. 55. In Dick v The State [2007] 2 B.L.R. 592, the Court noted that<br />
although it was proper for a judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer to warn an accused if he was contemplating convicting him on<br />
a substituted charge, the failure to warn him did not always result in a failure <strong>of</strong> justice. For example,<br />
injustice would not result where the evidence led related to the accused's possession <strong>of</strong> stolen property<br />
and his explanation or lack <strong>of</strong> explanation for such possession, had been fully contested at the trial.
UNREPRESENTED ACCUSED IN BOTSWANA 113<br />
interests into consideration. As noted in Makwapeng v The State, if failure by<br />
the court to advise the accused would by itself result in vitiation <strong>of</strong> the trial,<br />
even where there is overwhelming evidence to convict, this will affect the<br />
credibility <strong>of</strong> the judiciary. In addition, one must say that victims <strong>of</strong> crime and<br />
the wider societal interests would not be served if those that are obviously<br />
guilty were allowed to escape on the basis <strong>of</strong> mere technicalities.<br />
However, the application <strong>of</strong> the prejudice rule to the failure to advise<br />
an accused <strong>of</strong> her right to legal representation is a source <strong>of</strong> discomfiture. To<br />
say that the conviction should stand because the evidence is overwhelming, is<br />
to some extent, out <strong>of</strong> place in the adversarial context. The evidence may be<br />
overwhelming because it was not subject to challenge from an expert in the art<br />
<strong>of</strong> cross-examination. <strong>Law</strong>yers sometimes take over cases midstream from<br />
self-actors who would be faring badly in defending themselves due to their<br />
lack <strong>of</strong> legal knowledge. In such cases, due to their legal skills, the lawyers<br />
would be able to turn around the fortunes <strong>of</strong> an accused, where a conviction<br />
had previously seemed imminent. One can therefore never conjecture what<br />
effect legal representation could have had on the process. The crossexamination<br />
might have been different, and the lawyer could have produced<br />
evidence or witnesses that the accused was aware <strong>of</strong> but did not appreciate<br />
their value and so did not present such evidence or call such witnesses to<br />
testify. 126 There are issues that only a lawyer could unearth due to her legal<br />
skills. 127 Therefore, the evidence against the accused may very well be<br />
overwhelming, not because she is guilty, but because she did not have<br />
adequate representation. In this regard, failure to advise an accused <strong>of</strong> her<br />
right to legal representation is not a mere technical matter that can be<br />
overlooked. Such failure by itself, should render the trial unfair except where<br />
it is shown that the accused was aware <strong>of</strong> the right.<br />
6. THE IMPLICATIONS OF JUDICIAL ENABLING<br />
ON THE ADVERSARIAL PROCESS<br />
Effectively, judicial enabling mimics the inquisitorial system to some extent.<br />
The judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer is a more active participant. To some extent, it can be said<br />
that she “investigates” the accused’s case. Clearly, for the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer to be<br />
able to assist the accused in cross-examination as suggested in Mponda,<br />
126 In Kau v The State and Others op.cit. note 110 supra at p. 23 <strong>of</strong> the cyclostyled copy, the Namibian<br />
Supreme Court stated that “…it cannot be said, in the absence <strong>of</strong> representation on their behalf, that all the<br />
evidence which should have been placed before court was in fact placed before the court or that State<br />
witnesses were properly cross-examined and tested or that the cases <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> the appellants were<br />
properly presented.”<br />
127 As Jansen JA noted in S v Shabancru 1976 (3) SA 555 (A) at p. 558F: “The case against the appellant on<br />
the merits certainly appears to be formidable and to have fully justified the conviction. But, on the other<br />
hand, it is impossible to say what effect a properly conducted defence could have had on the ultimate<br />
result.”
114 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
Sebatana and Dipholo, she would have to inquire from the accused what her<br />
defence is and what aspects <strong>of</strong> the testimony she should like to dispute. The<br />
same approach applies if the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer were to assist the accused in<br />
stating her defence or plea in mitigation. This, however, does not mean that the<br />
judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer crosses the well over to the inquisitorial camp as pro<strong>of</strong><br />
primarily rests with the parties. The State investigates its case and initiates<br />
proceedings and the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer merely comes to the aid <strong>of</strong> the accused to<br />
ensure that the trial is fair. This underlying reasoning <strong>of</strong> judicial enabling and<br />
judicial advice is clear from the cases advocating this approach. 128<br />
Practical lessons can be learnt from judicial enabling. The two<br />
principal procedural systems can no longer exist in purist isolation <strong>of</strong> each<br />
other. This lends credence to the argument that the inter-marriage between the<br />
adversarial and inquisitorial systems is an inevitable necessity. Consequently,<br />
devout discipleship and extreme reverence to idealist models should water<br />
down. Realistically, none <strong>of</strong> these models can remain purist and an inevitable<br />
intermix has occurred over the years with each system borrowing from the<br />
other. 129 Scholars have time and again debunked the stereotype <strong>of</strong> confining<br />
procedural systems in polarised continuums. 130 As criminal justice systems<br />
undergo the inevitable process <strong>of</strong> reform, the line <strong>of</strong> distinction between the<br />
models becomes increasingly blurred. 131 Due to the fair trial imperative, one<br />
can say that the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer in <strong>Botswana</strong>, is not expected to maintain the<br />
classic adversarial posture.<br />
Judicial enabling inevitably results in a distortion in rules <strong>of</strong><br />
procedure and potentially, the order <strong>of</strong> proceedings. With time, what might<br />
have previously seemed a distortion <strong>of</strong> the rules, have developed into<br />
normative rules <strong>of</strong> their own. In 1984, the Court stated in Seakwa and Others<br />
v The State 132 that it might be necessary to suspend the rules <strong>of</strong> procedure to<br />
allow the unrepresented and illiterate accused to articulate herself. However,<br />
judicial enabling has come a long way since 1984. What seemed a deviation<br />
from the rules then, has solidified into normative significance. So while<br />
judicial enabling is bound to affect the rules <strong>of</strong> procedure, it has attained a<br />
128 Rabonko v The State op.cit. note 36 supra; State v Bareki op.cit. note 51 supra; State v Sethunya op.cit.<br />
note 51 supra.<br />
129 Thibault, Walker and Allan Lind, op.cit. at p. 388; Goldstein, op.cit. at p. 1025. While accepting that<br />
reforms are desirable, Damaska warns that, “The transplantation <strong>of</strong> factfinding arrangements between<br />
common law and civil law systems would give rise to serious strains in the recipient justice system. The<br />
interaction between the contemplated transplant and the new environment must be carefully studied, and<br />
the question must always be considered whether the recipient culture is prepared – or can be readied – to<br />
live with the wider effects <strong>of</strong> contemplated reform.”: M. Damaska, “The Uncertain Fate <strong>of</strong> Evidentiary<br />
Transplants: Anglo-American and Continental Experiments,” 45(4) American <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> Comparative<br />
<strong>Law</strong> (1997), p. 839 at 851-852; see also H.T. Edwards, “Comments on Damaska’s Of Evidentiary<br />
Transplants,” 45(4) American <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> Comparative <strong>Law</strong> (1997), p. 853 at 859.<br />
130 See P.J. Schwikkard, Possibilities <strong>of</strong> Convergence (2008), Deventer, Kluwer; Thibault, Walker and Allan<br />
Lind, op.cit. at p. 388.<br />
131 As Hayden and Anderson comment, it seems doubtful that a pure adversarial system exists in the United<br />
States or that pure inquisitorial systems exist in Europe. See Hayden and Anderson, at pp. 22-23.<br />
132 Op.cit. note 85 supra.
UNREPRESENTED ACCUSED IN BOTSWANA 115<br />
state <strong>of</strong> normative certainty.<br />
7. CONCLUSION<br />
It is irrefutable that judicial enabling has precipitated a metamorphosis <strong>of</strong> the<br />
adversarial system in <strong>Botswana</strong>. One might be tempted to say that having<br />
regard to the case law, judicial enabling gave birth to a new progeny which is<br />
inconsistent with puritan adversarialim: “the over-speaking judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer”. In<br />
this regard and accepting that the pure adversarial breed is no longer<br />
sustainable in <strong>Botswana</strong>, the active participation <strong>of</strong> the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer can now<br />
be referred to as part <strong>of</strong> the process. Thus the unpalatable tag, “the overspeaking<br />
judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer”, becomes a thing <strong>of</strong> the past. Criminal trials can now<br />
be described as a tripartite dialogue involving the disputants and the judicial<br />
<strong>of</strong>ficer. The judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer elicits evidence especially from the accused, with<br />
the aim <strong>of</strong> assisting her through the process. In assisting the accused, obviously<br />
the judicial <strong>of</strong>ficer will raise questions which are geared towards arriving at the<br />
truth, a trait consistent with the inquisitorial investigative judge. Essentially,<br />
we recognise a new strain <strong>of</strong> adversarialism or perhaps, one may say that the<br />
line between the adversarial and inquisitorial dichotomy now suffers from a<br />
blur. This is representative <strong>of</strong> the bridging <strong>of</strong> the cleavage between the<br />
adversarial and inquisitorial models.<br />
It is clear that the underlying factor for the more visible judicial<br />
<strong>of</strong>ficer is the need for a fair trial. It appears politically (or “judicially<br />
incorrect”) incorrect in modern democracies, to conduct trials without the<br />
participation <strong>of</strong> the accused. The present judicial ideology <strong>of</strong> fair trial involves<br />
judicial enabling which takes the form <strong>of</strong> a hand-holding process. Judicial<br />
enabling is clearly a by-product <strong>of</strong> the fair trial imperative. This has inevitably<br />
resulted in a welcome dilution <strong>of</strong> adversarialim at the altar <strong>of</strong> fair trial rights.
117<br />
Competition and Regulation in the Gold Industry:<br />
An American Perspective<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
J. Wilkerson*<br />
When taken from a domestic viewpoint, the primary gold market appears to be<br />
noncompetitive and marred by concentration. However, when seen at the<br />
global scale, it is clear that the primary gold market is competitive and diluted.<br />
Further, even if the primary market were noncompetitive and concentrated at<br />
the global level, that market probably could not readily affect the price <strong>of</strong> gold.<br />
Regardless <strong>of</strong> competitiveness, gold mines in the United States and elsewhere<br />
are subject to environmental and safety regulations that increase the cost <strong>of</strong><br />
production; Regulations are stringently enforced in the United States as<br />
compared to competitor countries, potentially creating a competitive<br />
disadvantage for US primary producers.<br />
1. INTRODUCTION<br />
Gold markets have been regulated for at least five thousand years—since the<br />
first dynastic ruler <strong>of</strong> Egypt, Menes, declared that the value <strong>of</strong> gold would be<br />
two and a half times that <strong>of</strong> silver. 1 The market has arisen in different areas at<br />
different times, with distinct civilizations discovering, exploiting, and coveting<br />
gold from the days <strong>of</strong> their earliest records.<br />
America has been no exception, and the United States has been a<br />
major consumer <strong>of</strong> gold since its inception. The U.S. has also produced gold,<br />
beginning in 1799 when the young son <strong>of</strong> Hessian-turned-farmer John Reed<br />
found a seventeen-pound nugget while bow fishing on his father’s North<br />
Carolina land. 2 This discovery led to the creation <strong>of</strong> placer associations and<br />
mining cohorts in the Colonies – Appalachian organizations that dominated<br />
gold production in the United States until January 1848, when California Gold<br />
Rush started at the American River. 3<br />
Once mining came to California in earnest, it spread throughout the<br />
American West, from Alaska to New Mexico and Oregon to Colorado.<br />
Wherever there were mountains and streams, there were miners and gold<br />
pans. Solo miners and small teams did their best to gather the easy pickings<br />
from streams and veins, but “[b]y the early twentieth century, the best highgrade<br />
deposits <strong>of</strong> precious metals were either exhausted or being worked<br />
<br />
Editor, Comparative <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Journal</strong> and J.D./M.P.P (Candidate), The College <strong>of</strong> William & Mary.<br />
1 O. E. Young, Jr., The Southern Gold Rush, 1828–1836, 48 J. <strong>of</strong> South Hist. 373, 375 (1982).<br />
2 Id. at 373.<br />
3
118 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
out,” 4 and mining became more capital-intensive. The need for capital moved<br />
mining away from a collection <strong>of</strong> individual miners to the formation <strong>of</strong><br />
companies. Luckily, this time <strong>of</strong> needed capital struck during the Second<br />
Industrial Revolution, a period that saw the harnessing <strong>of</strong> hydraulic, electrical,<br />
steam, and internal combustion power. These new technologies allowed<br />
mining companies to dig deeper than ever, to dredge stream beds, to<br />
communicate with far-flung operations, and to transport capital to mines and<br />
ore away from them.<br />
Consequently, technological innovation has been the key to gold<br />
mining in the last 100 years. From cutting mountainsides with pressurized<br />
water, to blasting tunnels with TNT, and – most importantly – to extracting<br />
gold from hard rock through the cyanidation and active-carbonation<br />
processes, new technologies have led to enormous startup costs and, therefore,<br />
huge mining conglomerates looking to exploit economies <strong>of</strong> scale. The<br />
benefits <strong>of</strong> scope economies have also arisen: since mining one mineral can<br />
lead to discovery <strong>of</strong> another, and the equipment and know-how used to dig<br />
one mineral can be used to dig another, mines <strong>of</strong>ten employ their expertise<br />
and equipment to gather gold while mining something else – or vice versa. 5<br />
Technological necessity has made size the watchword <strong>of</strong> modern<br />
economically-sustainable gold mining. Enormous haul trucks, excavators,<br />
underground facilities, open pits, and mills are getting bigger every year to<br />
make up for decreases in ore grade. Today, a mine can stay operable even at<br />
grades <strong>of</strong> one-hundredth <strong>of</strong> an ounce per ton <strong>of</strong> ore, but the capital costs that<br />
allow for such operations are astronomical: up to two billion dollars per mine<br />
for startup costs alone. 6 It is true that entry into the gold primary market is<br />
relatively easy if a high-grade deposit can be extracted with minimal effort<br />
(e.g, artisanal sluice mining in Alaska), but such deposits are increasingly<br />
scarce and <strong>of</strong>ten run dry after a short extraction period. In other words, these<br />
deposits are too small, too easily depleted, and too scattered to support longterm,<br />
large-scale operations. 7 Indeed, the average ore grade <strong>of</strong> large<br />
operations is 3 grams per ton, which leads to a cost per ounce <strong>of</strong> gold <strong>of</strong><br />
between $300 and $400 at well-capitalized firms. Experts agree that as time<br />
marches on, ore grade will generally decrease and cost <strong>of</strong> production will<br />
increase on an exponential curve. 8 Indeed, there is a very high long-run<br />
4 M. Malone, The Collapse <strong>of</strong> Western Metal Mining: An Historical Epitaph 55 Pacific Hist. Rev. 455, 458<br />
(1986).<br />
5 The Bingham Canyon Mine in Utah, for example, is a Kennecott Copper mine that supplements its copper<br />
production by finding gold in the process. As shown in Table 1, Kennecott copper is one <strong>of</strong> the top four<br />
gold producers in the United States, due almost entirely to its Bingham Canyon Mine, which produces<br />
12,300 kg <strong>of</strong> gold per year (the seventh largest gold-producing mine in the U.S.).<br />
6 J.H. Morris, Going for the Gold: The History <strong>of</strong> Newmont Mining Corporation (Univ. <strong>of</strong> Al. Press 2010).<br />
7 Datamonitor, Ref. Code 0199-2063, Industry Pr<strong>of</strong>ile: Global Gold 14 (2010).<br />
8 J. Muller & H.E. Frimmel, Numerical Analysis <strong>of</strong> Historic Gold Production Cycles and Implications for<br />
Future Sub-Cycles, 4 Open Geology J. 30–31 (2010).
COMPETITION AND REGULATION IN THE GOLD INDUSTRY 119<br />
minimum efficient scale at modern mines that is going to get higher. 9 This will<br />
force small firms to either bow out as soon as their high-grade ore is gone, or<br />
accept a takeover bid by a better-capitalized firm.<br />
2. PRODUCT MARKET IS BOTH DOMESTIC AND<br />
GLOBAL<br />
The relevant product in this analysis is primary gold, meaning gold extracted<br />
from the ground in order to be sold. This is in contrast with secondary gold,<br />
which is produced by recycling scrap – a method that took hold in the mid-<br />
1960s and has resulted in secondary production rivaling the size <strong>of</strong> primary<br />
output. 10 Although my concentration is on the primary market, the secondary<br />
market produces a significant amount <strong>of</strong> world supply (or, more appropriately,<br />
its re-supply). The gold produced in the secondary market is indistinguishable<br />
from that produced in the primary market. Thus, I cannot altogether ignore the<br />
secondary market – or gold sold on the market by central banks and others – in<br />
the following discussion. Most gold mining companies are not involved in the<br />
refining processes directly. Instead, gold mines take the refining process to<br />
about 80–90% purity on-site, forming the gold into doré bars and sending them<br />
to external refineries that take the bars to 99.6–99.99% pure bullion. 11 In<br />
addition to this break in vertical integration, I assume that gold mining<br />
companies are not involved in recycling.<br />
Geographically, the market has both domestic and global aspects.<br />
Although gold is bought and sold globally, making concentration and<br />
competition analyses tempting from the world-level, its production is<br />
intimately connected to countries’ land. Thus, individual countries have a<br />
stake in how their gold is mined and how mining affects their economy. From<br />
a regulatory standpoint, many statutes (such as the General Mining Act <strong>of</strong><br />
1872) and the common law are generally applicable to all gold mining<br />
9 It must be noted that large mining corporations appear to be waiting to enter some countries for political<br />
and governmental-efficiency reasons rather than ore grade. These countries’ rich resources are currently<br />
exploited by small-scale firms. China is the poster-child <strong>of</strong> such countries, in which one state-supported<br />
producer mines about 20% <strong>of</strong> all reserves, while innumerable small firms make up the difference. See<br />
generally, L. Tole & G. Koop, Do Environmental Regulations Affect the Location Decisions <strong>of</strong><br />
Multinational Gold Mining Firms? (12 August, 2008) (unpublished manuscript on file with the<br />
<strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Strathclyde).<br />
10 United States Geological Survey, 2007 Minerals Yearbook: Gold 31.9 (2008).<br />
11 J. Marsden & I. House, The Chemistry <strong>of</strong> Gold Extraction 449 (2 nd Ed., Society for Mining Metallurgy &<br />
Exploration 2006). There is a good possibility that gold mines will begin vertical integration with<br />
dedicated refineries (“i.e.”, refineries that take the gold to maximum purity), especially as gold in<br />
circulation (and therefore available for recycling) increases and the gold in the ground decreases. A move<br />
on the large scale would lead to more <strong>of</strong> a possibility that firms could exercise market power. One South<br />
African gold mining company, Harmony, has already integrated, and takes its gold from ore to 99.99%<br />
purity on its own. See R. Short & B. Radebe, Gold in South Africa (2008), available at http://<br />
www.goldinsouthafrica.co.za.It must also be noted that at least some dedicated refineries are owned by a<br />
conglomerate <strong>of</strong> nearby gold mines. Id.
120 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
operations in the U.S. 12 Thus, since both perspectives can be valuable in<br />
creating policy that affects primary production, I examine both the United<br />
States and global mining industries.<br />
3. THE DOMESTIC PRIMARY MARKET APPEARS<br />
HIGHLY CONCENTRATED<br />
Technology, capital, and large firms seem necessary to keep up with demand.<br />
Since gold is sold on a global market both as an investment and as an input,<br />
each gold-producing country (unless centrally-planned) is both an exporter and<br />
an importer <strong>of</strong> gold. The United States was, from 1900 to the early 1960s,<br />
generally a net importer <strong>of</strong> gold. Since then, the U.S. has been, almost without<br />
exception, a net exporter. 13 In 1971, Richard Nixon deregulated the gold<br />
market by removing the United States from the gold standard. This move led<br />
to an immediate jump in prices, which further led, in the 1980s, to a production<br />
level more than four times that <strong>of</strong> 1971. United States production continued to<br />
grow throughout the 1980s and 1990s, peaking at 366 metric tons in 1998 and<br />
then tapering <strong>of</strong>f as prices began falling. Production has steadily fallen since<br />
2001 despite rising prices, and in 2008 the United States primary producers<br />
generated only 233 tons <strong>of</strong> gold. Notably, the 2008 price <strong>of</strong> gold was the<br />
highest it had been since 1987, but the American production level was the<br />
lowest it had been since 1988. 14<br />
Today, gold is produced at only about fifty-five mines in the United<br />
States, with 78% <strong>of</strong> all gold production coming from the state <strong>of</strong> Nevada. 15<br />
Thirteen gold producers owning thirty mines make up over 99% <strong>of</strong> total U.S.<br />
gold production (see Table 1). Among these producers, Barrick Gold<br />
Corporation has the largest market share, at 37.8%, followed by Newmont<br />
Mining Corporation, at 29.5%. As shown in Table 1, the market is highly<br />
concentrated, with an HHI <strong>of</strong> 2521.06 and the top four firms holding more<br />
than 85% <strong>of</strong> the market. Barrick and Newmont have for years been major<br />
players in American gold mining (although they were accompanied by other<br />
similar-sized firms until the early 2000s) 16 and show no signs <strong>of</strong> slowing.<br />
12 It should be pointed out, however, that U.S. courts are not shy about finding jurisdiction over companies<br />
that affect American interests – even when the case has more effects in foreign jurisdictions. See<br />
Consolidated Gold Fields PLC v Anglo American Corp., 698 F. Supp 487 (S.D.N.Y. 1988) aff’d in part,<br />
rev’d in part, sub nom. Consolidated Gold Fields PLC v Minorco, S.A., 871 F.2d 252 (1989) (finding<br />
personal and subject matter jurisdiction over Luxembourg (Minorco) corporation and its hostile takeover<br />
bid for a British (Consolidated Gold Fields – plaintiff) corporation, because the merger would have<br />
created a 32% market share for the new company and because the new company would have minority<br />
control over some American mines).<br />
13 United States Geological Survey, Gold Statistics (2009), available at http://minerals.usgs.gov/ds/2005/<br />
140/gold.pdf.<br />
14 Id.<br />
15 United States Geological Survey, supra note 10, at 31.1<br />
16 M. Callahan, To Hedge or Not to Hedge ... That Is the Question: Empirical Evidence from the North<br />
American Gold Mining Industry 1996-2000, 11 Financial Markets, Institutions and Instruments 271<br />
(2002).
COMPETITION AND REGULATION IN THE GOLD INDUSTRY 121<br />
Indeed, it could be argued that the primary gold market in the United States is<br />
likely subject to collusion among the top producers: Barrick and Newmont<br />
would have a majority market share if taken together. However, this argument<br />
would overlook the global market in which these companies play. Prices are<br />
set at a global scale; thus, while it is true that the top producers could leverage<br />
market power if they were only competing domestically, I now turn to the<br />
competitive landscape at the global level to see this seemingly bleak picture in<br />
a larger context.<br />
Company<br />
Gold Production<br />
(kg)<br />
% Mkt Share (% Mkt Share)<br />
Barrick 90611 37.8 1428.84<br />
Newmont 70788 29.5 870.25<br />
Kinross 28800 12 144<br />
Kennecott 15372 6.4 40.96<br />
Creek 8770 3.7 13.69<br />
Teck 8080 3.4 11.56<br />
Goldcorp 4380 1.8 3.24<br />
Yukon 3790 1.6 2.56<br />
Quadra 3360 1.4 1.96<br />
Wharf 1800 1 1<br />
Coeur d’Alene 1570 1 1<br />
Jipangu 1360 1 1<br />
Apollo 1040 1 1<br />
239.721 HHI: 2521.06<br />
4. GLOBAL SUPPLY AND DEMAND FOR<br />
GOLDPREVENT PRIMARY PRODUCERS FROM<br />
EXERCISING PRICING POWER<br />
The global market is much less concentrated than the domestic scene. The<br />
global primary gold market produced 2,380,000 kilograms <strong>of</strong> gold in 2007 (a<br />
number that stayed relatively constant through 2009), meaning that United
122 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
States gold production consisted <strong>of</strong> only 10% <strong>of</strong> the global market. 17 On a<br />
global level, Barrick is the largest producer with a 10.2% market share –<br />
meaning that Barrick alone produces as much as all U.S. mines combined – but<br />
its market share is far from overbearing. Newmont is the second-largest<br />
producer, at 8.9%. 18 AngloGold Ashanti and Gold Fields follow, at 6.0% and<br />
4.7%, respectively. In other words, at the global level, the four-firm<br />
concentration ratio is only 29.8% – hardly a number that should raise<br />
regulatory red flags. Thus, given that American gold production is merely a<br />
facet in the larger market – within which every producer in the world competes<br />
– the fact that domestic gold production is focused in the hands <strong>of</strong> a few is<br />
meaningless from a price-fixing standpoint; the closest to market power that<br />
domestic firms could come, would be to hold vast deposits and mine them only<br />
when prices are high.<br />
There have been recent murmurings <strong>of</strong> a Barrick-Newmont merger,<br />
and most industry commentators predict that the two will enjoy “operational<br />
synergies” – if not merger itself – within the next few years. 19 Barrick, a<br />
Toronto-based company, has 26 operations scattered among the U.S.,<br />
Australia, Canada, Peru, Chile, Argentina, and Tanzania. 20 Newmont, a<br />
Denver-based company, has gold operations in the U.S., Australia, Canada,<br />
Peru, Indonesia, Ghana, New Zealand, and Mexico. Thus, in the U.S.,<br />
Australia, Canada, and Peru, these two companies could share resources and<br />
operations and possibly benefit from a merger. The merger <strong>of</strong> these two<br />
industry leaders could—if the agreement were to leave all mines operational –<br />
lead to a single firm with almost 20% market share. Such a merger <strong>of</strong> the<br />
industry’s top two firms might look suspect at first glance, but would not<br />
likely have an appreciable effect on the market because the price and quantity<br />
<strong>of</strong> gold on the global market is out <strong>of</strong> all primary producers’ hands – not just<br />
Barrick’s and Newmont’s. Indeed, the inability <strong>of</strong> primary producers to affect<br />
price, and their hedging against price fluctuations, is well-documented. 21<br />
A. Beyond Primary Production<br />
Supply to the global market comes from primary producers, secondary<br />
producers, central banks, and anyone else who has gold and wants to sell it. The<br />
price <strong>of</strong> gold is fixed twice daily by the London Bullion Exchange, 22 and this<br />
price is used as the benchmark for transactions in gold and gold derivatives all<br />
17 Datamonitor, supra note 7, at 10.<br />
18 Id. at 12.<br />
19 See, “e.g.”, D. Kasich, Newmont, Barrick Contemplate Operational Synergies, not Merger,<br />
MINEWEB.COM, http://www.mineweb.com/mineweb/view/mineweb/en/page34?oid=80653&sn=Detail.<br />
20 DATAMONITOR, supra note 7, at 20.<br />
21 See, “e.g”, M. Callahan, supra note 16 (detailing the hedging practices, such as long-term contracts, <strong>of</strong><br />
