06.06.2014 Views

Wellington Fault

Wellington Fault

Wellington Fault

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Combined Earthquake & Tsunami Lo$$e$ for <strong>Wellington</strong><br />

Jim Cousins, William Power, Umut Destegul, Andrew King


Question from the Prime Minister (in 2005):<br />

… what about NZ ?<br />

30,000<br />

25,000<br />

National Total Total<br />

Tsunami<br />

Tsunami<br />

Cost ($m)<br />

20,000<br />

Cost ($b)<br />

15,000<br />

10,000<br />

5,000 5<br />

0<br />

Earthquake<br />

Earthquake<br />

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500<br />

Return Period (years)<br />

BENFIELD<br />

GNS Science


Question from Benfield (in 2006):<br />

…. do we need to rethink our old favourite PML<br />

for New Zealand – the <strong>Wellington</strong> <strong>Fault</strong><br />

Earthquake ?<br />

(c. $10-15 b event)<br />

BENFIELD<br />

GNS Science


… most costly sources – earthquake shaking alone<br />

Source<br />

Loss ($ billion)<br />

<strong>Wellington</strong> <strong>Fault</strong> (magnitude 7.5) 12 ± 5<br />

Wairarapa <strong>Fault</strong> (8.2) 8 ± 5<br />

Ohariu <strong>Fault</strong> (7.5) 6 ± 4<br />

Subduction Zone (8+ ?) 5+ (?)<br />

Pukerua-Shepherds Gully <strong>Fault</strong> (7.5) 5 ± 2<br />

Napier 1931 <strong>Fault</strong> (7.8) 4 ± 2<br />

BENFIELD<br />

GNS Science


… add tsunami to<br />

the scenarios<br />

• <strong>Wellington</strong> <strong>Fault</strong><br />

• Wairarapa <strong>Fault</strong><br />

• BooBoo <strong>Fault</strong><br />

• Plate interface<br />

• Landslides<br />

Note: Booboo <strong>Fault</strong> was<br />

embellished a bit !<br />

BENFIELD<br />

GNS Science


… assets at<br />

risk<br />

Porirua<br />

Kapiti Coast<br />

Petone<br />

Lower Hutt<br />

… elevation<br />

& bathymetry<br />

Eastbourne<br />

<strong>Wellington</strong><br />

CBD<br />

Evans<br />

Bay<br />

Seatoun<br />

Lyall Bay<br />

Island Bay<br />

Owhiro Bay<br />

BENFIELD<br />

GNS Science


Rock ledge, seaside cliffs<br />

Low-lying, flat<br />

BENFIELD<br />

GNS Science


<strong>Wellington</strong> – CBD – waterfront<br />

BENFIELD<br />

GNS Science


<strong>Wellington</strong> – expensive stuff<br />

BENFIELD<br />

GNS Science


Assets Model<br />

• 160,000 residential<br />

20,000 non-residential<br />

• data sources<br />

… councils (footprints, earthquake-risk buildings)<br />

…QV property<br />

individual for 12,000 large (300 m 2 ) properties<br />

aggregated by meshblock for all of NZ<br />

… site visits & personal knowledge<br />

• composite model<br />

… footprint, property, meshblock aggregate<br />

BENFIELD<br />

GNS Science


Fragility Model<br />

BENFIELD<br />

GNS Science


1.0<br />

Mean Damage Ratio - Tsunami<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

0.0<br />

Timber 1-storey small (100 sqm)<br />

Timber 1-storey large (400 sqm)<br />

Concrete 1-storey large (400 sqm)<br />

0 1 2 3 4 5<br />

Water Depth (m above floor)<br />

BENFIELD<br />

GNS Science


Uncertainty in fragility function<br />

1.0<br />

Tsunami Damage Ratio<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.4<br />

0.2<br />

0.0<br />

High Fragility<br />

Standard Fragility<br />

Low Fragility<br />

Timber, 1 storey, small<br />

0 1 2 3 4 5<br />

Water Depth (m above floor)<br />

BENFIELD<br />

GNS Science


Inundation Modelling – ANUGA<br />

• Developed by scientists at Geoscience Australia and ANU<br />

• Solves non-linear shallow water equations, and models wetting-drying<br />

of land<br />

• Finite element method allows modelling to take place on an<br />

unstructured mesh<br />

– Arbitrary boundary shapes<br />

– Various boundary conditions available<br />

– Variable triangle density<br />

– One unstructured mesh - no need for nested grids – easy to<br />

incorporate co-seismic uplift<br />

• Python scripting permits great flexibility<br />

• Open source software – quick feedback<br />

BENFIELD<br />

GNS Science


<strong>Wellington</strong> <strong>Fault</strong> - vertical deformation in metres<br />

BENFIELD<br />

GNS Science


Wairarapa <strong>Fault</strong> Vertical deformation in metres<br />

BENFIELD<br />

GNS Science


1855<br />

reconstruction<br />

BENFIELD<br />

GNS Science


Subduction zone<br />

• Variation of near surface rupture<br />

– Termination at ‘seismic front’<br />

– Splay fault rupture<br />

– Rupture to trench<br />

• Return time<br />

– 400 to 1200 years<br />

• Southern termination<br />

– Limit of GPS confirmed locking<br />

~ Cape Palliser<br />

– Extending into Cook Strait<br />

Distribution of slip rate deficit on the Hikurangi subduction<br />

interface, estimated from ~12 years of campaign Global<br />

Positioning System (GPS) site velocities (Wallace et al., 2004).<br />

BENFIELD<br />

GNS Science


Subduction-interface rupture extending into<br />

Cook Strait<br />

• 1200 year return time<br />

• Rupture to seabed on<br />

interface<br />

• 12-18m slip in this region<br />

• Mw 8.9<br />

BENFIELD<br />

GNS Science


Subduction into Cook Strait model<br />

BENFIELD<br />

GNS Science


Estimated Losses<br />

Tsunami Source<br />

Shaking Loss Tsunami Loss<br />

($m) (%) ($m) (%)<br />

<strong>Wellington</strong>, mag. 7.5 (base case) 13,700 18 41 0.05<br />

Wairarapa, mag. 8.2 9,200 12 14 0.02<br />

BooBoo (embellished), mag. 7.4 800 1 1 0<br />

Subdn to Cook, mag. 8.9, 1200 y RI 6,100 8 2,300 3<br />

Subdn to Cook, mag. 8.9, 1200 y RI Worst-case tsunami 3,500 4.5<br />

Subdn to Cook, mag. 8.9, 1200 y RI Best-case tsunami 1,200 1.5<br />

• fragility function high / low<br />

• floor height 0 / 1 m above ground<br />

• prior quake damage increases / does not increase tsunami fragility<br />

BENFIELD<br />

GNS Science


Porirua<br />

Kapiti Coast<br />

Petone<br />

Lower Hutt<br />

Scenario:<br />

• Subduction<br />

to Cook<br />

• Mag. 8.9<br />

• 1200 yr<br />

recurrence<br />

interval<br />

Eastbourne<br />

<strong>Wellington</strong><br />

CBD<br />

Evans<br />

Bay<br />

Seatoun<br />

Lyall Bay<br />

Owhiro Bay<br />

Island Bay<br />

750 million<br />

500<br />

100<br />

50<br />

BENFIELD<br />

GNS Science


Main Findings<br />

• tsunami does not add significantly to New Zealand’s most<br />

costly earthquake<br />

• or to the second most costly<br />

• Porirua and Kapiti experience very little tsunami damage in<br />

the scenarios considered here<br />

• a very large subduction zone earthquake is the worst local<br />

tsunami source<br />

• losses from the most costly earthquake, magnitude 7.5<br />

<strong>Wellington</strong> <strong>Fault</strong>, are greater than the combined losses from<br />

the worst tsunami-causing earthquake<br />

• tsunami from very large South American earthquakes might<br />

be able to cause higher losses<br />

• we haven’t looked at casualties<br />

BENFIELD<br />

GNS Science

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!