primary producers in North America).<br />
22 See the London Gold Fix home page, http://www.goldfixing.com/home.htm.
COMPETITION AND REGULATION IN THE GOLD INDUSTRY 123<br />
around the world. If primary producers such as Barrick and Newmont were the<br />
only players in the market, their joint action could affect the price fixed by the<br />
Exchange. However, secondary producers add millions <strong>of</strong> kilograms <strong>of</strong> gold to<br />
the market every year (over 1.2 million in 2008 and increasing at a rate <strong>of</strong> more<br />
than 25% per year). 23 In other words, the size <strong>of</strong> primary producers would<br />
probably have to be unforeseeably enormous (or they would have to organize<br />
a widespread cartel) before they could begin controlling prices on the global<br />
market.<br />
Central banks, such as the United States Federal Reserve (<strong>of</strong> which<br />
most is held at the New York Branch), hold approximately 19% <strong>of</strong> all <strong>of</strong> the<br />
gold ever mined, or 31,350,000 kg. They primarily use these reserves to<br />
guarantee their currency, but countries buy and sell gold for various reasons –<br />
transactions that are controlled by international quantity agreements. A recent<br />
accusation against central banks is that they are using such firms as HSBC,<br />
Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan Chase, and Deutsche Bank to manipulate gold<br />
prices in order to make their currencies look more favorable. 24 Whatever their<br />
reasons for the purchase and sale <strong>of</strong> gold, central banks – especially those <strong>of</strong><br />
the United States (8,133,500 kg), Germany (3,407,600 kg), Italy (2,451,800<br />
kg), and France (2,435,400 kg) 25 – in conjunction with the huge and growing<br />
secondary market, pull market power away from primary producers. Indeed,<br />
annual global primary gold production is less than one-third the size <strong>of</strong><br />
America’s gold reserve alone; additionally, secondary production is growing<br />
and, in the U.S., is only 10% smaller than primary production. 26 Most<br />
importantly, since gold is priced daily by an external authority, anyone<br />
attempting to raise prices can be instantaneously detected and flushed by<br />
others dumping more on the market as prices rise. Consequently, primary gold<br />
producers do not currently have the ability to appreciably affect the price <strong>of</strong><br />
gold on the global market, even though they collectively supply about 50% <strong>of</strong><br />
the gold.<br />
Supply will continue to increase as long as mining companies are<br />
able to cost-effectively detect it and remove it from the earth, but the market<br />
will probably remain relatively stable for at least the next few years as gold<br />
companies plan for expansion. 27 There are no good estimates <strong>of</strong> the amount <strong>of</strong><br />
gold left in the earth, because finding new deposits requires a great deal <strong>of</strong><br />
time and mines generally seek known reserves for only five to ten-year<br />
production increments.However, there are approximately 128,000,000 kg <strong>of</strong><br />
23 Gold Fields Mineral Survey, 2009 Annual Gold Survey: Overview 2 (2009).<br />
24 See, “e.g.”, J. Turk, A Short History <strong>of</strong> the Gold Cartel, GATA.org, http://www.gata.org/node/7402; M.<br />
Gray, Metals Are in the Pits: Trader Blows Whistle on Gold & Silver Price Manipulation, New York<br />
Post, 11 April, 2010, available at http://www.nypost.com/p/news/business/metal_are_in_<br />
the_pits_2arTlGNbMK7mb1uJeVHb0O.<br />
25 World Gold Council, World Official Gold Holdings (2010), available at http://www.gold.org/<br />
deliver.php? file=/value/stats/statistics/archive/pdf/World_Official_Gold_Holdings_Mar_2010.pdf.<br />
26 United States Geological Survey, 2010 Mineral Commodity Summaries: Gold 66 (2010).<br />
27 United States Geological Survey, supra note 10, at 31.7.
124 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
known gold deposits, which representa miniscule <strong>of</strong> the gold in the top four<br />
kilometers <strong>of</strong> the earth’s crust (the currently-mined range). 28 Thus, it is safe to<br />
assume that, as long as economic pr<strong>of</strong>its do not fall below zero due to<br />
increased extraction costs, gold mines will be producing for centuries to come.<br />
Demand for gold is fueled by end-markets, including jewelry<br />
manufacturing (68% <strong>of</strong> demand); electronics, medical, and other industries<br />
(14%); and institutional investing (19%). 29 Given that gold has so many<br />
favorable elemental properties, such as its malleability, ductility, noncorrosiveness,<br />
reflectivity, and conductibility, there are no good substitutes<br />
for it in many applications. Gold has become a necessity in the high-tech<br />
industries. In jewelry manufacturing, gold has for millennia been the metal <strong>of</strong><br />
choice, even in the face <strong>of</strong> substitutes such as platinum, silver, zinc, and<br />
copper. As an investment, gold is strong and growing stronger, with<br />
recession-afflicted investors looking to grow their savings by planting them in<br />
nonperishable metals. Overall, demand is not very elastic but varies by<br />
application, with areas such as dentistry seeing more elasticity due to recent<br />
viable substitutes. 30 Given that overall demand for gold is relatively inelastic<br />
and that gold is increasingly used as a financial investment by governments<br />
and individuals alike, demand is not likely to decrease anytime soon. Further,<br />
in our technological age that increasingly requires gold for the production <strong>of</strong><br />
electronics for the private sector, the military, and personal consumption, it is<br />
likely that demand for gold will rise as time goes by.<br />
5. REGULATIONS IN THE UNITED STATES<br />
Countries are concerned with more than the competitiveness <strong>of</strong> the global<br />
market when they impede mergers or break up mining conglomerates. They are<br />
concerned with the gold in their own soil, and the possibility that a single firm<br />
or cartel will acquire rights to all <strong>of</strong> that gold and then mine it – or fail to mine<br />
it while waiting for higher prices – in a manner that hurts the national economy<br />
or kills jobs. It is conceivable, therefore, that nations look not to the global<br />
market but rather to domestic concerns when deciding how to regulate primary<br />
producers. Such motivations arguably led to the Second Circuit’s antitrust<br />
decision in Consolidated Gold Fields v Minorco. 31<br />
28 H. E. Frimmel, Earth’s Continental Crustal Gold Endowment, 267 Earth and Planetary Science Letters<br />
45, 48 (2008).<br />
29 Datamonitor, supra note 7, at 13.<br />
30 Id. at 14-15.<br />
31 J. B. Berman, Consolidated Gold Fields, PLC v Minorco, S.A.: The Growing Over-Extension <strong>of</strong> United<br />
States Antitrust <strong>Law</strong> 6 Am. U. J. Int’l L. & Pol’y 399 (1991).
COMPETITION AND REGULATION IN THE GOLD INDUSTRY 125<br />
A. Antitrust<br />
No discussion <strong>of</strong> market concentration and competitiveness in the American<br />
primary gold industry could be complete without a hard look at Consolidated<br />
Gold Fields. 32 In that antitrust case involving the potential joining <strong>of</strong> the<br />
world’s two largest firms, the relevant industry was determined to be primary<br />
producers only – and only those primary producers in the non-Communist<br />
world – even though the court recognized that 1) gold was a fungible product<br />
that was traded between Communist and non-Communist areas and 2) gold<br />
was being recycled and resupplied by the secondary market. The court held<br />
that, since Minorco (a member <strong>of</strong> the once-powerful Oppenheimer-controlled<br />
gold mines) would have a 32.3% market share in the narrowly-defined market<br />
if it were allowed to join with Consolidated, the hostile takeover bid violated<br />
the Clayton Act and had to be enjoined until the merits <strong>of</strong> the case could again<br />
be heard. On remand, the injunction stood. 33 Consolidated Gold Fields proves<br />
that determining the relevant market for gold mining antitrust cases is <strong>of</strong><br />
paramount importance, and that courts might take a narrow view <strong>of</strong> that market<br />
to protect domestic interests by finding mergers or takeovers illegal. However,<br />
since Consolidated Gold Fields, no U.S. court has found a violation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Sherman or Clayton Acts in the gold mining industry. This is unsurprising for<br />
three reasons: first, the Soviet bloc collapsed, expanding the market; second,<br />
the market definition began including secondary producers and other sellers,<br />
such as central banks; finally, no gold conglomerate since Oppenheimer has<br />
come close to such a large share <strong>of</strong> the global market.<br />
B. Environmental Regulation<br />
Consolidated Gold Fields is the only American gold mining antitrust case in<br />
the last 20 years, 34 and mines are not subject to direct economic regulation.<br />
Thus, the bulk <strong>of</strong> regulatory issues facing mining companies are environmental<br />
and safety concerns. Of the two, environmental regulations – imposed both by<br />
the federal government and by states – have by far the greatest impact on<br />
32 Supra note 12.<br />
33 Consolidated Gold Fields, PLC v Anglo American Corp. <strong>of</strong> South Africa Ltd., 713 F.Supp. 1457<br />
(S.D.N.Y. 1989).<br />
34 Although the United States has not been much concerned with anti-competitiveness issues in gold mining,<br />
other countries have. For example, South Africa blocked a merger in 2000 and has been stalling another<br />
since 2009. See SA Government Stops Gold Merger, Mining <strong>Journal</strong>, 22 September, 2000; M. Creamer,<br />
South African Government S<strong>of</strong>tens Stance on Zstrata-Anglo Merger, Requests Detail,<br />
MiningWeekly.com, 13 July, 2009. The South African government was concerned in these cases that<br />
intra-country competition and job creation would be stifled. This argument is based on the possibility that<br />
a single company or cartel can gain control <strong>of</strong> all <strong>of</strong> the gold resources in a nation in order to decrease<br />
production and raise prices. We have already seen that raising prices would be impossible – even for the<br />
gold-rich nation <strong>of</strong> South Africa – and therefore the mines would have little incentive to decrease<br />
production. The worst that could happen to South African workers would probably be the increase <strong>of</strong><br />
capital efficiency through a merger, meaning less <strong>of</strong> a reliance on labor and, therefore, lay<strong>of</strong>fs.
126 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
American mines, especially in light <strong>of</strong> the comparative cost advantage that U.S.<br />
regulation gives to mining operations in less-regulated countries. 35<br />
Environmental regulations can be strong enough to force gold companies to<br />
avoid exploration in certain areas, to delay operational startup, or even to go<br />
bankrupt. However, mining companies tend to establish operations in those<br />
countries that have the most stable and smoothly functioning governments –<br />
which also tend to be those countries with somewhat strict environmental<br />
laws. 36 The trade<strong>of</strong>f between effective government-business relations and<br />
exacting environmental laws seems to weigh in favor <strong>of</strong> government-business<br />
relations. Thus, major players in the mining industry are subject to<br />
environmental regulation almost everywhere they go.<br />
In the U.S., whenever a mining company (or anyone else who wants<br />
to mine) finds gold on federal lands through exploration, it can apply for a<br />
mineral patent with the Secretary <strong>of</strong> the Interior. 37 If on Bureau <strong>of</strong> Land<br />
Management-managed land (as opposed to National Park Service, Fish and<br />
Wildlife Service, or Forest Service-managed land, where processes are more<br />
stringent), the process <strong>of</strong> obtaining a patent is quite simple: after receiving the<br />
application, the BLM determines whether gold can be cost-effectively<br />
extracted from the land. If it can, then the mine pays a nominal fee for the<br />
property rights, and the BLM approves the patent, which the Secretary then<br />
reviews and either issues or contests for failing to meet statutory<br />
requirements. 38<br />
Once a firm has control <strong>of</strong> the land, it can begin mining operations –<br />
but not before it clears environmental hurdles. 39 The most important<br />
environmental laws in this arena are the Clean Air Act, the Resource<br />
Conservation and Recovery Act, the Clean Water Act, and the Comprehensive<br />
35 Environmental regulations in many other gold-rich countries, such as Peru, Indonesia, and South Africa,<br />
are not as stringent or as strictly enforced as those in the United States. Thus, environmental regulations –<br />
just like America’s necessarily higher wages and benefits – put mines in the U.S. at a comparative<br />
disadvantage to operations in many other countries. See,”e.g” A. Kumah, Sustainability and gold mining<br />
in the developing world 14 J. <strong>of</strong> Cleaner Production 315 (2005); J. L. Sznopek & T. G. Goonan, U.S.<br />
Geological Survey Circular 1197, The Materials Flow <strong>of</strong> Mercury in the Economies <strong>of</strong> the United States<br />
and the World (2000); J. S. Ogola, et al., Impact <strong>of</strong> Gold mining on the Environment and Human Health:<br />
A Case Study in the Migori Gold Belt, Kenya 24 Environmental Geochemistry and Health 141 (2002).<br />
36 Tole & Koop, supra note 9.<br />
37 Most <strong>of</strong> this section flows from provisions found in the Mining <strong>Law</strong> <strong>of</strong> 1872, 30 USC §§22-42 (2006).<br />
This law was passed during a time <strong>of</strong> little environmental foresight and incentivized expansion in the<br />
West.<br />
38 Mining <strong>Law</strong> – Approval <strong>of</strong> a Patent – A Command Performance 30 LAND & WATER L. REV. 109 (1995).<br />
For example, in 1994, Barrick obtained 1800 acres <strong>of</strong> land in northern Nevada from the BLM at the price<br />
<strong>of</strong> $5 per acre (a total <strong>of</strong> $9,000). There were an estimated 30,000,000 ounces <strong>of</strong> readily-extractable gold<br />
at the site – a value <strong>of</strong> $30 billion. Secretary <strong>of</strong> the Interior Babbitt, deploring Barrick’s ability to get<br />
astronomically valuable land for a pittance, attempted to halt the patent but lost in court because Barrick<br />
had fulfilled all statutory requirements <strong>of</strong> the 1872 Mining <strong>Law</strong> and its amendments.<br />
39 The National Environmental Policy Act <strong>of</strong> 1969, 42 U.S.C. § 4321 et seq. (2006), requires that the federal<br />
agencies study a project’s probable environmental impacts before giving the approval necessary for the<br />
project to begin. The agencies issue Environmental Impact Statements before making permitting<br />
decisions if the proposed activity will “significantly affect the quality <strong>of</strong> the human environment.” 42<br />
U.S.C.A. § 4332(2) (C).
COMPETITION AND REGULATION IN THE GOLD INDUSTRY 127<br />
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act. 40 Under these and<br />
other laws, the mine is required to obtain permits for air quality, water quality,<br />
underground injection, water supply systems, solid and hazardous waste,<br />
wildlife and vegetation protection, surface disturbance, reclamation permits<br />
and bonding, use <strong>of</strong> toxic chemicals, exploration on Indian lands, and dredge<br />
discharge. 41 After receiving the required permits, the mine then must both<br />
comply with them and issue regular updates on contamination levels, surface<br />
disturbances, water discharge quality, etc. The Environmental Protection<br />
Agency and Department <strong>of</strong> Justice (or states, which also issue environmental<br />
regulations) 42 can use administrative, civil, and criminal sanctions to stiffly<br />
penalize a company that does not comply with its permits.<br />
The EPA and DOJ have been stepping up environmental<br />
enforcement for the past decade, and mining companies consequently focus<br />
enormous resources on compliance – resources that add to the cost per ounce<br />
<strong>of</strong> production. 43 However, these resources are – if the enforcement actions are<br />
large enough to eviscerate economic benefits <strong>of</strong> noncompliance – less than<br />
what the companies would pay if caught violating the law. Whether the<br />
enforcement actions are large enough to remove economic benefits <strong>of</strong><br />
noncompliance is unclear, but it is very clear that mines are in many instances<br />
not required to pay the full monetary effect <strong>of</strong> their actions; the EPA <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
strikes a deal with companies rather than driving them into bankruptcy. 44<br />
C. Safety Regulations<br />
In addition to environmental regulation, the Federal Mine Safety and Health<br />
Act <strong>of</strong> 1977 45 imposes regulations handed down by the Department <strong>of</strong> Labor’s<br />
Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA). This agency issues<br />
regulations on everything from personal protective devices to fire suppression<br />
systems, from airborne silica dust to sound levels, and mines are subject to<br />
40 5 R. T. Connery, et al, American <strong>Law</strong> <strong>of</strong> Mining §165.03 (2d. Ed. 2008).<br />
41 Id. at §166.1. For a lucid discussion <strong>of</strong> hard rock bonding practices, see K. Wernstedt & R. Hersch,<br />
Abandoned Hardrock Mines in the United States: Escape from a Regulatory Impasse? 1 WM. & MARY<br />
POL’Y REV. 1 (forthcoming 2010).<br />
42 Many states, such as Nevada and Colorado, enact broad-based, comprehensive environmental regulations<br />
that apply to mines on all private and public lands. Thus, mining companies cannot escape environmental<br />
regulations just because they purchase their property from a private landowner.<br />
43 Id. at §165.03.<br />
44 See Wernstedt & Hersch, supra note 42, at 9. It is difficult to tell whether this relationship is marked by<br />
capture or by normative concerns, but companies’ long-term viability probably plays a role. A famous<br />
EPA/mine case is ASARCO, which closed down many <strong>of</strong> its regional plants after receiving enormous<br />
fines, but it usually found a way to strike a deal with the EPA so as to stay solvent. For example, in 2003<br />
ASARCO and the EPA set up a joint, $100 million trust fund to clean up all <strong>of</strong> ASARCO’s past misdeeds<br />
at Superfund sites, even though the task was valued much higher. It wasn’t until 2009, in a Chapter 11<br />
settlement, that the EPA stopped playing pat-a-cake with ASARCO and demanded $1.79 billion to clean<br />
up the company’s mess.<br />
45 30 USC §§ 801 et seq. (2006).
128 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
unannounced inspections. MSHA can impose large fines and can even halt<br />
operation <strong>of</strong> a mine if safety concerns are not adequately met. Like<br />
environmental regulations, safety regulations are more stringently enforced in<br />
the U.S. than in many other gold-producing countries, creating a comparative<br />
advantage for those countries.<br />
6. COMPETITIVENESS<br />
The gold mining industry is both rivalrous at the large scale and subject to easy<br />
entry at the small scale. Large multinational conglomerates are constantly<br />
jockeying for control <strong>of</strong> the most underground deposits. They also fight to<br />
lower their costs per ounce and therefore increase their pr<strong>of</strong>its, something that<br />
is done both by improving technology and operational efficiency as well as by<br />
discovering or taking over rich ore deposits.<br />
At the small scale, anyone who wants to stake a claim can do so,<br />
assuming the Department <strong>of</strong> the Interior is convinced that the applicant can<br />
extract gold at a pr<strong>of</strong>it; further, everyone who extracts gold from the ground<br />
can sell it at the same daily-fixed price as large firms, although large firms<br />
<strong>of</strong>ten hedge. From this perspective, the market is subject to infinite<br />
competition. 46 However, large conglomerates are hardly worried about tiny<br />
startups; they are reasonably confident that they are already sitting on the most<br />
lucrative ore deposits in the free world, and are equally confident that they can<br />
buy the smaller operations if need be. Practically, even a small modern mining<br />
operation will require permitting, extraction, electricity, transportation, labor,<br />
milling/leaching, legal, and communications costs – unless the operation is a<br />
tiny artisanal outfit. Even shutting down a mine is costly, given the costs <strong>of</strong><br />
environmental cleanup and reclamation, long-term labor agreements, and<br />
dismantling/transporting mills and other capital. However, since gold is<br />
fungible, any production – even at artisanal outfits – competes with largescale<br />
production.<br />
Even given free entry and a fungible product, “rivalry” is probably a<br />
better term than “competition” to describe the interaction among the world’s<br />
top mining companies. 47 Each company is trying to expand, which means that<br />
they must either find previously unknown ore deposits or take over other<br />
companies’ deposits. In order to get into a position to swallow smaller fish,<br />
gold companies scramble to expand their in-ground reserves and make their<br />
operations more efficient. However, much <strong>of</strong> this rivalry is dispersed due to<br />
many large companies’ expansion into other minerals. For instance, Newmont<br />
Gold, like Kennecott, has recently begun mining copper. This diversification<br />
(along with the likely attendant economies <strong>of</strong> scope) lessens the degree to<br />
46 Datamonitor, supra note 7, at 13–15.<br />
47 Datamonitor, supra note 7, at 15.
COMPETITION AND REGULATION IN THE GOLD INDUSTRY 129<br />
which existing companies can compare balance sheets and makes merger or<br />
takeover more complicated.<br />
Overall, gold mines produce a single, indistinguishable good, cannot<br />
affect the price <strong>of</strong> that good, and are subject to the relatively easy entry <strong>of</strong><br />
competitors. Thus, the industry is, at the small scale at least, competitive.<br />
7. CONCLUSION<br />
The gold mining industry is dominated by relatively few large players with<br />
global market shares <strong>of</strong> at least 1%. However, only one mining company,<br />
Barrick, has a market share over 10%. Even if the global market were more<br />
concentrated, gold mining companies would not likely be able to control the<br />
global gold prices. Further, although entry is relatively free, long-run minimum<br />
efficient scale is high enough to allow in only well-capitalized firms, while<br />
small firms either quit or sell out. Large firms deal with each other as rivals,<br />
with each attempting to control the most and best-concentrated ore deposits,<br />
but even this rivalry is being diffused as companies expand into other mineral<br />
markets. Finally, the impact <strong>of</strong> regulations – including the impact <strong>of</strong><br />
comparative cost disadvantages for U.S. mines – comes mainly from<br />
environmental and safety strictures, but countries may have an idiosyncratic<br />
incentives to protect domestic interests through antitrust.
Procurement law in Nigeria: Challenge for attainment <strong>of</strong> its<br />
objectives<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
O. A. Jacob*<br />
131<br />
On the 4th <strong>of</strong> June 2007, the then President <strong>of</strong> Nigeria, Alhaji Umaru Musa<br />
Yar’Adua signed into law the Public Procurement Act (PPA) which is the first<br />
Nigeria procurement law in the.<br />
The purpose <strong>of</strong> the Act is to ensure transparency, competitiveness, value for<br />
money and pr<strong>of</strong>essionalism in the public sector procurement system. Many<br />
believed that the new law would curb corruption and abuse <strong>of</strong> power in the<br />
award and execution <strong>of</strong> contracts a tool in the hands <strong>of</strong> government<br />
functionaries and politicians to loot the public treasury. This article examines<br />
the objectives, coverage, and compliance strategy and efficacy effectiveness <strong>of</strong><br />
the new law. The author concludes that full implementation <strong>of</strong> the law remains<br />
an elusive objective despite a measure <strong>of</strong> impact. He identifies the factors<br />
contributing to the partial implementation <strong>of</strong> the Act are examined and makes<br />
remedial recommendations.<br />
1. INTRODUCTION<br />
Nigeria gained independence from the British Government in 1960. Between<br />
1960 and 2007, she has passed through Military and Civilian governments. The<br />
military governments rule with decrees while the civilian governments govern<br />
by the constitution and the laws made by the legislature. Both [military or<br />
civilian governments] engage in business transaction <strong>of</strong> which the greater part<br />
is the award <strong>of</strong> contracts. Before 2007, there was no statutory provision that<br />
directly regulate the award <strong>of</strong> public contracts in Nigeria and the result is that<br />
the award <strong>of</strong> contract becomes an avenue by which the government<br />
functionaries reward their friends and cronies and by which they too amass<br />
wealth. Most <strong>of</strong> the rich business men that we have in Nigeria today make their<br />
money through contracts that are awarded to them in the past by the<br />
governments, whether military or civilian government it is the same.<br />
Disgusted by the depth <strong>of</strong> corruption in the procurement system and<br />
its effects on the economy, the Federal Government commissioned the World<br />
Bank in 1999 in collaboration with some Private Sector Specialists to review<br />
the country’s public sector procurement structure, including the existing legal<br />
<br />
LL.B [Unilag Nigeria] BL, LL.M [Oau Nigeria] MA [U. I Nigeria], LL.M [Pretoria South Africa], CILS<br />
[American <strong>University</strong> Washington DC USA] Lecturer Faculty <strong>of</strong> law <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Ibadan. Presently, a<br />
visiting scholar, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Wisconsin Madison USA. E-mails: Permanent osunfolak@yahoo.com<br />
temporary: aosuntogun@wisc.edu
132 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
framework, organizational responsibilities and capabilities, and present<br />
procedures and practices, including how these may differ from the formal rules<br />
and procedures. The World Bank report was damning, it notes that: 1<br />
“About 50% <strong>of</strong> projects in Nigeria are dead even before they<br />
commence ... the projects are designed to fail because the objective<br />
is not to implement them, but to use them as vehicles for looting <strong>of</strong><br />
the public treasury ... Instead <strong>of</strong> adding value, they become<br />
economic drain pipes.”<br />
It was rightly observed that the government functionaries were involved in the<br />
awards <strong>of</strong> public contracts and a new legal regime that will eschew that<br />
abnormality was advocated by the report:<br />
“Members <strong>of</strong> the Federal Tender Board are Ministers who due to<br />
their political role shall not and cannot be expected to deal with<br />
details in procurement procedures. It is therefore considered that the<br />
Federal Tender Board does not add value to the procurement<br />
process. High level politicians such as Governors, Ministers and<br />
Commissioners should use their valuable time for major policy and<br />
strategic issues rather than approving contract awards. Elected<br />
<strong>of</strong>ficials are responsible for allocation <strong>of</strong> resources but the<br />
mechanics <strong>of</strong> spending these resources should follow laid down<br />
procurement regulations and procedures.” 2<br />
Rather than enacting a statutory legislation to regulate public contracts, the<br />
government took a step to check the abuse in the system by establishing the<br />
Budget Monitoring and Price Intelligence Unit (BMPIU) in the Presidency<br />
with an objective among others to ensure that merit and due diligence are<br />
adhered to in the award and execution <strong>of</strong> contracts, procurement <strong>of</strong> products<br />
and services. 3<br />
However on the 4th <strong>of</strong> June 2007, the then president <strong>of</strong> Nigeria<br />
President Umaru Musa Yar’Adua signed into law the Public Procurement Act<br />
(PPA) which is the first procurement law in the history <strong>of</strong> Nigeria. The<br />
purpose <strong>of</strong> the Act is to ensure transparency, competitiveness, value for<br />
money and pr<strong>of</strong>essionalism in the public sector procurement system. 4 The Act<br />
1 See Nigeria: Country Procurement Assessment Report Volume 1 and 2 - http://www-wds.worldbank.org/<br />
external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2001/06/08/000094946_01053004 [site visited on 2<br />
September, 2010].<br />
2 Id.<br />
3 The Budget Monitoring and Price Intelligence Unit (BMPIU) serves as a “vanguard <strong>of</strong> ensuring fiscal<br />
transparency, strict compliance with Federal Government guidelines on Due Process Certification as it<br />
concerns budgeting for and procurement <strong>of</strong> facilities/services/contracts at appropriate costs(Ezekwesili,<br />
2005.<br />
4 Section 4[1] <strong>of</strong> the Act.
PROCUREMENT LAW IN NIGERIA 133<br />
provides for the establishment <strong>of</strong> the National Council on Public Procurement<br />
(NCPP) and the Bureau <strong>of</strong> Public Procurement (BPP) as regulatory authorities<br />
responsible for oversight, management and monitoring <strong>of</strong> public procurement<br />
practices and system. Though the new legal regime takes effect immediately<br />
as it should, we observe lack <strong>of</strong> total commitment on the path <strong>of</strong> the federal<br />
government to fully comply with the regulations enshrined in the Act. The<br />
problem lies with the issue <strong>of</strong> government involvement, whether they<br />
[government functionaries] should disengage from procurement process or<br />
not is an underlying question the government is not comfortable with. The<br />
argument <strong>of</strong> the government functionaries is that they must be involved in the<br />
procurement process in order to safeguard public resources 5 but the report <strong>of</strong><br />
the World Bank nullified this argument:<br />
“Politicians in Nigeria would argue that it is their responsibility to<br />
safeguard public resources by ensuring that corruption is minimised<br />
in the procurement process. However, what is most critical is to<br />
build legitimacy in the procurement process through appropriate<br />
legislation and regulations and not direct involvement in the<br />
procurement process. This legitimacy is very important for both<br />
civil servants and the politicians because they, in the end, need to be<br />
able to work in a system where the public has faith in what is going<br />
on and where they can account for their dispositions.”<br />
As <strong>of</strong> today, the greatest challenge for the enforcement <strong>of</strong><br />
procurement law in Nigeria is the involvement <strong>of</strong> the government<br />
functionaries in the procurement process and this is possible because the<br />
government has not fully implemented the provisions <strong>of</strong> the Act. Should the<br />
government who initiated the enactment <strong>of</strong> the Act fail to fully implement it?<br />
That lackadaisical move on the part <strong>of</strong> the government is worrisome but not<br />
unpredictable. A clue to the reason behind their conduct could be deduced<br />
from the history <strong>of</strong> the PPA itself. It takes the government almost seven years<br />
to enact this law.<br />
This writer finds out that partial implementation or dragging <strong>of</strong> feet<br />
in enacting the law is actuated by the desire <strong>of</strong> the political class in the<br />
government not to lose the means to award contracts to their cronies. This<br />
article discusses the challenge for the attainment <strong>of</strong> the l<strong>of</strong>ty objectives <strong>of</strong> the<br />
PPA. It observes with chagrin that three years since the Act has taken effect,<br />
the Federal Government has not fully implemented it. The implications <strong>of</strong> that<br />
partial implementation <strong>of</strong> the Act are examined and recommendations <strong>of</strong>fered.<br />
This article is divided in to eight parts. The first part is an<br />
introduction while the second part examines the statutory objectives <strong>of</strong> the<br />
5 See World Bank report volume 2 page 39 supra note1.
134 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
Act. In part three, the mechanism for attainment <strong>of</strong> its statutory objectives is<br />
examined and the scope <strong>of</strong> the application <strong>of</strong> the Act is dealt with in the next<br />
part. The impact and the amendment <strong>of</strong> the Act are briefly discussed in the<br />
subsequent parts five and six. The challenge for the enforcement <strong>of</strong> the Act is<br />
considered in part seven and conclusion is in part eight.<br />
2. THE OBJECTIVES OF THE PPA<br />
We cannot overemphasize the importance <strong>of</strong> objectives to a statutory provision<br />
since objective its self is the harbinger that occasion its enactment. It is the<br />
purpose which sets the mission which a particular statue intends to achieve and<br />
does not only prescribe the yardstick for its assessment but also provide a<br />
mechanism for its interpretation. 6<br />
The Canadian courts captured the importance <strong>of</strong> objectives in<br />
interpreting a statute in the Driedger principle: “… the words <strong>of</strong> an Act are to<br />
be read in their entire context, in their grammatical and ordinary sense<br />
harmoniously with the scheme <strong>of</strong> the Act, the object <strong>of</strong> the Act, and the<br />
intention <strong>of</strong> Parliament.” See Ruth Sullivan, Sullivan and Driedger on the<br />
Construction <strong>of</strong> Statutes 4th ed. (Vancouver: Butteworths, 2002) at 1.<br />
As a result, statute ought not to be drafted without having a particular<br />
purpose in mind, just as a house should not be built without having a<br />
particular plan as pattern for engineers to follow. 7 There is a presumption that<br />
every enacted statute has a purpose and that purpose must be discovered either<br />
in the preamble to the statue or in the entire statue. Therefore in this section<br />
we will consider the purpose <strong>of</strong> the PPA by looking in to its objectives in the<br />
Act.<br />
Section 3[1] <strong>of</strong> the PPA establishes a regulatory body known as the<br />
6 There are many rules <strong>of</strong> interpretation from the literal rule to golden rule and the mischief rule etc. The<br />
common thread however is that most <strong>of</strong> the rules consider the objects <strong>of</strong> the Act in interpreting a statute.<br />
Even where there has been uncertainty, ambiguity or absurdity in the words used in such way that it is<br />
difficult for the judge to fathom the meaning <strong>of</strong> the statute and its objects, the courts under the common<br />
law will still consider what is the purpose <strong>of</strong> the Act and not what ought to be the intention <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Parliament or the Judge. In Duport Steels Ltd v SIRS 1980 House <strong>of</strong> Lord Scarman said:<br />
‘In the field <strong>of</strong> statute law the judge must be obedient to the will <strong>of</strong> Parliament ... Parliament makes ... the<br />
law: the judge’s duty is to interpret and to apply the law, not to change it to meet the judge’s idea <strong>of</strong> what<br />
justice requires ... Unpalatable statute law may not be disregarded or rejected, merely because it is<br />
unpalatable.’<br />
‘If Parliament says one thing but means another, it is not, under the historic principles <strong>of</strong> the common<br />
law, for the courts to correct it ... We are to be governed not by Parliament’s intentions but by<br />
Parliament’s enactments’<br />
But even if the court intends to use the purposive approach as advocated by Lord Denning the relevant<br />
point here is still the purpose <strong>of</strong> the parliament. In Magor and St Mellons v Newport Borough Council<br />
Lord Denning said:<br />
‘We do not sit here to pull the language <strong>of</strong> Parliament to pieces and make nonsense <strong>of</strong> it. We sit here to<br />
find out the intention <strong>of</strong> Parliament and carry it out’.<br />
7 But see Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Steven L. Schooner Desiderata: Objectives for a System <strong>of</strong> Government Contract <strong>Law</strong><br />
11 Public Procurement <strong>Law</strong> Review 103 [2002] He asked a question and answered it himself: ‘What does<br />
your government hope to achieve through its government procurement law? It is possible to draft and<br />
enact a new law without answering the question, and experience demonstrates that this is <strong>of</strong>ten the case’.
PROCUREMENT LAW IN NIGERIA 135<br />
Bureau <strong>of</strong> Public procurement [BPP]. The body becomes an agency with<br />
corporate personality. 8 The objectives <strong>of</strong> the PPA as a statute are not directly<br />
stated in the Act but could be gathered from the statutory function <strong>of</strong> the BPP.<br />
In a section <strong>of</strong> the law 9 titled the objectives <strong>of</strong> the Bureau the Act mentioned<br />
four objectives <strong>of</strong> the Bureau which are first to harmonize the existing<br />
government policies and practices on public procurement and to ensure<br />
probity, accountability and transparency in the Procurement process. The<br />
Second is to establish pricing standards and benchmarks while the third is to<br />
ensure the application <strong>of</strong> fair, competitive, transparent value-for money<br />
standards and practices for the procurement and disposal <strong>of</strong> public assets and<br />
services. The fourth is the attainment <strong>of</strong> transparency, competitiveness, cost<br />
effectiveness and pr<strong>of</strong>essionalism in the public sector procurement system.<br />
It seems the <strong>of</strong>ficial website <strong>of</strong> the BPP at its home page is<br />
conspicuously enumerating the objectives <strong>of</strong> the PPA in a simplified form<br />
when it displayed four core issues as its objectives 10 which are economy<br />
efficiency, competition [provision <strong>of</strong> a level playing ground for all strata <strong>of</strong><br />
bidders], value for money and transparency.<br />
To avoid ambiguity as to what the PPA intends to archive and to<br />
provide guidance and direction to all parties in the contract <strong>of</strong> procurement,<br />
the Federal Government <strong>of</strong> Nigeria publishes Procurement Procedures<br />
Manual for Public procurement in Nigeria, 11 The Manual reiterates the issue<br />
<strong>of</strong> the objectives <strong>of</strong> the PPA when it mentions and explains six principal<br />
hallmarks <strong>of</strong> a pr<strong>of</strong>icient public procurement system.<br />
The first to be mentioned is the Economy which it explains<br />
graphically as the best value for money. It explains the meaning <strong>of</strong> value<br />
explicitly when it states:<br />
“For complex purchases, value may imply more than just price, for<br />
example, since quality issues also need to be addressed. Moreover,<br />
lowest initial price may not equate to lowest cost over the operating<br />
life <strong>of</strong> the item procured. But the basic point is the same: the<br />
ultimate purpose <strong>of</strong> sound procurement is to obtain maximum value<br />
for money.” 12<br />
The third is fairness which it describes as a process <strong>of</strong> being non<br />
8 In Nigeria a company must be registered with Corporate Affairs Commission [CAC] before it can be a<br />
corporate body but section 2 <strong>of</strong> the Act invests the agency with the power <strong>of</strong> a corporate entity without<br />
registration with CAC. Section 2 provides that the body shall be a body corporate with perpetual<br />
succession and a common seal and may sue and be sued in its corporate name and can also acquire, hold<br />
or dispose <strong>of</strong> any property whether movable or immovable for the purpose <strong>of</strong> carrying out any <strong>of</strong> its<br />
functions under this Act.<br />
9 Section 4 <strong>of</strong> the PPA.<br />
10 See the <strong>of</strong>ficial website <strong>of</strong> BPP supra note 10 [assessed on 16 August,2010]<br />
11 It can be downloaded from the <strong>of</strong>ficial website <strong>of</strong> the BPP [assessed on 16 August, 2010.]<br />
12 Id.
136 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
partisan in the sense that all interested contractors, suppliers and consultants<br />
must be given a level playing field on which to compete and thereby, directly<br />
expands the purchaser’s options and opportunities. The fourth is transparency<br />
which according to the manual means that the procurement rules must be<br />
accessible and unambiguous. The fifth is that <strong>of</strong> accountability and ethical<br />
standards which it explains in form <strong>of</strong> exhortation and obligation:<br />
“Good procurement holds its practitioners responsible for enforcing<br />
and obeying the rules. It makes them subject to challenge and to<br />
sanction, if appropriate, for neglecting or bending those rules.<br />
Accountability is at once a key inducement to individual and<br />
institutional probity, a key deterrent to collusion and corruption and<br />
a key prerequisite for procurement credibility. A sound procurement<br />
system is one that combines all the above elements. The desired<br />
impact is to inspire the confidence and willingness-to-compete <strong>of</strong><br />
well-qualified vendors. This directly and concretely benefits the<br />
purchasing entity and its constituents, responsive contractors and<br />
suppliers, and donor agencies providing project finance.” 13<br />
One <strong>of</strong> the objectives <strong>of</strong> domestic legislation <strong>of</strong> public procurements<br />
by the national governments in their various states is the use <strong>of</strong> public<br />
procurement as a tool to promote their social and industrial policies. This<br />
particular objective has become a universal trend throughout the globe that<br />
Sue Arrowsmith rightly observed its significance as important objective that<br />
could not be ignored:<br />
“Another important aspect <strong>of</strong> procurement procedure in many states<br />
is the use <strong>of</strong> the economic muscle provided by government<br />
procurement to support wider industrial, social or other policies<br />
which are not directly connected with the procurement itself. Thus,<br />
so far as industrial policy is concerned, in order to boost domestic<br />
industry and employment, general preferences have sometimes been<br />
given to national industry in awarding procurement contracts, either<br />
by reserving particular contracts for domestic products or suppliers<br />
only although more commonly by operating a preference <strong>of</strong> bids<br />
meeting specified domestic content requirements, in terms <strong>of</strong> use <strong>of</strong><br />
domestic products or labor in the contract, or for firms which are<br />
deemed “national’’ firms in term <strong>of</strong> their location or ownership.” 14<br />
13 Id.<br />
14 See S. Arrowsmith, National and International Perspectives on the Regulation <strong>of</strong> Public Procurement:<br />
Harmony or Conflict? In Public Procurement: Global Revolution [S. Arrowsmith & A. Davies eds, 1998]<br />
Kluwer <strong>Law</strong> International . See also Geroski, P.A [1990]. Procurement policy as a tool <strong>of</strong> Industrial<br />
policy, International Review <strong>of</strong> Applied Economics, 4 [2]; 182-198.
PROCUREMENT LAW IN NIGERIA 137<br />
To further that universal but domestic objective 15 the PPA provides<br />
that in international bidding, 16 a margin <strong>of</strong> preference may be given to<br />
domestic bidders or suppliers over the foreign bidders. This preference is<br />
exercisable during the process <strong>of</strong> evaluation <strong>of</strong> tenders when a procuring<br />
entity is comparing tenders from domestic bidders with the foreign bidders or<br />
even from the domestic suppliers if some <strong>of</strong> them are <strong>of</strong>fering goods<br />
manufactured locally and others are <strong>of</strong>fering goods manufacture abroad. 17<br />
The purpose is to develop the economy and thereby ensuring dividends <strong>of</strong><br />
democracy to the citizens. One <strong>of</strong> the ways by which the citizens can benefit<br />
from dividends <strong>of</strong> democracy is for the government to encourage development<br />
<strong>of</strong> local contractors and manufacturers. 18<br />
Despite the tendency to prefer local contractors and manufacturers in<br />
certain circumstances enumerated above, the overall goal <strong>of</strong> the government is<br />
to give all qualified bidders an equal opportunity. Therefore, the Act insists<br />
that everything should be done in a transparent manner. Existence <strong>of</strong><br />
preferences must be stated in the bidding documents. 19 In my own analysis,<br />
this will ensure three things; the foreign bidders will have notice <strong>of</strong> those<br />
preferences against them and can prepare on how to swim against the tide, the<br />
local bidders too will have notice <strong>of</strong> eligibility for the preferences and that will<br />
ensure preparation too on how to meet the qualification. At the end, the<br />
existence <strong>of</strong> preferences is not a guarantee that local bidders will win the bid.<br />
The overall goal <strong>of</strong> the PPA is to inculcate all the objectives in to the<br />
procurement process. It envisages that a sound procurement system must not<br />
take one objective and reject the other if confidence and willingness to<br />
compete must be integrated in to the system. Therefore the Manual 20 gives the<br />
picture <strong>of</strong> what the Act intends to avoid by embracing all the objectives<br />
without exclusion <strong>of</strong> any:<br />
“Conversely, a procurement system that fails to take the above<br />
elements [objectives] stimulates hesitation to compete, submission<br />
<strong>of</strong> inflated tenders containing a risk premium, or submission <strong>of</strong><br />
deflated tenders followed by delayed or defective performance.<br />
Other direct results include collusion in bribery by frustrated or<br />
unscrupulous vendors and purchasing entities, bad value for those<br />
15 There has been a minimal restriction on the use <strong>of</strong> domestic regulation to further industrial goal as a result<br />
<strong>of</strong> free trade phenomenon, that the word universal may be subject to criticism therefore this issue shall be<br />
further discussed in the next section.<br />
16 International Competitive bidding is defined by the Act as a solicitation <strong>of</strong> bids from both domestic and<br />
foreign contractors and suppliers.<br />
17 Section 34 [1] and [3] <strong>of</strong> the PPA.<br />
18 The Manual supra note 24 reiterates that it is the policy <strong>of</strong> the government to encourage the development<br />
<strong>of</strong> local contractors and manufacturers page 4.<br />
19 Section 34[2] <strong>of</strong> the PPA provides that where a procuring entity intends to allow domestic preferences,<br />
the bidding documents shall clearly indicate any preference to be granted to domestic suppliers and<br />
contractors and the information required to establish the eligibility <strong>of</strong> a bid for such preference.<br />
20 Id.
138 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
entities and their constituents, and betrayal and abuse <strong>of</strong> the public<br />
trust for personal gain.” 21<br />
3. THE MECHANISM FOR ACCOMPLISHMENT<br />
Compliance strategy or mechanism is the most important aspect <strong>of</strong> law<br />
making. If rules that are made are not complied with, the effect is the same as<br />
if they are not made at all in the first instance. Therefore what should be the<br />
thinking <strong>of</strong> the law makers and those who are drafting the law is how to ensure<br />
compliance? In most cases regulatory agencies are established by the enabling<br />
statutes to ensure compliance. And that is the case with the PPA. The first thing<br />
the Act 22 does is to establish a managerial and administrative architecture for<br />
public procurement in Nigeria and this for the purpose <strong>of</strong> ensuring compliance<br />
<strong>of</strong> the rules made.<br />
In section one <strong>of</strong> part one 23 the Act establishes the National Council<br />
on Public Procurement [NCPP] and in section3 <strong>of</strong> part 2 24 it establishes the<br />
Bureau <strong>of</strong> Public Procurement (BPP) both as regulatory authorities<br />
responsible for the monitoring and oversight <strong>of</strong> public procurement in<br />
Nigeria. While the BBP really performs regulatory and administrative<br />
functions, the NCPP exerts control over the administration <strong>of</strong> BPP to ensure<br />
that the objectives <strong>of</strong> the Act are not defeated. It gives directives for<br />
implementation to the BPP to ensure that it does not derail from the<br />
fundamental principles for procurement. It approves contract thresholds and<br />
policies on public procurement to ensure and maintain sound procurement<br />
process. 25 Though the president appoints the Director General <strong>of</strong> the BPP who<br />
is the chief executive and accounting <strong>of</strong>ficer 26 the recommendation for the<br />
appointment must come from the NCPP who must also approve it before the<br />
appointment can be valid. 27<br />
The BPP serves as the secretariat for the NCPP 28 and performs a<br />
plethora <strong>of</strong> administrative functions that are too numerous to chronicle in this<br />
article. In a nutshell, it oversees and regulates public procurement so as to<br />
archive economic value for money, it develops the legal frame work for public<br />
procurement by undertaking research and survey and sets and monitors<br />
standards for public procurement.BPP is the organ that implements rules,<br />
policies and principles <strong>of</strong> Public procurement in Nigeria and has enforcement<br />
power to ensure compliance with its rules. The issue <strong>of</strong> a ‘Certificate <strong>of</strong> no<br />
21 Id.<br />
22 The PPA supra note 10.<br />
23 Id section 1[1].<br />
24 Id section3 [1].<br />
25 Id section 2.<br />
26 Id section7[1] [2].<br />
27 Id section2[b].<br />
28 Id section6[2].
PROCUREMENT LAW IN NIGERIA 139<br />
Objection’ by the BPP is a condition precedent before a contracting entity<br />
could award a contract 29 and if a contract is awarded without this important<br />
document, the contract is null and void and no money can be disbursed to<br />
service such contract. 30<br />
The principal method <strong>of</strong> procurement is by open competitive bidding<br />
known as a Sealed Bidding, a process by which a procuring entity, based on<br />
previously defined criteria, effects public procurements by <strong>of</strong>fering to every<br />
interested bidder, equal simultaneous information and opportunity to <strong>of</strong>fer the<br />
goods and works needed. 31 Whether international 32 or national, it commences<br />
with invitation to bid which shall be advertised in at least two national<br />
newspapers. Additional advertisement in an internationally recognized<br />
publication is required for international competitive bidding. 33<br />
All bids by the contractors under open competitive bidding must<br />
comply with special special requirements that might be prescribed by the<br />
procuring entity .It should be in writing and sign by an <strong>of</strong>ficial authorized to<br />
bind the bidder to a contract and placed in a sealed envelope. 34 All bids<br />
received before the deadline shall be deposited in a secured ‘tamper-pro<strong>of</strong> bid<br />
box’ while those received after the deadline are returned to the bidders 35 . The<br />
bids shall be opened in public in the full glare <strong>of</strong> the bidders, their<br />
representatives and members <strong>of</strong> the public after they must have been allowed<br />
to examine the bids and ascertain that their bids have not been tampered<br />
with 36 . After the bids have been opened, award must be made to the<br />
responsible bidder who submitted the lowest responsible bid with regard to<br />
work specification and standard 37 .<br />
The second type <strong>of</strong> procurement process is special and restricted<br />
methods <strong>of</strong> procurement and this is statutorily divided into different methods.<br />
The first is Two-Stage Tendering Process generally known as ‘two-step sealed<br />
bidding’ which could be used by contracting entity in certain circumstances. 38<br />
29 Id. Section 6[1] [b] gives the power to BPP to issue certificate <strong>of</strong> ‘No objection for contract Award’ for all<br />
contract to be awarded by the Federal Government <strong>of</strong> Nigeria and any <strong>of</strong> its agencies and parastatals.<br />
30 Id section16[2].<br />
31 Id Section 16[1][c]S24[2] <strong>of</strong> the PPA.<br />
32 Id Section 25[1] it is international if the solicitation <strong>of</strong> bids is from domestic and foreign contractors but if<br />
all are domestic contractors it is national.<br />
33 If it is international, it can be advertised in any <strong>of</strong>ficial websites <strong>of</strong> the procuring entity and that <strong>of</strong> the<br />
BPP, as well as the procurement journal. If it is national, it shall be advertised on the notice board <strong>of</strong> the<br />
procuring entity and any <strong>of</strong>ficial websites <strong>of</strong> the procuring entity .See Section 25 Id.<br />
34 Id Section 27[1].<br />
35 Id.<br />
36 Id Sections 16 , 17 24 and 31.<br />
37 Id Sections 29 and 30.<br />
38 Id Section 39 [2] ‘where it is not feasible for the procuring entity to formulate detailed specifications for<br />
the goods or works or, in the case <strong>of</strong> services, to identify their characteristics and where it seeks tenders,<br />
proposals or <strong>of</strong>fers on various means <strong>of</strong> meeting its needs in order to obtain the most satisfactory solution<br />
to its procurement needs; where the character <strong>of</strong> the goods or works arc subject to rapid technological<br />
advances; where the procuring entity seeks to enter into a contract for research, experiment, study or<br />
development, except where the contract includes the production <strong>of</strong> goods in sufficient quantities to<br />
establish their commercial viability or to recover research and development costs, where the procuring<br />
entity applies this Act to procurement concerned with national security and determines that the selected
140 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
The first step requires the contracting entity to request for submission<br />
<strong>of</strong> tenders and if necessary solicits technical proposals. No tender price is<br />
involved at this stage because the purpose <strong>of</strong> the step is to find out whether the<br />
supplies or services received are adequate and acceptable. Those suppliers or<br />
contractors whose tenders have not been rejected shall be called upon by the<br />
contracting entity to submit final tenders with prices on a single act <strong>of</strong><br />
specification and the awards shall be made from the second stage tenders after<br />
the tenders have been compared with one another and properly evaluated. 39<br />
As an exception ,a procuring entity may result to restricted tendering<br />
and invites only specified contractors to submit tenders if it has obtained the<br />
approval <strong>of</strong> BPP. Restricted tendering could only be used if it could be proved<br />
that it is economical that a limited number <strong>of</strong> suppliers or contractors should<br />
supply the goods or works required and that the time and cost required<br />
examining and evaluating a large number <strong>of</strong> tenders is disproportionate to the<br />
value <strong>of</strong> the goods, works or services to be procured. 40<br />
All contractors or suppliers who can provide the goods or services<br />
must be invited to tender their bids without discrimination and if there is no<br />
time for evaluation and examination <strong>of</strong> tenders, then the contracting entity<br />
shall select in a non-discriminatory manner the number <strong>of</strong> suppliers or<br />
contractors to ensure effective competition. A notice <strong>of</strong> the selected tendering<br />
proceedings must be published in the procurement journal. 41<br />
As for solicitation for negotiated contracts, PPA requires the<br />
contracting entity to request for quotations from at least three separate<br />
contractors. The requests must be made in writing and should contain<br />
information as to whether any factors other than the charges for the goods,<br />
works or services themselves, such as any applicable transportation and<br />
insurance charges, customs duties and taxes are to be included in the price and<br />
the procurement shall be awarded to the qualified contractor or supplier that<br />
gives the lowest priced responsive quotation. 42<br />
A procuring entity may procure goods or works or services from a<br />
single individual as long as it satisfies the conditions for such direct<br />
procurement but must justify its decision for single source procurement and<br />
those justifiable reasons for determination should be recorded in the record <strong>of</strong><br />
procurement proceedings. The reasons must be compatible with the<br />
provisions <strong>of</strong> the PPA 43 which may be as a result <strong>of</strong> the fact that the goods,<br />
38 method is the most appropriate method <strong>of</strong> procurement; or where the tender proceedings have been<br />
utilized but were not successful or the tenders were rejected by the procuring entity under an open<br />
competitive bid procedure and the procuring entity considers that engaging in new tendering proceedings<br />
will not result in a procurement contract’.<br />
39 Id, Section 39[4] [a] [b] and [5]. See also W.Noel Keyes Government Contracts 2 nd edition West<br />
Publishing Company Minnessoata USA p.135.<br />
40 Id section 40.<br />
41 Id.<br />
42 Id.Section 41<br />
43 Id. Section 42.
PROCUREMENT LAW IN NIGERIA 141<br />
works or services are only available from one source or that supervening<br />
events or catastrophic circumstances make the need for them so expedient that<br />
a recourse in to other methods <strong>of</strong> procurement apart from direct procurement<br />
will be unrealistic. On the grounds <strong>of</strong> either reasonableness <strong>of</strong> the price,<br />
unsuitability <strong>of</strong> alternatives to the goods or services in question or national<br />
security the method can still be adopted.<br />
In the same way, procuring entity may engage in direct contracting<br />
<strong>of</strong> goods, works and services during emergency situations when the country is<br />
either seriously threatened by or actually confronted with a disaster,<br />
catastrophe, war, insurrection or Act <strong>of</strong> God or when the condition or quality<br />
<strong>of</strong> goods, equipment, building or publicly owned capital goods may seriously<br />
deteriorate unless corrective or remedial action is urgently and necessarily<br />
taken to maintain them in their actual value or usefulness or when a public<br />
project may be seriously delayed for want <strong>of</strong> an item <strong>of</strong> a minor value that<br />
ought to be procured. 44 Though immediately after the cessation <strong>of</strong> the<br />
situation which led to the emergency procurement, the procuring entity must<br />
give a detailed report <strong>of</strong> procurement made to the BPP for verification and if<br />
necessary the BPP will issue a Certificate <strong>of</strong> No Objection. 45<br />
4. SCOPE, COVERAGE AND APPLICATION<br />
Nigeria is a Federal Republic with a federal system <strong>of</strong> government. It consists<br />
<strong>of</strong> thirty six states and a federal capital territory in Abuja. Power is divided<br />
between the states and the federal government. The legislative power <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Federal Republic <strong>of</strong> Nigeria is vested by the Constitution in the National<br />
Assembly <strong>of</strong> the federation which consists <strong>of</strong> the Senate and the House <strong>of</strong><br />
Representatives. 46 The National Assembly has constitutional power to make<br />
law for the whole <strong>of</strong> the federation in any matter included in the exclusive<br />
legislative list 47 The power to make law in any <strong>of</strong> the states <strong>of</strong> the federation is<br />
vested in the House <strong>of</strong> Assembly <strong>of</strong> each state 48 The House <strong>of</strong> Assembly has<br />
power to make law in any matter not included in the Exclusive list. 49 Both the<br />
states and the national assembly’s can make laws in any matter that fall within<br />
the concurrent list with a proviso that if there is inconsistency between the law<br />
made by the federal legislature and the one made by the states, the law made<br />
44 Id. Section 43.<br />
45 Id.<br />
46 See Section 4[1] <strong>of</strong> the 1999 Constitution.<br />
47 The states could not legislate on any matter in the excusive list. Some <strong>of</strong> the matters are Aviation matters,<br />
Bankruptcy and Insolvency, Census, Copyright, Defence, Creation <strong>of</strong> states, Citizenship etc.<br />
48 See section 4 [6] and [7] <strong>of</strong> the 1999 Constitution.<br />
49 Id. Section 4[7] <strong>of</strong> the Constitution, this is called Residual power <strong>of</strong> the states to make laws in the area <strong>of</strong><br />
chieftaincy matters etc.
142 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
by the national Assembly shall prevail and the state law shall be void to the<br />
extent <strong>of</strong> its inconsistency. 50<br />
Government contract falls within the concurrent list which means<br />
both the states and the federal governments can legislate on it and that is the<br />
constitutional limitation in the application <strong>of</strong> the PPA. It was enacted by the<br />
National Assembly and its coverage does not go beyond the federal<br />
government expenditure. It regulates public contracts at the federal level by<br />
the national government. 51<br />
Another limitation though statutory is self imposed by the PPA itself:<br />
Subsection 2 <strong>of</strong> section 15 provides that the PPA shall not apply to the<br />
procurement <strong>of</strong> special goods; works and services involving national defense<br />
or national security. However the limitation is not an absolute one, since it can<br />
be avoided if the express approval <strong>of</strong> the President has been first sought and<br />
obtained. The PPA gives an inference that it is applicable in some<br />
circumstances to every nook and crannies <strong>of</strong> Nigeria without a territorial<br />
barrier beyond the jurisdiction at federal level when it provides that it applies<br />
to all entities in Nigeria which derive at least 35% <strong>of</strong> the funds appropriated or<br />
proposed to be appropriated for any type <strong>of</strong> procurement from the federation<br />
share <strong>of</strong> consolidated Revenue fund. 52<br />
Section 162 (3) <strong>of</strong> the Constitution 53 makes provision, for<br />
distribution <strong>of</strong> money in the Federation Account, between the Federal<br />
government, the States and the local government Councils in each state.<br />
Section 80 54 defines Consolidated Revenue Fund as:<br />
“All revenues or other moneys raised or received by the Federation<br />
(not being revenues or other moneys payable under this Constitution<br />
or any Act <strong>of</strong> the National Assembly into any other public fund <strong>of</strong><br />
the Federation established for a specific purpose) shall be paid into<br />
and form one Consolidated Revenue Fund <strong>of</strong> the Federation.”<br />
The fact is that money in the Consolidated Revenue Fund should be<br />
shared between the three tiers <strong>of</strong> governments in Nigeria. The question for<br />
consideration is whether they can be regarded as entities and whether they are<br />
subject to section 15[1] [b] <strong>of</strong> the PPA. If they are, the PPA will apply to them<br />
as far as the usage <strong>of</strong> that fund is concerned; if they are not it will not apply.<br />
50 Id. Section 4 <strong>of</strong> the 1999 Constitution.<br />
51 This limitation is from the constitution as well as from the statute. Section15[1] <strong>of</strong> the Act provides that it<br />
shall apply to all procurement <strong>of</strong> goods, works and services carried out by the Federal Government <strong>of</strong><br />
Nigeria and all procurement entities.<br />
52 See section 15[1][b] note that the Act is still new and all <strong>of</strong> its provisions have not been tested in courts.<br />
However if there is conflict between any <strong>of</strong> its provision and that <strong>of</strong> the constitution , the provision <strong>of</strong> the<br />
constitution will prevail and that provision in the Act shall be void to the extent <strong>of</strong> its inconsistency se<br />
section 1[3] <strong>of</strong> 1999 constitution.<br />
53 Id.<br />
54 Id.
PROCUREMENT LAW IN NIGERIA 143<br />
Whatever might be our conjecture, the actual fact is that PPA applies to<br />
federal government and its ministries and agents wherever they might be<br />
located but does not apply to states and states must enact their own<br />
procurement law.<br />
5. THE IMPACT OF THE ACT<br />
The federal Government <strong>of</strong> Nigeria initiated public procurement reform in<br />
2001and the law was passed in 2007.The Act has been in existence for three<br />
years and that is a short time to examine the effect <strong>of</strong> a new law in the life <strong>of</strong> a<br />
nation. Nevertheless it is our opinion that the effort <strong>of</strong> the government to enact<br />
this law has not been in vain for the past three years that we cannot have<br />
something significant to say about its impact. Therefore this section examines<br />
briefly the impact <strong>of</strong> PPA in the polity.<br />
The first impact itself is the establishment <strong>of</strong> procurement law for the<br />
first time in the history <strong>of</strong> Nigeria to govern public contract. This will go a<br />
long way to save government money and to ensure transparency in<br />
procurement method. The rules and regulations enshrined will serve as a<br />
yardstick to bring culprits to judgment and there is tendency that sound<br />
procurement system will prevail.<br />
A commentator in Nigeria 55 lamented how many people particularly<br />
statesmen have escaped punishment for <strong>of</strong>fences <strong>of</strong> corruption in the abuse <strong>of</strong><br />
public procurement because <strong>of</strong> the absence <strong>of</strong> law in that area when he wrote:<br />
“Last year Patricia Etteh was forced to resign as Speaker <strong>of</strong> the<br />
House <strong>of</strong> Representatives 56 in the light <strong>of</strong> evidence that she<br />
irregularly spent 628 million Naira on the refurbishment <strong>of</strong> her<br />
<strong>of</strong>ficial residence and diverted much <strong>of</strong> this money into illicit<br />
payments. Etteh is a prime example <strong>of</strong> someone who could be<br />
prosecuted under the terms <strong>of</strong> the new Bureau <strong>of</strong> Public<br />
Procurement Act. And if she were convicted, the disgraced<br />
politician could find herself serving a prison sentence <strong>of</strong> up to 10<br />
years.” 57<br />
Another report from Nigeria encapsulates the degenerated state <strong>of</strong><br />
55 V. Nwanma- Beware, That Business Proposal Could Procure a Jail Term for You Nigerian Budget<br />
Monitoring Project le: ///C:/Documents and Settings/osua1/Desktop/BEWARE 1.htm [assessed on the 30<br />
<strong>of</strong> August 2010.]<br />
56 Nigeria has two houses <strong>of</strong> parliament at the federal level. The upper house is called House <strong>of</strong> Senate while<br />
the second one is called House <strong>of</strong> Representatives. The upper house is headed by the president <strong>of</strong> Senate<br />
while the second house is headed by a Speaker.<br />
57 What the commentator was saying indirectly was that the failure <strong>of</strong> the government to prosecute Patricia<br />
Etteh the former Speaker <strong>of</strong> the House <strong>of</strong> Representatives was the absence <strong>of</strong> a procurement law in<br />
Nigeria. While that may not be the sole reason for non prosecution <strong>of</strong> Etteh and many public figures that<br />
have mismanaged government money through public contracts, it could be a contributing factor.
144 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
corruption in the award and performance <strong>of</strong> contract from both private and<br />
public sector <strong>of</strong> the economy when a man called Shuabu Attanda was arrested<br />
in Lagos for being in possession <strong>of</strong> a bag containing 70 dead babies. 58<br />
According to the report, the man was trying to dump the corpses when he was<br />
apprehended. Police report later confirmed that the man in question was<br />
neither a ritualist nor a child trafficker as was originally suspected. 59<br />
On interrogation, the man confessed that he was a contractor to a<br />
prominent hospital in Lagos. He explained further that his services were<br />
engaged through a contract to dispose <strong>of</strong>f corpses <strong>of</strong> dead babies by the<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Morbid Anatomy <strong>of</strong> the hospital. 60 He disclosed that part <strong>of</strong><br />
the terms <strong>of</strong> the contract for disposing <strong>of</strong>f the corpses was to give the dead<br />
bodies’ decent burial at a cemetery. 61 The man confessed that he was forced<br />
into dumping the corpses <strong>of</strong> the dead babies anywhere, anyhow because he<br />
could no longer afford to pay the cemetery charges even when it was included<br />
in the total cost <strong>of</strong> the contract because the funds had been exhausted after<br />
“greasing the palms” <strong>of</strong> key <strong>of</strong>ficials <strong>of</strong> the hospital who facilitated the award<br />
<strong>of</strong> the contract. 62 The writer observed correctly that the experience <strong>of</strong> that<br />
unfortunate contractor underlines the long chain <strong>of</strong> corruption in public<br />
procurement at all levels <strong>of</strong> government in Nigeria and that that issue is one <strong>of</strong><br />
the numerous challenges which an agency like the Bureau <strong>of</strong> Public<br />
Procurement is expected to deal with on daily basis at the Federal level. 63<br />
Therefore the enactment <strong>of</strong> a direct statutory provision will<br />
ameliorate this problems if not totally curb it. It is noteworthy that the Act<br />
prescribes harsh sanctions for those who violate its rules. Most <strong>of</strong> the<br />
sanctions are imprisonments without an option <strong>of</strong> fine. A natural person who<br />
is not a public <strong>of</strong>ficer can be imprisoned for not less than five years but not<br />
exceeding ten years without an option <strong>of</strong> fine 64 while a public <strong>of</strong>ficer who<br />
contravenes any provision <strong>of</strong> the Act is subject to the same years <strong>of</strong><br />
imprisonment in addition with summary dismissal from government<br />
services. 65 Even a corporate entity cannot escape sanction if it contravenes the<br />
provisions <strong>of</strong> the Act as it may be liable for disbarment from all public<br />
procurement for a period not less than five years and a fine equivalent to 25%<br />
<strong>of</strong> the value <strong>of</strong> the procurement in issue. 66 It is not likely that those measures<br />
specifically aimed at ensuring the integrity <strong>of</strong> procuring entities may fail, if<br />
effective sanctions in the Act are enforced.<br />
58 See J. E. Nigeria; Procurement Reform – A case for BPP in the states Vanguard Nigerian Newspaper on 9<br />
August 2010.<br />
59 Id.<br />
60 Id.<br />
61 Id.<br />
62 Id.<br />
63 Id.<br />
64 Section 58[1] <strong>of</strong> PPA.<br />
65 Id.Section 58[5].<br />
66 Id Section 58.
PROCUREMENT LAW IN NIGERIA 145<br />
Another impact is that <strong>of</strong> sensitization <strong>of</strong> the citizenry on the objects,<br />
values and components <strong>of</strong> the Act so that it can be acceptable to all. This<br />
aspect has generated an incredible result in Nigeria. Conferences and<br />
workshops were embarked upon by the civil societies and the BPP to create<br />
awareness among the people about the benefits <strong>of</strong> transparency in public<br />
procurement. The result is that <strong>of</strong> public acclamation <strong>of</strong> the Act, people have<br />
accepted the Act and are clamoring for enactment <strong>of</strong> same law at the state and<br />
local level. As a result most states have enacted their own procurement laws to<br />
satisfy the aspiration <strong>of</strong> their people 67 and other states are taking steps to<br />
follow suit. The benefit <strong>of</strong> this impact is that people are now playing a<br />
watchdog role on procurement issue.<br />
The last impact is that <strong>of</strong> prudent management <strong>of</strong> government<br />
resources and money. The Director-General <strong>of</strong> the Bureau for Public<br />
Procurement, BPP, Engr. Emeka Ezeh, is <strong>of</strong> the opinion that more than $590<br />
million (N88.5bn) has been saved the nation through the activities <strong>of</strong> the BPP<br />
in the short time <strong>of</strong> its existence. 68 According to him, the Public Procurement<br />
Act <strong>of</strong> 2007 has served as “a clarion call to probity, accountability, adherence<br />
to methods in the disbursement <strong>of</strong> a commonwealth and the production <strong>of</strong><br />
evidence in the application <strong>of</strong> the wealth.” As a result, “cost <strong>of</strong> contracts are<br />
no longer unreasonably expensive; they are projected in context and vetted<br />
with due rigour.” 69<br />
6. AMENDMENT TO THE ACT<br />
An amendment was made to some provisions <strong>of</strong> the PPA by the Senate in 2009.<br />
The first is on the percentage <strong>of</strong> mobilization to be paid to contractors handling<br />
Federal Government projects in the country. In the Public Procurement Act<br />
(Amendment) Bill passed by the Senate, the Senate specifically amended<br />
Section 35 <strong>of</strong> the Procurement Act which provided for payment <strong>of</strong> mobilization<br />
fee <strong>of</strong> not more that 15 per cent <strong>of</strong> the contract sum. 70 The amended Bill allows<br />
for the negotiation <strong>of</strong> mobilization fees to be prescribed in the bid document<br />
for approval by the tenders boards; whereas, the original Act exclusively vested<br />
such power in the Bureau <strong>of</strong> Public Procurement. 71<br />
The Senate also used the amendment to break the monopoly<br />
currently enjoyed by the Executive to give approval for procurements by other<br />
arms <strong>of</strong> government.<br />
Under the regime <strong>of</strong> approval that the new amendment seeks to<br />
67 Twelve states have enacted their own procurement law in Nigeria.<br />
68 Oscarline Onwuemenyi Due process saved Nigeria N88.5Bbn in two years 12 August 2010 Vanguard<br />
Newspaper.<br />
69 Id.<br />
70 See report <strong>of</strong> the Amendment by the National newspapers Senate amends Public procurement Act This<br />
day 7th <strong>of</strong> October 2009.<br />
71 Id.
146 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
introduce, other arms <strong>of</strong> government – Legislature and Judiciary – have been<br />
given powers to govern their procurement in line with the provisions <strong>of</strong> their<br />
respective budgets. By virtue <strong>of</strong> the amended Section 16, power <strong>of</strong> approval<br />
has been devolved to the Body <strong>of</strong> Principal Officers <strong>of</strong> the National Assembly<br />
in the case <strong>of</strong> procurements in the Federal Legislature and the Judiciary<br />
Tenders Board in the case <strong>of</strong> procurements in the Judiciary.<br />
According to the Chairman <strong>of</strong> the Senate Committee on Finance,<br />
Senator Ahmed Makarfi, who presented the report <strong>of</strong> the committee on the<br />
amendment Bill, the purpose <strong>of</strong> the amendment to section 16 was to ensure<br />
the independence <strong>of</strong> the other arms <strong>of</strong> government. 72<br />
Section 22 was also amended to provide that the decision <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Tenders Board shall be communicated to both the Minister and the<br />
Accounting Officers <strong>of</strong> the entities making the procurements in the<br />
Legislature and the Judiciary. In the original Act, the decision was<br />
communicated to only the minister. 73<br />
The Senate, which subjected the Bill to clause-by-clause<br />
consideration, also deleted the section which vested the Chairmanship <strong>of</strong> the<br />
National Council on Public Procurement (NCPP) on the Minister <strong>of</strong> Finance<br />
and provided that the Chairman shall be appointed by the President.<br />
Another amendment to the Bill was the inclusion <strong>of</strong> the Nigerian<br />
Union <strong>of</strong> <strong>Journal</strong>ists (NUJ) as against the media under composition <strong>of</strong><br />
membership <strong>of</strong> the NCPP. 74<br />
7. CHALLENGE BEFORE THE NEW LEGAL<br />
REGIME<br />
The enactment <strong>of</strong> PPA is a great opportunity for Nigeria to develop as a nation<br />
because national resources will be allocated on just and transparent manner to<br />
satisfy the needs <strong>of</strong> the people and the move towards government<br />
accountability will be guaranteed as the people have a role to monitor the use<br />
<strong>of</strong> their resources. However the greatest challenge to the Act is the reluctance<br />
on the path <strong>of</strong> the government to embrace in totality the full implementation <strong>of</strong><br />
the Act. Public contract is seen as a tool to reward political loyalists and to<br />
amass wealth.<br />
The full implementation <strong>of</strong> the Act will take that supposed tool <strong>of</strong><br />
reward away from those in governments hence the lackadaisical attitude by<br />
the government to fully implement the law. Since 2007, 75 the government has<br />
failed to do the first thing that the Act prescribes to be done to lay a strong<br />
72 Id.<br />
73 Id.<br />
74 Id.<br />
75 The Act was passed in 2007.
PROCUREMENT LAW IN NIGERIA 147<br />
foundation for its implementation. Section 1 <strong>of</strong> subsection 1 76 establishes the<br />
National Council on Public Procurement with mandate so sacrosanct to be<br />
jettisoned. It has mandate to approve and amend the monetary and prior review<br />
thresholds for the application <strong>of</strong> the provisions <strong>of</strong> the Act by procuring<br />
entities. 77 It is the highest authority in the hierarchical structure <strong>of</strong> the<br />
procurement institutions in Nigeria and without its establishment, its statutory<br />
role to control and monitor procurement procedure will be lost. Apart from the<br />
enviable status and function <strong>of</strong> the NCPP, the likely feature <strong>of</strong> the Council<br />
which is a good quality for success is the composition <strong>of</strong> its members. 78<br />
While there may be tendency on the path <strong>of</strong> the government to<br />
influence some <strong>of</strong> the members, there is likelihood that it may be difficult to<br />
influence majority <strong>of</strong> them. As a result, it will be difficult for the government<br />
to influence award <strong>of</strong> contract to their surrogates. The realization <strong>of</strong> that<br />
consequence on the path <strong>of</strong> the government might create reluctance on their<br />
path to full implementation <strong>of</strong> the Act. Presently, it is the Federal Executive<br />
Council [FEC] that approves public contracts in Nigeria a duty that is<br />
statutorily assigned to NCPP as the approving authority. The continued<br />
approval <strong>of</strong> contracts by the Federal Executive Council violates the Public<br />
Procurement Act as FEC is not the approving authority recognized by the Act<br />
and this has led to more violation <strong>of</strong> the Act.<br />
The general pabulum is that birds <strong>of</strong> the same feather flocks together,<br />
the failure <strong>of</strong> the Government to constitute NCCP which should be the<br />
foundational step for entrenchment <strong>of</strong> new procurement regime in Nigeria has<br />
led to other violation, the appointment <strong>of</strong> the Director General <strong>of</strong> the BPP by<br />
the president without an input from the yet to be constituted NCCP as the Act<br />
provided is a flagrant disobedience to the provision <strong>of</strong> the Act. 79<br />
The outcome <strong>of</strong> such a precarious footing could be predicted. Abuse<br />
<strong>of</strong> procurement is likely to be the order <strong>of</strong> the day and that could be one <strong>of</strong> the<br />
contributing factors to recent abuse in the awards <strong>of</strong> high pr<strong>of</strong>ile contracts in<br />
Nigeria. The award <strong>of</strong> a N8.2 billion contract for the upgrading <strong>of</strong> NTA<br />
broadcast equipment generated a lot <strong>of</strong> controversy until it was probed by the<br />
Senate to affirm its consistency with due process <strong>of</strong> procurement law. Certain<br />
revelations from the probe suggest the fact that a lot <strong>of</strong> discrepancies occurred<br />
during the award. An independent reporter explained the inconsistencies <strong>of</strong><br />
76 Id.<br />
77 Id Section 2[A].<br />
78 Some <strong>of</strong> the members are Minister <strong>of</strong> Finance, Attorney-General and Minister <strong>of</strong> Justice, The Secretary to<br />
the Government <strong>of</strong> the federation, Economic Adviser to the president who by their political position<br />
might likely be influenced by the president but the list <strong>of</strong> members include representatives <strong>of</strong> the civil<br />
society and other pr<strong>of</strong>essional bodies like Nigeria Bar Association, Nigeria Society <strong>of</strong> Engineers, Nigeria<br />
Institute <strong>of</strong> Purchasing and Supply Management, Nigeria Association <strong>of</strong> Chambers <strong>of</strong> Commerce,<br />
Industry, Mines and Agriculture etc who are likely to be independent. In fact some <strong>of</strong> the pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />
bodies like Nigerian Bar Association have been in the forefront <strong>of</strong> democracy campaign.<br />
79 The Act provides in section 7[1] that the Director General shall be appointed by the President, on the<br />
recommendation <strong>of</strong> the NCCP after competitive selections.
148 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
the award with the procurement law when he wrote: 80<br />
“During the Public Hearing conducted by the Senate Committee,<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>. Akunyili had stated categorically that the contract was not<br />
awarded by her; rather she only received three names <strong>of</strong> contractors<br />
forwarded to her by the NTA (Director General?) which she also<br />
forwarded to the President/Federal Executive Council (FEC) for<br />
approval. Further she claimed at that time (2009) that the planning<br />
<strong>of</strong> the contract started about two years ago (that is 2007) before her<br />
appointment as Minister, though concluded under administration,<br />
and that she is ignorant <strong>of</strong> the technicalities involved in the<br />
procurement processes and therefore failed to participate in<br />
the award <strong>of</strong> the contract…the first capital error <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>. Akunyili is<br />
that in procurement implementation under Section 19 and 22(5) <strong>of</strong><br />
the Public Procurement Act , no one contract is awarded to three<br />
contractors at the same time by the Tenders Board with the approval<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Chief Accounting Officer. It is on record that while<br />
responding to the above charges before the Senate Committee, the<br />
Director General <strong>of</strong> the BPP, Engr. Emeka Ezeh admitted on the<br />
floor <strong>of</strong> the Senate, before the nation’s media crew <strong>of</strong> print and<br />
electronic that the President sent the details <strong>of</strong> the three contractors<br />
to him for audit/review. Therefore in this chain <strong>of</strong> contract award<br />
process, the bus stop was now at Engr. Ezeh’s door step. According<br />
to Ezeh, on analyzing the contract documents he found out there<br />
were errors, which included that the project (contract) was not<br />
appropriated for, neither was it advertised for prospective bidders as<br />
required by law in Section 24 <strong>of</strong> the PPA.”<br />
The independent reporter condemns the role <strong>of</strong> the Director General<br />
in the whole saga when he further wrote: 81<br />
“The Bureau under Engr. Ezeh did not only become an independent<br />
statutory player (referee) but also a major party in bid Technical<br />
and Financial Evaluation (TFE) in the contract award, a<br />
responsibility strictly reserved for procuring entities . In essence, he<br />
is now acting as a procuring entity instead <strong>of</strong> an independent umpire<br />
that should adjudicate on the matter when and if there is a dispute …<br />
By selecting one <strong>of</strong> the contractors forwarded to Engr. Ezeh, which<br />
he described as ‘Damage Control’, knowing that the award failed<br />
80 See M. B. Attah Independent Report: The unresolved N8.14 Billion NTA Contract Award Saga http://<br />
www.nigerianinquirer.com/2010/07/30/independent-report-the-unresolved-?8-4-billion-nta-cont<br />
[assessed on 31 August 2010.<br />
81 Id.
PROCUREMENT LAW IN NIGERIA 149<br />
due process makes him a major party in the [bad] procurement<br />
dispute.”<br />
Another indictment for BPP came in respect with Abuja Airport<br />
Second Runway Contract for the construction <strong>of</strong> a four –kilometer second<br />
runway at the Nnamadi Azikiwe International Airport Abuja. The House <strong>of</strong><br />
Representatives Committee on Aviation after conducting a public hearing on<br />
the contract gave a damning verdict accusing BPP <strong>of</strong> manipulating the cost<br />
and bidding process <strong>of</strong> the award in violation <strong>of</strong> procurement procedures. 82 A<br />
newspaper Editorial in Nigeria captures the discrepancies graphically when it<br />
comments:<br />
“Many issues were uncovered during the public hearing. The ‘No<br />
Objection Certificate’ issued for the project was not only falsely<br />
issued by the Bureau <strong>of</strong> Public Procurement but deliberately and<br />
wrongly issue in conspiracy with the Managing Director <strong>of</strong> Federal<br />
Airport Authority <strong>of</strong> Nigeria [FAAN] and other <strong>of</strong>ficers <strong>of</strong> FAAN to<br />
inflate contract and defraud the federal government <strong>of</strong> Nigeria. The<br />
proceedings, processes and decisions for the award <strong>of</strong> the contract<br />
were not made accessible to the public, which would have allowed<br />
for observation, monitoring ,review ,comment and possible whistle<br />
blowing to ensure transparency.” 83<br />
The Minister <strong>of</strong> Transport Alhaji Isa Ibrahim Bio was also indicted in<br />
the award <strong>of</strong> contract for the modernization <strong>of</strong> the Jebba-Kano railway line to<br />
Costain West Africa Construction Company at the sum <strong>of</strong> N12.2billion. The<br />
staff <strong>of</strong> the Railway who made the allegation recounts how the contract was<br />
inflated through spurious procedures contrary to procurement rules. They<br />
assert: 84<br />
“By right, the board supposes to deliberate and agree on any railway<br />
contract before it recommend to the Federal Executive Council<br />
(FEC) through the Minister for approval. But unfortunately, the<br />
meeting <strong>of</strong> the board was summoned on 29 December, 2009 by<br />
10am to deliberate on the contract for the rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> the Jebba<br />
82 House Aviation Committee Chairman, Bethel Amadi, issued a statement where he specifically mentioned<br />
the sections <strong>of</strong> the law breached. He said: ‘There were obvious breaches <strong>of</strong> various Sections <strong>of</strong> the Public<br />
Procurement Act, especially 16(17), (18), (19), (20); 24(3), 31(2), (3a, b and c), and 33, indicating the<br />
potential breach <strong>of</strong> due process in the award <strong>of</strong> the contract’ See http://news2.onlinenigeria.com/news/<br />
general/25770-Reps-Tackle-Presidency-Over-Runway-Contract.htm [assessed on 1 September 2010.See<br />
also Abuja's Airport Runway <strong>of</strong> Controversy Daily Trust 14 April 2010.<br />
83 See News star Newspaper 31 May –1 June Editorial Pr<strong>of</strong>ligacy in Public procurement page 14.<br />
84 S. Abubakar, Nigeria: How N2Billion Railway project was awarded at N24 Billion Daily Trust 26<br />
January 2010. Can be down loaded at http://allafrica.com/stories/201001270550.html[assessed on 1<br />
September 2010].
150 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
to Kano railway line that was to be awarded to Costain West Africa<br />
that same day by 4pm.<br />
It has already been decided and invitations were already distributed<br />
invited people to witness the signing <strong>of</strong> the contract by 4pm that day<br />
before we were asked to come for a meeting by 10am the same day<br />
to agree on what has already been decided. There was no record<br />
anywhere indicating that Costain West Africa ever handled any<br />
railway project in the past. In any case, the board suppose to meet,<br />
deliberate and agree on who should be recommended for the<br />
contract and not for us to adopt the decisions <strong>of</strong> the minister.”<br />
The minister retorted back in defense: 85<br />
“We want to make sure Nigerians enjoy railway services. The<br />
challenges are enormous, people call us names. We are not <strong>of</strong><br />
particular interest to a particular contractor, to a particular sector, to<br />
a particular group, but what is <strong>of</strong> particular interest to this<br />
administration is delivery. If you are able to deliver or you have the<br />
ability to deliver, we would work together.”<br />
The fact that emanates from all these controversies is the<br />
involvement <strong>of</strong> the government in the award <strong>of</strong> contracts in Nigeria contrary<br />
to the procurement law. Governments are not procuring entities; they are not<br />
tender boards and should also not be the approving authority for public<br />
contracts. The present trend is misnomer and should be rescinded. Another<br />
pathetic fact is that <strong>of</strong> the integrity <strong>of</strong> the procurement <strong>of</strong>ficers. That is a great<br />
setback to the new legal regime but the root cause is still the failure <strong>of</strong> the<br />
government to fully implement the procurement law. Although there is<br />
adequate sanction 86 for the procurement <strong>of</strong>ficers who misbehave in the Act to<br />
make them suffer for their misdemeanor, if government is involved, they may<br />
escape punishment. In addition, section 57[1] 87 provides that the Bureau with<br />
the approval <strong>of</strong> the NCPC shall stipulate a code <strong>of</strong> conduct for all public<br />
<strong>of</strong>ficers. The problem is that the NCPC has not been constituted. Final<br />
implementation <strong>of</strong> the procurement law is the panacea to the ills <strong>of</strong> the<br />
procurement system in Nigeria.<br />
85 Id.<br />
86 See section 57 <strong>of</strong> the Act [PPA].<br />
87 Id.
PROCUREMENT LAW IN NIGERIA 151<br />
8. CONCLUSION<br />
We have examined the procurement law in Nigeria, the policies and the<br />
objectives <strong>of</strong> the law at the domestic level are sound. The regulations fashions<br />
along UN Commission on International Trade <strong>Law</strong> [UNICITRAL] Model are<br />
capable <strong>of</strong> attaining the desired objectives if well implemented and that is<br />
where the problem lies. There is great concern on the involvement <strong>of</strong> the<br />
government in the procuring process, concern on the integrity <strong>of</strong> the<br />
procurement <strong>of</strong>ficers and the lack <strong>of</strong> political will by the government to fully<br />
implement the law. We observed to our chagrin, partial implementation <strong>of</strong> law<br />
by the government. What could be responsible? The power to award contract<br />
is a prestigious one which the government does not want to lose and we pr<strong>of</strong>ess<br />
that to be the reason why the federal government in Nigeria has not constituted<br />
the right body to approve contract. Till today the Federal Executive Council is<br />
responsible for approval <strong>of</strong> contracts while the ministers and other government<br />
functionaries play a greater role in procuring contracts. The resultant effect <strong>of</strong><br />
that lip service has been explained in this article which is an orgy <strong>of</strong> violation<br />
<strong>of</strong> procurement law. We, therefore call on the federal Government <strong>of</strong> Nigeria<br />
to take all necessary steps to inaugurate the NCPP according to the<br />
procurement law. On the issue <strong>of</strong> the integrity <strong>of</strong> the procurement <strong>of</strong>ficers,<br />
those who are found to be corrupt or whose names have been discredited<br />
should face the wrath <strong>of</strong> law and qualified pr<strong>of</strong>essionals <strong>of</strong> impeccable<br />
character should be appointed. Another aspect is the scope <strong>of</strong> the application<br />
<strong>of</strong> the PPA, until similar law applies in all the states and local levels, the gain<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Act shall be short-lived. Though the broad exception in the areas <strong>of</strong><br />
defense and security may be universal 88 it can constitute an avenue for<br />
compromise and corruption in Nigeria in view <strong>of</strong> the controversy surrounding<br />
the use <strong>of</strong> security vote by the executive governors in the states. There should<br />
be an amendment to check the excesses <strong>of</strong> the executives in that area.<br />
88 Almost all the procurement law <strong>of</strong> every country has this exception.
153<br />
COMMENTS<br />
Principled leadership: Finding common ground among<br />
divergent philosophies*<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
V. D. Lopez**<br />
This opinion piece tentatively explores the interrelationship among the various<br />
competing ethical philosophies and the political systems they inform and notes<br />
some <strong>of</strong> the qualities shared by effective principled leaders that transcend<br />
irreconcilable philosophical differences and foster fair decision making<br />
regardless <strong>of</strong> the school <strong>of</strong> ethics from which a leader's personal ethics are<br />
derived.<br />
1. INTRODUCTION<br />
The quest to discover ethical truths has led Western philosophers down some<br />
very different paths throughout the past three millennia. Even a cursory<br />
examination <strong>of</strong> the field quickly reveals irresolvable tensions among<br />
irreconcilable points <strong>of</strong> view. Unfortunately, the discussion <strong>of</strong> ethical standards<br />
and the societal, political and moral norms they inform <strong>of</strong>ten occurs without an<br />
attempt to define terms or provide context for meaningful debate. A brief<br />
overview <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> the leading divergent philosophies is a good starting point<br />
to any meaningful discussion on ethics, its impact on public policy and its role<br />
in the making <strong>of</strong> a principled leader.<br />
2. A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF SOME TRADITIONAL<br />
SCHOOLS OF ETHICS<br />
Ethical Absolutism<br />
Ethical absolutism is an ethical philosophy with many diverse branches all tied<br />
in to the central idea that there are certain universal standards by which to<br />
measure morality. Under this broad branch <strong>of</strong> ethics, concepts such as good and<br />
evil and right and wrong have a separate existence that can be discovered and<br />
* This opinion piece is based in part on an essay by the author on principled leadership that was posted to<br />
leaderethics.com in 2005.<br />
** Associate Pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> Legal Studies in Business, H<strong>of</strong>stra <strong>University</strong>, Frank G. Zarb School <strong>of</strong> Business,<br />
Hempstead, New York. The author gratefully acknowledges the support <strong>of</strong> a summer research grant from<br />
the Zarb School <strong>of</strong> Business that facilitated research, writing, and revision <strong>of</strong> several articles and this<br />
opinion piece.
154 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
understood by human beings through philosophical inquiry. Proponents <strong>of</strong> this<br />
broad branch <strong>of</strong> ethics represent a very wide variety <strong>of</strong> schools <strong>of</strong> thoughts that<br />
<strong>of</strong>ten include diametrically opposed world views and political philosophies.<br />
Plato, St. Thomas Aquinas and Karl Marx all believed in ethical absolutism,<br />
despite the fact that the overall philosophy and world view <strong>of</strong> each man was<br />
quite different.<br />
Religious Fundamentalism<br />
Religious fundamentalism is an <strong>of</strong>fshoot <strong>of</strong> ethical fundamentalism. As a<br />
theory <strong>of</strong> ethics, it is based on the existence <strong>of</strong> certain immutable truths. Unlike<br />
ethical absolutism, however, which requires that these values be discovered<br />
through philosophical inquiry and introspection, ethical norms under religious<br />
fundamentalism can only be found by studying the lives and writings <strong>of</strong><br />
prophets or by consulting Holy Scriptures. Under this philosophy, living a<br />
moral life depends upon strict adherence to the religious principles and moral<br />
code dictated by one’s religion.<br />
Utilitarianism<br />
Utilitarianism has as its ethical base the assignment <strong>of</strong> value to actions based<br />
upon their outcome. Under utilitarianism, the ultimate good is defined as<br />
actions intended to bring about the greatest happiness (or greatest good) for the<br />
greatest number <strong>of</strong> individuals in any society. Thus, moral action for a<br />
utilitarian requires the constant evaluation <strong>of</strong> actions based upon their intended<br />
result. Actions that bring about the greatest good to the greatest number are<br />
ethical, or good, while actions that fall short <strong>of</strong> that goal are unethical, or<br />
wrong. To put it another way, utilitarianism does not recognize an intrinsic<br />
value to actions, but rather assigns a positive or negative moral judgment to<br />
actions only in view <strong>of</strong> their result. The most notable proponents <strong>of</strong> this<br />
philosophy are the British philosophers Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) and<br />
John Stuart Mill (1806-1873).<br />
Ethical Relativism<br />
Like utilitarianism, ethical relativism denies the existence <strong>of</strong> absolute moral<br />
values, and holds that moral judgments cannot be made in a vacuum. Unlike<br />
utilitarianism, however, the yardstick by which to measure the morality <strong>of</strong> an<br />
act is not the common good, but rather the circumstances surrounding the<br />
person committing an act at the time that an act is committed. It is a precept <strong>of</strong><br />
this philosophy that a person's actions cannot be judged other than by placing<br />
oneself in the same situation that the actor faced in committing the act in
PRINCIPLED LEADERSHIP 155<br />
question. So that stealing to feed one's hungry child, for example, is not<br />
necessarily wrong. On a societal level, ethical relativism acknowledges that<br />
there are differences between cultures and that what is considered wrong or<br />
even hateful in one culture may be acceptable in another, depending on its<br />
particular circumstances. Human sacrifice, cannibalism, infanticide and ethnic<br />
cleansing are all arguably justifiable for some cultures. Notable proponents <strong>of</strong><br />
relativistic theories include W.G. Sumner (1849-1910) in the U.S. and E.A.<br />
Westermarck (1862-1939) in the U.K.<br />
Deontology<br />
Deontology is a duty-based ethical theory whose principal proponent is the<br />
German philosopher Immanuel Kant (1724-1804). For Kant, an act's morality<br />
is dependent upon the actor's motive, and the only unconditionally good motive<br />
is doing one’s duty. For Kant, the concept <strong>of</strong> duty finds its expression in<br />
categorical imperatives, a set <strong>of</strong> rules <strong>of</strong> behavior derived from practical reason<br />
and tested through a filter <strong>of</strong> universal application. A basic categorical<br />
imperative arrived at practical reasoning, such as you should not steal, is valid<br />
if you can justify the whole world living up to the rule. In other words, moral<br />
behavior can be defined as acting in accordance with rules that you would be<br />
willing to impose on the whole world as a valid code <strong>of</strong> conduct. A person acts<br />
morally whenever she follows a categorical imperative out <strong>of</strong> a sense <strong>of</strong> duty.<br />
Merely engaging in right action <strong>of</strong> itself is not moral; refraining from stealing<br />
because one feels the obligation not to steal is moral conduct, but refraining<br />
from stealing out <strong>of</strong> fear <strong>of</strong> getting caught would not rise to the level <strong>of</strong> moral<br />
conduct.<br />
3. ETHICS AND PUBLIC POLICY<br />
The political implications that flow from even a very superficial overview <strong>of</strong><br />
differing ethical systems should not be ignored. Whether by design or by<br />
default, the ethical values held by political leaders and lawmakers invariably<br />
become a part <strong>of</strong> the political system. We need not look far to see examples <strong>of</strong><br />
the influence <strong>of</strong> ethical systems on public policy and on the politics <strong>of</strong> nations.<br />
The influence <strong>of</strong> religious fundamentalism can readily be seen today in a<br />
number <strong>of</strong> countries, particularly in the Middle East, where militant religious<br />
fundamentalists are engaged in armed struggles to overthrow what they believe<br />
to be immoral secular governments that are instilling in their people false moral<br />
values. If one believes that the only true source <strong>of</strong> morality is religion, it is<br />
logical to believe that theocracy is not only the best, but perhaps the only moral<br />
form <strong>of</strong> government. Ethical absolutism is also readily observable in its secular<br />
form in past and present non-religious totalitarian Marxist, communist and
156 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
fascist regimes. Taken to their logical conclusion, absolutist ideals can not only<br />
be used to justify totalitarianism, they require it; if there are certain knowable,<br />
immutable truths that are valid for all time, then only truly moral form <strong>of</strong><br />
government is one that educates and indoctrinates its people to recognize and<br />
conform to the moral conduct that those truths dictate.<br />
If totalitarian regimes are based on ethical absolutism or religious<br />
fundamentalism, it is clear that democratic governments lean towards nonfundamentalist<br />
ethical principles. The assumption that a variety <strong>of</strong> plausible<br />
views can exist on even essential ethical principles is central to a democratic<br />
form <strong>of</strong> government. The principle <strong>of</strong> majority rule almost inevitably leads to<br />
the adoption <strong>of</strong> some form <strong>of</strong> moral relativism as the guiding ethical principle,<br />
especially in societies with highly diverse social, ethnic and religious cultures<br />
and large numbers <strong>of</strong> unassimilated immigrant populations. The very notion<br />
that right and wrong is subject to a vote institutionalizes ethical relativism in<br />
all democracies; issues such as the death penalty, abortion, and pornography,<br />
and governmental efforts to regulate these areas, illustrate with the strong<br />
emotions and endless debate they elicit our relativistic ethics. Individuals in<br />
democratic societies are free to reject ethical relativism, and many do. They<br />
can also lobby their government to change existing laws, arguing for the<br />
adoption <strong>of</strong> their point <strong>of</strong> view. But a democratic system that completely<br />
abandons ethical relativism in favor <strong>of</strong> ethical absolutism, whether <strong>of</strong> the<br />
secular or religious variety, cannot remain a democracy for long.<br />
The obvious problem we face when trying to impose an ethical<br />
system is in deciding which system to use. While it can be argued that<br />
governments should not legislate morality, all governments in fact do so to<br />
some extent. Criminal law is largely based on prohibiting and punishing<br />
antisocial behavior; as such, criminal law inevitably reflects society's ethical<br />
standards and attempts to discourage behavior that society deems immoral.<br />
Ultimately, questions <strong>of</strong> ethics come down to personal belief. Depending on<br />
the philosophical system applied, nearly any moral point <strong>of</strong> view is<br />
defensible; unfortunately, one person's ethical conduct is frequently another's<br />
mortal sin. In a political context, ethical debate <strong>of</strong>ten hinges on irreconcilable<br />
differences. On the abortion issue, for example, the pro choice and pro-life<br />
groups have philosophical differences that cannot be reconciled. The same is<br />
true <strong>of</strong> people on opposite sides <strong>of</strong> the perpetual debate on the death penalty,<br />
gun control, legalization <strong>of</strong> drugs, animal research, gay marriage, and<br />
innumerable other issues. Very <strong>of</strong>ten, groups on either side <strong>of</strong> a political<br />
controversy believe themselves to be morally right, and, by definition, believe<br />
that those who hold opposing points <strong>of</strong> view are morally wrong (hence,<br />
immoral). The strength <strong>of</strong> a democracy is in its ability to incorporate differing<br />
points <strong>of</strong> view and to obtain a functional compromise on most issues. Some<br />
issues, however, leave no room for compromise, and it is here that the battle
PRINCIPLED LEADERSHIP 157<br />
for the hearts, minds – and votes – <strong>of</strong> citizens is fought. Regardless <strong>of</strong> what<br />
group wins and what opinion manages to weave itself into the fabric <strong>of</strong> the<br />
law, issues <strong>of</strong> ethics cannot be resolved by majority rule for most people, and<br />
spirited debates continue, sometimes escalating into violence and death in too<br />
many countries around the globe.<br />
4. CHARACTERISTICS OF PRINCIPALED<br />
LEADERS<br />
Fortunately, honest, honorable men and women worthy <strong>of</strong> the respect and<br />
loyalty <strong>of</strong> those they are entrusted to lead can create and promote an ethical<br />
business environment regardless <strong>of</strong> whether their personal ethics are grounded<br />
in the teleology or deontology traditions. I prefer the term principled leadership<br />
to that <strong>of</strong> ethical leadership to denote such individuals precisely because there<br />
is less ambiguity in the former than in the latter term. For me at least, the<br />
qualities that make for a principled leader are easily enumerated, and the<br />
environment that such individuals need in order to thrive and flourish is equally<br />
easily identified. These leaders do not need to consult best practices manuals<br />
or other flavor-<strong>of</strong>-the-month derivative “new” pathway to success. Their<br />
guiding principles are simple, timeless, and work without mystery or magic.<br />
They simply share the following characteristics:<br />
1. They put the interests <strong>of</strong> the institution they serve above their own self<br />
interest;<br />
2. They understand that character is defined by the small acts they perform<br />
when nobody is looking;<br />
3. They recognize that respect must be earned and nurtured over time but can<br />
be lost in an instant;<br />
4. They promote their people, not themselves;<br />
5. They take responsibility for their personal failures and for the failures <strong>of</strong><br />
the group they lead;<br />
6. They share credit for their successes with those who made them possible;<br />
7. They are consistent and predictable in their decision making and in<br />
exercising their discretion;<br />
8. They strive to do what is right rather than what is expedient, regardless <strong>of</strong><br />
the consequences to themselves;<br />
9. They do not fear making unpopular decisions or clearly communicating<br />
their rationale for making such decisions;<br />
10. They only serve institutions that do not require them to compromise their<br />
principles.<br />
Principled leaders make an enormous impact on the organizations they serve at<br />
all levels, and are <strong>of</strong>ten most appreciated after they retire or move on, their<br />
contributions and impact most poignant and palpable in their absence.
158 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
5. CONCLUSION<br />
While we may forever debate the relative worth or practical value <strong>of</strong> the<br />
various schools <strong>of</strong> ethics, there can be no doubt that there are countless<br />
principled leaders whose personal ethics reflect each <strong>of</strong> these divergent views.<br />
Consistency, fairness, conscientiousness, reasonableness, supportiveness and<br />
predictability are among the qualities that earn good leaders the respect and<br />
trust <strong>of</strong> those they are entrusted to lead and are universal virtues in themselves.<br />
Women and men <strong>of</strong> good conscience can arrive at good decisions for the<br />
organizations they lead from a wide range <strong>of</strong> perspectives. And while their<br />
personal ethics will inform their views on issues, it is these other qualities that<br />
will ultimately determine whether they are principled leaders. Strict adherence<br />
to a given ethical philosophy will not guarantee principled leadership, and may<br />
well hinder it. Leaders with an absolutist philosophy (religious <strong>of</strong> secular) can<br />
be inflexible, overly judgmental, and unable to empathize or effectively<br />
interact with those who do not share their views. Likewise, leaders who strictly<br />
follow ethical relativism may face difficulty in setting clear standards,<br />
enforcing rules and providing a predictable, stable administration. And,<br />
clearly, a truly nihilistic individual who acknowledges no valid guiding<br />
principles beyond the attainment <strong>of</strong> goals dictated by their self-interest will<br />
never be a principled leader.<br />
Examining the essential sources <strong>of</strong> our different ethical belief<br />
systems can enhance understanding, allow us to find common ground and<br />
work together towards achieving a common purpose. The personal ethical<br />
values <strong>of</strong> a leader, and the ethical philosophy upon which these are grounded,<br />
may be important elements <strong>of</strong> principled leadership. But an individual’s value<br />
system is not the best yardstick by which to measure principled leadership.<br />
Ultimately, we must judge our leaders by the observable virtues we can glean<br />
from their actions and recognize that good, honorable, effective principled<br />
leaders may hold value systems very different from our own.
159<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
MTN & Airtel’s African tryst: The legal angle<br />
S.V. Adithya Vidyasagar*<br />
Bharti Airtel and MTN have been two telecommunication companies that enjoy<br />
a dominant position in India and South Africa respectively. When an alliance<br />
was first proposed between these to companies, everyone in both the countries<br />
went into frenzy as to how the combined entity would be formed, its structure<br />
and the potential benefits this combined entity would provide to its subscribers<br />
and shareholders. When the deal didn’t get through; infact it fell through twice,<br />
it was as if a match made in heavens was not being allowed to be. The primary<br />
logic which perhaps formed the basis <strong>of</strong> this deal’s failure was that these two<br />
companies were seen in their home territories as prized possessions and their<br />
respective governments were not willing to let them relinquish their national<br />
identities. Keeping this basic premise in mind, this article tries to dwell deep<br />
into the legal issues involved in this deal and how they were instrumental in the<br />
failure <strong>of</strong> this deal. The three primary legal issues involved in this deal were:<br />
(i) Dual Listing <strong>of</strong> the combined entity (ii) FDI regime in India (iii) India’s<br />
Takeover Code. All these issues are discussed in detail in Chapter 3 <strong>of</strong> this<br />
article. Since the deal never actually materialized, the deal structure and the<br />
full monetary aspects <strong>of</strong> the deal were never disclosed. Hence secondary<br />
sources <strong>of</strong> information like leading newspapers, journals etc were utilized to<br />
base this article. The complex legal issues involved in this deal have been<br />
analyzed in a simplified manner for the benefit <strong>of</strong> the general public and to<br />
allow for everyone to appreciate the size and importance <strong>of</strong> the deal. The main<br />
aim <strong>of</strong> this article is to allow for the general public to understand the legal<br />
issues which didn’t allow the deal to go through.<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
Bharti Airtel and MTN have been two telecommunication companies that<br />
enjoy a dominant position in India and South Africa respectively. When an<br />
alliance was first proposed between these two companies, everyone in both the<br />
countries went into frenzy as to how the combined entity would be formed, its<br />
structure and the potential benefits this combined entity would provide to its<br />
subscribers and shareholders.<br />
When the deal didn’t get through; in fact it fell through twice, it was<br />
as if a match made in heavens was not being allowed to be. The primary logic<br />
<br />
Company Secretary <strong>of</strong> the Institute <strong>of</strong> Company Secretaries <strong>of</strong> India (ICSI); B.Com LL.B (Hons.)<br />
candidate at Gujarat National <strong>Law</strong> <strong>University</strong>, India (Class <strong>of</strong> 2006 - 2011).
160 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
which perhaps formed the basis <strong>of</strong> this deal’s failure was that these two<br />
companies were seen in their home territories as prized possessions and their<br />
respective governments were not willing to let them relinquish their national<br />
identities. Keeping this basic premise in mind, this article tries to dwell deep<br />
into the legal issues involved in this deal and how they were instrumental in the<br />
failure <strong>of</strong> this deal.<br />
The three primary legal issues involved in this deal were: (i) Dual<br />
Listing <strong>of</strong> the combined entity (ii) FDI regime in India (iii) India’s Takeover<br />
Code. All these issues are discussed in detail in Chapter 3 <strong>of</strong> this article. Since<br />
the deal never actually materialized, the deal structure and the full monetary<br />
aspects <strong>of</strong> the deal were never disclosed. Hence secondary sources <strong>of</strong><br />
information like leading newspapers, journals etc were utilized to base this<br />
article.<br />
The complex legal issues involved in this deal have been analyzed in<br />
a simplified manner for the benefit <strong>of</strong> the general public and to allow for<br />
everyone to appreciate the size and importance <strong>of</strong> the deal. The main aim <strong>of</strong><br />
this article is to allow for the general public to understand the legal issues<br />
which didn’t allow the deal to go through.<br />
PROLOGUE<br />
Bharti Airtel Ltd is an India based multinational mobile telecommunications<br />
company. It is the largest cellular service provider in India and makes up for<br />
about 23 per cent <strong>of</strong> the India’s mobile market. 1 The telecom company is led<br />
by India’s telecom czar, Mr. Sunil Mittal who effectively holds a controlling<br />
stake in Bharti Airtel through Bharti Telecom. Bharti Airtel has been keen to<br />
position itself as a transnational corporation with its non-India operations like<br />
Airtel Lanka, Airtel Kenya etc.<br />
The MTN Group is a South Africa based multinational mobile<br />
telecommunications company, operating in many African and Middle Eastern<br />
countries. It has presence in nearly 20 countries in Africa and Middle East.<br />
Bharti Airtel and MTN conducted exclusive negotiations twice, 2 in<br />
just one year to create a transnational alliance which in future could lead to a<br />
full blown merger however both times the negotiations fell through. 3 The<br />
talks attracted the attention <strong>of</strong> the Governments <strong>of</strong> both the countries who kept<br />
a close eye on every move made by these two corporations. With all this<br />
public, industry and media frenzy over a deal which could have easily<br />
1 ‘Subscriber Figures for April 2010’, Cellular Operator Association <strong>of</strong> India, URL: http://coai.com/<br />
Sub%20Figs/GSM%202010/all%20india%20GSM%20cell%20sub%20figures%20-%20Apr%27%2010.<br />
xls (Last visited on 13 May, 2010).<br />
2 The first round began on 5 May, 2008 and the second round on 25 May, 2009.<br />
3 A. Sharma and E. Bellman, ‘Bharti, MTN Disconnect Deal Worth $24 Billion’, The Wall Street <strong>Journal</strong>,<br />
URL: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB125431578653952371.html (Last visited on 20 April, 2010).
AIRTEL’S AFRICAN TRYST 161<br />
positioned the combined entity as a leading telecommunications company<br />
worldwide, the deal fell through.<br />
This article tries to understand in simple terms the reasons for<br />
pursuing this deal and the reasons for its fallout from a legal angle. The<br />
various Indian laws applicable to this deal and the reasons for South African<br />
government’s unwillingness to approve a proposed deal structure would be<br />
analyzed. The main thrust <strong>of</strong> this paper is to bring to the fore the importance<br />
<strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> these corporations in their home countries and how each country<br />
was unwilling to let go <strong>of</strong> its home corporation’s national identity.<br />
THE NUMBERS OF THE DEAL<br />
The two companies pegged the transaction size at around USD 23 billion.<br />
Bharti Airtel was to pay around USD 13.1 billion for a 49% stake, with USD 7<br />
billion in cash and USD 6.1 billion in equity. MTN, on the other hand, was to<br />
pay around USD 9.6 billion for its 25% stake in Bharti Airtel (the remaining<br />
11% to be held directly by MTN shareholders). Since MTN was paying USD<br />
2.9 billion in cash as part payment for its stake, the net cash outflow for Bharti<br />
Airtel was estimated at USD 4.1 billion (i.e., the USD 7 billion that Bharti<br />
Airtel was required to pay less the USD 2.9 billion it was supposed to get from<br />
MTN). 4 The transaction could have created the third biggest phone firm (by<br />
subscribers) in the world behind China Mobile and Vodafone Group Plc. A<br />
combined Bharti Airtel-MTN would have more than USD 20 billion in<br />
revenue and over 200 million customers easily allowing it benefits <strong>of</strong> scale. 5<br />
THE SYNERGIES FROM THE DEAL<br />
The two companies would have surely benefited from their respective<br />
technical and services experience. Bharti Airtel had already demonstrated how<br />
managed services (outsourcing key network and IT installations) can be<br />
utilized to handle growing markets such as India. Bharti Airtel operates in a<br />
market where average tariffs per minute on mobile phone calls are less than Re<br />
1 per minute (USD 0.02 per minute), but it still makes a lot <strong>of</strong> money. It cuts<br />
cost by outsourcing network construction and management in a model that is<br />
close to pay per use. It has also outsourced IT, a move considered radical by<br />
even US and European telecom giants. India’s IT firms built their business by<br />
convincing customers elsewhere that their work could get done at lower cost<br />
4 A. R. Khan, ‘Bharti-MTN deal: short-term worries, but long-term gains’, Live Mint, 25 May, 2009, URL:<br />
http://www.livemint.com/2009/05/25231630/BhartiMTN-deal-shortterm-wo.html (Last visited on 26<br />
March, 2010).<br />
5 A. Sharma, ‘Bharti, MTN Near Compromise’, The Wall Street <strong>Journal</strong>, 28 September, 2009, URL: http://<br />
online.wsj.com/article/SB125407120709044251.html (Last visited on 23 March, 2010).
162 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
here. Bharti Airtel operates on a low cost model and was convinced the model<br />
can work in other parts <strong>of</strong> the world or at least in Africa. 6<br />
MTN on the other hand has extensive mobile broadband (3G)<br />
portfolio and has implemented mobile number portability (MNP). With India,<br />
on the verge <strong>of</strong> implementing MNP and 3G looking to pick up steam, the<br />
combined entity would certainly have gained an upper hand. Further, Africa<br />
and large parts <strong>of</strong> West Asia have high customer billings also known as<br />
average revenue per user (ARPU) in the industry running up to USD 18 a<br />
month in countries such as Syria and South Africa which present a revenue<br />
expansion opportunity for Bharti Airtel, which like most Indian players rarely<br />
has ARPU rates <strong>of</strong> more than USD 7. Also, the opportunity for growth in<br />
Africa and India is a positive for both sides. Both Africa and have around 40%<br />
penetrations allowing for a lot <strong>of</strong> opportunity. 7<br />
THE FAILURE OF THE DEAL<br />
After months <strong>of</strong> due diligence and talks between Bharti Airtel and MTN, after<br />
countering a host <strong>of</strong> issues, the deal couldn’t go through because <strong>of</strong> the<br />
‘structural issues’ as stated by the South African government. 8 The deal was<br />
primarily influenced by the following major factors:<br />
1.Dual Listing <strong>of</strong> the combined entity<br />
2.FDI regime in India<br />
3.Indian Takeover Code<br />
Dual listing as per standing South African laws is allowed. 9 However<br />
India currently does not allow dual listing at its stock exchanges. This<br />
presented an unforeseen legal challenge for the structuring <strong>of</strong> the deal<br />
especially given the restrictive Indian laws. Further the FDI regime in India<br />
was changed in early 2009 especially as regards the telecom sector which<br />
further complicated matters. The death bell for the deal was perhaps the<br />
complete U-turn done by the Indian market regulator – SEBI from its earlier<br />
guidance provided to the deal makers and the subsequent amendment <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Takeover Code. All these issues combined with the South African<br />
Government’s unwillingness to let go <strong>of</strong> MTN’s South African identity jointly<br />
failed the deal and are discussed at length in the next chapter.<br />
6 A. Anyimadu, ‘The Economist on MTN’, The Economist, 10 May, 2008 (U.S. Edition).<br />
7 A. Mukherjee, ‘Airwave Sandwich’, Outlook India, 2 June, 2008, URL: http://www.outlookindia.com/<br />
article.aspx?237548 (Last visited on 12 May, 2010).<br />
8 ‘Bharti, MTN call <strong>of</strong>f merger talks’, Bloomberg UTV, 30 September, 2009, URL: http://<br />
www.bloombergutv.com/industry-news/telecom-industry-news/33330/bharti--mtn-call-<strong>of</strong>f-mergertalks.html<br />
(Last visited on 17 April, 2010).<br />
9 For instance Investec is a dual listed company with Investec Plc (listed in London) and Investec Limited<br />
(listed in Johannesburg). Also Mondi Group Plc is listed on the London Stock Exchange and the<br />
Johannesburg Stock Exchange.
AIRTEL’S AFRICAN TRYST 163<br />
THE LAW VIS-À-VIS THE PROPOSED DEAL<br />
The legal setup <strong>of</strong> both the countries presented a unique challenge for this<br />
strategic alliance. Both these companies were market leaders in developing<br />
economies which led to each <strong>of</strong> these companies being seen in their home<br />
territories as prized possessions and their respective governments were not<br />
willing to let them relinquish their national identities.<br />
One <strong>of</strong> the novel suggestions put forth to overcome this national<br />
identity issue was to allow for the combined entity to be dual listed at<br />
Johannesburg and Mumbai. Dual listing is a listing process by which a<br />
company would be allowed to be listed and traded on the stock exchanges <strong>of</strong><br />
two countries. Put simply, it is a process that allows a company to be listed on<br />
the stock exchanges <strong>of</strong> two different countries. The company’s shares, which<br />
enjoy voting rights, can be traded on both the bourses. When two companies<br />
in two countries enter into an equity alliance without an outright merger, dual<br />
listing means continued listing <strong>of</strong> the firms in both the countries. The key<br />
point is that the shareholders can buy and sell shares <strong>of</strong> both the companies on<br />
bourses in the two countries.<br />
In a conventional merger or acquisition, the merging companies<br />
become a single legal entity; with one business buying (for cash or stock) the<br />
outstanding shares <strong>of</strong> the other. However, when a dual listed company is<br />
created, the two companies continue to exist, and to have separate bodies <strong>of</strong><br />
shareholders, but they agree to share all the risks and rewards <strong>of</strong> the<br />
ownership <strong>of</strong> all their operating businesses in a fixed proportion, laid out in a<br />
contract called an ‘equalization agreement’. 10<br />
We will now focus at the legal hurdles in the Indian laws as regards<br />
this dual structure. India currently does not allow dual listing. This is because<br />
there is no full capital account convertibility (CAC) in India. CAC is normally<br />
understood as the freedom to convert local financial assets into foreign<br />
financial assets and vice versa at market determined rates <strong>of</strong> exchange. India<br />
introduced full capital account convertibility first for NRIs in early 2002, 11<br />
and with the decisions in January 2004 it has substantially begun the process<br />
<strong>of</strong> introducing full convertibility for the benefit <strong>of</strong> foreigners. 12 However this<br />
process is still not complete. India is slowly moving in this direction at a slow<br />
and calibrated pace.<br />
Now let us look at the Bharti Airtel-MTN deal from the dual listing<br />
viewpoint. At the 2009 G-20 Summit, a South African minister requested<br />
10 See generally L. Rosenthal and C. Young, ‘The seemingly anomalous price behaviour <strong>of</strong> Royal Dutch/<br />
Shell and Unilever N.V./PLC’, <strong>Journal</strong> <strong>of</strong> Financial Economics (1990) 26, 123-141.<br />
11 T. G. Arun and J. D. Turner, ‘Financial Sector Reforms: The Indian Experience’, The World Economy,<br />
(2002) 25(3), 429-445.<br />
12 ‘Full convertibility: Caution still the watchword’, The Hindu, 9 February, 2004, URL: http://<br />
www.hindu.com/2004/02/09/stories/2004020900050200.htm (Last visited on 5 May, 2010).
164 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
Indian Finance Minister Mr. Pranab Mukherjee to allow dual listing <strong>of</strong> Bharti<br />
Airtel in India and South Africa. 13 This single move clearly lays down the<br />
importance attached to the deal from South African viewpoint. The Indian<br />
position on CAC is based upon in-depth analysis <strong>of</strong> volume <strong>of</strong> reserves and<br />
reserve management system. The Government <strong>of</strong> India was not willing to<br />
change its policy change on full convertibility <strong>of</strong> rupee at the time <strong>of</strong> the<br />
deal. 14 Even though the case <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong>f exemption in case <strong>of</strong> this deal was<br />
contemplated but it was not thought feasible to due the RBI’s perception <strong>of</strong><br />
the Indian rupee and the fiscal debt position. Hence such an exemption could<br />
not be made possible thereby totally eliminating the dual listing scenario<br />
which the South African government was heavily banking upon to approve<br />
the deal.<br />
On top <strong>of</strong> that the Independent Communications Authority <strong>of</strong> South<br />
Africa also asserted that the proposed deal would require their approval and<br />
may face public hearings before such approval is granted. This new hurdle<br />
was because MTN was a South African company with a footprint in Africa<br />
and the South African government was interested that it should remain<br />
African. 15 This made the passage <strong>of</strong> the deal even more burdensome so much<br />
so on the eve <strong>of</strong> failure <strong>of</strong> Bharti Airtel-MTN, investors rejoiced as shares in<br />
MTN jumped as much as 5.98 percent on the Johannesburg bourse while<br />
Bharti Airtel shares gained as much as 11.58 percent in Mumbai. 16<br />
Another major hurdle was the complex FDI regime applicable to<br />
telecom sector in India. FDI is brought into India by two means. The first is<br />
the approval route, whereby prior approval from the Foreign Investment<br />
Promotion Board (FIPB) is required before making any investment. The<br />
second is the automatic route, whereby no approval from the FIPB is required,<br />
provided that the intended investment fulfils the applicable criteria.<br />
Thereafter, the Reserve Bank <strong>of</strong> India is to be informed within 30 days <strong>of</strong><br />
inward remittance and the necessary documents be filed with the Reserve<br />
Bank <strong>of</strong> India within 30 days <strong>of</strong> shares being issued to foreign investors.<br />
On 13 February, 2009 radical changes were made to the FDI norms<br />
in anticipation <strong>of</strong> increased foreign investment. The Department <strong>of</strong> Industrial<br />
Policy and Promotion issued Press Notes February 2009 and March 2009 and<br />
issued further clarifications on 25 February, 2009 through Press Note April<br />
2009, which expanded upon and modified the various previous policies and<br />
13 P. Sinha, ‘Dual listing to hit Bharti-MTN’, 16 September, 2009, URL: http://times<strong>of</strong>india.indiatimes.com/<br />
biz/india-business/Dual-listing-to-hit-Bharti-MTN/articleshow/5016156.cms (Last visited on 1 June,<br />
2010).<br />
14 ‘Bharti-MTN deal: Dual listing not possible now’, Business Standard, 24 September, 2009, URL: http://<br />
www.business-standard.com/india/news/bharti-mtn-deal-dual-listing-not-possible-now-says-sharma/<br />
74264/on (Last visited on 31 May, 2010).<br />
15 W. Roelf, M. Bosch and D. Cowell, ‘MTN, Bharti deal needs S. Africa govt clearance’, 14 September,<br />
2009, URL: http://in.reuters.com/article/idINLE70811520090914 (Last visited on 4 June, 2010).<br />
16 S. Chaudhry and D. Tripathy, ‘Failure <strong>of</strong> Bharti/MTN talks pleases investors’, 1 October, 2009, URL:<br />
http://in.reuters.com/article/idINIndia-42846420091001 (Last visited on 27 May, 2010).
AIRTEL’S AFRICAN TRYST 165<br />
the method <strong>of</strong> calculating direct and indirect foreign investment.<br />
Press Note February 2009 laid down criteria as to how and when will<br />
a company will be considered to be ‘owned’ and ‘controlled’ by an Indian. It<br />
also clearly differentiated between direct and indirect investment. 17 Press<br />
Note March 2009 further provided that for the assessment <strong>of</strong> FDI, foreign<br />
investment will now include investment by foreign institutional investors,<br />
non-resident Indians, American depositary receipts, global depositary<br />
receipts, foreign currency convertible bonds, convertible preference shares<br />
and convertible currency debentures. These were earlier regulated separately.<br />
It further made it mandatory to procure FIPB approval where the control or<br />
ownership <strong>of</strong> an existing Indian company is transferred by resident Indians<br />
and companies to a non-resident entity as a consequence <strong>of</strong> a transfer <strong>of</strong> shares<br />
through a merger or amalgamation. 18<br />
Press Note April 2009 elucidated the new guidelines for downstream<br />
investment by Indian companies and, specifically, operating companies (i.e.,<br />
those companies undertaking operations in various economic sectors and<br />
activities), investing companies (i.e., those companies holding only<br />
investments in other Indian companies, directly or indirectly) and operatingcum-investing<br />
companies, which were owned or controlled by non-resident<br />
entities. 19 On an overall reading <strong>of</strong> these guidelines it became clear that the<br />
Bharti Airtel-MTN deal was made further complex as these new regulations<br />
changed the definitions <strong>of</strong> important terms like company owned and<br />
controlled by Indians, calculation <strong>of</strong> direct investment, indirect investment,<br />
downstream investment etc. It was apparent that retaining ownership and<br />
control with Indian companies and Indian residents was <strong>of</strong> paramount<br />
importance for the Government <strong>of</strong> India. Thus the deal was again requiring to<br />
be restructured to ensure that the transaction structure minimized the need for<br />
government intervention and approvals.<br />
The last bump was SEBI’s Takeover Code 20 and its recent<br />
amendment. The amended code now mandated that an open <strong>of</strong>fer be made<br />
even if American Depository Receipts (ADRs) and Global Depository<br />
Receipts (GDRs) with voting rights cross the prescribed threshold. Earlier a<br />
stake acquisition <strong>of</strong> more than 15 per cent triggered the open <strong>of</strong>fer<br />
requirement. Depository receipts were however not considered part <strong>of</strong> this<br />
requirement until they were converted into Indian shares but with overseas<br />
investors increasingly seeking voting rights, SEBI decided to amend the<br />
17 Press Note No 2 (2009 Series), Government <strong>of</strong> India, URL: http://siadipp.nic.in/policy/changes/<br />
pn2_2009.pdf (Last visited on 1 June, 2010).<br />
18 Press Note No 3 (2009 Series), Government <strong>of</strong> India, URL: http://siadipp.nic.in/policy/changes/<br />
pn3_2009.pdf (Last visited on 2 June, 2010).<br />
19 Press Note No 4 (2009 Series), Government <strong>of</strong> India, URL: http://siadipp.nic.in/policy/changes/<br />
pn4_2009.pdf (Last visited on 4 June, 2010).<br />
20 SEBI (Substantial Acquisition <strong>of</strong> Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997.
166 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
norms. 21 This was a complete ‘U’-turn by SEBI from its earlier position. In<br />
July 2009 SEBI had through an ‘informal guidance’ exempted MTN from<br />
making an open <strong>of</strong>fer to Bharti Airtel shareholders. At that time, SEBI had<br />
said an open <strong>of</strong>fer would be triggered only once the GDRs issued to MTN and<br />
its shareholders by Bharti Airtel were converted into local shares with voting<br />
rights. 22 This informal guidance was one <strong>of</strong> the main pillars on which the deal<br />
was being structured. This informal guidance seemed to suggest that SEBI<br />
was in favour <strong>of</strong> the deal and necessary exemptions would be granted. In fact<br />
the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) even dismissed a Bharti Airtel<br />
shareholder’s appeal against the informal guidance <strong>of</strong> SEBI on open <strong>of</strong>fer<br />
pertaining to the proposed Bharti Airtel-MTN deal. 23<br />
This new amendment virtually changed the dynamics <strong>of</strong> the deal.<br />
The amendment meant that the South African company would have to pay<br />
around USD 6.6 billion (approx) as it had to buy an additional 20% stake in<br />
Bharti Airtel while making an open <strong>of</strong>fer to Indian shareholders. 24 This<br />
change again changed the mechanics <strong>of</strong> the deal. This additional <strong>of</strong>fer<br />
requirement made the deal less valuable to Bharti Airtel as it would mean<br />
further dilution <strong>of</strong> its stake in favour <strong>of</strong> MTN and more cash outflow for<br />
MTN. This position was unacceptable to both the parties.<br />
THE AFTERMATH<br />
The USD 23 billion deal for the merger <strong>of</strong> Bharti Airtel and MTN fell through<br />
finally on 30 September, 2009. All the issues discussed above seem to have<br />
been the deal-breaker during the tough negotiations which lasted well over a<br />
year. While announcing the calling <strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong> the talks, Bharti Airtel expressed the<br />
hope that the South African government will review its position in the future<br />
and allow both companies an opportunity to re-engage. 25<br />
Both the companies since then have worked on their separate<br />
strategies to achieve their respective objectives. Bharti Airtel in January 2010<br />
announced a deal to acquire 70% stake in Bangladesh based Warid Telecom.<br />
21 A. Bahl, ‘Sebi amends takeover code: may affect Bharti-MTN’, Live Mint, 23 September 2009, URL:<br />
http://www.livemint.com/2009/09/23003600/Sebi-amends-takeover-code-may.html (Last visited on 2<br />
June, 2010).<br />
22 ‘Takeover Code change to impact Bharti-MTN deal’, Business Standard, 23 September, 2009, URL:<br />
http://www.business-standard.com/india/news/takeover-code-change-to-impact-bharti-mtn-deal/21/29/<br />
370971/ (Last visited on 17 May, 2010).<br />
23 R. R. Prasad, ‘SAT dismisses appeal <strong>of</strong> Bharti Airtel shareholder on open <strong>of</strong>fer’, The Hindu Business<br />
Line, 29 August, 2009, URL: http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/2009/08/29/stories/<br />
2009082950711000.htm (Last visited on 25 May, 2010).<br />
24 A. Datta and A. Laskar, ‘Govt backs Bharti-MTN deal, FM says’, Live Mint, 23 September 2009, URL:<br />
http://www.livemint.com/2009/09/23233726/Govt-backs-BhartiMTN-deal-FM.html (Last visited on 3<br />
June, 2010).<br />
25 ‘Bharti calls <strong>of</strong>f $23-bn telecom deal with MTN’, Rediff Business, 30 September, 2009, URL: http://<br />
business.rediff.com/report/2009/sep/30/tech-bharti-mtn-deal-called-<strong>of</strong>f.htm (Last visited on 20 April,<br />
2010).
AIRTEL’S AFRICAN TRYST 167<br />
This is the largest investment in Bangladesh by an Indian company. 26 Bharti<br />
Airtel also created a foreign expansion unit to continue its ambitious<br />
expansion program. 27 Later Kuwait based telecom company Zain, accepted a<br />
USD 10.7 billion <strong>of</strong>fer from Bharti Airtel for Zain’s African assets. Zain’s<br />
Africa assets include around 70 million customers. Zain’s reach is spread<br />
across Africa and the Middle East. 28<br />
On the other hand MTN could reopen merger negotiations with<br />
Reliance Communications. The current proposal to MTN is similar to the one<br />
in 2008 when Reliance Communications had proposed to merge with MTN by<br />
swapping Anil Ambani’s 67% equity holding in the Indian cellular company<br />
with MTN shares. If the deal eventually fructifies, Reliance Communications<br />
will become a subsidiary <strong>of</strong> MTN while Anil Ambani could end up with a 20-<br />
25% holding in MTN, making him its single-largest shareholder. 29 This<br />
would help Anil Ambani circumvent the South African stock exchange<br />
regulations as if an <strong>of</strong>fer is for 35% <strong>of</strong> a company it triggers the rules whereby<br />
that buyer <strong>of</strong> the South African company must extend the <strong>of</strong>fer to other<br />
shareholders. 30<br />
It does seem that both the companies have moved on from the failed<br />
deal but certainly this deal’s exceptional potential because <strong>of</strong> the market<br />
penetration opportunities available in the African markets and the low cost<br />
model running experience <strong>of</strong> Bharti Airtel cannot be ignored. However due to<br />
the multitude <strong>of</strong> legal issues involved in both the countries coupled with the<br />
need to protect the national identity <strong>of</strong> the two corporates involved in their<br />
respective home territories, led to the downfall <strong>of</strong> an alliance which could<br />
have easily been called as a ‘match made in heavens’.<br />
26 N. Mookerji, ‘Bharti seals Warid Telecom deal’, DNA India, 13 January, 2010, URL: http://<br />
www.dnaindia.com/money/report_bharti-seals-warid-telecom-deal_1334087 (Last visited on 4 May,<br />
2010).<br />
27 ‘Bharti Airtel creates unit for foreign expansion’, The Economic Times, 13 January, 2010, URL: http://<br />
economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/news-by-industry/telecom/Bharti-Airtel-creates-unit-for-foreignexpansion/articleshow/5440449.cms<br />
(Last visited on 22 April, 2010).<br />
28 A. N. Ghaswalla, ‘Zain accepts Bharti <strong>of</strong>fer’, The Times <strong>of</strong> India, 15 February, 2010, URL: http://<br />
times<strong>of</strong>india.indiatimes.com/biz/india-business/Zain-accepts-Bharti-<strong>of</strong>fer/articleshow/5574130.cms<br />
(Last visited on 19 April, 2010).<br />
29 ‘MTN to reopen merger lines with Anil Ambani’, The Economic Times, 1 June, 2010, URL: http://<br />
economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/news-by-industry/telecom/MTN-to-reopen-merger-lines-with-Anil-<br />
Ambani/articleshow/5996604.cms (Last visited on 2 June, 2010).<br />
30 ‘Reliance-MTN Deal Offers an Opportunity for Private Equity’, The Wall Street <strong>Journal</strong>, 24 June, 2008,<br />
URL: http://blogs.wsj.com/deals/2008/06/24/reliance-mtn-deal-<strong>of</strong>fers-an-opportunity-for-private-equity/<br />
(Last visited on 27 May, 2010).
169<br />
Limits <strong>of</strong> fair dealing with literary works in India<br />
ABSTRACT<br />
A. Goel*<br />
In this essay, I seek to briefly juxtapose the fair dealing and fair use defences<br />
to copyright infringement and argue that under the Indian Copyright Act,<br />
1957, the narrower exception <strong>of</strong> fair dealing is envisaged and not <strong>of</strong> fair use.<br />
1. INTRODUCTION<br />
Copyright protection in India is granted to original literary, dramatic, musical<br />
and artistic works; cinematograph films and sound recording. 1 For our present<br />
purposes, literary works are important. Although there is no definition <strong>of</strong> what<br />
constitutes a “literary work” under the Copyright Act, the classic definition <strong>of</strong><br />
Peterson J. is generally regarded as a good one, which is that “literary work”<br />
refers to written or printed matter. 2 To bring the Act in line with the TRIPS<br />
obligations, 3 the Parliament amended the Act to bring computer programmes,<br />
tables and compilations including computer databases within the scope <strong>of</strong><br />
“literary works”. 4<br />
Once a copyright is granted, the holder is given certain exclusive<br />
rights like those <strong>of</strong> reproduction, performance, translation and adaption. 5 Any<br />
exercise <strong>of</strong> these exclusive rights by a person not granted a licence 6<br />
constitutes infringement. 7 However, the statute provides certain exceptions, to<br />
which the defendant may take recourse in an infringement suit brought against<br />
him. 8 These exceptions have been incorporated in order to protect the right to<br />
freedom <strong>of</strong> expression guaranteed under the Constitution <strong>of</strong> India. 9 One <strong>of</strong><br />
these many defences is “fair dealing” 10 against claims <strong>of</strong> infringement <strong>of</strong><br />
copyrighted material.<br />
B.A. LL.B. (Hons.), National <strong>Law</strong> School <strong>of</strong> India <strong>University</strong>, Bangalore; Advocate, Punjab and Haryana<br />
High Court, Chandigarh.<br />
1 Section 13, Indian Copyright Act, 1957 (“Copyright Act”).<br />
2 <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> London Press v <strong>University</strong> Tutorial Press Ltd., (1916) 2 Ch. 601, approved by Satsang v<br />
Mukhopadhyay, AIR 1972 Cal 533.<br />
3 Article 10, TRIPS (Marrakesh Agreement), 1994.<br />
4 Section 2(o), Copyright Act.<br />
5 Section 14, Copyright Act.<br />
6 Licence is granted under Section 30, Copyright Act.<br />
7 Section 51, Copyright Act. In RG Anand v Delux Films, AIR 1978 SC 1613, the Court held that an exact<br />
copy <strong>of</strong> the original is not necessary, but there is infringement even if there are resemblances with the<br />
original in large measures. The test for infringement laid down by the Court is this: to see if the reader,<br />
spectator or viewer after having read or seen both the works is clearly <strong>of</strong> the opinion and gets the<br />
unmistakable impression that the subsequent work appears to be a copy <strong>of</strong> the original.<br />
8 Section 52, Copyright Act.<br />
9 Article 19(1) (a), Constitution <strong>of</strong> India. See: Wiley Eastern Ltd. v Indian Institute <strong>of</strong> Management, (1996)<br />
PTR 46 (Del).<br />
10 Section 52(1) (a) and 52(1) (b), Copyright Act.
170 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
The raison d’être for such an exception is that an infringing use<br />
which by allowing will cause greater public benefit than by denying it, must<br />
be allowed. 11 Such an exception therefore is included so as to allow members<br />
<strong>of</strong> the public to use copyrighted work fairly without the requirement <strong>of</strong> a<br />
consent or licence from the copyright-holder. In very broad terms, therefore,<br />
the exception seeks to allow fair use <strong>of</strong> copyrighted material because curbing<br />
it would mean impinging on the fundamental right to freedom <strong>of</strong> speech and<br />
expression. In other words, this exception is to balance two competing<br />
interests – on the one hand, the monopoly <strong>of</strong> authors which acts as an<br />
incentive to create, and on the other, that such a monopoly must not come in<br />
the way <strong>of</strong> creative ability <strong>of</strong> others or the right <strong>of</strong> the public to build upon<br />
previous works. 12<br />
2. “FAIR USE” AND “FAIR DEALING” COMPARED<br />
As already stated, fair dealing <strong>of</strong> copyrighted work does not amount to an<br />
infringement under the Copyright Act. Although it has been generally assumed<br />
that fair dealing is roughly equivalent to its American counterpart <strong>of</strong> fair use,<br />
the latter has a wider scope in that it is not restricted to specific purposes. 13<br />
According to Section 107 <strong>of</strong> the US Copyright Act, 1976, there are four factors<br />
for determining ‘fair use’, viz., (i) purpose and character <strong>of</strong> work; (ii) nature <strong>of</strong><br />
copyrighted work; (iii) amount and substantiality <strong>of</strong> the portion used; (iv)<br />
effect on market value <strong>of</strong> the original. 14 On the other hand, fair dealing is<br />
restricted to only the purposes allowed in the Act, viz., ‘private use including<br />
research’; criticism and review; and reporting current events.<br />
The American concept <strong>of</strong> fair use has been contested on the ground<br />
that it is not in line with the TRIPS requirement 15 confining the limitations or<br />
exceptions to the Berne three-step test, 16 which is that reproduction is<br />
permissible only in certain special cases and that it must not conflict with the<br />
normal exploitation <strong>of</strong> the work and must not unreasonably prejudice the<br />
legitimate interests <strong>of</strong> the copyright-holder. Now, the charge leveled against<br />
11 Newby, T.G., “What’s Fair Here is Not Fair Everywhere: Does the American Fair Use Doctrine Violate<br />
International Copyright <strong>Law</strong>?” 51 Stan. L. Rev. 1633 (1999). See also: Sony Corporation v Universal<br />
Studios, 464 US 417, 479-480 (1984). There are jurists who have justified the fair use doctrine in a<br />
Lockean framework. See: Damstedt, B.J., “Limiting Locke: A Natural <strong>Law</strong> Justification for the Fair Use<br />
Doctrine”, 112 Yale L.J. 1179 (2003). Some authors also argue that fair use doctrine does not in any way<br />
protect freedom <strong>of</strong> speech, see: Lockridge, W., “The Myth <strong>of</strong> Copyright’s Fair Use Doctrine As a<br />
Protector <strong>of</strong> Free Speech”, 24 Santa Clara Computer & High Tech. L.J. 31 (2007).<br />
12 Kartar Singh v Ladha Singh, AIR 1934 Lah 777; Eastern Book Co. v Navin Desai, AIR 2001 Del 185.<br />
13 Griffiths, J., “Preserving Judicial Freedom <strong>of</strong> Movement–Interpreting Fair Dealing in Copyright <strong>Law</strong>”,<br />
[2000] IPQ 164. See also: Copinger and Skone, J., Copyright, Volume I (Sweet & Maxwell, London: 15 th<br />
edition, 2005) 481.<br />
14 For a good analysis <strong>of</strong> American law on fair use, see: Fisher III, W.W., “Reconstructing the Fair Use<br />
Doctrine”, 101 Harv. L. Rev. 1659 (1988).<br />
15 Article 13, TRIPS (Marrakesh Agreement), 1994.<br />
16 Article 9(2), Berne Convention for the Protection <strong>of</strong> Literary and Artistic Works. See: Heide, T., “The<br />
Berne Three-Step Test and the Proposed Copyright Directive”, 21(3) EIPR 105 (1999).
LITERARY WORKS IN INDIA 171<br />
Section 107 is that it does not satisfy the first (specific cases) and the third<br />
(unreasonably prejudicing the author’s legitimate interests) requirements <strong>of</strong><br />
the three-step test due to its open-ended guideline nature. 17 The reason for not<br />
enumerating the purposes for which copyrighted work may be fairly used is<br />
that in view <strong>of</strong> rapid technological advancement, Courts must be free to adapt<br />
the doctrine on a case-by-case basis. 18<br />
Different from this is the fair dealing concept, which was inserted in<br />
the UK legislation in 1956 and retained in 1988, 19 and permits fair dealing for<br />
three purposes, viz., research or private study; criticism or review; and<br />
reporting current events. The concept <strong>of</strong> what is ‘fair’ in fair dealing is<br />
difficult to define. Though it is recognised that it is a question <strong>of</strong> degree, it<br />
depends on various factors, like the quantity and proportion <strong>of</strong> original work<br />
used and the use made <strong>of</strong> them. 20 Similar principles to assess ‘fairness’ have<br />
been followed in India. 21<br />
Additional fetters have been placed on fair dealing in the UK, to<br />
bring it in line with the TRIPS requirements – the Act was amended to further<br />
limit the fair dealing for research or private study in two ways – that it must be<br />
for a non-commercial purpose, and that it must be accompanied by sufficient<br />
acknowledgment. 22<br />
The Indian Act is also based on the fair dealing concept, as opposed<br />
to the American fair use approach, as it limits the purposes for which fair<br />
dealing is allowed. Therefore, in the present circumstance when the law on<br />
fair dealing has not been subject to much judicial examination, it is advisable<br />
to prefer the UK approach to the US approach in understanding the Indian<br />
position.<br />
Having examined the scope <strong>of</strong> the fair dealing provisions in the<br />
Indian Act generally, I will now divide the cases existing under two heads:<br />
first, for the purposes <strong>of</strong> ‘private use, including research’, criticism or<br />
review’ 23 and second, for reporting current events. 24 It is noteworthy that both<br />
Section 52(1)(a) and Section 52(1)(b) exclude computer programmes, despite<br />
the fact that computer programmes are literary works. This is because they<br />
have a different set <strong>of</strong> fair dealing provisions in the Act. In the case <strong>of</strong><br />
computer programmes, fair dealing in the form <strong>of</strong> reverse engineering or<br />
temporary backup is recognised as non-infringing for limited purposes as<br />
17 Ricketson, S., “WIPO Study on Limitations and Exceptions <strong>of</strong> Copyright and Related Rights in the<br />
Digital Environment”, 5 April, 2003, WIPO Doc. SCCR/9/7, p. 67-69.<br />
18 Lewis Galoob Toys v Nintendo, Inc., 964 F.2d 965. See also: Weinreb, L.L., “Fair’s Fair: A Comment on<br />
the Fair Use Doctrine”, 103 Harv. L. Rev. 1137 (1990).<br />
19 Section 29, 30, Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988 (“CDPA”).<br />
20 Hubbard v Vosper, [1972] 2 WLR 394 [per Lord Denning, MR].<br />
21 S.K. Dutt v <strong>Law</strong> Book Co., AIR 1954 All 570; Civic Chandran v Ammini Amma, (1996) PTC (16) 670<br />
(Ker).<br />
22 Section 29, CDPA, amended by Section 9, Copyright and Related Rights Regulations, 2003.<br />
23 Section 52(1) (a), Copyright Act.<br />
24 Section 52(1) (b), Copyright Act.
172 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
analysis, inter-operability, and protection against loss and for non-commercial<br />
personal use. 25 All these provisions rely on the same basic principle behind<br />
fair dealing, which is that fair dealing must be permitted for non-economic<br />
purposes <strong>of</strong> study and analysis, but if they affect the copyright-holder’s<br />
market adversely, they must not be allowed.<br />
3. FAIR DEALING FOR “PRIVATE USE,<br />
INCLUDING RESEARCH”, “CRITICISM OR<br />
REVIEW”<br />
Section 52(1)(a) provides for fair dealing for these purposes. In Blackwood v<br />
Parasuraman, 26 the High Court set forth the basic principles for determining<br />
what constitutes “private use”. In that case, the defendant had published guides<br />
for two <strong>of</strong> plaintiff’s books. Fair dealing for the purpose <strong>of</strong> private study was<br />
claimed, but was rejected by the Court. The Court held that private study only<br />
covers the student copying the book for his own use, and not circulation <strong>of</strong><br />
copies among other students. In other words, “private study” has been given a<br />
restricted meaning. However, problems creep up if one notices the change in<br />
wording from “private study” in the erstwhile legislation to “private use” in the<br />
present one, which may mean to include almost any use with the copyrighted<br />
material as long as it is fair. In such a circumstance, one can give a more<br />
plausible meaning to the fair dealing exception here – by limiting the scope <strong>of</strong><br />
“fair” in fair dealing to include only those actions which have no intention to<br />
compete with the original and which do not have any improper or oblique<br />
motives.<br />
An important departure can be witnessed from the UK Act, because<br />
<strong>of</strong> the 2003 Amendment there inserting the non-commercial purpose and<br />
sufficient acknowledgment requirements as aforementioned, and no such<br />
corresponding riders existing in the Indian legislation. However, the concept<br />
<strong>of</strong> fairness itself as has been understood implies that the nature <strong>of</strong> the fair<br />
dealing must be such so as not to affect the pecuniary interests <strong>of</strong> the<br />
copyright-holder by competing with him. The reason why perhaps such a<br />
requirement does not exist in the Indian Act is because it is still <strong>of</strong> foremost<br />
significance to encourage research and study, and regardless <strong>of</strong> whether such<br />
research is carried out by commercial organisations for commercial purposes,<br />
it must be encouraged. It might suffice to say here that India is not ready to<br />
restrict research and study to only non-commercial uses and the scales must<br />
25 Section 52(1) (aa) to (ad), Copyright Act. For the position in US, see: Rice, D.A., “Sega And Beyond: A<br />
Beacon For Fair Use Analysis ... At Least As Far As It Goes”, 19 Dayton L.Rev. 1131 (1994). See also:<br />
Asarch, C.D., “Is Turn About Fair Play? Copyright <strong>Law</strong> and the Fair Use <strong>of</strong> Computer S<strong>of</strong>tware Loaded<br />
into RAM” 95Mich. L. Rev. 654 (1996). In UK, Section 28A, 29(4A) and 50BA, CDPA, inserted by the<br />
2003 Amendment permit making temporary copies <strong>of</strong> computer programmes and observing, testing and<br />
studying computer programmes.<br />
26 AIR 1959 Mad 410.
LITERARY WORKS IN INDIA 173<br />
tilt against the copyright-holder in this respect.<br />
In Syndicate <strong>of</strong> Press <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Cambridge v Kasturi Lal, 27 the<br />
defendant published three guide books with substantial reproduction from the<br />
plaintiff’s books. The Court held that this was an infringement, not falling<br />
within any <strong>of</strong> the exceptions, 28 because Section 52(1) (h) allows reproduction<br />
for the purpose <strong>of</strong> answering questions to be answered in an examination, and<br />
not questions and answers as a whole.<br />
The exception <strong>of</strong> fair dealing for the purposes <strong>of</strong> criticism or review<br />
came for consideration in Civic Chandran v Ammini Amma, 29 where the<br />
Court held that even if the copying is substantial, it is excepted from<br />
infringement if it is for the purpose <strong>of</strong> criticism. Criticism or review may<br />
relate not only to the literary style, but also to the doctrine, philosophy, ideas<br />
or events described by the author.<br />
The situation in the English case <strong>of</strong> Sillitoe v McGraw-Hill Book<br />
Co. 30 may fall within the purview <strong>of</strong> fair dealing in India, although it was held<br />
not excepted there. In that case, the plaintiff had written three stories, and the<br />
defendant had published three booklets in the nature <strong>of</strong> notes, reproducing up<br />
to ten per cent <strong>of</strong> the original work. The Court held that despite the existence<br />
<strong>of</strong> a disclaimer that the notes are not a substitute for the text, the notes did not<br />
amount to fair dealing. Indian Courts have upheld similar fair dealing claims<br />
in Forster v Parasuram 31 and Ramaiah v Lakshmaiah, 32 where publishing<br />
guide books, even for a pr<strong>of</strong>it-making purpose have been held to be falling<br />
within the fair dealing exception. Be that as it may, it is humbly submitted that<br />
these cases are not correctly decided because the element <strong>of</strong> ‘fairness’ as<br />
described above has not been paid due consideration, since these guides<br />
clearly hamper the sale <strong>of</strong> the original works and compete with them, despite<br />
their educational motive.<br />
Parodies also fall within the purview <strong>of</strong> criticism, and constitute fair<br />
dealing. 33 Parodies are a humorous form <strong>of</strong> social commentary, and while<br />
deciding whether a particular work constitutes a valid parody, it must be<br />
established that only that much work is to be copied as would be necessary to<br />
remind the reader, listener or viewer <strong>of</strong> the original work. 34<br />
27 (2006) PTC (32) 487 (Del).<br />
28 s.52, Copyright Act.<br />
29 (1996) PTC (16) 670 (Ker).<br />
30 (1983) FSR 545 (ChD).<br />
31 AIR 1954 Mad 331.<br />
32 (1989) PTC (9) 137 (AP).<br />
33 Campbell v Acuff-Rose Music, 114 S. Ct. 1164. For the normative aspects, see: Posner, R.A., “When is<br />
Parody Fair Use?”, 21 J. Legal Stud. 67 (1992).<br />
34 Woody Allen v National Video, (1985) 610 F Supp 1612.
174 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
4. FAIR DEALING FOR REPORTING CURRENT<br />
EVENTS<br />
Fair dealing with copyrighted material for the purpose <strong>of</strong> reporting current<br />
events in print or broadcast media also accepts the infringer. 35 However,<br />
compilation <strong>of</strong> addresses or speeches is not a fair dealing. 36 In Civic Chandran<br />
v Ammini Amma, the Court laid down that the reproduction <strong>of</strong> the whole work<br />
or a substantial portion <strong>of</strong> it as such will not normally be permitted and only<br />
extracts or quotations from the work. Also, the quantity <strong>of</strong> extracts permissible<br />
will vary from case-to-case. Fair dealing for reporting current events is<br />
permitted because <strong>of</strong> the right to know, held to be a part <strong>of</strong> the right to freedom<br />
<strong>of</strong> speech and expression. 37 In UK, the scope <strong>of</strong> this exception came for<br />
consideration recently in Ashdown v Telegraph Group, 38 where a newspaper<br />
had published extracts <strong>of</strong> a confidential diary minute <strong>of</strong> a political meeting. The<br />
Court rejected the contention that this fell within the fair dealing exception,<br />
because <strong>of</strong> the extent <strong>of</strong> reproduction made for the defendants’ commercial<br />
interests. Having said that, it is submitted that right to privacy 39 and the right<br />
to know must be balanced in such a manner that neither the public is left<br />
unaware, nor is the citizen whose privacy has been impinged upon, is left<br />
without legal recourse.<br />
5. CONCLUSION<br />
While examining the limits <strong>of</strong> fair dealing exceptions in Indian law, the basic<br />
rule <strong>of</strong> statutory interpretation that “exceptions must be construed strictly and<br />
strongly against the party trying to take the benefit” must be regarded. As I<br />
have shown above, fair dealing as a defence is nothing but an exception carved<br />
out from the general rule <strong>of</strong> infringement <strong>of</strong> a copyrighted work. This<br />
exception is to ensure that giving a monopoly to the author <strong>of</strong> the work must<br />
be balanced with the public interest <strong>of</strong> allowing taking on from there and<br />
developing the work through research and study, as also with the right to know<br />
by allowing dealing for the purpose <strong>of</strong> reporting current events. However, these<br />
exceptions must be limited to the purposes permitted in the Act, and such acts<br />
must be construed giving due regard to the rights bestowed on the copyrightholder<br />
under Section 14, instead <strong>of</strong> a broad reading leaving room for judicial<br />
creativity as it exists in American Copyright law. Such a strict reading is<br />
evident from Blackwood v Parasuraman, 40 where the Court held that if the<br />
35 Section 52(1) (b), Copyright Act.<br />
36 Explanation to Section 52(1) (b), Copyright Act.<br />
37 Reliance Petrochemicals v Indian Express Newspapers, (1988) 4 SCC 592.<br />
38 [2001] EWCA Civ. 1142.<br />
39 Also held to be a fundamental right within Article 21, Constitution <strong>of</strong> India. See: Gobind v State <strong>of</strong> M.P.,<br />
(1975) 2 SCC 148.<br />
40 AIR 1959 Mad 410.
LITERARY WORKS IN INDIA 175<br />
purpose <strong>of</strong> reproduction is not one <strong>of</strong> those enumerated in the statute, the<br />
question <strong>of</strong> fair dealing would not arise.<br />
Further, since the defendant claims these defences, the burden <strong>of</strong><br />
pro<strong>of</strong> must lie on him to prove that his infringing acts were fair dealing for the<br />
purposes permitted under the Act. This burden <strong>of</strong> pro<strong>of</strong> is a heavy one and<br />
courts have held that the fair dealing must fall within the four corners <strong>of</strong> the<br />
statutory provisions. The statutory provisions are based on these general<br />
principles that fair dealing is acceptable as a defence only if the reproduction<br />
is reasonable, “i.e.” it does not prejudice the potential sale <strong>of</strong> the original<br />
work; if the purposes for which the reproduction has been done are among<br />
those mentioned in the statute; there is not a substantial extent <strong>of</strong> copying or<br />
appropriation <strong>of</strong> the research <strong>of</strong> the original.<br />
In conclusion, I submit that fair dealing with a strict interpretation <strong>of</strong><br />
the purposes enumerated in the Act must be permissible, and the American<br />
fair use approach must not be favoured. It must always be remembered that<br />
freedom <strong>of</strong> speech and expression does not necessarily involve the<br />
appropriation <strong>of</strong> another’s work.
177<br />
RECENT LEGAL DEVELOPMENTS<br />
LESOTHO<br />
Q. Letsika*<br />
L. Kometsi**<br />
1. ACTS OF PARLIAMENT<br />
1.1 LAND ACT NO. 42 OF 2010<br />
The preamble <strong>of</strong> the Act sets out the main objectives <strong>of</strong> the Act as being to<br />
provide for the grant <strong>of</strong> titles to land and conversion <strong>of</strong> titles to land, the better<br />
securing <strong>of</strong> titles to land and its administration. Section 4 provides that all land<br />
is vested in the Basotho nation. Section 6 sets out qualifications <strong>of</strong> persons<br />
entitled to hold title to land. These include foreign enterprises for investment<br />
purposes but Basotho must hold at least 20% interest in such an enterprise,<br />
companies and partnerships wholly owned by Basotho and societies in their<br />
different forms, international organisations for which Lesotho enjoys similar<br />
reciprocity for purposes relevant to their activities and citizens <strong>of</strong> Lesotho.<br />
Section 9 introduces a new form <strong>of</strong> title to land, namely sectional titles. The<br />
right to sectional titles are enjoyed in a unit within a complex or building<br />
without necessarily exclusively holding title to land on which the complex or<br />
building is attached. Section 10 creates the presumption <strong>of</strong> joint titles in as far<br />
as marriages in community <strong>of</strong> property are concerned.<br />
The Act provides for the institutional framework for administration<br />
<strong>of</strong> land. Section 11 establishes the <strong>of</strong>fice <strong>of</strong> the commissioner <strong>of</strong> lands. The<br />
functions <strong>of</strong> the commissioner include the administration <strong>of</strong> land by keeping<br />
accurate information and records, resolution <strong>of</strong> disputes relating to land,<br />
levying <strong>of</strong> taxes on land and granting <strong>of</strong> consent to transactions relating to<br />
land (Section 12).<br />
In terms <strong>of</strong> section 14 allocation and revocation <strong>of</strong> land in the rural<br />
areas are made by local councils in consultation with the chief both <strong>of</strong> whom<br />
must have jurisdiction in the area. If the land allocated is to be used for<br />
commercial or industrial purposes the local council is obliged to refer the<br />
application for a grant <strong>of</strong> title to the District Council first. A person allocated<br />
residential and agricultural land in a rural area is entitled to apply for a lease in<br />
respect <strong>of</strong> that land (Sections 16 and 18). The commissioner <strong>of</strong> lands is<br />
entitled to refuse to grant a lease if the land is not used in accordance with an<br />
approved development scheme. If the refusal to grant a lease is based on the<br />
* B.A., LL.B (Lesotho), LL.M. (Natal) Senior Lecturer, Faculty <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong>, National <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Lesotho.<br />
** B.A., LL.B (Lesotho), LL.M (Manchester) Lecturer, Faculty <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong>, National <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Lesotho.
178 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
complaint that the allottee breached the conditions <strong>of</strong> the allocation, s/he is<br />
entitled to remedy the breach failing which the allocation could be revoked. In<br />
the event <strong>of</strong> revocation the allottee is entitled to challenge it by way <strong>of</strong> review<br />
proceedings. Allocations relating to land in the urban areas follows almost the<br />
same procedure except that in the event that the allocating authority has to deal<br />
with commercial and industrial grants it must include a representative from the<br />
ministry <strong>of</strong> trade and industry (Section 25). If land is available for title the<br />
minister is obliged to publicise this fact in the gazette and the commissioner <strong>of</strong><br />
lands must publicise this fact in at least one <strong>of</strong> the newspapers circulating in the<br />
country and invite applications for grant <strong>of</strong> title (Sections 26 and 27). A person<br />
affected by the notice is entitled to object to the grant <strong>of</strong> title by challenging<br />
such notice before a district land court within one month from the date <strong>of</strong><br />
publication (Section 28). Titles in the urban areas are held through a leasehold<br />
system (Section 30). A lease can only be terminated if the lessee is in breach <strong>of</strong><br />
its terms and has failed to comply with a notice from the commissioner calling<br />
upon her/him to remedy the breach within a reasonable specified period <strong>of</strong> time<br />
(Section 37). Upon the expiry <strong>of</strong> the period <strong>of</strong> the lease the lessee is entitled to<br />
the first option for a new lease over the land (Section 38). A lessee may<br />
extinguish his/her rights to land by surrendering the lease or through<br />
abandonment <strong>of</strong> land (Sections 39 and 43).<br />
The Act authorises the government to expropriate land for public<br />
purposes or in the public interest. The minister is entitled to set aside and<br />
declare in a gazette land required for public purposes after consultation with<br />
the allocating authority (Section 48). The Act sets out circumstances that are<br />
considered to be in the public interest or for which land may be acquired for<br />
public purposes (Section 50 and 51). The state is obliged to compensate title<br />
holders if their land is expropriated and the Act sets out the scheme <strong>of</strong><br />
principles which the state must uphold in expropriating land (Sections 52 to<br />
60).<br />
Finally, the Act provides for the scheme <strong>of</strong> regularisation. The<br />
commissioner <strong>of</strong> lands after consultation with the chief and residents <strong>of</strong> the<br />
area selected for regularisation must prepare a scheme <strong>of</strong> regularisation in<br />
accordance with the regulations and in conjunction with an allocating<br />
authority in whose jurisdiction the proposed scheme is to take place (Section<br />
61). Upon approval <strong>of</strong> the scheme the minister declares the area to which it<br />
applies in a gazette and thereafter the commissioner assumes responsibility for<br />
implementing the scheme (Sections 61, 62 and 63).<br />
1.2 EDUCATION ACT NO. 20 OF 2010<br />
The main purpose <strong>of</strong> this Act is to make provision for free and compulsory<br />
primary education (Section 3). Parents are obliged to enrol children aged six up
RECENT LEGAL DEVELOPMENTS – LESOTHO 179<br />
to an age determined by the minister in independent or public schools. They are<br />
obliged to provide learners with full opportunity and guidance to complete<br />
primary education (Section 4 (b)). Attendance at schools is compulsory and<br />
learners are obliged to attend their school every day. Learners can only be<br />
absent if parents provide reasons acceptable to a principal or if a school where<br />
the learner attends gives notice to a parent that the learner has been excused<br />
from attending classes on the grounds that the learner is suffering from an<br />
infectious or contagious disease (Section 6). Where a learner fails to attend<br />
school regularly the parent <strong>of</strong> such learner becomes liable to a criminal<br />
conviction, which may attract community service, fine or custodial sentence<br />
(Section 6(5)). All schools must be registered in accordance with the provisions<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Act (Section 7). The Act establishes an inspectorate <strong>of</strong> schools whose<br />
main function is to supervise schools. The inspectorate inspects the work <strong>of</strong><br />
each school annually, monitors effectiveness <strong>of</strong> tests and examinations,<br />
appraises performance <strong>of</strong> principals <strong>of</strong> schools and performs other functions as<br />
the minister may prescribe (Section 18).<br />
The management <strong>of</strong> schools is undertaken by school principals<br />
(Section 20). In terms <strong>of</strong> section 21 schools are governed by the school<br />
boards. The Act also establishes the Education Advisory Council whose role<br />
is to advise the minister about school curriculum, terms and conditions <strong>of</strong><br />
service for teachers, funding <strong>of</strong> schools and quality assessment (Sections 28<br />
and 29). The Teaching Service Commission is another institution established<br />
by the Act (Section 41). Its main functions are to appoint, promote, demote,<br />
transfer and remove from <strong>of</strong>fice teachers whose salaries are paid by the<br />
government (Section 42). Part X <strong>of</strong> the Act provides for the appointment,<br />
promotion, demotion, transfer or removal from <strong>of</strong>fice <strong>of</strong> teachers other than<br />
those teachers whose salary is paid by the government. Any disputes <strong>of</strong><br />
interest arising in relation to the application <strong>of</strong> the Act must be conciliated by<br />
the Conciliation Board (Section 59). Disputes <strong>of</strong> rights are resolved through<br />
arbitration (Section 68). The Act establishes the Teaching Service Tribunal,<br />
which deals with appeals instituted by a teacher, a trade union or employer<br />
arising from a grievance and disciplinary action.<br />
1.3 WATER AND SEWAGE COMPANY<br />
(PROPRIETARY) LIMITED (ESTABLISHMENT<br />
AND VESTING) ACT NO. 54 OF 2010<br />
The purpose <strong>of</strong> the Act is to establish a government-owned company to be<br />
known as Water and Sewerage (Proprietary) Limited (Section 3). After<br />
incorporation <strong>of</strong> this company all the assets, liabilities, rights and obligations<br />
<strong>of</strong> the existing parastatal known as Water and Sewerage Authority vest in the
180 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
new company (Section 4). All employees <strong>of</strong> the parastatal will be transferred<br />
to the new company (Section 5).<br />
1.4 LAND ADMINISTRATION AUTHORITY ACT NO.<br />
43 OF 2010<br />
This Act establishes the Land Administration Authority as a body corporate<br />
with perpetual succession and common seal capable <strong>of</strong> suing and being sued in<br />
its own name (Section 4). The main function <strong>of</strong> the authority is to act as the<br />
government’s agency responsible for land administration. In discharging its<br />
functions it operates under the general supervision <strong>of</strong> the minister responsible<br />
for land affairs (Section 5). The authority is governed by a board <strong>of</strong> directors<br />
(Section 6). The director general administers and is responsible for the daily<br />
operations <strong>of</strong> the authority (Section 9). The board is responsible for appointing<br />
such number and grades <strong>of</strong> heads <strong>of</strong> departments <strong>of</strong> the authority as the board<br />
may deem necessary for the efficient and effective discharge <strong>of</strong> its functions.<br />
The appointments are made on the recommendation <strong>of</strong> the director general. All<br />
other <strong>of</strong>ficers and staff <strong>of</strong> the authority are appointed by the director general<br />
(Section 21). In terms <strong>of</strong> section 27 <strong>of</strong> the Act all property which immediately<br />
before the commencement <strong>of</strong> the Act was vested in the government for use in<br />
land administration will vest in the authority upon the commencement <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Act.<br />
2. JUDICIAL DECISIONS<br />
2.1 CONTEMPT OF COURT<br />
Lerotholi Polytechnic and Another v Blandinah Lisene Court <strong>of</strong> Appeal Civil<br />
Case No. 25 <strong>of</strong> 2009 (delivered on 11 June 2010) (unreported).<br />
Mrs Lisene (the respondent) was dismissed from her employment as<br />
a lecturer on the 12 March, 2007 following a disciplinary hearing at which she<br />
was found guilty <strong>of</strong> gross misconduct. She referred a claim <strong>of</strong> unfair dismissal<br />
to the Directorate <strong>of</strong> Dispute Prevention and Resolution (DDPR) for<br />
arbitration. The DDPR dismissed the claim and found in favour <strong>of</strong> the<br />
employer. Immediately after this the employer engaged the services <strong>of</strong><br />
another lecturer to replace the respondent. Being dissatisfied with the DDPR’s<br />
award the respondent approached the Labour Court for an order reviewing and<br />
setting aside the award. She was successful in this regard. The Labour Court<br />
ordered reinstatement <strong>of</strong> the respondent and directed the employer to pay her<br />
salary from the date <strong>of</strong> the purported dismissal. The employer appealed the<br />
decision <strong>of</strong> the Labour Court. The Labour Appeal Court dismissed the appeal<br />
and confirmed the decision <strong>of</strong> the Labour Court.
RECENT LEGAL DEVELOPMENTS – LESOTHO 181<br />
The respondent presented herself at work the following day after<br />
judgment was granted in her favour. The employer, being in a dilemma since<br />
it had already replaced her position after the DDPR’s award, requested her to<br />
stay at home until the question <strong>of</strong> what she could do was resolved. She was<br />
also told that in the meantime arrangements would be made for the payment <strong>of</strong><br />
her salary together with arrear salary. The respondent was paid her back-pay<br />
together with salary during the months she spent at home. Subsequent to this<br />
she launched contempt <strong>of</strong> court proceedings against the employer in the<br />
Labour Appeal Court alleging that instead <strong>of</strong> reinstating her, the employer<br />
wanted to retrench her. The Labour Appeal Court held that the employer was<br />
in contempt because it failed to allow the respondent to resume her teaching<br />
responsibilities. The employer appealed this decision.<br />
The Court <strong>of</strong> Appeal set aside the decision <strong>of</strong> the Labour Appeal<br />
Court on the ground that the respondent failed to prove beyond reasonable<br />
doubt that employer’s non-compliance with the reinstatement order was wilful<br />
and mala fide. It held that the employer was in a dilemma after the<br />
reinstatement order, but that the employer did not sit back when faced with<br />
this situation. The appeal was therefore allowed.<br />
2.2 SUCCESSION TO CHIEFTAINSHIP<br />
Neko Tsepo Qefate Nkuebe v Minister <strong>of</strong> Local Government and Three Others<br />
Court <strong>of</strong> Appeal Civil Case No. 41 <strong>of</strong> 2009 (delivered on 23 April 2010)<br />
(Unreported)<br />
This matter concerned a contest for the <strong>of</strong>fice <strong>of</strong> principal chief <strong>of</strong><br />
Quthing and Sebapala after the demise <strong>of</strong> the incumbent Chief Qefate<br />
Nkuebe. The appellant (applicant in the court a quo) is the third son born <strong>of</strong><br />
the late Chieftainess Mahlabathe Nkuebe while the marriage between herself<br />
and the chief was still subsistent. The family had nominated the fourth<br />
Respondent (his eldest brother) as successor to the <strong>of</strong>fice <strong>of</strong> the chief. The<br />
appellant applied to the High Court to stay the process leading to the final<br />
succession to the principal chieftainship <strong>of</strong> Quthing and Sebapala pending<br />
finalization <strong>of</strong> the matter. His basis was that he was the only legitimate son<br />
and successor <strong>of</strong> the late chief. The appellant wanted an order, which would<br />
subject him and the fourth respondent to a DNA test in order to bring this<br />
matter to finality. This application was dismissed by the High Court.<br />
On appeal the main issue was who was entitled to succeed to the<br />
<strong>of</strong>fice <strong>of</strong> the chief. This question was decided on the basis <strong>of</strong> section 10 <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Chieftainship Act No. 22 <strong>of</strong> 1968, which is to the effect that, the first born<br />
legitimate son <strong>of</strong> the only marriage should succeed. The court noted that under<br />
customary law, the fourth respondent would be regarded as the deceased’s<br />
legitimate son because he was so accepted through customary rites. The
182 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
contention by the appellant was that the ultimate test contemplated by section<br />
10 <strong>of</strong> the Chieftainship Act was not to be found under customary law but<br />
under common law.<br />
Applying the South African case <strong>of</strong> Surmon v Surmon 1926 AD 47,<br />
the court opined that the fact that the fourth respondent was born during the<br />
subsistence <strong>of</strong> the marriage between the deceased and his wife gave rise to a<br />
rebuttable presumption <strong>of</strong> legitimacy. The onus <strong>of</strong> rebutting such a<br />
presumption lied with the appellant as he was the one challenging the<br />
legitimacy. On the basis <strong>of</strong> the common law as well as customary law<br />
principles the court dismissed the appeal with costs.<br />
2.3 CRIMINAL LAW – FRAUD<br />
The Crown v Motsotuoa Bernard Ntaote Court <strong>of</strong> Appeal Criminal Case No.<br />
13 <strong>of</strong> 2009 (delivered on the 23 rd April 2010) (unreported)<br />
A deputy commissioner <strong>of</strong> the Lesotho Mounted Police Service<br />
(LMPS) was indicted in the High Court on two counts <strong>of</strong> fraud in that he<br />
misrepresented to the treasury, in respect <strong>of</strong> two separate international<br />
journeys. First, he had represented that he was entitled to subsistence<br />
allowance at the full daily rate. Second, that, inter alia, the minister had<br />
authorized payment to him accordingly. It was alleged that he made all these<br />
representations knowing that they were false and thereby induced the treasury<br />
<strong>of</strong>ficials to pay him the full rate, while he was entitled to one quarter <strong>of</strong> the<br />
rate. The court a quo returned the verdict <strong>of</strong> not guilty, hence the appeal by the<br />
Crown.<br />
On the first count the respondent had submitted claims in respect <strong>of</strong><br />
himself and the team with which he was going to the Republic <strong>of</strong> South<br />
Africa. He subsequently discovered that he was going to be paid on a quarter<br />
rate. He then approached the financial controller and demanded payment at<br />
the full rate. He argued that he qualified for the full rate and he would bring<br />
documentation to prove that he was so qualified. He continued to press the<br />
financial controller for the full rate and the financial controller duly relented.<br />
In respect <strong>of</strong> the second count an allowance <strong>of</strong> a quarter rate had been<br />
authorized for the respondent as well as two other persons accompanying him.<br />
Again respondent was said to have gone to the treasury to persuade them to<br />
change the payment from a quarter rate into a full rate and this was done.<br />
The respondent denied any wrong doing. The court held that, the<br />
Crown failed to establish that the respondent was in no circumstance entitled<br />
to the payment in full rate on the one count. Therefore that the first<br />
misrepresentation that he was entitled to the full allowance was not proved.<br />
The Court convicted him on the other count on the ground that the respondent<br />
misrepresented to the treasury that the full amount was authorized by the
RECENT LEGAL DEVELOPMENTS – LESOTHO 183<br />
minister. The appeal therefore succeeded in part. The matter was remitted to<br />
the High Court sentencing.<br />
2.4 DELICT – INJURIA (INVASION OF PRIVACY)<br />
Francina Malefu Letsieloa v Ernest Lethoko Khobethi and Others Court <strong>of</strong><br />
Appeal Civil Case No.10 <strong>of</strong> 2009 (delivered on 23 April 2010) (unreported)<br />
The appellant instituted maintenance proceedings in South Africa on<br />
behalf <strong>of</strong> her children and herself. This matter did not proceed and was<br />
removed from the roll on the basis that the appellant was a Lesotho national.<br />
The appellant then claimed damages arising out <strong>of</strong> the first respondent’s<br />
disclosure <strong>of</strong> confidential information concerning the appellant to a court in<br />
South Africa. The appellant alleged that the disclosure was given in breach <strong>of</strong><br />
the first respondent’s oath <strong>of</strong> secrecy made in terms <strong>of</strong> regulation 106 <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Public Service Regulations <strong>of</strong> 2005 and that as a result her claim for<br />
maintenance in the said court had been removed from the roll. The appellant<br />
further alleged that first respondent sent information in the form <strong>of</strong> a letter and<br />
copies <strong>of</strong> pay-slips to an address in South Africa. The appellant contended that<br />
the consequence <strong>of</strong> the first respondent’s action damaged her personality,<br />
invaded her right to privacy, dignity and reputation. She therefore claimed<br />
damages totaling R65 000.00.<br />
The court held that the right to privacy does not depend on plaintiff’s<br />
wishes, but rather that the boundary <strong>of</strong> the individual’s right or its<br />
infringement remains an objective question. It then held that the information<br />
communicated by first respondent to the South African court and the<br />
appellant’s husband were neither <strong>of</strong>fensive nor disparaging. The Court<br />
concluded that the information was factually correct and was transmitted to a<br />
judicial institution <strong>of</strong> a neighbouring state. The documents dealt with matters<br />
that were germane and, indeed, essential to the determination <strong>of</strong> the issue with<br />
which that court was concerned. Had the first respondent not disclosed those<br />
facts, the appellant would have been obliged to do so herself in the<br />
proceedings which she had instituted. The court held therefore that neither<br />
was there injuria because there was no infringement <strong>of</strong> the appellant’s rights.<br />
The appeal was therefore dismissed with costs.
185<br />
1. INTRODUCTION<br />
ZIMBABWE<br />
J. Pfumorodze*<br />
This paper seeks to discuss the recent legal developments in Zimbabwe in the<br />
context <strong>of</strong> the Global Political Agreement, (GPA), an interparty agreement for<br />
a power sharing government, and the Constitutional Amendment Number 19.<br />
Its main focus is on the Constitutional Commissions four independent<br />
commissions which were established by the Constitutional Amendment No 19.<br />
These commissions are the Human Rights Commission; the Zimbabwe Media<br />
Commission; the Zimbabwe Electoral Commission and the Zimbabwe anti-<br />
Corruption Commission. Concerning these commissions, the main areas <strong>of</strong><br />
coverage are: establishment and composition <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> these commissions;<br />
their functions and powers and what has been done to operationalise these<br />
independent commissions.<br />
2. BRIEF BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT<br />
Since the year 2000 the political and economic situation in Zimbabwe has been<br />
deteriorating very rapidly. Whilst the then Zimbabwe African National Union<br />
(Patriotic Front) (ZANU PF) government blamed west imposed “sections” for<br />
this bad economic situation, the then opposition Movement for Democratic<br />
Change (MDC) blamed poor governance as the source <strong>of</strong> Zimbabwe’s<br />
economic and political situation. This debate still rages on up to this day. By<br />
the end <strong>of</strong> 2008, the political situation was very tense and the economic<br />
situation was simply unbearable. This was exacerbated by the pre and post<br />
2008 elections violence which left many dead, injured or houses destroyed. It<br />
is in this context that the international community, especially the Southern<br />
Africa Development Community (SADC), facilitated the GPA which paved<br />
way for power sharing government and constitutional Amendment No 19. The<br />
former paved way for the making <strong>of</strong> the new constitution whilst the latter<br />
included important constitutional commissions. The focus <strong>of</strong> this update is on<br />
the four constitutional commissions only.<br />
3. THE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION<br />
The Constitutional Amendment No.19 provides for the Zimbabwe Human<br />
Rights Commission (section 100R). This commission is consisted <strong>of</strong> a<br />
* LLB.S (UZ); LL.M (Cume Laude) (UWC&Amsterdam); Lecturer, Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong>, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Botswana</strong>. Email: jimpfumo@gmail.com
186 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
chairperson and eight other members, at least four <strong>of</strong> whom shall be women.<br />
This ensures gender balance and is in line with the Zimbabwe’s Gender Policy.<br />
The functions <strong>of</strong> this commission include promotion <strong>of</strong> awareness and respect<br />
for human rights and freedoms; promoting the department <strong>of</strong> human rights and<br />
freedoms; monitoring and assessing the observance <strong>of</strong> human rights in<br />
Zimbabwe; investigating allegations <strong>of</strong> human rights violations and assisting<br />
in the preparation <strong>of</strong> state reports to regional and international bodies<br />
concerning human rights treaties conventions and agreements to which<br />
Zimbabwe is a party.<br />
In order to execute its mandate, the Commission is vested with<br />
certain powers. These include the power to take over and continue any<br />
investigation that has been instituted by the Public Protector, where it<br />
determines that the dominant question in issue involved a matter pertinent to<br />
its functions. Furthermore, the Parliament can make law which confess the<br />
Commission with power to conduct investigations on its own initiative or on<br />
receipt <strong>of</strong> complainants; to visit and inspect prisons, detention centres, and<br />
refugee campus to assess the conditions it inmates are kept there conditions to<br />
the appropriate minister. It has also the power to visit and inspect psychiatric<br />
hospitals and rehabilitation centres and make recommendations to the<br />
responsible minister. The Commission has the power to secure or provide<br />
appropriate redress for violations <strong>of</strong> human rights and for injustice.<br />
Members <strong>of</strong> the Human Rights Commission were sworn in on 31<br />
March 2010. The Zimbabwe Human Rights Bill is being drafted by the<br />
Ministry <strong>of</strong> Justice and Legal Affairs. This Bill seeks to provide for the<br />
operationalisation <strong>of</strong> the Zimbabwe Human Rights Commission. It is also<br />
anticipated that the Commission should have the power to comment on Bills<br />
that may in one way or the other violate the human rights principles contained<br />
in the Constitution or international treaties to the Zimbabwe is a party. This is<br />
dome in consultation with the Parliamentary Legal Committee. The principles<br />
<strong>of</strong> the proposed bill were approved on the 6 July, 2010 and drafting<br />
instructions have been sent to the Attorney General’s Office.<br />
4. THE ZIMBABWE MEDIA COMMISSION<br />
The Zimbabwe Media Commission (ZMC) succeeded the Media and<br />
Information Commission (MIC) which was set up by the Access to Information<br />
and Protection <strong>of</strong> Privacy Act (AIPPA) in 2002. The provisions for this<br />
Commission were incorporated into sections 100N to 100Q <strong>of</strong> the Constitution.<br />
This Commission is composed <strong>of</strong> a “chairperson and eight other members<br />
appointed by the President from a list <strong>of</strong> not fewer than we nominees submitted<br />
by the Committee on Standing Rules and orders. For one to be appointed as a
RECENT LEGAL DEVELOPMENTS – ZIMBABWE 187<br />
commissioner, he or she must have knowledge and experience in the press,<br />
print or electronic media or broadcasting.<br />
The main functions <strong>of</strong> the Commission are to uphold and develop<br />
freedom <strong>of</strong> the press, to promote and enforce good practice and ethics in the<br />
press, print and electronic media, and broadcasting; to ensure that the people<br />
<strong>of</strong> Zimbabwe have equitable and wide access to information. It also to ensure<br />
the equitable use and development <strong>of</strong> all indigenous languages spoken in<br />
Zimbabwe.<br />
Section 100Q <strong>of</strong> the Constitution <strong>of</strong> Zimbabwe provides that for the<br />
powers <strong>of</strong> the ZMC it provides that an Act <strong>of</strong> Parliament may confer powers<br />
on the ZMC including the power to conduct investigations and inquires into<br />
any conduct or circumstance that appears to threaten the freedom <strong>of</strong> the<br />
media. In addition, it has also the power to take disciplinary action against<br />
journalists and other persons employed in the media industry, who are found<br />
to have breached any law or any code <strong>of</strong> conduct applicable to them.<br />
Members <strong>of</strong> the ZMC were sworn in by the President on 31 March<br />
2010. It is note worthy that it was not necessary to pass another Act <strong>of</strong><br />
Parliament before the ZMC is set up. AIPPA, as amended in January 2008,<br />
already contains ample provision enabling the Commission to carry out<br />
functions conferred on it by the constitution and the additional functions<br />
conferred on it by AIPPA. This commission is already operational.<br />
5. ZIMBABWE ELECTORAL COMMISSION<br />
This Commission is established in terms <strong>of</strong> section 100B to 100J <strong>of</strong> the<br />
constitution. It is consisted <strong>of</strong> a chairperson and eight other people appointed<br />
by the President. The chairperson is appointed by the President after<br />
consultation with the Judicial Service Commission and the Committee on<br />
standing rules and orders. The chairperson must be a judge or former judge <strong>of</strong><br />
the Supreme Court or the High Court, or a person qualified for appointment as<br />
such a judge. Eight other members are appointed by the President from a list <strong>of</strong><br />
not fewer than twelve nominees submitted by the Committee on Standing<br />
Rules and Orders. Of these eight at least four members must be women. This<br />
ensures gender balance. For one to be appointable to this Commission he or she<br />
must have integrity and experience and competence in the conduct <strong>of</strong> affairs in<br />
the public or private sector. Members <strong>of</strong> the Commission are appointed for a<br />
term <strong>of</strong> six years and their appointment may be renowned for one further term<br />
only. Members <strong>of</strong> Parliament, public <strong>of</strong>ficers and employees <strong>of</strong> statutory<br />
bodies and local government are disqualified for appointment to the Zimbabwe<br />
Electoral Commission. Furthermore, members <strong>of</strong> the Commission must not be<br />
members <strong>of</strong> the political party. The constitution also provides for the removal<br />
<strong>of</strong> a member from <strong>of</strong>fice. The chairperson is removed from <strong>of</strong>fice by the
188 UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL DECEMBER 2010<br />
President, with the approval <strong>of</strong> both the Judicial Service Commission and the<br />
Committee on Standing Rules and Orders. Other members are removed with<br />
the approval <strong>of</strong> the Commission and the Committee on Standing Rules and<br />
Orders. The grounds for removal from <strong>of</strong>fice include inability to exercise the<br />
functions <strong>of</strong> member’s <strong>of</strong>fice due to physical or mental incapacity; misconduct;<br />
incompetence and or if one becomes disqualified for appointment to the<br />
Commission.<br />
The Commission’s functions include preparation for, conduct and<br />
supervision <strong>of</strong> elections to the <strong>of</strong>fice <strong>of</strong> the President and Parliament; to the<br />
governing bodies <strong>of</strong> local authorities and referendums. It also compiles<br />
voters’ rolls and registers, designs, prints and distributes ballot boxes; and<br />
delimitation <strong>of</strong> constituencies and wards. Currently, the Bill which seeks to<br />
operationalise the Commission is being drafted by the Attorney General’s<br />
Office.<br />
6. ZIMBABWE ANTI-CORRUPTION COMMISSION<br />
Sections 100K to 100M provide for the establishment and composition <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Zimbabwe Anti-Corruption Commission, its functions and powers. This<br />
Commission should consist <strong>of</strong> at least four and no more than nine members<br />
appointed by the President in consultation with the Committee on Standing<br />
Rules and Orders. Members should be persons <strong>of</strong> integrity chosen for their<br />
knowledge <strong>of</strong> and experience in administration or the prosecution or<br />
investigation <strong>of</strong> crime.<br />
The functions <strong>of</strong> this Commission include combating corruption,<br />
theft, misappropriation, abuse <strong>of</strong> power and other inappropriate conduct <strong>of</strong><br />
affairs in both the public and private sectors. It also makes recommendations<br />
to the government and to organisations in the private sector on measures to<br />
enhance integrity and accountability and prevent corruption.<br />
The Constitution further provides that Parliament should enact<br />
legislation which confers powers on the Anti-Corruption Commission. These<br />
powers include conducting investigations and inquiries, and to secure<br />
prosecution <strong>of</strong> persons concerning corruption, theft, misappropriation, abuse<br />
<strong>of</strong> power and other improprieties.<br />
7. CONCLUSION<br />
The four independent commissions discussed above are no doubt a welcome<br />
development. Some <strong>of</strong> them are now operational whilst some are awaiting<br />
legislation which operationalise them. At this stage, it is premature to judge the<br />
effectiveness <strong>of</strong> these Commissions especially that Zimbabwe is still in
RECENT LEGAL DEVELOPMENTS – ZIMBABWE 189<br />
transition. What can be said is that the power sharing government has worked<br />
positively in coming up with these independent constitution commissions.
UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL<br />
LIBRARY RECOMMENDATION FORM<br />
Dear Librarian/Library/Library Acquisition Committee,<br />
I would like to recommend a subscription to the<br />
<strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Journal</strong><br />
Name:....................................................................................................<br />
...............................................................................................................<br />
Position:................................................................................................<br />
Department:...........................................................................................<br />
Signature:..............................................................................................
UNIVERSITY OF BOTSWANA LAW JOURNAL<br />
ORDER FORM<br />
Please enter my annual subscription to the <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Journal</strong>,<br />
2 issues ISSN 1817-2733<br />
SUBSCRIPTION TYPE<br />
(Please tick type that applies)<br />
Annual institutional rate (Africa) P280 (US$ 50)<br />
Annual institutional rate (Europe and America) P400 (US$ 80)<br />
Annual individual rate (Africa) P100 (US$ 20)<br />
Annual individual rate (Europe and America) P200 (US$ 40)<br />
(All rates include postage)<br />
METHOD OF PAYMENT<br />
Cheque enclosed (<strong>Botswana</strong> Bank - include P15 for charges)<br />
Foreign Cheques (By special arrangements)<br />
Name/Organisation:...........................................................................................<br />
Mailing Address:...............................................................................................<br />
...........................................................................................................................<br />
Postal Code:.......................................................................................................<br />
Telephone:.........................................................................................................<br />
Fax:....................................................................................................................<br />
E-mail:...............................................................................................................<br />
Address all cheques to: <strong>Botswana</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Journal</strong><br />
All business correspondence, including order and remittances relating to<br />
subscriptions as well as advertising should be addressed to:<br />
The Editor-in-Chief<br />
<strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Journal</strong><br />
Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong><br />
<strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong><br />
Private Bag UB 00705, Gaborone<br />
<strong>Botswana</strong>
GUIDELINES FOR THE SUBMISSION OF ARTICLES AND OTHER SUBMISSIONS<br />
1. Contributions in the form <strong>of</strong> articles, notes, comments or reviews, should be word-processed, doublespaced<br />
and should be provided in electronic form, either by email or in hard copy to:<br />
The Editor-in- Chief<br />
<strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong> <strong>Law</strong> <strong>Journal</strong><br />
Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Law</strong><br />
<strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong><br />
Private Bag UB 00705 Gaborone<br />
<strong>Botswana</strong><br />
Email:ublj@mopipi.ub.bw<br />
2. One hard copy, double-spaced and printed on A4/letter paper (using one side <strong>of</strong> the paper only) may<br />
accompany an electronic version. A hard copy should be supplied in addition to the electronic version<br />
wherever a contribution contains graphs, tables, or any other significant formatting.<br />
3. In the case <strong>of</strong> articles, an abstract <strong>of</strong> not more than 300 words should be submitted with the contribution.<br />
4. Articles and other submissions are sent to three independent referees. To enable the refereeing procedure<br />
to be anonymous and impartial, the name(s) and institution(s) <strong>of</strong> the author(s) should not be included at the<br />
head <strong>of</strong> the article, but should be typed on a separate sheet and submitted with it. This sheet should also<br />
indicate the address, telephone number, fax number, email address, academic qualifications, institutional<br />
affiliations (where appropriate), and any other identifying material.<br />
5. All submissions should be original pieces that are written in a clear and straightforward style.<br />
6. The titles <strong>of</strong> submissions should be brief, attractive and accurate in describing what the paper is about.<br />
Headings and sub-headings within the text should be short and clear: avoid too many levels <strong>of</strong> subheadings.<br />
7. English spelling is recommended. The Oxford English Dictionary is the standard.<br />
• For punctuations, double quotes should be used for primary quotations and single quotes within quotes.<br />
• Number the pages consecutively only from the top right hand, excluding the cover page.<br />
• For dates, use 30 July, 2003, not 30th July or July 30 etc<br />
• In general, use the following:<br />
• 1995-1996 (not 1995-96)<br />
• 20th century<br />
• pp.24—250, not 24-25 0, Pp.240-250, p.240 et seq. etc<br />
• use “e.g” and “i.e”, instead <strong>of</strong> eg and ie<br />
• use Section and Article not S., Sec., Sect. or Art.<br />
• Latin and other foreign language words should be in italics.<br />
8. Authors are asked to pay particular attention to the accuracy and presentation <strong>of</strong> direct quotations.<br />
9. Footnotes should be numbered consecutively in Arabic numerals after the punctuation mark.<br />
10. The standard British method <strong>of</strong> citation should be followed.<br />
• Books should be cited as follows:<br />
Author (initial and name), title (in italics), place <strong>of</strong> publication, name <strong>of</strong> publisher, date <strong>of</strong><br />
publication and page numbers with p. or pp. e.g.K. Frimpong, Criminal <strong>Law</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Botswana</strong>:<br />
Cases and Materials, 3rd ed., Gaborone, Associated Printers (2000), pp. 50 – 57<br />
• All the words in the book title, except minor form-words such as “by”, “an”, “a”, “the” etc, should have<br />
capital initials.<br />
• Articles should be cited as follows:<br />
Author (initial and name), title (in double quotes NOT underlined), number <strong>of</strong> volume, title <strong>of</strong> serial<br />
publication (in italics), year <strong>of</strong> volume (in brackets), page number (s)<br />
e.g. C. M. Fombad, “Compensation <strong>of</strong> Victims <strong>of</strong> Motor Vehicle Accidents in <strong>Botswana</strong>:<br />
An Appraisal <strong>of</strong> the MVA Fund Act Scheme,” 43 J.A.L (1999), pp. 151 – 183.<br />
• (Please note that where a journal, as in the above example has its own or standard mode <strong>of</strong> citation, this<br />
must be employed, otherwise, the full title <strong>of</strong> the journal in italics must be provided.<br />
• However, the titles <strong>of</strong> law reports and legislation should be printed in plain text, NOT italics).<br />
• As regards cases, the mode <strong>of</strong> citation <strong>of</strong>ficially adopted by the report itself should be followed. In the<br />
absence <strong>of</strong> this, the usual English style should be employed wherever appropriate. This is generally in<br />
the order: date, volume no., if any, initials <strong>of</strong> report, page.<br />
e.g. [2001] 2 All E.R. 740 at 800.<br />
• The names <strong>of</strong> the cases except the “v”, should be in italics, for example: Tebogo v Tebogo.<br />
11. Articles and other submissions are considered on the understanding that they are not being considered<br />
concurrently by any other journal. Regretfully, disks and hardcopies cannot be returned.<br />
12. Articles and other submissions are accepted on the understanding that exclusive copyright is assigned to<br />
the UBLJ. Nevertheless, authors remain free to use the material contained in the paper in other works.<br />
13. It is the responsibility <strong>of</strong> authors to ensure that the material subm•tted does not infringe copyright or is<br />
defamatory, obscene or otherwise unlawful or litigious.<br />
14. The Editorial Board do not hold themselves responsible for any views expressed by contributors.